Video Transcript
Because the ultra magnets are alternating, there's no electromagnetic signature coming from them. So, if you wanted something that were stealth, this would be an amazing material science discovery. Meanwhile, the public, we just discovered ultra magnets just a few years ago. They're still in their infancy right now, which is why I say that this is alien physics. You bet your ass Lockheed Martin figured it out a long time ago. Ultra magnets intrinsically drives I don't even know I'm not even going to say this FFLO superconductivity. What? I didn't know about this. Thank you, Grok. So, in conventional superconductivity, you need a huge external B fields to mismatch Fermi surfaces. In ultra magnets, the built-in K-dependent spin splitting does it automatically. Spatially modulated superconductivity order parameter, pair density wave states, or even spin triplet pairing. Recent theory shows that this works in 2D Hubbard models, inorganic conductors, proximized proximitized systems, superconductivity can also expose or stabilize ultra magnetism by breaking additional symmetries. This is where when I read this, I said we definitely need to talk about ultra magnetism. Because now there's a weird connection between this ultra magnetism and superconductivity, which actually makes sense. Because superconductivity is an electron we visualize it we visualize an electron moving without any resistance. Normally, electron bumps into an atom every once in a while. When it bumps into something, it releases a little bit of heat. And then things heat up. When things are superconductive, the electron flows without any resistance, never hits anything. And I'm not surprised that ultra magnetism allows for superconductivity because why? Ultra magnets are engineered. It's like making a freeway. It's exactly up and down the whole way. All the electromagnetic fields perfectly cancel out. So, your electron is basically just flying on a freeway. Nothing in the way. Yeah, it doesn't surprise me it becomes superconductive. And this is important. Why? Because the orbs in the MH370 videos are superconductive harmonic orbs. This guy named Ashton Forbes figured it out back in like September of 2023. Superconductive harmonic orbs. I don't know how he figured it out. I think aliens downloaded the information to his brain. But anyway, how are they superconductive? We've always wondered how are the MH370 plasma orbs superconductive? Well, what if what if ultra magnetism plays a role? Let's keep going. So, this actually aligns with Salvatore Pais's high temperature superconducting patents. Ultra magnetism provide a realistic approach that could support exactly what Salvatore Pais has been saying. Um let's make it a little bit simpler here. So, normally, iron magnets, all spin points the one way. So, we know a regular magnet spins point the one way. Ultra magnets, the opposite, like a checkerboard. Cancel each other out. No outside magnetic field. Looks like I was right. Grok confirms it. Ultra magnets spins still alternate up or down, so there's zero outside net magnetism, but the crystalline structure has a built-in twist. Each spin site is rotated a little bit relative to its neighbor. This creates a hidden momentum space effect. Electrons moving through the material feel a strong spin-dependent push or pull depending on their speed and direction, even though nothing shows up outside. They This part I'm not sure about. There's a twist. Each spin site is rotated a little bit. So, they make a slight adjustment in the spin site, and this creates the waterfall that we're looking for. That's how I think I read this. This creates that momentum space. So, what we're looking for is this hidden momentum space effect. That is That's our waterfall. That's our zero-point energy waterfall. That's our space-time manipulation waterfall we're looking for right there. It's like an invisible force that only kicks in for the quantum stuff happening inside the material. Now, doesn't this also remind you of the Aharonov-Bohm effect? The Aharonov-Bohm effect proved experimentally that it's the potentials. You can still see action. Electrons can still phase shift even in the absence of electromagnetic fields. Just like you're seeing here. Aharonov-Bohm effect, same thing here. This situation, you're seeing electron movement even though we see absence of magnetic fields. Cool, huh? Now, why does this matter for the physics that we talk about? We talk about pulling zero-point energy out. This is boom. Ultra magnetism is Robert Forward's way of pulling energy out. In fact, in a second here, it's going to even propose the idea of plasma. Salvatore Pais's room temperature superconductivity, ultra magnets create the exact conditions without needing giant external magnets or ultra-cold temperatures. Now, this gave me pause. Can anybody in the chat tell me one room temperature superconductor? Crickets. Crickets. Why? Cuz there aren't any. LK-99 is the only one even supposedly, and that's been debunked. Even though it came out and they kind of proved that it is real or some other versions of it are. So, if there aren't any room temperature superconductors, how can the plasma orbs be superconductive? Their temperature is way too high. Even any fusion reactor is not going to be at zero Kelvin or whatever is required for a superconductivity. So, how is it pulling it off? Almost makes me wonder if it's not conventional superconductors they're using. What if they're using ultra magnetism in combination with plasma? Built-in quantum coherence. Like this ultra magnetism is everything we asked for. Apparently also, this automatically couples to the vacuum. It's like you basically connect to the vacuum when you are doing this ultra magnetism on the large scale. Which would mean you might be generating entanglement. You might be able to create two of these in two different points that are linked together in some way. Could enable spin polarized plasmas, aneutronic fusion containment, or standing wave resonance effects without bulky magnets. Well, sign me up for three helpings of ultra magnets, please. Uh what? Could enable spin polarized plasmas. Chat, major breakthrough. Get the yachtsies on the queued up. This is exactly what we needed. We don't need just a ball of plasma, a ball of energy. We need a polarized ball of plasma. Why? Because we need to rip through space-time. We need that ball of plasma to be like the biggest lightning bolt you've ever seen in your whole damn life. And we need it to be biased. I don't care if it's positive or minus. It just needs to be the opposite of wherever they're teleporting that plane to. So, when Grok said this could make polarized I hadn't even thought about that. I hadn't even thought about like how do they make the plasma have a specific polarization? Oh, ultra magnetism could play a role in that? Interesting. Oh, yeah, listen to this part. We already spoke about the outside twist. Zero outside magnetism, but the electrons still function like the Aharonov-Bohm effect. So, this new other paper that just came out, what's it called? Persistent spin currents in superconducting ultra magnets. >> [clears throat and cough] >> Buckle up, chat. Superconducting ultra magnets? So, wait. You're telling me now some people have just studied when these ultra magnets go superconducting, what the properties are? Okay, please do tell me. Monkman's team showed if you make an alternating superconducting an ultra magnet superconducting, it naturally splits into two separate superfluids inside the material. One made of spin-up electron pairs and one made of spin-down electron pairs. Um So, there's a thing called dynamic nuclear polarization that's connected to UFOs and they claim that if you can control the spin of your atoms, then you can control like the electromagnetic effects. Well, like how's it not just this? I think Is nobody else going to claim this? I'm just going to claim this. Uh the UFOs are doing this, guys. There it is. Ultra magnets. I think they found the hacks, chat. You need negative energy? Well, apparently this naturally splits your polarization in half. So, if you need one or the other like one of the biggest parts of negative energy is how do you get the negative energy from your laser beam separated from the positive energy? And if you could separate the positive energy from the negative energy, then you could use the negative energy to create a warp bubble or whatever. Well, like this is like doing that, right? At least conceptually, to me that's what that says that does. So, you needed a negative energy laser. How about a negative energy plasma ball? How about a negative energy plasma ball powered by superconducting ultra magnets? How about three negative energy plasma balls powered by superconducting ultra magnets spinning around? It's pretty wild cuz that's exactly what we would need for Hal Puthoff's vacuum polarization to manipulate space-time. Tim Burchett just holds it up. I want to do a little light reading, dag nabbit. Read this paper here that Hal Puthoff does, dag nabbit, wrote. It's a good That was a good impression, chat. You can even get a pure spin current. The charge parts cancel out completely, but the spin part keeps flowing without dying. How's that not How's that not free energy, though? How is that not free energy, though? Just in case you didn't hear me that first time. How can something spin forever, persistently, but there's no all the electric charge canceled out? Someone answer that for me. I love it. I'd love to hear it. Sounds like a perpetual motion machine to me. Bonus trick. They call the spin current dynamo, hit the material with regular charge current in the right direction, and it automatically generates spin supercurrent sideways. Oh, sweet. So, basically, we can also just shoot at this and it'll just shoot death beams at things. Shoot gravity death beams at things. I don't know what that means, but I'm just going to pretend like that would what it means because that's what it feels like in my head, chat. So, ultra magnets give you a new way to have lossless persistent spin transport built right into the superconductor. I didn't know superconductors could do all this. I thought superconductors was good enough. Nope. We had to upgrade it even more. Now we had to make it mega superconductor. We're going to need a new name. This is going to be like Pokémon, chat. We're just going to add things in front. Or we could say superconductor SSJ4 if you guys want. Superconductor We're going We're going ultra instinct superconductor right now. This paper itself doesn't mention ZPE. However, the other paper that I referenced talks all about it. Now, if you do this, uh why is it connected? You need highly coherent dissipationless quantum states to couple vacuum fluctuations without everything falling apart. The persistent spin supercurrent currents give you that. Spin currents that flow forever without resistance in a material that already has vacuum coupling. Think of it like an engine inside a vacuum motor. You could run stable lossless spin supercurrents through an ultra magnet setup. Then flip the ultra magnet in order to switch the vacuum torques on or off with basically no power cost. So, the net input is basically nothing. And yet you get this energy out because it's tapping into zero-point energy. The superconducting upgrade makes the ultra magnet-based vacuum torque way more realistic. It's the engine and the transmission you bolt onto the Casimir torque chases. So, what have I said? I said the Casimir effect is not the way we're going to do it. It just shows you the science and zero-point energy is there. This is where so many PhDs have fallen apart. They say, "Well, Casimir effect can't pull any infinite energy out of it. We're going to give up." These ultra magnet people did not give up, though. Now, I asked it, could could these could this power our plasma orbs, possibly? And it says, "Yes." You can inject pure spin supercurrents into adjacent plasma or plasma-like mediums. The dynamo effect or proximity coupling from a superconducting ultra magnetic layer would transfer spin polarization coherently over long distances. In a plasma, what this would do is create a spin-polarized electron or ion population while keeping net overall charge neutrally neutral. So, I don't That doesn't make a lot of sense to me because what it's explaining there is saying that the overall charge is balanced out, but you're still going to have an overall population of positive or minus charge, meaning you're going to still have a biased uh polarized plasma. So, if they figured that out, they're straight-up cheating. Straight-up cheating. I mean, free energy is not just on the table, but absolutely real. The way they explained it is also extremely similar to what Dave Rossi um Salvatore Pais and Tom Bearden all said. This is the way that 2026 paper is written. It says, "Ultra magnets in a per- perpendicular B field break time reversal symmetry in a way that generates a switchable Casimir torque purely from vacuum modes." Hm. >> [clears throat] >> So, essentially saying no input or very little input. Next to no input required. You can alternate the Casimir effect. Surprised this paper hasn't got more attention. I mean, unless there's a completely different interpretation. Unless there's a completely different interpretation that I'm missing here, this paper would seem to indicate, the one that's mentioned up here above, that we have unlimited energy extraction is possible. I did want confirmation and uh AI did agree that it does it is similar. The two papers in question, 1984 paper and the 1999, which was the endless extraction. This was the BPP paper. Both are cyclic Casimir engines. Same exact goal, completely different hardware. Instead of moving the plates, you use a real material that has built-in invisible spin texture. You flip an internal parameter and that will flip the torque. Hm. So, the persistent spin currents give you the lossless engine that keeps huge electromagnetic fields stable. So, you have these massive electromagnetic fields. How is it the electromagnetic fields don't cause the thing to blow up? This is how. Why? Because you have an a huge charge, superconducing charge. However, the overall charge is relatively neutral. You'd say, "Wait, Ash, that's impossible." No, it's not. I just explained to you this this these papers explain to you how that is possible using ultra magnets.