UFO Disclosure Dead - Congress has NO CLUE

Video Transcript

# UFO Disclosure Dead - Congress has NO CLUE Malaysian 370 contact 120 decimal 9. Good night. Malaysian 37. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [Music] Oh, [Music] [Applause] [Music] I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu. is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him. Takes on his multi-armed form and says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." >> Um, Zalapino, what what is that supposed to mean? Early for a change? Are you trying to say something about my uh tardiness on the my live streams? Okay, I see how it is. Uh just kidding. Hello everybody. Welcome to the live stream tonight, guys. Thank you very much uh for being here. Appreciate it, guys. Oh, look at look at this rare Lulu sighting. Rare Lulu sighting in the corner of the channel over here, guys. Guys, first off the bat, we need to say a prayer for woke disclosure. It is officially dead chat. It's basically like this Tony Romo play from 2006. This is basically woke. >> That is the epitome. That is the epitome of woke disclosure, right? They have it all right in their sights. We're going to pass these bills. We're going to we're going to get disclosure. Loheed Martin's going to give us their alien crafts and then everybody's going to be validated. We have it right in our hands. Fumble it all away. Next thing you know, we got Lou Alzando holding up pictures of chandeliers and of irrigation uh irrig like huge irrigation circles saying it's a massive flying saucer. We've got Chris Melon, deep state Chris Melon who's pulling all the strings getting headlines saying that Iran's building a UFO mother ship. Iran is building a UFO mother ship, guys. Plus, we've got Avi Loe. We've got Avi Lo saying this is alien space rocks. The alien space rocks are coming in everybody. The alien space rocks. Meanwhile, all the rest of the UFO community is rallied around the tridactyl, the dinosaur tridactyl aliens. Everybody's rallied around them. So, let's just go ahead right now because I listened to Congressman Berles last night at like almost 1 in the morning. In fact, I'm exhausted today because I was listening to Congressman Berles till like 1:00 in the morning talking to the UFO community. So, let's go ahead right now pay our respects. Moment of silence, chat. Moment of silence. And due respect to woke disclosure, they tried their best and they failed, but they tried their best. Moment of silence. Okay, I can't do it. No moments of silence. They got what they they got about as much as they deserved, which is practically nothing. Because what did all those people have in common? None of them have done really any science whatsoever. Avi Loe's version of science is I'm just going to say this is an alien space rock and until somebody debunks me, we're just going to go with that. That's science from his perspective. And that's as close as anybody's even getting to science on any of these things that people are really looking at. So, let's start with this. Let's start with the tridactyls since that is the thumbnail of this video. I actually have almost nothing to say about this. I haven't even watched the Jesse Michaels video about it. So, let's start with this. I do you do people out there understand scale? Like the universe is h how do I put this in simple terms? Really effing big. The universe is really really big, chat. And what that means is we are little ants, even smaller than ants. We are floating around on little grain of dust. That's about as as easy as our human brains can understand it. What this means is that if complexity of human life exists on this tiny speck, complexity of at least equal or more complexity almost certainly exists elsewhere in the universe. So, are there aliens in the universe? Yes. Yes, there's definitely aliens in the universe somewhere. And that's just if there's one universe and there's not infinite parallel universes. If there's infinite parallel universes, then there's every alien of every kind exists. So, when I say you can have every alien you want, I'm saying that because that's a that's an option. That's a very realistic option. is that every possible kind of alien you could ever want exists. There you go. There's your disclosure, chat. There's your I just gave it to you. That's disclosure. Does that blow your mind? Are you going to quit your job and stop everything you did you were doing before and change your way of life now? No. What is it that we're supposed to take from these tridactyls? What what what is the the moral of the story that I'm supposed to do? Let's assume for a second that these alien mummies are aliens. I haven't watched anything about it. And I don't really plan to, but let's just assume that they are alien beings. Okay, now what? Now what? Well, now we study them. Study them for what? It's a mummy. In fact, you know what? I'm going to go ahead and show you the problem with the with the tridactyls right now. I'm going to just go ahead and debunk them right now. You say that's an alien creature. I say we have all kinds of stuff on this planet that looked like aliens that we would say looks like aliens if it came from somewhere else, but it still just comes from this planet. In fact, you tell me that that is an alien mummy. And you know what I say it is? I say it's like a mutant that look, it's got elongated shapes. They uh people do that. Cultures do that, dude. cultures like extend their ears and their loes and stuff like that. In fact, I'm pretty sure they even have a word for it. I'm pretty sure they have a word for chat. Somebody tell me what the word for it is. It just put it in the chat right now. There's a word for the weird mutant elongation thing that some cultures do. Boom. Debunked. Boom. Once we have that word, there you go. Debunked, chat. Now, anybody says, "Oh, are the mummies real?" Ashen, you just go, "No, Ashton said it was some uh mutant thing that cultures do, right? Cuz at the end of the day, how are you going to prove it one way or another?" But honestly, like, how do you prove that those are from another planet? How do you prove those are from another planet and not just some splinter race of humans that are out there? So, end of the day, best case scenario, it's an archaeological kind of breakthrough. But we already found we've already found other protoans that date back like 200,000 years. So that wouldn't even be a breakthrough in that perspective. There we go. Cranial modification. Thank you. See, once you have a word for it, like a buzzword like that. Oh, it's just cranial modification. Boom. Debunked. Easy. You say they only have three limbs. I just say they're a mutant. I just say they're a mutant. Simple as that. Okay, honestly, that's all I really care about about the Tridactyl situation. What I really wanted to focus on in the beginning of this live stream here tonight is the Eric Berles conversation now that we've we've 100% debunked the the Tridactto mummies chat. Everybody's debunked them. There's so many they've been debunked so many times. People really like believe that nonsense. Okay. Congressman Berles was on a Xpace last night and I lost pretty much all faith that UFO disclosure is ever going to happen. We're going to play some clips. I'm just going to pull some random clips up on there. But the biggest thing that concerned me is it seems like first of all, David Grush is on the payroll of Congressman Berles. I don't really know how or why. I imagine it's because maybe the UFO caucus or whatever they're calling themselves can put people on the payroll. But I think people should be asking what is the relationship between, you know, David Grush and you know, is there a professional relationship where money is exchanging hands here? And why? like why is he the guy that is the ring leader determining who Congress should talk to or who they shouldn't talk to? I would really love to know that. But the reason why I lost faith is that it sounds like and by the way I didn't actually I don't think I asked any questions directly to Congressman Berles. I just listened. I just listened. I actually didn't know like what to say. Um because what what am I supposed to say to the congressman? I mean, I could ask him something about compact fusion reactor or something like that, but what I realized is that we are so far ahead of the game now. So far ahead of the game that we've lapped people like we actually have to dumb it down. We have to like slow down now. We have to slow down now. Go back to the people that we've lapped a few times ago, you know, the Special Olympics. and we got to go help the parapolgics come across the finish line. Like that's that's where we're at right now. So, we really have to dumb it down for him. We really have to be like, "Look, guys, we have advanced space juice capabilities. They're advanced space juice capabilities beyond the current form of space juice that we can absorb. your aliens that are out there. Sure, maybe we figured out some secrets from your aliens or whatever, but those are relatively insignificant to the new forms of space juice that we can harness. Congressman Berles is apparently just going around interviewing whistleblowers, interviewing whistleblowers that are like telling him information and stuff like that, telling him stories, things like that. And what does that even mean? What how is that supposed to get us UFO disclosure? It sounds to me like Congressman Berles is basically just like Fox Moulder in the X Files. He's going around and talking to these people that David Grush is telling them, okay, go talk to these people. They are, you know, trustworthy. They're reliable. You know, they're going to give you good information. I mean, end of the day, how is that going to get anything for the American people? At the end of the day, now we are relying upon Congressman Burles's discernment through second through like playing the game of telephone with people. That's what we're going for here. So, let's start with this. What are we even trying to do? What What is Congressman Burles? What is Congress even trying to accomplish? What what even is disclosure? The question that I asked on the space before Congressman Berles jumped on or what have you was, what is we can't even define what disclosure is. How are you expecting to get it? You literally can't even define what you're looking for. So, this is the reason why I didn't ask Congressman Berles a question because I just be I just I'm so pissed off at the situation. Like, what the hell? What is What do you think disclosure is? Is disclosure Loheed Martin wheeling out alien bodies? Is it Loheed Martin wheeling out a metal flying saucer for you? Is that what disclosure is? How do we even define it? How do we even define an alien body? How do we even define an alien craft? What if it just if it looks like something I saw in a Marvel movie? Is that is that what makes it an alien? is if it looks like what I saw in some shitty Disney Marvel movie. I think that's what these people think in their heads. I mean, what does Congress think? One of the things that Congressman Berles said, I took some notes here. He says, "Oh, we're just going to give them amnesty. We're going to we're going to offer them amnesty for their sins." What sins? We haven't even defined what we're looking for. What are people supposed to come forward with? They're supposed to come forward with crimes that were committed, but I thought the whole point is it's national security. So, is it illegal or is it not illegal? We haven't even gotten through the first bar yet. Is is disclosure uh disclosure of national security information? Is that what disclosure is? Because that would mean it's illegal. So until we at least define where the bar is, like what what is national security, what's not, what's legal, what's not, how can we offer people amnesty? Plus, it's