Video Transcript
So, I started digging around, started looking at references. I asked Grock, like I told you guys, I said, "Show me the references for Bousard's engine in um if there are any for Eric W. Davis." And of course, there was one. Here you go. Look at this. The IEC concept ion acceleration by electron injection driven negative potential well maintained in polyhedral magnetic field. Well well there well there you go there's a whole chapter a literal whole chapter in Eric W. Davis's scientific paper. Okay let's go to page 43. Okay I mean what just happened there? Okay, there we go. We're back. Okay, page 43. Where's the part? Oh, wait. Okay, that's not the real page 43. Oh, and there's Likeaboo's uh what's his face? We reviewed him. Okay, this is the part I wanted right here. Okay, I'm going to read this part to you guys. So, this is Eric W. Davis's uh like 200 what four paper here. You guys, if you don't know why Eric W. Davis is like one of the goats. Then just start just look him up. Look up. Start reading his papers. Warp drives, wormholes, extracting quantum energy. The dude knows he's actually somebody who reads. Like the difference between compare Eric Weinstein and Eric Davis. Eric Davis knows every reference for every physics paper ever out there because he's read them all. That's the difference. Okay. I can I skip the first long paragraph here? Okay. Um, this is a propulsion concept that is based on a form of nuclear fusion. Okay, I'm in. There are num numerous schemes and devices that have been built and tested to explore the production and extraction of fusion energy for commercial electrical and space propulsion and power applications. This is written by Eric W. Davis. None of the space propulsion designs have any relevance to launch vehicle applications. Plasma fusion confinement approaches for space propulsion or power applications include the field reverse configuration, tandem mirror, spherical tokamac, inertial confinement fusion, dense plasma focus, and magnetically insulated inertial confinement fusion. Well, a few of those. Wow. The fact that Eric Davis wrote this in like 2004 and he was talking about field reverse configuration fusion probably a decade before helion fusion even existed. Goes to show that he's very well researched. Okay. These approaches reduce or practically eliminate the confounding plasma confinement problem that has plagued fusion reactors for years. However, all of these approaches still suffer from extremely low reactor power to weight ratios due to bulky magnetic components, heavy power compression, and catalyst drivers and other massive structural components. These reactors use heavy hydrogen fuels and they appear only marginally able to burn advanced fuels as inutronic fuels. That is because the strong radiation emission from the thermalized ion energy distribution in the plasma. Well, if you're telling me the reason why they can only burn that is because there's an thermal equilibrium, a Maxwell Boltzman distribution, well, we know what the answer is. Now, do a nonequilibrium plasma if you want to get around that. The desirable advanced fusion fuel fuel reactions yield only charged particle products such that they produce no radiation hazards from energetic neutrons that are always produced by reactions using dutyium fuel mixes. So we've said it a million times a neutronic fusion is the goat. Autronic fusion is the goat. Also known as advanced fusion fuels because they don't release neutrons. that don't release radiation. A novel new fusion confinement concept called the quiet electric discharge inertial electrostatic confinement fusion was developed for the purpose of realizing a high performance fusion rocket engine that simultaneously possessed high thrust to mass ratios and high specific impulse. Okay, I'm going to skip through part of this blah blah blah. They call it that. Okay, an IEC fusion power source can attain very high powertoweight ratios because it does not require heavy magnetic components, high power drivers and the other massive structural radi radio radioactive shielding components that are normally required. In addition, a very important feature of IEC devices, they possess excellent efficiency for burning advanced fuels as a result of the highly non-M Maxwellian energy distribution attained by the reacting ions. That is the secret right there. If you ever want fusion to work correctly, you cannot throw away electricity. Inertial electrostatic fusion is essentially using positive and negative charges to get fusion to work. The reason why this is so big, this answers why we haven't been able to get fusion to work because physics hasn't realized that electricity is the grand unifier. Electromagnetism and gravity can be unified together under by using electricity. So, if you discount half of the equation, you're never going to get a good cake. If you if you only have half the ingredients, chat, your cake is going to taste like garbage every time. And he says, "Here are the fusion fuels. Number one is proton boron 11." We can see it right there. Number two is lithium 6. Proton lithium 6 is the second fusion fuel. Number third, these actually aren't the fuels. These are the reactions. Third reaction is helium 3 mixed with lithium 6. Now, by the way, this is every a neutronic fusion reaction right here. Pay attention. Dutyium lithium 6, dutyium helium 3, and helium 3 helium 3. So, you can see why helium 3 would be beneficial. It's used in half the re more than half the reactions. It should be noted that reactions one and two are actually thermonuclear fishing reactions. What What it should be noted that reactions one and two are actually thermonuclear fish reactions. Number one and two are fusion bombs. That's what that's saying right there. And number one is proton boron 11 and number two is proton lithium 6. Wow. One of these might literally be the reaction that zapped MH370 out of the sky. By the way, could be. I don't know for sure. Okay, let's keep going. All of the above