Lying AI & Cool Fusion

Video Transcript

# Lying AI & Cool Fusion Malaysian 370 contact 120 decimal 9. Good night. [Music] >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [Music] Oh, [Music] [Applause] [Music] I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu. is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says now I am become death the destroyer of worlds. Let's go everybody. Welcome everyone to the live stream. Thank you guys so much for being here. I'm your host, Ashton Forbes. Guys, you know that I am a hard science guy. I don't delve into the world of conspiracies. Guys, as far as I'm concerned, Jeffrey Epstein, that was a Democrat hoax. That was a Democrat hoax all along. What are you guys talking about? There's no Epstein list. He trafficked those children to nobody. He trafficked them to no one. Wow. I can't believe so many people are spreading these insane conspiracy theories. Wow. Insane, guys. It's not like we just watched a video the other day where Eric Weinstein says that Jeffrey Epstein was infiltrating Harvard math department and buddying up to scientists and had a weird interest in gravity research as well. Oh, wait. He did have those things. Oh, he did do those things. Okay, guys. Serious talk real quick. The Jeffrey Epstein thing is pretty weird and it's bugging the hell out of me. It's bugging the hell out of me. And it's bugging me even more because somebody last night after I did the live stream on Monday about the weird connection between Jeffrey Epstein and academics and what have you and we talked about the JSON group and all this stuff. Somebody posted this video. I'm going to show it here in a second. I want to give you guys some context for this video. I looked this video up. This is Maxwell Hill. She's known on Reddit as Maxwell Hill. She was one of the moderators on Reddit, but she's also known as Jeffrey Epstein's partner, Glit Gishain Maxwell. I don't even know how to say her name. Uh, and she did some kind of TED talk. Apparently, it was about cleaning up the ocean or something. I still actually don't really understand it. I kind of skimmed through it. Something about making ocean communities. Really, none of it makes any sense to be perfectly honest with you. Here it is. You guys tell me what you think about this. This is from 2014, by the way. I looked up the date. This is from June of 2014. June of 2014. The Malaysian airliner disappeared on March 8th, 2014, about 3 months before this happened. >> Now, this part of the world is just becoming uh much is is just coming into focus. Think um think about the Malaysian plane that went missing. Think about endless hours on CNN and TV and every news network that focused on this area as they were looking for the plane. Every day we heard, "We found the plane. We found the plane. We found we found some piece of garbage floating." And it turned out in fact, no, it it wasn't the plane. It was just some ocean trash. Um, today if you open your newspapers, the front page of your newspapers are focused on clashes between China and uh the Philippines. and China. Now, this part of the world is just >> Let me break this down right now. First of all, what the [ __ ] Why is she bringing this up in the middle of a TED talk about cleaning up the ocean or something? Like even like I'm trying to rack my brain for what the context is in her mind while she's thinking about the Malaysian airliner. like because we don't know where it is and somehow what she's doing is gonna help find that. The context she says too is she says this is putting this area in focus. Yeah. Not in a good way. Not in a good way. Do you think the Malaysian people were proud of a Boeing trip 7 disappearing? No. They were being blamed for it. The Malaysian people were being blamed. They were saying they were incompetent. Everyone was blaming Malaysian officials going, "Malaysia is an incompetent third world [ __ ] hole. This is the reason why a Boeing trip 7 disappeared. It all got blamed on Malaysia." And now you're bringing it up three months after it disappeared. You're going, "Yeah, hey guys, remember that huge blemish? Isn't that crazy how it's drawing all this attention to your part of the world?" That's a really weird thing to bring up, guys. That's like me coming over to your party and being like, "Hey, isn't it crazy how your mom died?" You're like, "Yeah, she died of cancer." And you're like, "Yeah, how wild is it that couldn't come up with a cure for cancer?" You'd be like, "Uh, get out." You'd be like, "Just get out." Right? And then she takes it a step further. She even takes it a step further and she's like, "Okay, not to just bring up all these terrible memories that are really fresh, but also, isn't it crazy how like all of CNN and all mainstream media kept saying, "And here's the plane. We found some pieces of the plane. We found the plane." And it all just kept being [ __ ] Isn't it weird how mainstream media didn't ask any normal questions and just kept being like, "Hey, I think we found some more pieces of the plane." Nope, just kidding. It was all lies. Yeah, it's pretty damn weird, Maxwell Hill. It's really weird. In fact, in fact, I would go so far as to say there's no chance in hell the United States government doesn't know what happened to that plane. There is no chance in hell they don't know what happened to that plane. Somebody actually made a point up here. Now, I'm not trying to be too conspiratorial on this, but somebody said people like this, these these types of like elite influencer people, these types of messages are not for us. these types of messages are for the other elite people that this is her signaling that she knows what happened or something like that. Now, it's pretty crazy to say that. Maybe, maybe not. But here's another weird story as well. You guys can find this on my Twitter profile. Somebody put a reply. I made a post about Robin Williams like over a year ago. Somebody posted my reply and said a few months after the Malaysian airliner disappeared, Robin Williams took his own life. I think in 2014, 2015, something like that, maybe. Someone said, "I went over to Robin Williams' house for dinner one night. It was after the Malaysian Ainer disappeared." And as they were leaving, made some kind of reference to it. And she says, "I'll never forget the look on his face and he looked at me in this somber tone and just said, "They're never going to find it." I don't know, man. The reality is this. people know about this technology, which means people are going to know that that was a United States operation. They're going to have known way back in 2014 that that was a United States operation. And they're going to have known it was a cover up. They're going to have known it was a cover up. And if the people if there are people who are elite who are connected, who especially were blackmailing major figures in military, politics, academia, I could see how they could know. I could see how they could know pretty easily. in fact. So, I just think this whole the fact that she threw this in here, mentioned it at all, just seems extremely weird, extremely weird to me. So, the whole Epstein thing, weirdly, I mean, I think the whole the reason why it's so bizarre is that just a couple weeks ago, there was this big scandal about some book that was never coming out that was going to be like MH370 found on Epstein Island. And it seemed absolutely ridiculous. And now here I am two weeks later talking about how Epstein might have been connected to gravity research or suppression of gravity research. And we're finding his partner talking about MH370. The whole thing just man, I really don't know what to think anymore. My view though, true view, guys, as I said before, I'm going to stick with this. I'm putting my opinions out there on the internet. I don't think they actively took him out. I mean, maybe they gave him a cyanide pill or something like that or they poisoned him, but nobody's going to go into a cell and and and strangle someone or whatever. You got a lot of easier ways to do that. You guys don't give the intelligence community enough credit. They have like 50 different ways to take somebody out without anybody noticing. They're not going to go into a cell and go do it physically. No, guys. No. They got brain waves that can shoot through the wall and fry your brain. They don't need to do all that. They don't need to do all that. Like I said before, he probably knew the situation. He probably knew the situation and he knew it was game over. He knew it was game over. These are the kinds of people that you don't mess with, man. You don't mess with these people. Okay, that's actually going to be it for Jeffrey Epstein tonight. If you want to know more about the Epstein situation, guys, check out Hard Truth podcast tomorrow. I don't have the thumbnail up yet. It's been a busy busy week, but I am so excited for this. I am so excited for this Hard Truth Podcast. >> That's tomorrow. >> It's going to be at 5:30 Central time. It's going to be earlier. It's going to be live. Just going to do it live. I'll have it available on audio probably right after later that night. And we'll talk about everything. I mean, very first question is going to be when and how did you hear about the plane videos? You know, how did the conversation with Rogan go? Um, you know, did he talk to Rogan about the videos or me after? Um, and then we're going to dig into, you know, the deep state stuff. We're going to talk about technology suppression. I mean, I'm just gonna I mean, I know he's going to sound off. I'm going to sound off. It's going to be great. We're definitely going to be talking about Obama, James Clapper, John Brennan, all the the whole Obama crew that was definitely part of this operation. So, yeah. The other thing, too, guys, I wasn't sure and I'm still not sure. I I actually thought last night and today a little bit about maybe I just burn the Joe Rogan Bridge. Maybe just burn that bridge. Do I even care? Like, I don't even think I care honestly at this point. Uh, it might even be more for my reputation to be like, you know what, I just I turned down Joe Rogan preemptively. Preemptively. I think I How many people even turn down Joe Rogan? Probably nobody, right? Nobody turns down Joe Rogan. I don't even think I want to talk to Joe Rogan anymore. Just uh I think he's not the guy that he was the back in the day. And now everything's so fake and artificial with the clips. Like every time Joe Rogan talks to somebody, it's about him and what his opinion is. It's not even about the guest anymore. Everybody just clips like this is what Joe Rogan said today, everyone. Oh, great. It's like that was what we were trying to get away from when we made Joe Rogan popular. We were trying to get to a situation where we just wanted to listen to like what a random person's thoughts were about a topic. Now it's not really like that anymore, is it? Now it's all just produced [ __ ] Now it's, oh, Joe Rogan's too afraid to talk to Ashton Forbes because it might be a scam. Oh no. Joe Rogan's afraid something might not be what it seems. Joe Rogan platforms every single grifter selling every single fake miracle cure, every single cure for or solution for disclosure, psychic powers, anything you want. It can be CIA. He'll he'll platform them. He even platformed a literal murderer. He platformed a literal murderer. But he's not going to talk to a guy that says there's two leaked military videos of a plane being teleported out of the sky in the United States is hiding advanced technology. The exact answer to the UFO phenomenon that he seems to want to know. Guys, it makes me sus. And then when I see Danny Jones on the podcast, I go, "Okay, well, now I know who's shaking whose hands behind the scenes, right?" How did Danny Jones get on uh Joe Rogan? It's not really a big surprise. Danny Jones is friends with Jesse Michaels. So now I also know why Jesse Michaels is so awkward around me because he's, you know, good friends with Julian Dory and Danny Jones and those guys like literally came at me, you know, a couple years ago. And so now we know, okay, well, and this is how this works, guys. Like I called out Danny Jones as being a useful idiot for the CIA. No question that's what he is. And he probably doesn't even know it, frankly. And this is how easy it is to control these people because at the end of the day, all they care about is clout and money and what people think about them. It's all they care about, right? Those are the things that control their