Video Transcript
Use of beams of radiation to confine plasma reactors. So, if we use beams of SU2 radiation, beams of gravity radiation to confine plasma and fusion reactors like the inertial electrostatic confinement reactor was studied. Fusions occur where fusion ion beams collide. So, we were encouraged that indicated We were So, we were encouraged that indicated that irradiation of the IEC fusion region with added beams of ion confining SU2 or SU3 radiation could greatly increase the number of fusion events and therefore the strength of the energy output. So, what is that point bringing up? That is the cheat code. That last paragraph he puts in that chapter is almost certainly as far as he could publicly push it without getting hit with a national security violation. It's right there. He's giving us the answer to cool fusion mathematically. This is what makes it a little bit better than Tom Bearden or maybe even Ferris Williams. Although Ferris Williams shows us the math. But here he says, "This is exactly how you transition an electromagnetic wave into a gravity wave." And I can't stop thinking about this Gary Stevenson microchip thing. That's why I posted about it yesterday cuz I'm just sitting here going this is crazy. >> It just to show that if you had a transition between a type one superconductor and a type two superconductor, that at that junction you could force you could force gravitons in and gravitons out. Uh and so that that idea is would be an S we call it S-wave junction in Josephson junction. And his first interpretation about how to do that was with with a bulk we call it a bulk device where you down a huge chunk of crystal of high temperature superconducting crystal, then you lay onto that a a smaller layer of of low temperature superconductor, and that gets that type one type two junction going so you can force those transitions. Uh he was recommending YBCO or our bismuth uh copper oxide uh as the um >> So, am I crazy or did he just say you can force the spin transition from a photon, an electromagnetic wave, into a gravity wave? I'm pretty sure that's literally what this whole thing is about. I don't know if this is the first ever time that anyone's made a microchip that they're said they're just literally producing gravity waves from superconducting Josephson junctions. But I'm sitting here just going, well, I mean, there it is. I think there it is right there. And that's exactly what we're here seeing being described, but that's a much smaller scale. And so I imagine the way by which that's occurring on the quantum scale is basically analogous to what we're seeing on the larger scale with David Froning. Um let's see. What did I want to discuss in this next part? Okay. On the next chapter of this book, David Froning talks about field propulsion. And he talks about this paper that I just pulled up. He says, "Part two of this Air Force vehicle study used the 2025 vehicle defined in part one as the starting point for the 2050 vehicle." So, basically, they once started with a vehicle that was going to be for 2025, and then they advanced it. We're like, "Okay, now we're going to write a paper for 2050." They wanted it to be able to go to the moon. But they wanted to be very be able to go much faster. So, the 2050 vehicle had similar designs to the 2025 vehicle, but science and technology of even more advanced systems were made by physicists wait for it. Which physicist do you think consulted on this project for them? To to advance their craft even more beyond to science fiction levels. Eric W. Davis. Eric W. Davis also consulted on that microchip. Gary Stevenson just says it in that interview with Tim Ventura. Does it Eric Davis consulted on that microchip? I'm reading in a book that he consulted on this 2050 aerospace vehicle thing that they had worked on, too. Right there. My magic cards are falling out, chat. Eric Davis. Zoom in. You guys can see it. You'll believe me. Okay. >> [cough] >> Developing 60% more impulsive velocity than the 2025 vehicle rocket engines with similar payload and takeoff mass required both propulsion and favorable interactions between electromagnetic fields. One such medium is the electromagnetic zero point quantum vacuum which pervades the stupendous vastness of cosmic space. Here, Haisch, Rueda, and Puthoff suggested that a body's acceleration through electromagnetic zero point quantum vacuum gives rise in at least part to its inertia. Force that instantly opposes a body's acceleration or deceleration to a higher or lower speed. Well, there's no doubt my man believed in zero-point energy. David Froning was not just believing in zero-point energy, he was literally promoting Puthoff, Haisch, and Rueda. Who, I mean, go watch the clips of me talking about them on, I don't know how many podcasts, saying that zero-point energy explains mass, inertia, and everything. Wow. Okay. So, he says, "What we're going to do then is we're going to displace that zero-point energy." He says, "There's a favorable radiation pressure gradient formed about the ship that is moving at a much slower than light and emitting vacuum-disturbing electromagnetic beam." So, what did we learn? We learn we can we can produce a laser beam that produces a gravitational wave by making this second-order higher symmetry effect occur in our laser beam. And when we do that, we can have it push away zero-point energy. If it pushes away the zero-point energy, it pushes away the resistance. It pushes away the resistance to acceleration. So, he talks about some advanced materials that they were working on to try to be able to be used in this vehicle, including some I think you would call them metamaterials. On one of his shows, they want to make a thin, light, strong aerospace material that could be reinforced by ultra-strong, ultra-light matrix of carbon nanotubes. So, one thing I want to point out is that I'm going back to believing there is something inside the orbs. I have a hard time believing it's just a ball of plasma. The more I've talked through it with AI and tried to figure out how this all fits together, there has to be something inside of there. Has to be something inside those orbs. Now, [snorts] traveling to distant stars. First thing you have to know is general relativity, you would have time dilation if you speed up towards the speed of light. So, yes, we can get to distant stars and from your perspective, it might only take like a year to get to Alpha Centauri, even though it's four light-years away. The problem is if you do that and you come back, you're going to be it's going to be 8 years later. You're going to lose all that time. Everyone will be super old. So, what David Froning says is that there's a way around that. The way around that is we actually manipulate the medium itself, that zero-point energy. Quantum zero-point energy fluctuation for propulsion. And so, he says this expectation value of how much zero-point energy exist might be basically infinite. Essentially, it could be an infinite amount of energy that could exist in this electromagnetic medium. He