Field Reversed Configuration - Manipulating Spacetime

Video Transcript

Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a forboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. >> Ashton Forbes, you know that super jacked guy. Malaysian 370 contact 120 decimal niner. Good night. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government, >> again, the Malaysian flight was a was one shot at China saying, "Knock it up. >> Why shoot it down if it's not hostile? Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. >> They need distance annihilated. >> This country is very powerful. >> Far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. I remember from Hindu scripture he's trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says now I am become death to destroy of worlds. I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> Hey y'all. Holy schmolley chat. Thank you for being here. Uh, happy Monday everybody. Oh my goodness, do we have a lot to talk about. Number one, we got Lulu over here, chat. I shocked her as many times as I could to make her stay. And now she knows never to leave, otherwise I will zap the [ __ ] out of her chat. That is my prop. That's not another animal distinct of life. No, that is my prop used for my streaming to draw more viewers to my to my screen. Okay, guys. Serious talk. Serious talk. This weekend, I went ahead and I reread the work by Dr. Jay Young Park of Trial Alpha Energy. If you don't know who he is, get him into your lexicon right now because he praised me. If you praise me, I will talk about you non-stop. We got jokes tonight. But in all seriousness, I reread his Polywell revisited. And what did I learn from Polywell Revisited, guys? Get ready for this. Number one, the biggest issue of producing this PLA high beta plasmoid is getting it turned online, getting it kicked online. And it requires a big jump start of a huge amount of energy to kickstart this thing. So you have these giant capacitor banks that they used for I think the Marauder program in order to charge these plasmoids that they shoot together. That's number one. But do you know what else I found out? I found out something else from his from his thing was that they actually came up with the idea of shooting plasmoids together. I don't know if he came up with it or John Slow of um I think he was from University of Washington came up with it but they came up with this idea of okay well let's shoot the plasmoids together and we shoot them together and then they'll create their own uh high beta plasmoid that's how we'll get over the gap of needing this huge amount of energy to kickstart this thing now here's the other thing the other big revelation which I think is something I've discussed If you're not sure what I'm talking about here, let me recap. In fact, I'll just read my most recent post. Very relevant post. If you guys have not read this, you know it's a relevant post. By the way, when they try to community note you if or at least for me, if they're trying to community note a post, you know you're probably reading something they don't want you to see. Field reverse configuration. What is field reverse configuration? the topic of tonight's stream. Why are we talking about it at all? Why does it matter to your life? You may wonder. Well, here you go. I'm going to keep it as simple as possible. I'm Professor for Orbs. I have no credentials whatsoever other than I get everything right all the time. And I'm here to tell you in very simplistic terms, in a way that you can understand, somebody with no physics understanding, what's going on. We got a ball of plasma here. This ball of plasma is pushing all the magnetic fields out. It says, "Get out of here, magnetic fields. You're not allowed to be in here. She's with me." That's what I was saying the other day. She's with me. Get out of here. But those magnetic fields, they do not give up. Those magnetic fields want to be in that plasma. They want to be inside of it. They want to be one with it. But this is the secret. So when you get to what we call a high beta, what we're talking about is that pressure of the plasma pushing out the magnetic fields relative to the strength of the magnetic fields trying to push back in. So to give you an analogy, she's got that fat friend and that frat friend is playing defense. You're trying to get in there. You got your wingman, but that fat friend just could get in there. Uh-uh. That ain't going to happen. She's got to get to bed early tonight. She's got work tomorrow. She's got papers and homework she's got to work on. Okay. So, now that we understand what's going on, we have the plasma pushing out, magnetic fields pushing in. And when you get to a beta of one, it's the ratio between those two forces. So, when we have the ratio of near one, what we have is something called balance. We have a balance. And when we get to this beta near one ratio, a barrier, what they call a dialectric barrier forms around it. So what this means is those magnetic fields are being pressed compressed into the region around the barrier. So this produces what we would call a forcefree condition inside of that barrier, inside of that bubble. There's no electromagnetic fields because it's all been pushed out. But that's weird. What does that mean? That's what they discovered. What I just told you is the felony physics. And you say, Ashton, that's kind of a simple thing. I mean, you could explain it to me in like two minutes. Yeah. That's why Salvador Pais says, "This isn't complicated. It's actually really straightforward. We're just divorced from the idea." in general. Therefore, we never really think about it. But when you start to think about what plasma can do and you start to realize that plasma has a self-organiz self-organizational property due to the fact that the plasma has its own magnetic fields. So what are they really doing? They're compressing the plasma down. And when they compress this plasma down, the beta beta ratio goes up until they get to the sweet spot where the beta ratio is nearly one. So the paper Polywell Revisited dropped last year found the timing pretty interesting goes back through the shortcomings of Polywell. And then the other thing is they say, "Okay, well we need to have these these plasmoids intersect and connect and hit each other." And I'm thinking about it, I'm going, "Wait a minute. If that's all producing a forcefree condition is, then isn't that exactly what these orbs are doing to MH370? What if these orbs are those tooidal plasmas that they're shooting at each other that are producing one larger plasmoid and producing that dialectric barrier, that bubble, that force-free condition and that force-free condition is literally the area inside the plane, the area that plane is at. That's the secret scale invariance. The things that we can produce on the very small scale, we can scale up and do on the very large scale. Boom. Yes. Thank you. Some Thank you for appreciating the magnitude of this discovery in the chat because nobody's called me out on the fact that I didn't post my scientific paper yet, but I already had my excuse ready to go. Chat, you're going to try to call me out. I'm not doing my homework. Well, that's because here's the story. I was in the middle of doing the paper and my idea for the paper was I was going to write a paper that just talked about how these high beta plasmoids that barrier condition can act like a casmir wall casmir effects and pull zero point energy by modulating the barriers just like dynamic casmir effects and while I was writing it I'm sitting there I'm thinking like I'm pretty much just explaining how to extract zero point energy and I was like Okay, maybe it should just be about extracting 0 point energy. And then I'm reading this paper by Jay Young Park, Dr. Jay Young Park, respect on his name, and I'm going, "Holy crap, wait a minute." I'm going, "Wait a minute. I knew there was a connection to this plasma stuff in this teleportation, but is it so obvious? Could it be that the field reverse configuration in general used to produce the plasmoid is the same thing we're seeing is the mechanism by which they are doing to this plane. And the real kicker, the real reason why I'm sold on it is because of how the orbs slow down. I was the first person to notice. Maybe not the first person. I think it might have been uh what was that Indian dude's name? Guys, help me out. Punjabi Batman. I don't even think he's Indian actually. I don't know. I think he was the first person to notice