NEW National Quantum Research Centers - Politics & Physics

Video Transcript

# NEW National Quantum Research Centers - Politics & Physics Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foroding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing [music] the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably [music] question those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our [music] critical faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back into [music] superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay [music] of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest [music] common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience [music] and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. [music] Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. [music] Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us. Less than an hour before your meeting with President Xi, you posted on social media that you instructed the quote department of war to start testing our nuclear weapons. That's right. >> Immediately. What did you mean? >> Well, we have more nuclear weapons than any other country. And I think we should do something about denuclearization. And I did actually discuss that with both President Putin and President Xi. We >> Well, I can tell you we shared it with America, but I can't share it with you. Okay. the most advanced offensive weapons on the planet. Things that none of the superpowers have developed by Israel, shared with America. >> We're very powerful. This country is very powerful. It's far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world that we have. More powerful than anybody even not even close. Malaysian 370 contact switch 120 decimal 970. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [music] Oh, [music] [music] [music] [music] I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, [music] the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu. is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and [music] to impress him. Takes on his multi-armed form [music] and says, "Now I am become death, [music] the destroyer of worlds." Hey everybody, welcome to the live stream guys. So happy for you guys to be here. TGIF. Thank god it's Friday, everybody. Guys, have an excellent show for you guys today. We are going to be talking about nukes like we've been talking about all week. And we're going to talk a little bit about politics. We're going to dive back into that world. Guys, I am doing domain expansion. I'm doing domain expansion. I'm increasing my knowledge, increasing the topics that I talk about. Uh, just another shout out, guys. Gonna be talking to Salvatore Py 3:30 Eastern time on Sunday. talking to US Navy engineer Salvador Pais and uh engineer contractor Dave Rossi 3:30 Eastern time Sunday right after this live stream I will set the link up so that you guys can set your reminders and check it out. Um, also guys, the main topic of tonight is going to be the new quantum research centers, new national quantum research centers because I think we've developed enough knowledge base, science, physics base over the last year and a half, two years where now we can understand the significance of these research centers and why it's so important that the United States government is spending over a half a billion dollars over half a billion dollars to ensure that the United States of America is the world's leader in quantum technologies as well as AI. Couldn't be more important if you ask me. Okay, where are we starting tonight? Let's recap the week. Okay, it was a pretty exciting week, guys. I think that we've shown in my opinion more than enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt if we were in a in a a court of law that the United States has figured out space-time manipulation directly tied to thermonuclear weapon research directly tied to thermonuclear weapon research. And I want to address the counterarguments. The number one counterargument that even I I mean I have to go research my I think when people are honest about their opinions when people present good arguments they should give you pause you should go okay wait how does this make sense so the number one argument people have which is I replied to somebody they said there's no way nuclear weapons can be manipulating spaceime because it's just a direct conversion of matter into energy. So the what does this argument mean? This argument is like saying, okay, I've got this bomb. It's a very heavy bomb. The most energy that can be released is whatever E= MC² is. That's what they're arguing. They're arguing all you're doing is converting that into energy. So if the bomb itself is not manipulating spaceime, then the energy of the bomb will also not manipulate space time. Does that make sense? Let me repeat that. [clears throat] What they're saying is that the original form of the bomb when it's still in its mass form before we convert it to energy in our thermonuclear explosion, they're saying if its original form doesn't manipulate spaceime, then when you convert it to energy that also won't manipulate spacetime. That's a reasonable question, right? It's a reasonable doubt to add. But here's the problem. What is energy? What is manipulation of spaceime all about? Manipulation of spacetime is about energy density. It's about energy density. How much energy can you fit into a region of spaceime? If I'm producing a black hole, it's not about how much energy is out there. It's about how much energy has been collapsed onto a single point. [snorts] That's what it's all about. It's about taking your you start with this energy and you collapse that down to even a smaller point than that. And when you collapse that down, the energy density goes up. The energy density goes up significantly. And what would what do we call that collapsing of the of the uh material down? We call that inertial confinement fusion. That's literally what inertial confinement fusion is doing. That's why we're imploding the object on itself because we are increasing the energy density significantly. So, it's to me, I don't know if you guys knew this, but I was doing some more research on this and Wood and uh Knuckles and Edward Teller and all those, you know, nuclear engineers. I mean, this seems obvious when I say it, but they are the guys that worked with the highest energy physics experiments that have ever existed. These are guys that worked on the highest energy physics experiments that ever existed in human in humanity. If anybody would have figured out manipulation of spaceime, it would be these guys. [laughter] These are the guys that would be the ones that figured it out. It's going to be the nuclear engineers. Those are going to be the ones that are going to be the very first people that are going to hit energy levels that are going to manipulate spaceime. They're the ones. which is why I' I've gotten so excited about this topic and why we've been digging into it so hard because these guys Teller Wood and Oppenheimer, the people of the Manhattan Project and their successors, they literally laid the foundational theory for black hole collapse. Like where when we think about where do these terms like black hole even come from? Black hole comes from John Archabal Wheeler. It comes from the people that developed the Hbomb. The these physics terms and the theory and the evidence for them all comes from the people that developed thermonuclear weapons. First, second, and third generation. All of these things come from them. So, we should not be surprised that these guys figured it out. And if you missed the live streams, I would say here are the big takeaways. John Knuckles. He's the guy that helped develop super efficient, clean hydrogen bombs. Third generation thermonuclear weapons. Fourth generation thermonuclear weapons would be like tailored customized miniature nuclear weapons that their purpose is to teleport a Boeing trip 7. That's the MH370 videos represent a fourth generation customized thermonuclear weapon. John Knuckles was being called his his ideas were being called science fiction by his colleagues. John Knuckles is the one that started the National Ignition Facility. uh would and all three of these guys worked on the nuclearped nuclearped free electron x-ray laser which just a couple weeks ago I said this would be the super weapon that they're hiding potentially even using plasma mirrors to amplify these high energy lasers. So Wood worked on those and Wood also proposed theories of using black holes to produce a power plant to literally make black holes to use a power plant. And all of these guys, they also work, they also had scientific papers, at least one specifically where John Knuckles and and Loel Wood wrote a scientific paper together saying that to test relativity to test Einstein's gravity waves using thermonuclear detonations. So I mean to me that is just the nail in the coffin. I'm actually more surprised that more people haven't figured this out already. It's like how when we're talking about UFOs defying gravity and flying around and we go to the physics and we start digging down into gravitational wave research and it just leads us right back to thermonuclear weapons. How are more people not putting two and two together here? These orbs that we're seeing flying around are thermonuclear weapons. They're connected to thermonuclear weapons. Their research comes from thermonuclear weapons. If UFOs and aliens exist, then we built thermonuclear weapons based on UFO technology. Like that's that's what I'm saying here. And I've been digging around and I can't find anybody else that's mentioning this. I will say that I have been unblocked this week by Dark Journalist and I