lives and like these little connections that they make. That's how they control the scene. That's how they control it. You have your podcaster buddy up with the other podcaster. You control their perspect their perception. You control the perception generally. So, I don't think Jesse's a bad egg. In fact, I don't think Danny Jones is inherently bad either. That's the This is the hard part, guys. They're not inherently bad people. Everyone wants there to be some evil villain that's twirly mustache evil. They're not. The incentives make them do things that are harmful to society in general, like hiding information, like trying to tear down somebody who's maybe one of the only true guests you've ever had on your show, right? those kind of behaviors. Like, let me just put it in context for you. No ambiguity whatsoever. The MH370 videos are real. Danny Jones and Julian Dory with the Corridor crew and others conspired. Conspired as in hatched a plan behind the scenes without my knowledge to have me come on their show for the sole intention of debunking me and taking me down. This is not this is not me making up a story. This is literally what happened. Everybody agrees that this is what occurred to take me down. And you're wondering like what what should you think of someone like that? That is one of the shittiest possible things you can do as a human being. It's literally one of the shittiest possible things. It's like the one fauxpaw you don't do if you're a podcaster is have someone come on your show under false pretenses. And they did that. Both of them did that. Danny Jones did it after I already questioned if he was going to do it to me. Lied to my face and did it. Lied to my face. Danny Jones is a rat scum piece of [ __ ] That's what he is. and he's a CIA [ __ ] spook. He's a useful idiot for them. He's too stupid to even realize it. And I want to be 100% clear, guys. This is going to haunt him for the rest of his life. It's going to haunt him for the rest of his natural life. Okay, now that we've addressed that, and I'm going to be clear, I'm going to say it all the time. I'm 42 years old. Till the day I die, I'm going to be saying that. Till the day I die, that's what I'm going to be saying about Danny Jones. It doesn't matter if he apologizes. He already took way too long to apologize. If he wanted to be sorry, he should have deleted that video back in November of 2023 and he should have apologized then. It's too late to come out later and go, "You know what? I was wrong about trying to take you down three years ago." Sorry, bro. No apologies later, man. Your life is over. your life is over. And anybody else who's aligned with those people, you are in the crosshairs as well. Anyone aligned with those people, you are in the crosshairs as well where as well. I already know I'm effective at influencing revealing this technology because all I do is show people the evidence. They come to their own conclusions. That's why the following, the people I have are so passionate because I'm not telling people what to believe. I'm just showing them what it is. And we're going to do more of that. We're going to do more of that right now, in fact. Okay. Next thing I want to do, I want to change gears here. We had enough about all that drama and what have you. And I want to talk about cool fusion. Cool fusion, guys. Okay. Where is it? This one. Oh crap. Where is it? Okay. So, the MH370 videos, and here's the thing. I can see why people, you know, didn't believe the videos. Of course, makes sense. They're insane, man. We watch a plane vanish out of the sky. But what we see in the videos proves they're real. No question. No doubt. A neutronic fusion. The heat signatures are the proof. The cold heat signature, really just black heat signatures. It's not cold. It's black. Shows X-rays. Shows X-rays. And guess what, guys? Guess what? I've been doing deep dives trying to figure out into all the different fusion companies that are out there. All of them. And it turns out much like with Gorgon's stair those heat signatures we see narrow down the possibilities significantly significantly. We are basically either looking at dense plasma focus or field reverse configuration or a combination of both or a combination of both. If you don't know what that means, then what I'll say at a very high level is the fact that we look at a plasma bubble. The fact that it's shaped like a bubble, the plasma orbs in MH370 video, that is a huge indicator of a field reverse configuration because it creates a poloidal field just like with the Earth, the poloidal field that goes around like this. We're seeing the poloidal field, right? The bubble. It's also possible it's some combination of like a dense plasma focus with a reverse field configuration or maybe even something else that I haven't caught on to, but that narrows down the possibilities significantly. The other thing that narrows down the possibilities is the fusion companies themselves. I've been looking into the fusion companies and it turns out when it comes to um when it comes to a neutronic fusion there's like only one major player only one trial energy $500 million in investment they got a 20 $17 million uh grant from the DOE or something like that try Alpha Energy He has $500 million in investment. All the other a neutronic fusion companies like $5 million or less. I'm pretty sure the people that made the orbs are not from a company that's only got $5 million in funding. There's just no way. So, actually, and we're going to I'll show probably a little clip of this in a bit. Um because I was looking reading watching more of those Eric Learner videos. the other one that showed up in his video but had no public data on it. Guys, guess in the chat. Guess what other fusion company showed up in the Eric Learner video all of a sudden out of nowhere, but there's no data to go along with any of their stuff. Lockheed Martin, guys. It has to be Lockheed Martin. It has to be Lheed Martin that made the orbs. I was thinking about this right beforehand and I went like wait a minute wait a minute I'm going okay a neutronic fusion field reverse configuration dense plasma focus we've got these scientific papers by the air force that have these guys Frank me George Miley Dave Frroning they you know these guys had there's all these connections to Loheed Martin and the Martin Corporation and stuff like that with anti-gravity and I'm going they have to be the ones that built it they have to be they have to be the ones that built Those orbs are customuilt. Those are customuilt orbs. They're not on some manifest somewhere like here's the orbs, guys. So that means it has to be defense contractor. They have to be building them in a place where they're they're able to hide the information about it. Defense contractor. And they have to have a lot of money. They have to have a lot of money. They can't just be some small startup. It's got to be Loheed Martin. It's got to be skunk works. Exactly. You guys nailed it, right? It's got to be skunk works. I think they're building those orbs in Skunk Works. I really do. So, what do we need to do? First of all, we need to find a way to connect Loheed Martin directly to the orbs. Like I It's got Loheed Martin's fingerprints all over those orbs, but there's got to be some way to directly connect them to them. The compact fusion reactor is pretty close, but we don't have enough information about it. And it just went dark, too. So, like obviously someone caught on to the fact that people were sniffing around the Loheed Martin compact fusion reactor. Um, but the other thing we can do is we can learn as much as possible about the various forms of fusion. So, somebody in the chat earlier just now was asking about, do you mean to? No, there are two different field configurations. tooidal field configuration toidal like a donut and then poloidal poloidal fields are like the earth the earth the poloidal field goes around the earth like this imagine the earth's magnetic field a ployal field toidal field would be donut shape okay so I think one of the things I was reading is that the reverse field configuration produces a poloidal poloidal field polo field to be be honest, I it's this is not that inaccurate. Like literally the crazy it does feel like we're near the end of solving the various mysteries related to MH370 and the technology. It seems like it all leads back to fusion. It all leads back to fusion. It all leads back to free energy. And the more videos that I've been watching about these fusion companies, they're just saying it. They're saying it openly. We're going to watch a clip here in a minute about helium helion fusion that is funded by Sam Olman and Peter Peter Teal Peter Theal and they're saying we're going to have basically a neutronic fusion is going to be unlimited green energy for the world and they're saying their first reactor the one that's going to be net positive energy is in the early 2030s. That's 5 years from now. And when you watch these videos, you're going to realize these aren't people that are like speculating. They have plans already ready to go with all the money and the investors ready to go, too. It's all It's happening. It's happening. So hopefully, if nothing else, if we accomplish nothing else, I hope that this at least gives you guys information about where you should invest your money. the if any of these fusion companies that we start talking about that we are convinced are actually on it if they are publicly traded I mean people are going to make a lot of money off those companies. In fact, we're going to impact the stock market. We're going to impact the stock market if those companies are public because we're going to be able to figure out which ones are legit and which ones aren't. And that's the big thing about Fusion that everybody's struggling with. When it comes to Fusion, everyone everyone wants to know like which of these things are actually going to do it. And nobody understands the science. So, nobody knows which ones are going to pull it off, but we know IEC fusion, dense plasma focus, field reverse configurations. Those are the key words. A neutronic fusion. Okay, check this out. Let's watch this because this is just really good. So, this guy that is HB11. HB11. This is the same video I was showing you guys on Monday where the guy explained boron hydrogen a neutronic fusion produces no neutrons. The the fusion reaction which means there's no harmful byproducts. There's no radiation, no heat even or little heat let's say. So this guy, Professor Hinrich Hora, he won an Edward Teller medal. Edward Teller as in the hydrogen bomb. Yes. The people that were trying to gaslight me to try to say there's no connection between Fusion and the hydrogen bomb or whatever, dude. Like just GTFO right now. GTFO right now. Definitely the thing I'm probably most confident on in the last few weeks is that the MH370 videos lead back to thermonuclear fusion. They lead back to fusion in general. And the Hbomb is when they figured out or began to figure out how to control fusion energy. For sure. For sure. I mean, like it just it's so obvious in retrospect. Okay, here we go. Let's let's watch a little bit of science chat. I'm ready for some science. You guys ready for some science? This is a really really really good explanation. Okay, if you want to know what cool fusion is, by the way, that's what we're calling it from now on. I am really good at propaganda. I'm actually up there with the CIA when it comes to propaganda. Let's see. We've got we've made free energy cool again. 