Video Transcript
How does the intelligence community operate? >> So the DNI briefs the president and offers decision levers. It's important to understand that the intelligence community never ever makes policy. >> Okay, that is another huge huge point. The difference between me when I do research and a lot of these talking heads out there, they don't know anything about anything. They're just plain pretend. When I do it, we listen to the GS15 CIA agents. What did he say right there? Intelligence community never issues policy. The only person that does the policy is the president of the United States, the commanderin-chief. What does that mean? That means President Barack Obama knew about MH370. No question, no doubt. Former President Barack Obama knows what we did to MH370. Even if he somehow was not involved in the oper in building the operation, which is practically impossible, the guy was president from 2008 to 2016 and the plane disappeared in 2014. The plane disappears six years into his presidency in his second term. Of course he knew the CIA was running an O covert operation. But even if he didn't know, even if we gave him the benefit of the doubt after the fact when now we have to like do some kind of weird cover up, the president would have been the one that makes the decision. The intelligence community would have come to President Barack Obama. They would have said, "Hey, hey Bo, hey Brock." They would have said, "We got a bit of a problem on our hands. They would have said, "Well, we kind of zapped this Boeing 77 with a thermonuclear weapon, and we need you now to smooth it over with Malaysia. Here are the options. Option number one, we make up a fake cover story. Option number two, we say nothing. Option number three, we press Malaysia to take the guilts." And that's what we did. What we did was we told Malaysia, "You're going to lie for us." People always ask me, they or they tell me, they criticize me and they say, "Ashen, you why are you pushing the government narrative on this one thing that's completely different than this other thing?" And first of all, because things that are different don't require the same exact response. Number one. Number two, the United States never actually lied about MH370. They just never said anything. Do you guys get the difference? When there's a real cover up, people are terrified to say anything on the record because anything they say on the record could later on be proven to be false. So when they do a cover up, what they do is they say nothing. Radio silence. Radio silence. And instead, we made Malaysia do the lying. We made the Malaysian prime minister claim that the plane went down in the South Indian Ocean with no evidence whatsoever. No evidence whatsoever the plane went down in the South Indian Ocean. Not one shred of the plane was found down there. And we made him lie. And how did we make him lie? Because we had dirt on him. Because it turns out we knew that he was stealing hundreds of millions of dollars. We knew the uh prime minister of Malaysia was stealing hundreds of millions of dollars from a fund that he shouldn't have been stealing from. And all we had to do was say, "You either go tell you either lie for us or we expose your kleptocracy. We expose your corruption." Turns out we exposed the corruption a year later anyway and he went to prison. Yes, the prime minister of Malaysia that we forced to lie went to prison. That's a 100% factual statement and he went for prison for corruption. So that's what we did. We made them lie. So, I just think that this slide is super interesting because what you have to understand, anybody that's talking about conspiracies and the CIA and all this which everybody talks about all the time, none of them know how any of this stuff works. The only person that makes policy is the president and the White House. The intelligence community do not make policy. So when people are talking about, oh, the the CIA and the MSAD are controlling the government, I mean, you can kind of stretch the definition, but in reality, the person that makes the policy is the president. President Trump is the one making the policies. >> So decision one, I threw three of them together, three that made sense. Well, first is to observe, but continue active collection and analysis. This is a very passive stance. Just keep watching and see what happens. The second is to engage the phenomena in some way but don't threaten it. That is let's fly something toward it or uh do something uh perhaps to attract its attention but don't make it feel like it's in danger. We're just trying to like see what reaction might come by engaging this phenomenon. The third is very dangerous because it's not only engaging a phenomenon but provoking a reaction um and provoking um in the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2022 that uh left the House and it's on its way to the Senate. Um there's a provision in there for this UAP office within the Pentagon to report on efforts to capture a UAP. When you tell the Department of Defense that you're interested in capturing a UAP and you want reports on progress for capturing UAP, it gives the Department of Defense the idea that it's a kinetic response. And so that's decision decision level three, provoke a reaction, and I don't recommend [laughter] shooting anything. >> There are clearances above top secret at the feasibility of DNA storing data. >> I skipped over some of this MK Ultra and biology stuff. If you're interested in that, you can check it out. Thank you for reposting the stream, guys. By the way, >> let's look at uh some classifications above top secret. There's nothing really above top secret. It's all top secret, but there are compartments that are so narrow and so limited as to who's read into them that for all intents and purposes, they might as well be above top secret because just having a top secret clearance does not necessarily um qualify you to have that information. The one that I know related to Bob Fischer again is crypto, the crypto clearance. He claims to have had an above top secret clearance. What he really meant to say is I had a top secret crypto clearance. Not many people have that. Um so that's an example of a so-called above top secret clearance. And if you look at FOIA, you'll see alphabet soup of markings. The most common one is SITK no form. Top secret is obvious. Special intelligence is communications intelligence or sigen. Talent keyhole. Talent is ISR is airborne sensors. Keyhole is space-based sensors. The keyhole, why keyhole? Well, uh the pattern that the satellites uh make over the earth is >> so the point of this one, I'm just going to skip a little bit past this, is that there are multiple clearance types like top secret is the top, but then it gets compartmentalized after top secret. And he's saying, okay, you need keyhole clearance if you want to have ISR capability. There are labels for no foreign as well. No foreign does not mean no fornication for my insults out there. No foreign means that you can't share that information with foreign uh allies. So this means that a lot of the information that might be no foreign, that means that we're keeping it internally. So for all the people out there that are going Israel controls you, they control blah blah blah. There's certain stuff we don't share with them. Presumably, we share whatever weapons we develop together. But keep in mind that we're also trying to keep this information from even our allies because our allies might leak the information out as well. It's very much like an hourglass except the very top of that hourglass is very narrow ellipse and the bottom of that hourglass is a much longer ellipse slightly wider. So it reminded uh in a row of keyholes. So therefore they named um that program keyhole that compartment keyhole. Uh no foreign means no foreign and that means not even to five eyes. Um the British >> not even to five eyes. No foreign means that not even the five eyes get to see that information. >> Uh uh UFO files were labeled uh UK only no foreign which means that the British did not share its files with the US government. It kept those files to uh itself until they were uh formally released. So even the British government was keeping their UFO files secret from us. So even people their allies are keeping this nuclear weapon technology and se and and secrets secret from each other which totally makes sense because you are trying to if you are trying to make sure something doesn't leak. You need nobody to know about it. Not even your allies. Not even our top allies can know about this technology. That's pretty scary, man. That's pretty scary to me. Yeah, I don't know about you guys. Okay, now we're going to get into some of the alien stuff for the people that are always saying you're talking about alien. I literally never talk about aliens, but you know what? We're going to talk about aliens. Here you go. >> Stuff here. Russia has had space forces for a long time. He's part of the Russian aerospace forces. I found an interesting quote from a Russian officer, Sergey Rishnoi, and he he said, "We are unfortunately not ready to fight extraterrestrial civilizations." And he said that in all seriousness to a question posed by Russian media. and that's his position. So, um I should have sourced that one, but it's an interesting it's an interesting quote. What um what did he just say? Let me put my glasses back on. I feel like I was unable to uh read that. Let me go full boomer here and make sure I'm I'm reading that properly. Direct quote. We are unfortunately not ready to fight extraterrestrial civilizations. Okay. Um, wow. The reason why that kind of I mean, most of you are probably going, "Okay, that's crazy, bro." You're going, "That's crazy. That's nuts." Right? And I'm kind of with you on that. The reason why it gives me pause. Two reasons. Number one, there certainly could be aliens out there that have super advanced technology. In fact, we are definitely primitives that are basically the equivalent of monkeys in the jungle. while the aliens are flying around on gravity wave devices. Right? The other thing that gives me pause is that Salvatore Py also implied this multiple times. I think it was our second interview, maybe the third interview, could be wrong, where he talks about human technology. He says, "I believe in human technology." Actually, I think it was his leaked uh the letter that he asked Dave to to post and read out loud. I believe in human technology that almost implied that we're developing this technology, these super nukes, these warp nukes, zero point energy weapons, whatever the hell you want to call them. We're developing these weapons because at some point we're preparing for an intergalactic battle. We're preparing for the aliens to teleport out of nowhere, appear in front of us, and we're going to zap them with thermonuclear weapons. It kind of sounds pretty crazy to me when I say it out loud, but it's not outside the realm of possibility. I'd say it's extremely low likelihood, but you could see just in a hypothetical scenario where we have been, let's say we see these energy orbs flying around, we do one of these investigations and they go, "It's not China. It's not Russia. It's got to be something else. Maybe it's the Atlanteanss. Maybe it's an a civilization from somewhere else." How would the military respond to that? We know how they would respond, guys. Come on, use our heads. They would go and try to build something that can fight the aliens. How would we respond if we see some alien fighting? We're going to try to figure out how to take them down. Guys, it's the whole plot of of um Independence Day. The whole plot of Independence Day. The aliens show up. First thing we do is figure out how to make a virus that kills them all. That's what we would do. We would try to figure out what kind of weapons work on them. What are they weak against? How do we beat them if they show up in mass numbers to wipe us out? And the reality is we would have no chance. We'd have no chance at all. They could just zap our planet away in a black hole if they wanted to, but that wouldn't stop us. We would still try to build counter measures 100%. So that's why this quote kind of freaked me out a little bit because the other thing is that it's not just us that knows. China and Russia also have intelligence apparatus. I don't personally believe they have the type of weapons that we have, but they're catching up. And so if we know about UFOs, the aliens that China and Russia knows about the aliens and the UFOs as well. And we might all be trying to do the same thing. You could even imagine a scenario where like the aliens came from underwater like uh Terror from the deep. ExCom Terror from the deep crab people. crab people. The aliens come out and then everybody just freaks out. Everybody's like, "Oh chat." They're going, "We got crab ali. We got lobster aliens coming out from the oceans." And then so Putin and Z and Trump or Obama, whoever meet together, not Biden. They all meet up and they're like, "Yeah, we got to we got to hide this. We got to be quiet about this. We got to all build up super advanced weapons so we can fight the Atlantanss, the lobster people, Atlantanss." So even if it's insane, which it definitely is, I could see a scenario where it where it happens, where it's real. Okay, the next one. Domes of light. Here you go. Reach across the ocean. It was not an ICDM. It could not have touched the US, but our allies would have been at risk. So every time the Russians, well, not every time, but many times when the Russians would test the SS20 Saber, here comes these domes of light u also appearing. Now, NASC's predecessor, FTD, they still stuck with the fact that um according to them, they thought the dome of light could be a missile countermeasure to obscure the numbers and trajectories of a of a Soviet nuclear missile attack. Um, and the dome of light was used by Senator Jesse Helms of North Carolina. He actually used uh the phrase dome of light um in a comment he made. >> Dome of light, chat. Dome of light. Sound familiar? Sounds a lot like some Tom Bearden. Tonight's uh Moment of Zen is going to be a Tom Bearden clip, by the way, guys. I've got it ready to go. That just reminded me actually. Domes of Light and now he's connecting it to Intercontinental Ballistic Missile weapons tests. This is the part where I look at this and I go, John Ramirez knows more than what he's saying here. I think John Ramirez knows more than what he's saying. And I mean he admitted this is just the declassified version. The moment they're starting talking about it linking this to weapons tests. He says the Soviet scientists and US missile analysts observed that these domes seem to have some coincidental association with test launches of the SS20 Saber intermediate range ballistic missile. Missile analysts at at the then foreign technology division believed that the domes of light could be a counter measure to obscure the numbers and trajectories of a soviet nuclear missile attack directly connecting these domes of light to nuclear weapons. I actually can't even comprehend how more people have not figured out the secret of nuclear weapons. And the first giveaway should be that we banned nuclear weapon testing right after Ripple. Right after we developed super powerful clean fusion bombs, we banned nuclear weapon testing. That's like literally what you do when when you figured something out. When you play in a video game, I'm a video game master. When you're a video game master and you figure out some secret, the first thing you do is you ban everybody else from using it. You figure out the cheat codes and you're like, "Okay, nobody else is allowed to use the cheat codes, guys. Sorry. It was fun. I got to play with the cheat codes, but you're not allowed to do it. Everybody else is banned from it.