these orbs do some weird movement here where they see them reshuffle right there for a second where they kind of go fuzzy almost like they're realigning right before the last second. And in the other video when they're spinning around the plane, you can tell that their actual rotation rate changes. This is a huge clue. And by the way, nobody would have ever added any of these details. These videos were fake. I just for the people that are somehow still not believing these videos are real, which is fine. I don't care if you believe or not. No one would have ever added the fact that the rotation rate of the orbs, it noticeably visually changes. Not very much, but a little bit. It changes enough that you can actually see the rotation rate change when you play it in full speed. Right about when the plane gets near that cloud in the middle of the screen. So, these are indicators that Yeah, they slow down a little bit. That's the weird thing, too. They don't speed up. They slow down a little bit in terms of how fast they're speeding around. Yeah, it's some like some sort of downshifting. And when I asked AI about it, AI was like, "No, this actually makes sense that they would do this and slow down for a second and then when they stop and converge, that's the field reversal. They're popping the field reversal. They're pushing out the magnetic fields." And this is then allow pushing out zero point energy. And this is what allows a wormhole to exist. Because from the perspective of zero point energy, what happens here now is you are pushing out spaceime and you have caused that region of spacetime to collapse to the true vacuum where there's no inertia, no gravity, where now things can be in displaced locally. Now the fact here's the rub. The fact that we don't see the clouds get pushed away where we there's not reporting sightings of people seeing a fireball flying through the sky. This tells us that this is not a simple rail gun. This is not a simple we accelerated the plane to the speed of light. If we accelerated the plane to the speed of light, it would have exploded, shot out everywhere. But it didn't. It just vanished like it went through a mirror. This indicates it's an extradimensional effect. Because if it wasn't extradimensional, if it was solely within our 4D spaceime, three dimensional, three spatial dimensions, one time dimension, then we would see the the scene be disrupted. So that's the clue. Now, if we piece this together, what do we have? We're almost there. For the CIA, for the foreign intelligence people that are watching, you're welcome. And I'm not sorry. You get what you get when you your [ __ ] leaks. It is what it is. Not on me. But for the people watching, the last connection that we haven't made yet, which we will figure out. I told you we will figure out every single thing about this science. We've now figured out that this is a form of field reverse field reversal that they're doing to the plane itself. But how do you determine where it goes? How do you determine where that plane's going to show up? You can say you're going to field reverse it. But now the question too is when you're producing these plasmoids, are we producing entanglement? Are we producing wormholes when we're making them? When we make a a plasma condition of a beta condition of one, are we making a wormhole or are there further conditions involved in it? Presumably there are. I want to go back real quick and you could say win, but the win question is um not as exciting as people think. The win is if there are multiple realities and you send someone to a different reality. Well, okay, then there's infinite realities. That may seem exciting to some people. It's not to me. I personally think there's only one one reality. And if there's only one reality, that means there is no retrocausality. That means whatever we think, you're not going to be able to go back in time. I'm sorry. You can't change the past. You might be able to reverse your local lo local aging, but you can't change the universe's entropy. So, keep that in mind. But where does it go? So, I found something, chat. Where is it? Oh, boy. I was looking up a lot of stuff the other night. Here it is. This should be it. Um, there it is. Where does it go? How about a clue? Who wants a clue? I told you tonight would be hard deep on science and I did not lie. No lies detected. Teleportation using EVs by Ken Shoulders. Well, well, well. Here we are. In the use of the word teleportation, there is no intention of evoking anomalous phenomenon when just plain experimental physics will do a better job of explaining the events measured. Neither does the author intend to invoke one of the standard dictionary descriptions as the movement of objects or elementary particles from one place to another more or less instantaneously without traveling through space. The method to be discussed here uses both time and space in a very normal way. The description of the method used in this writing will also be done without the notions of becoming entangled in the usual quantum physics entanglement world. The method will be described as straightforward transportation using the ability of EVOs, plasmoids as we know them, to effectively encapsulate nucleons into their structure and transport them through physical barriers by a gross reduction of the overall expressed charge. chat. Am I tripping or is he just basically saying if you produce a high beta field-free condition, you can just teleport [ __ ] I think that's what he's saying right here. And I think the reason why he's saying it it works goes back to Richard Fineman chat. Why does my hand not go through the microphone? How come my hand doesn't go through the microphone? The reason is because there are electrons in my hand and there are electrons in this microphone and those electrons repel each other. Not just one, a lot, a lot of them. And they're repelling each other. They say no sir, no entry. So if you could reduce If you could do a gross reduction of the overall expressed charge of an object by encapsulating it and enshrouding it, perhaps that would allow it to quantum tunnel as we have seen quantum tunneling is a real thing through spaceime itself. The other thing that I noticed from this paper and I can see why people dismissed Ken shoulders because he writes in a very normal way. I can tell you read between the lines. What is Ken Shoulder saying here? He's going, "Guys, I don't know exactly how teleportation works. I'm just telling you. I'm seeing it. I'm seeing something get teleported from here to over here. I don't care what you want to call it." He's like, "And it works in a normal way." When he says it works in a normal way, what does that mean? A normal way means to me I'm aiming this over here and therefore it's going to go and it's going to reappear over here. Now, this is a a reach admittedly, but to me, this is saying that I can I can direct my teleportation. I can get it to work in a normal way in our understanding of three-dimensional spacetime. If I wanted to go that way, I shoot it that way. If I wanted to go that way, I shoot it that way. works in a normal way. So then he talks about some Russian papers. I was kind of surprised because this is it. I was expecting there to be like more pages on here. Um what did he say? I should uh basically found that like this uh I was looking for something where it was trying to direct the the object but I didn't find anything in this one I don't think about directing it but basically showed that there was some kind of vacuum interaction happening that was consistent and very similar to cold fusion that was occurring at least in the experimental setup that they were seeing this plasma ball of light. it would stay afterwards after the experiment and now you're saying okay well why is this where's this energy coming from that allows this to happen um this also may be similar this may be why we see sorry to go on so many tangents here the sonoluminescence why do we see this light appear because we're seeing this same kind of forcefree effect or cavitation effect collapse effect happen. Maybe interacting or sucking quantum vacuum energy out. Okay, let me see if I missed anything I wanted to talk on there. Okay. Oh, I had a couple quotes here I wanted to go through. So, from the Jay Young Park, um where is it? Are you ready for this? Here's just a couple of the quotes I found relevant from the Polywell revisited because now I learned that Dr. Jay Young Park spent like over a decade I think at Los Alamos himself. So we're finding like all of these engineers worked at our nuclear weapons engineering facilities. Um, here's a direct quote from his paper. Between 1974 and 1980, two groups at the University of Tokyo and the University of Naval Research Laboratory, US Naval Research Laboratory successfully demonstrated the formation of high beta cusp plasma using a highowered laser ablation of dutyium ice pellets. in the work of Oh man. Kitsunat Oh man, I'm so close. Hold on. Hold on. I'm gonna get it. Kitsun. In the work of Kitsu Zaki. Kitsune Zaki. See, I got it. A ruby laser delivering 500 to 800 megawws of pulsed power was used to produce a high beta cusp plasma in a spindle cusp with a 3 cm coil diameter and a 3.3 kg magnetic field at the ring cusp location. Experiments conducted at varying custom magnetic facilities uh magnetic field strength showed that both two low and two high magnetic fields reduced the confinement indicating the existence of an optimal beta of one. The last part was the key. Oh wait, oh sorry I don't have it up in front of me. So here's the rub. When your beta is too low, the plasma is too lossy, as they say. It doesn't stick together like they need it to. As you ramp your beta up, the plasma starts to stick to the magnetic fields like you want it to. Now, you don't want it to go too high because if you put that pressure up too high, explode part. What you're looking for, and the key part of that, the reason why I read off that quote is that Dr. Park is telling us you want an optimal beta near one. Okay, chat. Side side side comment. I get one fbomb, right? Children ear muffs. [ __ ] Commonwealth Fusion chat. [ __ ] Commonwealth Fusion and [ __ ] anyone messing around with metal donut tokamac reactors. If you can't realize from what I'm telling you right now that metal donut tokamac reactors with their beta of like 0.1 are probably the biggest scam ever invented. I can't think of a scam better. The only scam uh bigger than I can think of recently is Fire Festival. This is like Fire Festival all over again, chat. I'm blowing the whistle on it right now. Commonwealth Fusion's talking about they're going to hook their their Metal Donuts up to the grid. This is going to be beyond a Nerf Fusion. This is like the Dera leaked campaign. We got the Homeless Fusion coming out, chat. We get We get two our Q factor of three, chat. Oh, we're getting over unity. we get 1.1% total over unity for we're going to get like the worst possible overunity there is. They're going to literally engineer the thing to be as shitty as possible while still technically working because you can realize like just looking at the math this is just you can't it's not even in the same league as any fusion reactor with a beta of one. Not even in the same league. Okay, crash out over. God, I hate I hate Commonwealth Fusion chat. I hate them. I hate Bill Gates and I hate everybody involved with it. If you're involved with Commonwealth Fusion, get your money out of there. Or if they change and they stop doing Tokamax, then I will re-evaluate my opinion at that point. Sorry. Back to Polywell Fusion Reactor, by the way. Nope. Sorry. I'm not done. I thought I was done. Thought I was done, but then I realized I want to dunk on them some more. Where is it? Wait. Oh crap. Oh, here it is. Yep. >> Crawl, a consultant to us. >> Wait, wait, wait. Hold on. Hold on. Crawl, a consultant who was probably one of the top three theorists in the world, said some years ago he spent $15 billion studying tokamax and what we know about them is they're no damn good. Bruh, if you are getting dunked on by 20year-old Google TED talks or whatever the heck this was, then you were in the wrong fusion business. You done messed up, bro. Those laughs, they're laughing at you. They're laughing at your inadequate donut. Your inadequate donut penis. Obviously everything everything comes back down to penis size and so and tookax are no different. They just can't let go chat. They just got to accept the fact that they got a small one that's not going to get it done and they're going to have to work 10 times as hard. It is what it is. Okay. Second revelation. That was the big one. Where'd it go? Oh, actually that was just the main one I wanted to go through. Oh, wait. No, here's the other one. Oh yes. So the theory when they were coming up with this high beta, the theory which ended up being right was that when they achieved this beta of one that particles would be spec specularly reflected and therefore the confinement would be greatly enhanced by the sharp boundary layer of this cusp that forms. So the big thing when it comes to fusion is confinement time. How do you keep the plasma confined? Well, here's a whole branch of physics where there's two major fusion companies that are doing it where they're saying, "Hey, when we get to this beta equals one condition, suddenly we get a huge ramp up in confinement because this barrier suddenly just begins to do the work for us." Now the question I would ask you chat question I would ask you my normal smart individuals how come if there's this huge discovery out there how come there's been like no funding for it basically no public discussion of it and if you were to watch the helion and try alpha energy video critiques by YouTubers even just a couple years ago even a year ago they're all saying that it's fake and and it doesn't work. All of them except for a couple people that are going this could revolutionize the world if it's if it works. But I don't know how come if the government knows about this and they've known about this and their experts are doing Google TED talks. How come all of our funding has been going into metal donuts? Just something to think about. Something for you guys to think about out there. Now, let's go to the next thing. Change gears here. Negative time. I missed talking about this paper from the other day. Let me see if I can find it. The paper proved that negative time is a real thing. And the question that people should ask is what the hell is negative time? What is negative time and why? How does it exist? And this is one of those things where back in the day, chat, I would be one of those people going on social media and I'd see these physics things and they would have these crazy claims, negative time, all this stuff, and I would just go, "What the hell does that even mean? I'm just a normal guy. I don't know what that means. Negative time, any of that stuff. Mumbo jumbo to me." So that's why I'm here because I can actually explain to you in ways you can understand what negative time actually means. And after we dig in that, I got a few more pretty spicy uh video clips for us. So where's my negative time video thing here? Oh yeah, that was from last week. Oh, here it is. Okay, that was easy. So, here was the headline uh from Fly Ether. Shout out to him. He's been a big uh fan of the show, friend of the show. Makes clips for us. Uh even though I think he just does it out of the good of his heart, actually, let's see. Actually, I'm just going to explain what happens here instead of reading all this. So basically we are shooting light at rubidium atoms. We're shooting light at atoms almost like they're a barrier. Shoot some lights at some atoms and then we are going to see they're going to hit the atoms and then some of the light's going to go through the atoms and we're going to have a detector on the other side. Let me make this wide screen. So we got our laser pew pew machine over here shooting light. We got our atoms over here near my face. Light hits the atoms. Some of the light keeps going and we have a detector over here. Light gets captured on the detector. Very very simple, right? So if we simplify this, we have a laser beam. We have something in the middle. The laser beam is hitting passing through the middle thing and then it's going to hit in the other side. Simple. So where's the negative time aspect come into the play? Well, how do you calculate time? Well, velocity speed divided by distance is equal to time, right? Speed divided by the total distance equals time. We know the speed of light. Speed of light's a constant, so we know what that is. So we should be able to calculate the time that it takes for a light photon to go from this laser beam pew pew to hit this detector over here. So you want to know the crazy thing when they did this experiment and they just calculate that calculate the velocity divided by the uh by um the distance and see when this hits the detector. Turns out the light is hitting