The Secret to Fusion - Field Reversed Configuration

Video Transcript

# The Secret to Fusion - Field Reversed Configuration Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of [music] a very few and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority. [music] When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline. [music] Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, [music] we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow [music] decay of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 [music] seconds or less. lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience and superstition, but especially a kind of [music] celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those were among his final published words. He died 10 [music] months later. Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he [music] was trying to tell us. We seem to have lost focus and vision, to have lowered our sights and let systems and structures and bureaucracies muddle us along. But we are capable of so much more. Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. They leave distance annihilated. >> We're very powerful. This country is very powerful. It's far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world that we have. More powerful than anybody even not even close. >> Malaysian 370 contact switch 120 decimal 9. Good night. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [music] Oh, [music] [music] [music] [singing] [music] I remembered The line from the Hindu scripture, [music] the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu is trying to [music] persuade the prince that he should do his duty and [music] to impress him. Takes on his multi-armed form [music] and says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer [music] of worlds. Welcome everybody to the live stream. Happy Monday everybody. Wow guys, I was late for a minute because I just got blocked by Lex Freriedman. Wow. Normally I would crash out in a situation like this, but honestly I just don't even care anymore. I don't even care anymore. I don't care about X Freeman. I don't care about podcast bros. I don't care about Joe Rogan. I don't care about politics and what side people are on or any of that crap. I'm just kind of over it. I'm over everybody being [ __ ] all the time. I guess my take is just this. Like, you do you, little bro. Here's my take. Here's my thing to streaming. You do you, little bro. If you want to just lose your mind because I said that you thought the videos were fake. I was just assuming, man. You ghosted me like two years ago. What am I supposed to think, bro? You ghosted me and unfollowed me and and went away and I didn't say anything about it for two years and then you interview David Kirkley which is who the podcast I've been talking about the guy non-stop for two months straight about helium fusion and now you're interviewing their CEO and I'm staring at field reverse configuration plasmoids in the MH3 370 videos. You're expecting me to not comment. Of course, I'm going to [ __ ] drag you, bro. I guess I am crashing out. I guess I am going to crash out on Lex Friedman. Bro, if you want to steal any more ideas from me, just come to me directly and I'll tell you who to interview. I'll tell you who to interview. Now, I'm still going to go ahead and give you props because I don't really care. I'm not the kind of spiteful person. I don't block people. Uh I don't really care. But reality is we are so far ahead of you. You have you don't even know where we're at. You literally don't even know how far ahead of you we are at. MH370X this community, bro. You're not even in the dust. Like we are lapping you and we don't know where you are anymore. We're talking about warp drives, a neutronic fusion, free energy for the world, which is going to be described today, thermonuclear weapons, where the technology came from, potentially going all the way back to the Nazis. We're talking about how this connects to UFOs and disclosure. We're talking about what this means for humanity going forward for the next 1,000 years. And you guys, you podcast bros are still busy trying to figure out what color the aliens are at. What color is this alien going to be? A blue one or is it going to be a green one? You don't even see the bigger picture. You don't even see how significant of a revelation we are talking about here. And we are broaching directly on free energy. David Kirkley says it in the interview today. says it in the interview today. He gives the secret away and I don't make people wait. So I'm going to tell you guys right now. He says we can get coefficient of performance greater than one. We can get more output than input. But that's not the revelation. All fusion is aiming for Q factor over one or effective over unity greater than one. They're aiming for a lot higher than that. And that's amazing because then that alone could be argued that that is essentially unlimited energy because we have unlimited hydrogen around us practically unlimited. It's the most abundant resource in the entire universe. But it goes further. Not only can we achieve over unity output in our system, we can recycle nearly 100% of the input energy too. We're going to watch the clip tonight, including the several other clips, and pray that we don't get copyright strike, but Lex Freriedman didn't even react to that. When somebody says, "Hey, man, we're going to get this overunity output. I'm going to get I'm going to put one unit of energy in and I'm going to get five units of energy out and we're going to try to collect as many of those five units as we can. And oh, by the way, we're going to get that unit of energy in. We're gonna get that back, too. What would you call that? What would you guys call that? I would call that free energy. Not just that, because now you've added a scaling factor where the more that you are recouping, your efficiency is now increasing multiplicatively. Your overall system efficiency is now going way up. So fusion energy represents not just the most efficient form of electrical energy direct conver direct energy conversion into electricity but it seems like there's a big secret here when it comes to electrical engineering. So tonight guys, now that I've done my little crash out, um, and really I don't care guys. Like if you if you have not learned anything from me in the last two months, I I DG AF guys. ID GF, right? I don't care about what people think. I don't care about the followers and what have you. I'm just a guy out here spitting facts. Take it or leave it. The truth is generally very unpopular. Truth is generally very unpopular. So I had done a bunch of research guys to do this live stream tonight because the last couple nights I've been thinking about field reverse configurations, Sphere Max, the MH370 videos, the orbs in them. And we are we have learned I have learned but I think we have learned that the configuration the spherical shape of the plasma orbs in the MH370 videos with the dark lines coming out of them is extremely specific. And this is the reason why Oops. This is the reason why they had to cover these up is that these the shape of these plasma orbs, the heat signatures, the X-ray lines coming out of them. This is like this is like having a fingerprint. The the debunkers used to say it's like when you have your your stock effect is matching, it's like a fingerprint and blah blah blah all this [ __ ] This is like a fingerprint. Like there's only so many things that these plasma orbs can be if we assume that this is a real video and that that's real physical effect happening right there. And really it's like only one thing. What we've concluded is only one thing that's a those are fusion reactors. Those are plasma fusion reactors. That's plasma surrounding it. And it's a spheromax shape spherical shape. So I done all this research uh that we were going to review here. And then amazingly today, this interview with David Kirkley drops. If you're not familiar, David Kirkley is the CEO of Helen Fusion. I have been making Helian Fusion as famous as possible. Now, I'm not going to take all the credit, but I've got to say that I I I have to be the number one cheerleader. I have 300,000 followers, and I shout them out nonstop. So, I'm going to say I'm the biggest cheerleader at a minimum. And there's David Kirkley talking to Lex Freriedman about Fusion. So, let me just quickly show you what I was planning to go through. Uh, I think it's this one. So, I had this whole series of things ready to go here. Uh, starting with this Reddit post about the difference between Spharmac versus F FRC's. Uh, some of the interesting history about Spharmax. And I'm going to talk about some of this stuff, but we don't I don't want to waste that much time on it anymore because we have something better to watch now. But the history of Spharmax, Spherax compared to like the sun, the theoretical backgrounds. Look at look at this heat signature that you're looking at right here that looks really, really similar to the MH370 videos. Um, I have this paper I found here about this Chinese paper on research of an unconfined sphere and its current path in a magnetic mag magnetized coaxial plasma gun. I was ready to go, chat. I had everything ready to go. Look at this paper that I found here as well. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. This was what, 1990 or something like this? 1999. Look at this paper. the spheramac path and they're literally talking about how to make compact fusion reactors. I mean, that's pretty much what they're talking about here. So, I found all this stuff. I even had plasma beta. I even had the Wikipedia for plasma beta ready to go because I wanted to teach people what is plasma beta? Why is it so important? And then Lex Friedman goes and oneups me and interviews David Kirkley in every single one of these questions is being asked and answered. So, we're just going to watch that instead. And we're definitely going to get copyright strike in the middle of this. So, I'm going to do my best to either play do whatever tricks I can and I'll deal with Lex Freedman after after tomorrow or something like that. [laughter] We'll see. But, he's definitely going to come after me. I think he's uh latigious when it comes to copyright strikes. So, guys, we're going to try our best here. Get ready. Oh, before we do that, I'm just going to go ahead and explain why plasma beta is so important because this is probably also the biggest the most important aspect of all this. Here's the the secret. The secret is magneto inertial confinement. So, everybody knew that fusion fusion was a matter of squeezing stuff together. We knew that since going back to the hydrogen bomb, even before the hydrogen bomb in the 50s. In the 50s, so they were using magnetic fields to cause this to occur. That was the thought process. Um, crap, I just forgot. There's two things I want to say on this. Um, so from the fusion perspective, we learn space-time manipulation because we're compressing energy down to a smaller and smaller compact more and more dense region. We're trying to squeeze this down. Um, crap. Okay, never mind. Uh, oh yeah, the other here. So, there's two secrets to it. One is the one we already talked about, which is space-time manipulation. Spacetime manipulation. If we can cause fusion to happen, if we can compress our energy matter down, we can increase our energy density. Number two thing that we figured out is that we have to flip our magnetic field configuration around. We have to flip our magnetic field configuration around. What we're trying to do when we're trying to do uh fusion is we're trying to build electromagnets that are containing our plasma, right? We're making our donut, we're making our stellarator, right? We're making our doughut shape. So instead of doing that, the problem is that the fusion the plasma damages the wall reactor, damages the magnets, deteriorates the device. So what we do instead is we have it have no confinement. There's just nothing. The the magnetic field is the confinement. That is the confinement. So we have our magnetic field be the thing that's confining it. And in order to accomplish this, we need a high beta factor. I beta. Now what does that mean? Beta is the relationship the relationship between the pre plasma pressure and the magnetic pressure. So what this means is that if we can get the magnetic pressure and the plasma pressure close to one close to 100% the beta close to 100%. This means the relationship between the temperature and the pressure is equal to the square of the magnetic field strength. Okay, I'll show that on the screen here. If our beta is close to one, the ratio of the plasma pressure to the magnetic field strength is close to one. And what that means is they're equivalent. What that means is they're the same. That means the temperature and pressure is equivalent to the the magnetic field strength squared divided by two something or other two two. So what this means is the higher we get our magnetic field strength in this configuration with the beta high beta value the more fusion we get. But not just the more fusion we get exponentially. the number increases exponentially because it's beta square or it's it's B squared magnetic field strength squared. In fact, I think he argues in this interview that it's even higher than that. It's like B to the 3.14 or something like that. So, what this means then is as long as our magnetic fields get more and more powerful for this sphere that we're trying to produce, we are definitely going to get to fusion. There's an image that I'm going to show in here where David Kirkley shows the reactors. Shows the reactors. And the most recent reactor that helium fusion showed that achieved 100 million degrees Celsius was only 8 Tesla. 8 Tesla. [snorts] That got to 100 million degrees Celsius. So what this means is that we can get to Teslas of like 20 or higher. We can double that. So if we could get to 100 million degrees just from eight Tesla from pulse electromagnets, they can get up to 100 Tesla. They can get extremely high Tesla. So we can easily get fusion to happen using this method. And in fact, I'm almost sure this is the method that they use to get fusion to work. This is what they did. They created a high beta fusion reactor which is just flipping the magnetic fields. Instead of having the container on the outside, the container is on the inside producing the magnetic bubble around it. That's what they figured out. And when they did this, this made it so that there was now a relationship between the the magnetic field that's trying to compress the plasma and the plasma trying to push out on the magnetic field as it's fusing. And then all they had to do was find a material that would produce an extremely high electromagnetic field like a superconductor. And then they had to figure out how to shield that superconductor so that the plasma would not destroy it on the inside. So the plasma just doesn't ever really touch it on the inside. And once they had that, they molded it. Boom. Now you've got mobile fusion reactor that can float around. Okay, that's the secret. Let's get into this spice, guys. Here we go. We got a lot to go through. Where's the video? Okay. Um, let's start. I'm actually really concerned about getting copyright strike now. Um, okay. The first yatsi, first yatsi for tonight. I'm just going to tell the yachts because I've already watched most of this and made up my minds on a lot of it. First one is that in a nuclear reaction when we're making a nuke fishing, we are causing a chain reaction to occur where the neutrons we we rip an atom apart and neutrons go flying out and those neutrons hit another atom and then that atom splits and it causes a chain reaction that cascades. That's not what we're doing in fusion. That's not what we're doing in fusion. So, that right there is huge because let's apply that to the MH370 videos. We're not looking at a chain reaction of an energy release in the MH370 videos. We're not looking at a huge boom, right? We already knew that, but now we understand the reason why. The reason why is because fishing bombs will release neutrons and have neutrons spreading. Now, a fusion bomb does the exact opposite. a fusion bomb is going to implode. In fact, this is where the question should be. What does a fusion bomb even do? If a neutron bomb or an a bomb is releasing neutrons everywhere as it cascades and has a reaction like that, what is a fusion bomb even designed to do? What does it do? Is it supposed to just implode an object onto into a size of a pin head? Because that's what logically from a physics perspective you would expect a fusion bomb to do. A fusion bomb is the opposite. It's an implosive effect. So you're compressing something down from all sides. So anyway, let's get right into this. A type of hydrogen called dutarium, which is a heavier isotope of hydrogen. Hydrogen is typically one proton and one electron atomic mass of one. Duterium has atomic mass of two which is a proton which is charged particle and it has a neutron in its nucleus which is an uncharged particle. And so that's dutyium as the fuel. Now duterium is also found in all water on Earth in the water I'm drinking right now. It's in my body. It's in Coca-Cola. Um it's it's it's everywhere. Um and and safe and clean and one of those fundamental particles that was born in the cosmos. And we estimate that in seawater here on earth we have if we powered at our current use of electricity all of humanity on fusion somewhere between 100 million years and a billion years of fuel in hydrogen and dutarium here on earth. >> Yeah. >> So