4orbs Reacts to Wormholes Lecture by John Cramer

Video Transcript

# 4orbs Reacts to Wormholes Lecture by John Cramer Malaysian 370 contact switch 120 decimal niner. Good night. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has [music] gone missing. >> Even as [music] these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government, >> why shoot it down though if it's hostile? Our technologies [music] permit us to manipulate time and space. >> What an [music] distance annihilated. This country is very powerful. Far more powerful than people understand. We [music] have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. I remember the line from Hindu [music] scripture [music] is trying to persuade the prince that [music] he should do his duty and to impress him [music] takes on his multi-armed form and says [music] now I am become death to destroy of worlds. >> This is so crazy. >> I suppose we all thought that one way or another. [music] >> The Americans would. Hey guys, how's it going? We might have to watch that again sometime soon. The old uh Minister of Defense interview with uh what was her name? I can't remember. Carrie or something like that. Anyways, thank you guys for being here tonight. feeling a little under the weather. So, we are going to do something slightly different. We are going to watch a uh video that was sent to me about John Kramer. I think it's actually the lecture that he was talking about in the other clips that I've shared where he talks about he was going to do a a lecture about wormholes and we found that lecture. Now, before we dig into that, couple political points I want to make very quickly. Number one, all of the ICE raids that are happening specifically in my neck of the woods right now. I think you guys know my position. Uh I'm unashamedly uh right-wing when it comes to politics. And but the the point that I want to make here isn't one that's necessarily a partisan point. The point I want to make is that I never knew how bad the problem was. Look at how bad the immigration problem is in the United States. We have so many illegal immigrants that ICE agents can just roll up in any major city and roll out with hundreds if not thousands of people who lit legally should not be in this country. Legally should not be in this country. And for the bleeding hearts out there, I understand I was one of you. You would think like we should be able to care for other people. But the problem is there's so many illegal immigrants now that it's actually literally impacting our economy to the point where Americans that are especially underprivileged Americans are competing with these people for lowincome jobs, making our entire standard of living in the entire country worse off. So, I want to bring that up because my position on all of this, including the technology, is that we need to be using this technology to advance our interests. And advancing our interests in America doesn't mean bringing in a bunch of third worlders to use our social services and jobs that Americans could be taking otherwise. So, it's a tough situation. And this kind of doxes me a little bit, but I'm going to share this, too. It's gotten a little hyster like out of control here. Like I'm walking around. I'm seeing signs like this all over. Let's just say in my very near proximity and a bunch of others that are like misspelled and stuff like that. Like literally misspelled signs that had tonight spelled wrong like all over the place. Like these people are like laring as if they're like some sort of like resistance or something like that. And I when we reach that level of psychological control, it concerns me. And this is going to feed into my next point, which is I'm a little bit sick right now. And I was going through, sorry, there's going to be one more political point, then we're going to talk about science. I a bunch of people always link to me um Dave Fina's takedown video. And so I happened to look through his feed yesterday and just I want to point out oddly this guy's got 4 million subscribers, but any video that he does that's not like so and so is a fraud, they have like 2,000 views, like less views than my random shorts have, which is just really odd to me. But beside the point, I clicked on one of his other videos that was a Piers Morgan video and he's he's getting asked about COVID and he's saying how all these people are antiaxers, Brett Weinstein is an antivaxer and how you it's impossible to deny that millions of lives were saved by the COVID vaccine. This [snorts] really bugs me, guys. I have not been able to say what I really want to say about COVID because I still have my job and it actually probably puts my job in jeopardy depending on what I were to say from my political opin from my opinions and my lived experiences. What I will say is this though and I feel comfortable saying this now because it's not 2020 anymore. I don't believe the COVID vaccine saved a single life. Not even one. And I don't think you could show me any evidence to the contrary. It's very difficult to prove a negative, right? How can you prove that co a vaccine saved someone's life? But I want to point that out because the people that seem to be against this movement in general have a very tenuous grasp on health, on reality, and on logic and on reason. Very tenuous grasp. And when you challenge them, like I watched Piers Morgan challenge Dave Fina, their comeback is just you're you're basically an idiot if you just aren't on board, which is just basically a cultlike mentality. It's not show me the evidence, show me the logical thought process. And I would love to debate him on that topic because I I I know exactly what their arguments are going to be. I know that their arguments aren't based on facts and numbers that are actually real. It's based on their misinterpretation of those numbers. So anyway, I just wanted to say that. And now the reason why I mentioned this is because I've been thinking a lot in the last few days about excuse me, [snorts] how it is that so many people struggle to understand physics, wormholes, teleportation, uh the idea of free energy. The idea of free energy, these things make people have that exact same reaction that Dave Fina has about COVID saving lives. It's it's like a thing that you just can't question it. You can't question how that he's coming to these conclusions. Why are wormholes not possible? Well, because quite literally, and the craziest part is general relativity proves wormholes are real. Proves it. If you believe in Einstein's general relativity, you believe in wormholes, man. That's it. And but there's this group of the general relative relativistic physics theorists that want to say that wormholes aren't really real because we don't see them or we haven't yet detected them. It's all it's science fiction even though they're mathematical solutions to Einstein's general relativity. And I've realized over the course of two years that the problem that we are dealing with here and and thank you. This needs to be said more. Er equals EPR. That's the answer. Wormholes are quantum entanglement. They're the same thing. It's we it's our misunderstanding of the concept that is the problem because we think a wormhole has to be this physical tunnel that we're looking at that opens up like Star Trek. We're not thinking about it in terms of wait are there things that act like wormholes right now. Oh, entanglement is a thing that acts like a wormhole. A connection between two points separated by extremely far distance that shouldn't be possible. So, we have a challenge in front of us [snorts] because it's a psychological issue that we're facing here. When I first started this, I thought, "Oh, all I have to do is get the information out. All I have to do is get the information out." And now I'm to the point where I'm realizing getting the information out is not even close to enough. In fact, part of the reason why the people like Hal Pudof, Eric Davis, probably John Kramer that we're going to listen to here in a moment don't talk about this. The reason why they don't try to be more vocal is because they know nobody's going to believe them if they do. And the more they were to push, the more they would discredit themselves in the eyes of their peers, in the eyes of academia. So there's no incentive whatsoever. I thought this was a silly idea several years ago. Several years ago, I thought, "No, there's no way." Okay, like if these people know about teleportation technology or advanced breakthrough energies like physics cap like uh fusion capabilities, they would just come out and they would just scream it at the top of their lungs. They would go on Joe Rogan and and yell it from the rooftops. Uh-uh. Uh-uh. Because they know that every person they interact with that they talk about these concepts with immediately thinks they're a cook. immediately just goes straight over their head. No idea even what they're talking about. When you say stuff like teleportation and wormholes, they're immediately thinking Star Trek, right? It is soul crushing to Tom Hudson's point in the chat. So, the best we can do is maybe just educate people. I feel like the sad reality is we were born a a hundred years too early. at least a hundred years too early. Okay, now that I brought you down, let's bring it back up again, guys. Um, there are amazing things going on. And John Kramer to me, this guy's got to know. He was one of the authors of one of the durs, the 38 scientific papers that Hal Pudof did talk to Joe Rogan about. He's author of the ER equals EPR der or the um it's not ER equals EPR dirt, but he does mention it. Um it's the author of the non-locality der and John Kramer uh is connected to you. So Eric Davis, Hal Pudof, etc. And yet he's talking about wormholes. He's talking about wormholes. Here's a clip that we found. I don't know if I found it, but a couple years ago that or it's from several years ago. We found it last year talking about wormholes that started this whole dig into John Kramer. >> I'm talking about uh reaching the stars by by accelerating a wormhole to a high very high velocities and shooting it at the stars and using relativistic time dilation to get there almost instantaneously. So you fly through the wormhole, >> you send the send the wormhole there, send momentum bearing particles through it to steer it uh around where you want it. You land it and then you expand it and get out and and explore the planet. >> I see. [laughter] >> Okay. Aside from the sinister laugh at the end, this guy is no lightweight. He's an experimental nuclear physicist. And again, all this goes back to nuclear physics, nuclear weapons. And he was part of the NASA Breakthrough Physics Propulsion Program. You may say, Ashton, what the hell is the NASA Breakthrough Physics Propulsion Program? Well, I've spoken about it dozens of times. 