the detector as if it's passing through the medium without going through it at all. It's getting to the detector faster than should be possible. You say, "Wait, what?" You say, "So you shoot a beam of light, add some atoms, and then somehow the light comes out the other side before it even entered or it comes out where when we do our calculations, suddenly it looks like negative time has passed." Well, that's what they're measuring. That's the answer. So if that explanation was bad, here's my better explanation that I wrote up earlier. A resonant laser pulse hitting a group of atoms causes the light that passes through them to arrive at the detector faster than the speed of light. Thus, negative time. So, what does this mean? How is this actually possible? Who can explain this? I can. You can too. There's only one possible answer to how this is possible. We know how fast a laser beam moves through the air. The only variable here is those atoms in the middle. What this means is whatever we're doing to these atoms is changing the refractive index of those atoms. The refractive index is how fast the speed of light travels through a medium. So what's happening? The refractive index is being changed and the speed of light is being accelerated. That's how you get negative time. That's also how you get teleportation, by the way. So that's the reason why I'm talking about it. If you're not sure why we're talking about this, cuz that's the same physics that now instead of your atoms, instead of your atoms, go back to our high beta forcefree conditions plasmoid that we're creating and you say, "Oh, wait. Are we changing the permitivity of spaceime when we're producing our high beta plasmoid?" And if we're changing the permitivity of spaceime, then does that mean the speed of light in that region no longer is what we call the speed of light anymore? There you go, chat. Now you've got it figured out. Now you understand. This is why negative time. So it's not that we're time is going backwards. No, negative time means we've engineered the refractive index of the medium. In this case, the rubidium atoms. We've re-engineered the permitivity to rechange the speed of light. And we did it how? Resonant pulses of a laser. Resonant pulses. Resonant being the key effect. Why? Everybody always thinks just smash something and make it work. But it's not about smashing something. Yeah, I can throw the wine glass on the ground. It's going to shatter into a thousand pieces. But if I just want to make it shatter without touching it, then I can do that with sound. I can hit a resonant pitch with the wine glass and it'll start to vibrate and then it'll shatter. That's why the orbs are spinning around the plane. They're creating a resonance effect and it gets amplified when there's more than one. And this is also why they shoot two plasmoids at each other. Like why would they shoot two plasmoids at each other? Because it amplifies the effect. That's why they're shooting three also for geome geometric purposes. Excuse me. So where was my thing? Oh, I lost it. Oh, I had two up. That's why. Okay. So, what this is is spacetimemetric engineering proven on a macroscopic scale. Spac-imemetric engineering is Hal Pud's polarizable vacuum model. If you boil it down, how put off saying, you can manipulate the permitivity of spacetime itself. That when you're pushing out those electromagnetic fields, you're also pushing out 0 point energy. And when you push out 0 point energy, you change the physical laws of reality as we know it. This is the connection. So when you see stuff about negative time and rubidium atom [ __ ] just realize that's the same exact physics as how PDA's polarizable vacuum. He just said, "Hey, whatever you can do to some rubidium atoms, you can do to space time, too." Now, the only question left that you may be wondering, the only piece we don't know about now, assuming that we're correct about this field reverse configuration, is what they're doing when they're spinning around the plane and then reversing the field at the last second, pushing out the electromagnetic fields. The last bit is how do they determine where it goes? I think it really is a beam. I think it really is them shooting an aimed beam and that it really is going westward from this zap. That's why I think Ken shoulders says that works in a normal way. I think that however this works with this extra dimension, it still depends on our 3D 4D reality. You can't just cheat and send it anywhere you want. You may be a situation where you got to clock it and shoot it where you want it to go. I think that's why these orbs spin around the plane so specifically the way they do right there. But here's the rub. How would this work? I got another physics drop for you. One more physics drop and then we're going to read through some comments on there. And I got to say this word right chat. First of all, for anyone criticizing me because I don't know all the million different people's names that physics concepts were named after. Screw you. These people made me do this. I didn't want to be a physics person. I didn't want to do any of this or learn any of this. I've had to learn all these people's stupid ass names I can't pronounce because nobody will just call things like a normal effect that everybody can understand. You can't call it like the trampoline effect. No, it's got to be called the Bushenhouser effect. Like, bro, come on, man. I get it. We all want to have our names tied to physics, but I want to be able to understand how things work in like a normal way. Okay. The non I don't even know how to say this word. nonablian ablion whatever Aaronhoff bomb effect basically chat there is an extra dimension there is an extra dimension and the scalar potential allows us to encode the vector that we want into the scalar potential so essentially what I'm saying is the way the orbs spin around the plane is likely encoding the directional How we're going to shoot that thing through the 5D spaceime, how we're going to create our warp drive, our hyperspace drive is that the direction is being encoded from the spin of the orbs around the plane that's producing the vector potential. And what did we learn from the Aaronhoff bomb effect? It's the potentials that determine what's real. So what I'm saying is just like in the Aaronhoff bomb effect where they create this solenoid of no there's no fields outside of this thing. They're doing something very similar here where in the aeronov boom effect you shoot the particles past it you can see them phase shift. So you know there's something happening but there's nothing that should be impacting it. That's what they're doing with the plane with the high beta cusp. But they're doing that with much much much higher potential. Enough potential to get it to link to another location and actually reappear somewhere else. Now, the last bit, which is the part I don't know still, is that four orbs. The fourth orb determines where the plane ends up. The fourth orb situation is the closest approximation we have to figure out how it shows up on the other side. Not just where how do they direct it, but like how does it stop right here? Why doesn't it just keep going right past? So that's the last part that we don't have a full accurate physics understanding of, but we'll get there. Look at how far we've gotten at this point, we've gotten further than basically anybody that hasn't worked at Los Alamos. The only people that even understand this at this point, there's people in the replies saying that this is all, what do they say is word salad. People that don't even understand physics, they're going this is word salad because what? Which part? You don't understand what high beta means or which part are you struggling with exactly? which really goes to show how sad the situation has gotten in today's day and age. Now, just to show you this isn't me trying to to to you know what this is this is actually Wait, am I showing the wrong one? Oh, yeah. What am I pulling up here? I'm pulling up the wrong one here. What's going on the heck is going Oh, there it is. That's why this is me trying to flex a little bit. Actually, Dr. Park has seen your work and you're on everyone's radar. Let's just say Helion and TAE are meant to be Nvidia and AMD. We're not allowed to reveal a breakthrough fusion until we say they can. However, your last stream, you're on the money. Okay, now let me just show you how completely surp how how much we have surpassed um standard physics at this point. Where is it? Here