Video Transcript
My next step, now that I know what this is all about, how long do you think it will take me to figure out the exact resonant frequency that they use to make this all go down? Because we already figured out the geometry, right? I mean, that part is easy. Have everything cancel out. But the next part is how did they make the plane link up with this location? How what resonant frequency did they use to have this get perfectly aligned with that? What frequency do they use to have the orb spin around the plane at that exact rate? Because that exact rate of spin is important. And these are the real these are the numbers that they don't want people to know about because these resonant frequencies are what really allows you to build something that you know can do like we saw happen to MH370. Okay, let me look back at this. Um, and here you go. He says, "This concept is very important. It seems to have been totally ignored in the current literature and only appeared in Milm's work. The idea is the uh theoretic insight directly into the heart of the understanding of charge. Here we have a case of fundamental physical theory relying on the existence of a physically impossible quantity. Charge is unique that it is quantized in the number of fundamental carriers is relativistic and probabilistic invariant within all physical reality. So we look at this and we look at charge and we say we can connect general relativity to uh to electromagnetism using this extra dimension. Here it is. And everybody seems to have just ignored it. Didn't give it the time of the day. And here's the air force saying this is the answer. I mean you guys listen or don't listen but here's the answer. So we need to modify the electromagnetic equations. It's interesting to note that all plausible variations to Maxwell's equations investigated here had variations in just these two equations. This was true regardless of the theoretical starting point. It is highly recommended that any experimental project hoping to capitalize on modifying Maxwell's equations concentrate on these two equations. Targeting these two relations is most likely to demonstrate any coupling between electromagnetism and other forces. So this and again this is not just a document about Williams. This is the document about all of them. So it goes on to lay out how these forces are significant how the waves are going to propagate in fivedimensional space. And you know ideally if this is real if this is true then this explains our entire reality. And down here it says the limits of the conversion rates. Now what did I just tell you? I told you that because we have to take into account the the space juice the how much space juice is in a volume of empty space. This means that there's a rate limit too. If we were to pull that energy out then the most we could ever pull out is how much space juice is in one volume. That's the most we could ever pull out before it refills back in. So whatever that is, there is some rate that we're going to be limited. Now, this might be good news because it's going to make it harder to make a black hole that destroys us all. Not impossible, just a little bit harder. That's all. And one more thing I want to read here is just to show you that Ferris Williams was talking, this is Ferris Williams talking about the history on this paper. This paper by Ferris Williams is energy and entropy as the fundamentals of theoretical physics. And here he says the quantum theoretical treatment of this case is as follows. So he's talking about this idea of linking quantum mechanics to gravity. G is what he's talking about here. Only after an infinite time has passed away is the wave supply inside G exhausted while the outside wave is spread over an everinccreasing space. He's talking about treating gravity as these ripples through this extra dimension. So I just wanted to bring this up because it's clear if you try to understand how was someone able to figure this out, what theories did they use to unify it. It's clear that quantum mechanics played an essential role in these people's theories, especially when they realized that charge can be quantized. Charge being able to be quantized means that it's scale invariant. Means that whatever we're seeing on the quantum scales is also true on the larger scales. And that is absolutely huge because now it gives us a metric. It gives us a ruler by which we can measure effects on any scale. Okay. Now this paper dynamic theory some shockwave and energy implications. Now look at the word shockwave. The shock waves and the bubbles, the the plasma sheets that the government was using for hypersonics were likely the beginnings of this research because they start to see these plasma waves forming in their sheath and they start to see these effects. So, not only do they see it from nukes, but they're seeing it in the plasma and the plasma sheets they're putting on our spy planes. Dynamic theory, a unifying five-dimensional theory of space-time matter is examined. The theory predicts an observed discrepancy between shockwave viscosity measurements at the low and high pressures in aluminum. A limiting mass to energy conversion rate constitu consistent with the available data and reduced pressures in electromagnetically contained controlled fusion plasmas. That last one, baby. So, you're writing a paper about your unification theory and you're like, there's three things I want you to know about. Three things. One, shock waves are going to act differently. You're going to see different plasma shock wave behavior. Number one. Number two, converting this energy, this 0 point energy, there is a conversion rate, there may be a limit to it. And then number three, you're going to want to know the impacts on fusion. Turns out this fivedimensional theory heavily impacts fusion. Okay, so the viscosity one, I'm going to kind of skip over this, but as you can see, the idea is that this shock wave is going to function slightly differently now in a fivedimensional manifold than it would function