Weapons of Time

Video Transcript

# Weapons of Time Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest [music] can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority. [music] When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline. Unable to [music] distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. [music] The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content and the enormously influential media. [music] The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest common denominator programming, [music] credulous presentations on pseudocience and superstition, but especially a kind of [music] celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those were [music] among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he [music] was trying to tell us back then. >> Ashton Forbes, you know that super jacked guy. Malaysian 370 contact switch 120 decimal 9. Good night. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with [music] 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [music] >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese [music] government, >> why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. >> What an distance [music] annihilated. >> This country is very powerful. >> Far more powerful than people understand. [music] We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. I remember the [music] line from Hindu scripture [music] is trying to persuade the prince that [music] he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multiarmed form and says now I am become death the destroyer worlds. [music] I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> And [music] here we go. Wow. Hello everybody. Welcome to the live stream, guys. Yes, Lulu is in the picture. OMG's chat. We will see how long it lasts, guys. Thank you for being here. Uh tonight we are talking about weapons of war or weapons of time. Weapons of time that Obama used on MH370. Uh and in that uh the primary focus is going to be on Salvador Pais's interview with Tim Ventur today. If you didn't already see it, well, you're going to watch the main highlights from it uh tonight. Um and in that, we have to have the most important thing ready, guys. We have to have our salads. OMG. Get your salads geared up. Now, if you are new to this idea of manipulating spacetime, let me begin by saying this is what's not angled right. Okay. Let me begin by saying that all of these engineers and scientists that have come up with warp drives and these ideas that we think of as science fiction propulsion concepts, they're all based on the same physics. It's all based on the idea of taking Einstein's equations and taking it to their extreme. And thank you very much for the salad emojis in the chat. These are very important if you want to understand these equations. You must make sure that you're eating salad. We're going to make sure that the salad meme becomes a thing. Hold on. I have it now. Oh, you know what? I should put salad next to the right quote because I have so many now of these. Here it is. Ready? [snorts] The famous salad interview. >> We we already know and a lot of other physicists know that Einstein proved that gravity is not a fundamental force of nature. which emerges from the fabric of spaceime when it's distorted or curved or bent. And Sakura, >> dude, duh. Duh. We all know this >> that gravity is an emergent force that comes from it's a pressure force from the fabric of space. So it's not its own primordial force like the other forces. So when we understand this, what is the thing that we need for this to make sense? We need to understand that spacetime is a thing. That spacetime has a pressure to it. And just like in a refractive index change, if this material over on this side is of a different density than this material over here, we can do the same thing with spacetime and gravity. That's what Eric Davis is saying right here. >> He believed that the metric elasticity of space. Aarov, by the way, BTW, the guy you're seeing right here, is the Russian physicist that helped develop the fusion bomb for Russia. Turns out all the people that were theorizing about space-time manipulation were also the people that were developing fusion bombs. Wow. In the future, it's probably just going to seem obvious, but in 2025, 2026, now we're still idiots. So, give us a little bit of slack. Okay. described by the space-time metric which is just a very simple equation actually >> and uh he said that should come from the quantum vacuum fluctuations because he sees the quantum vacuum fluctuations as being the seed of all existence and he was right uh basically that started from Richard Fineman when he got the Nobel Prize for the quantum electronamics theory gravity is not a force of nature it emerges from space-time phenomenon the space-time manifold or the continuum however you want to describe it and It's a coupling constant measures the strength of the interaction force between particles. The coupling constant in general relativity is is the universal gravitational constant times uh 8 pi / the speed of light to the fourth power. You know what the units of that are? 1 over force one over newtons. >> That's right. >> And that's a coupling constant to convert the dimensional units of the stress energy tension which is the source of space-time curvature. That's in units of jewels per cubic meter or energy density or pressure because an equivalent is newtons per square meter. Energy density is pressure. I could only understand that energy density manifests a pressure force known as gravity in our spaceime. Only makes sense if there's an extra dimension and our spaceime is an actual thing, not an empty vacuum. Hope you had your salads ready. Hope you absorbed that information. Even us normies, even Lulu. Lulu, what do you think? Yeah, you agree. Space time's not on an empty vacuum. You see that passive that passive look she has right there? Just staring me in the eyes. She's saying plasma universe chat. Very obvious. Very obvious. Okay, next [snorts] clip. Uh, which one was I gonna play? This is what we used to have, chat. This is what we used to have here. Hold on. Where is it? Yeah, here it is. There's a whole Veritassium video about wormholes, black holes, Schwarz child radius going faster than light. And it made me think, we're going to get political. It made me think, Ashton, we're about to get political as [ __ ] [snorts] Why? Because society kind of just sucks today. Nobody does anything. Somehow I'm quasi famous and all I do is read other people's scientific papers in a very sarcastic tone most of the time. And I go between black pilling people and Chad pilling people alternatively on a daily basis. And somehow people watch. But in the old days, people used to do stuff. People used to do things, research stuff. Listen to this gigachad response back and forth between Albert Einstein and Schwarzchild when Schwarz literally took all he did was took Albert Einstein's equations and said, "Oh, hold up. Let me just math this out. Let me just visualize this and math this out real quick." Which, by the way, we call the radius of the black hole, the Schwarz child radius because he was able to take and visualize Einstein's equations and figure out the event horizon of a black hole. I think it's event horizon, right? Yeah. Here we go. And closer to it, spacetime becomes more and more curved. It attracts objects in and time runs slower. >> We got to be careful here not to get copyright strike by these big boys. Schwarz Shield sent his solution to Einstein, concluding with, "The war treated me kindly enough in spite of the heavy gunfire to allow me to get away from it all and take this walk in the land of your ideas." Okay, hold up. So, just to start right there, my man is just in the middle of the war, World War, and he's like, "Hey, I'm taking gunfire, but you know what? I took a look at General Relativity." I was like, "Hey, I got finished uh killing some commies, and I took a look at General Relativity. And it turns out looks pretty legit. Looks pretty legit. And I went ahead and did some math for you. And here you go. Have some math. What a badass thing to do. Here we go. Einstein replied, I have read your paper with the utmost interest. I had not expected that one could formulate the exact solution to the problem in such a simple way. But what seemed at first, so he comes back and he's got his equation laid out and his equation basically says, "Oh, let's just simplify this whole thing." He says, "Let's imagine an empty void." And we're going to put just one point source mass. It doesn't matter how big it is. Doesn't matter how big it is because there's nothing else and everything's relative. So, we'll give it one unit and we'll have it sitting there and I'll imagine I will visualize what that would look like from the outside observer's perspective. And he writes the equation out for imagine me looking at the object. Right? We're going to turn sideways here. Look at our object. He says, "As you would get closer and closer to this object, you would experience more and more of this space-time curvature, more and more of this gravity that Einstein talks about." And here's the equation that represents that change, that visualization of that. Oh, Einstein just says, "Wow, didn't expect you could write something so elegant, so simply." We used to be a society. We used to be a society and now now we've got woke people breaking into churches. They got caravans of people awkwardly honking behind federal officers doing their sworn duty, arresting criminals. I don't even know what the world is anymore. I truly don't. And I don't know if it's right or wrong to tell people about this technology and this science. Sometimes I think the bad guys are right. Sometimes I think the deep state is right to keep it hidden. [snorts] But let's dig into it first. Um, Eric Davis last live stream before we get into the Salvador Pis interview with Tim Venturo. Uh, we Eric Davis mentioned that he and Hal Pudof had worked underneath a VP of Lheed Martin who was in the program. We use the program to talk about the UFO crash retrieval program, reverse engineering program. It's kind of a nebulous term. They don't really lock down exactly what it means. They just say the program as if it's a special club or something like that. Anyway, we found out who the VP is. Lulu, are we boring you? You don't like Loheed Martin engineers? Okay, you chill then. the Yeah, she's super cute, but also very, very deadly. Not a joke. Don't mess around with Lulu. She will bite you. Um, the Loheed Martin engineer in question is James Ryder. James Ryder. Grock was able to figure it out. And you know, I would say 99.9% sure it's got to be this guy because Eric Davis is giving a lot of contextual clues, which by the way, AI is getting pretty good because if you give it enough contextual clues and there's enough resources available, it's going to figure out the answer to the question, something like that. And it figured it out within a few seconds. So James Ryder h interesting guy. One of the things that he had been I asked AI to tell me all of the projects that he's been associated with and his background perfectly fits for all of this electromagnetic technology of course um but his career goes way back and one of the things he's involved with is the THAAD missile defense system which is where we are able to shoot incoming ICBMs which stands for intercontinental ballistic missile uh out of the air intercept them and intercept hypersonics And the AI goes on to expand and say that the program uh has now been incorporated to take on hypersonics, which is interesting because even a few years ago, I think that would have been extremely controversial where people still thought the United States didn't have hypersonics, which now of course we know we have we have hypersonics. [snorts] So, um let me take a look at the Gro thing here. I'll pull it up. Here we go. [snorts] So, James Ryder [clears throat] 38 year career locked Martin uh retired in 2011. some of the things that he worked on. Uh, Air Force materials labor. Oh, yeah. He's a specialist in material science, which is kind of a weird thing. Before all of this, I wouldn't have known what material science really meant. But now I know that's all about like, you know, it could be anything from microchips to metamaterials actually chemistry of metamaterials which are used in thermonuclear weapons. Um, absolutely. So, uh, where is why did this not Oh, here's There we go. So, some of the projects he worked on was the L1011 Tristar aircraft, which was the last commercial aircraft. Here's a question for you. I do want to talk about glitter. I don't know if we're going to get time to talk about it today, but I think we understand that that uh conspiracy, too. We're going to uncover like several conspiracies, real conspiracies. The Tristar was the last commercial aircraft. Loheed Martin stopped building aircraft for the public back in the 80s. 1984 was the last one. So, it's like they just let Boeing have that industry. They said they don't really even want to compete. F-22 Raptor, uh, fleet ballistic missiles program. So a lot of this is pretty normal but here is is the THAAD terminal high altitude area defense contributed to engineering materials for the missile defense system which intercepts short medium and intermediate range ballistic missiles. Now why is this important? Why am I bringing this up? This is actually relevant to everything else. AI targeting and intercepting capabilities in three-dimensional space. That is very relevant, very relevant for space-time manipulation. Not just for targeting, for something like the orbs that have to intercept an object, but also to determine where your where you're going to send your object. Because we're not talking about just sending an object now in our threedimensional space in four dimension now just in our threedimensional space. We're talking about possibly sending something in our three-dimensional space and incorporating the extra dimension, the time dimension. And I would have previously said we are jumping the gun. We can't possibly ask this question yet. We don't even know what the nature of quantum mechanics is and how it combines with general relativity. But then we saw an airplane get zapped out of the sky and teleported. And it didn't look like any [ __ ] that I had ever seen before in my life. [snorts] Here it is again. Because really, this should be on the front page of the Times, but it's not. You're watching a literal wormhole. Jesus, man. Watch how it opens and closes here. See how it like expands in this next frame? Get ready for it. And then it gets like small again. Look at that. And then it's just gone. That's what a real wormhole looks like because your object's just not there anymore. Now it's somewhere else. Now it's in a different location somewhere. So we can talk about it. And the question the question that we haven't said is what does this mean and where is it showing up? And I don't mean where is the plane like what people always ask me. >> [snorts] >> I mean, what time did that plane show up on the other side? It's one thing to say, we've got our object over here, and this object's going to appear over here. But the better question, smart, the high IQ people don't ask that. The highest IQ people ask when did the plane show up. Not where, when, because that tells us the answer to the missing piece that we don't know right now. Just to get you caught up, what do I mean by this? I mean that if you were able to teleport an object from one side of my screen to the other side of my screen, what looks like instantaneous from our perspective, the real question is how much of a delay, how much of a delay is there between doing that, even if it looks like it's faster than light from my perspective, from a proper time perspective, how much time elapsed and can you control it. Can you control it? Because if you can control if I can say this is this is for you, Obama. I dedicated this salad to Eric W. Davis. Caesar salad, of course. Holy crap. Cobb salad's appropriate, but not not the best. Um, if I can make this plane teleport, disappear on this side. The question is, how long is it in this limbo before it reappears over here? This is the part that bug should bug everybody. Should bug everybody out there. My mind would say it just should just like reappear instantly. But the the portal the the wormhole we saw wasn't instant. It was very fast, but that wormhole was at least three frames. At least three frames. So it was a fraction of a second. So some time is elapsing. Now the question is if you can control that. If you can make this side disappear but control the path while it's hidden down here. It's moving around. You don't see it but it's moving around down here. And then all of a sudden it just appears over here because why does it matter when it reappears once you've displaced from spaceime? Does it really matter when it appears on the other side? And if you can engineer that, oh boy, we got a problem, chat. If you can engineer that, you've created the most powerful weapon there is. [snorts] What's the most precious thing we have is time. So, if you can manipulate time, if you can change events, here's the the the rub. This is the big thing [snorts] for today. Moral of the story for today, guys, 20 minutes in is this. Even if we cannot go to the past, even if I can't send my whole body to the past to the previous state of entropy in the universe, even if you can just send a message, even if you could just send one word, that would be able to be a ripple effect that change everything. Imagine imagine going back to the time of the cavemen and saying fire. That's it. It's all you say. If you could send one word back and you just say fire to the caveman and that stimulates them to think, what did he mean by fire? What did he mean by fire? And then they produce it and it makes sense. And that over the course of many eons, decades, generations, uh, millennia, that eventually leads to where we're at now. Because what I'm thinking is this. Maybe John Kramer is right, but maybe S is right, too. Like maybe there are loophole ways where we can communicate retroactively without violating causality. Remember what the answer was the other day? This should also bug people. The answer to the paradox, the grand, you know, the grandma paradox or whatever is if you were to go back in time and then now, you know, you go back in time, well, you decide that you're just, you know, you uh you know, what stops you from, you know, killing your grandparents or whatever and make it so you could never exist. [snorts] The answer is because you didn't do that. You already know. History's already been written. Your history's already been written that allowed you to exist. So, you know, you don't go back and kill your parents. So if you go back in time, you don't go back and kill your parents or your grandparents. We already know that. What if that's just the answer? The answer to going back in time is you can do anything that doesn't change what's already happened. And if that seems weird, then you ob you didn't go back in time. If you didn't if if you didn't see yourself in the past, you didn't go back in time and see yourself. Anyway, I've rambled on enough. The James Ryder thing, I mean, this guy, you know, he's got the highest level of security and he worked on the SR71 Blackbird. So, yeah, I'm sure he knows 100%. There's nothing that was like super incriminating here, but I thought the THAAD missile defense thing was pretty interesting, especially to see the improvements here. says right here 2026 uh we've got all these THAD things in uh different nations and they can intercept missiles really really really effectively. So this is probably the same kind of technology intercepting and like whatever they use to track this stuff. Um that's probably the same kind of technology that they're using in the orbs to vector the orbs. It doesn't even necessarily have to be AI or AGI for the orbs. It can just be normal computers, but who knows? Okay. >> [sighs] >> Okay, Salvatore Py. Um, let's start. He starts by talking about this idea of a cyclical universe. Uh, and that we should mimic what we see in nature. And he presents a very elegant idea that is what if nature has already created a super intelligence. He says if given enough time plasma may be able to be conscious. If that's true, something like the sun or something we don't really think of as possibly being conscious could become conscious and that might manifest itself in ways that seem foreign to us. So if this is the case, then there may be a super intelligence that's already out there. Not going to get too metaphysical here, but it could be that we are that super intelligence as well or we are a piece of that super intelligence. And he also speaks to this idea of a cyclical universe. Now the earliest physicists we previously thought there might be a big crunch. This idea that the universe expands and contracts in this cycle. Everything in duality, waves, cycles. The same way where when we first theorized black holes, we also theorized white holes. One in, one out. Which is why it should not be very surprising to connect the idea of a wormhole to a black hole. Perhaps it is either the very same thing or uh an analogy for this for uh or it can be manipulated. so that you do not have uh the event horizon crush our object. [sighs] So, let me play this first clip with Salvatore Puse. Actually, I'm going to start a couple minutes earlier. Here we go. [snorts] Now if you consider this the engineering of this idea truly gives rise to temporal weapons weapons of time which when designed developed and fielded would prove highly disruptive to the arsenals of nation. Imagine the ability to win all wars even before those wars are fought. >> So s let me jump in here real quick. I did research as well. I was going through everything that you sent me before the interview and I got completely turned around and so I had to do a bunch of research and I thought, you know what, if I'm lost, the audience will be lost. So, I tried to come up with some quick translations here. The Schwinger limit that you're talking about is basically the spark gap of the vacuum. And in everyday life, a strong enough electric field can rip electrons off atoms to create a spark. Now, the Schwinger limit is the vacuum version of that. If the field gets intense enough and it has to be incredibly intense, empty space becomes unstable and can convert field energy into real matter as electron positron pairs. So you get these high energy gamma rays, high energy like interactions like that and it literally creates matter. It creates these pairs of electrons and posetrons out of the vacuum. So the vacuum itself stops being a passive stage for other things to act on and starts behaving like an active medium. So that's that's the swinger limit part of it. And so [clears throat] he did a really good job right there. This is very important is that early on I didn't know if S believed in 0 point energy or the ether. But now I know for sure it's just a matter of conceptual viewpoint. S saying that spacetime is this medium and if you get to these high energy levels, energy density specifically, then all of a sudden spacetime will get begin to break down and you will have these posetron these uh uh particle antiparticle pairs will get produced in the form of light out of the ether out of the vacuum out of spaceime. So that's the Schwinger limit. So there is a limit because we think of spaceime as being this infinite. It can absorb infinite energy density. But you get to a certain energy density and it just you've hit the limit. You've hit the wall. You've hit the ceiling. Can't get over it, guys. Can't cannot get over that ceiling. Okay, that was important to state. Here we go. Oh, and then also right I mean there at the beginning he says if you have weapons of time this could potentially allow you to win all wars forever Edge of Eternity's chat or uh Edge of Tomorrow Edge of Tomorrow Tom Cruz great movie but that's the whole premise the premise of the movie in Edge of uh tomorrow is that the aliens have the ability to see the future. to have the ability to see the future and Tom Cruz's character is immune to it in the form and what that represents itself as is whenever he dies he comes back to life and the only reality that's the true reality is the one where he stays alive all the time quite interesting to think about because manipulating time is going to start to get pretty weird it's going to start to get pretty weird and what Sal's saying here then is there must be some way to do it. There must be some way to pull it off. We don't want to enlighten our enemies, but somehow we can we can manipulate time into some level of degree and there may be some way to send a message and who knows maybe in the future we will be able to you know actually travel through time. Now going forward is easy. Honestly, going forward is trivial. No one even argues that. We're really talking about retrocausality here. Future impacting the past. That's the the mind trip that everybody wants to know about. Okay, let's keep going. Here we go. And the part that you were talking about, what you're speculating about is um in Einstein's picture, energy and pressure don't just sit there, they gravitate. So if you could concentrate and shape extreme energy densities in a very controlled region, you're not only doing quantum vacuum effects, you may also be affecting space-time geometry. Right. So absolutely to the point of breaking ripping the space-time fabric itself at the quantum level which would mean creating a void within the quantum vacuum. >> This is what Frroning was talking about when he talked about um as you know David Frroning good friend of Paul Murad a good friend of U God what was his name? Uh him and I had a conversation when I was working for the USPTO. Um Ferris Williams very interesting man. Wow. I I'm working on a story. [clears throat] Um, what what what did I what did I just hear right there? Sorry, hold on. I I feel like I must have misheard the words that just came out of S's mouth. Sorry. who the US PTO sorry what >> vacuum this is what Frroning was talking about when he talked about um as you know David Frroning good friend of Paul Murad a good friend of U God what was his uh him and I had a conversation when I was working for the USPTO um Ferris Williams very interesting man >> I'm actually working on a story about Ferris right now yeah a very interesting man indeed one um >> wait Hold up. So, first thing Sal says in that the f first part of that clip is he's saying you can't just take energy. Einstein's equations require energy to be doing something. They require it to be moving around. They require this energy density. It's not just not just energy because that's nothing. It's got to be doing something relative to something else. And then he says, this is what David Frroning was saying. David Frroning, that's one of the engineers where I was talking about. And he says all of a sudden, I don't think Sal me brought this up. Brings up that he's had a chat with Ferris Williams. When didn't Ferris Williams die in like 2013? Didn't he die in like 2013? Was it his warp drive paper published in like 2016? this patent. Look, I'm just asking basic timeline questions here. Just asking basic timeline questions cuz holy crap, what is happening? Like, so S was directly connected to these engineers that we've been talking about. It wasn't just Hal Pudof and Eric Davis and Jay Stratton or whatever like [ __ ] blocking him in his engineering thing like he was communicating and talking to these other people. Paul Morad, Paul Morad, David Froonian, [snorts] Ferris Williams. Okay, if you guys have been not following my content, I don't blame you. It's fine. But you're missing out. Ferris Williams is the guy that corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations sometimes. Chat, remember when I said like a year ago that humanity is kind of [ __ ] Like the answers are just kind of sitting there and nobody's really awake enough to just even look. Shouldn't shouldn't it be kind of interesting that a guy corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations and then he was like, "Oh, I don't think I don't think these people know anything about physics." I wish I was making this up. He's like, "I don't think these people know anything about physics. I'm going to come up with my own theory since these people don't know how to do math." Now, what is it that he added? He added an extra dimension, five dimensions instead of four. Because why? Because your energy can't just be the amount of energy is great, but you need the energy moving around the pressure. The energy causes the energy density. Because if you were to pressure, put pressure on your energy, you're increasing the energy density. If you expand, you're reducing it. Now imagine a balloon and putting a weight on a balloon. Okay. Sorry, S. Continue, please, with telling us your uh story about Ferris Williams that you never told us about before. Let me just rewind it a little bit. Now, he's just bringing up Ferris Williams after Ashton discovers that Ferris Williams was working on clean fusion reactors and warp drives and his own 5D theory, dynamic theory. And Ashton says, let's just I don't know this for a fact, but I know this to be the case. Ferris Williams didn't squeal. He saw the nuclear calculations and he that information was still secret and classified to this day. Ferris Williams. Let's see what S has to say about him. It's pretty short but sweet. >> Conversation when I was working for the USPTO. Um Ferris Williams. Very interesting man. Wow. >> I'm actually working on a story about Ferris right now. Yeah. >> Yeah. A very interesting man indeed. One um one of our best I I believe he he had a great deal of nuclear weapon secrets that he took to his grave among other things. But yeah, >> I have an anecdote about Ferris. >> His dynamic theory is quite interesting to say the least. He actually pointed me to Paul Murad when I sent him my first my so-called first paper that took me four and a half years to uh to publish called conditional possibility of spacecraft propulsion at super lumininal speeds. My goodness, what I went through it is again exactly what you've noticed them extremely hard to publish especially if you're not one of them. >> You know, as as George Collins said, it's a big club and you're not part of it. [laughter] >> Yeah. Unfortunately. Yeah. >> Yeah. But you know the the other quote I keep repeating. >> Holy crap. It's a big club and you're not part of it. Wow. And then S talks about how hard it is to get published which of course it's super hard to get published. That paper conditional possibility of spacecraft propulsion at super luminal speeds Salvatore Py 2015. That's two years after one to two years after Ferris Williams died, right? 2013. Is that when he died? Hold on. It's just basic math I'm doing here. Hold on. Uh yeah, it must be sometime around that. He didn't die from a car accident, did he? No, he died in Doesn't say. Weird. That's pretty weird. Oh, December 11th, 2014. December 11th, 2014. So S had sent Ferris Williams that how did S even know about Ferris Williams and he says the dynamic theory is very interesting of course because the dynamic theory fits perfectly within what Salvatore Py has been talking about. There needs to be an extra dimension for this warp drive stuff to work. Heck for maybe all of it to work. Fusion reactor for sure. Maybe even super conductivity. I don't know. We don't superconductivity is something that we try to just describe and imagine but we our visualization of it is Cooper pairs forming whatever I don't know doesn't make a lot of sense to me so he's a fan of Ferris Williams spoke to him and Ferris Williams connected him to Paul Morad Paul Morad is Paul Morad still alive one of these guys got to talk right like the other thing I want point out is that there is clearly when he said there's a big club and you're not in it. Again, it doesn't matter if you have the truth on your side. That's just not how the world works. You can't get published if you don't have the right academic credentials. And in some cases, if you're not even talking about the right stuff, you can't get published. Um, and these guys that have this that know about this, they are not going to talk. They have been well compensated. And it's not just a matter of like ego. In fact, I don't even think that's a driving factor, but it may be for some of them. Some of them probably do like the fact they know and other people don't know. But for most of them, probably a combination of this is just how the world works and I'm being well compensated and I don't want to risk my family. And those motivations are powerful enough to hide anything. Nuclear weapons, fusion bombs, space-time manipulation. Heck, even free energy. Even free energy, guys. Okay, let's go to the next segment here. So, let's skip ahead a little bit and let's go ahead to like 40 minutes here. Let's go somewhere in the middle here. I can't remember what they talk about here. Travel and energy and changing the world, you know, and it does seem like >> yeah, things have things have become >> yeah, more challenging. Although that being said, you know, when you look at it from another perspective, I mean, look at what's going on with AI today and look how that's empowering people like yourself and I. >> Speaking of which, speaking of which, again, going back to weapons of time, it is our Secretary of War, Beat Hex, that has recently stated, victory belongs to those who embrace real innovation. Nothing is more innovative than the idea of designing, developing, and fielding weapons of time. Leave it there. >> That opens up the door to so many big ideas. >> Uh I won't leave it there. What I'll say [snorts] is that we need to develop the time branch. I don't know. Call someone come up with a smart name. We need to develop a new weapons branch. Time cops. We needed to develop a new weapons branch that is working on advanced technologies related to space-time manipulation. And Salvatore Pais should be the zar of it or whatever weird uh fascist name we're going with for our titles. I don't really care. But this get this guy in charge. He's got the clearances. He's in the Navy. we've already conscripted him and made him our endangered servant or whatever is going on with this weird relationship we've got going on with S. So just put him in a position and let him start making plasma disruption fusion weapons, space-time manipulation weapons, warp drives, enterprises, and little Jarvis balls. Why are we not doing that? We're wasting Here's the other thing about it, and I said this on a podcast yesterday. It's not even expensive. It probably would I don't even know how much Sal's research would cost. If he had $50 million, he would be like through the moon. Even $10 million would probably be enough to like do some significant research. These people aren't asking for that much money to put these teams together. We waste more money on scam daycarees. We make we waste magnitudes more money on scam daycarees run by illegal immigrants when we could be having space-time manipulation weapons. Even saying the words kind of makes me just want to die kind of makes me just want to die. Okay, sorry. Let's go back to S here. The plots also like I mean sliders the TV show although that was dimensions but but and you know I shouldn't even broach this question. So could weapons of time be used to go to different dimensions do you think? >> Absolutely. And not only that, imagine we recently had a let's call a physical extraction. Now imagine let's say an individual sometimes unfortunate it is the unfortunate things of our times that it's individuals that lead to certain wars. Imagine the ability to actually go back in time and um try to change the mind of a certain individual or not. >> Well, imagine that. >> Yeah. I so the the the obvious one that comes to mind the old movie trope is go back in time and kill Hitler right before he comes to power and then the the question and I've actually read philosoph is he saying what I think he's saying [music] chat how did Hitler die chat how did Hitler How did Hitler die shooting himself with his new wife? Do we do we know this for a fact? Like what? How do how sure are we about how Hitler died? The reason why I say this, the reason why I say this is because anything that isn't publicly known, Here's the crazy [ __ ] This is what I'm talking about when I'm talking about how weird this is going to get. Okay? Anything that we don't know for a fact that there's not some kind of verifiable information that can prove it. In theory, that could be changed by going back in time. In theory, think about this. In theory, I could go back in time and kill Hitler. And as long as I hide his body or something like that, it's perfect crime. How would anybody in 2023, two years ago, know about that? They wouldn't. All they would know is what Wikipedia tells them. All they would know is what Reddit tells them. They would go, "Dude, no. This guy Ashton went back in time and he killed Hitler." Like, that's what happened. He took a He took a selfie while he was back there. He took a selfie. They'll be like, "Nah, that's fake." They'll be like, "No, that's fake." They'll be like, "I went on Wikipedia, said he shot himself." Said he shot himself. You got to believe it. So, anyway, I'm joking. But here's the point. The real point is anything that we don't know for sure, like we don't have video evidence or some sort of information that can be passed on in theory that could have only happened potentially because of time travelers if it's possible that we can go back in time. Now, the other side of it is this. That's in a deterministic universe. I think Sal's getting a little ahead of himself there with Tim Ventura where he's saying you can go to different dimensions. That to me speaks to a many worlds hypothesis. Meaning that if we do end up figuring out time travel, you're not really going you're going to a different version of your reality, which now it doesn't matter if that different version's in the past because it's all just a matter of perspective. I kind of hope it's not the second one, but I don't really have any vested interest one way or another. Okay, here we go. ical treaties about this. They've said well was was it Hitler or was Hitler a product of his time? Would somebody have just come in and replaced him and they would have had a different name but same thing. >> It is a very good question sir but uh how should I say uh nobody says you got to stop at one individual and usually there's a cabal of them right and usually you know their names well salvi as the French say. >> Okay well so there you go. Yeah. So it does open big possibilities. Now what about the possibility of going forward in time? >> Of course, but this this mathematics speaks directly to a possibility of time travel to the past, which again was denied by Steven Hawings um chronology protection conjecture. I wanted to make sure that again I I bring forth the idea that there are no such thing as physical impossibilities. That the there are no such thing as physical impossibilities only conditional possibilities. In other words, under certain conditions everything and anything is possible. >> So again the solution to the most complex of problems may actually be extremely simple depending on perspective. That's key. Now, do you think that this could be tested using you were >> that's pretty much Salvador Pais's overall ethos? There are no impossibilities, only conditional possibilities. That is possible if this thing were to happen. Unicorns are possible if you breed a horse with a porcupine. [laughter] I don't I'm just making that up. But that's the point. Anything is possible. S's basically saying this. I'll be the the anger translator for S. [clears throat] Yo, we can manipulate spaceime, [ __ ] There's infinite energy everywhere. All we got to do is go tap into it. You got to just tenderize the meat and you can get to the bone. There you go. Hopefully that resonated with some of you out there. [snorts] Okay, back to the uh task at hand cuz he says something interesting right here. >> Talking about fusion reactors a moment ago. >> Yes. Yes. >> This is something we could test like on a on a micro scale with power levels that are accessible to humanity right now. I believe for example that uh I first first of all I'm pretty sure that the plasma compression fusion device someone has tried it either theoretically or actually put it in practice. I I cannot say more than that. I've heard rumors of Katas and so forth with Canada believe it or not. Anyway, I'll I'll leave it there. That's for another time and place most likely skiffs. But um the whole idea >> if I hear people talk about skiff one more time chat I'm going to crash out. I'm gonna crash out if I hear any more talk about skiffs. You know what? I don't even know if I care about national security anymore. I really do oscillate between not giving any crap about national security and not giving any crap about the low IQ people that are just living in a days in a little dream. Um so people might already have the Yeah, of course he thinks they already have it. A even if S didn't see some of this technology in any one of the five different jobs that he's had that he could have been exposed to it. NASA, Navy, uh what Northro Grumman? Uh I mean, come on, dude. This guy could have been exposed to this any number of ways. But even if he hadn't been exposed to that, he's seen the MH370 videos and he's said more than literally any other human being on Earth about those videos, including the non-equilibrium plasma. Just imagine, you see those videos, you're like, "Whoa, non-equilibrium plasma orbs? Whoa, that's crazy. I've been talking about those." Which, by the way, chat, just let's just be honest with one another here. S obviously knows way more than what he's saying and he's saying a lot a lot. Okay, let's keep going. Uh actually yeah no I'm just gonna let this play through because >> is this >> look carefully at the PI effect especially the engineering thereof rather than dismiss it out of hand as the illusory figment of imagination of a an engineer that should stick to what he knows or rather what his pedigree has brought him to be. Think further. We all have great abilities of intellect. Again, the idea of being enslaved by our minds and by our peers is no way to attack and win in physics. >> Yeah. Because if we if we unify our thoughts, if we bring again if we it's unification all the way, if we came together, can you imagine the kind of Manhattan Project ideas that we could actually solve if instead of killing each other off, we would actually come together and put our ideas together. Because I truly believe, sir, in this great cosmos of ours, not only are we not alone, but we have enemies out there. >> You must one of these enemies. >> Uh here's my criticism of S. Too preachy. Too [snorts] preachy. Now, maybe it's because I've listened to S repeatedly and heard him say some of the same things over and over. It's not that he's wrong. He's 100% right about all things he's saying there. But you got to realize if your objective is to get people to understand physics, you want to leave as much of the mythology and some of that other stuff, the analogies, some of that on the side as much as you can. The difference for me, how I get away with it is because I'm literally just a guy. I'm literally just a guy trying to explain physics to people uh and doing my best. But the more of the battle versus good and versus evil stuff, it's probably not wrong. But we are trying to get people that voted for Camala Harris to understand basic physics. That's like trying to get them to learn how to read. [laughter] You got like no chance. So, we got to tone back some of the, you know, uh, fire and brimstone a little bit. A little bit, not not entirely. We got, you know, the message needs to still be clear, which is that if we do not come together, we are definitely going to destroy ourselves. I was even talking to my brother today and we were talking about and I was mentioning that S, you know, brought me up and talked about this idea of a fusion bomb manipulating spaceime and he's like, "Oh, isn't that like making like a black hole though?" And I went, "Yep, it's exactly like making a black hole." And he said, "But wouldn't the black hole like, you know, zap away the couldn't it suck away the, you know, the galaxy, the solar system or whatever?" And I said, "Yes. Yes, that's exactly what is going to happen. It's just a matter of time because once you've unlocked certain technology, there's no putting it back in Pandora's box. At the end of the day, the way it gets reset is we destroy ourselves. And we've probably destroyed ourselves many other times by producing these black holes. [panting] So, you know, there's two sides to disclosure. one side we can have Star Trek, we can have warp drives, we can have time manipulation, we can have uh replicators, teleportation, we can have abundance for everyone, assuming nobody messes it up. You think nobody's going to mess it up? Alternatively, we can have greed. We can have violence, wars, we can have jealousy. We can have few people absorbing the resources for the masses. [sighs] I don't know. Not sure we're going to make it, chat. Not going to lie. Don't think we're going to make it. Okay, here we go. actually present itself for us to come together as a world, as an earth, as a united front. >> Let let me >> I'm going to hit more movie tropes here. Even if in theory, even if we couldn't send people back in time, we could probably find a way to send information. And the movie that comes to mind there is Paycheck. I think that was 2003 with Ben Affleck. And and the idea is he build a machine and you could transmit from the beginning of the machine's when it becomes operational to any point future right so so you get the machine built in 2003 and you could send messages back to it from 2025 right so worst case example we might be able to do something like that right >> among other things among other things I think uh weapons of time would be highly disruptive to the arsenal of nations uh first of all they would be greatly reliant on AGI I think an AGI and I think we're again the idea the ideas that we have now speak to um computational power being critical in the I call it the triarchy of sensience the idea that computational power and then >> okay I want to talk about this for a second somebody just mentioned here's another thing that you take into account people are doubting I don't blame you doubt go ahead doubt I would say when was the last time I was wrong about something, but go ahead. He doubted me. Dope. People say it's silly that we would have destro How How can you say we've destroyed ourselves already? Well, I'm looking forward I'm looking forward a thousand years. I'm looking forward 10,000 years and I'm going given a long enough time scale, anything and everything will have happened. Given a long enough time scale and for me, if anything, I'm probably being generous. I think like the letter to Ashton Forb said, our planet won't even last one day if you give this technology everybody. Not even one day. If you gave everybody access to a bomb that would destroy the whole planet, all they had to do is press a button, we probably wouldn't even last 5 seconds. Probably not even 5 seconds. That's the reality of the situation, guys, that we're in. But here's the next level to it. There's a deeper layer to this. [snorts] If it's true that we have reset ourselves, that we are in this cycle of discovering this technology, destroying ourselves with this technology, maybe resetting and making our maybe we created our own timeline. That's possible, guys. Then that means that anything that happened, anything that could happen already happened and it will probably happen again. It'll probably happen again. This is the idea of why those early physicists thought about cyclical nature to the universe. Anything that could happen probably already did happen. Time might even get weirder than we even imagine it to be. We could be reliving these exact lifetimes over and over and over and over again without even being aware of it. We could be in a video game playing a game out. what appears like hundreds of years to for us is only seconds to an alien race playing the game. The other thing he says is that AI might be essential to this technology. I couldn't agree more. The more I think about it, when we are talking about solving quantum mechanics, by solving quantum mechanics, I mean unifying it with general relativity, figuring out how we can use non-locality, quantum entanglement to teleport. [snorts] We talk about solving the Schrodinger equation. We talk about taking this extra dimension and looking at our object as it moves through this extra dimension. and pinpointing its location, tracking it, and being like, "Okay, I want it to be from here to over here. Okay, solve the short equation. Okay, cool. Reappears over here." That requires a lot of math to pull that off. You have to do five different calculations according to Ferris Williams and his dynamic theory. Five different calculations to do that. And they're complicated math as well. I mean, trying to write that out and do that by hand going to take a while. So, you may need AGI to do that math. You may need supercomputers to do that math, calculating that math in real time. In fact, that might be part of the reason why those orbs are spinning around the plane. They're like scanning the plane to figure out its exact vectoring. And they might need that plane to be going straight at the final moments so that when it comes out on the other side, it comes out going straight on the other side, too. The last piece on this, this is what the letter to Ashton Forb said, too. This is what the letter to Ashton Forb said. The letter to Ashton Forbes said, "What we tried to do human before now became programmatically possible. The breakthrough in the technology came with quantum computers and AI in the early 2000s." That's what the letter to Ashen Forb said. And I'm pretty certain that letter is real. Whether or not all the details are real, I don't know. But the person that sent me that knows that we did an operation on MH370 and they have inside information about it, which is already huge enough to say. So when they say we figured this technology out in the 60s and then in the 90s and the early 2000s, boom, quantum computers all of a sudden made these things possible, my mind immediately goes to, oh, they needed these computers to figure out how to model this extra dimension to figure out how to how two things might connect invisibly that we can't even see between those two points. And then also the final element, weapons of time. Because when you're solving the Schrodinger equation, remember what's happening in the MH370 videos, the plane is vanishing. The plane is not exploding. It's not even imploding because it's not like we see like a little black hole like form. We don't see the plane convert into a black hole. The plane is just there in a fraction of a second. The plane is just not there. We can still see the clouds in the background of the thermal video. In both videos, we can still see the clouds. So the question is what are we seeing happen? We're seeing we can if we were to visualize an analogy we could say this plane is being converted to a waveform a Schroinger waveform and that waveform is being transported across time and space meaning if you are solving this equation presumably it requires two points. So then the next question is what if you can by solving that Schroinger equation not just determine its end point in space but also determine its end point in time as long as it's either self-consistent with reality as we know it the flow of time as we know it or sending it to another dimension. and a different timeline. Now, we only have one clue when it comes to MH370. And we know the MH370 videos are real and that Redditors are stupid. So, what is the clue? This is a timely clue. The debris. They found debris and the debris has serial numbers related to part numbers for a Boeing trip 7. So that debris almost has to be from MH370. Has to be. So what does that mean? That means that plane didn't go to another dimension. It didn't go to the bizarro dimension. Well, unless those few pieces of the plane are all that's left, it's possible. However, I've considered that as well. Several of those pieces they found are from inside the plane, like in the cargo hold, not outer pieces. So, likely that what we're dealing with here is a situation where if they can manipulate time, we're not talking about extra dimension. Not talking about going to the bizarro dimension, but we don't know for sure. What we need to know is we need to see the videos on the other side. And if there's a time delay on the other side, imagine the plane comes out an hour later. Imagine an hour after you've already teleported it. You set up three orbs spinning around over here. Looks like they're spinning around doing nothing. Suddenly, all of a sudden, they they converge and poof, a plane comes out. [laughter] A plane comes flying out of nowhere. an hour after MH370 disappears. If we saw that, I'd say, "Okay, holy [ __ ] time travel time. We did it." Okay, here we go. S. Now, here's more about AI. This is S wants us Sorry, one more thing. S wants us to know about this AGI thing. It's very important to him. understand that is he first started talking to me about it like a year ago. He said we got to do a podcast about we gota talk about the triarchy of sentience. We got to talk about AGI. We got to talk about the impacts related to those videos and the AGI. Which tells me S knows from the inside how significant AI is. Very significant. Here we go. the idea of vectorred databases and then the idea that the AI agent would be able to generate an original concept never before seen that is shown to be not an hallucination thereby bringing about a these ideas do not discard them just be >> some total of human knowledge especially the relationships between diverse scientific papers it's just too big for the human mind here and so we can mine that with AI >> and this is where causal inference This idea of Dr. Judea pearl in my opinion will come in incredible as far as acting as a multiplication an amplification factor to computational power. Again the coupling of algorithmic power based on of course deep learning and computational power based say on incredibly high energy generation. These two should be coupled. >> Computational power alone I believe will reach a scaling platform a limit. It is algorithmic power that I think will take us to that next step that along with the idea of using vector databases. So again things from physical review letters rather than Reddit and again this whole this third item which is extremely important this AI agent must >> Reddit taking strays out here. So a sal's concept for AI I don't even think this is very controversial. It's quite simplistic actually is one power energy. If you have a source of unlimited energy like fusion, you're going to power your AI with it because the more energy, the more computational power. But second, it's not just about computational power. It's about the algorithm. It's about the vector analysis, about the sources. It's about how it where it gets its data and how it processes that data. The more efficient you do that. Now, if you take both of these factors and you power them up, you've opened the door now to being possible for AGI. But there's one more detail have the ability to generate an original concept never before seen proved not to be an hallucination. Only then say by experimental verification because after all experiment trumps theory every time only then could you say that the metamorphosis of an AI to an AGI has been achieved. >> Yeah. And one thing I can think of in terms of AGI is being able to steer these weapons of time. Right. Being able to predict >> well yeah this is >> so [clears throat] before I go on there imagine this. Imagine that the military produces an AGI. They feed it all the scientified scientific papers, including Ferris Williams' work. They say, "Here you go." And it comes back and says, "Oh, hey, if you mix together these uh eight neutronic fusion bombs with these plasma orbs and you spin it around equilaterally like this and converge it, boom, you can just make a wormhole. And then everyone's going, "What the fuck?" Everyone's going, "Did that did the AI just say that? Should we try that?" Like, that's pretty wild. Did it just mix together all these scientific papers and just fit spit fit out these answers? Should we do that? And we go, "Yeah, sure. Try it out." And we're like, "Hey, are there any covert ops that we could use this on and just like see if it's going to work?" Oh, we got this one. It's called um MH370. Just I'm making up a story, guys. That's not I don't know if that's real or not, but could you imagine? Could you imagine? Cuz there is a possibility that we hit the singularity from the private military perspective and things just took off with this technology. And then at that point, that's how it was able to get from where it goes from being future tech to being technology that we can't even recognize anymore. We don't even recognize it as human anymore. >> Just a thought we can change in the past that will lead to the desired butterfly effect. Remember what I gave the definition of time as a peculiar type of informationational energy which permeates the space structure. It's extremely important to understand those words because it talks to Shannon entropy. It talks to the idea of again we're talking about the greatness of Vanoi Noman. Vanoyman who after all if it wasn't for Vanoyman I'm not sure where Edward Edward Teller would have been later on in life but I'm pretty sure Edward Tella did pretty well for himself. So >> now do you have papers that you could send me? I will put those in the YouTube show notes. >> I will sir I have not written any real innovation. >> Give me a lab and a team and let me and I will be extremely honest with you. Has absolutely nothing to do with these ideas and truly that troubles me. >> Here we go. Get ready. >> Because they they do not understand my capabil, where are you at, bro? Where are you at? My man, US Navy Engineer Salvatore Pis, who has five patents that are so advanced people think they come from aliens. He's thirsty. He's thirsty to make weapons that will make our enemies terrified to fight us. Give the man a lab. Give the man his money. Give the man his plasma orbs so that we can annihilate more narotists and communists even more efficiently than we do today. Here you go. Here he is, the man himself. for generating these what Secretary of Waret calls real innovation. give me a lab and a team and let me prove that true magic is possible that science fiction can become science fact instead of listening to how should I say people who tell other people now he has no idea what he's talking about and thereby by dismissing me cause people such as a certain individual pretty high up at the Senate Armed Service Committee to dismiss the ability to say give me a lab and a team and let me carry on certain work of course at that point in time I won't be able to do podcast anymore, but we call those people that disbelieve Joe Biden voters, chat. They don't even know where they are. They don't know why they're voting for him. They just know that they're going to vote for a D no matter who, chat. They're going to come and tell you this is not real. Don't look over here. Don't look up. No, don't look up at this. Everything's fine. No space-time manipulation. Don't ask what a fusion bomb does. Nobody asked, guys out there. Nobody asked what a fusion bomb does. No worry. You don't need to know. It's only been 60 years. Nobody has any [ __ ] clue what a fusion bomb does. But that's fine. That's fine. Just give the man his damn lab and let him get to work. Okay, that's all. Here we go. The Yeah. And as far again, I'm willing anyone that has the ability to get these ideas published, I'm will I'm willing to co-author papers with them so you can put it out there >> because again it is extremely hard to get deep. >> Yeah. [laughter] >> Took quite a bit of doing. >> I s I always believe in the number three. That would be the third time. >> There you go. There you go. get to also um uh uh speak with your followers and and your subscribers, possibly guide them toward um Evan How's um um he had an interview with me on weapons of time. Glory be to N key. Again, uh I believe it's called the the ancient pathways, >> his his part. and also Ashton Forbes, my friend Ashton Forbes, which in my in my opinion, this man will one day not only prove correct, but I think he's actually bringing disclosure to the masses and his ability to read physics papers and interpret them at layman understanding of every it's quite amazing. He truly is amazing. And my friend Dave Rossi of Genet Genset podcast, thank you very much for allowing to share all this. Thanks. >> Absolutely. truly are glorious. >> Awesome. Thank you. >> Okay, guys. Well, quite interesting interview there, guys. >> So, what [snorts] did we learn? S definitely thinks it's possible to manipulate spacetime. He definitely Well, manipulating spaceime is the trivial part. We're at this point now. We're a little smarter than the average bear on this live stream. And now we're not just talking about manipulating spacetime. We're talking about what are the implications of space-time manipulation. What are the general relativistic effects? Oh, it's only going to take me 59 days to go a thousand lighty years. That's what we care about. Everybody else is sitting there talking about you can you can travel in time. D I'm Cletus. Yeah, you can travel in time, Cletus. The question that we're trying to figure out, can we change the past? Can we impact the past? And there is the answer to that question is a resounding maybe. Maybe. I don't know, guys. I really don't know. But I hope that we can. And if so, I hope somebody teleports me off this planet. Teleport me to Diego Garcia. I'll live in witness protection on Diego Garcia sipping martinis and lattes on the beaches for the rest of my days. or I'll just keep talking about physics and science. There is one part in this interview that I did not play where S says I don't want to enlighten our enemies and talking about you know what the secret is for how to manipulate us how to figure it out. Well, I think I've gone well above and beyond. The next layer to that is that extra dimension that solving that Schrodinger equation figuring out how do you connect this point in space and time to that point in space and time. And if you don't have advanced AGI, good luck to you. Good luck with doing that math on the back of your on napkin. Okay guys, MH370X, that's it for me for tonight. Uh, let me think. I think I have a moment of zen for us. Hold on. See, got a little moment of zen action here. Been a lazy weekend. Happy Martin Luther King Day, by the way, guys. Oh yeah. Oh yeah. Here's our boy chat. This is the face chat. [clears throat] The face of public academia. Daniel Whitstein or what is his name? Sorry, one sec. White. Daniel Whit. Whitson. Daniel Whitson chat. This is the physicist that we should all aspire to be to. I could never hold a candle to someone who can explain physics in such a elegant and beautiful way. Daniel, tell the people my man. >> Fields predict every experiment that's going to happen, but they also provide a story about the unobserved component, right? These fields and what they're doing and whatever. You've just converted your map into a physical actor. A field is a map of effects. >> These like fields, dude. Like these fields are like what are they doing? And like the quantums. Yeah. You know what, bro? I guess I You know what? I could Turns out you did me a favor by running away from that debate challenge. You did me a favor. I could never explain physics in such a easy to understand way for the masses. I'll just have to struggle with being a lowly science influencer on the internet. Never being a true physicist. My douche. [snorts] Yeah, bro. Okay. Anyway, thank you guys. Let's get to the super chats. Uh, everybody, the pill chat, welcome back. Uh, Mimir the to remember and Myithil, thank you guys for being in the chat today. And Herb Green in the Rumble chat. Appreciate you guys. Sam Fiser, what are your thoughts on Georgian or Georgian's theory that humans may have sent themselves back in time to ancient Mars to isolate themselves in the timeline? Let me give you, by the way, thank you for that generous super chat. Let me give you a simpler answer. What if we didn't send people back in time to Mars? What if Mars sent people forward in time to us? It's easier to go forward in time and back. We are trapped in this idea that further in time means more advanced. But what if people on Mars had teleportation capability? And what if they went forward in time to Earth cuz future Earth would have been habitable and so they left their planet which was doomed and they came to our planet which was not doomed. Mind blown. There you go, guys. Keep it simple. Keep it simple. I am still not all about travel to the past, even though I am open to the idea of information and being able to impact the past. But travel to the future is no problem. Travel to the future is easy peasy, chat. In fact, it's a weapon. That's PLA styles plasma fusion disruption device. >> [snorts] >> Mick Leonard says, "Love me some S." Thank you very much, Mick Leonard. And lastly, Gon Gron gives the heart emoji. Thank you guys very much for those generous super chats. Have a great night. MH370X will be back on Wednesday. Later, everybody. Peace out. [music and bell] [music] Out in the fields where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorne, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull. No crushing [music] weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. [music] Where did it go? Bing 7 through a wormhole. Flowing talking wormholes. Stargates [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did [music] it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole flow. [music] Exotic [music] matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you [music] and me. Quantum vacuums squeeze so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab. They play generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational [music] squeezing Casemir's force negative zones. We need to stay the course. Talking wormhole star gates [music] negative energy travel through the cosmos it's our destiny. MH370 where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole float thin shell formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we [music] realign energy conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a try. >> [music] >> forces balancing [music] the plate creating the throat. Open the gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. >> [music] >> Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Blowing triple 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields [music] to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we [music] make the gain. Little Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, [music] we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos.