NASA Scientist - Einstein was WRONG! Light is a WAVE

Video Transcript

Hello everybody and welcome to another episodes of Hard Truths podcast. This is your host Ashen Forbes and today I have a very special guest Dr. U from NASA. Dr. U has a unification theory called Yuon theory which believes that at the smallest level everything is a magnetic particle and that this theory can explain dark energy, dark matter and all the fundamental forces. Welcome right now with me on the on the show is Dr. U. Thank you Dr. U for being here. How are you doing today? Thank you. uh Ashton for having me. I'm doing great. I'm so excited to have a conversation with you. Yeah. So, right off the bat, did I get yuan theory correct? How do you explain yuan theory to people? Oh, yeah. It is a unified physical theory. Try to uh explain all the phenomenon physical phenomenons and the mysteries in physics with a one particle, one force, one field. um one principle and also one universe. Well, let's start right off the bat with light. Now, I've watched some of your previous podcasts and I loved your explanation of what light is and how we should think about light. So, right off the bat, tell me why is light not a particle? Why is light a wave? Or is light a wave? Is is light actually a particle and a wave at the same time? This is the mystery of the light you know because we existing two uh two different theory one say light is a wave another one's the light is a particle eventually when is the third one say hey live is called wave it's a wave and a particle um you know uh my quick answer is after I studied this one my quick answer light is 100% a wave um it's not a particle uh but if you want me to subdiv If it's more explain say light has a light source and the light propagation. So if we say light source we say it is uh caused by particle is like a draw a pebble in the pond right create a motion. So the light source is a particle. However once the motion started the motion propagates is through a medium through a medium. So then that becomes a wave pro wave phenomena for light propagates. I know. Explain to me. Yeah. Yeah. The example that you gave I think in the podcast I was watching which I really liked just to visualize was that you said you know if you imagine a light in the middle of a room and we're all looking at that light. In order for light to be a particle, it would mean that the whole room would have to be completely filled with particles and that theoretically light could be infinitely small. So it would have to be an infinite number of particles which wouldn't make sense at all. Is that the strongest evidence you think for why light would have to be a wave? And if so, then how do you explain the photoelectric effect and this idea of this packet of photons? Yeah. uh the photo electric effect the short answer is um I do not believe current explanation of photo electrical effect is correct um so I'm going to divide by two things number one photoelectric assuming electricity photoelectric uh uh effect assuming electric is a motion of electron so so that's why there Hey, we we come out and also assum assumption is light is a pack of uh wave particle a pack of particle right so now becomes particle and particle interaction so that's the current understanding um but after I studied I found no it's totally different the first thing is electricity is not the flow of particles whenever we generate the photoelectric in fact is when you come in we have electricity come out right so we assuming based on the conventional theory we're assuming you create the motion of electron and the electron traveling through the uh through the uh the the substrate so that's how create electricity I found actually electricity does not created by any particle uh called the translated motion is actually a vibration motion is a wave propagate so so on the solar panel. Let's say on the solar panel light coming in all the particles on solar panel sub subject to light exitation right they only create oscillation or called a vibration oscillation disturbance in local area however the atoms on the surface of the of the solar panel they are elastic connected so that's why create like a medium vibrating medium propagates outside. So the so so so you're saying then that the uh the the light which is the photon that's hitting is this electromagnetic wave potentially just a magnetic wave that's hitting this medium of particles that's there and then that's what's producing what we're seeing in the photoelectric effect as this this disturbance in the medium. Yes. So now now you just answered my second second question. So we assuming light is a wave means light does not come out a whole things uh some impact it's not like impact it is a wave create oscillation of electromagnetic field when you shine the light what happens is on the surface of that you create oscillating oscillating magnetic field and then that's the number one thing so light is not a particle we think about as a wave of course wave have wave front. Yeah, right. We have a wave front wave vibration and a vibration wave. You have a wave front go through it create a oscillation of a magnetic wave. However, what the effect once the magnetic wave goes through this let's say solar panel equivalent to photo elastic material right solar panel. So what happens when you have oscillation electromagnetic wave you create all the particles on the surface of this material solar panel are magnetic particle. So it what happens it will oscillating with the wave frequency oscillating with a wave. So so so that means light is induced light wave induced oscillation of the particle on the surface of a solar panel and then this this this oscillation in local area create what is create a wave motion along the surface of that solar panel. So that's propagates. So if you keep going yeah if you based on this one uh you you you do not say how much pack of energy to knock electron out in order to make them motion right we don't need to not mock the knock electron out because electricity does not require translator motion just oscillating that's it so why because then Einstein would say right that the size of the uh we can interact by changing I think the frequency right we change the size of the spoon is the analogy that they use in terms of like what we're how we're interacting. So what would be your explanation there for like that we can change the size of the spoon by changing the frequency. How does that we're we're like changing the excitation by doing that like we're making the excitation more impactful or go ahead. That's where resonance comes in. You need to hit the resonance frequency, right? You adjust frequency. Not the every every frequency is resonant frequency. Only in the resonant frequency, you use the smallest energy can propagates. You like the word resonance, do you? I love the I mean and I know I can already tell like you know this is pre-recorded but I already know the people in the chat are all yelling Tesla Tesla Tesla right now and things like that because yes resonance I think is something that I I love your opinion on this but it seems like it's discounted in physics and yet like I use it every day when I turn my radio on you know and tune to the right station and then all of a sudden hear music that's a problem with the theoretical physicist they are starting point. They cannot think without a formula. Somebody give them a formula in front of them. That's the problem. They cannot, you know. So that's why if you do not have a day work in real job and dealing with true universe, right? How can you really truly understand how electricity works, how life work? Yeah. No, absolutely. in the resonance thing. Now it's also making me think of uh you you know you were debating or talking with Terrence Howard. You had a great discussion with Terrence Howard and it makes me think of Walter Russell and the that periodic table with the resonance on it. Do you think there's some merit to that viewpoint of looking at Adams like in terms of resonance like that then if everything is a wave? Oh uh yeah you know resonance is you know every every structure you know has its own natural resonance right? Mhm. No problem with that one, right? And then every multiple of frequency we call igon value you know uh you know we have a icon value any multiple integer multiplication of the same value the fundamental frequency any if you times any integer value it is still count as it is still called a natural frequency but just not a fundamental natural frequency is still natural frequency. So, so that means uh Terren said hey I have this one oscillation at this natural frequency right if I doubles it or triples right it is still counted as same family of value family give you different vibration mode different mode we call the vector right it's the same family so I hope that make sense to you so it's not violated anything but you know but that's not everything yeah I think you put it beautifully because I'm I I've looked at that periodic table and it makes conceptual sense like the way you described it if everything is a wave but I just don't know enough to look at it to tell like okay is silicon the fourth octave of you know yeah he said what is it another octave another of is still yeah still a natural frequency is still a is still a natural frequency that means you you can still use the same resonance of frequency to excite them yeah however have you heard of a coherent matter wave beam have you ever heard of that Yes. Yes. Yes. Um, so that would be using that concept, right? Which would be like if you go to the atomic level and say that okay, rubidium has this certain wavelength and you can theoretically like I think they use these cavities to like vibrate these atoms to the point where they exciting them become coherent and become like bzons, right? Yeah. Uh, any takes on that? because that seems like a like I watched the patent holder talk about it a couple weeks ago and he said that it could be a million times more powerful than a laser and I just thought that's that's what the the principle of a resonance they do give you in they theoretically it's infinite amplitude so if he say hey million times it's a less than infinite right uh so so basically everything have it's a natural uh vibration frequency uh how do We know uh it's a natural free uh natural uh vibration. So we basically you you just use a hammer to knock it. If this ring keep you know initially it has a some noise you know transition period after a while it will be oscillating constantly by itself fall that's actually is a natural frequency. So now if you have excitation hit exactly the free vibration frequency that's naturally at that time you know what happens that frequency keep keep on vibrating even though you input very very small I thought we have a like army marching over bridge right army marching over bridge if they marching in the in unison at a certain frequency it's not a it's It's never about how many people there. It's just if you use the same frequency and right hit the resonance frequency that's where times come in as time even the magnitude very small but the time is coming in accumulated energy can increase it can break that one. Yeah sounds like parametric resonance or parametric oscillations of electrical circuits. Yeah. And that's also I think what Salvador Pais I've spoke to him he's a US Navy engineer. He he talks about that a lot about tenderizing like when he talks about uh manipulating space time he talks about it like that with resonance. Yes. And you can use also the analogy of like the opera singer hitting the note for the wine glass to shatter. Opera the wine glass right. Yes. If you hit the if you hit the natural frequency of of of the glass and of course you have to last a longer time right. You cannot just hit the wind notes then you jump over and then you you keep at that note after few seconds I see you were to see stred so that's that's the power of frequency just like you mentioned someone said that you know could be million times higher theoretically resonance frequency can go to amplitude can go to infinity you know that one right yeah keep that in mind because we're going to come back to that and when we talk about some of the other later topics here one last topic on light which is how do you answer the double slit experiment? Like why does the wave function break down? And just to clarify for people out there who don't know, you know, double slit experiment, we're shooting photons through two slits. We would expect there to be like two slits on the detectors on the backside that matches our two slits. But when we look instead, we get this wave pattern. And so we say, okay, well, how is that possible? Which slit did the photon go through? So, we set up a detector and we just say, "Okay, we're going to look and see which which one it went through." And then when that happens, the wave function goes away and instead we just get our two slits. This is the number one mystery in all of physics is that whoever can solve this probably figures out all physics. So, Dr. You go ahead and solve it for us. Okay. So, you give me the easiest questions about the double cate right now. Okay. So, you shooting uh photons. We if you uh you know uh yeah if your audience uh watched your previous video it will be know. So my theory about the photon is actually not a pack of a particle. Uh I mean it's a photon is actually just the uh a wave propagation. So at a different location you see a w a pack that's a different uh different particles of the medium particles vibrating at that time. So it's not like a one particle go through the photon. Okay. So this is the one thing. So when you go through the go through this uh uh go through this double slit if you shooting when you know what happens you're shooting when photons we so call the window actually you just create a when excitation when you create a window the photon transmitted or propagated is through the medium. So you see the photon just like somebody swimming over there right it's actually the wave motion goes through it. So when the wave reach to the two slit on the so so basically the shooting photon is equivalent to create oscillation of the wave. So now the wave that's the medium wave right medium wave go through the slit and it will not go through a single one. The wave will go through two outs simultaneously. So now you have a have some wave motion in phase right uh in phase and everything's uh in tune in angle everything. So now you you create a double slit there's a coherent wave. Yeah. So if everything So I get the part where the wave part but I guess I just don't understand the part where it breaks down and why it breaks down like it breaks down the breaks down at when you're shooting electrons. Mhm. Electrons particles, right? Mhm. They said, "Hey, we we know electrons particles, right? If this is if theoretic physics get anything right, it has to have have a sub particles, right?" Yeah. So, okay. So, electrons particle they said if we shooting electron one at a time and we observe it one day at a time. So, go through this one or go that one. we know we we can count it and they find that you you shooting one at a time and still find the screen shooting the light interference pattern that's where that's where I believe people's question come out so how can you shooting electron and we know we monitor the electron we monitor electron go through one se one slit or go through the other slit right we monitor one at a time and still shoot that one you know the key lies in I I know one of the your favorite thing is we got the ether back. Is that right? You said ether. You said yeah the ether. Yep. You know we know the space in order for light to propagates. We need a carrier. That's a wave. So so this wave made by what? Electromagnetic matters. So that's why electromagnetic wave. So now you think about electron. What is electron? In my if you understand you yeah I know you understand my explanation electron is just little magnetic particles. You think about it a moving magnetic particles wave inside a magnetic medium. What happens to the medium? The medium create a wave. So now when you go through the two slits your electron goes through it but the wave the carrier wave also goes through them. The wave started started with what inter interference parent and you know how small electron is right. Yeah, it's tiny stretch on you know is you know yeah is element supposed to be element tiny so it will carried by the wave so eventually and the wave still inter uh interference right just like a light wave so now your electron very small been carried by that wave so that's why end up showing the same um wave pattern I don't know I don't I don't know if you feel feel that you know remember one thing is electron is a magnet which means electron itself carry magnetic field right carry the north south so this magnetic field interact with the medium the electromagnet medium field what happens vibration wave yeah so you're saying that it's actually this I think I get it is that so the electron is a little uh assuming the electron is a particle and it's also a magnet and we have this medium there must be some medium which we're going That's the next topic I want to talk about. Then there would be a wave disturbance from the electron moving through the medium. So from electrons magnetic field, right? So then you could have a situation where the electron can create a particle type effect and also one where it can also create a wave type effect at the same time. And I have thought the reason why I like this is I I think the answer must be that there is this extra dimension this extra medium of of kind of um energy or what have you out there and physics understands that to be real. So that's why I like that that answer. And so then my next question is well where is energy coming from? Where is electricity coming from in your view? If you're telling me that we are in this medium of particles of energy all around us and that light is an excitation of that, right? So then wouldn't that mean that the electricity and energy is locally coming from wherever that excitation is occurring or go ahead and explain to me what your what your concept of electricity is? Oh, I I do believe if uh you know the energy level uh are close to you know because light is uh light is electromagnetic oscillation right wave propagation and because we have a light transmitted through this medium wave electromag so you know if we can see the light we know the whole medium is in the background is vibrating is carry we do just like a fish fish do not see water right yes the water vibrating however we We we do see you know yeah we we see we can see fish but fishy does not see water this is the same thing uh when we see light just like we saw fish but we know the fish has to go through the medium right so that's why that means the medium is constantly vibrating the reason is if it can't carry light is vibrating of course the medium so what is it um yeah uh those those what is a cosmic uh mic microwave background you know Yeah, it's of course the medium you have lights, you have a thermonuclear explosions on the stars. These are create huge explosions, huge waves, huge disturbance. Of course, everything's vibrating. You will have energy everywhere, anywhere you see light. So where's that energy coming from then? So I mean you're saying then so are you say talking about zero point energy? I mean to me it sounds like you're saying there's an ether like and this is what Tesla and it has to have ether has to be an ether you think oh wow without ether light won't you won't be able to see light yeah because everything requires all waves require medium right I mean it seems pretty obvious to me why do you think physicists have discounted that I mean what is the counterargument to that you're saying space is not empty really that's the end of the day really what you're saying right space probably right probably it it is the same same scientific discussion and somehow being um sidetracked by political issue maybe you know social issue or or political issue and some somehow certain point of view has to be shut off shut down silenced maybe I don't know but I I noticed a lot of lot of uh contemporaries as Albert Einstein's contemporaries They they believe light is a wave. Wave need a medium. They should have some kind of transmission medium there. And then right now I try to avoid the word called the ether. It has a negative connotation. So I would say hey just simple symbol called black is black. Say it just magnetic uh also just magnetic uh medium. it you know light is a magnetic electromagnetic uh wave right of course carried by electromagnetic uh medium uh you you you may think you may you may notice I always struggling with the word electromagnetic or magnet or something because in my mind only one type of wave magnetic wave so are you talking about the zero point energy is that what you're referring to the zero point can you can you define zero point energy to me I I I think I I know what you mean, but can you explain uh to audience? So, what what do you mean? If this if this is a if I'm in a box here, well, I don't know where the w the width of this box is, but the screen is this box. If I were to take all of the photons and heat, all of what we would think of as the nonvibrational energy out of this box, then we would say there's no there's no energy left in there. Conventionally, we would say that. But if we were to do stuff like take the kasmir effect in that empty box and we were to put two plates together, we would see them come together and you would say, "How is that possible?" You took all the energy out of the box, but we're still seeing plates come together on their own. So there must be some energy there. And you know, from what you described to me, sounds like to me that's the answer to what you're saying is that where's that light coming from? Well, it's not coming from the thermal energy. It's not coming from any other energy in this box other than the the vibrations the zero point energy that's there the medium I believe that's if that's say hey all the observable particles everything we can feel something take it out we know the universe uh the space is not empty right not vacuum it's filled with this electromagnetic medium and this vibrational medium that's transmitted the light and and create the temperature so you you you might Right. That the coldest the temperature in in based on observation, right? Still like a three three Kevin or something. Yeah. Something around that one. It's never be zero. Right. Yeah. Yeah. But they, you know, and then the whole idea too is that like they cool down. They create these artificial environments. They cool things that region down to like absolute zero. And then we also have like super fluidity, you know, like helium 3 will still act like a super flu. It doesn't freeze. So there must be some energy there just even using conventional physics to explain that. And then the big argument is you know the vacuum catastrophe. So where do you land on the vacuum catastrophe? Do you you know what do you think the true energy the latent energy of the universe is? Do you think it's just what we see with respect to heat or do you think it's the answer of uh when you know Fineman and Wheeler took quantum mechanics and they added up all the modes all that zero point and they said oh it's 120 orders of magnitude or something like that I mean it's like the difference is huge like so who's right like a superp position u my I just give you intuitive simple answer say hey we know space filled with this called magnetic fluids right Okay. So where the energy come from? Because we do have a star galaxies. You see those bright lights or something where they come from? That is from a new thermonuclear explosions. So what that do? They create a huge mo moving time bearing magnetic field. Right? So you know even though we cannot see the stuff we know the stuff is is in in motion have energy. That's why we can see light you know right the light is the vibration through that one. So we know that's the background of the wave is never um never truly be stationary I you know still because if light goes through it you know you know the light traveling through all the three dimensional space so you know it will create oscillations. Well, so let me ask this because when you say that and you say, okay, you know, any movement through space is going to be creating these excitations, I start to wonder, shouldn't like free energy be possible? Free energy in the in the sense that like we have unlimited energy to tap into because if what you're saying is true, then stars and the light and the and the energy coming off stars is just a byproduct of this interaction happening in the medium. we should be able to recreate that even produce it at a smaller scale and I go well that seems like that's just unlimited access to energy if we could figure that out. What do you think? Yes, I think that's true. Uh so basically once we understand based on the yuan theory uh everything's started with fundamental with magnetic particles, magnetic medium, magnetic objects, right? Um so everything all the universe builded by this this single force magnetic field field force or I think force. Um so I believe anything natural can happen we can repeat by human being use this fundamental principle and remember you said you said one things is about use resonant frequency. We do not need a huge energy. We can create almost infinite magnitude I believe. So so so so that's why I do believe uh what is called a low energy nuclear reaction or something uh and if you talk about the zero point energy it's all about the medium right the medium if you can excited this medium at a certain resonant frequency which excitation does not require lots of force you just constantly constantly small excitation just with a a period of time right accumulation of time it can create a huge energy that that's why I I do believe we can create like a desktop of a type of a nuclear uh I'm not use nuclear fusion I have different definition of fusion so a nuclear reaction device create create unlimited I was going to ask you light you go ahead I mean a star the we're just trying to recreate a star with fusion and the secret to the star is gravity you know it's not temperature it's gravity Gravity is the secret and then gravity produces the pressure and the temperature and we've been trying to use we've just been discounting gravity this whole time. No wonder we've never figured out fusion for 70 years and then you come in with yon theory and this was actually on my list of questions to ask you and I go if everything's just a magnet and you know I sat and listened to you talk about how okay well it's going to repel because they're both like charges but if they get too close it's just a sphere so it's going to rotate around and it's going to connect back together. If you have control over that, over all four forces, the fundamental forces, you can cause fusion to happen at will. And if you can cause fusion to happen at will, that's access to unlimited energy in my opinion, just from basic chemistry, right? So I I thought about that and I wanted to get your opinion then because if that's the case, we don't need hot fusion anymore. Like you said, we should be able to produce low energy reactions by manipulating the forces at the, you know, atomic level, at the base level. And that kind of scares me because I think like do you think they've already figured this out or do you think you're the first one? No. No. No. Uh, you know, you know, uh, not only not only in the United States, I believe even in uh, the rivals to United States, other countries, they still use the I believe use a false uh, fusion theory, nuclear theory. You know, my my major engineer mechanics, right? My advisor is a nuclear engineer uh professor and he was he eventually becomes department chair of nuclear and engineer physics department you know so so I I know a lot about nuclear reactions nuclear engineering theories I I was his RA student TA and RA right so you know the reason of all the money we we invested what is it every time I heard like 20 billion $40 billion probably accumulated over hundreds of billion at least 200 billions worldwide. Oh yeah, you know they and they use the best and the brightest physicist to do that never success because they misunderstood the fusion. Actually I just let you know there are no energy created by combining two things together. That's called a fuse them together. That's a wrong concept. So however we do measure when they have a nuclear explosion we do measure that okay we do have a h we do have a with a side product we do have a formed helium right so started with fusion nucle hydrogen you know something and eventually forming forming helium so we thought okay it must be fuse particle together create energy that's opposite if let's see if I can explain to you and if you understand I I want you to explain to your audience. Okay. So what happens is I believe we have no problem with fishing. Anything you split two if you do any energy calculation you double you you increase energy. So means whenever you split one object to smaller objects use same same force pushing them you you increase energy. So the fusion thought when you bind them increase that's not whenever you bind two things and let them both moving together you're slower okay you you you're moving slower so that means your energy reduce so then where comes the helium helium forms right you I believe the the f called the nuclear hydrogen bomb or fusion bomb or something new fusion is split atom to a smaller your nuclear nuclear bomb just split a nuclear no split what is a u molecules you know into little atoms or something but if you fusion you split the atoms to the subatomic smaller what is a subatomic particles based on your they all magnetic part just smaller part magnet part when you split them you always increase energy so so what I believe so-called atomic bomb versus a hydrogen bomb. The difference is you split at a deeper level one order magnitude deeper make particles bigger. However, the what happens when you split a subatomic particle becomes all the particle becomes charged right fly. However, once they cooling down, you know what happens? The charged particle are magnetic particle when high energy they're flying everywhere. when cooling down they study recomb connect together form that's form of helium so helium is a side product after deeper level of fishing reaction that's really interesting in the context of like um Stanley Meyer and his water powered car he was arguing that he found a way to at low energy levels cause hydrogen and oxygen to come apart and then he basically just moved it to a new area and like a normal area and then it would they would come back together just naturally come back together and they also form I believe they form helium neutral helium particles and they saw transmutation as well. Yes. And they they've been crushed right they've been trashed the entire I thought actually you know what kind of force make them uh make make them you use electricity you know electricity is what is also let's say vibration equivalent to excitation force if you have electricity hit the resonance frequency of whatever you are you are testing right you know eventually going to break the break the atoms apart I believe that's the right way to Uh I want to finishing my thoughts about why the big money use high temperature could not create a fusion energy. You know what happens to charged particle. So let's assuming they already high enough energy make the all become charged particle. The only thing they can fuse together is when you cooling down. Okay. Now the charged particle they slow down. So they they no longer um hit each other bumping back and forth. They started oh started connection. Right. that one. But the current theory say you have to have a huge temperature to fuse them together. You know what happens? They never fuse them together because high energy make them keep constantly constantly moving. You never see you do not see helium come out. What happens? They increase temperature another order magnitude and that's problem comes. Your container cannot hold that temperature. Right? You have to use you create a plasma keep them away from a wall. This is become a new technology now. how you keep the heat right away from the the wall container wall that that's totally they could come out the different you know material uh new materials right hold the hard but it's it's not going to make a hu fusion work man I think we should go into a consulting business maybe we can help solve some of these fusion companies because like it just it's I had the same exact thought and it's just a logical thought is like okay you're increasing the temperature and you're making the molecules bounce around faster bouncing around heating How is that going to solve anything? That's just how can you fuse them together, right? Just random chance. We're just going to hope that they randomly hit each other in all of the space. It's like as opposed to using a magnetic approach, which is like we're just going to force their paths to come together. Like that just seems so much more obvious to me. So, um I don't want to get too much into the conspiratoral aspect of it, but I am very skeptical that why haven't other people figured this kind of out already? And my personal opinion is they probably have. And then it makes me question like okay are we being kind of like you know you know for example what I will say is that when you speak to energy amplification through vibrational uh amplification that's that's dangerous you know uh energy amplification in general is dangerous and I wouldn't surprise me to find you have to control it right exactly and so it wouldn't find it surprised me to find out that yes we could do fusion very efficiently using these concepts but that it's also very dangerous and that we also don't want to just give that to everybody out on the planet. Do you would you agree with that? Like where do you stand on on the dangers of some of this science? Oh, uh I I believe if you use a uh not high energy, high temperature, use electromagnetic induced vibration. Mhm. Uh you know to as try to create a resonance to a material, you can split them off. When you split them, you know what happens, right? That's where the people ask where the nuclear for nuclear energy come from. Two connected particles magnetic connector when you split you know what happens when split and bouncing back and forth. When when bouncing back and forth you have a attraction and initiate a repulsion. Now attraction repulsion. So the back and forth s and just increase not just not just the regular called uh impact. Wow. If you have a like charge particle impact the higher you impact the bigger the repulsion force right. So that back and forth. So now you see oh everything's started energy increase heat and some energy increase the mag that's called the magnetic repulsion. I believe that's that's where it play a huge part of the nuclear energy. Well, if any spooks are watching, I just want everyone to know that Dr. U from NASA just taught me how to make a fusion bomb. So, you know what? It's not on me. You can blame NASA. They're the ones who taught me how to do it. I'm just kidding. Uh, but no, that's good. I I appreciate that conversation, but let let's move just a little bit away from the uh possibly end of the world creating destruction bombs. And let I want to ask more questions on yuon theory. in terms of how it can explain stuff in cosmology. Uh so I think I understand your explanation of dark matter. That one I think is the easiest to explain with you on theory because I've already been thinking for like 15 years that like can't magnetism just explain this idea that galaxies the stars in our galaxies are rotating faster than we would expect if we just had like a pin wheel. So they say oh go ahead jump in. You said faster than we expected only when we use Newtonian concept. Yeah. But if we use electromagnetic concept or magnetic concept then the speeds are actually match what we would expect is that you know we've got this uh if you just use like the right-h hand rule in electrical engineering and you just look at the rotation of the of the galaxies then it all makes sense. That part no problem with the part I think I need a little bit more explanation on maybe not uh is the dark energy side of it. So, dark energy, the way I look at it is like if I had some paint and and a canvas or this table and I pour the paint on the table, it's going to spread out kind of all over the table evenly. That's kind of how I imagine like spacetime spreading or like the energy spreading out throughout spaceime to create, you know, our reality. So, when you explained it, I think you did. I love your plasma globe, by the way. I got to get one of those for my back. all kinds of when you put your hand on it. I like the idea that you're like, "Oh, why do the tendrils why do they all spread out? Like, why aren't the tendrils like coming together? They almost look evenly spread out." So, I guess what you're saying there is that there's attractive and repulsive forces that happen on these large scales that would cause then like the kind of paint to spread out of the canvas or what is your analysis of why we how dark energy is is solved? You you you I I believe it could be you sp uh spill the paint, right? Spread it over uh and uh of course it follow the least resistance fast, right? Yeah. When you spread uh but you know for the plasma ball because you know at the center of that's that's Tesla coil on one side of Tesla coil you know Tesla coil is highly electromagnetic generated electromagnetic field. So when we use one tip ball on the top right so that means it's all the same the like pole is all from started with the same light. So that's why you you you shooting uh you're shooting this called a filament the filament is all started with like a pole. So that's why repulsion and since everywhere repulsion so that's why you you would see each each pushing together eventually uh almost uniformly in all the direction. Does that make sense to you? You explain to Yeah. You just reminded me of a different uh thing that you showed uh where you had like a magnet, right? And you put like three poles under it and they pull they spread out from one another. Oh, you have it? Yeah. That was actually the best visual now cuz now that made me think of it. Oh, you think this visual better than shoot show shooting that one? Yes. You know, I I have a strong uh neodymium magnets inside. Yep. And I put this on inside. I you know I like collect all the uh the physical souvenirs but my my son told me you shouldn't you should not use this one to as example he said people would be definitely distracted by by the leaning tower of I just use as a holder of a magnets okay so now I have a three you know this is just a stainless steel you know some kind of steel it's itself not a magnets but I try to say how to demonstrate the L like a pole repel. I said, "Hey, since I have a magnets all on the bottom side is one side magnets." I hope you can see it, right? Yep. And then put another one. Yeah. And they repel. So Oh, you like this one better. That That makes a lot of sense to me because then I look at that as like the universe is like, "Oh, no wonder they repel." Because you can see they repel more and more and more as they get fur like as it kind of expands out. Oh, okay. So, okay. So I may use this way more sometimes I use plasma my sort of hey that represent the universe how un yeah so so basically people can understand so so a so-called dark energy or we call a dark force just pushing something away from each other just a magnetic repulsion right you have to yeah no that's that's good I like that let me ask though then how do you explain these are two the questions I don't think I've seen you explain maybe you have how do you explain mass and inertia and there's an equivalence principle between the two as well. So how does magnetism alone explain why there's mass at all? You ask a great question actually that's a one mystery about the mass right I do if you think about the the origin of mass right now under quantum mechanics frame we solved was 2012 uh but he higs higs right higs bzon right so that's try to solving where the mass come from based on the quantum mechanics or everything's a single a point particle So how could a point particle generate a mass right? So, so, so they use called interact use this a point particle interact with a field they called called Hakes field. Now my question is does Hakes field how does a h field can interact with a a point particle how could they interact use what interact because h field I believe if my understanding is correct is a neutral field it's not a magnetic field is that right yeah I I think that yeah generally I haven't heard enough explanation of how the Higsfield my understanding is the Higsfield does not adequately explain where all the mass can come from No. And now here's where I would push back on you or push back on that and ask you is that I would say why doesn't the zero point energies just explain it. So you know you get rid of the Higs field and you say okay instead of that thermal energy that we've got out there let's take that zero point that vibrational energy that you talked about that can amplify the that's where the medium that's exactly that's the I'm call the medium the medium could be at a zero point right uh or at any any point. Yes. The medium is what's giving you mass. That's where the medium interact. The medium interact. The medium electron is a magnetic medium. Okay. Interact with particle. Particle. What particle is all particle made by magnetic? Magnetic particle. So that's why they interact. You have resistance. I hope I I solving the mystery of mass. Right? That's what is called the mass is resistance of motion. Right? That means it's a force can change motion. and go. And that's why there's an equivalence principle between inertia and mass because when you move around, you're just moving through the resistance of the magnetic moment if you want to consider that like you know the same reason why I can't move my hand through this like there's repulsion that's occurring there and that happens even on the small scales even if I was in outer space because even in outer space there still is that zero point energy even if you remove all the energy from space region you're still going to have that inertia you're still going to have that mass and this is why I love your theory because you can literally just set the idea of zero point energy right on top of your theory. It makes perfect sense. That's the you cannot if you place without a medium, you won't see light. You won't see any anything, right? And if it one more thought is that if anybody were to say, oh, they want to challenge it, which I would I love for people to challenge that even Leonard Suskgind was asked about if we remove all this energy, how how can there be something there still? How can there be something there? And and he goes, "Yes, there's something there and it's electromagnetic." He says, "It has charge." And they go, "How can it have charge if there's no mass? If there's nothing actually, there's no energy or mass there." And and that he says, "I don't know where it can come from." Well, you just said it. It's there must be a medium. And that medium is electromagnetic. And it's interact with moving particles are magnetic, too, right? They're interacting. It's magnetic. So, isn't it just a beautiful kind of way to piece everything together? And and I love also too that you can now explain from your magnetic yuon theory all the fundamental forces and we don't need any of them. I mean the thing that's beautiful about physics is the most simplest the simplest answers are usually the best right can you I want your audience to understand how how it unified let's say strong force do we need a strong force I want you to explain because your audience will be will understand that in yeah so like the strong nuclear force why if I take two positively charged or two negatively charged things if I bring them together they should repel right but if they get too close If we together, right? So, the reason why that is if you imagine they're balls, if you imagine it's a ball of charge, a sphere of charge, then yes, they will repel at first, but if they get too close, the sphere is going to rotate and then you'll have the then they'll attract together. Boom. Now you have the strong nuclear force. And then when you describe the weak force, this was the one that I had the hardest time to understand, but when you showed the image, it made so much sense, is that we see this beta decay. we'll see this spontaneous decay where we see electrons get shot out from our nucleus. H how can that be possible? Well, it turns out if we slam something in to our atom, our nucleus, then we we'll see stuff get shot out the other side. So, conservation of our energy, right? Yeah. It's just conservation of energy. And we're in this magnetic this medium all the time. So, of course, things are interacting all the time. Things are getting hit all the time. So that would explain the weak force as well. And then gravity you I I think that your view of gravity works perfectly well with 0 point energy because the 0 point energy it is also electromagnetic. And what we're basically just saying is gravity is an electromagnetic force. Your explanation of taking the uh magnet let me see if I can use like my phone right or actually you have the magnets right? If you could do that explanation that' be great. Yes please. This is the one that I loved. Oh, you know, even when I when you showed this the first time, I didn't even know what was going to happen. Which just goes to show that even somebody who's been studying physics, you don't know. Like that's a very powerful magnet right now. Yes. And it can pick up something very, very heavy, right? Look at that. But then all you do is fold it in half, right? Yeah. There you go. Perfect. So even that tiny ball. Yep. Yeah. I believe I can pick two ball together. Oh wow. Yeah. I cannot pick a three. Okay. So then then my question is what if I folded this one? I I I'm so happy when I watch you. I know you are you even stop stop your video ask people questions, right? So I said, "Hey, so these are these are just regular magnetic interaction, right? Nothing serious. What if I fold this one? Make center gravity lower." And let's fold again. Yep. I believe who uh you know Patrick Bat David for my for for my tri trap this one and so does Terrence right Terrence Howard I said hey if I make center of gravity lower I will misled them and and then so yeah so counterintuitive though because most people look at that and they think it's still going to pick the stuff up. I have basically we have a stronger magnetism closer to that one, right? Yeah. Should be stronger, right? But logically you would think it was but you know go ahead and do it and almost almost 99% of people say that one very if occasionally somebody say you I I I may not even believe he know what he's his he's his he's his he's his understanding. So if I do this one everybody think about now you should pick up all three balls. Mhm. Can't even pick up any of them. Yeah. Can you even pick up the small one? No. Right. I hope you can see my small ball. Can you see small ball? Yeah. I can't even pick that up. Wow. Incredible. What happens if I fold even more? Yeah. It's going to get even weaker, right? Or no, it can get stronger again after it starts to become long again, though, right? Oh. Oh, you mean if I unfold your lung then stronger. But if I I mean if I fold it fold make it even compact weaker and weaker. So I have two questions on this. So my first one I guess is what is superc conductivity? How do you explain superc conductivity because it repels all magnetic fields right? So how does that work in the context of this theory? And then I also just want to say I love that because what you explain there and I all the physicists come to me when I say that electricity unifies general relativity and quantum mechanics and they say oh no gravity is too weak and even though you look at the terms the actual equations and you realize that electric force and gravity have like the same formations in the terms of the equations it's just the constant that's different. And so people say oh why is it weaker? Well, you just explained it because you just fold it in half. Now you've got the same amount of mass, but your force just became much much weaker. So, thank you for that explanation. But so, explain to me superconductivity and how that all fits in the role of this. I actually I have an experiment to demonstrate superconductivity is actually just magnetic phenomena. Nice. So right now we everybody try to strive for super room temperature conductivity right super doesn't does not means good super means you have to be a super cold temperature right temperature conductivity that's what we really want to apply so if if if if you allow me I'm going to just set up if take a take too long you can you can cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut cut a part off uh I'm I'm going to show you uh I'm going sometime. I'm I'm glad. Take a minute. We'll just We'll have them edit it. It's no rush. No problem. Right. So then I'm going to show you what I what I have here. We have a room super conduct room super conductivity too, you know. Yeah. So that's what I try to say. So I have a Oh my goodness. You know, okay. when you whenever you're dealing with the magnet you know you you said it very well everything bogged down to magnetism right so so that's why so right now let me see if I how can I demonstrate this one to you I have a six magnets can you see that one yep yeah you can see the magnet so I'm going I'm I'm going just Just keep it keep it keep it in here. You can see that right? Okay. So now what happens? Oh happens here. I have this called a par graph graphite you know just just type of a graphite different shapes. Let me see if that can make make any sense to you. Okay. And that's demonstrate what is the super room temperature superconductivity is. Okay. I'm not sure is if the uh okay let's let's let's use this one. Oh, I have to take it out otherwise I I cannot say. Hey, did you see the things floating? Yeah. Okay. Actually, can you see it's floating? Yeah. Yeah, I can see it. Wow. You can see that, right? And I can if I have a piece of paper. Oh, yeah. So, it's definitely hovering above the top. So why though? Is it because of the configuration of the magnets that you put it? Is that what you're saying? So So you you do see it it's hovering hovering there, right? Oh yeah. Oh yeah. I mean the paper makes it pretty. Yes. As long as you can see it. So so you know it's hovering. So this is exactly what called a room temperature uh uh you know uh conductor you know. Uh so basically the so-called resist remember electrical city the the reason we did that we said hey if we can reduce electrical resistance so we can have constant constant energy never so that's why we're we're have unlimited energy because it never consuming that's that's a wrong concept you know if you if you think about it the so-called electricity electricity is oscillation right the oscillation So where comes the resistance you know the particle oscillation where comes the res you know when you oscillation you you create a rotational uh acceleration right angular acceleration so resistance is create sort of accelerated this angular momentum you know right so that's where part of the that's part of the resistance come from another part you know pro probably friction over heat. So the particles random bumping each other, right? So when they're oscillating, they could be a little bit bouncing each other and reduce some some energy. So that's why it never it never there's nothing called a resistant electron motion. That's what current definitions we said electron move on on on the super super disk. So that's why if you can reduce uh reduce the resistance it can keep keep a motion. No that's not the word resistance come from you know this happening because you know we've seen stuff like um crap I'm trying to think of good examples but oh so like Cooper pairs then so like what is a Cooper pair then? If if you're saying that it's you know a local excitation therefore nothing's actually moving but we've measured superc conductivity and we're seeing these effects. So so what actually is it then? Oh that's where you come come after to magnetism. You remember that what they do is they put a cold temperature. You know what cold the temperature to temperature can do to water? Make a water to ice right? Mhm. What what what the difference between water ice they crystallite them crystallite them basically you align the negative positive negative positive crystal grow the crystals is a negative positive you align them so what happens you form a magnets so now magnetic force you forming a magnetic force the same thing happens to called the superconductive material the the particles and the super cold what happens Super cold basically create a condition create a condition less friction. So that that kind of free rotation now free rotation free. So basically all the particles started lying as a magnets in in every layers they all becomes the magnetic particle. So that's why this graphite the graphite have a one layer is lay layered layered different layers different layup and on on bottom is is is uh it's a one magnet on top at a bit different layers different magnet pole so that's why you would you would see oh suddenly suspended oh my goodness I have another I have another evidence uh to show I'm not sure if it's it's it sounds a lot like magnet inversion Is that where you're getting that? Yes, exactly. Magnetic inversion that's called diamagnetism, right? You somehow make becomes diamagnetic. So that's what cold temperature do. So do not believe cold temperature truly can make a resistance to zero. The most of the resistance when you make a particle oscillation you're consuming accelerating force consuming to accelerated particles, right? That's part that's part of resistance. Of course, other part is due to heat or something reduce the motion. This makes a lot of sense. Remember LK99 with that room temperature superconductor? They did the experiments and the big push back was that it never got to absolute zero resistance like it was really really really really low but not actually zero and still still have a similar resistance basically. Yes. I I remember even though we're looking at it levitating like we're literally right levitating just like a just like a super conductive. Yeah. Just like a magnet is floating, right? Yeah. And that would imply that it's something fundamentally they've misunderstood about the concept in general. And that's what you're saying here is that um you know as you cool it down the lattice structure of the magnet forms in case a water magnetical structure freezes in place. And so you could see that same thing happening when you do that to any material. And so that's why you might see that. And then you could theoretically, you know, create that same effect at a higher temperature. Um, and this actually makes me think of another question I wanted to lead into, which is, do you think we can make like coherent balls of plasma under this theory? So, if you're saying everything's magnetism and we can control all the forces and we've been talking about fusion, why can't I just make a ball of plasma that can float around freely because theoretically I can control all the forces at the fundamental level? Oh, sure. This is very similar to anti-gravity force. Mhm. Right. If you can gravity is you know gravity. Okay. So uh so uh I just say in my I give you my results from yuan theory say gravity just like a magnetic attraction just just magnetism. It's a part of a attraction part of magnetism. Um so uh if you watching the the was the PBD that podcast I I could I use a different language. I say oh uh gravity is a manifestation of magnetism or is a summation remember summation of a magnetic body you know summation of a mass system when when you when you have a lot of matter mass together actually you reduce the force right it's not like you you increase mass so I use called a summation or called a residual force of this magnetic body you you you mean So, so basically, so the gravity is a uh magnetic part of magnetic. So just to cancel out any anti-gravity would just be you know a reverse charge or reverse force going the other direction then right since um gravity we saw the attraction only force is a magnetis is part of magnetic but however magnetism has both attraction and repulsion right so we do able to use you said manipulate the plasma ball counter what counter gravity counter earth's magnetic field if you just counter reversed counter control the magnetic field of the platform counter earth attraction magnetic field you you are not just floating you could have been repelled at a accelerated velocity going in any direction then right like just pretty simply I hope this justify the UFO phenomena right UAP phenomena I think people that don't see the connection between the UFO stuff and magnetism like I I just don't know how to help them cuz like I can look at the superconductivity I and just look at like magnetic levitation in general and it looks just like all these UFO videos flying around. Exactly. Same. They got to be using magnetism, right? It's just seems straightforward. I believe if they are more advanced than us or somebody asked me uh in the in the past could be you know in the past human race could be mastered this kind of technology right you just need a reverse magnetic field so then it can can build itself like what is the pyramid or or some coral what is that in the Florida coral castle coral castle coral castle or something I I highly sus maybe might maybe might maybe Not that complicated. A couple more physics questions for you. Um, so do you think that the universe is scale invariant? Do you think that we can make an atom at the size of a human? Like scale it up that way then? Because if you're saying that everything's just magnets, like the way you've described everything to me today, I see no reason why you couldn't just make something bigger at the same, you know, scale invariant. Um, everything's just tiny little magnets and then you just add them together to make bigger. That's what we see in the sun or in some some uh some of the uh giant you know giant objects we we talking about the black hole what is six billion times the mass of the sun right we just considered is you know what happens with you have a launching magnets together you have a limit you launch them they started force reduce right the field reduce become the neutral when you too much you know what happens it's unstable unstable very easily to create what is a ejection. Suddenly the force is so weak right suddenly a local is instead of attraction they rotate and then becomes ejection. So that's why that's called a radioactivity. So that's where uh all the radioactive material has atomic number greater than 86 or 84 you know. Yeah, if you count it everything heavier than that one so it becomes radioactive becomes unstable. So that's I try to answer you do we have a limit? I believe once you lump together enough probably the very easily to create uh what is called uh what is uh yeah supernova or something you know I exploded and something right so all does that make sense to you? Oh yeah. Yeah. You're saying the big energetic events like as we just keep stacking things together together it's not like you can infinite there's a balance point right and even in a black hole they say so even if we were to say okay we get to this point where it gets so large that we have such a gravitational force that light can't escape there these huge like ejections that are like on the perpendicular axis of the black holes right yeah hacking radiation to talk about but you still have anticipate you know you know I do not believe we need a black hole Right. I know. I was going to ask you. That's why. And so it sounds like, you know, I you're kind of playing I was going to ask you're playing both sides here where you're saying, "Okay, well, you know, I guess you're I think your argument is going to be that it gets so big where it's unstable, therefore a black hole couldn't really become stable and therefore they shouldn't exist." Is that what you're you're getting at? Oh uh not not exact that that part you know you know we know every uh galaxy or every uh super giant uh object they have a certain limit beyond that limit they create a thermonuclear reaction you were there were some dynamic balanced right throughout something coming back and keep repeating this pattern um I try to say black hole is not it's not about we're missing matter is it's not about we're missing force we still have the force just instead of a gravitational force we use a magnetic force. Does that make sense to you? So we need the go ahead keep on. Yeah. So if you traveling near center of the galaxy without without a black hole you still could probably be burned burned by the by the objects nearby there. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. The center of the black the universe even without a black hole is going to be or center of the galaxy is going to be a very uh tumultuous place filled with uh high energy reactions, right? Um so so you think that so you do you don't think that I I guess you're saying that you don't think we need black holes but they still could be possible. Is that what your kind of official statement is? Okay. Yes. Oh. Oh, I want to emphasize one thing about the the black hole. Uh, are you living in Florida or in somewhere else? Where where do you live? I live in Minnesota. Yeah. Oh, you're in Minnesota on the weather. You use central time. Have you studied in Florida or have you lived in Florida before? I've been there before. Yeah. Okay. So, what I my analysis to uh to black hole is if you live in Florida, you go through hur hurricane season. Have you? Yeah. Okay. You know that's where I learned something counterintuitive. I'm leaving at the Merry Island is the island. So you know the barrier island every time hurricane they they force you to uh you know to move somewhere else right. Uh at one year we have a neighbor from Miami. They said oh we are not moving. They came from Miami is more than the central Orlando area right. They said oh we've been through this one doesn't matter. Okay. So I said okay I will follow you. So I did not moving you know what happens hurricane comes before hurricane comes everything's shaking after the center of eye reach them everything's suddenly totally quiet have you been through that that oh yeah that happens in Minnesota too with the tornadoes you get to the eye of the tornado and it's just calm oh eye of tornado that's yeah similar phenomen so I said why it's not is when is quiet because all the heavy particles the moistures in the air completely just like spinned out just like what is wash washing machine all the water spinned out right all the clothes on the wall in the center is completely empty that's what I found oh my goodness the center I feel like when is have no wind no sound and no wind I said where did the wind go all the particles the wind particles is on the wall or on the hurricane or outside of the eye and also there is no clouds. Yeah. When you look through the the the eye no clouds I feels like it's a complete fields piece. Yeah, that's what I have I believe that's what happens to black hole. The so we call the so-called black hole is not because the black is not because the gravity so strong no particle can no light particle I believe that's absent of matter or or my my my son even name is called it's called a void uh black hole black hole he called a black void it's an actual nothingness right it's like there's actually just nothing there that's why we see it as a black void because the forces everything's pushing pulling around it just like the eye of the storm right you see the eye of everything down. If you were in it, you would see nothing. And actually, I I love that theory perfectly, honestly. And I wouldn't be surprised to find out that it's real at the end of the day. Um, and this this makes me think about wormholes as well. Okay? Because this is this idea of an Einstein Rosen bridge which would say if we make that that black hole that that space what's really happening is you are creating a bridge between some point there and some other point anywhere else in the universe and that if you were actually somehow to be able to go into that really you're just going through a bridge and that's a shortcut between space and time. Do you think that's possible given your understanding of black holes and what have you? What are your thoughts on Einstein Rose and Bridges? Uh I I doubt that one true but you know I'm now I'm thinking about how about a black void could have that effect. Yeah. Could they I I have not thought about through this you know you may not you know the so-called black hole is still object in the center right just point article particle so you still flying there right if a black void you still have a empty space there right and you still have a force drag them so I'm not exclude that possibility okay I guess the way I would look at it is if the universe is like I guess hard to explain Maybe you know the word for this, but like if I go in one direction in the universe and I just keep going in one direction and I end up back where I was, like if I just after a while, if you look at it like that, then I would say this point black hole cannot exist. Like there cannot be a singularity that goes to nothing that must go and and open up to something else somewhere else. So like I would argue that every black hole if one does exist must have a white hole somewhere else either in our reality or another. Yeah. go through the wormhole, right? First the black hole drag you in, right? To the other side they call the white hole, right? Come out to suck it out. Let me push your uh even further in. And another one is push. So yeah. So based on what you said here, I see no reason why negative energy couldn't exist. Uh because you're saying that magnetism interacting with the medium is like churning up the ether. It's it's it's pulling energy out of the ether and then you can polarize it positively or you can polarize your interaction positively or minus and I would say okay if that's the case then now negative energy would just be how depending on how you polarize it if you consider positive charge negative charge polarized a different way I don't know how the negative energy defined right uh you know conventionally define energy like as positive number right however if you relatively if You you define a different way say relatively uh absolute zero degree right if you define that one it could we could define some energy right below so we so so-called absolute zero could be could be not not not that case so then you could have a different definition I'm not um uh exclude or not confirm but I just just just have a salt you know depends how how you define things yeah so then is Miguel Alubier's warp drive metric consistent with your understanding. I mean, if what you're saying is true and we can manipulate magnetic forces like this, I don't see a reason why we couldn't have infinite acceleration to a point where we would see relativistic faster than light travel. What do you think? I I believe there is no uh speed limit at the speed of light. Actually, speed of light in the cosmic scale is a very very limited finite number. We should you know the reason is um the I believe Albert Einstein posted this called the speed of universe right based on the light in his conceptual light is a capsule you know uh is particle concept if a carp's concept in particle traveling the fastest way is absent of any resistance so so then assuming vacuum is completely absent of any any medium anything Right? So then you you you could say hey if completely vacuum without any resistance materials in that we should have a maximum uh velocity. So that's that extraction to make make believe there's a limit of speed limit of universe. But in in in in yuan case we believe the speed of light is just the called the characteristic velocity of the medium right refractive index. Yes. You can modify you can modify the refractive index then of right if you can change it you can change the density you can change the strength so that's why light speed of light different even in air different than in water in in vacuum or in diamond t in glass right exactly so you do believe then that speed of light is variable I do not believe I I do believe speed light is not the ultimate speed of universe no we we definitely that can faster than speed of light. Have you ever heard of this term dynamic nuclear orientation? Have you heard of that before? Um, if you can define them. Uh, I'm not that basically has to do with manipulating the spin and orbital the spin of electrons. So to line them up. So like imagine that a permanent magnet's just a bunch of electrons that are perfectly lined up kind of like we were talking about before. Um, and that if you could manipulate the each spin of each electron like at the atomic level, if you could do that, the idea is that you could create a repulsive gravity like that just by changing those around you, you could cause your thing to just lift off or move around in any direction. And and to me, the reason why I bring it up is it sounds like your theory. It's like, okay, well, if everything's just a dipole magnet, then you just move you turn turn off the turn like pole together, you can repel, right? Yeah. And then you would use magnetism for that. So that theory that sounds like it could make sense to you. I mean it sounds like you have Yeah, that does not violate anything. uh I want to make sure before end I want to emphasize one thing about uh you know the uh the connection with uh electron we talking about electron moncharged particle does not exist right I would replace that term called the uon u means universal fundamental particle means business magnetic particle right yeah and then yeah go ahead you know sometimes my u my partner that's David Gowski he said sometimes I said hey electron does not exist he said why in the later on you you talking But use the electron term. I said I changed the definition. I said initially I said electron does not exist based on the quantum theory negative charge particle. I said later on I use electron means oh just a magnet. He think I'm confusing. So I I want to make sure I'm going to in instead of say electron I'm going to just yan. Yuan means magnet. And another thing I want to emphasize is significance. If the electron does not exist, a proton does not only you on magnets. What does that mean? That means current atomic model. That's a called a propion motion model would not be true. What that mean? That means entire quantum mechanics builded on top of this nucleus with electron clouds or electron orbitals should not be true should not be there. There's no free rotating electron uh in the clouds or what whatever whatsoever. So that entire model will be out. That means I hate to say that some certain my colleagues they teach in quantum mechanics for almost half of the life they will say are you telling me I'm a lie to my student whole whole career. Well it's a difficult subject. Well you're not ar you're arguing conceptually though right from an exper you're not arguing that the experiments that we've seen around quantum mechanics are flawed. You're saying that we have to look at it through a different lens. It's not this lens of different interpretation. Yeah. Different interpretation of it. Um and that and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I mean to me that's what science is all about. It's about building on previous theories. I mean science has pretty much always been wrong and then improved over history. So I I actually look up to the fact that you are bold enough to say stuff like that like hey look I'm saying quantum mechanics is wrong. You know like in generally in academia people are too afraid to do that because we've got this gatekeep peer reviewview process and if you don't if you go against the grain then you are get shunned by your your colleagues. So thank you for being brave enough to say that. Um there's a few more just a few more last questions on it that I think are pretty quick is um what about phase conjugation? So there was this uh uh I think he was a lieutenant colonel Tom Bearden uh back in like the 80s was talking about this idea of phase conjugation which you take your waves and they perfectly overlap. You can either create amplification so interference patterns so either an amplification effect or a cancellation effect right destructive destructive. Now imagine that I did a destructive event. So I like to use this rubber band analogy. So let's say I take my waves and I I I have them cancel each other out perfectly. So they're perfectly in phase or out of phase 180 degrees out of phase of one another and I say okay I'm going to use one let's say one unit of uh ampl or amplitude on each and then I increase it to two units each. I would say okay standard physics would say both sides are equalizing out. So there's no net force in any direction here. If I increase it to three times there's still no net force in either direction. If I keep pulling on this thing it's going to rip. It's going to snap. Right. So, right. Yeah. The question here is I'm pulling on both sides. Standard physics says there's no net force. Yeah. But why is the rubber band about to break then? You know, uh when when standard physics say no net force reference to the center of the mass you are talking about now you are talking about that's the defamation part. So internal force you know now we come to not talking about in in this called rigid tra like a rigid body you know the right uh so now we're talking about a trade materials as a elastic material have a defamations have a local point the different stress strain so that's why even though balanced however the internal if you cut if you look at the cross-sectional stress inside the rubber band it increase. Well, let me ask this cuz I want to put it in context. Now, imagine that I'm taking two photons, two packets, waves of light, and I'm doing and I'm having them cancel each other out. What's happening there? If I have them completely out of phase of one another and I have destructive interference occurring, what would you say I'm doing physically to reality there? What's occurring? Is is there nothing happening? If two photon we we're talking about two two like a wave. If like a wave you're talking about the say a destructive coherence. So, so that means when they meet meet and then you do not see any any wave motion, right? uh peak and valleys they are cancelled to each other just like a steel uh uh what a perfect calm weather you know look at the surface of the pond right perfect the steel uh yeah that that that's that's when it's very rare happen right however yeah if they are constructive constructive so now you have double you see double the amplitude right and you will see this called a uh wave inter interference pattern Yeah. How is that possible? Because if that's just two waves of light, then I imagine what I just described there is if it's going to be constructive, I would see a bright amplification of light. If it's going to be destructive, I imagine it would just disappear. But like how does that make any sense? Is that true? Actually, actually you just mentioned about that's one mystery. Uh in the double slit experiment, we we see light light cross there, right? Light goes through. We see interference. He said what what happens if we observe the light from the other side when we observe it suddenly they said the pattern disappear that that that episode remember that one right you know how they observe light they shining another light opposite the direction you know what happens they interacted cancel each other and at least break the original interference pattern I'm sorry I I I probably distracted you but you remind me yeah that That's another mystery. Uh when they say that we observe, we measured suddenly uh wave becomes a part what is yeah we would disappeared right becomes a particle. Yeah. I guess what I was getting at was trying to figure out if there might be a connection between these electromagnetic waves we call light and potentially some and the disturbance causing some sort of gravitational effect or some sort of secondord effect. um where and that's kind of what I was getting at because like I'm pointing out with the rubber bands like okay you have the the waves cancel each other out but it's not really that there's nothing there's still this disturbance in the medium we're seeing as the stress right stress and if that material is under stress then maybe that stress is gravity or some other you know second order effect that might be occurring there um and I just thought that kind of pieced together what we were talking about with respect to magnetism and then this you know medium that might be out there do you think Have you ever heard of one electron theory? How many electrons do you think? Oh, I believe maybe 10 years ago or maybe 13 years ago I watched the one one few is that a European is some lead physicist presented that one electron theory. Is that a if there is this energy out there or whatever this you know that we're talking about here that this idea of why does there have to be more than just one like maybe all of space and time is kind of an illusion and then there's just it's really just one electron and it's everywhere at the same time. I just wanted to get your opinions on on that type of idea and the framework of yuan theory. I thought that you know the particle based on our daily uh daily uh experience right the particle just like a one piece of materials and uh one electron to explain entire universe electro phenomena it's a little bit of stretch for me got it what do you think yeah I like the idea but I guess to me it depends on for me it would have to be that space and time is an illusion but I guess I already believe that. So, oh, okay. If you take a very hardline approach to general relativity and you say that we're all in our own little reference frame all the time, like all in our own little bubble, then how big or small does that bubble have to be? It could theoretically be infinitely small. So, maybe, right, everything really is the same and it's all been broken out of some equilibrium. We all come from one tiny little point or something like that. So, I kind of like that idea. The last thought I had on you is is another one that's get starts to get into more esoteric or the fringe aspects of physics which is what do you think about the holographic principle or what do you think about you know the nature of our reality in general and time. Oh okay. Uh at least in in the area I'm study I do not feel there's a uh true need for that theory. So basically use yuan theory magnet can explain everything all the mysteries we have at least I can collect I also you know can explain so I do not feel the needs for that one so if there's no needs for that one so I would leave as a other physicist let them to imagine right I just leave it out for now yeah well uh Dr. you. Thank you so much for your time. Uh I'll go ahead and give you a moment to just shout out any of the projects or anything that you're working on or any other colleagues that you want. Uh but thank you very much for joining me. Go ahead. Okay. I I hope you have my presentation. If you can turn to the very last page and the second last page, if you can open open the uh PowerPoint file I sent to you and I will say um so when is uh my name whipping you? I'm the founder of universal particle theory. I call the uon theory of everything and try to uh interpret the entire universe use one particle one fundamental force and the one field one universe um and uh simply to explain that one uh and also I want to acknowledge my uh if you're looking for additional information you can look at the website called a neighborschoice.com uh that's my partner He's the host of the a a a neighborchoice.com website and the podcast and also radio show and I'm he's a co-host for the for the part of the that show is called science and the U program. Awesome. Well, thank you Dr. I know I'll be checking it out and thank you everybody for watching another episode of Hard Truths Podcast. I hope you enjoyed and I hope you learn some new physics. Till next time. Later everybody.