reactions are super clean with respect to radioactivity such that the relative radioactivity present present in the reaction systems is zero. Therefore, no bulky mass of shield. So, what are we hearing here? Why is this so big? Why is a neutronic fusion so important? you can make the weight of your craft a lot lighter. There is no way the orbs are doing neutronic fusion. It's got to be a neutronic. The reason being that your orb can't risk falling apart mid-flight. That orb needs to be able to fly around for as long as it needs to be able to fly around until it zaps its target out of the sky. And you can't have radi radiation damaging your electronic components causing the orb to just crash to the ground. So it must be a neutronic. Those orbs must be using a neutronic fusion which means they almost are certainly using boron 11. Almost certainly. They could be using helium 3, but they must be using one of those reactions we just saw on the screen. Has to be. Because if they were neutronic, they would need a lot more heavier components. They wouldn't be able to fly. You need your stuff to be as light as possible. So also this is direct energy conversion. So here you go. It says the charged particle reaction produ products can be captured by the external magnetic field and directly converted to electrical power or they could be used to directly heat and expand propellant which could be used as well. The IECF concept was originally pioneered by Farnsworth as in Pho and became largely dormant for over two decades but it was later revived and revised by Brousard and his co-workers 1989 through 1997 and then later on through about the 2000 and then this is the name I saw boom here it was froning and busousard as in David Fronin and Bousard. The David Fronin that's on the advanced dense plasma focus drone paper that they were working on. That same David Froin, he worked with him. They were co-authoring papers together. And we weren't done yet. And look at these references right here. George Miley. George Miley also worked on him with it. The IEC fusion device is a spherical vacuum [clears throat] vessel that uses quasi spherical polyhedral magnetic fields to confine electrons which are injected into the vessel at high velocity in order to form a negative electric potential well that confines fusion ions into a spherically converging flow. And again, so why is the why is this the orb spherical? because we're having this spherical convergence towards the middle. So even more, I'm I'm pretty much convinced that we're looking at some design that was based off of this. Energetic fusion ions are generated by a plasma discharge and injected into the potential well near its boundary where they accelerated radially towards the center and oscillate across the vessel with the central core plasma density increasing rapidly. Miley proposed an IEC direct conversion propulsion system that runs on reaction number five and operates in a pulse power mode as an efficient way to decrease the collector grid heating. I'm pretty sure this is helium uh helium 3, right? Number five. Yeah, number five is dutyium helium 3. So the the version that we've been looking at with um helium energy is this pulse power uh uh helium 3. So Miley might actually know about helium fusions thing based on just reading this right here. Pulse power operation has the advantage that the high peak currents result in high fusion energy gain for an IEC device due to a highly nonlinear scaling of the fusion rate with ion current. Okay. So, Miley did a bunch of research in this. The problem is that Helium 3 is only on the moon. We only have a little bit of it. I think that's pretty good for this part. Okay, let's go back to the interview and let's listen to some more. I've I've done too much work here, but this is the idea of what it would look like. You see? So, you can imagine you have this plasma orb on the outside, this spherical plasma. We're looking at an image here of a spherical plasma or you can see the plasma escaping from the central fuser device which is a polyhedral device and that creates a sphere around your object. So you would have a polyhedral on the inside that's using superconducting magnets and some electronical equipment which can be very tiny and then on the outside you're going to have a plasma sphere that's going to encompass it entirely. And now you've created basically like a plasma balloon drone that can fly around, do whatever you wanted to do. And so there's some more diagrams here. I think it's pretty cool. So anyway, this paper, this is actually uh Eric W. Davis's paper here that I'm showing you guys. And that paper uh is elaborately goes over his work for like five pages, like five pages straight, maybe even longer than that. So, let's listen to the man himself because not only was his documentation, not only was his work good, the guy is actually just telling us really useful information in his interviews. So, I want to let's learn I want to learn something myself tonight. So, the first clip that we're going to watch, I noticed when I hovered over these, one of them said cold fusion. There it is right there. Let's listen. Let's start right here. >> Will the availability of dutarium or other nuclear fuels be a limiting factor? Oh lord, no. Dutarium is one part in 6,000 in every piece of water on the earth. I mean, it's it's it's just inexhaustible. 