Aneutronic Fusion Propulsion Orbs - PROVEN

Video Transcript

# Aneutronic Fusion Propulsion Orbs - PROVEN Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time when the United States is a service and information economy when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and [music] no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people [music] have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, [music] our critical faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back [music] into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay [music] of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites [music] now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest common denominator programming, [music] credulous presentations on pseudocience and superstition, but especially a [music] kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. [music] Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. [music] Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. Ashton Forbes, you know that super jacked guy. >> Malaysian 370. Contact switch 12 decimal 9. Good night. >> Breaking [music] news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, [music] including four Americans, has gone missing. >> [music] >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government, >> why shoot a damn if that's hostile? Our technologies permit us to [music] manipulate time and space. >> What an distance [music] annihilated. >> This country is very powerful. Far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea [music] what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the [music] line from the Hindu scripture. The Bagita Vishnu [music] is trying to persuade the prince that [music] he should do his duty and to impress [music] him. takes on his multi-armed form and says, [music] "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." [music] >> I suppose we all want that one way or another. Welcome to the show, the four orbs show. Thank you guys for being here. Hello, I am your host, Ashen Forbes. Guys, it is going down tonight, guys. I hope you are ready. OMG. OMG. Yes, the headline, the the name of the stream is not an exaggeration. I actually finally have what I would call proof that the orbs in the MH370 videos are in fact a neutronic fusion propulsion. We're going to be getting right into that in the next uh 10-15 minutes, guys. Before we get into that, we got a good show for you tonight. We're gonna be talking about Palunteer, talking about bots on the internet. Uh, Leak Myrau, Leak Myu, who's one of the first engineers who is working out laser light sale technology. Laser light cell technology. And then, of course, helium on the moon. Helium on the moon. And what do all of these topics have in common? A neutronic fusion. The bots hate a neutronic fusion, chat. Just kidding. Okay, let's get right into it, guys. I don't want to waste any time tonight. Just want to jump right into it. Okay, first things first, our politics discussion and topic of the of the day is that Data Republican, if you're not familiar with who Data Republican is, Data Republican is a Twitter account user. Twitter account user. Uh, let me find their thing here for you guys. And just today, they made a big post. They actually follow me. data Republican follows me recently uh about bots on the internet, specifically on a very contentious point recently related to uh not just Nick Fuentes, but just generally the woke right in general. So, where is it? Somewhere down here. Um here it is. Boy, Data Republican, you've been posting a lot of stuff here today. So, Data Republican posted this tweet and there was a new report that came out that everybody's been saying, "Oh, Nick Fuentes is bodied on the internet. He ratioed Elon Musk, you know, and and then this data comes out which shows mathematically that he is clearly getting more likes at a much higher percentage rate than even much bigger accounts than him like uh Elon Musk is. I'm gonna take I you guys, you know, I love controversial opinions. Here's my controversial opinion. This is not all bots. Sure, there's bots. Everybody's got bots that are following and liking them and what have you. Not me, but you know, fake people do and big accounts definitely do. But that doesn't mean that the vast percentage of this engagement that you see here is coming from bots. Let me make this a little bit bigger so you can see what we're looking at here. So, we're talking about like mean retweets where you can see the percentage for Nick Fuentes with only 1 million is extremely high. Even compared to Elon Musk who has 200 times the following. Even though Elon Musk has 200 times the following, Nick Fuentes is getting twice the amount of retweets on his content. So, they're just mathematically going something isn't really adding up here. Someone's getting a thousand times the engagement that somebody else is getting. But what is really happening is I'm going to explain this phenomenon to you guys. What's really going on here is that there are groups of individuals that hang out specifically in Discords but in other group chats as well and they share the news on them much in the way that people used to share the news on places like Reddit. So people used to share the news on place like Reddit say here's my thought here's my opinion and they put it on Reddit they would hope people would upvote it and then they to get people to upvote it they would go and they would post it on their discord and get all their friends to go and upvote it right that's how the game used to work and then Reddit banned everybody basically banned everybody and now Reddit is garbage so instead we have this similar phenomenon that occurs where content that gets posted specifically on Twitter will get reposted in various Discords and then you'll have an army of people going and retweeting it and liking it. And this phenomenon is essentially one of um what do they call it? Um manufacturing consensus. That's what the propaganda phenomenon is known as, which is that when people see something, if they see something has a lot of likes, if they see something as a lot of up votes, they think that it's automatically true, that it's automatically real. And this is why Reddit actually got rid of the downvote feature. They got rid of the downvote feature because the opposite is true. If something's downvoted to zero, you presume that it's unpopular, that nobody likes it, but you could just manipulate the algorithm to make it look like how you want. So, this is what I would say is that on one aspect, there is clearly a foreign following that supports Nick Fuentes mainly because of his anti-semitic beliefs because they do not like Jewish people and they want Jewish people to be eradicated. And Nick Fuentes is not on that side. So, of course, he does attract a lot of foreign following and what have you, but on the other side of it, you have real people that are disaffected that have their platforms, their speech has been essentially cut off, especially on places like Reddit, but also on places like Tik Tok and and Instagram, less so on Twitter. And they want to be heard. And the only way they know about to be heard is to retweet people like Nick Fentes that every time he posts, they post in Discord, they tell all their friends to go jump on it. And that's why you see these people getting huge amounts of engagement. But the last bit is that it does not represent real world, doesn't represent real people. What you see people doing and these behaviors that you see doing doesn't represent actual reality. if you go talk to real people on the street, they're not going to talk like Nick Fuentes does or any of those other people do. So, that's just what I wanted to say on that. I don't have any hard stance on it, but I think that it's being used to claim that his following is all fake and things like that, but that's not the case. It's not all fake. It's just more manufactured than anything else. And it's not going to go away. I mean, it's only getting worse. And people are now only realizing that this botting problem has also been a problem on uh for streamers as well. For streamers like you and me that are out there, these people have been boding to become famous. And once you you basically fake it till you make it, you make a thousand fake V bots until you start to get real following and