Video Transcript
I got a reply from David Kirkley of Helen Fusion. People should stop underestimating me. I know how to make people respond. I know how to needle them and make them respond. I got Lex Freriedman to respond to me and block me. It was a little bit he overreacted a little bit, right? It was the Stewie Brian thing where Stewie fl uh where Brian flips over the the the couch and then Stewie goes, "Well, that's a normal reaction." So, David Kirkley, how did I get him to respond? I basically said what is the significance of a nonequilibrium plasma when it comes to a neutronic fusion and this actually opened the door to understanding the plasma physics even better than I understand it now. I may have been wrong on one point. So, if you look at the thumbnail right now, you will see the the orbs in the MH370 videos and they we can see the pl the shape of this orb. We can see this heat signature of this orb and I said that the heat signature is the hot electrons. It turns out I might have been wrong about that. And there's actually a few different possibilities. It could be the electrons that are clustered together. There could be the ions that are clustered together, which is the opposite of the electrons is what's left over after we rip the electrons off. Or it could also just be a heat signature of some apparatus inside of the plasma orb is giving off heat. Those are the three options. David Kirkley responded and he said that in a non-equilibrium plasma, the ion temperatures are much hotter than the electrons. In fact, I looked up his scientific paper and read it and the ions are 10 times hotter than the electrons in a non-equilibrium plasma. And then I also cross reference further because every time I hear about these non-equilibrium plasmas, I always think about Salvador py. Salvatore pies. Here you go. Listen to this. way to see what the vice effect is all about is to say it's really the generation of extremely high energy densities that are obtained by the accelerated vibration andor accelerated spin >> of a none equilibrium plasma that means a plasma that's out of equilibrium you can think of of that um they have a term for it called cold plasma cold as in you know non-therrmal plasma and it really has to do with the um the electrons of this plasma uh that talks to the plasma density very high. The number of these electrons do not observe something called a Maxwell Boltzman distribution. That's what a core plasma is all about. >> Chad, I want to show you something. That was the very first interview I ever did with Salvatore Pice. As you can probably tell from the production quality, you could probably tell from the production quality and the giant headphones that it was basically like me rocking the 1980s style. You know, we had to upgrade. We had to modernize our presentation a little bit. It was quite embarrassing to be rocking that while you're talking to a US Navy engineer who, by the way, has very clearly been exposed to plasma weapons, right? Like, can we just be honest about this? Okay, S might say that he hasn't worked on nukes. Fine. I think he was being koi because like I think the definition of nukes now is super nebulous. Salvatore Pais has obviously been exposed to plasma weapons. Obviously, nobody goes like, "Hey man, I've got this dope idea called this the PI effect and it just requires a nonequilibrium cold plasma." Okay, hold on to that thought. This is David Kirkley's scientific paper. This is David Kirkley's scientific paper. If you just search non, take a look at this paragraph right here. ion temperature as described above. The S parameter for a stable F FRC field reverse configuration is in the range of 1 to three almost ensuring a uniform ion temperature profile within the field reverse configuration. It is important to note that the ion temperature within an F FRC can be temporally different different by species and or follow non-M Maxwellian distributions. Didn't didn't uh didn't Salvatore Py in that clip just say that these cold plasmas follow non-M Maxwell Boltzman distributions. The same thing that I think David Kirkley is saying right here. I think they said something else later on. Let me see what I wrote in my notes here. So, the other here's the three factors of this what we're looking at. S knew what he was looking at in these MH370 videos. He knew. He knew right away. And now that I Now that I know what we're looking for, now I know, too. We're definitely looking at non-equilibrium plasma. And we can tell the density the density of the plasma. If you guys ask Grock right now, what would a non-equilibrium plasma look like? It'll tell you that it's going to be the same temperature as the atmosphere. And what we're looking at here is the surface temperature of the plasma. We're looking at the surface temperature of the the sphere of the plasma when we're looking at here. And it's the same temperature as the background. It's very cold. Relatively speaking, that's extremely cold. So, we're definitely looking at a nonequilibrium plasma where we've got separated positive and minus charge. My only question is why are we seeing this heat signature? Is that heat signature the ions? Is that heat signature the electrons or is that heat signature some apparatus that's absorbing energy from within within the plasma ball? Now low temperature. Do you know what they use to make these low temperature plasmas? Anyone want to guess? What do they use to make these low temperature plasmas? They use helium 3. What? Helium 3? You mean the autronic fusion fuel? Helium 3 is what they use to make these cold plasmas. It seems obvious in retrospect. Now it's all making sense. We aren't just looking at some cold non-equilibrium plasmas. We're literally looking at a neutronic fusion reactors. Previously, I wasn't sure if those fusion balls are conventional fusion or if they're autonic fusion that's going on. Now, 100% that's a neutronic fusion propulsion. we are looking at in those videos. We know because of the cold temperature of the plasmas. The plasma is relatively cold and that must mean it's using a specific fusion fuel, not just any fusion fuel. And the density is super high. If you look if you look at the plasma videos that they showed of these tokamax, you see like a couple lines of color, but mostly you're just looking right through it. The transparency tells us how dense it is and we can kind of see through it but kind of not which tells us that's a pretty dense ball of plasma. So the point being Salvatore Py knows Salvatore Py knows and the question we should ask is how does Salvatore Py know? Obviously it's connected to his research in the US Navy. obviously connected as weapons research. My guess is we've got plasma weapons, whatever you would call that. And it's not really shouldn't be that much of a guess. John Ramirez, former CIA, has been talking about plasma weapons non-stop. Nobody just seems to take it seriously for some reason. And these plasma weapons aren't just like us confusing things on the radar with ghosts. Like these are physical objects that are can zap things out of the sky, make them disappear. Okay, I just wanted to talk about that because I've been looking into that and it's kind of bugging the hell out of me. Um, but this is the other thing about it is that David Kirkley's got to know as well. Anybody that's looking at the MH370 videos, anybody that's looking at the MH370 videos that works in plasma physics, they got to know what they're looking at in those orbs. The first thing you would look at that, you would go, "Huh, that's really dense plasma. That's interesting. It's got to be potentially theta pinch, uh, dense plasma focus or reverse field configuration." Like, right away you can narrow it down if you understand plasma physics and fusion. And that's what bugs me is that why aren't these people talking about it? Why aren't they looking at it going, "That's crazy. That looks just like our field reverse configuration. That looks just like a theta pinch. Instead, they're like weirdly not talking about it, like they're afraid or something. I don't know.