Magnetic Mirrors - How to do Fusion Propulsion

Video Transcript

# Magnetic Mirrors - How to do Fusion Propulsion Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foroding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. [music] When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest [music] can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those [music] in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical [music] faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, [music] we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. [music] The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content and the enormously influential [music] media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest common denominator programming, [music] credulous presentations on pseudocience and superstition, but especially [music] a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those were [music] among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we [music] are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us. >> We're very powerful. This country is very powerful. It's far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world that we have. More powerful than anybody even not even close. >> Malaysian 370 contact switch 12 decimal 970. >> Hello. Hello. Welcome to the live stream. Here we go. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. Oh, [music] [music] [music] [music] [singing] [music] everyone. remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, [music] the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu [music] was trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty [music] and to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, "Now [music] I am become death, the destroyer of worlds. Welcome to the live stream. Look at this comment to kick off our night, guys. Right off the bat, Ryan, I just wanted to shout out Ryan here. Says, "Ashen, I now understand why you hate Reddit. Some [ __ ] ass [ __ ] banned me over I don't know what. Wasn't using my current potty mouth. What a group of mental midgets running that show." Guys, thank you guys so much for being here with me tonight on our show, guys. I have a amazing show lined up for you. Um, right off the bat, I want to say that I'm super excited about what's been happening. I think there's a lot of people that are negative all the time about the administration, about the future, about what's happening in the world. And so, I just want to go ahead and and throw some positivity out there. Just a couple weeks ago, I said I'm changing my focus to a neutronic fusion. I said that the most important thing we need is the government to be subsidizing fusion energy. And next thing you know, all this stuff is happening. Like we're actually in the middle of real disclosure right now. People are going to be looking back at this time in like 25 years and they're going to be going that was the time where humanity the world changed. You are seeing fusion energy is now being massively subsidized. Chris Wright, the secretary of energy, announced it last week. You can see that we have as America we have circled the wagons around our biggest companies Nvidia uh Intel, Microsoft, Oracle, Open AI. We've basically took China out of the entire equation and said we're going to we literally stole China's number one chip manufacturer and said you're our chip manufacturer now. You work for us now. Now you build microchips for us and all of our friends. And to be honest with you, some of you may say, Ashton, this is fascism. This is fascism, Ashton. And I would say you're not necessarily wrong. You're not necessarily wrong. But it is something that we have to do. Something that we have to do if we want to be America first. If we want to be America first, we have to say we have to win the AI war. The people that develop the most advanced AI first are going to control the planet. And number two, we have to produce fusion before everybody else so that we can get unlimited fusion before the rest of the world. Simple as that. So I want to go ahead and say I have the utmost respect for the administration. And it's crazy to me that we weren't already doing this like under Biden before and even before that under Trump's first uh first first presidency. So shout out to them. The next thing I want to say, guys, is that people need to stop betting against me. I mean, it's starting to get embarrassing at this point, guys. People are now upset that I'm telling them that their space rock is just a space rock. Uh, I don't know if the guy's actually the redacted producer, but I've got people out here saying that I'm dumb for thinking that Charlie Kirk shot or was shot by Tyler Robinson, which obviously he was. It's where all the evidence says. And guys, this is the thing. I solved the biggest aviation mystery in history. I solved the biggest aviation mystery in history. I'm going to get my my Pulitzer prize for it eventually. And you are betting against me. You are betting against me when I'm trying to tell you guys there's no evidence that Threeey Atlas is anything other than a rock. You're betting against me when I'm saying there is four confessions that Tyler Tyler Robinson did it. Three points of DNA evidence. The gun was gifted to him by his grandfather. His father admitted that. I mean, guys, we're just You're going to learn the easy way or the hard way to stop betting against me. If I figured out the greatest aviation mystery in history, figured out that they've been hiding fusion energy from the world, I think I can handle some pretty mundane situations relative to that. But I you know what? I'm not here to silence people. Never been my goal. So go ahead and say that you think I'm wrong, but just keep remembering you're going to find out it's not the case. So let's uh Oh, yeah. The last thing I want to say is this on that front is that we're not going to talk too much about that. I'm not going to trigger people too much today, but there is a a character trait that I've noticed that transcends left and right, which is this character trait that all all opinions are all of equal weight. I call it wokeness. It's not about what's true or what's false. It's about how people feel. And the way people feel is the same way where the woke left people say, "Well, I feel like I'm a woman when I'm really a man." And they demand that you you respect their feelings. The same thing is true of the woke right. Often when it comes to blaming Israel, they feel like Israel is responsible. They don't have any evidence or anything that can actually support that, but they feel it really in their heart. And if you say something differently than them, they say, "Well, my opinion is just as valid as your opinion." That's their view. They say, "My opinion that I'm actually a woman is just as valid as your opinion that I'm a biological male. My opinion that Israel is responsible for Charlie Kirk is just as valid as your opinion that Tyler Robinson did it. My opinion that Israel killed Charlie Kirk is just as valid as your opinion that the United States zapped MH370 with some orbs. That's literally how they think. This isn't an exaggeration. That's literally how they think in their minds. In their minds, they don't have critical thinking ability. They just think all opinions are equally valid regardless of merit, and therefore you should respect my stupid opinions because I respect the opinions of you that I don't understand. That's not how the world works. And this is the cult of ignorance that needs to be completely removed from society. I don't care if you're on the left. I don't care if you're on the right. I don't care what your political affiliations are. If you're decision-making process is based on feelings, then you don't you shouldn't be allowed to vote. You shouldn't be allowed to vote. You have no your opinion doesn't matter when it comes to geopolitics. You get it? You can say whatever [ __ ] you want on the internet, but we're not going to take you seriously when it comes to adults making decisions about the future of the world. Okay? So, when I see people crashing out about the Jews on the internet, for example, this Anna Caspian, whatever woman, I don't know, I think she's from uh what are they called? One of the Narnia movies or something. Like these people are just they are exactly the same as the woke left when they're just crashing out about weird stuff that they've worked themselves up into a fervor over. Now, now that we've addressed the difficult part, let me I got to fix my camera. This is triggering me. It's not centered. Why is it there? I think that fix it. Okay, there we go. Chat, that was triggering me. Now, something we can all agree on. Okay, now that I've triggered um people, an absolute American treasure, the the girl from Narnia chat, I think she's from the Narnia TV movies. I think that's how she's famous. Now that we can now let's just guys, let's unify chat. We're going to unify right now. Okay, so for all the people out there that are triggered by the things that I'm saying, I'm going to bring you back into the fold. Gonna bring you back into the fold right now, guys. Turns out, I know this is going to be a shock to a lot of you, climate change was a scam. I know climate change was a scam. The number one pusher for climate change has now reneged. He's now backtracked harder than Candace Owens backtracked about Charlie Kirk's neck stopping the bullet. Bill Gates chat. Bill Gates has now shifted his tone on climate change. >> [laughter] >> now says that it's not the end of the world anymore. You can't make this up, chat. We are We are getting W's left and right. Always right about everything, chat. The penthouse, the the skyrise in front of Central Park and Always Right About Everything City is getting really full really quickly. So if you want to get into if you want to lock in your your apartment, lock in your condo, you need to do it real quick. So here he is. He was previously saying that climate change was going to be the end of everything. And now he's saying, well, people will be able to live and thrive on Earth for the foreseeable future, diverting resources from the most effective things we should be doing in life, blah blah blah. So he had a lengthy memo about how we have to keep innovating. He argued for putting human welfare at the center of our climate strategies. So, we've got major backtrack happening here, chat. Major backtrack happening by Bill Gates himself. So, let me go ahead and clarify for Let's bring this down to earth because I don't like all these skitso conspiracies that happen around this stuff. Yes, it's possible that the climate was changing. Nobody's arguing that climates change. That's what happens on planets over long periods of time. Climates change. Okay. The question that people had was are are humans appreciably cons impacting the climate change itself. So what we mean by that is is what we're doing on this planet actually accelerating that change in any significant sense? And as far as I'm concerned, my opinion is that that is that has never been proven. that we have not been appreciably changing the climate in any sense that can be measured. In fact, I think the best example I would give is that one of the claims has been that the polar ice caps are going to melt and that when the polar ice caps melt, all that water is going to go into the ocean and now the sea levels are going to rise. First thing I always say about this, which is funny because this is just a physics thing, is you say, if I put ice cubes in your cup, so you guys can all understand this. I put ice cubes in your cup. I fill your cup to the top and I put ice cubes in it and those ice cubes melt. Is the cup going to overflow? Basic physics question for you guys out there. Go ahead and tell me in the chat. If I I fill up your cup with ice cube with ice water and the ice melts, does the ice overflow? No, it does not. Thank you very much for the people in the chat. It does not overflow. So, this idea that ice caps melting that are already in the water is going to somehow increase the ocean level doesn't even make sense from the physics perspective. Now, if you go ahead and say that, okay, well, the ice caps are actually on land and then when they melt, then they're going to go into the water and then that will raise the ocean level. Okay, fine. Now, you've made an argument that, you know, has some plausibility to it. But here's the problem. That hasn't happened. That hasn't happened for like a hundred years. We've got like, you know, for example, the Statue of Liberty has been sitting on an island. Is it underwater? No, it's not underwater. Has there even been an appreciable sea level rise that we've been able to measure? As far as I can tell, no. So, I don't believe that we have been significantly impacting the climate. And then the bigger part as to why climate change is a scam is that we have clean energy available. If I'm right and we figured out fusion energy with the hydrogen bomb all the way back in the 60s or so, then we've had the access to clean unlimited energy for 60 years, which honestly predates the whole climate change scandal, which would mean that if people knew people knew that we solved fusion, those people invented a completely fictional narrative just for virtue signal. and uh doomer propaganda basically. Right now, the last thing I'll say is this. Not, you know, I'm I'm old now. I'm I'm basically like quarter boomer at this point. I'm old. I'm old as hell, chat. I'm farting dust over here. And when I grew up, people like to There's all this revisionist history going on. My personal experience from going to school, I went to public school. I also went to private school. I went to public high uh public public school and middle school and elementary school. I went to Catholic high school and then I moved overseas and went to a private school overseas. They were telling us that the world was going to be underwater, that climate change was going to obliterate the planet by the 2020s, right? That all, you know, things would be on fire, the catastrophic floods and the climate would get more extreme and things would be underwater. And when that thing when all those things never happened, they just pretended like they never said any of it. Like literally, we would be in school learning about this stuff about how LA is going to break off and fall into the water and how Florida's going to be underwater. None of this stuff ever happened. None of the doomerism stuff they said ever happened. So, this is what I find so delicious about Bill Gates backtracking on the climate change stuff because once you know that we've got unlimited green energy in the form of fusion, then there's no logical mind that can go, wait a minute, why are we why are we worried about climate change? Even if we hurt Even if we hurt the planet, even if we hurt the planet, we would be able to reverse those effects relatively quickly with unlimited green energy and not no longer polluting the planet ever again. Ever again. So, pretty interesting. Um, okay. So, that's all on the climate change stuff, guys. We're going to try to run through these topics quick so we can get to our science tonight. We've got a lot of political topics to talk about here. The next big one is the Tucker Carlson Nick Fuentes debate. Oh boy, I know you are all waiting for Ashen Forbes's take on this one. I have been monitoring social media outside of work and and and don't worry the people who are wondering about fusion. You can either watch my past live streams or just hang on to the end here. We're going to be talking about magnetic mirrors which are probably essential when it comes to producing working fusion, but we'll see. I did not watch the Tucker Carlson Nick Fentes debate. I'm just going to go ahead and throw that out there. So, if you want to go ahead and judge me for that, go ahead. I don't really care to watch like a puff piece. What I realized right away was Desh Duza was right about the Tucker Carlson Nick Fuentes debate. The problem with it is not that Tucker was platforming Nick Fuentes. In fact, I'm all about more conversations happening. I think that more conversations should happen that are contentious. The problem that I have with the Nick Fuentes Tucker Carlson is these guys were going at each other's throats. I mean, Nick has been going at Tucker Carlson like crazy. And Tucker Carlson called Nick a weird little gay kid, which is kind of funny. But and I will say I will say this I like Nick Fuentes generally actually I have I am holding back a little bit because I have seen a lot of his clips where in the past he was really vile really vile but I don't think he's I don't think he's a a violent person. I just think that he says really edgy things. This is what I'll say to to to question Nick Fuentes. The thing that gives me the most pause about Nick Fuentes, this is going to be weird, is that when Destiny, when the cuck named Destiny had a video where he was sucking another man's penis leak on the internet, can't believe these words are real. Nick Fuentes reviewed the video in detail to ensure that it wasn't him in the video to the level where people were questioning him and on his on his clip that I saw he's going I checked the video and and it was it was somebody else with a watch on their right hand so therefore it wasn't me and this is the thing I have to say about this the reason why this was weird to me was that I had no inclination to watch a video of Destiny sucking another man's penis. I had no inclination to ever watch that for any reason whatsoever. And if somebody had ever accused me Yeah. Hold up. That's a pause. Chat, pause. If somebody accused me of being the person in the video getting their penis sucked, that would not make me watch the video. In fact, I would just laugh at them and go, "What? Shut up, dude." I mean, why why would I even take that [ __ ] The fact that Nick Fuentes felt the need to watch the video to confirm that he wasn't the guy in the video is just really weird to me. I still like him, but it's just really weird. He's never beating the gay allegations. He's never beating the gay allegations. That's just all I got to say about it. Now, being serious for a second. Being serious for a second, I I'm probably going to piss everybody off with these takes. The other thing is that I've seen all of the people that I've now aligned with now that I have been on the I guess I'm on the MSAD payroll or whatever they say. I've got all the people that are like the anti the anti-anti-semite people. Those people are now aligned with me. And now I'm seeing those people go off the deep end to attack Tucker Carlson for having Nick Fuentes on which I did not see coming at all. I did not see that coming. Thank you for the 6Ks in the chat by or 7Ks in the chat, guys. Please, please respect that I get the highest premiums from my takes from Netanyahu. Netanyahu uses my narratives. Woke left equals woke right. Uses them in his press conferences. Therefore, I get the best paydays of them all. Now, I will say that the the biggest surprise to me was Seth Dylan. Seth Dylan, who now follows me, I think, and I mean, I haven't checked again today. The biggest surprise me was Seth Dylan where I was criticizing him for not being for cancel culture when I was saying that we should be deplatforming and we should be uh demonetizing these like grifter skitso accounts that are pushing fake content on the internet. And he was saying that no, we need to allow everybody to say what they want to say. And now him and the rest of the crew are saying that Tucker Carlson shouldn't have been platforming Nick Fuentes. So wait, what? The guys that are claiming to be for free speech. They're they're claiming that they're always for free speech are now the ones that are trying to cancel Tucker Carlson for having Nick Fuentes on. Meanwhile, I'm the one I'm the one saying that we should be deplatforming grifters and people that are lying on the internet. We should be demonetizing them. And I'm the one saying that they should Nick Fentes should talk to Tucker Carlson. Who cares? Everybody should talk to whoever the hell they want. So I guess my question is who really is the pro- free speech people and who are not the pro- free speech people. Now the problem with the debate is not that they're talking of people. Anyone can talk to anybody who want they want to talk to, right? Like nobody can stop that. The problem with the discussion between Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson was that Tucker Carlson just went have a It was a softball interview. It was a marketing stunt. These guys were at each other's throats just weeks ago talking [ __ ] to each other and now they're just jerking each other off. Like, come on. Where is the actual challenging of people's ideas? This is the part where I say that's the part that I didn't like because even when I think the good clip that I saw, the good example is when Nick Fuentes says, "Oh, I love Stalin. I love Stalin." How many people would Stalin kill? Millions and Tucker Carlson doesn't even challenge him. Like, bro, somebody's like, "Hey, man. I love Stalin. He's my idol. Should you at least push back a little bit?" Even if you agree, I feel like you should push back. in that scenario, but they don't push back at all. So, I would have watched the debate. If it was an actual debate, like if it was actually two people challenging each other on their ideas, then it would have been great. But instead, it just became some weird puff piece for Tucker Carlson to hold up Nick Fuentes and and basically be like, "I'm sorry for hurting you, Nick Fuentes." And so, here's my true opinion of it. Here's my true opinion. Tucker Carlson's a little [ __ ] That's my true opinion. I think Tucker Carlson was afraid of being annihilated by Nick Fuentes. I think he was afraid of losing credibility and losing followers now that Tucker has started to court this weird growing anti-Israel crowd. Right? And let's be honest, there's clearly a growing anti-Israel crowd. They're right about that. There's this definitely this growing movement of people that hate Israel. You see it infecting people every day out there. I don't think there's very much merit to it. But clearly Tucker was afraid that he was going to get destroyed in a debate with Nick Fuentes. And he was afraid that a bunch of his followers would say that he's, you know, that he's turned on them, that he's a massage shill and whatever other crap these people come up with. What you find is that a lot of these people and and I'm not saying they're paid by Qatar. I I do joke and say Tucker Katarlson or what have you. The reality is none of these people are really paid. And I think Nick Fuentes realized that when they had their back and forth and they said, "I thought you were CIA." And then Tucker says, "Oh, I thought you were CIA." He he the people generally people are not paid disinformation assets. people just have a lot of different views and they're untrustworthy untrusting of other people. That's the reality of the situation. So the big concern was really just that it was this puff piece, you know, and I think that the Jewish people are upset and scared that if you platform and mainstream somebody who's saying that we got to kick out all the Jews, that that brings us one step closer to it happening. And I won't disagree on that. I think there's merit to the claim that where is the line? Where is the line between Nick Fuentes being edgy on the internet and the line between his followers sending death threats to people, right? Where is that line? I think that's where the discussion should be had because my impression of the situation is that Nick Fuentes started a movement. He started a movement. this Groper movement. He started this movement and he started it kind of as a meme movement, right? Where people are latching on to it. This internet culture is latching on to it. They're making memes about it. That's they still are to this day. And it went from being edgy meme stuff to now people take it seriously and really believe it. And this is why I actually compare it to flat earth. This is how flat earth movement. Flat earth was never a serious thing. people just it became kind of a meme and then people start taking the meme seriously and then you get people that really believe it unironically and that's the same thing that's been happening with this anti-Israel stuff is that it started off as a meme Israel's responsible for everything and then people start taking it literally because they can't they can't dis they can't divorce the edgginess from the literal like stuff and now you've got people who literally literally unironically believe that Israel is responsible for literally everything. They unironically believe that that the the Fed that the federal government is this evil entity that always lies about everything as well. And if you follow down that rabbit hole, if you fall down these rabbit holes, you will constantly be wrong. You will constantly be wrong about a lot, guys. So that's my un unbiased political take on the interview. There should be more discussions like that, not less. And the more the last thing I'll say is this. Um, the more that people push back on Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, the bigger they're going to get. So, if you're somebody that wants that doesn't want them to be platformed, that doesn't want them to get attention, then you shouldn't be retweeting them. You shouldn't be quote tweeting all their content, all their clips. The more you do that, the faster Nick Fuentes is going to rise to the mainstream. It might be unavoidable already. So, that's my word of caution to you if you are somebody that doesn't want them pushing that stuff. Okay, that was longer talking about that than I wanted to. The next thing is Rand Paul. This is going to be a relatively quick one. So, this is just a followup related to the Venezuelan boats and bombings. There was four more yesterday. We bombed four more boats yesterday, guys. And this is the thing I want to say about it. Rand Paul is completely full of [ __ ] on this one. The this gaslighting that's being done to claim that these Venezuelan drug smugglers are like innocent people that have due process. This not even Tucker Carlson, the number one gaslighter in the world, can polish this turd. Nobody can polish this turd. They're literally using submarines to smuggle drugs and there's no claiming that they're secretly using submarines to hunt to to fish or whatever. Like there's just there's nothing you can say to try to make these people seem innocent. Nothing whatsoever. Um here's the worst part about it though. I looked up because people were saying like, "Oh, no. Rand Paul was against the the the uh Obama's drone strikes." That was not true, man. I looked it up. Rand Paul has completely lost the plot. By the way, guys, do I have the the image of it? Hold on. If I save this image or not. There's only one Republican senator who's been voting against reopening the government. Only one. Every single Republican senator, except for one, has been voting to open the government. Can you guys guess which Republican senator is voting against reopening the government? Guess which one Republican senator is voting with all of the Democrats. All of the Democrats and one Republican senator. You got it. It's Rand Paul, chat. It's Rand Paul. There you go. The one senator who is keeping the government shut down when all we need is like five more votes. Rand Paul. Now, here's the biggest hypocrisy. Are you ready for this? I did a little research. Turns out Rand Paul was initially against Obama's drone strikes in 2013. In 2013, Rand Paul was against Obama's drone strikes. But fast forward to 2015, guys. 2015, you guys can go fact check this yourself. 2015, we drone strike some terrorists and we accidentally kill some hostages. Guess who was the number one cheerleader defending Obama? [laughter] You got it, Rand Paul. Once again, best part was he was quoted multiple times specifically saying that enemy combatants in the field of war are not offered due process. [laughter] Holy [ __ ] Rand Paul. What are you talking about, my dude? How can a man go from in 2015 literally defending Obama's drone strikes, literally saying that people do not have due process if they're outside the country in a war zone or whatever, and now you're going to go ahead and start defending narotist drug smugglers, non-American drug smugglers that are in international waters literally committing a crime. [laughter] Literally committing a crime. import illegally importing drugs into our country and you're going to go ahead and now claim that these people are should be offered due process. What are you talking about, dude? I don't want to hear anything from anybody that was in any way defending Obama's drone strikes. I don't want to hear any anybody says Obama's drone strikes were fine. Don't you dare. Don't you dare try to criticize the administration when we're blowing up narco drug terrorist boats. Don't you dare. So Rand Paul, I don't know what's up with these people, but they have fallen off the cliff. Like they same thing with Ma Major Taylor Green or whatever. Like these people are literally just becoming liberals if they weren't already. If they weren't already. And I don't even have a problem with it. The problem I have with is the hypocrisy. I have a problem with the hypocrisy. You can't say that these people were these people have no due process because of their circumstances and now all of a sudden, well, these people do. These people do. What's the difference? Well, we didn't declare war on them. We have to declare war and now it's it's fine for us to blow up their boats. We don't need to do that. Crazy chat. Okay, that was a short one. Back to triggering chat. Only a couple more topics to endure and then we're going to get to the magnetic mirrors. So, the next one, three eye atlas chat. Oh god. Oh god. Um, Avi Lo went on Joe Rogan and explained all the anomalies with the threeey atlas rock. And I made a post about this earlier and I was looking through the replies after work and I see people being like, "You're going to be wrong about this one, Ashton." Oh boy. Chat, please don't put all your money on Avi Loe's space rock, guys. This isn't even the I got to be clear, this isn't even the first time he tried to grift off a space rock. It's not even the first time. This is the second time. Amuramua was the first time. And now he's playing the same broken record. He's It's We're on a repeat here. We're on We're watching reruns. It's not even an original story anymore. Here's the problem, guys. First off, I didn't watch the interview. I don't care to watch. There's no way I'm watching a two-hour interview about a space rock. It's just not happening. The logic being used is eerily similar to what the conspiracy theorists are doing for Charlie Kirk and all this other stuff. going the official story has some holes in it. They're going no there the light pattern in this uh spectrograph is uh not doesn't look right or previously they were saying that there was no corona. There is a corona. They were saying it's elongated but it actually isn't elongated. It was just the exposure. So they're doing the same stuff that the Charlie Kirk people were doing where they're inventing anomalies that don't exist. They invent these anomalies that don't exist and then they go, "But you have to explain these anomalies and if you don't explain these anomalies, then it proves it's not a rock and it proves that it's really an alien mother ship." Right? That's what they're doing. And for the people that are saying Avi isn't saying that it's an alien mother ship, yes, he is, man. Yes. When you say that there's a 40% chance that a normal space rock is an artificial structure. You are literally saying that you think that's a that's an alien. A 40% chance is a huge huge chance. It would be different if Avi was like, there's a 1% chance that it's an alien structure and a 99% chance that it's just a rock we don't fully understand. But he's not doing that. He's going there's like a 50% 40% chance that it's an artificial structure. Dude, that's called fanning the flames. That's called grifting, man. I'm sorry. I got to call it out like it is. That's what it is. And don't give me this crap that that's not He's not saying that. That's what Candace Owens fa fanatics do as well. They go, Candace Owens isn't saying that Israel killed Charlie Kirk. He's not She's not saying that TPUSA did it. The government's covering it up. She's just saying that the people out there are lying about everything. You're like, come on, man. That's what she's insinuating. That's what he's insinuating as well. Okay. So, now that we've clarified that, let me explain you why it's a space rock. This is actually really, really simple. Number one, it's moving too slow. It's moving way, way, way too slow. Okay, guys, I talk about teleportation. I talk about manipulating spaceime. I talk about fusion energy. The aliens are not flying around on slow space rocks that take like three weeks to get from Jupiter to Earth or wherever long it took. You guys not realize how slow this comet is moving? This is like I don't even know how to compare it. It's like getting on a horse and thinking I'm going to ride from California to New York, right? Okay, sure. It's going to take you like two months. Nobody's going to do that. The reason why people like Avi Loe don't understand this concept is that they are like cowboys in the early 1900s being told about cars and automobiles. A cowboy riding on a horse can't even imagine the idea of an automobile. Riding on horses is all they know. This is like Avi This is Avi Lobe's problem. Avi has trapped himself in a mental prison in which the speed of light is the is the limit and there's no way to even get close to the speed of light. And if you live in a prison like that, a mental prison like that, then a floating space rock is basically your best bet to find aliens. And that's why Avi is all in on this weird alien thing because he I hate to say this, he just doesn't understand physics. He just doesn't understand physics. It's just it's just how it is. So, here's the other reason why it's not an alien. The other reason why it's not an alien, and these are probably the best reasons. Number one, it's not changing directions. If you're listening to this on audio, I'm doing hand motions here. Number one, it's not changing directions. Sort of a big thing, guys. You kind if you think an alien rock might be an artificial structure, you probably want to see it make a like a lefthand turn. If it makes a left-hand turn in the middle of outer space, boom, you've proven that it's an alien. You've just seen intelligent control, right? Instead, it's just flying along normally, just like every other space rock does. Number two most important reasons why it's just a rock. It's not slowing down. Come on people. This is not deep. This is not hard. If we are sending a probe to Mars, then we speed up halfway. And this is under conventional physics. This is all classical physics. We speed up until we get halfway and then we start slowing down the other halfway. Why? Because we want to get to our destination at rest. We don't want to go to our destination at some percentage of the speed of light because we'll just go flying past it. So people are saying, "Oh, it's a alien probe being sent to Mar to Earth to monitor us." Well, then it probably should start slowing down at some point and slowing down in a way that can't be explained by just floating through the space, floating through an empty void. These are the number two reasons, the top two reasons for why ThreeI Atlas is just a rock, guys. It's just a rock. And I understand why everybody wants it to be aliens. I really do get it. I want it to be aliens, too, man. I want aliens to come and get me off this planet so I don't have to be here anymore. I'll take a few of you guys with me. The rest of the people, they got to stay. They got to stay on this [ __ ] hole. I want it to be an alien. It's just not an alien, guys. And for the people that are saying, "Ashton, you're using these conspiracies to show that you're not a conspiracy idiot." Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing. And I didn't I didn't make these conspiracies up. Avi Lo made them up. Candace Owens made them up. They just made it easy for me to refute them because there's overwhelming evidence that they're wrong. Right? So, go ahead. For the people out there that want to say that I'm wrong, go ahead. Go place your bets, man. Bet against me. Go ahead. I don't know what the odds are that it's an alien mother ship, but I'm guessing less than 1%. Go place your odds because you're going to find that I'm right about all these things, guys. Tyler Robinson's going to be found guilty for killing Charlie Kirk because he did do it. Atlas 3II is just a space rock. Just a space rock. MH370 was zapped away by some orbs. They're all real, chat. They're all real things. And once again, not all opinions are not equal. All conspiracy theories are not equal. It's not how any of that stuff works. We have to be smarter thinkers than that. Last triggering topic for the night, guys. This one's going to be maybe the most triggering. Yeah. One last thought on that is that people wonder, well, what is the motivation for Avi to go all in on this rock thing? Well, he did mention funding multiple times. Mentioned that we should be spending billions of dollars on something. He didn't really elaborate exactly. We should be spending billions of dollars monitoring space rocks or something. We already are. The military is already monitoring. The military would have already known if Atlas 3II was a alien mother ship. It just doesn't make it to the public. We just don't ever get to see that information. Um, okay. This is the most most triggering thing here. Daylight savings time, chat. Let me just make my position clear before people start crashing out on me, which I can already predict is going to happen. Daylight savings time forever. That's simple. That's my position. Daylight savings time forever. Anybody that disagrees, you're wrong. You have bad idea, bad takes. Simple as that. Here's I'm going to break it down for you guys. People don't understand the daylight savings time thing. You probably have heard my rants on daylight savings time going back to when I first started live streaming, but it's now come up again. It's now come up again because they're actually voting on bills to make it daylight savings time forever. And people are upset about it. And people were super triggered about when I was saying before that we should make it daylight savings time forever. And I watched a politician, I think it was Tom Cotton, Tom Cotton today. Tom Cotton today was saying that we can't allow it to be daylight savings time forever. So, he's against making a daylight savings time forever. And what are his what is his reason? And this is like this reminds me when I brought this up like a year ago and people started crashing out about it. The reasons are so dumb. This is the reason. This is really Tom Cotton's reason for why we shouldn't go to daylight savings time. The reason is because if we go to daylight savings time, children will have to go to the bus while it's dark outside IN THE MORNING. OH WOW. OH NO, CHAT. Oh no. Children will have to go outside and get on the bus while it's dark out. Wow. Whoa. Well, I guess we're all against it now. I mean, not like they ever discovered something called the light bulb. Wow. Here's But that's not even the reason why it's stupid. The reason why it's stupid is that if we stick with the plan that we're on right now, that we're already using, children leave school and it gets dark the moment they leave school. So, they're already going home at night. Because if you live like where I live in Minnesota for example in the winter time it gets dark at 4 in the afternoon. 4 in the afternoon chat. There's no changing how much light you get. All we can do is shift the light. Okay? That's all we can do. So the people that talk about circadian rhythms, that doesn't apply. Nobody is changing how much light exists. That's not a thing that we can control. The sun revolves around the earth the same way no matter how we refer to it. All we can do is shift when we get that light. That's it. That's the only thing that we can do. So, let me clarify because people really don't understand what daylight savings time means. They really just don't understand it. All we're doing is we're saying this between this hand over here. Let me take this down. Between this hand over here, this is morning. This is when the sun comes up. And this is when the sun goes down. In the wintertime, it goes like this. In the summertime, it goes like this. The further north you are, the more significant this change is. Okay? All we're doing with daylight savings time, like let's say this is the, you know, morning, night, we're going like this. This is it. This is all we're doing, guys. Okay. So the difference between standard time and daylight savings time, the only difference is whether or not you have more light in the morning or you have more light in the evening. That's it. That's the only difference. It doesn't have any magical stuff with your body, any of the other weird things that people are claiming that are all these esoteric things. None of these things are real. It's literally just a matter of when you get the light during the day. That's it. Okay. So, now that we've addressed that, now that everybody understands what daylight savings time is, the reason why daylight savings time is the correct approach and not standard time is because with standard time, the sun comes up at 4 in the morning in the summertime. Let's be clear about this. If you made it standard time all year long, which is what it's currently at during the wintertime, in the summertime, it would be fully bright out at 4:00 a.m. in the morning. Nobody wants that. Okay? And alternatively, in the summertime, you would no longer have the sun still out at 9:00 at night. In the winter or in the summertime in Minnesota, the sun is out till 9:00 at night. It's great. You can walk around outside till 9:00 at night. It's not cold. It's warm. It's beautiful. So, who cares? Uh, people that live in the North Care, we care a lot, actually. Why? Because we don't want to go outside in the wintertime after we're done with work and have everything be closed and everything be dark. We want to like, hey, go to dinner and have there still be a little bit of light out, right? As opposed to be pitch black by the time we get out of work. So, this is the reason why they're literally pushing to make it DST all the time. Because if it's DST all the time, but moving south, by the way, doesn't solve this either, guys. You guys really aren't understanding the problem here. Moving south doesn't solve this problem because we're talking about shifting the times around here. So, if you appreciate sunlight in the afternoon or evening, then you are pro DST. If you want sunlight at 4 in the morning and no sunlight in the evening, then you are standard time all the way. That's really all it boils down to. And it's a political issue. No one's necessarily right or wrong. I'm just, you know, I'm gassing you guys up. But there's no right or wrong on this issue. It's just a matter of preference. That's why it's politics. That being said, DST is correct and everybody that's not DST is is an evil person. [laughter] There you guys go. Okay. There we go. D, excuse me. Duke with the the money chat says, "I want it dark all the time." Thank you very much. Exactly, chat. This is why I told Pton Kelly, chat, I told Pton Kelly, she is the I don't know if she's a groper or whatever. I told her, "You're not racist enough for me." I said, "You hate the Jews. You hate black people. You hate minorities. Sorry, that's just not racist enough for me. I hate everybody. I hate everybody equally. I hate this planet. I hate the people on this planet. The only people I can even stand are you all. Those are the only people I can stand. Okay. Uh quick super chat. Thank you, Carrie, for this Ethernet subscriber. Look at that. First Ethernet subscriber. We love you. You're teaching us much more than science. We're finding grifters that are hiding fusion in plain sight. And we're going to actually talk about some science right here next, guys. So, thank you very much, Carrie, for that amazing super chat. I appreciate it, guys. Now, we've talen all the politics we need to talk. We've learned that DST is the superior uh clearly superior approach. We've learned that Rand Paul is a huge hypocrite. And we've learned to stop uh talking about people that you don't want to go to be to be famous. [laughter] Now, let's talk about science chat. Now, if you were here on Wednesday, I watched part of this interview that you see on your screen here. This is the interview between Tim Ventura and Paul Siz, maybe Paul size. I think it's pronounced Paul Sizz. Um, and he was talking about a neutronic fusion. And this interview was from, I don't know, a very long time ago, probably before MH370, considering Paul Sizz died before MH370. So, this interview was a really long time ago. One of the things that I said I was going to do is I was showing you guys the sources on this interview. So, if you go through this, I'll put a I'll put a link in the chat. Check out the YouTube chat if you want to link. It's in the real-time chat. Should be available to you guys right there. I was looking through the hyperlinks at the bottom of this. We were we reviewed it again on Monday, but one of the hyperlinks in here was a full textbook full textbook by Paul Sizz. Here it is. Future spacecraft propulsion systems enabling technologies for space exploration second edition Paul Sizz and Claudio Bruno. Do you know how much I wish that my science teacher that my engineering teacher was Paul Sizz? Can you imagine? I would literally buy the textbook if my textbooks were like this. Like this is a 500 600page textbook all about aerospace applications, future aerospace systems. So here's the link to this one as well. You guys can just Google it, guys. This is where guys when I get triggered when people ask for links is because literally all you have to do is just Google the name of this and you'll find the link. Like just you can even ask AI for it. But there you go. I'll give it to you guys anyway. So, one of the things that I was looking at during the live stream on Monday was I was digging through, where is it? Somewhere in here down here at the bottom there. This thing is long. I was digging through this and I found something really interesting. I found this part here that talked about status of open magnetic field configuration research in appendix B. And I told you guys I was going to read it and I was going to come back. Well, here we are, chat. Here we are right now. So, let's go ahead and before we look at that, let me just read what the titles of these chapters are. Here's the titles from appendix B, assessment of open magnetic field fusion for space propulsion. Status of open magnetic field configuration B3.1. Classification and present status B3.2. too. Mirror configurations. Mirror configurations. Let me just spoil it for you right now. It's just as spicy as it sounds. If you have not been watching my content, I don't blame you. The reason why people are excited when we see mirror configurations is because I just did a really long live stream talking about how we're using producing relativistic free electron lasers using plasma mirrors. Yes, you can literally why it was like last week last week did a whole live stream of free electron X-ray plasma lasers that uh use relativistic motion uh and and plasma and plasma itself as a mirror to amplify energy. And here we are in the appendix of Paul Sizz's book and one of the chapters is on mirror configurations and then right after that field reversed configurations. Wow. [laughter] Field reverse configurations chat is basically finding the secret buzzword. Whenever you see the words field reverse configuration in a textbook scientific paper, especially it was from like the 90s or 2000s, take a hard look at it cuz right after that is sphere. Okay. Well, let's go take a read. [sighs] Okay. Uh 523 I think was the page. Oh, whoa. That was not right. >> Okay. Here we go. >> [clears throat] >> We're going to have a little bit of hard reading here. Chat status of open magnetic field configuration research. It was shown in order to achieve large specific power, it is necessary to use the largest possible extent fusion in the form of direct propulsion with the possibility of direct electricity conversion. OMG chat, you have no idea. I got goosebumps when I read this. I got goosebumps when I read it, chat. I am now an autronic fusion 0 point energy influencer. And in the first sentence right there, it says direct energy conversion. The reason why this is significant is direct energy conversion is the holy grail of fusion research. That's what a neutronic fusion research is. A neutronic fusion research is literally direct energy conversion. He mentions it in the first paragraph, the very first sentence. So basically what he's saying here is if we want to be able to achieve propulsion using plasma fusion, we need to be doing a neutronic. The reason is we need higher efficiency. Neutronic fusion is not efficient enough. We lose like 60% of the energy in the form of heat. We need to get we go from like 30% efficiency with neutronic fusion to like 90% or higher with a neutronic fusion. No wonder the scientific papers and the durs talk about a neutronic fusion propulsion. This is why. There you go. So, you've already learned something very important tonight and we only got one paragraph in. This is not easy to achieve. referring to direct energy conversion. This is not easy to achieve in equilibrium configurations such as conventional tokamax where plasma does not escape from the reaction chamber but could be achieved by open magnetic field configurations. I don't even know if we're going to make it through this because I am so excited when I listen to this. Keep in mind guys, I had never read this before yesterday. never had read this before yesterday and it's saying everything that I've been saying for months on end which shouldn't be a surprise. My research literally comes from people like Paul Sis, Hal Pudof, Eric Davis, the Derds, etc. It shouldn't be a surprise but it's nice to be vindicated once again. So here he is saying that you took are going to fail. The reason why tokamax are going to fail is they're not using open magnetic fields. The plasma cannot escape. So what do they mean by that? Our tokamac is just a donut, but it's metally it's encased all the way around. So there's nowhere for exhaust to go out. There's nowhere for plasma to escape. If you want to create plasma for propulsion purposes, you need to have there be an exhaust. Sound familiar, chat? Does it sound like some orbs you saw spinning around an airplane? Okay. The topology of open magnetic field configurations may vary. Mirror's topology is cylindrical, but field reverse configuration sphere transitioning to a Taurus in the confinement region may be viable. Nevertheless, the common feature of open magnetic field configurations is that the magnetic field lines escape from the plasma confinement zone without intercepting any wall. And such a feature enables using plasma fusion plasma both for direct propulsion and direct energy conversion. Note that such a feature may also be common to other systems such as the very low aspect ratio spherical tokamac not considered here but already proposed for propulsion applications. My goodness, Chad. [laughter] So he says uh that what we need to make this happen is we need the plasma to not be running in to our wall reactor. So the why this is just so crazy man. Why is it that the tokamax won't work? Because the plasma is going to hit the wall reactor. It's going to destroy the wall. It's going to destroy the reactor itself. That's what happens with the neutrons. the neutrons literally destroy the reactors. So, what he's saying here is what's the answer for that? Don't have there be a wall. Let the plasma just go out into the open and have the magnetic field confine the plasma itself. To me, that's that's proof. To me, that's proof, guys. I mean, I don't want to be one of these people that's jumping to conclusions, but I'm literally staring at three plasma orbs here in this video that are clearly showing open magnetic field configurations. I didn't know anything about science or anything about military surveillance or anything about plasma. And I could still tell that what I was looking at in these videos was plasma that was freely connected to the to to the air. And then what we're looking at here is a magnetic field that is confining the plasma. That's called an open magnetic field configuration. Just like what Paul just said in this textbook, that's what you're looking at in these videos. So when people say, "Oh, it's the aliens zap the plane." There's no aliens in this video. We're looking at the thermal video of the zap right here, the three orbs spinning around it. You can clearly see the non-equilibrium heat signature. When I say none equilibrium, what do I mean by that? What I mean is why are you seeing a green heat signature, green yellow heat signature in the center of these orbs. The reason why you see the heat signature because it's none equilibrium. If it was in equilibrium, the whole heat signature would be uniform. The heat signature of the entire orb would be the same. The fact that you see the heat signature is not uniform means that this thing is most likely a nonequilibrium plasma. Meaning that the electrons and the ions are being held out of equilibrium from one another. When they want to come back together, they're not being allowed. Okay, now that we understand that, let's [clears throat] keep going. The best plasma performance achieved so far has been obtained in closed magnetic field configurations specifically in tokamax. However, for propulsion, open magnetic field configurations have intrinsic advantages. Number one, easy steadystate operation. Two, natural particle exhaust. We kept wondering why are we seeing these black lines coming out of these plasma balls? Why would you need black lines coming out of your magic alien plasma ball? Because there's nothing alien about it. You're literally seeing the exhaust from the fusion reactor. They're using a neutronic fusion as propulsion and you're seeing the exhaust. And the exhaust is not standard exhaust. The exhaust in this case is like X-rays coming out from the fusion reaction that can't be contained. High beta value. Does that sound familiar at all to you guys? Look at this one. I beta equal which is thermal pressure divided by magnetic pressure. So what we're saying here is that the plasma wants to dissipate. The plasma wants to spread out. The plasma wants to equilibrium. But the high beta value keeps it confined. The high beta value is the magnetic field strength that is keeping it confined. The high beta value is basically like saying this is how we're able to make it turn into a sphere because the magnetic field strength is so powerful. The plasma tries to escape and then it gets caught in the magnetic field and and and comes back around. Pretty neat. Simple design direct conversion of fusion power into thrust. That's direct energy conversion. And then we can we are going to configure uh consider three configurations. open-ended systems such as mirrors, closed field line systems such as field reverse configurations and sphere, and then levitated dipoles. Okay. Um, let's see. Let's go straight to mirror configurations. We're not going to be able to get through everything, so I'm going to skip through some of it. Mirror configurations was mind-blowing to me. And then, just like some of the other durs, it gets even more mind-blowing. So, let's start with mirror configurations. right here at the best. At the simplest level, a mirror configuration consists of a pair of Hem Holtz coils with current flowing in the same direction. Holy [ __ ] Wow. Chat, if you don't understand why this is so huge, I have been saying that what's happening to the plane is a magnetic wormhole. Do you know what they use for magnetic wormholes? Hemoltz coils. Literally, they use hemholds coils. In fact, I'm arguing that the the orbs are creating a hemholds coil around the airplane around the airplane. And what he's saying here is that the same idea is being used in the orbs themselves. So just like I've been saying is that essentially you're looking at a cylindrical device, a cylindrical device of rings, a cylindrical device of rings that causes current to flow through the middle of it where we're going to see our X-rays shooting out. And through this process, it creates this plasma bubble around the object and keeps that plasma in an equilibrium state. I better just keep reading this. Uh, magnetic field intensity varies along B with a minimum uh value B at the middle and maximum at the coil location. Confinement in the simplest mirror configuration is described by the conservation of energy and of the first aiatic invariant. Now, who wrote that paper about adiabatic compression? Uh, David Kirkley, CEO of Helium Fusion. Uh, adiabatic invariant of a particle of mass moving in a weekly imhog im inhomogeneous magnetic field. Charged particles spiral around the B field lines at a distance called the Larour radius. The lmer radius. These conservation laws imply that the particle moving along with field velocity V is reflected at the plasma location. So here's our image. This is actually from the thumbnail. So what does this look like? Literally just rings and the plasma is flowing through the rings. And you can see that because there is separation between the rings that's where it gets bulky. It gets bulky between the rings. So just like you would imagine a fluid flowing through magnetic fields, it looks that's exactly what it looks like. Very simple mirror configuration right there. Therefore, excuse me. Therefore, upon producing a magnetic field configuration such as that was shown above here, particles will be trapped. They're going to be trapped. So what happens is that particles enter this magnetic field configuration and they get trapped inside. You want to know the real rubber related to this? Any particle that falls into this gets trapped inside. So this is really interesting because this Yeah, this is like it's almost exactly the same as Helium's fusion reactor. And here's the other rub. When I was reading about Loheed Martin's compact fusion reactor, this is also how it was described. It was described as concentric rings using a field reverse configuration. So, it's not just helium energy doing this. Loheed Martin is sitting on a secret field reverse configuration fusion reactor that uses the exact same concepts. Exact same concepts. [clears throat] Let's see here. Um, so then they do the math on the trapping ratio, which is the so-called mirror ratio. Particles not satisfying this condition will be promptly lost with the result of producing an anotropic distribution function characterized by a loss cone in velocity space. So the idea is that a lot of this stuff is going to get trapped inside. Says obviously the fraction of unconfined particles can be made smaller if they are injected in the configuration with a small parallel velocity. So what they do here then if they don't want particles to fly out of this then you control the injection of your neutral beam injectors. So how do they keep the fusion going? They have these neutral beam injectors that basically just keep it spinning. You can imagine from the simplest perspective how do you keep the swing pushing? You have these neutral beam injectors. So if you inject them at the right velocity then they're also going to get trapped inside this spinning mesh of plasma. Okay. Um let's see. [snorts] So since electrons have higher collision velocity than ions, they are scattered in the loss cone at a higher rate. At a as a consequence, the plasma tends to be positively charged. Its potential is determined by the condition that transport must be am uh ambipolar yielding values in the range of I think this is is that uh I don't know what that that uh character is there if that's if temperature or not the uh okay so I'm I'm trying to remember here some of this stuff uh oh so here's the thing if the electron temperature is too low the slowing down of injected ions by the electrons occurs on a fast time scale. Thus, electrons must be kept at at sufficiently high temperature. I thought this was odd because we have to keep the temperatures at high levels. And he argues in here that the temperatures of the electrons is actually lower than what the classical interpretation would would claim. I might be saying that a little bit wrong, but that's I think the main idea of what he says here. says to achieve a high electron temperature in an open-ended configuration might appear to be a slightly diff difficult task since configurations based on classical fluid transport theory would predict very high electron thermal conduction. However, in experiments characterized by low collisionality, the electron thermal conductivity along the magnetic field lines is much lower than the classical estimate. This result is a consequence of the presence of this ambipolar potential that confines the electrons inside the mirror. Only suprathermal non-equilibrium electrons can escape the barrier and contribute to thermal conduction. This has the effect of a dramatic reduction in thermal electron conductivity at the expense of low plasma density and thus large size of the device. What this sounds like to me when I read this is that your plasma is going to get really dense and it's not going to heat up as much as you thought as long as you control it with your magnetic field lines. Your plasma is going to potentially become relatively stable and it's not going to get super hot. I mean, it's still going to get hot from a relative perspective, but not hot in the perspective of we need fusion to happen hot. That's how I interpreted that. Could be wrong. That's my interpretation. Okay. Um, let me see here. Okay, I think we're going to skip ahead a little bit. So, there are some instabilities. There's a bunch of instabilities. And when I read through the instabilities, one of the most common ways to cure the instabilities is actually just spin. introducing spin into your object actually fixes a bunch of the instabilities which I thought was interesting in general. Um let's go to the tandem mirror setup. Skip to the tandem mirror setup. Okay, so this is the one that I think the we get progressively more complex in these ideas and I think they build onto each other. They kind of build onto each other. the tandem mirror setup. When I look at the image here, which you see on your screen, it actually looks more accurate to what I expect we would see in the MH370 videos in the orbs. The orbs I expect are a long tube with a pinch on either end, much like the tandem mirror. But it might even get more complicated than this. If Paul Sizz was writing about this in textbooks back in the 2000s, then we probably had everything that he's been writing about. military probably had everything he's already been writing about. And why was he allowed to write about this? Because literally no one believed it. Literally no one believes any of the stuff that he's writing. I I I actually think the number of people that understood what he was writing about here is like you could probably count it on one hand. Probably count it on one hand. The idea behind the tandem mirror is to modify the electrostatic potential shape along the B field in such a way to confine both escaping electrons and ions. So we just talked about these electrons are escaping our trap that we built. We built this mirror trap to confine our electrons. And now they're saying we can actually do a better job if we use this this tandem mirror configuration. So in the tandem mirror, two smaller mirror cells are added at each end of the larger central cell where the fusion reactions are supposed to take place. The axial profiles of density and temperature of the two end cells are tailored using external methods such as radio frequency heating and neutral beam injection so as to transform them into positive potential electrostatic plugs, thus reducing the loss of positive ions from the central cell. the axial profiles of density, temperature, and electrostatic potential are shown. So, what are we saying here? The most simple level, we're saying that we are we are plugging up our mirror. We've got our cylindrical mirror. Now, we're going to plug it up with some more mirrors. So, if things try to escape out these sides, they're going to get reflected back towards the middle. That's pretty much what we're saying here. So, we're saying we're going to basically confine our fusion reaction using plasma mirrors or any mirrors because what do mirrors do? They reflect. They reflect the light. They reflect energy. Simple as that. Okay. So, then there's some math related to it. And then you can see our graphs here. And then it shows I couldn't really understand these graphs. Maybe you guys will understand them better here. But it says standard tandem mirror versus thermal barrier tandem mirror. And it shows the magnetic field strength. It shows the electron density. Uh and then it mentions hot ions here. We've talked about hot ions before, but I still don't fully understand them and maybe something I dig into a little bit more. And then the last one is the plasma potential. It says axial profiles in the tandem. Uh the illustration is showing a comparison between the density and electrostatic potential profile in a standard tandem mirror versus a tandem mirror with a thermal barrier. Okay. Um let's see. So it says since the density in the cell must be sufficiently high to reach large fusion density very high values of plug density are in order. And this implies a very high magnetic field in the N cells and high energy neutral beam injection. So here you go. This might be the first time that we've actually seen numbers in here. What kind of Tesla do we need in order to achieve our plasma fusion? Greater than 15. Greater than 15 Tesla. Greater than 15 Tesla is really high, guys. In fact, this is now starting to make me understand how we only figured this technology out in the 2000s because we simply didn't have the superconducting magnets that were required to achieve Teslas above like 15. But now, as of 2005 or so, we have been able to achieve these magnetic field strengths. So, we needed these high magnetic field strengths and now we have them. Now, we can produce them. In fact, when you see these wars going on over what do they call them? rare earth met uh materials, minerals. They're usually talking about things that we're producing that we're using to make superconducting magnets like this. There you go. And we also need high energy beam injection. So, not only so instead of lasers, instead of using laser confinement, we're using this neutral beam injector. So, we have to add energy into our system. As long as we're constantly adding this energy, then we're going to keep this thing going. That's the basic idea here. There you go. Okay, let's see. It says, "Therefore, electrons in the plug are in thermal contact with electrons in the central cell. Any attempt to increase the temperature in the plug will increase the temperature in the central cell." So, one of the downsides is you need to build like a barrier here. So, if you build a barrier, then what happens is that like you kind of separate the temperature out. The problem what they were saying in this part is that even the plug will heat up and when the plugs heat up then it's going to heat up the rest of the system or vice versa. So you separate the plugs they have their own thermodynamic setup and they're separated from everything else. Okay. It is apparent that in order to maintain this configuration external power must be injected into the two N cells. On the other hand, if the volume of the N cells is sufficiently smaller than the volume of the central cell, the contribution to the global energy balance of the energy cells is negligible and large Q becomes feasible. So this is the part where I think I'm pretty allin now on the orbs must have something inside. A lot of people have tried to claim that the orbs have nothing inside of them, that they're freely plasma balls that have no configuration. This tells me that you have to be injecting energy into these plasma orbs in order for them to maintain their shape. That's what I'm I'm hearing here. Even if it's a very small amount of energy, you have to inject some energy, which means there has to be something inside of them. There must be something inside of them. Something is managing the plasma essentially on the inside. Okay. And this actually just reminded me of something else. So, I think we're going to skip ahead. I'm just trying to make sure I didn't miss anything. Yeah, I think this is good. And this is something some kind of Japanese configuration. We're going to skip the Japanese configuration thing. Um, it talks about magnetic nozzles. Okay. I think this is in the field reverse configuration. Okay. Now, let's go to field reversed mirror. You should recognize the image on the screen right now because that is a field reverse configuration. This is literally what helium fusion is doing right there. There it is. You're looking at on the screen. That's the field reverse configuration. In a field reverse mirror, plasma confinement is achieved by producing a ring current of electric particles. If the current in the ring is sufficiently large, field reversal occurs and a napkin ringshaped configuration is produced with a closed magnetic field lines confining the plasma. This concept was pioneered by the Astron device in 1979 where field reversal was attempted with a beam of particles characterized by orbit sized characterized by orbit size comparable with device uh dimensions. The field reverse mirror has a great deal in common with compact Tori configurations and therefore will be discussed later. Okay chat, where is the clip? Where is it? Where are you at? How come I don't have my do Oh, there it is. Um, when I read uh compact tory chat, what do you guys think that compact tory means? Having a sip of my coffee here while the chat responds. The field reverse mirror has a great deal in common with compact tory configurations and therefore will be discussed later. Any thoughts? Nobody knows yet. I'm looking at the chat. Interesting. Interesting chat. Okay, I'm going to leave it as a spoiler. Let's see. We're going to we're going to skip ahead a little bit. So, we've got this gas dynamic mirror. I think I'm going to skip the gas dynamic mirror option, but the idea here is that we add a gas and we trap the gas inside, which actually I think is really similar to what Salvatore Py was saying where we use this monatomic gas. Oh, somebody got it. Somebody got it. EVOS. There it is. Evos. Okay. I I just want to get to the good part. Okay. So, this gasp thing is probably pretty cool. I just don't have time to go through it tonight, guys. So, other mirror concepts. So, they said there's some other mirror concepts in addition. So, we can kind of tell when the ideas have run out. We already just read the craziest [ __ ] I've ever read. Uh mirror, what is it? Tandem mirrors, mirror configurations, field reverse configurations. I don't think anybody on planet Earth even knows what these things mean. This book was written in the 2000s. And so he's saying, okay, there's some other concepts as well, but those are the main ones. Then he says, mere studies for space propulsion. Let's skip this for a second, too. We may come back to this one. We probably will come back to this one, but I want to go back. I want to go to the next part. Field reverse configurations. Ready? Compact toids, that's what he means by compact toi, are configurations characterized by the absence of a mechanical structure shaping the plasma. The the configuration is compact in the sense that the plasma extends to the geometrical axis and tooidal in the sense that the topology of the closed magnetic surfaces is that of a Taurus, a donut. Compact toids can therefore combine the good confinement properties of closed toidal configurations with the simple topology of open magnetic field systems. Chad, if you don't know what he's talking about here, he's talking about EVOs. He's talking about exotic vacuum objects. He's talking about ball lightning right here. That's what he's talking about. The fact that there's a whole section that the whole section related to field reverse configuration is all about EVOs. OMG. Holy [ __ ] We're going to need to clip this and make this into its own thing. Okay. Um, compact to uh wait, there we go. Compact toids consist of two distinct regions. a closed field line region inside of a magnetic separatrix with radius R and then an open field line sheath outside of the separatrix. Okay, I just said that there's definitely something inside the orbs and now I'm already backtracking. Now I'm already backtracking. I'm going in the other direction. Now I'm wondering what the hell is Paul size talking about right now? And have we developed plasma balls that are freestanding? Because that's kind of what he's implying here. What he's saying is that there is a closed magnetic field structure on the inside. So there's something on the inside. When we talk about separatrix, what we mean is there's something on the inside that's confining the plasma. the plasma can't escape this internal structure, but then there's this external structure that's connected to the air that the plasma is also confined in, but it's it's uh technically touching the air, right? So, pretty wild here. Now, says PLA and that's what we say the sheath the open magnetic field sheath is the plasma sheath. I mean, remember, I'm the guy that determined that Paul Sizz figured out that we took the plasma sheath from our spy planes and we turned it into a drone. And now you can see confirmation right here on your screen. This is literally Paul's textbook saying that directly. Plasma is a well confined inside the separatrix and exhausted through the open field line region. Holy [ __ ] chat. [laughter] What is the open field lines? The open field lines are the axial lines. So if you take your planet, your Earth, your plasma orb, the open field lines are the tooidal lines that go around the planet just like planet Earth. Those are the open field lines. And where does the exhaust come out in the plasma orbs? Right through the open field lines. That's what he's saying right there. And yes, it is not only like a Zpinch, the theories come from the Zpinch. Literally, he even says it in this textbook. I don't know if I skipped over it, but he says it. So, he says compact toids can be classified according to the following two parameters. The ratio between the poloidal magnetic field B in the plane RZ and the toidal magnetic field line along is that theta zero I don't know what this one is the parameter usually denoted by S corresponding to the number of ion gyro radii between the field null in the separatrix. So what he's saying is there's two distinct things happening in your EVO. You've got your internal structure that is doing the fusion and then you've got your outer external magnetic fields that's creating the shape. There you go. And then he does some math here. I don't really know about what this math means, but it's like apparently these different beta values between the separatrix area depend basically change the shape. So the shape of your orb of your plasma is defined by these ratios you see on your screen. We're learning a lot here. So, the ratio of the magnetic field strength of the internal portion relative to the magnetic field strength of the external portion determines whether or not your plasma is going to show up as a tooid or if your plasma is going to show up as a spherac. There you go. This is something I've been wondering for a while. Why is it that the plasma is spherical as opposed to being donut shaped? And the answer seems to be the ratio of the magnetic field strength between the two different portions. That's what this says to me. And it says if the B is greater than B 0 or whatever, then you get a field reverse configuration. And if you have B roughly the same, then you get a sphere configuration. So the reason why it looks like a sphere has to do with the math of the of the B field of the magnetic field strength between the area This is pretty weird because this right here, this image on the screen is looks like it's straight out of trialpha energies uh fusion research. You see these non-equilibrium formations. So it says F FRC formation and equilibrium. An F FRC is a variety of compact toids with the following characteristics. No appreciable toal field values of B on the order of unity that I think that's beta so beta close to one no rotational transform all the equilibrium currents maintained by diagnetism a scrapeoff layer exhausting heat and particles outside of the coil system. FRC's were accidentally discovered in the 60s in is this theta pinch or what does this mean? Hold on. I'm googling it. [ __ ] Chat, is that a What? What is this symbol, chat? Someone in the chat, tell me what the symbol is. I got to know right now. What does the zero symbol mean in Greek? Who are my Greek uh lifers out there? Somebody tell me. Is that theta zpinch? What is it? I don't know. Anyway, so [clears throat] we accidentally discovered these in the 60s. says a discharge tube is filled with a neutral gas and a bias magnetic field is applied. The gas is pre-ionized. Pre-ionization is what we read about in um magnetic in uh the autronic fusion dur as well. It is theta. Okay, people are saying it's theta. Okay, good. It is theta pinch. Thank you. Now, so here you can see the various configuration setups. Now, this is all based on the design of your system. Okay? So, based on the design of your system, you can see the field reversal. So, you see this is basically how the plasma is going to interact. What I found interesting about this paragraph here is that when we talk about the equilibrium currents being maintained by diagnetism, it sounds like we've built a structure with this plasma where everything is stable. Everything is stable. Even the electrons moving through the the trap, the mirror trap that we've created, we've created this mirror trap. I imagine it's a lot like a flowing river. It's a lot like a flowing river where if you look at the river itself, it doesn't look like there's a lot of movement happening. But if you were to like look at what's really going on at the detailed level, you would see all this movement everywhere. That's why I think the orbs are so amazing is that when you look at those orbs of plasma, that heat signature inside of them, it stays perfectly stable. It spins around, but it just stays perfectly stable. These plasma orbs must be an extremely stable configuration that can allow for energy buildup without allowing the plasma ball to become in unstable or fall apart. Okay. Then it says down here um that was a the discharge tube. B current in the theta pinch coils is reversed on a fast time scale that causes plasma bias field to implode radially. The oppositely directed magnetic field lines reconnects near the end of the Z the theta pinch coil forming a closed magnetic field configuration. The large magnetic tension at the reconnection region causes ther FRC to contract in the axial direction until an equilibrium configuration is achieved. So this is how it works. Let's see what else we've got. Um just trying to see what do I want here. Okay, let's skip ahead a little bit guys. So experiments that are currently happening. Look at all these different experiment. I'm not going to read through all these different experiments, but there's about a dozen listed on here. This the first three are all in Russia that experiments I had never heard of. Then you've got Japan experiments in field reverse configuration. And again, the dates on these 2005 uh these other ones don't have dates on them. Here's more in Japan. University of Washington. Holy [ __ ] chat. Oh my god. University of Washington. Guys, do you know who comes from University of Washington? [laughter] Helian Fusion. Helian Fusion comes from University of Washington. David Kirkley comes from University of Washington. Not just David Kirkley. John Kramer comes from University of Washington as well, actually. So, here you go. Uh, yet another yachtsy chat. There it is. L I'm gonna read this one. LSX mod, University of Washington, United States of America. This is the largest field reverse configuration facility in the world. It was converted to a TCS facility to perform experiments on controlling separatrix shape and to start up and sustain rotating magnetic fields. There's a paper referenced here. This facility should provide information on MHD stability at larger values of parameter S. The STX University of Washington USA facility is called the star thrust experiment. Miller is mentioned from 1998. Wait, is this Mark Miller? Wait, I know. We might have to find that paper there as well. Which Mark? Oh no, Mark Millis is who I was thinking. And in partially funded by NASA to investigate applications to space propulsion such as by using rotating magnetic fields. Oh my god. Very powerful but short-lived rotating magnetic fields will be used to overcome the ionization and radiation barriers that have so far limited the use of this technique to low temperature plasmas. Wow. Wow. Chat, uh, you know what? It's time for >> imbalance. >> Oh, wait. That wasn't even the right one. Where's the Where's the right one? >> Boom. Gotcha, [ __ ] Okay, so if you just tuned in, if you have been in the living in the uh, you know, under a rock, we just saw Paul Sizz references the University of Washington, the largest F FRC facility in the world. Why is David Kirkley out of uh doing helium fusion coming out of University of Washington? Well, they sort of had access to the largest F FRC facility in the entire world. So, when people are like, "Hey, Ashton, why do you think Helen Fusion is going to be the one?" Well, because they kind of had a leg up. [laughter] I'm seeing them referenced in literally these scientific papers, uh, textbooks from the early 2000s, and then they became a company in 2013, 2014, something like that. And now they're going to be one of the world's leading fusion companies in the world. Yeah. Well, I think they I think they found something out possibly during this experiment. Going to go ahead and and just take a guess at that. Then there's the Princeton MRX magnetic reconnection experiment. So Princeton is actually another one of the big fusion uh companies coming out. Cornell has something Los Alamos. Los Alamos compact plasma injector to study high density F FRC formation stability and translation physics. Now let me just point this out guys before we take a look at the propulsion side of it. Does anyone ever know that like our DOE labs like Los Alamos were studying all this plasma stuff? Like we knew they were studying plasma, but we didn't know what they were doing. We just thought, "Oh, they're studying plasma, right?" But no, it turns out they're literally studying EVOs. They're studying field reverse configurations. They're studying all the science that would be needed to make some plasma orbs that are freely floating and stable. They're studying all of it. Okay, let's finish this up, guys. So, we're going to take we're going to look at these last two chapters. The F FRC for space propulsion and the concepts of space propulsion. So, the use of F FRC for for space propulsion was first proposed in 1989. 1989 was a good year chat for fusion using helium dutyium helium 3 dutyium fuel. So, that's a neutronic fuel. Thrust is obtained by a magnetic nozzle where plasma flowing along the open field lines is mixed with propellant. The design was largely based on a conceptual design of a land-based power plant, Sapphire. Miley, wait, is that George Miley? No, it can't be. That can't be George Miley, can it? What year? What year was that? How? That was a long time ago. What year was that, chat? What year does that say on there? 1978. No way. Right. And it is George Miley. Holy [ __ ] chat. Holy [ __ ] That's George Miley he's referencing right there, chat. [laughter] George Miley is one of the world's leading experts on inertial confinement fusion, by the way. Uh, and by the way, I just pulled the paper up. I'm looking at the paper right now. A possible route to small flexible fusion units. GH Miley, 1979. Conceptual design studies of a small dutyium helium 3. I'll go full screen. Conceptual design studies of a small dutyium helium 3 field reversed mirror fusion plant are described. If achievable, the basic unit termed sapphire would produce a few megawatts of power. By stacking of units, however, plants could be built in the tens of megawatts of size. Are you [ __ ] kidding me right now? How is this real? H how do we keep finding [ __ ] like this? How do we keep finding [ __ ] like this? scientific paper from 1979 by George Miley literally talking about doing a neutronic fusion reactors using helium dut helium 3 dutium you can't you can't even make this up I'm going to show it to you guys I don't even believe it I don't even believe what I'm looking at this is the reference from what Paul says's book right there here it is a possible route to small flexible fusion rad to George Miley right there this is from 197 fucking9. This is older [clears throat] than I am. I'm 43 years old, chat. This is four years older than me. So when people say, Ashton, how have they been hiding this or whatever, I just keep telling you easily. The way they're hiding it is nobody understands science. Nobody understands physics. Nobody understands any of these things and therefore they can just write papers about them. I actually start to wonder if like what the reason why Pudaf responded to me at all is because nobody understands his papers. Like he probably expected there to be like way more people that are like figuring it out because they're just reading all these open scientific papers. But nobody does. Nobody reads the scientific papers. Nobody reads these textbooks. Nobody just checks into stuff. It just says it right there. So, how could George Miley have already been proposing a neutronic fusion reactors in 1979? How could he have been proposing it that long ago? The reason is simple. The reason is because this science goes back to at least the 60s. At least the 60s. Crazy chat. Yeah, this is this this is a good point. They don't touch this in school because it's literally classified under national security. Inertial confinement fusion is literally Sigma 11. Sigma 11. It's got its inertial confinement fusion has its own critical nuclear weapon classification code. Okay, this isn't a joke. Inertial confinement fusion, which is what all this classifies as, has its own nuclear critical nuclear weapon classification code called Sigma 11. Well, now I know why George Miley did not respond to my email. Now I know why George Miley never responded to my email, but besides the fact that he's like 90 years old or something like that. Wow. Okay, let's finish this up, guys. This has been a crazy show already. I didn't expect to find this. These are small details I didn't even know about before. So the example considered uses a five Tesla magnet. So back then they were only considering five Tesla for their magnets. Now previously in this paper they mentioned using 15 Tesla. So Tesla are three or four times higher than what they were using here. Uh and then they're going to basically compress the plasma into a small radius. And they at that time they only considered plasma betas of 76%. Now our plasma betas are higher than 90%. Beta value of plasma higher than 90%. And at that time they were already predicting a half a gigawatt of power. My god. Okay. So it says, "Oh my god, look at Oh my, this is it. This is the this is the orbs. I think this is the orbs. More recently, a colliding beam fusion reactor space propulsion system has been proposed in 2004 and it is shown right here. More rec uh the reaction is the proton boron 11. Oh, [screaming] although dutyium tridium and helium 3 dutyium reactions were also considered, it is an evolution of the ion ring concept. Neutral beams are injected to produce a current that sustains the configuration. So that the neutral beams can sustain the configuration. The beams tend to thermalize and this effect must be compensated by continuous injection which requires non-negligible amount of recirculating power. Wow. I mean look at that configuration. So for the people that are just listening right now, the configuration looks like a combination of everything that I just went over. You can see the internal cylindrical shape and then there's a cylindrical shape around that and then you can see the ring magnets as well. You can see the ring magnets that are spread out beyond it. So the idea here is what we're doing is we're confining our plasma, the plasma being confined in this tube and then it produces external magnetic fields around the entire structure that creates the sphere and boron 11. Just like with helium 3 is a neutronic. It's a neutronic means that the only thing being released in this interaction are alpha particles. No neutrons. So this is directly producing electricity with this configuration. Wow. Wow. This is going to have to be another Twitter post, guys. Okay. Um I'm not going to read through all of this. Let's see what else we've got here. waste heat. Okay. A propulsion system based on the magnetized target fusion approach has been proposed. A pair of conical theta pinches produced a compact Taurus which is imploded by a spherically converging plasma liner driven by a number of plasma jets. The liner is compressed to a very high density, creating an inner fusion fuel layer, producing the main fusion yield and an external layer made of hydrogen that slows down the neutrons and absorbs and converts 95% of their energy to charged particle energy. The spherically expanding plasma produced in this way is transformed into an axial flow by pulsed magnetic field. High conversion efficiencies to direct thrust are foreseen. Holy [ __ ] Okay, we might have to find this paper chat. This is the gold mine, guys. This is a [ __ ] gold mine that we're reading right now. One of these things in this paper is literally the orbs. Like one of these things he's referencing is literally the orbs in the MH370 videos. The date on this textbook is like 2007, 2008, something like that. I mean Paul Sizz died in 2013. So this is really old. And here you go. I mean that he's explaining it right there. He's saying we're using plasma and then it creates an inner liner of plasma fusion and an outer liner of hydrogen when they do these configurations. So, anybody that doesn't think that we've got plasma fusion propulsion, just just read just watch this live stream. Read this textbook. This isn't this isn't Paul Sizz writing science fiction here. This is hard math. And he's not speculating. These are all things that were all done, all things that were tested. He sourced them all. And this is why I love these guys because you can tell these guys were not. This guy was a heavyweight. Paul says was a heavyweight in the aerospace industry. He knew stuff that people still don't believe today. On paper, this system is very compact. Um the reactor weight is only 41T for 25 megawatts of power. Right? That must be a ratio. So it produces a really high specific power. And then the key to such a result is assumed high fusion power density and the percentage of conversion of neutron power to charged particle power in the liner. So what it sounds like it says to me is that this high field reverse configuration what it does is it can slow down the neutrons and cause the neutrons to then instead release pure energy instead of releasing heat. So we create this like trap system almost like uh what do they call that Chinese finger trap where now all the particles are stuck inside and now they have to move because we're we're vibrating the edges. We're pulsing this. So now everything's getting stuck in this cyclletron pattern and now everything slows down just like on a highway. Imagine a highway that's packed but you can only go as fast as the car in front of you. That's how I imagine these plasms work is that once you either slow everything down or it's not even a matter of slowing down or speeding up. It's a matter of getting everything in sync. Once everything's in sync, then everything's just moving like you know mar like a marching down the road, right? And so what this means is it controls the speed of all the electrons and the motion of all the particles that are being uh expelled. [sighs] Okay. And then it talks about sphere. I think we're going to skip the sphere mac stuff here. I want to go back cuz we we could be looking at a sphere mac. Let's see the stability limits. I just want to see if I missed anything. This is a lot. Oh, the levitated dipole. Eh, I think we're going to skip the levitated dipole. So, I just want to go back to the part where they were talking about space propulsion up here. I want to read that part, too. And you can tell this is not light reading, guys. I mean, this is this is pretty deep stuff here, but I think if you've been watching my content, you can at least glean enough information to understand the concepts of what they're describing here. Okay. Mirror studies for space propulsion. Although the system was proposed for energy production only, this is a 1987 paper. It features are similar to those of propulsion system. The electric power is 1 gawatt and is produced by dutyium helium 3 reaction through direct conversion. 80% efficiency has been assumed. David Kirkley talks about 90% efficiency. The fusion power is 1.9 gawatt with 70 megawws in the form of neutrons. About 470 megawws are lost through radiation. So take a look at this right here. We're saying right here, oh, I don't even have it up. We're saying right here that this is why you want a neutronic fusion is that the more neutrons that are being produced, the more energy that's being lost through heat. So, the more efficient your direct energy conversion, the less energy you're losing in your system. It's just a matter of efficiency. That's really all it is. The shield is designed to absorb all rejected heat without using a radiator. So basically what they're doing here is they're using this lithium hydrogen blanket as a shield and that shield essentially absorbs the neutrons. This is actually what they do in tokamac reactors as well. I think they line the reactor with lithium so that when the when the neutrons hit it that there's a reaction and it doesn't destroy the reactor. Now obviously what would be better than that? No walls whatsoever. Don't have any walls whatsoever. Okay. Yeah. So they use that blanket and then they talk about the size of it. The magnetic field strength in this is only 7.7 Tesla. So they're using this uh I don't know what kind of magnet this is. So one of the other big breakthroughs like I'm now saying directly I'm now directly accusing the government whoever defense contractors they took Ning Lee's work. What was big about Ning Le's work was that she was producing superconductors. YBCO superconductors, Yidium, barerium, uh, copper oxide, right? They were producing these superconductors that have super high magnetic field strengths and they're malleable. What does this mean? This means you can shape the magnet into whatever shape you want it to be. What shape do we want? Well, we want some rings. We want some ring shapes for our plasma fusion propulsion system. So why did Ning Lee's work go dark? I don't think it had to do with anti-gravity. I think it had to do with the fact that the stuff that she was producing was being implemented directly in plasma fusion reactors and plasma fusion propulsion. That's what I think the deal is with Ningly and Eugene Poplov. Okay. Then he says the possibility of using a gas dynamic mirror for space propulsion has been considered. The reaction had a Okay. So, these are just considering the different types. Um, and this one was using, this one had a magnetic field strength of 15 Tesla. So, we're starting to get a range of what Tesla you need in order to make this happen. Tesla 15 is really, really big. Really big. But we potentially need Teslas of like 20, 15 to 20 to start making it so that we can have magnetic field strength is powerful enough for fusion to occur as well as for orbs to begin to form in our plasma sphere. Okay. Um, and then it just talks about the energy levels that are being required. So, what we're also seeing here to kind of round this out is we're seeing that the energy levels that are required to or energy levels that we're seeing here are were initially coming from propulsion. All of these concepts really originate with propulsion concepts and then some of them were considered for standalone reactors. And now this is what's commercially happening today with Helium Fusion. Helium Fusion is trying to take something that was designed for a propulsion rocket and they're trying to turn it into a standalone reactor. So they want to have the exhaust, but they don't want it to move around. So these are the challenges that we're trying to solve. And I'm going to go ahead and say that that the military governments probably solved them decades ago. We're just resolving them again right now. Okay. Um so it says how electricity is produced for the neutral beam supply is not discussed. One of the things they said in this additional configuration is the possibility of using dutyium helium 3 was also considered in the same study. So a lot of these studies that were initially working off like dutyium tridium reactions which are neutron reactions they also considered a neutronic reactions. This is the part where we are going to find what's going to happen is a lot of these companies that are doing fusion they're going to flip over to a neutronic the moment that they start to get ignition to become viable. ignition is the temperature we need in order to get self- sustaining processes in fusion. They're going to flip over to a neutronic reactions because they're just better, higher efficiency, uh no uh radiation coming off of them. I mean, these are things that are just clearly better. And the only reason why we're not going for them right now is that the classic view of physics says that those are much more difficult. They think that boron 11 fusion takes these massive temperatures to make it happen. And if we can't even get lower temperatures, then why are we bothering with that? That's literally the view of the people that are against a neutronic fusion right now. So once you realize that we don't need any of that stuff anymore where we can potentially get fusion happening at lower temperatures, now of course we should go to a neutronic fusion. It just makes the most sense. And okay, one last thing on this is that a comment good comment by Jason I think here says the lithium fire is crucial forming what would be considered to be a high energy Bose Einstein condensate which is what provides the teleportation option. Now I find this really interesting because what we're going to talk about on Friday guys is this brand new microchip just came out like yesterday. They've been talking about I've been doing a little bit of research, but I haven't had enough time to dig into it, which is why it's not a topic for tonight. But they basically created what seems to be a room temperature quantum computer. We just learned two days ago what quantum computers are. They're just Joseph's and junctions connected to a capacitor with a pulseed current going through them. That's it. That's all it is. A squid is two Joseph and junctions hooked up together. And a cubit is just that same squid connected to a capacitor. That's it. And what did I say when I said how are we going to improve helium fusions a neutronic fusion reactions? I said first thing we need to do is need to get superconduct room temperature superconducting wiring on everything. Why? Because if we can get room temperature superconducting wiring, we don't get any more heat losses anymore. So it takes away a huge portion of the inefficiency. So what did I find out about this new microchip that is a apparently really it's it's a quantum computer. The microchip is on a quantum computer itself. The big thing about quantum computers is that we have to keep them cold because again they're superconductors. They're Joseph injunctions. So we have to keep them cold in order for them to work. So what did these new microchip people try to do? What was their task? Their task was to create a superconducting microchip at room temperature chat. Ooh boy. When I heard that, when I heard those words, I said, "Okay, I'm interested." And what did they build? They supposedly were successful in building something that's now called, I think, a t-bit or they came up with their own name. Basically, it's not a cubit. They were able to use silicon to make a microchip that they claim can entangle quantum states at room temperature. Chat, I can't wait till Friday. I can't wait till Friday because that's the topic of the stream. That's probably all we're going to talk about on Friday. And the other thing, the reason why I'm so excited about this is the name of the company by the way. Tell me when I can invest. Just tell me when I can invest, chat. Extropic. This is one where my spider sense is going crazy on this. This might be a better investment than Helium Fusion. Like, this could change everything. This is what we've been looking for. The last thing I want to say on it is that when I heard they were talking about harnessing the thermal radiation, the thermal fluctuations, do you know what it reminded me of? It reminded me of Paul Tibido's free energy microchip harnessing the Brownian thermal motion to produce energy. We're literally at the point where we are somewhere between. Is that true? Is this all it costs to invest? If it is, I'm going to invest. I've got the 50 G's. I'm going to drop it. If If that's all it costs to invest, I'm dropping it in this company after the live stream on Friday. I'm going to give them a call this weekend. Maybe they'll do an interview and I'm going to invest. So it sounds we are b we are broaching we are hitting the inflection point where free energy microchips are going to go mainstream. Room temperature quantum computers are going mainstream. And the reason why they claim this is so big is that because you will no longer need to cool your quantum computer. This means that your AI can run on your phone because again you don't need to cool down your quantum chips. That quantum chip can live in your phone and your AI can be run directly out of your phone. So you can have the AI running on your hardware that's like on your watch in the future. That's how big this revolution really is if you want to think of it from a practical standpoint. And I gota I might be the biggest cheerleader for this technology out there. I'm the one who's been saying this is the exact technology we need to move to the next level. We need room temperature superconductivity and they found a way around it. Hopefully on Friday we will find out what that way is. I think it might be proprietary. Wouldn't surprise me. I don't think that the US government or military wants us to come out. Last thing I'll say, I know that I said last thing and this is the real last thing. They said the reason why they did this is because they wanted to do it in an open not really open- source way but do it in a way where they could post a paper scientific paper publicly and that would force governments to follow suit. What they're going to find is that the government already did this. They're going to find that the military has already done this. The military already has room temperature Bose Einstein condensates which are room temperature entangled pairs, macroscopic pairs. Government's already had it figured out. The public is figuring it out and I'm just excited to be part of it, chat. So guys, that's going to be it for our live stream tonight. Let me hit through some of these donations. Thank you guys in the PL chat. Thank you in the Rumble chat and thank you again, Carrie, for this super chat donation in the in the YouTube. I appreciate it. Let me hit up the uh pill chat uh donos. Matt 1776 gifted the cookie. When are we getting fusion energy, Matt? Sounds like sooner rather than later. The amount of investment that's gone into Fusion there. There's a new partnership now between General Atomics and Nvidia to use AI to advanced Fusion. It's going to happen really quickly. They all already know it works. They just have to like reveal it publicly for us. So hopefully when we find out that fusion is real and all these other things that I've been talking about are real, teleportation is real, maybe then people will wake up and realize the MH370 videos were always real. Probably not though. I don't have a lot of hope for humanity out there. Couple other super chat donations. John Glock. John Glock says, "Gifted a cookie. Listening with my dad tonight." Hello, John Glock's dad. Glad you're out there, brother. So cool to have this level of discussion with my father and thank you for the stream. You know what? That is amazing. That's probably one of the most amazing super chats I've got. I love that we are having intelligent conversations and I throw the politics in there as well because otherwise it would get boring. It would get boring and there's no right and wrong when it comes to politics. Of course, I just love that we're we're increasing the discourse. We're talking about content and science that nobody else on planet Earth is talking about. Avi Lo is certainly not talking about this kind of stuff. And we're making people smarter. We're making people smarter. And if anything were to ever happen to me, I would die happy. And the reason why I would die happy is because I know that a lot of you who have been watching would just take my legacy and run with it. Some of you would go develop stuff. Some of you would become influencers like I am. and other of you would just teach and pass the information on to the next generation. And for me, that's all I want out of this life. That's all I want out of this life. I don't care about being rich. I don't care about being famous. I don't care about any of that stuff. As long as I left an impact on humanity, then I will die a happy man. So, thank you very much for that. And then, uh, methyl, I don't know what that one is. Einstein gifted the helion fusion. Thank you very much for that. Oh, and then one last super chat. Zaparoo says, "Great stream. Is there a connection between pulse power zpinch and the possible cause of the orbs x-ray burst?" Good question. I think that there is. I think that when we looked at the magnetic mirror setup, what happens is there's some kind of amplification process that happens in a magnetic mirror setup that causes x-rays to be released in the process. And what we saw when we look at stuff like bright power I think it's br or brilliant light energy they're trying to harness like ultraviolet rays or x-rays or actually lpp fusion was not only trying to harness the fusion energy but the x-rays that get released in the process they were also trying to harness those with uh photo volic cells or whatever they are basically stuff that captures light like a solar panel. So, yes, I think that we're definitely all this stuff is definitely connected and it it connects directly back to the MH370 videos and the orbs. So, thank you guys very much. I appreciate you. Thank you for gifting to me the memes, methol. Okay, guys. Tonight, our closing thing is going to be the video that [laughter] uh was just mentioned. Narrative War part two, guys. Narrative War part two. I'm going to play us out with the second Narrative War. Shout out to Tupacabra the goat. Tupacabra is just making amazing music out there. I'm not all in on the AI stuff, but I am all in on Tupac's AI music. The guy is awesome. So, here we go, guys. Hope you guys have a great night. Here's your moment of zen. [singing] [music] >> Light flash through [music] pain. Everything holy. Got a barcode name. [music and singing] Midnight prayer with a rum stains on the fire on a loop. Same songs. [music] Blessings burn in a private jet flame. [singing] Heaven look close but it don't feel the same. [music] I've been drowning slow in a silver sea. Every ghost in the glass look just like me. Don't know what I lost. Can't find was [music] true. But the sound keep calling. I'm coming through. Give me something I can feel. [music] Just so I can feel in a while for me. Send a sign [music] through the noise. I give me something I can feel [music] in the way I do. God in the wild. [music] I've been waiting on a heart that be a cy in a crystal [music] cup. Love turn ash when a flame too much. I've been [singing] rich. I've been lost. I've been broke that [music] still the mirror keep asking what I want. Print [singing] house view what the [music] sky look. Whole world turns off when I lay my head. Got angels and proud demons and fur. [music] They all sing loud but the worst still. If I fall and I just play a song. The one that says we ain't [singing] alone. I don't need peace. [music] I just need proof that the static can still be true. [singing] Give me something I can like just [music] so I can feel the sky in the wild. Let it spark for me. Send a song through the [music] noise. Give me something I can hear than the [music] way I was in a while. Let it be for me. [music] I've been waiting on a heart that began [music] automatic. [music] >> [music]