Video Transcript
Now, what I really wanted to talk about tonight was some more teleportation concepts. I started looking into the AC halt scientific papers. Now, let me share my windows over here with you guys. I started looking into these scientific papers. I found this one, space station technology test bed, which kind of has to do with like sending materials into space to build things in outer space, which I thought was pretty neat. And this is another AC Holt scientific paper. Uh, now when I got to the bottom of it, started looking through the references and look who I found here. Look at these references in these papers. Now we're starting to recognize these scientific papers. Look at this. Friedwart Winterberg. Thermonuclear rocket propulsion by confinement and heating of fusion plasmas. There it is. 1991. He's referencing Friedwart Winterberg right there. Can the world get any smaller? All our black project scientists, our S tier, our S tier black project scientists are showing up in references for AC hole where he's talking about wormholes and uh future propulsion technologies back in the 80s and 90s. Now look at this one. Anti-roton annihilation propulsion by Robert Forward. Robert Forward is Eric W. Davis's mentor. These were the other two that I thought were very interesting. Look at this one. Synretron radiation considerations in the dense plasma focus DPF magnetoplasma dynamic thruster for the air force research labs right there. literally referencing the dense plasma focus which is the precursor if not the exact technology we're seeing in the orbs in the MH370 base. It's a dense plasma uh fusion reactor. And then look at the very next paper. The very next paper is forcefree timeh harmonic plasmoids. And I don't even have to read the citation because I know Jack Nachamkin of the Air Force Research Labs wrote that scientific paper too because I reviewed it like a year ago. And the forcefree time harmonic plasmods was basically trying to figure out how to mess around with your electric and magnetic fields and make them parallel so that you get this weird forcefree vector analysis thing going on in your plasma. Basically, how to make a stabilized plasmoid. I think I have some clips here that I want to pull out. I didn't get this all ready to go ahead of time, guys. So, give me a second here. Oh, here's some more. Here's David Froining right here. So, this source right here is David Frroning. I can tell field propulsion for future flight. Here's Edward Teller referenced right here. And look at what he's referencing right here. In this Edward Teller paper, he's referencing space propulsion by fusion and magnetic dipole. That right there is the first, maybe not the first, one of the first field reverse configuration scientific papers that we could find. And it's by Edward Teller of the Manhattan Project. Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb. There you go. And then look at this. If you thought that was enough, there's more. There's a paper by George Hathaway. It's basically a who's who of Hal Pudof's friends right here in these citations. It's a who's who of Hal Pudof's friends. George Hathaway from anti-gravity to zero point energy. A technical review of advanced propulsion concepts. So guys, I'm starting to get a feeling. I'm starting to feel like I I kind of think this might be the MJ12. Well, I think we're looking at the JSONs here. Like if you're listed as an author in here, there's a pretty good chance that you're in the MJ12 and the JSON or whatever you want to call it. This was the combined paper between AC Holt and Hal Pudof and Eric Davis. I don't think I went over this guys on Monday, right? I don't think so. I'm starting to get confused because I think I looked over it after the live stream. Okay, we're going to come back to that other paper in a second, guys. Bigger fish to fry. Here we go. Okay, couple parts of this that I want to show. This was from the previous paper where I was just showing you all those references. This paper, how do you know this paper is legit? Because it's explaining the physics of the orbs. It's explaining the science that we've been going over. Now, listen to this. The idea was deep space transport for 2010. What would deep space transport look like in 2010? Now, what does it say right here? Nuclear and field interactive propulsion systems. Nuclear propulsion is clearly the next critical step in space propulsion. The term nuclear propulsion is used here in the broad sense and could cover particle and anti-particle energy conversion as well as advanced fish and fusion systems. So what they're saying here is again right off the bat nuclear power is just a nebulous term referring to the atom. So when people say nuclear it can refer to fishision systems, it can refer to fusion systems. So when they say nuclear power, you should say what kind of nuclear power. While nuclear fish fusion should be a viable candidate for 2010 spacecraft that was 15 years ago, the nuclear propulsion system is not dependent upon a fusion system being available. Nuclear propulsion in the sense described is still a big step behind the propulsion which will be needed to ensure a viability of outposts and colonies in the solar system and to eventually leave our solar system. Field interactive propulsion is a generic term covering a wide variety of electromagnetic nuclear and gravitational field dependent propulsion types. These could range from nuclear fusion MHD propulsion systems to exotic systems which screen or distort the gravitational field or jump across the space-time barrier. Both MHD propulsion types are utilized in this concept. The deep space transport uses blah blah blah. So there's the this might be the first reference I've ever seen to MHD propulsion. This might be it right here. I I mean, we're I think we're looking at the guys that developed this stuff. So, if we can find earlier references than 1998 where we're talking about nuclear MHD fusion propulsion, there you go. Right there. Nuclear MHD fusion propulsion systems. You can see it right here in this part of the paper. This paper is like when they were doing the NASA breakthrough physics propulsion lab. It wasn't even until 2005 that Frank me and George Miley and David Frroning wrote the dense plasma uh focus paper. That wasn't even until 2005. Now take a look at this next part. Protective shielding and systems. New types of protective shielding and systems are needed to improve radiation protection and protection from micrometeorites. The new shielding is expected to evolve from electromagnetically enhanced composits or microengineered materials. They're talking about metamaterials before metamaterials was even a term, before metamaterials was even a word. Some of the shielding required could be a byproduct of the field interactive propulsion system. So remember, our orbs are a magnetic field and the plasma is being contained. So you can imagine if something hits your orb, it's just going to flow around the orb because of the the force of the magnetic fields. But right, what does it say right after that? Active protection systems such as free electron laser system would be included to better deal with all types of potential collision systems. Systems which incorporated direct energy soluton resonance effects are also assumed to be utilized. Wow. Free electron lasers. Now slightly changing the topic going jumping over to a different scientific paper that gets referenced in many others. So when I started looking through that scientific paper the one that uh is Hal Pudof Eric Davis and AC Holt I find references to this scientific paper by Eric W. Davis, which I had seen and but I don't think I had read entirely. Interstellar travel by means of wormhole induction propulsion by Eric W. Davis. Okay, that's what this paper is called. Interstellar means wormhole induction propulsion. Okay, where where's my thing? And this paper is from I think also 1998. Says 2011, but it's actually predates 2011. And I think that's just like the update date for the scientific paper. There's a there's like a much earlier date on this particular scientific paper. Now, let me explain something because I've heard I've been hearing Sal Py's voice in the back of my head for the last three days. There's three ways to look at making our wormhole. Number one, we are simply making a big boom, nuclear boom boom. and big nuclear boom boom causes warp warp to happen. Okay, that's one way to look at it. Another way to look at it is that we can amplify the effects and when we hit this this limit once we hit this limit all of a sudden things invert things invert and now we can just begin to suck free energy out of our environment. So you have the the classical view of looking at things. You have the I guess semiclassical view of looking at things where we would say that electromagnetism can hit this peak but once it hits this peak then everything breaks down. Then physics breaks down then the swinger limit collapses. Well there's a third option. So I've basically been talking about this idea of the second option where we hit this peak and once we break through reality now physics doesn't obey the same laws anymore and now we can get infinite energy. The third option is maybe there's a shortcut. Maybe there's a way to bring the swinger limit down so that we can cause like a fold. Like basically we're we're pulling up the carpet. We're lifting up the carpet. We want to go make a tunnel underneath the carpet. And the carpet is our universe, our reality. Maybe there's a way where we can efficiently cause a little bit of a bubble in spaceime without this huge amount of energy requirement. The scientific paper that I'm about to show you right now by Eric W. Davis essentially argues that the only way to get the energy density required to manipulate spaceime for a measurable effect is thermonuclear weapons. Boom. chat 1998. Here it is. Eric W. Davis talking about how much energy or magnitude of Tesla would be required. How much Tesla aka magnetic field flux would be required to produce a wormhole or space-time distortion. And here you have it. The amount of Tesla that's required is extremely massive. The big moment. Here's the the clip for you guys here. I'll read it for you to clip it up. It will be necessary to consider advancing state-of-the-art magnetic induction technologies in order to reach static field strengths that are greater than 10^ the 9 tesla. That's really, really big. Extremely sensitive measurements of C at one part in 10 to the 6 or 10 the 7 level may be necessary for lab experiments involving field strategies field strengths. Magnetic induction technologies based on nuclear explosives/implossives may be may need to be seriously considered in order to achieve the magnitude of the results. Boom. There it is. I've been saying that it's it should be obvious that they figured out space-time manipulation and nuclear weapons. It's the only type of research that will ever get measurable effects. Even Eric Davis is saying, "Look at how sensitive you have to be. You need your your speed of light measurements to be one part in 10 to the six." That's really sensitive. So people say, "Why don't you show it to me? Show model this up. You want me to model up a thermonuclear weapon? Cuz that's what it takes. What does it take to prove space-time effects on the large scale? It takes thermonuclear weapons. And now that I've read this by Eric W. Davis, now we know why Eric W. Davis knows about thermonuclear weapons. Because when they were once upon a time, people were considering, hey, how do we test Einstein's relativity? And I guarantee you the physicist in the room said, "Let's set off some nukes. Let's set off some nukes." Just think about it. That's the very first thing somebody would say is that, "Hey, we're looking for the highest energy density effects that are possible." Well, what are those? They're nukes. And by the way, here's the chart. It's not even close. It's not even close. superc conductivity and pulseed magnets which we've been considering to be the best things that only gets you up to 300 Tesla. We need 10 to the 9 Tesla as in 10 with nine zeros after it. So when you start to look at the magnitude of the scale that's required, this is the reason why people are saying the effects are too small. You're never gonna get this with magnets. So now I can put the pieces together, the magnets and the lasers and all that That's just for the orbs. That's just for the plasma orbs. That's just to have fusion on a tiny scale to make a tiny basically microscopic black hole at the center of your plasma orb so that you can have a stabilized plasma orb that can produce energy just so that you can make your fish your non-fish trigger so that you can zap an airplane away. So what we're looking at is we're looking at the scaling up of this technology is that at one level you've got the magnets and you've got the lasers, the high-powered lasers that are needed to produce the fusion orbs, the fusion propulsion mechanism. But if you want to actually warp something, you want to warp it through spaceime, an object like a Boeing trip 7, you need to use the compact fusion reactors as the non-fishing triggers in a thermonuclear weapon. What a wormhole really is is a hyper cylinder with throat geometries patched together. Here it is. A traversible wormhole throat is then induced near the spacecraft where the hyper cylinder and the throat geometries are patched together. This is so crazy. Watch very closely in this video, chat. Watch very closely. What is a hyper cylinder? Great question. A hyper cylinder is an extradimensional cylinder. So you can think and I had to ask this question as well. Imagine a hyper cylinder as a tube that goes through an extra dimension. So you have your mouth over here, right? So what we're saying is we've got our airplane, Malaysian airplane, right? It's flying along and we've got a mouth over here. The orbs create a mouth over here and they're creating a tube, an invisible tube, the hyper cylinder, an invisible tube. And what's happening is they're cutting and pasting this part, one end of the tube with the other end of the tube. They're they're basically cutting and pasting it and reprinting it over here. And it's connected by an invisible tube through hyperspace. And this is exactly what I wanted you to ask because look at what the plane is doing. The plane is turning in this video. It's making a sharp turn. This is a non-standard left turn this plane is making in this video. And look at the wing. You can see that the plane is on its side from the angle of the footage. But watch closely. The plane levels out. The plane levels out right about begins to level out right about here. Plane starts leveling out right now. And by the time the before the orbs even change direction, the plane is leveled out and is no longer turning left anymore. It's no longer making the sharp left turn. Now the orbs begin to spin vertically. The plane is flying directly straight now. The plane is flying straight now. Why did they make this turn? Why level out? The plane is flying really low to the ocean. Why are they leveling out like that at a few thousand feet? That plane is being teleported backwards. What is a hyper cylinder? The reason why the orbs are spinning vertically around the plane is because they're sending the plane backwards in a hyperscylinder just like Eric Davis is saying in that paper. They're spinning vertical because they're literally doing a cut and paste. They're creating a wormhole that connects this point over here through a hyper cylinder to another point over here.