Video Transcript
The same device can be biased for emission or can be used passively uh as a detector. If you bias a Josephson junction, you wind up with the AC Josephson effect which which creates an AC signal, which is beneficial for us because if we pick the if we have a frequency in mind, we can we can bias it with a DC voltage, and there's there's an exact correlation between that DC voltage and the frequency you'll get out of an AC Josephson junction. And so that >> Whoa. There you go, physics nerds. He says, "We can apply a DC voltage direct current, and then we can have it based on the DC voltage we apply, we can get the exact AC frequency out that we want." That sounds like a tunable, I don't know if chat, I'm just a normal healthcare IT basic chungus. I don't know anything about these uh waves and physics and electrical engineering, but that sounds like a way where we could tune our wavelength to the exact size that we need. Especially when I'm building an array where I need every single array to be exactly one wavelength hop from the next one. >> That's the trick we're using here to make a gravitational wave. Uh it shows also the phased array approach uh on the right. It talks about estimates of power for 6-in versus 8-in wafers. I've also done a layout on a 12-in wafer. These These are the the 200-mm 8-in wafer is like 140 or so emitters. The if you go to a 12-in wafer, it's more like more like 300 emitters. And so that's that's designing for for 24 GHz. Why 24 GHz? It's first of all, it's an amateur band, so it's unregulated. Uh second of all, it's a happy medium between we want a large number of emitters, but we also want a frequency that is easy to use. If we start getting above 40 GHz or so, the this becomes the tech becomes very difficult. So it's easier to work with manageable microwave style signals. Uh and so that's why I picked this signal. It was like it was the highest conveniently usable frequency that I could pack a lot of them >> So, I mean, this is so well thought out. It's so well thought out that the guy that said we make earthquakes, it's hard to argue with you, sir. I mean, we got we got dudes out here just spilling the beans on how to make gravitational detectors and emitters and amplify them up to significant scales and you just have to wonder like did the government already figure this out 10 years ago, 20 years ago, 30 years ago, longer? What kind of crazy weapons could we have designed with this technology? Earthquake weapons are honestly kind of trivial at this point. Directed energy weapons, things that just beam energy onto things. It's about to get to be a very scary world, guys. >> meters I want to wait for. That's That's why I picked that frequency. >> Okay, let's see. >> And if the quantum efficiency is decent, you can get as many as 83 dB. We don't have a good reading on quantum efficiency, so I saw one of your questions was going to be you know, what did the skeptics say? Well, the skeptics are going to say, "Hey, what's the quantum efficiency here?" And so, I had to compare with similar quantum efficiencies for other uh Josephson junction detectors. They are used, by the way. JJs are used for um nuclear detection, nuclear event gamma ray detection. And so, >> What? JJ Josephson junctions are used for nuclear detonation detection? Uh of course they are. Of course they are. What What was I even thinking? I'm the one saying nuclear weapons are manipulating space-time, and you're saying that we use these Josephson junctions to detect nuclear detonations. Of course we do. Silly me. And the fact that Gary Stephenson's just casually dropping that right here. Damn. How many How does that guy know How does he know this? Very knowledgeable guy. Hmm. Yatsi indeed chat. Yatsi indeed. >> So, this this is an important precedent and I used the quantum efficiency from that use to translate it to this use. Okay, so let me stress how revolutionary this idea is, how timely and how well this fits with our existing technology base. But for challenging environments such as underground mines that we could use this technology to communicate through the earth to underground facilities and underground mines. We also >> We could use this technology to communicate to underground mines? So, this goes straight through solid matter. Straight through solid matter. And my first thought was well, what about submarines? Because now this is just Hal Puthoff's quantum communication patent from the 90s. Hal Puthoff's quantum communication patent from the 90s specifically calls out the Aharonov-Bohm effect, which was the first half of this live stream. Excuse me. And calls out using this to go through salt water or plasma. Now, Gary Stevenson's presenting it as going through solid matter, which is also crazy, but it's almost like he avoided that specifically. Now, listen to this follow. This is crazy. Watch this. If you were Do you think I'm the only one thinking that? >> I have a lot of government facilities that are underground and if we want to communicate with them in a stealthy way, we could leverage this technology for something like that. Okay, and so that would also enable like submarine communications and things like that. Well, that's what I got That's why I got interested in this technology at first was because I was assigned to a redesign of the E-6B program. They They talked to submarines. They work at very low frequencies, you know, on the order of 70 or 80 hertz. And that at that low frequency, you have to go through a lot of trouble to get a signal from the air to the ground, so we literally would have to fly the aircraft in circles, have a long trailing wire that's like kilometers long, and the submarine would have to have have a kilometers long, you know, tail antenna coming out of the back of it. And it that's [clears throat] literally the only way we could talk to subs that were submerged. Uh and so I had I was thinking there there has to be a better way to this. And so that was my initial interest in these high frequency gravitational waves is that Bob Baker had published in this area, and so I started following his work. And that's ultimately what led led him to invite me to Polymer Labs, you know, minor conference, the first SFGW working group. >> Gary Stevenson was on a project where they were trying to figure out how to communicate with submarines more effectively. Chat, live stream's over. Keep Gary safe, chat. I don't want to see any more General McCaslin out there. I've had enough. We already have one missing general. We don't need any more missing engineers out there, chat. Just kidding, we're not ending the live stream. Are you kidding me? This is great. >> If I remember correctly, and it has been a while since I dug into the this aspect of it, but you can also do remote sensing with this, right? And so like one example of that might be looking for oil deposits underground. Another might be trying to see through walls or something that is just simply too solid for electromagnetic waves to to adequately resolve. >> Yeah, I I would have to part company with Bob Baker on those those are very challenging aspects because we would be measuring very small phase shifts in the gravitational wave uh because of it it doesn't interact very strongly with matter. And so you have to have a lot of matter to see a little signal. And so matter is essentially almost transparent to gravitational waves. So uh I wouldn't think it would be um useful for remote sensing of of matter distribution in the in the modern sense. However, if there was a meta material, if there was some kind of exotic matter present, uh if there was some kind of negative index matter uh that would bend the gravitational wave in an unusual way, okay? Then then I could understand some remote sensing with it. And of course that's that's why Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis were interested in it, right? >> Of course, that's why Eric Davis and Hal Puthoff are interested in it, right? Honestly, I didn't know that they were interested in it, but is it surprising? No, I'm interested in it, too. Uh I haven't seen anybody else talking about turning photons into gravitons using a microchip. And I can see the connections to the free energy microchips, too. In some ways, this is a little bit superior to that. I want to have a phaser in my phone, chat. I want to have a phaser in my phone that can just zap the bad guys and make the bad guys go away. It's the ultimate second amendment. My phone in the future is going to be a free energy device. And it's going to be a phaser that just zaps people away. You point it at the bad people and pull the trigger and the bad people go away. PD the pistol. Pew. Oh, I can't wait. I'm going to have a gazer and it's just going to annihilate any infidel that dares to commit a crime against me. Perfect. I love it. This is going to be a great dystopian future we have. I'm ready for it. >> Yeah. Well, and then you could also use this to sense artificially induced gravitational waves, right? >> exactly why why Puthoff was interested was he had a charter of trying to find out, you know, how does non-human intelligence craft work? We We call that UAP adjacent technology. >> Pause, chat. Uh pause. Oh, well, that's why Hal Puthoff's involved because this is We're trying to figure out how the UFOs fly around and communicate, and we call this UAP adjacent technology. Who does? Who Who calls it that? Name them. Say who's calling this I I'll call it that. Is UFO adjacent technology obviously. I knew it the whole time. If you didn't know it you're a dum-dum. Uh Apparently we got alien microchips. You know what? I'm down with it. Alien microchips chat is already we've already had disclosure. The alien technology is right here. Honestly this is alien technology to me it really is frankly. >> And so this is one candidate. We don't know for sure but it's one candidate for UAP adjacent technology. The thought being that >> We don't know for sure chat. It could be anything. It could be this thing that Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis and Garry Stevenson and Giorgio Fontana went to the Miter conference and did all this it could be anything. Could be this very specific thing highly specific thing or it could just be some other thing else. Could be anything. Holy chat. Where do I sign up for this? >> [laughter] >> Uh in order to communicate through a warp bubble or a plasma bubble you're not going to >> Chat. To war to communicate through a warp bubble or a plasma bubble you need something like this chat. >> [clears throat] >> Boy oh boy. >> To be able to use regular RF frequencies to penetrate the those kinds of environments. Those are very challenging environments. However you could use high frequency gravitational wave communication to penetrate those environments which might mean you know instead of work working in some other dimension or something if they're communicating in our dimension they may be able to be communicating using gravitational waves through these very challenging kinds of craft structures. >> Ah okay so to bring that back to human technology then. >> Bro this this interview just went off the rails and I'm here for every moment of it. I didn't realize you could just be like hey Garry so how does this relate to alien technology and he would just pop off like this. Most of these people are shy about it. Gary's like, "Nah, we got this alien technology. This is alien tech. This is This is some we got from aliens. We figured it out. Now we're just doing it. We're building it." It's like, "Geez, could you be more casual about this? You're kind of dry You're dropping all the the secrets here at once on me." >> That reminds me of subspace communications from Star Trek. It would be >> This is like jujujus jujutsu kaisen, man. He's coming out. He's like, "Can you please fight more subtly? You're You're being a little too brash right here with your the way you're ex exposing anti-gravity a little too just bluntly and forcefully for people." This is why I love Gary Stevenson, by the way. Cuz the way he answers that is just There's no You can tell he's just being perfectly honest. He's like, "Not even trying to beat around the bush." He's like, "Yeah, it's just alien technology. We figured out from the UFOs. We've been working on it, building it. I do it all the time. It's just like sad Just act like you've been there before, bro." It's like, "Oh, you don't You don't work on alien technology? You didn't get that surgery? Yeah. Uh sorry. The only people that get to work on this technology is me and Bruce Willis. You ever see Armageddon? Yeah. Exactly. >> Subspace I mean, it's not faster than light. Faster than light you would need quantum entanglement. So, that's you know, that's instantaneous. Uh we're talking about not This doesn't This doesn't invoke quantum entanglement. This is simply a way to get through matter, a way to get through plasmas, a way to get through warp bubbles, um because it does not interact strongly with those things. Okay. >> We don't even need quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement? We don't even need that That's old That's old We got just abilities to go through to go through a solid matter, plasma bubbles, and warp drives. Can just use straight-up normal light speed gravitational waves. Don't even need the entanglement. Look at that. Way around it. People are like, "We can't figure out the UFO technology." Here's Gary Stevenson like, "We figured out the UFO technology and turns out we don't even need entanglement. We can just go straight through solid matter just using these gravity waves. We just convert light into gravity waves. All the dum-dums out there never just aren't paying attention to Giorgio Fontana, apparently. >> Okay, I see what you mean. And again, some of the key advantages here, and I still have the graphic up on the screen, are I mean, this uses conventional chip fabrication technologies, right? So >> And test test technologies and probing technology. So you would use cryoprobes. >> Oh, yeah, yeah, and by the way, Gary Stevenson also just happens to be like some crazy expert on lithography and nano and nano fabrication. Like in addition to all this crazy, uh, you know, uh what do you call electra, signals kind of intelligence type stuff? >> the form factor makes and in the experiment itself. Because a regular probe, I mean, if you use an SMA connector, for instance, which is typical, that's such an enormous heat leak, heat sink. You could never keep anything down to, you know, 4 or 7 Kelvin. So you you really have to be careful with how you probe these devices that you're not leaking a lot of a lot of heat in. >> Yeah. Yeah, no, it this is it is so exciting. Another place that my mind goes before I take this down is having these sensors, right? I mean, you've got arrays of sensors, which I think is also potentially helpful for filtering out noise. Being able to use these sensors for things like Dr. Sonny White's Casimir effect research or his warp drive research or reactionless drive research that's been going on for decades. There's no great measurement tools for that, right? >> That's right. So if you actually could get a link between a transmitter and receiver, then you could put materials, you know, I think about all the metamaterial research that's been speculated about. Uh that may >> But they're saying that you can use this to detect the gravity waves, too. Of course. I mean, of course you can. So if Sonny White and his microchip is manipulating space-time producing free energy from space-time, this can also detect that. Of course, the government's already got this. This We're like reverse engineering technology the government has already had. In fact, this is probably is just government technology. And how does it get out? Well, these guys work behind the scenes and then you It's like a catch-22. You can't admit that that technology was stolen from them cuz then you're admitting that you have it and you're not supposed to have it. Pretty crazy. Yeah, and you can change it back into light, which gives you signaling and communication capability. The same signal that got converted to a graviton can come out back as a signal, the same message that came in. Just a game of telephone now. Okay, I'm going to skip ahead a little bit here. >> If I quantum effects into to microscopic levels. >> [clears throat] >> Yeah, um impact uh the gravitational appears of superconductors that are separated by very, very thin insulating layer. So, it's like a transistor except it's superconducting. And the insulating layer is such that it only allows electrons to tunnel through it. So, it's a tunneling type of of transistor and only coherent electron pairs could tunnel through it. So, because it's superconducting. So, this allows uh the device to magnify quantum effects into to microscopic levels. >> [clears throat] >> Okay. >> Boom! This allows the device to amplify these effects to macroscopic levels. This feels like the missing link from going from yes, this is real, but it's too small to be measurable and too small to make a difference and too small to charge anything to now scaling this up to now we can produce a a gravity wave where you can feel the pushing effect. Where you can feel the work being done. And this can also then be used to test other people's gravity wave production devices to see if they're working. Including stuff that Sonny White has been working on where he's been working on both warp drives and he's been working on his free energy microchip. >> So the term and again folks read this in the description. The term he's used is geyser which is like a laser for gravitational waves. Now does the laser analogy fully hold when you get into gravity or or where does this analogy >> So so laser stands for light amplification stimulated emission radiation. So what's the same is we're stimulating radiation emission radiation. So the SER part is now we're stimulating the radiation of gravitons versus photons. So that's the difference between a laser and a geyser. Where the analogy somewhat breaks down is when you have a laser you're sending light in and then it starts getting amplified. Or in this particular case we're we're we're stimulating it by biasing the Josephson junction to to create the AC effect with spin two. So we're there's no amplification per se. What we're what we're really doing is we're just generating gravitons using this bi >> So it's not a same kind of amplification as a laser. In a laser amplification you send a beam of light in there and it hits the the medium of gas and then it causes all of those particles to be excited and then when population inversion occurs when most of the population has been excited then you get this stimulated emission. Now in this situation we're saying that this isn't exactly how it's working. Now instead we're just building an array of all these things that is converting light into gravitons and we're having them amplify from their shared effects geometrically aligned. So slightly different but same ultimate idea and concept of what we're trying to accomplish. A larger amplified effect. >> Yes and so that's where the analogy breaks down is it's not really truly an amplification of gravitons is is a generation of them. >> Okay, but like >> [laughter] >> Like a laser though, that laser uses coherence. That is a >> They're both coherent sources. Yes, that's right. >> Yeah, and so that that coherent I want to focus in on that because many tiny quantum systems acting together produce an effect that a single system can't produce on its own, right? >> Well, that's right. And that's the whole point of going to the higher frequencies. That's the whole point of of of coherence arrays of these things. Uh essentially, you know, I I grew up in in the microwave realm of of phased array antennas. So I just applied that same phased array thinking to these gravitational emitters. >> So he's an expert on phased array systems as well, Gary Stevenson is. >> Yeah. >> Guaranteed he's familiar with the work of Tom Bearden scalar physics, which I saw a lot of people mentioning in the chat.