feel like I feel like a new alliance. I can see it coming, guys. I'm using my remote viewing powers. I feel like a collaboration could be in the works. I could see it happening. I could see there being an amends because the reality is I think dark journalist is the closest out of anybody. He's the closest out of anybody. He's been He knows the history. He knows it goes back to the Nazis and he knows that we've been working on black projects. He just didn't realize the MH370 videos are real. And I don't really care if he real if he believes they're real or if he doesn't because ultimately at the end of the day all the science, the physics, what have you is real. Whether or not people believe the videos are real, I really don't care. I really really don't care. Um, so [snorts] uh what was I going to say? So to finish that out then the reasons the other big takeaway not just were these guys literally proposing science fiction ideas including John Knuckles saying that he wanted to make a thermonuclear engine. What does that mean? Sounds like the precursor for plasma fusion propulsion to me. Not only were these guys talking about all this stuff, but we learned a little bit about how it's been hidden. It seems like a lot of these guys have some kind of like middle school style feud with the other people in the intelligence community. And uh Loel Wood had one specifically where he was accused of sharing information with the Chinese, which is crazy because this is exactly what happened with uh Robert ML Baker, the guy who won the Lifetime Achievement Award for gravity wave research in 2011. He was accused by the CIA and Ron Pendalfi of sharing too much information with the Chinese. And in both cases, they were both given slaps on the wrist. They both got off on a technicality. In Robert ML Baker's case with Gary, which Gary Stevenson talks about, they say that the gravitational wave effect that he was speaking about with the Chinese was too weak to be significant. Literally was about gravitational waves. I don't think we know the exact thing that uh Loel Wood got written up for. It's funny. I even talk about like middle school terminology like being written up because that's what it feels like for when you read about these guys. Loel Wood gets written up because of some equations and it turns out the equations already existed in a published scientific paper. So he got off on that but his reputation was still damaged. It's like oh your reputation was damaged. So anyway, what does this all mean? What this means is there's literally like a little secret cult. It's just not Illuminati, but it's there's still like a good old boys club of people that know about this, that know about nuclear weapons research. It's legally classified. It's legally suppressed, legally classified because it falls under the highest secrecy of thermonuclear weapons. and this club basically like if you're in the club, you don't want to get kicked out of the club. You don't want to get kicked out of the club. So, you don't say anything. And if you do say anything, you're very careful about how far you push it cuz you don't want the club to kick you out. Because when you're in the club, you are just a level above all the other peasants, all the other sheep, all the other cattle, which is what we are. Myself included. I'm not special. We're all just sheep. And the people that are in the know, like realize that, guys, put this in perspective. The secret is so wellkept that they're not even concerned about it coming out. They're not even It's even what I'm doing doesn't even threaten them. Even me coming out being like, "Hey guys, um, hold on. Pull them up." I'm like, "Hey guys, so it turns out like uh you know this video right here, this is like literally Air Force Gorgon stair classified military surveillance that nobody's ever seen before." Hello. Hello. There's classified classified military wide area motion imagery surveillance nobody in the public knew even existed. Hanging out right here. We're just We're watching the missing airliner that everybody's wanted to know about for 11 years. There it is. This it's like it's surreal to even just be showing this and they don't care whatsoever because nobody believes it. Nobody believes it. Even when you're seeing it on secret military surveillance that leaked to the public, nobody believes it. Nobody cares. So [snorts] when people get mad because I call them sheep or whatever. I mean it's it's 100% deserved. Are you kidding me? Are you People are like are willfully plugged into the matrix. So yes, you're sheep. We're all sheep. And when the people are brought in to the next level where you get to talk to the other people. I mean, hell, I would I would join the club just to be able to talk to other people that aren't Just to be able to talk to other people that know about this. Can you imagine? It's like being a serial killer and you join a club of serial killers so that you can finally talk freely because nobody else understands you. Like that's what it feels like with respect to this technology is that the most people out there have no clue that we've developed this from nuclear weapons and and the real level of technology we have. And just look the chairman of Helen Fusion is Sam Alultman. Let me just repeat that. The chairman of Helen Fusion is Sam Alman. Okay guys, I'm just going to get myself angry if I keep going at it. So, let's talk about a little bit of politics, guys, and then we're going to dig into the quantum stuff tonight. Um, okay. Wait, where is it? Oh, yeah. Here we go. Okay, so the big politics news that's going on out there, guys, is obviously, uh, Kanye West. Kanye West. [gasps] Can't believe it, chat. Can't believe it. If there has ever been signs of the end times, I think we're seeing it right now. Like I'm trying not to be a full conspirator, but I'm starting to think that the end of the world might be upon us. I mean, you're watching planes get teleported away. You know, Trump is talking about restarting nuclear weapons. We're just casually blowing up submarines of drug dealers and stuff like that. And then you've got Kanye West. And Kanye West is now literally apologizing to the Jewish people. Literally apologizing to the Jewish people. and saying that he has bipolar disorder. This isn't me saying he's bipolar. He literally says he's got bipolar disorder. He's sorry for hurting Jewish people. And here he is talking to a rabbi basically asking for forgiveness. Let's just play a little bit of it. >> Blessed to be able to sit here with you today and just take accountability. I was dealing with uh some various uh issues uh dealing with um bipolar also. >> So it would take the ideas I had and have them take them to an extreme where I would forget about the protection of the people around me or and myself. >> Okay, that's enough. You get the point. Um, so that clip has basically made I I had to check if it was AI. For the people that are wondering if that's AI, I was scared to post it because I was like, am I getting sucked into some AI here? Is this How is it possible that Kanye West, the guy that was just wrote a song called uh Nbomb Hail Hitler was the name of his song where it basically just repeats the N-word and Hail Hitler over and over again. And I have to admit, it's got a catchy tune. It's got a catchy tune. If the lyrics was a little better, it could have been a number one hit. So, it's not AI, though. And this has been making the uh Nick Fuentes community lose their minds. Completely lose their minds. Their hero has turned on them. And none of them will talk about it. Nick Fuentes hasn't mentioned it. Hasn't mentioned it. I didn't watch his live stream, but I didn't see him mention it on social media. Candace Owens has now done two two live streams where she hasn't mentioned it. She's literally talking about listening to go listen to ye listen to power listen to these songs while she's going to go make up more fake conspiracies about Charlie Kirk and she hasn't mentioned the fact that that her idol has now turned on them. So, I'm just waiting for the moment when when uh Candice and Nick bend the knee, they kiss the ring, whatever you want put that what do they call it? What are the kids calling it? When they touch the wall. Is that what they call it? I don't even know what the terms are. I can't wait, guys. The heel turn is coming, guys, cuz this whole weird woke right thing has basically turned into WWE. It's turned into fake wrestling. It's turned into it's more about drama and the next storyline than it is about facts and logic and evidence and anything else. It's more about just what's the next story line going to be. And when you have story lines like this, you either live you either die a villain, die a hero, or see yourself become the villain. Live long enough to become the villain, right? And that's what's going to happen with those guys as well. Now, on that front, [clears throat] I've got another clip, [laughter and gasps] chat. I've got a new follower. I've got a new follower, and she is a CNN. She's a CNN uh CNN analyst. Wait, hold on. New favorite journalist, chat. Ellie Reev. Ellie Reev, new favorite journalist. Here you go. If the mind if the wine moms are mad at me, I can already feel the angry comments. By the way, I unblocked everybody on YouTube because there was like one dude I couldn't find in the list after searching for five times. So, the rest of you got lucky, chat. The rest of you got lucky. Here you go. New favorite journalist. She's also I don't really want to be mean to somebody that just started following me. She just started following me after I replied. Vice journalist and CNN correspondent, probably autistic. That's fine. Ellie Reev. Here we go. Ellie. Ellie Reev interviewed the one and only Candace Owens. >> When you say you believe that Charlie Kirk was betrayed by someone close to him. What do you mean? >> I think that in the coming weeks there's going to be a lot of financial reports that are coming out. And I first and foremost do not believe that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. I want to be very clear on that. Uh whether he was involved, I think the answer is yes. I think that's obvious. Um >> and your basis for saying he didn't act alone. >> Hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on. I have to stop right there cuz I've dug into the Charlie Kirk thing quite a lot now. You guys know that. Lost a lot of followers from doing it. No regrets. No regrets. But I want to point out here, she says, "I don't think Charlie Kirk did it, but he was involved." I mean, I don't think Tyler Robinson did it, but Tyler Robinson was involved. Um, what you're So, wait, you're saying there's a different plot where Tyler Robinson is not the guy that pulled the trigger, but he's somehow still involved in the assassination. Come on, Candace. Let's just be serious here. Let's be serious. And by the way, I want to make sure I'm on the record. I'm on the record like a month ago, maybe a month and a half ago, saying that by the end of this, Candace Owens is going to be the biggest cheerleader saying that she always knew it was Tyler Robinson and she never insinuated it wasn't Tyler Robinson. I told you that's where this is headed. Get ready, guys. This is how griing works is that you grift yourself back to the original logical position and pretend like you never said any of the crazy that you were saying before. They never will admit it, of course. Anyway, here we go. >> Is what? I don't know. Maybe the weird Fed messages that were concocted out of thin air that had no time stamp and were written like they were were speaking in 1822. So, the evidence, the evidence that there's a cover up, according to Candace Owens, this is her evidence, is that the text messages that have to be real, otherwise the defense would just get the whole case thrown out, she thinks they're fake. That's her evidence is that she thinks that the text messages where the where Tyler Robinson admits to doing it, where he talks about his his father basically catching on to the fact that it was his gun and what have you. She thinks that those messages are fake and she those messages must be fake for there to be a conspiracy because the messages pretty much wrap the whole case up in a bow and say here you go free conviction. Free conviction >> among other things um their lack of an ability to answer any basic questions about what took place. >> Do you have any proof that the messages were made up? Because that would be easily proven. >> Yeah, but they didn't put timestamps on them and Discord came out and said they didn't exist. This was supposedly text messages, not Discord messages. It's my understanding from the indictment. I I actually did not read that they were text messages. >> Chat, this is called a crash and burn chat. This is called a crash and burn. What just happened to Candace Owens was what I was afraid of happening to me when I went on Candace Owens. When I went on Candace Owens, there was no pre-arrangement about how the conversation was going to go. When you get an invite from somebody that huge, you just take it. You just say, "Okay, I'm going to come on your show." Right? So, I was worried when I first met Candace Owens that she was going to like try to take me down or whatever. Cuz that's how you take somebody down. When you go, "Hey, it turns out I'm not even talking about the Discord messages. I'm talking about the literal text messages that are in the indictment that are in the charging document that's like four pages long. Like, have you read the charging document? Cuz I'm I'm getting a strong vibe right now that Candace Owens never even read the charging document, which is pretty important because all of the stuff in the charging documents legally binding. So, if any of that evidence is made up, it's an automatic throw the case out type of situation. It's kind of a big no no to fake evidence. So, I called this out a long time ago. Two months ago now, I called this out and I got reamed over it by people. People were saying how stupid I am for believing that the text messages are real, for believing that Tyler Robinson really did it. It's really the the tunnel Jews and the directed energy weapons and the exploding microphones and the second shooter from the left side. There's no way a bullet could have stopped it. Which, by the way, Candace admitted Candace admitted that they she somebody leaked her the coroner report. And the bullet did get stopped by Charlie Kirk's neck and probably ricocheted into his body. Probably disgusting. Probably gross. And I'm horrified that Erica Kirk even had to know about that. Anyway, let's finish this. The indictment calls them text messages. >> What would it be like? Like like like the feds are like on a computer like typing it out back and forth. >> That's exactly what it is. The feds made up the text messages. >> But you don't have anyone from like the FBI telling you that or >> Okay. >> No. >> Has anyone leaked to you? >> And Tyler Robinson. >> But has anyone said to you even off the record like, "Yeah, we faked these." >> I have very strong sources everywhere on both sides. Well, I look forward to seeing the evidence of that. >> Sure. Because when we see keep talking about evidence, it's like who's going to present that evidence? Like the mainstream media? Like who who are you expecting to come out? >> Story. >> No. Uh it wouldn't be >> it would be >> it wouldn't be >> if the FBI like if I had a source telling me like if I had proof that the FBI faked those messages, that would be an enormous story. >> Yeah. I kind of feel like we live in a post Epstein world and we know how stories get shut down and >> yikes chat. Oh, that is brutal. I mean, that is straight up brutal. Candace Owens got annihilated by a CNN journalist. There's no living that one down, guys. There's no living that down. That is Oh, that was hard for me to watch. That was Yeah, that was straight up fatality. Perfect. Perfect fight. What did they say? Perfection. Um, especially because she she used my she used my argument. Did you guys notice that? I actually played the clip. I have the clip on my Twitter where I call this argument out over a month ago and I say that if the text messages were fake, then the whole case it would be easy to prove it. It would be super trivial to prove the text messages were fake. The defense would just produce both the phones. They would subpoena the the ISP, the the telecom. They would produce the the the logs. There would be some kind of error because they would have to fake all of that. There's no way they can be faked, guys. And so I called this out and she says, "Okay, well, who faked them? Do you believe that they're literal feds were typing up the messages?" And she's going, "Yes. Yes." She's going, "Yes, I believe they typed that who who is the person." Who is the person that typed him up? Do you have anybody that leaked any information corroborating this? No, of course she doesn't. She said, "I have sources. I have sources." Well, what do those sources say? Which which source told you that FBI people were typing up text messages? None. Doesn't exist. Catches are straight up in the lie. That's how you do it. And this is the reason why Ian Carol and even Candace Owens would never debate somebody like me because I, just like that journalist, would annihilate them. I wouldn't do it as politely as she did, but I would completely and totally annihilate them using the same kind of simple basic arguments and basic questions because their whole conspiracy stuff falls apart because it's all based on innuendo. None of it's based on any hard evidence. And she immediately, you notice how she throws in there the Epstein thing, too. This is all psychological manipulation. After she's being destroyed on the argument, she goes, "Well, the same people that are hiding Epstein, you you believe them? You believe them? How dumb are you to believe them?" Right? Uh, we were the ones asking you what your evidence was and you didn't have any. Kind of a problem. Okay, enough of that. Um, okay. I was going to rip on Nick some more, but I'm not going to. I I do think that the whole Kanye thing though, I mean, that's got to be absolutely devastating to these people because they based their whole personalities on this idea that Kanye West was the biggest anti-semite out there ever. and they were doing, you know, buddy hanging out with him, doing live streams with him. They were basically riding his coattails for more popularity. And now he just turned on them. Completely turned on them on a dime. Didn't say anything and left them with the bag. Actually wild. I I see personally there's an inflection happening. There's a a pivot that's happening with this whole weird skitso anti-Israel stuff. You're allowed to be anti-Israel. Nobody's saying that you can't be. The problem that's happening is it's become it's become cool to be anti-Israel now, right? It's become cool to be anti-Israel. It's become what all the cool kids are doing in the club. And when you get to that point, that's how we get to the woke That's how the woke happens, chat. And I saw it with the leftwing and I'm seeing it now with the right-wing where it's not so much even about what the arguments are anymore. It's about whether or not you're cool and in the club or whether or not you're not in the club. And when this happens, usually what happens is that you see this inversion occur where all of a sudden now people will be like, "Oh no, this is a scop. The people that are falling down this cult are the dumb ones, right?" And that's what I think has happened. I think you're going to have seen Nick Fuentes peak at this point. I mean, I could see him still getting more popular, but he's not going to rise like he has uh previously because too many people are just going to, you know, say, "No, I'm not interested in in collabing with you." Um, because of just all the horrible stuff he said. And what they're going to realize, too, is that the internet's not real life. The internet's not real life. Is that you can be popular on the internet and nobody in the real world gives one about you. I think I first noticed this when I if you watch their influencers will run for Congress, they'll run for Senate and they have millions of followers and you would think well if they're so popular they should easily win some local race, right? They should easily win some race and they don't. And they don't. And the reason why is because broad appeal, national appeal, doesn't matter when it comes down to the brass taxes, the people that are working the nineto-5s, they're not sitting there on the internet caring about the Israel Palestine conflict. They got bigger problems in their lives, man. They got bigger problems and those are the last things that they're voting on. Those those issues are just non non-issues when it comes to voting for 99.9% of people out there. Okay, some let's get to some other news of slightly less political front. First, little little true crime interaction here. And hey, John Glock and everybody in the pill chat. Nice to see you guys out there. Nice to see you. Wait, this is gone. Oh no. Okay, I guess I have to delete my post now, chat. Okay, well, there was supposedly an active shooter. Maybe it was fake. Maybe it was fake. There was supposedly an active shooter at the Loheed Martin Skunk Works. Um, and I thought that was interesting because Loheed Martin Skunkworks can't be that huge of a place and they might be working on some really interesting technology down there. So, anytime where there might be an active shooter, I thought, wow, that kind of want to know more about that. Was that just a workplace dispute or did somebody have a little too much to think one day and decide to go off the reservation? Um, but it looks like that got deleted. So, that might have been fake. Um, if it if it was, I apologize. I didn't mean to mislead people. I just posted though in the last uh last hour. Oh crap, I forgot about one important thing on the nukes front. Okay, so let's go back to this real quick. It's going to be a little disjointed, but on the nukes, I wanted to point out Oh, actually, no, this will be good. I'm going to play this clip of Jason Georgiani here. Jason Georgiani, since we were talking about the Israel situation, um I'm not sure I fully agree with this because I I'm trying to avoid getting into this culture war stuff about, you know, Israel, Jews are bad or Muslims are bad and trying to stay away from being, you know, too extreme on one way or the other. But I think I do agree with this general view that Jason Georgiani post that says you have to think think long term. Think long term. Think future of humanity. Islam is going to overwhelm in just terms of just numbers in the next 50 years. They're just breeding a lot faster. Islam's spreading a lot faster. And we're not saying that we're going to stop it. We're not saying we're going to stop certain religions or anything like that. But they might be saying that behind the scenes because imagine you have an AI algorithm. Imagine you have an AI that's telling you the future. What is it going to be telling you? The things that it's going to be telling you is it's going to be telling you what are the trends. It's going to be looking at trends and it's going to be extrapolating those trends to tell you what will most likely occur. And I do fear a world in which the majority is Islam because I think that what they will do like anybody would do like anybody who gets in power does is power corrupts. And the thing about Islam that scares me is that they don't have tolerance for other religions. It's like the one thing they're famous for is not having tolerance of any other religions and also having no tolerance of disrespecting their savior Muhammad. Anybody who disrespects the savior Muhammad, you will hear many many believers say they should be put to death. Put to death. That's the punishment. If you are an infidel, you are put to death. And there's no way this planet will survive with the type of fourth generation thermonuclear weapons that we have and beyond and beyond. We have no way of of beating that. So for the people there is this narrative and Jason Georgiani presents it here quite succinctly that is that Israel is the only thing holding back the wave of Islam. that if we all just, you know, fall over to Islam, then, you know, we will enter a much more violent and chaotic society that doesn't that doesn't align with Western values is the way to put it. So, let's listen to Jason Georgiani say in his own words so I don't have to speak for him here. Where is it? Here. Uh, here it is. And shout out to uh Lev Leva, I don't know how to say it, guys. It's hard when people have like hard to say names here. Um, anyway, here here he is. This This is the host here, Lev Pyakov. Oh man, I don't know. Anyway, he seems like a smart guy. I hope. Although I'm not particularly optimistic with people out there like Fuentes and uh uh Luke Luke Cage or whatever their names are. I'm not particularly optimistic, but there does seem to be maybe some potential in cleaning up whatever occurred, whatever bad blood there was in the past, and recognizing that the mission of Israel, like a secular Israel, is not that different at all from the civilizing mission of the Western civilization. >> Yeah. I mean, I I certainly hope so. I mean, that's what I'm working toward. If the West knew what was good for it, Westerners knew what was good for them, they would realize that Israel is the canary in the coal mine, and Israel is uh the the the frankly it's the first and last line of defense against the Islamic world. Because if Israel falls, I don't see the political will in Europe or even frankly, I'm sorry to say, in this country to really stop the rise of a global Islamic caliphate. I don't see it. what stands between us and a global Islamic by the way you know uh the demog the demography shows that we will have a Muslim majority on earth by the year 2075. Okay. So the only thing standing between us and a global Islamic caliphate are 300 Israeli nuclear warheads. >> Interesting. [clears throat] That's the kind of geopolitical uh analysis that at least makes me think at least makes me think in my head. And what he says is about you know the western values. He says that's the real issue is it doesn't align with western values. You require women to wear burkas age of consent way lower. We would consider a lot of the age of consent to be pedophilia for uh forced marriages. forced marriages, child marriages, infidels, executions, blasphemy, all of these things being met with punishment of death. It just doesn't align. Simple as that. Doesn't align with our values and doesn't align with thermonuclear weapons either. Doesn't align with thermonuclear weapons. We don't last. We won't last. If they have that technology, and we do, too, it's just going to be the end of the world. And uh sorry, what did he also say there? I forget the the main point. Um let me go back to this area in the coal mine and Israel is uh the the the frankly it's the first and last line of defense against the Islamic world because if Israel falls, >> I don't see the political will. >> Oh yeah, the political will. We don't have the political will. We definitely don't have in the United States because if you look at it and you look at what's happened in Gaza, obviously it's horrible. War is hell. There's no getting around that. My view is, I mean, what do you want? You want to try to change war? Good luck, man. War has never changed and war never changes. But if you look at what's been happening there, I guess the the contrarian position would be that it's a necessary evil because if you allow that to grow and fester, you're going to see more October 7th attacks. And the argument Jason Georgiani is making is that the reason why you're not seeing more Islamic attacks in America is because they're focused on Israel and Israel is basically holding them back. But if they were to we were to allow them to overwhelm Israel, the next enemy they're going to be coming for is us. We're the next enemy. And I do believe this. I do believe this. I do believe that if Israel was not the topic, then the same people that are on the woke right that hate Israel, they would all be leftists. They would all be leftists. They would all be Democrats and they would be coming right after us, the neocons, the wararm mongers, whatever. We're next on the list, right? There's always got to be a new enemy. And then Christianity is definitely next on the list as well. Right after they take out the Jews, Christianity is going to be next. And you may be saying, "No way Christianity can be next." Go take a look at Nigeria. Go take a look at the mass executions of Christian tribal camps that are happening in Africa. And you tell me, "Nah, that could never happen over here." The thing I learned from 911, The thing I learned from 911 is that atrocities, terrorist attacks, they can happen here and we just are oblivious to it. And when it happens, we don't even think it's real because we feel like we're invincible, but we're not invincible. So this is where my moral compass currently stands is that my moral compass tells me it may be a horrible necessity that Israel pushes back on Islam in that region of the world to delay that from coming for us next. And I will throw a bone to the um you know the anti-Israel crowd that says they say all the wars in the Middle East happened because of Israel. I think they're right for the wrong reasons. They're right for the wrong reasons. Why did we take out Iraq? Why did we take out Syria? Why did we take out Afghanistan? And then why did we come back again and take out ISIS? We actually had to take out Syria and Iraq twice because we took it out one time and then we let the power vacuum get sucked in by ISIS caliphate and so then we had to go take them out again. Why did we do all that? We did what's the common denominator on all these random basically like third world countries in the desert. Why? Islam. Islam is the thing that connects them all. All of them. Right. So, I do think we are absolutely helping Israel because we're taking out their mortal enemies all around them. We're definitely we're definitely helping them. But were they directing us to do it? That's a little bit more that's where I'm much more skeptical. But I would be I would be more inclined to believe that an AI told us that if we don't take those countries out that the world will be covered with Islam Islam and uh jihad. That that I would be willing to believe. I mean it's crazy but will believe it. Okay, let's talk a little bit more about science guys and then we're going to end a little early today. Two more things. Oh, so on that same front talking about going back to thermonuclear weapons, one of the things that John Knuckles spoke about in his I don't know if it was autobiography or what was it talking about his history is he talks about how he was trying to increase the gain increase the gain which obviously was something related to efficiency but I didn't really realize exactly what that meant until I was doing a deep dive earlier. here and what he means in increasing the gain is increasing the coefficient of performance. So, and it's interesting that he would use the term gain here because what we're talking about here is amplifying energy. So, again going back to the whole issue of thermonuclear weapons. The reason why conventionally we don't think thermonuclear weapons can manipulate spaceime is if I have a big bowling ball in front of me that bowling ball is not manipulating spaceime in a significant sense. So if I turn it into energy you would also say it's not going to manipulate spacetime because I just turned it into energy. But what if I turn it into energy and then also collapse it? What if I turn it into energy and then collapse it down to a small point? Now I've increased the energy density using the same amount of initial energy and that collapsing that implosion is exactly what inertial confinement fusion is. That's what inertial confinement fusion is doing. So John Knuckles was trying to increase the gain. He was trying to make the nuclear weapons more powerful. He was trying to incre He was trying to minimize the amount of input energy and maximize the amount of output energy. the exact same thing that fusion companies like Helen Fusion are trying to do right now. The exact same thing just in a different context, making an explosion versus harness that energy for practical use. So when you're trying to increase the gain, we can get our Q factor over one. And what the National Ignition Facility, which was literally started by John Knuckles, what they're trying to do is they're trying to achieve a Q factor of 10. Q factor of 10 meaning 10 times the amount of output over input. And this is important because we're also trying at the same time trying to increase the amount of fusion reactions that occur or I think they call it the cross-section. Trying to increase the cross-section of the fusion reactions. And if all three of these things, all three of these things amplify together, you that's how you're getting your huge huge increase, right? You can imagine this curve of energy that's just going up and up and up as you compress down your energy, as you can amplify your energy. And so nuclear scientists, they understand conservation laws better than anybody. The whole way that free energy is possible is actually because conservation laws exist. It's kind of backwards to think about, but it's true. And so, how did they figure out how did they figure out over unity? they were able to create an asymmetric system just like we thought when we listened to Paul Tibido talk about um Paul Tibido talk about how could the Brownian motion thermal fluctuations extract energy just like a waterfall nobody asks whether or not you can you can harness energy from a waterfall we all know that that's possible and so they've optimized these thermonuclear weapons for maximum yield. Ye clearly yields well beyond what the public knows is possible. Um crap, I had another example but I forgot it. Okay. Well, I think that's good on that one. Um so the next thing I wanted to discuss though is uh another aspect of it which is the microchips. So we have been seeing all of this uh disclosure happening related to technology has been honestly hard to keep up. We had Fusion just got a big invest big investment. They're now building these nuclear modular reactors. Nvidia is basically taking over the United States chip production. And I think it was just today, I don't know if I bookmarked it. I'm going to pull it up here. Elon Musk talked about producing his own fab. Elon Musk producing his own microchips. Here we go. Yeah, here it is. I've got it. Okay. >> Scenario for chip. Even when we extrapolate the best case scenario for chip production from our suppliers, uh it's still not enough. So I think we may have to do a Tesla terraab. So it's like giga but way bigger. Um I I can't see any other way to get to the volume of chips that that we're looking for. Um so I think we're probably going to have to build a gigantic chip app. Whoops. So, the re I mean that was the most that was the least least exciting announcement I've ever heard Elon Musk ever make there. I think most of the people in the audience don't even know why it's significant. But realize that a lot of the chip manufacturing is happening in Taiwan. And there was this is part of the reason why people think there's conflict between us backing Taiwan and China. I mean, Nvidia just pulled out of China. Nvidia went from 95% market share in China to zero. To zero. Why do you think they had zero market share? Because the United States government doesn't let them deal with China. We're literally in a trade war over microchips. So, Elon Musk getting involved in the microchip game. Bravo. I'm just surprised he didn't get involved earlier. I'm surprised he didn't get involved earlier. I want to have a microchip. I want to have a Fab Lab company because that's where the future is, obviously. And then the question is, well, what kind of fabs are you going to do? It's a very complicated process, by the way. Very complicated. I think X-ray or UV fabrication is one of the leading methods right now. But obviously, the future of Fab Lab production is molecular scale manufacturing, atomic scale manufacturing, where you can actually shoot one atom at a time, right? Like can you imagine a machine shooting one atom at a time building something like a 3D like a 3D printing it but on the tiniest scales possible that will be coming eventually. That's what Charles Chase is literally working on. Seeing your fellow former Loheed Martin skunk works. That's the stuff that he's working on. So Elon Musk getting involved in that I think is just pretty interesting. Now the big thing for tonight guys the main the main topic and thank you Levi. I appreciate you. We'll come back to that in a second. Is the new quantum labs. So, not only has the United States been investing in fusion research, not only have we been pushing now for to be the leaders of AI, we want to win fusion race, but they also just opened five new labs or I couldn't really tell the full context. We'll read through it here. five labs that are now going to be heavily funded for specifically quantum research, which is amazing because all of the technologies we've been talking about are quote unquote quantum quantum technologies. I would even say that the thermal sampling unit that the uh Extropic guys are working on, it's a quantum chip as well. They're just calling they're just calling it something else for branding purposes in my opinion. Don't at me. Don't at me. Here we go. Energy Department announces 625 million to advance the next phase of National Quantum Information Science Research Centers. So, new funding here. The renewal of the DOE's National Quantum Information Science Research Centers advances President Trump's directive to restore American leadership in quantum science and technology. The DOE is aligning its quantum research enterprise with national priorities focusing resources on advancing critical R&D across the American QIS. That oh that's that's what we're calling these. Okay. So these things are called QIS. Strengthening the quantum innovation ecosystem, accelerating discoveries that power next generation technologies and securing American leadership in quantum computing hardware and applications. Now guys, once again, the apartments in the skyrise in Always Right About Everything City are filling up very quickly. This is not something you want to be on the wrong side of. We are spending over half a billion dollars pumping that into quantum technologies for good reason because we know these technologies work. The Department of Energy already knows they work. The military already knows they work. We wouldn't be pumping half a billion dollars into something like this. If it was just a wild goose chase, this isn't just like one lab. This is like five labs. This to me is so significant because we're lit. This is like how how do governments battle over information and technology? This is how we say we're gonna invest a bunch of money in this technology that's kind of like cutting edge that people aren't really that that the public isn't really investing in because they don't know it's real. There's afraid that there's risk associated with it. So, let's read a little bit more. President Trump positioned America to lead the world in quantum science and technology. And today, a new frontier of scientific discovery lies before us. Breakthroughs in QIS have the potential to revolutionize the way we sense, communicate, compute, sparking entirely new technologies and industries. I mean, there you go. Sense, communicate, compute, and new technologies. quantum sensors, quantum computing, quantum communications, and teleportation, too. And we just throw a little teleportation in there as well, guys. I mean, the things that they even call out here are pretty specific. The renewal of the DOE's National Quantum Information Science Research Centers will empower America to to secure our advantage in pioneering the next generation of scientific and engineering advancements needed for this technology. Okay, we're going to get to what these are here in just a second. But right before we get to that, I do have to point out the massive disconnect between people not being paid SNAP benefits to eat to feed themselves. Meanwhile, we're spending half a billion dollars on super advanced quantum research. Just goes to show like there is we are slaves and there is no equality in this world. So if you want to free yourself from the chains that bind you then you better start teaching yourself science and physics. You better start teaching yourself. Okay. So the point of this, the point of these research centers is to support fundamental science with disruptive potential across quantum computing, simulation, networking, and sensing. Develop unique tools, equipment, instrumentation that unlock transformative quantum technologies. Advance quantum technology through application to the DOE's most pressing scientific and national security challenge areas. Hint hint. National security. establishes community resources, workforce opportunities, and industry partnerships. Okay, that's just some stuff. So, here's the new centers. Okay, co-design center for quantum advantage. They've got special acronyms that government loves their damn acronyms. Chat C2QA. This is at Brook Haven. So, it looks like each lab has been connected to an existing DOE lab. So, of course, it's happening all at DOE Laboratories. I should have should have known. Fell for it again. Award chat. Fell for it again. Thought that this money might be going to, you know, third party businesses. Nope. Nope. Fell for it again. Going straight back to the DOE labs. There it is. Okay. Brook Haven will advance quantum computing and sensing by improving materials using superconducting and plasmagrown diamondbased quantum devices. Okay, chat. What? Wait, where where what are we doing here? Where is it? Uh where are my links? [music] Chat, they said the magic word, chat. They said it right there. Improving using materials used in superconducting plasma grown diamondbased quantum devices. Yeah. Okay. I'm interested in that. I'm interested in that. So, we know all about superconducting plasma grown devices. I don't know about all of that, but it does say developing modular approaches for superconducting and neutral atom systems. So yes, this one's really interesting. Put Brook Haven on the list, guys. Put Brook Haven on the list of national labs that we have to be following very closely. Next one. Superconducting quantum materials and systems center. I'm already excited. SQMS sounds like some B and D uh some Yeah. Uh dominatrix stuff. Fermy National Accelerator Laboratory. That's probably another national lab, right? will scale quantum devices based on superconducting microwave cavities. What? Developing new methods of refrigeration and technologies for connecting many quantum processors to lay the groundwork for quantum data centers. H how is this real? How is this real? Most people are going to read this and think that this is just science fiction Star Trek that they're saying right here. But we know exactly what this is. Superconducting microwave cavities. I mean, if Charles Chase is not somehow connected to this, I'll be surprised. Charles Chase is either talking to the people that are doing this or he had a direct hand in this himself because it seems like they're talking about his coherent matter wave beam patent, superconducting microwave cavities, new methods of refrigeration. This was the other thing that I was going to talk about earlier, but the I went back and you guys need to watch. Somebody linked the live stream where I did the review of Yosi Yo yo yichiro Yichiro Taka whatever his name was. No disrespect to him. smart scientist where he explains how we can change the laws of thermodynamics so that cold flows to hot aka a new air conditioning system which just basically acts as a heat pump which would be a new method of refrigeration. a new method of refrigeration where if we use relativistic motion, we can force cold to flow to hot when normally hot would only flow to cold. Check out that live stream. It was from a few months back, but it's also just up on Charles Chase's excuse me, Unlab. It's the one with the Japanese guy if you if you get confused. I'm probably going to take another look at it soon. So anyway, I think that one's interesting because it talks about new new refrigeration technologies. The next one, Q. Next, Argon Argon National Laboratory will advance algorithms and ship components to scale quantum operations on the same chip across different labs and cities, preserving entanglement and prototyping next generation quantum sensors. So, these two both seem to be connected also to um the quantum internet, the Ethernet. When we finally get the Ethernet online, guys, this is probably going to have major connections to it. Keep in mind, the normal internet was started from the government, from the military. So, the quantum internet, the Ethernet will also probably start from places like this where they're literally building quantum data centers and they're going to connect the quantum data centers together. Next thing you know, you've got an Ethernet. You've got a new internet. Chat, by the way, when we when we get the new Ethernet, quantum internet online, I think we can all agree we're going to burn the old internet to the ground, right? We're going to do like the office space thing. We'll take the old internet out back and old yeller it, right? Just get rid of it. Make sure it can never come back. Make sure there's no Reddit. No Reddit is not allowed on the Ethernet. I get one rule. I'm the person who started the name Ethernet. I just get one thing. I'm not asking a lot. Reddit is not allowed on the quantum internet. It's not allowed to exist. It can it can only live on the old internet that we're going to get rid of. We all agree. You heard it here. You heard it here first. The date right now, Friday, November 7th, 2025. It has been ordained. Those are my last dying wishes. If anything were to happen to me, Reddit did it. I'm looking at you, Reddit. If anything happens to me. Okay, there we go. The next one, that was Q. Next. That one doesn't get an acronym. That one just gets a weird abbreviation. The next one is Quantum System Accelerator, the QSA. This one's at national at Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. So, they're all national labs. will enable largecale quantum computers through improved error correction using neutral atom ion and superconducting circuits to tackle DOE grand challenges in fundamental physics chemistry and emergent quantum phenomenon. So a lot of these are pretty similar to one another. And then the last one quantum science center QSC is at Oakidge. Isn't Oakidge the other nuclear facility? I think there's there's two, right? And I think Oakidge is the the second one. I could be wrong, but I think it's Oakidge. Um, so Oakidge National Laboratory will pioneer quantum accelerated Yeah, Lawrence Livermore and Oakidge, I think, are the two. Could be wrong. Anyway, sorry. Will pioneer quantum accelerated high performance computing, developing open-source software for quantum classical workflows that accelerate spec scientific advancements across multiple disciplines. uh opensource soft quantum software. That one I know the least amount, but my guess is people that are in AI are probably more familiar with this last one down here. So to finish this up, it says the awards were selected by competitive peer review under DOE national laboratory program announcement for the National Quantum Information Science Research Centers. Total funding is 625 million for awards lasting up to five years with 125 million designated for 2025. Wow. So, my last thoughts on this were, holy crap, how do I get in on this? Is there did you guys see that movie War Dogs where I'm pretty sure the whole premise is they like figure out how to finagle the government the military's like bidding system and then they just basically buy the guns and resell them for a profit. Is there some way we can do that with this? Like I don't want to be a scammer but like it's technically legal, right? Like how do you win one of these awards? How do we make a Fab Labs start building some microchips? do some quantum right? Anyway, if anybody knows the answer to those questions, put them in the comments. Put them in the replies below, guys. I appreciate it. Let's get to some super chats today, guys. Going to start with a pill chat because I've seen you guys been popping off. Hey, with God's grace, hey, John Glock, how are you guys doing today? John Glock gifted a cookie and he said, uh, Mike Adams made your point in long form on Infowars today. People will either use AI to enhance their intelligence and business efficiency or they will literally die out. Exactly. He expects Trump to be forced to issue a CBDC UBI before the end of his term. It's not going to happen that quickly, but it will happen. Elon Musk is mentioning this as well. What he's talking about is that there will have to be a universal basic income because a lot of people just aren't going to work anymore. We already did that. We already did that during COVID. During COVID, we sat around, we paid people not to work. The downside of that was the hyperinflation that came along with it. Spoiler alert, the reason why we had grocery prices skyrocketing is because for like two or three years, we were paying I'm just going to throw a percentage out there. We were paying 30% of the people not to work. How does a functioning economy, how does an economy function when you pay 30 to 40% of the people to stay home and not do anything? I mean, this is a real question because this is really going to happen to us in the future. What do we do when there's no scarcity? How does a capitalistic society function when people don't have to work? And here's you want to know the scariest point? Here's the scariest point. This is for you, John. These are great questions, by the way, John Glock. How many people would choose to take UBI just so they don't have to do anything? What percentage of people do you think would willfully choose to enslave themselves and say, "I'm just going to take UBI and play video games all day for the rest of my life." I bet you it's a huge percentage. I bet it's at least 50%. At least 50% would basically plug themselves into the matrix for their whole life and be like, I'm good with this. This is fine. I'll take my UBI and let the AIS do everything. A large percentage, right? You guys are getting it. See, these are the reasons why I'm talking about politics because all of these technologies, the the future of these technologies, they are going to shape the political discussions to come and they're already here. It's not going to happen in the next three years, but it's happening. The moment fusion happens and we are producing over unity and those efficiencies just keep increasing and our AIs and our robots and our androids are doing more and more of our jobs, those discussions are going to be coming sooner rather than later. And it's going to be in our lifetimes. We collectively, most of us are young enough that this stuff's happening. It's going to be happening in the next 10, 20 years. It's not going to be happening in the next three years. But by 2050 could be great question there John Glock good question on that one John Glock and thank you hey everybody else in the pill chat I don't know what I can't say say your name but um he also said Bob Greener fractal tooidal moment thank you for introducing him to my awareness and then raising Kane also gifted the cookie as well yeah Bob Greener DMs me quite a bit because a lot of the topics that I've been talking about are are pretty much like right the same stuff that he's been investigating. And he's right about cold fusion. No question he's right about cold fusion, guys. Like the I think that the thing about cold fusion was they figured out resonance was a huge factor in fusion and that is specifically classified under thermonuclear weapons. That's the reason why cold fusion had to be shut down. And it sucks because cold fusion is real, but it's also a bit of a misnomer. And we were set back like 30 years from them suppressing cold fusion when we should have had all this low energy nuclear reaction research happening for the last 30 years. But they made cold fusion into this taboo word and therefore we had very little funding and research for it. We could have figured out a neutronic fusion back in the year 2000, right? 25 years ago. So, as Fusion comes online, that's when I think you're going to see th this this political question of universal basic income and how many and really people selecting themselves to not work anymore. And you'll probably see the right-wing conservatives go after this and go, you know, what is conservatism if nobody really even has to take care of themsel? Like, nobody has to take care of themselves anymore. Nobody has to work anymore. Where does conservatism go? I can tell where liberalism goes to a pretty dark place. It'll be interesting to see. Um, super chats. Levi implosion compression casmir effect all ratios of fi 1.618. Randall Carlson connection. Here's what I will say. I've been emailing with uh Randall Mills actually of Brilliant Light Power because I'm I'm pretty I'm as convinced as you can get at this point that Randall Mills figured it out. But he has the wrong interpretation or maybe his interpretation is even correct actually. I don't know. Just his interpretation is different though I think than what classical physics and people like Hal Pudof and what have you are saying. But Randall Mills has discovered that there is a zero point energy and that the ground state, the ocean is not the bottom. And Randall Mills has figured out that the hydrogen atom can dip down below the ground state. And when you do this, you release energy, right? Because because of conservation, conservation must hold. So if you dip down below the ground state, that energy must be getting released somewhere and then the energy will flood back in. So I've been emailing with him and uh I don't know. I just I'm I'm basically just in the ear of anybody that will listen and I want to see what what their impressions are. My understanding is Randall Mills doesn't think that the military and the government could have figured this stuff out, which it's going to be a wakeup call for a lot of people. That's why they were able to keep it secret for so long is that a lot of people didn't believe that it could be kept hidden. If you have any last questions, by the way, before I do this last super chat, go ahead and put them in the comments here and then I will address the non-s super chat questions because I don't do I don't need to do only super chat questions. Uh Sam Fischer though says with these new fusion power plants and quantum coming online do you think that systems will need to be hardened so that we don't get hit with another stuckset type event? Yeah, absolutely. So does information I think assume that means information security basically. I can tell from the context um especially fusion power but I think they're only going to allow us to have fusion technologies that are not a national security threat. I mean the fusion power plants will have armed guards at them for sure but the bigger threat is something like stuckset which is able to attack air gap systems and with quantum technologies that all becomes possible. You don't even even having your own internal internet that's not connected to the web, you're still vulnerable. You can still be invaded remotely using quantum technologies. And I'm sure the CIA and the intelligence community already have stuff like that. So absolutely with these new data centers, with these new fusion technologies, I think the question becomes how much does the government have to be involved from a national security standpoint? In fact, this is the probably the last topic that I'm going mention here and I'll take a look if there's any other questions in the chat is that um and I'll I'll mention this atlas thing here in a second as well. Uh it was uh Sam Olman was dodging questions earlier this week because people have been saying that the government is picking favorites and they are. There's no question the government is picking favorites. This has been a big theme of my of all of my research is that the government is picking favorites but they're doing it in an indirect way. They're doing it in an indirect way and information is leaking out to certain people that know technologies are real and then they're following down a path that would be otherwise much riskier but they know that the technology works. But this presents a big point is like this was my whole point about Nvidia when I showed the graphic of Nvidia and basically Open AAI, Grock, XAI, Microsoft, the United States has sucked Nvidia away from China and we are building a closed ecosystem. It reminds me of this comic that I was reading where America America puts up a firewall and goes dark for like 15 years. Nobody's allowed in America. No cameras are allowed in America. And America becomes this technological singularity and goes in this weird crazy direction. That's what what we're doing right now reminds me of. We're building this. So to some degree, I agree with it. You kind of have to pick favorites when you're playing national security because you need your data centers to be protected. You need your AIS to be protected. You need your fusion power plants to be protected from foreign adversaries. The question is, how much favoritism do you do and how do you keep it as fair as possible? I don't have the answer to those questions, guys. I wish I did. Then John Glock says, "Dr. Judy Wood documentary on 911 showed some evidence of the Hutchinson effect." Now, here's the problem with those theories. not afraid of 9/11 theories or any other theories, but just because you see something that's consistent with like energy weapons or burns or what have you doesn't mean that that was the cause. Multiple things can lead to a same end result. So, I maybe that was the reason, maybe it wasn't. I don't really care about 911 conspiracy theories. Atlas 3II, a lot of people keep asking me about Atlas 3II. It's still just a rock, guys. It was always a rock. Wasn't there supposed to be some big thing on like October 29th where like we were gonna prove that's really technological? No. Atlas 3II is just a rock, guys. The bad news is Atlas 3i was always just a rock. The good news is we have technologies that are better than rock technology. Turns out space rock technology is actually pretty obsolete. Everybody turns out the aliens don't fly around on space rocks. If the aliens were flying around on space rocks, that would be very disappointing. That would be very disappointing because I expected so much more from the aliens. I really did, truthfully. But the good news is the aliens are not flying around in space rocks. Um, what now that you've got me thinking about that, what were the other topics that people always ask me about? What happened to the tail? Guys, you're doing the conspirator thing. What do you mean? What happened to the tail, chat? Show the evidence first. Okay, because people tried to claim there was no tail and then there was a tail, right? I think that what's happening is you guys are playing a game of telephone and people are throwing claims out there and people are taking them at face value without any actual evidence for them or like they'll say, "Oh, the speed of the rock changed. It changed naturally with what we would expect from gravitational acceleration." It's not doing anything abnormal. Right? This is the problem that I see with a lot of people out there. Let me talk real quick about the bogus sphere as well. Everybody asks about the bogus sphere. I'm not an expert on the bugosphere. My gut impression is that the boggosphere is not a secret plasma ball and it is not a gravitational technology. When I Yes. Before people at me, yes, I've seen the X-rays or whatever, and I when I look at the X-rays, I don't see any any reason why that makes it anti-gravitational. I don't believe the weird steam thing that was they were trying to do about it either. I simply don't believe that. I think that a lot of the Boa Sphere stuff is sensationalism. That's my personal opinion. And the biggest red flag for me with the Boa Sphere is all the hieroglyphics all over it. chat, the defense contractors and what have you, they don't care about putting weird hieroglyphics [laughter] on their technologies. I guarantee you there's not weird hieroglyphics written all over the MH370 orbs. Okay? So, whenever you see like weird hieroglyphics and other sensationalized thing, like red flags should be up probably. Plus, at the end of the day, like why would you tie your wagon to something like that? Like even if it's real, the probability of it being a weird hoax is pretty high and it's not proving anything one way or another. Unless you can get the boouga sphere to start flying around in the sky. Like if somebody shot the boggas sphere with a microwave and it like turned into plasma and started floating, I'd be convinced. I would be convinced 100%. Right? That would be like, okay, you made it do something, but it's just a ball. It's just a metal ball. Be like, oh, but it can fly, but you but you can't make it fly, right? So, that's my opinion on the bug sphere. Could be wrong. That's just what it is. Take it what it is, guys. And then John Glac has one quick followup as well. Gives another cookie. Says, I brought it up because it would be evidence of tech before MH370. Yeah, I think that's fair with respect to the directed energy claims around 911. People were pushing on me hard about that because a lot of people have the same opinion. But the truth is, yes, of course, we had this technology, at least the basis for this technology before 911. I doubt that we had the plasma orb technology on 911 because we would have used it on the planes. We would have used it on the planes that were crashing into buildings, crashing into the Pentagon. We would have definitely used it on the ones that were crashing in the Pentagon at a minimum. Don't at me at conspiracy theorists. Um, okay. Any other last questions? Have I read the recent ThreeI Atlas publication? No, I haven't. To be honest with you guys, I'm I'm just pretty much out on the Threei Atlas. At this point, you've got to present extremely extraordinary evidence for me to change my opinion on ThreeI Atlas. Now, what I will say is this. Every good claim should be able to be falsified. Should be able to be falsified, including my own. So, let's teach you. This is your moment of zen for tonight before we log off. Guys, here is your moment of zen, which is every claim must be a falsifiable one. What is the falsifiable claim for MH370? The orbs, the videos are real. How would you falsify that? How would you prove the MH370 videos are fake? How would you prove Ashton Forbes wrong? I always tell my detractors how to prove me wrong. Find the hoaxer. If you're saying the videos are fake, then somebody faked them. That means a human being faked the videos. Who is the hoaxer? I know there isn't a hoaxer because I know the videos are real. This is why this is the number one argument. Nobody will ever dare debate me because this argument cannot be defeated. There is objectively no hoaxer for the MH370 videos. So when you bring this up to debunkers, they lose their minds and they claim I don't need to tell who who the hoaxer is of the videos. Yes, you do. Cuz there isn't one because the videos are real. That's the number one way to falsify the videos. In fact, somebody was pretending to be the hoaxer for over a year. And I was calling them out repeatedly while the bunkers were claiming that they were the person who made the videos, while they were doing AMAs with them, while they were hosting them on live streams, showing their face. And it turned out that person was a liar. So, I've been right about everything so far. And debunkers have been wrong about everything so far. Number two way is to find the plane. I give you more than one way to prove me wrong. There's more than one way to prove me wrong. Find the hoaxer. Find the plane. Where is the plane? You keep saying it crashed in the South Indian Ocean. Well, spoiler alert. They searched the entire South Indian Ocean above water, below water, all along the ark, all along the flight path of the plane and they found nothing. They didn't even find anything underwater. They used submarines that were mapping the whole ocean floor and they didn't find anything because if I'm right, that plane never went to the South Indian Ocean. If I'm right, that plane never went to the South Indian Ocean. So if we find the plane in the South Indian Ocean, that proves me wrong. Proves me wrong. So everybody needs to have a falsifiable position. What is the falsifiable position for Atlas 3II not being an alien mothership? I don't know. What is the falsifiable position for Charlie Kirk not being a grand Israel conspiracy? There isn't one. there isn't one. Those are the problems when you have low IQ conspiracy theories. Or when you say, "What is the falsifiable position of the MH370 videos being fake?" Like you'll have you'll have debunkers in the chat right now, for example. What is their falsifiable position where they would admit that the videos are real? There isn't one. Even they would have said, "Well, you have to find the person that leaked the videos." I did. I did that. I did that. I found the guy that leaked the videos. He won't talk to me. His lawyer won't talk to me because he's the guy that leaked the videos. So, anyway, that's your logic. That's your logic uh teaching your uh education for today, guys. Okay, guys. I hope you guys have a good night. I hope you guys use your critical thinking over this weekend. And let's come back next week with more science, more technology, more political discussion. Thank you, MH370X. I love you guys. Take it easy, guys. Peace. [music] Out in the [music] fields where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorne, they set the stage for a trip through time across the [music] space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. [music] No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Bowling trip [music] 7 through a wormhole. But we're talking wormholes. Stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's [music] our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip [music] 7 through a wormhole flow. Exotic matter, negative energy [music] is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeeze so tight, creating conditions [music] for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the [singing] lab they play, generating forces in a new [music] kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cm force negative zones we need to stay the course. Stalking wormhole star gates negative [music] energy travel through the cosmos it's our destiny. MH370 [music] where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole float thin shell [music] formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy [music] conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a try. [music] >> [music] [music] >> forces balancing the plate creating the throat. Open the gates from [music] Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and [music] what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're [music] talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Blowing triple 7 through a wormhole flow. [music] From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. [music] Little Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. [music] Our path is clear. Exploring the