Eric W Davis Watch Party Live Stream

Video Transcript

# Eric W Davis Watch Party Live Stream Malaysian 370 contact 120 decimal niner. Good night. Malaysian 370. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [Music] Oh, [Music] [Applause] [Music] [Applause] [Music] I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu. is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says now I am become death the destroyer of worlds. Welcome everybody to the live stream. Happy uh Monday guys. Guys, what day is it today? Oh man, I'm losing track of the days. Guys, we have a great one for you tonight. Tonight, we are going to be doing a watch party of Eric W. Davis. Eric W. Davis is a black project physicist. That doesn't mean he's African-American. That means he literally has worked on classified projects for the government. And just for a little background on Eric W. Davis, Eric W. Davis spent 20 years working at Earth Tech International, the Institute for Advanced Studies in Austin, as the right-hand man to a guy named Hal Pudof. Hal Pudof, if you watched our science goat uh tier list, you will find out that Hal Pudof is in the S-class. In fact, one of the things we're going to potentially find out today is that Hal Pudof might be one of the people that is essentially the highest ranking secrecy CIA spooks that exist. What we're going to find out tonight is that there is something called the peds. These are emergency powers that are that have been pre-written that go above the president. There is a separate parallel track of CIA highlevel intelligence operatives that can use these peds and this is where they are potentially hiding these unacnowledged special access programs and it is very possible that Hal Pudof and Eric Davis have been involved in that. They've been involved in that process. Now Eric W. Davis as well for four years. I believe he says at the beginning of this interview, worked for Aerospace Corporation where Space Juice USA chat Huntsville, Alabama for Aerospace Corporation. The Aerospace Corporation is one of these private companies that is fully funded by the government. And this is the one where you they contract out the scientists and engineers to the various government labs across the country. So Eric W. Davis is very well connected. He is also one of these UFO whistleblowers who recently, just a few months ago, was talking to Congressman Berles, Congressman Luna, Congresswoman Luna, uh, about the suppression and and hiding this technology, hiding UFO crash retrievalss and aliens and whatever. Great. So, we're going to take a look at that in just a minute. We also have a potential special guest who will be joining us. Michael Peron has said that he will jump in the jump in at some point because he wants to discuss some of the science topics that Eric W. Davis says. So, I sent him an invite. If he jumps in, we'll take a look at that and we'll talk to him for a little bit. Now, right before that, let's go ahead and address kind of some of the stuff that happened yesterday. If you didn't check it out, guys, I am I'm elevating the skeptic side of it. I'm bringing a new a better class of skeptics to this world. Um, one thing I want to wonder, we have had literally for over two years straight, over two years straight, there have been debunkers. Debunk, I don't call them skeptics, they're debunkers because they're low IQ Redditors basically that have been attacking me in the MH370 videos every single day. Every single day. Now, this is the the most suspicious thing I find about this is that my following has been relatively small. Like, I don't even make enough money off of this to live off of this. And yet, these people claim that the reason why they've been attacking me, the reason why they've been trying to debunk the videos is some white knight mental illness thing where they proclaim that we have to stop Ashton because he's grifting off these videos. That's their supposed moral argument. is why they've been doing this for literally over two years straight every single day. Think about that. Think about that. Why are they not attacking Ian Carol and Candace Owens? Why are they not using their white knight powers to debunk the fake conspiracy theories being pushed by those guys? Those people are making tens of thousands of dollars per month off literally easily provable fake conspiracies and yet the debunkers are nowhere to be found. Can you find a subreddit dedicated to debunking Ian Carol? Can you find one dedicated to debunking Candace Owens or debunking the fake conspiracy theories being pushed by them? No. So the question then is, how come I'm a better skeptic than they are? How come I'm a better skeptic than they are? That's the question that you should be asking yourself. Now, the last thing I want to say on this is right after this video, the the the video yesterday where I pretty much destroy all of Ian Carol's terrible, terrible arguments about I don't know. He doesn't even have an argument for who shot Charlie Kirk. He doesn't even know, right? He's already right back at it. Already right back at it the very next day. now pushing that there's a another shooter from a different direction. Guys, I've realized here I People may wonder, hey, are you going to go after him again? Honestly, at this point, I realize it's he's he knows it's a grift. He knows a grift. He knows exactly what he's doing. Like, it's just it's so unserious at this point, you know? He ran from me just like a a snake oil salesman runs from the cops, right? When they see the cops coming, oh [ __ ] time to run. And then they go right back to selling the snake oil the next day, right? Like as if it didn't even happen. I just realized like, okay guys, we're not going to be able to stop this. He's got a bunch of brainwashed skits that are in him. So the best that we can do is simply purge them from our ranks. And I've seen what happened is that this movement got a little too big. Much like the Groper movement got too big and all now all the low IQ anti-semmites have kind of taken over, right? Nick is dealing with the same [ __ ] that we're dealing with, which we got too many skits in here and it's bringing everybody down. So, I'm glad that we were able to purge them all because we're never going to get any form of credibility with anybody who's a normal person when you've got people out here who are, you know, have no logical critical thinking ability whatsoever. Um, and no, I'm not outside my wheelhouse. Not only am I not outside my wheelhouse, I'm more of an expert on your topics than you are. I Ashton Forbes is more of an expert on Charlie Kirk than you are. I'm more of an expert that on ballistics than you are. I'm more of an expert on science and technology than you are. I'm more of an expert on literally everything than you are. Take that to the bank. I'm more of an expert on politics than Ian Carol will ever be in his entire life. Got that? Let just let that sink in for a minute. And this is the reason why he ran away like a little [ __ ] Let's just be clear. He ran away like a little [ __ ] because he was scared. Now, I'm gonna educate you. For my followers, this is just a rehash, but for the people that are, you know, the brain dead skits, like honestly, we're not even at low IQ anymore. We're at straight up zero IQ. Let me basically like I didn't realize like how dumb you guys were for the people that are out there. Like, I didn't realize how stupid you guys were. So, I apologize for that. I apologize also for calling you woke right because you're not right-wingers at all. You're actually just woke left nut jobs. You're woke left debunker nut jobs. That's what you guys are. You guys are. And so that's I'm so sorry guys that I called you woke right. I should have been calling you woke left redditors the whole time. My bad. My bad. There you go. Um, so let me go ahead and teach you just basic science. Okay, the word science basically means the scientific method. I don't you've probably never heard of that. I'm I'm sure you failed school, failed basic uh probably failed basic physics class and really any science class. So, let me just go ahead and show you guys real quick um the scientific method. Okay, so here this isn't even a good Let's do some better images here. How do I make this bigger, chat? How do I make this bigger, chat? All I want is the image. Okay, here it is, chat. The scientific method. Yeah, we might have to use crayons actually. Uh oh, hold on. Why is this not pulled up the wrong one to help these guys out? Look, I I have a little image here so that you can understand it because I know you guys are uh so, you know, not very intelligent. So the first thing you do is you observe something. You guys got that part right. Observe something. And then you ask the question. Okay? Asking a question. Research the topic. You did great up until that point. And this is when you went off the rails because what you did and what you continue to do is you start with your conclusion and you work backwards. The part where it says form a hypothesis here, this is the part where you failed. The hypothesis part is where you fell apart, where you went completely off the rails. And this is what you didn't understand about science. You form a hypothesis, you conduct an experiment, you analyze the results, and then you accept or reject the hypothesis. So what does this practically mean? This means you come up with a story. This is the part that when you want to tell when somebody's a grifter, right? How do you distinguish? You use the scientific method. What is the story that you're telling? So, what is your hypothesis? What is your story? Oh, the shooter wasn't on the roof. Maybe they were over here. Well, what is the facts and evidence that back that up? You say, "Oh, the guy that's in in custody is not the shooter." Okay, that's a hypothesis. who is how do you figure out who the right person is? So, the reason why you failed so miserably and it's pretty sad that you're you're still going with this when it's already dead and over honestly like the whole Charlie Kirk schizo Israel [ __ ] like it's dead in the water but you you do you if it makes you feel better that's is where you messed up. What you should have done is you should have come up with a hypothesis for what actually happened. And the reason why you didn't do that uh isn't just that you're brain dead, but it's because if you did that, your hypothesis would get falsified. You're you're not willing to put yourself up to the same level of scrutiny that you hold other analysis. If you presented your own hypothesis, then it would get torn to shreds. And that's the reason why Ian Carol will never tell you what he thinks happened. Because if Ian Carol were to say what he thinks happened, then everybody would absolutely shred that. It's much easier to not have a hypothesis and just say that you're just asking questions and pretend like you're trying to solve something. Now, if you go back to my early live streams where most of you are not here yet, I did this with MH370. With MH370, you'll find on many podcasts people ask me, "What was your methodology for figuring out what happened with the plane?" And I would say I took it like an investigation. I said come up with a story that makes sense. Take all the evidence, pull the evidence in, come up with a story and then eliminate the story or you know falsify the story if the evidence doesn't fit with the story until you reach a story which is supported by the evidence that's out there. This is quite literally the exact opposite of what the skits are doing with the the Charlie Kirk situation. The exact opposite. So what you're doing is not based on science, not based on logic, not based on reason. Uh it's based on emotion. It's based on distrust of the government and you'll never reach the right conclusion. And the last thing I want to say is if you're type of person that you believe, oh, if the government says it, it must be a lie. That's the type of view where you basically say everything is a lie that's out there. You're gonna be a very, very sad person in life if you choose to live your life that way. So, that's it, guys. Okay. Yeah, it's a never- ending asking questions situation, guys. I think I'm going to change the uh I'm going to make an exception here do these super chats right right now, but from now on probably the super chats will be at the end of the live streams. Okay, the peeds. I don't know what those mean, but thank you very much, War Ranch LLC for that donation. Pippy, hello Ashton. Wow, huge donation. I don't know how much that is in uh American dollars, but thank you. Uh, talk about Loheed Martin baited us on the Skunkworks advertisement. Yeah. Um, they did totally bait us, by the way, guys. They put out that advertisement. It was clearly plasma in their advertisement and then the next day is like some new drone kind of situation. They're like, why not like show an image of the drone instead of like some weird thing about plasma. Now let me tell you on the flip side though Loheed Martin ha and the defense contracts in general have been incorporating like electromagnetic electrogravidic science into their their designs they've been doing that and they've been doing that for a long time probably at least since the F-17 Nighthawk B2 bomber etc. They use electricitics to help produce lift. They use the plasma as a plasma sheath which reduces drag. These are all concepts that are directly connected to zero point energy. So, I hope that answers your question, Pippy. Uh, it's not really worth taking a look at the video clip. It's super short. Anyway, Sam Fisher, sorry, dumb question. No dumb questions, but when the orbs are displacing, decoupling the plane from spaceime, why doesn't every atom of the plane start disintegrating, dematerializing? Because that's not what's happening. You're making a bubble. You're making a bubble. When you make a bubble, you don't dematerialize the stuff inside the bubble. You displace your object. You displace it from spaceime. In fact, I mean, there is actually a real possibility that what we're looking at is what we think of as an annihilation event. Just because the plane's zapping out here doesn't necessarily mean it's appearing over here in one piece. When we look at ER equals EPR, one of the hypotheses that Suskind and others have proposed is that a black hole is basically spitting out the material just randomly or you know in some direction like that. So if we don't have this wormhole technology perfected, it is possible that the plane disappears on one side and when it comes out on the other, you know, nothing good basically. Okay, now let's get to it guys. All right, we got a lot to get through here. This is going to be a long uh interview. I'm going to play this at 1.25 speed. So, here is the Eric W. Davis. You guys can find the direct link in the description if you want it. For the record, if you do not know, that is Dave Rossi. I've interviewed Dave Rossi several times. He's one of my good friends. Um, and Eric W. Davis is basically somebody that nobody can get an interview with. There is a somewhat infamous interview with him now where he was eating a salad at lunch and he seems to have gotten ambushed by Jesse Michael's crew and they interviewed him and it was it was okay. Um, but Eric, you know, so people are wondering, a lot of people are wondering, you know, what's going on here? You know, you know, this guy. Uh, what I'll say is like when we watch this, people are going to go, "This is like really on the nose for what we've been talking about. Truthfully, I believe that this is somewhat planned disclosure. This is a way for them to get this information out in the public avenue. They know I have a huge following. They know I'm going to promote the hell out of this stuff. They know the UFO community will as well." So, some of these types of conversations are definitely a controlled mechanism to disperse this information. That's all I'm basically going to say about it. Okay, here we go guys, right off the bat. This question comes from David Chester. Um, he says that I know Eric has mentioned the work of Ford and Sper in regards to negative energy and he also likes Sakarov's view on gravity as an emergent phenomena from quantum fields. Um Ford and Spain show that in certain cases there can be negative energy densities found in certain areas. However, in Eric's view, even if we could pull this off technologically, does this actually give a realization of something like an alubar drive with negative energy density? Um I'll start there before I go to the next questions from uh >> Whoa, we're starting off strong right away. He says that's from David Chester who's a physicist and he's saying uh Eric Davis like Sakurov's view. Oh yeah, Sakurov's view basically that the zero point energy is the fabric of spaceime and he's saying does this open the door to negative energy therefore warp drives and wormholes. If you've been following me you know the answer is yes Mr. Chester. >> Okay. Well the direct short of it is yes. The answer to this question is yes. And the same would also be true for traversible wormholes and any kind of an anti-gravity implementation because anti-gravity uh is described by general relativity theory as predicted by >> well chat we're one minute in and we've already got our first yeti. Uh yes, there you go. It does open the door to negative energy. It opens the door to wormholes and warp drives humanly traversible wormholes. There you go right off the bat. >> General relativity theory. So um so the long of it is is that for those of you who have not are not familiar with the Ford Spader papers in the physical review D peerreview journals that are published by the American Physical Society they were two outstanding papers. One a geometrical optics analysis and the other one a a quantum field theory analysis of that geometrical optics uh a parabolic cylindrical mirror. Now what is that? Well, just think of a parabola, a mirror that's like a parabola, but stretch it out along the axis of the parabola. And what you have is a long parabola. And you see these in solar thermal power uh generators. And so what they do is they have these parabolic cylindrical mirrors in rows and rows and rows out on uh flat empty land. And at the focal line of that mirror instead, a parabola would have a focal point, but a a cylindrical version of a parabola called the parabolic cylindrical mirror uh would have a focal line. So along that focal line, you'll have a pipe, a thin pipe, and inside that pipe is some sort of a high heat conducting fluid. So the so the uh sun's light will be reflected off the mirror and onto the focal line to heat up that liquid. And that hot liquid would then be pumped out one or the other end of the mirror and uh it would turn it probably would be heat hot enough to create steam and so turn a steam generator to to uh produce electricity. That's how I recall it working. Um, from back in the 70s when I first studied about >> a parabolic cylindrical mirror. Okay, right here. I'm already getting freaked out. I'm already getting freaked out. And the reason why I'm getting freaked out is that, let me show you something else that I have up here. I'm thinking about nukes. I'm thinking about nukes right away because when I was reading uh Friedwart Winterberg's textbook about thermonuclear weapons, it's all about focusing your X-rays onto a single point. If you're not sure what we're talking about, we're talking about parabolic mirror. We're talking about reflecting the light, okay? And we're talking about just like this. [Music] We're talking about just like this. You're watching the light beam. Can this go faster? What is this? You're watching the light beam bend around. And because of its shape, it always bounces back towards the middle, right? It keeps bouncing back towards the middle because it's parabolic like this. What Eric W. Dave is saying is if you turn this into like a tube, if you turn this into a tube, it'll basically make a line, it'll produce a line. If you make a tube, a parabolic tube, and you shoot the light through it, it's going to produce a line. And this is very similar. If you go look at the shapes of the thermonuclear devices for thermonuclear detonations in terms of how they were getting fish reactions to trigger your fusion reaction, you put the fusion material right in the center there. You put the fusion material right in the center and then you focus the energy onto that point. So what Eric W. Davis is saying in this interview speaks directly to thermonuclear weapons. I don't think he's