then you become a real streamer. So that's how the world works, guys. It's fake as hell. Now, switching gears, another relevant topic is the search for MH370. I'm going to be serious here for a second because Ross Kohart, I think it was on Friday, whatever, recently said that he didn't believe the official story into MH370, but went out of his way to not say my name in regards to the MH370 videos and the theories that I've been putting out there. So, Ross Ker saying he doesn't really believe the official narrative, but he literally won't talk to me. He's been defaming me on the internet. He won't say my name now as well. Even though I'm like the guy when it comes to MH370. Here's what I want to say. I'm over being mad at stupid people. I'm just over it, right? I'm not I don't really have it in me to be angry at dumb people anymore. Yes, fusion propulsion is real. A neutronic fusion propulsion is real. Yes, teleportation and warp drives are real. And yes, free energy is real. If you struggle with those concepts, I don't know what to tell you. Life isn't going to get any easier. If you were to ask me, Ashton, I think that most journalists would ask, Ashton, how do you know this? How do you know this? Well, I've done a lot of research into real physics and real science. And actually, the more research I do, the more obvious it is that this whole thing has been covered up. And not even really a deep cover up. Like when you look into how this physics could be possible, you really just run into one one theory over and over again related to zero point energy. So these things are all real and I don't really know how to reach people like Ross Kolhart. I don't really think that he's a Fed. Honestly, my true opinion, my unfiltered opinion is I don't think he's smart enough to be a Fed. I don't think Ross Khart's smart enough to be a Fed. I think he's dumb enough to get used and I think that he should have reached out to have a normal conversation with me a long time ago. A long time ago. Guys, I really don't know what to tell you. They have fusion technology. They have teleportation technology. Yes, the United States military has it. And the the silliest part about all of this is it's literally the answer to the UFO question. All of these people have been wondering about what the UFOs are, what the UFOs are doing, you know, where are they coming from, how do they operate, and I've literally got all of the qu answers for you on a silver platter going, here you go. Here's the answers you wanted. And by the way, they're also connected to all of your UFO people like Hal Pudof and Eric Davis, too. It's all there. And all these people have to do is literally just pull open something called the Defense Intelligence Reference Documents, the DERSDS, which I talk about all the time, and just read them. Just read the DURDS, and you will see all the science and technology and the physics related to UFOs is all there. So, without further ado, let's get right into the science and the physics, then. So, you guys see how fast that was? So, what do I have for you tonight? First, I have a video. You can find the video link in the description. Stop asking me. Everybody's always like, "Ashen, where are the where are the video links?" I put it in the chat for you this time, guys. Okay? So, no need to freak out. This right here is a video unrelated to me from the Econauts. Only 500 views. My favorite are the ones with only a few hundred views on them. Talking about a neutronic fusion. Have you ever dreamt of spaceships reaching the distant stars? A neutronic fusion propulsion might be the key. I'm going to go ahead and give them a subscriber. I'm subscriber number 208 for all you noobs out there. Let's go ahead and watch this. I want to comment on this because yes, as you may be suspecting, the answer to the question of how I know that the MH370 videos are a neutronic fusion is in this video. So, before I get to this, let me just say one more thing. The reason why I'm so cocky is because I know I'm [ __ ] right. I know I'm right about the MH370 videos and nothing you can possibly say is going to change my mind. There's going to be no gaslighting me into believing that the videos are fake. I know that they're real. Okay, that's the first thing I want to say. Second thing I want to say on the MH370 videos is that I expected more people to be investigating to find this stuff out. Where are you guys at? Where are my researchers at to find out these things? Like, one of the things that should have been apparent at the beginning is if the videos are real, then the physics in the videos is going to be real. And there should be signs in the physics in the videos that we should be able to point to that we should say that right there that I'm seeing is an indicator of a neutronic fusion. Guess what? Guess what, chat? There is a sign in the videos that the orbs in the MH370 videos are in fact a neutronic fusion. And the question that I have for people that watch these videos, where were the physicists to point this out to me? Where were the physicists to point this out to me? I'm intentionally leaving you guys vague here because I'm going to get to the answer in just a few minutes. I want to build up the suspense for it. I'm doing the Candace Owens right now. I'm building up maximum suspense for this. Why were there not Why were there not 100 people in my replies screaming about these videos being a neutronic fusion? That's the thing that keeps me up the most. You ready? Let's listen. >> Then you could use it as a propulsion. So, here comes the beauty for the classic or the normal for the normal fusion. >> I think we skipped a little bit ahead there. you generate a lot of energy and that energy could be harnessed and if you can direct or guide this this energy then you could use it as a propulsion. So here comes the beauty for the classic or the normal for the normal fusion when you fuse for example daterium and trissium together you generate lots of neutrons. The problem with neutrons is they are not charged and therefore you can't really control in which direction they are going. So they they fly in every direction um and therefore you can't really do a propulsion with that. With a neutronic fusion, you generate charged particles and these charged particles, you could contain them in an electromagnetic field and therefore guide them in one direction. And this is how you get the propulsion with it because now you expel um mass with very high velocity in one direction. That means you go in the other direction. What kind of fuel would we need to actually hycha? Where is it? Boom. Gotcha, [ __ ] There it is right there. Do you know why the videos Do you know why those orbs are a neutronic fusion now? Why? Because a neutronic fusion means no neutrons. That's why it's a neutronic. A neutronic meaning lack of neutrons. So the problem with neutrons is that you can't control the direction of the neutrons. The neutrons are just going to go in any direction that you want. So for why then is a neutronic what is the key aspect of a neutronic fusion that makes it so viable for propulsion? You can control the direction of the expellant. You can control the direction. Okay, hold up. Wait a minute. We were looking at those videos there just a second ago. Um, orbs. Here we go. Oh, wait. That's not the right one. Okay, just kidding. Got a lot of I got a lot of videos here. Here we go. This one. We look at the Well, look at those dark lines. Look at those dark lines coming out in front of the orbs. There you go. You've got your expellant coming out of the orbs. So, this is the thing. The light the black lines. The black lines are the expellant. And the black lines are also X-rays. So, this is how we know 100%. This isn't just fusion. This is a neutronic fusion that we're looking at here with these orbs. A neutronic fusion. No question. That's what we're seeing. The only way they can use it for propulsion is it has to be a neutronic. Wow. Wowee. Wowee. Zoey. And one of the key aspects of a neutronic fusion is the radiation that it gets released in the X-ray band. And that's why it shows up as black. Keep in mind if this was normal expellant, we should be seeing these lines like white hot just like the engine. Compare and contrast the black lines coming from front of the orbs here to the engine that is red hot. Why are the lines black in front of the orbs? Because no question that's a neutronic fusion. Boom. Drop the bomb. Okay. Well, this I got to that a little bit sooner than I wanted in there, but I want to play a little bit of the rest of this because they go over the other key aspects of a neutronic fusion and why a neutronic fusion is so important. Here we go. >> It's such an engine. >> Yeah. So, as as I said, so for the classic fusion, you use um isotopes of hydrogen like dutyium and trissium. But for a neutronic fusion, there's other exotic um mixtures necessary. One of which is um you could do a pure helium 3 fusion. And that brings us back to the oh we have helium 3 on the moon. We could use that. Um you know I think there's an there's an estimate that one tablespoon of helium 3 contains enough energy to run an American city with electricity if we were able to use it for fusion. That is but yeah so that that's that's one thing and yeah obviously we could use it for for the propulsion and also one thing I might have not said before uh the propulsion we would get with that is so fast we can actually nearly reach the speed of light within um with a vehicle that is propelled by electronic fusion. So there's I think there was the the Icarus mission in the 70s from NASA. >> We can nearly reach the speed of light. Wow. >> Um never really did they never really flew but they wanted to find out what would be needed to actually reach another star system interstellar. We have talked about that as well. Um within the lifetime of a human being and that is that was the e-commerce mission. the the interesting part that I just uh gained from from this little conversation is we we talked about helium 3 in our episode about the moon and also when we talked about if I'm not mistaken and yes you are right we also talked about fusion fusion reaction when we're talking about um interstellar travel so so we would actually unlock all that by by having like helium 3 available is that that more or less correct well I mean let's put it this way in the moment we have next to no helium 3 available on our planet so if we would like to do any experimentation with it we couldn't even do it we could only simulate Well, because we have we have not enough helium 3 available. But if we somehow suddenly had a huge amount of helium 3 available, say so we need all this helium 3 on the moon. Okay, so let me skip ahead here. Uh he talks about farming on the moon. Okay, well [clears throat] I'm just going to lay it down for you instead of watching that all. I'll just make it quick. He says the other big thing about why a neutronic fusion is so important is that all power is using the steam cycle. steam cycle is extremely inefficient because we are converting energy for to heat to boil water. So it's like it should be really obvious that this idea of autumnic fusion is just generally going to be better. I mean it's a direct energy conversion to electricity we're talking about efficiencies conversion to electricity above 90%. Between 90 to 100% conversion to electricity. Do you know how much electricity a solar panel converts? Roughly 20%. five times more efficient than a solar panel just from a process standpoint. So there you go. That's why animatronic fusion is so big. The downside of animatronic fusion is there's only three a neutronic fusion fuels. Number one, helium 3, the one that is being discussed here. Meaning we need the helium from the moon to farm the moon helium. Apparently we have to heat up the moon and then the helium rises from the earth, from the ground or something like that. I'm going to tell you guys right now, we probably don't need to mine helium from the moon, but just, you know, bear with me on that. The other fu fusion fuel is boron 11. I haven't heard much about boron 11 except for a company called HB11 out of Australia, but the idea is that boron 11 can be used as an atronic fusion fuel, and it's much more abundant than helium 3, meaning we don't have to go to the moon for it. The last fusion fuel which almost never gets mentioned almost never gets mentioned is lithium 6 or lithium 7. Lithium 6 and lithium 7. So those are the three and lithium 6 lithium 7 according to Eric W. Davis is used in in thermonuclear weapons which shouldn't be surprising because thermonuclear weapons are fusion bombs. Literally fusion bombs. Okay. So I gave you a quick rundown there of those. Let's switch over and go to this then. Speaking of that, I found this scient is this scientific paper not really a scientific paper. Let's call it a NASA publication. NASA publication lunar helium 3 and fusion power. Why is it important to review this? It's important for you guys to understand the history. The history of all this science is not recent. It goes back a very, very long way. So, here it is. Lunar Helium 3 and fusion power. I don't even know how I found this just googling things. 1998. This is from a conference in 1998. I'm just going to read the forward for you guys and then I'm going to go through some cliff notes that I had Grock put together because 255 pages is uh no bueno. Ashton did no like reado. It's a lot of reading these scientific papers. Okay. The NASA office of exploration with the help of the office of fusion energy department of energy sponsored by the NASA lunar H3 or helium 3 fusion power workshop. The meeting was held to understand the potential of using helium 3 from the moon for terrestrial fusion power production. The meeting brought together fusion and mining specialists from academia, industry and government. It provided an overview parallel working sessions, lunar mining and fusion power. I mean directly connecting these. The lunar mining sessions concluded that mining benification, separation, and return of helium 3 from the moon would be possible, but a large-scale operation improved technology would be required. Guys, keep in mind this is 1998. 1998 that they did this whole thing and they determine it's totally legit and we can do it. Okay. The fusion power sessions concluded that helium 3 offers significant possibly compelling advantages over fusion of tridium principally increased reactor life redu reduced re radioactive waste and high efficiency conversion. Plus, it also determined that detailed assessment of potential of dutyium helium 3 fuel cycle requires more information. And number three, that although dutyium tridium fusion is the most near-term, dutyium helium 3 fusion may be the best for commercial purposes. I forgot one more downside. One more downside of of neutronic fusion reaction is it destroys the reactor. the reactor gets destroyed by the neutrons as they get released because they literally destroy the reactor itself. So this is another benefit of field reverse configuration where the walls are the magnetic fields themselves. The magnetic fields are the walls when it comes to uh reveal field reverse configuration. So several discussions on the basis of several concepts generally agreed to upon the workshop that helium 3 fusion research is at an early stage. This was 1988 that dutyium helium 3 cycle has low priority in the department of energy fusion power program. There are no direct efforts related to helium 3 fusion. So publicly and officially in 1988 there were no efforts for helium 3 fusion. Isn't that weird? You do a whole conference on it about how this is the next best thing and the Department of Energy has no interest whatsoever in it or or did they have interest in it but publicly they didn't want to have any interest in it because publicly they knew that it worked. They just didn't want anybody to know that it worked. Just throwing that out there. Call me a conspiracy theorist. Okay. And then it says mining it will be feasible plus helium 3 fusion has no rad bas almost no radiation. So I looked at the numbers the amount of neutrons released from neutronic dutyium tridium uh fusion is 80% neutrons relative to a neutronic fusion which is 1% to 4% neutrons. So we're talking almost a 100fold decrease in neutron radiation. So much much less radiation than standard. Okay, now let's go to Gro. I want to read the Gro summary to you guys about this because I think it was pretty compelling. Um, I think this is where Grock honestly and AI in general shines the best is when you have it coalate data or to summarize really long content like that where it's like just give me the summary of the main works in there that that I should know or what are they trying to explain and essentially it says that you know what we think is helium 3 is feasible it's viable strategically beneficial it's better fusion compared to detium tridium due to reduced radioactivity, enhanced safety, higher efficiency. I mean, look at listen to all this. And then it says outlines a pathway for it to exist by 2005 to 2030. So there you go. When you look at the actual time frame right there, 2005 to 2030. This tells you that the governments probably already had it. They probably already had it for a long time. So the core thesis is that the the uh moon holds a huge amount of helium 3. stuck on the surface. Here it is. The neutron production 1% versus 80%. So it's much cleaner. So this is much better option for commercialized fusion power. So when somebody comes at you and they say, "Hey, my buddy is doing he's investing in fusion reactors." First thing you should ask is, "Is it neutronic or a neutron?" Because if if it's neutronic, get out. Run away as fast as you can. Okay. So they search for mining feasibility. So not only they try to figure out is it even feasible to mine this. Now dutaterium helium 3 does require higher ignition temperatures but achieves a break even in modified devices. So this is a fuzzy way of saying like if you engineer your system correctly you can get break even at lower temperatures which is what uh David Kirkley was saying is that even though they don't need to hit ignition they don't need ignition to hit over unity in these uh configurations. Now, I will say that I do think that it's very likely that the MH370 a neutronic fusion orbs are hitting ignition. I think they are hitting ignition and that's why it's a stable orb that just keeps going. I think they've hitten a certain uh magnetic field strength that just allows for stabilized uh stabilized fusion reactions. Okay. And then there's some challenges blah blah. Let's see. Key results. Um, so this is where people were joking about this, like how expensive is it the mining cost? $6 per ton with a yield of $1 billion per ton. So, I mean, it depends how you cost it, but you don't need that. The point being, you don't need that much helium 3 in order to produce net energy. And then what we're doing is we're we're calculating all the pros and cons from this and determining that okay if you add up the radiation the ignition temperature all these pros and cons the waste etc. You're going to come down to an answer where the cost for helium 3 is actually relatively lower. Now is there some subjectivity that goes into those numbers? Absolutely. But I think the point being is that if you add up all these external costs, eventually at some point here, you're going to realize that it's going to be more beneficial to society to have this clean energy instead. For the question, am I going on some podcast? Yes, tomorrow I'm doing a gaming podcast, old school gaming retro podcast. I've got some other things in the works that I can't talk about, but you know, if they come true, it'll be pretty sweet. So, um, hang tight on that. I'll give one clue on one of my possible upcoming future things, which may or may not happen. But what if I was able to talk to somebody who is out there searching for extraterrestrial life? That's your clue for tonight. That's your hint for a next possible upcoming interview. There you go. That's all you get. Nothing more than that. Okay. So then the lastly, the conclusions and recommendations. So, uh, you know, 255 pages is mostly talking about how do we mine this helium on the moon? Why is the helium so beneficial? And keep in mind, in 1988, nobody had any idea what a neutronic fusion was. They still don't know what a neutronic fusion is in 2025. This was 37 years ago. So, 1988, this is like just introducing people the idea of these advanced fusion fuels. In fact, this paper that we're looking at, uh, the one that this is related to this Grock um, chat, this is actually the oldest reference I can find in United States government talking about a neutronic fusion production or energy production. I haven't found any earlier than this. So, if you can find papers talking about using autonic fuels for fusion before 1988, let me know. The only ones I could even imagine even existing are probably ones related to Knuckles and Wood who are working on thermonuclear weapons. So there's a little homework challenge for my followers out there. So lastly, in the conclusions of recommendations, it says lunar helium 3 mining is achievable with largecale robotics and aligns with space exploration initiative timelines offering dual benefits for energy and space settlement. Helium 3 fusion propo promises clean power with high availability and low maintenance. Political arguments stress US leadership to avoid moon treating deals and foster international cooperations. Recommendations NASA and DOE joint program for mining demos in Helium 3 research. Prioritize high TI site mapping. I don't know what that means. Tridium. uh develop risk assessment for tools and licensing by 2005. So honestly the people that say that there might be a secret space program like your your stock is rising rapidly. I mean they were writing proposals for how to mine helium on the moon for 2005 and we're watching a plane get teleported out of the sky by a neutronic fusion plasma orbs in 2014. So where were they getting the helium 3 for those plasma orbs? Were they getting it here? Were they producing it? where they getting on the moon or are those orbs using boron 11 or are they using lithium 6 I don't know could be any combination of those so we can only know so much but just to go back to this so this paper then is all about how to mine oops how to get the fusion how to get the fusion fuel and how to what is the fusion fuel how to get it why is it beneficial and then how we can mine it from the moon and bring it back here so that we can unlimited clean fusion for the rest of the world for the rest of the un for forever basically. Okay, next one. Now, here we go. Next scientific thing. Free electron lasers. So, this is another scientific paper. This one's only uh 500 pages. 525 pages here. We're not going to read through all of this sadly tonight because it would probably take a year and a half. Um, I believe this is a combination of multiple papers put together by Leak Mayaboo. Where is it? Where's his name at somewhere on here? It says his name. Here it is. Principal investigator Leak Myrau. So, Leak Myu uh is popular in engineering circles for making the laser light sail relatively famous. You might see some of these old UFO documentaries talking about this laser beam that was going to shoot something into outer space, shoot it up into the sky. And this should right away, right away begin to ring bells in your ears and you say, "Wait a minute. We've been talking about these advanced powerful lasers that we need to produce our magneto hydrodnamic air breathing plasmas to be able to produce these fusion orbs. We need very powerful lasers. The way you start making these inertial fusion reactions is by lasers or plasma or some sort of interaction high energy physics. And then from there we manipulate spaceime with our high energy lasers. And now we get this stabilized, you know, ignition fusion reaction happening. So let's see. Let's do this. First thing I want to do, we're going to take a couple looks through actually, you know, we're going to go to Grock first. I had Grock. I said, let's just take a quick look through the uh the table of contents. I want to show you guys the table of contents on some of the subjects that we see in here. Power beaming technology for laser propulsion. Okay, just going to list off some of the examples. We're going to take a look at a couple of these, not all of them, but a few. Laser thermal air breathing propulsion radial configurations. Air breathing, laser electric propulsion of radial shuttle craft. When they're talking about radial, I presume they mean circular. [laughter] Uh I think laser thermal air breathing propul propulsion of cylindrical configuration. Uh don't worry there's a lot more. Let me see. Laser boosted heavy lift launch vehicle electrostatic propulsion concepts. Uh man battle cruisers. Wait, where's the other one about uh where's my one about different types of lasers here? Somewhere in here. Here. I think I saw here it is. H E high energy lasers in future UASF missions. And I think somewhere in here talks about free electron lasers. MHD pumped vortex induced lift. So several of these large amplitude alphan waves thruster mode. So this whole pair this whole section here is like that's pretty much what we're looking for. But honestly, more than one of these is as well. And what we learned recently, we've learned the secret to all of this. Let me just see if I see free electron anywhere. Oh yeah. Oh yeah. Technical bottlenecks. Free electron laser. Free electron laser site with orbital relay mirror. The basic principles of the free electron laser concept shown seem very straightforward. Electrons accelerated nearly the speed of light are injected into an alternating magnetic field where the resulting transverse accelerations cause them to emit synretron radiation in the direction tangental to their motion. Because of Laurent contraction, the wiggles in the magnetic fields appear to the relativistic electrons to have very short wavelength approximating the wavelength of light corresponding to any choice of electron energy and magnetic periodicity. There will be an appropriate uh resonant wavelength where the synretron radiation from electrons in one wiggle tends to add in phase with the radiation from electrons in subsequent wiggles. Hence the synretron light grows in the mean direction of the motion. This is like literally what the orbs are doing. That's literally what the orbs are doing right there when he's explaining the relativistic motion. This is why the free electron relativist the relativistic free electron is so important. Let me repeat this part right here for you. This is why general relativity Einstein is the person that proved free energy was real. Relativity is what breaks physics. General relativity breaks physics. says right here, electrons are accelerated to the speed of light where the resulting transverse accelerations cause them to emit synretron radiation in the direction tangental to their motion tangent. Because of the contraction, the magnetic fields appear to the electrons to have very short wavelength. So the wavelength appears shorter because the electron is moving. so fast because the electron is its own little bubble adhering to general relativity. This is why relativistic free electron laser is so important. Now that I've said that to contextualize this back for you guys, let me contextualize this for you guys. I went ahead and I said, "Ai, do your thing for me. Do your thing, AI." Let me see how long is this. Can I read all this? This might be a lot. Okay. What can you do with free relativistic electrons? So, relativistic electrons are used in a lot of different things. Let me just skip down here, but here you go. Look at the second one here. Synretron radiation and X-ray sources in storage rings or accelerators. These electrons emit bright synretron light when bent by magnets. This is used for advanced material studies, atomic and molecular physics, and ultra fast X-ray science such as nondestructive imaging of micro structures in solids or biological samples. This is crazy because this is what we're seeing. X-rays coming out of those orbs. That's what we're seeing. We're you're literally seeing the synretron radiation shooting out of the orbs axially out of both sides. And they can they can close off one side of the orb or the other. So it either shoots out one end or the other or both ends depending on what you want to do for thrust. So you're literally seeing that synretron radiation, those X-rays coming directly out of these plasma orbs. Do I know they're a neutronic fusion? Yes, I know those plasma orbs are beyond any doubt a neutronic fusion. And I would say I at this point I would say they're using a free electron laser inside of them. inside of them is a free electron laser that allows that to happen. So there's the synretron part which I thought was interesting. Um optical vortex generation. I want to mention this because I've I've done a few live streams about optical vortexes in light. So interacting free electron relativistic beams in light produce coherent optical vortices useful for advanced photonics like manipulating nano particles. Sounds a lot like a tractor beam to me. Okay, let's get to the good stuff here because I said, "Okay, great. You didn't you didn't tell me what I wanted to know, Grock. What I want to know is check for uses in fusion and gravity manipulation." That's what we want to know about when it comes to our free electron lasers. So, here we go. Free free relativistic electrons have several established and proposed applications in nuclear fusion research primarily in enhancing plasma heating ignition processes and catalyzing reactions. These leverage the electrons high energy to overcome barriers like coolum repulsion between nuclei. Here's a breakdown. Inertial confinement fusion. In highintensity laser fusion setups, relativistic electrons are generated through laser plasma interactions. These electrons can deliver energy directly to the compressed fuel core, aiding ignition in schemes like fast ignition. Whoa. Maybe that's what's going on here. This approach aims for efficient, clean energy production by using relativistic effects to focus energy into imploded plasma without traditional compression limitations. Well, we might have to click on this link. Uh, using relativistic effects for laser fusion. A new Holy [ __ ] Using relativistic effects for las Okay. Yeah. Well, let's go ahead and click on that. [laughter] Japan 2020. Of course, Japan 2020. Okay. Well, I think we've got a topic for our next live stream. I'm going to come back to that one, guys. Uh, we may take a look at that in a second. For instance, plasma mirrors. As we talked about plasma mirrors or cone targets are used to produce picoscond pulses of relativistic electrons that penetrate and heat the fusion target. Electron beam induced fusion. Relativistic electron beams can cause high temperature dense plasma by focusing on solid targets. So this is target uh fusion. You have a pellet and then you target on that and then you cause some reaction to occur. Catalyzed fusion reactions including muon catalyzed fusion. So this can apply in cold fusion or in hot fusion as well. So it says the high relativistic velocities reduce effective repulsion between the nuclei include increasing fusion probability. So how do we know this is true? How do we know this is true? We read a scientific paper from the cold fusion fiasco. It was called something about the vibr basically using vibration to figure out why cold fusion worked. And if you increased vibration, your probability of fusion skyrocketed, skyrocketed. So there you go. Why does a relativistic free electron matter? Because that's what a relativistic free electron is doing. When you vibrate things, you're causing relativistic motion, contraction, and expansion. And then lastly, the magnetic uh confinement in Tokamax. I hate toax. I won't even talk about them. Screw you, Tokamax. You suck. Go to hell. Okay. uses in gravity manipulation. In general relativity, the energy of relativistic particles, including electrons, contributes to the curvature of spaceime, effectively increasing their gravitational mass. For example, accelerating electrons to near light speeds inflates their effective mass, which could theoretically enhance local gravitational acceleration without adding particles. However, for individual electrons or beams, this effect is minuscule, far too weak for any detectable manipulation like anti-gravity or field control. So, there you go. Right there it tells you the answer is that if you speed these electrons to near the speed of light, you will get relativistic effects and they will become heavier. So the reason why normie noob physicists think that we can't achieve the speed of light is because as you move faster and faster and faster, you get heavier and heavier and heavier. Your mass increases. And therefore, as your mass increases, it takes more and more energy to accelerate you. And therefore, you get a this curve that goes up like this for the amount of energy it takes to go faster and faster and faster. You can abuse this to manipulate gravity because now your free electron is now heavier than it thinks it is. You're making your electron seem heavier than it thinks it is. You're basically making a black hole. You're saying, "Hey, these iPods, these are pretty light. Let's go ahead and make this a thousand times heavier." You'd be like, "Wait, what? What do you mean make it thousand times heavier? How do you do that?" Well, I'm going to move it at a really high rate of speed and now it'll become heavier. That's the exact same things they're doing. And yes, that's probably not enough to make a wormhole. It's not enough to make a wormhole. It is enough to make your orb float around freely in the sky, though, because the orbs are basically weightless as it is. So, even a small amount of force will cause them to float in whatever direction you want them to go into. Just like a balloon. Just like a balloon. back to the task at hand. So there you go. Um, relativistic electrons and accelerators can probe quantum gravity. So the quantum gravity is going to be what they're going to call the zero point energy. I can already see it coming. They're calling it quantum gravity. Whatever, bro. I don't care what you call it. And then studies examine how Earth's relativism gravity. So I think we the first one we wanted was the answer. This is the answer right here. Like how are these things manipulating gravity? How are they manipulating gravity? They're manipulating gravity because they are able to make themselves heavier from a relativistic perspective. They're literally just abusing Einstein's general relativity. All the stuff you see happen in the MH370 videos, they prove Einstein was right. The funniest part is the normies think that Einstein's on their side. Einstein's the one that believed we lived in an elastic solid, an elastic medium. He's the one that predicted gravitational waves. Einstein's the one that didn't understand spooky action at a distance. Didn't want to believe that it could be real. But it is real. It is. And it's undeniable and there must be an explanation for it. So, let's go back to this scientific paper. Let's go back to this. Now that we have a better understanding of why the free electron is so important. Now we understand why they were writing this scientific paper. What year was this scientific paper? This scientific paper was or whatever we're going to call this technical report. Looks like 1985. Is that right? 1985. Okay. 1983. Field propulsion concepts. 1983. So this is really old. So they were already talking about free electron laser. And the technical bottleneck for making this work is the free electron laser. Look at this. Look at that. You're Look, this is right here. Holy [ __ ] Look at this. Do you know what this is, chat? You are looking at one of the first configurations right here for an autronic fusion reactor. [snorts] You are looking at one of the first configurations for an autronic fusion reactor right here. Look at the uh do you guys see in the middle of the screen here these north south magnets? Look at how they alternate. See how the magnets alternate here? So what they're doing is they're getting the electrons to go down this path in the middle where they get squeezed together and then the electrons have to vibrate up and down like this because of the magnetic fields. This is how they get that synretron radiation or whatever the hell they call it. You get all the electrons that start oscillating along these magnetic fields right through the middle of this thing right here. And that is what Loheed Martin's fusion reactor is doing. That's what these neutronic fusion reactors are doing. They have alternating magnetic fields throughout the middle. And they have them in a ring format though, in a ring format, not barb, but that's the idea right there. And so you just get it to oscillate the way you want it to oscillate. Once everything begins to oscillate in a coherent pattern, you're going to start seeing these relativistic effects start to occur right there. So, I'm glad maybe I'll just search for free electron. I guess this is the money, right? And the other point of why this is so crazy is that this says this is the bottleneck. So, we knew this science and technology was real. We knew the science and technology was real back in the 80s, but we had the bottleneck is we needed these extremely powerful lasers. We need these extremely powerful lasers to make it happen. And then we got the lasers. That's why atosecond laser won the Nobel Prize. That's why chirp pulse amplification won the Nobel Prize because we started figuring out how to make these lasers. And the reality here is they had this laser figured out in the military in the black world decades ago, probably in the 90s, maybe even before that. Let's see what else we got. Okay, free electron lasers. Let's see what else. Oh, here's references for this one. Bunch of references. Free electron laser from Los Alamos 19 or 2015. Is that right? That's probably just a a figure probably. That's probably like 1980. Free electron laser amplifier scaling relations for the power output of gain of expanded storage ring for free electron lasers. [clears throat] If the vapor produced from the hot particles has a lower ionization potential than that of the constituents of air, it is possible that the first free electron aes are emitted from the ionized vapor. The particles can also emit electrons thermally as they are heated. Even though the latter emission process is impaired by electrostatic excuse me effects. [clears throat] Okay, what else we got? More free electron lasers. High electrostatic forces would drive free electrons to the end of these fibers producing or prior to there being sheared off. The goal will be to produce a large surface area, high charge per mass. Oh, here you go. Damn, look at this. Relativistic ebeam propagation endoatmospheric. Look. And then you have this cone going around it. So you have this accelerator. You have this tube in the middle. electron beam in the middle and then you have this cone going around the tube. I mean this is basically what the orbs are, right? Ebeam blow up formation of the charged cloud. So you have your electron beam and then you have a negatively charged cloud of electrons surrounding it. Wow. Yeah, this is definitely what we're looking at, guys. This is definitely what we're looking at on in the MH370 videos. And so you can draw I mean we can basically start calling out engineers at this point like Myrabu obviously was in some of the early stages of the development of these of these weapons whatever you want to call them plasma orbs. Here you go. Space nuclear power plant technology military space weapons for example the free electron laser will demand instant i.e within several seconds delivery of hundreds of thousands of megawws which must be generated in the open cycle mode. So we got to what? We have to have a power plant on the outer space for this. Yep. Space power plants. Okay. Last one. Okay. Figure what is that? 14 indicates how a free electron laser weapon might be integrated with the exemplary battle cruiser configuration. Viable accelerator options include RF Linux, storage ring and induction liner varieties. Ex I mean the reason why nobody can figure this out, nobody knows what this stuff means. Accelerators would be positioned between the tanks. Okay, blah blah blah. Okay, so this whole document, entire document is about using high powered lasers for propulsion. We just saw a whole thing about how we can use these free electron lasers for a neutronic fusion propulsion. And now you see this whole thing about air breathing magneto hydrodnamics uh as well as ionizing the air to produce these bubbles of electrons around our object. So our orbs that we're seeing are using a lightened version of gravity manipulation using high energy lasers. So the conclusion that I've reached over a long period of time here is that we have both smallcale gravity manipulation which can produce fusion and fusion plasma orbs and fusion reactant and clean energy. But we also have a high energy version of gravity manipulation which takes those same fusion reactor orbs, combines them and uses them as the basis producing a catalyzed effect or a compounding effect that causes an actual wormhole in spaceime. So you take one individual plasma a neutronic fusion orb and by itself it's not going to teleport a plane. You can produce a huge amount of energy from it though. Huge amount of energy. Gigawatts of excess energy just flying through the sky. And if you combine three of those together, that's how you take your autonic fusion power plant and you convert it to a huge amount of energy that actually manip manipulates the fabric of spaceime itself. And maybe even according to our most recent theories, which are pretty out there, maybe there's a shortcut like how this zero point energy, imagine it's like a calm ocean. But what if you could figure out those those ocean waves and now all you have to do is like dip underneath one wave and now you're over here somewhere. Maybe there's an easier way to teleport where you just basically duck underneath the wave for a second and now you appear somewhere else. That's what we're going to be investigating in future live streams. Okay. Anything else? Let me take a quick look at the chat and see what else. Yeah. Is Synretron synonymous with X-ray? Let me look. Synron. I think it is synonymous. Let me just double check. Yeah, Synretron X-ray radiation is incredibly bright, tunable, and focused. And by the way, X-ray radiation is the kind of stuff where like if you get hit with the X-ray, like you can see your bones in your hand, like you would be able to see through your skin, that kind of stuff. That's the kind of radiation we're talking about here with that X-ray radiation. Um, okay. I've got one more thing to go over for you guys tonight. Yeah, the crazy the saddest part is this stuff is old, man. This stuff is old. These papers are from the 80s. These papers are I was a little kid. I was a little kid when these papers came out. Crazy, man. I don't know if you're still in denial about the videos being real, you're just going to have a hard life, man. You're just going to straight up have a hard life. I don't really know what else to tell you guys. I mean, that there's so many scientific papers that are out there that confirm it. And it's literally just how pudof's derds. the derds that were the most popular derds on the internet. Most popular papers on the classified servers and they're all about fusion propulsion and all this other stuff. So, okay, two more things. Let's let's chill out. Let's watch a couple videos for this Monday. Number one thing, this is just a weird video that I wanted to share with you guys. Uh this is Ale what's this guy's name? Alex Karp or whatever. Palunteers. Uh, is he the CEO? I just want you guys to watch this guy's behavior. Just watch my dude's behavior right here. This is Palunteers like CEO of decisions when we began talking annoying each other 10 years ago. Hopefully, I'm annoying you as much as 10 years ago. uh it it or more uh when when when I made a you know this every decision Palanteer made FDA's going public building products no one enterprise large data sets going to government acknowledging American superiority being pro meritocracy launching an AI platform calling into question that AI models would actually be able to perform without orchestration every single one uh every single every single one of those was viewed as stupid. Lot of decisions when we began talking >> chat. [clears throat] How many drugs is this guy on right here? >> Mute it. How many Why is this guy fidgeting around so much? If I was in a conversation with somebody and they were moving around like this, freaking out like this with all these weird handbook, I would definitely say they were on some drugs. Definitely. I mean, I'm not trying to be that guy, but this is like cocaine, I'm guessing, right? Is that what's going on here? Cocaine is what's going on here. That is not normal, chat. What you're seeing here with this behavior that that's like I don't know what drugs you're on. Probably some very expensive ones if I had to guess. But it just goes to show like even weirdly erratic behavior like this. People just brush it off. As long as you're a billionaire rich person, you can do drugs, you can show up to interviews high as [ __ ] makes no difference whatsoever. People give no shits about it. You're literally a defense contractor that is tasked with spying on our adversaries and some of the most important stuff ever and you can just show up co out of your mind on an interview. Makes absolutely no difference. Anyway, I just thought that was pretty interesting because that's Palunteer, guys. Palunteer and um uh Peter Teal and the Antichrist. You know, I'm big fans of Palunteer obviously. Now, let's switch gears real quick. Two things I want to show you here. Let's go two more. Let's go back to this. Actually, I want to highlight this real quick first. So, uh, shout out to what's this guy's name? Charge cluster. Charge plus 98432. You got the follow. The beloved Ashton Forbes follow or the uh um whatever. Everyone wants that follow DIA DURDS on free electron lasers and negative mass propulsion revealed that the US was actively researching how DRA's equation enables both high energy laser weapons through relativistic electron beam control and exotic propulsion systems through negative mass and energy configurations. So just on Friday guys we were talking about DRA and the free electron equation. Drack is the one that took Schrodinger's equation and was able to get the simplified equation for the free electron relativistic free electron. And then what we did is we took that and we weaponized that research. United States does what we do best. We took science and physics and we weaponized it and we turned it into super weapons. We turned it into super weapons that we would use to defeat our enemies. And there you have it right there. negative mass propulsion, state-of-the-art lasers, uh, high energy laser weapons. This one doesn't even have the animronic fusion propulsion listed on here. These are real papers, by the way, guys. So, highly recommend checking those out. And then this is just something else I thought was interesting. I'm probably not going to share the video here tonight, but there was a pretty neat YouTube video talking about the connection between um, magnetism and sound. And this goes back to Dr. U who I'm a huge fan of NASA physicist Dr. U where he believes that everything can be explained by magnetism. Everything can be explained by magnetism. And if you look at this video right here, when you represent magnetism, it almost looks like the magnetic lines are coming out at you. Like you have two things come together, but the magnetic lines kind of bend around. Why do they bend around like that? Why do they have this geometric shape to them? If I were to give you the most simplified answer, I would say it's because there's a medium. There is an extra dimension. There's an extra dimension. And electromagnetism or magnetism is connected to gravity. That's why it curves around like that because magnetism and electromagnetism and gravity are connected. They're one and the same. They're the same fundamental underlying force. Which is the reason why when you look at the equations for gravity and electromagnetism, they have the exact same form. [snorts] It's like literally the force equals a constant time mass one or charge 1* mass 2 or charge 2 / r 2. That's the same form, just different constant. Of course, there's going to be a relationship between the two of them. It's crazy to me that people don't see it. Okay, guys. Tonight's going to be a short stream. I just wanted to go through all that science and physics with you guys tonight. Uh, so let's do some super chats and then I've got a pretty funny moment of zen for you if I can find it here. Actually, I think it was in that right there. So, let me pull that back up for you guys. Uh, okay. Let's do the super chats. Oh, big shout out John Glock. Everybody in the pill chat. Thank you guys very much for following along. And in the Rumble chat, Deepc and everybody else in the Rumble chat, I appreciate you guys. Tokamac reactors are a scam. Tonga Mac reactors are a giant scam chat. Don't worry about it. Not going to happen. Okay, super chats. Sam Fiser, last week's breakdown of Verassium video, the ver V ver Veritassium video on Friday was all about Durax free electron relativistic equation. Check that out if you want to know more about it or just watch the Veritassium video directly. Take it either way you want. S Flecher says, "I shared your tweet about this with the smartest person I know and this was a response. There is just a small problem of how do you get the energy or helium 3 back from the moon from Earth?" Well, have a read of that scientific paper. Have a read of that scientific paper. In fact, I will go ahead and speculate because I think that's a really smart question to ask. I'm going to go ahead and speculate they're getting it back there using un the same physics that that the helium 3 produces. Like if I wanted to go farm helium 3 on the moon, I'm not going to send the space shuttle Colombia up there. Rest in peace Colia. I'm not going to send a space shuttle up there with people with rakes and go farming on the moon. No, I'm going to send a drone up there and I'm going have a drone just hover over the hover over the moon and heat it up and then the helium 3 is going to come out and I'm just going to suck it up like a vacuum and then I'm going to have my orb or my drone come fly back to Earth with the helium 3. So, if they are farming it, that's how they're farming it. They're not sending dudes up there to go farm it. We're just having drones go up there and farm it. especially if it's as easy as just heating up the surface of the moon and letting the helium 3 just come out of the surface of the moon, which is what I read in that in that article. So, to me, the bigger thing is why are we going to the moon for resources? We shouldn't need to go to the moon at all. We should be able to just produce the helium 3. If we can produce fusion, we should be able to produce the helium 3 that we need as well. In fact, we should be able to produce literally any element that we need, we should be able to produce. So maybe in the short run, maybe in the 80s we had to go shoot fly orbs up to the moon to harvest helium 3. But in 2025, 2025 we should either be using boron, which has no problem whatsoever. We have plenty of boron 11, or we should just be producing the helium 3 with our own fusion reactors on Earth. So this is why I don't put a lot of stock in we're going to go farm the moon. No, no, no. That's what we tell China to go do. We say, China, you go farm the helium 3 on the moon. That's for stupid people. The smart people are literally just producing elements from the vacuum. They're we're transmuting elements at will to produce whatever elements we want. Heavy elements, light elements, anything we want. Anything we want. And if we've unlocked fusion, if we' unlocked ignition, then this idea of transmuting elements is basically just, you know, it's uh presumed at that point. Sam Fisher with the follow-up donation says, "I keep wondering if this tech can be used to zap all the garbage off the planet like in that Futurama episode." Um, dude, are you kidding? We can annihilate. We can transmute the garbage into something useful. You're thinking too small. Like this is where normies like you're not you're not thinking in terms of a neutronic fusion. When you're thinking in terms of autumnic fusion, you should be thinking that nothing is ever created or destroyed. It just changes forms. So trash is just elements that we are in a configuration that we just need to break apart again to their under to the underlying constituent elements. We're going to be soilent, greening, recycling literally everything that we produce in the future. I don't think a lot of people are even ready for what the future's going to look like. You think we recycle now? Wait until trash is a thing of the past. Will materialism even be a thing when nobody has to work anymore? I don't know. I look forward to finding out though. And then could this damage our reality? Could using this physics damage our reality? Yes. Yes. Not only could it, but I would go so far as to say it's probably one of the main reasons why they don't let us have this. One of the main reasons why they don't let us have this technology is that they're afraid that somebody's going to destroy the Earth. Somebody's going to destroy the universe. like they're afraid that there's no limit to what this weaponization could do. And if aliens are real, then almost certainly aliens have bells and alarms to go off. When people start messing around with this technology, when primitives start messing around with this technology, the aliens bells go off and they go, "Oh, we got some dumb dums on planet Earth trying to produce fusion weapons. Let's go teleport over there and tell them to stop it. Chill out, little Earthlings. Primitive Earthlings. That's how it probably plays out. And then Zaparoo says, "Another fantastic Forbes episode. Thank you. Thank you very much." And guys, I'm g if if nobody if I don't get more compliments on my shirts. I swear to God, I'm going to quit. I'm going to quit. No one's gaining disclosure. There's going to be no zero point energy disclosure unless I get more compliments on these shirts. chat. Paul Frederick did not go and do all those years of fashion for Ashen Forbes not to get more positive feedback on his amazing shirts. Look at this. Look, chat. Look. Look at this. Oh my. OMG. OMG. Paul Frederick is rolling around in his grave. He might not even be a real person. He might be like the Colonel. Might be like the Colonel. not even a real person. Thank you. And thank you for the 7Ks in the chat. Yes, without those 7Ks, I could never afford these amazing shirts. And yes, I am singing for a uh sponsorship from Paul Frederick. Amazing shirts, Chad. Amazing shirts. Definitely not racist. And Paul Frederick definitely high IQ futurist. He's there. He's He's next door to me in the penthouse and I always write about Everything'sville. Thank you for the 7Ks in the chat. Appreciate it. Okay guys, that's it for tonight. This is going to be your moment of zen. Oh, sorry. One more donation for the shirts. Here we go. Zapru says, "I'm going out and buying a case of graph paper right now." Awesome. Thank you very much. Uh, okay. This is your moment of zen chat. Very real video chat. Very real video. Very definitely not fake chat. Here he is. The man himself, the man of the hour, Palunteer CEO Alex Karp. Yeah, dude. He can do that. You guys didn't know he can just do handstands like that? Y'all didn't know my man was built like that? Yeah. So, for you in the chat who are going, "This is fake that AI made this." Nah, bro. No. My dude just does this on the regular. He just goes to interviews and he just starts doing push-ups on the chairs. Upside down push-ups. There's your moment of Zen. Trust Palunteer chat. Palunteer loves you. Can Could someone like that lie to you? Never. Never in a million years. Guys, have a great night. Love you. MH270X. Hit it up in the Discord. Join us in the Discord and uh keep in touch because we got some good collaborations coming up, including a big gaming stream tomorrow, Retro Gaming, guys, uh with Perfect Storm Gaming. I'll be posting a link to it later on. Love y'all. Have a great night. MS270X later. [music] Out in the fields [music] where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and [music] Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant [music] points in space. traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing [music] weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Bowling trip 7 through a wormhole, but we're talking wormholes. Stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. LH370. Where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole [music] flow. [music] Exotic [music] matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum squeeze. So tight creating [music] conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. [music] Gravitational squeezing castle force negative zones. We need to stay the course. Stalking wormholes [music] stargates negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where [music] did it go? Boing triple 7 do a wormhole flow thin shell formalism [music] plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole let's give it a try [music] forces balancing [music] The plate creating the throat. Open the gate from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to [music] future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. [music] We're talking wormho, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, hitting star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Blowing trip [music] 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding [music] the universe, we make the gain. Little hoola crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll [music] explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. exp.