without. So this is going to speak to things like stability, stability of our plasma. Um, the one I wanted to dig into though is rate of mass conversion. Now, I already spoke about this one, but I'm just going to read this first paragraph. In nuclear weapons and reactors, mass is converted into energy. However, Einstein's theory which predicts the energy released in this conversion says nothing about the rate at which this conversion can or does proceed. On the other hand, the dynamic theory not only provides an additional equation of motion that can be solved to find the mass conversion rate as a fluctuation as a function of time. But it predicts a limiting rate of mass conversion. The question addressed here is what is the limiting rate and how does it compare with experimentally achieved rates. If the experimental rate rates exceed the predicted limit then something is wrong. If on the other hand the predicted limiting rate is not seen experimentally then its existence is still possible. Wow. So right there that I love that as a physicist because he's saying think of this zero point energy like a tap and also think of just in general converting mass into energy you can convert mass into energy but how fast how fast can you convert mass and energy there is a limiting rate by which you can do that and how do you even determine these things he's saying that Einstein's equations can't even determine these thinks cuz they're missing the required elements. But the fifth dimension, add that in and now you can convert these. Now you can calculate these things. To me, that's very powerful evidence. And just like it said, this should be testable. We are now on to the physics that things are they're testable things. People are probably testing them, at least some of them. So then he does his calculations and he says here's your example for uranium and and the maximum rate that you can get. Thus the fastest gram of uranium may be converted into energy is 1.7 ps picos seconds picosconds I don't know this time is very short considering that this time is several orders of magnitude larger than the minimum time possible for the fishing of one atom. contained ionized plasmas. I'm just going to read this part. I think controlled fusion programs use variations of electromagnetic containment of ionized plasmas. Dynamic theory predicts forces on these plasmas and pressures generated that are important to various fusion programs. This is where I start rubbing my hands together. Please sir, what what do you predict from your five-dimensional theory? The five-dimensionality of of the theory motion that becomes effective when mass is no longer conserved. Thus, the theory may offer a better description of the actual fusion process than current theories do. Any implications of the theory using this additional equation of motion during the actual mass conversion have not yet been explored. Hence, we're not digging into the limitations of doing fusion and pulling the energy out of the vacuum yet. On the other hand, conservation of mass embeds a fourdimensional hypersurface in the five-dimensional space and provides two implications for fusion systems before mass conversion. Both derive from the fact that within the dynamic theory, the energy momentum transfer for matter under the influence of electromagnetic forces has two parts. The first part is relativistic energy momentum transfer like running into something and the second part contains the geometric properties of the embedded hypersurface. So, what he's saying here is there's two things that go on in fusion and you already know which one's been left out. The first one, things flying around hitting each other. That's how we pretty much only figure out fusion right now. Energy momentum transfer. This one's moving really fast. This one's moving really fast. They hit each other. But there's something else. The other one is hypers surface. If you were to shrink the geometry, now two objects that were further apart are now closer together than they were before. This is written by uh Ferris Williams. That's the person who correct this guy corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations. Corrected them if you're missing it. The first implication for fusion systems lies in the additional forces that must be considered as a result of this geometric term in the energy transfer. He's saying you now need to consider the space-time structure. You need to consider this five dimensions now this geometric shape. These forces also depend on the energy density gradient as does the viscosity. So what he's saying here is that it's not just how much energy is packed into this region. Where is the energy localized? It also means is the all is the energy focus right here and then it disperses and gets less and less energy as you get further away or is it all uniform all the same energy density? That answer to that question changes the outcome. changes the outcome. Because these forces have the multiplicative term, the density gradient components must be large. Therefore, they are evident. The geometric term in the energy uh momentum transfer also predicts reduced pressures in the plasma as a result of electromagnetic pressure. This right here, I think, speaks to the high beta concept. Lower pressure than is predicted. we might be able to get uh fusion to happen with lower magnetic field strengths given this theory. Note the dynamic theory predicts a reduction in the pressure dependent on the mass density gradient. The value of the constant depends determined previously by the shock data indicates a density gradient could produce a 10% pressure reduction. So I think we looked at some of his other work, but to me this speaks to the idea that we might have a easier to produce fusion at lower temperatures and b we might be able to get away with using less magnetic field strengths. And this is the idea of the high beta concept that we can create this well and that we can create a a ratio of plasma pressure to magnetic field pressure that approaches one unity.