Video Transcript
Teleportation using EVs by Ken Shoulders. Well, well, well. Here we are. In the use of the word teleportation, there is no intention of evoking anomalous phenomenon when just plain experimental physics will do a better job of explaining the events measured. Neither does the author intend to invoke one of the standard dictionary descriptions as the movement of objects or elementary particles from one place to another more or less instantaneously without traveling through space. The method to be discussed here uses both time and space in a very normal way. The description of the method used in this writing will also be done without the notions of becoming entangled in the usual quantum physics entanglement world. The method will be described as straightforward transportation using the ability of EVO's plasmoids as we know them to effectively encapsulate nucleons into their structure and transport them through physical barriers by a gross reduction of the overall expressed charge. Chat, am I tripping or is he just basically saying, "If you produce a high beta field free condition, you can just teleport shit." I think that's what he's saying right here. And I think the reason why he's saying it it works goes back to Richard Feynman. Chat, why does my hand not go through the microphone? How come my hand doesn't go through the microphone? The reason is because there are electrons in my hand, and there are electrons in this microphone, and those electrons repel each other. Not just one, a lot a lot of them. And they're repelling each other. They say, "No, sir. No entry." So, if you could reduce if you could do a gross reduction of the overall expressed charge of an object by encapsulating it and enshrouding it, perhaps that would allow it to quantum tunnel, as we have seen, quantum tunneling is a real thing, through space-time itself. Hm. The other thing that I noticed from this paper, and I can see why people dismissed Ken Shoulders. Because he writes in a very normal way. I can tell you read between the lines. What is Ken Shoulders saying here? He's going, "Guys, I don't know exactly how teleportation works. I'm just telling you I'm seeing it. I'm seeing something get teleported from here to over here. I don't care what you want to call it." He's like, "And it works in a normal way." When he says it works in a normal way, what does that mean? A normal way means, to me, I'm aiming this over here, and therefore it's going to go and it's going to reappear over here. Now, this is a a reach, admittedly. But to me, this is saying that I can I can direct my teleportation. I can get it to work in a normal way in our understanding of three-dimensional space-time. If I want it to go that way, I shoot it that way. If I want it to go that way, I shoot it that way. Works in a normal way. Hm. So then he talks about some Russian papers. I was kind of surprised because this is it. I was expecting there to be like more pages on here. Um What did he say? I should uh Basically found that like this I was looking for something where it was trying to direct the the the object, but I didn't find anything in this one and I don't think about directing it. But basically showed that there was some kind of vacuum interaction happening that was consistent and very similar to cold fusion that was occurring in at least in the experimental setup. That they were seeing this plasma ball of light, it would stay afterwards after the experiment. And now you're saying, "Okay, well why is this? Where's this energy coming from that allows this to happen?" Um this also may be similar. This may be why we see, sorry to go on so many tangents here. The sonoluminescence. Why do we see this light appear? Because we're seeing this same kind of force-free effect or cavitation effect, collapse effect happen. Maybe interacting or sucking quantum vacuum energy out. Okay, let me see if I missed anything I wanted to talk on there. Okay. Oh, I had a couple quotes here I wanted to go through. So from your J. Young Park Um Where is it? Are you ready for this? Here's just a couple of the quotes that I found relevant from the Polywell revisited. Because now I learned that Dr. J. Young Park spent like over a decade, I think, at Los Alamos himself. So we're finding like all of these engineers worked at our nuclear weapons engineering facilities. Um Here's a direct quote from his paper. "Between 1974 and 1980, two groups at the University of Tokyo and the University of Naval Research Laboratory, US Naval Research Laboratory, successfully demonstrated the formation of high beta cusp plasma using a high-powered laser ablation of deuterium ice pellets." In the work of Oh, man. Kitsunezaki Kit Oh, man, I'm so close. Hold on. Hold on. I'm going to get it. Kitsunezaki In the work of Kitsunezaki Kitsunezaki, see, I got it. "A ruby laser delivering 500 to 800 megawatts of pulsed power was used to produce a high beta cusp plasma in a spindle cusp with a 3 cm coil diameter and a 3.3 kg magnetic field at the ring cusp location. Experiments conducted at varying cusp magnetic facilities magnetic field strength showed that both too low and too high magnetic fields reduced the confinement indicating the existence of an optimal beta of one. The last part was the key. Oh, wait. Oh, sorry. I don't even have it up in front of me. So, here's the rub. When your beta is too low, the plasma is too lossy, as they say. It doesn't stick together like they need it to. As As ramp your beta up, the plasma starts to stick to the magnetic fields like you want it to. Now, you don't want it to go too high cuz if you put that pressure up too high explode part. What you're looking for, and the key part of that, the reason why I read off that quote, is that Dr. Park is telling us you want an optimal beta near one. Okay, Chad. >> [snorts] >> Side side comment. >> [clears throat] >> I get one F-bomb, right? Children, earmuffs. [ __ ] [screaming] Commonwealth Fusion, Chad. [ __ ] Commonwealth Fusion, and [ __ ] anyone messing around with metal donut tokamak reactors. If you can't realize from what I'm telling you right now that metal donut tokamak reactors with their beta of like 0.1 are probably the biggest scam ever invented, I can't think of a scam better The only scam uh bigger than I can think of recently is Fire Festival. This is like Fire Festival all over again, Chad. I'm blowing the whistle on it right now. Commonwealth Fusion's talking about they're going to hook their their metal donuts up to the grid. This is going to be beyond inner fusion. This is like the Darer leaked campaign. We got the homeless fusion coming out, Chad. We get We get two our Q factor of three, Chad. Ooh, we're getting at over unity. We get 1.1% total over unity. For We're going to get like the worst possible over unity there is. They're going to literally engineer the thing to be as shitty as possible while still technically working. Because you can realize like just looking at the math this is this you can't it's not even in the same league as any fusion reactor with a beta of one. Not even in the same league. Okay. Crash out over. God I hate I hate Commonwealth Fusion chat. I hate them. I hate Bill Gates and I hate everybody involved with it. If you're involved with Commonwealth Fusion, get your money out of there or if they change and they stop doing Tokamaks, then I will reevaluate my opinion at that point.