this one I read this article. Sabine was posting this article about guys. What if we're wrong about dark matter? Hello, academic physicist. What if we're wrong about dark matter? What if it turns out that dark matter thing doesn't even really exist at all? Well, spoiler alert, chat. Basically, the answer from everybody's perspective if dark matter doesn't really exist is that the ether must be real. That the only other answer is that we have to go back to the ether. That's what basically everyone's viewpoint is. So, here you go. I read it. So you don't have to and you can really pretty much sum up these people's opinions in one sentence. That's just how surface level their analysis is. And it's basically like listening to de people support DEI. Like they've just got a script and a talking point that they've been told to read off of and it hasn't changed in 25 years. Hasn't changed one iota in 25 years. And it's just so easy to beat these people's arguments that it's just become sad. Here we go. So, first dude's like, "Disping the existence of dark matter is a tall order." Can you imagine ever putting those words on a piece of paper and having them be attributed to you? First of all, dark matter is literally a thing we had to invent because we looked at galaxies. A woman looked at galaxies and realized that they were rotating on the edges far too fast given our understanding of relativity. If you just do the math, no way that works. But so what am I saying? When we visually experimentally looked at the data, it disproved our theory. That alone would have been enough to throw out a physics theory. In fact, that's that's how little it took for them to throw out the ether. They found one thing that they thought was wrong with the ether and they threw it out. When the same thing happened for general relativity, they said, "No, we're not wrong. We're not wrong. It's just that uh there's dark matter. It's because of dark matter." And you say, "Well, what's dark matter?" They go, "Uh, it's literally a thing they invented." Because they can't explain why that's happening. And they still can't. To this day, they still can't explain what dark matter is, where it comes from, and nobody's ever measured it before. There's no such thing as dark matter. Literally, not a thing that really exists, no physical thing that exists, just something we came up with. And again, this is factual. I'm not speaking I'm not saying an opinion here. We factually made up this thing called dark matter. So when someone says you have to disprove it, nobody has to disprove dark matter. It doesn't even exist. You first of all have to show me the dark matter cuz show me some dark matter. There isn't any. It doesn't literally is not a thing. So first person's a complete idiot and they don't even understand how logic works because you're telling me I have to prove your unfalsifiable position. That's not logic. So, I don't know who that first person is, but they get an F. Sabine Hosenfelder says, "If dark matter doesn't exist, the observations that led to astrophysicists to conclude it exists won't go away." Wow. Thank you, Captain Obvious. Thank you, Captain Obvious. Uh, you're right. Turns out those galaxies not spinning the correct speed is not going to go away no matter what. The observational experimental data that shows general relativity is wrong is not going away. You need to figure that out. And if you can't figure that out, I suggest you go back to the drawing board and come up with a new theory. I got one for you. It's called zero point energy. Turns out it explains all these things very easily. She says we would therefore need something else to explain these observations. Uh chat, can you think of anything else that could explain these observations we see in the sky? Anything that can explain inertia, mass, gravity, dark energy, dark matter? Oh, zero point energy can explain all of those things. All of them. The reason why the stars spin at that speed is because we live in a medium. Where's the extra energy coming from? extra mass to make those stars go faster. We're in a medium. There's an extra dimension. That's why that's why we don't have there's no mathematical stable solutions for three bodies in orbit over the long period of time. Over a long period of time, any three bodies in orbit of one another, something's going to get ejected out. So, how come they exist? We look at this. We look out there and we see them. So, what's where's the where's the disconnect? Oh, it turns out we live in a medium. And that medium is like a sticky substance. That's your dark energy. That's your dark matter. That medium is why you think that we have this big bang that spread space time faster than the speed of light. There's your answer. So, for the people that say, "Hey, Ashton, you don't know what you're talking about." Well, here you go. These are your top physicists and I'm knocking them down one at a time. If they can respond, I can't wait to watch your videos. Stacy McGaw says, "When we apply the law of gravity taught to us by Newton and Einstein to the matter we can see in these systems, we come up short. The observed motions imply more mass than meets the eye, aka dark matter. Now, in a sane world, if you told somebody, "Hey, I got a theory, but I went ahead and just checked my theory and it doesn't work," you would say, "Hey, you're wrong. It was a good shot. You were pretty close. You're pretty close, but you were wrong, and you should try again." But we don't live in a sane world. We live in a world where that happens and people go, "I'm not wrong. The universe is wrong." They go, "The universe is wrong. We just have to invent dark matter. Now we're right again." And you wonder why a healthcare IT consultant has to teach you physics three times a week? Because we're a planet of retards. And this is where I just think we tested relativity. observations proved us wrong, so we invented and made up a fake term instead of admitting we're wrong. That's called insanity. And then one caller says the bias towards its existence was enormous. Exactly. This was the problem. There was a massive bias towards the existence of dark matter. Even if Maxwell's equations provide a recipe for self-propagation of electric and magnetic fields. Oh, sorry. So the previous time they were trying to say that there was a bias towards the ether. Yes. The bias towards the ether was that anybody could realize that all waves require a medium. Tesla realized that everything was about energy, frequency, and vibration. And he realized there must be a medium. Hell, even Einstein space-time view that space was a malleable solid that had structure to it. And this is where the scalar potential comes into play. You would say if they say any argument about Maxwell's equations, that's the worst argument anybody against the ether can ever make. If they say, "Hey, Maxwell's equations prove there's no ether." You go, "Fuck you, dude." Ever hear the scalar potential? They literally had to delete a part of Maxwell's equations because there's an extra term in there that's absolutely real but only comes into play when dealing with this extradimensional extradimensional scalar potential because a scalar potential as anyone will point out is just a magnitude. They say Ashton a scalar is just a magnitude. You don't know what a scalar means. Yes, I do know what it means. And that magnitude is relevant only if there's an extra dimension where that magnitude could reappear over here by some type of quantum entanglement effect or quantum tunneling effect. Then suddenly the scalar potential becomes very relevant and that scalar potential could also help us explain gravity. So there you go. Knocked them up. Uh brought him up, shot him back down. Basically, the ether is coming back and the Michaelelsson Mley experiment. If you were relying on a experiment from 1887, I got bad news for you chat. That [ __ ] is done. >> Pattern on the moving the rotating plane is positioned vertical to the Earth's surface. We are now moving the entire >> This is my favorite part. I'm just going to mute this. This is my favorite part is I have a video of a dude that took the Michaelelsson Mley experiment that you can just watch with your eyes. He all he did was take it level and flip it vertically so that it would be clearly interacting with gravity, right? Higher, lower you are, less or more gravity. And you can see these are lasers where you can see the interference pattern is shifting. Those are laser beams. And the only thing happening