Video Transcript
If I had to guess, Paul Sizz while he was alive may have been the world's leading expert in hypersonics. That's the feeling that I get. If he wasn't the world's leading experts, he's certainly like top five in the world. In the entire world, I've never seen air breathing, magneto hydrodnamics, and fuel propulsion than what I've seen from Paul by anybody. It's not even close. So they talk about this Russian project, this Ajax project that they were kind of stealing from, that the United States was stealing from. But essentially all they were doing here was they were trying to turn a traditional ramjet scramjet engine into a heat exchange using electromagnetism. So if you actually look into how jet engines operate and how they work, it's all about moving the air through the turbine in a very complex way. so that it doesn't melt the the rotors and all this other stuff. So, what they're essentially trying to do when they convert when we make these plasma drones is what we say is instead of all those rotors and metal parts inside, we're just going to use magnets. That's it. We'll have a laser shoot forward and ionize or pre-ionize the air to turn the air into a plasma. And then we're going to have a tube. And then we're going to have magnets, cusps, magnets. And the magnets will just slow down particles that try to flow through the tube. Just like if you're making a fire hose and you get why do we get all that pressure from the hose? Because at the end we make a little nozzle and we make a hose. So in our plasma configuration though, what we're doing is we're trapping it within the interior of our orb. So we have m we have mirrors on either side so that when the particles come in, they gets trapped in here. and that the only thing that can escape is the X-rays or whatever we want to escape and then we can accelerate or decelerate those particles as necessary within our trapped plasma system. This is the essence of a air breathing magneto-hydrodnamic fusion system. Magnetohydrodnamic just means controlling plasma with electromagnetism or you can just think of electromagnetism as magnetism if it makes it easier for you. So that's what the idea of this paper is is an advanced concept here. Now he goes through how it's set up and I think that my favorite image is this one here. You actually can see this in some of his other works for Paul Sizz. But what you see here is essentially this is just like a tube. It's just a tube and they're just having the air get compressed through this tube and then they put these magnets along the edges of it. I think they alternate in magnetic field too, although that may not be like a thing that's stuck in uh set in stone. The idea of creating a virtual aerospace craft with respect to the flow field around the vehicle and the engine performance prevents represents a basic change in aircraft design philosophy. Traditionally, the environment through which the aircraft to fly is defined and then the aircraft is designed to operate in that environment. The higher the speed, the more difficult it is to define the flight environment and simulate it in test flights to verify the design. As speed increases, more performance is necessary by all elements compromise or comprising the aircraft design concept. Cost and technical risk increase. The virtual aircraft approach is different in that the environment is changed to accommodate the aircraft. Wow. Wow. What is Paul Sizz saying right there? I mean, he's being very explicit. What Paul Sizz is saying there is he's actually making a general relativity argument. Paul says is saying if you were to accelerate something like that this top to my soda, the more I accelerate this, the faster I speed this up, the heavier it gets and the harder it gets to accelerate. And he's saying the faster I fly my craft, the more we have to work on the structural design because otherwise it's going to rip apart. So he says there's another way to think about it. Don't think about changing the design of the craft. Think about changing the design of the environment of the environment. Now, if you know Paul Sizz and you know his work on hypersonics, you know exactly what he's talking about. He's talking about using cold plasmas to reduce drag. This is exact. This is real. By the way, people think that I'm bullshitting, but if you just fact check me, you would find that probably almost everything I'm saying is 100% true. They use something called a plasma sheath. Imagine that our Boeing 7 is actually a fighter craft, a spy, hypersonic spider fighter craft. They use a plasma sheath. They shoot a laser in front of the craft to make a sheath. And the plasma sheath reduces the drag. Reduces the drag means reduces the stress on the plane. Exactly what Paul says is talking about. Why? Why does a plasma sheath reduce the drag? Why does that and why does that reduce the friction of the craft? Because you're modulating you're modifying the environment. You're modifying the environment. And the moment that they figured out that the plasma sheath is is making your craft easier to move, okay, make it a plasma bubble. Now, even better. Now, we can move 360 degrees any direction we want to go. Just aim the laser where you want to go. Simple as that. In fact, in here, here you go. This is actually what I remembered I wanted to say. Listen to this. I'm glad I mentioned that. Here we go. The technologies incorporated in the design concept include a magneto hydrodnamic generator to extract power from the air entering the engine. A neutron beam to increase conductivity of the flow entering the engine. an MHD accelerator in series with the MHD generator to bypass energy around the combuster and return the energy to the exhaust of the engine. a cold plasma beam or air spike to interact with the flow field ahead of the aircraft and electromagnetic fields and microwave energy to modify the flow around the aircraft. And there's your design right there. There's your image. These guys, can you believe this? These guys were literally working on the precursors to the orbs in the MH370 videos. This is the precursor. The image you see here of a traditional flight craftm. Once your object is covered by plasma and once you realize there's no reason to have a person inside of the craft, once we can make a drone out of it, now this thing can become much much smaller. Drag and heat transfer reduction is obtained by using a combination of magnetic fields, cold plasmas and microwaves. It has been proposed to change the operating environment by using a combination of magnetic fields, plasmas and RF energy sources. To change the environment around the aircraft, it is necessary to make the flow conducting. The flow must be conducting to change the environment. So you need to create an electrostatic bubble. This is a key requirement of the system. How it is to be done and the level of conductivity is needed is a question yet to be defined. The engine of the Ajac uses an MHD energy bypass system to control the velocity, the speed in the engine combuster. So this is what they're doing. This this bypasses and controls the speed in your combuster in your engine. An MHG generator is used to extract energy from the flow entering the engine thereby slowing the speed of the air entering the engine combuster. Flow through the combuster is maintained at subsonic speed. By maintaining subsonic flow in the combuster, performance of a ramjet rather than a scramjet engine is obtained. So what they're saying here is by doing this we can actually improve the efficiency of the engine. The ramjet produces a higher level of performance than a scramjet engine is much easier to design and build. And then I just said the thing about the cold plasmas. Okay. Drag reduction did not show a performance advantage based on the representation used for the cold plasma drag reduction system. In this study, the cold plasma trade case was preferred to the air spike trade case. However, little is known about the phenomen phenomenology of cold plasmas at this time. Both NASA and the Air Force are currently investigating cold plasmas. A close look at the comparison of the ideal velocity requirements for both designs indicates that drag losses were not a significant factor compared to the NASA to the allaxis breathing. So there you go. He's talking about coal plasmas right here as well. Okay. So I wanted to show that paper. Let me show another one. I think he says somewhere in this paper that the significant factor is the weight of the magnets. Yep, here it is. Right here. Oh, found it. Found it. Listen to this. The heaviest component of the system is the superconducting coil magnets which surround the MHD channels. Some of these I feel like are like unless you're a super follower, you probably don't understand the significance. But here you go. One of the connections that I think only I've put together, maybe some other people have put it together, but from an influencer standpoint, I mean, from people that have over a hundred thousand followers, let's say, on social media, I'm the only one that's put together that superconducting magnets are a requirement for this MHD fusion propulsion. And this is why Ning Lee and Eugene Popclanov, this is why they became so interested or they became so popular in the '9s. They were testing with superconducting magnets and they were seeing some of the effects that the US Department of Energy already knew about and and they knew that they could take these superconducting magnets potentially these new YBCO superconducting magnets and they would be lighter. they might be lighter because the key factor is that the magnets are the heaviest part of the apparatus. So if the magnets can get lighter then that changes everything about the design. So if there was a major breakthrough in superconducting magnets especially ones that can be molded that is something that would have enabled the fusion orbs now all of a sudden become something that we can produce humans can produce. So, why is that significant? Because these papers are about to roll from one into the next. Get ready. What's this? Take a look at this paper right here. Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 1967. So, we're starting to get to the point in this investigation, guys, where now I'm starting to make sense of these old scientific papers. These old scientific papers that are like from the 70s and the 60s that I didn't really understand the significance of. Now, I know exactly what the hell they're hiding. They are hiding a neutronic directed energy fusion conversion. They figured it out from inertial confinement fusion. And there's breadcrumbs everywhere in these old scientific papers. I mean, look at what this one is called right here. Superconductive magnets at the Lewis Research Center for NASA, 1967. They were researching superconducting magnets in 1967. Well, we're about to find out. What do you guys think? Go ahead and speculate in the chat what you guys think they were uh looking into with these superconducting magnets in 1967. Take a look at this. Studies have shown that for such possible space applications as magneto hydrodnamic power generation and thermonuclear power generation and propulsion. The only practical solution to the required magnetic fields is the superconductive magnet. Boom. Drop the mic. Boom. We're out. We're out. 1967 says right there, you need superconducting magnets if you want to pull this off. Wow. Okay. I mean, when I start reading these papers, there's like five more moments like this in this paper alone. And now we can understand why this is important. But we can only understand it now having learned what we've learned over the last two years uh reading these scientific papers, understanding this context. Now we understand why this is important. Now we understand why they were writing papers like this in 1967. So it says as NASA's primary space propulsion and research laboratory, the Lewis Research Center is especially interested in the development of superconductive magnets. Of course we were. Of course, we were interested in superconductive magnets. Take a look at the next one. Forcefree tooids. What? Bob, is Bob still in the chat? Is Bob Greener still in the chat? What the 1967 Forcefree TOIDs? This I mean just just at a glance it sounds exactly like forcefree time harmonic plasmoids by Jack Nachamkin from the 90s but this is from 1967. What does this say? The concept of a forcefree magnet has been known and used since the early days in the production of high field magnets. Pioneers such as Capita and Croctoff Croc Crocoff used the principle of uniform hydrostatic pressure throughout the magnetic windings. In more recent times, the concept has been used in various laboratories concerning with the construction of highintensity fields of large volume for thermonuclear research. Wow. A tooid can be wound so that everywhere the conductor is nearly parallel to the field. In that case, the J * X the the crossroduct of the current times the magnetic field is small and therefore is a reduced force on the conductor. So they're talking about forcefree toids here. For superconductors, however, there's an advantage of winding the conductor parallel to the local magnetic field. Experiments have shown that superconductors carry more current when placed in longitudinal fields than when placed in traverse fields. Now I highlighted this. I still don't know exactly why this is important but this feels really important because we're talking about longitudinal fields here which is a scalar longitudinal scalar fields are longitudinal in nature. And this here when they talk about making them parallel. This is exactly what Jack Namkin was talking about in his 1992 paper forcefree time harmonic plasmoids. So it was seems to be implying that there's a higher current when you set this up correctly with superconductors. Says the critical current is strongly influenced by the angle that the conductor makes with the field. And then near the bottom here, it says these and other investigations showed that current enhancement can be as much of a factor of 10 or more. That isn't that an energy amplification factor right there? You can amplify the current by a factor of 10 just by your geometric winding of your superconducting magnet. I mean, this may not be exactly what Salvatore Pais is talking about in his patents, but it seems very close, minus the vibration.