the thing about fusion is that it's not free. But again free now becomes a matter of what's your perspective on the universe and whether or not you think there's an extra dimension where all energy comes from. But let's just assume a classical understanding of science cuz I think it's simpler is it's not it's not a renewable resource, right? It's not like the sun or wind that just keeps coming back. When we're talking about this, we're talking about actually using up the hydrogen and converting it to another element. So in theory, it's non-renewable. But at the same time, if you go through and do the math, you know, 100 million years, assuming our current understanding of physics and technology, we're probably fine with 100 million years. It's essentially unlimited. It's unlimited in a similar sense, not quite the same scale, but the same idea where people say, if we can tap into space-time, 0 point energy, and pull energy out of spaceime, then does that use up the spaceime? Technically, it might technically, but there's so much. is so vast that it's inconsequential. It's essentially infinite. So, similar kind of idea to that. I'm going to skip ahead here a little bit. So, I want to get to the the meat and the potatoes of this. There's actually a part in the middle that I think is the best. And I think I already explained what I wanted to do on the first stuff or talk about on the first stuff. Oh, yeah. Um, one other thing that he talks about here about if it's safe or not. So, here's the other thing. Fusion energy is safe in the sense that we're talking about releasing a small amount of neutrons compared to to fishision compared to classical nuclear energy. So, it's technically safer and there's since there's no cascading effect since we don't have that cascade that we cause for nuclear fusion or uh sorry, nuclear fishision reactions, a bomb reactions, we can just turn it off whenever we want. Let me repeat this. This is huge. Why is it safe compared to a nuclear reactor? In a nuclear reactor, we're afraid of a meltdown. We're afraid of a runaway. We're afraid of a runaway reaction where it's gonna boom, blow up, what have you. But in fusion, all you have to do is hit the switch and turn it off. The moment you stop feeding the fusion reaction, it's going to die off. Kind of like keeping a little fire alive, right? Keeping a little fire alive at the campfire. You wake up the next morning, there's a few smoldering coals. Keep it, burn it. Right? Now, I think that a fusion reaction, if we were able to make one that's on the scale of a black hole, then I think you do have a runaway concern. But nobody here, definitely not David Kirkley, are talking about creating black holes. They're talking about energy production on a much smaller scale than that. If we're able to make a black hole, I think that's where we would start to look at Q factors in the thousands, millions, maybe infinite essentially. But at that point, I mean, we don't know. We don't know. Okay. Um, let's skip ahead here. Oh, yeah. Here's how nuclear fusion works. I do want to watch a little bit of this. So, David Kirkley knows a lot, guys. I have to point out that he goes through kind of the history of inertial confinement fusion and how laser fusion separated from uh magneto inertial fusion and the subtle differences as we suspected. They're all pretty much the same thing. They're all the same underlying concept, but they have slight derivations in terms of how they approach it. And it's very interesting because he's gonna say here, but just in case I don't uh play the clip that when they did laser fusion, they discovered something new about plasma. They discovered something new about plasma. And what they discovered was field reverse configuration. Field reverse configuration. Okay, let's listen to a bit. Inertial fusion. you're trying to do is bring together and push together by a variety of means, physical means, those particles, you push them together. The most common is called laser inertial fusion. Our colleagues at the National Ignition Facility did this really well and made world records in the last few years for being able to demonstrate you can do this and do it at scale where you take very high power laser lasers and pulse them together to combine them to do fusion for a pulse for a very short period of time, nanoseconds, billionth of a second. The other extreme and you mentioned tokamax and stellerators. Stellarators are actually my favorite and so we'll talk about those graduate student infusion. And the accelerator is the first thing you learn about because there's a mathematical solution for a stellar that solves perfectly and and um and and you can write it out and you can solve it and analytically it's very simple. Building one is very hard and so it's taken a humanity a number of decades to be able to build accelerators and we can do it now um with the Windows 9 7X that came online uh in the last few years being the premier accelerator in the world. I should say all the different ways to do fusion. So I think I've also learned what's going on in terms of like people say and and rightfully there's good questions to be asked which are like Ashton how if they figured this out how is it been how come we don't have it right now right the number one question is if they figured out fusion with the Hbomb the 60s were a long time ago why are we just now getting fusion online in 2025 why is helen energy the one to do this why didn't it happened in 2000 1990s partially the material science partially because what did I just say early on we need magnetic fields that are extremely powerful we didn't have them we didn't have high super high temperature high magnetic field strength super electromagnets whatever we needed right the other part of it is that he is kind of he is actually like part of getting this out to the public. The they've been slowly researching it over time, getting better at it, and the government wasn't the one doing it. It had to come from the private sector. So, there had to be this whole process of, okay, these people know about it, and now they're going to go try to commercialize it. And they had to get blessed, you know, by the government, uh, as well. So a lot of this goes back to the government labs and the people that worked on the government labs. It goes back to the initial funding was from the department of energy. He even says in this that most of the initial research came from sers. Those are the government defense contracts that they give to engineers. So we I think we are watching it play out. and their research helium fusion. He says in this interview for the first time I had never seen anywhere else that their first reactor started in 2003 2003. So Helium Fusion has been doing this for decades. And this also lines up the MH370 videos quite nicely because it goes to show that these people were working on it, but it's clearly being developed in advanced and in the same window that that plane disappeared where we're seeing three plasma orbs spinning around the plane clearly with this open magnetic field structure with no confinement on them. Anyway, I'm going to let him keep >> all just looks so badass in terms of let me see here the galaxy galactic cosmic rays and solar particles that would come to earth that magnetic field when you run a compass you see the magnetic field from the earth so we know what's happening it's all over but how we generate it with electric currents is a little bit different and what we do is that we have a loop of of wire and the simplest way to think about it is literally a round loop so something I wanted to point out here I'm going to skip ahead a couple of minutes um he talks about the the Earth, right? It's like the inspiration is look at the magnetic field lines of the earth. Look at the magnetic field lines of the sun. In fact, we can see the magnetic reconnection occur when we see these plasma arcs shoot out from the sun. We know that we can magnetically confine plasma. How do we know it? We're looking at a ball of plasma every single day out there. Magnetically confined. There's no container around the sun. And it's in a spherical shape, which should tell us that the equilibrium for that system is a sphere. It's a sphere. Look, we see spheres everywhere. So, just to help people out, a tooidal shape, a tooidal plasma is a ring, a donut, a donut. And a poloidal poloidal magnetic field not toal but poloidal with a P is flip that flip that horizontally and and draw your magnetic field lines around it just like you would with the earth just like you would with the earth. A poloidal magnetic field produces a spherical shape. Okay, let me go ahead like one minute here and we're going to watch most of this I think. Oh. Um, yeah, there's like there's like a 10-minute rant that we're going to watch here. So, if you guys think I'm skipping ahead here, I'm mostly just skipping ahead because I I want to minimize how much we're watching in a in a long run here with electricity going around it. And you have a magnetic field inside of it. And then you have a test particle, a charged particle, an electron or an ion, which is, if you imagine to generate this, I have a coil with electrons moving around it. But if I put one in the middle of it in this magnetic field, some really interesting things happen. That electron or that ion, that charged particle is what's called magnetized. And what magnetized means is that it's trapped on that field line. In fact, even really more interesting is that it oscillates around that field line. And so the way I think about this is if you think about the Earth's magnetosphere again, and you think about the charged particles, the aurora, the the northern lights is a charged particle trapped in the Earth's magnetic field going around >> the Earth's magnetic field. And in the same way in fusion, we do the same thing here on Earth, but in a smaller direction where we trap these particles on magnetic fields, and they can go around and stay attracted to that magnetic field line. >> How much of the physics at this scale? >> He's going to ask you a question here. I mean, honestly, I don't want I don't know why I have to beef with Lex Freedman. I just don't really care. But he does ask good questions during this interview. I wanted to give him a lot of props, and I'm still going to give him a lot of props anyway. Uh I hope he doesn't take what I said too personally earlier. I think he's he's just kind of emotional. I don't know. People get takes the internet way too seriously. Um crap. What was I going to say? Uh oh. Okay, never mind. uh fail understood here like how these systems behave when you when when you um they're trapped the magnetic field in this way. >> Oh crap. Trapped in the magnetic field guys that's the answer that's the answer. The issues with plasma with fusion one issue is temperature. We solve that high magnetic field. Higher magnetic field causes higher temperature more fusion reactions to occur. Get the highest magnetic field strength that you can get. Number one issue. Number two issue, control, confinement of the plasma. How do you make your plasma confined when it wants to shoot out in every direction, guys? How do you do that? Spin it around. Get it to move. Get it to vibrate. All the things that we've been learning about for the last two years. Get it to act in sync. Get it to line up. He says the magnetic field lines, the electrons will get trapped. They'll get trapped. The reason why the bubbles that in MH370, the videos, the orbs we call them, I guess the reason why why do they look so stable? The orbs look so stable. It almost just looks like a little snow globe moving around, but it's flying through the sky. Shouldn't it get get blown in every different direction? No, because the magnetic field lines are locking in the charged particles, locking it in there. In fact, it's almost identical to if we were to look if we were to look at the um the tokamac the tokamac reactor. There's a video of the tokamac reactor. You can see the plasma spinning around and it's very faint. You can see a little bit of plasma. You see a little bit of glow. We're looking at a much denser version of that. The more dense the plasma is, the thicker it's going to look. And that's the secret as well. It's three factors. Temperature, uh there's a constant, Boltzman constant, and then there's also the amounts of particles. The more you get, the more dense they're going to be. So remember dense plasma focus. That was one of the papers that was um connected to this uh plasma fusion propulsion. Is this fundamentally now [clears throat] an engineering problem or is there a new physics to be discovered about how the system is behaving >> in in fusion? The physics we're using is actually quite old that the fundamental electromagnetic physics is 1800s physics. The fundamental atomic physics is early 1900s. And so the fundamental physics of how these work is very well understood. Putting them all together into a power plant that's hard. And so you can do the math you can do the math. Every introductory grad student does the math on a steller and say this is all I need to do. Um I just need to make a magnetic coil in this very complicated shape and then fusion will happen. Um, however, doing that in practice is actually quite quite challenging. >> So, maybe you can speak a little bit more. So, the the accelerator and the TOK, what's the difference between those two? They're both magnetic fusion systems. And then what does helon do? The tokamac and accelerator are both magnetic systems. Their goal is to generate this magnetic field and hold on to the fusion fuel long enough. Like I mentioned, these charged particles are trapped on the magnetic field. In fact, they're oscillating. We call that a gyro orbit as the radius that they oscillate around. >> So, that right there, you just saw the images. That was the those fusion reactors. So, what's the difference? Well, the fusion reactors that uh Helen is doing are can produce much more dense plasma because their beta is a lot higher and their pla and their magnetic field strength is going to be higher. So, they're going to be able to produce a much more dense plasma than those reactors are going to. Now, we can kind of understand why have we not had fusion for so long? Because we've been going about it the wrong way. In fact, I'm off on basically every other form of fusion that's out there. If they're not doing a high beta concept, I have zero faith. And that actually includes Commonwealth Fusion. I don't know what's going on with Commonwealth Fusion. You guys can make your own judgments based on that. But I don't they're not they're working on like tokamac type styles. So I don't see how they can achieve the level of efficiency that David Kirkley is talking about in this video. Okay. Uh talked about oscillating there. So he's actually going to talk about the history of it here. I'm just going to skip ahead like one minute here. Too creative with the terminology. We call the technique that Helon uses magneto inertial fusion because it does a little bit of both. So to understand that we can actually go back in history a little bit and think about the evolution of some of these approaches to fusion. And so from our perspective we look at the technology that we use as built on physics experiments that were very successful in the 1950s. Um and in those systems the earliest pioneers of fusion said I know we understand the physics. We have to take these gases, heat them to 100 million degrees and then confine them, push them together so that fusion happens. And so what is the best way to do that? So the some of the earliest programs we called them the theta pinch. And what those programs were were a linear topology because we know how to build these magnets. It's called a solenoid. Or you take a series of electric coils, you run electrical current through them that generates a magnetic field. Great. So you have a magnetic field. Now you add your fusion particles. Okay? So you've added fusion particles to this solenoid. Here's the challenge. Those particles as they're sitting in that magnetic field in this nice magnet escape. They leave out the ends. There's nothing holding them in. Great. So that makes sense. Um, and so that doesn't work. Okay. So then the ne >> So great. What do we just learned there? First of all, he goes, "People were working on this in the 50s." Wow. Yeah. I mean, the the podcast hasn't dropped yet, but the Jason Georgiani podcast is about to drop. And you're going to learn about uh what's it say? It's Ronald Richtor. Ronald Richtor 1953, 1952. This stuff goes straight back to the 50s. And then like his research got classified. They said it didn't work. They're like, "No, don't worry about Ronald Richtor. Don't worry about his basically a neutronic fusion reactor that he's building. Forget about that." And then they started trying to do it. And then what we're going to find here is that the research I did my own research those uh slides or those websites I was showing you guys and this science kind of just got defunded in the 80s in the late 80s. So they were doing this science into magneto inertial fusion and it just kind of went by the wayside for some reason and then David Kirkley shows up in the 2000s and and uh what's his face um uh the guy that worked with Richard Esgridge uh the other founder. But these guys show up and now they're picking it back up again. So, I was already convinced that this stuff went back to the fusion bomb and our research in the fusion bomb. And now we're drawing even more parallels. And it's also connected to plasmoids and EVOs. You're