Video Transcript
Essentially what I'm saying is that people that worked on the fusion bomb would have man figured out spac-time manipulation because spacetime manipulation is all about energy density and they're working in the highest energy physics that exists and they are compressing you know their fusion payload imploding their fusion payload to increase energy density. >> When you asked about the nuclear fusion aspect with regards to amplifying the density I would agree with you. However, I would add one thing to what you said, which is that in my humble opinion, there needs to be an aspect of that process in which there is a reversal of the entropy in which in in which that system behaves within. And then when that pinching effect occurs, you then may get very cold nuclear radiation instead of hot. And then you with with that bal that offset of cold and hot in a vortex-like manner, then maybe you can you can break that limit. So yes, I'll I'll leave it there. >> I'll take it one step further. Brother Ash, sorry to interrupt your train of thought. I know you're thinking some genial thoughts, but this is important. Breaking the Schwinger limit does something something astonishing. It destroys the arrow of time. And that's how time manipulation, especially reverse temporal excursion, can take place. I will I will try to convince you brother Ash because I know you do not believe in travel to the past. But under this when you break the Schwinger limit brother everything goes because you destroy the arrow of time number one. Number two remember Stephen Hawking he takes in his chronology uh protection conjecture he allows for the hour of time not to be disturbed. That's why those things are once you break the schwinger limit, forget about it. Anything goes. >> Travel to the past is feasible. But you must first break the Schwinger limit. Give me 10 minutes at the end of this podcast. Whenever you have time, I will give you the mathematical formalism of time travel to the past. A time machine, gentlemen. A time machine to the past. And by the way, >> [ __ ] causality. Excuse my language, but this idea of cause and effect has always bothered me. This [ __ ] grandfather paradox. Ah, [ __ ] your grandfather. No, it's not. You know what? Anything goes the moment you break the arrow of time, brother. >> So, you think you're creating new universes then? I mean, that's the only interpretation, right? Or do you have another interpretation? Many >> super, you could argue superimposed timelines within it's a it's it gets comp. I would say in my humble opinion that um if you look for example at the the the notion of if you if you read very very carefully what Elia Prigoin had written which was that when you have entropy in a system as it fills up if you can in an engineering way which this has been shown if you can find a way to prevent the entropy within that system from growing what happens is it's been observed that there's actually more organization in the system the lower the entropy is um And I would say that would speak to the the rever the the the breaking of the time arrow. And also I would mention as well that if you look specifically at the um oh jeez I sorry I just got a a brain fart. But the uh oh oh yes the grandfather paradox. There are a couple professors in the past 20 years that I believe and I I would agree with them seem to have solved the issue of that paradox which is that you could go back in time to certain particular points and then you can super what you do in that previous event will superimpose over the the the present event and so on and so forth. But anyways, um, >> so I think what you're saying there is more of the like whatever you did already h always happened like that, you know, so you could go back and because there's two ways you could do it, right? Is that one you can go back in time and you create a new timeline. Therefore, we don't have to worry about how you messed with the first timeline or have you. The other way, which is this closed loop time process where you can go back in time and in fact you can create your own universe, right? You can create your own self-contained universe loop as long and and I think even John Kramer talks about this is like time travel's allowed so as long as the loops are closed. So >> I right closed loop temp um temporal manipulation right I I would say personally yeah John Kramer is a genius brother John Kramer is a genius the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics will one day not only prove extremely viable but remember he used he really uses bow mechanics he truly is a great student of bone bow would be incredibly proud of this man I would love to meet him we should all try to meet him one Aaron Hoff Aaron Hoff agreed too. Aaron Hoff recently did an interview with um what's his face? Kurt Jungle and said straight up he thinks that like time is moving in two directions and then it's meeting. I'm going well that's the you know transactional interpretation right there. >> Well, think of the think of the um the one electron theory with Fineman and the the notion of of fractals, right? If you can maybe it's possible you can make a little universe because it's a fractal of a larger one. >> Just a thought. And that speaks to what I think you've said and Dr. Halaputoff has said about if you go inside of a UFO could be the different different size on the inside than it appears to be on the outside, right? Is that that would be kind of an idea of how that would work. So just to give people an example of how a closed time loop might work. Closed time loop would be a situation where like I give myself the Nobel I give myself a pri award-winning book, right, that makes me famous. I go I'm in the future. I go give younger Ashton an award-winning book or future Ashton comes back and gives younger Ashton MH370 videos, right? And then I get older and who gave Ashton the younger Ashton the videos? I did. So I have to invent time travel, go back in time and hand myself the other book. And as long as I do that, well then the question is who who wrote the book? Who made the videos? Nobody did. Nobody get made them. But that's a closed time loop and that works as long as the loop just keeps continuing like that. So I hope that's not the case. But the reason why that scares me a little bit is that any form of that time travel being real would absolutely justify. [snorts] >> He who controls time controls everything else. >> It's possible. It's like the Schroinger's cat where you gave yourself the award but you also didn't at the same time. >> Yeah. Exactly. Yeah. or like I I wrote the book, but who wrote the book, right? That I gave back to myself. I never wrote it. So, who gave me that book? Like, >> and if I can mention to what brother Sal said um the like the ruling of time, I I'm paraphrasing here, but the very famous quote that Oenheimer like to quote, which was I am death, the destroyer of worlds. I've come across some research recently that suggests the original translation was actually, I am time, the destroyer of worlds. >> Oh my god. Oh my god. There's a great American poet that says time is the fire in which we burn. >> I Yes. Yes. >> And this is a old hermetic idea. >> Yes. >> Very important. We do not brother Ash, brother Rossi, we do not understand the nature of time. I truly believe time is a type of energy field which prevents everything from happening at once. >> I agree. >> It is not your idea. for example of just a physical interpretation of the the ruling of clocks, >> right? >> And since we are on the topic of time, I know I said at the end of the pod, but I'm I'm rolling here and the juices are flowing. Just let me give you this, okay? We already discussed part of it, but I will recap. Let me go back to uh this is reverse temporal excursion. the idea of the possibility of going back in time and not just sending communication back. Now, we're talking about physically physically affecting the temporal structure. It it involves the breaking of the Schwinglement. Why? That is the only way you could circumvent the great Stephven Hawking. His chronology uh protection uh conjecture is based on Yaro time. Only thing that can destroy the arrow of time is the breaking of the Schwinger limit. >> This formalism is based on it. The whole idea starts simple. Again, Arkham's razor simplicity and minimalism. Time is on the order of one divided by frequency. Again, the great Nicholas Tesla said everything is energy, frequency, and vibration. And by the way, brother Ash said this like two parts ago. I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm plagiarizing a bit. Sorry. No, I'm about to say time is on the order of one divided by frequency. It could be frequency of spin or frequency of of vibration against the mathematics is similar. With one my well I want to say minor um um exception but remember in um in spin you you deal with a radius of spin and in vibration you deal with the amplitude of vibration. That's the main other than that the mathematics seems to be very similar between spin and vibration up to a point. Now the what is important is again time is on the order of one divided by frequency. Take the chain rule. You do the chain rule on this simple again you differentiate with respect let's call it a quantum of time. DDT is really a a delta towo if you like to think of it as a quantum of time. I just like this idea that matter may be confined energy frozen within a quantum of time >> bound within fluctuating fields of >> maybe all of reality as is a room temperature superconducting state to some extent >> macroscopic quantum coherence it's a microscopic quantum phenomena but again time is [clears throat] on the order of one divided by frequency you take the chain rule of that based on a a ddt simple um this is simple Simple differential calculus. We're talking about first year of undergrad. >> You take uh the chain rule based on that will give you a a constant. Most likely it's going to be dimensionous. So let's call it to subs times the delta of frequency divided by frequency squared. You see how it's dimensionally inconsistent. Again, time being on the order of one divided by frequency. Check the dimensions. Always check the dimensions. The first thing you do, that's the first thing they teach us in engineering. If a formula does not give correct units, no good. Start all over again. Now, so again, minus delta t. So out of the chain rule comes this minus delta t. So the whole idea is that is it part of the mathematical formalism? Is it again the great Draq believed in the beauty of true mathematics? He believed in mathematical physics that the ability of mathematics to influence physics but physics must also influence the mathematics. Hence the second step. So the first step you get from the chain rule of the simple um um time is on the order of one divided by frequency. From the chain rule you get minus delta t equals um a dimensionalist constant say to subs times delta frequency divided by frequency squared dimensionally consistent check it for yourselves also your followers now what I'm about to say about to of s will require your followers to do a little mathematics and again use your ability to think engineering here. How would you make this happen? How would you break the Schwinger limit and affect this quote unquote miraculous phenomena of reverse temporal excursion? Again, this minus delta t speaks to the reverse temporal excursion. Mhm. >> This house of s is equal to 10 to the 25 times epsilon0 divided by sigma subs^ squar close parenthesis open parenthesis one ratio r subs divided by r sub omega Yeah, it's as simple as that, gentlemen. Now, your followers and your subscribers should look into what is this ratio. I'll leave it up to them. What is this ratio based on everything we've talked about and we've talked about about this uh time is on the order of one divided by frequency several occasions. But this is the equation. This is the mathematical formalism of reverse temporal excursion. study this equation. It's simple. Extremely simple. Again, >> what's the implications of the equation? [clears throat] >> Say it one more time and then give us the >> either tell us what it means or give us the implication because it's too many numbers for me to do in my head. >> Again, I will I will recap the equation one more time and I will say it distinctly. minus delta t >> change in time >> equals go ahead >> equals this touse of s to s which is a dimensionous constant >> okay constant >> times delta omega / omega squar close parenthesis change >> the star of s the star of s equals 10 to the 25 and I will tell you what the 10 to the 25 is we've discussed it already 10 to the 25* times I'm rather Rossy epsilon0 / sigma subs 2 close parenthesis open parenthesis the ratio r subs divided by r sub omega close parenthesis gentlemen this is the mathematical formalism of reverse temporal excursion we have a time machine to the past because the shoing the limit by breaking the Schwinger limit the arrow of time is destroyed. >> Hence Steven Orings idea of the chronology protection conjecture no longer applies. >> Now 10 to the 25 represents jewels per meter cube >> and hence it will give you an idea. But one more thing I will say that epsilon zero you know it well Ashton >> is like >> it's the electrical performativity of free space that sigma subs is the surface charge density >> your followers and subscribers should figure out of what it's essential do I bet you Dr. Rossi over there knows all right I bet you Dr. Forbes knows as well. Dude, we're all doctors. That's it. I have the ability to do that. So, there you go.