just a total bluff. Congressman Berles says, "We're going to offer them amnesty right now, but now this is the only period. This is the incentive that you can have amnesty if you come out over the next 6 months and tell us what we we don't even know what we're asking for. We don't even know what we're asking for. Come out with amnesty with what? That you know where an alien is hiding? Do people really think that's the situation? Oh, I know where there's an alien body. Is it being illegally held? How did you know that it was an alien and not like a squid or just like literally anything? Well, I just knew cuz I saw it. Have people actually like tried to just think through how any of this would play out? Because it makes no sense at all. And here's the problem. This is the crux of the problem. Is it national security issue or not? They will go they go in front of Congress. We heard Lu Alzando Mike Gold in front of Congress and they say they say what's the energy source Annapolina Luna asks. He says that's a national security issue. That's a national security issue. Okay. If you know the energy source of the aliens is a national security issue, then you know what it is, right? So then why am I hearing the same people say they don't know what it is? If we don't know what it is, how do we know if it's a national security issue? If we don't know what it is, then if we offer amnesty to somebody, what are we offering them amnesty from? We're offering amnesty because there might be interdimensional aliens. It doesn't make any sense. This is the reason why UFO disclosure is dead. There's no chance. no chance ever of anything coming out of this. We haven't even defined what we're looking for. And the moment you try to say, "Okay, Ashton, we're looking for the alien bodies." Okay, what's the definition of an alien body? Let's just start there. If I'm a lawyer for any of these Loheed Martin or defense contractors, I'm just laughing thinking about the idea that you're going to enforce any of this on my company. No chance at all. Unless you know exactly what you're looking for and where it's being hidden and why it's a crime to hide it, then what are we talking about? All you're doing is wasting our time. All you're doing is wasting our time. I hope Congressman Berles's listening to that because the next thing I'm going to do is I'm going to tell him what he should be looking for because that's the one thing this community knows and has. We have the answer sheet. The best thing that you could possibly hope for. We have the answers. Because again, you can't even start disclosure until you know what you're looking for. Until you can define what disclosure is, then you have no chance of achieving it. And I can define disclosure. Disclosure is free energy for the world. free energy, infinite abundance, the end of scarcity on planet Earth. That's disclosure. That's real disclosure. Free energy, zero point energy disclosure. That's real disclosure because that changes everything about our planet. And it's an ontological understanding and it's an educational and scientific understanding as well. That's disclosure. And when you know that that's disclosure, then you know exactly what you're looking for. You know exactly what you're looking for. What am I looking for? I am looking for technology that is free energy based. Technology that is zero point energy based technology that is over unity systems that are producing over unity. Free energy. And where has that led us? Exactly. It has led us to realizing the ether is real. We actually were able to figure out where physics went wrong and where physics was right in the past and will be right again. The ether is real. Spacetime is not empty. And we found the fusion reactors. We found the fusion reactors. Excuse me. So, what should Congress be looking into if they want to be successful? because you're never going to be successful going around and asking J Stratton and J Stratton. Imagine thinking that Jay Stratton is gonna give you the truth about UFO disclosure. I couldn't believe these people that were crying to uh to Congressman Berles about why are you not talking to Jay Stratton? He's my woke disclosure hero. He's my number one gatekeeper. Why are you not talking to him? Like my god, this literally just keeping up with the Kardashians with these people. It's unbelievable. We're not gonna get anywhere talking to these random spooks that are already gatekeepers that already could have said anything they wanted at any point in time that they wanted that clearly do not plan to speak publicly and no amount of amnesty is going to get them to change their minds. Never going to happen. Talking to all those people never going to get anything. can build more, you know, statues to people like Lu Alzando and David Grush, whatever weird hero worship they're doing with these people. You can count me out on that, by the way. And don't ever do that with me either. All this weird hero worship, can't stand it. You want to build more fake heroes that are I'm the authority that uh worked on the alien spacecraft and you should listen to everything I say. You have any evidence for anything? Nope. Sorry. I can't tell give you any evidence because that would break national security. But you can just trust me because I'm a good guy. That's literally all this every single time, right? You can either have more of that fake crap if you want to do that, right? And that's what they'll do. They'll just they're going to parade out the next person, right? I'm the next hero. That's what they're going to do. Or or or or we can do something different. You know what? We can go, hey, why does Lockheed Martin have a compact fusion reactor with a beta of one that can produce a neutronic reactions that went dark in 2018? Uh, here you go. Here's some disclosure on a silver platter, chat. Here's the answer. Instead of just blindly, aimlessly begging people to tell us about the aliens, why don't we figure out what their energy technologies are that are national security. Just find out what those energy technologies are because there must be some paper trail for it. We've already done all that work for you. a neutronic fusion reactions and just go to the defense contractor where they're literally hiding their black project compact fusion reactor and just pull on that thread. Let's just pull on that thread because I have a good feeling that's going to lead to your aliens on the other side. Why are they hiding compact fusion reactors from the world? That's a really good question that I think a lot of people in Congress and the public, the American public would love to know the answer to. We would love to know the answer to that question. Hey, um, have you secretly been hiding compact fusion reactors for like a decade minimum? More likely many decades. Uh, and have you been doing it for national security so that our submarines can have like fusion reactors on them? Meanwhile, people are literally dying homeless on the street. Mentally ill people dying homeless on the street like my own biological mother. People just suffering every day so that our military can be more powerful that we can control this whole planet and just make everybody our on this whole planet. Unbelievable. 40 trillion in debt, yet we've got plasma orbs that can teleport Boeing 7s. It's not like we're testing it out on a tiny airplane or on a car or something. We're testing out on an airplane. It's got hundreds of people on it. 40 trillion in debt. We got magical plasma orbs. I think we've hit the point where uh income inequality and technological inequality. This is where you say, "What's the crime that's being committed?" The crime that's being committed is uh crime against straight up humanity. We need to get the Geneva freaking convention involved because we're talking about literally just letting like millions of people die every week just because we want to keep technology like in the isolated in the hands of a few elite people who are controlling the world that have billions of dollars. It's honestly sick when you put it like that. So there you go. Congressman Berles, you guys wanted your disclosure. Here's the disclosure. I don't give a about aliens. They sure exist. That's not a problem for me. But those alien technologies that they have, it's uh free energy for the world. That's the goal. Free energy for the world. That's the disclosure. And how we obtain that disclosure is we go after the technology that's gone black. We go after the very energy technology that they have been hiding for military purposes. Why? Because even if we're wrong, even if it turns out the compact fusion reactor is all human technology, even if their lawyers try to say, "No, humans made this out. Turns out it comes from Tesla. Comes from it comes from Nicola Tesla, Donald Trump's uncle." Turns out that's all real. And I think it is, by the way. I think it is real. the then we can say, "Oh, yeah. Well, even if it's not aliens, you're still hiding free energy from the world." Because aliens is the distraction. Because when we push on the alien angle, they're just going to go, "We're not hiding aliens." How are you going to prove it? How are you going to prove it? You're going to say, "Oh, well, they're interdimensional. They're interdimensional aliens." Now, good luck. Good luck proving it. You know how we prove it is we don't worry about aliens and we go, "Oh, they're definitely hiding super advanced technology that the public definitely deserves to know about. Is it related to aliens? Who cares? Who cares if it's related to aliens? We will find out when we go to Loheed Martin Skunk Works and we get the plans for their combat fusion reactor." Boom. And I don't want to hear any excuses about, oh, but we can't do it for intellectual property reasons, whatever. Just get a subpoena. We'll still hide it or whatever. But once we verified that you have magical free energy teleportation devices and things like that, then yeah, we're going to let people know cuz the public deserves to know. We're the ones who literally paid for it. We literally paid for the free energy technology you're hiding from us. There you go. Okay, some of the other things I'm going to do a couple super chats. If you want to do super chat related to this topic, jump in. Um, what is up with everybody whining? If I was Congressman Berles on one of those spaces, I would have honestly lost my 1:00 am and like three people back to back like how do I get in touch with you personally? It's like well you're talking to me right now on an X space so go ahead. No, no, no. I need to be in I need to have a cell phone text message personal contact with you at all times. Get you updated and appraised of everything happening in my life right now. Like whoa man chill out a little bit. The thing is, everybody's the main character of their own story, you know, and you know, several people like, "Oh, I need to talk to you about this or that, what have you." Again, if you just have stories, if you just have stories, no offense, people have some really, really good stories. Take it to Jesse Michaels, man. Take it to Jesse Michaels. Stories to Congress isn't going to get us anywhere. We need hard evidence. We need hard evidence. We need actual strings to pull. We need to know where we're looking. Not just, "Oh, I saw some craft. Great. Why are you not giving me enough attention? It's just not going to get us anywhere." I'm just giving you guys the hard truth right now. Lots of people were saying that. And then you have the other people like average Chris. Holy crap. I couldn't stop laughing at this guy. Like it feels like he's fighting the truth. Fighting his real like accepting reality all the time. coming out and going, "Did you not did you not look into this guy's background? Do your people and resources not look and find out this guy's a sketchy background that he had?" Like like he just like in his head he thinks that the world works like in the Disney movies. I thought the world worked like in the Marvel movies where Batman's in his Batcave and he's doing all his background research on everybody. It's like no, it turns out in the real world they're just they're just normal people. just normal people and things aren't really as uh you know as as well greased behind the scenes that everybody thinks. But I can imagine him like trying to like admonish a congressman over that. Like isn't your staff doing enough research on these people ahead of time that you shouldn't be trusting them at all? Like oh no, we need to hire you, Chris. We need you to be the uh prime security uh lead for my team. Make sure you're vetting everybody. Yeah. Do the ocular pat downs on them to make sure that they are not a threat to us. My god. Yikes, man. So, yeah, the questions were even uh pretty sad as well, but there was a few key points that I thought were were worthwhile. I think we've already mentioned most of them, which is if these people have NDAs, if these people have NDAs, he's saying, "Well, these people have NDAs." Okay. So then what is the NDA hiding? Right? That's disclosure then. Okay. What does the NDA prevent them from disclosing? That would be disclosure. That's the thing that they would need amnesty to break. So we should probably be talking about whatever that thing is. I guarantee you they don't have NDAs that say you can't talk about aliens. There's no NDAs that are saying sorry you can't talk about the gray aliens. Thay aliens have been classified. You can talk about the reptilians as much as you want, but the grays, nuh-uh. That's classified for national security. No. So, we can just at least be a little bit logical about this. And Congressman Berles says he thinks the defense contractors have technology they've developed that is, you know, advanced, really advanced. It's crazy to me people have not put the connection between nukes and UFO technology together yet. Apparently, we are like the first community to do that. We've got the UF people have connected nukes to the UFO topic. They've said, "Oh, the UFOs are shutting down the nukes." But what they never connected, they never connected the energy source fusion. Fusion, the dream energy source. That's the energy source of the UFOs. fusion nuclear power. Real nuclear power, not the scam fake nuclear power that we are meant to believe or that we actually the one that we get right now. The one that heats up some steam, heat up the water and make steam and then spin the turbines. That's fake nuclear power. The real nuclear power is direct energy conversion, splitting and joining atoms and just sucking the energy as electricity. That's efficient. energy conversion. That's what the UFOs are using. That's the big secret. And why is it a secret? Oh, because thermonuclear weapons use fusion detonations. Oh, how is this? I'm just sitting here like I wonder how is it me saying this and like you I know other people have said this. I'm not trying to claim to be the first. But you got Congressman Berles pretending like he's got no idea what's going on. It's not that deep to figure out. It's pretty much just right there. So, if you want to figure out the UFO topic, you probably should be digging on the thread of nukes, specifically fusion. Fusion. Now, I want to switch over and play a little clip here. This is something that And by the way, we're going to review this other video I think tomorrow. Share this real quick. I just saw this. This dropped earlier today. The reason why I'm bringing this up, Dr. Michael Anderson made a warp reactor. That's not the reason why he's interesting. I come down here and I see that he's been working on the mag lift, which was one of those uh uh eight um uh department of uh energy uh machines. But not just that, this guy works at TAE, Trial Alpha Energy. Where does it say that? Somewhere in here. Here it is. Trial Alpha Energy. Dr. Anderson is the lead pulse power scientist at Lawrence Livermore and he works at Trial Alpha Energy which is one of the only two places currently doing field reverse configuration. There it is. Okay. So the other thing I want to show this video uh okay let's just Okay. Okay, so this video here, this video by Sabine Hassenfelder. Oops, I have to share it differently. I just realized Sabine Hosenfelder six months ago, guys. Six months ago. Look at the date on this. February 16th, 2025. What's different about Helen Energy, the nuclear fusion startup backed by Sam Ultman? Okay. Okay, Sabine, I'm gonna let this intro play while I turn the AC on for Lulu here. It's not It's not cool enough. Uh, let's just play this and listen to what Sabine has to say. Artificial intelligence has an energy problem. Indeed, if you listen to Donald Trump, then the United States has an energy emergency. Experts advise citizens to conserve energy by staying off Twitter until Fmus Ber is some out on the CEO million. Hold up. Too fast. Too fast chat. >> Which puts its total funding above a billion. Helion is a privately owned company. It's probably most famous backer is Sam Outman, the CEO of OpenAI. Helion was founded in 2013. In 2014, they wrote on their website that they aim to have a commercial plant operational in six years. Six years later, they still aim to have the plant operational in six years. Come 2022. And they want to get it done by 2020. that while skeptical. Helon uses an approach to fusion called field reversed configuration that >> uh h where is it? [Music] Uh that's the magic word chat. That's the magic word. Field reverse configuration. Wow. Sabine Hosenfelder actually spoke about it 6 months ago. I didn't this is but right before we figured out all this a neutronic fusion stuff. >> While not new is only pursued by three startups. Helon General Atomics and TA Technology. >> Whoa, look at that chat. Helium, General Atomics, and TAE which stands for trialpha energy. Only three places are doing field reverse configuration. Chat, I'm just going to go ahead and say it. Guys, I'll give you the address on where to send the Pulitzer Prize for blowing the lid off of nuclear fusion and the cover up related to all this BS. Wow, chat. We are straight up just exposing exposing the deep state government companies. These companies, Helen and TAE, I know for a fact are supported by the Department of Energy. General Atomics almost certainly is as well. There you go. Turns out the whole fusion game was rigged from the beginning. Rigged from the beginning. If I'm in personally, this is not investment advice. This is just my opinion. If I was investing in a fusion company, I would be investing in Helium Fusion personally. Well, probably Trialpha Energy as well, but one of these is who would I be investing in because seems like somebody got some inside information. >> These field reverse devices are basically particle accelerators. You accelerate a bunch of fuel particles with magnets and then collide and compress them in the middle. That compression increases pressure and temperature and fuses the nuclei. The >> turns out, guys, this is quite literally exotic vacuum objects. This is quite literally, and this isn't, I'm not exaggerating or, you know, taking it out of context, quite literally plasma tooids, smoke rings of plasma shot at each other in a particle accelerator. Particle accelerator, tooidal plasma rings shoot at each other, field reverse configuration. Boom. Do you think it's a coincidence, chat? Do you think it's a coincidence that the Department of Energy just happens to be backing, secretly backing, not even really secretly, I mean it's kind of now in the open, but nobody knew about these companies before me and other people started exposing them. Do you think it's a secret or a coincidence that they are producing fusion using tooidal plasmas? No. No. Because tooidal plasma's geometry is exactly what you need to manipulate electromagnetism. >> Energy released on the fusion creates very fast moving particles. One then has to find some way to harvest that energy. To give you a sense of scale, nuclear fusion reactions typically take place in the range of 10 to 100 mega electron volt of energy per particle. About a million times less than the energy that the LHC uses, which is why the helium device is just a few meters long. >> Okay, let me see what else we got here. Okay. Um, so they explain she explains a neutronic fusion but not really. She doesn't really explain in much detail. >> Wants to fuse helium. >> Explains the the helium uh using uh helium helium helium 3 uh reaction for a neutronic. There you go. >> Reason why no one else uses helium 3 as a fuel for nuclear fusion. It's because the energy threshold is about four times higher. With that in mind, have a look at this 2021 press release from the Helon website. Helon Energy today became the first private company to announce exceeding 100 million degrees C in their sixth fusion generator prototype Chunter. Reaching this temperature is a critical engineering milestone. So basically she says the reason why nobody was looking at helium 3 uh for a a fuel is because it takes a four times higher energy or four times higher temperatures. But that's not a problem at all if you've solve if you have figured out high beta concept. High beta when you look at the equations it's an exponential growth. So the more that beta goes up, your pressure increases exponentially. If that's true, now you have a situation where, okay, yes, it's four times higher, but who cares? My beta is going through the roof. I give me the best possible fuel source. Boom. We can do it. That's why field reverse configuration high beta is so significant. And I just learned that from the 2005 JNF PDF presentation. JNF is the joint like NASA, air, army, navy, air force. They literally just had a presentation said, "Here you go. Look at the beta value. It increases your power exponentially." Boom. And even the helium fusion CEO says it as well. The more the higher your beta, it's like how much you can compress your plasma. Simple. >> Else. So here we go >> cycle. Finally, thus the general issue that the nuclear plasma motion can become unstable which will lead to losses and also make net energy generation more difficult. Generally the company has been very secretive. They have for all I can tell not published any technical reports. So really we have no idea what's going on. I have little doubt that they can generate nuclear fusion reactions in their devices, but I strongly doubt that they're anywhere near break even. That leaves the question, why is this company in particular so extremely wellunded? Do the investors know something that we don't know? Is it re-engineered alien technology? Are they secretly building a >> pause chat? Pause. Gravity class. Pause. Uh, what did you just say? Was that a Freudian slip? >> Doubt that they can generate nuclear fusion reactions in their devices, but I strongly doubt that they're anywhere near break even. That leaves the question, why is this company in particular so extremely wellunded? Do the investors know something that we don't know? Is it re-engineered alien technology? Are they secretly building a portal to a parallel universe? Or is it maybe wishful thinking? Let me know which one of those you think. >> Okay, you know what? I'm not going to rule out parallel universe portal and I'm not going to rule out Alien Reverse Technology either at this point. At this point, I don't know. But I will tell you this. If Congress forces Charles Chase to testify and and tell us what we know about their compact fusion reactor, I guarantee you it will lead to some plasma orbs that most people on this planet would say is alien that look like aliens. And it'll probably lead us to the answer of where all this technology comes from, guys. Okay, let's do some super chats. The ZPE disclosure, the goat, check out his stuff, guys, on uh on X Leslie, drop some bills in woke disclosure tin cup LFG. Thank you very much, Leslie. I appreciate you. RIP, woke disclosure. RIP chalk dust of the earth. Uh, vertebrae ammonites. I don't know. With ukulele, I forget how to say this this thing. Okay, stop. You're just trying to make me look bad, not say these words. Okay. Uh, translate earth code are native earth life, not alien. They are reptiles. Nagas narr. Okay. So, aliens are serpents. There you go. Thank you very much for that donation. Thank you, Catman. So, what that doesn't have an impact on our life. Exactly. This is what I think everybody in the disclosure movement needs to realize. Everybody has their own personal stories, experiences that are super important, especially to them. End of the day, if you want to change other people's opinions, if you want to change other people's perceptions, you have to tell them something that impacts their life. If it doesn't impact their life, can't expect them to really care. Carrie, Ethernet subscriber, thank you very much, Ethernet subscriber. Fox Moulder. I had a poster in his office saying, "I want to believe. Durs are proof enough to me." Guys, there's a reason why I mention the Dirds on basically every single podcast I ever do. I truly believe they will be looked back in history as the most important scientific papers of our generation, maybe ever. 38 scientific papers. 