The Photoelectric Effect - What is Light?

Video Transcript

# The Photoelectric Effect - What is Light? Malaysian 370 contact 120 decimal 97. [Music] Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. Mind if I can hear you, Red? [Music] [Music] [Applause] [Music] [Applause] [Music] Oh, I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu. is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of [Music] worlds." Hey everybody, welcome to the live stream. I'm your host, Ashen Forbes. Guys, wow, what a time it has been. If you did not check out the Hard Truth podcast with Dr. U from NASA, definitely go check that out. We're going to be talking about that a little bit tonight. Also, MH370 stuff is obviously uh hit a major crescendo over the weekend. Had almost 50 million impressions just on Twitter on X talking about it. didn't have one community note stick to any post which goes to show you that people are waking up. You can also just see the evolution in people's thought process. And some of people may say out there, why does that matter? Why does MH370 matter? Well, the only reason we are talking here tonight at all is because of those videos. Is because of the science in those videos and understanding it and getting to that point. And I sat there thinking today before the stream about how crazy it is that we've gone from investigating this missing plane to now talking about quantum mechanics. The other video that you need to watch if you have not watched it is the G8 cold fusion demonstration. I think we've found the next thing. Like I can't believe I'm saying this, but one of the things I said early on is that we would find out the science and the physics, which we're going to talk about tonight. My goal tonight is to try to blend some newbie understanding of light, quantum mechanics, general relativity, Einstein's understanding to the more advanced understanding that we've come to to realize that, you know, light is not actually a particle and what that means. Now, we've come so far in this journey. Some people have been been posting talking in the comments replying saying, "Ashton, you've gotten to the point where you could build something." Many of you also probably as well. That may be the case. But the goal here is not to build something. There are lots of people out there building stuff. What I'm doing, what we are doing here collectively is we are leveling up. We are leveling up our knowledge. Not our muscles, but our brains. We are making ourselves smarter and smarter and smarter. And my direct goal for you all is through these live streams to teach you the physics in a way where you can defend the points that you can defend the arguments against the Neil deGrasse Tyson's of the world because you already know what they're going to say. You already know what they're going to say. For example, they're going to say that, oh, how does Yuon theory explain the photoelectric effect? Einstein won a Nobel Prize for that. You're going to say, watch Ashton's live stream about that. So, we have found the science out there and we've been leveling ourselves up and something amazing has happened. something amazing happened where I don't want to get too excited about it, but I this is a little I didn't even I could have done the whole like guys there's an announcement tonight. Get ready. Watch the stream thing. I could have done that. I actually didn't even post the stream. I pro I probably should do that. Um, but I'm pretty confident that the NG8 interview uncovered what we've been looking for, which was actually not necessarily NG8, but we found Randall Mills brilliant light power. Now, I want to talk about this for just one minute to get you guys ready because I didn't wasn't ready to talk about it tonight in full. I feel like it's What we're going to do is on Friday we're going to do kind of an old school investigation stream and we are going to dig into everything about this company. Everything about this company. By the way, two other quick things that I just forgot to mention. I'm going to be talking to Randall Carlson, the gray bearded man. Hard truths. That's going to be the next one. And then the hard truths after that, I'm probably going to talk to somebody that has researched Randall Mills and the Hydrino and Brilliant Light Power. So, yeah, there you guys go. And I almost guarantee you the very first thing that Randall Carlson and I discuss is the letter to Ashton Forbes. So going to be an interesting one. Okay, let me just quickly tell you. So we've been looking for a low energy phase transition, a negative energy event. And just in the last couple months, we realized that the MH370 Zap is actually ultraviolet. It's ultraviolet light that's releasing. That's why it's black in this. This is actually ultraviolet. So, we actually figured the physics out. Why is that black? Because ultraviolet light shows up as black in a thermal video. And then of course the moment you find out something like that, you go, "Okay, wait a minute. I mean, we're we're kind of narrowing it down here, right? Why UV light?" Exactly. It has to do with this phase transition that occurs is that if you cause this negative energy event to happen where you if you lower the equilibrium point of the hydrogen atom. So the way to think about it is that we have this box of spacetime and everything in this box of spacetime and all the little lattice structures, everything's connected, right? And we're shrinking this down. We're shrinking this down. And what this effectively does is this lowers the the normal equilibrium play. If we're sitting on top of the water, the water level sinks. Water level sinks. So when the water level sinks it changes the equilibrium point of the atoms all atoms and this causes an energy release. And if you go and look into what type of energy release this causes this negative energy event causing this reduction in the refractive index of spaceime the exact thing we've been talking about the polarizable vacuum of Halaputoff just electrifying a region of spaceime. What this causes is there to be an ultraviolet release of photons. Ultraviolet release of photons. So when I started looking into Brilliant Light Power as I was told to from um the NG8 people, the first thing I see is that they are collecting extreme ultraviolet light. That's what they're doing. They're collecting extreme ultraviolet light. And that's exactly what the photon burst is is an extreme ultraviolet so far that it's all almost into what's the next band or whatever x-ray or something. I don't know the next uh band up. So whatever he Randall Mills is doing with his hydrino, it appears to be the same chemical process as the videos. And it turns out Randall Mills has been getting attacked and discredited like crazy. And what Randall Mills is saying is that n equals one uh planks uh or it was actually I think it was Schrodingers that did the equation basically show the idea was that we thought we couldn't go below the equilibrium point. We thought there's no way to go like this. Randall Mills came in and said we can have fractions of one. We can go below n equals one in quantum mechanics. And if you go fractionally below one, to me that's the same as going down lowering your sea level. So just conceptually, conceptually what Randall Mills is saying sounds exactly the same as what I think we're seeing when the orbs converge on the plane and the plane zaps out and this ultraviolet release of photon happens. So, Friday, we're going to figure out what's going on because the reaction I got from Randall Mills when I emailed him, my spider sense was tingling. Something isn't right. I email Randall Mills and he gives me a very short response. It didn't really make any sense. And now I'm kind of sitting here thinking, this guy's been doing this research for decades. Where's the money coming from? Where's the money coming from from these guys to be doing this research for so long? I mean, this got to cost a lot and there's no product. Is the military involved in this? I'm starting to wonder, can we figure out who the people were who figured out the orbs? Like maybe Randall Mills isn't making plasma orbs that can fly around, but like maybe his technology led to that. You know what I'm saying? H something's something's weird, guys. So, we're going to put Randall Mills on the map. And last point, and then I swear we'll get on to the next thing. This and this does connect, by the way, all this. I think we are going to be able to blow up the fusion scam. Uh, metaphorically speaking, in case any feds are out there, don't don't take what I've said literally in out of context. Um, we are going to be able to expose the fu hot fusion scam before it even has a chance to kick off. This is probably what will get me killed more than the Malaysian Airlines thing. I strongly suspect right now that they have Fusion planned out. They have Fusion planned out, a roll out plan for Fusion, and it's going to be a gimped, intentionally gimped version of Fusion that they know they can do it better. And I think they've got it all planned out. They know which companies are going to do it, everything like that. And Brilliant Light Power might be one of those companies maybe or one that's going to what it's going to be is it's going to be controlled by the government where the government dictates like how efficient it can be. That's basically probably how it's going to play out. So we might be able to expose it in a way where like we can actually impact the markets. We've gotten big enough now from uh just like a community standpoint where like if we start really just exposing these companies just airing their dirty laundry out any weird like who knows what we'll find. We could actually like impact the markets where