10 billion years worth of supply. And and boron, if you do hydrogen boron, boron is the 10th most populous element in seawater. And there already exists processes to extract it cheaply. There's enough boron in the oceans to last several billion years. I mean, and hydrogen, hydrogen is the basis of water, H2O. There's enough of that forever. >> It's it's a fuel that is cheap. It's essentially free and and it can't be cartel. Nobody can control it. Well, I'd also like to ask um about your thoughts on >> I don't want to go full conspirator, but uh I feel like this guy died like one year after he did that talk. And right here, the way whenever free energy, I let's just call him free energy scientists or fusion scientists are talking about there's no way for the cartels to own it. There's no way for the cartels to own hydrogen or boron because we can just there's basically like enough for billions and billions of years on this earth. It's basically as free as anything could possibly get. Generally, their life expectancy gets cut down by about half whenever you start making those proclamations on podcasts and and what have you. So, if you are fusion engineer, specifically a neutronic fusion engineer, I'm not saying keep your lips shut. I'm just saying just be careful. Just be careful. I want you to stay around as long as possible. >> Alternative nuclear theories such as cold fusion, bubble fusion, and you know there are a bunch of concepts that really don't they're they're not easily quantifiable. I guess like uh Dr. Ruerro Santilly's claim that it's possible to generate neutrons. Um do you have any thoughts on these? >> I don't I have thoughts. I I'm not deadly familiar with them, but I'm looking at them reading about them and seeing about them. There are a lot of ways that one can make neutrons at very low levels which have no possible way to go beyond low levels. Cold fusion is one of them. It indeed in lises you can in fact make little fusion reactions occur. It's just you can't ever make them occur at a level of any interest in the sense of the power world of power. Steve Jones at Brigham Young University quite apart from pawns and fleshman was working on this long before pawns and fleshman. It was perfectly good microfysics. the bubble fusion thing. I'm not so sure that that that really is a real effect, but if it is, it's going to be a very small effect like all the rest of it. Uh anything that there are little little oddities like that in the world that can make a few neutrons and and and but they don't scale anywhere. You can't make them go anywhere. >> Yeah. Silly's >> interesting. So he doesn't poo poo it. He basically just says that of course people were already working on this way before that. That was just a media thing. And that's kind of how I would expect somebody to react who like actually is on the inside and they know what it looks like. I want to jump real quick because I just found uh my Grock my Grock uh chat here. I want to pull this up. I do want to point out here that it says right here, Busousard and Miley and their co-workers discovered a way to configure the IEC device for electric power and space propulsion applications using modern engineering physics and materials technology. So, it was left dormant, but these guys ended up figuring out how to make it work. And right there it just says Bousar and George Miley. We already know about IEC fusion, DD fusion, probably the department of energy stuff. I want to listen to this part here. progress >> people working in the laboratory at that in that time and we have tested 15 different versions of these machines and we have managed to lay out and define and understand and find the scaling laws for 19 almost 19 different critical physics issues one at a time. It's been a very long and tedious process because our funding was always very small compared to what the need for funding was. And that's a result of the fact that the Navy which supported us really couldn't ever put the right amount of money in even though we knew what it was from the beginning and so did they because that would have been too large a sum of money for the budget people on Capitol Hill and it would have become visible to the DOE and they would have complained about it. And so the general funding political situation in Washington said we can only fund you at a small level. Can you >> I mean he just said it again in this interview right there. He just says they could only fund at a small level because once you start funding them too much and then the DOE finds out what you're doing, they're going to come in and shut you down. How are they just openly talking about this and people are like, "Oh no, there's no fusion scandal here." Uh people are deathly afraid of doing fusion research because the DOE is going to show up and shut them down and they're just talking about it openly. I this guy is a legendary engineer that worked at DOE labs and he's talking about this do anything with that. Well, we did. It took us 20 years and as I say, all that effort and time, but we did finally succeed in solving the last basic physics problem in the last test we did in 2005. All the physics is done. All the basic physics is done. We're ready to do engineering development now. >> Okay, I found it. Found it for real. Here you go, Chuck. So, after I did the whole deep dive for Eric W. Davis, I was like, "Wait a minute." I was like, "What about Paul Sizz?" I was like, "Paul Sizz might be the number [clears throat] one hypersonic engineer that the world has no idea ever existed." And so I said, "Did Paul Sizz ever talk about or reference Dr. Robert Bousard?" And Grock said, "Yes, [clears throat] Paul Sizz referenced Dr. Robert Bousard multiple times in his work on advanced propulsion systems where Bousard's contributions to nuclear electric propulsion, inertial electrostatic confinement fusion, and the interstellar ramjet are detailed across sections on the nuclear thermal rockets, electrostatic ion thrusters, and autonic fusion for space missions. Additionally, in the Halcon years of air and space flight, SIS described collaborating with Bousard on fusion propulsion for the National Aerospace Plane Program, the one that was just discussed by Tim Ventur at the beginning of that article, including using proton boron 11 fusion to heat hydrogen fuel in air breathing ramjet scramjet engines. and noted how Bousard earlier interstellar ramjet ideas influenced his own research on quantum field energy for propulsion. Their joint efforts extended to the studies for Air Force research labs from 2002 to 2004, integrating Busousard's IEC fusion designs into hypersonic vehicles. Boom.