talking about in that context but it speaks to it >> that in advance high school uh physics. So So that's what this is. This is a parabolic cylindrical mirror. There's but on the focal line you don't have a pipe of anything. Instead, it's just space, the empty space. And Ford and Seder showed that, which is what we all know in quantum field theory already, a mirror will reflect quantum vacuum fluctuations. That's the quantum noise of all of the quantum fields that produce. >> The mirror will reflect the quantum vacuum fluctuations. Also, I had not heard that before. So, he's saying here it's not just light. So not just if you shoot a light beam in there, but the actual zero point energy will also have this effect happen to it. So we can potentially manipulate the zero point energy, not just with the casmir effect. The kasmir effect, we take our plates, right, and we squeeze these plates together. And this is our boundary conditions. He's saying, don't worry about the plates. Make a tube. Make a parabolic mirror like this. And then you'll get these jets shooting out either way. chat. I'm starting to get freaked out. I'm starting to get freaked out. Hold up. Wait for it. Wait. Kind of looks like this. I feel like where there's jets shooting out of either end. Doesn't that look like something we've seen before or sound like something we've seen before? In fact, haven't I said it feels like there might be a tube inside of these things? What if these What if this concept he's talking about is exactly what we're seeing with these orbs? What if this is why there's dark lines in front and behind? It's at a very minimum, it's analogous to what we're seeing there. Could be even more than that. all of the elementary particles that we're made out of including the interaction forces of which they uh exchange when they collide with each other or glance with each other or merge or bounce off each other. So um so we have elementary particles and we have their interaction forces which are described as quantum fields and those quantum fields when you shut off all temperature all heat all energy in a region of the vacuum those fields classically should be zero because if you turn off all the energy input there should be nothing there there should be no field right >> the field should be quiescent but that's not true the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics dictates that nothing is zero at absolute zero right >> uh so you'll have fluctuations of the important observable quantities in each of those fields. And that gives rise to what we call zero point fluctuation. Zero point refers to zero energy. State of zero energy or ground state energy. The bottom minimum energy of some sort of a system whether it be the ground state electron uh orbiting an atom in an orbital shell. Um or it's the zero temperature vacuum state, zero photon or zero particle vacuum state where there's nothing there. And the quantity that describes that state is not zero. That's a wave function. That's a probability function. what what uh what we would classically describe as zero would be >> so right there he's referencing zero point energy guys if you're not familiar he's referencing zero point energy right here he's saying well classically we would say okay this stuff's all cancelceing out there's going to be nothing there but he says Heisenberg uncertainty principle says that there is something there and this speaks directly to the pendulum that never stops swinging and the quantum level the pendulum never stops swinging so even if we create a system where classically everything should cancel out that's not what's going to happen in real life I'm gonna fast forward this just a little bit because he rants for a few minutes here. He rants for a few minutes, but let's but then he kind of gets back into it. Here we go. >> Nonzero for quantum vacuum fluctuations. And and how many modes are there? Infinite. There's an infinite number of modes. They run from zero to infinity. So these fluctuating modes and all the quantum fields uh bounce off the mirror and they're going to be reflected onto the focal line. And that means that focal line is going to collect energy. Now the analysis these guys did was on quantum electronamics. So they're looking at the quantized electromagnetic field. >> He's saying if you create this parabolic mirror, it's going to start focusing energy. It's going to start focusing energy. So we've now created a situation. We got our tube, right? We've got our tube. It's focusing energy up clawing a line along a line. And now you're going to have this energy being focused on this line potentially shooting out either side >> field. And that's light. So this is what we can engineer with mirrors is light and we have instrumentation that can measure light particles and quantum vacuum fluctuations in that term uh in terms of that. So this is what you're what you're reflecting from the mirror onto the focal line is quantum vacuum energy. Now there are angle prescriptions. In other words, how open or angularly wide the parabola is or how narrow down and small that angle of of extension and I don't remember the name of that from geometry. G I know parabas and hyper hyp hyperolas very well but I don't remember the name of the angle. I'll call it the aspect angle. It's just the angle you got that point uh at the center of the parabola. Um it forms an axial line and so you'll measure the angle from that line to the surface of the parabola. So I'll call that an aspect angle. It's probably not the correct technical term. So you're going to have a dependence based on the mathematics of what angles you can use what well what angles you will measure what type of vacuum energy. So if the angle falls within a certain range of degrees um like the angle is greater than or equal a minimum number of degrees or it's less than or equal to a minimum number of degrees or it's less than uh there's a number of degrees less than the angle which is less than a number of maximum degrees. It could be an inequality like that. Then then you're one of those is going to dictate that the energy density along the focal line is positive. Another range of those angles means that you'll have alternating positive and negative vacuum energy there. And then a third range of angles uh in the mathematics shows that you'll have manifestally negative energy density along that man along that focal line. And you ask well where's all the positive energy going to be in the fluctuations? Well, they're going to be in the space away from the focal line. So this is perfect. This is exactly what you want. You want a concentrated line uh of finite thickness of negative vacuum energy. That's what this energy is. It's vacuum. It's in the vacuum state. >> What it sounds like to me he's saying here is that if you do this, if you create this parabolic mirror configuration, this cylindrical parabolic mirror that along the focal line, let me make this wider. along the focal line you will get negative energy density depending on how the angle that you set up of this configuration and around it you'll have positive energy so what he's saying here is that you're going to have positive energy around the focal line and a negative energy of the focal line itself that's how I interpret it >> of the quantum field that's why we call it a negative vacuum energy density because its energy density is not zero and it's not positive it's negative and uh uh the theorems of differential metric geometry dictate that wherever you have negative vacuum energy or any kind of negative energy even a negative pressure negative stress negative tension negative momentum of mass flow or energy flow or flux uh you will have you will have a gravitationally repulsive space the space-time curvature will create a gravitational repulsive effect uh in other words you should have a um you should have a wormhole or a warp drive now that answers a good chunk of >> oh yeah hell yes baby are Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? Wherever you have a negative energy pressure, negative energy density, you should have a warp drive or a wormhole. Let's go. It turn that right there is saying that if you produce negative energy, you are producing a warp drive. And he's directly connecting a warp drive to a wormhole. What have I told you guys? There's three levels. impulse drive. Star Trek impulse drive. We just want to go really slowly. That's our EM drive, right? We're creating a little bit of negative energy and it pushes us forward. You increase the amount of negative energy. Now you got a warp drive. You're riding the wave, baby. Riding the wave. If you turn it all the way up, turn that [ __ ] up to 11. Turn it up to 11. Boom. Teleportation wormhole. You've ripped right through spaceime. >> That question. Yes, if oh sorry >> just one last step here and then we'll finish the question. Um uh then the next step is well how do we know how to shape it? Will Einstein's general theory of relativity his field equation tell you the properties of that that that negative energy density must have? We know it has to be a vacuum energy. It doesn't tell you it's a vacuum energy. We just know that it's going to have negative energy density andor negative pressure. Uh and so it just tells you how that energy is distributed in space. And the problem is that's wonderful but it doesn't tell you how to build it. Right? So that's why we're looking at this mirror as a technique. There are other techniques for building it. But the other techniques we already h exist that we have existing in the laboratory now like the casmir effect uh is confines the negative vacuum energy between two parallel plates that are a micron or less apart. You can't use it. That's confined. That's a confined negative energy vacuum in between those two parallel plates. So that's worthless and it's too feeble. In order to increase the energy density, you've got to you've got to get those vacuum uh those um cavity plates uh as small as a fraction of the Compton wavelength of an electron, which like 10 of the negative 35 meters. We can't engineer that. My god. And the casmir effect goes away below uh 10 nanometers. It's no longer a casmir effect. So, it's no longer a casmir vacuum. Uh then squeeze states of light, that's a specially prepared laser beam where you can shift the vacuum's EPF noise in one part of the laser's property to another part. and you're only interested in the part that squeezed down to where it has negative. >> Okay, so this part right here, I have to I have to be honest here. I'm starting to wonder. It's not He's not saying it doesn't work. What Eric W. Davis is saying is that the Casemir effect is of course real. I mean, there's no question if it's real. What he's saying is it's too weak. You can't use the Casemir effect to produce a warp drive. He's probably right, actually. Now, the more I think about it, he's saying that we have to find a way to amplify the negative energy. So, we're not going to do that by having two plates come together. The effect is too weak. But it's not too weak for what Sunonny White is doing. This is why Sunny White with Joe Rogan, what did he say? They're looking to power low energy requirement devices. Your free energy microchip is not going to create a wormhole, but your free energy microchip can power a device that doesn't require that much energy. That's why it's a different mechanism. It's it's something we're looking at it for a different purpose. Different purpose. But he also talks about squeeze states of light. Read those durs, guys. If you have not read your Defense Intelligence reference document, get on it. Wormholes, warp drives. He talks about how to produce them. And one of them he says is squeeze states of light. Basically what you can do then okay if we need a big amount of energy then let's use a laser. A laser is how you amplify energy. Okay. Well then what's the next step? Split off the negative energy portion of the laser from the positive energy portion of the laser. Much like what he talked about with his cylindrical parabolic mirror. If we can split that off and we can increase the energy of our laser. Now we have a negative energy laser. That's potentially how we can create our warp drive. It's probably what they're doing with the orbs >> energy density. But the adjacent uh it'll be pulsed and the adjacent interweaving pulses in between the negative pulses will be humongous positive energy density pulses of vacuum. So we don't know how I I have proposals I published in papers and a chapter one of my chapters in my uh frontiers of propulsion science um uh book from the AIAA press uh where I've looked at these concepts like that. But still the energy density the negative energy density is too feeble. But for a Ford fader mirror it might be possible to scale that up. You might be able to intersect multiple focal lines from multiple mirrors um that are in in an arrangement. And so that could amplify the blob of intersecting uh focal lines and make >> and there he's talking about okay now we can combine our lasers combine our lasers together. If we get one negative energy laser it might still be too weak but if we can combine them together now you might be able to create a much more powerful one. Hm. Sounds a lot like a dense plasma focus to me, chat. In fact, that was exactly what George Miley was working on. George Miley was working on how do we get our lasers to all come together? And he said the problem was you got one laser moving at this speed. It's almost like you're trying to hitch a ride on a moving train. How do you get it to do that? And he said he found out a way to do it. My guess is they figured it out from geometry, but I'm guessing guessing helical formation. Basically, get your lasers to just start all spinning around and and sync up, but we'll see. >> Create a large amount of negative energy. And you've got to have a huge amount of negative energy, something like uh the order of 10 the 44 uh jewels per cubic meter >> at a second. >> So, it's huge just to produce a one meter measurable curvature of space-time, >> right? >> So, that ends my answer to that question. >> Perfect. Thank you. And if I may jump in very quickly to add to this, and please correct me if I'm wrong here, but I I do believe that in theory, in principle, um for some type of gravitational repulsion effect, I believe I read this from one of uh your papers in the past. Um you don't I guess in theory need um negative vacuum energy, you just need negative pressure. Uh you can >> Yeah, negative pressure. But uh the only we don't have um I haven't seen quantum field. You have to go this is a topic of quantum field theory, but this is heavy duty math and heavy duty pedagogical physics, right? So um in quantum field theory, I'm not familiar with any quantum matter fields or quantum force propagating fields that have negative pressure. They you could you in a in a certain prepared quantum state um you can get negative vacuum. You can get negative energy density out of it, but you can't get negative pressure. But we have a natural form of a cosmological energy density that has positive that's positive. It's a it's a cosmological energy which has a positive energy density which we measured and it has the property that it's pressure. The pressure in the field happens to be negative. >> Right? >> So, so this is interesting. >> We've spoken about this a lot. He's basically saying that gravity is a pressure force. Gravity is a pressure force. So, a negative pressure is fundamentally equivalent to negative gravity. Quite simple. pressure gravity anti- pressure opposite pressure negative pressure neg negative gravity >> because Einstein's general theory of relativity says that if we reduce his field equations down to the classical old posson version of Newtonian gravity you'll have the general relativistic version now that that's the corrected version because remember Newton's theory of gravity it turned out to be wrong it it turns out to be useful for low energy low speed non-relativistic regimes like orbital mechanics of satellites spacecraft and planets and gy and whatnot. But uh there's there's uh precision errors in involved because the theory is incorrect and the to overcome the precision errors uh and and incorrect predictions of what you want to measure which is greater than the precision errors. These are significant uh predictional problems like the uh parahhalian shift in Mercury's orbit around the sun was a big issue that uh led to >> basically this right here is Eric Davis saying cosmology is fake and gay. Basically, cosmology is fake and gay. And we look observationally out there and it doesn't line up. Doesn't line up with our theories. It's close, but if you actually go down to the precision level, it doesn't work anymore. This is what I've been saying is that we can't even understand why our solar system is stable. Why did we not get why did Earth not get sucked out of our solar system due to due to Jupiter, this huge planet that's outside of us? Why does that not rip us out? Slowly but surely, it should be nudging us further and further away. There's many other examples, but that's just one that I give that's a simple one to understand. And so Eric Davis is saying here that we are missing something. We are missing something. And Sakurov's view that space is not empty. The zero point energy will solve that solves it. The great first great success for confirming general relativity theory. So um so you got to use posson's version of general relativity and that says and I'm going to skip all the details but the equation is actually even more simple. It says you have the energy density plus three times the pressure whereas the original uh pos equation for Newtonian fluid or Newtonian mass is the pressure plus the uh energy energy density or mass density plus the pressure. But here in general relativity it says to take proper account of the effects of curve space time you're going to have energy density plus three times the pressure. So pressure exerts three creates three times more gravitational force than the energy or mass density alone of a of whatever mass or mass of system you're evaluating like a planet, a star, a galaxy of stars or a cluster of galaxies. So dark energy, >> this is our natural form of energy that exists cosmologically and uh I'm not going to get into the debate on whether it's a constant energy density versus whether it's dynamically changing in time. Uh there's >> he's about to now explain. I can already tell where he's going. I actually haven't watched most of this at this point. I've only seen from now on. I've only seen a few clips. But now he's saying, "Okay, dark energy." I mean, if you read between the lines here, he's saying, "Hey, turns out this dark energy that this is going to help if we if we think this dark energy is the zero point energy. Now, we're going to be able to solve those gaps that we just mentioned from the classical view of of physics. >> Been recent evidence that suggesting that it is dynamical. They've had this emerge on and off since uh Reese and Pearl Motor first discovered dark energy, measured it and and uh derived this equation of state from the empirical data and they got the Nobel Prize for that too just in the 2010s. So um so basically what that means is that you have positive energy density row and you've got to add uh three times a negative pressure because that's what they determine. It's got the the magnitude of positive energy density is equal to the magnitude of the negative pressure. So in magnitude they're the same number and that number is one nanojle per cubic meter. That's the unit. Yeah. One nanojle per cubic meter. So that's the positive energy density. And uh and so the absolute algebraic expression for that is negative 1 nanojle per cubic meter for the pressure. So the reason why the universe is accelerating outwards is because you got three times that pressure that negative pressure and that's a larger negative number than the positive energy density in the in dark energy. So you're going to get a net negative combined result. Uh like I think one unit of negative energy of negative pressure cancels the positive energy density that one plus one minus one equals zero. That's what it would be. Then you're left with -2 times the pressures left over. So -2 times the pressure is what you've got a net a net gravitational repulsion of to push space time out to create the inflationary big. So he's saying that the negative pressure is actually overwhelming the attractive force which causes the universe to expand there. I