about to hear David Kirkley talking about plasmoids and EVOs. The very same thing that Ken Shoulders was talking about. The very same the Marauder program, guys. the Marauder program in the 90s uh that went classified. They were shooting plasma tooids at each other. That's what Helen Fusion is doing. That's literally what their reactor does. I couldn't believe this. I'm just sitting here going, "Wait a minute. So, did it just go dark? Is that the secret that this whole area of research, all this magneto inertial fusion, it went dark because it was all being classified under the nuclear weapons secrets and it went dark and it partially got defunded because nobody knew what it was or what it did. People like, you know, you can't talk about it publicly. You can't be like, "Hey man, we made some weapons and they're just manipulating spaceime. By the way, they're based on the Hbomb." People just look at you and they would just laugh. They would be like, "Oh, yeah. Okay. Yeah. You're doing Star Trek? Uh-huh. Are you going to put on your Star Trek clothes and go to the convention?" That's what they would say to you 100%. So, it gets defunded and then I don't know exactly how it picked up, but now I'm starting to see like this is what the deep state is. No offense to David Kirkley. I don't care if you're deep state, guys. They think I'm deep state now. Um, but this is what the deep state is, though. The deep state is a group of people that know about weapon secrets that even the public doesn't even really believe are real and they're profiting off that knowledge. Computer technology secrets, micro electronic engineering secrets, you would call it gravity manipulation secrets, fusion, plasma topological research, all of it. They're all profiting off of it and they know the other people that know. And then you have a club. Now, no individual is actually evil. They're just driven by their own incentive structures. Okay, I've ranted too much. Here we go. Next approach. I say, well, one one branch of fusion said, okay, well, to solve that, why don't we take that solenoid and bend it around? Let's just make it a big donut. So, as they're escaping, they go around and around in a circle. Great. That's a great approach. And so, one branch of fusion went down that direction. And and that became that evolved into the stellarator and the tokamac. different ways of taking those solenoids and wrapping them around so that the plasmas go around and round in that magnetic field and are those charged particles are held long enough that fusion happens. But there's a different way to do it. And so the theta pench was what was born in the 1950s of take this magnetic field and oh they're trying to escape. Great. Let's not let them escape. Let's close the bottle. Let's close the ends. And so we make the magnetic field much stronger at the ends. This one was called the mirror. >> I already knew what he was going to say here. If you guys watch my if you guys watch my content when he says this here, he goes, "Okay, the problem is the plasma is escaping. We try to do a theta pinch. The plasma is escaping out. Well, we already know the answer to that is let the plasma escape, bro. Use it as propulsion. Use that as your propulsion. Use the use the exhaust. And but we knew the answer. The answer is a mirror. Mirror configuration. Remember the mirror. And remember what else is good about the mirror. The mirror is also also used to produce a free electron relativistic laser. We produce mirrors, have them vibrate, and you can speed up. You can create a particle accelerator. You can make a laser or a X-ray laser essentially with it. So I think the byproduct of them producing these fusion reactors that are mobile fusion reactors is that they produce X-rays. They give off X-ray exhaust. Anyway, let him keep going here. And so the idea was that the the particles would bounce in between. And that worked and they got hotter and hotter and hotter. But guess what? As you kind of would imagine, as this mirror topology, this linear topology, the pressure increased inside the the particle pressure, the particles tried to push back on the magnetic field. They're trying to escape. Now they're trying, they're getting hotter and hotter. And just as you imagine, hot gas in a balloon tries to get out the ends. And you could not hold it tight enough at the ends to keep those particles in. And in fact, the problem is the hottest ones were the ones that would escape. And so you do a good job of heating it and they'd all leave out the ends. Okay? So the next iteration has said, "Okay, well, why don't we just not try to hold on to it very long? Why don't we squeeze it?" And so rather than just holding it constantly, let's now crush it. So we built this solenoid, we pinched the ends, and then we crushed it. And when what I mean by crushing it is not actually like crushing any magnets or changing the the topology or or moving any parts, but just rapidly increasing the magnetic field. And so going from a magnetic field that's just holding it to now taking all those particles, if you imagine they were in a streaming around together, and then rapidly increasing the magnetic field so that those particles get closer and closer closer together. So you increase the density, and now fusion starts to really happen. But they ended up hitting a technological limit. So this is the part that that um I look back and I look at the pioneers that in 1958 there were some >> I mean this is wild man. This is it man. This is it chat. I am getting goosebumps listening to this because we have figured it out man. This is the big secret. The big secret is fusion and what fusion is actually capable of. And he says, "We know what we have to do. We knew the answer. We know the answer. What's holding us back right now? We have the math and the equations right in front of us. And it says right there that the pressure is going to be equal to the B ^2 / 2 uh times the electric permitivity or permeability of or magnetic permeability of free space. There it is right there. There's the answer. We don't have the material science. That was the thing that was holding us back in the 50s. It was a long time ago. We didn't have the material science we do now. So when did it get figured out? If somebody were to ask me or to ask you Ashton MH370 Orbee out there, when did it get figured out? You don't give them a date. You don't give them a date. You say, "We figured it out the moment we were able to develop magnetic electromagnets that were powerful enough." When did that happen? Maybe in the '9s. My guess, if I have to guess, computers. We needed computers that were powerful enough. Yes. person in the chat. We need computers and we needed super powerful electromagnets. And we got those electromagnets in the form of YBCO superconductors. Who's famous for those? Oh, Ning Lee and Eugene Potenov are famous for their YBCO superconductors. YCBO. I always say it backwards. What is it? YBCO super No, I said it right. YBCO superconductors. the high temperature superc condunders y idium barerium copper oxide now I'm sure we have other options as well I mean that was 30 years ago but the moment that our material science took off we had this figured out and who would be the first person then if now we know the parameters the the physics was figured out in the 50s the material science needed to catch up we know it got figured out when the material science got figured out who would have been the first person to figure out which groups would have figured out about the material science first. It's going to be the United States government. It's going to be Loheed Martin and the companies that came before Loheed Martin, the Boeing, it's going to be Boeing. It's going to be Rathon. It's going to be General Atomics. It's going to be all of these companies, the defense contractors are the ones that figured it out first. That's why Loheed Martin with their compact fusion reactor. That should be setting off red flags and warning bells, alarm bells for everybody. The moment Loheed Martin came out and basically copied what Helen Fusion was doing, literally just copied what they were doing. They didn't even say it because they probably didn't want to get sued. It's pretty obvious when Charles Chase says, "We're making something with a high beta value." We know exactly what they're doing. You're making something with a high beta value. You're using a field reverse configuration. We know what you were doing. You're doing the same thing that Helium Fusion's talking about and they're talking about having it not be externally confined. They're talking about the plasma itself is doing the confinement. The plasma itself is producing the confinement. Anyway, here we go. Pioneering work done um and this was in California, what later became Livermore Labs. There was also some work done at other national labs too. These are all fedally funed programs to explore this uh theta pinch topology of can you just squeeze the plasma down fast enough hard enough. This was 1958. The transistor was sitting in the laboratory and they were commuting. They were turning on millions of amps of electrical current. And they were doing it. We haven't talked about the time scales, but they were doing >> Wait, I didn't pick this up before. The transistor, the transistor was a key lynch pin in this taking off. Of course it was. The transistor is basically a switch. Oh my god, it's so obvious now. It's so obvious. Remember when we were thinking that maybe the UFOs brought us the transistor, guys? The UFOs. We got the research technology. Now, maybe we did. Maybe we got this from the aliens in the 20s or 30s or whatever, right? We got a UFO, but maybe we didn't at all. Maybe all of it goes back to nuclear weapons research. This is what's bugging me out the most, by the way, guys. I used to be a guy that loved the idea of aliens and aliens visiting us, the thick whites. And now I don't even believe in aliens at all. Now I'm like, I don't even know if there are aliens out there. And if there are aliens out there, they might just be like machines. They might be machines out there. And we might be so primitive. We might be so primitive that we're not even on their radar. Not even on their radar, man. Chad, these videos ruined me. Okay, sorry. Let's keep going. >> In uh millionth of a second, microsconds, megahertz speeds. Um and this was in 1950. No transistor, no CPUs, and um and no electrical switches, none of the things that I take for granted every day. And so they were able to show at that time the highest performing fusion systems. Um they got to temperatures. They didn't get to 100 million degrees, not quite then, but they got to 50 million degrees. They were outperforming everything else in fusion, but they reached a technical limit where they just could not build it anymore. And so they those pioneers went in a different direction and they started down the laser inertial path of saying like okay well we can't do these electromagnetic pinches but we now have in this new thing has invented the laser which turns on in a nconds it's vast it's interesting let's go down that path um and it's not you have to fast forward a couple of decades to researchers found with some of these theta pinches when they're operated in a very specific way something else happened something new happened and that these plasmas where before they squeezed them very hard and just like squeezing tube toothpaste they squirted out the ends now it didn't squirt out the ends it actually pushed back. It stayed confined. It stayed trapped inside that linear topology. Even though the ends were open, the plasma didn't leave. And so there was a large amount of programs of like what is happening here? This is an accidental discovery in plasma physics that something new is happening. And what we discovered is we now call the field reverse configuration. OM [music] chat. Galaxy class. Pause chat. What? They were messing around with theta pinches trying to get the plasma to be to act right and all of a sudden it just started stabilizing. It just started self-organizing is basically what he just said. They discovered a new property about plasma where it started. He said the the the doors were still open and the plasma just chose not to go out them. The plasma just didn't want to go out and they decided to call this brand new this brand new discovery of plasma what did they call it chat? Field reverse configuration. Boom baby. BOOM. Suck my dick, Lex Freriedman. BOOM. CHAT. OMG, CHAT. We were right. Ashton Forbes was right. Get the apology form. Start printing out the apology forms. We're going to need stacks of apology forms, chat. MH370, Cold Fusion, literally blowing the lid off of Cool Fusion like five years before it even happens. Chat, just get the apology forms ready. I I got all the people's Twitter posts saying how much of a [ __ ] a hoax, or a scammer I am. Oh my god. Chat, someday in the future, we're going to have the greatest day ever. It's going to be the greatest day ever, chat, when everybody has to acknowledge that MH370X was right the whole time. We're going to just have a live stream for 12 hours straight. We're just going to go through all the people's post, all the douchebags, all the idiots talking crap. It's going to be amazing. Okay. Wow. Uh there's numerous programs of FRC, field reverse configuration programs, um both at National Labs. There's actually a number of private companies now of people building field reverse configurations. Um, and they have some really unique properties, but fundamentally talking about the main difference, I describe a solenoid with magnetic fields throughout the center of that volume and plasma trapped. By the way, that graphic right here, if you're listening on audio, it's a graphic of two rings with like stuff spinning around in the middle. This looks just like the images of Loheed Martin's compact fusion reactor reactor. [laughter] Like literally, it's just a series of concentric rings of different sizes. That's it there. I mean, you're basically looking at the graphic >> going back and forth. But some other things can happen which is really interesting. And what they discovered early is if they have field going in one direction. So the plasma the uh electrical current is going around the loop and the plasma is going back and forth along this magnetic field line inside that solenoid inside that theta pench. But then they change the direction of the magnetic field. And this is what we call field reversal. And this is really the key is that you start with the plasma going in one direction and then very rapidly you change the direction. you change the direction and reverse the direction of that field and something really interesting happens which is the plasma this fusion fuel these charged particles which are trapped on the magnetic field lines um that are moving back and forth you change the direction what that means is that there you're trying to take that electrical current and that magnetic field and reverts its direction flip it and but can't flip fast enough that the plasma is sitting there and you can't move the particles and so what's really interesting is what happens is that because the particles can't move but you've now flipped the direction of the magnetic field you've inverted it something really really unique happens which is that the plasma itself reconnects internally. And so now what you're left with is an outside magnetic field, an electrical coil, and inside the plasma where now it was before it was moving along, it's now moving internally, >> rapidly reversing the magnetic field. >> Wow, chat, do you guys when I heard that, man, I was just like, wow. Direct connection to free energy right there. How do you guys think free energy works in a magnetic motor? How do you guys think that it works? Right? When we talked about parametric amplification of oscillations of electrical energy, um what we're talking about in terms of like how we're going to produce free energy is we're going to use the the back uh emf, the collapse of the magnetic field. So you build your magnetic field up and then your magnetic field collapses and electricity flows when there's a changing magnetic field. So the idea is that why does a pulse matter? Well, when you're pulsing, you're pulsing on and off your magnetic field. You're pulsing it on or off. So uh this idea of pulsing the magnetic field strength if that same concept that's the same exact concept that we were using like for uh bendini motors the same concept that we were using for seral uh magnetic motors is the same thing that we're using for our plasma reactor we're using the same physics for free energy devices that we are using in our plasma reactor fusion reactor That tells me even more that what we're talking about when it comes to free energy really is some fundamental aspect of the universe that people have found how to tap into in multiple different ways. Whether that be from an electromagnetic motor or sorry a magnetic motor uh that can tap into zero point energy from using these types of oscillations and amplification or directly going to the source which in my opinion is plasma fusion and yes how do you allow free energy so the thing that I'm doing here is I am turning this topic call it what you will zero point energy a neutron fusion turning this into a political discussion, turning it into a political topic. People don't want to talk about it, but I'm going to turn it into one because it needs to be discussed. All the implications of what this means need to be discussed. I talk about them with Jason Georgiani. I think that's the biggest thing that we need to talk about is how do you implement free energy and what how what safeguards do you put into place? Are we only get the nerfed version of it? When do we get to teleport throughout the universe? Right? These are the big questions that I think should be asked. When is it going to be safe? How much do we really know compared to what they're telling us? Here we go. >> Plasma self-organizes into a closed field. >> What? >> Yep. So >> it sounds wild. >> It's it's it's Yeah. So first of all, there's a lot of there's a million questions I have. So one of them what's rapidly? >> What time scale are we talking about here? >> Mhm. You have to reverse the electrical current faster than a million degree, which is a very hot gas particle can move. And so that means we have to do it on the order of a millionth of a second. We have to do it in a millionth of a second. >> And so you just think about what did I just say? You're abusing the collapse of the electromagnetic field strength here. So how how do you get that to work? You have to make the collapse happen. The time scale has to be faster than the electrons themselves. What does that mean? That means they have to be relativistic. We're dealing with relativistic implications here. It's exactly what he's implying right here. He's saying you need that pulse to be so fast that the magnetic field can't even collapse faster than that. So that when the electron turns around now it's bumping back against the electromagnetic field that it created. So now this is very similar to the core concept of vibrating the walls on our magnetic our plasma mirror to make a relativistic electron laser. the same thing that was being discussed by Paul Tibido when he talked about the drift velocity of graphine. Why are all these things connected? Because it's all goes back to the electron. How fast the electron is moving and then having relativistic motion. So if I go left and you go right, then our combined relativistic motion is the speed combined. Add the speeds up. that also applies even on small scales, even on tiny scales that applies. And this is why my view of the universe um is that there is this that there's nothing that's ever really stopped. Nothing's ever really stopped. I'm going to go on one quick tangent here. uh the answer to the Hal Pudof question of or I I I've now know what the counter response is when Hal Pudof says the ground state of the hydrogen atom is should be radiating energy all the time because there's an electron and this electron is moving around the nucleus. So in a conventional view of our atom the electron should be radiating energy. it's moving. Anything that's moving should radiate energy. Otherwise, it's a perpetual motion machine. The second law of thermodynamics says anything that's moving should lose a little bit of energy. So, the electron should eventually crash into the nucleus, but it doesn't. And so, Hal Pudof says that electron must be gaining energy from the 0 point energy field. There must be another source of energy for that electron to stay stable. The classical view, the counter view is that they believe that at the quantum level, nothing is moving. It's all stopped. It's all frozen. To me, that's the easiest thing to disprove. Easy to disprove. The fundamental rule of quantum mechanics is that nothing is stopped. It's the exact opposite of that. The truth of quantum mechanics is the exact opposite that if we look at the smallest scales, everything is jiggling. That's why we call it the zitrabuagong. So this is the difference. This is where I now know where quantum mechanics went wrong. Now it all makes sense. Quantum mechanics went wrong when it started trying to talk about breaking down the wave function, collapsing the wave function. started getting going wrong when it thought about well we're going to freeze this moment in time as opposed to addressing the physical realities of the experiments that we were getting the responses for as opposed to reconciling what we already knew about quantum mechanics. The pendulum is never stopped. The pendulum is never stopped in quantum mechanics. So hopefully that helped you guys get a little bit more context. Let's listen a little bit more Lex Freedman. And so in practice [laughter] this is hard and it's only we can only do it now because of semiconductor switching because we can we can move things we can switch things like the transistor in every CPU in a computer switches at a gigahertz that means in a nanoc switching in a billionth of a second and so now which we didn't in the 1950s when these data pensions were invented but now we have the semiconductors to be able to do that >> the self-organizing plasma can you just speak to that what the heck is it doing how do we discover how do we understand the self-organizing mechanism the dynamics of the plasma that is able to contain itself >> so what I like to do is use an analogy here of once you've made it. It's actually somewhat straightforward to understand. Getting to it is tricky. And how they discovered it the first time is absolutely amazing, but once you made it, it's a lot it's a lot more straightforward to understand. So, in a magnetic coil, when you have a round electrical coil, you have electrical current flowing in that coil. And if you have a conductor, if you have another a metal inside that coil, and this is called Lind's law in one of the Maxwell equations, is that as you have electrons and you have current flowing in that coil, an equal and opposite electrical current is induced in a piece of metal nearby. This is the same thing that happens in a transformer where you have a primary on a transformer and you have electricity flowing it and you have a secondary where electricity flows exactly the opposite direction. We use this every day in in in our lives. And so in this in condition you have a conductor an electrical conductor where current can flow and you have an electrical current flowing on the outside electrical current flows on the inside. Um and in that case now you I described two pieces of metal. Now let's go one step further and that inner conductor is not a piece of metal anymore. It's one of these high temperature gases this plasma this charged particles. So now you have current electrical current flowing in the plasma. This is really really interesting. We talked about these charges moving back and forth. Well, moving electrical charges is current. So, in every plasma condition, we've talked about the tokamac, um the theta bench, the stellerator, there's electrical current flowing in the plasma. But in the field reverse configuration, you have a lot of electrical current flowing the plasma, massive amount. So now [clears throat] what he's saying here is that our plasma that we're producing has got a huge amount of current flowing through it because what is electricity? Electricity is technically just electrons moving and that's definitely happening in our plasma when our plasma moving around. So, it's going to produce its own it's going to produce its own magnetic field because of the current that it's producing. So, what we're talking about here is that we're just we're figuring out how to use plasma to produce energy in the most efficient possible way. That's really all that's really all it boils down to. And that's the key. So you have the center core where electrical current is flowing in this transformer if you want to think about it primary and secondary. And here's the craziest part of it. This electrical current, how did I describe a magnet? An electromagnet is a loop that has electrical current flowing in it that generates a magnetic field. And for a pench and for a mirror and for a tokamac in that magnetic field, the plasma gets trapped. But in an FRC, this electrical current is the plasma. And that electric that plasma then generates its own magnetic field and it's then trapped on its own magnetic field. >> That's fascinating. >> And that's the key. And so in your tokamac and in your donut and in your and in your funky donut, your accelerator, you make the magnets and you trap your plasma in it. In an F FRC, you make the plasma which makes the magnets and it traps itself. And the craziest part of this in my mind is that we actually see this in nature all the time. If you look at the sun, we see solar flares. And in a solar flare, we hold up chat. Pause. Okay. [clears throat] Wow. Yeah. Now they're starting to get caught up. Like this is like this is Lex Freriedman starting to brooch on the letter to Ashton Forbes which is like almost two years old at this point by the way chat. Letter to Ashton Forbes almost 2 years old at this point. This is Lex Freriedman starting to broach on the topic of plasmoids self-organization self- sustaining plasmoids like smoke rings. They don't dissipate. They don't dissipate. They stay structured and they can move around. They have a lot more stability than what has been expected. And this is where FRC's come into the game. FRC's are essentially using plasmoids. That is their function. That is how they are operating is they're creating these plasmas that create this self-organization from this uh field reverse configuration that they produce. And it's self-organized, spontaneous self-organization. And so this property is almost certainly something that the, you know, the government figured out and weaponized a long time back. And this is what Ken Shoulders was talking about when they were producing these plasmoids to teleport things. Literally to teleport things. He said so directly. We've all seen the pictures of the photosphere of the sun and this large arc of plasma coming out. That plasma has current, electrical current flowing in it. And then we see this solar flare rip off of the sun. And that solar flare then can flow throughout and continue into the solar system and for a little while anyway it makes something called a plasmoid. That plasmoid is in fact electrical current flowing in the plasma generating a magnetic field and holding it for longer than it would otherwise. So we've observed these for hundred years and we've known about these plasmoids for a long time and there's researchers that have tried to we see them everywhere in nature. He said as well he we see them everywhere in nature. Where's my thing? Where is it? Boom. Gotcha [ __ ] The plasmoids. We see them everywhere in nature. They self-organize into specific shape. We needed to be working with nature. That was the big secret all along. Instead of trying to work against nature, we should just been working with nature the whole time. And so, how do we get the how do we build out the instabilities is we use the magnetic fields. The magnetic fields trap the particles. The magnetic fields are what helps the stabilities. And here's the other big secret. Spin. Why are the orbs spinning around in the MH370 videos? Not just spinning around the plane, the orbs themselves are spinning. The helical motion provides stability for the plasma. The same exact way where if you were to spin a top, spin a top on your desk, you spin it fast enough and it's going to stay upright. If you don't spin it fast enough, it's going to fall over. He uses that analogy. I stole that from him here >> intentionally to make them. Um, but fundamentally that's what we do every day is make one of these self-organized closed field plasmas >> in a more controlled way at this rapid rate of 1 millionth of a second and being able to make sure it's reliable and stable and all that kind of stuff. So, by the way, how do you keep the things stable? >> And and there's the hard part because I just described a solar flare, but and yes, we've seen the pictures of them, but we've also watched them and they they appear, they fly away from the sun, and then they go away. And that's not what we want in fusion, right? We want to be able to control this. And so, that's the hard part of the job. Um, and so that's what we spent the last number of years learning how to do ourselves and others on these pulse closed field F FRC systems. Let's first talk about how to make them and then we'll talk about how to make them stable because they're two different things and we spent a lot of time on both. So we talked about time scales. You have to reverse the field. You have to you have to change the electrical current in a millionth of a second. And so how do you do that? So I described this system as you have a series of magnets. you have a magnetic field on the outside and then on the inside of this you have this donut this FRC that has its own electrical current and we didn't talk about this yet but it's generating a magnetic field and that magnetic field has pressure and this is the other thing that's really interesting so we talked about how this theta pench compresses a magnetic field it applies a pressure on the outside um but the plasma itself has a pressure on the inside and it has both a particle pressure literally the particles bouncing think about hot gas in a balloon the particles expanding the ideal gas law expanding and contracting inside a balloon but they also have a magnetic pressure they have the electromagnetism is pushing back. And so I like to think about this as the motor in a Tesla. In your electric car, you have a motor, electric motor. And what that motor has is a series of windings. Those windings, you flow electrical current. In this case, from a battery, hit the gas. Electricity flows from the battery into the motor into those windings. And it generates an electromagnetic force. A Lorren force is what it's >> So this is funny because early on when I talked about magnetic motors, people were like magnetic motors already exist. They use them in Teslas. They use them in Teslas. And here is David Kirkley comparing their plasma engine, their fu plasma fusion engine, which is really what it is at this point, directly to the motor in a Tesla car. uh because it uses similar principles is that not only are we having fusion occur, but we're actually using the relationship between the magnetic field compressing the plasma and the plasma trying to push out on the magnetic field. We can use that. That's basically a piston. Imagine a balloon that you squeeze down and then the balloon compre goes back out when you let go of it, right? It's the same idea. You're caus work, man. You're getting energy out of that. You're creating an engine with that. They turned this into a rocket engine, but it's not a rocket. They converted to like a heat engine. It's a The best explanation, the best thing I can call it is a plasma fusion propulsion because that's really what it is. But it's somewhat equivalent or similar analogist to just like a just a normal engine. Yeah, compression engine I guess would be the right way to put it. So here we go. Technically called this electromagnetic force induces an electrical current on the armature on the shaft. And this is getting into the details, but if the armature of an electrical motor that actually is what spins and so the outside of a motor doesn't spin, you flow electrical current through it. And the inside does spin. That electromagnetic force is what is spinning that armature. In our case, we're inducing an electrical force in that electromagnet. And that's putting electrical current just like in the armature into that plasma. And we can use that force to do interesting things. So that electromagnetic force can compress the fusion plasma. It can expand the fusion plasma. But here's the problem. It's unstable. And so this is something you learn very early in your graduate work uh as a student in fusion. If you learn about plasmas that are called high beta plasmas. So it keeps So he already just explained we're about to learn about high beta plasmas, but he just said why the orbs are spinning. Why are the orbs spinning? Because we've got a plasmoid in the middle of that thing. There's a plasmoid in the middle of it and it's spinning around. And so that's why you see the whole orbs spinning around. Now, here's the question that comes up. Is there something inside of the orbs? Is there something inside of the orbs in the MH370 videos? Based on what has been said so far, you could make a strong argument that you don't need anything inside, that you could shoot like a plasma gun and that it would shoot out a plasmoid just like a smoke ring and it would just keep going. The reason why I think there is something inside, I do think there is something inside the orbs, twofold, two major reasons. one the X-rays that we see coming out of the back and the front that means there's something inside there that's allowing that to pass through as the axial uh axial symmetry basically when I say axial I just mean like the earth right number two reason the orbs are being moved with intelligent motion the orbs are actually moving pretty clearly with it's not intelligent but it's computer controlled right computer controlled motion is what we see here. Watch very closely. Specifically, the first orb. If this was just somebody shooting with a gun, that orb won't be able to lock into the plane. Watch it lock into the plane right here. See how it flies past the plane and turns around? That's not just magnetic attraction. That is something directing it. They're being directed into those positions. The only way I could think that what we're looking at right here was purely naturally controlled would be if they all came together in unison. Instead of coming one at a time like that, which implies they're not being shot at it, there must be some kind of computer control inside of those things. Now, when they lock into position, they can pretty much just spin at at will. But before they lock in, that to me that requires some level of computer control. So, and also that same computer control would be used to fly them around through the sky. So, I think there is something inside of those orbs. I do want to point that out. That's my current opinion. Still seeing this plasma beta thing everywhere. What uh what is this ratio of plasma field energy to confining magnetic field energy? Please explain. >> Plasma beta is the ratio of the magnetic pressure to the particle pressure. And so, what that fundamentally means is I talk about how you have a magnetic field. And in that magnetic field, plasma is trapped in on that magnetic field. Um but it's not very well trapped. it can escape. It can leave either down the ends, it can freely travel or it can also travel um across the magnetic field. And so we have a term called plasma beta which gives us an understanding of how well trapped that plasma is. So as you apply a magnetic pressure, a magnetic field to this plasma, it pushes back and does it push back a little or does it push back a lot? And for a field reverse configuration in one of our plasmas, uh beta is very close to one. In fact, usually by definition, one at any point in in the system, which means that every time I apply a magnetic force on this donut to compress it, the plasma particles on the inside push back. And what's really interesting is you have equation for magnetic pressure which is B ^2 over 2 mu not. Um the magnetic field squared is the external magnetic pressure. Any magnetic field anywhere generates this pressure. Um but the plasma particles themselves also have a pressure. This is the ideal gas law. And we use the definition in KT density Bzman constant and temperature for pressure. And in high beta they're the same. B ^2 over 2 mu KN is NKT. So for a known magnetic field I know what the density and the temperature of the plasma is. and just >> Jesus chat. There it is. My goodness. That is the secret. I don't know how more people don't see it. I am sitting here watching this, listening to this, and I'm going, how how do physicists still have to ask me why this is the answer? Why is this the answer, Ashton? Um, did you hear what he just said about high beta value? When the beta value approaches one, the plasma pressure now is equal to the magnetic pressure. Okay, do the math. Look at them side by side. That means the temperature what we're trying to achieve in fusion over here is equal to B squared. Do you see those terms? That means as the magnetic field goes up, we're going to get multi we're going to get exponential increase in temperature. exponential. Exponential means increases a lot really really rapidly. What this means is the moment we start to get very powerful magnets, we're going to get fusion. That's what that that's what the math says. Just the math, just the theory says the moment you get very powerful magnets, you got fusion locked up. Remember, eight Tesla already produced 100 million degrees. Eight Tesla produced 100 million degrees. Do you guys think we can get above eight Tesla? We've already proven we can get to like 20 to 100 Tesla. So yeah, I think we're probably safe. This is the reason why Helium Fusion's got a $5 billion valuation. The math shows it's going to happen. The math shows it's going to happen. No doubt. It's just a matter of when we get those magnetic field strengths. So circle back to it. We talked about fusion. We talked about it had to be hot enough and it had to be dense enough. And that's n and that's T. And so now I have a very clear equation between magnetic field and density and temperature of the fusion fuel. And that's really critical. All plasmas have some all fusion plasmas have some beta some number. Um the F FRC has one of the highest betas beta equal one. However, what you also learn in school when you when you learn about beta the first time is you learn that high beta plasmas are typically unstable. And so the good way to think about this is a tokome is an accelerator are stable because those plasmas that are going around in the donut, there's a force on that donut, but that plasma donut is very well held by all those magnetic fields, by all those magnetic coils. If it tried to move, it would be confined by that magnetic coil. But in an F FRC is unconfined. So the plasma is confined, but the whole topology can do something what is called tilt. Is that this whole plasma donut because it's under pressure can just turn over. The way I think about this is um think about the uh a motor is a good example. an armature in the center of your motor. You have a spinning armature. You have this this spinning magnet on the inside and it is held by the main axis of the magnet. It can't go anywhere. We don't have that access. We don't have any mechanical things inside these fusion systems. They're 100 million degrees. You can't put any mechanical things inside them. And so we have nothing to hold on to it. And so it's unstable. So when you learn about the FRC, that's the first thing you learn. Um and it took us a number of years to learn about a parameter of how to make them stable. And so it's all about stability, right? This is where he talks about like what are the problems? Temperature. Well, we got temperature covered. Temperature is covered. We just looked at the math. B^2 equals temperature time Boltzman constant time N. There it is. Dense plasma. Your plasma is going to get really dense, really hot, really quickly as your magnetic field strength increases in your field reverse configuration. Next problem, stability. Stability was the same thing that George Miley was trying to figure out when he was trying to produce a free electron laser. He's trying to figure out how do I get these beams, these laser beams to combine together. And I think what he figured out was helical motion, spin, make them move. And again, why are the orbs moving? The orbs are moving because they're using it as stability. They figured out plasma stability, too. For the MH370 orbs to be real, they have to have had they basically perfected stability. And I would argue I think that a lot of the fusion papers argue that the more powerful your magnetic fields get, the more stable it gets as well. It's pretty obvious, right? The more powerful your magnetic field is, you're going to have a more stable plasma. The other thing they figured out, not just spin, spin will help with stability. What's the other thing they figured out? Let some of it go. Don't try to hold it all in. pulses air breathing magneto hydrodnamics create a magnetic nozzle just like a fire hose just let the more the most charged particles the x-rays let those shoot out like we're ghostbusting out here that was the other thing they figured out is let the exhaust pump out and you can use that you can use that exhaust as as uh propulsion is and and and that's pretty fundamental, but most people who've heard of an FRC haven't understood this really key fact. Um, and so we have a parameter we call Sar over E. Um, and we're getting really into the physics weeds here, but but it's go, but it's really important. And the good analogy here is a top, literally a top spinning top. And so you have a top spinning on your desk, you know that it'll spin for a little while and then it will fall over. It is unstable. However, if you spin it fast enough, if you take a top and you spin it fast enough, put enough angular momentum, enough angular inertia into that system, it'll stay upright even though it wants to just fall over even though it's unstable. And we do the same thing in an FRC is if you can drive it fast enough, if you can add enough kinetic energy and inertia to the particles, it will stay stable. However, you can do another really key thing. We are not limited now to having a very skinny top. We can actually make it much bigger. So, the good analogy here is if you have a coin and you know you're spinning that coin, um if you spin it faster and faster, it'll stay spinning longer. Um however, uh eventually it'll slow down and fall over. But if you had a roll of duct tape, if you had something thicker and heavier and longer and it's spinning around that same axis, it'll stay spinning even longer both because of the inertia and because of the geometry. And so we have this parameter called Sar over E. SAR is the hybrid kinetic parameter which tells you how um stable it is from that top point of view. And the E, which is the elongation of how long it is. And so, okay, so this is pretty interesting here. So let's look at this because I I'm not sure I fully understand this, but I mean he's talking about the spinning top. So he's basically saying this equation should explain why if we add angular momentum, if we add spin to our plasma, why it's going to be more confined, why it's going to stay more stable here. So the top value S star is the hybrid kinetic parameter. It's the measure of the plasma's kinetic energy and angular momentum. So the more spin, the more spin we have, the bigger this number is going to be. So I presumably we want this number to be pretty big. So we want a high angular momentum. The higher angular momentum will offset the bottom value and the bottom value is the elongation of the plasma. How long the plas so the longer the plasma is the more spin is going to be required to keep it stable. That's how I'm understanding this. If that's true then what does that mean? If if I want my E I want my E to be as small as possible. How do I have the minimum what would be the minimum elongation? [clears throat] Let's think about that. What would be the minimum equilibrium elongation? I'm going to go ahead and guess that it's going to be a sphere. How do you minimize elongation? You make a sphere and then you have no elongation, right? A sphere would have zero elongation because it's perfectly symmetrical on all sides. If I'm right, then this explains right here why they're plasma orbs and why they're not plasma donuts or plasma hot dogs. Right there, that explains it. That's why it's a spherac. Okay, if I'm wrong, then I don't know. Give me a better explanation. There we go. Maybe fortuitously, thank you, nature, uh, gave us a win here, which is that how we make these in these long solenoids is naturally very, very long. And so we can build these with very long lengths. And if we can drive them fast enough and hard enough and drive the ions to move at very high velocities, we can stabilize against those instabilities and hold them stable. And so we now know we can design with a given sar over e parameter, we can design these for very long lives. The theory of the systems we make say that they should last for a few microsconds at most. Us and others in the field have been able to make them last for thousands of microconds. Thousands of times what the stability the basic the basic criteria would tell you. And so we know now >> the whole time. So, you're trying to reach 100 million degrees. How do you get to that temperature fast? And by the way, what can you say to help somebody? >> So, uh crap, what was he saying there? Oh, uh so they're trying to get to this super high temperature super quickly and spin will let us maintain maintain our uh pressure or let uh yeah, maintain our stability of our plasmas here and potentially allow them to begin to self-organize. Oh, yeah. What he said there is that they stay in this stable orientation a thousand times longer than what the theory predicts. This is directly in line with Bob Greener. Shout out to uh Martin Fleshman Memorial Project. Maybe I'll have him on again soon to talk about this. Bob Greenier and Ken Shoulders. They talk about the stability of these plasmoids. Self- sustaining, self-organizing plasmoids. How many podcasts did I do where I'm I was talking about this exact concept and now you're hearing David Kirkley talking about it, saying that we're doing this with my five billion dollar company and we're going to produce fusion energy out of it. I mean, wow. We are on the cutting edge here right now. >> Like me understand what a 100 million degrees is like. It seems insane. What does that world look like? I guess just everything's moving really fast. Uh like you said, you can't put anything mechanical in there. >> Yeah. So, a couple of key things happen. So, when gas is that hot, there's we talk about the states of matter. You have solids where >> we're going to skip ahead a little bit. We understand plasma and uh I don't think we're going to watch all this. I'm definitely getting copyright strike. So, if you're listening to the audio here, guys, I'm going to do my best to give you as much as I can without getting stried here. Um, okay. Let's move ahead a little bit here to the explanation of the betas. I think this is where it is, right? any of the loss rates that are happening in t and in beta with b^ squ you know already two of those parameters n and t are equal and so that tells you right away the goal is to maximize magnetic field absolutely maximize magnetic field and most folks in magnetic fusion whether it's a tokamac or it's data bench or it's an f frc are attempting to do that maximize the magnetic field so we're all pushing to that um what's really nice in pulse systems is that we know how to do that in fact um in a pulse system uh researchers in pulse magnetic fields have demonstrated over 100 tesla magnetic fields in pulse magnets that's much higher than you can get in a steady magnet or what's been demonstrated so far just a so boom right there it was he says the secret because of the beta value I explained that the beta value is the plasma pressure and the magnetic pressure it's basically just all about maximizing magnetic field strength he says it right there maximizing magnetic field strength and we know pulseed systems can produce magnetic field strength up to 100 Tesla 100 >> clarification question uh so maximizing magnetic field is about the n the beta Mhm. >> So, we're not talking about tow yet. >> Not yet, but we need to cuz that's really important. Um, and so we can even talk even a little bit further about how fusion scales. And so, in fusion, the hotter you get the fuel, the more fusion you get. Um, and we know that by increasing the magnetic field, B^² is in T. You increase density and temperature together, more density, more temperature is more fusion plus more temperature, even more fusion. And so what we see is that in our in the in these types of systems uh a scaling very clearly a magnetic field to the 3.75 power or even uh in a lot of a lot of demonstrations 3.77 that that specific chat I did you just hear what he just said the scaling is the magnetic field to the 3.77 power. I don't know how he came up with that just now but that is that's just straight up incredible. Basically what he said is he said Ashton yes you explained it correctly to your audience. Basically David Kirkley said Ashton yes you explained it very correctly. Not only are we trying to maximize the magnetic field strength it's actually higher than beta squared. The actual effective output that we're seeing is the magnetic field strength to the power of 3.77. So when we're talking about how does this impact fusion as the magnetic field strength increases the amount of fusion goes like this goes like this it actually reminds me of the JNF paper the presentation we found in 2000 the 2005 JNF paper where they talk about the power scaling and you can see the power scaling just go through the roof because that's what we're talking about here power scaling just goes nuts. So as you increase your magnetic field strength, we're talking about getting huge amounts of fusion reactions happening. So once you see an equation like that, anybody out there that's watching should begin to wonder, why haven't we done it already? All this is like, why haven't we made a pizza, guys? I've got pizza crust over here. I got some flour. I got tomato sauce. I got cheese. I got pepperoni. Why haven't we made a pizza yet? Why is the pizza not made yet? Why? We don't have any cooks in here. Just someone put it together, make the pizza. We should already have fusion. We have all the recipes here based on what he's saying. We got the physics. We got the material science. And the government's had these things for a long long time. They've had this for 20 years. Yeah. We're too stone to make the pizza. [laughter] Sorry, we can't do it. All the recipes are there. All the fusion recipes are there, but we smoked too many dupes. We injected too many marriage jooas into our veins and now we're too lazy. Now we're like, you know what? We could do it, but we just don't want we don't want to. Too lazy, chat. Too lazy. Scaling. That's a very strong scaling of fusion power output um and fusion reactions. And so that tells you you want to go to as maximum magnetic field as you can. Pulse systems are really powerful. Pulse systems have shown when you do pulse magnetic fields compared to a steady magnetic field. Researchers have shown over 100 Tesla magnetic fields where in a steady system people have showed in the 20 maybe high 20 Tesla systems. >> Chad, what are you talking about here? Chat, look. Can you see the graphs on the screen? If you can't because you're listening on audio, the graph on the screen of Lex the podcast says pulse systems 100 Tesla or higher. [laughter] What the hell are we talking about here, chat? I mean, if we can do this, why aren't we doing it? It's B to the 3.77 power already. You can see massive fusion power outputs by doing a pulse system. >> Okay, got it. So we we maximize in the magnetic field. So that's going a number go up super up. How do you get the duration the towel? >> But then I said pulse and pulse already implies shorter towel. Yes. And so that is in the fusion field. The name of the game folks will will have a very uh inertial fusion will have a nancond towel, very short, but then very high pressure. They don't have magnetic fields but very high pressure. Um and then in stellarators and tokamax your goal is very long tow but you'll have much lower density and and and you can't really go too much in temperature but they'll have much lower density. And so where we live in the pulse magnetic or the magneto inertial fusion is in the middle um is in extremely high magnetic fields increasing pressure as much as you can and then keeping them around long enough. Um so that gets to the tow that gets to that. So basically stellarators and tokamax are a scam. Nobody will ever be able to convince me that stellarators and tokamax are not a scam. There's we're not gonna a donut power plants. Any you show me any doughut power plant and I'm just gonna tell you to go watch the Simpsons. Go back to Homer Simpson. Go back to your cartoons. The adults are dealing with Spheramax. We're dealing with uh no walls on our structures. It's like, dude, this is like so nuts to me, man. I am This is actually going to make me crash out, chat. I'm actually about to crash out right now over this. These stellarators, these tokamax, they have beta values of 5%. 5%. That means these things are extremely diffuse. They're not dense at all. So, the plasma is super non-dense in these Why did we ever think this was going to work? You're telling me we were trying an idea out with 5% beta and we could have made one that doesn't have any walls as a 100% beta value? It's just so ridiculous that it makes me wonder like you're clearly hiding the secret recipe. You got the Colonel's secret recipe sauce, secret spices in the back pocket. Clearly that's what happened here. You don't just roll out be like, "Yo, just kidding. We found this new thing that's 20 times more efficient." 20 times more efficient than your current best designs. And bonus, you don't even need walls for it. There is just no way in hell that this wasn't some secret that was being kept secret by the government. It obviously was. Obviously. Really pisses me off because we're wasting money and research on these dumb nondense fusion reactors that are never going to be near. Like I don't even know how you could even theoretically be as efficient as what Helium Fusion is talking about. Does the math work like B to the 3.77 for tokamax? No. There's no way that Tokamax and stellarators can ever scale to the level that field reverse configuration can scale to. This is the answer right here. Now I know why. Now I know why you can't scale something that's not efficient. If it's not efficient now it needs to get really really big for a little bit of output. But when you scaled something the way that Helian Fusion is talking about it now even something very small can produce a large amount of output and now you can scale it very easily and you can scale it up. He even shows here as well. I don't know if we're going to show the clip of it, but the size of IDER it t the European fusion thing. It's already a scam and it's not even built yet. I don't even think it's going to be done for like another five years and it's already a scam. It's already doomed to do literally nothing. The thing is the size of like a 10story building. Think about that. They're building this fusion reactor thing. It's like 10 stories tall. It's huge. It's huge. They have to build something that size to get an effective reactor. Loheed Martin's over here building reactors that are size of a basketball. Not that small, but the size of something that fits on the back of a truck. It's not There's no contest. No contest at all. Field reverse configuration is the way to go with Fusion. Anybody else going any other direction with it, I'm just saying good luck. See you. Bye, Felicia. Bye. Go to your stellar raiders. Go to your Commonwealth Fusion. I'm going to chill with Trialpha Energy, Loheed Martin, and Helium Fusion. Somebody asked about Trialpha Energy. I don't know what's up with them. I don't know what's up with Trial Alpha Energy. I think Trialpha Energy might be like some government black project [ __ ] because why are they silent? And where are they getting their money from? How is this all working? And it's all behind the scenes and they're getting they're putting out no products. No products. Just give us billions of dollars. No products. I mean something doesn't add up at energy confinement lifetime. And also it gets to stability. And so this is the thing that this field reverse configuration which has showed that we can um build that these plasmas can last for hundreds or thousands of times. The basic theory has shown that now you can have long enough lifetimes. So what that means is in in a practical fusion system uh that there are lifetimes of these high beta pulse systems between 100 microconds and a few milliseconds thousands of a second and you hold on to it for a few thousand of a second. You do fusion and then you exhaust it. And so the whole process in this is we start with a magnetic field that fills the full chamber. You then inject fusion fuel. You ionize it superheating it now to a nice cold 1 million degrees but hot enough that you have charged particles. You have plasmas. You can then in start increasing the magnetic field. You form an a field reverse configuration and then rapidly increase the magnetic field further increasing from one to five to 10 20 to even higher magnetic fields. And as you do that the plasma heats it. You compress it increasing the field and pressure. Fusion is now happening. New charged particles are being born inside the system with a tremendous amount of heat and energy but in charged particles. And this is where the beta really really works in in in your advantage is that just like magnetic pressure on the outside magnetic pressure is in KT compresses the fuel and increasing pressure and temperature. When the pressure and temperature of the plasma increase in KT increases, it pushes back on the magnetic field increasing the magnetic field on the outside of the plasma. And what that does is magnetic field is electromagnetic current and current running in a wire. And what that does is pushes current back in the wire. And so the plasma itself now pushes back on the magnetic field pushing electrical current out of the system and recharging the capacitors where we started this whole process >> all in a self-organizing way. So I think it's >> yeah I mean it just seems so efficient. He's like okay we're going to cause this reaction to occur and I think is that how they're recouping the energy? So because everything's electric efficiency just goes off the scale. So you start the process and you produce this fusion reaction. you extract some of the energy from it and it causes an expansion which now is again again just energy just work that we can then recharge our our capacitors. So it's just an extremely intelligent electrical engineering system that's using efficiency levels that are going to clearly go far over unity in my opinion as long as it's working as it's explained. And I so far I've seen no reason to believe that it doesn't work exactly as it's explained. the math seems to check out and it just seems like it scales up from there. Okay, we're just going to do a couple more uh clips and then we'll get to some super clarify how fusion usually generates energy where this intermediate step of heating up water then the steam is the thing that leads to electricity and then of course the FRC method that you use leads directly to electricity. I was wondering if you could describe sort of the difference between those two. Yeah, I I like the analogy of the match in the campfire and I hear that a lot in fusion where um a lot of what steady fusion, think of accelerator or tokamac is attempting to do is take a little bit of fuel that match and then add heat um to ignite that match and then put it with enough fuel and in the right conditions and hold on to it for a long time that it grows into a campfire. Even if you're doing if they do a good job of bonfire, it's creating a tremendous amount of of energy in that steady system, burning fuel in the same place, generating some ash, generating a lot of heat in that reaction. Um and in and in a traditional in in a in a tokamac or accelerator that's a lot of what you're doing is you're you're holding on to the heat as much as possible to keep that reaction going. Um and in that the optimal fuel is called dutium and trumium where you have dutium is a heavy isotope of hydrogen where you have an extra >> what I think there's other ways to do it with a pulse magnetic system. There's one more thing you get to do because you have this high beta where there's electric field and electromagnetic force that's now compressing the fusion fuel. It's increasing in temperature. It's getting hotter. It's increasing in density. fusion is happening. New fusion particles are being born and those particles are not just stoking the flame. They're not just holding on the campfire like in the tokamac, but they're doing another thing which is really powerful which is they're pushing back on the magnetic field. They're applying a pressure. That pressure induces a current. We can extract that electrical current. But then but it takes you into another direction. So your analogy of the campfire now breaks down because now the campfire is expanding. It's pushing back on something. And so now it's the analogy of the piston engine. As you move from the match to campfire to now pistons and so you use boom. There it is chat. There it is. He says, "Now the real analogy is it's like we created a piston. We created a fusion engine. A fusion engine. And all we're doing is feeding it hydrogen and it is producing electricity at efficiencies well beyond any steam engine ever could. Way beyond any steam engine ever could. I see the people in the chat saying they Lex Freeman must have watched Ashen. No, I don't think so. I think Lex Freeman does a lot of research ahead of time, but he's asking really good questions here that I think that only somebody who did some research could be asking these questions to fully understand the implications. I think that a lot of this goes over his head because he's like about a light year behind we are right now. But this is so huge because just like Tim P said when I was on Tim P, Tim P is actually very astute. He doesn't really know all the physics and what have you, but I think he conceptually gets it. It's all about efficiency. It's all about recouping our input energy because again, our input energy is just electricity and we're getting electricity out. We're never converting it to heat. We're keeping everything electric. We're keeping it all efficiencies everywhere as high as we can. And if we add superconducting systems to all of this, then our losses go down even more. piston engine, you used the motion of the piston, the pressure on it and the motion of it to do something useful. And in a piston engine, it's to turn a crankshaft and and and uh run a turn a crankshaft and run wheels or maybe even a piston engine to turn a crankshaft and run a generator and make electricity. And in fact, you can do it pretty high efficiency in a generator using that method um using the expansion of that piston. And what we do is use the expansion of the magnetic field to extract that electricity. And we believe you can do it at much much higher efficiencies. Um, there's been theoretical papers that show not 30 to 35% efficiency like a steam turbine can do, but 80% efficiency, 85% efficiency. Expect much more of the energy of the fuel in that process. >> Can you actually just take a tiny tangent on the word efficiency here? So, yeah. So, so you said 30%. So, it's inefficient and that efficiency measure is how much of the energy is actually converted to electricity. >> That measure is how much of the thermal energy that gets outside of the system is then converted into electricity, which is the thing we care about. We we're not in this to make >> How funny is this? This is just this is literally the answer to the corridor crew. Now, that corridor crew video we watched on Friday was from like a year ago. But the funniest part is the corridor crew guys and the only reason why I'm ragging on them is because they tried to debunk me in a really really rude way, which history will not look kind upon them for doing the they are so dumb that [clears throat] they thought solar power was basically a neutronic fusion. The corridor crew guys thought that solar power was basically what David Kirkley is explaining right now. They thought electricity is the best. So therefore we should get solar when they didn't realize that that's not at all what solar is or how solar works. And solar actually is if you just were to add up all the efficiency solar is not better than nuclear not even remotely close especially when you start to take in the externalities of what it takes to build the solar panels etc. So when it comes to real electricity production from power from power plants fusion a neutronic fusion specifically is the way to go because we're not trying to produce heat to boil water. It's already coming out in the form of electricity. Isn't this another thing where it's like this should have been obvious to everybody? If there's a system we can produce power, electricity, and we can produce it directly to electricity as opposing as opposed to converting it from one form to another, which is inefficient. >> Shouldn't we just be doing that? [laughter] It seems super obvious to me. Um, but I don't know. Fusion, we're in this to make electricity and we're using fusion to make electricity. And so from from my point of view, that should be the focus is how do we get to that? So that's the efficiency of that thermal energy that makes it out to electricity. when it is not a measure of how much energy you put into the system and what happens to that um in terms of you started this campfire with a blow torch. What about all that blow torch energy? What are you getting for that? And so I think that's something that high beta is one more side benefit that it turns out is actually maybe the tail that wags the dog is that not only do you at high efficiency get out any of the new fusion energy which is great because that's what you want make electricity from fusion but you also get to recover all of that magnetic energy you put back into it. Um, and that's the really powerful one and that's something that um, folks have demonstrated over 95% efficiency that you can put electricity into fusion and then get that electricity back out and 95% efficiency plus some very high efficiency maybe 80% maybe higher of all the fusion product electricity too. So now you're just making a tremendous amount of electricity in one of these systems. >> Yeah, that that now you're cheating. Now we're cheating. Now we're talking about free energy here. Now see what I just you see what you just heard there. This is what I said at the beginning of the live stream. You guys hear what he just said there? He said, "Uh, oh, somebody made a video for me, Alexander Slabs." Is that your username? How am I going to find you, bro? You got to tell me like what your username is on X. You want me to find you, man? Um, he says, "Not only are we going to get direct energy conversion from hydrogen or whatever our fuel is to electricity at 85% or higher, we're also going to recoup the input energy at 95%. Okay, guys, just do that math in your head. We're going to put hydrogen in and we're going to get direct energy conversion to electricity at a rate of 85% efficiency. And the energy that we put in, we're going to get that back, too. This is like you're just picking up free energy off the ground, chat. This is just collecting the rain. The rain is falling from the sky. We got the water. It's actually drinkable. We don't even have to boil it or anything. We just can use it right there. This is as close to free energy as you can really get from a conventional view of of physics without invoke invoking the ether or anything like that because now we're just straight up producing and potentially now if your fusion reactions get high enough and you get enough fusion reactions, you're just printing money. You've got a money printer now, right? Depending on what fuel source you're using and how expensive it is. So now the problems and this actually goes now to the next part. Now the problem is not the physics at all. The problem is not the physics at all because people are wondering why are we not doing this. Now the problem is the business side of it. How do you build it? How much does it actually cost to do this stuff? And what you're going to find out here in a minute is that you can estimate the cost of a power plant by adding up all the raw materials it takes to produce. Seems pretty logical. You can estimate the cost of the power plant by adding up all the materials that it costs to produce. But there's another problem. The supply lines. You're building custom fusion reactors. They don't exactly make those parts down at the uh at the Home Depot, right? You need specialized production of your components for your fusion reactor. Those can take up to a year to get. So now you have to build your own supply line. You got to go full Walmart here. You got to go vertical integration, chat. Look at me with my business terms. You got to get vertically integrated and you got to start producing your own stuff. Why is this big? Who is the other what's the other big company that's doing? Compact fusion reactors? Lockheed Martin. This is exactly what Loheed Martin is doing. Remember what did Charles Chase say on his resume that he probably should have deleted? By the way, Charles Chase, I love you. You're my goat. You'll always be my goat. Charles Chase. But boy oh boy, I bet you the CIA came and knocked on your door about your about your resume. Really shouldn't have said that you were the one that convinced the Loheed Martin CXOs to do the compact fusion reactor and that it's successful and breathing on its own because Loheed Martin figured out, oh, we can make this small compact fusion reactor. What did they do with it? They added it to their production line. They added it to their production line. Basically, Charles Chase basically, if you're imagining like a video game, we're playing a Dungeons and Dragons game here. Charles Chase just handed them the sword of a thousand truths, chat. The sword of a thousand truths. Can we hand Can we trust this to a noob? I don't think we can trust it to a noob, chat. So, Charles Chase rolls up. This is See, I'm I'm bringing it down for you guys level so you can understand. Charles Chase rolls up. Loheed Martin's struggling. They can't beat the raid boss, chat. Loheed Martin can't beat the raid boss. Charles Chase rolls up. He's like, "Guys, I've got the answer." The sword of a thousand truths. Here it is. A neutronic compact fusion reactor. It's modular. We can make We can put it on airplanes. We can build we can build energy reactors out of it. And by the way, it's tiny. It's It's only the size of like an engine. It's small. He rolls up. Now Charles Chase is the hero. Now the raid boss. Raid boss had no chance. They basically got hacks chat. They got the thunder fury and they shouldn't even have had the thunder fury yet. Only my wild players are going to know that reference. So they destroyed the raid boss. Destroyed him. The problem is it was too good. Nobody else can have the sword of 1000 truths chat. It's too powerful. too powerful for a noob to ever have that power. So what happened? It went dark. It went dark. The GMs, the game masters stepped in. Blizzard came in, chat, they came in. They said, "You can't have that weapon. It's too powerful for a noob." And they took it. They took it. They said, "This is going dark." Only Only US government black projects are allowed to use the Sword of 10,00. But it's now been added in the classified catalog of components that you can add to your ship. Right. I'm building my custom ship. There it is. Compact fusion reactor. What kind of engine do you want in your new uh custom model? I think we'll have one of these. Throw this in there. Add that slot in there. Boom. There it is, chat. That was your Ashton story time. Okay, let's skip ahead a little bit now that I explained that. Here's David Kirkley. Yeah, I think I think this part is him explaining it. We try that's the kinds of teams we try to build at Helon is folks that want to really get their hands dirty. >> Uh so the I have to ask then what uh what timeline do you think like first working out there nuclear fusion power plant. What do you think? >> Yeah. So um what we've been able to do is build rapidly build every few years bring a new fusion system online. Um in 2023 we signed a deal with Microsoft to build a power plant for Microsoft for one of their data centers. And this is a power plant um that is plugged into the grid generating electricity from fusion and um and with a very very tough ambitious timeline of 2028 for the first electrons from that power plant. >> And that power plant will be powering >> this is a pipe dream like this >> crap I just this is indeed impossible. Then you wake up the next day and you're like all right we're going to do it anyway. >> I mean that's the thought process. That's the mentality. We're going to do it anyway. Let's go do it. The world needs it. There's no physics reason this can't be done. Now it's a question of how fast can you build it and can you engineer it to be as efficient as it needs to be? and and and those are engineering and manufacturing are ridiculously hard challenges. So do do not short sell that, but that's the goal and that's that's what we we get up every day thinking about. This is something I was actually just thinking about and talking with some of my team in the last few days. We we certainly have people that say like no, this can never be done. Um and and we had that before. We had that at the very beginning of I want to go merge these plasmas together and folks said nope, that can never happen. And we went off and did it. And you can't compress an F FRC because it's unstable. In fact, I actually still hear that FRC's are unstable. And um and I say yes, I know. Now, let me introduce you to SR Ori and 20 years of studies on what we know about that and and how we So, I was looking I was dragging through this because there's a few slides that show up on here. He talks about the contract with Microsoft. He talks about the contract with Microsoft and he says something here I did not know, guys. And now I'm even more all in on Helen. He said Microsoft was there when they were testing all their reactors. So, Microsoft didn't get involved just a couple years ago. Microsoft has been watching Helion as they've been iterating through their reactors. Oh, wait. Did I take a screenshot of it? I think I took a screenshot. Um, let me see if I can find it here. Oh, it's not. Uh, yeah. Uh, yeah. Oh, I did take it. Okay, I'm gonna pull up the screenshot because I was looking for it and I can't find the screenshot in there. That's why I took the screenshot because I had a feeling I was not going to be able to find this later. So, here you go. Let me share this with you guys real quick. Um, here. Okay. How do we make this smaller? There we go. This is actually Helen Fusion's timeline right here, guys. Take a look at this. Prototype number 1 through three was between 2005 and 2012. Early experiments. Dutyium dutyium fusion. They were shooting plasmoids at each other at 300 km/s. That's what they were doing in their first iteration. That is almost identical to what the Marauder program was doing in the '9s, shooting plasmoids at each other with the US government. Almost identical, just 10 years later. Basically, the Marauder program was I think 1992 through like 1995. So we've actually found all the the projects including NASA breakthrough physical propulsion all these government connected projects that were working on these similar technologies space-time manipulation etc. But look at the magnetic field strengths here, guys. The Grande 2014, four Tesla. Okay, this is only four Tesla. That's nothing. Look at the Venti, seven Tesla. That's only seven Tesla. Look at the Trent. This is only 5 years ago. The sixth prototype, 100 million degrees Celsius. That's only eight Tesla compression. This is why Helium Fusion is worth $5 billion. Just look at that right there. Look at the trend. Look at that trend since 2020. They already achieved 100 million degrees at 2020 with just eight Tesla. That's all it took, eight Tesla. And so now they don't even say they say Polaris seventh prototype direct energy conversion goal 25% larger than Trenton. Come on chat. They're definitely going to be hitting fusion with this one. Polaris is definitely hitting fusion threshold. They were already well above it beforehand. So now as their next one and then beyond this, they're probably going to be producing energy that's going to be going on the grid. And that's their goal by 2028 to have energy on the grid in 2028. Fusion, a neutronic fusion energy on the grid 2028. That's only three years from now. So what I'll say is this guys, this is not stock advice. But this company, I I don't see any way this company fails. The math, everything right there works out. They've got multiple prototypes. He uh Microsoft has been working with them while they've been working through these prototypes. So, if anything was wrong, you know, Microsoft is doing their due diligence. They're doing their due diligence to make sure it all works out. And they shouldn't have this much they shouldn't have this much funding and this much backing. How have you already gone through eight different fusion reactors and people are still throwing money at you, but you haven't ever sold anything? Because they know that the concept is going to work. They already know it's going to work. Okay, one more thing. Um, okay. Yes, here's one more thing and then we're going to do our moment of zen for tonight, guys. Let me skip ahead to like about here. Oh, what the hell? >> [snorts] >> What did I just do chat? Sorry, I stopped sharing. Here we go. A couple of things. So, one, to get access to it, we have windows. We have small windows all the way around that we look into with cameras, uh, spectroscopy, lasers, other kinds of scientific diagnostics that we use to measure. Um, and and so so you get you you see the light emission through that, but also it's very bright. And so, the actual vacuum vessels themselves that we use are ceramic. There are some versions of silicon and oxygen, typically quartz, but there's also some other centered materials. And it's so bright that they can shine through those materials. And so what you see is you see the light of not fusion. When fusion is happening, thermonuclear fusion is so hot that the light is in the X-ray spectrum. And and human eye can't see that. Um but as you're as you're as you're that ice cold 1 million degree plasma when you're just getting started, boom, chat. OMG, were you listening right there? What did he just say? The human eye cannot see it when the fusion reactions are happening. Why? because it's releasing X-rays. It's releasing X-rays. Chat, why are they recording? Why are they recording in thermal in the MH370 drone video? Partially because it's nighttime. Partially because it's night time. Why is this video in thermal? You wouldn't be able to see the lines coming in front of the orbs. If we were looking at the orbs in this video, I'll I'm going to show it bigger here. If we were looking at these orbs with our own eyes, it would just look like a plasma ball. You wouldn't even see the X-rays coming out behind it or in front of it. The dark lines are dark because it's not in the optical spectrum because we're literally looking at a fusion reactor spitting X-rays out. And so, the reason why they're recording in this thermal IR is because they know exactly what they're looking at. They know exactly what they're looking at and they know what to expect. They know what to expect and that's why they're zooming in on this. Look at those plasma orbs. What are you kidding me? You can see the like the like the skin of the plasma orb like pretty clearly. And then they change. They reconfigure right near the end. They reconfigure and then they collapse. Boom. Yeah. No doubt. No doubt. Nuclear weapon. That's a nuclear weapon. How you define nuclear weapon? Like nuclear weapons are about to get a lot more confusing, chat. Nuclear weapons are about to get a lot more confusing. It used to be really simple. Nuclear weapons, a big boom. Big boom, you got a nuclear weapon. Now we're going to be like, we got floaty plasma orbs that are doing [ __ ] We got space-time manipulation. We're compressing things in the black holes. Uh we have neutron bombs. If we just want to irradiate you to death, we basically have like a It's basically like Burger King chat. You get to have it your way. You get to have it your way. If you are a deep state military contractor that likes to zap airplanes, we got everything for you. We got everything. You want to teleport it to the next dimension, you want to teleport that [ __ ] to the moon, we got you. We got you covered. You want to melt those people so their skin falls off? We got some of that. No doubt. You want to just fry their brains so that their body just falls over limp like the Tesla death ray? I'm sure we got that, too. We got everything. Have it your way, chat. Have it your way. Okay. Uh, that was the last thing I wanted to show. Okay, I'm gonna do the super chats here. As I do the super chats, I have one more. I want to talk politics for just one brief second. One brief second. I'm going to [ __ ] on Nick Fuentes for a second because we're fremies. We're fremies. He's never talked to me before, but we're fremies. And I have to say that everybody was saying that MAGA was dead. They MAGA is dead. No, we're all Israel skitsos now. And we all hate we all hate the Jews. Blah blah blah. Right. And they were [ __ ] on Trump. And now Trump is just literally just destroying MTG. I call her MT GGG. Major E Trader Green. MTG cuz she's cooked chat. She's cooked. Trump is just annihilating her on social media. And Massie, he went after Massiey's wife. Remember Massiey's wife died and he got remarried and it was only like a year ago that his wife of 30 years died. Trump was going after her, too. So all of the libertarians and all of the woke right have been saying MAGA is dead. Trump is so mean. And and then this is the best part I want to point out. I was right about Nick Fuentes. He just wants a friend chat. Nick Fuentes just wants a hug. That's what he wants. That he's just spiteful and he's angry and all he needs. All these Groper people need is just to give him a hug and say it's going to be okay. It's gonna be okay because here you go. Trump gets asked. So, so, so literally like one day ago, Nick Fuentes is saying, "MAGA is dead. It's all over. You guys got fell for it again. Fell for it again award, right? Take off your hats and put on your new Democrat hats." Right? And then Trump gets asked about Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes and he doesn't [ __ ] on them. He's pretty respectful and he's like, "Tucker can talk to whoever he wants to talk to. They can have those conversations." What does Nick do? [laughter] I couldn't avoid this. I had to talk about it. Nick posts, "Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you so much." And I'm just sitting here laughing my ass off cuz it's like, dude, one day ago you were saying that MAGA is over and the administration is dead. And then the moment that Trump, he didn't even praise him. He just didn't [ __ ] on him. He's here go, "Thank you, sir. Thank you. Could I have another, please, sir?" I'm just like, "Oh my god, are you kidding me? Are you kidding me, chat?" It really is. He just needs a hug. It's really all it boils down to. He just wants to be accepted. He just wants somebody to acknowledge him. [laughter] I love it, chat. I love it. Okay. I still like you, Nick. I have nothing against him. I think that Nick will be great when he grows up out of this weird conspiracy Israel [ __ ] that he's doing because he's smart and he realizes how people are going to use the stuff he says against him. He realizes this stuff. He's just decided he's a oneisssue person and that one issue is one that's just like way too far out there for a lot of people. So, I don't know. I wish him the best. Okay, guys. Let's do the super chats. I'm going to start with the pill super chats because you guys were popping off in the pill chat today, guys. Thank you. And hey everybody in the pill chat. Matt 1776 gifts a cookie. Nom nom nom. Delicious cookie. When will we get the government to acknowledge MH370? I will say that I did have private correspondence. I probably shouldn't have actually, by the way, posted those emails with Charles Chase and Hal Pudof and I understand that. But the reason why I did it is because those guys are never going to talk to me again anyway. [laughter] They're probably never gonna talk to me again anyway. Um, I did have private correspondence with another OG uh MH370 investigator. I'm not going to say who. They're not necessarily in agreements with us, but I said, "Hey, I don't care if you agree with me or not. I really don't care. I already know the videos are real. What do I care if you agree or if you believe? Just don't be afraid to speak about the videos. The only way they can cover this stuff up is if people won't talk about it. The more people talk about, like I literally told them, if you want MH the truth of MH70 to come out, talk about the videos. Even if you say, "Hey, they're super fake." Because that will force the government to say anything. Say something about the videos. They don't want to say anything about the videos because they can't lie publicly. They're going to get caught in a lie. They're going to get caught in a lie. Those videos are real. It's Gorgon stair wide area motion imagery. Nobody faked that. Nobody faked that. No chance. And we're literally reviewing the physics now on a daily basis that is emerging only now 10 years after that happened which is perfectly in alignment with what the military technology would be ahead of the public. Okay. Thank you Matt for that. Appreciate you brother. Thank you guy whose name I can't say. I appreciate you. John Glock also says something is needed to generate topological monopole inside of the orb. Yes, in the case of MH370 fractal troal moment. Let me add to that. Remember the equation that he showed. The equation he showed had another parameter in it. It was not just the pressure is equal to the magnetic field strength squared. There was a denominator. The denominator was divided by 2 times the magnetic permeability of free space. H that's interesting. So look at the magnetic pressure equation again. What if we change the permitivity of free space? What if we change the permitivity and permeability of free space? If the perme permeability of free space changes now that causes the denominator to go towards zero that means the numerator skyrockets as well. So there's your answer right there is that there's two amplification factors at play. One amplification factor is simply the magnetic field strength. We want to maximize the magnetic field strength. The second amplification factor is a little bit hidden. If you can reduce the permitivity permeability of free space, you also get an amplification factor of your pressure. This is what speaks directly to this idea of creating a topological monopole, creating a little black hole at the middle of our orb that basically has fusion going on at it because we manipulate spaceime itself to actually amplify the pressure effects. There you go. That I think is why we don't even have to change the math. The equations work. You just have to realize that the permeability of free space is not a constant. It's actually can be changed, can be manipulated. Great question there. Then John Glock says, and I once again I'm probably going to try to talk to Bob Greener. Says, Bob Greeners, others have produced 1k Tesla magnetic field strengths. So yes, there have been arguments about producing these really high magnetic field strengths, but it's a matter of how much credibility there is align aligned with that. Uh thank you. Um, thank you methyl for that. Appreciate you, brother. And then John Glock, speaking of hiding the recipe, I finally watched Howal Pudof on Rogan and wow, incredible gaslighting. We just don't have the physics. He says, "Bullshit. Five minutes on plasma and zero point energy almost three hours. So glad I listened to the real Hal first before the Rogan coverup." Yes, if you just watched the Hal Pudof interview on Joe Rogan, we were pointing that out when it first happened was how like he's talking about remote viewing and all this stuff for like two hours and then like five minutes on zero point energy. And it goes to show that he's it's kind of being allowed to drip out. Howal Pudof knows the MH370 videos are real. No question. Nobody All of the engineers that were working on this, all the engineers that wrote the DurS, they know the MH370 videos are real. No question. Every single one of them knows. I even think people like Larry Forsley might know. Anybody that understands nuclear reactions, nuclear physics, they're gonna be looking at those videos going, "That's a nuke. That's a nuke." There's very tall tell signs that nuclear physics is in action. One of them is geometrical shapes and plasma orbs. Okay, so thank you for those donations. Filter dog gifts the cookie says, "Keep pounding." Thank you very much, Filter Dog. Okay. Uh, also I just want to shout out the Rumble chat. I don't think I have donations set up on the Rumble chat, but thank you very much, guys. I appreciate you all. And then we got some super chats here as well. Chaotic. Good. Lex Freriedman stole James Lip James Lipson's pentameter. Yeah, I actually don't have anything against Lex Friedman. In fact, back in the day, I was trying to simp Lex Freriedman because I thought he was such an intellectual. And just the reality is he's just fallen far behind. Like super far behind. I mean, he was an intellectual. Two years ago, I had no chance against Les Freeman. He would have been an intellectual powerhouse that I could never even have maintained a conversation with. Now Lex Freeman can't even maintain a conversation with me anymore. He can't keep up anymore. I mean, he's struggling with concepts related to Anutronic Fusion that we figured out like a year ago. So, it is what it is, chat. I really don't care anymore at this point. I'm in full IDGF mode. Fly ether. Nice nice to see you, brother. Hope you got some good clips out of it tonight. Micro reactor for the military, but not for the people. Exactly. I mean, nuclear micro reactors for the government. Like, people should be wondering a little bit more about what the hell a nuclear micro reactor is. And if we can build nuclear micro reactors, how come we have nuclear power plants that are like huge and huge liabilities as well? H just something to think about, guys. Just something to think about. Zapperoo says, "Fantastic. Thank you for that huge donation, Zaparoo. Fantastic. This is the real disclosure. Ashton, you're running a graduate course in both physics and investigative research. You've more than earned your PhD. I forgot to mention the Hawaiian shirt, chat. I can't get over the Hawaiian shirt. I'm watching it. I'm like, what is this? Breaking Bad. This guy's Why Why is he wearing Hawaiian shirts? I You will never catch me in a Hawaiian shirt. Not ever. Literally never. Even if I'm at the beach, I'm still not wearing Hawaiian shirt. It's just not in my There's zero Hawaiian shirts in my wardrobe. None. Not even one. I don't know what it is, but whatever. If he's rocking it, he's working it. I appreciate it. If you are like a soontobe billionaire, which David Kirkley is definitely about to be. Wear whatever the hell you want, bro. Wear whatever makes you comfortable, my douche. Wear whatever makes you comfortable. Reminds me of uh the Facebook movie where Jesse Eisenberg's character is just wearing the robe. He goes to the his uh investment meeting was just the venture capital meeting with just a robe on because he knows he's worth so much. Timothy Foster, thank you for that donation. Thank you for teaching. Thank you for listening. Appreciate you. And then this one, I don't know. I'm going to write your name down cuz I I can't remember how to find your thing, but we'll take a look, man. Alexander Slavnik, thank you, man. Are you the guy that does the scientific paper? If so, I think I already watched it. The if it was the AI thing, I think I watched it, which was good. Thank you. I appreciate it. Okay, our moment of zen tonight, guys. And I'll just look to see if there's any other chat questions in the chat. You guys had some good question. Oh, the other thing people were bringing up was something about some drilling James thing or something. It's probably a scam, guys. Don't get caught up in all this weird like remember that guy who had the like the alien fungus or whatever. Like, you're getting caught up in weird Tik Tok [ __ ] chat. Don't get caught up in weird Tik Tok [ __ ] Focus on the science. Focus on what we know is real from the science. Don't get caught up in clickbait and bat boy stuff and people that are trying to get you to follow into their new alien trend, right? 99% chance it's a scam. 99% chance. Okay. Our moment of zen. Uh where is it? Oh, it's already up here. Um the end of this. So Lex Freeman does ask some pretty good questions here, guys. Um >> it's emitting >> and at the end he asked about the Fermy paradox. So of course Lex talks for like three minutes here. The Fermy paradox is this idea of why don't we see aliens out there when we look out of the sky? How come I don't see alien civilizations everywhere? There's a couple theories on it. Dark forest theory. Everybody's too afraid. Maybe there's nobody out there at all. That's the reason why we don't see it. Um but that's not I think all of those are regressive views, right? I think we do see them out there out there. We're just not looking for the right thing. I think that aliens are so technologically advanced that we're just not seeing them. The same way where we don't look like imagine Native Americans looking for signals of other people and they're looking for smoke signals because that's how the Native Americans were using smoke signals to communicate. So they're looking for smoke signals, but we're using electromagnetic waves. They're never going to see our communications because we're communicating on something that's invisible. The same idea holds true for the aliens. They're communicating through the ether. They're using quantum entanglement to communicate. We're not even detecting it. In fact, we are detecting their communications. We're just not looking for them. We're not looking for them. Therefore, we don't see them. We also, if we looked using high frequency gravitational wave detectors, high frequency, I think we would see warp drives flying around in the sky. In fact, I think that some of either the fast radio bursts or the gamma ray bursts, some of the stuff that we're seeing out there is probably actually techno signatures and we don't even realize it. We don't even realize it. So, now that being said, let's listen to what David Kirkley's view is of the universe because the reality of this is what I want to know. Does David Kirkley know about this? What how much does David Kirkley really know? Does he know that we figured this out from fusion bombs? Does he know that we can potentially produce free energy? Does he know that this has been suppressed? Does he know the implications of this? Or is he a regressive thinker that thinks, "Nope, you know, whatever. That we're not seeing the aliens, they don't exist, blah blah blah. There's no, you know, we've hit the peak of technology." Now, my guess from just listening to this today is that he's got to be a little bit enlightened. So, let's see >> there. Do you think it's like pretty certain that they in order to expand out into the cosmos they would be using nuclear fusion? >> It's hard to imagine anything else that right now where does energy in the universe come from and it comes from fusion comes from stars. Um and and we know that that's the process. And what's the power source chat? A+ actually S tier A+ answer right there. What is the power source for the aliens? Do you think they're using nuclear fusion? No question. That's what he says. power source of the UFOs is nuclear fusion. A neutronic fusion is what's powering aliens chat right there. That wasn't even the yatsi, but that's just a bonus. So whether they're harnessing the star itself, Carter Chev type 2, or are they bringing fusion along because they want to go somewhere and they're bringing it with them to go visit. Um I think that that's that that's pretty um that's pretty likely. You bring up the Fermy paradox. How come we don't see alien civilizations? um even if it's infantestly small chance that there is life on any one planet and infantestly small that life uh grows into intelligent life. There are however almost infinite planets around infinite stars in our galaxy that have been around for vastly longer than we've been around but we don't see it and I think that's a question that many scientists and and everyone has wrestled with over the years. >> I mean I'm very scared by the implications of that. The scary thing is that to the point that we made earlier as we become more and more technologically advanced we end up destroying ourselves. Like there could be things we unlock like nuclear weapons but plus+ like >> there you go. That's probably the real reason why Lex Freeman didn't talk to me. He can make up whatever answer he wants right there. The answer is most of the aliens are probably destroying themselves. [snorts] Right. Where does this technology lead? You eventually make a weapon that's so powerful that any individual can destroy the whole planet. How does any civilization survive that? The only way you could survive it is you all spread out. We all just spread out. Maybe we reset ourselves. So there you go. I'm going to let him keep going. >> New things that happen as you develop super advanced systems that close to 100% probability uh destroy ourselves. Destroy any intelligent being. The kind of intelligent being that's ambitious enough to keep innovating will eventually destroy itself will be one explanation. And that's scary. that that should be a sobering that's at least an inspiring sobering thought to be careful with the stuff we create. Um but I also just look into humans. We create dangerous stuff and then figure out like sometimes almost like last minute how to not destroy ourselves. >> We're good with deadlines. We're good with deadlines and we're good at like surviving. I mean life as we know it on earth seems to find a way and intelligent life as we know it, human life seems to find a way. We do a lot of painful things along the way but in the end we somehow survive. It's interesting. There's something in the human spirit. Mhm. I think I agree with Lex to a degree. We've survived this long, but we didn't have the kind of weapons we're about to have. The kind of weapons we're about to have make our current weapons look completely obsolete. They make them look like the same. It's the same as the conquerors, the the West showing up against the Native Americans with guns when they're using bows and arrows. Just no contest >> that allows us to survive. So, so I have like a lot of optimism about the super powerful technologies that we create will eventually lead to us still surviving for thousands of years. But then like why are the aliens not here though? >> So maybe it's also possible that's really difficult to traverse space. Maybe it really is that difficult. The physics makes it not easy. There's a lot of space. It's just hard to hard to travel. >> I think um >> it's easy. It's not hard. I as I have gone further and further in building fusion systems that work um I've become more optimistic around the firmy paradox specifically and there's there is the uh there's several of them but I think you're referring to something called the great filter something happens that filters out life um the dark forest is another philosophy around sure it's out there but everybody's hiding because they want don't want to be noticed but I think about something else actually a philosophy that I've always loved and I'm going to pronounce this wrong so I apologize uh matricka brains is that and that's kartev level two that civilizations get so advanced and they focus not on expanding physically and expanding in space and expanding their reach by planting flags in new places, but grow their cognition, grow their ability to think, they grow their brain, they grow their intellect. Um, and I I feel like in the last few years, we've seen a massive trend that maybe this is the thing that happens and that we do grow our intellect and we grow the intellect of the species by AI and advanced tools and and as a society can just get smart enough that we don't need to go plant those flags everywhere. And so the matrices brain is uh a Dyson sphere where a civilization has covered the entire sun in essentially solar panels or collects its light in some way and uses all of that power to power intelligence to power computers and to power brains. And I think we're away from that, a ways away from that. But maybe AI and fusion together gets you actually along that path sooner and wow well chat that was your stream and that was your moment of zen. What did he say right there then? Maybe AI infusion gets us there faster. I think that couldn't be more accurate. And his perspective, his perspective is I think that you're gonna have so much energy. His perspective is essentially you're gonna have so much energy that you're going to not even focus on expansion. You're just going to focus on self-improvement. You're going to have so much energy at your at your fingertips, so much computing power that you don't care about expansion. Why would we care about that? This is where people talk about where it's like, why would I bother going to another star, another planet? We have everything we need on this planet, and we don't even need the star. We don't even need the star. We can make our own stars. There you guys go. That's your moment of zen. That's your mo. That's your uh message of optimism. I hope you guys enjoyed the live stream tonight. The answer is fusion. A neutronic fusion. That's what the aliens are using. That's what we're going to use for the next 10,000 years. unlimited energy of fusion, enough hydrogen to last us 100 million years or longer. And if we're right about the ether and zero point energy, then we have an unlimited reservoir where we can literally pull hydrogen out of the ether to use as fuel. Have a great night everybody. Thank you MH370X. I love you guys. Peace out everyone. later. [music] [music] Out in the fields where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, [music] they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes [music] pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. In wormhole, stargates, negative energy travel through the cosmos, it's [music] our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Bowling trip 7 through a wormhole. Flow. We're talking wormhole. Stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Owing triple set [music] to a wormhole flow. [music] Exotic [music] matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeezed so [music] tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab [music] they play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing castle's [music] force negative zones. We need to stay the course. Stalking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. [music] Where did it go? Boing triple 7 do a wormhole float thin shell formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy conditions [music] that we must defy for a stable wormhole let's give it a try [music] [music] forces balancing The plate creating the throat. Open the gate from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers [music] hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. [music] We're talking wormho, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, [music] sitting our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Blowing trip [music] 7 through a wormhole flow from the fields to the stars. We break the chains, understanding [music] the universe, we make the gain. Little hoola crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night [music] with wormholes