How Cold Fusion Was Suppressed

Eugene Malov blew the whistle on the Cold Fusion coverup in 1989 and he was he was actually a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize, I found out. And in 2004, 15 years after he blows the whistle on MIT, blows the whistle on Cold Fusion coverup, he's mysteriously found brutally murdered in his home, beaten to death. They crushed his neck and they beat him in his face with a blunt instrument multiple times. That's giving you the PG1 13 rated version.

The story goes that they were neighbors or something that broke into his house over some debt or something like that and stomped him to death in his own home. So, I don't know. I don't know what the truth of the Eugene Malv situation is. All I know is that whole story, that whole case is as suspicious as you could get. You thought you had two random people for his death and they turned out to be completely unrelated. Then six years later you find two other random people and decided those people are related.

People don't generally get stomped to death in their own home. They don't get shot to death in the back in their own home either. And it turns out they're always seemingly connected to uh not always but in some cases at least connected to fusion research, a neutronic fusion research. So, and before you ask me, because I just threw that out there, there is a reference to a neutronic fusion in this video that we're going to end up watching that I don't know how much in-depth research he had done into a neutronic fusion, but I do know he was aware of it.

Anybody that knows about fusion is going to know about a neutronic fusion fuels because it's basically like the holy grail. It's just that a lot of people imagine it being too far out of reach and so they don't really talk about it that much. So before we get to that though, I want to play this video because this is Eugene Malov.

This is him right here talking about the cold fusion cover up was a threat to the scientific establishment. the threat of it even being implied as real and having uh monies, shall we say, being diverted from their favored programs. And uh that was a threat. It was real. Overwhelmingly compelling, as I said, in fire from Ice. It it it was real. Now it's 100% certain. In fact, what Puns and Fman found was only the tip of an iceberg.

But within weeks, the hot fusion people were going into action behind closed doors to disprove them. The difference between July 10th and 13th was dramatic. The raw data excess heat. But then on the 13th it was shifted completely. It was altered. They did some standard averaging which was appropriate.

That is in time blocks. But the level of the signal had been utterly changed. It looked like monkey business to me at the time and it has turned out to be exactly that scientific paper done under department of energy contract that had altered data and that data is scientific fraud. as far as I'm concerned, it was represented as a negative result when it was positive. The representation of the altered data as a negative was clear fraud.

We >> So, if you're not familiar with what he's talking about here, he's actually kind of talking about two different things, but the big one is that when cold fusion was proven to be real. I say it was proven to be real because by my standard is it was by the scientific standard it was proven to be real. is that they came out,

they p they came out and they went straight to the media as opposed to going Ps and Fleshman did as opposed to going through the peerreview process and they said here you go here's how we did it and everybody says okay we're going to replicate it and we're going to see does this work or not and so they did they replicated it and they did replicate it and it worked there was 60 replications 60 6 replications and it got so overwhelming that the DOE had to step in and the DOE used their partners like MIT because the DOE had a strong relationship with them and

they developed a tribunal, a tribunal of the top physics experts, probably several people who were on the JSON group and they went by they went lab by lab and they debunked they started at the top ones and just started debunking the most significant ones. Claim that one of these was because of high voltage on the weekend. This is, by the way, that's very real. They did say that they just basically made up a bunch of plausible explanations for why they were seeing these provable experimental results and then they forced them to retract those papers.

The pressure of the DOE coming to your site and saying that there are flaws in your experimentation causes you to retract your papers. And so, Cold Fusion went away. And so the DOE not only did that but they did their own experiments, their own replications with MIT. And this is where Eugene Malv is saying that they cooked the books. They did some normalization, but they they made the probably made the error bars look smaller. So they made it look like the excess heat wasn't really there.

You know, it's just manipulating things with statistics. Pretty simple to do. So that's what Eugene Malov's central claim was. And then they use their study that said, "Oh, look, we did one and it didn't find any excess heat. And we debunked all these other people. Therefore, cold fusion is fake.

Fake and gay. And anybody that talks about it is also fake and gay. And they don't get any money from the government." That's pretty much what they said and what they did. We know for a fact today that the coal fusion low energy nuclear reactions are real. In a few instances, I can say there are clearly overunity electromagnetic devices, things that produce more electrical energy out than in.

Electromagnetic theory require will require radical revision. The only way of approving any patent that resembles coal fusion is to eliminate the words coal fusion or anything like it. They no longer look at the data. Of course, they never really looked at the data. They had a bad frame of reference. >> I want to point that out, too. This is something I've independently figured out in just my own thing is that they don't actually even look at the data.

Like imagine there's 60 different sites are are are showing positive results. I mean, how could you possibly debunk that? The answer is they don't look at the data and they don't look what you actually did. They just come in and they say, "This isn't possible. Therefore, we're going to come up with a plausible explanation for why it didn't really happen. And if this just makes you go crazy, welcome to the matrix.

This is the matrix. This is how they suppress it. This is how we brainwash ourselves. In fact, we do it to ourselves to some degree. If you when I look at people commenting about cold fusion, I see people in the replies who are probably were born after the cold fusion fiasco that are going cold fusion is fake. And you're like, you don't even know what Cold Fusion means.

You probably don't even know who the people, the names of the people were who brought Cold Fusion to the foreground, but they know it's fake. They know it's fake. And that's the key. Nobody even looks at it. How did I learn this firsthand? Pretty simple.

I built a magnetic motor device. I built a magnetic motor device or let's just say I had one built and I challenged major YouTuber electrical engineers who believed that free energy was not possible to review it to test it to come and see it for themselves. Did any of them accept the challenge? No, of course they didn't. Not one accepted the challenge. None of them did.

They all came up with excuses for why they wouldn't do it. They claim that it wasn't possible, therefore there's no reason to waste their time. It's actually so when people say if if it was real, somebody would do it. Somebody would prove it. They have done that many times. That's that's not the standard of evidence.

That's just the standard of evidence we imagine an idealistic version of the reality that we live in. In the real world that we live in, people will only believe something when the government comes out, when their authority comes out and tells them this is reality. That's how they were able to keep it hidden from us for so long. To begin with, they said it must work like hot fusion. Well, this was in a solid state. It's just like saying the the equivalent of demanding that cold fusion works like hot fusion is like saying a transistor works like a radio tube.

There must be this product or this radiation or or we're not going to believe it. The Wright brothers airplane flew and there was very much controversy about that from 1903 to 1908. One prominent critic who said it would never fly, never would be real, could never be done. This one is particularly intense because of the threat to academic wisdom. There's nothing worse I found than suggesting to academic physicists in particular and academics in general that they are not only wrong but disastrously wrong, catastrophically wrong.

And that once they are proved and shown in public to be the fools that they are and the bad actors that they are, there's possibly going to be some punishment for them. There you go. He hits the nail right on the head there at the end. He says they're afraid, right? The the reason why they don't want to review any of this, they don't want to look at the evidence is they're afraid of being wrong.

They're afraid that if they were wrong, what are the consequences going to be when it turns out the Nobel Prize is basically just something we give away to appease people in the public se sector? What are those people going to say when they find out their whole life's work was one big joke and the joke was on them the whole time? How is that going to play out for people? Right? This is why I think the people that have been hiding this technology, I think they're been they're they're waiting the clock out.

They're like, I want to die before the public realizes what's been happening because some of these people are going to be really upset and people are going to be out for blood. People are going to be out for blood because you pretty much were holding back all of human civilization. And you got to try to justify to us that you were doing it for for for moral just causes and not for your own greedy self-interest. Good. Good luck with that one. Good luck.