Fusion Is a Tap Into the Spacetime Lattice

Video Transcript

If we are Richard Fineman, we're asking the why question. You say, okay, why is the government hiding this? We explain it. How is this technology work? Okay, it's zero point energy. How are they tapping in? What is the what is the physics framework that allows us to tap into the zero point energy at this fundamental level? And the answer to that question is the ground state of the hydrogen atom. If we just take one atom of hydrogen, simplify your nuclear bomb down to just one hydrogen and we say that is the electron spinning around this atom. There's so much energy. Why is it not just radiating that energy away? And we realize each atom is pulling a tiny little bit of energy from that 0 point energy. Each one is. So [snorts] then you would say, well, okay, now we've figured out the fundamental framework. What is the core concept that allows it? Now what do we have to do? Now we have to take that individual atom. We're going to extract this tiny insignificant amount of energy and we got to scale that up. We got to scale that up. And the best way to do that is plasma because plasma is like taking all those little atoms and having them all in a cluster together and treating them like a liquid. Treating it like a liquid of atoms of ions and electrons. A soup. If you boil it straight down to its grass roots, probably the most efficient way, the most direct way to extract 0 point energy probably fusion. probably fusion because you can indirectly manipulate the lattice structure to get past the kulon barrier in fusion. That's where you can use that free energy, the lattice structure to get actual real energy out that's usable for us. Don't think about it in terms of extracting 0 point energy to use the zero point energy. Think of it in terms of we have this energy source of the lattice structure. What can we do with that lattice structure that can give us real practical output? This is why I'm all in on a neutronic fusion because when you boil it down, any logical person just like I concluded will conclude that plasma is going to be your best way to interact with the zero point energy. And what is everybody doing to produce energy with plasma? They're doing fusion. They're all doing fusion. And this means there is a way to test this. The best physics theories are testable and this one is too. When we start producing fusion, we're going to see more energy output. In fact, fusion will likely add act like a tap where depending on how dense you get your plasma, how powerful you get this gravitational effect, you can pull more and more energy out of spaceime. And at some point from a theoretical perspective, there would be a limit to how much energy you could pull out of a region of spacetime. because you pulling the energy out. Imagine like you're pulling water out of the ocean and then the water fills in the gap. But in theory, if you pull the water out fast enough, it would not be able to fill in the gap quick enough. This same theory, this hydrodnamic theory also applies to the ether, to the space-time energy. So this means that there probably is some limit to how much energy can get pulled out of a region of volume of spaceime. Ferris Williams, we've spoken extensively about Ferris Williams. What I wanted to do tonight was to look at some of the scientific equations and papers related to Maxwell's equations and what are the impacts from Ferris Williams own words of this 5D theory if you add this extra dimension what does this do to general relativity what does this do to electronamics this was from the UFO hearing that got submitted Ferris Williams has several indirect ties UAP research. Los Alamos colleague Oak Shannon told a journalist in 2019, "If we were to build an anti-gravitational device, it would be built on the principles involved in Williams's theory." That's a pretty big uh endorsement. uh nuclear physicist from Los Alamos is like, "Yeah, if we built any anti-gravitational devices, it's going to be based on this guy's fivedimensional theory because you're going to move the medium to travel instead of using conventional rocket propulsion or something like that." Now, three different papers and I've got kind of some summaries to go through. So, how are we going to do this? Let's start with this. What page are we on? 32. This right here [clears throat] is electric propulsion study by Franklin me project manager. The author wishes to thank Dr. Ferris Williams and the other tireless theoticians who have spent years slowly working and removing the rocks from the difficult path to the unified field theory as others idally stand by complaining that the road is too rough to travel and may never lead anywhere. Go to page 32. Williams. Williams has advanced 5D theory starting from thermodynamics. This is a unique approach that does not appear to have been stated elsewhere. He has combined thermodynamic laws with mechanical systems to give a unified 5D theory. I'm going to ignore a lot of the equations because I forget all the characters and what have you. But here you go. Here's