Video Transcript
Like when I started investigating the MH370 videos, the the first surprise for me was that I started looking up wormhole scientific papers and I found three that were all after 2020 that all said that wormholes are humanly traversible. I had been under the impression that a wormhole was like maybe something that's like a black hole, but it would annihilate you if you went through it. I didn't think it was actually a real thing. And so then I start researching, you find out like, oh no, these a bunch of engineers and scientists have said that like, no, you theoretically should be able to get through a wormhole. And you're going, huh, okay, maybe we will go and look down this route. And the next thing you run into is something called ER equals EPR. Einstein Rosen aka a wormhole is equal to Einstein Rosen Powoski, which is quantum entanglement. It takes the idea of scale in variance. Things that are really small can be made to be very big and things that are very big can be made to be very small. And it unifies those ideas. It says maybe a wormhole, a macroscopic wormhole is equivalent to quantum entanglement. Maybe they're the exact same thing. Hm. Holy grail of physics has been and is the unification of these two realms into something like a quantum theory of gravity which we don't currently have. Einstein himself was working on this idea of unification until his last days. In fact, he along with his collaborator Nathan Rosen in attempting to create this unified theory of quantum gravity published what is now called the ER paper for Einstein and Rosen. Together they develop the concept of a certain type of wormhole called an Einstein Rosen or ER bridge. The idea is you start with a flat spacetime. Then you add something super heavy like a black hole that breaks spaceime. Something that creates a kind of hole in the fabric of spacetime because of a theoretical singularity which would occur at its center. It's a So you can see right away how this connects the idea of a black hole to a wormhole is they're saying okay we got this flat space time. Okay, we're going to say just to simplify things, let's say spacetime is flat and now we're going to bend it. Well, if we bend it a lot, now we're changing the geometry. We're changing the geometry of spacetime. So now you can do what we just saw there, which is we can make a bridge between two points that weren't previously connected before. That's what Einstein Rosen er was showing. It's a point of infinite mass density. Thus, you get a kind of tube-like structure of spaceime that ends up at the singularity. Now, if you have this same construction somewhere else in space, then you could just imagine these two tubes connecting such that you don't have a singularity anymore, but rather a tube that connects one spaceime to the other spacetime. This is a wormhole. It's like a bridge from one part of spaceime to another. How crazy. This science is just it's just real science. Like this is Einstein's equations. The same equations we use every day. The basis for all physics. This is Einstein's equation taken to its extreme. So when people say this is just theoretical, what do you mean it's theoretical? This isn't theoretical. Einstein's equations are proven to be real, proven to be true many, many times over. But that some people, the same people that say Einstein's equations are real, all this stuff, they go, "Yes, but you're not allowed to break them like you just did. You're not allowed to break." What do you mean? It's not even me who came up with this. This is Einstein who came up with this. All Einstein stuff is correct, except for they just don't believe that this part's real for some reason. And here's the here's the rub. Like many things in physics, the academics, their math isn't wrong. Their math's not wrong. Their conceptual view is what's wrong. Their conceptual view is what's wrong. We're not physically making a tube. We're not physically making a tube that the objects going through. That's not what happen. That's not what's happening in the MH370 videos. It's more confusing than that. Actually, what we're seeing is like the plane is there and then it's just not there. And presumably it's somewhere else the next instant. So the tube, the tunnel, the throat is more of a concept of us thinking about it. It's not necessarily what we would physically see. That's what I want people to understand because people ask me, Ashton, they say, "What would it look like from the perspective of the people on board the plane?" And I always say it would look like walking through a doorway. You're not going to be like in some kind of tube like hyperspace like in the movies. No, you're just going to instantly be somewhere else. Now, it so happens just prior to publishing this paper, Einstein Rosen and another collaborator by the name of Boris Podolski had published what is known as the EPR paper in which they argued that quantum mechanics is incomplete because of something called quantum entanglement. This is a phenomenon in which a pair of particles can be created in such a way that their quantum states are linked to each other. They're linked such that the act of measuring, for example, the spin of one particle instantly determines the spin of its entangled pair, no matter how far apart they are. So, the EPR paper argued that this is not possible because it would require information transfer instantly or faster than the speed of light, breaking causality. Now, here is where it gets interesting. What if the wormhole from the ER paper and the phenomenon of entanglement from the EPR paper were theoretically connected? What if two entangled particles very far apart were exchanging information instantly because they were intimately connected via a wormhole through which this information could transfer through spaceime instantly. Wow, look at that end. when they just overlay the two on top of each other. It's like it's Isn't it just obvious? Like clearly the idea of a wormhole, a opening and a closing in one point for conservation to hold true, it should be the same as entanglement. Like it that they seem like they obviously must be connected. When you look at them conceptually, you say they're really explaining the same kind of concept, aren't they? One person brought up in the comments said, "We're just now working on information transfer using quantum entanglement." No, we've got information transfer figured out. In fact, John Kramer explains it in his dur I'm not going to pull it up right now, but you can watch the inter uh the live streams from last week. John Kramer explains it. He says they figured out how to do signaling with a quantum system. Here's the rub. In that video, it said theoretically, they don't think it's possible because it would cause retrocausality. Faster than light communication will cause retrocausality. That's fine. Don't do faster than light communication. Set it up so that it's just instantaneous. Instantaneous transmission. As long as it's instantaneous and not retrocausal, then there's no causality break. That's what John Kramer says. And he's right. I the moment I find one of these defense intelligence reference document authors these and then we find out he's a experimental nuclear physicist. Yeah, I'm going to pay real close attention to what his view is on quantum mechanics. So he says this the solution have it not be retrocausal. Maybe nature doesn't allow us to go back in time. And then the answer to the question of how do you communicate? How do you use quantum entanglement to communicate faster than light? The answer is you create a switch. You create a switch. So you have two connected systems, a sender and a receiver. And the transmitter sends to the receiver a one or a zero. It sends it a one or a zero in the form of an interference pattern. either they see an interference pattern or they see two slits. I mean a one or a zero. You either see coherence or decoherence and now you have a switch. So you actually don't need to let's say let's say this is something that's spinning and I say okay I'm going to turn it 90 degrees and you say okay the entangled particle is also going to turn 90 degrees. You don't even need to do that. You don't even need to do that. That's the crazy part. They figured out how to turn quantum entanglement into a switch that turns on or off the coherence pattern and that gives you binary. And once you have binary, you can send any message you want. Boom.