says, um he found out that respected fusion physicist Robert Bussard had con- conceived of a fusion-propelled interstellar ramjet long before me. He even mentions, about then, a company physicist referred me to the work of John Archibald Wheeler of Princeton. As in the guy that coined the term wormhole and black hole. That John Archibald Wheeler. The guy that turn coined the phrase matter tells space time how to move, space time tells matter how to curve. Wheeler showed the incredible possibility of what seems inert and empty space is actually teeming with energy. So this is actually a real physicist explaining his diary how he came to realize that space is not an empty vacuum. Like I feel like I'm reading I mean we are reading this guy's dying memoirs. He references Robert Bussard repeatedly. He says more importantly aerospace Air Force scientist Frank Meade became interested in my zero-point vacuum energy ideas. He directed his brilliant scientific consultant Robert Forward to work with me on how it might be applied to space flight power or propulsion. At first Robert told me, "Right now I see no way to get a handle on that energy. It may be as impossible to use as the heat in the ocean." He says in the note down here at the bottom Arthur C. Clarke also used similar work inertia as a ZPE effect by Puthoff, Rueda, and Haisch that he called the space drive for his book 3001 a final odyssey. Wow. So it says that Robert Forward became a huge supporter huge supporter of Froning and followed him around at conferences. As soon as he learned of the Casimir effect wherein closely spaced metal plates exude the longer wavelengths of quantum fluctuations. Forward Robert Forward showed that this dry could drive the plates together without effort and that the EM energy of all excluded quantum fluctuations could be drawn off like electric current from a battery. Boom, chat. Holy I've been out here saying that Robert Forward 1984 he showed that we can use the Casimir effect to power a battery. You can draw off current from those plates coming together. It's undeniable. You just can't repeat the process. And this is And And listen to the very next sentence in this book. Sounds like exactly like what I've been saying. Unfortunately, his battery didn't generate net electrical power because it needed input energy to force open the plates to repeat the process. But his work showed the vacuum could be interacted with to cause force and release energy. Holy crap, chat. And then he mentions right in the next paragraph Bernard Haisch and Garrett Moddel's Casimir cavity free energy microchip right there. He mentions their free energy microchip right there. Okay, the last part I want to mention in this book is the is number nine, chapter nine. Faster than light in higher dimensional space. And this is the part where I was trying to figure out, okay, well, how does the teleportation work? And this is where I got to this page right here. And it started to blow my mind. Yeah, it's all like JK Philly fan just said in the chat. This is like all our greatest hits all thrown together in one book. That's why you realize this has to be the origin of these orbs. This has to be it. It's just too on the nose. We got Eric Weinstein wondering how teleportation is even possible. And we got a whole encyclopedia on exactly how to do it here. Unlabored acceleration requires constant ship momentum and hence no change in the wave packet wavelength, lambda. It's lambda, right? So, lambda is shown to be unchanged. And then it talks about phase velocity and group velocity, which I thought was crazy because this was the explanation for that negative time experiment on the live stream the other day. Remember when we talked about negative time and how when they calculated when the light hit the detector, it actually happened in negative time? That was they explained that away as the group velocity or phase velocity. So, right here, the secret of what he's saying is in order to get this low energy phase transition, in order to get this low energy jump, the plane has to be moving at a constant speed in a straight line. So, there are secrets. There are ways that you have to you have to do this in a specific way. And this is what bugged me the the about this. I'm glad I remembered this. Think about this. Like I just said, all we have is three orbs spinning around the plane. They don't even spin around the plane very fast. So, like and somehow that lowers the energy requirement enough to teleport a Boeing 777 from one location to the next. The reason why this scares me so much is cuz this isn't complicated. It's not just that China and Russia are going to figure out that we have this. People are going to be able to make versions of this like pretty easily. Like it doesn't take the state power to to make this thing. People are going to be making garage scale versions, and janky versions of this of these science science experiments, and be able to do it themselves. That's what scares me the most about this. Is that this also speaks to some underlying framework of reality that they've got figured out. Like there's a specific frequency these things are spinning to cause this to happen. And it's got to be tuned in with the resonant frequency of the universe or whatever the hell's going on. So, this is what bugs me the most. Is that A, it's this huge secret, but that ultimately it's going to end up being something generally pretty simple about the universe that we're going to discover. And then when people figure it out, they're going to be able to recreate it pretty simply. So, when I say that hey, I don't even want this to be real, I want to go back in time, I'm not joking, man. I'm not joking at all. Okay. Let me see what else I got here. My favorite page in the old book. This. The one that shows the actual jump. The hyper space condition created by a tachyon drive seems somewhat similar to the height of my coordinate that rose above flat space time. So, basically what David Froning is saying here is that you essentially move to some higher dimensional realm while you're zipping through space time. Which to me is perfectly consistent with what I've described and how the teleportation works. The reason why we need an extra dimension is cuz when that plane phases away, where is it? And what I would describe is it's in the true vacuum, the true nothingness, the true void. It's created its own space, its own universe for a brief instant. Before the wall comes down and now it's in a new location. So, a lot of people ask me, Ashton, does the plane go to another dimension? No, there aren't other dimensions. There's only this dimension, this reality. The plane is using like a tunnel that we don't see. But that tunnel is infinitely short. You're not actually driving through the tunnel ever. The tunnel is just a metaphorical understanding of how we can do this. Or this. Right? So, the the plane's not actually going through the tunnel, which is represented by my fingers here. The tunnel is imaginary. But it exists. That's how I imagine the extra dimension.