all the different equations people say. Show us the math. This has all of the math. I don't want to hear people say the math. math is like I might be one of the only people on the earth showing the math. Okay. So he shows what does that mean? Development of 5DM equations. One goal is to basically take Maxwell's equations and we want to understand what physical effects we should expect from by adding a fifth dimension. So when we do this here, this is where we're taking our variables and we're saying, "Okay, we're going to add an extra dimension. So now you have up, down, left, right, back, and forth. You have time. And now we're going to add this extra lattice structure, this super structure dimension that we can't perceive, but it's there. What does that do to the equations?" That's what this is saying here. So down here, he's saying if we take this, we now can make a matrix. Now, if you've learned from physics, we've learned that in order to express dimensions and the vectors along those dimensions, we need matrix. Matrices are really great for doing this because matrices can tell you where things are relative to other things. Great. Okay. So, we're going to use this matrix add a 5D analog. Oh, these can be now utilized to derive 5D analoges to classical Maxwell expressions. By using this identity bianke or whatever bianke we now achieve our four field equations. So by doing this we now find our new maxwell equations. So, if you are not keeping up, we said, okay, we're going to take a 5D five-dimensional theory and we're going to say we're going to make a matrix out of it just like people did with fourdimensional theory and we're going to say what does this mean for electro what does this mean for uh Maxwell's electronamics Maxwell's uh electromagnetic equations and the first two equations are exactly the same first two are exly exactly the same. The last two indicate there is a new role played by the mass terms. Notice that a constant a is introduced specifically to indicate the degree of coupling between the electromagnetic fields and the inertial fields. Additional equations are obtained from the current density expression and three additional equations. Says equation 101, this one in the middle will become important in locating new effects. So now we're saying, okay, we've got a new 5D framework, new electromagnetic equations. Can we predict? Can we predict things? The electric field from the region now depends both on the charge density and the change in density. Uhoh. Wow. Now the field is determined by the density of your charge. Why does that matter? Dense plasma. All plasma is is a bunch of charge. So the denser you get it, that seems to be the secret. And here we're seeing the density is now going to impact the electromagnetic equations. And the change in mass density and the change in mass density represents gravitational waves. If I were to increase my density in a region and then decrease it rapidly, you would expect you would expect a gravitational ripple. Just like if I were to put a black hole here and then make the black hole disappear and then make the black hole come back, you would expect a gravitational ripple, right? I love that. This is my favorite part actually. I think when he explaining the Maxwell's equations okay notice that J I= 0 1 2 and 3 are the classical charge density or currents and then J4 is a new entity which is a mass d mass density like flow and dependent on the exact assignment of the fifth coordinate. Okay. Likewise it says here that uh oh this expression is important in looking for nonconservation of charge. So we get this new equation. So we're doing a bunch of transformations with the math here. The only assumption that has been made is that there is a fifth dimension. And it says this term is important because now we're looking for non-conservation of charge. We're looking can we break conservation rules. And you say ash what's a conservation rule? Conservation says if I take something from over here then it must reappear over here. Nothing can be created nor destroyed. The conservation rule is what we're looking for. Is there a way to cheat and bring the airplane of energy to me? Is there a way to get around our perception of the laws of thermodynamics? And he says, okay, here's two more equations. The 5D forces become these equations for particles of velocity V. Notice the scalarike force that modifies the classic Lorent force. Now we have a scalar term that is modifying our classical Lorent forces. So what we've got here is we've added another variable to this equation that can change the others. This is important because what we've contested is that these effects only show up when you get to very high levels. Once you get these very high energy densities, when you get to these uh voltages that I think are in hundreds of thousands of volts where you'll now because of your charge density, you will now begin to see and be able to measure some of these effects. But only when you get near that threshold, because the fabric is so tight of our special of our reality. To better understand the expected charge due to the added physical dimension, we must look at some special cases without any mass in free space. And now we say if the electromagnetic fields could be removed, the equations become these. Oh, so what you're saying here is that if we simplify our scenario, if we take our 5D example and simplify our scenario, we just take like a point charge, the equations reduce back down to Maxwell's equations. This is a huge point. what they're saying. The reason why we don't see this dayto day is because if you ignore this, if you don't act, if you're not near the threshold where these effects app these effects appear, then you Maxwell's equations are basically what you have today, what you what we work with and what we see today. This is essentially saying this fivedimensional effect only is visible under the certain conditions. That's huge. That to me is absolutely massive. And for it now to say, okay, we reduce this back down and it reduces back down to exactly Maxwell's simplified equations. That's in minimum a proof that this theory at least fits with observational reality. 111 and 102 can be used to help understand V4 and J4. So V4 and J4 I think these were the things these were the uh scalers that we were seeing the gravitational waves from it is from these it is apparent that they are that they are functions linear with respect to the added dimension. From equation 112 it is seen that the divergence in mass from a point is impossible in the absence of charge and magnetic effects. This rules out photon photon reactions via virtual particle virtual charge pairs. Such terms have plagued QED calculations. I actually didn't fully understand this, but I think he's saying here that this will help us understand why we see potential effects with the Areronoff bomb effect. Could be wrong, but that's kind of the gist I got from that. Now, the first two equations remained unchanged, indicating no monoples. This would mean no monopoles in free space, but this doesn't necessarily mean there can't be a monopole from a from a teleportation standpoint. It's interesting to note that Mil pointed out the need to modify just these two Maxwell expressions. He arrived at a slightly different terms due to alternate assumptions concerning two timelike coordinates. His viewpoint was that strict relativistic AB initio theories must consider the possibility that in a moving reference frames it is impossible to use a moving test charge to measure a magnetic field without its own velocity relative to the other blocks. What he's saying here is that it's very difficult to test relativity because in your own reference frame everything always looks normal to you. This is the trick to relativity is that somebody can teleport relative to me, but relative to them, it just looks like they're walking through a door. This is the big rub. So, how do you test something like that? Well, you teleport an airplane and then you record it on both sides. That's literally what you do. You teleport an airplane and record it on both sides. Okay. Um, this is another point that I should have mentioned here earlier in the above paragraph. So equation 118 modifies Gaus's law to state that the flux through a closed sur closed surface is proportional to the charge inside only if there's no mass density charge within that region. In other words, the effect of particle creation and annihilation within a region must be considered when calculating the flux from a volume. Boom. Drop the mic. What this is saying here, if you're making a bomb, if you're making a nuke, it's not just the lithium and the hydrogen. You have to consider if 5D theory is correct. You must also consider the effect of particle creation anti and annihilation within the region. What is that? That's the zero point energy. Particle creation and annihilation is the virtual particle pairs that we talk about in physics. The virtual particle pairs that is the zero point energy that ver that particle pair creation that's the swinger limit when you break the swinger limit and the virtual particle pairs become real photons. Conversely, calculation of a mass within a volume must consider the possible flow of electromagnetic energy within the volume. It can be argued that Gaus's law implies a 1 / r 2 potential and any new terms would alter that potential. The effects are very subtle or appear only in high mass density regions. The new potential does not have divergences as does the 1 / r^ 2. Likewise, the magnetic field can now arise from the changes in the electric flux, the movement of the charges, and the change from the voltage arising from the mass effects. I think that's what that V stands for. Wow. It lays it all out right there. Do you guys see why I needed to read this for you? It's not just me saying this. Papers from the 1990s by the Air Force Research Labs have been saying this. They're saying it right there. The reason why the calculations for the nuclear bomb were 50% lower, whatever the percentage is, were so low is because they forgot to calculate the 0 point energy within the volume. Boom.