is that this thing is spinning around and the only difference is how much gravity there is when you're either closer to the surface of the earth or less when you're higher up. And they say, Ashton Michaelelsson morally disproved the ether. And I say, well, what do you think gravity is? And I say, gravity is the displacement of the ether by mass. Which is also why the Michael Morley experiment does work. when you turn it vertically. Anyway, I'm literally eager to debate anyone, any PhD physicist or anyone who just feels like they know more about this because my arguments pretty much uncontested. Now, I think there was somebody in here. Oh, yeah. Here we go. Here it is, chat. Some rando's time to shine. You say, Ashton, why are you gonna elevate some random person with probably like 10 followers, may even be a bot. because I'm an equal opportunity hater. Chat, here we go. I said, "Now's your time. I'm going to debate some random person, some random person in the comments." Oh, they were crashing out. Chat, we're not going to reach all these. We're not going to read all these crash outs, just the ones that matter. Asserting that dark matter doesn't exist is just plain stupid because dark matter is literally just a label we use to refer to a constellation of observations. It's like saying, "No, you didn't make those observations. No, that's not what it's like saying at all. Applying a label to dark matter is like applying a band-aid to a problem you don't want to deal with anymore. You made up a term called dark matter because your theory general relativity uh Newtonian gravity fell apart fell apart when we tried to observe it. And so if the overall argument is hey you don't have any argument to stand on when you try to claim the ether is real. My counterargument is my theory explains more about our reality than your theory does. And it's not close. I can explain to people logically and consistently how inertia, mass, gravity, dark energy, and dark matter, all of them work in the model of the ether. In your model of general relativity, you can't explain any of those or where any of them come from. Think about that. So if the overall argument is, hey, you have to prove to me the ether is real. I don't have to prove anything. You have to prove to me general relativity is the answer because it's not looking good right now. So then we make an argument about you can't uh dark matter is the option that correctly predicts gravitational lensing galaxy cluster dynamics and cosmic microwave background. So classic fallback they say well our theory explains these things and I don't think this guy knows about ether theory because he would know that ether theory actually explains these things as well. So if you can change the permitivity of the vacuum then light it would make sense for light to be redshifted that we see when we look out there. In fact, if you believe in a tired light hypothesis that energy could energy is like lost back to the ether, then that could also explain the red shift that we see. It would be it would mean that not everything all started at one particular point. It would mean that a big bang isn't needed anymore. It could also be a big bang could exist, but it is not needed in an ether theory anymore. Gravitational lensing then is not an issue. Gravitational lensing is totally covered by the ether. So is galaxy cluster dynamics. In fact, like I said, the threebody problem. You can't even explain cluster dynamics using general relativity. You have major problems. Any three or more body system should fall apart and become unstable under your theory. Cosmic microwave background just isn't even needed. You use cosmic microwave background to quantify the amount of 0 point energy, but that's not the true amount of 0 point energy. The true amount of zero point energy is like 80 magnitudes higher, maybe even higher than that, maybe infinite. So, it's not that cosmic microwave background, cosmic microwave background isn't wrong. It's just irrelevant. It may be relevant if we need a cosmic reference frame. If we're going to use adaptive optics and we need something to compare to to be able to tell where two points are, that might be useful. Cosmic micro background might be useful for that. And then people say, "Well, if you were in a medium, you would have a preferred frame and you would see drag." We do see drag. It's called gravity. It's called time dilation. The reason why we don't see it and experience it is because we're all on the same planet Earth. We all experience basically the same amount of gravity. We're all experiencing basically the same amount of frame dragging. So therefore everything, all of our interactions feel normal to us. But I promise you, if one person was at a black hole and one person was at Earth, it would look like one person's moving in fast forward and the other one's moving in slow-mo. With respect to the preferred frame, I I'm not even sure what that argument relies on. Actually, I'd have to look at I've never made an argument about that. But that may if that is an argument towards a universal reference frame then I would say yes there probably is a universal reference frame. We can probably deduce that based on the cosmic microwave background. So I'm not sure what that was trying to argue there though. And I think that was basically it because right after that then it just gets into personal attacks. We're no longer talking about physics and say you've never demonstrated anything. Okay. Yeah. Well, guess what, chat? Um, general relativity is the one that has all the problems. So, what was the other follow-up I was going to do on this? Oh, yeah. So, I wanted to jump to some David Frroning. Shout out to Tom Hudson. He's back. He's okay. He's not gone. just to really drive this point home about how they've hidden this science, this physics, but it's really in there in plain sight in these people that have known about it. David Frroning, get this chat. David Froin is connected to Bousard, Frank me, he's connected to um Robert Forward, literally everybody that was working on Quantum Vacuum. In fact, when I read this, I can't even believe what I was reading here. David Fronian is a ghost. I posted that he died. Rest in peace, David Fonian. And I freaked out for a second because I couldn't even confirm if he was really dead. I started searching online. Had AI search everywhere online. There's no birthday for him. There's no death date for him. There's no obituary. The only reason why we even know he's dead from a public perspective is that his sister died. And his sister said he was she was preceded by her brother. That's the only way we even know he's dead. Even though he was born in like 1925 or something like that. That to me is extremely suspicious. Well, he has no basically internet footprint whatsoever. Kind of spooky. Now, let's read something about him. This is from his book. Tom Hudson has the book, by the way. I already ordered it. If you want to get one of the last two copies on Amazon, it's only 20 bucks or whatever. I recommend grabbing them. I read a few pages of this. This is some [ __ ] we're about to take a look at here. You ready for this? How do I get this to be I'll just read it to you guys. Years later, at a special gathering, I found myself seated at the dinner next to Robert Busousard. Chat, that's the guy I just showed you the clip talking about the Tokamax. Robert Bousard, that was him. the guy I just showed you the clip talking about the Tokamax. That's him. Okay. Who I had conceived of an interstellar ramjet. I told him how much I admired his interstellar ramjet design. He smiled broadly and said he had actually read my quantum interstellar ramjet paper and liked it well enough to give it to his wife for use on one of her advanced university student projects. So he considered us even in borrowing each other's ramjet. We soon became good friends and his larger company and my much smaller one enjoyed years of collaboration on fascinating fusion and propulsion energy research for NASA and the ESA. Boom. Gotcha, [ __ ] Wow. Holy [ __ ] Okay, this is my favorite paragraph though. Although no quantum interstellar ramjet is likely to fly in my lifetime, it is only it is my only claim to any kind of public fame. Science fiction writer Arthur C. Clark used my quantum ramjet as a huge heroic lifesaving starship that carried 1 million people to safety from dying earth to a new world in his 1986 science fiction novel, The Songs of Distant Earth. Now, more than 30 years later, science fiction