think I explained it very shortly there. >> Thanks Ariel. >> Wow. What do you if I may ask one more thing before we move on. What do you say about the debates out there uh that some people claim you know dark energy is the concept of dark energy is nonsense. What it really is are you know quantum vacuum? >> Hold on. Hold on. I'm sorry I got to sidetrack. What chat? What? What is Eric Davis wearing here? Somebody pointed this out and it's bugging me out. It looks like my man here is like strapped in or something. Like what what is going on with like there's some straps on this dude's shoulder? You see these straps like on his shoulders here? I swear if he's in some kind of bondage thing where he's explaining physics, I'm not going to be able to deal with it. You know what? I don't I'm never going to be able to unsee it now. Actually, I'm not going to be able to unsee it now. What is going on? Why are there straps on his shoulder? Why does it look like he's on an airplane like buckled up? Okay, let's we'll just try not to think about it. >> Fluctuation zero point uh vacuum. Yeah. >> Yeah, I know the answer. That's a really short answer. The equation of state row, which is energy density, and we're not going to use the mass density version because that's not how that's not you really don't measure you can't measure mass, you only measure energy. And you divide that result by uh speed of light squared to get the mass. Okay, so row is equal to negative P and um what did I want to say about that? Okay, ask your question again. >> Sorry, I had asked about um to some people out there that say that the concept of dark energy is nonsense and that what it really is is that there's vacuum fluctuations and zero point fields and so on. >> Yeah. And what I was getting at what I was going toward is equation state. So the equation of state uh Reese and Pearl motor measured is row equals negative P. Okay. So row is equal to negative P. positive energy density row and you got and it's equal to negative time negative pressure, right? Okay. All right. That's the equation of state. Well, guess what the equation of state for um a quantum vacuum is? It's row equals negative P. >> Okay. Okay. >> Boom. Okay. I don't know what all the math he just said, but he just said the exact same equation twice. He said, hey, the dark energy is negative row equal or row equals negative P. And he goes, you know what the vacuum modes are? Row equals negative P. H chat interesting very interesting so yeah I see what you're getting at so in other words you can say one yeah >> yeah so for any quantum field that has an equation of state it's always row equals negative p >> got you so in other words you could say that they're conceptually one and the same just different ways of looking >> exactly it's a vacuum energy yeah and right now we don't have any other hypothes >> conceptually the same it's just another way of looking at it hold up wait for it where is Boom. Gotcha, [ __ ] >> This is that uh is terribly persuasive otherwise. >> Right. Right. Um and speaking of which, one last thing before I move on to another uh question here. Um again, and please tell me if you've answered this, but uh uh David Chester would like to know, does Sakarov's work in particular provide any hints towards uh whether it's possible to actually get warp drives from vacuum fluctuations? >> No. No. His his work doesn't address that. his work is addressing what the fundamental uh cause of of space-time curvature is. Okay. >> So he his 1967 Soviet paper which was published in the English version of the Soviet journals in ' 68 I think it was which is Sakurov's uh theorem is basically that he wants to relate um the Einstein's general theory of relativity's space-time spacetime metric. The metric is just a single equation. It's a single line equation that um produ that provides a measurement rule, a measuring rule, a a ruler and curved spacetime. And what it does, it describes the curved space-time geometry of some spaceime that you're in. Got it? >> Okay. Okay. And that spacetime could be the spacetime that uh the earth produces the sun. That's called Schwarz spacetimes or black holes or uh negative energy, negative pressure or both. Uh and things like that. Sakurov, I'm gonna skip ahead a couple minutes here to go because, you know, Eric Dave is very long-winded, but he's basically saying that, you know, Sakurov was the one that's saying spaceime is this medium of energy. And if so, now this opens the door to negative energy as we described. This opens the door to us manipulating and be able to produce these wormholes. So this is the logical extension of general relativity from Einstein who he himself believed that wormholes uh that space was a a malleable you know solid or a flexible solid. This is the extension of how does this how do we quantify this? How do we unify this with uh quantum mechanics Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. So, Sakurov opened the door to this. And ironically enough, my favorite, one of my favorite clips is when I say this to Candace Owens, like literally said this exact thing to Candace Owens when I did her interview. I said, "Sakura was the one in 1967 who opened the door to this physics." Now, I'm not saying that I came up with that. I literally just stole it from these guys. But there you go. They're saying it themselves now. Okay, let's skip ahead a minute. >> Straight up geometry. I'm saying this this is this is me pretending to be Sakurov here in the third person. I'm saying that that's geometrical. We all know that physical spaceime is not geometry. Astronauts when they fly up in Earth orbit or they fly out to the moon, they're not moving through lines, points, curves, and manifolds and uh and and mappings of functions. They're moving through a physical space time. And we've already established from quantum theory uh field theory that physical space time is filled with vac quantum vacuum fluctuations. Right? >> If you get rid of all the matter, remember what I said, that thing is zero. You may be in a The only thing that's zero is you're in a zero particle, zero photon, zero W bzon, z bzon, zero graviton, zero well gravitons, that's a quantized gravity. Forget that for now. But a zero um uh um gluon state and zero particle states, you still have vacuum fluctuation per the >> what he's saying right here, this is this is so wild. He's basically saying right there that even if you remove everything, you still have the zero point energy. So imagine removing all the light, make this this whole screen dark and removing all the heat. You would say, "Oh, there's nothing left." But I could still move through that, right? I could still walk through it. There is still something there. The zero point energy is there. So what does that mean? If you were to remove the zero point energy, then what? Well, now you've changed spacetime because that 0 point energy is the physical manifestation of distance. It's the physical manifestation of of of time itself. Why does why does there why does it take time for me to go from here to here? Because the what's in between here even if I remove all the light and all the heat is zero point energy. This is why I'm a zero point energy influencer because zero point energy is the basis for everything. Heisenberg uncertainty principle and and so that should be the physical spaceime from which curved space-time geometry emerges. So think of hydrodnamics. Do you know that it wasn't until uh somebody in the 19th century derived the hydrodnamic equations and then in uh the mid like exactly 100 years ago this year quantum theory was born. When quantum theory was born, those guys that were looking at atoms and molecules as a fluid or in in terms of a fluid realized, oh my goodness, it is from quantum mechanics that fluid mechanics or hydrodnamics emerges. Because >> hydrodnamics, chat, does that sound familiar? Hydrodnamics, you treat the medium, the zero point energy as a fluid, as a super electromagnetic super fluid substance. Same thing that Salvatore Py said, exact same thing that Salvatore Py said is the binding between atoms and molec and and the atoms that form molecules and then those molecules bind to other molecules chemically. So th those things are all ultimately rooted in quantum mechanics of atoms and molecules. Well, out of that emerges the equations of hydrodnamics. >> Okay. So the same thing for gravity. So Sakurov saying, "Hey, we have a physical space time. It's basically quantum vacuum fluctuations in the vacuum state. So how do we get curved space time out of that?" Well, you just basically say that you're going to relate the metric elasticity of spacetime, which is the metric tensor. You're and you got to have a certain equation that expresses Sakurov's uh theorem and or it's a conjecture, I should say. It's really a conjecture. And you have to relate that to some equation to to another to the opposite side of the equal sign that says your quantum vacuum fluctuations are going to add up to in some particular way that produces space-time curvature. And that's just the fundamental aspect of what Sakaroth is trying to solve. And it doesn't apply to warp drives and wormholes because that's an application of Einstein's theory. That's just an application. It's not a >> I mean, holy [ __ ] chat. What he's saying here is that Sakurov set up the ability for us to explain what curvature of spaceime really means. We talk about curvature of spaceime, but what does that mean? I'm not It's not like I I feel like I'm going through a curve when I walk around or even if I go in outer space, I'm not going to feel like I'm going through a curve. He's saying that the zero point energy is what the representation of the of the curvature of spaceime. The zero point energy is that manifestation. So he's saying that Sakurov didn't figure out warp drives and wormholes, but he set the framework. He set the foundation for how we can do it. He said, "Hey, how can we actually warp bend spacetime?" Well, we don't we can't bend it until we understand what it is. Now that we understand what it is is zero point energy, then manipulating the zero point energy will effectively quote unquote bend spacetime. Bending spacetime is just a it's just words. It's just how we describe it. What is actually happening? This is why I think the MH370 videos are so significant because we watch this plane vanish. The the clouds don't even move. the plane is just gone. Seems impossible for the human mind to comprehend. But when you understand physics and you understand, oh, we're not actually like bending spacetime. We're manipulating the zero point energy. And the zero point energy is the representation of spacetime itself. And that may be somewhat sound somewhat circular but from a perspective of how to like build upon the foundations of the science is very important to understand what are we starting with and how do we build up to finally get to the point where we can say okay now we can produce something that can make a warp drive now we can produce something that can make a wormhole >> fundamental uh Sakurov's uh conjecture or Sakarov's model is not a uh application it's a fundamental aspect of where spacetime curvature really comes from. >> Gotcha. Gotcha. Well, thank you so much for that. Um, the next question is, um, and this may be, uh, uh, quite a bit to cover or maybe not. Um, do you think, does Dr. Davis think that the, uh, somewhere in the military-industrial complex, somebody or some group, whether military or private, is pursuing his wormhole teleportation physics? Uh, he said that Dr. Davis said that General Lanni held up uh, your paper as the type of research he wanted done in the Air Force Research Laboratory. So, in other words, do you think someone somewhere is pursuing your wormhole teleportation concepts? >> Uh, this is my question. He didn't say my name, which is very quite interesting. He said David Chester's name. He had no problem. He doesn't say that this question comes from Ashton Forbes. That's fine. Whatever. Okay, let's see what he's got to say. No, I happen to know for a fact nobody is um because just because you write a AFRL study or a DIA uh DID, a defense intelligence reference document that's published by the Defense Intelligence Agency, just because you publish those studies on those topics doesn't mean that immediately something's going to run out and then put out competitive bids and have get appropriations from Congress to pay to fund studies or fund theoretical developments to to build something and then fund a follow like a phase two um prototyping of a technology. and then a phase three deployment of the technology and possible commercialization. No, no, that isn't that isn't what follows. What follows is you've got the study done. It's in the record uh the defense department's record. It's up to people in the defense labs to >> Okay. Okay. Let me stop Eric W. Davis here. This he's his logic doesn't work right here. What he's saying here just doesn't even work at all. He's saying, okay, he gets asked, are they working? He goes, I know for a fact that nobody's working on it. First of all, there's no chance you can know for a fact that nobody's doing it. Like that's not a thing. That's a You can't prove a negative. You can't prove a negative, right? So, I'm already skeptical right off the bat when he's claiming an unknowable thing and he's claiming to know it as a fact. And then instead of actually arguing how he would know such a thing or why, he just says it doesn't work like that. The way that it works is that just because you write a paper doesn't mean people are automatically bu Yeah, nobody's saying that, dude. Now you're arguing against a straw man. So he immediately first claims that he knows nobody's working on it and then he creates a straw man argument and goes, "Well, the way it works is this." That's not what the question was, buddy. The question was, "Is somebody working?" And I know for a fact, 100% they were working on it because we're watching MH370 get zapped out of the sky. So I don't know what's up with Eric W. Davis. The dude is definitely 100% gatekeeping. I don't know if he's got an NDA that says he has to lie about certain topics, but there's no [ __ ] way that General Lanny in 2005 was holding up his teleportation physics study going, "This is the kind of research I want to do in my labs." And Eric W. Davis is going to say, "I know for a fact that nobody's doing that." Yes, we know that just because a scientific paper was written doesn't mean that somebody's automatically doing it, but it also doesn't mean that they're not doing it either. That was the point of the question. So, it's a really weird way that he's deflecting this question. >> Grab that report and if they got the competency to handle that type of research, then they need to go forward and they need to move up through their chain of command a proposal for or request for congressional appropriation to fund it. And unfortunately, when you work in the labs, you don't have freedom to do what you want. You have to do what the what what is required. What are the requirements of the war fighter of the combatant commanders? that comes down to the labs to dictate what they're going to have to do to solve the advanced technical problems. And they do basic physics as well because there are applications that go beyond the basic phys well I should really say they do advanced applied physics research to develop new technologies and techniques and capabilities that evolve into a technology that that war fighters and combat units and combat and commands need. And so, but unfortunately, >> this is pretty interesting here though what he's saying because he's saying that they do develop new technologies and new capabilities. So, this speaks directly to the idea that they would take his paper and start to figure out can we develop new technologies based on these concepts. They absolutely have figured this [ __ ] out. No question. If it's true that 0 is real, Sakura's real, they've been working on it secretly figuring out how to make new weapons out of it. And of course, they're not going to be honest about it. They have to protect that from our adversaries. That's the reason why this is being secret. It's all about military weaponization. Welcome to the real world, chat. It's all about military weaponization. Therefore, us peasants get nothing. >> There's no requirement for the for the Department of Defense to build wormholes and warp drives. >> Gotcha. Gotcha. Thank you for that. Um, >> of course there's no like What kind of argument is that? There's no requirement to build warp drives. Uh, duh. There's no requirement to build anything. There's no requirement to build anything. If that's your argument, then you would say we don't have any technology whatsoever. Military doesn't have anything. No requirement to build directed energy weapons, so we must not have those either. Yeah. But, um, they're sort of like pretty damn cool and pretty damn useful, so I absolutely guarantee. Now, maybe they don't have them in acknowledged programs, but definitely unagnowledged programs will have them. Next question is um does Dr. Davis believe the quote free energy microchips by uh the likes of Garrett Modell uh Paul Fabado and Sunonny White have any scientific merit? Um I >> I will say very quickly that I know Mr. Garrett Modell in the last 3 to four years has uh done some presentations uh claiming that there may be some uh they're claiming some type of out net output energy in the microwatt range of a casmir chip that they have just to give some context in case you weren't familiar. This was another one of my questions. I did listen to the answer of this and he's he gives another sus answer again, chat. This was another one of my questions. Here we go. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. So, are you talking about Paul Violet or is that >> Paul? No. Paul Fibado. I'm not sure. >> Oh, I don't know who that is. I've never heard of him. But I do know that. Um, >> so I need to point this out before he answers. Paul Tibido. I'm going to keep it brief. He was using graphine and basically he made a very thin graphine layer and it bounces up and down like this. When the when the thermal fluctuations go past this graphine layer, it causes it to bounce up and down much like a trampoline. Much like a trampoline. And he's able to produce a free energy battery off of this. A battery that never runs out. So, let's see what Eric W. Davis's responses to these questions. >> Um, you named another guy, >> Sunny White and Dur. >> No, Sunny White. Yeah, Sunonny White wasn't doing energy research and his work is wrong physics because I I've known him personally. I knew him personally uh for many, many years. uh my co-workers and I attech international incorporated and the Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin had reviewed his work when he presented it to us personally and he failed to be able to he failed to answer key technical uh key foundational questions that we asked about his developments probably. >> Okay, this this is this is peak Redditor right here. This is actually peak Redditor arguments. Like now I'm super sus of Eric W. Davis. He goes, "Sunny White doesn't know what he's talking about." Okay, the moment you say that, you're attacking him. You're attacking the person, not the argument. I'm already I'm super skeptical because Sunny White's whole basis is all based on the same 0 point energy Casemir effect stuff that's going on. Like, it's definitely not nonsense. And Eric Davis knows that it's not nonsense. So, instead of actually attacking the arguments, he's going right at Sunny White. He's saying SunSy White was not able to adequately describe how it works for us. What? You're like, "Oh, he wasn't smart enough. So, he wasn't smart enough. Therefore, we're just going to dismiss it." Well, does it work though? This is what I say. Like, this is the same [ __ ] that they've been doing for free energy devices for, you know, 50 years, whether it is Stanley Meyers water power car or if it is magnetic motors. Now, what they do is they'll say, "Well, the person that built it doesn't know how it works, therefore it's bullshit." That's not how the world works. Does the device actually do what they say? Who cares if they can describe how it works? The whole reason why they can't describe how it works is because they've been taught, we've been literally brainwashed into an incorrect view of the world. This is so crazy that this is his argument. It's a terrible argument by Eric W. Dav is here >> that we found to address the problems that we discovered in his mathematics and the problems that we discovered in the um in the principles that he was doing or the the theoretical um foundation that he laid for his concept and he was doing a quantum vacuum thruster not quantum energy extraction and there are all kinds >> okay well now I'm super sus about it now I just realized he's not even talking about the same thing white he goes he's not doing energy extraction yes he is did you not see like Okay, that right there was Eric W. Davis saying that Sunny White is not doing energy extraction. He's doing a thruster propulsion. So, obviously he's talking about the wrong thing right here, which is pretty weird. How can I prove that? Here's how I >> It's cool to think that, you know, >> maybe come up with a technology that >> Eric Davis, have you heard of this guy called um what's his name? Um Joe Rogan. Have you heard of Joe Rogan? This is Sunny White on Joe Rogan. Tell me again that he's not doing energy extraction. >> You know, provides useful power today for things like this. Um maybe, you know, as we if we if we put it in aggregate, if we put a lot of them together, right, we could get to a point where >> what is that chip? >> So, this is so this is just a 3D print of having a bunch of of those little chips that are 5 mm x 5 mm, 1 and a half volts, 25 micro amps. If we add a bunch of those together at a very large extreme, you know, that particular board might generate 3.4 watts. And so that board could recharge your phone in 3 hours. And so imagine a scenario where you had a had a phone that's pretty resilient that for the most parts you'd never have to plug it in. That might be pretty useful. Uh might be pretty useful. Yeah. I I'm just going to go ahead. He's definitely definitely definitely talking about energy extraction. He's talking about He's definitely not talking about propulsion. So, Eric Davis is already 0 for two here. He attacked the man personally instead of explaining why he was wrong. And then he clearly is referencing the wrong thing. Pretty weird, man. Pretty weird. Keep going. >> Problems because basically that goes back to what he got his PhD in physics in. He got it uh doing a a dissertation on >> I'm skipping past this because dude now he's saying like then he just starts literally attacking his education. It's like oh he didn't get his PhD in the right thing. What the what are you talking about dude? >> And um and some of those courses a few of them were in general relativity and and uh quantum field theory that I went instead of one or two semesters. >> And now he's talking about courses that the dude took. This has nothing to do with the topic anymore. Oh, he didn't take the right courses. And what the the [ __ ] I just It's like so crazy how this guy gaslights and comes up with these [ __ ] excuses. >> So, you get until you take a graduate quantum uh quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. So, Garrett with Bernie High. >> Okay, so this is actually good. Now it gets good. Get ready. Okay, so basically he doesn't know Paul Tibido. He totally messes up and botches the question related to Sunny White. And now Garrett Mell because we've got three free energy microchips going on here, guys. And yeah, I will go ahead and guarantee you that Eric W. Davis has got at least two boosters, chat. At least two boosters. I guarantee you too, if you talk about Donald Trump with this guy, he's going to go t full TDS. full TDS chat >> because the stuff that Garrett had been working on prior to that is all the stuff that Hal Putoff had invented but did not patent. Um and uh and so Garrett with Bernie Hisha at Loheed Martin uh in um Advanced Technology Center in in Sunnyville, California uh took Hal's ideas including adding their own and patented it. Um, and those are great ideas. And >> holy [ __ ] Boom. Are you kidding me? Did you guys hear what he just said? He just said, "Oh, I just my my thing is too loud." He just said that it was Garrett Modell and Bernard H with their free energy microchip. They took Hal Pudof's patent. They took Hal Pudof's idea and they stole it and they patented it. I had no idea that that free energy microchip came directly from Hal Kudolf. Well, that explains a lot. That explains he's straight up snitching out here, chat. He's snitching on people. Eric Davis, EWD, bro. Snitches get snitches. Snitches get snitches, bro. I don't think uh Garrett Modell is gonna appreciate you uh outing him like that. No wonder Bernard Hay and Ruda and Hal Pudaf were all writing these scientific papers together. They were all working together. They're all just they all came up these ideas collectively or however you want to call it, making money off each other, making patents off each other. This is nuts. Okay, now I'm about a million times more interested in Garrett Mell's uh microchip. No wonder Garrett Modell was so sus to me. No wonder he's so sus. I got to send him another email later tonight. Like, hey, bro. Uh, hey, Professor Modell. Um, you kind of forgot to tell me that you stole Hal Pudaf's idea in those emails that we had back and forth. It's pretty sus that you like literally never brought that up when I was asking about how your free energy microchip is going. H interesting, guys. >> Um, so I'm just not familiar. Basically, you really you can't use the casmir cavity to generate uh any net energy in a in a in a closed thermodynamic engine cycle because the amount of energy you're going to need to pry those plates apart is going to equal or exceed the amount of energy. >> Just stop, Eric. Just stop. Ewd. I'm not gonna be gaslit by this [ __ ] He's literally giving me the zero IQ debunker physicist answer right here. There's no way that you can get N net energy because in a closed system a stop stop. It's not a closed system. There's no closed systems. And he goes if the Casemir effect if if you bring the plates together you can extract energy because literally his mentor Robert Ford the mentor of Eric W. Davis is the guy that wrote that paper in 1984. 1984, the person that showed that the Casmir effect can produce energy was Eric W. Davis's mentor. His mentor is the one that did that. And now he's trying to gaslight and try to say, "Uh, but you'd have to pull the plates apart if you uh" Nobody's doing that. That's not what Garrett Mell is doing. We've reviewed his his uh he has a presentation on YouTube. You guys can find it. Unlocking zero point energy. That's not what's happening. Garrett Mell is basically creating a cavity and then like it's basically works kind of like a trampoline. You go over here, you bounce on the trampoline, you pull out a little bit of energy from the electron orbital and then you move it over here and it regains that energy from the zero point energy. That's what Garrett Mella is doing. And in an open system, you definitely can produce over unity in an open system >> that you get when the plates are collapsed under the attractive force of the vacuum that the vacuum exerts on those two plates. So we did the analysis on it. There's no there's no principle that says you can't extract energy from the vacuum. But the Kazmir setup is a conservative energy system. That means what you put into it is what you get out of it. And that means what you get out of it, you're going to have to put back into it to reset the system to its initial configuration. This, if I may ask, this is also why from the perspective of propulsion, the negative energy or the negative vacuum pressure generated between the plates is is so negligible compared to what you would need. >> That's right. It's like it's a it's tiny. I I don't remember the number off the top of my head, but the the maximum plate separation that you can get and measure kasmir force is a micron. If you want to measure it a stronger casemir force than that, you got to shrink the plate. You got to uh push the plates further together. So, the distance between the plates shrinks, I should say. It shrinks even smaller. And then like I said you got a minimum of 10 nanometers uh below which you no longer have a casmir effect. >> That's interesting. Below 10 nanometers the kasmir effect or the kasmir force uh >> it's a electronamic effect involving the um the uh electromagnetic properties of the plates. >> Gotcha. So below 10 nanometers that the the effects aren't there. >> No they're not there. Instead what you get is the one over six power Vanderval's force. >> Gotcha. And that the for those that may be wondering as they're listening in real time the could you explain the difference between the Vanderwal's force and the the Casmir force once you go >> Vanderwalls is a molecular force. We've known they've known about it for decades and they measured it but the difference is the Casmir force is one over the fourth power of the distance between the plates. The Vanderwal's force is one over the sixth power of the distance between the plates. And >> so what here he's saying is that this is interesting. He's saying that something happens. He's saying that you have this Casmir effect, but when you get too close, the Vander Walls force begins to take over. The Vander Walls force begins to take over instead, and it works differently now. This is kind of interesting. I didn't really really think about this. >> There's no vacuum energy density in a Vanderval like there is in a Casmir cavity. >> Gotcha. Okay. Thank you. Yeah. So in other words, just to wrap this up in terms of the Kasmir question, when it comes to energy production and or even for propulsion use, the major issue is getting that that minute amount of energy to scale up essentially. And >> you can't Yeah, you can't because if because um let's let's put it this way. If you're down at the 10 nanometer letter level, you are seeing the surface of atoms, the surface of the outer electron orbital shells of atoms. Now the electronamics of that material is drastically changed. It's no longer the electronamics of conducting or insulating walls on or plates that form the cavity. Now it's like this very complicated array of atoms that are bound together electro electronically through uh atomic interatomic forces that you're now dealing with. And so the fluctuation modes of the vacuum don't see >> uh that those plates now become transparent literally at that distance. The plates are so transparent you don't have any more fluctuation modes left over that they can't be trapped. there the shorter the shorter wavelength fluctuation modes just fly out of there. >> That's kind of I mean if I if you could see that through a microscope that would kind of be probably cool to witness occur. But >> yeah, but we don't have that type of technology. >> So that's Yeah, the way every time Eric Davis says we don't have that technology. I never I literally just never every time Eric Davis says we don't have that, I just immediately assume that we do. I immediately assume that we do. Uh and we can use like these gravitational waves can produce microscopes that could see things at super super tiny scales. what what Dave is saying there and what what RW Davis is saying there is that when you get to such a small scale these super super tiny scales now you're essentially between like if I take my my atom here and I rip my electron off of it our plasma he's saying now the scales are getting so small that you're able to like slip between the electron and the and the atom the pos the um ion if you can slip between them now the electronamics breaks down when you get to a such a small level. Now our understanding of electromag is going to break down entirely because now it's too complex. It's not as simple as like oh I've got one thing over here and I got one thing over here. Now we've got this fuzzy cloud of positive and negative charge and it gets very complicated. That's what he's saying here. >> So what's our next question? >> Sure. Next question actually is a is an interesting one and I decided to include it simply because this has been a recent revelation which is that uh this comes from this question comes from online JK Philly who asks uh Dr. Davis um Evenny Podenoff recently spoke on Tim Ventur's podcast exper claiming that using a toroidal solenoid setup uh with a 10 to 11x harmonic frequency ratio in the terraertz range created rotating magnetic fields. Uh doc Dr. Mr. Dr. Potenoff claims this generates uh torsion fields and a gravitational well that lifts his device for 15 to 20 seconds. With your expert expertise in warp drive metrics, Dr. Davis, could this harmonic ratio be key to including localized space-time perturbations strong enough for scaled up gravity modification? >> Uh PLA is well known for speaking technto bababel. It's just pseudocience. There's no real physics there. He's just he's just making it up as he goes. And I to that point I don't believe he demonstrated any of his claims on >> he hasn't successfully yet. As a matter of fact uh the uh the research team and the research leader >> [ __ ] bro he's going harder on uh Eugene Planov than I went on Ian Carol last night. Oh chill out Eric W. Davis, chill out, homie. >> Ship of PhDs at General Motors Advanced Technology Center went and visited Podkenov when he after he got his first paper published in Physic C in the Physic Journal is what I'm referring to. And um they went to his laboratory, interviewed him, interviewed his co-workers and looked at the apparatus and found out that a he's not a physicist, he's not a material scientist, he's just a lab technician. So he's he has no real strong theoretical founding in physics. Not at least not even >> Dude, I hate I hate these people. I I dude I can't stand Eric W. Davis. He's a smart guy, but he's such a dick for no reason. The difference between Eric Davis and me, when I'm a dick, it's for good reason. It's for really good reason. When Eric Davis is a dick for no reason whatsoever. He's like, he's a lab technician. He doesn't He doesn't have the right scientific background. He Therefore, he can't possibly know or do anything. Well, Einstein was a patent clerk. Albert Einstein was a patent clerk. Does that mean that he didn't know anything either? I mean, what are these stupid arguments he keeps making? I mean, I don't I never heard that he had a bachelor's degree in physics, but even a bachelor's degree in physics, you're taking it's just a survey over what you can learn at the undergraduate level about all the different physics topics. You're not at the advanced level like you get in uh for a masters and a doctorate where you have to focus on a particular specialty to propose a research topic that you're going to uh do uh an experiment or theory on and then publish your thesis or dissertation for the PhD and defend it. >> Got it. >> In order to earn your degree. So, uh you're Yeah. Undergraduate physics is is is a survey of all of the different types of physics so that you have a good rounded knowledge of what physics what there is in physics and uh and of the mathematical and physical and physics procedures you do to solve problems right >> and but it doesn't prepare you to do real world problems well actually does it's a good way of preparing you to do real world problems using those principles but when you're getting to the advanced physics level of applications >> you have to go to the masters and doctorate level actually even the doctorate is more advanced than a masters >> this is the most like this is how You sidetrack a question, right? And this is like this is the same [ __ ] that Jack Sarati does. Jack Sarfotti literally the very first thing Jack Sarat does when anyone says anything. You don't know what you're talking about. You didn't get a a degree in this. You didn't get you didn't go to wherever like I did. Blah blah blah. Like these are the worst arguments ever. And whenever I hear this trash, I immediately disregard what it's saying. It's it's clear disinformation. It's just an attempt to to uh poison the well so that you don't listen to somebody. Once again, the only thing that matters doesn't matter where you went to school, doesn't matter what courses you took. None of that matters at all. All that matters is does it work. That's it. Does it work? Yes or no. I don't care about anything else. I just want to know if it works. Simple as that. And so yeah, I I I just can't address these things because it's not he he's a he got that paper published in Physic, but as you know, George Hathaway in Missaga, Canada uh had Podkenov involved with his replication experiment of Podkinov's apparatus back uh what was that the early 2000s I think it was and Podkenov gave Ha George Hathaway his blessing right said okay this is great do it. So George did it and built up statistical analysis on all the different experimental runs he did and he basically got an old result. Nothing happened. There was no mass modification. >> And I gotta be honest guys, he's talking about George Hathaway. We found George Hathaway. He's best buds with Hal Pudof, Eric Davis, etc. And he does all these experiments. It's like all these experiments that we've been looking into, he like tries to recreate them. There's an interview, you guys can find this on the AP, which is Charles Chase's thing that I talked about from 2022. George Hathaway talks in that and he brings up Eugene Pllenov. They talk for like 20 minutes about him and about this replication they tried to do. And my impression from listening to George Hathaway is the guy's the biggest [ __ ] shill on the face of the earth. I wouldn't trust that guy to walk me across the street. These guys are definitely gatekeeping this technology and they know how to do it in a way where they can get people to discredit it. And so and George Hathaway's response is like he has all these same excuses about well we tried to recreate but we didn't know exactly what he was doing so we had to make some uh some assumptions here and there and that's when I'm immediately like red flags are going off right and the way George Hathaway will say stuff like well we want it to work you know and we were hoping it would work but it just didn't work. Sorry. This is the same [ __ ] that I hear from Redditors when it comes to the MH370 videos. They go, "I want I really want these videos to be real, but they just aren't, guys. So, don't pay attention to them." Like, they're lying. They're lying through their teeth. They don't want the videos to be real. They want you to stop looking at them. Anybody that comes at you goes, "I really wanted these to be real, but they're not. Everybody go away now." That's gatekeeping 101, chat. Gatekeeping 101. Uh, George Hathaway, don't trust him. Not even I wouldn't I literally would not trust him with my kids or my dog. I would not even trust Eric Davis either. They're smart people. They're a little too smart. >> Or inertia modification, right? Nothing. Nothing of a sort. No anti-gravity or repulsive beams or any of that nature. And has just been an empty vessel. I mean, his glass is not half full. It's empty. >> Got you. Got you. Thank you. Um the next question I wanted to ask was actually this is something that even I have an interest in myself, which is um Dr. Davis, how far away do you foresee, if at all, the feasibility of >> This is actually another one of my questions. So, three of Ashton Forbes' questions get asked to do to Dr. Eric W. Davis here. Get ready, guys. It's about to get spicy as hell. >> A neutronic fusion being useful for energy production and or propulsion. >> Oh my god, they're working on it now. We've got a startup company that's been worked two maybe two startup companies working on a neutronic fusion. That's the best way to go. But it's got >> Okay. Okay. Right off the bat, I already know. This dude knows way too much. He knows way too much right away. A neutronic fusion. He goes, "Oh, there's two companies already working on it." Um, yeah, we know. Trial Alpha Energy and Helen Fusion 100%. Right. Boom. A boom chat. And the way he responds, like he just instantly responds. That was I was going, "Oh boy." And it just keeps getting better. Buckle up. highest temperature ion plasma temperature threshold to reach in order to fuse those blasted uh fusion fuel ions together and uh and generally there's only um proton boron 11 and boron 11 is an isotope of boron which you have to refine from boron 10 and boron 9 I think even so uh then there's uh two helium atom fus uh two helium nuclei fusions chains then I think there's dutyium and maybe a helium and there's several different branching ratios of different reactions where >> so now he's talking about boron 11 that's one of our autronic fusion fuels helium 3 is the other one he's talking about here that's the other a neutronic fusion fuel that we heard David Kirkley CEO of helium fusion talking about and he talked about the temperature but we know we were listening to David Kirkley several weeks ago and he said that it turns out we don't even need to hit ignition if we don't need to hit ignition we don't need this temperature way up here. The temperature level that David Kirkley is saying they're achieving over unity at is 10 times lower than ignition 10 mess instead of 100. One of them doesn't have any neutron production but a lot of energy. So you really have a limited amount of a neutronic fusion, but they're there and you just have to find a clever engineering way to overcome the kulom repulsion between the the the positively charged atomic nuclei of each fusion atom that you want or each atom you want to fuse together in the in the fuel. And the only atoms we can fuse together are the are hydrogen and the heavier hydrogen isotopes. >> Yeah. So atronic fusion, yeah, it's it's been studied and >> underway since oh my gosh, for decades. And they actually knew about animronic fusion as far back as the mid or late 30s when the first nuclear fusion experiment was demonstrated in a in a chemistry lab. I don't remember I don't remember. >> Holy [ __ ] He's he's taking it all the way back to the a bomb and before. He's going back to Farnsworth fuser. They we've known about a neutronic fusion since the 30s. since the 30s. Chad, >> for now, whether that was a German lab and a British lab or American lab, I I haven't read that paper. I got it, downloaded it when it got republished, and it was mind-blowing because this made the news a few months ago. It was over the summer that a physicist I think in America had discovered that paper. The fusioners have forgotten all about the fact that there was a a non-tokamac, non laser inertial, non alternative fusion reactor type technology that was used to do a simple demonstration of heavy water fusion in a lab. And you didn't you didn't confine it. You didn't need big giant magnetic fields and superconducting magnets of any kind. All you did was just set up a catalyzing system that allowed the um cross-section to be of the that's the probability of reaction uh to be high enough to overcome the the natural kulom or electrostatic repulsion of highly of not highly but positively charged uh atomic nuclei which would be the proton for the hydrogen atom and single proton and a neutron. Well, the neutron has no charge, so it's still the proton in dutarium and it's still a proton in uh tridium. And um even though tridium >> tridium, I mean, why can't he pronounce basic elements? I'm a little I'm a little sus here that he doesn't know how to pronounce tridium. Feels like a dude who's a PhD physicist that knows about this stuff should at least be able to announce pronounce the name of a basic element. But okay. Um oh, let's just let him keep going actually. tridium I think even though it's got two neutrons. Duterium has one neutron and uh you can do it with lithium and I just don't remember off the top of my head how many neutrons and protons lithium has but lithium is a nuclear fusion fuel. Oh that's it. That's the other fusion fuel you can use for a neutronic reaction is >> a matter of fact yeah as a matter of fact the isotope lithium 6 is important because it exists as a solid at standard pressure and temperature. Just get some lithium 6, set it on your desk, play with it like a powder or whatnot. And that happens to be one of the fuels in our thermonuclear weapons. >> Wow. Well, wow. Well, I wasn't sure before if there was another secret autronic fusion fuel and now I am actually if you guys go back several months ago when I was reading Friedwart Winterberg's thermonuclear principles of thermonuclear weapons detonations textbook he talks about lithium when in one of the first chapters he's talking about lithium as your thermonuclear fuel and I was like this is weird because it's not referenced in a lot of the stuff like it wasn't referenced in the 2005 JNF where I found the boron 11 and the helium 3 and I'm wondering why is it not really talked about in the same vein that these other fusion fuels are talked about well now we know why because it's classified for nuclear weap thermonuclear devices guys I want to replay a clip right now this clip is from Diego Garcia whistleblower a letter to Ashton Forbes As soon as we knew what plane was the last leg of their journey, we planned and delivered. So, the plane was loaded up with lithium ion batteries built by us for this occasion. Lithium ion batteries cannot be put out, has a predictable burn rate, and we made sure that the volume was just right for a long burn that would allow for a fulllength show. Wow. Wow. The letter to Ashen Forbes is legit, chat. The letter to Ashen Forbes is legit. We're looking at a thermonuclear weapon. We are looking at a thermo autronic thermonuclear weapon. The orbs are the fishing trigger. Plasma fishing trigger for a fusion bomb. Holy [ __ ] I mean, we speculated this, but to just hear it get laid out so simply last night, if you check out the Discord chat after we kind of figured this out last night, cuz we were watching this, I was watching this. Now, you're starting to wonder, did the batteries get planted on the plane specifically for this purpose? And they would had to been controlled. They would had to put together those that lithium specifically for this purpose. They would have had to securely deliver it. Make sure it gets on the plane. Make sure it gets put in with the other batteries where it's indistinguishable, right? For this whole operation to work out, you trigger the fire so that the plane turns around. Plane turns around, goes to the rendevous point where the operation is scheduled. Have the orb spin around the plane. Boom. Zap that [ __ ] Thermonuclear weapon. Holy crap. Honestly, I want to look at this again because now when I look at this now, like it it's it's terrifying. It's terrif. We're looking at a nuke. The way that it just shadows out like this right here. This is just you can see the reflection of the tail of the plane sticking out of the wormhole right there. Let's call it a wormhole there. I mean, so for Bob Greener, who was in the chat, who said that he believes that it's a annihilation event, I think we're both right. I think it is that plane. There's no chance those people are alive. I'm going down to zero chance those people are alive. And I'm not even sure the plane came out on the other side in one piece anymore. I do absolutely believe that they're manipulating spaceime. No question. I think we found out that thermonuclear weapons have so much energy density, especially an autronic one, which is not releasing the energy in the form of heat, that it actually manipulates spaceime. And then they started playing around with, can we turn this into a wormhole? Can we turn this into a wormhole? But does that mean it's necessarily coming out on the other side in one piece? Not necessarily. Rest in peace to the families uh to the passengers of MA370 and condolences to your loved ones because it's just I don't even know there's so many emotions that go through my head when I think about this. Absolutely insane. Okay, Eric Davis, keep going, brother. Don't let me stop you. EWD, >> if I can ask on behalf of myself and the audience, for those that are watching that are not as well verssed in fusion, would it be possible to just give a basic breakdown between the difference of a neutronic fusion and uh, you know, what we've considered to be, you know, classical fusion, if you will, processing. >> All right, one more thing I want to point out. So, at the beginning of this, I said, why are the debunkers attacking me non-stop? Why are they not attacking Ian Carol and Candace Owens who are grifting off [ __ ] that's way easier to prove, right? They can. It's easy to prove that what Ian Carol can these guys are pushing is fake. Easy. And yet they're not attacking them at all. Even though they're making huge amounts of money. They're tricking people, fooling people. If you're a white knight, you should be blasting those people. But instead, they spend all their time trying to debunk me, trying to say that the videos are fake. We know why now. We know why now. because that's a thermonuclear weapon and that thermonuclear weapon is being covered up 100%. They need people to not believe that's real. They need our adversaries to not believe that's real. They need what they did to MH370 not to be exposed cuz good luck justifying the legality of using a thermonuclear weapon on a civilian airliner. Good luck with that. let alone using a thermonuclear weapon that by the way we're not supposed to be detonating thermonuclear weapons at all at all. So what we're looking at is something so illegal, so criminal, so morally repugnant that they cannot let that come out. This is the reason why you're seeing people attack me and have you seen people attack me using whatever they can. And yes, they 100% planted the Gorgon stair whammy footage. They planted those cl those those cloud images from that on the internet 100%. Because they needed to make sure that nobody ever ever exposed those videos and ever exposed what they did to that plane. >> Yeah. Uh you could call it neutron fusion. A neutron fusion is the fusion of two atoms that the nuclei of two atoms where neutrons are not produced. >> Okay. >> And you don't like neutrons because they're high energy. They're penetrating to a point. But the problem is when they hit the reactor wall or any reactor component that the plasma is exposed to, they will they will belate or >> batter the material of the reactor wall or the reactor component to where it's now deteriorating. It's getting it's no longer a shiny new smooth surface of the of the reactor wall or component. It's now one that looks pockmarked at the m at the uh atomic level layer or maybe maybe even uh after accumulated years of use it it'd be visibly pockmarked. So now you've got problems with your reactor wall and reactor components not being at their optimal uh characteristic or or or material property and they'll break down and that cause problems. Another thing is when you add a neutron to an atom's nucleus, you turn it into an isotope. So now all of a sudden uh whatever your material is made out of in those in the react inside the reactor that gets radiated by neutrons, you turn them into uh you turn them into isotopes of that it'll be a metallic alloy. And unfortunately some of these isotopes can be radioactive. >> Gotcha. I want to there's a there's a comment that I almost never read random comment from uh Pakonin CT says uh in the Rumble chat lithium 6 duteride is actually the storage medium for the hydrogen in a thermonuclear weapon and is it is an anhydride and stores the hydrogen so it can undergo fusion. It is unlawful to produce commercially, but you can make it at home as Bob Lazar did for his hydrogen powered Corvette. You just need your own smallcale particle accelerator, which the Farnsworth fuser can be modified into. You guys ever wonder why the FBI was showing up to some 12year-old who's making a Farnsworth fuser? Now, we know the FBI, the feds are worried that somebody's going to make this lithium duteride fusion fuel that can literally produce a thermonuclear weapon. Now, we know how and why. There you go, chat. The more you know, chat, you only get this information on the Ashton for Orbs live streams. You will not find anything like this anywhere else on the internet. Hit the like and subscribe if you like, if you're enjoying the content. Let's keep going. But they're not like uranium or plutonium which have half long half lives that make them dangerous. It's they'll have short half lives but you ruined it by changing the isizotope. Now you've ruined the material property of that metal of that alloy and it's no longer optimally strong enough to handle all that rad uh radiative heat coming from the fusion reaction. So you don't want neutrons. You don't like it. You want charged particles to be the result of to be the products of nuclear fusion because uh a neutronic fusion would use those charged particles which are usually alpha particles. That's basically the nucleus of a helium 4 atom and the nucleus of a helium 4 atom contains two protons and two neutrons. That means it's positively charged twice, two times two plus. And you could use that if you have a magnetic or electric field around for those at for those alpha particles to go through and that'll create an electrical current somewhere. So if you got a current of alpha particles according to Maxwell's equation uh you'll have a current of electricity generated in whatever setup you have to generate the electricity in that environment. Um that's why the orbs have that's why the orbs are a ball of energy because the byproduct is charged alpha particles. Those charged alpha particles within a plasma will produce current energy electricity. That's what electricity is current right. So he's also saying here he's speaking to directed energy conversion as well. Why is a neutronic fusion better than normal fusion hot fusion because it doesn't have it doesn't release neutrons. That's a neutronic. No neutrons. Neutrons are the heat, the radioactivity. So if you get rid of that, what are you left with? Pure energy. Pure energy. Boom. Cool fusion chat. That's what we're calling it. Cool fusion. A neutronic fusion. It's cool because it's dope as [ __ ] >> Gotcha. >> A neutronic fusion is where you're going to generate a lot of neutrons. They're high energy. They're penetrating to a point. They're lethal to human tissue. But if you got a reactor containment wall, they'll stop there. But I've already told you what what bad things those neutrons will do to the reactor system. >> Thank you. Those neutrons, those neutrons, if you have any kind of magnets or superconducting magnets, magnets, especially superconducting magnets, those neutrons will damage the superconducting property of the magnet. And they'll just by heating it up and depositing energy and neutrons to turn the material of the superconducting atoms into or you know the molecules that make uh the superconducting material by by turning them into isotopes. And those isotopes when they're in combination with the other mo atoms in a molecular formulation will stop being superc conducting because only one type of isotope combination of different materials like YBCOs's uh can be superond. But if it's if it's isotope of Y, an isotope of P, an isotope of C or O, or a combination thereof, it's no longer going to have superc conducting properties. >> It messes with the composition of it basically. >> Yeah. >> So even the orbs have to be a neutronic. Even the orbs have to be using a neutronic fusion. Why? Cuz otherwise the superconducting magnets inside are going to fail because the neutrons hit the superconducting magnets and they make them not be superconductive anymore. That's what he's saying right there. A neutronic fusion is the secret to all this [ __ ] It's the secret to all this. Finding out about a neutronic fusion. Honestly, give me my goddamn uh uh Pulitzer prize. Where are my Perri guys? I'm gonna have so many Purprises by the end of this. There's going to be I have so many Pulser prizes here. I'm going to have to start handing them I can't even carry all these pulser prizes at this point. Solving MH370, exposing a neutronic fusion to the world, exposing helium fusion, trialpha energy, um exposing the fact that thermonuclear weapons are producing wormholes. I mean, this [ __ ] is crazy, man. How are they hiding all this? And I'm obviously being used. Otherwise, I would have killed me a long time ago. If I was the CIA, I would have killed Ashen Forbes. What are we What are we doing here? What are we doing, CIA? Why am I alive right now? And we got Eric Davis is like basically speaking to me here. >> I don't know. Did he watch my content? This is so weird. It's just too on the nose. It's too on the nose. This whole interview is too on the nose >> with everything. Yep. That's why you don't like neutrons. >> Gotcha. >> And nuclear fusion. >> Gotcha. >> We don't like them in fision, but we can't get away from it. There's no such thing as a neutronic fision. Um. >> Gotcha. Okay. Thank you so much. Well, the the next question here comes from uh someone by the name of Vox. I'm not my friend Vox. I'm not going to say the last name of your username because it's hard to pronounce, so forgive me. But um Vox has a few questions actually. um which is the first one is um what is the likelihood that um instead of seeing a UFO near Groom Lake as Bob Lazar and John Lear claimed, what what is the likelihood they instead saw some type of directed energy proton or laser beam uh back in the 1980s rather than a UFO near >> zero because there were no technology of that nature back then uh especially at Area 51. um protons were not used and lasers were but laser work was done in another part of the country at another laboratory and Dar 51 doesn't have a laboratory to begin with it's not a laboratory um so the answer is zero and Bob Lazar and John Ler I wouldn't put any stock in anything they say because there are a couple of net cases and we already know that Bob uh George Knap investigated Bob Lazar and as much as he'd been promoting him over the years uh George knows um on a private basis that Bob Lazar uh is a problem uh and I've investigated him with a former Area 51 program manager who was a member of the Road Runners um retiree association. He knew Bob was >> wait for it. [Music] Uh I I just can't trust this guy when it comes to like when he he just he shits on everybody that like but he doesn't explain why. Oh, he's he's a he's a cook. Ignore him. Ignore that guy. our female supervisor and he got the the poop on Bob Zazar's employment which did not take place in Area 51. It took place in an unclassified logistical uh support facility way outside of Area 51. He never had to get he never had to fly on take a Janet flight out there. He stayed in Vegas. He worked in Vegas and then he ran and then he ran in a legal prostitution operation at the same time. Yeah, there's there's some I know that people that have promoted Lazar don't like bringing that aspect of his life up, but I think it's fair to >> But that's how you do Yeah, that's how you do forensic profiling. Uh we're not saying he's a criminal. He was just a profiling of somebody who's made outrageous. >> Yeah, this this is straight up CIA disinformation right here. Like literally, this is textbook CIA disinformation. He literally even says this is forensic profiling. Yeah, you're literally bringing up his brothel has nothing to do with science whatsoever. Well, he owned a brothel. And he goes, "I'm not saying he did anything illegal." That's him legally protecting himself. That's him legally protecting himself from defamation right there. He knows exactly where the line is in terms of how you can discredit somebody without getting yourself sued into oblivion claims, which everybody at Area 51 are looking at each other like, "What the fuck?" And uh and so, you know, and then you got George Knap who's promoting him a lot. Um he has said so what the [ __ ] but he just kind of says well you got the story but I think George is missing a beat somewhere and I'm not sure why he knows all the people I worked with who investigated Bob Lazar and that includes Colonel John Alexander or Dr. John Alexander uh Colonel US Army retired who hired who was responsible for Bob Bigalow hiring me at in July of 96. >> Um uh and so John Alexander was right out of Los Alamos at the time. He was the father of non of the non-lethal weapons laboratory at Los Alamos. And he did that after 32 or 30. Yeah, 32. Maybe more than 32. >> Like, bro, what are we supposed to believe here, man? Bob Lazar literally put Area 51 on the map. What's the story here? He was living in Vegas, but he just made up this whole story that happened to be real about there really is this whole thing happening in Vegas at this place called Area 51. Literally, no one knew what Area 51 was before Bob was arguing about. So, to me, you can't make an argument that he's just making this all up. That's just that makes no sense at all. The only question is how significant was his role and what was he really doing and where was he really at to me. That's the only thing that you can say. So when he tries to like completely throw the baby out of the bathwater, I'm extremely suspicious of him. >> In the army. >> Wow. Wow. Yeah. So he John Alexander spent quite a bit of time in the army. That's for sure. >> Yeah. And you know, when you're in the when you're the chief of staff to the commanding general of the Army Intelligence and Security Command, you can you could pull a lot of resources in the government to look into guys like Lazar. And he did. >> Got you. Got you. >> He did when he looked into Phil Corso. So, >> Ah, that's right. Yes. Okay. Thank you. Got you. >> What a lot of people don't realize is that um the military records of of uniformed service personnel were stored in some place in the United States. >> We're going to skip some of this because I don't need to hear him [ __ ] on people anymore. >> How many of them didn't get recovered? Corso Corso had uh uh Alexander was able to find all of something like that >> and there were if I'm not mistaken there were another there was another crash that same day I think or no >> there not that I was familiar with. >> Okay. Okay. So no that's probably probably >> mis so anyway uh yeah so so uh let's see I guess that was my point or something. >> Yeah we're talking about Phil Corso and Walter >> Phil Corso. So basically, yeah, his what he wrote there is is absolutely I verified it through my work since NIDS. Um, and I didn't do it the way John Alexander did it. John Alexander kind of broke the rules. The way he did it, it's like the way he took the approach he took to talk to high level people to get information on whether there was a crash retrieval of of a crash on the foster ranch in Corona in Mexico. Uh, he would knock on the door. Remember his uh with the security clearances and need to know. He didn't have the security clearance and need to know for that for the crash retrieval program. So they said, "I don't know what you're talking about. I've never heard that before." Okay. Then when he retired and he's at Los Alamos with his Q clearance, he's getting the same responses. However, I went to the heart of the program and found the right people. And that's a long story I cannot get into, but um but uh I found the people. I found a US president. Uh I found uh an admiral. I found a general. I found program managers at companies who confirmed all of it. And they said, "Oh yeah, Phil Corso. Of course, he's right." Um and Dave Brush did too. Wow. >> And so, uh, but but when you read The Day After Roswell by Corsel and Burns, >> I got to be honest, I'm even more sus of this now, though, where like I'm super suspicious whole crash retrieval [ __ ] It's very I mean, this guy is snitching on everybody. He's bad mouthing and discrediting people that seem to be genuine in their intent. And then he's like, "But yeah, I did all this stuff." And it turns out there are these crash retrievals and there's four species of aliens. It's like, are you just making all that [ __ ] up to cover all the rest of this stuff up? Because when we look at the MH370 videos, I'm definitely not looking at aliens. And we're definitely looking at the technology that the US government definitely has. And so I don't know where where the truth is with Eric W. Davis and where the lies are. It's hard to distinguish. find a lot of [ __ ] in there because Bill Burns looked at that one chapter said I can't write a book I can't write a book based on >> oh one more thing I want to say is I looked up this whole Q clearance thing it's 100% legit there are when I was looking up those clearances of thermonuclear weapons turns out there is this whole categorization of clearances in order to have access to various sigma information um related to the use of thermonuclear weapons and that's how I found out that the president has unlimited access. Assuming that the president can find the actual program, then they can have unlimited access. But the way they protect it from them is like if you just don't know what the program's called, then you can never find it anyway. So even if you have access, you can't see it. >> He he couldn't write Corso's autobiography because a Corso was a horrible writer. B he's boring. His life is kind of mundane and boring. There was really nothing spectacular. and B and and B only that one chapter on the UFO aspect of the Roswell crash was the only thing of interest and so Burns had to embellish that chapter heavily to make it a readable entertaining uh attentiongrabbing >> to sell as to sell as a piece of media >> and it was a bestseller right >> for God's sake how long I think it was on the New York Times bestseller list for more than a year wasn't it >> I think so I think >> you were probably a little kid then you're such a young guy >> for sure yes for sure >> I know it was on the New York Times best seller list at least a year which is unusual >> unusual because a lot of new books kind of hit the bestseller list comparable to what we were developing in the way of the early microchip tech how microchips came out when Corsel was working for as a civilian for Lieutenant General Arthur Trudeau and he was already well he was still active duty general lieutenant general and he said the the fiber optic uh or the the craft the components pulled out of the Roswell craft resembled fiber optics and microchips. >> I heard about this misinterpretation I mean, the components pulled out of the Roswell crash resemble fiber optics and microchips. There just happened to be 20 microchip engineers on board MH370. What a coincidence. Turns out we figured out that microchips are where it's all at. I was getting super excited. I can't believe how stupid I was. I was going to do a free energy magnetic motor thinking that, oh, we're going to make a free energy magnetic motor. It's going to be the cutting edge science. These people, they've had freaking microchips that can do this stuff probably for 50 years. For 50 years. And this makes me even more suspicious of the whole Yeah, it was aliens. I mean, there is a possibility like it's plausible to think that another civilization crashed here or whatever and we found the technology and we start reverse engineering it. But it's also possible that we've been advancing it in unagnowledged special access programs and then an unagnowledged special access program crashes and somebody sees it and now we go, "Oh, look at this alien technology." But, you know, it's just secret black project technology. This is where I say it's not even worth it to try to figure it out. It literally just doesn't matter. It doesn't matter where it comes from. We've got free energy microchips and warp drives and wormhole technology. Just give it to us. I don't give a crap if it came from aliens or you've been hiding it for 50 years. It's ours no matter what. We're the taxpayer. We're the ones paying for it. All the DOE labs and aerospace corporations, all 100% funded by the government. It's our technology. Give it back to us, you sons of [ __ ] because I know that a rumor a false rumor was started I believe which was that uh there was a rumor for years and I'm sure maybe you've heard of it which was that allegedly that Corso had claimed that the what we now know as the transistor had come from Roswell which was not what he was saying was that he had picked up he was handling pieces that resembled transistors because if you look at history right I believe >> and he did say that they looked like or look similar to transistors but he also said the same about the uh because microchips were already out in the very early 50s I think the precursor to Michael Trip came out emerged in either Thomas J. Watson Center at IBM or one of the other ones. Um >> I think it was labs maybe. >> I think it was if I'm not mistaken and I could be wrong here, but I think there was a German scientist or team of scientists in the late 30s that had developed at least a concept for the first transistor. I could be wrong. >> No, I'm talking about microchips. >> Oh, microchips. Okay. Okay. >> Yeah, microchips. Microchips. And um and so those emerged during the Korean War. Gotcha. >> And and so it's not out of the question for Kos to have access to and even fiber optics. I mean, >> and this this speaks to how what the other big aspect of MH370X and what we've discovered, guys. We're trying to figure out who are the sons of [ __ ] who are getting this technology leaked to them from the defense contractors. This is why if and when I talk to Nick Fuentes, I'm going to steer him and his fans directly at Commonwealth Fusion and Helen Fusion because these [ __ ] are working with the defense contractors in the CIA and they are being given this technology. is dripping out through them potentially the same way transistors, microchips, and all this other stuff has been dripping out to the public. The same way AI, Sam Ultimate, I don't believe any of these AI companies are legit. At least not the first ones. I think this is what they've been doing with all this technology. And that's just criminal. It's called fraud. If you knew that something worked and you got inside information, you should go to prison for the rest of your life. You don't deserve any of the money you made. You shouldn't have been. You have unfair advantage. And this is another reason why they won't release the truth. We're never going to get disclosure. There's too much money tied up in billionaires who don't deserve their money, who will go to prison and go bankrupt and go broke if this stuff comes out. So, I'm going to release the Gropers and everybody else on the Peter Teals of the world. The even the JD Vances of the world, who is 100% owned by Peter Teal. Sorry if that hurts your feelings, but he is. We're going to release those people as our weapon against them to bring them down. >> He plan is older than the 50s and that's a fiber optic material including but you know the modern fiber optics are have different composition than the first generation of fiber optics materials. So he's looking at this alien stuff he's saying ah this looks like that that looks like this. Right? You know, but but you see if you change the words just a little bit, you make it you make it sound like, oh, Corso said, >> oh, >> it came from right >> transistor and microchip and fiber optic technology came from the aliens. We we use we reverse engineered it and created those technologies in human culture. >> Right. All you had to do, all Bill Burns had to do is just twist those words just a little bit. >> Right. Well, thank you so much for that answer. The next question I have here is Dr. Davis, given your work on ball lightning in the past for the uh a air force research laboratory, >> right? >> What are the odds that pilots um people who fly in, you know, for example, various aircraft uh all over the world, uh what are the chances that in some cases when people claim to see UAPs or UFOs, they may in fact be observing some type of laser induced holographic display u of some nature? Um is is that is that a feasible explanation for some UAP sightings? Well, that's not ball lightning, but um holographic projection. Who's doing the projecting? The UFO or somebody with technology that's that's fooling around. Well, >> a human with the technology on the ground that's shooting it up in the air. >> Right. Right. In the case of, for example, if you have a pilot that is flying near say uh you know, near an Iranian military base, it maybe could it be possible that you know the Iranians for instance or the Turkish or whoever are testing some type of holographic projection tech that could be misconstrued for UAPs in some cases? Yeah, there is no such technology because holograph holograms or holographic images cannot be projected in daytime. >> Gotcha. Okay. >> Boom. Okay. Say good night to the whole [ __ ] holographic plasma nonsense that people were throwing out there. That was all disinfo. And we knew that was disinfo once we realized what plasma is. Plasma is a physical thing. It's not a hologram. It's not an illusion. It's not a projection. This goes and you know what? I'm going to [ __ ] on Jeremy Reese because this guy's been attacking me still after he begged me for a truce. He's p still pushing this fake like that I threatened him or something which is all nonsense. He's such an idiot. He's like, "Oh, they have this uh plasma projection hologram technology." No, they don't. That's not real, bro. Learn science. Learn physics. Learn how plasma works. It's not an illusion. It's not a projection. Jesus, man. >> The sun swaps it. Swamps it. I'm sorry. The sunlight is like uh a thousand almost 1300. It's It's somewhere in the ballpark of 1300 watts per square meter of beam of energy intensity of visible light intensity. Well, that's going to swamp or wash out any laser beams that you have to use to create the hologram because that's the only way to create a hologram is with laser beam. And the only technology that makes it where you can visually see it is when you record a hologram on a transparent piece of specialized photographic plastic sheet and the holograms are are etched in like the silvering of of an oldfashioned film photograph. Um so you have to shoot a laser beam after you make the holographic patterns on the transparent sheet. You can see little blotches on it and the little blotches are the hologram. But to make sense of what the blotches create in the way of a sensible 3D image that you can recognize in your brain, you got to shoot a reference laser beam at it. And usually the beams were limited to red and green back in those day. Well, it was hard to produce a green laser laser beam back in those days. So, um, so I don't So, I mean, what color were the holograms? If they're red, we could do it. If they're green, we can do it now. We could we could do it like since the early 2000s, but any but and blue. Well, blue is only was invented blue laser diodes were invented in the late 2000s, I think. uh close to 2010, probably late 2000s. And so um and so that's the first time that you could get all three colors uh to produce a holographic image, but you have to shoot the uh the sheet with a reference laser beam in order to expose the hologram holographic image in order to see it. And it's in and that image is built geometrically within that sheet. To do it in the air is even more complicated. And it's and it requires smoke and mirrors literally, >> right? Um, no, that's the probability of that being misconstrued as a EUAP is next to zero. Is is probably >> as close to zero as you can get. We >> Well, he's even if we take the assumption that they might have the capability to do it, it would be extremely limited and it would never be misconstrued as a UFO essentially is what he's saying right there. >> Just don't have that. You could question on a wall because now we have that type of technology. But that but you need a wall to see it, >> right? Right. >> Okay. shooting it up in the air and seeing a 3D image. Uh, they can't do it yet. Um, >> what they're doing now is using UAVs, little little drones. What they do is >> I thought he was going to say this because instead we see these UAVs. That's how they're producing the image because there has to be something there. There has to be a wall. There has to be something that you're shooting your image onto, right? That's the whole point of the hologram is he's saying here. So what they're doing when it comes to China is they're making these drones that are making shapes in the sky because there's got to be something there to be able to see. So it looks like a hologram when China uses these drones flying around. They use AI to control a whole bunch of hundreds and hundreds of drones and they put all kinds of lights on them, different colored lights. And the drones are programmed to emit one of the, you know, LED colors, all the different LED covers, maybe red, blue, and green, maybe yellow. Uh the white that's where all of our electronic and make the exotic spaceime warps. Well, the forefront of uh they can't do it yet. uh produced to turn on certain LED colors and then when you look up it at a sky they could they could shape this thing into a 3D image based on the positioning of the drones and the type of lights they use on. >> Gotcha. Thank you. Um let me see one other question here which is that um this one here is from Michael Peron who says uh let's say I am an inspiring an aspiring engineer or physicist of the publicly available topics what should I study to do well at the forefront of physics uh looking 10 to 20 years into the future in your >> yeah Michael Peron was going to join I guess he's not because he didn't jump on maybe I'll talk to him later because I want to hear his opinion but here's Michael Peron's question so Michael Peron works with APEC he's an engineer I think he's a very intelligent guy Let's see what he has to say or >> well the forefront of physics covers a lot of areas. Um it depends upon what you want. Do you want to look into applied physics or do you want to look in theoretical physics? If you want applied physics to make something and invent something or solve a big technical problem, you would um you could go into condensed matter theory because that's where all of our electronic and exotic electronic technologies come from. Uh >> condensed matter physics. Condensed matter physics. Chat, I gotta play one more clip. I gotta play one more clip. Uh, what? What is it? This hold on. Crap. Actually, I don't know where it is. I I'm going to find it while I play this. Uh, while I play this. Hold on. I wanted that the how put off Eric Davis or uh uh Eric Weinstein thing. >> Um you might look at um if you're interested in nuclear fusion or nuclear fusion, you want to go into nuclear physics. >> Gotcha. And um and if you want to look at stuff like what I look into as a theorist who's looking into the applied physics aspect of traversible wormholes and warp drives and anti-gravity uh then you need to go into general relativity theory and quantum field theory because quantum field theory gives you the source of the exotic matter you need to make the exotic space-time warps uh or space-time curvature effects that it uh create a traversible wormhole in a work drive. And um or gravitation anti-gravity effect. Um, if you want to try to look for exotic particles, that's getting harder and harder to do because, um, we're having to build bigger and bigger accelerators with higher and higher energies. They get costlier and costlier and costlier. So, it's harder now to look for exotic particles than it has ever been before because we're just not seeing any anymore. We are seeing some, but they've already been known. They just haven't been discovered. Now, they're being discovered, but there's nothing new and different that takes us up to a higher level. Um, if you want to do quantum gra >> Okay, I found it. Here we go. That was easy. Okay, here it is. Uh, ask yourself, what Pandora's box would a new physical insight potentially open? The role of aerospace companies as holders of potentially basic scientific knowledge not shared with the academic world. Is it possible? Seems very wrong to me. >> Maybe wrong, but it's um true. >> It is true. You believe it's true. >> Yeah, I know it's true. >> You know that there is physics knowledge held by aerospace companies that is not >> There certainly is materials knowledge. >> Materials. Well, okay. material science >> which involves topological physics or whatever. >> Okay. But fundamental physics as opposed to >> matter or topological >> certainly aerospace corporations have knowledge in the UAP area that specifically are >> sequestered by against FOIA. >> Oh, >> because of proprietary labels which the whole thing was set up to be that way >> on purpose. >> Right. But the idea that there would be fundamental physics knowledge that would be housed in an aerospace company and not shared with the physics community, there is no evidence of that. >> No evidence for it. Not that I know of. >> And I would that doesn't mean it's not the case. But >> that would be this crazy egregious. >> It would change our entire concept of who we are if somebody kept fundamental physics secret in the years since we became capable of exploding fusion devices. I would grab a pitchfork >> and a tiki torch and I would march on the National Science Found. >> Weird reference to fusion devices there by Eric Weinstein as well. I have a bad I I'm starting to get a feeling Eric Weinstein knows a little more than he's saying as well. So topological physics is at least similar if not equivalent to condensed matter physics. people that um that uh get a Nobel Prize in planet of gravity, then you need to go into quantum field theory and general relativity because the two of them come together in some way or maybe it's not at all. You might have to go outside of that bounds, but you need the fundamentals of those two disciplines in order to tackle quantum gravity. And you won't be and you most likely won't be using a conventional approach that everybody's been using taking uh because all the approaches that have been used now have ended in dead ends. And that would be uh quantum loop theory, quantum superstream theory, and dbrain theory. >> We got another called the DD254 form that gives him authorization to get clearance and need to know. Wait, >> the House Oversight Subcommittee subpoena. And the the options are Admiral Wilson, Admiral Bobby Ray Inman, the Loheed Martin CEO, Glenn Gaffne. Uh, those are the options. If if you could >> the admirals are a waste of time. Glenn Gaffne, I'd kick his ass and all the way to Washington DC to the House Oversight Committee hearing read uh hearing room in the Rayburn House uh office building. He would be the guy that under oath would Well, here's the thing. He's going to say this is at a level level classification that I can't testify to in an open hearing. I can do it in a classified setting like in a gift in the O'Neal House Office Building. The problem is it'll be waved under acknowledged special access program. His clearances will have to be reactivated for him to testify at that level and he'll have to be given the the need to know and all that is done through what's called the DD254 form that gives him authorization to get clearance and need to know and um and that'll be >> Oh boy, >> let's put it this way. Holy [ __ ] chat. Glenn Gaffne. Lockheed Martin. Glenn Gaffne. Hold up. Hold up, chat. [Music] Hold up. Th this this Glen Gaffne right here, this one that I just pulled up who I didn't know about before just now. Glenn Gaffne joined the Noble Reach Foundation in 2023 when a merge was spun out from Inqell. You've got to be effing kidding me. Inqell. Inqoutell is literally the CIA's venture capital company. I'm not joking. Inqoutell is literally the CIA's venture capital company. Holy smokes. Well, sir, you are now on the list. Welcome to Ashton's investigative list, sir. And the other thing that he just mentioned is that he says this guy will never testify. He if you try to force him to testify, he'll say I can't say anything because it's classified beyond your comprehension. Classified beyond your comprehension. Chat, when I said I'm going after Loheed Martin next, I was not kidding. We are going to start making lists of these people. We're going to start finding out everything that they're doing, every company they're working with, and start making little webs that connect them all together so that everybody can know. So that if, let's just say, people that are on the outside, they want to know who knows all this technology, all this stuff, they know who to go talk to. And you know what? If they don't like it, you know, I I want my Scar Joe clone to have red hair. I've decided, you know what? It's not good enough that I want a red-headed ScarJo clone. So, make that happen. And if you make that happen, then maybe we don't need to make any lists. It's all I'm saying. It's all I'm saying. CIA, I know they're watching. Make the clone happen. Glen Gaffne, make Ashton Scar Joe clone a redhead. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Okay, let's get back to this. We got to finish. executive branch does not have to cooperate with the legislative branch on these matters. That's the problem. The legislative branch, I know they have an oversight role, but the issue is they're battling an executive agent uh executive branch uh issues and and and agencies for which they can only control the power of the purse. Ah, >> and just to get Gaffne in there, uh, Gaffne will be able to waffle and avoid and divert because he is trained to do that especially for way unacknowledge special access programs. >> Got you. Got you. >> What did he just say? He just told on himself, chat. This dude's snitching like crazy, chat. He's snitching like crazy. He's going, he's been trained to divert. Trained to divert. That's the first time I've heard this. You know who else has been trained to divert? Eric W. Davis. I can just tell listening to these dudes that they're being trained to divert. The reason why you guys watch me is because you know what an honest person who just says it like it is says, right? Doesn't leave anything behind. Listening to these dudes, you're like, nah, he's diverting like crazy. He's attacks people. He talks about their their education when it's completely irrelevant to the question. These are this is like the type of training you would get to divert questions. I'm really glad I was a professional poker player at one point in time because it makes it a lot easier to see through the [ __ ] that these people tell. >> Well, freaking waffle and but he would be my first target. I wouldn't waste my time with admirals and generals. I'd go for him and um but it's just that >> he will be bound. Okay, he's also bound by the presidential emergency action directives. >> So, the presidential emergency action directives will probably clam him up. uh as well as the fact that uh the president of the United States also has presidential executive privilege that he could exert on Gaffne since Gaffne was employed by the CIA. I don't I think he's retired now but when he was employed that's in the executive branch. So the president can exert executive privilege which means anything that Gaffne was doing is covered under pres uh executive privilege but more importantly it could be covered under the presidential emergency action directives of which are never released to Congress under any circumstance. Never. So do you, if I may, >> that's what the presidential emergency active directives are. PEDs, presidential emergency action directives. Remember I said this the beginning of the live stream. This is how they're hiding it. This is how they're hiding it. It goes to a level where there's no oversight. Congress has no oversight to this. Now we know how they're hid those orbs in the MH370 videos. They're probably not any acknowledged program that's out there. They're an unagnowledged program that's covered under these presidential elector of active division. This is the situation when they say when you hear people in the military say like if anything were to ever happen, we would break out the super technology or whatever. This is what they're talking about. That's what they're saying. Why the hell were they stupid enough to use that on MH370? I have to know. The orbs in the MH370 videos are a weapon that we only break out when like Russia starts shooting nukes at us, right? They're like the thing that you it's your ace in the hold. You never show it to people. But we were dumb enough to use it on MH370 and record it like idiots. and allow it to get leaked to the public. You know what? I found people that are lower IQ chat than the low IQ anti-semmites and conspirators. The CIA. The low IQ CIA that got so overconfident that they were like, "We're going to go ahead and just break out the super weapons against a civilian airliner. You are idiots, bro. You're so dumb that I found out about it. A healthcare IT consultant off the street exposed your secret super weapon because you're so stupid that you went ahead and used it. Used it in a location you never should have been using it. There was no reason. Like a lot of people say, "Why are they using this on the plane?" Exactly. They shouldn't have been breaking this out on the plane. Yo, CIA, hold that L. CIA, hold that L, stupid [ __ ] You better carry that thing. Carry it around with you. You got exposed by a healthcare IT consultant. How embarrassing is that? Low IQ CIA chat. L's in the chat, everyone. Oh my god. Do you think realistically, do you think that it would be a a waste of time for Gapany to be brought in? >> Yeah, it would be. But he would be a target of a subpoena in my opinion if I had all the power in the world. I I basically would would do a Jesus to him. I put him on a on a cross naked and uh and hammer big nails in his wrist and ankles and and then see how much he's willing to talk. >> Um what, bro? Why did he just start talking about bondage right there? My dude's got some weird bondage clothing on and the first thing he says is I'm gonna start hammering nails into Glen Gaffne. Like, dude, uh, what is this? Like, what is this dominatrix fetish that Eric W. Davis has here? Pretty creepy, bro. That's a weird way to bring it up. >> Got you. Okay. >> Or maybe give him sodium penol shots and see how he's really gonna talk. >> Yeah, he's a good doobie. He is well trained like I am. Um, right. He's been trained on He's telling on himself some more. He's wellrained like I am. Bro, what do you mean you're well trained? Aren't you a physicist? I thought you're a physicist. Now you're being like, "Oh, I'm well trained." That's not the kind of thing you say when you're talking about science and and physics knowledge. When you say you're well trained, you're talking about being CIA. Dude, I I have this guy nailed. I have Eric W. Davis straight up nailed. I I can see right through this guy. I can see right through him. You know what? You know what? This is why these guys are terrified of me, chat. Why? Everybody is so terrified of me. Comedians are terrified of me. Random Uber drivers making up fake conspiracies are terrified of me. I've got CIA spooks and engineers who are terrified of me as well. Some of the smartest people on the planet are terrified of me. And the reason why they're terrified of me is I see right through them. I see right through them. And they would not last in a two-hour discussion with me. I will have them in the corner sucking their thumb begging for mommy. Please, mommy. Please, mommy. Make make me stop having to ask your questions from Ashton. Oh my goodness. chat >> violating security and and not being an insider threat to the national security and um and he just is going to follow the law and follow the rules and he's just going to say you know the president will be told by the national security adviser who at this era would be the acting national security adviser Marco Rubio former US senator from Florida >> right >> oh boy oh boy acting national security adviser is who? Marco Rubio. Marco Rubio is the acting national security adviser. Who would be the person that knows? Oh my goodness, chat. Oh my goodness. I called it. I [ __ ] called it, chat. I called it. Marco Rubio. Guys, remember what I told you guys? There's a letter out there, an email that I've seen and I've shared. I've deleted the email addresses that were on it, but I saw them. And Marco Rubio's name was right on there, chat. It was right on there next to Chuck Schumer. Both of them were on there. And the email is talking about using some ball lightning cold explosion on MH370. Whoopsie. Whoopsie. Marco Rubio. Little Marco, you've been exposed. Little Marco, put him on the list, chat. Put Little Marco on the list. Oh boy. Oh boy. JD Vance, Little Marco, Glenn Gaffne, y'all are screwed. We know what y'all are hiding. We know what y'all are hiding. Oh, chat, please let me talk to Nick Fuentes, chat. I just want to talk to Nick Fuentes for just a little bit. Just a little bit because I'm gonna get I'm gonna load this dude's arsenal up. We're going to strap a a rocket launcher onto Nick Fuentes's shoulder and just have him blast these [ __ ] into the sun. Oh my god, I'm excited. Oh boy, what an interview. Oh, it'd be Rubio and Trump that'll have to decide if they're going to wave executive privilege and wave the PE and maybe even Trump won't even have power to wave the PE for all I know. The PE being the presidential emergency action directives, right? >> So, I just don't know what mechanisms are there for exceptions to the PE because so far we've never seen a PE published, revealed, leaked, um, acknowledged or shared with Congress. It is classified and it's never shared with Congress. >> Well, that's so I was going to say that takes me to the next question which is that one of the last ones here. Um, does the crash retrieval program uh under the opices of the CIA have any coordination with the National Security Council and NEPs? Actually, that was >> um honestly I gotta be careful. Like literally, maybe I shouldn't collab with Nick. Like we're going to end up getting Nick killed. I'm not even joking. Like these people are going to start like killing us if we start coming after them probably. Right. And it's probably better that Nick doesn't know about this [ __ ] It's probably better that Nick just thinks these people are just corrupt but doesn't really realize the implications of how corrupt they are. like he's so close to figuring it out. Like he knows JD Vance is owned by Peter Teal, but he doesn't really get that like there is like serious serious [ __ ] going on behind the scenes. And this is why I tell people that are like, "We're going to get the the Israel lobbying out of America." I'm like, "Bro, you got no idea how deep it goes, man. They're never going to let that happen. They will definitely take you out before you get remotely close to that." But you know what? So, I don't know. We'll see. No, they don't because that's a program and the program is not run at the higher level. It's run at the program management program office level. Got so uh the higher level like the National Security Council and or the National Security Adviser and the PED that's way up the food chain from those guys down at the program office. Those guys are like puppets. You you manipulate them to do whatever you want them to do, but they can't do the reverse. They they can't coordinate. They don't coordinate anything. They just they get a request for information from above and they look with their general counsel or their legal counsel and they look to see is that a legal question we can answer. If the answer is yes, they answer it. If the answer is no, they say sorry, we can't answer that. >> So you're referring to the National Security Council or >> Well, it'd be it'd be really the National Security Adviser. >> Gotcha. Okay. >> Not the council. I make that mistake. That's the National Security Council might need to know for some reason, but it's really the National Security Adviser that coordinates the aspect of UAP issues between the CIA and the president. Got you. >> National Security Advisor. National Security Adviser is the one that coordinates between the CIA and the president. Okay, now we know. And Trump knows 100%. Trump knows about this [ __ ] No question. That's why Trump is saying random stuff. Hey, it's not that I'm scared, Chad. I already know I'm cooked. I already know I'm cooked. I'm going to get drone strike or fall down a something. And by the way, nobody has permission to make up fake conspiracies about me. I don't even care. I don't even care. They're going to take me out. We all know it. We all know they're going to take me out. We all know who's going to have done it. Whatever. It's all good. We don't need to make up fake conspiracies. I don't want to give people a bunch of free grift money when I die. Just let them cover it up. That's fine. Whatever. Who cares? I just don't want to get somebody else killed. That's my moral quandry. I don't want to get someone else killed. Then I will feel bad. If I die, whatever. Who cares, right? But if somebody else dies from it, then I'm going to feel a little bit guilty. So that's all that comes down to. >> And one of the final ones here, we have a question from Michael Boyd. Uh what if any peer-reviewed empirical evidence have you seen for uh anti-gravity or gravitational repulsion in the literature over the years? >> Oh my gosh, the American Journal of Physics. Um my publications which have been in the peer-reviewed um the Institute for Radio Engineers. So um and yeah, I already covered the American Journal of Physics. Uh that covers it. That covers it. Um there hasn't been a lot of work on that topic. uh other than oh and I and I forgot that there's a journal of mathematical physics a is another one that's because that is a journal in which they publish the peer-reviewed proceedings papers from a conference series that no longer exists. It was hosted out of um of a German university in LIIPC and it was called it's a weird bunch of acronyms QEXT or something or QEXC and they held it every two years uh up until it terminated and just didn't they don't do it anymore but for every two years for many for a good portion of a decade they held the conference I think it's quantum uh quantum >> actually actually I changed my mind chat so so Eric Davis here is talking about he's the one that's figured out anti-gravity Eric Davis like nobody figured out anti-gravity except for me I figured Figured it out. I figured it all out. Look at my papers. Okay. I mean, sure, whatever. I don't even care. You know what? Whoever just said that about Palestine, I changed my mind. If I die, I allow the anti-skits, we'll call them, the anti-skits are allowed to make up a fake conspiracy and blame it all on Palestine. They're allowed to because we I believe in equality. I believe in equality. The skits wanted to blame everything on Israel. You are allowed to make up fake conspiracies and blame everything on Palestine chat. So that the scales have been balanced. Balance the scales. I'm all about equality. There you go. You got it official. >> External fields or something like that. Well, that hosted a lot of papers on the quantum vacuum energy. Sorry. The quantum uh the Casmir effect, quantum vacuum, the Casmir vacuum, the quantum vacuum energies, quantum ZPF effects, manifestations, predictions, theory, experimental proposals and whatnot. You would find um papers by some Italian guys, one guy named Bismanti and another one named Coloni uh who were with the uh Italian nuclear uh research agency which is called in the Italian acronyms uh inf the institudo nuclear physica something and I don't remember what the last minute is. So, INF is where Bismani and Coloni had gotten uh funding to work at and they generated a great deal of really outstanding papers on experimental concepts that they did extensive theoretical and theoretically predictive um work on in support of a variety of different Kazmir effect experiments and um and and measuring the vacuum effects. And their other papers were on the effect of kasmir vacuum energy density or just uh vacuum energy density overall as it applies to quantum field theory and curved space time or the production of gravitational field which are a manifestation of curved space time. So, they looked at that. They looked at it and they said, "Hey, we got a lot of businesses out there running." Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. >> Uh, we're gonna go to the next question here. Uh, but I gotta be honest, like, man, I'm becoming dangerous now. I'm actually becoming like a literal threat at this point because we're now not just figuring out that they hid something. We're not just figuring out that they've got this hidden science and and and that the Casmir effect and zero point energy is real. We're now figuring out exactly the mechanism by which they're producing significant amounts of negative energy, right? The parabolic cylindrical mirrors, not not not the Casmir effect, but a different application of the same concept. And we're also figuring out exactly how they're hiding this. And we're naming names now. Now we know the people that know, right? Marco Rubio knows about MH370. He knows about this weaponry. Tulsi Gabbard probably knows as well. Trump knows. Glenn Gaffne knows. Charles Chase knows. We are making lists now of people that no doubt know. So it's getting it's getting spicy. >> Yeah. So uh so now the issue is can you do a materials science technology? Do we have a technology from material sciences that allows you to build these things so that they're rigid, robust, and won't fall apart on you? Then this that's the one side of the question. The only other side of that question which also needs an answer to is can you measure forces down to 10 -14 newtons because that's that's the largest force you can create from a pile of roughly a billion kasmir cavities stacked on top of each other and the answer to that question has resoundingly is now as of the mid2010s or early 2010s is yes we no mid to late 2010s we now have the capability to measure uh below the threshold of 10 to the negative 14 newtons. So we can measure very tiny forces and if if you can measure that then we can start measuring if we uh um a casmir cavity induced gravitational or anti-gravity effect gravitationally repulsive/ anti-gravity effect. >> I got to give props to Dave Rossi here not just for one of the most incredible interviews I've ever ever heard in my whole life. But how is he keeping a straight face throughout this? How in the hell you think Dave Rossi doesn't know about all this chat? You think Dave Rossi doesn't know this is all real? How is he keeping a straight face during this interview? Like he's just plain dumb the whole time. Like he has like Yeah. Wow. That's interesting. Wow. Mhm. I can't I can't keep calm on this. I'm losing my mind listening to this. Bravo, Dave. Bravo to you, sir. >> Got >> from the negative vacuum energy contained in all those cavities. And everybody's in physics always saying, "Well, you got the positive energy density contained in those cavity walls." Well, that's true. And they're always bigger than the negative vacuum energy density in between those walls or or cavity walls or plates. But if you make those walls thin enough, more transparent enough, more, you know, very thin, right? Uh so that maybe even at an atomic level, uh just one layer of atoms thin, then you might be mitigating so much of that positive mass that you might have an edge on the negative energy density. >> One layer thin, he says. You know what that reminds me of? It reminds me of Paul Tibido's graphine free energy microchip which he says we're going to make it one layer thin of graphine and it becomes very flexible as well. There's definitely a connection to zero point energy and Paul uh Paul Tibido's free energy microchip thermal bath microchip whatever he calls it. So we are exposing a lot of different technologies here and a lot of the technologies that we've been looking into are getting significant support based on what Eric W Davis is saying here. in the little vacuum spaces uh between each of those uh plates. Gosh, those billions of plates. Yeah. So, it's it's a real tough balancing act in the technological implementation of that experiment that they proposed. They proposed an amplification scheme which is amplified by the number of cavities. So, you've got the the raw force just between two plates in a cavity. Now, what happens if we they did the math to show that you can magnify that force amplify it tremendously by having large amounts of cavities connected together. >> Right. Okay. >> It's just it's still in feas in feas. Well, it wasn't feasible to measure 10 to the negative 14 Newtons. Now it's feasible. Now it can be done. Just nobody. These guys never got money, right? They got awards. They won awards. >> Dude, this dude literally just said that Sny White's thing doesn't work. And now he's basically explaining how Sunny White's thing works. Sunny White showed you that clip. He goes, "Vavas, imagine if we string these all together. Now you can amplify that effect or now you can increase that effect and get this energy extraction." This actually I mean Eric W. Davis is now basically confirming that Sunonny White's stuff does work. Actually, here >> for the proposals, it was called Alpha 2. Sorry, I'm sorry, that's wrong. It was Aladdin 2, Aladdin 2. Got >> um and so Aladdin 2 had wonderful number of proposals of different >> Have you ever come in contact with any type of NHI, Alive, not Alive? And have you also worked on any type of uh uh UAP craft in which you were analyzing materials directly? If you could >> Okay, here we go. Stupid questions about aliens, guys. Here we go. Dumb question about aliens. We had We had We were doing so good. We were doing so great. An hour and a half of physics, quantum energy extraction, wormholes, warp drives. Now somebody's got to jump in with the alien talk. How many how many species of aliens are there? Eric W. Davis. >> Answer those. >> Yeah. No to both questions. and the arts parts. We don't we can't rule out that we Hal and I were involved in reviewing the Oakidge National Labs uh materials analysis of arts parts on behalf of Arrow and the Army Capabilities Combat Command in Detroit uh Michigan uh which had the crata um contract with uh to the stars. Gotcha. >> And so we were just outside contractors or scient you know subject matter experts who looked at the report and reduced it down from 90 pages. Now, the public saw a nine-page summary. We got access to a controlled um unclassified information version of the 90page report. And I took we were allowed to take copious notes. So, I took copious notes. >> So, basically, I mean, he just said he's never been on a crash retrieval. He's never worked on a UFO, and he's never seen any aliens. Boom. Can we put that to bed now, or do we still got to keep asking Eric W. Davis about how many species of aliens there are? And by the way, that should have just been common sense cuz the dude's a physicist, not a biologist. If you wanted to have somebody look at aliens, you don't bring in a physicist for that. You would bring in a biologist. Somebody to actually or a psychologist, but just anything other than a physicist. Basically, >> I reduced it down to a a few pages. I don't remember how many pages my memo is, but it's just a very few pages where I bulletized bulleted all of the key features. So, while we don't have evidence that there's an extraterrestrial explanation for arts parts, we do have clear and convincing evidence as Arrow does that that was u manufactured, not natural materials. Uh it just and I'm not saying it's like it wasn't natural bismouth, not natural magnesium. It was, but it it's uh manufactured into the configuration that you see those materials as they are now. There's a big chunk and then there's a bunch of flakes and He's talking about the magnesium bismouth zinc thing, which I there's definitely some merit to that. Whereas like potentially they're using this as a shell to separate the outside from the inside. This is how like a UFO on the inside can be bigger than what it appears on the outside because you're just you're decoupling it from spaceime. And then what he's implying here is that it must be alien technology because we wouldn't have had the material science to produce it. Which I think that's a reasonable argument, but I don't believe it because this guy's lying through his teeth throughout this whole interview and he doesn't he's never seen any aliens. You've never seen any aliens? What do you mean we couldn't have figured it out? You just told me we've had microchips since the 50s. We've had microchips since the 50s, but we can't figure out how to layer m magnesium, bismouth, and zinc on top of each other. Seems a little ridiculous to me. >> That's right. So, we we can't say that that came from from and that was out in the New Mexico area and I'm not sure if that was near the ro near the Corona near Foster Ranch in Corona, but um but I can't we cannot uh assign that to that particular crash retrieval event of July 4th, 199 uh 1947. Uh all we can say is given the rise of the advance and need for the advancing of material science to support advancing military weapon needs during World War II, there was no reason no requirement to bond bismouth and magnesium together at micron levels where where where the layers are micron size uh layers and there was no reason or requirement to do that. there's no purpose or point of doing so and nobody knew how to do it until uh very recently had been suggested in the mid2010s or so and that you would do that to create a particular electromagnetic waveguide and it turned out when we looked at the material it certainly was no electromagnetic wave guide for terverts radiation and it was certainly not a metam material. This material did not have the properties required to meet that application or those applications and uh it was so heavily damaged too as well. It had been sitting out on the desert floor. It had been oxidized and hydrated. So where you have elements of instead of magnesium just pure magnesium you have hydroxi hydroxilized and oxidized hydroxilized so it's magnesium O and magnesium O which is magnesium O is magnesium oxide magnesium O is magnesium oxyhydride I think that's what it is and um u and that comes from thick and terrestrial origin other than you can rule out the extraterrestrial origin only on the lead isotopes alone that we typically see on her quick break because I just lost a hearing aid and I So battery. >> What What is going on with my dude's camera here? Is this guy holding his cell phone when he's doing this for this interview? My this guy literally helped the government develop teleportation technology and he's got he's working off his Nokia phone. He's doing his stream off his Nokia phone. Can we get my man a camera? What's the deal with this? Why do our black project engineers got the jankiest streaming setups ever? I'm a healthcare IT consultant. I got one of the best streaming setups apparently of all the people that are out here. What What is this? The dichotomy is just breaking my mind right now. Okay. And for the final question, this question here is not a question that Ross Colart has asked. However, it's been making the the the news lately. Um, which is that, and I just wanted to see simply if you agree with this assessment. Uh, Ross Colart states that, and I quote, "There appears to be intervention from a very high level in government to stop UAP disclosure. President Trump made a promise during the election campaign that he would try to be more open about the disclosure of UAP imagery. That promise is not being fulfilled. End quote. Uh do you agree with Ross Coltart on that assessment? >> Yeah, he's right. Remember, President Trump is the highest level authority of of the executive branch, not of the other two branches of government. It's only all in the executive branch. The freaking judges don't have a say. The legislative branch doesn't have a say. The the Congress on Capitol Hill. So, uh it it's not that it's somebody at the high higher level. If somebody at the highest level, which is the correct term to use, and I think that was in the question actually. So somebody at a high level can go to President Trump and and and probably show him the peeves, right? >> One or more of them concerning this specific topic and saying, "Sorry, the legality of this as in as it was derived or defined in the Eisenhower administration is you can't do this." >> You can't disclose, right? >> And the and there are consequences if you do. Now, I think on the industry side, industry's got the legacy aerospace industry. They've got security offices and their security offices aren't going to compromise your government contract by harming American citizens, much less harming the president of the United States. But there are contract security officers. They can hire third party security, who are notorious for doing nasty things to American citizens who work in the legacy uh industry. Um, >> as well as >> Well, chat, I'm cooked. I'm cooked, chat. You just heard it right there. He says basically someone's got to come down. Someone comes down and will tell the president, "Sorry, you can't disclose this. Here are the peeds. You can't talk about this. This has definitely happened to President Trump, 100%." And people say, "If Trump knew, he would say something." No, because he doesn't want to get killed either. And they're saying that there are it's it's not the government that's going to send it out. They've subcontracted the wet works, which is the people. They've subcontracted the wet works out to private military contractors who have their own security forces like Sierra Nevada Corporation, Loheed Martin. They hire the exjock people, the ex special forces people. And if you're a legacy program, that's the these unacknowledged programs. If you're one of these people and you start talking, I'm not saying this is the case, but I'm just going to say rest in peace, Amy Estridge. Rest in peace. >> Startups. I mean, legacy means they're the old companies that have merged, merged again, and now you got the modern versions after all the merchants have eliminated the previous existing original aerospace companies in America. those they they they work with I think they they work with the security officers the third party security there's lawyers involved with those companies uh there are soul source contract legalities involved with this topic there are um there are the methods of hiding the program from auditing and oversight there's all of this that comes together and the biggest number one issue is compromising a company's proprietary information because to take this out of the national security system so it cannot be foyed or or given into Congress, you got to put it into the proprietary information protection system of industry. >> Right? >> That's been judicially tested for centuries. And one thing the Supreme Court of the United States and all the appellet courts below it have always said, including judges, is you cannot violate proprietary information or intellectual property right protection of any enterp capital enterprise of the United States incorporated u entities. >> My guy Eric Davis is just out here spilling the tea. He's just spilling the tea everywhere. is going, "Oh, they literally just gave the technology to the private defense contractors and now it's proprietary information." Proprietary information. Now the contractors can defend their own proprietary information, whatever means necessary. They're basically just above the law. Loheed Martin is above the law. Loheed Martin's defense contractors, they probably make these people sign agreements that say, "We can take you out if you start talking." I want to see if somebody has and wants to leak one of these NDAs. You know what? I shouldn't even say this because people will fake the NDAs, but I imagine that they have clauses in their like basically death clauses that are like we can take you out. And so this is how they don't it doesn't come out because if you go work for Loheed Martin like Charles Chase, I probably put him at risk, man. I probably put Charles Chase at risk. And that message that Charles Chase sent me, there's probably some coded [ __ ] in there, chat. Like, he's We should maybe look at that email again. I don't even know if I should have made that email public now, actually, because he's probably never going to talk to me ever again. These people are terrified to talk to me because they can't even risk this coming out because if it even comes out indirectly through them, their lives are in danger. Their whole lives and livelihoods are in danger. Yeah. I have so much respect for Charles Chase, man. That guy's like my hero. Honestly, if he was like, if he would let me just be his apprentice, I'd probably just give up all this [ __ ] I'd be like, "You know what? Deleting my deleting my YouTube, deleting my ex profile. I'm just going to go become Charles Chase's apprentice. Like, uh, he can be my Sith Lord. Basically, I'll be the Sith apprentice, Anakin Skywalker. Just let me have a taste of the power. Give me a taste of the dark side, sir. I just want a little taste. bring people back to life. Whatever I got to do, strike down the strike down the the younglings. If I do I have to strike down the younglings, I'll do it. I'll just [ __ ] do it, chat. >> Right. >> You can't do it. It's illegal. It's it's illegal for the constitutional reasons and they'll fight the constitutional reason. So, you're going to get you're going to get these voices that are going to be brought together under the direction of a peed that's going to tell the president under no circumstance can you do this. So I think um this is going on with the with President Trump not going forward to um to fulfill his campaign promise to declassify more of the military sensor platforms and military weapon and military other platforms or I should say other military platforms that have clear and unambiguous high >> chat chat chat from my point of view the Jedi are the evil ones. From my point of view, the ones disclosing it are the evil ones. Chat, never never let me have this power, chat. No, real talk. Real talk. Never let me have the orbs. If you do, whatever happens is on y'all. If you give Ash and Forbes orb technology, do not cry about what happens later. I'm just saying, chat. >> High caliber high precision detection of UAPs is because it's going to it's going to reveal too much about the existence of the platforms. number one. The sensing system's number two, and it's and it's going to probably be a little too much for the American public to want to digest or be able to digest when they see what's on those videos. This isn't just a matter of a triangle going into the ocean and flying back out of the ocean again. It's it's more than that. Uh much more than that. Yeah. >> Okay. Wow. Well, thank you so much, Dr. Davis, for coming on here. Uh we've spent almost approaching two hours doing this and I want to thank everyone in the audience who um over the past handful of days >> Okay. Wow. Okay. That was an amazing interview, guys. Holy smokes. Again, huge shout out to Dave Rossi, my good buddy. Uh Eric W. Davis. Listen, man. Can if Dave Rossi can just swing these kind of interviews. Can you get Hal Pudof on? I want to have Halov come. In fact, I want to play one more clip because I saw this video file and I haven't listened to it in a while. Let's just listen to this. explain to you right now exactly how they've infiltrated these defense contractors, how they control and how they make sure that the technology flows from the aliens or beyond. >> From now on, you own it. >> How do you control that though? You you'd have to have government agents embedded deeply in that which I assume they do anyway, but you'd have to have intelligence agents deep I hope they do deeply embedded in these defense contractors where they would make sure that they maintain some sort of intense level of secrecy. >> That's exactly right. And uh when you think about okay uh these days well supposed we have some kind of disclosure uh what are these companies going to do? They've been hiding things or various parts of the government been hiding things. Um >> mispropating funds line Congress line to Congress. So it's you can see why it's such a problem. >> I'm just going to read these. Autronic fusion propulsion. Autronic fusion propulsion by the way is cold fusion. They just keep coming up with new names for it cuz they don't like to say cold fusion cuz it's got a bad stigma. >> A neutronic fusion. The very first one on the list is cold fusion propulsion. IEC Fusion as a compact energy source. The one on the top right, IEC Fusion as a compact energy, spaceimetric engineering, nuclear propulsion, IIA and the CIA. And then he got a contract from the DIA to write to get all those papers written, some by him, some by Eric Davis, most by other people, other black project engineers. And they were on a classified server that nobody outside the classified server had access to. And they were the most popular papers out there. so popular that people demand that they not be removed from the classified. Okay, guys, that's your moment of then. Have a great night. MH37DX, I'll see you guys later. CIA, I love you, too. Don't take it too personally. I just want the truth for MH370. All you had to do is admit what you did to the plane and none of this would have happened. Honestly, if anybody if this is anybody's fault, it's your fault. Later, everybody. Peace out. [Music] Out in the fields where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Wormhole, stargates, negative energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Bing 7 through a wormhole. Flowing talking wormhole. Stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? blowing triple 7 through a wormhole flow. [Music] [Applause] [Music] Exotic matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeezed so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cast force negative zones. We need to stay the course. Stalking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing triple 7 do a wormhole float thin shell formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole let's give it a try [Music] fores balancing The plate creating the throat. Open the gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. [Music] We're talking wormho, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Blowing trip 7 through a wormhole flow from the fields to the stars. We break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. Little hoola crunk shines, bringing truth to light through his music. We'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear.