Video Transcript
We've been wondering how do you make one of these special gravity beams? They actually it's talked about a lot in the APEC conferences, the alternate propulsion conferences, but it's never really made sense to me on what it is, how exactly it works. Specially conditioned EM radiation research with transmitting toidal antennas. David Froin and George Hathaway. I read that I read the whole paper. And basically, it's about them trying to figure out how to make these special EM fields that we're calling SU2 fields. So, when you hear when you see the word SU2, that is just to confuse you. They're basically saying that's a gra they turn an electromagnetic wave like a light beam into a gravity beam. And in it they basically say that it works but their experiments are inconclusive. And you would say just reading through it, I'm reading I'm thinking in my head about these two guys deciding to test including the tooidal uh what is it? The offshaped like triangle tooidal coil that's in here as well. And they test it and they go in all this detail and they say everything is promising, everything looks good. we tested everything on a small scale and they're like it's it's ideal for research and they're like but we didn't really see anything. And you're sitting there thinking if you were developing if you were researching some science you would want to you would want to build it up. You would want to hype it up. You would want to oversell it. But in that paper they're underelling it the whole time. Which leads me to believe that these guys really did figure it out and they really did classify it. And what we get in the public is a nerfed version of the science that doesn't go far enough to convince the public. Doesn't go far enough to convince the Sabine Hassenfelders of the world. Now, sorry guys. The other big update that I want to talk about quickly is the back and forth. Maybe not. Okay. Back and forth beef with me or me just basically ragging on Sabine Hosenfelder. And here's my big problem with it. We're starting to see these people all flipping their narratives. Neil deGrasse Tyson. I think I was watching I I think the Polarity Josh was actually I was watching him recently and talking about these people switching their narratives. Neil Degrasse Tyson is one of the key people doing it. He's saying, "Oh, before he was saying the aliens can't ever get here. We shouldn't worry about the aliens. is stupid to think about that. And now all these videos, anomalous stuff are being released. And now he's going, "Guys, we have to get ready for the aliens. What changed? Physics hasn't changed. What What's the What's exactly is changing here?" And another great example is Sabine Hosenfelder. She just made a video saying that Sunny White's Casemir free energy microchip isn't real. Well, it's not real physics, doesn't work. So, I challenge her on it and they come back and they always come back with, well, it's a symmetrical system and any any system is going to is going to uh be uh have to be energy conserved. So, there's no way you can get net energy out of it, which is not thinking outside the box enough. But here's my problem is that today she posts a video and says, "I think faster than light communication is possible." And I'm just sitting here going, "Am I in the Twilight Zone right now? This is a woman that makes a video saying the CIA is lying about ghost murmur. that their quantum technology they use that they call ghost murmur isn't real physics. And then she says, "But you know what? I believe that the aliens have secret alien communication technologies that we don't know about." How how can you keep those two ideas in your head at the same time? It's the same physics. There's no secret alien physics that humans can't understand. It's just right there. And this is what I hate about these people hedging or fence sitting or whatever you want to call it because I think they see the writing on the wall. They see they're going to be proven wrong and they have been spent their whole career ragging on people claiming that their science is fake. That is it. Literally Sabine has a meter that she does in every video. And now these people are going to be the ones who are going to be the bullshitters, the ones that were the gatekeepers, the ones that didn't understand science. And now they're trying to hedge. So they can be like, "No, I I never said it wasn't real. I always thought it was real." Chat, I don't know how I'm going to not crash out on these people. I don't know how I'm going to not crash out. You know what? I was going to be mean and talk about politics before we do video games tonight, but I just don't even really care anymore. I think the best way to deal with the whole woke right situation that's happening right now is just to ignore them. Just to let them go and move on with their lives. I want us focused on things that matter. But if you're somebody that's upset about Thomas Massie or politics in general, honestly, any of it, then here's what you need to know. None of that matters. None of that matters at all. Whether or not Thomas Massie won or lost isn't going to make a difference at all. Just a game, just a distraction. It's circus and peanuts. What actually matters is if you want to actually free this country and actually help common Americans, the absolute best thing you could do is promote UFO disclosure. You would say, Ashton, why? What does the hell does UFO disclosure have to do with helping common people? Because UFO disclosure is about free energy. It's about fusion energy for the world. It means everybody's going to have as much energy as they need basically for free. Just imagine like homeless people can have heat when it's cold. You know, simple things like that. People forget the very very simple things of this world. So that's what I would tell you to focus on. Focus on UFOs. Focus on free energy. focus on something that's going to actually help us out. Um, oh yeah, I need to promote this real quick. Sorry, there's a couple things we got to do. Curious Crossroads video. Uh, Curious Crossroads just dropped, guys. Check it out. Great conversation. Very recent. I think it was like last weekend or something like that. Uh we talk about fusion, talk about gravity manipulation, talk about what happened with MH370, get you guys up to date on that. Uh and then on Friday, the Pat Gray conversation will be dropping. So Pat Gray on the Blaze on Friday morning. That one's going to be amazing. Um one more clip. Where is it? Oh yeah, one more update, too. A lot of updates, guys. I'm going to forget about some of this on Friday. That's why I wanted to do a little live stream. What this also means, if we can manipulate spaceime, if we can reduce the cool barrier, Lulu, please girl, don't hit the camera. Um, what this means in terms of fusion, it means that we are literally going to get T-Moon nerfed fusion. No matter what fusion they give us, the version of fusion that we're about to get is going to be a version that is a low coefficient of performance. coefficient performance of three, coefficient of performance four. You may say, "Wow, Ashton, gain four times energy out is huge. Four times more energy out than you get in is is crazy." And I'm telling you, that's a t-uass nerfed fusion. Thank you for the donuts in the chat. what this means. And if you literally read the scientific paper I was just referencing for you, including the other ones that are in here, the implications on fusion are that the energy requirements go down by more than a factor of 100. The energy requirements for fusion go down by more than a factor of 100. more. Honestly, they're they're being conservative in the book because the math is such that if you were able to manipulate spaceime, then the amount of energy it takes to make fusion happen goes down and down and down and down and down. So, the more you're able to manipulate spaceime, the cheaper the energy requirement gets. So, it actually becomes a type of thing where the more manipulation you can do, the cheaper it gets, the better it gets. So, energy cost goes down and down and down and down and down, gets progressively cheaper. So what the math means is that those coefficient of performances that we're going to get out of fusion are janky as hell. We're essentially in theory able to get infinite coefficient of performance true free energy. Now not in practice it won't be actually infinite coefficient of performance but you can imagine coefficient of performance of 1,000 for example a thousand times more energy out than you put into that system. So truly we are looking at an age of absolute free energy. There's no way no way around it.