Video Transcript
What is the thing that causes non-locality to occur? We believe the ether. The ether must be the manifestation of it. Other people also think it's thought, but the Copenhagen interpretation would say that it's information that's being encoded. I think that's going to be going away, but we're getting to something that's more metaphysical than that. And what if what is entanglement if light is not a photon or a particle? This is what I love the most, guys. What if when we think about entanglement, we're always thinking about this particle is connected to this particle. But what if that's not it at all? When you think of it as the ether, it's not that this particle is connected to this particle. What we're doing is we're creating a ripple in the medium. That's what entanglement is. I've created a ripple in the medium and I'm seeing the two ends of the ripple. I'm just not seeing the pass through because it's in an extra dimension. And so the what we're trying to figure out here from this paper as we go into it, how do we produce entanglement? And yes, the person said longitudinal. Yes, longitudinal standing wave. That's what we're trying to produce. Produce a longitudinal standing wave. And are you producing a gravitational ripple? Are you producing a ripple in the ether? What are you producing exactly? What we just saw in the MH370 video is a gravitational ripple in the ether, that's why it looks like the plane is flying through a mirror. The reason why the plane looks like it's not there, just vanishes without disturbing the medium, is because it's blipping straight through the medium, it's a longitudinal wave like a funnel. Like that thing went down a drain and it appeared somewhere else. It's literally one of these. Boom. So what we need to find out is how do we rebuild the wave function? We know how to collapse it. We know how to collapse the wave function. That's easy. We look at it, make a measurement, the wave function will collapse. How do we rebuild it though? Can we even rebuild it? Well, we know the answer is yes because we just saw them teleport an airplane. The question is how? right in the introduction. This paper reviews quantum entanglement non-locality considers the possibility that this phenomenon could be used for sending observer to observer signals. So observer observer signals is basically just communication but it could also be like teleportation in theory. Such demonstration would break several quantum no signal theorems. Non-local quantum signaling would have far-reaching implications as an enabling technology for super luminal and retrocausal signaling. So you could theoretically have faster and light communication uh and you could also have going back in time communication as well. That's what that's saying right there. The applications to retrocausal signaling and real-time space communication are considered. Also considered briefly is the non-local communication implications of nonlinear quantum mechanics. That's a nice little tease at the end there. Guys, do you know what nonlinear quantum mechanics is? That is phase conjugation. That is phase conjugation. They're talking about Tom Bearden gravity manipulation. Classically, if I have two waves that overlap perfectly, cancel each other out, we would say there's nothing there. They canceled each other out. The phases perfectly canceled each other out. There's nothing there. But in nonlinear quantum mechanics, it says there's there's actually something left over there. something very small that's left over the stress in the medium. Right? If I pull the rubber band equally on both sides, you would say there's no net force. But now just double it, triple it. Eventually, this rubber band's going to snap. So, is there really no net force or is there something else there? when I pull equally on both sides that is the nonlinear quantum effects non-locality was first highlighted by Albert Einstein Boris Podolski and Nathan Rosen in their famous EPR paper so when you want to know why I'm saying EPR er equals EPR these are the guys EPR Einstein Puldoski Rosen they argued that the non-local connectedness of quantum systems was unphysical in that it implied a faster than light connection in apparent conflict with special relativity. Despite their objection, quantum non-locality has now been demonstrated in many quantum systems in the physics community is now generally acknowledged to be implicit in the quantum formalization as applied to the entangled systems. Although there remain a few Copenhagen holdouts, Heagen holdouts who would require an explicit demonstration of signaling before admitting that it can be considered a real effect. So basically it's over for the quantum uh the Copenhagen interpretation. Things aren't real and we do have this weird non-local uh effect that occurs like if we have entangled two things what what does that mean? Well, okay. What? You've entangled them. So, if I do something over here, something over here happens. But what is that something? The quantum entanglement condition is usually a consequence of some conservation law acting within the system. So that the subsystems are connected by the conserved quantities. Yes, guys. Remember how my name's Ashton four orbs? Well, it might become Ashton's six orbs. What have I been saying about the teleportation? There's an equal amount of charge on one side of the equation as the other. When we're entangling these things together, we're forcing them to come together because we're creating these entangled orbs. And on one side, we have three orbs spinning around the plane. And then on the other side, we either have three orbs spinning this way or we just have one orb over here that's got, you know, three times the charge. We're entangling these things together through space and time. For example, if two photons are emitted back to back in a joint state that has zero angular momentum and positive par, then whatever linear or circular polarization state one photon is measured to have, the other photon must have an identical polarization. if measured in the same basis. So go ahead and measure your thing and whatever's happening in one must also happen in the other location so that if you were to add them up they cancel out. This condition must exist to ensure that the net angular momentum of the two photon states is zero. So add up the net angular momentum got to be zero. I love science and physics because conservation is everywhere guys. Why is the plane not being annihilated? Why is the plane not being annihilated in the MH370 videos? Because of conservation. Because of conservation. That energy has to go somewhere. That mass has to go somewhere. It didn't just disappear. it has to reappear somewhere else. And it didn't reappear as an explosion that destroyed the whole planet. So, it probably reappeared in one single form. Now, here's an example of one of the 1972 designs. And right off the bat, you can see they're basically shooting a beam here in the top right. It's splitting between two beam senders or whatever. And then they're going down these different paths, right? That's what usually the double slit experiment shows. in pretty much all versions of this show. So, what are we doing is that we take our photon and we split it down two paths. That's the first step of what we do in any double slit type of experiment when we're doing these non-local quantum experiments. We split it. They're entangled. And then we send them down different paths. Okay? And then usually what we do is we send this one down this path over here. And then we say we're going to give it more choices. We're going to say it can go here. It can go here or it can actually go way over here to the other path. The other path that was already decided. So we give it like three choices and we say now this photon you're going to pick one of these directions and I don't care which direction whichever direction you want to go. And we do that and when you do that you rebuild the wave function. Remember the double slit experiment that we just looked at? The interference pattern comes back. So you go from having this photon that got separated out by itself where we can we're watching this photon and then we send it through another beam splitter that splits into three random directions. And then we look at the inter we look at the patterns on the detectors and we go, whoa, there's an interference pattern there now. There wasn't an interference pattern before, but now there is. What did we do? We created decoherence. We created decoherence. The electron was coherent when it was flowing or the photon was coherent when it was flowing through and then we gave it random directions and we made it decoherent. In fact, I want to take another I want to make another claim here. I think I was right. In my first letter to Congress in October of 2023, I said that what we were looking at was macroscopic quantum decoherence. And I ended up flipping and saying, "No, it's macroscopic quantum coherence." It's actually both. The plane is becoming decoherent. Macroscopic phase conjugation. The plane is becoming a wave. And then it's decoherent. It's teleporting through the ether to the other side and it's becoming coherent again. Does non-locality violate special relativity? Special relativity saying that we can't go back in time. Einstein and relativity was the best thing Einstein ever came up with shows that time is a dial. The answer is no. Non-locality does not violate special relativity. The prohibition of signals with super luminal speeds by Einstein's theory of special relativity is related to the fact that the definite simultaneity simultaneity of two separated space-time points is not Loren variant. Since some hypothetical super luminal signal could be used to establish a fixed simultaneously between two uh between two points for example by clock synchronization this would imply a preferred inertial frame and would be inconsistent with overs and variance and special relativity. The problem is this. Special relativity says you can't make a permanent connection between this point and this point that's super far away because if you do that, reality breaks down. Doesn't work. Doesn't work. So you cannot cheat is what special relativity says. Says you can't make a permanent connection between like my hand right here and zeticuli over here. Because if I add a permanent connection between these two points, I can do weird time travel stuff that isn't going to we're not going to be able to reconcile too many paradoxes. That's actually really cool. So the author is saying that special relativity doesn't allow us to have a fixed point between two locations. But however, if a non-local signal could be transmitted through measurements at separated locations performed on two entangled photons, the signal would be sent at the time of the arrival of the photon in the location in one location and received at the time of arrival in the other photon. By varying the path lengths to the two locations, these events could be made to occur in any order and time separation in any reference frame. Wow. What that's saying right there is that you can manipulate the experiment that the uh the quantum entanglement experiment that I showed and and just add path length. All you have to do is add path length. Make the light go a further distance and just mathematically you can show that the signal should arrive before it was even sent. Don't worry, I'm going to show you the math here in a little bit. I think one of these screenshots has it. Therefore, non-local signals could not be used to establish a fixed simultaneity between a relation between two separated space and uh points because the sending and receiving of such signals do not have fixed time relations. The transmission and arrival instance of a non-local signal cannot be used for synchronization because the transmission and reception instance are path and delay dependent variables. Holy, this paper is amazing. What is it saying right there? You can't make a permanent faster than light connection. You can't have a permanent one. Why? Because this point and this point don't have fixed time intervals. There's nothing to tie them together in spacetime. But you can create a temporary transition. You can create a temporary transition, just not a permanent one. The reason why we're not watching the plane go through uh like a hypergate or whatever the hell, like a big gate or a portal, is because you can't. This paper says straight up you can't make a Stargate like this, at least not right now. They didn't have the technology to do it. But they did know that you could make a blip. They did know that you could blip something from one location to the next. This one right here, like when I read this, I just sitting there going, "Everything's a lie." Like, what is happening? Just wow. Right there, chat. The dirds. So, here's an example of the double slit experiment here. This isn't really one of the better ones. The reason why I actually took this screenshot is that it explained coherence. It should be clear that a pointlike source has perfect coherence. That is why I took this screenshot. That is such just it's like a small thing that's thrown in there, but it's so important. When we talk about entanglement, we have to talk about coherence. We talk about in terms of coherence. Are you coherent? If you're coherent, you are physically here in our reality and I'm looking at you. If you're decoherent, then you're a wave function and you could be anywhere. And now, like I my mind was reeling when I read that. Why? Because I just can't stop thinking about coherent matter wave beams. Uh my colleague Dr. H and myself is really Mo's idea. Uh but I helped him with that. Uh this is a way of generating chat. Look in the bottom right figure. Look at the bottom right figure. That's coherence. Look at that peak. That's the Aaronoff bomb effect. When he's talking about the Aaronhoff bomb effect, he's talking about creating a blip in the ether just like we're talking about in this fast light communication. Just like we're talking about with teleportation, this patent, those orbs are Lockheed Martin orbs, chat, those orbs are Lockheed Martin orbs. They used a coherent matter wave beam. That's the design. Matter wave beams. So rather than a laser beam, it's a matter beam with firmians. And we're using a hard bomb effect to put things firmians in coherence which sounds like wow that doesn't sound like that would work um because there's an en there's um you can modify the firmians with no energy exchange and so uh we predict that we'll be able to put those uh in coherent and generate a beam and people have done those with Bose Einstein condensates you know at very low temperature but using one of those uh constraints um Lorent and variance. Well, that that firm uh compensate is a beam in a different reference frame. So, in my mind, this is my favorite part. Reference frames. So, the reference frames, chat, what is he talking about reference frames, chat? He's talking about general relativity. He's talking about Einstein. He's saying that well if you look at it from a different perspective from a different reference frame you actually theoretically can allow firmians to collapse down onto a single point it is it is actually allowed from Einstein's general relativity that shows you can uh build a beam out of firmians million times more powerful than a laser plus atomic scale manufacturing and and maybe um transport of matter over a ance well that that firm uh condensate is a beam in a different reference frame. So in my mind that shows you can uh build a beam out of firmians million times more powerful than a laser plus atomic scale manufacturing and and maybe um transport of matter over a distance. Transporting matter over a distance. Transporting matter over a distance using the Aaron Hoff bomb effect. Chat, what does that mean? That means literally teleporting stuff. Like literally, I'm going to transport the matter from here. Bloop.