Virtual Cathodes and Non-Thermal Plasma Create the Orbs

Video Transcript

# Virtual Cathodes and Non-Thermal Plasma Create the Orbs Let me pull this up. So, I'm going to pull up the WB polywell and show the images here. The WB polywell looks like a series of donutshaped metal rings that are connected on their vertices so that it creates a cube or specifically you could say a polyhedral because in theory you could create different shapes out of these. It wouldn't just have to be a polyhedral. And the reason why we're doing this is exactly what Brousard what it says in that article we were reading. It says right in there that this creates a negative energy well or let's say negatively charged well in the center of this device. And if you have negative charge in the center of this device, the positive charge is going to get attracted to it just like you see in the images on the screen here. And when I started to think about this, I went, "Wow, this almost, if you could describe this, if I was going to describe this to somebody in terms of what we did here with this device, I would say we took a monor structure, the monor structure is your tooid, your ring, and we created with that monor structure a multistructure, a polyhedral object. Combine mono structures and you have the recipe for an unlimited energy source that will last forever. That's what the letter to Ashton Forbes said to me. And now I'm sitting here looking at exactly what that letter to Ashton Forbes was describing. >> Products or application you are now working on is correctly based on superconductivity. The number of orbs you've been speculating about is correct. The fourth orb decides where the object ends up. The technology is based on structures, simple and beautiful structures that lets us use the unlimited power that is everywhere and step outside what I would like to describe as perceived reality. But I just wanted to point this out because I think I'm trying to make the case best I can that what we're looking at here is at minimum. I'm not saying that this is exactly the orbs, but this is the the technology and the research that was the precursor to them building the orbs which are in my opinion a high beta proton boron 11 a neutronic fusion. I don't think they're using DD fusion in those videos although I'm not even really sure how I could tell the difference. So we said how the orbs were set up. Um high beta effect and then the virtual cathode. When the poly well operates the electron beams inject high-speed electrons into a magnetic field structure. These electrons become trapped in the central region bouncing between the magnetic cusps and forming a negatively charged well. So when we say virtual cathode, what we're saying is you're going to have one negatively charged thing over here and you're going to have cathode and anode. One positive and one minus. So what we're saying is that you're making one half of a of one end of a battery, right? One end of a battery is positive, one end of a battery is negative. You're making a really powerful negative in the middle of your cube. You built your cube. In the middle of that, you got this super powerful negative. And this is good because in fusion, we're trying to make two positives, two ions. We want those two positives to collide. Well, what better than having a well of negative charge because now you're going to have those positive ions just shooting right at it. Boom. That's our goal. So, you can already just see conceptually how this could help. And what I just described to you is called inertial electrostatic confined fusion, IEC fusion. Why not combine them? Why not combine the benefits of the field reverse configuration using the superconducting magnets to create your plasmoid? Combine that with electrical engineering, having your negative potential well. Do both. In fact, if you do both now, maybe we can get over that hurdle where we weren't able to get over. We couldn't get these high energy levels that we needed. Well, maybe this combining both these together, we'll get to that. At this point, I'm ready to say if if TAE and Helion are not at least thinking about this, they should be. They should be. There's no reason why they shouldn't be thinking about producing this negative voltage. Well, and I maybe that is non-equilibrium. Maybe that's the definition of your non-equilibrium plasma. I'm not sure. Okay, let's keep going. Okay, so this he says increases the strength of the magnetic cusp confinement with electrostatic acceleration. Moreover, and he calls it the whiffle ball configuration. Why? because it looks like if you were to look at the device, it's a cube with a bunch of holes in it. So, it looks like a like a whiffle ball. If you guys don't know what a whiffle ball is, just a ball with a bunch of holes in it. Looks like Swiss cheese. So, they built six different reactors. By the early 2000s, the WB6 device showed promising results. Billions of fusion reactions per second using dutyium fuel. and it was using lower voltages as well. Now, this here, multiple things I have to point out. One, the timeline matches. That's the timeline. If I'm looking for a company that helped build the orbs, they've got to be working on this technology in the 2000s. There you have it right there. In fact, they have like eight years to take this technology and turn it into the orbs you see in the MH370 videos in 2014. We got Fusion to work. Another direct quote from the guy. With a device about yay big and yay big around, it can make more neutrons per unit well uh unit well voltage than anybody had ever done in an IEC fusion machine and it was only 30 to 40 cmters. The other thing about this is this is tiny guys. This is something that I heard Devon Nunes talking about which is that these devices are not going to be huge nuclear power plants. these devices are going to be relatively small. In one of the clips, he says, "These things need to be a certain size. They have to be so big in order to get it to work, but they also don't need to be any bigger than that because there's not any efficiency gained essentially. And the size that he says is roughly two to two and a half meters radius." So, if I'm just adding that up, that's about five meters diameter. Four to five meters in diameter. That is the exact size of the orbs in the MH370 videos. And the crazy part about it is that he says he's essentially saying that this is the optimal size for these fusion reactors that he's building with these with this uh WB1 or whatever poly well device. So this is another thing where you realize that the physics when you make a fake video, the physics never ends up working out. But when a video is real, and especially when it's showing scientific experimentation, there are going to be physics reasons why it has to be real, why it has to be legit. And this is potentially one of those reasons, which is that the orbs being roughly 18 to 20 feet in diameter might be some optimal size for fusion reactors in our macroscopic reality. They can't be any smaller because they don't produce enough energy. And they don't need to be bigger because you're not getting any efficiency gain for making it any bigger. Instead of making it bigger, you just make another one. H if that ends up being real, that will be pretty wild. So, let's go play this clip because this is the man himself. This is him. This is apparently a famous I don't know the lore. I don't know the history of TED talks. Did TED talks start as like talks that they did at Google? Because this is a talk that Robert Brousard was brought into Google to all their super engineers in 2006 and asked to tell them about this device. And a lot of them left in the middle of it. I'm sitting here going, "These people are dude, I don't think they knew who this guy was." Anyway, here we go. >> Impedment has always been money. We've told the Navy and the DoD since 1989 that the cost of this program in today's dollars is $200 million. We've had it in report after report after report and they knew that and they knew that from the beginning and they said we can't do that. Why can't you do that? Because if we do that, I'll tell you the story. If you do that, it becomes visible to the staffers on Capitol Hill. It's a big enough budget item that people see it. Once it becomes visible to the Capitol Hill staffers, everybody on Capitol Hill knows that this is what the Navy is doing. The DOE will see it. The DOE will say, "No, you can't do that. We have the charter to do fusion." And that's the end of the program. I feel like I'm watching Secret Files that I shouldn't be watching. And this is a video where they were at Google where he's just openly like, "Yeah, no." They were like, "No, we can't do that. DOE will come in and shut us down." The Navy told you that the DOE will come in and shut them down if they do that >> because they will co-opt it and shut the Navy down. So, the Navy had to fund us at a low level below the radar screen of politics. And that's exactly what happened. It's its nature. It's life. It's nature. It's life. That's exactly what happened. He said, he's like, "Yeah, I mean, look, Navy just step Navy tries to do fusion. These guys step in." This guy worked in the Navy. He was building plasma fusion orbs. I'm going to call them orbs because it's a spherical plasma this guy's making for the Navy. and he sounds just like uh Ken shoulders who was working on EVOs. I mean, what is going on with S here? Like, is the Navy in some weird shadow war with the DOE or you building fusion research? Cuz didn't S also have a fusion reactor? S has his own fusion reactor that's a little bit similar to this. In fact, if you guys look up right now the fusion reactor that Sal's patent is, it's like four arrows pointed inward. Similar concept, although I suppose they all are to the Polywell device. So, let's go back to this the Polywell device, guys. Fuel choices. Cuz now guys, this I was reading this on Saturday night and I'm sitting here going, "What the hell did we just find?" Let's listen to the next sentence. By the way, yeah, let me repeat this. The origin of this Polywell device is Pho, the guy that invented the television. Pho Farnsworth. The Farnsworth fuser is the technical origin of this device according to Bousard. Busousard says he basically took the Fines with Farlo and took it to the next level. Wow. I mean, you could draw a straight line from the development directly from the television possibly to the plasma orbs and MH370 videos. How dope will that be? How dope would it be one day if we can draw a straight line television to Farnsworth fuser to like Busousard ramjet engine to MH370 being teleported by some plasma orbs. Can you imagine if children are being taught that in like 50 years? What a world. Busousard dreamed of a f a fusion future powered by proton boron 11 reactions. Proton boron 11 right there. He says unlike dutyium tridium reactions and tokamax proton boron 11 produces no neutrons. Yeah, it's called a neutronic fusion and no radioactive waste just clean helium. But the proton boron 11 reactions require extremely high temperatures or voltages to ignite making it far more challenging than DT fusion. also suffers from high brelung radiation losses where high energy electrons emit x-rays when they decelerate. Bousard believed that the polywells non thermal distribution of ion energies unlike the unlike the uh evenly heated plasmas and tokamax could mitigate brelung rad losses non-therrmal distribution. Okay, everybody. Even if you are a a noob when it comes to science, you are about to learn something new right now. Non-thermal distribution refers to a non-M Maxwellian Boltzman distribution. This is a temperature temperature graph of ions. They use it to determine the optimal temperature to get fusion reactions to happen. So when you say it's a non-therrmal distribution, you're saying it's a it doesn't it doesn't obey that curve that famous curve for the Maxwellian Boltzman distribution. And the first person who talked told me about this was Salvatore Py. He said that you call a plasma a non-therrmal plasma that doesn't obey a Maxwellian Boltzman distribution, you call it a cold plasma. You call it a cold plasma. None equilibrium, none thermal plasma. And S said specifically that this is the kind of plasma you need if you want to start to manipulate spaceime. So while I'm looking at this and I see right here that he says the key here is that the temperatures are not evenly distributed. In the tokamax the plasma temperatures are evenly distributed but in this device they're not. And this could mitigate brelung radiation losses. So it turns out I think we also heard David Kirkley talking about this non-equilibrium. There's another reason for the non-equilibrium temperatures mitigates the bremlung radiation losses.