Video Transcript
All the answers to the question of how to teleport are available on the internet. All the physics papers are available and publicly published peer-reviewed, too. You don't even We don't even need new physics papers. And I'm going to prove it to you right now. Takashi Musha Takaki Takaki Musha wrote a scientific paper in 2017 titled The probability of faster-than-light space travel by using quantum tunneling effect through the light barrier. Now, I like this paper number one cuz it's not too long. I hate going through the 30-40 page scientific papers. Honestly, just wrists at that point. This one's a good 10 pages, pretty straightforward, the math is there, and then it explains most of the concepts, not all of them. So, if you're reading this yourself trying to struggle through it, just have AI explain to you what the equations are and the significance of the equations. Be like, "Hey, what does equation number 11 mean in this paper? And what's its significance from the physics perspective?" And it will tell you. That's how you should be using AI, and you will become super smart super quick when you start to do that. Okay. Time for time for reading, chat. Here we go. Woo! I'm excited. Abstract. In normal physics Actually, you know what? Before we do this, video. Video before we even do this. What am I even thinking here, chat? TV is twice as fast at information. Reading is for slow people. Here we go. Shout out to AstronX channel that's been shut that's been reviewing this for a while. This is the only consistent video I could find. Here we go. >> As it turns out, yes. In 2016, a Japanese physicist and author of several books, a Dr. Takaaki Musha, wrote a paper entitled The possibility of FTL space travel by using the quantum tunneling effect through the light barrier. In it, he introduced a method for [music] tunneling through the light speed barrier and into a new superluminal state via, as Dr. Musha puts it, violent acceleration. Dr. Musha discovered this [music] by treating the speed of light as a potential barrier, a wall, something that increases the energy required to transition between two states. Basically, anything that resists change. A everyday example is when electron tunnels [music] from one high energy state to another lower energy state within a lightning rod diode. >> So, right off the bat, he says, "What's the secret sauce to make this work?" Violent acceleration. Does that sound familiar? It probably should. That's the same exact mechanism as the Paies effect. The Paies effect says we either need rapid acceleration transients or rapid vibrational transients. Why? Because vibration and spin are essentially two forms of the same thing. Huh, interesting. So, what do we need? We need to go like this. We need to be buzzing really fast. I'm doubling down, chat. Bees are flying around on 0.80. So are those crazy bugs with the giant noses that their bodies are like 10 times bigger than their their wings. If you think bug, a bug that's like 10 times fatter than its tiny little wings, is flying around like a bird, and you're going to try to make fun of me for saying that it's using zero point energy to fly around? [ __ ] I can say that [ __ ] is flying around by pixie dust and it makes more sense than you saying it's flying around like a bird. Anyway, let's I'm getting I'm getting distracted, chat. I'm going to play this other clip even though it actually spoils the ending a little bit. And then I'm going to review the rest myself cuz I just want to impress you. Here we go. >> D-space. This also means that a spacecraft that has tunneled into a superluminal [music] state must actually rematerialize after a very short amount of time. This answers the problem of how to rematerialize. >> Well, well, well, chat. We're getting a bonus tonight. This scientific paper doesn't just prove ER = EPR, which is that quantum tunneling, quantum entanglement is the same as a wormhole. It also tells us where the plane is coming out on the other side. And how does it tell us that? Because it turns out the whole basis for this paper is that these tachyons, these states of faster-than-light travel, hyperspace if you want to think of it, when we enter warp drive mode, that warp drive mode decays rapidly. What that means is you're going to fall out of hyperspace after a very short period of time. Now the question is how long do you even stay in hyperspace and how far do you go? And guess what, chat? There's an equation in the scientific paper that answers that question and I already did all the math and I put it in and I already figured out the answer, too. Get ready. Here we go. Woo! >> [sighs] >> Where is it? Let's start the reading. So, I'm going to read and I'm going to give you some interpretation cuz I've already done a lot of the analysis, but main thing here, abstract. In normal physics, nothing can move faster than the speed of light. Einstein's relativity forbids it. If you try to go super fast, then it takes more and more energy to go faster and faster. Therefore, we can never go faster than the speed of light. We need another way. How are we going to do that? We're going to manipulate space-time itself to get around the problem. So, one of the ways this was proposed is that using general relativity, it's called a wormhole using Alcubierre's warp drive metric. Warp drive works by distorting the fabric of space, contracting the space in front, and expanding the space behind to create a warp bubble between two distorted space-times. However, it had been shown that the total energy density needed to maintain the warp drive metric is far too vast. So, in this paper, the author says there's another possibility. Faster-than-light travel, which applies a tunneling effect through the light barrier caused by manipulation of the zero-point fluctuation field surrounding the craft. Boom, chat. Is that a mic drop moment? We haven't even gotten to the mic drop moments yet, but you can feel them coming already just from the introduction. Here we go. Here's the full intro, and I'm going to read the full intro because there's not a lot of words in this whole thing, so let's just do it. Some physicists have proposed faster-than-light travel formulated in the context of Lorentzian manifolds. I think I already read some of this. I'm just going to skip past. A ship cro- of faster-than-light travel. One is a ship crossing a bridge would move at below the speed of light, but arrive before a beam of light would have gotten the long way around. Warp drives are the second and more appealing option. A ship can't move through space faster than the speed of light, but with enough energy, space itself can move faster than the speed of light. The most renowned theory is Alcubierre's drive, and we know that's true. How do we know that's true? Because dark energy is exactly this phenomenon. The idea that space can expand faster than the speed of light is exactly what dark energy is explained to do in the Big Bang. That's the whole point of dark energy. So, if this is true, you should be questioning is dark energy even real, or is it just zero-point energy misunderstood? It's that one. Um The most renowned theory is Alcubierre, which we've talked about. And I've said this, but I haven't said it a long time, is that I was surprised to find out the answer to all this alien stuff is just Miguel Alcubierre's warp drive. I was thinking there was going to be some secret alien physics out there that nobody had figured out, but it's just Alcubierre's warp drive metric. And all we're missing from that is what's the negative energy. We can understand the idea of contracting and expanding space. We don't understand how to do it because we don't understand what negative energy is. Now, I explain negative energy very simply. We are in an ocean of zero-point energy. It doesn't matter how deep you think that ocean is. You can think it's tiny, you can think it's super deep. Doesn't matter for this perspective of negative energy. What is negative energy? Tapping into it. Tapping into it is negative energy. Why? Because you're pulling that energy out of space-time, bringing it into our reality, and that's creating a divot, a void. And that void has to be filled by the pressure of the rest of the negative energy flooding flooding in, just like if you were to pull a cup of water out of the ocean. And it would fill in very very rapidly. That's the same concept as negative energy. And so what you're going to find is ways to produce negative energy are ways to manipulate that zero point energy. Let's keep going. >> [clears throat] >> I'm going to zoom in here, too, cuz I can't My old eyes, chat, getting hard to read. I'm an old man now. I'm your grandpa. Okay, so we're going to make this warp bubble. We're going to contract and expand stuff here. It's going to make the It's going to take this huge amount of energy though. Um Now, they say if certain inequality conjectures hold, it was shown by Flenning Fenning, the guy I was telling you guys about before in the references, that the energy requirement for some warp drives become the equivalent of 10 to the 64 kg to transport a small spaceship across our galaxy. The author proposed in his paper that the possibility that light particles, which can penetrate through the light barrier by violent acceleration, suggests that electron neutrinos travel in a space in a FTL mode as confirmed by many experiments. So what they're saying here is that this is also confirmed by CERN. The studies that they have been seeing in CERN about neutrinos and tachyons and faster than particles that have faster than light states or faster than light properties, that's consistent with this scientific paper. So when the academics try to come for this, which they won't, when you're right, they can't come at you at all. They can't touch you, chat. That's why if you roll with me, you're going to be safe. You got the protection. But they can't say anything. This is where Avi Loeb can't say anything cuz he [ __ ] loves CERN. He loves CERN, loves all their [ __ ] and this is all consistent with CERN. Now, let's get right to the beginning. First equations are about the possibility of tunneling through the light barrier. This is all based on the idea that there is always a small probability because of quantum mechanics that any particle will achieve a superluminal state, meaning suddenly, spontaneously this particle invisible particle right here will suddenly teleport. You would say, "Ashton, sure. Maybe there's like a one in a quadrillion zillion chance of that happening, but it's basically nothing." Exactly. Exactly. That is the basis for a quantum tunneling being teleportation. You just heard it. That small, tiny insignificant percentage we're going to turn that tiny percentage into something real. Okay? That's the goal. That's what we're going to do here. You're saying there's a chance. And so he's doing this is quantum mechanical wave functions here. You see this psi guy going on right here? So, what we're trying to figure out is what is the probability, what is the chance that any particle will suddenly go faster than the speed of light. And that's what they're showing right here. And then this equation, this figure number one shows here's your condition where suddenly it's possible that this particle will suddenly achieve spontaneous faster-than-light travel. Now, the question is we figured out it's possible based on the math, how do we engineer it? How do we engineer this? And so this is that image that was just being shown on the Astron X channel, which you see right here. It says, "Thus it can be seen that violent acceleration makes it possible for the spaceship to tunnel through the light barrier." How do we do it? We have to accelerate our object. So from a theoretical perspective, we can do this, but we need to accelerate our object. And it says right here, "However, it can be estimated that the enormous acceleration 10 to the 60 m/s second squared is required for the spaceship with a proper mass of 100 tons. This cannot be attained by any conventional propulsion systems." So that's a Debbie Downer, chat. The paper says right there, if we want to do this, the math says there's no conventional propulsion systems that can pull this off. Oh, it keeps going. Exactly, but dot dot dot. Acceleration generated by the manipulation of the cutoff frequency of the zero-point fluctuation spectrum. Well, that sounds familiar. By the Puthoff's theory on zero-point fluctuation field, the rest mass of the pion corresponding to the zero-point fluctuation can be given by this equation right here. Where this other weird Hookman guy represents the dampening condition for Zitterbewegung oscillations. What they're saying right here is that this zero-point energy is a a froth, an ocean. And it's always fluctuating. That's what the Zitterbewegung is, constantly fluctuating here. And now what's going to be interesting is this part right here. And I'm going to have to explain this to you. I had to have AI help me, actually. It says, "As the force acting on the mass of the body can be described by F = MV or uh or uh then or F = MA is basically what we're saying here is that we're basically using an equation F = MA, force = mass * acceleration, and we made it a lot more complicated. We're saying then if we create a situation where the force equals zero, where we have no acceleration, constant momentum, you might say, and then we would get suddenly there would be a rapid acceleration. It says, "Then enormous acceleration can be produced when the cutoff frequency of the zero-point fluctuation is reduced to zero around the spaceship." What this is saying right here is when you put in the math, put in the equations, if you were to somehow begin to reduce the mass of your airplane, let's say, if you were to make this way less, you're going to get free acceleration. When you put in the equations F = 0, you get a free term here. What comes out is acceleration becomes related to the change in time. This is saying that as we reduce the mass of our object, it gets easier and easier to push. Imagine pushing on an object, but it just woo, just goes away from you. That's what this is saying the math, how the math works out. This is why we can break the light barrier and why it's so counterintuitive when we see it happen in the real world. Because you're pushing on this object, and suddenly when it hits the inflection point, it's just gone. It's gone. Why? Because it didn't need any more energy. It actually needed less and less energy. Normally, we think of things if I'm going to push on something I got to push on it harder and harder and harder to make it move more and more and more. But this is saying you actually need to push on it less and less and less to get it to move more and more and more. This is why the math becomes crazy all of a sudden.