Exploring Spacetime

Video Transcript

# Exploring Spacetime Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. [music] When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few [music] and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably [music] question those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our [music] critical faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without [music] noticing back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay [music] of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest [music] common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience [music] and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. [music] Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. [music] Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. >> Malaysian 370, contact 12 decimal 9. Good night. 37. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [music] [music] Oh, [music] [singing] [music] [music] I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture. [music] The Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade [music] the prince that he should do his duty and [music] to impress him. Takes on his multi-armed form [music] and says, "Now I am become death, [music] the destroyer of worlds." Hello everybody. Welcome to the Monday live stream, guys. I hope that the internet works throughout this entire connection. If we get cut off early or something happens, I apologize right off the bat, guys. I'm getting sus vibes from my internet right now. Websites are taking like 30 seconds to load. Messages aren't posted in the chat. I don't know what's going on. But I want to do a quick live stream tonight to talk about the interview that was done yesterday with S and Dave. I have just been thinking about it nonstop since yesterday since it happened. So, if you guys have not had opportunity to check out that Hard Truths podcast with S and Dave, check it out. Um, S does get his internet his uh computer connection figured out about 20 or 30 minutes in and joins us. And we had a really amazing conversation, guys. So, check it out. We're going to go over some of it here tonight, assuming everything holds up. before we get to all that. So, we're only going to talk about some space-time manipulation stuff, a couple scientific papers, uh, and then we're going to talk about a little bit of politics stuff right off the bat, guys. So, the first thing that's going on in the world, just to keep you guys apprised, what's happening in the world of politics is the government shutdown has ended. The government shutdown. I mean, actually, I'm not even 100% sure. I think it's over. So it turns out like six or seven Democrats basically jumped ship and went full traitor and joined the Republicans to end the shutdown. And I will go ahead and say on the record, I am very happy with the shutdown being over. I think that making it so that people were basically being held hostage and not being able to feed their families so that we could try to fund health care for asylum seekers. also read as uh illegal immigrants. I think that's absolutely absurd. Absolutely absurd. I also want to point out there was only one Republican who did not vote in favor of ending the shutdown and that is Ron Paul. Rand Paul, not Ron Paul. Rand Paul is the only one who voted against the reopening the shutdown on the Republican side, guys. Now, I was right again. You're going to hear this a lot, but I was right again. I said that this shutdown, Democrats had no chance in this shutdown whatsoever. They never had any chance. The Republicans are the ones that want to make government smaller. They used the shutdown as a political prop clearly for the elections that just finished. Once the elections were over, they went ahead and reopened the government. They tried to blame Trump and everybody on the government shutdown and that narrative just did not work whatsoever. didn't work whatsoever. So, I'm glad the government's reopened. Even as somebody that wants to minimize uh minimize government in general, the reality is, and this bleeds into the next topic, the reality is that government is not idealistic. A lot of people come into government and think, "Oh, I'm going to be the new kid on the block that's going to change everything." This is relevant for what we've been talking about with respect to disclosure. Changing the world, changing the world, driving change, impacting change is an extremely difficult thing to do. For example, if the R the reason why I don't like Rand Paul, the reason why I don't like uh Major Taylor Green is that these people are idealists. They don't have any actual pragmatic solutions to anything that they complain about. They just say, "Oh, like uh M MTG, for example, just got called out by Donald Trump." And she says, "Oh, I want to release the Epstein files." Okay, which files do you want released? If you ask her that, she'll say she doesn't know. Or she'll say, "All of them." Right? She'll say, "Oh, I want affordable health care. We all want affordable healthare. Healthcare is extremely expensive because the United States government spends 25% of the GDP on healthcare." 25% of every dollar that we produce and spend is spent on health care. There's no easy solutions to just I want affordable health care, right? These are easy things to say. They're very difficult things to actually do. And this is why to talk about the growing uh alt alt-right, woke right, whatever you want to call it, community, the Nick Fuentes community, he seems to be leading the charge. The moment that he or anybody in his sphere of influence were to get power, everybody would turn on them. His own followers would turn on him. Because what you realize is that the moment you've been given power, it's not easy to be like, "Okay, here's transparency. Here's the change that you wanted, the moment that outsider comes into the fold, they realize how difficult it is to change anything." And that's what already happened with this administration. We literally got the people that we wanted in in the FBI. The people wanted Cash Patel. people wanted Dan Bonino. Dan Bonino left his podcast career. Cash Patel. They We get the exact people that we want in those positions and then we complain that they don't do the things that we demanded of them. We complain that they don't make more arrests or they don't release the Epstein files. Here's a crazy thought. What if they're just being honest? What if there really isn't something? What if they either don't have access or there isn't anything to release? What if that's just the case hypothetically speaking? This is the problem is that everybody want everybody wants there to be this conspiracy going on all the time in the government and they want the other people to be the ones responsible. But the moment we give them the wheel, the moment we say here you go, you go ahead and drive the ship, then all of a sudden they can't do anything anymore. In fact, I would argue they don't want to drive the ship. They want to criticize while not actually accomplishing anything. Now, the last topic on tonight, which is relevant to this. Yeah, it's always a conspiracy, right? It's always there's another layer to the conspiracy. Now, Cash Patel is in on the conspiracy. Now, Dan Bonino's in on the conspiracy. Maybe it's just a systematic issue that we have to deal with. And systematic issues are not easy to fix. Now, going deeper into that conversation to piss people off even more because the more people come at me and say, "Stick to the orb. Stick to the plane. Stick to MH370. You're paid off by MSAD 7Ks." The more people do this type of stuff, the more I am going to push back and the more I'm going to annihilate this weird racist movement that's been growing in the right. Just yesterday or today, this kid, 20-year-old kid, gets arrested. He is a Nick Fuentes supporter and a groper. I don't know that for a fact, but I know it to be true. I can just look at his eyes and I can tell immediately that this kid was a Nick Fuentes supporter. It's pretty much as as a parent as as you just imagine in your head what a Nick Fuentes supporter, a Groper, looks like in your head and boom, there you've got the kid right there in front of your face, right? long shaggy hair, white kid, dead eyes, no hope for the future whatsoever, right? Extremely vile and racist. And he he goes and he sees Dave Portoi. Dave Portoi is bar stool sports presidente guy. He goes around and does pizza reviews and the kid just starts yelling at him, starts calling him a Jew, say, "F all the Jews." And literally throws coins at him as well. This is about as racist as you could possibly ever imagine somebody being. And so the kid gets arrested. Kid gets arrested for disturbing the peace like today or yesterday like that. And the racist anti-semitic rightwing is losing their minds over it on social media. My free speech. Oh no, the Jews are coming to get me. Let's just be honest. If anybody did this, if you like, if I went up to a black person and started calling them the n-word and then I just started throwing cotton at them, I would get arrested. No question whatsoever. I would get arrested. I would get arrested for hate speech. I would get arrested for disturbing the peace. I would get arrested for anything they could throw the book at me for. So, I have no problem whatsoever with this kid getting arrested for that. In fact, not only do I not have a problem with it, I think that they should make an example out of the kid. I think that the kid should get the maximum possible sentence. I think he should have to do community service. I think that he should have to do a formal public apology about how he is. I think you should have to literally write a 10,000word essay about why it's stupid to believe everything you see on the internet and not trust random skitso maybe gay kids who are, you know, trying to teach you to be a racist anti-semite. Absolutely. Throw the entire book at him, guys, because the it's a valuable lesson for these perpetually chronically online losers. And these are Redditors. Like I can look at this kid and I can tell right away he's been on Reddit way too long, right? They're Redditors, the left and the right. They need a wakeup call. They need a wakeup call that the internet is not real life. The internet is not real life. The way that you talk in the Nick Fuentes live streams, which I've seen, by the way, that is not acceptable in the real world. That is called you are living in a weird cult full of other unemployable losers. And that behavior is not acceptable in the real world where the rest of us live, right? And that's the lesson that you need to learn right now. If you are one of those people, the lesson you need to learn is your weird internet subcultures, those don't have any real power in the real world. Those don't actually mean anything. When you get to the real world, when you start acting like a vile, racist, terrible human being to real people in public for no reason, we are going to arrest you. We are going to arrest you. We're going to deplatform you. We're going to make you internet famous so that you can never get a job ever again. Okay? And the reason why we're going to do that is because we need to get this rot out permanently forever. I get it. I understand. Everything that happens to you is the Jews fault. It's somebody else's fault for all the bad things that have happened in your life. But that is not an excuse to be racist to people. That is not an excuse to blame a whole group of people for your problems. It's not. And this leads into our discussion. I literally asked Salvatore Py this yesterday. I said, "What do you think about the fact that a huge percentage of the scientists were Jewish?" A huge percentage of the scientists that we've been reviewing are Jewish, including Einstein. Einstein, a lot of Stein, a lot of Bergs, a lot of Jewish last names in there. And he just rattled off like a half dozen half dozen names just off the top of his head. You know, Fineman, I mean, I don't even know which of these people are Jewish. I I didn't know, but a lot are. And so, I guess the question becomes, you know, at what is our relationship? And I mean, if you really want to get out there, you really start to wonder like if we were to say here's all the here's all the races and what they have developed from a scientific perspective. Jews are way near the top of the list in terms of advancing technology in this world. Way near the top of the list. So I see no reason why we shouldn't be allied with the Jewish people whatsoever. I mean they are totally compatible with Western civilization. They have done more for scientific advancement than possibly any other race on the planet. Possibly any other race on the planet. So I just find the hatred towards them and the and the attacks towards them to be one inorganic. I find it to be highly inorganic and I find it to be highly ignorant as well. Highly ignorant as well. Not only is it inorganic where it's clearly they're clearly botting like clearly botting. Most of the accounts that are supporting these people are fake. They're fake accounts. They're brand new accounts. They're accounts with no followers. Or you'll also see a situation where they they follow like 15,000 people, but they only have like 500 followers. You see a lot of that behavior as well. None of them have profile pictures, right? It's it's just it's inorganic and it's fake. Now, the last thing I'll say on this before we move on to the the worthwhile stuff tonight, there was one more thing as well is that um so a lot of people have also been pushing this idea that Cash Patel's girlfriend is a MSAD agent as well. Uh I forget what her name is, but this is the other stuff too where it's like, guys, you're you're taking it too far, man. you're taking it too far when you're you're literally building up fake villains and fake stories in your head. And every single time it's it's about Israel. Every single time they're making it about Israel. Every time. And so she's actually suing she's suing the people. Alexis is her name. She is suing Elijah Schaefer. Now, I had a fallout falling out with Elijah Schaefer because when all the Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk stuff was happening. He was pushing a lot of this fake conspiracy stuff. And so I unfollowed him. And then he DM'd me. He DM'd me like, "I always respected you. Why did you unfollow me?" And my response to him was, "I never respected you. I don't respect racists and hyper anti-semite people. I don't respect that. I never have, never will. And so anyway, he's being sued by Alexis. He now is being sued by Alexis. So I want to just point out, the only reason why I'm even bringing this up is because I want you all to understand why I disavowed myself from these people. None of these people were increasing my credibility. If anything, they were quite literally tanking it. Quite literally tanking it. When you have people that are vile and we're talking unashamed racists, like the kind of people that are like, "Yes, white people are the best and we need to be we need only white people here, right?" That kind of stuff, which is just it's a little too much for me, guys. So, I do want to point out that we are all the things that I said I was going to do, that I said was going to happen, those things are happening. And so I don't want to hear crying about it. I said like a month ago we were going to cancel these people. We're going to deplatform these people. And we're even going to arrest these people if they commit crimes. We're going to do all of these things. And that's exactly what's going to happen. Last thing I'll say is this is that Nick Fuentes himself was the one that said that this was going to happen. And you could probably find a post by me where I said Nick Fuentes is right. What is going to happen is we are going to use these actions by his followers to shut down his entire movement. That's what's going to happen. That's reality. That's the future is the more of his followers that continue to do these acts where they go out in public and start committing like, you know, borderline hate crimes against people. He got lucky that they only came after him for disturbing the peace. The moment the more they do this, we are going to use this against you to shut down your entire movement to make sure that you are deplatformed, demonetized, and that you have no voice. So, if you want to keep doing it, go ahead. Just know that is the future. Okay. Now, let's get into the good stuff, guys. Understanding spaceime. So, here's the thing that you need to understand right off the bat. S's first thing I want to take a look at is S's time reversed, what did he call it? He said dimensionless constant. Dimensionless constant. Oh, okay. Well, before we get to that, if you think you can shut down the Nick movement, you are cooked. His entire movement came after me and entirely failed. You guys have peaked, man. The generational run is over, bro. Nick's generational run is over, bro. You have peaked, and now it's only downhill from here. I want to be as clear as I can about this, and I hope Nick Fuentes listens to this as well. Your generational run is done, bro. You win on every podcast you could go on. You went on Dave Smith, you went on Candace Owens, and you went on Tucker Carlson. Those were literally the only people that would host you. That was it. Patrick Bet David did you a solid and then kind of called you out. There's nobody else left. You're not getting on Joe Rogan. You're not getting on Joe Rogan. You're not getting on mainstream TV. You can't even get support from the right. You You think you're going to get support to be mainstream? The right can't even handle you. The right can't even pallet you. You think you're going to get support from the left? The reason why we're throwing out the Nick Fuentes of the world is because we know the left will use them to attack us. They're going to use these examples like this kid who yells at Dave Piti as an example of why all right-wingers are terrible racists. And we don't want to be painted with that same brush. >> [laughter] >> I just think it's funny because guys, let just remember this. Remember this. What have I been wrong about? What have I been wrong about? Guys, this is what I want you to remember. The people that are going, "You can't stop Nick. He's unstoppable. He's his generational run is so great. He's He's my hero. I jerk off to Nick Fuentes every single night." Okay, good luck. What have I ever been wrong about? Just remember that, okay? You will find out. You will find out that your hero is going to disappoint you. He's going to disappoint you guys. Get ready. Okay. Anyway, here we go. That's enough of that. That's enough. No more no more picking on those guys. Okay. [clears throat] The biggest question that I had and from the uh interview with S and Dave was the reverse temporal excursion equation. S lists off an equation and I tried to keep it you know tight in my head and what I gathered from the equation is that time is a factor of frequency and we're going to take a look at this here in a second. Uh actually let me read it off to you. Can I read it off? Negative delta t which is a negative time change is equal to a constant times the change in frequency divided by the frequency squared. That's it. That's the equation. And so that equation to me before I looked into it I thought in my head I was a little embarrassed. I didn't really want to say on the podcast just in case I was wrong. But in my head I thought well interesting this would mean that there is a way to manipulate time time dilation through manipulating manipulating frequency. In fact I I think it even speaks to the idea that time itself emerges from frequency and at a base level that we could say the zero point energy scales down to the plank frequency. So we could in theory I think say that all around us all the time there's this harmonic oscillation that's happening and that harmonic oscillation that's happening all the time determines our perception of time. So this zero point energy is in equilibrium meaning that the ocean is pretty flat but it's jiggling just a little bit right there's a little bit of waves on the surface of the zero point energy. This is what would cause us to experience our flow of time in the way that we feel it at the speed in which we feel it. And if you were to change those frequencies, manipulate that that frequency, then you could theoretically manipulate the zero point energy, manipulate time itself. Manipulate time. So, let me go ahead and read this because I asked Grock, I've been leaning heavily on AI, at least for like interpretations. I think it's pretty good at interpretating equations and why equations are significant. But let's just take a look ourselves and see what we think. Here we go. Whoops. Okay, here we go. So, here's the equation. I asked it to say what what do you think the significance why do I have all these things on my side screen here? Okay, here we go. So it says um the equation uh that I just described there describes a direct mathematical linkage between a shift in frequency and the corresponding excursion or shift in time with the negative sign indicating a potential reversal in the direction of time flow under certain conditions. here uh is this I don't know TS acts as a scalar factor that modulates the magnitude of this effect without altering its dimensional consistency. So here's the key implications. One, time is emergent from frequency dependent mechanisms. Time measurement fundamentally relies on periodic references such as atomic vibrations, light waves or mechanical oscillations all characterized by a base frequency. A pertabbation in this frequency induces a proportional time shift implying that time is an emergent property rather than a fundamental constant. In essence, time as we experience it could be redefined or rescaled by altering the underlying frequency of the system, challenging Newtonian absoluteness and aligning with relativistic views where time dilates based on reference frames. Wow. Yeah, it does sound a little bit like Roy, doesn't it? It sounds like Roy de Herbert right there. And that is pretty much what I just said, right? It says like what is the baseline? Great great question in the chat. What is the baseline? The baseline is that zero point energy that that uh constant flux the zitrabuagong. Remember that term zitraong. Zitraagong is a natural oscillations of spaceime itself. So to me that supports the idea that we experience time at the rate that we feel it due to the vibrations and the of the zero point energy all around us. And the earth this ball of rock that we're standing on is manipulating that zero point energy. The earth is causing a gravitational effect an induced effect on the 0 point energy field. So this is fully consistent with how we perceive general relativity. Fully consistent with this idea that the more mass you put, the more pulling on spacetime, the more the the uh the zero point energy gets disturbed. So I think that part is absolutely correct. Let's keep going. Let's keep going. So says for instance if frequency represents the ticking rate of a clock a positive change in frequency aka faster oscillations yields negative time or time reversal suggesting that the clock runs ahead compressing the perceived time intervals. Conversely, a negative frequency slows the system, potentially expanding time. So, right there, we're definitely speaking towards time dilation. So, if you're not familiar with time dilation, time dilation says that if I travel towards the speed of light and you stay at a at a constant speed or a rest speed, then our clocks get out of sync. How can our clocks get out of sync, though? Aren't we both in the same universe? If we're both in the same universe, then how can two different clocks by two different people get out of sync? And the answer to that is that time is not a fundamental property of the universe. Just like gravity, gravity nor time are fundamental properties of the universe. They're emergent properties. They're emergent properties, meaning they're things that we calculate based on other things. Gravity is the how much manipulation of the 0 point energy of spaceime occurs from mass. Time is how we measure intervals. But how far away are the intervals? The intervals can be far apart or they can be close together. So what that paragraph was saying there is depending how far or close your intervals are, you can either have a slowing of time or you can have an increase of the rate of time. Just like I've always been saying in terms of think of time, think of time as a dial. Think of it like a dial and you change the dial forward or back. What would that do? It speeds you up. I'm gonna talk really fast. What do we do? Go in once. Go in twice. Three times. Sold over there. right? Or going really slowly like this. That's how time operates. Now, I'm still not 100% convinced at the reversing time, but this got me a lot closer because this is saying here that if we increase the frequency, we can get a reverse temporal excursion. Meaning, if we increase the frequency enough, then we can actually get time to flow backwards. we can actually get time to flow backwards. So if that's true, if that's true, then that means that we can go back in time, that back in time travel is possible. Now, it may still be a limited version of back in time travel, meaning like maybe only you can reage your reverse age yourself, but in theory, it becomes it becomes plausible. Let's go back to it and see what other revelations that we can get here. sensitivity to the frequency scale. And actually, there's one more thing I want to talk about this real. Oh, okay. It's coming up here in a second. The one divided by frequency squared term means that the time shift is highly sensitive at low frequencies, but diminishes rapidly at frequency increases. Huh? At high frequency, even large frequency changes only cause minimal time changes, implying time stability in high energy regimes. Huh. Huh. At low frequencies, small frequency changes produce significant time excursions. Well, this is interesting. So, this is true, right? Because what it's saying here is if you have very high frequencies the amount of delta t is going to become very small. So if your frequency becomes very large then you're squaring it. So it becomes really really big. Frequency squared in the denominator means that the higher your frequency goes up the smaller your number gets exponentially. So your time excursion becomes very small if your frequency is very high. If your frequency is somewhat low and then you have a drastic increase in the frequency, then that's the type of situation that will cause a drastic time change. So just to go through the math, if we want a large negative temporal change, large backwards in times change, then we want to start at a low frequency so that the frequency squared is relatively low and we want to rapidly increase our frequency. If we rapidly increase our frequency, then our term on the right becomes very large and that's what becomes our negative delta t. That's very interesting. I don't know exactly what that means, but I see a lot of smart people in the chat are yelling boom and other stuff like that. So, if you understand the significance of that or have revelations from that, post them in the YouTube chat comments. Post them in on the X on my feed, guys. I'd love to see your your thoughts on that. Okay. Implication. Time might appear more fluid or prone to reversals in low frequency environments such as disperive dispersive media such as acoustic or electromagnetic waves in lossy materials or cosmological scales. This could explain phenomenon like perceived time as asymmetries in complex systems where frequency dispersion occurs. So this is where S was saying that the secret is a massive change in energy density. A massive change in energy density is what we need for a gravitational wave. And that must be connected to what he's talking about with the frequency as well. I presume because higher frequency implies higher energy. So higher frequency implying higher energy. Then when he's talking about drastic increases in energy, I think he's talking about drastic increases in frequency. So if you drastically increase the frequency suddenly, boom, possible gravitational wave. Okay, then let me get a sip. And I'll get these super chats, too, guys. Yeah. And I wonder now that you say this, I wonder if there's a way to test this. It seems like something that we should be able to test, right? Start with something that's a relatively low frequency and rapidly increase it. And I would say check testing sonoluminescence makes a lot of sense because sound waves I think should be able to do this as well. Sound waves should be able to have some this type of effect. Maybe not exactly the same. Okay. Um the explicit labeling of negative delta t as time reversal excursion shift suggests the equation models and scenarios where time flow can invert directionally at least locally or perceptually. If frequent change in frequency is greater than zero and the constant is greater than zero and the change in time is less than zero indicating a backward shift. This echoes concepts in time reversal in variant wave equations. However, this breaks strict time reversal symmetry in dispersive or lossy systems as frequency shifts introduce irreversibility. In physics, this resonates with broken symmetries in the arrow of time. This is exactly what SA said where frequency dependent effects could excursion time backward temporally. perhaps in controlled setups like time reversal mirrors or quantum experiments. So here's the applications. Why does this matter? What does this matter, chat? Atomic clocks define hyperfine transitions. A change in frequency would accumulate as a time error. So what it's saying here is if you were to change the frequency rapidly on an atomic clock then you're going to get a it would accumulate as an error like time the the clock would be off sync. So and that makes sense. I mean if you do this to a clock what's going to happen? The clock's perception is going to change. You're going to literally send the clock through time. You're going to time travel the clock. So it says uh it says a frequency change here would accumulate as a time error but the one divided by frequency squared scaling suggests ultra high frequency clocks no uh eg optical lattises are more robust depertibations enabling precise timekeeping implications redefining the second or synchronizing global time standards could account for such shifts in variable able environments. Okay, now this is crazy that that I just showed there. It says if we want to what that what that paragraph basically means is if we want to start traveling amongst the stars using gravitational manipulation like the aliens are doing, let's just assume the aliens are flying around in gravity waves. We would have to have some type of new clock system because clocks don't work anymore. You can't use a clock to compare time if my watch flows at a different rate than your watch. You need a universal time system. Now, you know what's crazy about this? No daylight savings. There will be no daylight savings in the quantum tech clocks chat. And before you say quant quantum clocks are fake, no they aren't. Guess who was promoting? Guess who wanted to make a quantum clock? Atomic quantum universal clock. We if you have watched this is like a quiz to see find out which of you are my most hardcore viewers. Whoever gets it right um I will shout you out in the chat. If you can guess before I say who the person was who want it's somebody that I've talked it was somebody that I brought up yesterday on the live stream. It's somebody that I brought up yesterday on the live stream with Sal and Dave that wanted to make a quantum universal time system based on Aaron Hoff bomb effect and all those things. It's not Hal Pudof. It's not Hal Pudof. It's not John Wheeler. It's not Tesla. It's not Jeff Bezos. And it's not Rathon either. It's none of those. It is Gary Stevenson. Gary Stevenson is the one that wanted to make a quantum universal time clock, a gravitybased time clock. One that would not be beholden to time dilation. One that we could always have a reference frame. There would always be a reference frame. This Gary Stevenson, this is the same Gary Stevenson that pulled the story about the JSON group and Robert MLB Baker. Same Gary Stevenson. So, I just find this crazy because everything is kind of coming together. All I did was ask Grock about Salvatore Py's equations that he said in his live stream. And one of the responses we get back is, well, you could use this theory to develop a quantum universal clock. Quantum universal clock. And turns out Gary Stevenson was already talking about it like 10 years ago. He was already talking about it like 10 years ago, maybe even longer than that. So there you go. Kind of interesting. And then it says in wave propagation and signal processing in time reversal techniques frequency dispersion compensates via similar uh relations to maintain focus. The equation implies that manipulating frequency could engineer artificial time shifts potentially for applications like undoing signal delays or simulating reversed causality in simulations. Wow. Whoa. Whoa, whoa, whoa, chat. Huh? That right there sounds just like John Kramer. That sounds Everything about this makes me think about John Kramer. I hope that guy lives to be like 110 because John Kramer, he's the one that said we can make an EPR device. We can make a quantum communication device that can communicate with Mars in real time. How is that possible? I think that's only possible with reverse time excursion. I could be wrong, but how else can you communicate with Mars in real time, which is like 5 to eight light minutes away? It should take 5 to 8 minutes for any signal to transfer from here to Mars. But if I'm controlling a rover in Mars in real time, then there must be some reverse temporal excursion that's happening. We don't really perceive it, but it's happening. And that to me speaks to John Kramer's transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics where he says there are always forward he calls it and advanced waves. Don't cancel me. That's his words. I can say the word as many times as I want. and advanced waves converging on one another. Oh, look. We got a good comment here in the chat. James alone says, "I should kill myself." Wow. Thank you very much. Just to be clear, these are the types of people like these people aren't my followers or physics people or anything like this. These are the types of people that support Nick Fuentes, right? These are the types of people that want to be taken seriously in politics. It's never going to happen. Never in your lifetime are you going to be taken seriously. Just let that sink in. You will live and die as a slave for the rest of your life. That's that is your that is your fate. That is what you were put on this earth for. You are put on this earth to be cattle for people that are better than you and ruling class people. And that's how you're going to live and that's how you're going to die on this planet. So there you go, chat. I'm tired of being nice to people. I'm tired of trying to convince people of anything. It's not really anymore. Instead, I'm just going to tell you the truth. I'm just going to tell you the truth. You were born on this planet as a slave and you're going to die on this planet as a slave. That's your fate. That's your destiny. Enjoy. Okay, back to the physics and the science. For the people that want to educate themselves and be a little bit smarter than your average idiot racist, the political and theoretical ramifications of this equation. If time is frequency dependent, it supports relational theories over block universe models. In quantum gravity or string theory contexts, where frequency relate to energy scales, also known as E equals H bar, frequency. This could hint at time emerging from vibrational modes with reversals possible near singularities or high energy shifts. However, it raises causality concerns because an unbounded frequency change might allow for paradoxical loops. Though the constant could bound the effect as a natural constant. So the constant that's in that equation he's saying could be the thing that prevents time loops from happening. Could be. But what he's saying there in that equation, what the equation is essentially meaning is that time itself emerges from vibration. How we understand clocks and and and time itself emerges from vibration emerges from this back and forth rocking. And if we go from a slow state like this to a fast state, then we're also manipulating our flow of time, our perception of time, consistent with general relativity, which was what Einstein was should be best known for, general relativity, understanding that time dilation exists. Okay, any questions on that? Any questions? I mean, I have some questions. Specifically, the question I'm cons I'm curious about is how all of Salvatore Pais's stuff has to do with frequency, has to do with vibration, has to do with scaling your omega, your frequency, scaling that up and getting uh exponential growth, exponential growth from vibration, from uh non-therrmal interaction. So, I I I think there's more to come from that. I think it's a good starting point and I think it's clearly consistent with all the physics that I've been talking about time travel, time dilation, everything like that. Um, so the next thing that I asked Grock and then I'm going to show a couple clips as well. We'll talk about a couple clips. Um, and somebody asked somebody asked where I can download can I download your knowledge? Yeah, you can download my knowledge for free. You can watch all of my live streams, over 350 live streams going back to November 2023. And you can watch the whole progression of my knowledge grow from knowing nothing about electrical engineering, quite literally nothing about electrical engineering to where I'm at today. And the reason why I've done live streams is number one, because this isn't my job. If this was my job, I probably wouldn't go about doing it this way. But I want people to also in the future at some point when all this is proven real, I want them to be able to go through and watch and see the progression of my own thought process, see the progression of my own knowledge for me because I haven't been right about all of this. Not even close. I've been wrong a ton along this journey. But that goes to show, I mean, that's just human. It's human nature to be wrong. It's human nature to correct yourself and and grow smarter. That's how we learn. That's how we learn. So that's the reason why I've shown it all out there. Now if you want a lot of people really what you really want when people ask me that is they say where do I start if I want to get involved in this and the way that you start is at the beginning. Start at the beginning learning the basics. What's an electrical circuit? How does positive and minus charge work? But if you really want to know the shortcut, I love shortcuts. The shortcut is to read the durs, the defense intelligence reference documents. Howal Pudof talks about them all the time. Those papers, PhD physicists that are like, you know, leads of their university, they don't even understand those papers to be real. They read those papers and they think it's science fiction. Those papers are the future. Autronic fusion propulsion, uh, space-time communications, quantum non-locality, uh, quantum energy extraction, warp drives, wormholes, all of it. And I guarantee you the science in those papers is all legit, too. They're all publicly available scientific papers. So, that's your answer for that. If you want to know where to go to read the durs, just type in defense intelligence reference document dur. And one of the best top links is an archive link that has everything out there. In fact, I'll just put it in the chat for you guys right now. I have it right here. I have it right here. I got it on speed dial chat. There you go. This is where I go to read the durs right here. There you go. Check that link out, guys. If you are just listening to this on audio, then just Google what I said, the durs, and you should be able to find it. The one that this one is specifically pulling up, it has a link to all of them, is dur a neutronic fusion propulsion. One of my favorite papers, be honest with you guys. There you go. Yeah. Another one, real title. This is a real title, one of the dirds, traversible wormholes, stargates, and negative energy. That particular dirt is all about understanding what negative energy really is and understanding how wormholes could be realistically humanly traversible. Meaning that like we're not going to die if we go through a wormhole. At least not based on what would happen in the wormhole. Okay, let's go on to the next thing because I don't want to go on too late too uh late tonight here. Here's the next one. Question from Dave Rossi. So Dave Rossi, there's a clip out there. I'll play the clip afterwards here, but Dave Rossi said because I asked him about like the main idea that I proposed about fusion bombs was that I saw some of the criticism and I'm open to criticism. Feel free to criticize as much as you want. Um, and I'll get I see you guys questions in the in the super chats. I'll get to at the end. But I say one of the criticisms was that okay if this bottle of soda is manipulating space time which by the way this bottle of soda is manipulating spacetime. It's just very very very slightly manipulating space time but it is doing that. The thing about this is all the atoms in this bottle of soda they're relatively separate. Right? This bottle of soda is 99.9% empty space. Keep that in mind. This bottle of soda is 99.9% empty space. So if this amount of energy is not manipulating spacetime, then the detractors or the critics would say that even if you convert this bottle of soda into energy from mass into energy E= MC², it still won't manipulate spaceime because it's the same amount of energy. same amount of mass energy either before or after. Makes sense, right? But but in fusion we are creating an implosive effect, not an explosion, not a release of energy where energy gets more and more diffuse. In an eusion implosion, we are making energy more and more compact. We're squeezing it down. And so what does that mean for energy density? That means a traditional Abomb explosion will reduce energy density over time. The energy density gets more smaller and smaller as the energy blast wave expands out. But when we compress something down, what happens to the energy density? It goes up and up and up. Remember that 99% of empty space? Well, we can compact everything into that 99.9% of empty space. This is the idea behind our fusion bomb. We're creating an implosive. This is how we can achieve an energy density that in theory is infinite. In theory, that energy density is only limited by how farly how much you can squeeze these things together down to the point where theoretically you can make a black hole. So I asked Dave Rossi this question. I asked Dave Rossi this question. I said, "What do you what do you think about that? Is that am I being logical? Are there some gaps in this?" And Dave Rossy's response was that he says in order for that amplification of energy to occur, he says at first you must have a reversal of entropy. You have to have a reversal of entropy for that to occur. So actually I haven't even read this yet. So let's take a look. says, "Rossi argues that standard physics operated under the assumptions of a flat spacetime and increasing entropy, which inherently limits energy concentration, amplification, and exotic manipulation to push fusionlike energy amplification to thresholds like the Schwinger limit. Or to directly warp spaceime for effects like gravity control or inertial mass reduction, you must first engineer a local reversal of entropy, negative entropy. This reversal acts as a prerequisite because it transforms the system from a closed entropybound one to an open neg entropy state that taps in to the quantum fluctuations's infinite potential allowing runaway energy buildup without unusual dissipative losses. Wow. Wow. I'm kind of glad I didn't read this till just now. So what Dave is saying there, what Dave is saying is that we can't even pull this off unless you assume the ether is real. We have to have the negative energy. And what we have to do is we have to couple to the negative energy or couple to the zero point energy. We couple to the zero point energy. That opens our system up. So now our system is not a closed system. Now our system is open. And if our system is open, now we can achieve the energy densities that we require. Now we can achieve the energy densities that require. And we have one more detractor that I'm going to call out here. Now when somebody says something like this, unfortunately Austin, you lost me when you stopped on the airplane stuff. Were you told to stop talking? What do you think? I'm literally talking about right now. I'm literally talking about space-time manipulation right now. And number two, my name is Ashton Forbes. It's literally on the banner bar right above my head. You can't even spell or say my name correctly. Please don't criticize me. Please don't pretend to be my follower if you don't even know what my first name is. I'm so tired of the fake ass followers that keep pretending to have followed me. You don't really follow me. You never really followed me. You didn't even know what my first name was. So clearly you were never really interested in my content. I mean, guys, the amount of bots and fake ass that is pushing this weird Israel crap, I don't even know. If you don't see it, I don't know how to help you, man. If you think that people that are following me don't know my first name, I don't know what to tell you. People will be like, "Ashen, I wish you were talking about the aliens and the orbs more." I go, "I don't even talk about aliens, man. I don't know who you're following, but it's clearly not me. It's clearly not me. I mean, Jesus. Okay, sorry. I had to I had to do a side tangent. Let's back to the entropy. Back to the negative entropy here, guys. Okay, so Dave is saying Dave is saying that we potentially need to tap into the zero point energy, which to me what Dave is saying there is that there is a direct connection between fusion and over unity and zero point energy. that fusion is truthfully a tap into the zero point energy. At least that's what I've been saying conceptually. I hope I'm right in the end. That fusion is basically tapping into zero point energy. You're tapping in that zero point energy and the energy is just flowing out. And this is what Dave is saying is that in order to achieve these huge energy densities that we need, first thing we got to do is we got to tap in. Got to tap into our source. Get as much energy out of there as we can get. That's what he's saying right off the bat. So he's saying in uh wait, okay, in essence, so this is the the more detailed explanation. In flat spacetime, entropy always increases. Wait, didn't I just say this? Okay, this Yeah, it's kind of a repeat. Rossi posists uh pos uh posits uh that curving spacetime induces neg entropy where systems can self-organize, concentrate energy and produce cold effects instead of heat. I didn't even say that thing about cold effects instead of heat. This reversal is achieved through engineered asymmetries such as spinning high voltage capacitors, pulsing superconductors or polarizing the vacuum with scalar waves. Without it, amplification hits thermodynamic walls preventing the extreme dens. That's exactly it. That's exactly it. Okay. Wow. Damn. Grock chat AI is getting real good. AI is getting real good. If you're not like if you don't ask Grock's stupid questions, it actually can produce some good stuff because it's actually referencing Dave's actual words here. It clearly went and it found my video and it read the transcript and it's interpreting the context of Dave's words right here. I didn't even ask tell it about the cold electricity part. That's just in the clip. So what it's saying here is that the Maxwell Boltzman distribution shows that you can't hit uh runaway exponential energy growth. Max, am I saying this right? Sometime I feel like I'm uh Will Frell and old school sometimes. Sometimes I feel like I just black out and I just say stuff and it's like actually real because it's like absorbed in my head. But the energy scaling with frequency um you know you would think okay if you can just increase frequency and get infinite energy we would have figured that out and they did they did they did it and they found out that energy doesn't scale infinitely they found out that it curves off and comes back down at a certain level and so what this is saying is that traditional thermodynamic constraints won't let energy density grow that high and this is what Dave is saying is that the in order to achieve the to break through that energy scaling then we have to either use spinning high voltage capacitors spinning high voltage capacitors [snorts] that is pretty much what the orbs are spinning high voltage capacitor or pulseed superconductors so this is similar to Eugene Potclav's work or polarizing the vacuum with scalar waves. This one's a little bit more abstract. So, he's saying that we have to actually tap into that zero point energy and use that zero point energy. That's what will allow the energy scaling to grow as high as we need it to grow to manipulate spaceime. Pretty interesting. Linking to fusion bomb energy amplification, Rossi compares advanced energy tech to making a thermonuclear bomb look like a child firecracker. Conventional fusion bombs amplify energy via chain reactions, but are bounded by entropydriven inefficiencies. To amplify further scaling outputs to over unity levels, coefficient of performance greater than one, you need neg entropy to extract virtual particles from the vacuum into real ones violating flat spacetime rules. So this is where we would essentially uh break the the null energy condition, I think. Right? I'm pretty sure I'm saying that right. Correct me in the chat if I'm wrong. The null energy condition would mean that you can never pull energy without paying it back. But we are going to pay it back. We just pay it back later on. This could theoretically enhance fusion processes by coupling electromagnetic fields to nuclear forces in vortex geometries. Huh. But only after inducing the entropic reversal to avoid self-defeating energy losses. Wow. So, it turns out that it's a little bit more complicated than what we want. Turns out we just wanted to be able to make a big boom. But it turns out we might have to have our geometry set up in the right way to cause neg entropy to occur first. Then it says reaching the Schwinger limit which is 10 to the 10^ the 18 volts per meter is an electric field strength where the vacuum becomes nonlinear spontaneously creating electron positron pairs and losing energy. Rossi explains that breaching it requires coupling spin with specific electromagnetic charges to trigger runaway effects. However, this demands neg entropy first. In an entropic system, fields dissipate before hitting the threshold. Reversal via spac-time curvature polarizes the vacuum, enabling nonlinear breakthroughs without the massive power inputs that would otherwise be required. Well, okay. So, what this implies, this is a little bit scary. This right here implies that we don't even need large energy levels. that really all we have to do is reverse that entropy flow and now we can amplify energy as high as we want to go even starting off at a low amount. So this is where I think um either Dave or S talked about parametric oscillations. Now I've shown the video multiple times. I'm not going to show it again right now even though I show multip maybe I will maybe I will show it. Parametric oscillations mean that even if we start at a very low energy level, we can amplify it up very quickly. Here you go. Inductor into the circuit. The capacitor only needs a minuscule amount of latent charge as even any dead capacitor will have some latent charge. the process of exponential growth begins and after a short amount of time the current begins to take off and since the current must be constant through all the elements we see that the voltage across the resistor take off as well. This means that real power is being generated in the system and is able to do real work creating heat through the resistor. So this right here is like this is the the money shot right here. >> With the resistance above 165 ohms, we can see that the oscillation exponentially decays as more energy is lost than gained per cycle. As we drop the resistance below 165 ohms, the oscillation grows exponentially as more energy is gained than is lost per cycle. So right here, [clears throat] why is superc conductivity important? Why is superconductivity important? This got brought up multiple times yesterday regards to this context with regards to amplifying energy. Because right here, the difference between this taking off as energy growth or this energy being cut off is the resistance. There's a resistance threshold. And if you're below a certain resistance, then you get energy amplification. If you're above a certain resistance in your circuit, then you get energy deamplification or whatever deboosting, whatever it's called, I don't know. So why is this important? Well, how much resistance is there in superconductivity? Zero. There's zero resistance in superconductivity. So if we have a superconductive parametric oscillation then the energy amplification factor becomes massive. You can start at even a small amount of energy and amplify it up extremely high. So but it seems like what Dave is saying in his uh in his in his in the clip is that we first need the neg entropy. We first need to couple to the zero point energy. We first need to tap into that potentially using vortex motion or whatever else is required to do it. And then we basically just have access to unlimited energy. We basically have access to unlimited energy. Now this opens the door back up to magnetic motors. magnetic motors as being feasible because now you're saying okay well if that's true then any system that can couple to that zero point energy should be able to extract over unity out of it should be able to pull over unity out of the zero point energy including a magnetic motor design but your magnetic motor design is going to have to be tuned very specifically for that vort vortex motion to occur I just think that's interesting that's all so manipul Spacetime spacetime manipulation warping spaceime um involves inducing curvature through vectors and scalar potentials high voltage pulsing or superconductors. Rossi describes spaceime as a living structure with memory. Wait, does he describe that? This is weird chat. Remember who else said this? Is this actually a direct quote from Dave Rossi? It was Charles Chase that said that. Remember Charles Chase's email response to me? I asked him about spacetime in the ether and he said he thinks there's something like an ether and that it has a memory. Remember when he said that to me very reminiscent right there reminiscent of that. So spacetime is a living structure with a memory malleable like a slinky via longitudinal scalar waves. But the standard model assumes flat spacetime where entropy prevents sustained curvature. Entropy reversal is essential to bias potentials and create persistent topological states to royal geometries allowing effects like falling up or time displacement. Remember the falling up guys? Remember what was the secret chat? What was the secret to getting the orange out of the cup of water? Remember the orange at the bottom of the cup of water? How do you get the orange out without getting the water to spill over the sides? Twist it with the vortex. Twist the water with the vortex and all of a sudden the orange falls up. Twist the water with the vortex and the orange rises. Falls upward instead of falling downward. Interesting chat. So, even just straight up, there's real analogies to this idea of vortex motion causing things to fall up. You swirl your water and the orange rises to the surface of the cup. Quite interesting. So, he says um without neg entropy attempts to dissipate into chaos with it you can access negative energy densities for stable manipulation. So last thought, Rossi frames this as a paradigm shift. Physics taught us in schools to assume flat spacetime enforcing entropy increase and barring over unity and exotic effects. So these are U1 models. You guys will see this U1. When you listen to physicists, they love to talk in terms you can't understand. So they'll talk about U1, U2, symmetry, all this crap, whatever. Okay. By reversing entropy first through practical engineering like acoustics resonance at the Schuman frequencies or plasma as a doorway to the vacuum, you've unlocked a curved neg negropic regime where Schwinger breaches, hyper amplified fusion, and space-time engineering become feasible. Wow. Chat, I'm getting spider sense is going off. chat. Spider sense is going off right now. There it is. There it is, guys. How is fusion going to work? Why is fusion not worked? Why is fusion not worked, guys? The reason why fusion hasn't worked is because we don't want it to work. Number one. Number two is our physics prevents us from understanding how it can work. We have with our U1 symmetry physics we've basically told ourselves that neg entropy and over unity is not possible. We've convinced ourselves that those things are not possible and so therefore physics isn't going to work. Right here it says hyper amplified fusion becomes possible. So if we are right, if 0 point energy is really a source of energy that can be tapped into, even if it is spacetime itself, this opens the door to hyper efficient fusion processes as in coefficient or performance of a thousand or greater infinite energy, unlimited energy potential. That's what it opens the door to. And that that's what we've been looking for, guys. That's what we've been talking about. Why is 0 point energy free energy? Why do I refer to it as free energy? Because we literally have a sea of energy all around us and we've been trying to figure out how do we tap into it. Magnetic motors can do it, but it's difficult. fusion and plasma can tap into it as well. And when we tap into it, we are quite literally manipulating the fabric of spacetime. The zero point energy is the fabric of spacetime. Time and gravity are emergent properties. They're emergent properties, meaning they only exist because they are properties of another system, properties of another physical process that is happening. So we see them as these emergent properties. Gravity, the force that we feel pulling us down. Inertia, the force that we feel that slows us down if we were to accelerate in spaceime. These are all phenomenon of the zero point energy. And if we can tap into that zero point energy, now we have access to magic. Now we have access to unlimited energy. Now we have access to making ourselves be over here and then be over here the next instant. Because distance the the distance between these two points the only thing separating the distance between these two points is the zero point energy between them. [snorts] The zero point energy between them is the only reason why this point over here and this point over here are not in the exact same spot. That's what the zero point energy is all about. Uh one last sentence I think on here. He says, "Dave warns of doomsday risks, eg uncontrolled runaway energies and national security classifications, noting that private labs have verified such phenomenon since the '9s. Spiritually, he ties it to human evolution, suggesting these technologies require moral readiness to avoid misuse." Okay, not bad. So, let's take a look. We can watch a clip here. And I've got some other opining that I want to do. Um, I don't think we're going to have time to show the papers, but I'll probably I'll try to link the papers in the Discord later on. Sal's paper that he mentioned, I I did grock that earlier. And Dave also sent me the paper from uh Richard Escridge that he mentioned in the live stream. And the Richard Escridge one is interesting because the guy that funds him has a pretty sus past. Apparently got caught up in some pretty sketchy stuff. I'm probably not going to go deep into that because it just gets to be a little conspiratorial. Um, but he did send me that paper. So, if you weren't watching Dave yesterday on the live stream said that uh he quoted this Richard Escridge paper where it talks about the effective moment of inertia can be calculated for the nucleus if we are willing to suspend our disbelief regarding the actuality of atomic spin. This suspension of disbelief is required because the calculated surface velocity of the nucleus can easily exe exceed the speed of light due to the high spin rate. Experimental observations of the mechanical effect of quantum spin have been performed in an experiment proposed by Einstein and Das in 1915. So why is that interesting? Is because they know just from looking at the math. Just from looking at the math, they can tell that the surface of the of the nucleus can theoretically go faster than the speed of light. But how can that be? That shouldn't be possible. That should not be possible. The speed of light is the speed limit, isn't it? So how is that possible? that now opens the door to us not fully understanding the speed of light, the speed limit, or an underlying truth about our universe, about our universe. Um, I already spoke about the Gary Stevenson quantum clock thing. Let's just go ahead and watch the clips and then I want to speak a little bit about the JSON thing because that's the thing that's probably bugging me the most about all of this. So, let me see if I can find these clips real quick. Hopefully my internet works. Yeah, here we go. Okay, some great clips here were made by Victor. Here's the equation on temporal excursion. Oh, this is it's kind of a long clip. That's okay. I'll just I'll on speedy mode. I'm not going to get copyright strike for my own content, thankfully. Okay. >> Your greatness. them. Now, okay, let me go back to uh this is reverse temporal excursion. The idea of the possibility of going back in time and not just sending communication, we're talking about physically physically affecting the temporal structure. It it involves bringing of twinglement. Why? That is the only way you could circumvent the great Steven Hawking. His chronology protection conjecture is based on time. The only thing that can destroy the arrow of time is the broking of the swinging. >> This formalism is based on it. The whole idea starts simple again simplicity and minimalism. Time is on the order of one divided by frequency. Again, the Nicholas Tesla said everything energy, frequency, and vibration. And by the way, brother Ash said this like two parts ago. I'm I'm I'm I'm plagiarizing a bit. Sorry. Now, what I'm about to say, time is on the order of one divided by frequency. It could be frequency of spin or frequency of vibration against the mathematics is similar with one well I want to say man get ahead a little bit here >> if you like to think of it as a quantum I just like coherence it's a microscopic quantum phenomenon >> maybe all of reality is is a room temperature superconducting state to some extent >> macroscopic quantum coherence it's microscopic quantum phenomena but again time is [clears throat] of one divided by frequency you take the chain rule of that based on a a dt simple Um this is simple differential calculus. We're talking about first year of undergrad. >> You take uh the K rule based on that will give you a a constant. Most likely it's going to be dimensionous. So let's call it subs times the delta of frequency divided by frequency squared. You see how it's dimensionally inconsistent. Again time being on the order of one divided frequency. Check the dimensions. Always check the dimensions. >> Okay. So we nailed it. We nailed this one. I was very confused in the middle of that conversation. I was trying to keep that in my head, trying to understand that. But now I see how clear it is. Now I see how clear it is. What that equation represents, just as we just reviewed, is that time itself, our perception of time is a function of frequency. It's a function of how the waves are oscillating. That makes sense. This is why this is why Einstein was right about time dilation. So that equation S is saying is that if you look at this math you have to come to the conclusion that time can be reversed that Einstein was correct that we can produce time dilation that my frame of reference for how I feel time is moving normally is not the same as your frame of reference and to me this is such a profound understanding of reality I've said this before, but what it means is that we are all living in our own little bubble. We're all in our own little bubble all the time. And the only reason why it appears is we are in this collective environment, is because we're all on the same planet Earth, so we're all experiencing a very, very similar rate of time. If one of us was on a different planet with a different gravity, then we would see each other moving at different speeds. Either one person would be moving really slow like the ants in Lord of the Rings. Hello little hobbites. Come on my shoulder and I will go tear down Sauron's tower. The ants. That was my impression of the ants in Lord of the Rings, which is by the way an amazing trilogy. Can anybody anybody that hates on Lord of the Rings GTFO and never come back? Never come back. Anyway, I digress. What was I saying? We would see this either moving down, slowing down, or you would see a speeding up. But the crazy part, this is the craziest part about time dilation. So even if you are looking at somebody else and they look like they're moving super slow and they're looking at you and you look like you're moving at super speed for both of you, your time would appear to be going normally. That's that's the that's the mind f chat. That's what'll mess with your mind is that even if two of you are flowing at different rates of time, your own perception of time will always be constant. You'll always feel time moving normally for you. That's the trick of general relativity. Because you would think that if we live in some kind of universal empty space, empty vacuum as we've been taught to believe, then everybody's time should be flowing the same no matter where you are. And if somebody's time is flowing differently, then they should feel like their time is moving slower. But you don't. You always feel like your time is moving normal no matter what. You always feel like in fact I might watch Tenant tonight chat. [laughter] Time to rewatch Tenant everybody. chat. Okay, homework for everyone out there. Find out which streaming service Tenant is on. We're all going to go watch Tenant tonight and we're all gonna we're going to do the math. We're going to do the math and people are going to be walking backwards and in Tenant and we're going to be like, "Oh, we got it. That's a reverse temporal excursion. Looks like that person's frequency started off pretty low and then it must have shot up really fast. Boom. Got them. Got him. Okay, next clip I want to show. So, I think we understood the temporal excursion thing. If you are still confused about time, re-watch the video. I feel like this I think feel like we pretty much explain time as best as you possibly can here. And honestly, if you understood this live stream, you probably understand spacetime better than 99.9% of people out there. Just truthfully, you understand spacetime better than 99.9% of people out there, guys. Um, people really, really do not understand physics and they think that gravity is a fundamental force that's like pulling on you. It's like pulling you towards it. But that's not what's happening with spacetime. What's happening is we're all moving in a straight line. We're moving in a straight line, but the Earth is moving in a straight line, too. And we're both moving in a straight line, but the Earth is the Earth is bending spaceime. So, what happens is as we move in a straight line, we converge. And you know what we call this convergence? We call that gravity. We call that that's the reason why I throw the ball in the sky and the reason why the ball comes back to the ground is so the ball is moving in a straight line and the earth is moving in a straight line and those straight lines are converging. That's how gravity really works by the way chat. Okay, another clip. Let's do this clip. Here we go. This is a short one. Oh, so this is the one he was saying about the energy density. Here we go. When you asked about the nuclear fusion aspect with regards to amplifying the density, I would agree with you. However, I would add one thing to what you said which is that in my humble opinion there needs to be an aspect of that process in which there is a reversal of the entropy in which in in which that system behaves within and then when that pinching effect occurs, you then may get very cold nuclear radiation instead of hot. And then you with with that balance that offset of cold and hot in a vortex like manner then maybe you can you can break that limit. So yes I'll I'll leave it there. >> I'll take it one step for >> so interesting part about that too is that this speaks directly to the example that I brought up on the live stream. I said Yiro Taco whatever his name is. I'm I'm really I feel bad I can never say this guy's name correctly. I'll have to pull it up. Um, actually maybe I can find it. Unlab yiro. No, I can't find it. So there were several presentations at Charles Chase's UNLAB 2022, I think it was. And one of them was about using relativistic motion, right? To cause cold to flow to hot. This is this would be a reversal of entropy. Normally entropy would say that hot always flows to cold, right? That's simple. We all understand that it's cold outside right now. If I open the window, the cold air is going to come rushing in because the hot air is going to go flowing out. We all understand that. We can actually change that around. We can change that around by manipulating the waves, right? We can manipulate the waves. So, if we make two things go away from each other at really high rate of speed, we get the Doppler effect. We get the Doppler effect. And so if we do this, we pull these things a far apart, you can actually show the mathematical formulations that from the perspective of one another, cold now will begin to flow to hot because from the perspective of the cold side, the other side looks even colder. So this is what happens is that from the relative perceptions of e each party like point A and point B let's say point B over here is colder than point A when point B is moving super far away from cold point A point A looks colder than point B does and so what this causes then is cold to flow to hot so it's all a matter of perception it's how we perceive the world acts like how we perceive leave it to act. Kind of a weird thing that occurs. And if we do this now, Dave is saying, okay, if we can get cold to flow to hot, now we can amplify energy exponentially, potentially infinitely and the dangers that come along with that. So, the last topic for tonight is the JSON. The part that I think I got the most out of that interview, I just enjoyed the most at least was the JSON conversation. So, what S brings up is John Trump uh Van uh Vanavar Bush, John Trump, Vanavar Bush, and uh Edward Teller. And he says, "These guys have to know. They have to know John Trump literally got Tesla's Tesla's work when after he died. So Tesla clearly figured this out. Like all of us in that live stream yesterday pretty much agree this all comes down to energy frequency and vibration which means Tesla was right and we clearly took Tesla's work, advanced it and then kind of discredited it publicly so that nobody would figure it out. Now, uh, Vanavar Bush actually helped develop the Vandergraph machine. Vanavar Bush, who I didn't know that much about, helped develop the V the Vandergraph machine, I believe is what Dave was saying. So, he was chairman of the research and development board from 1947 to 1948. Okay. So this guy was very involved with uh thermonuclear weapons etc. And then Edward Teller, Edward Teller was the father of the hydrogen bomb. He was like the number one guy when it came to nuclear nuclear weapons secrecy. So I think and those guys kind of agreed with me that what must have happened must have happened assuming that we're right about all this assuming that the videos are real and all this stuff. Oh, and look like JK Philly fan is helping us out. Vanavar Bush was the dean of engineering at MIT. Yeah, by the way, where is UNLab? Charles Chase's UNLAB. Where are they based out of? MIT. Based out of MIT, of course they are. And uh so I think the only that what must have happened is that they decided to build a brand new culture of secrecy. They decided after the Manhattan project, the big thing about the Manhattan Project was everything was leaking out. There were leaks everywhere. Everyone was paranoid. So after the Manhattan project, they must have redone all the security protocols and they were like they probably had the smartest people come in and be like, "Hey, how do we make sure that nothing ever leaks out ever again?" And they were like, "Okay, number one, compartmentalize it. Number two, build it into the presidential emergency action documents." So number two is they literally write it in to some secret action documents that only the president can enact or the CIA that have very specific criteria for how and when you can enact those documents. And then what did they do after that? They made something called JSON. The JSONs is my literal favorite conspiracy of all because it's 100% real. Everybody admits it's real, but nobody pays any attention to it. The members of the JSONs are classified. I tried to look it up. There's a few that you can find, but for the most part, people don't know. Now, if we believe Gary Stevenson, and I do the JSON are mostly physics professors. They're professors that you or electrical engineering, aerospace, right? Probably a lot of the people whose scientific papers we've read are JSONs. And so what this means is that these professors at various universities that they are the gatekeepers. Hal might be in it. Hal is definitely in it. Hal Pudof is definitely or or was definitely in the JSON guys. [laughter] I would bet any amount of money. Hal Pudof is probably the president. He's probably the one that has the gavvel. what's next on the agenda? Howal Pudof Hal Pudov's the one determining what it's gonna be. Um, so what they did is they built this JSON group and they made this culture of like if you're with us, you're in the fraternity, right? You're in the fraternity of the JSON. And having been somebody that was in a fraternity in college, I can tell you that level of propaganda, it works, man. It really works. like you buy into it. You buy into the the ritual. You buy into the ceremony and look at the benefits. If you are somebody who was in the JSON, a you had access to technology before the public knew about it. You had access, you know what technologies are going to come out before the public does. So you have access to that and you get hooked up and you get oh you get to be uh a physics professor. You get to be professor emeritus at University of Washington, right? John Kramer is almost certainly in the JSON. So John Kramer gets to you get to be this prestigious physics professor. You probably only teach like one class per year. So once once a week you got to go teach a class. You probably do like one lecture one hour a week. The rest of the time you're getting paid to do nothing. Getting paid to do nothing. Do whatever you want to do. And so they build this culture of secrecy that anybody that goes outside of it, they ruin you. They just ruin you. This is why people say, "Well, don't they have to kill people to silence?" No, they don't have to kill you to silence you because they will destroy your life. They will destroy your career. And they will discredit you as a cook. they will discredit you as a cook. And then yes, let's let's go ahead and talk Epstein. I think the Epstein connection is extremely fascinating because Epstein was a science philanthropist that was trying to connect himself to all these people. Now, if you haven't been following this community, then you just think that Epstein is all about pedophilia and selling girls out to politicians. But Epstein was deeper than that. He was literally hosting gravitational wave conferences with Lawrence Krauss, physicist supposedly um Stephen Hawking was visiting Epstein Island. So you could see that these JSON physicists would have been extremely powerful influential people. The JSON physicists are the ones that you want to control because those are the people that are determining the course of civilization, the course of technology. And if you win against them, which is what happened to Lel Wood, if you accidentally talk to a Chinese or a Russian person and tell them more than you should have, and here's the hardest part. This is one of the most interesting revelations from my research. The hardest part about knowing about all this secret information is knowing what you can't say. The problem is you've you've absorbed so much classified information. You have to remember which thing is classified, which thing is not classified. And you have to keep that straight in your head all the time. And this is the reason why most people that are involved in these programs, they don't talk. They don't say anything. The simplest way to to be sure that you're not breaking national security is to say nothing at all. And so they get trained either say nothing, divert away from questions, etc. Because if you mess up, if you mess up like Loel Wood did, then they write you up to the JSON that next summer, your name is on the agenda. The JSON agenda says Lel Wood spoke to Chinese people about secret resonance frequencies. Hell, Salvatore Pais might have to be worried about this. And then later on, we heard the story of Gary Stevenson talking about how Robert ML Baker was written up in the 2000s by Ron Pendalf. Ron Pandalfi, who's been in my email replies, CIA spook Ron Pandalfi was the guy that wrote up Robert MLB Baker because he spoke to the Chinese a little bit too much about gravitational waves. Now, last thought for the night. If this science is all fake, if we can't actually produce gravitational waves, then why did Ron Pandalfi write up Robert MLB Baker for sharing that information with the Chinese? [gasps and laughter] If gravitational waves can't be scaled up or can't be made to be effective, then why did anybody con why was anybody concerned with what Robert MLB Baker was telling the Chinese? Could wouldn't it have been just disinformation then? If we can't actually make gravitational waves, then anything he would have been telling the Chinese would have been disinformation. You wouldn't be worthy of being written up over. But they did write him up. They did write him up. And what they decided, the reason why they didn't punish him was they decided that the effect was too weak. They decided what he told them was too weak of an effect, which to me was a copout. That was their way of slapping him on the wrist, telling him, "Don't do that again. We don't like what you did, but we're not going to ruin your life over it." Probably because, keep in mind, this is my real last thought. It's a little bit of a game of chicken. Keep in mind, these scientists and engineers that know about this technology, they have power, too. They don't CIA doesn't want to piss the JSON people off because if you push somebody too far, they might go show up on CNN. They might go to Redacted and say, "Hey, I got a great story for you, Clayton Morris. Turns out I've been part of this secret JSON group and they've been hiding advanced technology. Do you want to hear about some of those meetings?" Right. And now technically that might be illegal, but it starts to get to be a pretty gray area with respect to whistleblower laws and things like that. So even when they go after these people, they have to be careful not to push them too far because these people literally have nuclear weapons secrets information and potentially space-time manipulation, free energy secrets in their head. So you don't want to piss those people too much to piss them off too much because then they'll lose it, right? So, it is, I think, a little bit of a tenuous situation between probably the CIA and the JSON's group. And my guess is they're very cordial all the time because they don't want to piss each other off. Okay guys, let's go to super chats. It's been a good live stream. Thank you guys for being here with me tonight. John Glock, always popping off in the pill chat. Um, says, "This is the first episode where it's as if we were caught up on the edge of your knowledge. It reminds me of when Tom Bearden would say, "Rason with me." I love it. I love it, too. It does feel like we have caught up. It feels like two years later now. This might be like the the anniversary of the two-year live stream, by the way. Feels like we've caught up to where the science is at now. Now, we're understanding quantum radars. Those got brought up in our discussion yesterday. We're understand China has these quantum radars. We're looking at the precipice of fusion right now. I think it was Google. Google just announced that by 2029, all their AI data centers are going to be run off fusion energy. I mean guys, Fusion is literally in the next 5 years, we are going to go from zero fusion anywhere to everything being powered by fusion. Fusion is going to power everything. Probably not the next five years, but in the next 25 years, fusion power is going to power everything. And we're going to be sitting here going, "How did we not see it coming?" And you all in the chat are going to be telling your family members, your children, your loved ones, I did see it coming. You're going to be saying, "I was watching Ashton Forbes and we knew this was all coming way ahead of time." And some of us will be smart enough and lucky enough to invest in some of those companies and hopefully we would get rich. Hopefully we do. Thank you guys in the Rumble chat as well. One more question from John Glock in the pill chat says he gives us the cookie. Have you gone over Marco Rhoden's vortex math? I hear all the engineers and physicists we review here talk vortex and tooid and never mention his name. Oh, he gets brought up. He gets brought up a lot. The hard part is separating the the the wheat from the chaff. That's the hard part with this is like people might be conceptually correct but the reason why I try to stick to as much conventional physics equations etc as I can because I want the basis to be in conventional physics. I don't want to go off and say I'm redoing all the physics. I'm reinventing everything else out there. So, for me, the hard part with a lot of these guys is like some of them go too far into the woo for me. For example, um what's his face, guys? Dan Winter. I like Dan Winter. I I like his stuff, but I've watched some of his stuff. And I think he's right. Truthfully, I think he's right. Uh but it's just it's hard when people just they speak over my head. I can't understand what they're talking about. And the other thing I don't like a lot is when people are always kind of like they'll they'll they'll describe an effect and they'll use their own terminology kind of like what S does with this the pais effect. But I understand the pais effect like breaking the swinger limit. So you know I I think that a lot of those guys are correct when it comes to vortexes. Yes, absolutely. At the end of the day are they 100% correct? Harder to know. And the last thing I'll say on that front is that I'm probably not 100% correct about it all. We're trying to learn as we go along as well. But I think that we've figured out enough that we don't really we're not really looking for answers. We already know the answers. Now what we're trying to do is we're trying to figure out how it's possible. What do we do to engineer it and make an make an experiment that can show it? Who do we look at in the commercial world that's already doing this? Those are the things that I think I'm more concerned with and I think that our community is more concerned with at this point. Like we're looking at thermal processing units and we're going hm is this microchip similar to Paul Tibidos. We're looking at uh microchip you know kasmir patents and we're wondering which of these is going to be the first one to power my cell phone. We're looking at the fusion companies and we're going okay which of these fusion companies as the DOE selected is going to be the big the trillion dollar fusion company in the world. That's what we're doing right. Let's see these super chats because I got to take Lulu out here. Tanya. Wow. $50. Tanya Ellison. Ellison, thank you very much for that super sticker. Appreciate you so much. Wow. Thank you. And Rex. Rex with the $20. What is it? Just super sticker night tonight. $70 in super stickers right there, chat. Look at me. Look at me, America. I'm making juice. Uh SKR Angel says, "Zenodor Records new type of fusion reactor." I don't know what that means, but thank you very much. I'll try to take a look at that fusion reactor. Thank you. Thank you, SKR Angel. Alexander says, "Would you be willing to check out my ACPD1 paper?" I don't know what that means. Bold theory for UAVs for drones that integrates BEC quantum diagnostics with proton boron 11 a neutronic fusion for compact plasma propulsion sites. I mean, I am excited. I do want to know about it. Do I have to Google you to find this paper? Bro, next time you are you in the chat? Somebody link that guy's paper in the chat so I maybe take a look at it or best actually better thing. I'll post a link in the Discord. Somebody tag me with this scientific paper in our Discord later and I'll take a look at I mean these are all the right words that I want to know about. So yeah, we'll probably take a look at that. Uh, Levi says 1.618 is the only ratio for compression. That's the golden ratio, right? Yeah, I think that's the golden ratio. Randall Carlson connection. Yeah, very well could be. It's all about vortex. Wait, is this double chat double? Oh, one only ratio for negative entropy. So, yes, we're connecting now the idea of vortex and golden ratio to neg entropy as well. So, and I've kind of avoided that too because when it comes to sacred geometry, flower of life, all these other geometric patterns, absolutely the answer is in nature. Nature is tapped into itself, right? It understands things at a level that maybe in some cases beyond our perception. But at the same time, I don't care what the ratio is. I don't care if it's the golden ratio or something else. Whatever works works. That's what I care about. Tiffany, thank you, Tiffany, for that super chat. Appreciate you. And then Levi, Levi's popping off here. So, I think this is kind of the same thing here. Yep. Okay, we got you. We got you, brother. We understand your your super chats. Thank you. ZPF is storage. Gravity is storing because the geometric geometry of storage is by definition negative entropy. Great. Thank you very much. Zaparoo. I'll state it again. Yesterday was fantastic. You guys, you don't need to call me Dr. Forbes, but I mean, if you want to, I don't care, but I'm definitely not a doctor. I won't be calling myself that. What a rush. Felt like flying Super Sonic. Thank you, Ashton, for the early Christmas present. Boom. Sal is Santa Claus. Yeah, we're probably I'm going to see if we can set up another live stream convo between us for the Christmas time. I think that would be really good in like a month. Then, Zaparoo, thank you for the fantastic research, Ash. Intelligent, successful people educate themselves and unintelligent unsuccessful people reitards entertain themselves in their mom's basement. Yes, this is what I would tell people the most is that it's never be afraid to be wrong. Always be willing to be wrong because being wrong is how we learn. It's how we learn. If you think that I'm somebody that's smart, I don't necessarily think that I'm particularly intelligent. Uh, but if I am somebody that's like that, the reason why I'm that way is that I've been wrong a lot. I learned a lot. Right? That's how we get better is that we learn and we grow and we teach ourselves. And if we're constantly self-improving, constantly teaching ourselves, constantly second-guessing our own biases, that's how we'll become the best version of ourselves. Woo! Chad, did I I just kind of popped off right there. Oh, look at me. Motivational speaker. I almost want to end it right there, but I got two more two more donos we got to do. Matt Bartles, my boy Matt Bartles says, "Burning firewood is fun, but fusion is cooler." Exactly. And at some point in the future, all of our heating and cooling systems will all be electric. All be electric. And then Mick Leonard says, "Thanks, Ashton. Never dull. Appreciate you guys." Okay, guys. Thank you guys very much for all the donations. Very happy early Veterans Day. I think it's Veterans Day tomorrow, right? Veterans Day is the holiday. Pretty sure. Very happy Veterans Day to everybody that's out there tomorrow. I'm going to have the day off as well. I actually might just play video games tomorrow, guys. So, I might be live streaming tomorrow, playing video games. I got some errands I got to do, but I kind of just want to do a live stream tomorrow. Take it easy, chill. So, if you're just hanging out, nothing else going on. Probably not going to be talking too much science physics. probably either playing Magic Cards or playing some other video games with people. Come check it out. I'll I'll like having you guys there. Um, one last thing to plug upcoming interview. I am going to be talking with Jason Georgiani in a couple days. As I said before, we had to move it back a week, which was fine. I was super busy last week. It's going to be a discussion back and forth. And the hypothesis is going to be of the discussion of did the United States figure out space-time manipulation from thermonuclear weapons. So our conversation will brooach into areas of history going all the way back to the Nazis and the gravitational experiments the Nazis were working on. We'll talk about Loel Wood, John Knuckles, Edward Teller, talk about some science and physics, and then we'll also talk about the geopolitical implications of these weapons and this technology. Uh along with what it means for humanity in general, specifically what I want to talk with Jason Georgiani about is time travel. Because the reason why I even found Jason Georgiani was because he went on Danny Jones and he said UFOs are time machines. Jason Georgiani was the one that went on Danny Jones said UFOs are time machines and we can't give this technology to random people because they're literal time machines and that's too much power. So now that Salvador Pais just laid out reverse temporal excursion for us, that really opens the door now to time travel and those implications. So I can't wait to chat with him about that. It's going to be an amazing conversation. Hope you guys check it out. Thank you, MH370X. Have a great night. We'll see you guys tomorrow. Take it easy, everybody. Later. >> [music] [music] >> Infrared eyes scanning the black, tracking the heat, never turning back. And gold 22, a covert gaze. [music] And roll 33. In the cosmic maze, and rolls in the mix, secrets untold, [music] silent washers, brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, [music] protecting our interest far and wide as spears. Sentinel [music] of the night, watching over with infrared [music] sight, alerting us to threats of guiding our defenses [music] like a guiding star. In the silence of space, they keep their post. Shields [music] unseen yet feared the most. With precision and speed, they warn of danger. Keeping us safe from the missiles anger as beers, sentinel [music] of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding [music] star and trolls in the mix. Secrets untold, silent watchers, brave and bold. In the [music] shadows they silently glide, protecting our interests far and wide as spears. Sentinel of the night, [music] watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats of guiding [music] our defenses like a guiding star. The spears, Sentinel [music] of the Night, watching over with [music] infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding artist.