people either we find out that like they knowingly have super advanced technology and they've been holding back from their shareholders or something like that or you know who knows just as hypothetical hypothetical only. tonight. The photoelectric effect. Why Why are we talking about the photoelectric effect tonight? Why is this connect to Randall Mills? How is all this stuff connected? Well, it turns out that once upon a time, all the smartest people in the world thought that light was a wave. Everybody said light is a wave. And then this big brain bastard came along. I don't think he was really a bastard actually, patent clerk named Einstein. And he said, "Nah, those Nobel prizes you got about your waves, that's some [ __ ] [Music] work." And he came in, he said, "Light is not some wavy thing that's just constantly feeding energy. It's a packet. It's a packet floating around in little packets here and there. And then everybody said, "No, Einstein, I don't like you. You're not cool. I don't like your ideas." And unfortunately, all those wave people were right. They were right. They were bullying Einstein and they were right. And the woke people won. And they somehow changed public opinion and everybody started believing Einstein. And now we're in a situation where everybody thinks that everything's a little particle flying around, right? We all there's little apples flying around. Little light light. It's a little apple bouncing into your eyes all the time. There's little particles of apples hitting you in the eyes. Yeah. That that's how the world world works. Yeah. It's little particles of light. Even though all the experimental evidence like every time you run an experiment on light shows it's clearly a wave. But nope, we got to think of it like particle. Okay, that was the common man very a bridged version of what the photoelectric effect is. We're going to do a couple different versions here for the different skill levels. Right? So Einstein came in and by the way that is the only thing Einstein won a Nobel Prize for. So the ulti the funniest thing is that Einstein won a Nobel prize for the photoelectric effect and this is the thing the other physicists gave him the most [ __ ] about. They said this was the thing that they actually didn't agree with general relativity and what have you. You know everybody agreed with all that. Okay. So before we jump into this we're going to have a little bit of fun. I've got some videos prepared. Um, you know what? Let's first uh Okay, let's do this one first. Trying to decide what Wait, what happened? Why? There it goes. What's that? What is this? Oh, okay. There we go. I was listening to myself. Okay. Um, chat, you know what it's time for. Science is a liar sometimes, chat. Here it is. Presents some egghehead scientific argument based on fact. I'm just a regular dude. I like to drink beer. You know, I love my family. Rock flagging eagle. Right, Charlie? He's got a point. No, he doesn't. See, Charlie, these liberals are trying to assassinate my character. I can't change their mind. is liberals in there. Science. I was trying to assassinate my character, chat. It's true. It's true story. This This is a joke, but Ashley, it's just real. It's just real, though. Won't change my mind cuz I don't have to cuz I'm an American. I won't change my mind on anything. Regardless of the facts that are set out before me, I'm dug in and I'll never change. Beck, look, you're wasting our time. You're not going to get us to not believe in evolution. And why is that? Because the smartest scientists in the entire world all agree that it's real. I'm glad you brought that up. Oh, the smartest scientists in the world all think that light is a particle. Mhm. Is that the case? Do you guys uh can you tell how this is going to go? Everybody, how does it go for the smartest people in the world? Because Mr. Reynolds. Science is a liar sometimes. Oh boy. This is Aristotle. Thought to be the smartest man on the planet. He believed that the Earth was the center of the universe. And everybody believed him because he was so smart. until another smartest guy came around, Galileo, and he disproved that theory, making Aristotle and everybody else on Earth look like a [ __ ] Of course, Galileo then thought, chat, have you ever seen someone get served as hard as Galileo served Aristotle? There's no coming back from that. You can't even show your face on social media after that illusion. And there's no way that the moon could cause the ocean's tides. Everybody believed that because he was so smart. He was also wrong, making him and everyone else on Earth look like a [ __ ] again. Boom. And then bitched again. Best of all, Sir Isaac Newton gets born and blows everybody's nips off with his big brains. Of course, he also thought he could turn metal into gold and died eating mercury, making him yet another stupid [ __ ] You seeing a trend? Are you seeing a pattern? No. Mr. Reynolds, these were all the smartest scientists on the planet. Only problem is they kept being wrong sometimes. This is in chat. I mean, look at how can you argue with this logic? My man knows how to work a crowd. They're wrong sometimes. All of them. The smartest people in the world. Saying you fool. Oops. I'm a fool because I have more faith in the saints that wrote the Bible. Yeah. Because you just read the words of a bunch of guys that you never met and you just take it on faith that everything they wrote was true. And what makes you think what your scientists are writing is any more truer than my saints? Because there are volumes of proven data, numbers, you know, figures. There are Have you seen the data, poured through the figures, you know, for yourself? Have you done the research, chat? H fossil records. Oh, fossil records. Ah, I didn't even think about the fossil records. I guess I'll concede. Oh, wait. One more thing before I do, Mr. Reynolds. Have you seen these fossil records? Have I? Huh? Have you poured through the data yourself? The numbers, the figures? Well, no. I mean, no. Oh, interesting. So, let me get this straight, Mr. Reynolds. You get your information from a book written by men you've never met, and you take their words as truth based on a willingness to believe, a desire to accept, a leap of dare I say it, Faith. Come on. Come on. Look, I mean, I don't even know how I'm supposed to respond to that. Like, come on. That is That's a false equivalency. Just answer the question, Mr. Reynolds. Sure. Yeah. Okay. I rest my case. Oh, that got me. Yeah. Well, chat, I don't know about you, but I'm convinced science is a [ __ ] sometimes. Now, what is the lesson that we can learn from that valuable educational science video that can be shown to children? The lesson we can learn is that we shouldn't get too egotistical about what we think we know science to be. Science is not what I was taught in school. Science is not what I learned in a book. Science is the study of observable reality. So you may say, Ashton, how do I know? How do I distinguish science, the study of observable reality? The answer is the experiments. We look at the experimental results and we interpret those results and that's called making a physics model. See guys, science. So what we're going to do tonight is we're going to look at the photoelectric effect through the lens of Dr. Yu's yuon theory using the help of float head physics to assist us. Now before we do that let me reexplain Dr. uh use yuon theory for you guys. By the way, NASA might guys, apologies to my conspiracy theory followers who are always hitting on 19. In fact, maybe you need to hit on 19 a little bit more. What if it's that NASA was not lying about space? Maybe maybe the reason why we didn't go back to space isn't that space is fake and gay. What if space is super real and NASA actually is secretly hiding the super smart people that figured everything out and they just have to pretend to be stupid? The SCAP was one more layer deep. You had to go one more layer deep on the scop. They're actually expending a huge amount of effort to appear to be [ __ ] to the public. Like they have to do big plans. Okay, [ __ ] All of our IQs are like 150. How do we appear to be like room temperature [ __ ] IQ when we talk to mainstream media today? Okay, here I got it for you. Go out there and tell them that we lost the technology. Go back to the moon. Perfect. Perfect. Go out there and say that to to CNN. Boom. See, you guys aren't uh Sometimes you got to hit on 19, but only on the right time. You know that two is coming, chat. Okay, so here's the real explanation for the photoelectric effect. I'm going to use my mug as an example. What happened was we discovered electromagnetism and quickly what was observed was that we can shoot light onto let's say a metal and when that happens there is a release of electrons from from the atom. The atom has electrons in it. the electrons are being released from it. So, we're shooting our light and it hits our atom and electrons are being released. Okay, that's normal, right? Nothing wrong with that. If I shoot something at this mug, I expect it to move a little bit, right? Or there to be a reaction, a conservation of momentum, equal and opposite reaction. Something must happen. That's not a problem. But here's the problem. They increased the brightness. So let's say imagine going from a 50 W bulb to a 100 watt bulb. It's a lot brighter now. They said, "Okay, I just made the light much brighter, much more kinetic energy coming from the light and it's hitting my mug. So what should happen? The electrons should be shot out at a higher speed, right? I mean, I'm I'm putting more energy in. You should have more energy come out. That's what should happen. And that's not what happens. Wow. So what is the experimental? What is the experimental result we need to explain? We shoot light at a metal or an atom of what of some sort and we can get electrons to break free. But when we make the light more intense, more bright, increase the amplitude of the of the wave of the light, the electron doesn't doesn't break free with any higher speed. Huh. That is a very unusual phenomenon. So then we had to explain this and we found something very very weird. We can cause the electron to break free with higher energy. How how what's the how what if it's not the intensity of the light that causes it? What causes the electron to have higher energy when it gets released? The color. The color like the color like like this is yellow. Yes. The color the wavelength the frequency of light changes the kinetic energy at which the electron is shot off of the atom. Not the intensity, not the brightness, the color, the frequency. Huh? So what Einstein discovered, why he won a Nobel Prize, why we all believe in the photon is that Einstein realized that we have to look at light differently in order to interpret this experimental result. In order to interpret this experimental result, we can't look at this relationship of this as this linear relationship between the laser shooting the light beam and the the electron that's released. Instead, there's this like stepwise result and it's based on frequency, not based on amplitude, not based on the intensity. So Einstein decided that we're going to create something called a packet a packet of light and we now call this also like a quantum a quantum unit of light. It got unified with Max Planck's theory of quantum mechanics into this idea of this quantum photon of light that's some imaginary particle and that the only way that that this whole idea of why we don't see this continuous release of or we don't see this continuous energy release of the electrons. when we turn up the intensity must be that there's this packet of photons and we have to change the size of the packet change the he calls it like changing the size of the spoon to cause more energy to come out. So what is the alternative answer? Well, somebody already said it before I even asked the question. I asked Dr. U the answer to this question. and his answer was resonance. Now, I'm going to blindly play this clip without knowing exactly what it's going to say and hopefully it's relevant. Here we go. Light not a particle. Why is light a wave? Or is light a wave? Is is light actually a particle and a wave at the same time? My quick answer is after I studied this, so my quick answer, light is 100% a wave. So what would be your explanation there for like that we can change the size of the spoon by changing the frequency how does that we're we're like changing the excitation by doing that like we're making the excitation more impactful or that's where resonance comes you need to hear the resonance frequency right you adjust frequency not every every frequency is resonant frequency only in the resonant frequency you use the smallest energy can propagate anybody were to say, "Oh, they want to challenge it, which I would I love for people to challenge it." Even Leonard Suskin was asked about if we remove all this energy, how how can there be something there still? Well, how can there be something there? And and he goes, "Yes, there's something there and it's electromagnetic." He says, "It has charge." And they go, "How can it have charge if there's no mass? If there's nothing actually there's no energy or mass there." And and that he says, "I don't know where it can come from." Well, you just said it. It's there must be a medium. And that means electromagnetic and it's the zero with moving particles are magnetic too, right? They're in the right. Everything's magnetic. Okay. Wow. So the answer is resonance. Now I want you to think about this while we're going through watching some of these clips here because think about that exact same thing that we just said. It's not the intensity of the light that is causing the kinetic energy of the electrons to be released with more energy. There's some kind of step-wise process that's related to the frequency. So, what is going on? It's resonance. It's always been resonance. You have two waves interacting. How do waves interact? They interact with resonance. So if you have two waves that are out of phase, they're not going to interact. When they're in phase and they hit a resonant frequency, they're going to interact. It's actually hilarious that Einstein came to this conclusion because to me it seems obvious that the conclusion to the photoelectric effect is that Tesla was correct. How can you look at like just look at it like this. Let's just recap what I just said without even looking at anything else. We increase the intensity of the light shining on an object, shining on an atom. Increase the intensity doesn't cause it causes more electrons to be released, but it doesn't cause each electron to be released with more energy. Doesn't make any sense from a perspective of physics. If I run into something, my energy should be conserved and pushed into that thing. It shouldn't be spread out over three different things. That doesn't really make sense. But we found out what the real mechanism is. There is a real mechanism that causes that can cause the electron to be released with more kinetic energy. The mechanism is color frequency. You don't change the intensity, just change the frequency. That just to me says, okay, that's resonance. Like when I change the frequency of my radio, I'm tuning in to the radio station. When you change the frequency of your light, you're tuning in to the frequency of the object that you're shooting the light at. Thank you, Matt, in the pill chat. And thank you guys, my PL followers. Love you guys. The more I watch these shows, the more I'm starting to resonate with the light as a wave. To be honest with you guys, I was somebody that was all about the particle stuff before all this, and now I'm sure there's no chance that light is a particle. Light is definitely definitely not a particle. So, let's take a listen to my man uh Floata Head Physics explain it. Okay, I think this is it. Hold up. I have the right video. I think this is the right one. We called it the ultraviolet catastrophe. But I never understood what really happened. Why did it happen like that? I mean surely you can understand the mathematical derivations and by the way if you want to do that there are some beautiful videos out there and why classical physics leads ultimately to this ultraviolet catastrophe and so if you're ready for this let's begin so Fman what's the whole issue with this hot glowing things well Fman reminds us that it's not just these metals that glow everything including you me and donkeys we all glow due to our physics tried to explain it and tried to predict this and when they did that was a disaster so fine one help me understand why did the classical physics you know why did the class why the classical physics breakdown. What is a disaster? Help me understand without any equations. And Fman says, "Mahes, what happens when you pluck a guitar string?" And I'm like, "What? You get music?" And Fman asks, "So asked, but what causes that music?" Sound waves. But what causes the sound waves? The waves on the string, Fineman. But what kind of waves? I'm like, "Oh my god, standing waves." Yes, standing waves. Guitar strings or strings of any music. There we go. Standing waves, chat. H. So, why did Ashton spend all that damn time talking about waves, explaining why light's a wave? Why is Ashton showing this video? The first thing we need to understand is light is a wave. What does that mean about particles? Why do we see things as particles? Why do we see things as solid? We see see things as solid because light everything is actually waves at the smallest scales. It's all waves. And if everything is waves of the smallest scales, then you interact with waves with other waves, right? And this is what I think Dr. U is trying to say is that you can have particle like magnetic small maybe even the smallest thing is a particle. Is the smallest thing a particle or is the smallest thing a wave? I don't know. But we have these wavelike interactions which drive our visible reality instrument for that matter creates standing waves. These are different from traveling waves which well they travel. But you know what I find the word standing wave very weird because wave is where you have energy moving from one point to another without the particles themselves moving. But standing wave that means is stationary motion. It's an oxymoron kind of like bittersweet or acting naturally or internet privacy. But Fman reminds us that it's called a standing wave because you get it when you have two traveling waves in the opposite direction and they interfere with each other. Again, check out this cool visual I did using chat GBD and some video editing. I'm not trying to sell the course over here, but I'm super super happy about. So, this I wanted to just show because also thank you for that donation. I have no idea what this means. Have the moonlight. Uh I don't know what that means, but thank you very much for that donation, Raphael. So the other thing about this is that this also connects to Tom Bearden and phase conjugation. This is what Tom Bearden was talking about is manipulating waves and interacting waves can manipulate gravity, excuse me, by potentially either constructive or sorry that was destructive destructive or you know constructive interference. So I'll skip ahead and then this also ties interestingly into this idea of black body radiation where they will plank at the same time while the photoelectric effect was being discovered or maybe a little bit earlier he's all plank is also discovering there's this black body radiation that everything is radiating energy out and so they start to realize that this energy. If you you imagine an empty box or a box that's not empty, you can have all these modes of energy of and a heat and you can pull this energy out. And this energy might be is always coming off of every object all the time. This energy radiating off of us and during Ma Max Plank's discovery of the black body radiation is when we found Planck's constant. And so there's this connection here to the photoelectric effect in that plank's constant exists in the photoelectric effect as well in the equations. Meaning there's some universal connection between this idea that light isn't acting like a direct stream of of particles. It's acting like this packet. There's some connection between that and this energy that we are radiating all the time. And this kind of makes sense, right? Because think about what we said here. You're shooting light at an object and electrons are released. And we're also saying that if you're just standing around all the time, you're releasing energy and black body radiation is releasing off you all the time as well. So maybe they're the same thing. Maybe the black body radiation is because of us interacting with the medium all around us. The answer seems pretty clear. How do you explain all this stuff? The same way Dr. U did. Light is a stimulation of the medium. We're in a medium all the time. There must be a medium for any of this stuff to make sense. So, let's go to which part? Uh crap. I can't remember which part I said. Oh, okay. Here we go. Here it is. Okay. So then there's this expartation expartation theory. I'm not going to show the video part of it, but basically says that if there is three dimensions, this cube of space, energy is averaged over that all directions. Energy is a averaged over all that directions. But here's the thing. There's an additional degree of freedom. So you have up, down, left, right, you know, back and forth. There's another degree of freedom that's allowed spin. In fact, maybe I'll go to that part where he talks about that. I think he talks about right here energy in the vertical axis. But since there's no preference for any axis, on average, the energy has to be equally distributed among the three directions. That's what the equipotition theorem says. On average, energy not water is equally distributed among various degrees of freedom. Degree of freedom is a fancy way of describing the different ways in which energies can be stored. So for air molecules, the kinetic energy can be stored in these three different axes. And so there are three degrees of freedom. And so according to equipartition theorem, if the average energy for each degree of freedom is E not, then the total energy should be three E not. Makes sense, right? And by the way, if we had say diatomic molecules like oxygen molecules for example, then there would be more degrees of freedom. And at this point, I'm like, wait a second, fine. We're still in three dimensions. How can you have more than 3 degrees of freedom? Well, now along with the motion along the three axis, they can also spin. That's additional ways of storing energy. In fact, they can spin in a couple of independent ways now. And total therefore they get five degrees of freedom. So in this particular case, if on average the energy per degree of freedom is E not, then the total average energy would be five E not. Make sense? Wow. Thank you in the bushes for gifting the can of of luminada. Mhm. Yeah. That's what I am now. That's what I've that's what I've become. So spin. So yesterday when I just tweeted magnetism and spin magnet spin is a form of energy, angular momentum. And what was it that Salvatore Py, remember Salvatore Py, US Navy engineer has the UFO patents. He says that we can potentially manipulate spaceime using accelerated vibration or spin. H interesting. So obviously S is looking at this this vibrational energy but in general he believes we can amplify energy. Dr. U believes that we can amplify energy. And now here we're seeing that when we really get down to the basis of physics, spin is one of the degrees of freedom. for energy as well. Imagine if we have a frictionless spin and we can increase the acceleration. That's infinite energy. Okay, here's another really cool image of standing waves. Where is it? Here. Here we go. Because the other thing that Dr. You said when we talked to him was he mentioned uh that there like when I had talked about Terrence Howard the octaves he says there are certain harmonics. So you can imagine here's n equals like two at the at the top here your wave. You've got this one here n equals 3 n equals 4 if you want to imagine it like that. So you can see actually that you can just by increasing the number the increasing the frequency you can see that there's a relationship between the waves essentially which to me excuse me uh I'm not personally super convinced on the whole periodic table in terms of this but it's starting to make more sense because now if you're saying that everything has a resonant frequency everything is waves Then elements are really just waves and it's just like an element is the base form of some standing wave. So you're saying what is hydrogen? Hydrogen is just a standing wave of a certain exact uh structure geometric structure. That's it. And then everything builds upon that. That's the theory behind this. At least electromagnetic waves in that metallic cube, they are threedimensional. And I'm like, okay, how does that change things? Well, in 1D, there's only one way to set up each wavelength. But turns out in higher dimensions, there are more than one ways to set up each wave. And it's harder to visualize this in 3D. So, let's look at it in 2D. Again, this is something that I coded myself. So, but anyways, okay. So, if you look at the longest wavelength, which is analogous to what we see over here in 1D, then that looks like this. And again, there's only one way to set this up. Okay. However, if you were to go for the next higher frequency, you can set it up this way or you can set it up this way. These are the two ways in which you can have two loes. Look at that. So, since there are two independent ways to set up this particular standing waves, there are two degrees of freedom for this particular wavelength, not one. And for even shorter wheel length since you get more more loes you can even set them up in multi even more ways and therefore you get even more degrees of freedom over there. So what are we saying there? Why is this so important? Why what are the degrees of freedom? So imagine all the directions that I can go in. I can go that way. I can go this way. The degrees of freedom are all the different ways something can move. And then what's another degree of freedom? If you have three every dimension that you add, you get more degrees of freedom. When you increase your standing wave, you get more degrees of freedom. You get more ways the wave can be set up. And when you add another dimension, that wave gets more and more complicated. The waves get so complicated they get hard for us to comprehend. One of the degrees of freedom is spin. So you have all these degrees of freedom, right? And this is what become makes it become really difficult for our human brains to even comprehend what is energy. Energy can come in all these different forms. Energy can come in any form of movement in our three-dimensional space. I present this because I want people to understand that a couple things. One, energy is everywhere. Of course, there's infinite energy because when you add all this up, you go, there must be infinite energy out there. The other thing is now realize all these modes, these wavelengths, especially the zero point energy, it's everywhere, all around us all the time. all the different modes in every possible direction everywhere. If you imagine that our we are the fish in the fish tank. Remember actually Dr. U said this it was actually really cool. Dr. U said we're fish in the fish tank. The fish doesn't see the water. Exactly. The fish doesn't see the water. That's us. So when somebody says what is polarizing the vacuum? What is that? What is space-time metric engineering? What is manipulating spaceime? Well, Dr. U told us light is a pertubation in the medium, a disturbance in the medium. So when we're manipulating spaceime, all we have to do is we have to electrify the region of spacetime, push out all that white noise. Imagine you look at one of those old TV screens with the the white uh the snow they used to call it on the screen and then the ring goo comes through your television. Imagine if all of a sudden all the white noise on the TV just went away. The white noise all just gets pushed out. That would be my visualization of polarizing the vacuum. You're basically creating order from disorder. Also, the ringu is coming for you guys. Okay. Uh let me think. Is there anything else we need to look at here? So, basically the number of uh degrees of freedom gets kind of out of control. Now, I wanted to show you that part. Now, this video, this next one I'm going to show you is even better. This one's actually directly about the photoelectric effect. But I need you guys to understand the quantum mechanics stuff a little bit more before we get to that. Okay? Because what's my whole argument? The whole argument that I'm making here is that the photoelectric effect is incorrect. I mean, it's not that it's necessarily wrong. Obviously, the experimental results are correct. It's the interpretation that's wrong. the interpretation that we have these packets of light and we're just going to change the size of the packets. That's what's wrong. That's not the right way. That's not what's going on. We are creating a wave and our wave is interacting with the wave that we're shooting that thing at. That's why it's releasing an electron that's going faster. So imagine now we say, "Okay, I'm standing here and this thing shoots into me and I'm like, oh, okay. I'm going to shoot off. Now imagine I'm spinning really fast. Right now imagine all those degrees of freedom. I can be spinning this way. I could be spinning this way. I could be spinning any different direction. Right? Because we have three degrees around us. So what are we starting to realize now? We're starting to realize, hm, what happens if I shoot something and hit something that's spinning? Well, it turns out the direction in which I hit that thing that's spinning, my direction that I throw it at matters a lot because it could be oriented this way. It could be oriented this way. It could be oriented this way. It could be oriented any different direction in a random direction in space. If something's spinning, then you need to hit it in the exact right way. This is the same concept as if I'm shooting something with a frequency, I need to hit it with the right frequency in the right way. To me, this is the answer. Why do the electrons not shoot out with more energy? Because hitting it with more light at the same frequency isn't going to do anything. You can keep running into the brick wall, but you're going to never go through that brick wall until you, you know, get a sledgehammer. Simple as that. And if you get that sledgehammer, why does the sledgehammer break through? Because the sledgehammer was made to break through because you hit that resonant frequency and now you are just hammering through. And that thing is just a matter of time before it cracks. Every frequency, every is just beating on it. Interesting. Okay, so this one here, so here's the guy that figured out the photoelectric effect, why it even exists. That's not Why is this not working? Is that Oh, here we go. But he probably didn't care much because he was celebrating the discovery of electromagnetic waves and was probably too busy having a unit named after him. But soon the electrons were discovered and it then became clear what was going on. The ultraviolet light ejected electrons from the metal. This made the spark bigger and it was called the photoelectric effect. And this led Einstein to revolutionize our understanding of light eventually earning him the Nobel Prize. So, someone made a spark gap. Look at that. There's a spark gap. That's how we discovered electromagnetic waves. That is basically the very basis for producing cold plasma. That's the very very most basic thing to begin producing cold plasma. And then they shoot it with a laser beam. That's what this is right here. And what happened? The ga the plasma grew. The plasma grew. The ark grew. So they were like, "Wait, what? Light is causing an interaction with this metal surface. It's causing electrons to be released. Why? Why?" And then so here they kind of just explain. I'm just going to I'm I'm not going to show. So, he's just kind of explaining basic physics like I told you guys, right? He says, "Okay, he says we can figure this out. He says the electron must have some kinetic energy when it gets released from the metal. How do we measure that kinetic energy? We can't like actually look at the electron. It's too small. There's no way to actually look at it. So, how do we measure the kinetic energy of the electron?" Well, let's do the opposite. Let's measure how much energy it takes to make it so the electron doesn't get released to to put to hold the electron back. So, what do they do? They create an artificial electric field, right? They create this electric field and they create a repulsion effect and then they shoot the light at the metal with the repulsion effect containing it. And then they measure to see if there's energy flowing. And if there's no energy flowing, then you figured out the amount of energy it requires to stop that electron. You figured out how much energy that electron has. So this is actually super genius. I'm going to let him explain it here. super genius for them to figure this out because this shows that this effect is not some imagination thing. It's not some, you know, uh, somebody misinterpreting something. The effect is very real. The question is how do you conceptualize the effect? How do you explain the effect? Oh, wait, which part does it? I wrote all this down. Oh, here it is. This should be good. Right about here. we use another metal to collect the electrons which we're going to call the collector but put a negative voltage to the collector then that will repel the electrons and it can make the electrons stop. Now if it takes a little bit of voltage to make the electrons stop that means the kinetic energy of the electrons was very little but if it takes a lot of voltage to make the electrons stop that means the electrons had much bigger kinetic energy. Makes sense, right? And I'm like, yeah, that makes sense. But how do I know if the electrons have stopped or not? I can't see them, right? Ah, this is where you put an ampmeter. If the electrons are collected, then there will be a current and the ambit will detect it. In fact, in this particular example, there is a current. That means I know the electrons have not stopped. So, this much voltage is not enough. So, let's turn up the voltage until the current just stops. So at this point I can now visualize that all the electrons that are coming out over here must have stopped and must have turned around. None of them are getting collected. So in this case it takes 3 volts to stop these electrons. Right? Now imagine another photoelectric experiment in which it took say 6 volts to stop the electrons. Then I can immediately compare and say that hey there the electrons must have come out with more kinetic energy. In fact about twice as much kinetic energy as over here because it took twice as much voltage to stop it. This means this stopping voltage as we call it is a direct indicator of the kinetic energies with which the okay so just like I said so we have a way where we can now check to see how much energy was being released. Okay. So and here's the thing that didn't make any sense for everybody. They said, "Okay, well, how is this possible? Is if I'm increasing the intensity, I'm getting more electrons being released from the metal, but they're not being released with any higher energy." How does this make any sense? The analogy he gives in this video is he says, "Well, imagine a cannon. How much energy is? He says, "What's the relationship between you lighting the cannon with a match and how much energy is being released from the cannon and the cannonball?" There's no direct correlation. One just triggers the other. It must be a triggering effect, not an effect, not a direct connection. Absolutely must be the case. Right? So that's a good analogy. So when somebody says, "What about the photoelectric effect? Every all 600 people watching this live stream right now should say the photoelectric effect that Einstein show must be some sort of triggering effect because when we increase the intensity of light increase the wattage brightness on our metal the electrons released don't get released with any more energy at all. Just more of them gets released instead. that shows it must be a triggering effect that's happening. The light is causing a trigger something to occur within the actual medium. Okay, here's this part I think is the next cool part. Cool. This time L experimented with different colors or different frequencies of light. higher frequencies like X-rays and even lower frequencies like visible light. Now according to the trigger hypothesis, light is only triggering the electrons. So the energies with which these electrons come out should only depend on the metal. Right? So this means the frequency should have no effect on the kinetic energies of the electrons. Right. Right. But what Leonard found was that was not true. Leonard found that high frequency light actually made the electrons come out with more kinetic energy and lower frequency light made them come out with lesser kinetic energy. And if light's frequency was too low, then electrons didn't come out at all, no matter how bright you made the light. I do want to clarify when I say triggering, Leonard was the person that Einstein bitched. And he had a theory called trigger theory, which is not the same thing that I'm saying. When I'm saying triggering, I probably shouldn't say that to avoid confusion. I mean just pertabbation. So right here, why is an increase in the frequency causing the electrons to come out with more energy? How weird is it? Just remember this. You want to just blow somebody's mind when anytime anyone breaks up brings up the photoelectric effect, you just say why is it that it's not the intensity of light that causes the increase in kinetic energy from the electrons, it's the color, the color causes an increase in kinetic energy from the electrons. Just look at it from that perspective. If I were to tell you the color of light with which you hit this piece of metal is going to change the energy level at which the electrons are released from it, you would say what? Why? That makes no sense. It does though. If you if you understand waves and frequency, if you just ignore waves and frequency and think everything's a particle, it makes no sense at all how that could be possible. The color, I'm going to actually say this a lot because it just sounds awesome to say. Technically, it's the frequency. You all know that. But saying that the color changes the the release the the amount of kinetic energy released by the electrons. Each electron weird. Yes, finally someone in the chat some people already said this as well. Probably the other thing that people are realizing that obviously now sound why have we been discounting sound? Some people should be thinking now, wait a minute, sound is a wave. Why? Why can't sound create light? Why not? You're telling me light is a pertabbation in the medium, a disturbance in the medium. Sound is creating waves. Can't sound create light? Yes, it can. Yes, it can. And yes, it has uh in the form of sonoluminescence. Sonoluminescence. Sound can create a pressure in the medium that causes light to be released. Pretty wild, huh? And it can't really be explained. I don't think Einstein could explain it with his classical theories either. Could be wrong. Uh yeah, I guess not not a lot of people. It's hard to like get a find a good grasp of like what I should show for people and not be too repetitive. But for people that want to know soon luminesence, there it is. It's obviously zoomed in. See that light? That light. That's just sound and water. Just sound waves. Just water. That's it. That's it. That's all it takes. Okay. Okay. Back to my guy. Okay. So we know that it's not the intensity but the color the frequency that changes the kinetic energy that the elect that is released from the atoms. So to me this is really now the answer here the the medium itself must be providing the energy. Where are all these electrons coming from? And if you don't hit the resonant frequency then what's happening? your light's just bouncing off of bouncing off of it. Like if I imagine something spinning really fast and I start throwing rocks at it, the rocks are just going to fly off of it, right? But if I spin around really fast as well and I match my speed to the thing that's spinning around really fast, I could slow it down. I could stop it. I can do all kinds of stuff with it. That's pretty much how we need to be thinking about the photoelectric effect. And I guarantee you as somebody that know I I don't know any sh I know like you know nothing about physics. Obviously that's not true. It should be pretty easy to look at physics from the lens of the photoelectric effect being this resonance effect and then I think you're probably going to find a bunch of stuff that confirms this from, you know, other perspectives. That seems to be how this always goes down is that people say, "Atton, you're a crank." Blah, blah, blah. And I say, "I have no reason to believe this is real except for these crazy videos I saw that say that this must be it." And then we find out there's some crazy rabbit hole and then yep this might actually this physics thing might be real, Einstein might be wrong, etc. Before we get to the last part of this, I want to say that Einstein I actually agree with the the criticisms of Einstein from the the classic physicist that would say that the photoelectric effect is probably Einstein's biggest blunder. Relativity. Genius. Relativity is probably E= MC² and relativity are two of the most foundational physics concepts ever. Up there with F= MA. And E= MC² is huge because of the idea that mass is energy. Mass is energy. And that idea feeds directly into the idea that everything is a wave. Energy is light. Light is a wave. Mass is energy. Mass must be waves, too. Simple. Simple. E= MC². Vitally important. Anybody that tries to discount Einstein, you're you're just up the creek without a paddle. Cannot be denied how huge that is. And that's only one of the two major major contributions. The other contribution and actually that's not even he's had many. I mean Bose Einstein condensate now that you guys bring that up. Yes. Uh Einstein Rosenbridge. Yes. These are things that I'm not even mentioning. Uh the other one though is relativity frame of reference. Einstein told us the speed of light is constant. But that's actually a weird thing to say because it shouldn't be constant for us to be living in this shared universe. The speed of light should change based on our relative perceptions based on our relative movement. Because if I'm moving in the direction of the speed of light, it should appear to go a little bit slower. But in my frame of reference, the speed of light is always measured the same. What? How can that be possible? How can it be possible that I can move in any direction against the speed of light or for the speed of light, but in my own frame whenever I measure it, it's always the same? This is what causes time dilation. This is a paradox in and of itself that the universe autocorrects with time dilation. Einstein showed us we're all living in our own little bubble. We're basically avatars in a video game living in a little bubble, but our own little bubble is not perfectly in sync with everybody else's little bubble. They just look to be in sync with one another because we're all on the Earth at the same time. But if I were to go to a different planet and come back here, our times aren't going to be in sync anymore. I could go live on a different planet for 10 years and I could come back here and it could still be today and I would be 10 years older. That's possible. I could also go live on another planet for 10 years and come back here and it could be a thousand years later. That's also possible. That's how time travel really works. So Einstein showed us two of the most the greatest things in physics. Relativity, which I just explained, that we're all living in our own bubbles, and that mass is just energy, which if energy is a wave, then mass is a wave, too. So Einstein, absolute genius. No question. Absolutely wrong about the photoelectric effect. Absolutely wrong about the photon. That's where Tesla comes in and takes over. And Tesla says, "Think of everything in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration." And that's where Einstein screwed up and he said, "I'm going to come up with this photon particle to explain this." When he should have just said, everything's going to have a resonance effect and harmonics of that resonance as well. And so when we are seeing these experimental results which show this step-wise motion, it's because we have this harmonic resonance effect that's happening between the light and the the metal or the the material. Yeah, actually quantum gravity always comes in with really good insights. He was overthinking it. This is a classic case of overthinking it. He was trying to come up with some new explanation when it was just the answer was simpler than it needed to be. And so why did Einstein get so much [ __ ] because the people at the time all knew that light had to be a wave? And now we've come to this point where people are like trying to make fun of people when they present the argument that all waves require a medium. Yes, all waves require a medium. This isn't some gotcha. This is just basic universe. This is what happens. All waves by definition require medium. So if you're saying there's a magical electromagnetic wave, it must be flowing through a medium, not through an empty void. Crazy, man. Okay. Thank you, Matt, for that other follow-up cookie. Why was Einstein always the figurehead of science and Tesla's work shoved to the side? Those are going to be questions for the ages, but I absolutely guarantee you that Einstein will be proven incorrect about the photoelectric effect and Tesla will be proven correct that it's it's all based on resonance. And it should be obvious like when Dr. U pulls up the um uh what is it? The quantum what is it? That one. Crap. I forgot the name of it. Anyway, you pull up the thing and you you show that if you just by showing two polarized lenses out of phase, light doesn't get through. If if light was a particle, it would go right through, right? If it was infinitely small, there's no way that polarized lenses should prevent it from getting through. There really shouldn't be much of an argument after that. Like, how can you still present the idea that light's a particle? It just didn't feel like being a particle when when it tries to go through a polarized lens. Two out of phase polarized lenses. Yeah. And then Matt also says, "Wow, that medium being needed for wave cancelling out canceling out a vacuum just blew my mind." Yeah, that's and it says that's one of those things where like even I had never heard that for 40 years of my life. And the moment I heard all waves require a medium so it can't be a vacuum, it just seems so obvious and you wonder and like this is that's actually probably why physicists in the early 1900s were just crapping all over Einstein because they were going there must be a medium that we're living in. It has to be. Uh a couple of these other donos Stanley Raven came for the mystery, stayed for the science. Thank you guys. I hope you appreciate it. come back for Friday, too, when we check out Randall Mills and the Hydrino stuff. So, I I think I mentioned this before, but I got in touch with somebody who did research, like lots of research on Randall Mills and Hydrino theory, and I'm going to interview them for hard truths after Randall Carlson probably. And I asked them before I interview them, I want to kind of come in a little bit blind. I want to learn during that interview. But I said like what's your opinion after researching it? After re spending all this time researching Randall Mills and they said going to end up winning a Nobel Prize and changing the world. Wow. It's going to be an interesting one. Okay. Some of the other donos. Thank you. It's about our Merkoba. I don't know what this means. Probably a spiritual thing. Thank you very much for that donation. Um consider the liies contribution towards the purchase of a new sign. Yeah. O, our signs on life support chat. Actually, no. There's like just a thing in the back that needs to be fixed. I'll probably just have a like get somebody to do it for me. Um, I love purple things. Honestly, Einstein was probably paid off by the gatekeepers. I think we're overthinking it ourselves. I don't think he was paid off. I think that it's just human nature. Human nature. We just were very tribal. And I think that happens in science as well. And that's what I think happened here as well. Whoa. Is this a lot? Is that a lot of money, chat? It's red. Wow. Thank you very much for a questionable amount of monies, but thank you. Do you think classified projects achieved large scale negative energy densities or more likely they're using inertial mass production and normal EM anti-gravity? And regarding MH, you said it was a small NE rather than large scale. Uh I assume you're that net energy density. Is that what you're saying? NE. Um yeah. So especially because you donate a huge amount, they are definitely using negative energy densities. Negative energy density is in like the casemir effect. And my guess is that whatever they're doing with the hydrino is also showing a negative energy density. So I think that the hydrino is them figuring out how to use negative energy at the atomic scale. The same way the casemir cavities effect works. Essentially like a trampoline. Pull a little energy out. Move it over here. Goes back to normal. Go over here. Pull a little energy out. That's it. Simple as that. Have they been using that? Absolutely. And they've been using that to produce fusion. They've been doing that to produce cold fusion. And it's a low energy phase transition. Why? Because the plane that zap around the plane is relatively small. If that was a high energy phase transition, I would expect like a massive blast. The clouds not like shifting. The clouds move like a little bit like there's a little bit of a disturbance, but the clouds should get blasted away if that was like if there was a shock wave. There's no shock wave. So, that has to be a negative energy event. A negative energy event must produce no shock wave. And it must basically be like looking at something phasing through a mirror. Like that's what it looks like when the plane disappears is like something just phasing right through the mirror. And all they've done in the MH370 videos to demystify it to explain why it's not aliens. All they've done is scale that effect up from the atomic level all the way up to these balls of plasma which are just huge atoms. Bose Einstein condensate a coherent ball of atoms of plasma and they use and here's the genius thing they use the same concept that we just learned about the stopping voltage. That's it. How is the plasma staying stuck together? Because the stopping voltage prevents anything from being uh leaking outside the bubble. Just have your magnetic field powerful enough so nothing leaks outside the bubble. That's it. The air itself is a natural uh insulator. Anyway, that was another thing I realized about this when I was like, "Oh, the stopping voltage." I was like, "This is the same concept to confine your plasma." Just have is your stopping voltage is high enough, your plasma is not going to dissipate. How powerful is your magnetic field? The more powerful magnetic field, the easier it is to confine your plasma. So, there you go. Thank you very much for that huge donation. I appreciate it. Let's get back to there's a couple more pieces from this that I want to take a look at here. Oh, and so one of the other things he explains here which is pretty cool is that plank Max plank kind of cheated in quantum mechanics. So Max plank realized that there was this stepping stone scale. He realized there was this scale but he didn't know how to explain it. He didn't know. He's like, he didn't know where is this coming or why. Why is this scale there? So, Max Plank was smart and he said, I don't need to explain it. All I need to say is here's plank's constant, the value that's been determined for the slope. And here are the numbers. N= 1 through infinity. N= 1 through infinity is the stepping stones. I don't care what the how what the size of the steps is. I don't care why the steps exist. Here's the math that shows how it works. That's what Max Plank did. He just said, "Here you go. Here's the math that shows how it works. I'm not going to explain it." Which is funny because it makes me think about this video from Leonard Suskind when he was asked about zero point energy. Uh, wait, which one is it? This one? think understanding if you remove matter and you remove radiation what causes the electric fields like what's the perturbation and what I can't answer what causes it I can tell you that the uncertainty principle requires it to be there but we're making the assumption there is no electric field there is no mass I thought you did I say there's no electric field said consider space has only the uh the dark energy or okay it has no real photons. It has only the zero point energy. Okay, you can have an electric field without real. It just doesn't have any charges. It's there anyway. The field fluctuates anyway. It doesn't need charges, right? And it does have charge. Actually, the field does have charge. So, what's crazy is that you see how Max Planck avoided the issue. Why? Why is it like this? You see, when talking about zero point energy, Leonard Suskin avoided the issue as well. They never ask, they never will answer the why. Although to Einstein's credit, he did try to answer the why, the photon theory. But now we see that that theory is outdated. So, so um Plank kind of cheated. He kind of cheated. Now, let's get back to this. And this is the conceptual explanation right here for how this this came about. This is where you realize if the spoon size dependent on the color of the water. So if you have high frequency water you have bigger spoon size and low frequency water meaning smaller spoon size then he could probably explain the experimental results. So he comes up with this random condition that the minimum quantity of water that you can transfer the quanta the size of the quanta should be proportional to the frequency of the water frequency of light and again remember he's only doing this to fit the experimental results. It has no physical reason whatsoever. How many times did he just say he's just doing this to fit the results? Max plank basically saw the result was E equals HF energy equals plank's constant times frequency. Simple as that. And he realized somehow a quanta can be shift changed. The size of the quanta, the size of the spoon can be changed by changing the frequency. Do you guys realize why frequency is definitely the answer? Now Tesla was no doubt correct. Why? Because all the math of quantum mechanics about photon theory is all directly connected to quantum mechanics. And it's all related to waves, not particles. It's related to waves and frequency and spin. Not related to little apples flying around through the sky. What we see is F= M A Newton's famous theory. That's only on the macro scale. When you really dig right down to what we're actually dealing with, it's all waves. Okay, it captured the essence of what plunk was trying to do without having to go get into the details of the blackboardation and all of that. But now the big question is did it work? And plank plank says it half worked. His strategy worked perfectly and he was able to perfectly explain the experimental results. Yay. But he wasn't able to get rid of his constant. He found out to make all of this work that constant had to have a particular value and that value is this. Yes, very close to the plank's constant accepted value that we have today. But think about what this means. This meant that it was no longer just a counting trick. It was physical reality that nature is indeed transferring water in some minimum quantas. But Plunk hated this idea. That was never his intention. He never wanted to quantize anything. If water is continuous, why is nature forcing you to, you know, restricting you to transport it one spoon at a time in a multiples of a particular spoon size? Why was nature doing that? So, why is nature doing it chat? It's funny that anybody in my chat can probably answer the question for my man floathead physics right there is that everybody would probably say why because of resonance because it was never about atoms being shot into something. It was always about resonance interacting and and frequency. And so then Einstein comes in and Einstein says, "We're going to think about the water like ice cubes. We're going to think about it like ice cubes and we're going to change the size of the ice cube." And this is where the photon theory came from. This is what Einstein called the photons. So you can clearly see it was Einstein who came up with this revolutionary idea of photons. Bravo Einstein. Bravo. Truly out of the box thinking. But the big question now is can this explain the photoelectric effect better than the trigger hypothesis. Let's find out. According to Einstein, light is not made of waves instead of particles like ice cubes. And he says when you shine light on metals, the electrons have to absorb one entire quanta, the entire photon. You cannot absorb half of it. Okay. So what happens now if electron absorbs the entire photon? Now if the photon doesn't have enough energy to kick that electron out, well then the electron will just remit that photon back. And now even if it absorbs another photon like this again it will remit it back. So look if you're shining light whose photon energies are too. So I like the idea of it remitting it back but this idea that like it has to absorb this one photon. There's just a roundabout way to explain away resonance. Right? You could explain this this exact same concept could be used for to explain resonance. It's just more confusing way to explain it in a way that uses a particle that we don't need. Basically, that's the idea here. Too small to kick the electron out, you will not get photo electric enough that it can kick out an electron. And now, if you further increase the frequency, then the energy of a single photon becomes even more. So, when the electron absorbs, it gets even more energy. And that's why it'll come out with even more kinetic energy. This now perfectly explains why as the frequency increases since the photon's energy increases it transfers more energy to the electron and that's why the kinetic energy will increase. That's why the kinetic energy or the stopping voltage depends on the frequency of light. And of course if you were to increase the intensity what does it do? Well it just increases the number of photons. So that won't affect the energy transfer to a single electron. But now since there are more photons more electrons so what's the alternative answer? Why are more electrons being released when you increase the energy? Well, the answer is actually the same. If you're increasing the energy, you're just making more waves or you're increasing the amplitude, right? Which is the same as stacked waves on top of each other. So, you can look at an increase in intensity of brightness is actually just more waves being stacked up. And if you're adding more waves and hitting it, then yes, if you're not changing the frequency of the wave, you're not going to change the type of interaction. You're just going to get more interaction. So if you increase the intensity of light, the reason why you get more electrons coming out is the obvious. You're hitting that thing with more waves. I mean, it's conceptually, of course, not in reality. So you should get more electrons come out, but you're not going to get them come out with more energy unless you change the frequency. And this could be the analogy here could be imagine two spinning things and getting them to align correctly. If they're not aligned correctly, the amount of energy that comes out is going to be relatively low. If they're aligned correctly, you might get a huge energy release. Okay. Now the last part. I love this part. So how did this all go down? How did the elect or the photon theory go down? The already established wave model of light. We have century worth of experiments confirming that light is a wave like interference and defraction and so much more. And now this patent clerk comes out of nowhere and says that hey all that is wrong and light is not a wave. It's made of particles. And you expect people to accept that? No ways. In fact, this idea was so so so revolutionary and people hated it so much that people actually thought that this was Einstein's biggest blunder. I mean, take a look at this recommendation letter written by Max Plunk in 1913. You can pause and read this. So, he praises Einstein over here and then he says that he may sometimes have missed the target of his speculations as for example in his hypothesis of light quanta cannot really be held against him. Oh man, this aged well. But second, wow. So Max Plank basically bitched Einstein about the photoelectric effects. His hypothesis of light quanta cannot really be held against him. He won his Nobel Prize for that. Einstein won his Nobel Prize for something that I'm pretty sure now is going to be invalidated. Like photons are going to get invalidated as a theory. And that was and we rever Einstein for all the wrong things. Well, that's not true. We rever him for the right things, but the thing that he got the highest praise for probably going to be some of his worst work. Pretty funny. Now, um Oh, let's let's finish. Finally, the photon theory challenged a Nobel laureate. Who are we talking about? Leonard. That's right. Leonard actually won a Nobel Prize in 1905, the same year Einstein published all his beautiful papers on special relativity and and photoic. So the reason why I wanted to bring this up is that the universe just repeats itself. So what happened before the reason why the photon theory was rejected was because it invalidated Nobel Prize winners. Photon theory invalidated Nobel Prize winners. Nobody wanted to believe it. And now we're in a situation again where people have won Nobel prizes based on work that's going to be proven wrong. And now they don't want to admit that they're wrong. People have decided that energy comes from wires and that warp negative energy is not real and that zero point energy is not a significant thing. And all these people are going to be proven wrong. And so it goes to show you that the reason why I started tonight with that clip of science being a [ __ ] sometimes is that we really are just stuck in a cycle, aren't we? And when I talk to Randall Carlson tomorrow, this is why I want to talk about the idea of cycles. There's cycles in everything. Everything is waves. Why is there not cycles in technology? Why is there not cycles in civilization? We are repeating the same mistakes over and over and over again. The same [ __ ] that we did to Einstein, we're now doing again, holding ourselves back. Once again, we never learn from our mistakes. The mistake was idolizing people instead of jud instead of, you know, analyzing results from an objective lens. The last thing I want to say on this for tonight is that I've been reading some of the comments. I read the comments. I read the criticisms. I'm not afraid of any of that crap. And I see people say stuff like, "You know what? I don't agree with Ashton. I think he's a [ __ ] I think what what some of the stuff people says some people say is wild. People really have a crazy view about me. Uh he's a narcissistic, egotistical [ __ ] But I think that he might be right. The big lesson I want people to take from all of this when one day this is all proven to be true is that we need to stop trusting authority, stop trusting experts. I imagine a world where this gets proven true and then a bunch of people come to me for all their answers because, oh, Ashton was right about that plane and teleportation. He must have all the answers to everything. No. No. Just because I get something right, even if it's a crazy impossible thing to get right, doesn't mean I'm somehow the guy that knows everything. This is the [ __ ] that we fell into. We start idolizing people like Einstein thinking they can't be wrong about anything. This is the the expert [ __ ] that we get stuck into where we just think that, oh, it's all about credentialism and who's the the smartest, that person's right about everything. That's what we need to learn is that even if you disagree with someone, even if you think they're a shitty person, they can still be right. We can still agree on things. So part of me is glad that people think I'm this [ __ ] person that I'm not because I want that lesson to be learned as well. So thank you guys for the uh joining me on my uh live stream here tonight. Last donation is truth is treason. Thank you for following and supporting. And yes, Ken Wheeler's light and magnetism. I think that Ken Wheeler is on the mark when it comes to this stuff. But the other part of it that you're going to learn is that if you haven't already, it's not just being the smartest guy. It's not being the guy that has the answers or knowing the secrets. It's figuring out how to communicate that to the world. This whole thing is absolutely we're in the middle of a major propaganda war. There was a new UFO whistleblower that came out and it's almost like they just like looked at the feedback from the focus groups and were like, "You know what, guys? The last whistleblower talked a little bit too much about the psychic powers and summoning egg al egg orbs and [ __ ] like that. Let's have this new whistleblower be more straight cut. This one's going to appeal to the to the workingclass man. He's not going to talk about the psychic power stuff, right?" It's like you see all this [ __ ] going down and you're just like, how can people even buy into that anymore? It seems like such contrived nonsense and you see it in the academic community, you see it in the UFO community, you see it in the media, and you see it in the government. So whatever people want to believe, whatever people want to think about me, I hope at the end of the day we learn let's judge ideas on their own merits and not have people be guilty by association. I hope you guys have a great night. Thank you MH370X. I love y'all. You're the best. Friday, let's talk about brilliant light power, hydr theory, and negative energy. Who out there is covering up free energy for the world? We're going to see if we can find out. I love you guys. Later. Oh, wait. Almost I almost ended the stream without doing our goodbye thing. Here we go. [Music] Out in the fields where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Bing 7 through a wormhole. But we're talking wormhole. Stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Owing triple 7 through a wormhole [Music] [Applause] [Music] flow. Exotic matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeezed so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing casters force negative zones. We need to stay the course. Stalking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing triple7 through a wormhole float. Thin shell formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a [Music] try. Cool forces balancing the plate creating the throat. Open the gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. [Music] We're talking wormho, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole flow from the fields to the stars. We break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gains. Little Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stars.