1996 through 2002, Mark Milis, Eric Davis, Hal Pudof, John Kramer, and a bunch of others get together to work on basically Star Trek propulsion concepts and they basically find out what's what works and what doesn't work. So when I'm talking about breakthrough physics propulsion BPP, think of the Holy Bible chat. If you haven't got your Holy Bible, virtual versions of this were disseminated on the Discord after the last live stream. If you have not received your Holy Bible, 700 pages of just pure science, pure distilled science and references by the great uh high priests of the movement. By the way, we are officially becoming a cult now. Turns out I'm not actually the cult leader, though. I am just uh uh I'm a disciple. I'm a disciple like the rest of you guys. I'm a simple disciple. We are going to become a cult now. We've decided. So I it turns out I am your grandpa. I am your grandpa. You are my grandson. Um so we have the books of Haway, the books of Davis, the books of Pudof, the books of Kramer in here. And so now we're going to watch some videos from one of the uh the great disciples, one of the original John Kramer. So, if you were wondering in this video, okay, there's got to be some recording of this wormhole lecture that this totally not evil man with his completely sinister laugh here. And by the way, if John Kramer's watching this, I'm just joking, bro. I love you. You're up on my Mount Rushmore. You're up there with uh Charles Chase. You're a goat. Don't worry about it. I don't really think you're an evil monster. Only a little bit. Okay, guys. I'm just going to get right into it because he dropped some truth bombs in this. So, here you go. This is I This is the actual presentation that he was talking about. Uh right here. What did I do here? Oh, it's over here. Okay. Got it. Thank you. Wormholes as starships. John G. Kramer, Professor Ammeritus. Ammeritus, Department of Physics, University of Washington. Advanced Propulsion Workshop 2018. So for the historians that are out there who are watching this, let's say you're watching this in the year 2035 and you're like, "Oh, damn. This guy Ashton was on board." Okay, if I turn out to be right about this, then let me just tell you, my spider sense is going [ __ ] crazy when it comes to Mark Milis, John Kramer, these dudes at the BPP, Eric Davis, Hal Pudof. I'm almost as sure those guys developed teleportation as I am that Edward C. Lynn leaked the videos. So, if it turns out Edward Lynn really did leak the Gorgon stair video of MH370, then you probably want to be talking to these guys, although they're probably dead at this point in 2035. But those guys probably developed teleportation. There you go. It's just and the reason why I say that you're going to find out in this presentation is that the way this guy is describing wormholes, there's like I found out there's like 50 different ways you can imagine a wormhole. Polyhedral spinning wormholes. Okay, cool. Then there's like the different ways that you can create the wormholes. And here's John Kramer pretty much explaining exactly the way we're seeing wormhole work in the MH370 videos. And before I play that, here's a little quick reminder of what what a real wormhole looks like. This is what we're working with here on our screen. We can see these orbs spinning around the play. And these orbs, when we think about orbs, guys, everybody laughs at the idea of orbs. I'm going to keep calling them [ __ ] orbs. You show me some plasma balls and yes, I could get real specific and be like, well, that is a field reverse configuration plasma with a plasmoid inside and but I could do that. But no, I it's just easier to say it's some orbs. My whole thing in the back sign says orbs. So, there's three plasma orbs, but think of these as just balls of lightning. Imagine you take your lightning and you spin it up and you just zap something with it. That's what we're talking about here. And what we're talking about is these little balls of lightning, little zaps they do. They send you to the nega universe. They send you through a wormhole when you get we hit that little zap. It's like a little special ability. Think of it like that. Okay, so here we go. So here's here's the video, right? So we got little balls of lightning and then they converge almost like magnetic reconnection and then our object's just not there anymore. Even the orbs aren't there anymore either. But also remember the dance. Look at how they're spinning like this. Okay, around the plane. Just remember that. I wanted to give us some frame of reference before we listen to our boy here. Uh Johnny C. Okay, Johnny C. By the way, sometimes guys, I just sit around thinking like what would I ask these guys if I got to interview them? like what would be the question that I could ask them that wouldn't be like you know you don't just come in and be like yo bro did you make that orbs that teleport that plane you can't start with that obviously you gota you got to ask the questions that like reveal information so I would ask like tell me why Eric Davis is a better phys wormhole physicist than you that's what I would ask John Kramer you know something to like trigger him but also would let him know that like I know what he knows kind of situation like real mind game [ __ ] chat. I probably shouldn't say this on stream. This is why they'll never interview with me because I know that I'm just like a psycho when it comes to interviews. Okay, anyway, here we go. John Kramer. [laughter] >> There was that laugh. There was that laugh. >> We can track wormholes back to to 1500 AD. Uh this is a picture from the uh palace of the doge in Venice uh by Heronomous Bos showing a wormhole connection between earth and heaven in which the blessed are taken from one place to the other. Um more [clears throat] recently um wormholes were invented uh or were perceived to exist in the uh structures of general relativity by Einstein and and Rosen. Um, basically what Einstein and Rosen were trying to do is something very similar to what the speaker in the previous talk was trying to do, trying to explain what electrons and positrons are. And there [clears throat] were their idea was that there if if you had a wormhole that had electric flux threading through it that one end of it would appear to be positive and the other end would appear to be negative and therefore that maybe that's what fundamental particles are. Uh, [clears throat] it was laid. >> Okay. Okay. I mean, I'm one minute in here and I'm going, wait, what? So remember guys, what is my name? Ashton the demon. Four orbs takes no prisoners chat. And it's gonna probably turn out that there's six orbs and that I'm going to have to legally change my name to Ashton Six Orbs. It's going to be rough. I'm gonna have to change this whole banner. My thing at the top is going to be all wrong in the future. The reason being, here's your answer to wormholes. monopoles, positive charge, minus charge. The connection between these two points, that's your wormhole. From a very basic physics perspective, what are we seeing in the MH370 video? When the plane disappears out of spaceime, you're seeing one half of a dipole. A dipole is a positive and a minus. You're seeing one half of it. That means the other side must be the other half. And the reason why this is the case is this is how you're determining how the plane's going to be attracted from one location to the next. You have a positive charge over here. You have a minus charge over here. They're linked together. When the barrier is removed between them, that's where they're going to go. And there may also be a vectoring which is a targeting system that is required. So when John Kramer is mentioning this and he's saying, he's also talking about scale and variance here. He's alluding to this this idea that maybe this is also true at the very small scale. Maybe particles themselves are little wormholes. Maybe particles themselves are governed by the same physics that a wormhole is at the larger scale by the community at the time as an Einstein Rosen Bridge. The basic idea as I said is that you have a uh a wormhole connecting two regions of space. You have electric flux going through them. Here you see the electric electric lines of flux going in and ending on the object here and that represents a negative charge. Here you see the lines of flux coming out of the object and that represents a positive charge. And so they said that's what maybe that's what electrons and posetrons are. The trouble is that if you calculate the mass of an object like this uh it doesn't have an electron mass. has a much much larger mass somewhat some somewhat comparable to the plant mass. So uh this is a um uh an interesting [clears throat] idea but it didn't satisfy its original mission. What? So the earliest people Einstein Rosen er Einstein Rosen the people that came up with the Einstein Rosen bridge the first idea of a wormhole before wormhole even had an idea they said maybe a wormhole is just positive and minus charge being separated. This is a beautiful thought. Do you want to know why? chat. What is the first question that Dave Fina would get asked in a debate that he would never be able to answer? What is electricity? What is electricity? Got to be one of the most basic physics questions you could ever ask somebody. And yet 99% of physicists probably can't even answer it. What is electricity? Ashton can answer it. A separation of positive and minus charge. Separation of positive charge and minus charge produces a current between them that we call electricity. That's it. So when we talk about maybe a wormhole, maybe a wormhole is one end of positive charge and one end of minus charge. We're going all the way back to fundamental physics here. They're saying, "Whoa, are we unifying everything through electricity? Are we saying that spacetime itself is governed by the ideas of positive and minus charge, by electricity?" Whoa. Well, if that were the case, it would be some kind of electrical universe or something. Okay. >> Was to explain what fundamental particles are. Um, and [clears throat] John Wheeler subsequently uh renamed wormholes and demonstrated that they're very unstable and that's where things sat for a long time until 1988 when we Ray gave us a nice uh introduction to that to this business um yesterday and his student Mike Morris and his posttock uh [clears throat] UV viter uh uh were caused to reexamine the the old idea of wormholes. because Carl Sean had had a book had a book a movie contract for writing a uh for writing the a novel and a screenplay for things that ultimately became the movie Contact. Uh and uh he wanted to have his uh [clears throat] C SATI radio astronomer go from the Earth to some alien civilization in a big hurry without having to get on a spaceship and take years and years to do it. And so he said, "Hey, what about wormholes?" and Kip Thorne thought about it for a while and said, "Well, you know, the the real problem is that they're horribly unstable, but nobody's really looked very hard at seeing whether there's some way of stabilizing them. Maybe that's worth thinking about." Uh, and so he put his brightest student, Mike Morris, on the job, and Mike Morris found a way of stabilizing wormholes, which is sim summarized in this paper and involves the Casemir effect. >> Okay. Wow. Wow. I mean, from a historical perspective, what we just listened to right there, it should be mind-blowing for you guys. I mean, this is almost like this is a movie in and of itself. Carl Sean was writing contact and he was like, I need a real physics way to go super far distance that would work. So, he sends his students, this is a true story, this is all true, by the way. Carl Sean was working on contact. They they were doing what do they call it? Um like hard sci-fi is what they call it. Science fiction based on real physics and say go dig into this idea of wormholes. And so they're like oh well wormholes are I guess theoretically possible but the problem is they'd be really unstable. But nobody's really looked into how you would stabilize a wormhole. So maybe we could dig into that. And that was in the late 80s. And then 1994, Miguel Alubieri writes his warp drive paper which expands the idea. And then now it's 2025 and there's so much literature now and not just on warp drives and wormholes, but traversible wormholes. Wormholes that you're not going to get wiped out on. Uh there's there's literature about what even is negative energy if we really think about it. And how would we stabilize a wormhole? And the idea that a wormhole can be more easily stabilized than a warp drive. Because for the wormhole, if you think about it, you only need a brief moment to go from here to over here. You're only keeping that wormhole open for a second, split second. Versus the warp drive, you're keeping that thing constantly flowing. [clears throat] >> And the way they sort of envisioned wormhole. Oh, one more thing I want to say about the timeline. So, I was going to review some notes when I was just feeling under the weather, but we were talking about Oak Shannon and Ferris Williams. Guys, the Ferris Williams thing is giving me the creeps. Like, I've literally got hair standing on my head thinking about the Ferris Williams situation because I'm pretty sure that he solved physics for the military and they're just never disseminated to the public. Think about that. and you're just not allowed to talk about what he discovered. Anyway, Oak Shannon was friends with Ferris Williams. Frank me, Paul Morad knew Ferris Williams as well. All these guys are the guys that were working on this technology figuring out uh teleportation. And Hal Pudof and the CIA and Loheed Martin and Boeing, they met in 1985. Oak Shannon has the notes cuz he was there. says that the CIA and Hal Pudof and and Loheed Martin and Boeing all meet to talk about UFO physics in 1985. And then in 1987, Hal Pudof writes his first zero point energy paper, ground state of the hydrogen atom, claiming that hydrogen atoms can just absorb energy from the zero point field. Basically giving us an avenue to infinite energy. And now you guys all know where we're at with Hal Pudof and Eric Davis. Now, so you're looking at this and you're going, we have a very clear timeline from the 80s to when wormhole physics came back in vogue in the late 80s, early 90s to the guys that were literally working on it in the breakthrough physics propulsion program, including the man you're listening to right now in 1996 through 2002. And then in 2014, we are watching two leaked military videos from surveillance platforms we didn't even know existed of a missing airliner MH370 get teleported out of the sky. It's there one second and then it's just not there in two in sync military videos. I mean, to me, this tells us a story. This tells us a story that we found out some technology. Maybe it was forgotten technology, lost technology, maybe alien technology. That part still freaks me out. And then we rediscovered it and like reverse engineered it and we figured it out. And by 2014, we were like off to the races, baby. Pretty wild, huh? to be produced was that you have some advanced civilization which means a civilization much smarter than us who could reach down into the quantum foam where at the most fundamental level >> by the way he calls it quantum foam. Oh, one more thing I had to mention. He calls it quantum foam right there. You know who else called it quantum foam? The ether Tom Bearden. So I was just talking about Oak Shannon's notes from 1985. This is probably the thing that freaked me out the most. I'm reading the Oak Shannon notes from Hal Pudof. In fact, let me just pull them up. Let me just pull them up, chat. You can download these and you probably should download these. Crap. Where are they? Uh, I'll just pull them back up again. Hold on. Where is it? Uh, that's Oak Shannon. [snorts] Oh crap. Okay. Well, I don't know where they are right now. I'll probably have to pull them next time. So, I'm looking through the Oak Shannon notes, and what do I see when I look through these Oak Shannon notes is I'm looking I'm sitting there thinking the whole time like, where is Tom Bearden? Like, why isn't Tom Bearden at this meeting? In the 80s, Tom Bearden was talking about this Tesla science, teleportation, directed energy weapons. And I'm wondering while I'm reading these these notes because they even mentioned Tesla as in like the theory that was messed up was Tesla. And so I get down later on in the notes and what do I see right there? Tom Bearden. I hear see Bearden's name mentioned regarding this physics in 1985. Yeah, I have it. My computer just restarted so all my windows got like moved around. So that's the problem. I, you know, I'll look for it while we listen to this here and then I'll show you guys. Okay, let's go back to this. >> Well, there's all kinds of stuff going on. There's electrons and positrons coming out and being annihilated. And there are much more complicated structures also emerging and disappearing all the time. And if wormholes are a valid solution of Einstein's equations, then they should be spontaneously popping out of the vacuum and disappearing again over and over again. And so if you have a uh a member of one of these advanced civilizations who is agile enough to reach in and grab it while it while it's popping into the vacuum before it goes back in and pays off its debt to Heisenberg in the form of energy, you can keep it. And that's that's the basic idea that behind this paper u so [clears throat] what did he just say right there? He also just connected to Charles Chase. I think about Charles Chase all the time. I think about Charles Chase all the time because in his conference that he held, he kept asking people about how are you you're borrowing this energy. How are you paying it back? How are you paying it back? It's like you're dipping into this ocean, but you have to observe conservation. So somehow that energy has to get back to that ocean. But this shouldn't be a problem. We have an analogy for this that we see all the time. In fact, you're seeing it right now as I'm drinking this water. When I drink this water in this cup, it's not free water. It's not gone. Doesn't disappear and go to the ether. It's part of a system. It's part of a cycle that recycles in and out forever. You tell me that there are virtual particle antiparticle pairs and you can dip into that ether and you can pull those out. How are you paying that back? You're paying that back because all energy is going back to that ether over time. That's my perspective. That's my view. I could be wrong, but that's how I look at the universe is I look at the universe as a big energy cycle. The same way you look at water as a big water cycle. And say, can you dip into that energy and pull it out? Sure. There's going to be consequences just like pulling water out of the ocean, but you can do it. Okay. So, uh the assumption is that an advanced technology could by choice keep a uh stabilized wormhole very small so that in the spirit of Einstein and Rosen, one mouth would behave like a charged particle of a certain mass and charge. Now they also showed another interesting property of wormholes which nobody had thought about before which is that if you have a pair of wormholes or a pair of wormhole mouths and you put one of these on a relativistic spaceship and send it off at a on a trip near the speed of light for maybe a year and then bring it back. There is a phenomenon in relativity called relativistic time dilation in which the clock on the spaceship slows down and the clock of the wormhole slows down. And so when it comes back, it's basically basically younger than the other end of the wormhole that had been that had been going on in the normal direction. And so there's an now [clears throat] you want to know what's so crazy about what he's going to explain here in a second. Two years ago, we were talking about time travel before I dug into all the physics and I drew something on MS Paint that looked very similar to this with just two lines and pair of lines and they were different sizes. And I'm trying to do these lines and show you guys like, oh, we could do teleportation without violating causality. But what it's showing here is you're seeing time dilation. The reason why you see this bent curve and the straight line is that if you were to be walking along that line and you imagine the amount of time you experience, you can see that those two lines are different lengths. So, two different people might meet up, but they'll have walked a different amount of of of distance. They'll have experienced a different amount of time. This is what time dilation is. And this is why it's 100% real. I mean, if you don't think time dilation is real, you can't believe that grav we must completely misunderstand gravity and spacetime if that's the case. To be consistent, you must. So, we know that this this this idea of time dilation is real. And then when I see a similar equ similar graph like this now I know I'm thinking about it the right way. And in fact, what he's about to say in a moment is that he says the same thing that you and I, if you were, some of you here have followed for this whole period of time, last two years. And somebody in the chat, I remember when I was drawing those graphs talking about going to Mars, teleporting to Mars, somebody was like, "Well, what if you build a second wormhole on Mars? Won't that cause problems?" Because now you've got one wormhole that goes to Mars, but now you have another wormhole that can go in another direction. And now you're going to have a situation where retrocausality becomes possible. And I said, "Yeah, that is kind of a problem. What's the answer to that?" Guess what? That gets mentioned in this presentation. So I'm droning on. Let's go. >> A connection between two points in space becomes a connection between two points in time. and the wormhole becomes a time machine. Um that bothered a lot of people. [laughter] Um that the u uh this this is the statement from the uh from the paper describing what how exactly you do it. And this is their diagram here. The stay at home wormhole is going along like this. The traveling wormhole is going along like this. And the time connections are shown by this dotted line. This about dotted line. And the point is that they now when these things are together 11 on the stay-at-home guy corresp. >> So I'm going to skip ahead a little bit, but here's the point. They did the wormhole math and they came out with an answer that scared them. They said it turns out if we make any kind of wormhole or warp drive, it's a time machine. It's a literal time machine. There's no avoiding it. Time dilation means that you're making a time machine. Crazy. Jason Georgiani was saying this exact thing to Danny Jones. So people that want to hate on Jason Georgiani, I mean that guy at least he might not be a PhD physicist, but he understands the physics better than most PhDs do which is a which is a passage through time. Okay. Um Stephen Hawking didn't like this idea and um uh he suggested that uh there there are equations in uh general in the interface between general relativity and quantum electronamics in which there are certain intervals involving the separation between two things and if you let these intervals go to the space-time intervals go to zero it's you divide by zero and the equation blows up and so [clears throat] he suggested that the result of this would be that the fluctuations in the quantum vacuum would become larger and larger and larger as you approach this situation where you're making a time machine and they would >> [clears throat] >> uh essentially cause an a quantum explosion which would destroy the apparatus and you wouldn't be able to make your time machine. In other words, nature not only aborts a vacuum but nature aborts a time machine even more so and would rise up and smite the wouldbe time traveler. [laughter] >> So another huge point I at this point I'm going I'm going against s on this one. going against S. Nature is not going to let us go back in time. Not going to happen. In fact, when I dug into uh John Kramer's more recent experimental results, they found that there are like reverse signals that cancel out the forward signals, which basically means when you try to do retrocausality, nature just shuts it down. Basically, the noise just comes in and takes it over, which makes sense because we don't see it. We don't see it. So, I like the idea that nature doesn't let retrocausality happen. And so, some of you may say, "Wait a minute, Ashton. If you think retrocausality can't happen, so are you saying, how is teleportation possible then?" Because you're saying if you do teleportation, you make you're making a time machine. How can you keep both of those ideas consistent in your head? Well, what did I tell you guys on the last live stream? What was the what is the weird answer? The weird answer to the grandfather paradox or the biling paradox, whatever, is that if you were to go back in time and you're given the choice between doing what keeps chronology correct or breaking the time stream, the answer must be that you don't break the time stream. So what's the answer for the retrocausality? The answer must be you don't do retrocausality. You can do teleportation, but you can't break the time stream. Huh. Pretty interesting. So, what does that mean about MH370? For the people that always say, Ashton, where's MH370? It means it almost certainly reappeared on the other side, probably either instantly or with a slight delay. slight delay, meaning fraction of a second to I don't know, a couple hours. I don't think it's going to show up 10 years from now. But I think that it basically was a point-to-point instant transmission because that would prevent retrocausality. As long as that plane has a slight delay when it comes out on the other side, like when you pick up your phone and you dial a phone number, there's a slight delay before it starts to ring. Same exact idea. right before that it's like boom it's gone and then it just boom appears over here. That's what I think happened. And then because there there may even be I'm gonna let him keep going here. He explained some of this. Also, let's go back here. I found the thing that you guys were asking me about here. Let me show this or I was just bringing up. You weren't even asking me. Here's the Oak Shannon notes. By the way, we're going to talk about this probably on Friday. Just wasn't feeling up to it today. These Oak Shannon notes are basically about whether or not these guys should study UFOs. It was like a whole conference remote viewing Hal Pudof and he's talking about this stuff and and they're talking about in a way where like it's serious and it deserves to be studied. And I'm looking at this all this alternative physics advanced physics. I'm going huh? They're talking about gigahertz signals. I'm like how is Tom Bearden at this? You know, you're just wondering like this is like right up Tom Bearden's alley. One thing they mention right here is where is everybody? Because they're saying if we're right, and I've I've said this exact thing, but this is from 1985. If if we're right and teleportation is possible, field warp drives are possible, whatever, there should be aliens. We should be seeing aliens out there. Where is it? So, I was scrolling through this and then I get down to these notes near the bottom here and I'm like, "Where's Bearden at?" You know, feels like you should be here. [snorts] I think it's right here. Boom. There it is. So, right after the page, literally the page after it says, "Who's all there?" This is John Alexander, by the way. John B. Alexander is listed on this thing. You guys have to Google him. We'll talk about this later. But McDonald Douglas who merged with Boeing, Lheed Martin before they merged with the Martin Corporation. Hal Puda. I mean, what are we talking about here? How are people not realizing what's going on here? If I was a mainstream media news station, I mean, we're looking at a Pulser Prize right here. These [snorts] are the people that met that developed the what we're calling UFOs that we're seeing flying around which are really just drones using plasma fusion and quantum mechanics. So anyway, next very next page. By the way, look at this part right here. Mind control parasychology. What does this say? Israeli book about Soviet work being far ahead of us, but Israel is ahead of them. Wow, that's a crazy thing to have written in your notes in 1985. And then talks about the task like what should we do? Book the Tesla request. And then down here at the bottom, Bearden work. There it is right there. Beardarden work as in Tom Bearden. I was sitting there thinking about Tom Bearden and there his name shows up. has got a guy's phone number and stuff on here. Has he vi could he visit us? Willie, is he talking about [ __ ] Ferris Williams? Ferris Williams is Willie. Is he talking about Ferris Williams? Okay. Anyway, we're getting sidetracked here. Let's get back to the task at hand. Chat. I can't even. [snorts] Okay. John Kramer, teach us the ways. [clears throat] Um and this is called chronology prediction. It's not really a proof. It's just a conjecture, but it's it has a certain plausibility in terms of the equations of uh out the other side and nothing else will change. Uh that's not the way it works. Um the all of the conserved quantities on this end of the wormhole have to be preserved. All of the conserved quantities on this end of the wormhole have to be conserved. If you walk through, mass disappears from this side and appears on that side. So therefore, this end of the wormhole has to become more massive. And this end of the wormhole has to become less massive in order to compensate. And this is [music] called back reaction. Holy [ __ ] What did he just say? He just said you have to conserve everything in your wormhole. Whatever disappears over here has to reappear over here. And when you do that, this side becomes more massive. This is a very subtle difference that you have to take into account if you are engineering your wormhole. You are cut and pasting one side over here. We're cut and pasting this region right here. So this region is become less massive because whatever you move from this region now is less energy density in that region. It may be very small but you have to take into account and we're going to move it over here. So this airplane, this mass of this airplane is actually pretty significant. I mean it's the size of a city block. So, you have to take into account that this mass is going to move from over here and it's going to reappear over here because when this reappears, it's going to impact the wormhole mouth as well. This is pretty damn specific, especially when I'm like, this guy might literally be the guy that helped the Air Force develop teleportation. Like, not like maybe, you know, he's the one. >> Similarly, if you send an electric charge through, if you send a positive charge through, this end becomes positively charged. This end becomes negatively charged. If you send angular momentum through the angular momentums have to similarly work out the anything that's conserved has to be locally conserved at the end of a wormhole. Uh and that creates problems for the wouldbe wormhole traveler but it also represents a certain way of manipulating wormhole ends if you look at look at it in the right way. Um [clears throat] so suppose you wanted to uh charge a wormhole. Well you could in principle do it by just sending an electric current through it so that the electric current circulates. >> Oh did we get iced here? Did we uh let me take a look what's going on here? Did we lose some bandwidth? Okay, we're going to keep going here. But so he's saying now that once we've understood that the mass moving through the wormhole actually impact the wormhole's mouth, he's saying we can use this from an engineering perspective. I think it was Eric Davis. just got way over my head and I've been digging into this science for several years, but he was talking about how you can potentially control the time dilation effects. This is where I think we talk about putting the plane in super position. Like some of you are like, "Hey, could the plane appear five years later?" In theory, I think we could engineer something like that. And I think that's what he's alluding to right here. He's saying that we might be able to use this this idea that the the the mass appearing impacts the wormhole mouth to our benefit. Maybe even to control the time dilation effect >> the wormhole like this and this end becomes positive and this the other end becomes negative. So it looks rather like a a capacitor with a positive plate and a negative plate and like a capacitor. >> Sorry, I'm sorry I'm pausing a lot but there you That's the answer right there. Right? That's that's your magnetic wormhole. Magnetism might not even be a thing. It might just be electric charge. And magnetism is a byproduct of electric charge in a fivedimensional ether. You're looking at the schematic right there. Drop your charge through your wormhole and you've connected two points in space and time. That's what the orbs are doing. chat, you don't believe in wormholes. That's why my name is Ashen four orbs. That's why I'm going to have to change my name to Ashen 6 orbs because we have to have symmetry. There has to be conservation. So, if you want those orbs to cancel out, they have to be exactly equal on both sides. In fact, they might even have to be spinning the opposite of one another, just like entanglement on both sides. Then, when they converge, it's like replacing them. This is this seems weird, but this is how physics works. Physics is all about conservation. And what's crazy is that knowing this, you can actually reverse engineer how the orbs and MH370 videos are working. It's kind of crazy to see, but I'm reading scientific papers now where I have to even wonder are they are they learning stuff from this content from the videos etc. because you know or are they just you know find converging on the same information >> eventually the current would stop when the borho builds up enough electric charge in order to repel the charges are trying to come in and so you would have to if you want to get a a big charge you have to use a you would have to use a very high voltage in order to do it >> god I think that's it to be charging up they've got to be charging up in the MH370 videos chat he's saying Okay, you're going to make this circuit here. You can see the little diagram. You're going to make this circuit. What's our circuit? Our circuit is the three orbs spinning around the plane on one side and then our three orbs or one orb, whatever it is, on the other side. So, we're going to make a circuit between them. And when is that wormhole going to open up? That wormhole is going to open up when the voltage gets high enough to basically rip through between them. When the voltage gets strong, just like lightning, why does lightning all of a sudden strike? The voltage builds up until it can break through the barrier of the air, which is which is an insulator. When it's strong enough, suddenly, same way, same way our magnetic wormholes working, those orbs have to be charging up. And when they converge, voltage gets strong enough that boom, for a split second, and it only has to be a split second. It breaches our reality, however you want to think of it, dimension, and tunnels to the other location. Wild. >> Or you could simply go to an electron accelerator and shoot a beam of electrons through it from Stanford or something and charge it up to a mini GEV or if you if you were so inclined. Okay. Um [clears throat] now uh for the purposes of this talk I want to I'm going to make certain assumptions about our uh wouldbe wormhole capabilities um that [clears throat] um u I want to I want to lay out explicitly. Um first well we I we I will assume that transversible wormholes exist and are valid as valid solutions of general relativity. There is a certain segment of the general relativity community that is is rather disturbed by the fact that all these things like warp drives and wormholes and so forth have been appearing in the in the literature and would like to sort of construct a barbedwire fence across the middle of general relativity with a forbidden region and an allowed region. Uh the the [clears throat] uh weak energy condition you heard about yesterday and various other things are sort of examples of that. and they think that when uh we have a proper theory of quantum quantum gravity that all of these these ugly solutions will disappear leaving pure ones behind. Uh [clears throat] um and so I'm I'm going to assume that they're wrong. Um [clears throat] that right there John Kramer going all these people out there are just they don't want to talk warp drives and wormholes. saying, "Guys, just believe me, bro. We just need, bro. Please, bro. One more collider, bro. Please. This collider will be the last one. I promise, bro. This one's going to be the biggest. It's going to be 10 times bigger than large item collider. I promise you, bro. One more collider. We'll understand this. Gravity string theory will be proven real. And then when I swear, I swear, bro. Please, bro. Warp drives and wormholes will go away. Just one more hundred billion dollar collider, please. And we'll prove we we'll get it. We'll prove the gravities based on the strings and the theories and what have you. And here you got John Kramer going, "Yeah, those people are all going to be wrong." Like, bro, this is that's like when did you guys see that YouTuber show up to the hotel and the YouTuber is trying to act tough to the to the the the uh the bouncer and the bouncer is like, "Oh, you know Aikido? Oh, you know Judo." He's like, "Here's me with my black belt, bitch." That's basically what John Kramer is doing right here. This is basically John Kramer going, "Oh yeah, you know judo." Uhhuh. Here you go. Here's my black belt, [ __ ] Yeah. This is why I watch this and I'm like, man, okay, you start to see what's going on. He just explained it. He's explaining that like there if he talks even John Kramer with his background, if he goes to talks to like PhD physicists that are teaching academic physicists, they're not going to give him the time a day. And he can't be like, "Hey man, if I told you what I worked on in black projects, you would [ __ ] your pants. You would blow your brains out because you wouldn't want to live in this reality anymore." But he can't say that cuz he can't because he got all the NDAs. Can you imagine? I would be so triggered. This is probably why they don't bring me in. It's probably they don't bring me in. They're like, "Nah, Ashen's going to fly off the handle. Like, we're going to let him see the the the flying saucers and the directed energy weapons. he's going to lose his [ __ ] and he's going to start just talking and blabbing about it. Maybe they're right. >> Secondly, that wormholes can be fished out of the quantum vacuum and made any size all the way down to the plond length. So, you don't have to make enormous wormholes. You can make things that are really quite small. Uh thirdly, the [clears throat] wormholes can be easily stabilized. uh one of the uh I guess the the person who wrote the book on wormholes if you imagine literally is Matt Bisser who uh the American journal American Institute of Physics published his book called Lorencian wormholes and uh he pointed out that there is another solution to uh in [clears throat] general relativity called a cosmic string and cosmic strings can have negative string tension and if you combine a wormhole with a cosmic string of negative string tension you ought to get a stable object and so if you're fishing things under the quantum vacuum more like you're more likely to fix fish a stable something out of the palm of vacuum than an unstable one. And so you might be able to fish out a wormhole which has already been stabilized. Um so wormholes are super real. I mean basically what is he saying right here? Worm. By the way guys, I I might have to come clean here. I'm a little worried there might be uh like from like a couple years ago a quasi tipsy had a couple martinis Ashton email to Matt Visser might be out there. Guys, if if an email comes out, big expose, Ashen Forbes rages out, crashes out on on Matt Visser, wormhole theorist. Look, yeah, I I'm a I'm a bigger man. I've grown now. I've grown now. [laughter] Okay. Um, so what's he saying here? He's saying that wormholes are definitely possible. They're not off limits. They are valid mathematical solutions to relativity. This is something that's got to be drilled into people's heads. People out there really think that wormholes are science fiction. They're mathematical solutions. So far, everything about general relativity has been pretty much proven right. So, if you think that that's right, gravity is real, then at least it's on the table. Also, scale invariant. They can be any size. Wormholes can be tiny or they can be large. This has got to be the key. Anybody that wants to come up with a unification theory, scale and variance must be at the center of it. You have to believe that whatever you can make that's small can be made to be very big as well. To me, that's an essential thing. So, he's saying scale and variance. And then lastly, they are easily stabilized. Easily stabilized. Matt Visser shows that it's the negative energy that we need for a worml is very small. One of the things that the Bible taught me chat already taught me so much only been a week. The negative energy requirement for a wormhole is much easier than the negative energy requirement for a warp drive. It's actually a negligibly small amount. And you can imagine why. because we only need one brief flash of energy. Time doesn't even matter to us. That thing's going to disappear in an less than an instant and it's going to reappear. So, all we need is just one little blip as opposed to some consistent constant flow of energy. Um finally uh I assume that wormholes can be be manipulated charged uh changed in size uh given momentum given charge and so forth from either end. So if you have one end of the laboratory you have complete control of the wormhole even what's going on on the other end. Okay. So those are my assumptions. >> So there [snorts] he just said too is that somebody asked how are they going to control it? He's going to get to that right here. You can also control it. You can shoot the wormhole where you want it to go. >> Okay. Now the reason we're most of us are here is we would really like to find a better way of getting to the stars um and and u most of the ways that have been suggested even if these uh mock drives and so forth actually work would require a really long time to get there and what I want to point out today is that there that given these assumptions on wormholes there's a way of getting there really fast okay um uh the Einstein and Rosen speculated that charged particles were actually tiny wormhole mouth and their speculation was wrong. But it raises an interesting question about whether given a hypothetical existence of a stable microscopic charged wormhole mouth, they could be treated like ordinary particles and accelerated with electromagnetic fields. >> And the answer is yes, you could you could certainly do that because because they would have all the properties of a of a fundamental particle. That's basically what where Einstein and Rosen were coming from. And in particular, a microscopic wormhole ma mouth if you give it the same charge to mass ratio as a proton should behave like a proton in an accelerator. You want to be able to put it in a a conventional particle accelerator uh like a vandagramraph or a cyclron or a synchro and get and accelerate it and give it the same velocity and the same lorren factor, the same mass increase factor that that you would get if you accelerate a proton the same way. chat getting goosebumps again. Are the orbs a particle accelerator? He's saying right here is that you should if you He's basically saying if you were to create a wormhole, it's going to look like a particle, a scaled up particle. Because in theory, this concept is scale invariant, meaning it can be very tiny or very large. So, it should look like how a particle is going to look here. To me, that's crazy because that's what it looks like with MH370 is they converge on the plane. It almost looks like it becomes a particle and then it just vanishes and it gets sucked away and it's not there anymore. It's just it's too on the money. And then the whole concept of positive and minus charge pulling things together. I mean, that's clearly what's happening in the videos. Yeah, we are learning. We are learning here chat. Physics learning school. >> Okay. So, what [clears throat] what would be available for doing this given that we had a worm? >> That's what I'm wondering. So, he's saying like you would just need a particle accelerator and you particle accelerate your particle. So, the orbs could be acting like a particle accelerator kind of conver or like encompassing the plane turning it into a particle and then accelerating it towards the destination. being attracted by the counteracting forces and the vector that they're shooting the plane at. And on top of this, they probably also need to understand the universe's rest frame, the absolute rest frame, the primordial rest frame to understand the contextual difference between this location over here and this location over here. from just two arbitrary locations. The all the [ __ ] these guys figured out, when I think about it, when I think about the orb spinning around the plane and I'm imagining what John Kramer is saying here, I'm just going, how far ahead is Lockheed Martin? It's starting to get comical at this point. Loheed Martin's starting to get f so far ahead you start to wonder if they're an alien civilization to play with or say a bunch of them. Well, here are here is a zoo of of accelerators. Uh this one is the tan vandagramraph that we have at the University of Washington. It will accelerate to 19.35 me. Um down the coast from us is a machine that I've done a lot of physics with over the years. The Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 88 in cyclron. It will produce 55 me protons. Another machine I've used is the Michigan State K500 cyclron which will produce >> just straight up humble bragging about how he's been at all like the most powerful particle accelerators except for he throws some shade at CERN because he hasn't been at the CERN before >> heavy Iron Collider at Brook Haven which will produce protons that have 125,000 me. Uh, another machine that I done physics with is before Brook Haven was the CERN SPS, which will produce 450,000 me protons. And the CERN LHC, which I've never used, but I uh uh but is even more energetic. Will produce 7 million me protons. >> Never used in terms of velocities. >> Oh, you never got that surgery, did you? Too bad, John Kramer. Sorry. Not Guess you weren't as good as you thought. You didn't get to use the LHC. Sorry, bro. velocities coming out of a tan vandagramraph is about 20% of the velocity of light. Uh the uh from the LBL