38. It's hard to even think that there are that many of them, but yes, there's that many scientific papers from everything from laser light sails to warp drives and wormholes and extracting energy from the quantum vacuum, negative mass propulsion, uh non-locality, invisibility cloaks, all of it. All of it's out there. And then my catman also says that good definition. Uh they're whining because people are asking the right questions. Yeah. Uh, fly ether. Thank you. Fly ether. Berles knows there's no aliens. All mistrect. I wouldn't go so far to say there's no aliens. There certainly could be aliens. I mean, keep in mind, guys, when we follow the technology, the technology tells us that we can teleport. The technology tells us we have free energy. The technology tells us that we have the ability to transmute and produce alchemy, produce elements. So, if that's the case, aliens are going to be a lot more powerful than we predicted. They're not just going to be ET, the extraterrestrial. The Marvel movies and Disney movies, they're thinking it's going to be some derpy alien. I'm a little derpy alien. Burp. Like, no. What if it's like an invisible alien that can teleport that's also super intelligent? Maybe like has integrated with AI, too. So now it also has some super intelligence as well, like in the back of its mind all the time. I mean, that's just a whole another echelon. So I think that yes, aliens can be real and aliens could even be visiting us, but we got to totally change our perception of what aliens means. Less Disney movies, guys. And then Adam says, "Some rogue faction of engineers need to demo ZPE plasma related tech on a grandiose scale in a peaceful way." That won't do it either, guys. I think that that's our kind of fantasy imagination of how disclosure happens, right? And this is where I am critical of Stephen Greer because he says, "Oh, we're going to have this lab and we're just going to video record the lab and it's just going to like do this amazing thing and we're going to get disclosure." That's not going to work either. That's not how disclosure really works. Disclosure isn't some big marvel that everybody's standing around for and clapping for. That's the problem. Disclosure is us on a civilization scale, a societal scale changing our perception. That's what disclosure is. Disclosure is changing the title wave of people. Disclosure is quite literally this this movement, this community. Getting people to realize that zero point energy exists to the point where we're influencing public conversations. That's disclosure, guys. That's what disclosure really is. And when they write about what disclosure was when they in the history books, they're not going to write about people like Jeremy Corbel. Jeremy Corbel uh said that the big lie is coming. You think they're going to write that in the history books? They Well, you know what? In 2014, Jeremy Corbell said the big lie was coming. Um, no. In the history books, they're going to talk about and people started to accept the idea of zero point energy in the 2020 in the 2020s where before it was taboo to think about the ether. That's how it'll play out. And you guys are in the middle of it right now. Zapperoo, thank you very much, Lulu. Appreciate those dog treats. I can't believe she's actually still just chilling over here. She's chilling. She's sleeping now. And then Gwendelyn says, "You have a white shepherd." I have a black shepherd. Oh, you're actually I mean, she's technically like a husky or something, but yeah, she is white. I like that. And then in the PL chat, Steve B the can. Thank you very much. Awake not woke gives the cookie. Thank you very much. And Filter Dog gives the can as well. I appreciate those. Cheers to you guys. Also, shout out to the people in the Rumble chat saying that Sam Olman is a gay demon. Gay demon. Could be true. Could be true. Okay, back to the story or the task at hand, guys. The next thing I want to go through is I want to go through a little bit of science. A little bit of science with you. So, I found this really amazing video from just a few days ago, straight up called the Higs field makes no sense. Okay, so let's go ahead and boil it down for people right off the bat. What is the Higsfield? Why does any of this stuff matter? Well, it turns out some of the dumb dumb physicists, they've drawn themselves into a corner. They couldn't explain mass. They couldn't explain inertia. They couldn't explain gravity. They can't explain dark matter. They can't explain dark energy, can't explain anything. And then we spent billions and billions of dollars making this giant doughut particle collider, particle accelerator that's super super big. Bigger means better, right? Of course. So the bigger it is, the more goodter it is. And we turned it on and we started shooting particles at each other. And what did we learn? Nothing. Nothing. We didn't learn the origin of mass. We didn't learn the origin of gravity. We didn't find any graviton particles. Pretty much nothing. And so everybody got real sad. Everybody got real sad and they were like, "Oh, you know what would make us feel better? Let's just say we we found something. Let's just say we discovered something and we'll give somebody a Nobel Prize and we'll just say we were successful." Mission accomplished, chat. Mission accomplished. If you don't know what that is, it's a classic George W. Bush. He had he uh took picture photo op in front of a mission accomplished sign when the war wasn't over. Yep. That's basically it. We're just going to go ahead and say that we've we've the Higsfield exists, chat. We we discovered the Higsfield. Wow. The Higsfield, chat. Okay, cool. So the Higsfield then it uh does it describe does it explain uh mass? Does it explain why we have mass or gravity? Nope. Doesn't do any of that. Does it explain any of those things that we mentioned before? Like anything about physics that we're currently struggling with? Nope. Doesn't explain anything. Basically, honestly, if we're just we're really boiling it down, it's actually worse than just space juice. Like science has actually gotten to the point now where if you just said we discovered space juice, you'd probably just be more accurate because nobody understands what the hell we're supposed to have discovered from this. So here we go. We find this presentation. The Higs field makes zero sense on the true origins of mass. You know this is going to be a good one. You know this is going to be a good one right off the bat. The sixth speaker from the 2025 Conference for Physical and Mathematical Ontology, Professor Donald Chang from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology presents a remarkable take on the origins of matter and mass via scrutinizing the physical meaning of the equations of electromagnetism, quantum theory, and relativity. ultimately proposing a brand new formal formalism which demonstrates just how they might all be combined into coherent and meaningful hole. So what is he presenting? Let's really we got to simplify it guys. We might have Congress listening to us. So we got to really make it simple for Congress to understand. Okay. So you know how all the smart smarts are trying to figure out what is mass, what is gravity, what is this stuff? Turns out people have figured out how really small things relate to really big things. It turns out they relate through something we call electricity. And all electricity is positive and minus charge separated. So it turns out this idea of positive minus charge being separated. This connects really small things to really big things. And people figured this out like a hundred years ago. And it turns out we've just been lying to ourselves for like a 100 plus years. But you know who hasn't been lying to theirselves? Lheed Martin. Lheed Martin hasn't been lying to themselves. Loheed Martin's been going, "Oh, this works and we can make magical technologies with this. Let's do that. Let's make some magical technologies. Should we tell people?" No, that's not our responsibility. We're Loheed Martin. We don't have to tell people. Our responsibility is make a lots of monies. Make a lots of monies. There we go. Okay, let's watch a little of this. I didn't take notes for the beginning part. I have some notes from like the second half of this, but it's generally just all good, I think. So, let's see if we can understand my man here. He's got a pretty tough accent. One of us. All right. Uh, now this is a big question. But now with the development in the last 100 year we know we have the people we mean people has >> one of the things that we really want to do >> press a button I shouldn't have pressed chat rest in peace >> for the stand >> okay here we go >> you make a reference on on how many years ago I ago >> okay let's just look at the slides in the background maybe we >> basics of the quantum wave equation such as the sluring equation the direct equations >> okay so what are the problems with quantum physics today. Problem number one, particle wave duality, double slit experiment. Double slit experiment is is light a wave or a particle? We can't even tell if light is a wave or a particle. Spoiler alert, it's a wave. What is the physical basis for the quantum wave equations? Why is a quantum wave equation exist? What is the meaning of a quantum wave function? So, right off the bat, what this guy is saying is that matter matter is not even a particle. It's all waves. And he's saying we can define matter as a quantum wave function. Matter is a quantum wave function. So why are why am I pulling this up, guys? Why do you guys think we're watching this right now? I mean, I could watch a lot of different videos on my live streams, but we've got a guy saying here that matter is not a particle. It's actually a quantum wave function. H. And now talking about Schrodinger's equations. Does that remind you guys of anything that we've been talking about recently? Oh, yeah. How about a couple weeks ago when we were quite literally looking at how to solve the vortex equation, how to solve Schrodinger's equation. Well, this guy is basically saying, I've figured out the formalization, the formulism to produce that. He's saying, here you go. Here's how you take the equations and you get from electromagnetism to gravity. Here you go. And by doing this, we can solve how matter is interacting with the ether. Why? Why? Let's talk about why this is possible. How is this actually possible physically? How is this possible? Because you see me here, right? It looks like I am detached from everything around me. The reality is I'm connected to everything around me. The ether is all around me as well. When I move around, I'm moving through the ether just like I'm moving through the air and that's reacting to me. And when I do that, I create vibrations in that ether. And you can create those vibrations that ether. We can measure the vibrations and we can then figure out the pertabbation. We can figure out how you moving through this medium impacts the medium. It's not a complicated thing to understand. Just like if you were looking at a fish moving through the water, you could watch how the the the water is displaced by the fish. The fish doesn't see it that way. The fish just thinks it's in the, you know, it's in nothing because the water is all the fish knows. It's just like that. And this is what he's presenting right here. So, let's skip ahead a little bit. Okay. Okay. Now, here's some he brings up some good issues. So a lot of people say one of the best things that we can know is we can know where are the gaps where are the gaps in the current model standard model of physics and how does 0 point energy solve them right this is the most powerful ammunition we can have because then when a PhD comes at you and says you don't know what you're talking about you get you say okay you tell me then you teach me you tell me where what what is the origin of mass I'm waiting Tell me where mass tell me where gravity comes from. >> You say self consistent. If you have a self-consistent theory, that's a a correct step. But for physics, you know, as a a circular logic is not something you prefer. Okay. Well, sometime you have to do it, you know, in order to make you know the paper acceptable or you can write a grand proposal at least you'll show something like that and then later you get a circular logic. So you convince the reviewer of the grand that okay at least self-consistent. Okay. Now, something else I think this is a >> one more thing I want to point out right there. He even says it. He says you have to word it in a way that you can get past the reviewer. He's talking about the patent reviewer board or in some cases a scientific paper. So many times have we found the engineers just admitting that they have to word stuff in a specific way so that it doesn't seem like they're breaking the laws of thermodynamics. Because if they word it and said, "Oh, I'm doing cold fusion. I'm producing free energy. I'm producing over unity." Then they would say, "Nope, that's not possible. They can't we can't give it to you." But if you just lie and use some other fancy words and confuse the patent uh officer, there you go. So, when you see some of these patents that are like overly complicated, that's probably why. It's not by accident. It's because the people that are putting them in know they've got to do that so that they can get it approved. It can't look like a perpetual uh energy motion machine. Exactly. Exactly. True. Okay, here we go. >> Even more important in this blue color that is what is the origin of mass? What is the physical meaning of the hex field? Because if the standard model think mass is a coupling between its own quantum field and the hex field, then what is a hex field? I think hex field is something come out from the head of the people working on hex. theory. Okay, there's no human experience of the hex field. There's no scientific evidence for the existence. Now, we know there's a a particle that attribute to a hex excitation, but that's attribute to it. Okay, but that's another proof that there's a such thing called hex field. You know, we know the other field, we know electric field, we know magnetic field, we know the gravitational field, okay? And we can even have some feeling about strong interaction, you know, the strong force field or the weak force field. Okay, but hex, what is it? Okay. Ah, >> basically we just there's no physical representation for the Higsfield. There just it doesn't really exist at all. It's just Higsfield is literally fake and gay chat. Higsfield is literally fake and gay. We actually can use that unironically. It's just some that they made up that there's no actual physical interpretation for it. And the crazy part is you could probably press physicists and they're going to get super upset and super defensive over it because they can't they have to admit that it's true. It's literally just them patting themselves on the back from discovering nothing discovering nothing. Absolutely insane. Absolutely insane. And another thing interesting is that uh if the mass coming from a coupling with the hex field then how do you explain the energy mass conversion based on the hex mechanism? Why a coupling constant is equivalent to energy? Why energy converted into a coupling constant and a coupling constant can be converted into a mass. Okay. And then you know for something which is outside the standard model of particle physics that's general relativity if you're so I think that other part he's saying is that why if you're saying that the Higs field is this significant field then why is energy converted to mass if there's this coupling what's the mechanism by which energy is being converted to mass or mass is being converted to energy you should be able to explain that if you say if you're telling me you figured out some fundamental field of the universe. So, what's crazy is if they the Higsfield is almost like the little redheaded stepchild of the ether. It's like it wants to be what the ether is, but it's not. It It's trying to be that, but they're too afraid to like go jump all the way in on it. So, pretty wild. Here we go. >> Cosmology. Okay. Then cosmology think you know what is gravity? You know yesterday we already saw many talks about gravity. gravity >> the traditional model associated that we have the curving of space time due to the presence. Now then please explain how can a coupling constant between a quantum field and hex field will curve space time you know so this there's a fundamental problem there that's another good one too why spacetime is a flexible solid think of spacetime if you struggle with this idea of spacetime then view the universe as a solid structure But it's flexible. It can bend like this, right? It can move around and bend like this. But everything's connected all the time. You're not ripping this off and moving it. You just everything's kind of connected. You can kind of squeeze it, compact it, etc. An elastic solid. Thank you. An elastic solid. Think of it, think of spacetime like that. Because if spacetime is an elastic solid, then we can create a bridge between two points. We can move that that medium around and manipulate it. >> Okay. Okay. So I think you know >> let's skip ahead a little bit. >> So the way out >> Mart has book okay later I can show you that >> quantum wave model quantum particles are quantized excitation waves of the vacuum medium. So essentially what we're saying here this theory is saying that everything is an excitation of this ether of this quantum vacuum that we are fluctuations in the vacuum everything is a wave fluctuation in the vacuum in the medium in the ether which it says okay now it's not just particles we're not just simple particles now we're a complex waveform that is materialized out of the Space juice. Exactly. The space juice. See, we have to simplify it for people. It's very complicated. We say there's an ether of invisible energy. You just say, "Look, you're swimming in space juice all the time. You just don't realize it." Boom. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Byebye. Thank you very much. Point light at point mass. It's a quantized exciting wave of explore. Okay. Not only and one of the common point you know in the conclusion of each talk is that you know after they saying well this dark matter could be this could be ri sometime could be small a dark hole or and so on and so on and the fin say we really don't know okay now for dark energy that's even more dark than dark matter okay okay to to work better than the people >> there it is this is the main screenshot so the classical view as you see in the top middle of the screen is that it's a particle. It's a little dot. But the quantum wave function world, it looks like this weird shape here. If you're struggling with that weird shape, don't worry. Don't worry. Don't worry, little Boo. Ashton's got you. Oh, wait. Do I have you? Uh. Uh oh. Oh, I thought I had a clip for this. Oh, I I have one. This is not the one I Oh, it's on my phone, I think. Here you go. Wait, it's kind of like this. It kind of looks like this. But anyway, you can see it a little bit better on this other one. That That's technically a plasmoid, but yeah, chat, I failed. I have the wave function thing somewhere. I think it's on my phone. Feels bad now. Okay, but anyway, quantum wave function, not a particle. So instead of thinking of things as like a discrete particle, we should be thinking of things as a wave function, as a wave function. Uh and yes, that's abstract for sure, but it's just it's more accurate to how reality really works 100 years ago. Okay, so we know that the two historical there are two different view of particle in the car view of the particle. We just Oh, sorry. I I pushed the wrong button. Okay. Oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh okay if the uh so one is say you know this is like classical mechanic okay Newtonian mechanic okay so the particle is basically just a a point mass okay and uh you can use a Newtonian mechanic to describe uh now nowadays we see many many indication okay that the in the quantum world I do I call it a wavele is a it's a wave particle kit okay So in nature in a microscopic wheel it is not a point mass it is a wave packet a quantiz packet a quantise and some wave packet and yeah >> I'm here just a name for example >> double slit experiment for you okay so now here he talks about how LHC is a scam >> here you ready for this >> experiment to convince all of us will be this experiment and this is called the particle particle collider now I picked this example because we have spent so much money building this particle accelerator. Okay, you're talking about billion and billions of taxpayers money and many many Nobel prize uh winner were working you know there too how they get the Nobel prize was based on this particle particle collider. So this is a big topic in modern physics today you know this is not a just unimportant uh experiment. So now of course these people they're working on the standard model particle physics they have a a very natural interpretation say well we discovered a new particle that support a like hex model and so on but I will put it in know the different angle to look at it you know if someone if you're not satisfied with the standard model then you can see well the evidence they got from this particle particle collider >> it may indicate something else okay >> oh not only not Not only is the LHC a giant scam, large pattern collider, billions of taxpayer dollars, major scam alert, not only did they never really discover anything, they also pretended to discover the Higsfield because we needed to give some old guy a Nobel Prize so that he would cry on TV. And turns out if we actually look at the evidence, it may actually prove them wrong. Oh boy. Oh, this is my kind of science chat. I love watching these communities meltdown. MH370X is honestly the greatest. We literally get to watch the UFO community meltdown and participate in real time in their melting down in their realization that their whole UFO disclosure has been a big scam the whole time. We get to watch academia come to terms with the fact that they screwed up bigger than they could have ever imagined. That academia is a bigger scam than anybody could have ever thought in their wildest dreams. We get a firsthand seats. We get front row seats to it. And we get to just sit here the whole time and just say, "I told you so. I told you so." I mean, I would pay for this kind of service. Chat, what a life we live. What a life. Big scam action. Here we go. LHC. Once I saw this part about LHC being a scam, I said, "Okay, we're watching this." Okay, so I'm offering a new angle of looking at the result of this particle particle collider experiment. Now, first, why they want to spend so much money with such a technological challenge to build this particle particle? Here's the biggest scam of all. The biggest scam of all. Like they literally were just like, you know how they sold this to us? They were like, "Hey. We're going to make it really big." I can't believe not one physicist came to them and said, "Does it need to be really big?" Like, does it actually need to be really big? What if the universe is scale invariant and we don't really need to make like a 20 mile wide particle collider? What if that's just stupid use of resources? Nobody ever said that. We've got compact fusion reactors. We're looking at plasma balls that are not even 20 feet wide. And you're telling me in order to do particle acceleration research, we have to have a collider that's 20 miles wide that we spend billions and billions of dollars on. That was the biggest scam of all. The biggest scam of all was thinking having us go big must be good. More bigger means more goodter in science, right? actually just wild man every single time I find out some more stuff it's always just disappointing it's just disappointing when it comes to a scientific perspective called collider I mean the reason is very simple >> tell us >> is that they want to find out what particle is make off now just take an analogy okay suppose a Martian you know come from a different planet come to earth there's a no automobile in Mars and they come over here in mun See this car driving a lot. So this Martian is curious about you know what these cars make up. So what they doing you say the Martian magic they're putting two car colliding each other. Okay. So they collide. Wow. Oh and they the Martian analyze that debris came out from this part of a part of collision. Oh you can see you know there's a rubber tire. Okay. Rubber tire. Okay. You can see some of the metal. You can see some of the glass parts. Find out of that. >> Okay. So he's saying, "What are we doing?" We're smashing two things together and we're going to see the parts. We want to see what they're made up of. That's what the idea of the particle collider is, right? So we smash two cars together, we see all the parts, wheels, tires, etc. So what happens when we actually do it? You're not getting a broken glass. You're getting something farhead, far more sophisticated. you know than the automobile you put in. In fact, I I I plan to withdraw this picture. I'm going to put aircraft carrier, you know, like Roel, you know, in the middle years we almost at war. Okay. And and you know the math is many many time you know this is not dramatic. Basically the point he's making here is what we're seeing is bigger is more complicated than what we shot into it. So this is a big problem but from a zero point energy perspective it makes total sense. If you shatter these things apart and you're seeing the total combined things is much more complicated, much heavier, much bigger than what you shot together, how do you explain that? Where's that excess mass? Where's that mass coming from? Where's that energy coming from? Oh, it's coming from the vacuum. It's coming from the vacuum. Why? Because we are in a vacuum of energy that's in an equilibrium. We're not in nothing. We're in an ocean of energy all the time. So, this is actually a simple explanation for people that believe in zero point energy that understand zero point energy. People that don't understand zero point energy, this is like, whoa, what does this mean? Why why is this happening? How do we explain this result? So, let's skip ahead a little bit. Here's the hypothesis of the quantum wave model. Particles are quantized excitation waves of the vacuum medium. means different types of particles are different excitation modes of the same vacuum. So in a few seconds here he says what is the vacuum. Okay. Uh so the different type of particle are just a different size of the same vacuum. Now this quickly simplify the picture of quantum field. Now you don't need 200 quantum field. You only need one wave medium. That's the vacuum medium. Now if that is the conclusion then next question immediately jump up. If we believe particle is a quantized wave of the working medium then they really say what is it what's the physical property you say I as a fake question which is almost like this question okay but just slightly different so we thinking we asking the same question okay we asking the same thing okay so so what is the physical property of the vacuum okay now in the 19th century this was a hot topic because the people believe in this evil model but in the 20th century ether Ether model chat there he goes and people believed in the ether model. >> This is not a a fashionable topic because you know since the day when special pub is built people well the hypothesis are evil is old fashioned for Maxwell summarize all their uh study on electricity and magnetism. So there it is the answer. Okay I'm just going to simplify it. His accent's pretty rough. So basically he says here there's a hidden assumption in Maxwell's equations. The hidden assumption in Maxwell's equations is that the vacuum is a dialectric medium. Boom. The vacuum is a dialectric medium. Who else said something similar? Friedwart Winterberg in the plank ether hypothesis. Maxwell's equations have that. Why? Because Maxwell needed to propose and include a displacement current in his equations. His equations didn't work at first. He had to include displacement current. Displacement current is being affected by the medium by the dialectric medium of the vacuum. This proposal is only valid when a wave medium is a dialectric material. This is why right here. This is why Jarfat is wrong. Jack Sarat is wrong. We do not need metamaterials to produce warp drives. We have a medium that we can manipulate. We have a material we can manipulate. It's called the vacuum itself, the ether. Spacetime itself can be manipulated via energy. That's the big secret. Okay. uh >> when he first publish it this is the first version of the emp >> let's skip ahead a little bit >> then this a negative primordial charge and a positive primordial charge will separate and now you have a separation this will create a electric field okay >> there you go there's electricity right here guys this is I just kind of skipped over the most important part what is this medium this dialectric medium what he's saying on the screen right here look at that graph what he's saying is that you have positive and minus charge and they're overlapped. When they're overlapped, what happens? They balance each other out. They cancel out when they overlap. Positive. But if we rip the positive and minus charge apart, if we rip them apart, if we separate those charges, we call this electricity. Why? Because we have positive over here and minus over here. And we create what? A current. I think I I think I did that the right direction. we create a current. That's what he's saying right here. That's what he's showing right here. What we think of as electricity is positive and minus charge separated of the ether. When we think of as a a generator, a generator, magnet, a copper coil spinning through a magnetic field, we're churning up the ether. The ether is in an equilibrium. We rip it out of equilibrium and we produce what? Electricity. The electricity will flow until the equilibrium closes and then no more electricity flows. You can imagine it like your battery. When your battery runs out, no more energy. Why? Positive and minus charge separated. There you go. There you go. That's what he's >> But that's how the is created. >> Okay. >> Question just for clarification on the previous page at the top you said changes. You mean charges or changes at the top right? >> I think charges. >> Yes. Is that charges? Oh, this is a charge. I don't mean minus. I mean, you you see there's a P side. The red is positive, the green is negative. Okay. >> Okay. Okay. Okay. Now, if that is the case, now we can ask some very specific question. Okay. So, for example, if the quantum part is excitation wave at vacuum, can the quantum wave equation including direct equation equation be derived based on vacuum excitation? Right? There's a reasonable question. The other question is what is the physical meaning of the quantum wave function? Is it the me measure of the oxillation of the ve? Look at that top question right there. What does that top question say? If a quantum particle is an excitation wave of the vacuum, can the quantum wave equations including the Schrodinger equation be derived based on the vacuum excitation? What's the answer to that? Yes. The answer is yes. The answer is what he's saying is there. If it's not a particle, if mass is not a particle, if it's a quantum wave packet, can we solve the Schrodinger equation and figure out how that mass is interacting with the medium? Yes. Yes, we can. In fact, that is the live stream on solving the Schroinger equation from a couple weeks ago. So, when I saw that, that's when I knew we were going to be looking at this tonight. And finally, if the >> what is the physical meaning of the quantum wave function s is it a measure of the oscillation of the vacuum medium? So what he's saying here is sigh the quantum wave function is it just a measurement of the oscillation in the medium? Why is this so big? Because now we're starting to understand how do you determine an object's quantum wave function? How what is my wave function? What is the wave function of this cup? What is the wave function of that? Well, I can tell you what it how what it means with respect to physics. It means how is this cup displacing the medium? This cup's in a medium. How is it displacing that medium? If you can measure that, then you can measure what this cup means in its space and time in the medium. Boom. There you go. Why? Because as somebody said, the cup is oscillations itself. It's oscillating in the medium all the time. Boom. Solving Schrodinger's equations. That's what it means conceptually. What we're talking about is how do you determine how an object is displacing the medium of the ether that we're in all the time? Particle excitation wave. How can a particle a wave have mass? What's the physical meaning of mass in a way? Okay. So this this is immediate question from their hypothesis. So we think is well we know that the wave function usually represent the physical displacement of wave medium. This is from our study of a classical mechanic including continuum mechanic and you know I think shadow is going to talk about the elastic solid elastic is a very a very good example of that but even simpler example is a stressed string a vibrating string. Now this is probably most textbook they start from the HR state. >> So okay it's hard to understand. So I'm gonna say he's it says examples vibrating spring elastic solid dialectric medium. So he's saying how is this possible? Well think of the medium as an elastic solid. Think of as a dialectric medium. How do we interact with it? Oh electricity. It's dialectric. So we interact with it with electricity. We can manipulate the properties of the medium with electricity. Okay. And because the elastic solid is already quite you take an analogy just like an a elastic solid and a solid consider the motion of a sound wave in an elastic solid using the hemholtz decomposition the displacement of a volume element in the elastic solid can be decomposed or decomposed. So one you have the scalar potential and then you have the