vehicles are still saving Earth and other worlds in innumerable ways. But I am still pleased that my earthsaving quantum ramjet was among the first. Damn chat, that is some heavy [ __ ] Yeah, if you're saying is this the smoking man? This is literally what I'm wondering. who says that my I my only public claim to fame is his ramjet and then like oh yeah that super famous science fiction writer Arthur C Clark one of the three OG goat hard sci-fi writers use knows me personally and use my concept this is why Arthur Cark why his stuff is so real because he was talking to the guys that really knew the real physics. Wow. But then the bangers don't stop. More importantly, Air Force scientist Frank me became interested in my zero point vacuum energy ideas. He directed his brilliant scientific consult consultant, Robert Forward, to work with me on how it might be applied to spaceflight power or propulsion. At first, Forward told me, "Right now, I see no way to get a handle on that energy. And maybe Okay. Did it crash? Uh, what what happened to my thing, chat? Are we still here? Hopefully, we're still here. Okay. I don't know why my thing just crashed. Um, Infrared eyes, scanning the black, tracking the heat, never turning back. And 22, a coverted gaze. And roll 33 in the cosmic maze. And rolls in the mix. Secrets untold. Silent washers brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interest far and wide. Spears sentinel of the night watching. >> Sorry guys, the infrared sight, alerting us to threats of guiding our defenses like a guiding star. In the silence of space, they keep their post. Shields unseen yet feared the most. With precision and speed, they warn of danger, keeping us safe from the missiles anger. As beers, sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star and trolls in the mix. Secrets untold, silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interest far and wide as >> Okay, are we back? Okay, sorry. Are we back? Somebody just disconnected my internet. That's pretty cool. So, I'll be giving Verizon a call. I talked to them yesterday. Uh Jesus. Thankfully, I have absolute proof that my internet's disconnecting and you can't uh they can't try to blame it on whatever [ __ ] they were kind of blaming on last time. Okay, back. Thank you guys. Sorry about that. Let's get back to the topic here. Apologies. It's just it's ridiculous because like I'm trying not to be conspiratorial about this, but like I'm in the middle of talking about like literally the number one most secret scientific concept in the entire world and my internet is being like literally tampered with in real time multiple days in a row. And then you call them up and they just go, "Oh, someone was doing maintenance on my internet just at that moment at the exact moment I'm streaming." Amazing. Okay, got it. Back to the scientific paper here. Oh, I was going to play the clip of Robert Forward. So, basically, we have a connection now between Robert Forward and Busousard and specifically here to David Froin. Here's Robert Forward of the ability to cruise over vast distances powered by the sun. >> No propellers, no roaring engines. Incredible graceful flights made possible by one of the future's most promising power systems, ion propulsion. Author and scientist Bob Forward is an expert on the future of transport. >> Ion propulsion is where you take atoms and uh put a charge on them and then use that charge to throw the atoms using electric fields out the rear of the vehicle. Not convinced? Take a look at the ionoccraft invented by Alexander D. Severki. A huge >> So you guys get the point. Um because we got a lot lot more to go through here. So let me try to get through the rest of this. Hopefully we won't get disconnected again. So Frank me got interested connected Robert Forward with David Froning. Forward became interested in quantum energy gave him broader support as soon as he learned of the Casemir effect. Listen to this. Soon he learned of the casemir effect wherein closely spl sp spaced metal plates exclude the longer wavelength of vacuum fluctuations between them causing an inward pressure. Robert Forward showed that this could drive the plates together without effort and the em energy of all excluded quantum fluctuations could be drawn off like electric current from a battery. This resulted in a famous paper by forward on the vacuum fluctuation battery. That's the 1984 paper. When you read my scientific paper, I thousand% guarantee you, you will see a reference to Robert Forward's 1984 paper because he showed and this does not take anything to understand. You can argue anyone about this. You put two metal plates together, Casemir effect will cause them to come together. That force can be used to power a battery. Simple as that. No one can deny that. And they say and then when you win that argument, which you will win because that proves quantum vacuum fluctuations are real and that proves they can power real things in our real reality. Now the question is how do you engineer it? How do you turn that into something that you can perpetually extract energy? Because you'll get the comeback. They'll say, "But you got to pull the plates apart again." So, we're not going to do that then. If you're telling me the only thing I need to do to extract energy is make these plates come a little bit together, then I'm going to do this. I'm just going to vibrate them. And in fact, it turns out when you vibrate them like this out of resonance, you create something called a dynamic casemir effect that amplifies the Casemir effect. That's what we're going to do with our plasma. That's how we're going to produce infinite energy. So, Robert Forward is the one that showed us this. Unfortunately, his battery did not generate net electrical power because it needed input energy to force open the closed plates to repeat the process. But his work showed the vacuum could be interacted with to cause force and to release energy. So it greatly increased scientific interest. Chat, I had never read this book or this paper or this page before today and there is David Froin saying the exact same thing I've probably said on 25 different podcasts. The same thing that I've argued with on Twitter against PhD academic physicists. Was it that Martin Bower guy or one of the others? I can't remember which one. One of those those physicists made the same argument here and I said the same thing. Yes, it doesn't produ doesn't show infinite energy extraction, but it does show that quantum energy extraction can be used to produce real energy undeniably. Lastly, he references Garrett Modal and Bernard H's 0 energy microchip. I almost emailed Garrett Modal again, but I don't think he knows about this. And I think he just is honestly kind of a guy that has no idea what's really going on. Wait, what's this down here? See Zero Point Energy, the fuel of the future by Thomas Voluone for a discussion of Forward's Battery, his AFR report on ZPE, the Casmir effect, and the energy density of the quantum vacuum. Wow. Last thing I want to say on this guys, when I did this, when I started digging down this looking for how do you explain how a plane is being teleported from the sky, it wasn't like there was a million different options for the answers. I quickly found out this one is the one zero point energy and everything points to this. That's why there's this huge rich history of Air Force research lab engineers, Loheed Martin engineers, engineers affiliated with the CIA, all writing books, papers about this. They're not grifting. This isn't a super elaborate 5D game of chess to convince China that zero point energy is real. These people didn't go out of their own day, spend their own time and effort to get books published on something to confuse China. It's just real. And they realize that most people, not you all, but most other people are too stupid to even think about it. To literally even think about it. Even if they write the books, people don't think about it. That's what's going on. Okay, let's go back to what else we Oh, so because here's the reality, and this applies to not just This applies not just to David Froining. It applies to Robert Forward himself. It applies to Paul Sid. It applies to Bob Baker. It applies to every engineer that came before us. None of these guys got the recognition they deserve. You got people like Neil Degrasse Tyson are famous. Meanwhile, nobody knows about Thomas Towns Brown. They don't know about what Franklin me did for the Air Force. They don't know about