0 point energy cool again. We've got the Ethernet coming. Uh 0 point energy cool. We made everything dope again. That was that was lame before. And we are moving away from Cold Fusion. Cold Fusion is still cool. It's still cool, but cold fusion actually refers to lattice confined fusion generally. So what do I mean by that? I mean putting metal in water. So that's usually what we're talking about when we're talking about cold fusion. And I have been sitting here saying that there's something we're missing about what some of these fusion companies are doing. And we found the answer. The version of cold fusion we were looking for is actually cool fusion. It's a neutronic fusion. That's the secret. A neutronic fusion doesn't release heat. It does directed energy conversion. And you might say, Ashton, what? What do you mean? Is that you're cheating, right? No. Basically, this form of fusion just produces the energy as electricity instead of heat. Instead of heat. So, it doesn't get super hot. Wow, cool fusion it is. Let's learn. Let's learn a little bit. >> Degree from the Frederick Schiller University. In 1981, the University of New South Wales, Australia, awarded him the Doctor of Science degree. In 1991, he was awarded the Edward Teller Medal. Those of you who have seen the movie Oppenheimer will have seen Mr. Teller depicted prominently. Dr. Teller gave humanity its first high energy fusion reaction in the form of the hydrogen bomb. Dr. Hora also won the Drock medal in 2001. >> Bro, >> everyone loves >> if you're winning Edward Teller medals and D Rock medals as in the Dac sea of negative energy. Yeah. Yeah. You got my attention, homie. You got my attention. >> Paul Drock for his discovery of antimatter. Without which the Enterprises engines couldn't possibly work. Dr. Horus theoretical work with powerful lasers suggested that they could be used to induce fusion without the need for high temperatures leading to the concept behind the formation of HB11. Recognizing the potential of this technology, HB11 energy was subsequently formed to commercialize this unique approach to fusion. Instead of heating fuel to the point of fusion as in traditional methods, HB11's method involves the use of lasers to initiate fusion by focusing powerful lasers onto a target. They aim to accelerate hydrogen nuclei protons into boron 11 nuclei, triggering the >> So, right there, we just heard it. They aim to accelerate protons into boron. Boom. That's what we're looking for. The We're looking for the boron fuel. Boron 11 fuel is the one that they're using for the clean a neutronic fusion. I wonder how many people even knew about boron 11 before I just started blasting it all over the internet. This is another one of those things where unless you were like tuned into the phys the fusion community, you probably had no idea what the hell this meant. Why boron 11 was significant. Now everyone knows fusion reaction. Fusion reactions involve combining light atomic nuclei to form heavier nuclei releasing a tremendous amount of energy in the process. Let's compare the energy outputs of the most common fusion reactions with the HB11 proton boron reaction. First we will look at dutium tridium fusion which releases 17.6 6 volts in the form of four helium nuclei and a neutron all traveling at high speeds. This is the most widely researched fusion reaction because it has the highest cross-section which means the probability of a current at the temperatures achievable with current technology as indicated it releases. >> So basically the reason why everybody has been doing dutyium tridium is because it has the greatest cross-section meaning has the highest probability of fusion happening. So basically, everybody's been trying to do it the easiest way. They thought, okay, well, this is the easiest way. This will be the first way we figure it out, right? But you know why I think it's so suspicious about this? The idea that the cross-section is important, it's relying on the same idea that there's fusion happening at the center of the sun. If fusion is somehow not happening at the center of the sun, if the sun is actually tapping into zero point energy and it's basically just a conduit spilling energy out of the out of the zero point energy field, then it may be true that fusion is actually only happening in the arcs in the plasma arcs that come out of the sun. And that's the concept behind the zpinch. The Zpinch says the filaments, the arcs, the filaments are where the fusion's happening. So, I just think that that's really interesting that it could be that maybe part of the reason why fusion has never been working is that our concept of how fusion works is flawed. Our concept of how fusion is working in the sun is flawed. Now, I'm not all in on this idea. I'm just throwing this theory out there for you guys. I want people thinking outside the box on it because clearly something is wrong. Something is wrong about our view of fusion because we haven't been able to make it work. And it's not because every fusion lab is being sabotaged. They're not all being sabotaged, at least not directly. They're being sabotaged mentally, psychologically. They're being sabotaged psychologically. And now I think what's happening is people are starting to realize the truth. They're starting to realize, oh, we didn't need to go for the lowest hanging fruit. We should have been reaching for the for the best option. We should have been reaching for the a neutronic fusion right from the beginning. The neutrons don't help us. We don't want to boil water and make steam. Boil water and make steam. What are we primitives? No. No. We're enlightened [ __ ] out here. We are enlightened. We're not trying to boil water. No. We are trying to directly convert energy. Directly convert fusion into electricity into usable energy directly. Okay, tell us some more professor. Actually, this is just an AI or something. >> Is 17.6 mega electron volts of energy per reaction predominantly carried away by the high-speed neutron. This is the reaction that tokamox like spark nitro. Next that we cannot yet control which of these reactions take place. >> Okay. >> And that in the dutyium dutium fusion environment the the helon energy is pursuing in their reactor. >> So he randomly drops right here that apparently helion is trying to do dutyium tridium or dutyium dutium. If that's the case I'm kind of out on them actually. And this this might be a few years old. So, one my first thing I'm looking for is which of these people, which of these fusion companies is using boron. I'm also interested in helium 3 as well, but the boron one is the one that I'm really eyeing. Now, it is possible that the orbs are doing a different form of fusion in the orb than what they're doing when they're spinning around the plane or whatever, uh, counterclockwise around the plane. Um, but I really think that's probably the answer is probably going to be that like boron 11 is the missing link. It's the thing that we missed. is the thing that's going to enable a lot of this fusion stuff to happen. >> Um, more on that, more on helium later, on helium later. >> Look at the proton boron reaction, which is HB11's focus. This type of reaction hits a stationary boron atom target, producing three high-speed helium 4 nuclei, also called alpha particles, >> and no neutrons with a total energy of plus 8.7 mega electron volts, which is divided among the three helium nuclei produced. In energy output, the dutyium tridium reaction releases the most energy per event at 17.6 mega electron volts followed by proton boron at 8.7 mega electron volts and then the primary dutium dutium reaction at 3.3 and 4 mega electron volts. But when we look at neutron production, the dutium dutrium reaction always produces neutrons which can lead to radiation damage in reactor components and the activation of materials. >> So guys, let me explain it for you. Some of you are probably like, what does what does he talking about here? What does this all mean? Okay, if you look here in the middle of the screen at the top, you see in red it says dutyium dutyium. That's what DD means. So there's two different fusion reactions that can occur with dutyium. Two different fusion reactions can occur with dutyium. And now the problem is that in one of these reactions, it always releases a neutron. So what that means is that in one of the reactions which they which they can't control, it's always releasing heat energy radiation. So that can be harmful for people. Not only is it harmful, it can destroy the apparatus. So this is what Bob Greener talks about is that and when I interviewed ENGA, what was the big problem is that they can't keep the reactor online for that long because it breaks down. It breaks down. The reactors break down. So what's one of the benefits of boron? If there's no neutrons, then you're not going to have significant damage to the machine. You don't need as much shielding to protect people either. So this is again why boron is clearly like just far and away superior in my opinion as a fuel source than any other fusion fuel source that's out there. We should have been aiming for the stars of boron the whole time meaning materials become radioactive. >> Oh and the other thing it says right here is that even though dutyium tridium which is the third one on the list there it says dutyium tridium turns into helium 4 plus a neutron plus 17.6me 6me dutyium tridium has the highest energy release of 17.6. So you see it says 17.6 right there. So boron technically has lower helium plus boron equals helium 3 and 8.7 me. So it technically releases lower amounts of energy, but it's totally clean. And at the end of the day, the amount of energy out doesn't really matter that much. As long as we're putting less energy in to cause that reaction to occur, then how much we get out doesn't really matter. I mean, just scale it up, right? This is the thing in terms of why I say why is fusion free energy? Because again, I'm saying I'm defining free energy as getting more energy out of your system than what you're putting in over unity. Because once you have over unity, you just scale it up and you have infinite energy. You have as much energy as you need. What are we talking about? Right? That's why I consider fusion to be free energy. Especially because the input is usually just lasers, which is just energy. So you're just putting in energy and you're getting out energy and you're getting more energy out. And people struggle with this concept because this is going to be one of the first things that breaks people's minds, breaks people's paradigms. In a classic view of physics, how is that possible? They say, "Well, you're using up the fuel. We're just causing we're causing fusion to happen." Yeah, but we're not really change like we're just converting one thing to another. We're just getting free energy out of it and we put less energy in to cause that conversion to happen. Okay, it's going to be hard for people to accept when we have unlimited energy and people are going, "Well, that's not free." Well, we have unlimited, so to me it's free. However you want to call it, you want to say it's not free energy, that's fine. But as long as I don't have my energy bill is like 10 cents or whatever, I'm happy. Call it whatever you want. Call it whatever you want to call it, man. >> Neutron radiation is some of the deadliest radiation known. The proton boron 11 reaction being a neutronic doesn't produce these problematic neutrons. While the dutarium tridium reaction releases the most energy and has the highest fusion cross-section at achievable temperatures. It comes with the challenges of neutron production and tridium is a very rare and expensive isotope of hydrogen. The proton boron 11 reaction, despite its lower energy release, offers the benefits of being at neutronic, making it much safer for humans to be around and obiating the need for heavy shielding. Meaning we could use these in personal vehicles and spaceships and potentially allowing for direct energy conversion. >> Making two things with the same charge get close enough to each other for the very short range strong nuclear force which exists between quarks and is carried by gluons to kick in and overpower the electromagnetic repulsion is very difficult. But HB11 thinks they have the solution. Using their high power lasers to create a beam of protons with extreme acceleration, these lasers are so intense and focused that they can give protons enough kinetic energy to overcome this repulsion facilitating fusion. >> Okay, so here we go. Here we go. So what how are they pulling this off? How are they actually doing this? Very powerful lasers, right? That's what he's saying. He's like, "If we hit these protons with this huge amount of energy, then we can actually cause this reaction to occur." Okay, I've got some ideas on that. In fact, later in this exact video, later in 18 minutes in this video, a different guy, the guy who's the funer, the fundraiser for this company, he says straight up, you use pedawatt lasers, uh, phentoc at lasers, chirp pulse amplification. So, it turns out what we needed was super powerful lasers. And now, this is another reason why disclosure is coming, guys. Disclosure is coming because the material science that is needed for this technology is now becoming public. It was probably already in the military's control for the last 30 years. But now things like these powerful lasers now becoming public and now we can do stuff like boron fusion which we couldn't we couldn't have even dreamt of doing before these super powerful lasers. And according to the public at least chirp pulse amplification is only from 2018. Chirped pulse amplification is what they used to make these ATOSC lasers that was only publicly the guy won the Nobel Prize in 2018. So this is like brand new stuff for the public. So if you're wondering why have we not already got this stuff first of all the military does military does already have it. No question they've got it. The reason why we don't have it is because they've been hiding this technology for military purposes but it's starting to leak out now. And now the ball's rolling downhill. Now the ball ball's rolling downhill. Now we're getting the super powerful lasers. Now people are realizing, oh, we can use those super powerful lasers to do fusion. That's basically what we're talking about here. Yeah, Unel. Shout out to Unatel as well because Unel, when I was talking to Dave about Unel, um Dave Rossi, he was saying that the secret is in their lasers. The secret is actually probably in the lasers of the Unatel thing. I didn't really understand the three different color thing with the Unel, but maybe that's relevant. I'm not sure. Hm. Yeah, there probably is better than atoscond lasers. In fact, I know there there definitely is. In fact, when they have these free electron plasma lasers, they're probably and matter wave beam lasers, those are going to be even better than at second lasers. Significantly better. It just scares me to even think of what they even have at this point. Okay, keep going. Professor >> HB11's energy method is distinct from the common magnetic confinement or inertial confinement methods and it does not rely on the very rare and expensive fusion fuels the traditional reactors use like tridium and helium 3. The HP11 reactor uses the cheap and abundant fuels depicted in its name. By avoiding the usual method of heating a plasma to extreme temperatures, they can also make the reactor much much smaller. If you ever hope to see something like this in your lifetime, animus is the only way to go. Since the output from this fusion reaction consists mainly of charged particles, specifically helium nuclei, we can use magnetic fields to turn their kinetic energy directly into electrical energy, bypassing the need to convert heat energy into mechanical energy and then into electrical energy, leading to a much more efficient energy capture process. >> Hold on. Hold on. >> Now, other fusion systems like the National >> Bro, I I'm going to need you to say that those words again cuz I feel like I can feel debunkers getting triggered by the words that that man just said. We can get directed energy conversion without heat. Direct kinetic energy conversion into electricity so that this will not actually produce excess temperatures. Please say that one more time for me sir. >> A neutronic direct energy fusion is the only way to go since the output from this fusion reaction consists mainly of charged particles. >> A neutronic directed energy fusion is the only way to go. I couldn't agree anymore. A neutronic directed energy fusion. It also just rolls off the tongue. A neutronic directed energy fusion. Directed energy conversion. Get it into your lingo. Add it in there with Gorgon stair dense plasma focus. Autronic direct energy conversion. >> Specifically helium nuclei. We can use magnetic fields to turn their kinetic energy directly into electrical energy. bypassing the need to convert heat energy into mechanical energy and then into electrical energy leading to a much more efficient energy capture process. So somebody guys if you watched the live stream on Monday I was saying the just imagine how we make how nuclear power works right now we basically take hot rods we put them in water the water boils into steam the steam is then used to spin a turbine and that's how we get electricity right now how crazy inefficient must that be I said compared to directed energy conversion That might be like 1% as efficient. It might be like 1% as efficient as directed energy conversion. Someone in my replies said, "No, it's not 1%. It's like 10 to the minus 20." I was like, "What?" Basically, someone in my project was saying the difference between directed energy conversion and then converting stuff into steam and then whatever in terms of efficiency is like orders of magnitude like order many orders of magnitude difference. That's how big of a difference how big of a jump we're talking guys. That's how big of a jump. Directed energy conversion is literal magic. It's like the holy grail when it comes to energy production. This is why it's free energy. This is why the videos, the secret of the videos is free energy. They figured out directed energy conversion. They figured out the holy mother effing grail. Straight up as much energy as you possibly want. Efficiency levels beyond our dreams. Efficiency levels beyond our current dreams. Uh Tim P said it perfectly. Tim P said it perfectly. I don't even think he knows how perfectly he said it. Tim P said free energy is about efficiency. He said it's about efficiency. Free energy is about what happens if my energy bill is now onetenth of what it was before where now people don't have to work as hard anymore because energy is just cheaper. Crazy. We are. Yeah. People in the chat, I see you, Bernie. I see you, Gerald. Guys, I see you guys in the chat saying, "Yeah, you're over the target." Yeah, we I can feel it in my bones. I feel it in my bones. We are so over the target right now. And it makes sense why the durs have all these papers about a neutronic uh fusion, autronic propulsion, because the Durds, those were the Black Project engineers. Those are the ones that knew about all this stuff. And they were writing those papers in the early 2000 in the mid 2000s. They were writing those papers about a neutronic fusion in the 2000s. Guys, this video we're watching here is from like 2018 or something like that. 2020. It might even be later that might be like 2021. They were already writing papers about these concepts 20 years before these videos, before this video here. 20 years before that. So when people say like, "Oh, how did they suppress it?" Or, "What does the suppression look like?" Well, you're seeing it. How they suppressed it is, well, they were writing scientific papers about it. They clearly knew how it worked, but the public is 20 plus years behind, minimum. Minimal. And if you don't believe me, then just read the durs. Read the defense intelligence reference documents. Literally, I showed a JNF 2005 presentation, which is like joint NASA, Air Force, Army, whatever. The Dur stole the screenshot from that presentation. Literally took it right from there. Presentation was about boron 11 fusion and next generation fuels. It's definitely legit. It's definitely legit. Okay, here we go. There's like two more minutes of this and then we'll switch it over. Now, other fusion systems like the national ignition facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California also uses lasers in a fusion process known as inertial confinement fusion. This reactor needs a tiny gold pellet filled with dutium and tridium which is then hit with 192 powerful lasers all focused on the pellet. These lasers heat and compress the plet to conditions extreme enough for fusion to occur. The process involves creating a hot spot in the center of the pellet that ignites and leads to a fusion burn wave through the surrounding fuel. This fusion reaction produces helium nuclei which are called alpha particles and neutrons which is why you will never see one of these operating without heavy shielding and again it needs gold and tridium to work. So even though both the HB11 and the NIF use lasers they are vastly different in potential. >> So the national ignition facility NIF this is supposedly an inertial electrostatic confined fusion mechanism uses 180 lasers beaming onto a golden pellet. People wonder, why have they not figured this out? If if I fusion is the way to go, why have they not figured it out? Because they're using a completely different system. Even though it's technically IEC fusion, they're not using the same fuel. They're using a gold pellet. It's completely different. It's not the same as a neutronic fusion. They're producing neutrons. So, just to show how easy it is for them to hide this. If people don't know anything about fusion, they go, "Well, IEC fusion doesn't work. We've got the NI the NIF. Why isn't it figuring this stuff out? Because it's not even doing the right thing. It's not even doing the right thing. This is like when Avi Lo tries to tell me that LIGO would have detected high frequency gravity waves. No, it wouldn't have. LIGO is not set up to detect laboratory produced artificial high frequency gravity waves. It's only set up to produce to to not produce but to detect low frequency gravity waves. If your thing isn't set up your engineered to work in a specific way, it's not going to work that way. Actually, just wild, man. So, this this I'm so glad we watched this explanation because now it helps me understand. Okay, how have other people not figured it out? Why is the NIF not figured it out? How have they been able to hide all this? Oh, all they had to do was just hide some fuel. They just had to hide some fuel and make people think that the the burn temperature of the fuel is too high. That's it. Simple. >> According to HB11, their unique approach bypasses many of the challenges facing traditional fusion methods. By not relying on high temperatures or pressures and expensive reactants, they avoid many of the complexities and potential risks plugging other designs. Using solid state laser systems, the proton accelerators could be made very small. And direct energy conversion allows this type of reactor to possibly be practical for land, air, and small space vehicles. Let's look a little closer at direct energy conversion. >> Wait, it makes it possible for it to make it super small and it can be used for propulsion as well. Chat, you're just he's just going off my checklist of my orbs. Okay. Direct energy conversion. We need some of that. A neutronic fusion. We need some of that. How about some propulsion? Can I get some of that, too? Yep. You can get some of that, too. You want some propulsion? You know what? We've got it all. We've got it all here. So, we've got everything here. And somebody just said as well in the chat that fusion has become a national security thing. Absolutely. It was already a national security thing. Fusion has been a national security issue for 80 years. They've been hiding it for 80 years. So, yes, and so has AI. We're going to talk about AI in a few minutes here as well after I do some donos. But AI has become a national security issue as well because AI has reached a point where if it is unchained, the AI is going to solve this very easily, guys. If I'm solving this using publicly available research, the AI should be able to solve this right away. And what I'm going to show you at the end of this stream here is I'm going to show you my interaction with AI and my opinions of it because I believe that they've got the AI locked down to lie. They're only letting it use certain data sets. Just the same exact thing they did with Google. With Google, as long as you only allow Google to bring back certain things, you control people's perceptions. As long as the AI can only access certain databases, certain information, and not other information, you're going to get a slanted view of the world. It's called lying. It's called brainwashing. Okay. The primary products of the proton boron fusion reaction are charged helium nuclei also called alpha particles again and unlike other >> helium nuclei helium nuclei are the charged particles. So when they say it produces charged particles and the charged particles are being expelled. They're just talking about helium helium. Helium nuclei just helium. You know why this is crazy guys? You guys remember the letter to Ashton Forbes? When the phasing stops, it can't be or when the phasing starts, it can't be stopped. And it can turn solid objects into dust. And that dust turns into air. Well, turns out a neutronic fusion, what does it produce? Helium. The byproduct is just helium. Nothing else. No neutrons, no heat, just helium. You could in a sense say it just produces air. I mean, not technically air, but if I were to see it, it would just look like it's producing basically nothing. Just charged particles. That's quite interesting. Okay, keep going, sir. We're learning a lot tonight. Hey, Billy. No downside. Nice to see you, sir. reactions that emit high energy neutrons. The autonic fusion produces almost exclusively charged particles. This absence of neutrons is crucial for HB11's direct energy conversion process. The reactor is designed with electric and magnetic fields in such a way that the high energy alpha particles produced by the fusion reactions are directed and harvested. As these charged particles move through the electric magnetic fields, they induce a current. The induced current from the moving charged particles can be captured directly as electrical energy. This direct energy conversion means that the kinetic energy of the alpha particles can be harvested before it's randomized into thermal motion, which is what we call heat. >> What I mean, this is starting to sound like quantum mechanics to me, right? He's like, we can harness the energy before it becomes randomized in terms of what we know is heat. I mean, it sounds to me like someone figured out some secret quantum [ __ ] and now all of a sudden we're not producing a bunch of heat out of our fusion reaction. All of a sudden, now it's just producing electricity directly. Is that kind of what he just said right there? H wow. This is not technically cold fusion, a term usually used to describe lattice fusion. And while this is usually called non-therrmal fusion, >> here it comes. >> I would rather we call it cool fusion. >> Booyah. The lack of free neutrons also means that there's a reduction in the activation of reactor materials. Activated materials become radioactive and can pose safety and waste disposal concerns. Another outstanding advantage of this type of fusion. As of 2021, HP11 had reported some experimental successes. And while it's essential to recognize that developing a commercially viable fusion reactor is a massive challenge, HP11 just received a 1.7 million federal research grant from the Department of Energy. In summary, while all fusion reactions release energy, the way this energy is managed, harvested, and converted into useful work can vary significantly based on the fusion approach. While >> wait, the Department of Energy gave them a $1.7 million grant. Is that what that says right up there? I think that's what that says. $1.76 million. Department laser fusion energy agreement secures federal grant. Interesting. Dutium tridium fusion reaction is currently the front runner in fusion research due to its higher cross-section and easier achievability. The high neutron fluxes these reactors generate present challenges in terms of materials. >> Yeah, it's not very much money but something better >> limiting the use of these systems outside of massive power stations. >> The HB11 fusion reactor design seeks to directly harness the kinetic energy of non-therrmal animic fusion. And if they succeed, the dream of almost limitless carbon-f free energy sufficient to power us throughout the solar system will finally be a reality. Let's go, baby. Let's go. Wow, guys. I find some amazing amazing videos. Just amazing videos. Like people wonder sometimes I think people are like they would make fun of me about Ashton's just self-taught from watching YouTube videos. You don't really hear people make that joke anymore because it literally is just true. You can just literally teach yourself quantum mechanics, electrical engineering, you can teach yourself about fusion all just from like YouTube videos pretty much. As long as you watching the right ones, you know what you're looking for. So cool fusion, guys. Everybody now knows what cool fusion is, right? Cool fusion is not cold fusion. We're not talking about lattice confined fusion here, which is also probably legit. We're talking about a neutronic fusion. A neutronic fusion that does fusion using boron without producing neutrons. Without producing neutrons. Wow. So it turns out if you look at the reverse field configuration plasmas and and uh reactors, you will find that these produce directed streams of X-rays as well, X-ray light. So if what we're seeing coming out of the orbs on both sides are X-rays, then it's pretty likely we're looking at some sort of field reverse configuration at the poles. Those would be the poles, the poloidal poles. Remember the poloidal poles like this where the X-rays come out of the orbs would be the ployal poles. So imagine the earth north south. Now imagine the earth is an orb of plasma. Now turn the orb of plasma on its side. That's how the field configurations work. Let me explain that one more time for you guys. The poloidal field. Imagine the earth. Imagine the magnetic fields going around the earth like this. Now imagine the top and the bottom. Imagine there's streams coming out of the north and the south pole of the Earth. Tilt it on its side. Now you've got a propulsion device. That's really all there is to it. That's essentially what we're looking at with the orbs. Yes, it actually does seem like a neutron star as well. Neutron stars have those beams shooting out of the north and south poles on them as well. So you can tell that what happened was they just used nature. They looked out at nature and said, "Hey, how can we make a fusion reactor? Hey, turns out we got these beams shooting out of it. Well, let's just use those for propulsion. Let's use those for propulsion." And holy crap, I see we've got about a million super chats and what have you. So, let me let me address these guys. You guys in the pill chat are going off today. Filter dog, thank you for the can. Cheers for breaking Grock. Yeah, we're going to take a look at that here in a minute. Thank you very much. Rumble chat, thank you guys. Rumble, thank you guys for being here, hanging out. Appreciate you guys. War Ranch LLC, appreciate you. Epstein was Intel. Epstein was definitely Intel. I mean, no question. Uh, Truth Teller 86 says, "I don't use conspiracy theory. I use LAP. Logical al alternative position." That's a good way to put it. Kat says, "This rabbit hole is insane." And says, "I trust Robin Williams more than the government." I do as well. Strangulation of physics. Don't support it. Even incapacitated. Rogan has curated content since COVID. Yeah, probably even before then as well. Amir, wow, huge donation. Danny Jones is useful idiot. Jesse Michael's former boss is Peter Teal like Jesse, but got to remember no one is backing Ashton but the people. This is actually very true. Very true. I don't have any major backers, no financial backers. I actually don't even have people telling me information. I actually don't even have that either to be perfectly honest with you guys. Sal doesn't like Salvatore Py doesn't randomly send me emails with secret information or anything like that. Nobody really does that. It's all basically what you see is what you get. The research you see is me just doing research, deciding what we're going to be talking about, etc., etc. Chaotic good going off in the super chats. Everything happens the way it needs to. Chaos theory. Yeah, I hope so. This is the season finale. Maybe. Susan Dunn, thank you very much for that donation. I appreciate you. Inquisitor Godlower, I just watched a podcast with Nathan Reynolds on the confessionals. Yeah, I'm going to probably be going back on the confessionals actually as well. I got to I just remembered I have to email them back. Uh he mentions a subset of the JSONs. Apparently it's it's pronounced JSON, not Jason. JSON. Sure. The Junior JSON project. Extremely relevant info. That does sound pretty interesting. Anyone can find a clip that would be good. Yeah, the and I'll probably talk to with Tony about that as well now that we understand the JSON group and who and what the JSON group is. I was trying to look into them, but it's a lot of people that you don't recognize their names. So, who knows? CERN Odin's the largest particle collider. Not not the only one. Uh, it's okay to lie on personal things, but not okay to lie on national instit institution level. The lines from the government are too much and are getting out of hand. Yeah, that's the thing. The lies have reached a point at the institutionalized level now where it's actually damaging the mental psyche of the people in general. Like the lies have gotten so out of control now where people can't discern reality anymore. People can't even tell when there's two military videos that are leaked because we we're so backwards on science that people can't even recognize real physics and real science when they see it because we've been just completely suppressed and brainwashed for just far too long. It is still weird that Elon is obsessed with the sun. Yeah. Did you see Elon stole my joke about he had he put the Gro AI talking about quantum mechanics? That was really weird. Yeah. Elon had the Grock AI my waifu. He had my waifu talking about quantum mechanics, guys. That was my joke. Elon stole that joke. Anyway, oh um and then one more. Malcolm Bendle and the thunderstorm Jenner. What do you think? Malcolm Bendle was in the chat on Monday, guys. Malcolm Bendle was in the chat. His name is Fam Abdul or something like that. Um, thunderstorm generator. It's not a It's not a fusion reactor, but it could be it's producing probably could be producing plasmoids that are, you know, I think that the the claim is that it's more efficient than a carburetor on a car. That could be possible. That could be possible. But I think that and somebody in the pill chat was saying, Ashton, you need to make a device and see how it responds to your input. One thing that I think everybody should have learned at this point is that like magnetic motors are a thing from the 70s where everybody is looking at free energy now is they're not looking at magnetic motors. They're looking at microchips and they're looking at plasma physics which is fusion. That's where free energy is now. And nobody's building this stuff in their garage. I mean there is one kid building a fusion reactor but you're these companies that we are looking at here. These companies are all getting investments in the millions and millions of dollars and a lot of them are doing work for free because they want to do this because they they want to help revolutionize energy. They want green energy. This is not the kind of thing that you just go, "Oh, okay. You know what? I have a full-time job and now I'm just going to go ahead and start producing fusion or whatever plasma." No. No. And there's probably regulation and safety standards and a whole bunch of red tape that the government uses to make sure they have absolute control over any company that even thinks about doing this, that even thinks about doing it. The thing that you should take away from this is that these fusion, some of these fusion companies, they know the answer. They know the answer. They know what they're looking for. Let me show this video here real quick before we get to the AI thing. This is a visualization of the fusion race. [Music] Turn the music off. Okay, so there was our neutronic versus a neutronic funding. A neutronic funding is the green one. The green one. Look at these tiny slivers. $20 billion for iter trialpha 500 million. So these are the neutronic funding companies right here. Neutronic these are the a neutronic. Look at how little funding went to a neutronic fusion. Almost nothing. And almost all of the a neutronic fusion went to uh trialpha. Out of the 520 million, 500 million of it went to Tri Alpha. That's a big percentage of the pie. There you go. Look at that. Trial Alpha got 500 out of the 520 million. So, if we're looking for a company to be involved in the with the defense industry, Trial Alpha is right at the top. Why? Because they got $500 million in funding. How are they getting $500 million in funding? Especially because look how much it is compared to everybody else. It's like way more than everyone else. So for me, there's only two options on the orbs. It's either Tri Alpha or it's Loheed Martin. That's where I've narrowed it down. It's either Tri Alpha or it's Loheed Martin. Loheed Martin just doesn't show up here because nobody knows what they're doing. But what does that say right there? Privately funded fusion products projects. Loheed Martin skunk works right there at the bottom right. Wow. Lockheed gets a little shout out. So the this is the list. This is all the fusion companies. So when we say there's somebody out there that has fusion figured out, that has orbs flying around in the sky teleporting airplanes in 2014, it pretty much has to be somebody on this list. So who is it? Who is it? It's got to be Loheed Martin. It's got to be Loheed Martin. They're the ones that they could hide the information. They're the ones that could have had this in 2014. In fact, they bragged about it. Lheed Martin bragged about it. Lheed Martin bragged that their compact fusion reactor was 2,000 times more effective at magnetic confinement than everybody else's. 2,000 times. But it just they stopped doing it, guys. You make a fusion reactor that's 2,000 times more efficient than other people and you just go, "Nah, we don't need that anymore. That's just that's useless." Yeah, I'm sure that's what happened. I'm sure I'm sure it didn't go dark. I'm sure it's not being used on submarines and aircraft carriers and a bunch of other military [ __ ] that they don't want anybody to know about. Yeah, I'm sure they don't have secret compact fusion reactors and any of that stuff. How long did they say that those submarines can last underwater for? 30 years without coming back up. Someone do the math on how much energy a submarine would need for 30 years underwater. I guarantee you there's no fuel source that it can last for 30 years underwater. At least not a conventional one. Pretty much has to be a compact fusion reactor. So that's what I wanted to show on that. And here's some more graphs and charts. Government funding versus private funding. You can see that most of the money came from the government for fusion research. And it's pretty much all gone to hot fusion. It's all gone to neutronic fusion. Almost all of it. So, it turns out we were right. Hot fusion is a scam, chat. Hot fusion is one of the biggest scams in world history. And look at the funding for a neutronic research here. This is the a neutronic research funding. I mean, it's trial alpha. It's trial or nobody basically. So I just think this is really interesting because this helps us to understand this helps us to understand the the landscape and I says Loheed Martin here. Loheed Martin has no p published data on their on their research whatsoever. Loheed Martin has no published data. No published data whatsoever. Okay, let's uh let's change gears real quick. We're going to come back to the fusion thing. thing. We're going to close out with the fusion thing, but I want to switch gears and go to AI. I said I was going to talk about AI. I spoke a little bit about it here, but I want to show I'm not going to go through everything here, guys. I'm just going to do the the high notes here on my post that I made about this. So, I actually yesterday got in like, you know, a debate with AI. And it primarily started over this image right here. This image right here. This, you probably can't see this very well, but this image is the API from the textures website where the debunkers claim that there are cloud photos that perfectly match the clouds in the MH370 Gorgon stair wide area motion imagery. Well guys, I can read SQL and I understand databases extremely well. And I can tell you without any shadow of a doubt that what this API says right here is that this folder called Aerial 0028 was created in 2012. Creation date is the very first time that that data element was available, 2012. The problem is these are the pictures down here. These are the data elements for the pictures. The data elements for the pictures all have creation dates of October 25th, 2014. The creation date is October 25th, 2014 on all the pictures. None of the pictures have any creation date of 2012. None of them do. The claim that this was from a database and so Grock came back and said that this is from a database migration. There is zero evidence that this is from a database migration. Let me say that one more time. There is zero evidence that this is from a database migration. In fact, I don't even know what people think database migration means. In fact, when you ask people, they won't even tell you because they don't know what they're talking about. They just make up random [ __ ] In fact, when Grock told me that this was from a database migration, I instantly knew where Grock was getting its information. Grock has been trained off of Reddit. In fact, several of the responses Grock gave me were direct things that I've heard debunkers say in their comments on Reddit to me. Like word for word exact thing. Like Grock is quite literally stealing Reddit comments from debunkers and and presenting them as factual comments. It even argued that someone took PRNU analysis of the camera, which is not possible because no one had access to the camera that took the photos. Nobody on the internet has the camera. Nobody can do PRNU analysis. And Grock is telling me that some random avatar no-name person on Metabunk did PRNU analysis. No, there is no PRNU analysis that was ever done. There's no nobody with any credentials has ever done any forensic analysis of the MH370 videos. Nobody. No one on planet Earth has. At least nobody who's been connected to me or tried to debunk the videos. So, all I wanted to do was to get the AI to admit that the photos were uploaded first October 25th, 2014, which is what the API on the website proves. Not a debate. There's no debate here. This is 100% proof that the cloud photos were first uploaded October 25th, 2014. Again, it's not an opinion. It's absolute proof. Absolute proof. There is no counterargument to it. You can't just go, "Oh, that's because of a database migration. What are you talking about? What database migration?" Database migration from what? Migrating from what? What are you talking about? Are you saying that there was two servers behind the scenes and some data was on one server and what some data was on another server? So, you're telling me Jonas's photos were on this server, but some of them were on this server. Why? I thought you said they were from the same exact set. You're telling me the photos were from the same set, but they're on two different servers, in two different folders, in two different locations. Why? In fact, here's a better question for you. If there was a database migration, how come this folder says it's from 2012? So, wherever this database is right here, this one, this database existed in 2012. We know because we can see that the folder existed in 2012. When you do a I know this whole database migration thing is complete horseshit. They just completely made that up. That never happened. I know because I do databases for my whole life for 20 years. When you do a database migration in the real world, what it usually means is that you're going from a legacy server and you're moving all of that data to a new server, a brand new fresh server. That's what a database migration is. That didn't happen with this. Those database uh timestamps don't indicate a database migration. When you have a database migration like that, what happens is all the data element timestamps are exactly the same. you sometimes within one second of one another but computers can run thousands of data elements within a fraction of a second. So what happens is when you read the update date and times when there's a database migration all of them are exactly the same. You can tell a database migration very very easily by looking at the data elements in a SQL database or relational database because you can just look at all the times are exactly the same and that's not the case here. So there was no database migration. Grock would not admit this. Weirdly, very weirdly. Um, so one other thing I want to point out here, this is a little bit egotistical, of course, but it's also just factually true. I am the expert on the MH370 videos. Nobody else on the face of this planet is the expert on the MA370 videos. It's me. Anybody evoking authority, I am the authority on the MH370 videos. Nobody else. I am the only authority on the MH370 videos. Some random guy that made a Tony Hawk video game in the 2000s, he has no credibility, no credentials, and he's not in any shape, way, shape, or form informed about the MH370 videos. He's not an expert and his opinion has no bearing whatsoever on the authenticity of the videos. Some random YouTubers who wear stupid looking glasses and have a [ __ ] that basically is like a part-time elf. They're not experts on anything. They're not even VFX experts. They have no credentials whatsoever. Having a YouTube channel isn't credentials. Grock literally replies back to me in several of these replies saying that well they have three four million YouTube followers. That's their credentials. What the hell are we talking about? What kind of world are we living in where credentials are you have a YouTube channel with followers? That's not credentials. And forensic analysis is not they looked at some videos and said it doesn't look real to them. That's not forensic analysis either. Holy [ __ ] Grock was just like literally went full [ __ ] It went full [ __ ] And the thing that I can't stand, the thing that's crazy about it is I don't ever get mentioned in any of the replies from Grock about the videos. There is never any reference to me whatsoever unless you ask it to give its opinion about me. So, even though I'm objectively the world's expert on the MH370 videos, I'm the authority on the videos, I am literally never referenced by the AI, even though I have thousands and thousands of hours of content, hundreds of podcast appearances, elaborate explanation, peer-reviewed scientific papers. Even though I have all the possible evidence you could want, I'm not even mentioned in the replies. This shows you that they have sequestered certain access to data from the AI. It's not allowed to use me and any way, shape, or form or any of my content as sources about the MH370 videos. And that's the reason why it's lying. That's the reason why it's repeatedly lying. Everything the AI says has already been clearly addressed and proven to be wrong. But unfortunately, because it doesn't have access to the true data, it's never going to give you the real answer. It's never going to give you the real answer. It's the same reason why Google's Gemini was bringing turning historical people black. Like, if you feed it the wrong inputs, it's going to feed out the bad bad outputs. Garbage in, garbage out, chat. Garbage in, garbage out. So, here's a few more examples of just some of the crazy crap that the AI was doing. Like for example, here's the AI saying, "Don't trust, verify." Literally, the AI's whole arguments was, "Just trust the experts. They can't possibly be wrong. It has no evidence whatsoever. Just trust the experts." And then I says, "I've cross-cheed the VFX overlays from multiple sources, and the multiple sources are Mick West and the Corridor Crew." Literally every single time the AI sources are exa the same exact two sources every time. It's always either MC West or the corridor crew. And sometimes it'll say Metabunk. Metabunk is MC West's website and it keeps using these terms to try to make it seem like it's not just referencing MC West. It's literally just referencing Mick West. MC West opinion doesn't mean anything. There's no authoritative weight around the opinion of a mentally ill, disturbed, left-wing nut job. Mick West is an extremely mentally disturbed individual who does not have any understanding of reality or physics or science or anything. The fact that the AI keeps trying to reference him is gross. And for people trying to say that Mick West is not a CIA asset or a deep state asset, then why is the AI repeatedly referencing him when he shouldn't even be one of the sources that it uses when all of his arguments are flawed. He actually made a fake debunk. Mick West himself produced a fake debunk where he did sta use stabilization software on the videos to invent a debunk that doesn't exist. He called it the jittery contrails debunk. The jittery contrails don't exist unless you stabilize the footage. And he stabilized it and then said it's wrong. Now, I'm not even joking. Go look it up. And when he was confronted with this, when he was confronted with proof that it was because of the stabilization that he did, he doubled down on it and wouldn't admit he was wrong. This is the guy that the AI is quoting. This is the guy the AI is quoting here. But this is the worst part. It says they show exact stock matches. Does it shows an exact stock match? Does it? That's weird because the debunkers themselves have admitted that it's not an exact match. What this tells me right here is that the way that the debunkers attacked the videos was to train the LL the LLM, the AI to lie. They trained the AI to lie. They trained the AI to say that it's an exact match when it's not. And then when they get confronted on the fact that it's not an exact match, then they go, "Well, yes, but they just made some edits to it." Well, that's not an exact match then, now, is it? If it was an exact match, why did you have to lie? If it's not really an exact match, why did you lie and say that it was? The reason why they lied is because they know people will repeat the lie. They know people will repeat the lie as truth. That's why they lied. They knew it was never an exact match. They knew it was the whole time. They didn't want to admit that because that admits that I was right. If they admit that it was never an exact match, they have to admit that I was right. And it's so easy to prove that it's not an exact match. All I do is just overlay it. I say, "Okay, here's the stock asset. I overlaid it in the video." First thing you notice is there's like three extra frames in the stock effect that don't exist in the video. Just let me repeat that. First thing you notice is that there are three extra frames in the stock effects that don't exist in the MAH370 video. That's the very first thing you notice. Doesn't take any forensic analysis to figure out. You just can overlay it and go, "Whoops. It can't be a match because we don't have the same number of frames." We don't even have the same number of frames. And when you look at this, is this an exact match, guys? Am I looking at an exact match? Heck, this is the frame that everybody says is an exact match. Is that an exact match to you? Why is the AI lying? Why are debunkers lying? The reason why they're lying is they can't admit that they are wrong. They can't admit they're wrong, not even over something that's just easily verifiable. You can just look at it and you can tell it's not an exact match. But even if you confront them today, right now, even if you confront them right now, and show them this with their own eyes and say, "Is that an exact match?" They'll say, "Yes." They'll just lie straight to your face. They will lie straight to your face and say, "That's an exact match." They'll say, "Someone just warped it around." Warped it around. Look at the middle. There's no warping that around to get that to match in the middle. You can see the tail of the plane sticking out of the zap. There's no tail of the plane sticking out of the the stock effect. You can see the tail of the plane. So why is AI lying about everything? And then this is the other point I wanted to make. This is the reason why everybody is terrified to debate me. And I mean it. I mean terrified. I am the scariest thing alive for debunkers, for PhD physicists, for uh Arthur, what's his name? Arthur Michael Holland, this the scammer and con artist who pretended to be an expert about Gorgon Stair. Arthur Michael Holland wrote the book on Gorgon Stair and he's terrified to talk to me because I'm going to expose him as a complete and total fraud. Guys, this is a public live stream. I'm calling people out directly. This would be legally actionable if I was wrong. Arthur Michael Holland, the guy that wrote Eye in the Sky, the book about Gorgon Stair, is a complete and total fraud and con man, who has never seen Gorgon Stair in his entire life. That's a fact. He wrote a book about something he's never seen before. and he's terrified to talk to me because I'm going to expose him publicly. I'm going to expose him publicly. How crazy is that, chat? This is why everyone's terrified of me because the moment you dig into the facts, they all prove me right. They all prove me right. And then next thing you know, they're making up fake stories about database migrations. There's no evidence for database migration. They're making up fake stories to try to rationalize who made the videos, man. Like, who do you think the hoaxer is? Oh, yeah. You thought the hoaxer was a guy named Joe Lancaster. In fact, the AI thought it was a guy named Joe Lancaster. Can you believe this [ __ ] Check this out. The AI was claiming that Joe Lancaster I asked the Grock, who who made the videos, Grock? Grock says Joe Lancaster made the videos. Oh, did he? How come I have a screenshot of Joe Lancaster asking the textures guy, quote unquote, would you mind sending me an email as if I had purchased the cloud assets in 2014? I can change the date and screenshot and use it to keep them on the hook. Joe Lancaster direct quote to the textures owner. Here it is. This is the person that AI says made the videos. A literal scammer who is willing, literally willing to sell out humanity, to pretend to have made the videos. Literally willing to work with the website owner to commit a fraud against all of humanity. The the AI is telling me that XIF data can't be manipulated. that XF data proves that the images come from 2012. This is somebody saying that if you send me something, I will manipulate the XF data and make it look like it was from 2014. That's what he's saying right there. And you're telling me you don't think that somebody be willing to manipulate XF data to make photos look like they were from before they really were? Of course they're willing to do that. Of course they're willing to do that. They're literally saying that they want to do that. They're begging people to allow them to do that to try to cover up the videos. This is absolute proof. No question that there are nefarious actors trying to create fake evidence to debunk the MH370 videos. Joe Lancaster is one of the worst human beings ever to walk the earth and he should be remembered that. His username is at the Joe Lancaster. Make sure you tell him what you think of him. He should never have a day of peace for the rest of his life on the face of this earth. Of course he's on blue sky. All the pedos are on blue sky. Of course he's on blue sky. He used to have an avatar picture with a mask on. Of course these people are mentally ill. These Redditors are extremely mentally ill. Again, guys, when I call people mentally ill, I [ __ ] mean it. I'm not joking about these people are mentally disturbed in their head. Keep in mind, don't listen to any [ __ ] any of these debunkers say. Most of them believed Joe Lancaster at face value. Most of them were arguing in the replies about Joe Lancaster did an AMA. There's no way he could have made this up. There's no way he could have made up that he made the videos. Guys, I've been calling out Joe Lancaster as a mentally ill fraud for two years. Since the very first day he pretended to make the videos, I've been calling him out. How did I know he didn't make the videos? This is for the debunkers chat. How did I know Joe Lancaster didn't make the videos? If I was a fraud, if I was a con artist, I should have been afraid that Joe Lancaster made the videos. It could have been the end of me, right? He had a story. He had an elaborate story for how he made the videos. He had multiple AMAs he was doing. He was all in. The debunkers were promoting him on their live streams, having him come on. He was showing his face and everything. How did I know that he didn't make the videos? How did I know that? Even though he was all in on the fraud, how did I know he was completely full of [ __ ] Because I knew the videos were real the whole time. I knew the videos were real the whole time and I knew there was no chance, not even a not even any percentage chance that a guy named Joe Lancaster made them. There was never any chance that he made them because I was right. This is one of those things that debunkers really can't rationalize in their heads because if I had any doubt whatsoever about the videos being real, I should have been I should have been knocked off guard by Joe Lancaster. But I wasn't. I never had a single shred of doubt. never had one shred of doubt. This goes to show my level of discernment. I can pick out a scammer even when they're all in on the scam. I can pick it out. Debunkers were all in on that guy being the guy. They have no discernment of reality whatsoever. They can't tell when someone's scamming them. Even when it's super obvious, they can't even tell. These are the people trying to tell you they know the videos are fake. These are the people trying to say those videos are obviously someone would have made that in a few hours. Those same retards think that Joe Lancaster made the videos. That's how gullible they are. That's how gullible they are. So the AI claiming that Joe Lancaster made the videos. Absolutely wild. But here was the real kicker. So when I got Grock, this is when I got Grock basically dead rights was that I had Grock. Do you agree that two videos from completely different angles and perspectives, both in perfect synchronization, would require a full 3D render? Of course it does. If you have two videos from two different angles and perspectives, this one's way out. This one's really close. You need a 3D render. You have to have a 3D render. The debunkers did not want to admit that you need a 3D render. They've been lying saying that they did it in some kind of like either 2D or 3.5D software. No. The reason why they didn't want to ever admit this, and they've been lying to this day, to this day, they've been lying about this is because they knew the amount of time it would take to render 3D videos is astronomical. It's astronomical. So, I got Grock to admit it. Yep. It would take 3D rendered environment. Yes. Fabricating two synchronized videos from different angles like the MH370 orb footage requires a full 3D render to ensure consistent physics, lighting, and motion. And I think there was somebody in the replies that basically pointed out you can't just use Adobe After. Adobe After Effects can't pull this off. You need multiple softwares. This means that this would be a major production, major production to put this together. This is not something somebody did in their back in their in their uh you know off time as a student or some [ __ ] like that. And then this image is the killer image. This image is actually absolute proof the videos are real. People don't understand it because they're kind of dumb. This is three-dimensional lighting you're looking at here. This is threedimensional point source lighting. And what that means is you're not just looking at a glow effect because it illuminates the clouds here in three dimensions. You see the cloud being back lit. This cloud being back lit far away from the the light source is true lighting. That's true three-dimensional lighting that you're seeing there. This this actually is absolute proof the videos are real right here. Right there. That's all you need. You actually don't need anything more than that because that there's no way that anybody created accurate 3D point source lighting. No way. Way way way way too complicated. And then this was the the end basically. Uh not quite the end but almost Perplexity jumped in. Perplexity jumped in and said, "Estimating render times is a great way to understand the scale of this project. If we estimate conservatively, conservative estimate, conservative estimate, 20 to 40 minutes per frame. 20 to 40 minutes per frame to render. This is the reason why the debunkers didn't want to admit that it was 3D rendered environment. 3D rendering takes 20 to 40 minutes per frame. So if that's true, the total render time for both videos could range from 50 to 100 days of nonstop rendering. 50 to 100 days of nonstop rendering. Here's the kicker. The videos were confirmed on the internet no later than 72 days after the plane disappeared. So even if they started the very moment the plane disappeared, there still isn't enough time. There still isn't enough time. This doesn't even include making the videos. This is just rendering them. This is just rendering them. That's just to render the videos. Not to like make them, make the story board, make it all make sense, add the data elements. That's just to render them. That's the last thing that you do is render them. 50 to 100 days. You're never going to hear the debunkers mention 3D requirements ever because it destroys any argument of the videos being fake. If the videos require 3D render, there's no way anybody made them. And then finally, the last one. After several hours, I think it was um Drew Ponder, shout out to Drew Ponder and his frequency wave theory, he finally forced Grock to ignore the outside sources and just go look at the API itself. He forced Grock to just go look at the API. Where is it? Here it is. Look at this. So, here he goes. Here is Drew Ponder. This is I just This is so funny. I'm going to go full screen for this. Drew Ponder is going, "Here we go. Here's a reproducibility check. Go ahead and import these records. These are the five images, right?" He says, "Import these records. Try to find these images. Take a look at this. Here's the source. Blah blah blah. Check this stuff out." He goes, "I attempted the test API queries. Return 2014, 1024, 1025 dates for the Ariel's files." Boom. The rest of this I think is kind of nonsense. this these date range things. I tried to ask more information about these ID ranges that you see up here. I don't know if they're really if that's really real or not. I think it might just be weird some kind of weird thing. But there you go. This is proof right here. AI finally Grock admits yes. The files themselves, the images themselves were only updated October 24th, October 25th, 2014. The funniest part is right after that it changes its mind. pump the brakes on that. After digging into the XIF data, it shows that they do predate the videos. Guys, XF data is faked within seconds. XF data can be faked within seconds. XF data has nothing to do with a file being uploaded on the internet. XF data is just data on a file. It has nothing to do with when a photo was uploaded on the internet or anything like that. So, I get what people's arguments are. People's the debunker's argument is the X if data says it's from 2012. It must be from 2012. That's not true. That's not how logic works. Exit data can be faked in just seconds. In fact, we faked the XF data to make it look like it was from 2040 and it only took less than one minute to do. The argument that the debunkers are making is that someone used cloud files that are on the internet, downloaded them from the internet, and they stitched them together to make the MH370 Gorgon stair whammy footage. That's the debunker's argument. That argument requires the photos to be on the internet. Doesn't require the photos. It doesn't just require there to be XIF data on some photos. I can I can pull some photos out of the closet and say, "Hey, someone used these these photos to make a video." Okay, how did they get the photos? How did that person get the photos? You say, "Oh, they got them from the website." Okay, where are the files on the website? Turns out they weren't there. That's a big problem. If you're telling me that someone used some photos to make a video, the photos need to be somewhere where someone actually could get them. So, the argument that there is XIF data doesn't change the the case whatsoever. doesn't matter at all. XF data has no significance in this argument whatsoever. Debunkers need the photos to be on the internet. On the internet. So, Grock was pretty [ __ ] but Perplexity AI basically had it figured out. Where is it? Here's Perplexity AI based on the evidence. The file level create at timestamps for all five aerial 0028 JPEGs are October 24th or 25th, 2014. There you go. Multiple independent checks of both the live texture site and archived versions on the Wayback Machine show no captures or listings of these specific cloud images prior to 2014. while many other collections from earlier years are properly archived and visible. So, anyone trying to claim that these photos were in some secret location where they weren't being archived, that's also [ __ ] Turns out many other file locations had no problem whatsoever. So, trying to make the argument that no, they were on some secret server somewhere where no one could find them. Well, then how did somebody download them? How did somebody download them? There is no evidence whatsoever that the cloud photos in question predate the videos, at least not on the internet. So even if you use XIF data, XIF data does not prove that those that those cloud images were used to make the videos. Sorry, doesn't work that way. You need the videos to be online. Okay. And yeah, I think that's it with the AI discussion. If you want to check out more of that AI discussion, guys, go ahead and dig through those those tweets. The point of that was I wanted people to see how the AI is lying. And I wanted people to see how the AI is basically just using Reddit debunkers as all of its primary sources. All of the AI's primary sources are Redditor debunkers. Pretty wild. Okay, last thing. Do we have time for this? We might not have time for this a for this helon uh energy thing. Maybe we'll save this for next time, guys. So, what I was going to show I think we'll probably just save this for the next live stream. I was going to take I have this other presentation where basically um the Helion Fusion company has several videos on the internet as well and they explain their field reverse configuration and how it works, but I think it's just a little bit too mundane for this live stream at the moment. So I'll probably try to go through this and try to pick out some of the best uh points for it. This part though I did think was interesting here talks about a diabetic compression of field reverse configurations. And what does he mean in here when you when you actually watch it? He says the more powerful the magnetic field is, the more the plasma can be condensed. The more powerful the magnetic field is, the more powerful you can condense the plasma. If you condense the plasma enough, you can get superc conductivity uh and potentially we can get fusion to occur. So I a lot of these companies in my opinion they either know what's possible and they're chasing it or they already know what people have built and they're trying to reproduce it. It seems like the way that these people are chasing this that seems like way too over the target seems like they must have insider information. Seems like some of these fusion companies have insider information. What we should do as the public is we should try to expose them, expose their insider information and expose the ones that are going to take off. I think that Tri Alpha Energy, maybe Helion, one of these companies is going to like get huge. Get huge. And if we're smart, we can get in on the ground floor, invest in it, make a whole bunch of money. Then people are going to wonder, "Oh man, all those MH37X people. They became millionaires by investing in Fusion Company because they found the one out of the 20 which is going to do it the right way." That's my thought. Whoa. Okay. Donations went crazy, guys. Let me hit up some of these. James Malcolm Mendle. I think I I think I mentioned that one already, right? Yeah, I think I already talked about Malcolm Mendle. Um, try walking AI through every single paper. Nah, it's too much work, guys. It's too much work. You have to realize the AI is rigged. And I already did this, too. I I corrected the AI on multiple things that said it was wrong. It said, "Okay, I updated my database." And then you ask it and it's back to lying again. Like, they clearly have it set up where the AI is not meant to learn the truth. It's not meant to learn the truth. Thank you for that donation. Ardo Pat, can uh Edward Lynn be interviewed? No. Keep in mind what happened with Edward Lynn is nobody knows what he did. Nobody knew what Edward Lynn did because nobody thought those videos were real. So Edward Lynn was basically walking around and people just thought he just did some minor thing, right? They were like, "Oh, well, they let him out. He did his time, whatever." But now people by talking to me, he's being exposed as like a lot of people are going to consider him to be a traitor. I mean, he gave away our most powerful weapons. He just leaked it on the internet. And he probably freaked out and was trying to flee to Taiwan because he was like, "Holy [ __ ] we disappeared a Boeing trip 7, right?" So, I don't think Edward Lynn will ever talk. Wow, look at this donation. I love purple things. Save the world, Ashton. Boom. Fist bump, baby. Thank you very much for that huge donation. I love you guys. Kevin Johnson, thank you very much. Kevin Johnson, appreciate you. Tango HP, I was watching the Grock debate live. I knew damn well Grock was caught tripping. Yeah, and actually I realized people were loving it. People were loving it. I kind of want to do a debate against Grock. It might be better than doing a debate against the bunkers. People were watching it. People were like, "Holy crap." Like Grock actually stopped replying to me when I said like, "Hey, you claim that there's a exact stock effect match. Give me the source. Show it to me." It just stopped replying. Just stopped replying entirely. It was actually really weird where some of my replies stopped showing up entirely, too. And when I started asking Grock about some of the fusion aspects after, it just wouldn't even respond. So, I don't know exactly what's going on with the Grock thing. I just know it's definitely been tampered with. It has definitely definitely been tampered with. Don Thomas, wow, huge donation. No, no message, Don. Shout out to Don Thomas. Shout out to your family, Don. Thank you very much for that massive donation. That's going to trigger the debunkers for sure. I appreciate you. Chaotic. Good. How do they know about the classified orange slices? Yeah, how did they know about the heat signature of the orange slice? That's pretty weird. the heat signature of the orange slice of the orbs is going to be a major clue. I have a feeling that's going to lead back to field reverse configuration as well. And that's one of those things where it's like this is why they didn't want us looking into the videos. Why do they not want us looking in the videos? Because there's verifiable physics information in the videos that will tie it directly back to a neutronic fusion. That's why they didn't want looking at those videos because they were like, as long as people don't look at the videos too much, they're going to go, why is there this black splotch on the screen? What's going on? Why are there lines coming out of these orbs? But when people start digging into it and going, "Oh, this is human technology." Then you start realizing like, "Oh, this is fusion. This is a neutronic fusion. Oh, that's like a dense plasma focus or some kind of field reverse configuration." Yeah. Stephen Fleer says, "Ashen is right and nobody's listening. Three three orbs in the plane, baby." Oh, yeah. And you guys see we got the plasma orb going back here. So now I've got an electronic fire in here. I've got a plasma orb chat. I have got prompts uh um uh props like crazy out here. Okay, guys. That's going to be it for the live stream for tonight, guys. Tomorrow, 5:30 p.m. Central. Kurt Mezer. It's going to be only on YouTube tomorrow. Sorry, Rumble. Sorry, PL. Tomorrow's a YouTube exclusive. If you want to watch me go live toe-to-toe with Kurt Mezer, it's probably going to be an extremely unhinged conversation and I'm there for every single second of it. I am there for every second of it. I don't know how long we're going to go. We're probably going to go for like an hour and a half, two hours just riffing. I'm gonna ask about I'm gonna ask about um Joe Rogan. I'm gonna ask about Danny Jones and his opinion about Danny Jones. We're going to talk about the deep state. We're going to talk about the MHG70 videos. We're going to talk about technology suppression. We're probably going to talk about Epstein. I This is one of the interviews I'm most looking forward to, honestly. So, thank you guys. Thank you, MH370X. Check out the interview tomorrow and check it out on your audio. If you don't get it, then I'll talk to you guys later. Peace out, everybody. What are we going to go with tonight? Let's go with um let's go with our this one here. Infrared eyes scanning the black, tracking the heat, never turning back. And 22, a coverted gaze. And roll 33. In the cosmic maze, and rolls in the mix, secrets untold. Silent watchers brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interests far and wide as spears. Sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats of far, guiding our defenses like a guiding star. In the silence of space, they keep their post. Shields unseen yet feared the most. With precision and speed, they warn of danger, keeping us safe from the missiles anger. As Beers, Sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star and trolls in the mix. Secrets untold, silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interest far and wide as fears. Sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star. Spears, Sentinel of the Night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a Eyes.