vector potential. So here you go. He said their motion can be described by different wave equations. So this right here is directly now links us back to the solving the Schrodinger equation. We can say oh now we can see there's this scalar component and there's this vector component of all of our wave functions. It's not simple as I am a particle in hanging out in nothing. No, I'm a quantum wave function in a medium. So, he's saying, "Okay, we've got the equations to solve that. Let's go ahead and do it." And now he's talking about vacuum displacement. So, we can figure out what vacuum displacement is to figure out how we're being displaced in the vacuum. I think I'm just going to go straight to the the summaries then medium. Okay, this is for probably for >> I want to see this one. I wish there was a better visualization of this one because I think he talks through how this explains um uh it can be uh figured out from first principles I think >> instruction purpose. Okay. Uh but sometimes by comparing different system different way inspire monopol >> what >> where is it? >> Simple here. Okay. Here we go. >> So like that. Now we find out that for the material medium you have both the transverse wave and the longitudinal wave. But for the veum medium because it is a a a dialectric medium you only have the long uh the transverse wave. You don't have the longitudinal way. Okay. Now this is experiment. We know light is a transverse way. So now once we have the excitation the wave equation of vacuum excitation then it should be possible to derive all these equation like the wave equation for the massless particle set and the photon and then also wave equation for the mass particle such a ker equation de equation certing equation. Now then they have the same different solution of the same excitation wave. So put it in in a simple my way a simple way this wave excitation in the vacium is provide the mother of all quantum wave equation. >> Wow. So the simple way to explain it he says this the way you explain this you can you have Schrodinger's equations you have D's equations you have the Klein Gordon and then you also have photons massless particles. How do you explain all of these? He says, "Well, at the top you have something called vacuum excitations. Excitations in the vacuum in the medium." Now, you understand why I like people like Dr. U because these are physicists that realize we are in a medium. That's the only way you can explain these phenomenon. It's the only way you can explain light. You can explain mass. You can explain the Schrodinger equation, entanglement. We must be in a medium. We must be in a medium. This video is only from a few days ago as well guys. Okay. And there you go. There's another visualization of the uh actual sigh of the >> wave equation of the vacuum. We represent the mother of >> depend on the longitud relation the block relation and also we know that the P equal to mass times velocity and the velocity of particle is the group speed dependent. So these relation in the literature they call it relativistic relation but what I show you is that they are not from relativity they are from the consideration that a quantum particle is a quantized exciting way. So >> so this this is the part we didn't lose it actually this is the part where from first principles he shows using this conceptual viewpoint you get directly back to E= MC^2. So what this means is a self-consistent theory. It says, "Here you go. We've got this theory out here, and just using this logic, following this formulization, you fall right back into E= MC^2." Boom. So, when people say, "How do we know that gravity electromagnetism must be connected?" Because the equations fit together like a puzzle piece, guys. The equations fit together like a puzzle piece. It's like if you found a puzzle piece and it fits into the puzzle. You'd say, "Well, that's part of the puzzle." You wouldn't say, "Oh, it's just a coincidence that that puzzle piece fits in that puzzle spot." No, it's a perfect match. Literally must be this way. The bigger question is, why do people ignore this? How is not every physicist in the world on board with the fact that obviously electromagnetism and gravity are linked together? Like, here you go, right there in front of you. Here's the DRA equation being derived from Klein Gordon as well. And then uh we can derive the quantum wave equations as well. There's the Schroinger equation. And I think there's a summary at the at the end here. Let me take a look. Oh, wait. Does it say matter wave? Here we go. That they actually represent they represent. So this term is related to M0 is related to L. And what is L? L is related to the trans wave number. >> All I know is at the top of that screen it says the energy momentum relation is originated from the dispersion relation of the matter wave. So yeah we're making matter waves. Particle properties versus wave properties. So, one of the big questions that people should be asking is Charles Chase has a coherent matter wave beam patent. What the hell is a matter wave? I mean, does a matter wave even exist in a classical view of physics? If everything is a particle and two firmians cannot have the same point in space and time, how do you make a matter wave beam? Someone walk me through that step by step. I literally just want to understand that. I was actually on a podcast. It's going to come out pretty soon, I think. And I asked that question. It's a pretty basic question. How is a matter wave being possible? If it is possible, then matter must be a wave, right? Or you've turned it into a wave or was it always a wave? I mean, these are pretty simple questions. Hope they have simple answers. Okay. Um, oh, and this is actually an interesting point here. What does he say about the curvature and the wave field? Yes, they're two sides of the same coin. Okay. And also we find that yes, a connecting loop between the particle property and the wave property. For example, energy is connect to frequency. Momentum is connect to the longitudinal wave vector. And then mass is connect to the trans wave number. Okay. Now what is this wave property? They're all one over the either the periods or wavelength. Now what is one over period of wavelength? One over period of wavelength actually represent the curvature of banning the vacuum. Now >> wow. So right here it looks like he's saying we can actually use this to determine the curvature of spaceime. We can actually use these equations to determine what the expected curvature of spaceime is based on the energy in that region, the mass energy in that region. So with these theories, we actually begin to have an answer for what is spacetime? What is gravity? Well, here you go. Here's the formulization for it. Okay, last part. So then he's saying here energy, momentum and mass are all related to the curvature of the bending of the vacuum, the curvature of the ether of the zero point energy. There you go. And if this is possible, if this is true, there's your warp drive. How do you make a warp drive? Well, you create some ripples in the in the vacuum. Manipulate the vacuum and you are going to create a warp drive. Simple. Okay. So here's a short summary. This is the last part and then we're going to go on to the next >> electric medium. The quantum wave equation of electron photo can be derived based on the wave excitement in vacuum and the quantum wave function of a particle is a sol and the energy momentum mass are all as the curvature of a bing medium. >> So vacuum is not an empty space. How many times have I said that? That's point number one right there. The vacuum is not empty space. Particles are quantized excitation waves of the vacuum medium. According to Maxwell theory, the vacuum behaves like a dialectric medium. Behaves like a dialectric medium. The quantum wave equations of the electron and the photon can be derived based on wave excitations in the vacuum. We can actually derive the electron and the photon from these quantum waves as well. Not just mass but the light as well. The quantum wave function of a particle is associated with the electric the electric vector potential. The electric vector potential is associated with the quantum wave function. And then lastly energy momentum and mass are all associated with the curvature of the bending of the vacuum medium. So what's that saying? That's saying that where is mass coming from? Why do we why do we have mass? Why do we weigh anything? We weigh something because the more bending of the medium, the more mass around us, the more stuff, the more bending there's going to be, the more we're going to weigh, the heavier we're going to be. So this theory can explain the the parts of physics that we don't have right now, the parts that we struggle with. So what we can say is um we can unify matter and radiation. We can provide a physical basis for the formulation of quantum mechanics. The origin of mass, the origin of charge. Then there's implications on dark matter and dark energy. We can explain all of these things pretty well with the idea of zero point energy. So to close out the night, a little bit more science, guys. Bear with us. We are going to listen to a little bit of Richard Fineman. I kind of might turn this into a thing. I kind of like listening to Richard Fineman. Maybe not every night, but a little bit here and there. Richard Feman explaining to us electricity. It's about five, seven minutes long. Let's see. I'll play back. Here we go. Now, let's see how close Richard Fineman's explanation of electricity is compared to what we just learned in that video is four days old. So, this is 2025 physics where we're talking about separation of charges, breaking out of our equilibrium, being in a medium of energy. Let's see what Richard Fineman thought. Where does energy come from, Richard Fineman? Uh, why are you not speaking, Richard Fineman? >> At the world imagining things, which really isn't fantasizing because you're only trying to imagine the way it really is. comes in handy sometimes. The other day I was at the dentist and he's getting ready with his electric drill to make holes and I thought I better think of something fast or else uh it's going to hurt. And then I thought about this little motor going around and what was it that made it turn and what was going on? And what's going on is there's a dam some distance away here and water going over the dam turns a great big wheel, right? And this wheel is connected with long thin pieces of copper which split up into other pieces of copper and split up and spread all over the city. And then they're connected back through another little gadget that makes wheels turn. All the wheels of the city are turning because this thing thing turns. If this thing stops, all the wheels stop. It starts again. They all start again. And I think that's kind of a marvelous thing of nature. It's kind of it's extremely curious that phenomenon I like to think about a lot because all it is is copper and iron. See, sometimes we think it's a man-made generator. It's very complicated. The phenomenon is a result of some special something that we made. But it's nature doing it and it's just iron and copper. And if you took a big long loop of copper and had iron at each end and moved the piece of iron here, the other iron moves to the other piece. And if you get it down to the nothing, you know, just moving a piece of iron in a loop of copper and seeing another piece of iron move, you realize what a fantastic mystery nature is. Uh the you don't even need the iron. You could if you at least get this pump prime primed and started by jiggling copper strands around fast enough, knotting them and unnotting and so forth, you can get other copper strands to move at the other end of a long connection. And what is it? It's only copper and motion. And uh we're so used to circumstances in which these electrical phenomena are all canceled out. Everything's sort of neutral with pushing and pulling is really very dull. So before we even get too far into it, he's already saying that he's talking about this idea of synchronization. He's saying, "Oh, if I turn this over here, this thing's going to move. And these things are all linked together in this big system." And then right there before I I stopped it, he says, "We think of things as everything kind of dull, neutral. It's always neutral all the time, right? How does this connect to what we just listened?" Because the vacuum is generally neutral, is equilibrium. But we can rip it out of equilibrium. We rip it out of equilibrium. Then what happens? We get this magical thing we call electricity occurs. But nature has these wonderful things, magnetic forces and electric. You comb your hair with your comb and you get some strange condition. So you put it in front of a piece of paper and it lifts up the paper where the paper jiggles at a distance far away. And that's in fact turns out that that is the thing that's more deeper inside of everything than the things we're used to. We're used to forces that only act directly, right? You push with the finger, it only acts directly. But then you have to imagine what it is that's pushing with the finger. Here's this little fingers made out of little balls and atoms and it's got another bunch of atoms that I'm pushing. And there's a little space between those atoms and this pushing is going through that space. And the only thing that happens with the cone and the paper is that circumstances have arisen which make it possible to see that these forces go through a bigger distance than just the short distance between the atoms. What what it is is they have you have charges like electrons that are both the same. They repel each other with a force. They're little tiny particles. They have a piece of the atom and they repel each other with a force which is enormous. It's inversely as the square of the distance just like gravity is inversely as a square of distance but gravity is attractive and this is repulsive. And for two electrons the gravity is so weak compared to the electricity. Electricity is so much more enormous. Then the gravity I can't express it because I don't know the name of the number. It's one with 30 or eight or 40 zeros after the one. Bigger is electricity. It's so enormous that if I were all electrons, well, it's the numbers are too big. So, so he's saying, why is it that my hand doesn't go directly through the cup? Why doesn't my hand go through the cup? Because repulsion. The electrons in the cup are repelling. The electrons in my hand can't go through it. the force increases exponentially as the distance goes down. That means as I get closer and closer, the repulsion increases significantly. This is probably one of the most important concepts to understand is that everything isn't as physical as we imagine it is. What's really just happening are forces, electric forces that are repelling. That's what prevents our hand from going through the cup. If uh there's also however for electrical things other kind of charge positive charges example of protons are positive they're inside the nucleus of the atom and they attract electrons opposite charges attract and like charges repel. So you have to imagine enormous forces where likes are trying to get away from likes and unlikes are trying to get near the opposite. What would happen if you had a lot of them? There'd be all the likes would collect with unlikes. They attract each other and they get an intimate mixture of pluses and minuses all on top of each other very close together. you wouldn't have a lot of pluses anywhere because they repel each other. They'll all be compensated by minuses very close and you get these little knots of plus and minus. The reason that the knots don't get smaller and smaller is because they are particles and they've got quantum mechanical effects that we won't discuss that makes it that you can't get any smaller than a certain size. And so you get these little lumps which are balls. They're the atoms. The atoms have positive and negative charge and they're neutralized. They they cancel that charge as nearly as they can. And because of this intimate, this force is so big, it ends up nowhere with very little left because it's so big, it cancels out. There's always so exactly the same pluses and minuses in any normal material. When you comb your hair, how huge was that? Do you guys understand how big that was? He's saying almost every material is almost perfectly neutral. Why? Because when you have positive and negative things, they attract towards one another. So over time, everything becomes kind of neutral. It tries to become neutral. Everything's trying to become neutral all the time. This is also what Dr. U is saying. Why is it that gravity is so much weaker than electromagnetism? Why? Because it's it's neutral. They're particles that have come together and they've neutralized, but they've still left something over. Gravity, the curvature of spaceime that they're causing by existing. So, you can tell he's already connected to the idea of, well, if that's the case, then what is electricity? Oh, well, if I break those apart again and pull the electric away, the minus away from the positive, they're going to want to come back together again. Now, I have a force. Well, there's just a little bit extra. Just a few extra minuses, say here, and somewhere else a few extra pluses. But the forces are so big, there's just the extra ones which make a force that we can see that seems to be at a long range. And that we find mysterious and that we need an explanation for. and we try to find an explanation for it in terms of ideas like the forces that are inside of rubber bands or steel bars or twisted things. We would like to have some kind of puller at a distance because we're used to it that we don't get any push until we're touching. But the fact is that the reason we don't get any push until we're touching is it's the same force as you see at a long distance only it's come down to short because the pluses and minuses have canceled out so well that you don't feel anything until it gets very very close. When it gets close enough of course it makes a difference which is plus and which is minus and where they are and they repel each other. So it's kind of fun to imagine this intimate mixture of highly attractive opposites which are so strong that they cancel out the effects and it's only sometimes when you have an excess of one kind and another that you get this mysterious electrical force. And how can I explain a mysterious electrical force in any other way? Why should I try to explain it in terms of stiff of something like >> So there you go. He just said it right there. He goes, "How do I explain this electrical force?" Well, if you have a little bit more positive or a little bit more minus, you have an electric force. If you create an asymmetry where there's more positive over here than there is over here, you've created a current. So, what did he just say there? He said, electricity is a separation of positive and minus charge. And he says, how why should I explain it any more than that? That's a perfect answer. Why do I have to explain it more than that? Anything more than that forces me to go into esoterics. Why does that exist? Why does that why is that a property of the universe? I don't know. That's the way the universe is apparently. Jelly or other things which are made and I understand the other way around in terms of strong long-distance forces which have all canceled out. So it's the electrical forces in fact and the magnetic forces in fact that we have to accept as the base reality in which we're going to explain all the other things. So again it turns out it's hard to understand. You have to do a lot of imagining that the real world has it as its base a force which acts at a long distance that we haven't got much experience with that force. We have a peculiar phenomena here and there but ordinarily we don't have much experience with that force is simply because that's what requires explanation. That's what requires imagination. The long-distance force we have no other picture for. And then the example of the >> h that's probably good enough. So there you go. The answer to that question, what is electricity? Really, no one knows. All we can do is describe electricity as a separation or an asymmetry of charges. More positive over here, more minus over here. You can reorient that however you want. When that condition gets created, boom, current, electricity forms. Somebody asked, can you talk about string theory and why string theory is a distraction? Truthfully, no. Why? Because I don't really know much about string theory because I have no interest in string theory. And I don't think we should waste a lot of time going, "Oh, these string theory people are wasting our time or whatever." No, we should just be blazing our own trail. What is it that I say in a lot of my spaces that you you're either somebody putting up roadblocks trying to tear other people down or you're trying to build your own thing up? We have no reason to tear down string theory. It's already a dead theory as it is. Doesn't solve anything. Doesn't make anything simpler. Instead, we just present our own theory. Here's a little bit of zero point energy. It comes with a side of a neutronic fusion. Would you like some of that? If you don't want that, you can go back to string theory. I don't know. It says there's like 27 dimensions and you extend the strings or something. It doesn't make any damn sense to me. But hey, if it works for you, go for it. Me, I'm going to stick with the people talking about how the sigh waves can manipulate the medium and explain entanglement and how we can teleport stuff. But hey, that's just that's how I'm built, baby. We're just built different, I guess. Okay, guys. Thank you very much, everybody. Awake not woke in the pill chat. Thank you everybody in Rumble. Hope you guys hung out and enjoyed tonight. Guys, these songs, everybody always asks about the songs. MH370 Cipher, I think that's the name of both songs. One is by Pepe and the other one is by um Little Huda. Guys, thank you guys. MH270X. On Wednesday, we're probably going to dig more into fusion and we're going to look at this warp drive warp reactor that's connected possibly to too toidal plasmos. Let me just take one last look and make sure that we hit the all the super chats. We did. Great. Thank you guys. M270X. Have a great night. Make sure you guys are following, checking everything out on Twitter and on the social medias. And we'll be back on Wednesday, everybody. Peace out, everybody. [Music] Out in the fields where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull. No crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Bone trip 7 through a wormhole. But we're talking wormholes. Stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole flow. [Music] [Applause] [Music] Exotic matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeeze so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab. They play generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cases force negative zones. We need to stay the course. Stalking wormhole, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing triple 7 through a wormhole float. Thin shell formalism plate so fine. Spherical geometry. We realign energy conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a try. Cool [Music] forces balancing the plate creating the throat opening gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. [Music] We're talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, city star destiny, MH370. Where did it go? Going triple 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. Lil Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos. Our future here.