any of it. >> And all these noble lords can't even remember his name. His name was Sir Ireland of Penny Tree. And I am his legacy. On tomorrow, we will show them what his hand has wrought. Chat, we are their legacy. We are their legacy. They wrote those books. You know who they wrote those books for? You know who they wrote those scientific papers for, chat? They wrote them for us. They wrote them for us because they knew one day in the future we would come along possibly after they were already gone. That we would figure it out and that we would dunk on every noob out there. Chat, we are going to make the red wedding. We're going to make that look like a little kids show, chat. We're going to make that look like a little kids show. People are going to lose their minds. People are going to be flipping out. People are going to be committing sudoku on themselves. Academia is going to collapse under the weight of its own hubris when it has to accept the reality of how horribly, horribly wrong it has been. The debunkers and the skeptics, their minds are going to explode. Their minds are going to explode. the normies, they're not even going to know what's real anymore. And we get to be the ones that get to just revel in all of it. That's honestly what keeps me going. I don't even want to talk about this anymore. I actually don't even know what's right or wrong. Truthfully, I don't I don't know what side I'm on. I feel like I'm being used when I'm even saying this information out there. like somebody out there wants me to be doing this, like I'm doing their bidding for them without even knowing it. That's what it feels like. And truthfully, it feels dangerous to reveal this information. And part of the reason why they suppress it and keep it secret is because it is dangerous. Is a dangerous technology that has huge implications. And a lot of the time I think it the world is just easier when we don't have to worry about any of this [ __ ] We just go back, plug ourselves back into the matrix. Let's just let the CIA deal with this. They can brain ray however many Iranian people that are working on plasma physics. They need a brain ray. Melt their brains. Turn them into dum dums. Whatever you got to do to them, ghost remember them. So, at the end of the day, the only thing keeping me going is going to be those I told you so at the end. Those gotas. And for the record, for the people saying that, hey, Ashen, you might be in your grave when that happens, just know I'm there in spirit. I will be haunting all the Redditors, the deboners, the CIA spooks, the zapped MH370. I am going to haunt you. Okay, guys. Let's keep going. Um, what's next? What we got here? Okay, last thing. You got all these scientists trying to talk about how ghost murmur doesn't work. Ghost murmur is not real science. Literally just watched a Veritassium video. Veritassium video chat where they're talking about the CIA didn't quite get it right on this one. That's not how the physics works. And I'm just sitting here wondering how is this real life right now, chat? How is it? Who am I supposed to believe? chat the CIA who's revealing a real system that there's going to be real documentation for literally called ghost murmur that they told us what it's called how it works how we literally use that system to save a real human being's life in a way that's incredible and practically impossible or should I believe some YouTubers who say no that's how physics works. Nope, that didn't happen. That was staged. That was staged. They used some other thing that nobody knows. They They used something else. We don't know what it was, but it just wasn't that. It wasn't the thing they said. It was just something else. This is the [ __ ] why I have no respect for academia. Like, none. None at all. They are so delusional that they don't even consider the possibility that they are wrong. It's not even a thought that goes through their mind. Literally not even a thought. The only thing that's not a possibility is that they don't understand physics. That's the only thing that's not possible because they spent eight years in school and $200,000 and they got $150,000 in debt. And if they were taught wrong, then they're the biggest chumps on the face of the earth. Then they're the biggest chumps on the face of the earth. And that's the reason why they'll never even think about it. So the reality is this. Of course this system works. Of course we can beam energy from space because we can manipulate spaceime itself. So suddenly all those problems you had with electromagnetic fields not being able to propagate far enough, suddenly those aren't a problem anymore. The same physics that non alabion whatever uh aeronov bomb effect that extradimensional aaronov bomb effect that can encode it can encode a vector into an extra dimension. That is what allows ghost murmur to work too. Suddenly something that seemed impossible now just becomes a quantum entanglement effect. And yes, you have to understand quantum entanglement to be able to utilize something like that. You obviously have to understand it. So the point is the CIA has more information about physics than academic physicists do. And I'm saying this from a position of somebody who's staring at two CIA videos of an operation they did where they are teleporting a plane out of the sky. Yes, teleportation. Not annihilation. Literally teleporting it. That's how I know. Now, I was going to play this clip of Steve Quas, but it's seeming just kind of redundant at this point. So, the last thing I want to talk about is General McCassland. I'm going to talk about this guy every single live stream until they tell us where he is because we got ghost murmur technology that can hear a dude's heartbeat that slop tubers don't even think is real and possible. And you're trying to tell me we don't know where our general who upgraded the nuclear arsenal is. There's just no gaslighting this. There's no gaslighting this. This general unequivocally knew about our nuclear weapons. You can't be like, "We're not super concerned about this guy disappearing." Uh, you better be concerned. If you're not concerned about this guy disappearing, then I'm concerned. Then I'm concerned why you're not concerned. So, forget all the UFO [ __ ] Forget the alien stuff. This guy literally upgraded our nuclear weapons and he's missing and he's got to be like a super high priority for the CIA. Got to be. No question. So, the question is where the [ __ ] is he? Where is he? And why aren't you telling us where he is? Because you definitely know where he is. You got magical technologies, but you're trying to pretend like you don't know where he is. Yeah, you know. And back in the This is You know what? This is a bold prediction and probably very, very unlikely to be true, but I'm going to throw it out there because I'm getting a weird gut feeling about this. There's a possibility that he got arrested, that they picked him up, and that he's been in some kind of pre-trial detainment where they don't want to let anybody know that they picked him up because they're afraid he's leaking something on the internet or to some people or something like that. If they have him and he's arrested somewhere and they're not saying anything about it, then that's really messed up. And this whole thing is going to go crazy when they reveal that. If they suddenly reveal that they arrested General McCassland and they've been keeping him in some black shadowy jail cell so he can't talk to anybody, then I think everybody at this point is going to know why. We're going to all know why. And when they try to tell us some [ __ ] about Korea or China, he's trying to sell secrecy, we're going to know that's [ __ ] I'm going to say, "Hey, you have any uh Twitter accounts? TMBB spaceships?" Just kidding. Okay, so shout out to Congressman Berles. I was surprised by this because he hits the nail on the head. And if you guys have been watching my content, you know I've been saying this that General McCasslin is the one that everyone needs to focus on. Forget all the rest of the missing scientists and the assassinated ones. They're all their stories are very sad, sucks, but nobody has the background like Okay, there we go. We're back. Please just let my internet hold up for one more minute. Hey guys. Okay, that's uh that's going to be the end of the stream. That's the second disconnect for tonight. So, apologies. I'll get to the um I'll get to the super chats on our next live stream. Sorry. Sucks. Thank you guys. Have a great night.