Video Transcript
The biggest question that I had and from the uh interview with S and Dave was the reverse temporal excursion equation. S lists off an equation and I tried to keep it you know tight in my head and what I gathered from the equation is that time is a factor of frequency. Uh actually let me read it off to you. Can I read it off? negative delta t which is a negative time change is equal to a constant times the change in frequency divided by the frequency squared. That's it. That's the equation. And so that equation to me before I looked into it I thought in my head I was a little embarrassed. I didn't really want to say on the podcast just in case I was wrong. But in my head I thought well interesting. This would mean that there is a way to manipulate time time dilation through manipulating manipulating frequency. In fact, I I think it even speaks to the idea that time itself emerges from frequency. And at a base level that we could say the 0 point energy scales down to the plank frequency. So we could in theory I think say that all around us all the time there's this harmonic oscillation that's happening and that harmonic oscillation that's happening all the time determines our perception of time. So this zero point energy is in equilibrium meaning that the ocean is pretty flat but it's jiggling just a little bit right there's a little bit of waves on the surface of the zero point energy. This is what would cause us to experience our flow of time in the way that we feel it at the speed in which we feel it. And if you were to change those frequencies, manipulate that that frequency, then you could theoretically manipulate the zero point energy, manipulate time itself. Manipulate time. So, let me go ahead and read this because I asked Grock, I've been leaning heavily on AI, at least for like interpretations. I think it's pretty good at interpretating equations and why equations are significant. The equation uh that I just described there describes a direct mathematical linkage between a shift in frequency and the corresponding excursion or shift in time with the negative sign indicating a potential reversal in the direction of time flow under certain conditions. here uh is this I don't know TS acts as a scalar factor that modulates the magnitude of this effect without altering its dimensional consistency. So here's the key implications. One, time is emergent from frequency dependent mechanisms. Time measurement fundamentally relies on periodic references such as atomic vibrations, light waves or mechanical oscillations all characterized by a base frequency. A pertabbation in this frequency induces a proportional time shift implying that time is an emergent property rather than a fundamental constant. In essence, time as we experience it could be redefined or rescaled by altering the underlying frequency of the system, challenging Newtonian absoluteness and aligning with relativistic views where time dilates based on reference frames. Wow. Yeah, it does sound a little bit like Roy, doesn't it? It sounds like Roy de Herbert right there. And that is pretty much what I just said, right? It says like, "What is the baseline?" Great, great question in the chat. What is the baseline? The baseline is that zero point energy that that uh constant flux, the zitra buong. Remember that term zitrabuagong? Zitraagong is a natural oscillations of spaceime itself. So to me that supports the idea that we experience time at the rate that we feel it due to the vibrations and the of the 0 point energy all around us. And the earth this ball of rock that we're standing on is manipulating that zero point energy. The earth is causing a gravitational effect an induced effect on the 0 point energy field. So this is fully consistent with how we perceive general relativity. Fully consistent with this idea that the more mass you put, the more pulling on spacetime, the more the the uh the zero point energy gets disturbed. So I think that part is absolutely correct. Let's keep going. Let's keep going. So says for instance if frequency represents the ticking rate of a clock a positive change in frequency aka faster oscillations yields negative time or time reversal suggesting that the clock runs ahead compressing the perceived time intervals. Conversely, a negative frequency slows the system, potentially expanding time. So, right there, we're definitely speaking towards time dilation. So, if you're not familiar with time dilation, time dilation says that if I travel towards the speed of light and you stay at a at a constant speed or a rest speed, then our clocks get out of sync. How can our clocks get out of sync, though? Aren't we both in the same universe? If we're both in the same universe, then how can two different clocks by two different people get out of sync? And the answer to that is that time is not a fundamental property of the universe. Just like gravity, gravity nor time are fundamental properties of the universe. They're emergent properties. They're emergent properties, meaning they're things that we calculate based on other things. Gravity is the how much manipulation of the zero point energy of spaceime occurs from mass. Time is how we measure intervals. But how far away are the intervals? The intervals can be far apart or they can be close together. So what that paragraph was saying there is depending on how far or close your intervals are, you can either have a slowing of time or you can have an increase of the rate of time. Just like I've always been saying in terms of think of time, think of time as a dial. Think of it like a dial and you change the dial forward or back. What would that do? It speeds you up. I'm going to talk really fast. What do we going for once? Going twice. Three times. Sold over there. right? Or going really slowly like this. That's how time operates. Now, I'm still not 100% convinced at the reversing time, but this got me a lot closer because this is saying here that if we increase the frequency, we can get a reverse temporal excursion. Meaning, if we increase the frequency enough, then we can actually get time to flow backwards. we can actually get time to flow backwards. So if that's true, if that's true, then that means that we can go back in time, that back in time travel is possible. Now, it may still be a limited version of back in time travel, meaning like maybe only you can reage your reverse age yourself, but in theory, it becomes it becomes plausible. Let's go back to it and see what other revelations that we can get here. sensitivity to the frequency scale. And actually, there's one more thing I want to talk about this real. Oh, okay. It's coming up here in a second. The one divided by frequency squared term means that the time shift is highly sensitive at low frequencies, but diminishes rapidly at frequency increases. Huh? At high frequency, even large frequency changes only cause minimal time changes, implying time stability in high energy regimes. Huh. Huh. At low frequencies, small frequency changes produce significant time excursions. Well, this is interesting. So, this is true, right? Because what it's saying here is if you have very high frequencies, the amount of delta t is going to become very small. So if your frequency becomes very large, then you're squaring it. So it becomes really really big. Frequency squared in the denominator means that the higher your frequency goes up, the smaller your number gets exponentially. So your time excursion becomes very small if your frequency is very high. If your frequency is somewhat low and then you have a drastic increase in the frequency, then that's the type of situation that will cause a drastic time change. So just to go through the math, if we want a large negative temporal change, large backwards in time change, then we want to start at a low frequency so that the frequency squared is relatively low and we want to rapidly increase our frequency. If we rapidly increase our frequency, then our term on the right becomes very large and that's what becomes our negative delta t. Implication: Time might appear more fluid or prone to reversals in low frequency environments such as disperive dispersive media such as acoustic or electromagnetic waves in lossy materials or cosmological scales. This could explain phenomenon like perceived time as asymmetries in complex systems where frequency dispersion occurs. H. So this is where S was saying that the secret is a massive change in energy density. A massive change in energy density is what we need for a gravitational wave. And that must be connected to what he's talking about with the frequency as well. I presume because higher frequency implies higher energy. So higher frequency implying higher energy. Then when he's talking about drastic increases in energy, I think he's talking about drastic increases in frequency. So if you drastically increase the frequency suddenly, boom, possible gravitational wave. The explicit labeling of negative deltat t as time reversal excursion shift suggests the equation models and scenarios where time flow can invert directionally at least locally or perceptually. If frequent change in frequency is greater than zero and the constant is greater than zero and the change in time is less than zero indicating a backward shift. This echoes concepts and time reversal invariant wave equations. However, this breaks strict time reversal symmetry in dispersive or lossy systems as frequency shifts introduce irreversibility. In physics, this resonates with broken symmetries in the arrow of time. This is exactly what SA said where frequency dependent effects could excursion time backward temporally perhaps in controlled setups like time reversal mirrors or quantum experiments. So here's the applications. Why does this matter? What does this matter chat? Atomic clocks define hyperfine transitions. A change in frequency would accumulate as a time error. So what it's saying here is if you were to change the frequency rapidly on an atomic clock then you're going to get a it would accumulate as an error like time the the clock would be off sync. So and that makes sense. I mean if you do this to a clock what's going to happen? The clock's perception is going to change. You're going to literally send the clock through time. You're going to time travel the clock. A frequency change here would accumulate as a time error. But the one divided by frequency squared scaling suggests ultra high frequency clocks no uh eg optical latises are more robust depertibations enabling precise timekeeping implications. Redefining the second or synchronizing global time standards could account for such shifts in variable environments. If we want traveling amongst the stars using gravitational manipulation like the aliens are doing, we would have to have some type of new clock system because clocks don't work anymore. You can't use a clock to compare time if my watch flows at a different rate than your watch. You need a universal time system. Now, you know what's crazy about this? No daylight savings. There will be no daylight savings in the quantum tech clocks chat. And before you say quant quantum clocks are fake, no they aren't. Guess who was promoting? Guess who? Gary Stevenson is the one that wanted to make a quantum universal time clock, a gravitybased time clock, one that would not be beholden to time dilation. One that we can always have a reference frame. There would always be a reference frame. This Gary Stevenson, this is the same Gary Stevenson that told the story about the JSON group and Robert MLB Baker. Same Gary Stevenson. So, I just find this crazy because everything is kind of coming together. All I did was ask Grock about Salvatore Py's equations that he said in his live stream. And one of the responses we get back is, well, you could use this theory to develop a quantum universal clock. Quantum universal clock. And turns out Gary Stevenson was already talking about it like 10 years ago. And then it says in wave propagation and signal processing in time reversal techniques, frequency dispersion compensates via similar uh relations to maintain focus. The equation implies that manipulating frequency could engineer artificial time shifts potentially for applications like undoing signal delays or simulating reversed causality in simulations. That right there sounds just like John Kramer. That sounds everything about this makes me think about John Kramer. I hope that guy lives to be like 110 because John Kramer, he's the one that said we can make an EPR device. We can make a quantum communication device that can communicate with Mars in real time. It should take 5 to 8 minutes for any signal to transfer from here to Mars. But if I'm controlling a rover in Mars in real time, then there must be some reverse temporal excursion that's happening, we don't really perceive it, but it's happening. And that to me speaks to John Kramer's transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics where he says there are always forward, he calls it and advanced waves. Don't cancel me. That's his words. I can say the word as many times as I want. and advanced waves converging on one another. The political and theoretical ramifications of this equation. If time is frequency dependent, it supports relational theories over block universe models. In quantum gravity or string theory contexts where frequency relate to energy scales also known as E equals H bar frequency. This could hint at time emerging from vibrational modes with reversals possible near singularities or high energy shifts. However, it raises causality concerns because an unbounded frequency change might allow for paradoxical loops. Though the constant could bound the effect as a natural constant. So the constant that's in that equation he's saying could be the thing that prevents time loops from happening. Could be. But what he's saying there in that equation, what the equation is essentially meaning, time itself emerges from vibration, how we understand clocks and and and time itself emerges from vibration, emerges from this back and forth rocking. And if we go from a slow state like this to a fast state, then we're also manipulating our flow of time, our perception of time, consistent with general relativity, which was what Einstein was should be best known for, general relativity, understanding that time dilation exists. Any questions? I mean, I have some questions. Specifically, the question I'm cons I'm curious about is how all of Salvatore Py's stuff has to do with frequency, has to do with vibration, has to do with scaling your omega, your frequency, scaling that up and getting uh exponential growth, exponential growth from vibration, from uh non-therrmal interaction. So, I I I think there's more to come from that. I think it's a good starting point and I think it's clearly consistent with all the physics that I've been talking about, time travel, time dilation, everything like that.