Wormholes Equal Quantum Entanglement ER=EPR

Video Transcript

# Wormholes Equal Quantum Entanglement ER=EPR Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foroding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. Welcome everybody to the live stream. Let's go. Nice to have you guys all here. You guys know who I am. Your host Ashen Forbes. Guys, it's a celebration. Wormholes are real, chat. Wormholes are real. That is the alternate intro when I feel like I found some science that I can't believe the world just hasn't really caught on to yet. And that's what we're talking about today. Right off the bat, guys, I got to play. We got lots of clips to play. Here we go. This is my feelings right now, Chad. I'm in my feels. Here it is. >> Son of a horsey [ __ ] I wish I knew how to quit you. >> I wish I knew how to quit you. science chat. I don't know how to quit the science. I don't know how to quit. I I expected to work on some video production stuff this weekend. Next thing you know, I'm looking at a wormhole paper and I'm going, "Holy crap, there it is. There's the solution." So, we're going to be looking into that tonight, guys. We're also going to be looking at um what did I put on the agenda here? I'm trying to get caught up with all this stuff. Um, I don't know. Let's just get right into it, chat. Let's get right into it. Let's get into the fun. Okay. I actually to start off here, there's been some uh I guess some kind of updates in the UFO community. Not really, but um I do want to comment on the woke disclosure crew. I I did >> they they said that >> I saw um Admiral Galedet, Galedet, whatever, however you say his name. Um he was on Danny Jones. So, here he is. >> Actually, here was the crazy thing, and this is still out there. They they said that Nimit's tic tac event was actually a US tech demo. And there's a lot of reasons I think that's a that's a lot of BS. >> Really? >> Oh, yeah. Because first of all, >> I was kind of under I kind of thought it was US secret tech, black black budget stuff. >> There's a lot of people saying this, but here's my point. And first of all, I know the four witnesses. I've talked to I've talked to two of them, Dave Fraver and Alex Dietrich. And this this is beyond >> the acceleration was beyond anything they've seen. You know, Dave Fraver is great. I like him. Navy pilot. He said, "I don't know what that was, but I want to fly it, you know, >> and of course, but ultimately so he couldn't imagine anything that we had like that with the instantaneous acceleration that would have obliterated any material or person pilot." >> And the second thing is this, that was 2004. >> If we had some capability like that in terms of transportation or movement, uh, we would have used it on the battlefield in Iraq and Afghanistan to save lives. And if we didn't, and if that was US tech, then there's some real irresponsible actors out there. So, I really, that's why I highly doubt it was. Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. Guys, it couldn't be United States technology because if we had advanced gravity manipulation technology, we would have used it to save lives on the battlefield. Is is anyone buying this? Like, is that like I don't think he's lying. I think he believes that. I think he actually believes that. Holy crap. That's the scarier part. The scary part is I don't think he's lying. I think he's just actually that misinformed. Oh yeah, we've got free energy technology and teleportation and you know what we thought? Oh, let's go save the lives of a few grunts and have it get exposed to China and Russia. Yeah, that I'm sure they did the calculus and they were like, yeah, we got we got to save the lives of all these people. Holy smokes. I'm starting to realize this might be straight up hidden from the military themselves. I don't think Tim Galedet even knows this technology exists. I don't think he knows we have this technology. I think he literally just has no clue whatsoever. This is the the scariest thing about all this to me is how many people have no clue. Like Elon Musk having no clue. Like the literal UFO disclosure people having no clue. I'm sitting here like, how do they not have any idea what's going on? They're the ones saying that the aliens are teleporting around. He's the one saying like, "Yes, these sightings by these people are very credible." Well, what are those people saying? Those people are saying that these craft are defying physics. So, what do you think it is? I don't know how they can hold these two ideas in their heads. At the same time, they're like, "Yes, there's crafts flying around that are defying physics, but there's no physics that we don't understand. That's not possible for us to have figured out physics that we don't understand. Are you guys just idiots? Are you complete idiots? And the worst part is he's referencing the people that figured it out. Are they lying to each other? So here's the next clip. I mean, they might be lying to each other as well for all I know. I mean, that might be how deep the, you know, the nuclear secrets go for all I know. So, there's a second clip here. >> Like, can put all these questions to rest. >> No. So, I wasn't involved with any UFO UAP programs. I was not read in. Okay. So, the reason I talk about this now is I had my eyewitness account of the Go Fast video and Ryan and I had people supporting Ryan Squadron who seeing these all the time. And I I'm a Navy retired admiral and people like Fraver and Alex Dietrich and Ryan are speaking out and this Petty Officer Alex Wiggins and I just felt these these courageous folks deserve top cover, right? They deserve someone like me, a retired admiral because no one else is. I don't know why, but to say this is credible. This is a real thing. It deserves attention and research. >> So the stuff that >> Okay. Okay. Did Did you guys just hear what I just heard on that? I just heard Admiral Galedet has never been read in. He's never been part of any of these projects and he's literally just telling secondhand stories that other people have told him. That's a whistleblower. That's who we're having testify to Congress. Someone who has no inside information whatsoever just to rah rah prop up the other people. This is the problem with woke disclosure. It's just a bunch of [ __ ] It's just a bunch of cheerleaders telling you that, "Oh, yep. This person had a story. You should believe this other person's story." I mean, come on. This none of these are any of these people actually whistleblowers? Are any of them even firsthand witnesses? If we're going to bring up Tim Galedet and Michael Shelonburgger, who has no reason to be talking to Congress about this, if we have them talking to Congress, then I, Ashton Forbes, absolutely can talk to Congress. There's no reason we shouldn't be having MH370 hearings. There are a lot of people we could get to testify that will blow the whole MH370 case wide open, which is going to come with it all this technology. We could actually do something useful. So, there's another UFO hearing I'm hearing right now that's being set up for like September 9th or something like that. This is going to be complete [ __ ] again, isn't it? This is going to be complete [ __ ] again. I can already feel it coming cuz it feels like we're just finding people to tell us stories. We're having little children's story time. Everybody, all Congress gather around. Okay. that you were telling them uh I guess I imagine that you did eventually tell them uh what they were asking you in a private setting. Well, this stuff was was uh secondhand accounts that were told explained to you by other people. >> Yes. Yes. And these are people I trust. In fact, as I told you, I knew people who touched the legacy program. >> I know them and and many of them are out already. Eric Davis, how put off >> Joel Joe J Stratton was not in the legacy program, but he led the UAP task force, so he's seen a ton of UAP. >> Wait, wait, wait, wait. Does that Has anybody ever confirmed this before? Eric Davis and Hal Pudof were in the UI were in the program. They were in the program, meaning they had access to apparently alien technology. Well, okay, that might explain why they're writing scientific papers about teleportation and autonic fusion and a bunch of other stuff that seems like science fiction. I mean, maybe that's the reason, guys. Hey, I guys, I don't want to step too far for my slow UFO community people that are trying to keep up to speed with us here. But hey guys, well, just let's let's consider this for a second. What if this whistleblower Eric W. Davis that supposedly was part of the UFO program, whose boss is Hal Pudof, the world's leading expert on zero point energy? What if their scientific papers actually aren't [ __ ] What if they're actually just real? And what if they've been doing that and building that technology for the United States government? Wow. Could it be? Could it be true? I mean, my god, people, it's really not that complicated. And somehow Tim Galedet has no clue. Why doesn't he just go read Eric W. Davis's paper on wormholes? Just read it. information that's not been declassified and I trust >> You know what? Actually, that's good enough. I don't need any more Tim Gadet. That was it. Okay, next. Next thing. Okay, I had remembered what I was going to show and then I forgot. Okay, here we go. Uh, I want to show this wave pool thing before we get into this. Here's the secret chat. Everybody wants to know, right? They want to know like how does the physics work? How does the science work? It actually works very similarly to this right here. Paper or uh waves. Everything is waves. Paper. Why did I say that? Everything is waves. And we are in a medium that waves can transmit through this medium. Now, this medium we're in, the ether or whatever you want to call it, I guess they're calling it anti-deitter space. That's what we're calling it. Now, if we can understand, even if we can't visually see the waves, if we can control the waves in the medium, we can we can play with relativity. We can play with gravity, right? Because again, what is a gravity wave? A gravity wave is a ripple in spaceime. That's what it is. Now maybe a part of the problem is we can't see those ripples at least not easily but they're there. Now the other thing that we are the big discovery is this er equals EPR. Einstein Rosen equals Einstein puldoski Rosen er equals EPR. What this means is that quantum entanglement is connected to wormholes. They are the exact same physical phenomenon. Okay, this is also people people sometimes say um they'll say Ashton. Actually, I just remember what I was going to show next. I'm gonna write this down in the chat. Okay. Um, damn, I just lost my train of thought there. Um, yeah, they say, Ashton, what you keep saying, you keep changing what you say is happening in the videos. They'll say, is it a wormhole? Is it macroscopic phase conjugation? Is it quantum tunneling? The answer is it's all of those things. It's all of those things. In physics, actually, there's different different ways of describing the same phenomenon. And the technical description isn't necessarily the same as the conceptual description. The idea of a wormhole is a conceptual description that was uh invented by John Wheeler, John Archal Wheeler. And the reality is that our spacetime while distance appears to be this real thing that we see, distance is simply just an illusion. We can skip from here to there. You know, that's the reality of our situation. And so quantum tunneling is this idea that there is this quantum effect that we can bounce skip through a barrier, teleport through a barrier, teleport through a wall. Quantum effect. So when we say macroscopic quantum tunneling, we're saying we're tunneling through this barrier. The process of tunneling through the barrier is known as a wormhole. It's a wormhole. And when we talk about phase conjugation, we're talking about getting our waves to get into phase and a line. So I think the answer is all of these things are true. Now what connects them is this concept of ER equals EPR, which means that the same effect that we see spooky action at a distance, if I change this over here, I see a corresponding change over here that can be predicted. If that's the case, then this is the same effect that allows for teleportation, a wormhole. What's connecting these two things? The distance is too far. The speed of light, it's faster than the speed of light. We're seeing these things interact. How's that possible? And that's possible because there's a medium. There's a medium connecting. There's a string connecting these two points. It's an invisible string. An invisible string connecting these two points. Now the other thing to keep in mind is this. Black holes are also just wormholes. Black holes are also just wormholes. But a black hole may function in a slightly different way. The black hole may suck in all the matter, all the light, everything, and then spit it out, but spit it out fractured. Not necessarily coherently spitting it out, just shooting it out. kind of like uh like a lawn uh lawn watering machine thing, right? Like like a sprinkler shooting it out everywhere. So, what we would need for a humanly traversible wormhole is we need an ability to move our entire object all at once so that it doesn't get spit out like a sprinkler because we don't want that, right? I think that's a good where place to leave it for now is just as an example while before we jump into the science here and take a look at at the deep side of it. One more thing I want to say about it, we're going to look at a different video, change directions for just one second, is one of the things Charles Chase um told me came back pretty hard here, which is that I was reading one of the I think it's a she's a CERN scientist, I believe, talking about the ER equals EPR, and she mentioned that these entangled pairs these entangled pairs may actually uh have a memory. They might have a memory. These entangled pairs that we see everywhere, the the string that connects them secretly behind the scenes. There might be a memory to it. There might be a some type of ability to like reverse that, figure out where that always was. Maybe it's saved somehow in the bulk in the universe. And I thought that was crazy because I was like the first time I had heard that was from Charles Chase when he replied to my message about the ether. And then I was reading it in this and I went, "Oh boy, I think we might have we might have come on to something here." Okay, actually I think I'm going to reverse the direction. I decided to show something else instead because I want to change and show this. This is Paul Kersh. Okay, Paul Kersh. Let me pull this up. Think about here. Goodbye. Paul Kersh was friends with the Unatel guys, Larry Mau and Michael forgetting his last name. But they had promoted this idea of quantum tunneling using three drones, ODVs, orbiting drone vehicles around an object, which was really similar to the MH370 videos. And Paul Kersh did this interview. Now, why is this important? Well, we're talking about wormholes. So, listen to what he says here. This is actually him explaining how they think this effect works. I'm going to just go back just a little bit here with a um probe in um oh, here's the picture I was looking for. Uh with a uh uh the electron of a of a distant photon. Here's an example. I'm speaking, you know, it's maybe getting uh confusing. So, I want to clarify something here. So, I don't if you can see that. Imagine that there's uh two couples on a dance floor and uh they're dancing together then then the lights go dark and uh while the the um the lights go dark that the couples switch partners. So, essentially uh it's just it's a way like way to describe this process here. So you you have an electron and a positron from the uh distant source. Uh you're creating an artificial electron and posetron with our probe and endpoint and then you're swapping partners and then this the probe is at the remote place many light years away >> in a way is it something is it similar to like quantum entanglement? >> Well um >> I mean it's like a reactionary thing you're you're you're talking about it seems like. Well, it's more of a maybe you could say access to interdimensional space. I think it might be more accurate to say uh and um that like Mr. Miller has told me that space doesn't exist. You know, and again these are you know kind of abstract concepts to uh understand but um >> it's like access to extradimensional space. Mr. Miller says, "Space doesn't exist." So, when I listened to that that interview, and I think I put a link in the in the YouTube channel if you want to watch the whole thing, you can see in the description. Those guys knew. Those guys knew because they're talking about technically spacetime itself is an illusion. The distance is an illusion. Is it connected to quantum tunneling? Yes, it's connected to quantum tunneling. Absolutely, it's connected to quantum tunneling. It's the core foundation of our reality. Now, somebody asked, can you explain gravity and electromagnetism? Because we need to understand how is this actually possible? How is this actually possible? Well, the way this is possible is there is 0 point energy. We're in a medium of zero point energy which is electromagnetic in nature. It's electromagnetic in nature and therefore we can interact with it. we can interact with it. What this means is there must be a unification theory of gravity and electromagnetism. There must be something that combines them together that says these are how these two things go together. So there is one there is one actually and it's the Kuza Klein theory. Now, there's probably some variation of it, but I can say now with I think a 100% certainty that what we're seeing in those videos is teleportation. And the science behind it is field propulsion, if you want to think of it like that, manipulating the fields of the ether, of the zero point energy of spaceime itself. Gravity manipulation we would call it. So, here actually this interview just dropped um today, yesterday, something like that. Today it's Richard Bandurich. Now you guys might recognize this guy because we were talking about him from the NASA podcast episode number 60 69 and he was talking about alien metamaterials and I wasn't really sure about this guy but now I am sure. Now I know he definitely knows he definitely knows and so let me just go ahead and show you. >> Here you go. Look at this unification equations. um >> of the electric and magnetic fields Maxwell's equations. Where is it? What is the heavy side gibb reformulation chat? Here you go. Talking about heavy side reducing the fields. So where's the part where he talks about the scalar potential? Um for he talks about it. I think down here >> field just must be an aspect of the electric field. Um this basically unified the the equations and what this resulted in was the view that the magnetic field is not a separate field from the electric field. It's just another aspect of the electric field. But the problem with his his derivation is he generated this third equation which is called the magnetic scalar potential. Um and this has some effects. I mean it still has the same magnetic vector potential. So this basically says this equation could feed back onto the other two and virtually make them unsolvable because you know you could have an electric field that generates the scaler that feeds back to um the magnetic field that could eventually feed back to the electric field. So um they had to get removed it because nobody was really seeing the effects from this uh third equation when Maxwell did his derivation in the early 1900s. So the magnetic scalar potential is the equation up here. Um okay so let me switch the mode here. So he's saying the scalar potential was removed from the equations because we weren't seeing it. We weren't seeing the actual effect. If the scalar potential was real, what did he just described there? He said that if the scalar potential is real, you can get to infinities. You can get to singularity. You can create a singularity. And now that this is actually significant because this is what we're seeing when we see vortexes, they're stable. He's saying that if the scalar potential exists, you can create a stabilized plasma ball singularity. You can create a sta stable structure, self-consistent structure. That's what scalar physics opens the door to. Scalar physics is basically saying like this guys, we say, okay, here's our universe, right? Our universe, let's just go with the big bang theory for now. We say the universe is expanding. This is our universe expanding. Okay, so this is our universe we've got here. we say that the ether the uh the anti-fitter space or whatever is everything pushing in on that from the outside while it's expanding. Okay, we got or we got the the the ether is the counter space counter to that, right? The ether is the counter space to that. And what we're saying is when we add this counters, we add this medium that's really actually all around us all the time. It's not really appropriate to think of it as like encapsulating us. When we add this medium, we now get this scalar potential. We now get this ability to interact with that medium. And early on, we were as scientists looking and we're going, well, we're not seeing this effect here, so we're going to just throw that out. We're going to throw it out. And now that we're bringing that back in, we're realizing that actually explains the universe. That explains these quantum effects that we're seeing. That explains the stuff that we've been struggling to understand on why are systems stable when they shouldn't be stable. Why are uh galaxies spinning faster than we would expect? So, let's listen to a little bit more. Thank you very much for this huge super chat, by the way. I'm just going to hit that one up right now because I just noticed that pop in. Thank you, Dread Max Triac. Appreciate you. Huge super sticker. Okay. Uh the meaning of it was the point space is tied to an inertial reference frame. Okay, a changing potential will produce a non-zero value, but a non-zero value of what? Because the units in here don't really tell you what that value is going to be. And the magnetic vector potential produces oops >> a non zero value in the direction of the vector. So >> the unified velocity gauge uh there's there's just >> an off bome effect confirmed that these magnetic scalar potentials were physically real and you can measure them. They would take a coil where um a is not zero around the outside um but Pause it right here because I want you guys to realize, are you noticing a pattern? Are you noticing that every single engineer that knows what they're talking about is saying talking about the Aronoff bomb effect? They're saying this magnetic scalar potential is proven. This isn't a debate, guys. This is the worst part about this whole situation is this isn't pseudocience and this is not even debatable. It's proven. The Aronhoff bomb effect proves that the scalar potential is real. A real effect that's experimentally measurable, not a debate. It's not about, oh, this is like ghost. This is not something you're not trusting someone. Again, experimentally proven. And when and when people come back, this is why it's so dumb try to even like talk to physicists, academics, because they have no counterarguments. Their counter argument is I wasn't taught that. That's their literal counterarguments. They're all talking about this magnetic scalar potential. They all talk about the rewrite of heavy side uh of Maxwell's equations removing the scalar potential, the Aeronhoff bomb effect, and the unification of gravity and electromagnetism. All of them. All I mean, it's just like anybody that just re puts their toe in the water to research this is going to find the exact same thing. It's like maybe guys, hey, maybe maybe all these people saying the exact same thing, maybe they're just right. They're literally all black project engineers, too. Maybe they know a little bit more than some academic that works at like UC Irvine, right? That doesn't really know anything. Just teaches people what he read in a book. >> Okay. >> Is zero. So basically the gauges must be invalid under some conditions because electromagnetics is saying that the gauge is flat here as this little graph but really >> does that if that looks familiar to you it should it looks just like a Bose Einstein condensate it looks just like a coherent point in spacetime. So again why are they what what is the significance of the Aaronhoff bomb effect? What is the significance of the unification of electromagnetism and gravity? What is the significance of the scalar potential? Manipulating the ether, manipulating the ether, manipulating the zero point energy. That's the significance of it. So what does this teach us? This teaches us anything connected to quantum mechanics, quantum computers, uh Bose Einstein condensates, this is all connected to the science of zero point energy. This is all connected to the idea of teleportation and wormholes as well. So in that particular instance to me the graph is something like sphere is like a big sync and source that um you can use to try to keep some system um of currents neutral. So >> almost every system today is grounded somewhere or they have an indirect path to ground and that's one of the reasons that you can eliminate the difference is thousands of times. So you virtually can two wires conduct the difference is thousands of times. So you virtually can you know ignore any scalar effects on a normal electronics. So the source so we have to go into the source of the magnetic force which is the the magnetic field was created to describe the magnetic force originally back in the 1800s. So today's electromagnetic vector equations when two wires conduct an electrical current a magnetic field is generated a magnetic force arises it's described by that formula. Um we have two currents and you know basically this is the mathematical abstraction we use to represent the magnetic field. But if we look at these two equations we have current current one current two. What is current? current is just kulums per second passing a certain point. Well, that kms passing a certain point could be flowing really fast or really slow. So in copper the drift velocity which is the speed that electrons move in wire is really you know it could be as low as 1 millimeters per second or as great as maybe 10 20 millimeters per second but that's really slow and but you could have current flowing through another type of material is ringing at 10,000 meters per second or 100 meters per second. Um and now the current density of the wire is going to be less by that same amount and you'll still have one amp going through that particular point. So I could have uh 0.01 kums per meter current density with a velocity of 100 meters per second. That would give me 1 amp flowing past the point. Or I could have one km per meter in the wire flowing at a drift velocity of 1 meter per second. Um and that would give me a current of 1 kon per kum per second or one amp year. And there's made no efforts made to distinguish between those two. Um >> so what he's bringing up why this is relevant here is he's saying what actually is electricity? He's saying what is current? What does that actually even mean? He's saying actually it's like the drift velocity of the electrons in the material. It's like how fast are the electrons actually moving through the material will actually be related to how much current is flowing. So if you actually change the material then you can actually manipulate how much current's flowing through it. Okay. Right. That's I can understand that. Okay. Copper has is slow. Right. Some other material might be really fast. Okay. So uh where did he say the next thing? Where's the trippy part? Uh, let's just Okay, actually I think I might I don't Okay, let's >> dilation and length contraction and the length contraction that the electric current observes. >> Okay, here we go. >> Electromagnetic says that those fields should avail rules of superp position. So, you just add them up at any point space to calculate the force. >> Um, but that's not necessarily going to be true here because really once 1905 relativity was, you know, proven to be true. What happens instead is um when electric current is flowing down the wire, it's experiencing time dilation a length contraction and a length contraction that >> So what he's saying right here, what he's saying in this part, he's saying spaceime itself is if you manipulate spaceime itself, you can actually manipulate how the appearance of how the current is flowing. In fact, he says if you take it a step further into the next slide he shows here. Here he's going actually you have to consider the perspective of the electron itself. You have to consider relativity from the perspective of the electron itself and from the perspective of the uh the electric current. So what this means is it actually gets more complicated how to think about it. Now just like you see in this graph right here is you have uh positive and negative charges interacting multiple different ways. You have positive and negative charges attracting each other. You have certain ones repelling each other and you have to com if you kind of like add up all these different interactions that are happening then this is what we're trying to figure out. This is what we have to control. we have to say, "Oh, okay. Well, now we have to realize like we have these multiple things moving against one another and they're all experiencing general relativity. They're all in their own little bubble looking at the world from the other perspective. Now, what this means is if we begin to warp spaceime, you begin to warp these effects in unusual ways. So, why is this important? Because this is essentially how do we actually manipulate spaceime? We use electricity. We polarize our vacuum. That's what we do. So in order to understand how to manipulate spaceime to make a wormhole, we have to unify electromagnetism and gravity. We have to understand that why is gravity a thing? Why do we feel gravity at all? Well, there's complex charge interactions that are happening everywhere all the time. So that's the basis for understanding it. So, we're not going to go through this whole thing here tonight, but I did want to show just this interview here. I haven't even watched the whole thing either, but I watched enough to realize that Richard Van Durick definitely knows. He definitely knows. And if you go once again, check out, you know, Hal Pudof, Eric Davis, any of these other black project engineers, even Charles Chase, they're going to say the same exact thing. They're going to say the same thing. Okay, I'm gonna do these super chats real quick. Thank you, Mick Leonard. Appreciate you for that donation. You're awesome. Appreciate you, man. War Ranch LLC, thank you very much. Appreciate you. Tracy Scott, thank you very much. Yeah, I'm not going to Congress on the 9th, guys. That would have been planned out way in advance, but thank you very much, Tracy Scott. And then, thank you very much, Dad Max. Okay, let's get to the spice, the meat and the potatoes that we wanted to talk about here today, guys. Um, where is it? Okay, I want to start with the Medium article. Okay. Where is it? Here it is. I think this was the first one I found. Actually, maybe not. Uh, yeah. So, I was digging around. I was watching reading a scientific paper about wormholes and just er equals EPR stuff. And I saw this quantum gravity in the lab. teleport teleportation by size and traversible wormholes. Anastasia Cremonov or whatever I think she's Ukrainian or something. There have been numerous proposals for experimental tests that indirectly shed light on one quantum gravity model or another. Many of these proposals rely on repurposing technology and techniques originally developed for scientific endeavors. Okay. Um, wait. So, this person, she actually worked on the large Hadron Collider, I believe. And is this the one I want to show? I'm trying to remember right now. Yeah. Okay. Which is the one actually? So, let me hold on a sec. Let me switch. This isn't the paper I want to show. Is it this one? I think this one that's cool horizons. Is it this one? Traversible wormholes in four dimensions. Uh I'm trying to find the right scientific paper that I wanted to pull up here. It's the one crap sec chat. Um yeah, I don't have it up here ready. Okay, so the scientific paper that I wanted to pull up is the one where they did I I reported on this I think a couple like a year and a half ago. And it turns out this scientific paper about holographic wormholes is basically just er equals EPR. I'm going to pull it up right here. Here it is. Okay, this one. Okay. Scientists successfully create holographic wormhole with quantum computer. Physicists have used quantum computers to implement a wormhole teleportation protocol. They were able to use holography to simulate a wormhole and send information through it. The experiment further supports the unification of ER equals epskind and Juan Melisino and proposes that gravity may be an emergent from some quantum bits. John Wheeler, Archabal Wheeler, first proposed that information could be the foundation of everything in spacetime all the way back in the 80s. The holographic wormhole emerged as a hologram from manipulated quantum bits or cubits stored in minute superconducting circuits. achievement brought us or brings us closer to realizing a tunnel theorized by Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen er in 1935 that traverses an extra dimension in space. The team successfully transmitted information through this quantum tunnel. Okay, right there, that's the big point. This experiment successfully transid transmitted information through the quantum tunnel 100% proof of teleportation. Proof of teleportation. This was the big revelation that I had on this scientific paper right here is that the holographic principle, a hypothesis proposing a mathematical equivalence or duality between quantum mechanics and general relativity gains support from this experiment. It gets proven by this experiment. The holographic principle is true. This breakthrough affirms that the quantum effects controlled in a quantum computer can give rise to the phenomenon expected in relativity such as a wormhole. Okay, what does this mean? What does the holographic principle mean? The holographic principle essentially means that we are on a 2D flat surface. It looks like we are this 3D projection, but we are actually a 2D flat surface being projected out. And so that would mean that what we see is distance, space, time, and distance is an illusion. The same way where if you're playing a video game on your computer, it looks like you're in a threedimensional reality, but you're not actually in a threedimensional reality. You're actually on a microchip or on a hard drive, right? Same exact concept. So when we are trying to figure out the ether, you can also interpret it like this. If we're in this medium, that medium might be spinning around all the time. We don't experience it because we are we see everything from our frame of reference. The same way where I don't feel like the earth is spinning. I don't see the earth spinning. I mean, it is spinning. We know it is. Just feels normal to us. So, if you were able to reverse engineer all that spin, all that orientation, what would you get? Would you hack into the source code of the reality essentially at that point? Now this experiment is huge. I read it. I read it. And this actually this this graph kind of explains it really well here. So it says seven cubits simulate entangled sets of particles. An eighth cubit is swapped into the left model. The cubits information spreads amongst the particles on the left. A magnetic pulse rotates the cubic states. This is equivalent to sending a negative energy shock wave through the wormhole. Hello. The information unspreads to a single particle. Repeated measurements show that teleportation is occurring. Now, this paper made a huge upslash. People were debunking it and saying a bunch of other nonsense. No, it's real. It's 100% real. So, as you saw, they took seven entangled cubits. So, they're entangled to another location, right? You got two sets of cubits, two sets of seven. They add a cubit into one of them. Or let's say over here, they add one in. information spreads. So now you have a new shape, right? We had a sevensided shape. Now we have an octagon. What happens over here on the other side? It spreads over here. The shape forms over here as well. That's how you can conceptually think about it. That is straight up teleportation, right? How is that possible? How is that happening? We're not talking about just one thing changing. We change the state of a system. We changed the state of a system and now this system over here is matching that state. We swapped something out in there. And here's the best part. It's not super luminal. It's not actually going it's or it's it's let's say uh it's not breaking causality. It's not breaking causality. Technically, it's super luminal from our perspective, but there's a delay. There's a measurable delay. It's not perfectly instantaneous. Think about that for a second, guys. This is huge. This tells us how real wormholes work. A real wormhole is not going to send you back in time. It is not going to send you back to 1959. Sorry people. Sorry Edipuses out there. You're not going to be able to sleep with your mother, your grandmother, or whatever. You're not going back in time. At least not according to the wormhole theories that I've seen reading about this. You are basically just jumping through a gap. You're just reaching a shortcut. But there's still travel time. Even in the ether, even if you remove the zero point energy and tunnel through, there's still a travel time component to it. There's still a travel time component. So this experiment, no question, shows transfer of information. information not theoretical information using quantum entanglement explained via EPR equals EP er which is quantum entanglement is essentially equivalent to a wormhole. And what this would mean then too is that what the hell are quantum computers? I I was wondering what a quantum computer was doing before and now I'm just sitting here wondering is a quantum computer them building a artificial brain. I mean theoretically then that would mean a quantum computer is just a bunch of wormholes connected maybe they're tiny or what have you but they're wormholes connecting to the ether connecting to other points in spaceime. Now, here was the big kicker of this. I was reading this scientific paper again, and now I actually understand it more than I understood it before. Starts to actually make sense right now. And I'm going, "Wow, this is not just real. I want to see who's connected to this. Who is working on this experiment? Who indeed? How about Leonard Suskind?" What? So, it turns out the guy that came up with er equals EPR, he was working on that. Whoa. Okay. So, what was the story? I read a different article that show that goes through the whole story of of quantum computers and and wormholes and qu and quantum entanglement. And so it turns out that like Juan Maldina, the other co-author of ER equals EPR, had a theory like 10 years, like 10 years prior in like I don't know the 90s or the 2000s. And all of a sudden, out of nowhere, he's like, "Oh, I might have found something there." And he goes and meets up with Leonard Suskin of Stanford, and they develop this theory of er equals EPR. this idea that a wormhole is equivalent to quantum entanglement. And so what this means is that these guys are not just they didn't just throw an idea out there into the into the you know the public's consciousness. They are like actively trying to prove it. This experiment guys this is the teleportation experiment that everybody wants. People say, "Ashen, when are you going to, you know, make an experiment or build something?" I'm not going to because now I know for sure it's all out there. It's all out there, guys. Like, there you go. You wanted a qu You wanted a teleportation experiment. This is about as good as it gets. We're not going to be teleporting macro objects to do a proof of concept experiment. When you do a proof of concept experiment, you do stuff like this because this shows we can literally teleport information through the ether using cubits. Cubits of information. So the next thing I did was this. I read through that paper again and I found that Medium article I was just showing here. and we'll go back to that Medium article. But I first before I do that, I want to take a look at these. This one here. So then I decided to go back and I said, "Okay, let's take a look at the first ER equals EPR paper." And this is it right here, 2013. Juan Maldina and Leonard Suskin. This is the ER equals EPR scientific paper. And so I read back through this general relativity. Can I zoom in there? General relativity contains solutions in which two distant black holes are connected through the interior via a wormhole or Einstein Rosen bridge. These solutions can be interpreted as maximally entangled states of two black holes that form a complex EPR pair. We suggest that similar bridges might be present for more general entangled states. In the context of an entangled black hole, one can formulate versions of the amps paradox and resolve them. This suggests possible resolutions to the firewall paradoxes. So, one of the things they were talking about is when we talk about coherence, can we actually get an object to coherently move from over here to over here? There's only when we look at quantum mechanics, there's only a possibility that we're going to find the electron in one point or the other. So, how do you maximize that? How do you get through the firewall? The firewall is the barrier. How do you get through that? This paper argues that they there is no firewall, that we can actually perfectly teleport things. I I mean I'm kind of that's crudely pointed it out. Okay. Um what do I want to point out here on this paper? Okay. So one thing I want to point out is anti-deitter space is not quite exactly the same but very similar to the idea of zero point energy. Anti-sitter space is very similar to this idea of zero point energy. So if you see ads written around here which you will see like there it is right here. See this ads framework talking about anti-deitter space. So when they're talking about anti-itter space, you can just imagine the ether. You can just imagine the ether. That makes this a lot simpler to understand. Okay. And then we have our penrose diagrams down here. I'm trying to think. You know what? I should have took some screenshots of the stuff that I wanted to review on here. Sorry guys, I didn't do go through it. Okay, I'm going to read a couple paragraphs here on this. Cool horizons for entangled black holes. The entangled black holes described by Penrose diagram have no firewalls and an observer who falls through the horizon does not feel anything special. But it is easy to change this. Um actually I'm just going to explain it because it's just going to be easier. So what this scientific paper I think shows is that you can create a bubble and if you create a bubble that bubble can be considered a quantum bit of information. the bubble, the wormhole around MH370 can be considered one of those quantum bits, one of those quantum bits that we were looking at in that previous experiment. And if that's the case, then that means that we can actually detach that area of spaceime. Cut it out. Cut it out. And it also argues that essentially you can just take slivers slivers of spaceime you know of of uh because time is you know a moving measurement and we can cut that out at one point and place it somewhere else. Place it somewhere else in our observable reality. Um, one of the other things that it mentions in that scientific paper is, and I'm not sure about this part, but that I think it's necessary for the object to be encapsulated. Like you can't fall through the black hole unless that black hole was like permanently fixed there. But we can only keep the wormhole open for a brief second. So it may be either difficult or impossible to actually go through the black hole, go through the portal. you might have to actually be on the inside to make it happen. This also means this scientific paper means there's actually limitations to it as well. So one of the things that I will show here that I do remember now and here here's the graph right like there it is guys that's that's what's happening right there see this bridge connecting those two points that's it that's our these flat surfaces are our reality that's our real reality not the illusion that we see and you can make these vortexes in it just like that it's basically like a cutting paste. This part right here as well is actually pretty interesting because this I think to me this visualization right here is like making a divot in spaceime making a bump in spaceime using electromagnetism. It says um what does it say? One one considers a geometry with a constant magnetic field. The pair of black holes is described by uclitian instant instaton instant geometry. There is one a there is a one parameter or family of instatons. What is this word instant that describe the creation of a black pair pair of black holes of various sizes. These dominant cases correspond to the creation of relatively small black holes. These black holes are close to extremality. Ext ext ex extremal black holes have a fixed charge to mass ratio. Okay. I don't know. Um, okay. The part I wanted to show is actually something different down here. No super luminal travel. Where is it? Bridges for less than maximal equation. So part of this or uh scientific paper also just has to do with the idea of how do we confirm how do we ensure that we can actually make something go through the black hole. Growth of the bridge. Where is it? This is longer than I thought. Okay, here's the er equals EPR part. There are similarities between entanglement and Einstein rose and bridges that we want to call attention to. In fact, we are going to take the radical position that in a theory of quantum gravity, they are inseparably linked even for systems consisting of no more than a pair of entangled particles. No super luminal signals. At first sight, both entanglement and Einstein roads and bridges seem like strange violations of locality. How can you go faster than light? But in both cases, they do not provide mechanisms for super luminal signal propagation. So when they're saying super luminal signal propagation, they're saying that yes, you can teleport, but you're not going to show up before you arrived. There's no way you can ever show up before you arrive. That's not possible. That's not actually physically possible. Not according to this math, this science, etc. This scientific paper at least, let's say. So, what this means is you're not going back in time. And this is actually consistent with what John Kramer said in his non-locality dur. Highly recommend you check that out if you haven't. It is easy to prove that no local operation on one member of an entangled pair can influence the other before a classical signal can propagate between them. So a classical signal is still propagating between them before action occurs. The situation is same for Einstein Rosen Bridge shows that no signal can propagate through the wormhole from one exterior region to the other. Okay, so that's a really big part about this. Now let's go and take a look at let's just go to the conclusion now on this one. Oh, this is the part I wanted to show. Yep. Hawking radiation. I had never actually seen this. But right here they explain that Hawking radiation can be thought of as black can be thought of as entanglement as wormholes. Why does Hawking radiation escape the black hole? And why does it not do it all at once? Well, this is essentially like the sprinkler. It's eating up all that matter and it's shooting it out. Shooting it out in different locations, right? So this actually to me opens the door to a white hole. What is a white hole? A white hole is the opposite of a black hole. Black hole is sucking everything in. A white hole shooting everything out. And they don't have to be next to each other. They can be anywhere. So maybe there are multiple infinite universes. Maybe the big bang is actually just Hawking radiation shooting out of a black hole somewhere. Just a thought. Throwing that out there. Okay. Now, let's just go down here to the bottom. Damn, this paper is super long. Okay, I didn't read all of this. I only read about 20 pages or so. Haven't had time. Conclusion. H. Okay, the most interesting for us is that it represents the geometry of two distant black holes which have been created in a certain maximally entangled state. Pair creation of near extremal black holes in an external electric field provides an explicit example of the creation of maximally entangled black holes. Right here it connects the idea of vacuum polarization of using electricity to induce a black hole to induce an entangled particle pair. Right there we claim that any pair of entangled black holes will be connected by some Einstein Rosen bridge. So if this is true then all black holes have some form of wormhole. The Einstein Rosen bridge is a manifestation of entanglement. So actually real wormholes are just entanglement scaled up. We further suggest that the connection is more general than just black holes. This the connection is more general than just black holes. So right here, this is the part where this is why they got involved in the EPR experiments because they're saying this isn't just black holes. We're talking about literally teleporting stuff. We're talking about quantum entanglement. What are the implications of quantum entanglement? Well, uh how about consciousness? for one consciousness and then here we go. This is where the ER equals EPR was born. The general principle relating to an Einstein Rosen bridge and entanglement we summarize by the relation ER equals EPR. Chills chat. I get chills because this is going to be famous in the future. They're right. They're not just right. This is exactly er equals EPR is real. The MH370 videos prove it beyond any shadow of a doubt because that's exactly what's going on in the MH370 videos. And when Leonard Suskin and these guys talk about the bulk, the bulk, they're talking about the medium. They're talking about the ether plus everything else on top of it. Black holes created by collapse are usually considered to be one-sided. But as a normal one-sided black hole evaporates, it effectively becomes two-sided. By the er= EPR principle, it is connected to the outgoing radiation by a complex Einstein Rosen bridge with many outlets. The outlets connect the bridge to the black hole and to the radiation quanta. So basically saying that the radiation coming out of the black hole is happening through wormholes. It's happening through wormholes. We emphasize that to describe the interior of max black hole we would have to know how it's entangled. But also, I think what this means here to me, what this means here to me is that our wormhole is a one-way trip. Our wormhole is a one-way trip. We're creating a magnetic monopole. You're sucking something out of here and you're reappearing it over here. And you have to perfectly encapsulate, maybe not perfectly, but you have to encapsulate our object that we want to move. So that would mean that we're not opening a portal and having a portal where people are walking into it and going through and appearing on the other side. So this is the type of wormhole we are dealing with is exactly what they're describing in this scientific paper. It's exactly it. And then it gets kind of complicated about the wave function. Now, I couldn't really follow all the wave function stuff, but we already know and understand that part of it because we were watching the optical vortices um scientific presentation where they were talking about understanding how the vortex works through the ether and solving Schrodinger's equation. There you go. That's the answer. Now, now I want to switch over. Actually, there's one more thing here. This part here. Oh, did it just go this part here? Okay, this part. It seems to be a good strategy to formulate behind the horizon physics in terms of Wheeler Dwit wave functions right here. Wheeler dwit wave functions. Now, I haven't really looked this up to see this exactly what this is yet, but my guess is that this is figuring out the Schroinger equation. Something like that. Consider ordinary anti-deitter space gauge gravity duality. The bulk duel of a Schrodinger picture of wave function. It is in the boundary theory is not an instantaneous state in the bulk. It is much better to think of it as a Wheeler dwit wave function of the whole space-time region obtained by combining all space-like surfaces that end at the boundary slice. What is this saying? This is like saying that we only need the boundary of the spacetime. We actually don't care about what's inside of it. We don't have to worry about mapping every single atom in the body that we want to teleport. Instead, we just need to worry about the boundary condition like a bubble. Like we just need to worry about the bubble of our boundary condition. Then what's inside of it is not really going to matter anymore. That's what how I interpret this conclusion in this scientific paper. It is much better to think of it as a wave function of the whole space-time region obtained by combining all space-like surfaces that end at the boundary slice. So the way I think of it and he says in the same way we should not think of an Einstein rose and bridge as an instantaneous configuration. We shouldn't think of it as an instantaneous configuration. It is a space-time region of the type shown in these various figures. Different types of Einstein rows and bridges refer to different types of space-time regions that end on a particular boundary slice. So actually what he's saying is that when you really dig down to the physics, when you really add in this idea of the ether, you actually have multiple different wormhole possibilities. Now, cuz you could have a wormhole possibility where we just suck something out in a bubble and then it reappears over here. You could also have a wormhole possibility where there's just like a mirror and you walk through it and you walk back. Why? Because at the end of the day, a wormhole is a representation of geometry. It's a representation of geometry of spacetime. You're taking that flat surface and you just bend it like this. And now the two points that were distant are now connected. geometry and it seems weird. It seems magical because we don't perceive it actively, but it's real. It's it's 100% real and it's measurable. The bridge between two entangled systems depends on the particular entangled state that we consider and not only on the total amount of entanglement. We believe that similar things are true in the cases of black holes connected to radiation by an Einstein Rosen bridge. Okay, sweet. So, that paper was pretty sweet. Also, let's go back to this now. So, this was I think written by one of the scientists that she either worked on that or she worked on uh the CERN. So, what was this about this that I wanted to check out? A consequence of the holographic principle. Uh yeah, here we go. Okay, so here she is talking about Hawking radiation and basically talking about I think how that hawking radiation might be connected to a wormhole. A consequence of the holographic principle and this concrete realization in the anti-itter space correspondence is that non-gravitational systems with sufficient entanglement may exhibit phenomenon characteristic of quantum gravity. The anti-deitter space not a conformal field theory correspondence is best understood as an incarnation of the holographic principle which means there's an exact equivalence or duality between the two types of same systems theories of quantum gravity on the one hand and lower dimensional theories that feature quantum mechanics but not gravity. So the quantum gravity in the lab term means that non-gravitational side of duality is physically realized as a strongly coupled system in a low energy physics laboratory in the context of size winding in holographic teleportation. Now this size winding term new term chat what happened? So that experiment that I was showing you guys, they took the seven quantum bits, added a quantum bit, and then it teleported over here. They saw there was a pattern when it happened. Like they saw something. I I haven't really been able to figure out exactly what they saw, but she says they saw something and how it transferred over that shocked her. Like she had like an ontological experience, like like ghosts are real kind of situation. And they came up with this term called size winding. Size winding. My interpretation from what I've been able to read about the term size winding, which is not very much right now, is it is basically like figuring out the vortex motion in the ether. It's basically like figuring out, okay, how do we control this phenomenon? How do we explain this phenomenon this this connected string between these two points? Oh, well, we can refer to it as size winding. That's how I understand it right now. I reserve the right to change my mind in the later as more information comes forward. So, anything you guys know about size winding, put it in the put it in the comments, put it in the chat. Okay. Um, okay. In the in this language, the quantum hardware lives on the boundary. So uh let me see here. Where was part? Okay. Teleportation by size is a new mechanism for teleporting quantum information inspire. Oh, this is the part that I wanted right here. This is the part I was waiting for. Inspired by traversible wormholes in gravity. introducing the concept of size winding which is an anesat or ansats for thermal operator near scrambling time proposed as a general diagnostic of signals traversing the wormhole. Okay, so if we look at these graphs it makes more sense in my opinion. What are they saying here? When we look at these graphs they're saying that we can actually anticipate the wave function as we shoot the message through the ether. we can figure out what it's going to look like on the other side. Why? Because we can actually figure out these degrees of freedom and we can say, "Oh, well, we sent it in with this wave function, but then when it came back out, it came out with this wave function. Oh, well, we can actually just solve Schrodinger's equation and figure out, okay, well, what did it do when it went through the bulk when it went through the ether? Oh, it must have gone like this." Essentially, that's what this looks like to me right here. There you go. Um this is not an abstract theory. I the experiment was done on Sycamore's uh quantum computer. So you can check out that. It's already out there uh 100%. You can see it. You can see the information get passed from one side to the other. This right here is an explanation for how it works from a geometric perspective. Right? This property of size distributions gives a clean mechanism for operator transfer that abstracts how geometrical wormholes work at the level of the boundary theory. And I'm not going to go through the examples here, but you can see they explain each one of the four different states right here as well. Okay. Now, here's a bunch of math. If you want to know the math in the equations for trying to solve the wave function, positive, negative, blah, blah, blah, check it out. Then I found this part down here at the bottom, the references. So she referenced wormholes in the laboratory. So here's more scientific papers. You can check it out yourself. Quantum gravity in the laboratory, teleportation by size, and traversible wormholes. There's multiple of them. Adam Brown, bunch of other people, and then who's this? Leonard Suskind right there. right there. So, uh, did I not find this one? Teleportation by size in wormholes. Do I have that one up somewhere? Thought I had that up. I guess I don't have that one up at the moment. But so, uh, if you dig into that, you'll see that they've pretty much dug in and they've found out, uh, how, uh, wormhole theory connects to quantum mechanics. And they've been using these quantum computers to run these experiments to show I, I think, basically solve teleportation, but on these tiny scales, or at least, you know, quantum information passing. Sorry, I just messed up my screen thing here. So, the other paper I want to show is this. Oops. [ __ ] Oh, Rumble. Travis donation. Thank you very much, Travis. That donation says, "Can you personally vouch for the Liberty Engine?" No, I cannot personally vouch for the Liberty Engine. I have not worked on the Liberty Engine. Um, but thank you very much for that donation. Appreciate you very much, Travis, for that. Okay, so this scientific paper right here, traversible wormholes in four dimensions. I think this was referenced in the other paper. I think that's how I came across this one. But if you just Google now traversible wormholes. So the other scientific paper that I just mentioned that reference, I recommend checking that out. I think I put a link in the in the YouTube description also explains the concept of ER equals EPR and quantum entanglement connecting to teleportation. But then the next part is how do you make it traversible? How do you make it so that you can actually go through it? So Juan Maldsina has been working on this. I think this scientific paper also made some headway because it was one thing to say okay teleportation is real. We can transfer information. We can teleport information, right? It's another thing to say that we can actually go through a wormhole and survive and be on the other side of it. You're not going to get stretched and ripped. Um, and it's funny. I see a lot of people, you know, a I think what's wrong with a lot of people out there is that you don't think for yourselves. A lot of a lot of people out there, they never they don't think they've ever had an original thought in their whole lives. For a lot of people, the only information that they accept is information that they, you know, Googled or what have you, and then they trust that person to tell them the truth. And and what you're going to learn here, a lot of you, is that your whole lives have been a lie. Everything about your whole lives has been a lie. Everything you've been googling to tell you the truth is a lie. Um, the experts that you have trusted to tell you the truth are completely full of [ __ ] and they don't know anything. They're dumber than rocks or in some cases just straight up lying to you. Straight up just lying to your face. These experiments, the experiment that I showed you is 100% proof of information travel using quantum mechanics potentially. It appears to be a super luminal signal, quantum entanglement, but there's a there's a delay. And the delay basically corrects for faster than light issues, aka the signals are not super luminal. Signals are not super luminal. So what that means from the perspective from a physical perspective is that you can go through that worm. You can have the plane get teleported out of the sky like this, right? And it can appear over here and it appears like it got over there faster than the speed of light, but it didn't. It didn't. And there's no reality in which this plane gets over here before it arrives. That's not possible either. Now, that seems weird, but that's that's what the science says. That's what the science says, guys. If you disagree, feel free to explain it. Right? The beauty of science, and this is the true science, real science. The beauty of science is it's not afraid to be challenged. It's not afraid to be challenged, but don't just come with that's not how it works. My expert told me that's not how it works. You can't do this. Explain why. Explain why. That's the part where people who are skeptics, the people that just read like what they saw on YouTube or what the AI told them, they can't explain why. They just say, "Well, that's just what I read." Right? And this is what you'll see as well is like if you look at MH370 is a good example. If you ask the AI, it'll just tell you a bunch of [ __ ] that's just objectively not true. And if you argue with it, it'll just keep repeating the same [ __ ] over and over again. So, okay, let's go back to this real quick. So, the abstract says we present a wormhole solution in four dimensions. It is a solution of an Einstein Maxwell theory. Einstein Maxwell plus charged massless firmians. Firmian is the counterpart to a um Bzon. Firmians cannot occupy the same point in space and time. The firmians give rise to a negative casmir like energy which makes the wormhole possible. It is a long worml that does not lead to causality violations in the ambient space. It can be viewed as a pair of entangled near extremal black holes with an interaction term generated by the exchange of firmian fields. The solution can be embedded in the standard model making its overall size small compared to the electroeak scale. So what what is he saying here once again? He's saying that you can think of a wormhole as two black holes being connected. And he's saying that you are not going to violate causality. Anytime you see not violate causality, you're not going back in time, chat. Sorry, you're not going back to 1940. No causality violations. So he's essentially saying here that we can create a black hole. What was the other thing he said here? Um, firmian fields. The firm fields give rise to a negative kasmir-l like energy. So he's saying this negative concept of negative energy. It's a misrepresentation. If you are a classic physicist, then you can think of it in terms of anti-itter space and decitter space interacting with one another. Interacting with one another. So the interaction between them, these fields, is this casmir-l like energy. We're creating our bubble. Our bubble. That's our negative energy that we need. Oh, one thing I wanted to measure about the or mention about the measurements of the wormhole. So, an operator needs to happen. There needs to be some action that occurs, some measurement that occurs. What the measurement they do when they have their seven entangled cubits? They spin it. They spin it. That's what they do. So, they replace out their cubit. They put their new cubit in there and they spin it and then the other side just updates. So there may be yet another reason why the orbs are spinning around the plane. There may be yet another reason why the orbs are spinning around the plane. Maybe to initiate the operation of the the operator of the actual wormhole event. So what I think is happening based on uh let's let's read uh actually this is good. What I think is happening then in the case of MH370 and yes, I want to show this as well. This actually reminds me of something. I think that we have three orbs spinning around the plane over here, right? You got your plane. Got the orbs spinning around the plane. I think there are three orbs somewhere else as well. Entangled, maybe even spinning oppositely. I don't know if I can do that right. And then what's happening is there's this phase singularity happens when the orbs converge and then they disappear over on one side and they reappear on the other side or however you want to think of it. That's how I imagine it happening. And what they're doing, why are they spinning around the plane? They're creating that entanglement between the two points. You can imagine it like creating long invisible tendrils through the ether through the ether. And they've when they do that and they create this bubble they've created they've passed through the firewall or however you want to think of it they quantum tunnel through the spaceime and they get attracted to the location in which they're entangled to attracted to the location which they're entangled to. That is what I think is actually literally happened to MH370. So I'm not talking about aliens didn't take the plane or some [ __ ] like that. I'm not talking about they didn't go back in time. They're not going to show up in the year 2050 or anything like that. They literally were instant transmitted with a with a time delay involved. And the time delay prevents retrocausality, prevents back in time travel. And all of this, the craziest part about all of this is all just normal physics. I mean aside from the part that I said earlier about unification of ma of Maxwell's equations and electromagnetism and gravity and Einstein and uh quantum mechanics but the rest of it is just normal physics this is all just normal Einstein general relativity right and that's what all these papers keep saying is they keep saying like we solve this in a way where general relativity is perfectly consistent perfectly maintained or we in some cases they say we're able to define the equations of general relativity from which means it must be I mean we get to the same equations that that Einstein got to using these methods. So let's just skip through this. Um actually I just want to take a quick look and see if there's anything about rotating rotation and ads. Okay, let's take a look at this chat because now I'm curious about rotations, right? Wormholes at larger distances. I might have to take another look at this now that I know way more about this. Stability of the throat, negative energy, stabilizing the wormhole, directly solving the Einstein equations with quantum matter. Yeah, I want this though. Rotation of anti-deitter space. That's what I want to see real quick. 24. Where's 24? Here it is. Okay. In order to produce a more stable wormhole, we can put the whole rotating configuration in anti-itter space. Now we have a new parameter the anti-itter space radius. If distance is less than the the radius of anti-diserve space and omega radius of anti-disc less than one then we can ensure that the symmetry of the rotating configuration is described by a killing vector which is timelike everywhere. In this case, by weakly coupling the anti-istor space theory to an external system, we can let the black hole cool down and so that thermally thermodynamically stable phase becomes the wormhole one. I'm not going to lie to you, chat. I don't know anything of what that means. I don't know anything what that means, but I just do like the word rotation. I do like the word rotation, chat. Okay. Um, let's go check out the conclusion. We have constructed a traversible wormhole solution in four dimensions. It is the solution of of a theory described by Einstein gravity plus one gauge field plus massless charge firmians. Solutions with this topology are forbidden in classic physics because of the average null energy condition. A null energy condition is called NEC but that gets broken all the time which is positive classically. The idea is to engineer a configuration that generates enough negative null energy via quantum effects so as to make the solution possible. This is achieved by close to extreal black holes with large magnetic charge. Booyah. Magnetism. Electromagnetism guys. There it is. How do we make the wormhole? Electromagnetism is the answer. Electromagnetism charged firmians moving in the magnetic field have a zero energy land level level on the sphere with a large degeneracy proportional to Q which is the charge. These give rise to two to Q twodimensional fields moving along the magnetic field lines in the wormhole configuration. These magnetic field lines describe closed circles. A massless firmian on the on the circle develops a negative energy density. Wow. This negative energy when fed into Einstein's equations makes the wormhole into a solution. To stabilize the mouse, we added rot what? To stabilize the mouse, we added rotation so that they can be kept apart at least for a while until the electromagnetic radiation causes them to lose energy and they eventually merge with each other. Hello. Boom. Gotcha, [ __ ] Uh, that sounds pretty that sounds like vortices spinning around the plane to me, chat. I don't know about you. Until they eventually lose energy and merge with each other. That's exactly what I said was happening, right? Like the orbs are spinning around the plane. You've got your like three positive charge, like one for each orb right over here. And you've got your corresponding three negative charge over here. You stretch them apart just like the rubber band. Chat, where's the rubber band? Where is it? Here it is. You stretch them apart. You stretch your three orbs apart over here. And you stretch your other three orbs here. And when they converge together on the plane, they come together. They come together. And now the plane is over here. Now the plane is somewhere else. So that's how the wormhole effect is happening. You're you've pulled them apart. You slingshot them back together. So I think that most likely what happened when the plane disappeared and came back. The plane appears somewhere else. Maybe not in one piece, chat. Maybe not in one piece, right? Because what did we just see from that scientific paper? What comes into the black hole can get shredded out like a like a spigot. So that thing might have got ripped in a thousand pieces for all we know. But it comes out on the other side and the orbs probably just evaporate. the orbs probably just evaporate because the positive negative charges counteract. Boom. And if there is something inside the orbs, it probably just falls to the ground. Now, there's other options, but I'm just throwing throwing that at you. This also means that the plane teleported it teleported to the future, but it didn't teleport 10 years in the future. It teleported like whatever the distance is divided by the speed of light or something like that. So there was probably a time dilation of like you know a second a few seconds or something like that like practically no time dilation but so it would have appeared as though it was like instantaneous transmission but there would have been a short delay very very short delay before it happened. Okay now I mean okay let's let's keep reading the conclusion here. I didn't realize we were just going to see more yatsi moments here. We should emphasize that this wormhole does not require exotic matter. This wormhole does not require exotic matter. In fact, the ordinary matter of the standard model is enough. The wormhole is metastable. It is a long live solution but not completely stable. The resulting wormhole solution has no horizon and no entropy. It can be viewed as an entangled state of two black holes. The state is close to the thermal field double if there was no interaction between the black. Okay, I don't know what thermal field double means. Okay, it might seem surprising that we get a controllable solution by balancing quantum and classical effects. It does seem kind of weird. It does seem weird, right? So, what he's saying here is that the negative energy comes from the quantum effects like the Casemir effect. That's what he's saying is that this negative energy comes from this quantum effect. It might seem weird that that's the case, but it's true. There are a couple features that make this possible. Okay, let's see what else we got. Oh, there's a Vanderwal's analogy here. The fact that close proximity leads to entanglement is very common occurrence for systems that have several low energy levels. Okay. In our system, instead of atoms, we have black holes with an exponentially large number of energy levels. When they are close to proximity they exchange the charge firmians. This generates an effective Hamiltonian. Okay, let's see what questions are there. Let's see how we going to finish this. Let's see. Um uh this does not describe the system for taking that to a solution. Okay, so we'll describe then the system for taking this to a solution because we can take it to the next level. How did they figure out how to make this happen? Well, they use nukes. They use fusion reactors, plasma orbs, and they got them to converge. Magnetic reconnection kicks in. Super high electromagnetic fields. Electromagnetic fields that have never been seen in any laboratory experiment ever. That's probably what we're dealing with with respect to the orbs. And they are therefore able to manipulate the ether. Manipulate the ether. In fact, the way the orbs are spinning around the plane, the exact phase of the orbs shift is probably a mathematical solution. Like we can quite literally just do the math and be like, "Okay, you need the orbs to be this size and you need them to spin around the plane at this rate, this frequency." All of that stuff is probably mathematically solved. And that's what you're seeing happen with respect to the orbs. So, you're seeing extremely advanced physics, math, and definitely computers are being used for this. Human brains aren't doing this on the fly. This is like a computer solving this math, right? So, it's very possible, in my opinion, that with respect to the movement of the orbs and how they're spinning around like this. It's probably AI calculating on the fly, recalculating on the fly to figure out, okay, if I'm at this point in spaceime, what do I have to do to make the plane appear over there? Teleport, connect to the other orbs. Pretty wild. Okay guys, that's our stream for tonight. Um, so several scientific papers that I recommend. We are on top of Leonard Suskin and Juan Maldsina. The question here is we're staring at videos of the plane of a plane that's still missing to this day, by the way, being teleported out of the sky quite literally using er equals EPR. That right. Well, this is the bulk wormhole. The black hole they were talking about. There it is. That is it right there. The reason why that plane disappears and it looks like it's going through a mirror is exactly described by er equals EPR. This is a quantum effect that we're seeing on the macro scale level. It looks like magic. It looks it looks alien to us. It doesn't look like it could possibly be real to us because our physical reality this doesn't happen very often. This requires lab engineering to make this occur. That's why we don't see this all the time. The question here is who the hell told Juan Maldescina? Who the hell told Leonard Suskind? Do you think that I believe that their first scientific paper for ER equals EPR was one year, not even one year before this plane disappeared? They This is not They didn't just like test this out. Like there's only a couple scenarios here, right? like either Juan Maldina and Leonard Suskin figured this out and they were like the Air Force came to them and the Air Force was like, "Hey, we're going to make some plasma orbs that can teleport a plane. Let's do an experiment. And by the way, we're planning on doing this operation on MH370 anyway. Let's go ahead and zap this with some orbs." No, that's not what happened. They had the teleportation figured out way before Juan Maldina and uh Leonard Susan came along. So the question is who told those guys? Who told him? I think that what happened was Juan Meldina, somebody reached out to him, put a little bug in his ear and said, "You figured this out. You don't even realize you figured out teleportation and said, "Okay, you know, go flesh this out." And then that led them down this path where he goes and reaches out to Leonard Susky and they start working on this science and now they all know it's legit and now they're working with quantum computers because they're trying to figure out how do we make an experiment that proves it etc. That's what I think is going down here. But I'm not sure. What I really want to know is I I want like this is what you need to realize. I saw a Reddit post earlier talking about, you know, Ashton's ignoring these reasons why these videos are fake or what have you. The videos are 100% real. They are no question real. I will eventually be famous because those videos are going to be proven real. Hopefully, it's before I die, but whatever. I don't really care at the end of the day about being famous. Um, ask yourself why Juan Maldescina and Leonard Suskin don't want to talk to me about those videos. Those videos literally prove their science is correct. Proves it. They don't need another experiment. Those videos prove it. Uh, a te ask why why does Charles Chase why does he not want to talk to me about the videos and what I think is going on in the videos and the science behind what's going on in the videos. The guy's whole career is plasma propulsion fusion. Everything we see happening in the videos. Why does a guy like Charles Chase not want to talk to me about those videos? Why is he not at my doorstep begging to knock talk to me? I've got people in the chat right now begging to talk to me. They want to just have a few minutes. my time to talk to me because they want to tell me about, you know, science, engineering. This happens a lot, by the way. So, why did these guys, the guys that are literally working on black projects, why do they not want to talk to me? You would think they would be lined up for it because they know the videos are real, guys. They know the videos are real. They know the physics is real. They know the orbs are real. And they know what the orbs are. They know it better than we know it. That's the reason why Hal Pudof, Eric Davis, Charles Chase, these other guys, why they're afraid to talk because they don't want to break their NBA. In fact, that was actually part of the other clip that I wanted to show. I'm just going to say it. So, Tim Galedet also mentions Danny Jones actually asked a good question. Some credit to Danny Jones. He actually asked one good question. He said, "Why don't these people just come out? Why don't these engineers just come out and say what's going on? And he says, "Well, we signed an NDA. In fact, before you're even allowed to look at the information, you have to sign the NDA ahead of time." They have to say, they come to you and they say, "Hey, we think you have a need to know for this information, but before we even show it to you, you need to sign this NDA that says you go to jail if you mention any of this." That's how the NDAs actually work. And then he says, Danny Jones says, 'Well, but but what? Like, if you just come out publicly and just say what you know, the public will back you up. The public will back you up. And do you know what Tim Galedet says in response? He says, "I will go to jail immediately." I signed something that says, "I am going to go to jail if I say anything." And it has my signature on it. So the answer for all the people out there that say, "Well, they should just come out and break their NDAs, they're too afraid. They are too afraid to break their NDAs because they will 100% go to prison. The United States government does not mess around with national security." So there you go. That's the answer, guys. Now, today's Moment of Zen chat. Well, I guess just to recap real quick, electromagnetism and gravity are unified through the anti-itter space, the zero point energy, the ether. The ether we are in a holographic universe. This actually does not mean that this is a fake simulation. In fact, what we found today means that this universe is real. All the physics that we discovered makes this universe just as real as it is right now. In fact, because we can't go back in time, to me, this means there's not multiple universes. It's just this one. Now, I mean that abstractly. Of course, there can be other universes that we don't see that are out there, but I mean everything that's happening here is really happening. It's really happening. So, there you go. This this is not just a simulation. This is a real universe that we live in. And we can create bridges. Bridges between two points that are not super luminal. They will not go back in time, but they can allow for what we would think of as instantaneous transmission. From our perspective of going through the wormhole, it would seem instantaneous to us, but all of a sudden, we're super far away from where we were before. This is possible because we're pulling two points together. We're pulling two points that were apart, pulling them together, and then we're just hopping across the bridge, right? But in the case of what we see with MH370, it's even weirder than that. What's really happening is the plasma is encapsulating the plane and then this whole plasma bubble is moving from here to over here. The whole bubble is. So it's not dematerializing the plane. No. And it seems like there's a phase matching that's going on. So macroscopic phase conjugation. We're phase matching the plane in one location. phase matching it to a unique let's say a unique frequency. Imagine picking a unique frequency, right? We're like this frequency. We're matching that over here to over here. So that the only place this plane can show up is right here. Just like that. So when the orbs are spinning around the plane, I think almost certainly because of everything we learned here, how it's all real, it's all physical, that we're not going back in time, the orbs are telling us exactly where that plane's going. The orbs are spinning around the plane like this because the plane's going exactly backwards. Exactly backwards in our three-dimensional space that we perceive. That's where the plane is headed. So that is the answer chat. The answer is spinning polyhedral wormhole. The answer is macroscopic phase conjugation. The answer is holographic wormhole. The answer is magnetic wormhole. Magnetic wormhole also meaning the same exact thing. Uh the answer is teleportation. That plane is being teleported. The United States government has teleportation capability. And now we know how it works. Now we know how it works and we know what the limitations are of it. And we know the people that are working on it or at least the people that are working on the science related to it. We found them. I appreciate it. So guys, thank you very much. Um thank you guys. Uh Matt in the pled chat. appreciate you for the shades and thank you everybody else in the ch the pill chat as well for all your support. I appreciate you guys. Guys, tonight our moment of zen, our moment of zen is Richard Fineman. What I want you guys to remember is this. Anybody can understand this. There's a lot of comments in the chat about I I can't I wish I could understand this blah blah blah. You can understand. You can. It does take a little bit of work. And even now you can see that I still struggle with a lot of the concepts. But I've gotten to the point now where I can actually read these wormhole papers and I can understand the what they're trying to convey. You can understand what they're trying to convey and you can get there too. But don't expect it to just be all of a sudden you need to just build your way up to it. That's what I want you to remember. Anybody anybody that researches this can become a scientist can can become an expert on it. For me, what I do is this. I like understanding how things work. I like thinking about how things work. I like thinking about how did this SevenUp can get this SevenUp logo on it. Oh well, somebody must have created a, you know, an artist rendition. They had to go through approval process. There probably was a lot of debates, a lot of meetings that were done about it and then eventually it got handed off to somebody at the can, you know, design manufacturing place and they put it in a machine. That's what I like to think about and that's why I think I'm good at this is why how I figure this stuff out because I want to understand how everything works. If you have that mindset of how does this all work, you will eventually build up your knowledge base to where all of this science, all of this will make sense to you. Now, I want to do a few last donations. Thank you again, Dread, Matt, Dread, uh or Dread, appreciate you. Thank you, Mayo, for the donation. If an observer traverses a wormhole, the system has to collapse the observer's end. Well, so this is where I think you're thinking about it too technically, too. Theoretically, the wormhole is collapsing. We watch the wormhole collapse there, right? Um, and so we watch that wormhole collapse. And when it's collapsing, it's reappearing somewhere else. Hopefully that answers your question. For the person inside the wormhole, you're not going to experience time, right? You just appear instantaneous somewhere else. From the observer on the outside, it looks like teleportation occurred. Zaparoo. Couldn't the quantum computing diagnostic tool of size winding be used to replicate the orb's wormhole? Probably. Probably. I mean, replicate a Boeing 77 disappearing. I don't know. But definitely what we saw with the quantum cubit being exchanged and then passing information faster than the speed of light to a entangled pair or entangled a system. That is where we should be looking. So when we want to be thinking about what do we look at next, these are the kinds of experiments that we want to be looking at these EPR experiments where they're using quantum computers to simulate wormholes. For sure there is a connection between quantum entanglement, these quantum computers and wormholes. And it's all connected through zero point energy. Guys, just remember this. When you wonder whether or not you can learn this, just remember that you listened. Oh, where is it? You listened. Or if you want to know how I learned all this, then you can just remember that all I did to figure this all out was that I listened. And I'm trying to stall for time while I'm looking for the clip for the moment of zen. Oh, that's why it's finement. Right here it is your moment. >> Ask me if an ordinary person by studying hard would get to be able to imagine these things like I imagine. Of course I was an ordinary person who studied hard. There's no miracle people. It just happens they got interested in this thing and they learned all this stuff. They're just people. There's no talent, a special miracle ability to understand quantum mechanics or a miracle ability to imagine electromagnetic fields that comes without practice and reading and learning and study. So if you say you take an ordinary person who's willing to devote a great deal of time and study and work and thinking and mathematics and time and I then he's become a scientist. >> Where did you learn our language? I listened. I listened. Have a good night, M7X. Peace out, guys. I hope you guys enjoyed wormhole disclosure. Hey, Josh. Polarity in the chat. Hope you're having a good night. Peace. [Music] Out in the fields where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorne, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Bowling trip 7 through a wormhole. Flow. We're talking wormholes. Stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole flow. [Music] [Applause] [Music] Exotic matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeeze so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cm force negative zones we need to stay the course. Stalking wormhole star gates negative energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing triple 7 through a wormhole float. Thin shell formalism plate so fine. Spherical geometry we realign. Energy conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a try. [Music] Criminal forces balancing the plate creating the throat. Open the gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. [Music] We're talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Blowing triple 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. Lil Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos.