Plasma Fusion Propulsion - Paul Czysz & Aneutronic Fusion

Video Transcript

# Plasma Fusion Propulsion - Paul Czysz & Aneutronic Fusion Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foroding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries [music] have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few [music] and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority. [music] When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical [music] faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back [music] into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay [music] of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. [music] lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience [music] and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those were among [music] his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we [music] are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying. >> Well, I can tell you we shared it with America, but I can't share it with you. Okay. the most advanced offensive weapons on the planet. Things that none of the superpowers have developed by Israel, shared with America. >> We're very powerful. This country is very powerful. It's far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world that we have. More powerful than anybody even not even close. >> Malaysian 370. Contact mean 120 decimal 9. Right. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [music] Oh, [music] [music] [singing] [music] I remembered [music] the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu [music] is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and [music] to impress him. Takes on his multi-armed form [music] and says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer [music] of worlds." Welcome everybody to the live stream. Good to see you guys. Guys, I am back. I am back from taking care of family stuff for my birthday. Guys, I am old AF, chat. I'm old AF. I don't think I don't know if I'm going to be there to see the new future. New future world chat. Feels like we're a long way off from the Jetsons right now, even though we should be having it already. Today's live stream is almost 100% gonna be about science quantum mechanics and fusion. We've just had a late addition to it just now. Brand new edition that we're going to be talking about. So, we're going to be digging into quantum mechanics. You are going to learn tonight how a quantum computer works. You are going to learn tonight how a quantum computer works. The person that's going to teach it is literally the Nobel Prize winner for macroscopic quantum tunneling. New interview just dropped. We're going to take a look at it. I've already watched it. You're going to love it. Then we're going to look at the connection between Paul Sizz and Autronic Fusion. And of course, I'm going to shout out Helion Fusion. I've got a couple videos. I hope we get to all of them, but we got a lot to get through. We'll see. Um, and let me see real quick. Uh, what else I wanted to make sure we hit? Yeah. So, I'm basically I think I'm old enough now where they they get like I have to be put in a bucket where they draw hats out, decide who they're going to grind up into pace to feed the new generation. I think that's Soilent Green. So, I think I have to go register somewhere and make sure that I get in that list now because I'm I've hit the boomer age. I'm like half Boomer now. I think officially I'm on the edge. It scares me, guys. Um, okay. Real quick, just to just to to recap, Candace Owens came back from her multi-week vacation. um and is once again pushing a bunch of crazy crap I don't have time to get into nor do I even really care about getting into but I just want to point out and like apparently I somebody made like a whole live live tweeted her entire show today and and tagged me in it and I took a look at it and the one thing I want to point out is these people are like her and her followers not necessarily her followers but the ring leaders of this crew like Ryan Mata and Ian Carol these people are shameless grifters guys. Shameless opportunistic grifters. She's calling them out in the chat about how great investigators they are. They're all full of [ __ ] And they know they're full of [ __ ] guys. They know they're full of [ __ ] And this is the reason why you don't see them jumping at debate opportunities, right? Like when I was doing the MH370 stuff, which by the way, watching that clip again, like how do people think those videos are fake? How do people think that the color fleer is fake? You can see the camera shaking accurately after after they zoom in. They think somebody had the foresight to fake something like that. When I was doing the MH370 stuff. And by the way, rest in peace to MH370. Um the the MH370 passengers are are gone, guys. They're getting hit by a thermonuclear weapon. They're getting hit by a thermonuclear weapon. even if it's bending spaceime there, how can we even begin to assume that they could have survived that? So, there's no way that they can be alive in my opinion, although it's theoretically possible. And I think the difference between me and the grifters like Candace Owens, and I see so many people have been bought into the allure of these grifters, they are completely full of [ __ ] and they are taking advantage of you. When I was revealing that M370 stuff, I challenged everybody else to to debate me. I challenged everyone to debunk me. Do you know how many people accepted that challenge? Zero. Zero. I challenged physicists. I challenged experts on MH370. Not a single one of them had the balls to debate me. Even though I have a massive platform, I have bigger platform than every single MH370 investigator combined. I have a bigger platform than all of them combined. Not one of them would debate me. I challenged several, including Jeff Wise of the Netflix documentary. He refused. He said debating me would platform me and give me credibility that I don't deserve. That was his argument. I challenge everyone in the UFO community as well. Not a single person would debate me on it because they knew they would lose. They knew what they would lose badly. It's not a matter of me making them look silly. It's a matter of I have the evidence and facts on my side. Now, flip this around. Now, look at the Charlie Kirk conspiracies. The other conspiracies that you see this like is I don't know what to call it, Israel derangement syndrome. It's really low IQ people. It's people that are very unintelligent that get bought into like ridiculous logical fallacies and they buy into it. Not only will they not only are they not challenging other people on their debates, they won't even accept debate challenges. I challenge Ian Carol straight up. When I saw this guy grifting and lying about what happened to Charlie Kirk, I said, "Okay, I challenge you to a debate right now." At the last minute, he backed out. He made up a bunch of excuses about, "Oh, you're being emotional. You're being mean to me." No, you were just afraid of your griff getting destroyed. And has any of these people, have they debate, has any one of them debated anybody? No. I saw Ian Carol getting called out by several more people saying that, "Hey, I want to debate you because you're lying. because they only go on friendly appearances where they're not going to be challenged on debates. I think it's important to point this out because I realized that a lot of my followers, guys, my only fans isn't making any money anymore. My only fans isn't making any money anymore because all the wine moms were apparently Candace Owens followers and now they're not donated anymore to me. Feels bad, chat. I'm gonna have to go get a real job soon. Um, so but to the point it's extremely important I think that I apparently teach people this because there's people that are just out there watching me that are like, "Are you dumb for not believing that Israel killed Charlie Kirk?" No, I think you're literally [ __ ] if you think that there's any connection between Israel and Charlie Kirk because there's literally none whatsoever other than the past donations they got while he was alive. So, the more I see people putting stupid [ __ ] like this, the more it forces me to react because I want to I want you to be sure if you're one of the people out there watching that's getting really offended by this. The reason why you're getting so mad is because you believe a lie that's not supported by any facts or evidence. And when someone challenges you on that, it makes you very upset. And I have bad news for you. It's going to get worse. I'm right about Charlie Kirk. Also, it's a the truth is not an opinion test. It's not a popularity test. The truth doesn't care who your favorite person is. It doesn't care what you think or what you feel. There's only one truth. And the truth is Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. It didn't have anything to do with Israel or any other weird skitso [ __ ] It didn't have anything to do with directed energy weapons or whatever else. That's the truth. A lot of you got caught up in a weird Israel derangement propaganda scheme that's been going around on the internet. And you need to go, you need to step back from the internet for a while. You need to go outside. You need to go touch some grass. Log off from the internet for a while. Stop letting the internet determine what your opinions on everything are. I really worry about this actually. I can see it's growing and getting worse and worse and worse. That's it. Now, now that we've addressed that, the last political thing I want to talk about before we jump right into quantum mechanics tonight is the Venezuelan situation. I I don't know why Rand Paul of all people has decided to throw his body in the way of the Hellfire missiles as they are striking the Venezuelan boats. But I can't I've lost so much respect for the libertarian conservative movement in the last last few weeks. I've completely disassociated myself. I used to say that I was libertarian. Absolutely not anymore. Guys, let's just keep it 100% simple. Drug smugglers from other countries in international waters are not protected by the United States Constitution. I don't know who needs to hear this, but it's weird how much conservatives are doing damage control for left-wingers. A left-winger shot Charlie Kirk and now I've got conservatives, quote unquote, I'm doing the air quotes if you're just listening to this. I've got conservatives out here SAYING THAT NO, NO, IT WASN'T THE leftist guy with three DNA matches and four confessions. It was really Israel. You should be mad at Israel. And then I've got other quote unquote conservatives saying we shouldn't be destroying narco terrorists. We shouldn't be killing them in international. We should be arresting them in their speedboats and their submarines. Literal submarines, guys. Literally, we destroyed a submarine, drug running submarine. And you hear people on TV, the liberals and the woke right and the woke left going, "No, no, no. We shouldn't be doing this. What should we be doing? Oh, we should be arresting their submarine." and then bringing them on shore to try be charged. They're not even American citizens. No, we should be blowing them the hell up and the the the missile hellfired missiles will continue until morale improves or the drugs stop being sent to our country. In fact, it's the most genius move, one of the most genius moves this administration has done at all because Venezuela has no ch no contest for our missiles, Hellfire missiles raining down on them from MQ9 Reaper drones. There's nothing they can do. And they can't even say like, "Oh, you're going to get into a ground war with Venezuela." What? We don't need to even send one boot on the ground to take out Venezuela if that's what we want. We can beat Venezuela with with politics if we want. economics. We have a million different weapons we can use against uh Venezuela. Now, if we want to take out their narco uh cartel leaders, we can send in special forces and we can just wipe those people out anytime we want. We can shoot a hellfire missile down on their house if we want. And the question that people should be asking, here's the question people should be asking. What is this surveillance that is being used to track these drug smugglers? Marco Rubio said in no uncertain terms, "We know who is doing it. We know who's on the boat. We know what they have on that boat. And if you don't believe that, then you have not been watching my content enough." The question people should be asking is, "Hey, how are we getting all this surveillance? How do we know who what drug runner is on what boat with what drugs? How have we collected that intelligence? What surveillance systems are we using? Thank you, Joshua. Nobody in the chat. Thank you, Gorgon Stair. I mean, you spelled it wrong, but we'll give you partial credit because I understood what you meant. They're using stuff like Gorgon Stare. We're flying over the top with drones and we're monitoring every single moving person with AI. So, of course, we know like the the dumbest people are the ones that are like, "Dr. We don't know who was on that boat. It could have been a fisherman. He was doing some some uh you know, Caribbean tuna fishing or some nonsense." No, no. We know exactly who are on those boats. We know what's on them. And you are the only angle you could play is you could say, "Oh, we are, you know, killing innocent people because we can get away with it." Right? It doesn't really make a lot of sense. really. Oh, yeah. We're like, "Okay, we're just going to kill those fishermen for no reason. We're going to claim they were drug smugglers. Why would we do that?" So, people that don't understand our surveillance capabilities are the ones that disappoint me the most. I mean, you really have to have no you have to give no credit to our intelligence apparatus to think that we're just taking these people out for no reason whatsoever. And then for the people that say, "Well, what were their names then if we know who they are?" One, no one cares. Sorry, no one cares. We don't care what the name of random Jose the drug smuggler is. Doesn't matter to us. And B, even if we do release that information, they're just going to be some low-level poor person probably. It's not like the cartel leader was on the boat. So, I imagine what'll happen is they'll be like, "OH, NO, THAT WAS just Jose. He just worked at the auto body shop. He just did a little moonlighting where he was uh, you know, doing drug trafficking. That was just his moonlighting job." So, I don't see any reason to even release the names either to be honest, but they definitely know who they are. Now, first clip of the night, and this is the last political thing, and then we're going to jump right into the quantum mechanics. [snorts] Here's Donald Trump. This is really the only thing that needs to be said about anybody that has push back on our policy on the narotist. Here you go. This is it. >> Mr. President, if you are declaring war against these cartels and Congress is likely to um approve of that process, why not just ask for a declaration of war? >> Well, I don't think we're going to necessarily ask for a declaration of war. I think we're just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. Okay? We're going to kill them. You know, they're going to be like dead. Okay. >> Yeah. >> There you go, chat. He's like, "No, I think we're just going to kill people that bring drugs into our country. We're going to kill them. They're going to be like, you know, dead. That's it." No, there's not even a reason to even respect these the push back cuz let's just be honest. I mean, who cares? Who cares what's happening? I mean, we are literally being overwhelmed by opiates and drugs. Like, literally, anything you can do to stop that problem, do it, guys. Okay, I see you whining in the chat. We're getting straight to the physics now. Now that you whined and got upset about it. Okay, here you guys go right off the bat. Uh, this is brand new interview. This was not even in the name of the live stream tonight because this just dropped a few hours ago. Just kidding. Wait, what was the 27th? Oh, that's today. Yeah, just dropped a few hours ago. All-In podcast. I've become I've recently become a fan of the All-In podcast. David Friedberg interviews John Martinis. That's his real name. John Martineis. Can we get a fact check on that, chat? Can we get a fact check on this guy's name? John Martinis, the 2025 recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics. Hello. Hello. So chat, there's so much I want to say, chat, but I just can't say it. So let's just say, man, I saw this interview pop up. Somebody posted it in the Discord. I clicked a link and I could not believe what my eyes were seeing in this interview. I could not believe what my eyes were seeing in this interview. I had deja vu, chat. I had deja vu when I started watching this going, whoa, David Friedberg is interviewing John Martini, the Nobel Prize winner for once again, what did they win for? Uh, quantum macroscopic tunneling. Quantum macroscopic tunneling. So, let's just get right into this. Um, let me take a look at my clips that I timestamps. Okay, I didn't actually say what they were, so we're just going to go to these timestamps. He explains quantum mechanics. Um, now a lot of this stuff, like we've already known some of the history of quantum mechanics, so I didn't really go through all the explainer stuff here. So, if you guys have been watching my content, quantum mechanics is spooky action at a distance. We know all about that. Quantum mechanics is explained by the ether, the zero point energy. There's an extra dimension of zero point energy all around us all the time, everywhere. And quantum mechanics, spooky action, and distance entanglement is explained by this extra medium. There's an extra dimension. We don't perceive it. But this explains why we see this entanglement effect where two different particles separated by a vast distance can have action. What the action on one can mess with the action on the other faster than the speed of light. Faster than light could travel that distance. So how is that possible? It must be the ether. It must be zero point energy. Here we go. you make the this barrier this insulator just a you know 10 20 atom thick then that's thin enough for it to go through >> to go through. So this is what's so interesting. Um you can actually predict the number of electrons that might tunnel through one of these barriers one of these insulating barriers as they're called over to the other side which really is crazy to think about. It's just like walking through walls right I mean >> yeah that's that's the idea. >> Yeah. So going back to the story you were sharing, you're in grad school, right? >> And then Leot proposes this idea. Maybe you can share a little bit more now that we've got I think a bit of the basics on what was discussed which was so right there he was describing Josephson junctions. It comes up several times which is like also mindblowing to me. Really mind-blowing to me. I've spoken to several people about Joseph's injunctions. I've been talking about it a lot on live streams. And now I'm watching All-In podcast host talk about Joseph and Junctions with the Nobel Prize winner. Once again, a Joseph and Junction, a squid as it's also referred to, superconductor or could be a semiconductor, but superconductor insulating wall and then another superconductor. And what happens is some of the of the electrons of the current makes it through the wall. Gets through the barrier. Gets through the barrier. And so we're going to learn a little bit during some of these clips how this is possible, what it means. And and weirdly, I did not expect for him to jump right into AI computers and quantum computers. So it turns out that's what John Martini does now is he win this research that he won the Nobel Prize for his body of work in macroscopic quantum tunneling dating all the way back to 1985 40-year body of work in recent years in the last 10 years he's been working for Google on their quantum computer the guy that just won Nobel Prize. So, we're going to start putting some pieces together, which is why I got so excited about this. Here we go. >> Coming out a bit, like rather than just think about all of this happening at a microscopic scale, is it possible for it to happen at a bigger scale? >> Yeah. And again, we've been talking about quantum mechanics is the physics nature at this microscopic atomic scale. But the question was if you made a macroscopic object, would it obey quantum mechanics also? Okay. And then you know that was the basic question and it turns out that there's a very natural system to look at looking at an electrical system and look seeing for quantum mechanics and electrical system where the currents and voltages of essentially electrical oscillator does it behave like a classical physics or does it behave with this quantum mechanical nature to it? And that was the question. Now it turns out that when you think about quantum mechanics and thinking about well there's the quantum behavior but then at some point you have to measure it which then turns it into a probability there's something called the Schroener pat cat paradox where um in the paradox you have a your radioactive decay and then you you you let it happen for let's say half of the radioactive decay time and then you say and then the in you have a radio detected decay a detector and then a bottle point. So um so he said well you know people should be testing this and let's see if it's true and u as a as a young graduate student who just you know learned >> being in the perfect moment perfect position you know to to be able to kind of cross through the wall is so low it would never happen in this or many other universes >> and and that's the problem is that most macroscopic objects when you try to think about the quantum mechanics that won't happen. Okay. >> So there's a small probability one electron can cross over a barrier, >> but the probability that many cross over at once is lower and lower and lower and that makes it very difficult to see at scale. >> And that's the answer. Boom. Boom. [sighs and gasps] I don't know who just understood that or understood the significance, but don't worry, I'm going to explain it to you. Right there, we're talking about infusion. We refer to it as how often the particles are interacting, how often they're fusing together. It's the crosssection of uh the fusion probability chart. Now in the same vein we can think of what is the probability of us getting through the barrier and they say the reason why this doesn't work at larger scales is you would need every electron in my body in my hand would have to go through the barrier which is this microphone. And even if one or two are going to go through, then you're not going to have all the millions in my elect my hand go through. Most of them are not going to make it through. So this is the problem. How do we scale this up then? How do we scale it up if we have all these electrons and only a small and only some percentage of them will make it through the barrier? How do we scale this functionality up? How do we make it so that we can successfully tunnel a large object through the barrier? Any thoughts in the chat? Here's a thought. Turn your large object into one electron. Turn your object into an electron. How do we do that? Oh, that part's easy. We make a bubble. We make a bubble of plasma around our object. And now the universe treats our object as though it's one single electron. You make a wormhole. You make a mouth of the wormhole. In fact, you could argue maybe this is what making the mouth of the wormhole is. Everything you see with the MH370 videos, it's physically accurate. So, we can gain intention about the design of the technology that we see. Why do we see the plasma orbs spin around the plane and then converge? Everything they're doing has purpose, scientific purpose. Why they converge at all? Why can't they just zap the plane and then the orbs stay there? Because the orbs are part of the process. The orbs are enveloping or enshrouding the plane, treating it like a single electron. And now all that single electron needs to do is tunnel through just one electron. We've just scaled it up. We need that one electron to tunnel through the barrier just momentarily. Can be for a split second and now it'll be somewhere else. That seems to be the answer. Because why don't the orbs themselves Why doesn't Why doesn't it take one orb to zap the plane? Why does it take three? because they need to enshroud the plane on all sides. They have to enshroud in all sides. You can't do it with just one. We're dealing with a three-dimensional space. Threedimensional space. So, we can learn a lot about how the technology works even from only short one minute long videos. Let's get back to it. What what happens is if you look at an electrical circuit then the parameters become favorable for seeing this kind of macroscopic behavior and okay it's hard to go into the the whole physics of all that but it's basically because you can make a circuit that operates at microwave frequencies. So instead of you trying to go through the wall once a second it tries to go through the wall five billion times a second. Okay. So then it's it's a lot you know more you know you have more chances to go through. And uh uh the other thing is just the various parameters that involved in quantum mechanics you know are favorable for seeing this kind of phenomena. You have to do the experiment right but uh it's favorable. The other thing I just heard there is microwave frequencies. This is something I have not been able to get out of my head since we started looking at lasers. One of the laser mechanisms that we looked into months ago used microwave pulse microwave pump lasers through some kind of sapphire crystal. I think they were producing phentoc or something like that pulses. Um maybe they were doing pedawatt lasers or something with it. So microwaves seems significant. Literally the same microwaves that you have in your oven if you have an oven near you guys. So they're actually using pumping microwaves through these Joseph junctions because it increased the tunneling because you're having more chances of tunneling. So we're learning already a lot about how these Joseph junctions work and you're going to learn more here in a second for doing that. >> So one of the parts of your experiment you created what's called a Josephson junction. Is that is that correct? So this is two superconductors with a barrier between them. Right. I got really fascinated by superconductors when I was maybe 12 years old. I I went and bought a superconducting discrium barerium copper oxide. >> Oh yes. Yes. That's right. >> From the back of popular science and then I went to use >> IBCO superconductor. He talks about uh he just talks about levitating >> electrons condense into one state. Okay. Now to just to give you analogy of how it's not a perfect analogy it's close analogy. If you have a normal metal any metal we have at room temperature it's like a gas of electrons. It's like you know gas in the air and then when you get below the superconducting temperature >> sorry I think we should just explain that. So so you have a metal all the electrons are kind of moving around. They're they're perturbed. They're different energies different states. That's right. different energies, different states. You know, there's some firm statistics that go into that, but it's more or less looks like a gas. You think of a of a gas and then when you cool it below, you know, a certain temperature, it then coaleses into, let's say, a solid like like atoms will electrons coalesce into something Cooper Cooper pair BCS condenset is the name where all the electrons are kind of locked together and doing the same thing. Now the nice thing >> so something you just mentioned there guys if you don't know understand superconductivity here we're saying that at certain temperatures when we get below or below this critical temperature we will have superc conductivity begin to form where our electrons begin to move in unison with one another and he's saying that at room temperature at high temperatures the metal is essentially acting similar to a plasma the electrons are moving around freely this is not the first time I heard this somebody else also O mentioned that a metal is very similar to a plasma in that the electrons are moving around pretty freely independently of one another. If you cool it down now they they stopped acting independent. Now they begin to act like one one object in unison. And this is why high temperature superc conductivity is so important is that that critical temperature they call it the the TC you might see it measured see it documented the critical temperature is a temperature at which superconductivity breaks down where that collective action now goes back to being a scattered independent action thing about that it's not like they're frozen in place but they have a free parameter that allows them all the currents all the electrons to flow in some direction which is the supercurren >> in [clears throat] a superconductor meaning a material that's cool enough that it reaches its superconducting critical temperature, right? So suddenly all the electrons can still move. They can still create a current but >> but they're moving together like they're in like in my analogy like they're in a solid instead of the gas. And because they're moving together, okay, then then when you work through all the physics, they are not um you know they aren't randomly scattering off things. >> We're going to skip ahead here a little bit to this other part is really good. Here we go. It's right about here. Okay. >> Frequencies that come out of that. And this is a quantum mechanical effect that Oh, I need to go back a little bit. We missed it. >> And the light coming out of that gas would be at certain colors of frequency. So if you go outside and you have the sodium lamps on, these are kind of the yellow lamps. You have, you know, kind of a single frequency coming out of that lamp. Or nowadays you look at LEDs, there are certain frequencies that come out of that. And this is a quantum mechanical effect that see how the electrons travel around the atom. There's only certain kind of frequencies that they oscillate at. Now classically you would expect there to be all different frequencies that it spirals around or spirals into the nucleus. So that's what you expect. But we saw these discrete frequencies. And so by measuring those discrete frequencies, you now had proof >> that there was quantum mechanics happening at a macro scale. >> That that's right. >> And you published this work. And was there a lot of attention when you published this work? >> Yeah. >> So what did he just explain right there? >> He said we think about these electrons moving around and they're only oscillating. Our atoms are only oscillating at at specific frequencies. It turns out it's not a matter of this chaotic system where every frequency has a response. What he's talking about here is there's certain coherent frequencies, certain coherent frequencies. Now, this is going to shoot out green light. This one's going to shoot out yellow light. He's saying this is how an LED screen works. How do LE LED screens work? He says this is a quantum mechanical effect when you're on your LC LCD screen. And your reason why you're seeing certain colors is they're abusing this quantum mechanical effect. This explains why Charles Chase tells the story about the guy who invented the LCD screen going to the Nobel Prize winner and the Nobel Prize winner telling him, "Nah, it'll never work. It's not possible." And he had already developed it. He had already invented it. So there, this is big because now we're understanding what's really happening. If we tie this back to the photoelectric effect, we know it's all about resonance. It's all about resonance. Now, you're about to find out later on in this interview very actually very briefly in a few seconds here why this is important, why these discrete frequencies matter when it comes to quantum computers. So, here we go. Let's skip ahead a little bit. Little Richard Fineman read his his his books and whatever and he was talking about using quantum mechanics for computation, which is building a quantum computer. >> So, he gave a talk that was, you know, really kind of amazing. I'm going to be honest, as a student, I I didn't quite catch everything. And my Michelle Dev Ray, my dear friend, said, "Yeah, maybe some of the things wasn't quite figured out at the time." But afterwards, he was absolutely mobbed by people asking him questions because it's so interesting to think about taking this this, you know, basic law and actually doing computation with it, >> right? >> And I was a graduate student, so I was kind of at the outside ring, you know, you have the professors in close and whatever. I was just a lowly graduate student, so I could hear a little bit. Well, what I what I learned from this it was a great question and and something that would be kind of worth doing, you know, for your your life your life work because it's so deep and so interesting and maybe practical and the like. So that really out so so this was him explaining this was crazy to me was that the guy that just won the Nobel Prize for macroscopic quantum tunneling has been in AI and quantum computers. That's what he's been doing since like the 2000s, but really the 2010s with the with Google. And what did he just say there is that even back with Richard Fineman, they were already floating the idea of using quantum computers, quantum mechanics to make quantum computers. Chat, this is where it got real spicy for me because what have I been talking about? I have been saying that this all goes back to nuclear weapons. And if you have not been following all my work, that's fine. I don't judge you. You probably should though. Turns out when I started looking up, I just asked the question just not even that long ago. And how often have you asked this question is when did we invent computers? When did we invent computers? Chill out, Corky. You're getting ahead of the game, Corky. A little too soon. For my audio listeners, I'm not even going to say what it says in the chat right now. It'll it'll come for you in a minute. We're not to that point yet. We're getting there, though. When did we develop the first computer? It turns out some of the first computers ever invented were for nuclear weapons. We built computers so they could do the calculations for nuclear weapons. Why? Why do we need computers for nuclear weapons? Oh, because it's really, really important that we get the waves to interact perfectly. I mean, when I say perfectly, I mean we need equilateral triangles. We need our shapes to be perfect in a threedimensional environment, not a hypothetical. Usually, when they do the math, they simplify it and they're like, "Okay, we're just going to make a bunch of assumptions to make this a two-dimensional model of what was going to happen." three dimensions is really tough to model. So they needed computers, advanced computers. And if Richard Feman, who was on the Manhattan project, if he was already floating the idea of quantum computers back when he was alive, then we almost certainly developed quantum computers for the military. And I'm going to give you one guess as to what we're using those quantum computers for. You know what? No guesses necessary. You ready? I forgot I had this >> into the future of quantum computing. >> I think it will come. Um I saw a paper by some guy who was listing all of the reasons why it was impossible. Uh and read I read the paper very carefully. Two of his reasons I I was clearly wrong. I'm not sure about the other five. Uh but I my my guess is that quantum computing will will come along and will revolutionize certain kinds of calculations that we do and in nuclear physics I'm an experimental nuclear physicist and the um uh the kinds of calculations we do for nuclear physics you either have to uh make assumptions that are contrary to quantum mechanics. For example, in a cascade calculation, you have to collapse the wave function a 100 times where the where it would stay uncolapsed in a real quantum mechanical situation or uh or else you have to emulate the quantum mechanics with great difficulty using complicated integrals that are very difficult to execute in many cases. I think quantum computers will eliminate a lot of those. There will have to be a whole new generation of theoretical nuclear physicists learning how to use these computers to do the appropriate calculations. But I think one will be it will revolutionize that particular feel that I'm very familiar with and it will probably have a similar effect all over the place. >> Holy [ __ ] chat. There's a reason why I've got that clip saved. That is John Kramer, professor ammeritus at University of Washington Udub. He also presumably knew people like David Kirkley who's the CEO of Helian Fusion. That was him back in 2013. I want to say that video is from explain the person interviewing him. What do you use a quantum computer for? Oh, it turns out nuclear math doing math math on nuclear weapons is one of the main reasons they use them for. There you go. There's a connection. Didn't come to me from a dream either. Came to me from hard evidence and and videos on the internet. Here you go. >> Motivated me. >> Yeah. So that big idea is is to use quantum mechanics and these properties of quantum mechanics to do computing. >> Yeah, that's right. And and I would say uh soon after that other people in the field got a little bit more specific and showed how you would how you would do it. And then it was in the early 1990s maybe 5 years later that Peter Shore came up with this factoring algorith to solve a you know a real world problem with it. Yeah. And it took a while to people figure out. was very abstract and you know people weren't sure what to do but but like I said I could see that in all of the crowd around Fineman asking them questions that this was >> so this is crazy right like this is like holy [ __ ] this is the reason why they built quantum computers like why do quantum computers exist everybody's sitting here wondering why why do we have these quantum computers why are we building all these quantum computers everyone's asking Richard Fineman back I don't know who knows how long ago that was 50 years ago why do We have them. You can't say the answer because the answer is nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons. We've taken nuclear weapons into some weird Star Trekesque direction where now we're manipulating spaceime because the energy densities we can achieve are so massive that they're actually warping spaceime. And it turns out this also unlocked this understanding of zero point energy that's all based on resonance not based on particles based on waves based on what Tesla told us a 100red years ago. This isn't I wish this was a conspiracy theory. It's just actual physics just actual science. And I I did see a comment earlier in the chat saying well these are these are theories. Not really. People know this is real. The difference is the public doesn't understand that it's real. And from the public perspective, the military, everybody agrees the military has stuff beyond what the public knows about. We have secret weapons. What do you think those secret weapons look like, guys? This is what a secret weapon is. We have a secret weapon that manipulates spaceime. Straight out of Star Trek. People worked on that. A lot of people worked on that. They must know the principles are real. And what they do is they go to the defense contractors. They go to Loheed Martin and they go and they build weapons for them under NDAs. Or they do what this guy did and they go commercial and you know he's not sitting here talking about teleportation but he's explaining the physics behind it. He's explaining the physics behind it. So the difference is that we are looking at and revealing technology that was not planned to be revealed for another minimum 20 years. Might even be longer than that. I mean most of these fusion companies aren't talking about getting practical fusion for like another decade at least. Some of them they're not they're looking like 15 years down the road. Meanwhile, the military's had fusion, inertial confinement fusion figured out since the 60s. Since the 60s. Let's get back into this. >> The most, you know, most interesting fundamental question, you know, how to combine quantum mechanics with doing computation. It's it's really amazing. >> And so, you started to do that with your life's work pretty much. You go on to a very good career. >> Yeah. So my career path um was of course quantum computing was getting developed and and it took me a while to really get go all in on it. Okay. Yeah. >> So um what happened is Michelle Devet was was from France from CEA going to skip ahead a little bit because we don't have time for all this >> but basically >> cubits >> I'm pretty sure this is is that Google's uh s uh what do they call it? Sycamore. I think that's sycamore. So we're about to learn now here. here. I mean, the reason why we're watching this is, okay, he's just kind of connected some of the thoughts in my head about how the orbs work, what have you. He's about to connect another major one right here. Another major one right here, guys, which is what is a quantum computer. Does anybody in the chat even know what it is or how it works? Before I watched this, I'll be honest, I didn't really know what I mean, I don't know. I just know that it like somehow interacts with the zero point energy. Other than that, I didn't really know what a quantum computer was. We're about to find out right now. Why is the guy that just won a Nobel Prize for macroscopic quantum tunneling using a Joseph's injunction, why is he all in on quantum computers and and what does it actually but what what like literally if I were to say how do you build a quantum computer? Where do you start? You know, because people say, "Oh, well, it uses entangled states to solve a problem." But what is it? How do you Okay, how do you build something that measures quantum states? What is a cubit? What is a cubit? What is What are these things? Well, here we go. We're about to learn. And we made them really good and you know fast and whatever so that we could run some algorithm a mathematical algorithm that um we produced some output that was took you know much much longer on a classical computer to to emulate than do that. It was not practical but it was a demonstration of the power of a quantum computer >> that it proved that the quantum computers could work. Now, it didn't solve something that couldn't be solved on a normal computer because again, a lot of this stuff, a lot of the physics is just proving the concept. Once you've proven the concept, you can scale it up. Once you've proven macroscopic quantum tunneling works, now the question is how do we scale that up so that we can make a jumbo jet disappear, right? So, they've proven that we can do quantum computers. They just used a few cubits and they did the quantum computer math. But how does it actually function? How does it how does it build one? He explains what it is. Here we go. >> Well, just maybe give your description of a cubit and maybe we can relate, you know, how do we build these quantum computers from cubits to the Josephson junction and some of the early work you had done that you ended up winning the prize for. >> So, very simply, we have a metal wire and a metal wire that gets put together on this Joseen junction which represents a an inductor flowing through here. And then from this wire to this wire, we have a capacitor. And then we set that up to oscillate at about 5 GHz cell phone frequencies uh uh you know to to form the cubit. Okay, this oscillating thing and then there's at low temperature superconductors you know all this magic we can we can get quantum mechanical behavior out of that. What? That's it. That That's what a cubit is. That a cubit is just a Josephson junction hooked up to a capacitor pulsing a resonance through it. Is that resonance chat? Is that it? That was it the whole time? It's a literal [ __ ] Josephson junction hooked up to a capacitor pulsing a resonance through it. Um, are you kidding me, chat? So, quantum computers are just Joseph's junctions being run out of resonance. How did I not know this this whole time? A cubit is just it. Did he show the image there? Oh, yeah, he showed the image. Where's the the image? No, here it is. I'm just gonna He pulls the image. I'm going I want to replay that cuz like this is the most important part of the whole stream where I'm watching this I'm going okay so what is a cubit and he's like well you just make this Joseph and junction you hook it up with a wire it's all superconducting and we now have a superconducting Joseph and junction with a jo with a superconducting wire hooked up to our capacitors and that produces a macroscopic effect >> put together on this Joseen junction which represents a an inductor flowing through here and then from this wire to this wire we have a capacitor and then we set that up to oscillate at about 5 GHz cell phone frequencies uh uh you know to to form the cubit okay this oscillating thing and then there's at low temperatures superconductors you know all this magic we can we can get quantum mechanical behavior out of that >> and then you can measure that quantum mechanical behavior create a representation and use that to run your computing That's right. What you can do is you put on microwave pulses to change the state of the quantum computer, change the way it oscillates, and then we connect it to um it's a complicated readout circuitry uh to, you know, in the end figure out what state it's in. >> Holy [ __ ] Wow. If you're watching on video, they have uh as images here some images of what these transistors look like. The squid we can see uh in B and then we can see our Joseph and junction in C over here and then we can see what the cubit the cubit diagram is basically. So the Joseph and Junction the squid is two Joseph and Junctions basically looking at this image here we see our Joseph and Junction is on the right. Our third image C is the Joseph and Junction. Two Joseph and Junctions build the squid sqid superconducting quantum something or other device. And then our cubit is basically just our Josephson junction just hooked up to a capacitor. That's it. Literally just a [ __ ] squid hooked up to a capacitor is our cubit. I'm so triggered right now. I might just crash out right now because it turns out here is you wanted to know what the connection is to lithography. You are looking at it on the screen right now. You are looking at the connection to lithography on the screen. What do you think you're staring at here? You're staring at microchip design. That's what you're staring at right here is whoever produces these little squids the best or can even improve upon them, they are going to control this technology. They're going to control all quantum technologies cuz spoiler alert, this is everything. This right here, this this squid design is everything. All of the things like when China was talking about their quantum radar, what do you think they're talking about? How do you think they're you? How do you think what do you think that looks like? This is what it looks like. This is it. It's a squid. It's a squid. The key is you need to measure the output. What are we even measuring? Think about this. What are they actually measuring here? So, we have one one cubit is a superconducting device that's being resonated. So, you're basically looking at the variance. You're looking at this reson. Imagine that you made a swing. Let's just simplify it. You've got a swing. It's going back and forth. Right now, in our squid, it's like the forward only moves a little bit and then it moves like further back. So, it's not it's asymmetrical. It doesn't whatever goes through the barrier is not the same as what like hit the barrier, but doesn't matter. What we're measuring here is we're measuring differences in the swing. We're like, oh, the swing went a little bit further back this time or it went a little bit further forward this time. We can measure that. That's what they're measuring as their output. So, what is a quantum computer that has a whole bunch of cubits hooked up to it? That's a web. That's a that's a whole web of cubits. You can imagine all these cubits sitting out there and they can measure any little oscillation in any of them. You can imagine like a ghost. Let's say I'm Slimer from the Ghostbusters. Slimer from the Ghostbusters goes through all the cubits and the cubits can measure that resonance of the ghost passing through them. Why? Because the ghost is manipulating the zero point energy. So they could see the pattern that would be equivalent to the slime or the ghost traveling through the cubits of the quantum computer. That's what the quantum computer is doing. This is why it gets creepy for me because now I'm sitting here going, "Man, I really do think that these quantum computers might be tapping in to an external intelligence, maybe even our own." Our brains are probably quantum computers that are tapping in to an external intelligence. And it wouldn't surprise me if if you make enough cubits in your quantum computer that it's going to be doing the same thing. It might be doing the same thing. You might start getting readings from your quantum computer where God is talking to you. I use I use this term very loosely, but some being might start talking to you through the quantum computer and it could be a being that's on the other side of the galaxy or it could be a being from another dimension or a higher dimension. Who knows? Okay. So, that to me was wild. Uh cuz now we're connecting this to fabrication. >> Okay. And then and then you you connect just an array of these and you just use capacitive coupling from you know one one wire to the to the next one to to couple them together. And it's more complicated than that but that gives you a good idea. >> And then just to understand your work that you won this Nobel Prize for that demonstrated this quantum mechanical phenomena at scale. Is that part of the design of a cubit and the circuitry? Did that inform that design work or explain it rather? Yeah. >> Yeah. It was the very basic simplest circuit. Uh you know we were using analog simulators at the time not even the I took data with a computer but this is this is far back enough that you know it was very rudimentary and then over the years we just got more sophisticated design by the whole field you know many many people. >> So the reason why I played this part is because man I have gained so much information from this interview. My favorite interviews are the ones where I get information from reading between the lines. And right here, he's saying, "Look, we started this in 1985." He knew this was a thing in 1985, but it's 2025 now. And he's saying, "We didn't have the technology to even do the measurements. We didn't have the technology to even accurately do the measurements back in 1985. But now we've been catching up from a technological from a material science standpoint. We've have the tools. And this is something Tom Bearden spoke about. Tom Bearden when people asked him how have they been able to hide free energy from the world. He says, well, the problem is partly a material science one is that as our technology and understanding increases, our tools also increase and our tools get better and then our science understanding gets better and our tools get better and then our science understanding gets better. For the people in the chat who said these ideas don't have any proof, well, first of all, you're wrong because you're listen you're literally listening to a Nobel Prize winner who just won the Nobel Prize for it. But there's an element of truth to that. The science is so far because the universe doesn't wait for humans to understand it. The universe has always worked. If we understand a new property of the universe like zero point energy, it's always been there. It's not like it just only be got there the moment we discovered it. No, it's always been there. The universe and its properties are not dependent upon peer-reviewed papers to be real. The only thing that peer-reviewed papers do is help the public to accept what is real because no one in the public understands science. No one in the public understands science at all. That was the reason why I play the Carl Sean clip at the beginning of every live stream. We've become a society where people are listening to Candace Owens rant about dreams and [ __ ] that she had because people are more concerned about spiritual understanding than they are hard science and reality. And so I mean it just is the way it is. I'm not a guy that's going to try to, you know, change everything about people's nature. People are the way that they are. Nobody understands science. Nobody wants to learn about science. So the science that we're reviewing here is science that will be accepted in 50 years the same way where we accept the sky is blue today. This is why when I defend the science against people, usually I just start with, do you think gravity is real? Because Einstein is the person that has best described gravity and Einstein was the guy that predicted gravitational waves about almost a hundred years before we accurately measured them. So Einstein understood gravitational waves almost a hundred years ago or a hundred years ago and we only detected them officially in 2016 2017 maybe 2015 I forget whatever year LIGO is when we detected them. So there you go. So once again, what we think we know to be real is often what we or what we know to be real often is lagged or the the public science lags far behind what we know to be real. And uh and we were able to put things. >> Let me skip this ahead a little bit. Here we go. Saying, well, what do we have to do to build a quantum computer? that kind of led me to know what physics we have to test and what are the kinds of things we have to build and that's just the way my mind works. I'm I'm much more practically oriented. So it was a perfect field for me to get in and that's kind of what you know intuitively led me to you know going to do this in graduate school. And I think it's just so fascinating the amount of engineering and technology you have to do to make this work. >> Where are we in quantum computing evolution today? So what's the state? At what point will we have call it generally accessible and generally useful quantum computers that can do all of the amazing things everyone's kind of talked about for decades that one would be able to do. >> So that's right. So um right now we're we're about 50 or 100 cubits for the superconducting case but they they can be fully controlled and run real algorithms and do very complicated things. They have a lot of other systems that can do that. I think the the newcomer on the block which looks good is neutral atoms where they've made big neutral atom systems but they're still working to get the gates controlled really well and the like but what's happened right now is we can run genuine algorithms on that and people have uh you know have ideas they want to run but because these cubits are not perfect okay you it's an analog control system and fundamentally these quantum bits have a little bit of error to it little bit of noise to it You can only run so complicated of a project and it's good enough to write scientific papers and try things out. Uh every once in a while people say they've done something uh you know that's hard to compute and well that's fine but they aren't really big enough to be useful yet. They have to get bigger and they have to get better less noise. >> Do you have a point of view on the timelines? This is everyone's speculation. >> Yeah. They say they're like 10 years out. Everybody says they're always 10 years out. I just think that that part is interesting about how they've been scaling them up because it it lets you realize like, oh, the government must be having quantum computers that are next level. They've got to have some next level quantum computer stuff. There is something that's interesting about the noise and then they talk about the physical noise is that remember we have this network of these oscillators. Oscillating things make noise, right? You can hear a vibrating or buzzing sound depending on the frequency that's being played at. So, I imagine these computers are loud. Like really loud. I'm just guessing. But if things are buzzing around, imagine like a bunch of bees humming. Presumably they're doing in resonance with one another though. So maybe it's more like a symphony than it is just like bugs freaking out out. Okay, let's move up here to fabrication. >> Control is clear enough. uh you're you're not going to get the the great performance out of it. So I'm a little bit old school here. And then around 2000 we had more sophisticated fabrication. Little bit uh concerned about that. Now what we're doing with our our company is we're doing a new generation of fabrication of the devices and I would cons consider in my my my research we have the simple fabrication. >> Oh you're doing a new method of fabrication for your devices. Do you say is that true? Oh, interesting. >> Yes. Okay. New method of device of fabrication. Go on. >> With the original papers in 85 and then around 2000 we had more sophisticated fabrication and then for the quantum supremacy experiment we did something even more complicated. other groups too. But we want to do a similar jump in the fabrication. And what's interesting about this is we're going to be using applied materials and the modern fabrication processes that they have which on 300 mm tools you know you can't get in China for example >> you can get it for seamos. And then they're developing we're developing standard processes but you know new recipes and new ways to put it together. And we think by doing that we can do a huge leap frog and then get there faster and get there in a way that you know will protect our lead. There's other >> Oh my god, Chad. Oh my god, what an interview. This is why we pushed the fusion stuff. We are going to talk about fusion in the second half of the live stream, but I mean listen to what he's saying, guys. He's saying we are developing new advanced forms of lithography. The qu the context chat, do you know what the context is? The context of what he's saying right now is how do we beat China? How do we beat China in quantum computers? So number one, advanced lithography. Number two, he says, we're going to develop processes and material science that China won't be able to copy. That's what he's saying right there. He's saying we're going to develop a process that they won't be able to copy very easily. Now, when people say, "Ashton, why haven't you built this? Why have you not gone and made a thing?" Do you guys not realize now that this is a complex process? This is not a situation where you just go to your garage and go, "Hey guys, I'm going to go whip up the fin the the feeble shrump or whatever the hell you're going to call it, right? We're talking about advanced lithography, microchip manufacturing at the atomic scale or at scales that are just a little bit bigger than atomic scales. This is the kind of thing where like nation states nation states are controlling this flow of commerce. In fact, we just talked about this. I think it was the last live stream, not the video game one, but the last live stream. One of the big things I mentioned, which I don't know how people are not paying bigger attention to, is that Nvidia Nvidia has completely left China. Yes, they have completely left China. Nvidia went from a 95% market share in China to zero. Zero. So now we're hearing the real practical answer for a lot of this lithography stuff is that this is like literally controlled by the government. This lithography stuff is literally controlled by the government. What is going on here? Why did this Streamyard? What the actual hell? There we go. Um, so what I wanted to show here, first of all, is the waves, right? This was going to be my Mona Zen, but we're switching it. This is what quantum computers are being used for. [music] They're being used to do this because you can control wave functions at a level where you can make perfect shape. That's all you need to [music] just wanted to show that real quick. Hopefully that music doesn't give me copyright strike. We're going to come back to that. Where is it? Here it is. This chat. Memorize this. I saw this earlier today. Take a look at this. Nvidia in the middle. $4.5 trillion. That's what Nvidia is worth right now. $4.5 trillion. You can see Oracle here. Oracle spends tens of billions on Nvidia chips. And then you see also open AAI is also spending money. So basically everybody in the United States is buying Nvidia chips. You can see this big all the circles here. You can even see AMD is getting involved in it now as well. So everybody's buying Nvidia chips. And then OpenAI has all their AI on the on the cloud under Oracle. And you see here's XAI down here. You see Intel. Then you see Microsoft was just worth $4 trillion. Wow. So, what are we seeing here, guys? You're getting the best geopolitical takes on the planet right now. Nvidia basically is the leading com the central commer technological commerce zone in the entire United States. They feed everybody. They feed everybody. Oh, wait. I think there was one more thing I wanted to show. Let me take a look. Was there one more? Oh, no. There was that AMD uh thing. We'll we'll we'll maybe take a good look at that another time here. That was it, I think. Okay, let's go back to this one more one more clip on this uh interview. >> Other things we're doing too. Uh and you know that that's a small part of it, but uh you know we think there's a way to um you know really lead the field and uh and we're happy we have good industrial partners of uh applied materials, synopsis, design tools, Hula Packard Enterprise, some startups who do the theory work. Okay, the last thing is what are they using these things for >> your kind of >> think to be honest I'm just so focused on doing this and especially when you start a company you better be focused right so I'm doing that but one of the fields that I find this is someone Ben Mazen at UC Santa Barbara is looking for exoplanets and they're using superconducting detectors that are somewhat similar to what we're doing in fact in the 1990s or So I helped this, you know, helped establish that field with other people and did that for five, six, seven years uh to do that. He's doing it in a different way. And I really like how, you know, this instrumentation, you know, that we've been working on. Is there quantum devices are are now able to um uh do these astronomy uh detectors and and look for look for these? And of course, there's so much going on in astronomy these way days with gravitational detectors and exoplanet searches and wow wow holy smokes chat. So there he is saying that these uh quantum devices can be used as telescopes which well if you followed me you already knew that. If you followed me, you already knew they could be used as telescopes because I've spoken about Robert ML Baker and he was literally mentioned using highfrequency gravitational waves as telescopes. And what did I say earlier? All of the applications of quantum mechanics of quantum devices are all from the same exact basis of this Joseph and junction of this cubit. All of them are. This even makes me wonder about the ice cube nutrino detector. You guys remember the ice cube nutrino detector in uh in Alaska? Ice Cube nutrino detector is this like high voltage capacitors that are all linked in an array that are supposedly detecting neutrinos quote unquote. I'm doing the air quotes. Makes me wonder if that's not some quantum mechanical uh squidbased device. How much do we even know about that thing or anything else that's set up in an array similar to uh quantum computers are? So, wow. I just thought that interview was amazing. Shout out to the AllIn podcast. Um there's a link in the Discord if you guys want to watch it. Shout out to um David Friedberg of the All-In podcast. That was a amazing discussion with Nobel Prize winner. Learned a lot about quantum mechanics. Now, we don't have time to to shoot the breeze here. We're just gonna jump right into the next thing that I just accidentally closed. Crap. Hold on one second. Let me reopen this. Um, straight into fusion, guys. Fusion, our next topic of the night. So, if you forgotten about a neutronic fusion, why it's important. Here's a here's a brief recap by LPP fusion. This is Eric Learner's company. Eric Learner's company that does dense plasma focus which is slightly different than field reverse configuration but pretty similar. Here you go. Fusion. >> Most of the fusion [music] energy and most of the energy originally fed into the device is emitted in an ion beam traveling away [music] from the electric >> like some 90 [ __ ] >> This beam is fed through a type of induction core. The ion beam generates changing magnetic fields which in turn generate current in the core. This pulse of current is fed to capacitors. Some of that energy is recycled to provide energy for the next shot and the rest is [music] fed out to the grid. An additional part of the fusion energy is emitted as [music] a pulse of X-rays. This is captured in an onionlike photoelectric device. X-rays collide with electrons in thin metal films, causing the electrons to be emitted with high energy. The electrons are captured on charged electrical grids, generating a current that is also fed to the grid. I'm going to go ahead and and say with a high degree of confidence that we're watching X-rays get zapped out of MH370 when the when the flash happens. I'm going to go ahead and say I got a hunch. I got a hunch that they might be X-rays because as we just saw there, he says, "How does a neutronic fusion work?" Well, we're shooting a beam of plasma through a coil. That coils then its electrons are going to begin to move and we'll use that movement to draw current. We'll use that movement to draw current. We'll recuperate the plasma beam energy as much as possible. And we're also going to capture the X-rays, the X-ray release of photons. We can also use a photo detector to capture that energy as well. This is the idea behind LPP's a neutronic fusion approach. Clean fusion. Once again, a neutronic fusion is fusion that does not release neutrons or releases like less than 1% neutrons. Neutrons are the thing that is releasing the energy and the radiation, the stuff that's damaging. And here's the big key the why why is why are neutrons important? A neutronic fusion. Why is a neutronic fusion important for propulsion? Why is there a connection between a neutronic fusion and propulsion? The reason is the neutrons are what causes the damage. The neutrons are what destroys the fusion reactor. The neutrons destroy your aircraft. Right? It's like imagine blasting something with radiation. it's going to fall apart. This is the This is actually why they struggle with fusion confinement and hot fusion because they can only run it for so long and then the neutrons literally destroy the reactor. And so they try to do a bunch of stuff like coating it with certain materials, but end of the day it's it's a physics problem. So why would you want a neutronic fusion? Because the autronic fusion won't destroy your craft. won't destroy your craft and they use very powerful magnetic fields to ensure that the plasma never interacts with the walls of the craft either as much as possible. This is why it's an open open configuration. You don't have to have anything confined in it. The plasma will just keep self-confined by its own magnetic field. So there's very little to get destroyed. So, first thing I want to show you uh before we look at the Paul Sizz connection, which is also pretty spicy. He's one of my goats. He's one of my favorites. Is this scientific paper also found, take a look at this scientific paper. I think somebody posted it in Twitter. Fundamental scaling of adiabatic compression. So plasma compression of field reverse configuration thermonuclear fusion plasmas somebody was asking me Ashton should we still call it a thermonuclear weapon if there's no neutrons and I actually that gave me pause for a minute gave me pause because I went yeah wait a minute why are we calling it a thermonuclear reaction if we're saying that it's not releasing the heat well it's still a thermonuclear reaction No, it's still a thermonuclear reaction. Thermo doesn't require hot temperatures. We're just talking about a fusion reactant. And when we talk about thermonuclear, we're talking about optional fishing component and then a fusion component where we're lighting off a fusion bomb. So, I'm going to still go ahead and say for now, although I I reserve the right to change my mind later. No, thermal requires heat changes. It doesn't mean that it has to be a hot thing, though. But I'm going to go ahead and say I still believe I don't have a good name and I'm sure they have a name for what they did to MH370. The best name I can come up with it for right now other than just you know wormhole is a neutronic fusion bomb. A neutronic thermonuclear fusion bomb. Yeah, that seems like the best explanation. Okay, so this paper though is who's the author? Oh, it's David Kirkley. It's literally the CEO of Helen Fusion. Literally the CEO of Helen Fusion here. Field reverse configuration plasmas are devices that have demonstrated through magnetic compression they can be heated to thermonuclear fusion conditions in the parameter space of an energy producing generator. of particular interest. FRC's are high beta in that plasma particle kinetic energy is in balance with externally applied magnetic field at all stages of the operation. What this tells me is that their plasma is stable. They're saying that with this high beta, this really high magnetic field that compresses the plasma as the plasma wants to move around, this magnetic field keeps the plasma stable, keeps it in place. It's not moving around. Then he says the following work will show what that a cylindrical approximation for the energy and particle distribution within an F FRC can within 11% match the fusion performance results of both full magneto hydrodnamic simulations as well as all robust modern theoretical spatial and energy distribution models. Now dear at the bottom it says in the second section of the work a detailed numerical model will be presented with the key theoretical performance of the compression of high beta fusion plasmas in both dutyium tridium which is a standard fusion fuel and dutyium helium 3 which is a neutronic is as will be shown high beta dutyium helium 3 outperforms forms a low beta dutyium tridium fuel and can theoretically yield net positive fusion generator. Cha-ching. There you go, chat. Scientific paper for you. Scientific paper for you. There you go. Now, I do have this couple other videos here. I'm just going to show I'm we're not we don't have time tonight to go through them as I wanted to, but that's fine. and we talked about better stuff. This video right here called Helian Energy Fusion Before IDER is by a British guy who's got a classic British sounding name and he doesn't know. Well, you know what? I'm not going to be that rude to him. He actually did get a lot of the details right, but he basically says there's no way Helian Fusion can figure out fusion before ID does. IDR ID is the best European fusion that money can buy. We spent billions and billions of dollars on it. Sorry, bro. I hate to be this guy, but Helen Fusion is going to get there way before IDER. IDER is just expecting positive fusion output by 2035. That's 10 years from now. And that's this this device isn't even set. IDER is not even configured to go on the grid. IDER is just proof of concept. and their road map is 2035 or 2040. So, we got at least 10 to 15 years to wait just for the prototype, just for the proof of concept from the Euro Trash. Yes, I disrespected you and called you Eurotrash because your Eurotrash Fusion isn't even going to get online before we all have commercial fusion already ready to go. The reason why people don't understand Helium fusion is that they don't understand zero point energy. They don't understand thermonuclear weapons. If you understand resonance, if you understand autonic fusion and the benefits of not using having neutrons, if you understand that we can create an electrical system that recuperates the energy use, and you start to realize that the answer to the swing problem is not to push on the swing the whole time. You just pulse the swing. Pulse it every so often. These basic concepts push helium fusion above the rest. But they're not concepts that classic physics can wrap their brain around because they require quantum mechanics to understand. So does quantum tunneling also help with fusion. Quantum tunneling can increase the fusion probability as we learned in previous live streams. So, I found this video to be extremely condescending and also I think that it's just going to age like milk. Now, the other video, this one I haven't had opportunity to watch yet, but supposedly another company. Now, the thing that I do like is multiple companies are now getting in this fusion game. I think that people are seeing the writing on the wall that they know it's going to happen. They see other people know it's going to happen and everybody wants to get involved in this. There's been multiple announcements now over the last couple weeks about fusion and us beating China. I couldn't be happier. I'm not one of those people who's going to doom and gloom you all the time. I love what I'm seeing from Chris Wright, the secretary of energy. I love what I'm seeing about these announcements about trying to get fusion online. And I only wish that we had been doing them sooner. Now, okay, now that we've opined about all that, let's get back to what we wanted to talk about here, which is my goat Paul Sizz chat. So, I believe it was right after the live stream last week, Tim Ventura dropped an interview and in it he says that he had a bunch of info connecting Paul Sizz to a neutronic fusion. And now what we know Paul Sizz from, we know Paul Sizz from explaining uh space flight. In fact, I think I'll play, it's kind of a longer clip, but I'll just play part of this at least. Here you go. >> Paul Ziz was head of [music] hypersonic research during his career at the Macdonald Douglas Aerospace Corporation. [music] >> And these were the concepts we were looking at 30 years ago. >> He has no doubting [music] electrons from molecules to form a plasma. This forms a cushion between the shock wave and the aircraft's skin. [music] >> The Russians have induced a coal plasma by means of a plasma torch that introduces electrons. It [music] makes the air electrically conductive uh very low energy in the [music] front of this vehicle. And in doing so, in a mechanism that we do not yet understand or cannot [music] calculate, the strength of the shock wave uh reduces in half. So the entire vehicle now [music] flies through the air at half the drag it would have with if it did not have the plasma torch here. >> Half the drag. Half the drag with from having a plasma torch in front of your aircraft creating a plasma bubble. That was the first clip that I watched that made me realize there was a connection between plasma and these plasma orbs and our hypersonic vehicles and our spycraft because clearly they figured out how to take this plasma sheath and turn it into a bubble, a drone around your craft. That's what they figured out. And it wasn't just random people that figured out literally the guy that was just speaking, Paul Sizz, was one of the people that figured it out. chat. He was one of the people that figured it out. So, if you love this, here we go. We're not gonna listen to all this, but there's actually an interview up here at the top. We're going to listen to a little bit of it. I can't I don't I didn't write down some clip segments, so we're just going to look around through it. Um, but let me just play some listen uh I'll read out some of the stuff that he mentions here. He talks about working on the Aurora, which is I think a secret spy plane. He says, "There's no magic required for a Mach 6 aircraft. teams like his had the knowhow decades earlier. So, they knew how to do it a long time ago. This implies that it wasn't new physics they understood. They didn't discover new physics. They've known about this, let's call it UFO physics, although it's not. It's really just Tesla science resonance. They knew about this for decades. Hypersonics are all about response time. So, they just wanted to make things go faster. Um, what was the thing? Okay, here we go. Technically, the NASP team, what's the NASP team? What do they stand for? Whatever. National Aerospace, probably. The NASP team wrestled with a knot that sits at the heart of hypersonics. How to breathe air efficiently while the air itself tries to melt your vehicle. dual mode ramjet scramjet combusters had to transition cleanly as inlet mock climbed. So talking about the challenges that they were facing and how they were going to solve these answers. Just as challenging as physics was the problem that wrapped it. NASP became a big tent enough for NASA centers, Air Force Labs, and multiple primes, each with its own design center of gravity. Workshare agreements, multiplied test articles and review boards. Requirements involved as stakeholders added just one more capability. So right here, this is huge. This is telling us how did this conglomeration How did this actually happen? How did they develop this? You're seeing it right here. They developed a combination of NASA researchers, Air Force, and probably private contractors, people like Paul Sizz, who I think was working for Boeing at the time or the precursor to Boeing. And they figured out air breathing magneto hydrodnamics in their plasmas. There it is. This connects the Air Force right there. Um, let's see. Here you go. The handoff scramjets to a neutronic fusion. Well, then let me just get my GL reading glasses on right here for this part. Where NASP largely stopped at low Earth orbit, Sizz's next act aimed past it. working with David Frroning. His name sounds familiar because David Frroning is on the scientific paper about uh future military craft that use plasma and uh plasma weapons and gravity devices. Yeah. Working with David Froning at University Air Force Research Lab Collaborators, he fleshed out a reusable single stage space plane concept that air breathes to a very high mock number. then hands off to a compact autronic fusion rocket. Jesus Christ. The favorite cycle MHD aided air breathing to roughly Mach 1214 then ignition of a dense plasma focus fusion stage for the push to orbit and beyond. Wow. Wow, chat. I'm trying to wrap my brain around this right now. Is that what the orbs are doing? Are is that what the orbs are doing? Are they using air breathing to engage the plane and then flipping over to dense plasma focus? Is that the reason why the dark lines appear in front of the orbs after they've engaged the plane? Yeah. So I I Okay, I gotta switch screen shares here. I think that's what's happening in these videos. So you see the orbs. I'll go full screen here. The first orb, I mean, look how fast it comes in. This orb is going several like Mach 3 or something like that. It's going really fast when it comes in. But then once it gets on the plane, I think it switches propulsion. like you only see the lines appear in front of the orbs after they've engaged the plane. So if you missed it from that video, then let me show you this other one real quick. I don't want to sidetrack too much here, but this is pretty big, I think. So here's the other one. So watch when the orbs first approach the plane, there's no line in front of the orb. There's no black line in front of the orbs. We'll zoom in here and you'll see there's no black line in front of the orb, right? Now you can kind of see the beginning of a black line in front of this first orb. The orb on the top has no black line in front of it, right? And now all of a sudden it's like all three lines like get turned on. Now you can see the lines in front of all three of them pretty clearly. Really makes me wonder. And those are X-rays. Almost certainly what you're seeing in those black lines are X-rays that are being developed from they're using a high-owered laser to cause this fusion to happen inside these plasma orbs. Um, or they're producing a high-owered like X-ray free electron laser. It's not quite like a conventional laser like we would think. I mean, you can definitely see the lines in front of them during this part right here. I mean, you can clearly see the lines. You can see the straight line right here before the orb on all all three orbs have a line in front of it. Definitely makes me wonder. Well, I mean, I I might as well play it out for posterity. About to see a plane get teleported out of the sky. Poof. It's just gone. Just gone. Was there now it's not there. Frame doesn't even slow down. Just not there anymore. Guy zooms out. You can still see the drone. Nose of the drone on the zoom out. Okay. So, going back to this then, and by the way, look at that. using dense plasma focus using proton 11 boron fusion. So this fuel source boron 11 that's even beyond helium 3. The hierarchy goes helium it goes like hot fusion dutyium tridium then you've got helium 3 uh fusion then beyond that you've got boron 11. Boron 11 is the dream. And here's Paul Sizz talking about casually ma using boron 11 in a dense plasma focus. And this was like Paul Sizz died over 10 years ago. So this was probably from like the 2000s. So the military has known about boron 11 a neutronic fusion which again is only one of three autronic fusion fuels. They've known about it forever. They've known about it for a really really really long time. The rationale is elegant. A hypersonic speed and thin air, MHD can extract hundreds of megawws of electrical power from the ionized flow. More than enough to sustain ionization and charge the DPF ignition pulses at around Mach 12. With fusion lit, the system can even feed back power to augment the air breathing thrust until roughly Mach 14, smoothing the transition rocket. Okay, chat, I'm calling it. I'm calling it right now. Paul Sizz either helped build the MH370 orbs or his exact science was used in their development. one or the other. There is no way that this is a coincidence. Paul says, I mean, we're literally listening to somebody explain exactly how the orbs work in the MH370 videos. Not not random other literally how the orbs work in the MH370 videos. It's right there. These paragraphs explain it. If the videos were fake, there wouldn't be paragraphs like this on the internet explaining exactly how they work by the engineers that literally helped build it for them. This is the reason why you have people like Salvatore Py who were eager to talk to me when I'm just a crazy conspiracy guy on the internet that believes in orbs and is a healthcare IT guy. Like, why would somebody like that talk to me? because he's like, "Holy [ __ ] this guy figured out our secret technology that I can't even talk about because I have a million NDAs, but this guy Ashton Forbes doesn't have any NDAs and he can talk about whatever he wants to talk about." That's the reason why you see some of these engineers are eager to talk to me and other ones are like, "Nope, we're not going to talk to you at all." because those engineers don't want to break their NDAs. Because those engineers have decided that they're going to keep this fusion thing secret. They're going to keep this technology secret for many different reasons. Number one is that we cannot handle this technology. We are a race of primitive idiots that simply are not ready for this yet. Technically, the DPF stage operates as a pulse coaxial Zpinch. Wow. Capacitor banks discharge to form, accelerate, and focus a plasmoid to fusion conditions, then expand the exhaust through a magnetic nozzle. Post combustion, the plasma jet couples magnetically to a stator pickup to generate electrical power. No turbines required. So they literally are able to produce they basically turn the engine into a turbine without the turbine being required whatsoever. There's no jet. There's nothing spinning. You don't have a jet fan in there. It literally can produce electrical current just from ionizing the plasma and then focusing the plasma through this uh like magnetic pinch essentially. Yeah, it's a little bit. It's like a squirt gun. That's a good analogy. Thank you. It's like a squirt gun. The design froning team examined points to thrust levels in the 300 to a,000 kilon class. So this is the part where people don't believe this stuff because they're like wait 15 to 20 ton packages could be moved by this. This is the stuff where Elon would never believe this until he saw it. And he says Sizz's operational logic reappears in the flight profile. keep nuclear ignition out of dense air to sidestep safety controversies and use the fusion stage not merely to reach orbit but to routinely go higher. This is the part where I wonder if Paul Sizz saw wormholes. Did he see that we were going to use this to make wormholes or was he just trying to make a better rocket engine and he just helped develop the orbs, the drones so to speak? Because the other thing that's beneficial, like he said, we can make we can pull all this energy. These things can make all this electricity. That electricity is being used as those non-fishing ignition. Those plasma orbs are now an electrical detonator of the lithium on board the plane. That's what they're doing. They're basically big bolts of lightning, but really, really big bolts of lightning. So they turn these plasma balls into an electrical generator that's that's basically building up as it flies through the sky adding adding and adding electricity. It's building up its charge. So it's charge gets really high and then they collapse them together onto their focal point which is where you've got the lithium. Boom. Fusion reaction. Boom. Gotcha [ __ ] Okay. Um let's see what else we got here. Um oh yeah. So here's the road map, right? So this is like this 2025 2050. Read this guys. Today it is 2025 right now. It's 2025 right now. So let's see what we got here. 2025 vehicle would combined MHD augmented air breathing to Mach 14 with a DPF fusion rocket reaching orbit with bomber class takeoff mass. So they can reach orbit from 174 tons. Modest propellant fractions and airike ops. Deploy satellites. Perform around the world suborbital reconnaissance or strike. Service assets up to geostationary orbit. Service assets. Geostationary orbits really far away and return to the same runway. The power budget anticipates MHG generated electricity for sensors and directed energy with fusion providing both propulsion and copious electric power above the sensible atmosphere. Now let's see what it says for 2050. A 2050 vehicle pushes it further, augmenting jet and fusion propulsion with field propulsion. Wait, what? That says field propulsion right there. Uh, by the way, chat, field propulsion is gravitational manipulation. That's what UFOs are using. Field propulsion. By the way, 2050 pushes it further, augmenting jet and fusion propulsion with field propulsion. Concepts like conditioned electromagnetic fields to ease reaction to gravity and inertia. a Woodward style transient mass fluctuations and even quantum vacuum extraction as an electrical backend. Holy [ __ ] chat. Wait, where's my clip? Where is it? Where is it? Where's my goddamn Sorry, I MOVED ON MY >> GRACE of >> There it is. Yeah, I hope Bob is watching this. The aim is a two times increase in effective delta V without growing the airframe. So they're trying to keep it small. Opening routine CIS lunar and rapid Earth moon Lrange logistics. Sis never claimed these were solved. They were bets placed on where high power electromagnetic systems of metamaterials might lead. Parallel parametric work from the Air Force research labs and university partners mapped the fusion box itself. With reasonable gain and high nozzle efficiency, the dense plasma focus system could yield hundreds of megawws to multi-gawatt excess electrical power beyond what is sent to the jet. a headroom for comms, sensors, pulse plasmoid weapons, ultra high powered lasers, and gravity adjacent devices. Sizz also argued that the fusion choice matters both politically and environmentally. The proton boron 11 reactions clean exhaust is helium ions and soft x-rays with proper design to reflect and absorb absorb uh breong radiation. External radiation can be minimized again lit at altitude far from atmospheric pathways. Wow, dude. Wow. Wow. Wow. We are actually looking at in the or videos, we are looking at this technology. We are looking at this dense plasma focus technology using field reverse configuration. Combining these concepts of field reverse configuration and uh a neutronic fusion using dense plasma focus. They turned it into a propulsion. Yes. The only the only outputs are soft X-rays, guys. That's why you're seeing the X-rays, the black lines in front of the orbs. It's all a neutronic. They're using a neutronic fusion reactions. Okay. Let me see if there's anything else on here. Okay. Well, I think we hit most of it here that we talked about the ethics. I love this guy, man. By the way, so I looked through a bunch of these uh links down here and I haven't read through all of them, but like this one over here is David Froin and Paul Sizz. This is their conference proceedings in 2006. So that was one year after the JNF presentation that talked about Helium 3 and Boron 11 as fusion fuels. So again, the other part of it is the time frame. The time frame also perfectly matches the MH370 videos. Like they were talking about this in 2005, 2006, and then in 2014, we're seeing a plane getting zapped by this technology. That's plenty of time for the military to have developed it, even if they only were thinking about it in 2005. And then this really gives away the game, right? because they're saying this is physics and breakthrough physics and technology for 2025 and 2050. They knew that that technology even though the military already had it in the 2000s and the 2010s, they knew that the public wasn't going to know about it until 2050. I mean, we literally already had it in 2014 and Paul Sizz was talking about it in scientific papers saying that, oh yeah, we'll we'll we'll have this publicly by 2050. So, they're saying that even from Paul Sizz's perspective, we're like 50 years behind the curve. And spoiler alert, it's 2025 and we still don't publicly have this. So, we're probably even further behind than what Paul Sizz was claiming. Basically, they're hiding this technology for as long as possible. They're hiding it as long as possible until probably people ask me all the time like when is this going to come out? Well, you're literally have you're listening to it come out right now. You're listening to the evidence yourself. But the other part of it is the US military will only admit it even even if like more videos leaked, they're still not going to admit it. They're only going to admit it when China figures it out. When China figures it out and starts flying around plasma drones, then the United States will go, "Uh, yeah, don't worry. Those are China and we have them, too." That's what they're going to say. They're going to say, "Yeah, we got the plasma drones, too. We've had the plasma drones for 20 years. That's what they'll say. And everybody will go, "Oh, yeah, of course they did. They were keeping us safe with their secret alien technologies, right?" Half the people will be like, "Yeah, they're just keeping us safe with their secret alien technologies. No big deal. I forgive you." And then the other, the UFO people are going to lose their minds. They're going to lose their minds and they're going to go, "The government is is hiding the aliens. They're they're they're hiding aliens from us that we want to go have butt sex with." And they're doing it to because they don't want us to know. They don't want us to know about the green aliens and how cute they are. Right? That's what the UFO people are going to say. Get ready for it. Mark it down, chat. You can already hear. The more I've learned about this science, the more convinced I am that aliens are just a big scop. We would have seen more alien bodies if there was like 50 different species of aliens visiting us. They're not all invisible. They're all apparently telepathic, but they're not all invisible. So, some of them would have got killed, some bodies would have been seen, right? And when you realize this, Paul Sizz is out here saying, "We understood this physics going back to like the 60s. We've had this physics figured out for a long time. It was a material science problem." So, let's listen to little Paul Sizz in his own words. So, this must be an old interview because Paul Sizz died in like 2013. He died a long time ago. So, I don't know when this interview happened, but shout out to Tim Ventura. He has really good interviews. Um, they're all audio. A lot of the older ones are audio, which are great, but once again, we're only going to get this technology. Like, nobody's going to come save us. Aliens aren't coming to save us. Um, the government's not coming to save us. The government's not going to willfully tell us about their thermonuclear super weapons, right? They're never going to. Why would they do that? They probably have like laws that prevent them from ever saying anything about it. So, the only time this will become public knowledge is when we get into World War II and we start shooting a neutronic super weapons at each other or when China figures out the plasma orbs and they start flying plasma orbs around, which maybe they were doing that during the the New Jersey drone sightings or maybe it was us. Who knows? Okay, so let's One of the things that I found was interesting was the background of Paul Sizz. Paul Sizz was not some random guy like this guy he was like being asked to lead like I think it was rocket dine I have to look at exactly which company I think they folded into Boeing later on or maybe it was L3 Harris but Paul tells this story about how one of the high up people at the company takes him to this meeting and then he introduces Paul Siz is like the new head of research and development or new head of engineering or whatever. Like Paul Sizz was a very humble guy that was extremely intelligent and all he cared about was aerospace engineering. One of the links in that clip that I was just showing or in the article I was just showing is a full textbook, a full textbook that Paul Sizz wrote with someone else. It's like 500 pages and it's all about aerospace engineering getting up and I read a little bit of it near the end getting up to future concepts including you know alternative propulsion. This guy was not a lightweight not by any anyone's uh estimation. So let's see what do we want to do. Uh we know why hypersonics test pilots aurora project. I don't really want to talk about aurora. Let's just get right into fusion reactor. Let's listen to the air the Aurora aircraft and the fusion reactor here. When I see fusion reactor as one of the uh chapters makes me really interested. So let's let's go. >> Budget line item for Aurora on a on a funding uh form, I guess. And I guess it was a very high dollar value. And so his first assumption was this is the Aurora aircraft, which is really what what prompted me to to kind of start trying to follow up on this and say to my, you know, I'm trying to ask the questions in terms of well, is this thing out there? Is it more than a ghost aircraft or is there some reality to it? it. There's no magic to build it. As I say, I was convinced the group I was with at Paton Douglas in in the mid60s could build it. Uh Mel Buck at Wright Patterson, we did we had two models that we built for him that did uh pressure measurements, force measurements, and thermal mapping to get the surface heat transfer rates. And those models went in every tunnel from our sonic to uh to a low-speed tunnel to the tunnels on a home, the 16T tunnels tunnel. >> I love this guy, Chad. the Mach 6 tunnel, the Mach 8 tunnel. We had flight we had data on those things. I I think they had over 1300 hours of um wind tunnel test time on them and they were made out of out of plastic. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> So, he's saying we built this stuff, man. This isn't He's saying this isn't me just messing around telling you stories about theoretical things. Like we're literally out here building these prototype aerospacecraft for people that nobody's ever going to see in the public because it's under national security or it was under a private corporation. These concepts, this electrogravidics, the Thomas Townson Brown stuff, this is all real. It's real stuff. Real physical phenomenon. Just like quantum entanglement. People talk to me like, "You're the guy that believes in in portals. You're the guy that believes in portals and orbs." Guys, it's I I'm so over it at this point. I'm just like, you just don't understand. It's basic physics. We're not even talking about complicated physics. Plasma produces its own electromagnetic fields. That means if your plasma gets dense enough, it's going to form a shape. Turns out that shape is a donut. It's going to form a shape. This is not comp. This is like the entry level to science and physics. You're like, "Oh, you believe that you can manipulate spacetime?" Yeah, it's called gravity. Have you ever heard of it? Do you believe gravity is real? Do you believe gravity is real? Because if you believe gravity is real? It turns out the guy that came up with that theory is the same guy that predicted gravitational waves. What's waving? What is waving in your gravitational wave? If we're in a static universe that's solid that can't wiggle, what is waving in my gravitational wave, right? Like, think about that, chat. All waves require a medium. What is the medium of our electromagnetic waves that can transmit through outer space through the the vacuum of outer space? Just a thought process, guys. Just think about that. >> Well, have you ever followed up with any of the You'd mentioned the late night calls where they said they were standing next to the aircraft. Have you ever followed up with any of your colleagues to to see if they might be more open to talking about it with you now than they have been in the past or >> No, the the ones that I the ones that I knew that were involved are no longer alive. And the ones that >> I do want to mention this because people brought up Ken's shoulders several times, guys. I have been talking about Ken's shoulders for months. The reason why I'm not talking about Ken's shoulders that much anymore. People say, "Why are you not talking about plasmoids?" I am. I am talking about these things. We've leveled up chat. A lot of you people out there, I'm going to talk to my free energy uh followers right now. I think that a mistake a lot of you did was you went, "Oh, free energy is real. Time for me to go make a magnetic motor." Yeah, that's what they want you to do. That's what they want you to waste your time on. They want you to go waste your time making a magnetic motor that's some 50-year-old technology that's been obsolete forever because then you're not really doing anything significant that harms national security. They want you to go waste your time there. They want you to get obsessed with Tesla and focus your entire life on trying to make a magnetic motor. Then you'll have wasted your whole life to build something that they figured out 70 years ago. What's happening with where we're at now talking about fusion is we're taking their science and technology and we're taking it to figure out where they're at right now. That's what we're figuring out. We're saying EVO experiments that was 1989, bro. That was 19 Cool. We can make a tiny plasmoid. We can make a tiny plasmoid using a simple setup. That's great. That doesn't that doesn't solve the power problem. What we need to do is we need to scale it up and that comes with real challenges and we need to take this propulsion plasmoid this because these plasmoids were made for propulsion purposes and now we need to turn it into a stationary physical energy generator. How do we do that? These are real challenges. Just because we've developed a plasma orb that can fly through the sky and build up a huge amount of energy. How do you now get that energy to connect to the grid? That's a separate challenge. It's actually possible, but unlikely. It's possible. Again, unlikely, but possible, that they never even bothered to build a fusion reactor that's stationary. Once they figured out this aerospace concept, they might have just been like, "Okay, we can make a super we can make a super lightning ball in the sky, but we can't make a we can't turn it into a power generator. We can't turn or we can't turn into an electrical power plant." I mean, we can, but we got to figure out those challenges. So, what I'm trying to do is take the science that we know exists, the Tesla science, all this stuff, and figure out where are we at today with it in 2025, not where were we at in 1989. Where are we at today? And we just found out a lot from this live stream so far. We found out, well, we're at a neutronic fusion reactors are being built by Helen Fusion, who's got funding from Microsoft and Open AI founder Sam Elman. And we also found out they're making they're doing proprietary lithography and design systems to build quantum computers and cubits. And that basically involves getting it smaller and smaller and smaller. The smaller you get your microchip design, the more accurate it is and the more efficient it's going to be. So that's pretty much what they're trying to do. And then it's what lithography mechanism do you use to make that happen? One option is a coherent matter wave beam. Who has a patent for that? Charles Chase of Loheed Martin does. atomic scale manufacturing. It's probably the bee's knees when it comes to this kind of thing. I'm going to hit those super chats in a minute, guys, but I want to I want to get through some of these clips. Here we go. >> Involved today. Um, >> okay. Here he comes. >> Don't talk. >> Oh, I see what you mean. They're still bound by their covenants. >> Well, remember there's there's a whole a whole new young group of people if these airplanes exist. Um, it's like the people flying B-52s today are the grandsons of the ones that started with the original B-52s. >> Yeah. >> So, so whatever is out there now is a whole new group of people. >> Interesting. >> So, this is what he's saying. He's saying that these people, >> he's saying they took the concepts. This has been the other thing is like I hate when the people try to throw out all of science. Science is about building on other people's work to get where we're at. And the problem is that we've sequestered a huge amount of that knowledge under national security. This is the reason why the public is so far behind. The public physicists are all the theoretical people. The experimental engineers are literally working for the United States government and the defense contractors and they know more than the physicists do. But it's all protecting our national security. And he's saying that even though I left the field, he's saying other people have picked up the reinss and they're using that information and they're making things better and better and better. This is how we go from plasma fusion propulsion to literally making wormholes in the sky, zapping Boeing 7s out of the sky. This is how that happens role. So, you know, you have to I don't know what's out there. There could be to say that it's a techn technical impossib hardware impossibility is really the wrong statement. U it has been technically feasible for the last 3540 years. >> Well and and in terms of in terms of really groundbreaking you know hardware proposals. One of the things that you brought to the stave conference um was the concept for an animronic fusion reactor married to a hypersonic aircraft. And I I thought that that was just a brilliant idea. I mean just the the output thrust from this so tremendous that that really would be >> well it's not the thrust it's the specific impulse. >> Okay. >> See the problem is the problem is time and the rocket equation is very simple. The change in velocity um is basically the or the the um the logarithm of the weight ratio and the specific impulse and gravity's in there. And so if you the if you have a limited weight ratio, you can't put infinity up in R, but it has to be a finite number that's probably no larger than 10. That means that the specific impulse to go fast enough to get to these distant places in the lifetime of a human being and back has to be very very very high. the estimates that the Russians have done at the IIAF conference that was held in in uh in Braymond a couple years back estimated that you'll need uh an ISP on the order of uh 20,000 to 40,000 and if you really want to go for it has to be 100,000. What that means is that one one pound of propellant has to generate um 20 or 30,000 pounds of thrust. Well, >> so the specific impulse he's talking about is efficiency, right? We have to get really, really efficient. End of the day, what are we talking about? I've got my phone here. I want to send my phone into orbit. This thing needs to be really, really light. And the problem is the same problem we've always talked about. You got to have fuel on board. And the fuel is really, really heavy. This destroys your specific impulse because you've got all this heavy fuel and now it costs more fuel to push it along. So, what's the solution to all this? Well, how about no fuel tanks? How about no fuel tanks? That's the number one solution. That reduces the weight significantly. Okay, here we go. And the only engine that I know that even comes close to that is the engine that's over in Italy that Professor Rubia patented and has a Nobel Prize award for. >> Oh, okay. >> And and the reason we look Dave Froning and I look at the the the autoronic engine is because there's no external radiation. And if you want to build a vehicle that is a tug that goes between the Earth and Moon and the Earth and Mars that you can attach uh it's just it's just a roundroin tug and you hop on board when you're at Mars and come back to Earth or you hop on at Earth and go to Mars or the moon then you want a vehicle that has no external harmful radiation. >> Well, and that's that's the animic one. >> Now for the animronic design, what would the flight time be to to the >> boom baby? I if you if you're not watching the live stream, I am smiling ear to ear right now because there you go. He just said what I just said like 20 minutes ago. Why a neutronic? Because there's no neutrons. There's no radiation. So if you want a craft that you can fly in, you don't want it to kill you on the plat on the way >> the moon. Do you think? >> Oh, on a round trip. on a roundroin trip, you're probably the Apollo astronauts took 72 hours. And since you don't have to land, since you just do a uh it's an ellipse because you don't need anything else but an ellipse and as long as you're not going in if you want to go into in into moon orbit. >> So, here's the trick. Like, this makes me think that Paul says didn't know about wormholes, although he probably would not have mentioned them even if he did. But we're not going to fly like we could fly in an autonic rocket. But if we can just wormhole ourselves there and quantum tunnel through the barrier, then we don't even need to bother with any of that. Downside is we don't know if you can survive an animatronic fusion bomb. Like the passengers of MH370 never showed up anywhere. The letter to me claims that some of the people survived and they were put back to work, but who knows? That could be [ __ ] My gut would tell me it doesn't look very safe to get hit by plasma balls and have your your plane disappear out of the sky. Doesn't look very safe to me. So, I guess the next best thing would be you fly in your your fusion rocket and you just get there really quick. I mean, so even in a fusion rocket, we can accelerate and then we start decelerating when we, you know, get to halfway point or whatever and we can still that that makes getting to Mars reasonable. Makes getting to Mars possible. Now, having the teleportation wormhole mechanism makes it obviously trivial at that point. Um, but there may be limitations to that. We don't know. Like, we just saw them do this thing to this plane, but they only sent it 100 or a thousand kilometers. Do we know if you can send it hundreds of thousands of miles to the moon or to Mars or what have you? Not sure. >> Then you're going to have to do a burn to be captured by the Earth, the moon's gravitational field. You could do either one. >> I'm going to skip ahead a little bit here. >> You must remember that what they're told is that if something happens to the solids during the one minute boost phase, there is no survival. >> Okay. He says, "Almost all of those diapers are filled by the time they get up there." Now, they said, "No one's going to admit to that, but I'll admit to it." [laughter] He said, "It's the damnest ride you've ever seen." >> Yeah. >> So, I I I would never ever consider a a solid as a prime propulsion system for an Earthlunch system. >> Well, would with the autronic drive, I mean, admittedly, there would be a lot of legal. >> No, not not in the atmosphere. It this this has this has to be above the atmosphere. >> Oh, okay. So, it's very high altitude. >> Yeah. So, it's never going to it's never going to be the actual space taxi to the moon, probably. At least not in a single. >> No, it's not going to be the thing that picks that goes to the tug. >> Yeah. >> Tugus does these does this elliptical loop and you you go up to lower earth orbit to rendevous with it and come back you have a flight vehicle that comes back down and you have a target on the moon that rendevous with it and then lands back at the moon. And the reason that makes sense, by the way, I had a briefing in Russia uh back in in 19 >> 88 in which uh this concept was briefed by Gabbanov as the way the Russians wanted to do it. >> Okay. [clears throat] >> And what that makes sense on is that now every time we go to the moon, we leave a lander sitting on the moon. So if we went there 10 times, there's 10 landers going to be >> Yeah. Well, and it's interesting to see how how one specific device can become the enabling technology. You know, I just saw a special. >> The way he talks about it, it makes me think that he wasn't even envision. I mean, he was envisioning as being like a space transport. Like you have these things flying around in space and then you bring them over here when you want to pick somebody up and then you take them there. But he's basically saying like we're not going to have it be the thing that takes off from the ground. But obviously that doesn't seem to be the case anymore because the second orb seems to come straight out of the water. So they seem to be completely autonomous. although they could be multi-stage like he says >> on the steam locomotive on the History Channel and they they really talked about how it opened up the west and how before that you know people had managed to make it there but it was dangerous and unpredictable and people weren't going in large numbers and once the locomotive was there once the rails have been laid and it was making regular trips all of a sudden >> what was what St. Louis is one of the centers for Knosoga wagons and there's only a record of one knosoga wagon ever returning to St. Lois. So that was a wagon that was sent out by the governor. So >> what else we got? >> Yeah. No, that makes sense. That makes sense. >> Uh, so what you need is a transportation system, which means back and forth. Um, if you go back to England, the way England used to transport stuff was by what they called donkey trains. >> Okay. Okay. So it was leaking. >> They were only holes the size of an atom, but there were a lot of them. >> Yeah. No, that that makes perfect sense. It makes perfect sense. And well, and I wonder what that says to the ISS then. And I wonder if that really limits the life >> accepted the Indians for their 3,000 years of history. Uh not what happened recently between the the Hindus and the and the Muslims. >> Well, and in terms of the Russians, do you know if they're doing any work in hypersonics? >> When the last time I was there, they were uh >> in terms of hypersonic aircraft, do you think that we'll ever see something like this? Maybe it would be a completely incompatible role, but you know, right now it seems like there might be a need there for maybe even intercontinental, but definitely long-distance fighter interceptors. Do you think on that scale? >> When when when Scott Crossfield and myself and Gus Weiss were sitting over at the aerospace club in Washington DC, we put together a chart for Sandy McDonald that talked about the demonstrator we were proposing to the Air Force and this was before Copper Canyon. Um, and what it did is it had a Mach 6 capability to carry about 40 people. It had a Mach 7 or eight capability to carry military goods. And it could be used as a demonstrator to show that with the right equipment, it could it could with with a rocket boost inside of it, plus the air breather, we could get it to orbital speed. Now, we weren't going to go into orbit. We were going to go to nearly orbital speed and then glide around back on the other side. >> Okay. Um, and that's where when we were sitting there talking about what this Mach 6 vehicle was going to be called because in the full-size version, it would fly about Mach 4 4.5 4.6 across the Pacific. Uh, I think Scotty came up with the word uh Orient Express. >> Oh, okay. Okay. >> That's that's where that came from. >> These speeds that he's talking about right here are really consistent with what we're seeing the orbs do as well. It's not exactly the same, but pretty similar. >> But if you go back and look at the original B70 proposal, one of the proposals was to take the fuel out of the fuselage and carry 50 people as a demonstrator to the fact that a Mach 3 transport could carry people without killing them. And that's all we did with this vehicle. We had if you take the hydrogen tank and block it off so you could run methane instead and fly as an aerodynamic vehicle, not as not as something that would go to space, you have enough room for about 45 to 50 people in the tank. >> And since the tank kept liquid hydrogen cold, keeping the people warm to 72 degrees is not even an issue. >> Oh, sure. Sure. >> Although that was always a problem. The people are going to burn up. No, the people aren't going to burn up. They're sitting inside of a tank that held minus 450°ree hydrogen. >> Yeah. Well, and at Mach 3, that that definitely >> Oh, we were flying 4.5. 4.5. Okay. >> So, this is why they're using why the the orbs themselves are not a vehicle, not a transport vehicle. So, this actually reminds me so much of the uh Intel uh Unel guys, the Unatel guys were like, "Your payload is your central object, your cylindrical object, and your drones are what allows for the teleportation to happen." You can almost see the human mind solving the problems that Paul says is talking about. He's like, you can't you can't put them in there because you either got this freezing hydrogen or you've got these super high temperatures where we're doing fusion or you've got radiation. So, they're like, well, what is the solution? What is the solution to these problems? Well, we'll have orbiting drone vehicles surround our craft and then they'll just build up this huge amount of energy, which is enough energy to manipulate spaceime. And then we'll have them converge using our thermonuclear equations that we use our quantum computers for. We'll have them converge perfectly cylind or you know on a in a spiral or whatever on a plane and then it'll encapsulate it. It'll turn it into a giant electron. We'll turn it to briefly into a giant electron that we can trick the universe. We can trick the universe. Create a magnetic monopole. Suck this out over here. Reappear it out over here. Wow, what a crazy crazy live stream. Let me play I'm going to play the Larry Mau video real quick as we wind down. Um because I think this really brings it together. And then I'll do the super chats, guys. Uh what is it? Unatel. Unatel. Uh, wait. MH370 unit. Crap. I forget what it's called, chat. What did I call that? O, I don't even know what I called it. Okay, I may not have that clip handy. Yeah. Okay, never mind. I don't have that clip handy. Okay, so we've connected the concepts of thermonuclear weapons, plasma orbs, plasma fusion propulsion, and as well as quantum computers. The other thing that I wanted to mention is that my initial uh assumptions, which were definitely just assumptions when I first started this, was that there was a few things. If you watch my old podcast that I did, you would find out that you needed to understand quantum computers to understand the orbs. You needed to understand propulsion and superc conductivity. You need to understand these these concepts to understand how these orbs could even function. The quantum computer aspect I think was the biggest thing that was unveiled today unveiled which is the guy that won the Nobel Prize for quant microscopic quantum tunneling literally works on quantum computers and they're just squids that are hooked up to capacitors in in an array. That's all a quantum computer is and it can do fun it can do computing with this. They almost certainly are using these quantum computers for these exact thermonuclear weapons that we would call UFOs. And that's the reason why when they move around through the sky, they look perfect. They look perfectly in sync when they're moving around through the sky because uh they're just they're using super advanced computers or quantum computers to do those calculations in real time in addition to just being coupled together through electromagnetism. So, let me just make sure. Oh, yeah. We hit it. Um let me just show you this as I actually have the his uh his textbook up right here, guys, if you wanted to see the text. I was reading it just to show you that I'm not making this up. It's called Future Spacecraft Propulsion by Paul Sizz. Here's the conclusions I was down to, which is on page 375. Here you go. Future Space Path Propulsion Systems: Enabling Technologies for Space Exploration. I'll put the link in the chat. It's a free link, so you don't have to buy the book if you don't want to. But it I looked through it. I mean, it looks pretty dope. And what year was this? 2006. So, yeah, the time fits, guys. Probably some interesting stuff here. Uh, regarding fusion propulsion. As you can see, it's very detailed. In fact, here's the thing about mirror configuration and field. Wow. Hold on. Hold on, chat. This may be a live stream for Wednesday right there. What do I see with my eye? chat. What do I spy with my little eye? B3.2, mirror configurations. Page 505. What is page 517? Field reversed configurations. And then next after that is spheramax. And then you have levitated dipole. Those are the words that I like to see. We'll have to save that for next time, guys. Uh we're already a little over normally how long I live stream. Let's do some super chats and then we'll get to our final stuff. Sam Fischer, what are your thoughts on quantum crypto cryptography? Um, well, I mean, quantum computers are going to be able to hack any encryption. So, your encryption is cooked. Now, can they make their own encryption? The idea is that you can have an unencry uninterable communication because you're basically tunneling through the zero point energy nothingness. So, you're not even sending a signal, a conventional signal. So, how do you detect a non-conventional signal? The only way you could detect a quantum message is with another quantum device, right? The same way where my phone can't detect quantum communications. It can only detect electromagnetic communications. So, to answer your question, there's no such thing as something that can't be hacked into, but it works on a different spectrum. This is the same reason why we also don't see and see messages from aliens everywhere. Because if the aliens exist, they're using quantum technologies. They're not using standard electromagnetic technologies that are limited on the speed of light. They're using quantum technologies. And if we're not detecting quantum technologies, we're not seeing anything. This is why I think when we start setting up these quantum computers since they have multiple purposes, one of the things that we're going to start getting is alien messages. We're going to start receiving interference from all the other aliens who are messaging each other throughout the universe. And they're going to be going through our quantum device. Like, why is this thing vibrating, giving us feed spitting back a message saying, "How much for the for the quickie in the back, guys. Keep the aliens safe." Good evening, Ashton and fellow Orbee ambassadors. This new chip technology is absolutely amazing. Thank you for your teachings, Ashton. Yes, thank you very much, Timothy Foster. I've seen your replies in my in the YouTube channel. Thank you very much. And once again, fusion. Why am I focused on fusion specifically a neutronic fusion? Well, you just heard it from Paul Siz. They were literally working on a neutronic fusion for propulsion. And clearly they had a breakthrough and that breakthrough has been leaking to the public and in areas like John Slow and David Kirkley's helium fusion, trialpha energy, LPP fusion. And presumably what I think what I'm predicting is that several other fusion companies will flip over at the last minute to a neutronic. They're going to go, "Oh, guys, we figured out fusion. It turns out it's so good that we can just go straight to the animatronic fusion fuels." That's probably how I'm predicting this is going to play out, but it's not going to happen from Tokamax, I don't think. And then Sam Fischer does a follow-up. Says, "Are bees and other bugs using field propulsion to fly?" This is one of my most controversial takes. Yes, bees and bugs are manipulating quantum effects in order to fly. Call it whatever you want to call it. Zero point energy flight, anti-gravitational flight, quantum mechanic, resonance. They're using resonance. They're obviously using resonance. Why does it sound like when the bug is flying? Because it's flying at a specific resonance. Otherwise, it would be like you would hear it like the the frequency changing. The frequency when the bug flies is very specific. My guess is you hear the same thing when you're hanging around near a quantum computer. You're going to hear the of the of the resonance of the current flowing through your cubits. Presuming you have a lot of them, it's going to sound a lot like a bunch of bugs flying around. So, yes, I believe bugs are using this. They're definitely not flying around like birds. Anybody that says that's an idiot. They are using resonance. I mean, this shouldn't be surprising. Geckos, guys, lizards on the walls, they use the casmir effect to stick to the walls. How does a lizard stick to the walls? It's using the chasemir effect. So, quantum mechanical effects are powerful enough for lizards to take effect advantage of them. Why would a bug not be able to take advantage of it? They're pretty small as well. So, absolutely, I think so. Um, and I think it's going to be crazy when we start to realize that bugs are using quantum mechanical effects. It's going to be one of those things where like nobody is going to ever claim that they ever thought they're going to be like, "No, we always knew bugs were using quantum mechanical effects." All those [ __ ] who were in my replies trying to community note me when I said that bugs were using zero point energy TO FLY, SAYING, "NO, NO, THEY THEY they're flying just like birds fly." People were literally arguing with me that bugs were flying like normal birds fly around. posted me some scientific paper like dude the way it flips his wings back around like get out of here bro. GTFO you're I'm gonna have a special apology form filled out for all the haters who claim that bugs are flying around like birds fly. You get a special apology form. Apology for Ash and Forbes always right about everything city. I'm in the penthouse chat. Okay. And then in my pled chat and Rumble chat I see you guys in the Rumble chat. Thank you very much for hanging out with me tonight. Pilled chat, my boys in the pill chat. I see uh just shout out to Methyl who's just been popping off in the chat. Just thank you very much. But John Glock gives the ship. Oh, I haven't I have never been gifted a ship, guys. I think that's good. Late late AF to the show. Terrible internet while driving. My ship can't go back in time, but thank God and Ashton crew for the replay. Looking forward to seeing the episode. Thank you, John Glock. Woke not walk gifted the cookie. Num num num delicious cookie. I should probably stop doing that meme. And then John Glock gifted the cookie. I believe there's still utility in building magnetic motor generators for the sake of proving the concept correct with your kids. Absolutely, man. I mean, if you can build it, if you have the knowledge and you want to show your children how electrical engineering works, don't get me wrong. Absolutely. Just don't think that you're going to build a commercial product. That's the problem. And even if you did try to build a commercial product, you're going to get somebody knocking on your door, sending you a we've stolen your device now under the invention secrecy act or some crap like that, too. The the thing I've learned about the energy industry in general is that you must be blessed by the department of energy. If you have not been blessed by the department of energy, you are probably going to fail. what you look at all these people especially this this new deal with uh in uh AMD as well news AMD deal is all everything's blessed by the department of energy everything's blessed by department of energy they control everything when it comes to fusion game and then lastly woken says he gifted another cookie quantum communication nets this is how the intelligence agency un uh oh unk teams track people who start to develop plasma nuclear technologies and contain it prior to deployment. Now, this is something else I'll mention you guys here. Uh final closing thoughts are that yes, they're able like the way I've heard about this like how the suppression of this technology works in general is that you are dissuaded. If you are even broaching these technology, if you even get close enough to these technologies, then you get dissuaded away. Like I don't know exactly how they do it, but they have lots of different ways to get you to go onto a different path. And they have kept people away from this particular path for a very, very long time. For a very long time. I mean, we saw Larry Mau, the guys that did Unatel, they died destitute. No money, nothing, right? They can ruin you financially. They can take you out if they really need to, but they generally don't even need to do that. They can just ruin your credibility. They can make it so that you can't get contracts because they're the Department of Energy. They own everything. So, that's the way it's been a lot more subversive than what I think people expect. And we are probably the biggest cause. Us being stupid humans that don't ever research or learn any of this. Like just think like if you're like me and a lot of you are, we would never have known about any of this if those videos didn't leak on the internet. We would never know about any of this science, any of this physics, any of this technology unless those videos leaked on the internet. I would never have learned about any of this stuff. Not for my whole life. They could have kept it hidden from me till the day I die at 150, which is when I'm going to die. I'm going to be 150 years old. They could have kept it hidden the whole time. So realize that it takes this concerted effort and let's just be honest, the best evidence you could possibly ask for. Two two perfectly in sync military videos, both showing the same event from completely different angles in color fleer and some kind of weird mid range or midwave gorg whatever gorgon stair is recording in. We still don't even know what it's recording in. I think it's midwave midwave infrared, but it could be some amalgam of hybrid reality that they've got. It took that level of evidence for us to even begin to dig into this. So, you can realize how difficult it would be to get normal people to buy into this science, to buy into this physics is if they don't have compelling evidence like those videos, they're never going to believe it. Never going to believe that it's possible. So, it's very, very easy to hide this physics from people. It was more successful, more easy than I would have ever anticipated in my whole life. So, hopefully we learned a little bit tonight, guys, where we've now broken down that barrier because to me, I'm not the guy that's going to tell you what's right and wrong. I'm not here to tell you what's right or wrong. I'm just here to tell you the world is a terrible place filled with people that do terrible actions and abuse and take advantage of other people. That that's just the way the world's always been. It's the way the humans always are. And all I can do is arm you with the information so that you can make the best decisions in your life. That's it. No more, no less, guys. Okay, guys. Our moment of zen tonight. Forget what is our moment of zen again? Um, oh yeah, this is our moment of zen chat. Our moment of zen. Now that I've taught you all science, now that I've made you high IQ futurist, now that we've purged all the low IQ racists, conspirators, etc. Who out you? Who of you can figure out this science experiment? How are you smarter than a little child? Chat, we're about to test it right now. This is a quiz. Pop quiz hot shot. Who can figure out how to get the orange out of the bottom of this glass of water without spilling any water over the sides. So, you'll have about 45 seconds while I play this until the answer is revealed. Put your answers in the chat if you know how to get this orange out of the water glass without spilling any water over the sides. Here we go. Put your answers in the chat if you know. >> I'm gonna get rid of the music so we don't have to do that. Okay, chat. Time's running out. What's the answer? They're all sticking their hand in the water. Unfortunately, every time they stick their hand in the water, the water rises to the top and sticks out. Anybody in the chat know the answer? What's the answer, Chad? How do we get the orange out? Some people are close. I see some people are close. Uhoh. See, chat. Oh, there it is. Spin the water. Spin it. All we had to do that whole time is just spin the water. Here comes this genius. Are you smarter than a kid? There she is. Or he or she. We don't know. It's an ad androgynous uh person. Boom. Just spin it. The question I want to know, did that little kid did that little kid just know that? Like if that little kid just went up to that water and was like, "Get that kid all of the funding and give them the scholarships. Just go ahead and sign them up with the National Science Foundation right now. I want that kid making warp drives for me in the future. The kid that figured out the spin was the answer intuitively. That's the next Tesla right there. Get that kid all Yeah, that person was the genius. Get them everything right. Like, wow, that's impressive if that kid figured that out. So, yes, the answer is spin. How do you get the orange from the bottom to the top? Spin. You spin the water around, all of a sudden it's got a anti-gravitational type effect and and it just floats to the top. Pretty cool, guys. Okay, that was your moment of zen, guys. Hope you had enjoyed the live stream. Hope you're enjoying the science, physics, and politics discussion. If you're not, I don't really care, but give your opinion in the replies in below if you do guys. We'll be back on Wednesday. Probably going to take a look at those chapters in the Paul Sizz book because I'm loving Anutronic Fusion right now. We are so far ahead of the game on animronic fusion and I love being in that spot. I hope you guys have been enjoying it, too. Have a great night, everybody. Peace out, everyone. >> [music] >> Out in the fields where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the [music and singing] cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect [music] distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Wormhole, stargates, negative energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Bing 7 through a wormhole. Flowing talking wormhole. Stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Owing triple [music] set into a wormhole. [bell] [music] Exotic [music] matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum [music] vacuums squeezed so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and [music] lasers in the lab they play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cast force negative [music] zones. We need to stay the course. Stalking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. [music] Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing triple 7 do a wormhole float thin shell formalism plate [music] so fine spherical geometry we realign energy conditions that we must defy for a [music] stable wormhole let's give it a try [music] forces balancing The plate creating the throat. Open the gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space. Profound. Engineers [music] and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting our destiny. MH370. [music] Where did it go? Blowing trip 7 through a wormhole flow from the fields to the stars. We [music] break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. Little Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his [music] music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear.