Video Transcript
David Curtley. David Curtley is the CEO of Helion Fusion. One of the co-founders of Helion Fusion is John Slow. John Slow worked with Richard Eskridge, Amy's dad. I guess I have to just keep repeating this cuz it's [ __ ] weird. Guy that's now in charge or guy that co-founded a $5 billion fusion company worked on plasma fusion propulsion with Amy's dad. The same dad that was telling his 16-year-old daughter to do Eugene Podkletnov's spinning bilayer anti-gravity experiment. Let that sink in while I pull up this clip. D is unconfined. So, the plasma is confined, but the whole topology can do something what is called tilt. Is that this whole plasma donut, cuz it's under pressure, can just turn over. This [ __ ] knows the orbs. I don't mean no dis- I say [ __ ] in the most respectful way to David Curtley. I love this guy, by the way. This [ __ ] knows those orbs. That's why he's not saying some [ __ ] You can't come on here and start saying, "Oh, FRCs are unconfined." Meaning there's no walls around them. Oh, and they also just flip suddenly. You mean like in the MH370 videos where you can see the heat signature of the toroid flip around suddenly? Like this is the reason why I'm like, "Why don't I simp to podcasters? Why don't I basically give a [ __ ] about what people think about me?" Cuz the amount of people that know what the [ __ ] going on in those videos that are afraid to talk about it is insane. And I'm going to make it so I'm going to raise raise the pressure as high as possible. Our paths will cross, even if it's forced, unless the CIA hits me with the discombobulator or the [ __ ] beam. In which case, I'm cooked, chat. It is what it is. The way I think about this is um think about the uh a motor is a good example. An armature, in the center of your motor, you have a spinning A motor is a good example. Why? Because we have a [ __ ] thing spinning in the middle. But what's our thing in our fusion reactor? What's our thing in our FRC? There's nothing inside the FRC. It's just plasma. So, this is David Curtley literally saying their fusion reactor is just some [ __ ] plasma spinning around. Do Do people understand the words I'm saying? David Curtley is saying their fusion reactor is just some plasma spinning around, and somehow this produces more energy out than it takes to produce. That's literally what they're doing. Now, you understand why people don't believe them and why people are hesitant to believe in this. Because how can you explain that without free energy? How is that happening? Just Like yes, I get that you can throw some numbers on a page and tell me that it's real. And I get that you can produce it and show me that it's real, but it doesn't seem consistent with our current classical understanding of physics. spinning armature. You have this this spinning magnet on the inside, and it is held by the main axis of the magnet. It can't go anywhere. We don't have that axis. We don't have any mechanical things inside these fusion systems. They're 100 million degrees. You can't put any mechanical things inside them. And so, we have nothing to hold on to it. And so, it's There can't be anything inside. It's just too hot. Like it's just simple as There can't be anything inside. It's just too [ __ ] hot. Now, our plasma orbs are cold. So, there actually might be able to be something inside of them. But the more he talks about this, the more I think that doesn't even The only reason why there even has to be anything inside the plasma orbs is to move them around initially and to intercept the plane. That's it. Everything else can be easily explained by electromagnetism. But here's he's saying that what's going to happen to it is it's going to spin around the axis of the solenoid at the middle. So, what we would expect to see is it's spinning around like this while it's moving forward. And I don't know. I tried to stare at those MH370 videos for like another hour yesterday. I just can't tell. It's too hard to tell, too, if they're all perfectly locked in. And if the orbs are also spinning in formation with one another, but I I suspect they are. unstable. So, when you learn about the FRC, that's the first thing you learn. Um and it took us a number of years to learn about a parameter of how to make them stable. And And And that And And that's pretty fundamental, but most people who've heard of an FRC haven't understood this really key fact. Hey, chat. How do you [snorts] think you make them stable? How do you think they made the FRCs stable? Anyone want to guess? Tragedy of the commons, chat. Why is this not public kno- Why is it not public knowledge that the answer is as simple as spin? Spin. Simple as that. Plasma and spin. Um and so, we have a parameter we call S star over E. Um and we're getting really into the physics weeds here, but but Let's go. But it's really important. And the good analogy here is a top. Mhm. Literally a top, a spinning top. And so, you have a a top spinning on your desk. You know that it'll spin for a little while, and then it will fall over. It is unstable. However, if you spin it fast enough, if you take a top and you spin it fast enough, put enough angular momentum, enough angular inertia into that system, it'll stay upright, even though it wants to just fall over, even though it's unstable. And we do the same thing in an FRC. Is if you can drive it fast enough, if you can add enough kinetic energy and inertia to the particles, it will stay stable. However, you can do another really key thing. We are not limited now to having a very skinny top. We can actually make it much bigger. So, the good analogy here is if you have a coin, and you know you're spinning that coin, um if you spin it faster and faster, it'll stay spinning longer. Um however, uh eventually it'll slow down and fall over. But if you had a roll of duct tape, if you had something thicker and heavier and longer, and it's spinning around that same axis, it'll stay spinning even longer, both because of the inertia Oops. Let's go to the tape real quick. Wow. Look at those orbs, chat. Look at them spin on their axis. In fact, at one at a couple points, you can see the entire green spot in the middle just flip around suddenly as well. And if you ask AI about this, if you feed it what we've been saying here tonight, it will say that yes, this is exactly the behavior you would expect for some type of macroscopic combined system to couple the space-time and to teleport the plane away. In fact, what they're doing at the end right here, what they're doing when they're converging right here, you notice that remember this shift they do right here at the end? Where they like you can see them blur out like this, and they come back? They are stopping. They're not spinning anymore. So, they suddenly stop. So, they're spinning around, and they stop. And what they're doing is they're converting their angular momentum of the spin. >> [snorts] >> And they're reson- They're doing it in a resonant condition, meaning it's amplifying because all three of them are doing it simultaneously. So, it's like basically the equivalent of It really is the Beyblade game, right? Where you take one of those Beyblade things, and you wrap your wire around it, and then you shoot it, and you let it go. It's basically like that. They're doing that to the plane. They're wrapping around the plane, let it go, snap. Rail gun. I mean, to me, I guess the most It's not even I'm starting to think of calling it a wormhole is a bad idea. I think for the norm norms, for the dum-dums, for the primitives, we should just be calling it a rail gun. That's what their primitive minds can understand. They can't really understand all the space-time manipulation wormhole stuff. It's just too weird for them. You just say, "Hey, we just rail gunned the We just rail gunned it. We rail gunned the plane, and it just went boom. Bye-bye." Right? They can understand that. That way, their minds can understand why there's debris. What's crazy is people like, "Why did they find debris?" I'm like, "Do you know what a wormhole is?" And they're like, "It's a bridge between two points in space and time." And I'm going, "Well, now you know why they found debris." I mean, what are we talking about here? Okay, next time we'll just call it a rail gun. Simpler that way. So, anyway, they're basically winding up the same way where you're to like wind the the wire around something and then let it go. That's what they're doing. They're just doing it with plasma and spin instead of doing it with, you know, uh a rope or whatever. So, let's go back to David Curtley here. geometry. And so, we have this parameter called spinning around that same axis, it'll stay spinning even longer, both because of the inertia and because of the geometry. And so, we have this parameter called S star over E. S star is the hybrid kinetic parameter, which tells you how um stable it is from that top point of view. And the E, which is the elongation of how long it is. And so, maybe fortuitously, thank you, nature, uh gave us a win here, which is that how we make these in these long solenoids is naturally very, very long. And so, we can build these with a a very long lengths and if we can drive them fast enough and hard enough and drive the ions to move at very high velocities, we can stabilize against those instabilities and hold them stable. And so we now know we can design with a given S star over E parameter, we can design these for very long lives. The theory of the systems we make say that they should last for a few microseconds at most. Us and others in the field have been able to make them last for thousands of microseconds. Thousands of times what the stability the the basic un the basic criteria would tell. This is so freaking crazy. What he just said is exactly what they're doing. And that S star over whatever the [ __ ] he was saying, that's also exactly the equation they use to make those orbs stable. Exactly that equation. That's exactly what they did because here's the reality. That's spinning. It It cures the instabilities. Like if you're on a bicycle, you have to bike pedal fast enough so that you don't fall over left or right. That's basically how the orbs work, too. That's what that S star or whatever means. So the trick isn't spin super fast. The trick is spin just fast enough so that your orba plasma doesn't come apart. So you actually want a very specific spin. That's why these orbs are spinning not like super speed. They're just spinning at what looks like a controlled motion. Like if I were to take this coffee and I were to just spin it, I'm not going to go crazy. If I do, the coffee will go flying everywhere. That's not what I want. I want it to just mix together nicely. So I'm going to slowly control spin it and what they do is they spin it and then they let go and then baboom. [ __ ] this is actually insane because it's actually simple. I can understand and explain it as Beyblade because that's exactly what the physics is. It's just the electromagnetic version of that same exact phenomenon. It's all just nature. It's all nature. So David Kirkley is explaining right there. Now, I went further with AI which I'll just explain to you, which is I said, "Okay, guys. This is the reason why Ferris Williams was so interested in fusion." Because he realized this is the secret. Resonance is the secret to fusion. We can get fusion happen at much lower temperatures. If we just go about it instead of just randomly trying to get fusion happen, if we go about it in a controlled fashion. If we [snorts] go about it in a controlled fashion, we can make it happen. And what seems like what should occur, I've been saying these aneutronic fusion reactors are going to produce excess energy. The aneutronic ones are definitely definitely going to. Cuz what seems like what happens is the reason why aneutronic fusion exists is because when you get to those high energy levels that are required to do aneutronic fusion, you're tapping into space-time. You're tapping into the 5D. Could be part of the reason. It seems like it's at least a plausible explanation. Now, the way it comes down is that it's going to depend on the exact coupling of that plasma spinning, that exact coupling to space-time in terms of how much excess energy you're going to get out. They have to be trying to be producing a lot of excess energy, but I think what I said, the theory is that when we start turning on these fusion reactors, specifically the FRCs, we're going to see more net energy out than what the math can account for. They're going to they're going to, you know, blame it on something or other. But eventually over time it will become obvious. And the moment they start turning on the non-equilibrium fusion reactor where they separate the charge and keep them separated just like those EVO's we're seeing, the orbs in that MH370, that's where it will be undeniable. We can look at those fusion reactors flying around in the sky, those plasma orbs, and we can go there's no way that that's there's where's the input of that energy coming from? It's a plasma orb flying around the sky. There's no engines or fuel on it. How's that working? We can tell there's something wrong with that right away. But we know the answer now. Not only can they do fusion reaction like this, but they can also use fusion and plasma to couple to space-time and borrow energy directly from space-time. How much of that energy they're borrowing? Debatable. I would argue there's no limit. >> [snorts]