Why China Reveals Fusion Breakthroughs America Already Has

Video Transcript

We should be paying a lot of attention to the headlines that are coming out of China around fusion because they don't have the same level of suppression of science that we do in America. For the people to wonder why is that the case? Because we're in the lead. So how it works is we have some technology that nobody else has. We're not going to give it to the public because if we give it to the public then our adversaries all get it as well. So that that the best technology only will come out, only be admitted when everybody else already has it. So the other people like China over here, they're trying to catch up. We're way up here and they're trying to catch up to us. So they don't care about revealing science and technology because we already have that stuff. So this is how the game is is playing out. This is why you should be listening to what China is saying. So here we go. China's artificial sun reactor shatters major fusion limit a step closer near limitless clean energy. Chinese fusion reactor achieves plasma density previously thought to be impossible. Wow. I'm going to share something with you and maybe I already told you this. Hopefully not. But I've been wondering about what level of plasma density is actually going to be required to get this fusion process thing to work. I mean what we're trying to do is we're trying to make this negative voltage potential well and we want our ions to just all collapse into it like a little sun. And we're going to do that through magnetic fields using these tooidal donuts configured geometrically around it. But how dense does that how thick does that plasma have to be for that to work? So I as so actually I didn't even ask. Salvador Py sent me an email after we talked about this last week after I was wondering about this on live stream. So he clearly watches and he said 10^ the 23 electrons per meter cubed or something like that. 10 to the 23 very big number. So, I look it up and it turns out that that's even higher than like the high threshold that Google or Grock or AI would would have expected a dense plasma to be. So, they have their own uh tokamac east. And before we say, oh, well, it's a tokamac. But keep in mind, I don't care. You can use tokamax to do research. They're just never going to produce fusion that's going to be on the grid in my opinion. at least not any significant amounts. So they say they were able to achieve plasma density far higher than previous limits. So because in fusion you want things to be closer and closer together. The more you can pack stuff in the better. But because things are na because you know positives are naturally repel one another this becomes very difficult. You would think that, okay, because two positives or two negatives will repel, there should be some theoretical limit where you can only pack so much in there because there's going to be these repulsive forces that will cause things to repel and rip apart. That was the reason why this limit was theoretical. They would say, well, in theory, the forces should rip the stuff apart. They were wrong. And how weird is this? Because it turns out that the whole secret of plasmoid research turned into something called condensed charge research. This is what they called it when the n when uh the milit the Pentagon took control of it in the early 90s. Ken shoulders and Hal Puda took this idea of plasmoids and they saw condensed charge. They saw charges that were clustered together that should that should basically break their understanding of physics because again negatives should be repelling. So how are all these clustering together? How are these how are they achieving this? That's the same exact idea and concept that what was just mentioned here in this paper in this uh article this idea of well how are all these how is this plasm getting as dense as as this when it shouldn't be able to? Wow, that's a major breakthrough because if that's true now, didn't we just unlock fusion? If the whole point is we have to achieve this certain density, plasma density, and now you're saying we can do that and we didn't think it was possible before. Aren't we saying now that we can do fusion? And are you telling me that the United States didn't know about this until just now China is the the first person to figure this out? The US military had no idea even though we have fusion bombs. We didn't know that we could break this limit. Do you really believe that? So that's why I think that this is uh important because China is coming out with these empirical results. The the result is a plasma that remains stable even as its internal density rises resulting in fuel densities far exceeding empirical limits. To me, this speaks directly to self-organization. directly to Ken Shoulders's research about EVO's uh condensed charge physics, condensed plasma charge physics, because again people want to know if you don't know what a plasma is, it's just a separation. You take your hydrogen atom, it's got its nucleus here, this ion, you separate the electron from it. Now you've created your plasma. That's it. So, if you were able to separate that electron and cluster them up over here and take these ions and theoretically cluster them up over here, you might be able to cause fusion to happen. I did reread the dense plasma focus paper uh of the last few days, here it is. So, if you don't know what I'm talking about, you think I'm making that up or something, all everything I talk about is generally scientific papers. propulsion and power generation capabilities for a dense plasma focus fusion system for future military aerospace vehicles. Uh there's Franklin me, there's George Miley, there's David Froning right there. Um down here you'll see time distorting devices. They actually changed it. So it generates power for cloaking and shielding devices and gravity or time distorting devices. right there. Right in the scientific paper. Boom. A neutronic fusion orbs can manipulate time and space. There you have it. Okay, let me show you something cooler than that though. George Miley, one of those scientists that was working on this fusion for them. There was a clip that was going around of him talking during the 1989 congressional hearings about cold fusion and it was really boring. They honestly just like avoid it and they're all like they're basically fence sitters before fence sitting was even a word on the internet. Like I'm just going to sit the fence and say like these guys were good. I don't know what happened here. I didn't do it but it could have been real maybe. No fence sitting. Look at what I found. George Miley 2006 advances in dense plasma focus R&D for space power and propulsion. So how did I find this? Basically, I was going through the dense plasma focus and I saw that George Miley presented about dense plasma focus in 2007 and so I was like I want to find that presentation and it's not easy to find and so instead I found this one which is maybe connected to it like it might be a different version of the same presentation. I'm not entirely sure to be honest with you guys and it's pretty amazing. Um you can see Franklin me is mentioned right in this first uh first slide here. So Frank me is this Air Force guy that he is basically the co-signer or the manager on all of Eric Davis's papers including Ball Lightning study which is all about plasmoids and EVOs. He's also the co-author on the teleportation physics study by Eric Davis. And there's another guy. So this paper here, I'm going to try to get another version of this that I can share easily without having to skip ads every 10 seconds here. But this talks about this thing here talks about a neutronic fusion, talks about boron 11 fusion. And I think the significant part about this is that this was 20076 this presentation came out. This is 20 years before now. And I animic fusion is just now becoming a thing that people understand what we're talking about. This is a long time ago. So, you know, it talks about a lot of stuff about how we can get to Mars, how we can get to Jupiter, how much faster this can be, how much more efficient this propulsion can be. Um, some of the scientific papers they mention, there's Ed, look at this one right here. This is the Edward Teller 1992 paper right here talking about using the magnetic dipole for fusion that talks about a neutronic fusion propulsion. He's referencing the 1992 Edward Teller paper that I told you guys. So, that's the paper right there. Boom. And then to show you there's so many different similar types of fusion. This is how people are like, well, how many different types of configurations of fusion even within inertial confinement fusion? Like there's over a dozen now. And then some can be like hybrid or archetype fusions that include more than one. So there's a bunch of different you can see field reverse configurations list. Look at this field reverse configuration right there. There's field reverse configuration right next to dense plasma focus. Okay, let's see what else. Talks about the cost, the design. He shows the actual design of these reactors here. Uh he talks about why autonic fusion fuels are essential right here. So, this is huge because the orbs in the MH370 videos must be a neutronic fusion. It's not normal neutronic fusion. It's got to be a neutronic. It's it's actually essentially it's a neutronic fusion. And the main reason he says right there is he says because the neutrons cause radiation effects and material damage. Tridium is radioactive and it must breed. And the other reason is that we can get direct energy conversion. Without direct energy conversion and a neutronic fusion your system becomes really inefficient because now you have to use the steam cycle. If you want direct energy conversion, then you need to be doing animatronic fusion. Boom. Boom.