cyclron is 32% the velocity of light and from the CERN LHC is 0.9999999991% the speed of light [laughter] not percent but fraction of the speed of light. Um the and this is one minus beta. This is how much how close they are to the speed of light. So you're going part two parts in 10 to the minus 5 uh two parts two parts in 10 to the 6 two parts in 10 the 9. U [clears throat] there's not once you get going this fast there's not much point in talking about the velocity because the velocity is essentially the velocity of light and the thing that really counts is the relativistic mass increase factor. Now this is the factor in special relativity that makes the mass get bigger the distances get smaller and time slow down. Okay all of those things are controlled by the same factor which we call gamma and vandagramraph will give you unmuted chat. You're about to learn some [ __ ] right now. Yeah, you are about to learn how the sofons work. We're about to learn about some threebody problem [ __ ] right here. You guys here? You're [snorts] if you learn nothing tonight, learn what the gamma factor is. I can just tell from the context what the gamma factor is. The gamma factor is the time dilation factor. The gamma factor is the time dilation factor. So from now on, I will be calling our time weapons where we change the dial of time on our enemies. We're going to send Kim Jong-un to [ __ ] the year 5000. Good luck, bro. Good luck. They're all trans in the year 5000. Good luck, Kim. Kim Jong-un. [snorts] Our time dilation weapon is actually a gamma weapon because we're going to change the gamma factor. We scale that gamma factor and you're just [ __ ] with people's time. You're just basically turning them to an old man or you're just sending them into the future. Bye. See you. We're not deporting people back to their own countries anymore. We're deporting them to the future. We're going to start deporting people. All these illegal immigrants. I've got We've got the solution, chat. Holy [ __ ] Get Trump on the phone, chat. Get Trump on the phone. In fact, I I might have to slap on a camera, chat. I'm going to go to the protests. We're sending the illegals, sending them to the [ __ ] future. It's somebody else's problem to deal with. Perfect solution. Look at us just solving solving political problems. You a gamma of about 1.02 and the earn LC will give you a gamma factor of 7,000. Okay. So, what does that mean in terms of wormholes? Uh, well, if we took if we go to the LHC with our little flask of wormholes and put them wormhole mouths and put them into the LHC and accelerate them, we should be able to get wormholes traveling at the speed wormhole mouths traveling almost at the speed of light that we can point in various directions of stars and they will have a gamma factor of 7,445. uh therefore uh the uh and that will be their lorren velocity. Now what does that mean in terms of the wormhole itself? Well, there's a there's a quantity in relativity called proper time. And proper time is basically if you go from this point to that point, you want to know how time it takes, you simply take a clock with you and you walk from point A to point B with your clock and see what the time reading is. And um in uh relativity the proper time is equal to the observer external observer time divided by gamma. And remember gamma is like 7,000 with the things we're talking about. What that means is if you if you have this wormhole mouth and you look through it to see what's going on at the other end uh you will see things that are slowed down by [clears throat] uh by that factor. So if you send your uh and so the the time through the wormhole viewer goes like t prime which is c over gamma uh and [clears throat] uh to the external viewer watching the wormhole travel it's traveling essentially at the speed of light which is uh equal equal to c but through the wormhole mouth what you would see in terms of scenery going by looks like you're traveling at a speed which is gamma times the speed of light. So you would be traveling at 7,000 times the speed of light. >> So there you go. So he just said it. So how does this work? So it works actually multiple ways and it can work in our benefit. So it's not just a weapon where you can send Kim Jong-un or send Putin to the future where he's [ __ ] right? Um maybe that's what the UFOs are too. Maybe Palmer Lucky is right. Maybe the UFOs we're seeing were people doing this. This is like sending people out to the airlock, right? In the in the sci-fi movies, you go into outer space, you want to get rid of somebody. It's simple. Just shoot them on the airlock. Put them out in outer space. They're dead. Boom. What if people are like, "You know what? Just send them to the future. That's our airlock. Good luck. Bye." And now they're just showing up. That's the aliens. There you go. That's why it explains the whole thing. Proper time. What this means though is that we can shoot our wormhole at almost the speed of light at an object that's really far away. And from a proper from our time perspective, it will get there way faster than what we would expect. Like he said, 7,000 times faster than the speed of light. So, you start to realize relativity is what allows us to cheat. We're just doing math, Einstein's general relativity, and we're going, "Wait a minute, that star is a thousand light years away, but we can get there in 50 years." You're like, "Wait, what? Shouldn't it take a thousand years at the speed of light?" No, because we can cheat relativity. Don't believe me? Here you go. He's going to give you an example right here. >> What are you saying? It's a straight line trajectory. >> Yeah. you can tell how what >> 32E. So, let's use that as an example. Kepler 32E is supposed to be 1,200 lighty years from Earth. So, a wormhole from So, let's let's accelerate one of our wormholes of which we have a large number. Now, uh to uh at the LHC and point it at uh in the direction of Kepler 32E. Now, the pointing might be a problem because you you you have real troubles with with angular spread and so forth as the thing was going, but since you can since there's back reaction, you can send momentum through the wormhole and it will steer the other end and cause it to move back and forth. And so, you can actually do steering in order to zero in on the on the object that you're looking at. So, here is Earth Earth uh going along this world line. And here's Kepler 32E, 1200 light years away going along this world line. And in this di in this kind of Menowski diagram the speed of light represents a 45 degree line. So our wormhole going effectively almost at the speed of light just a few parts per billion less than the speed of light goes from here to here and it takes 100 it goes 1,200 lighty years in 1,200 years. But as far as the uh as far as looking through the wormhole goes, uh you arrive at Kepler 32E in 59 days. Uh so you've gotten to a a really distant star in a really short time. Um >> now you said that there's conserved momentum. >> So I think this is based on the calculations of using the LHC. Could be wrong. So what he's saying is if we go 99.99999% the speed of light, we get this gamma factor of what was it? 7,000. And so our time, our trip, if we were to shoot our wormhole towards this star that's 1,200 light years away, which is that means it would take 1,200 years at the speed of light to get there. If we shoot our wormhole less than the speed of light, but close, it will only take 59 years from our perspective to get there. That's huge. Holy crap. I mean, that's two generations. You're telling me you can open a bridge to another star system that's 1,200 light years away and we can get there and get that set up in just 59 years because of relativity. And if we can go faster than LHC, then we can do that even quicker. I mean this is these are the kinds of revolutionary ideas that are breakthrough technology, right? Like this pushes the paradigm forward. And sadly, you only hear about it on my channel and other channels like Demystify Science who actually interviewed John Kramer a year ago. You don't hear about this on other science and physics communicators channels and he explained why. John Kramer explained why. Because there is a big group of physicists that simply do not believe in physics and science. Sad. >> Oh yeah, sorry. Days, not years. I said years. Days. Holy crap. Chat gota I got to work on my arithmetic. Chat, you divide 1,200 by 7,000, you only get 59 days. So yes, not even not even years. The gamma factor is insane. That's how much of a difference it makes. The faster we move towards the speed of light, we can get there way faster than what the Neil Degrasse Tyson's would have you believe. And the secret is what? Because we're not sending mass. We're creating a wormhole. And actually, the little bit of mass that we do shoot through the wormhole, John Kramer says, we can use that to steer around. And you'd be like, "Well, that's gonna be really tough with the speed of light." And you're like, "Well, we've got 59 days." So, pretty cool. Yeah. Katzio said, "An annihilate distance." So, yeah. You know what? Let's play that clip, chat. Let's play that clip. Perfect time for it. Cuz again, you're learning right now about real worms. We seem to have lost focus and vision, to have lowered our sights and let systems and structures and bureaucracies muddle us along. But we are capable of so much more. Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. They leave distance annihilated, cause things to grow and improve productivity. >> What more do you want? >> Here we go. John Kramer, take us home, buddy. >> There is a change in momentum. actually the mouth will will recoil forward by the the momentum of the particles that go through and the wormhole mouth over here having the particles come out will recoil backwards and so you can steer so that momentum is conserved by >> okay what else we got >> and see where he's going of course it will be there will be some Doppler shifting problems but I wonder if we can put in a penning trap and hold it there >> Kip Thorne told us that the wormhole mouth has become a time machine because to deal with [laughter] Um so [clears throat] the answer is uh we don't have to wait 1200 years for to for the particle to get there because Kip Thorne told us that the wormhole mouth has become a time machine because of this relativistic time dilation thing. So what we've actually done is constructed a time machine that connects the uh the wormhole mouth on the earth 59 days after its launch to the wormhole mouth at the other 12 1200 years later uh to the wormhole mouth at the other end when it arrives at the star. So, we have a space-time link which allows us to get the start to the SARS in a hell of a big hurry. Um, [clears throat] okay. Now, suppose you uh manage to get to Kepler uh 32E is or you satisfied with just a flyby that goes through the the system at the speed of light. You presumably get a little data that way, but that's not exactly what you'd like. And so, as I was uh saying earlier, >> this is going to be the last main point of this, which he's going to bring home right now. Okay, so he's he's laid out wormholes are definitely possible from a physics standpoint. No question. Even your normie academic Neil Degrass Tyson, Bill Ny the science guy, people have to admit that the math checks out. The question is, as everybody always wonders, what about retrocausality? So, we already heard Stephen Hawking and others believe that there's going to be chronology protection. The universe, if you try to go change the past, the universe will step in and make sure that it's not possible. However that is, we leave that for your imagination. But for whatever reason, you will never choose the door that were to change history. That can never be chosen. Nature doesn't allow it. So he's going to explain what this means. And he and he explains it in a way that I really really really like. Here you go. Uh by putting by by uh sending momentum particle momentum carrying particles either either protons or heavy ions through the wormhole in various directions, you can steer. So in principle, you could do a grazing collision with the stellar atmosphere or a planetary atmosphere and have a whole lot of stuff uh coming through the wormhole which would mouse which would slow it down. Uh the problem is that it would also be gaining mass a at the same time. And so uh probably what you'd like to do is to take the stuff that's coming through and send it right back through in the other direction and and slow start exploring and colonizing and whatever else you you wanted to do. So this is a path to the open it up and walk through and you and start start exploring and colonizing and whatever else you you wanted to do. So this is a path to the to the stars that would allow you to get there in in a very big hurry. Um um [clears throat] okay now what about chronology protection and Stephen Hawking was worrying worrying a lot about that. Is are we if if we try to do this is our wormhole going to explode in our face or something like that and the answer is no. Uh the uh legal wormhole link has to be spaceelike. If it guns time like that, that's when you get into trouble with Hawking. >> And since the uh wormhole connection to the star is less than uh maybe I should explain um this is a Minowski diagram. Anything any trajectory that goes like this less than 45 degrees is called space-like. Any trajectory that goes this way is called timelike. And anything like this is called lightlike. And the um what one would like to do is have your trajectory for the particle u be below the lightlike line in order to in order to preserve cause and do all these things and indeed that that is done. So there's not any real problem in terms of of coronology protection and sending wormholes out to the stars in various directions. What might be a problem is if your colony decided to send their own wormhole someplace else and started making connections that could produce timelike loops and >> Okay. Wow. He just said the same thing that I said two years ago that we talked about at the beginning of this live stream. He said you'll run into a problem if your colony So you can send a colony. You can send a wormhole 59 days 1,200 light years away and you can show up on the other side. But now the problem is if you make a wormhole on the other side going back now you've got two sleds that are both go you got two uh slides that are both going downhill. You got a problem here. you're going to have an issue where you're going to be able to go back to Earth and appear on Earth before you left on Earth. Now, you're going to have retrocausality, assuming that this is all working the way that we think. Um, now the other thing he said here is that there's there's a solution. See that little graph? It's kind of tiny. I can make it bigger here for a second. By the way, is that the dude from Stargate? Is that Colonel Jack O'Neal? I think that's Colonel Jack O'Neal's image in the star from Stargate in that graph there pointing um as long as we stay below the light like line there's no retrocausality. So how would you imagine this? The way to imagine this is that as long as we don't try to go back in time with our teleportation, as long as we're we're all good. As long as when this plane disappears, it reappears after it disappeared. We're good. No causality can be broken if that happens. The problem is this. If this plane disappears over here, but before it disappeared, it reappeared over here. So in theory, the plane was in two locations at the same time. That's not possible. Can't have that because in theory now that plane and those people could have been seen in two different locations at the same exact time. Shouldn't be possible. So we have to stay below the light like line and the like like curve. That's how you want to think about that. It's not quite like breaking the light barrier because we can break the light barrier without retrocausality. Um we can't break the timelike. When we we push too far on the time like that's where we're pushing back in time as opposed to keeping within the current keeping causality. uh the same. >> So you would have to make a law that the that it was absolutely forbidden for your colony worlds to to produce their own wormholes um or to use [clears throat] it. >> No, but is the technology protection I see it more like an action or a principle that that entropy must increase or that is >> well it's basically that that there should was taking the point of view that there can be no time like loops. Okay. And And if you made one of these going out here, it would it would not be a time-like loop. But what Thorne and Morrison company were talking about was going out and then coming back. And if you have another wormhole link that goes from out here to over here, then you get a timelike loop and then then you you get into trouble with corality. >> And it's not, this is where it gets confused. It's not exactly like saying that you're going lower than the speed of light. I don't I'm trying to think of how to phrase it correctly. I think the way to phrase it would be that you don't the distance that you travel doesn't appear to break. Well, no, even that's possible, too. It's like if you imagine you were a third party observer in the MH370 situation. In theory, there should never be a situation where you're seeing the plane in two different locations at the same time. That's how I think about it. It's a little weird because the plane in theory can travel faster than the speed of light because that how we calculate that's just the distance divided by the time. So from the third party observer perspective, it will look like the plane is moving faster than the speed of light because it just disappeared here and appeared over here. But it's not going back in time. That would be the difference. It's a little weird. There's some edge cases there. And that's what John Kramer is saying is that you can't just think of it in terms of if you can teleport, it's automatically retrocausality. There's a little nuance to how it works. And this is important. If you are if you want to understand general relativity and you want to be able to make warp drives and wormholes, we have to be thinking about these edge cases. Have to be thinking about them. >> Saying is that it's not a question of preventing these colonies from interconnecting themselves that they are just not able to. >> If they tried to interconnect themselves, there would be there would be problems. Yes. If Hawkings right if if he's wrong, then you start getting causality violations. [laughter] Okay. [clears throat] So, uh in summary, uh assuming that stable wormholes exist and that we can master the physics and engineering and of microscopic wormholes, we may may a be able to use them to rapidly explore the the stars and colonize uh interesting extra solar planets that have been turning up lately. U [clears throat] the time spanning properties of relativistic wormholes can be used to reach distant star systems in a very short time or on the order of days, weeks, and months. Uh the wormhole timely connects to the present where the wormhole grows from which the wormhole is launched to the future where a star is reached so that you can get there without having to wait until uh at the speed of light the object travels there. Um this isn't a new idea. I uh let me say where I this came from. I I was giving a talk about wormholes at a science fiction convention a number of years ago and one of the people in the audience asked me what happens if you look through the wormhole. What do you see if it's if it's traveling fast? And it occurred to me that this is this is what this is the way it works. And I went home and worked it out and sure enough there's a this is the way relativity applies to wereholes. Um and so [clears throat] I write a uh a science fact column in analog science fiction magazine 2,000 words. And um I guess I I just submitted column number 198. And one of my columns in 1990 discussed this idea. Um, I should also mention that if this idea is not worth anything else, uh, I was able to use it as the basis of a science fiction novel that I recently completed called FMY's Question, which is the the sequel to my, uh, second novel, Einstein's Bridge. So, and it turns out that's the next point. Um, [laughter] here we go. [clears throat] Um, yeah, this is >> so this is the last part of this. And, uh, so what did we learn here? He says we can make wormholes. This is not new science. It's old science that's been rediscovered. He says we can use this and time dilation to get extremely far distances in short periods of time. And for the person in the chat said this is very deep, but it does make sense. This is why I love John Kramer. To me, I don't like listening to the physicists who it almost sounds like they're trying to confuse you. Like they'll use all these physicists names and proper names or theories that they know you don't know as opposed to just explaining things in a way that makes logical sense to people. John Kramer explains it in a way that can make sense to people. He explains it and he does explain the the the actual physics and the history of it and what have you, but he explains it in a way where you know you can imagine it in your mind. You can imagine it in your mind. So the last question that he asks which is a huge one in fact this is by the way I have no control over the ads. I have on the lowest level setting. Um, this is what I asked uh Wyatt, go back to the Wyatt uh hard truths podcast from the other week, and I asked him, if we have this technology, shouldn't we be seeing aliens everywhere? Where are the aliens at? If we are about to figure out warp drives and wormholes, then any civilization more advanced than us must be traveling amongst the stars and they apparently can cheat general relativity and show up like whenever they want. So distance doesn't matter anymore. 1,200 light years becomes 59 days. The Sons can teleport. So where are the aliens? Where are the aliens? Let's see what John Kramer has to say about it. >> In terms of the Fmy paradox, is is some advanced civilization already using relativistic wormholes to explore the galaxy and our our solar system? Well, maybe so. Uh there are unexplained cosmic ray events called centauro events that c I guess they come from the uh the const there coming from the direction of the constellation centurus. uh and uh any particle we know about pro including electrons uh if if it form if it's an accelerator or protons or heavy nuclear whatever that forms a cosmic ray has not only electromagnetic interactions when it hits the upper atmosphere but it also has strong interactions that make pions and so forth. [clears throat] You know you might think that electrons don't because they're weak at weekly interaction but they make plenty of pions and stuff at at slap when they accelerate electron beams. So these particular cosmic rays coming in from the at very high energies from outer space show only electromagnetic interactions and no evidence of of strong strong or weak interactions at all. Um and so that's exactly the way a charged wormhole would look if it hit the upper atmosphere. So maybe we should go out to Argentina where they have this big um [laughter] where they where they have this big cosmic ray telescope and track these central events down to the ground and go and pick them up and bring them home. >> [laughter] >> which which is more or less what the protagonist in my novel do. >> Wow. So, what is he saying? He's saying we are going to see the aliens. We're just not looking the right way. He's saying I had never even heard of Centauro events. Sounds like we got a new rabbit hole to dig into on Friday. I had looked into fast radio bursts. There's a couple of different weird astronom astrological phenomenon that aren't well understood. Doesn't mean they're aliens. Doesn't mean they're technological signatures, but my guess is there is one of these things is definitely a technological signature. And we are just too stupid to realize it because we are basically the Native Americans using smoke signals while everybody else has figured out electromagnetism. Let him finish here. >> Okay. Oh, I I as I told Heidi maybe I can catch us up a little bit because I didn't really have a whole hour talk and so this is the end and [laughter] >> so I can stop here and ask if there are any questions. >> Bravo, sir. That is a great presentation. Uh one of my favorites uh because of how simple it was. Now, there's another part. I think I'll probably save it for Friday, but I was watching the Demystify Science uh podcast. I think I took some notes. Let me take a quick look here. Yeah. Uh I think we'll talk about this on Friday, but John Kramer talks about renormalization. He talks about quantum mechanics and says that we had to we we got these infinities in the energy. And so, we had in order for quantum mechanics to even begin to work, we had to renormalize everything. So this just adds to it because when we talk about this energy, we say we need these energy. We need this negative energy. Well, where is it? It's buried in the physics. It's buried inside. It's buried because we renormalized it. We got rid of the negative energy. We got rid of the zero point energ. We said it's insignificant when it's not. We got rid of the ether. We got rid of the space-time structure lattice. I could have sworn that those notes that Oak Shannon said. Oh, yep. Here it is. So, let me show you. Remember those notes I was just showing you with Oak Shannon? Remember what John Kramer just said about the Fermy paradox? Look at this hypothesis ET. One way most likely fuel replacement at destination. No fundamental physics required to permit interstellar flight. Dutyium fusion. You see that right there? Dutyium fusion. 1985 by the way. This is and it says, "Is speed faster than the speed of light or lower than the speed of light?" And it was looking into all of this. You get down here at the bottom and it says, "Where is everybody? Where is everybody?" Even in 1985, these guys were looking at the physics and science and they're going, "Wait, this stuff should be possible. So, if it's true, where are all the aliens at? You have to wonder that question and you have to wonder what our place is on that. Let's do the super chats and then let's go to our moment of zen for tonight. Thank you everybody in the pled chat. John Glock, I appreciate you guys, man. And and Myth Myithil in there. Appreciate you guys. Um, yeah, we would not see them if they are warping into our reality. So part of the answer could be that they are they have invisibility technology and it actually isn't if they have teleportation technology. Invisibility technology is trivial compared to that. Home run after home run. Mick Leonard says love the stream. Thank you very much Mick Leonard. I appreciate you. Uh did I hear Ashen six orbs correct again conservation is important. So to me there's only two possibilities. Either there's one orb on the other side that has triple the charge of the three orbs on the one side or there's three orbs on the other side and they perfectly match out. That's how I think they're managing this. And it's probably exactly opposite in terms of if they're dancing around in the sky. But we will never know until they show us the Gorgon stair footage on the other side. We'll defend drunk Ashton Matt Visser. Forgive me. That was a different me. It was a different time back then, guys. I've given up. Martineis ST99 says it would be only 5.47 hours to get to Alpha Centuri. So now you start to realize what was previously thought to be impossible. Alpha Centauri, four light years away. We could wormhold Alpha Centauri in five hours. You could go watch Lord of the Rings. Go watch Lord of the Rings amazing trilogy. Watch. You wouldn't even get through the second movie. And they're like, "Hey, your wormhole's ready. We're ready to land you on Proxima Centauri on our outpost." You're like, "Oh, okay." And then you just get up, walk outside the door, and you go through the wormhole, and now you're in Alpha Centauri. Proxima Centauri, whatever. Incredible. Let's use it. Why? Why? You're thinking too small, my bro. I'm about to do the Nick Fuentes thing and crash out on my own super chatters. We don't need asteroids. We are when we have control of the atom and fusion, we've also unlocked literal transmutation. Transmutation. We're talking about being able to potentially suck energy and convert energy into elements directly from spaceime. That's a Star Trek replicator. This is the reason why the idea that the aliens are coming for our water or literally any resource on our planet is pretty stupid. It's not totally stupid. It might be that some elements are harder to produce and therefore it's more efficient to just pull them out of planets, but most likely they can produce any element they want in any amount of abundance that they want. And that's the reason why the aliens aren't dominating our planet and lording over us because they don't need anything that we have here. That's why you don't have alien overlords because they're like, "Yeah, sure. You can have this stupid planet that's kind of tiny that no one really cares about that's the edge of the galaxy." Sure. You're b we're basically like fungus. Okay. Jalil Robin said, "Is spaceime itself fundamental or is it an emergent property?" H see now you're asking me tough questions. If I were to ask her that question I would say that spacetime only exists as we know it because of energy density and we are energy density. So us existing is what manifests what we experience as spaceime. But in reality if we were to take zoom out from a higher dimension and look at our reality I think we would look like a microchip or we would look like a snow globe. stuck still. Jalil Robinson says, "Awesome stream." Thank you very much. And then Jonathan Zurra says, "Recon convergence cascade effects are bish unless mastered. Scalar gradient mapping is how you track the centuro events." I don't know what that means, but it sounds cool. Thank you very much, guys. Okay, our moment of zen tonight. Where did I put it? Where did I put it? Our moment of zen. Josh Polarity here. Shout out to Josh Polarity. One of my favorite UFO. Actually, probably my favorite UFO uh podcaster. Listen to this. This You guys probably know more about this lady than I do. I think was she former NASA or something like that. Here you go. Listen up, guys. Your moment is in. >> Jay Bennett Johnston subjected me to some other mind manipulation that involved instead of an occult theme, an alien theme. Now these these these guys who were who are manipulating my mind and programming me for mind control purposes claim and these criminals in control of our country as well claimed to be gods, demons and aliens in order that I feel totally helpless in order that I felt like they were beyond my realm to effect. And it certainly worked at that time. J Bennett Johnson told me that he was an alien. He told me that he had been part of the Philadelphia experiment and when the ship disappeared it came back a spaceship. This is in keeping with kind of a an air water mirror theme that NASA uses quite frequently a reversal because again the subconscious mind doesn't have any reasoning capacity. Jay Bennett Johnson then showed me his g his opposite general dynamics a then top secret stealth. Here was this triangular stealth that wasn't in any of the school books. Wasn't being talked about anywhere. Wasn't out in in um the newspapers or anything else. It was being withheld. It was still a top secret um weapon system. But I saw this triangular stealth. looked like a spaceship to me. I'd never seen anything like that. And everything that Jay Bennett Johnson was doing and he was involved in certainly was alien to me. So, it was easy for me to accept the idea that what was happening was in fact being perpetrated by aliens. I'm not saying that there's no such thing as aliens. That would be foolish of me to even even say anything like that at all. But what I am saying is that my it was my experience that these were people claiming to be aliens. If we if there's a reality out there pertaining to any alien influence, we need to sort out the government misinformation. >> This is so [ __ ] crazy. This is so [ __ ] crazy. Because old Ashton, like that was from the '9s, would have said, "Oh, this is just some crazy lady. This is just some crazy lady." But now I'm listening to this and I know exactly what she's saying. Now I understand where the alien SCOP comes from cuz she's going, I saw this triangular craft and I had no frame of reference for what it was. So I assumed it must be aliens. But she says then I learned more about the context and I realized humans must have made this. Humans must have made this, but they want to blame aliens for it because that way there will be no accountability. And so she's saying we have to get to the bottom of this alien scop that's happening because it turns out we have technology that any normal person if they were to see it is going to say that that's aliens and it could be used to trick people into thinking that there's an alien invasion that's going to happen. [ __ ] chat. I believe her. I believe her guys. Anyway, that's your moment of zen. Have a great night guys. Love you. MH370X. I'll see you on Friday. I'm going to rest up later everybody. Peace out. [music] Out in the fields where the skies are wide. [music] Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Bing 7 through a wormhole flow. We're talking wormholes. Stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing triple [music] 7 through a wormhole flow. [music] [music] Exotic matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum [music] vacuum squeeze. So tight creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they [music] play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cast force negative zones. We need to stay the course. Stalking wormhole star gates [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where [music] did it go? Boing triple 7 do a wormhole float thin shell formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy conditions [music] that we must defy for a stable wormhole let's give it a try [music] [music] criminal forces balancing The plate creating the throat. Open the gate from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space. Profound. Engineers and dreamers [music] hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting our destiny. MH370. [music] Where did it go? Blowing trip 7 through a wormhole flow from the fields [music] to the stars. We break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. Little hoola crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night [music] with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear.