Video Transcript
Fusion is a much safer option. A next generation of airplanes that doesn't rely on fuel and can just stay aloft. Unlimited range, unlimited endurance. That's okay. So, 5 seconds in and we're listening to like the lead engineer of Loheed Martin's compact fusion reactor. And the very first thing he says is unlimited range, unlimited endurance, no fuel. No fuel on board your plane. That's what compact fusion reactor can do for propulsion. What? Guys, let me just put the timeline for you here. I'm just going to set the timeline for you. That's Tom Maguire. Let me just set the timeline. Loheed Martin's fusion reactor went dark in 2018. Their fusion reactor went dark in 2018. The literally the guy that sold it to the CXOs, his name is Charles Chase. In his resume, he says he's the one that convinced the CXOs and the project was successful and breathing on its own, quote unquote. The you know what year the project that lost $2 billion was started? 2018. The contract in this article says the contract started in 2018. It says right here, fixedpric contracts that were negotiated back in 2018. Is it just a coincidence that Loheed Martin's fusion reactor went dark in 2018 and these fixed price contracts that were related to aerospace advanced aerospace propulsion concepts were started in 2018 and we've got Tom Magguire in the first 5 seconds of his Loheed Martin video saying that fusion is the solution to aerospace propulsion. What could have happened chat could have been anything. Fusion is a much safer option. A next generation of airplanes that doesn't rely on fuel and can just stay aloft. Unlimited range, unlimited endurance. That's what nuclear fusion can do for an airplane. We put it in a magnetic bottle that can contain the high temperatures. You need hundreds of millions of degrees. We can release in a controlled fashion net energy. We think we have a very robust strategy going forward that has potential for success. What this concept does is it's a high beta concept which means we use a high fraction of the magnetic field pressure. We use all of its potential and that means we can make our devices 10 times smaller. So instead of a something the size of a building, we have something the size of a large truck. How are people not making a bigger deal of this? How are people not making a bigger deal of this? Oh, I know. Cuz no one understood fusion. That's why we're doing the live stream tonight because apparently nobody understands fusion because the words here he's saying here should have been like shocking people. The the the Helen Fusion this is like that video is from over 10 years ago. Helen Fusion is saying the same thing this guy was saying 10 years ago but they're saying it now about their reactor they're about to roll out from Microsoft. Right? They're about to roll out a reactor from Microsoft in 2028. This guy is saying the same high beta. High beta. We're not talking like, oh, it's a little bit higher than before. Beta is the magnetic field strength. It's magnitudes higher. Magnitudes higher. This isn't just a small breakthrough these guys figured out. It's a huge one. [Music] The small is the reason we can do this quickly. If something's small, you can build up momentum. You can develop it fast. It doesn't take 5 years to design it. It takes 3 months. We can design it, build it, test it in under a year. We can do several of these cycles and we think we can get to a prototype in 5 years. Every time you do plasma physics, you learn something new. And that's why this is a high-risk, high payoff endeavor. That's what we're doing here is testing that concept out to see if it really holds the promise that it appears to. And as a defense company, our increasing mission is to enhance global security. And this is how we do that in the energy realm. Gas turbines are a huge improvement over other technologies in terms of climate change, but they're only a 50% improvement. We take it all the way. So, no emissions, safe operation, proliferation free. That means we can ship it to the whole world with a good conscience. They don't explicitly say there that it's autonic, but he says it's clean. And I remember they were doing some kind of prototype demonstration and people were freaking out because people were saying, "Oh, there's like X-rays. There's radiation coming off the reactor. You shouldn't be anywhere near it." And they were just chilling, right? They were just chilling and they're going and then people are freaking out. I'm sitting here wondering, I wonder if they're trying to do a neutronic fusion reaction. And it would make sense for why they are doing a neutronic reaction because if they have super high beta field strength, they might be able to achieve temperatures that are required for an autronic reaction. The reason why you might say, hey, if there's this secret way to do fusion, why is everybody not doing it? Well, as we're going to get to, the reason is because it's considered to require a much higher temperature. And from a conventional view of physics and conventional view of fusion, we can't even get this level of temperature. But if all of a sudden they figured out magnetic field strength that just go through the roof now, why are we aiming for the lowest bar? We should be aiming for the highest bar now. That's the difference. The old promise of atoms for peace was a noble one, but ultimately flawed because the technology wasn't right for it. We can achieve that grand vision and bring clean power to the world. the true atomic age can start. 10 years we have great military vehicles. 20 years we have clean power for the world. This isn't online by 2100. This is online by the time I can't even retire after we finish this. No, I still have to find another job after this is done. Okay, chat. You I dare anybody on this earth to tell me that that secret project is not related to their compact fusion reactor. I dare you to tell me it's not related to that compact fusion reactor. It's got to be plasmabased propulsion. Has to be at a minimum, right? And probably could be incorporating the concept of the diffusion reactor. Side note here as well I want to point out. I have been talking quite a bit about whether or not the plasma orbs in the MH370 videos have something inside of them or not. This is actually one of the most hotly contested aspects of the videos is whether or not the orbs are just like a self-contained ball of plasma where the plasma itself is what creates the asymmetry and that's why they can move around or if there's an actual like jet engine type situation without a turbine inside. And I'm open to the idea. Like basically everybody around me is trying to convince me that there's nothing really inside. Or if there is, it's something really really tiny inside. And they're just using like creating an asymmetry that produces this this ball, this coherent ball of plasma. Much like we saw with the with the vortexes in the pool where you create the vortex in the pool and now it's it's self- sustaining, but all you did was you got it started and then it just goes. If they are self-contained plasmoids with no device inside of them, then the fusion reaction reactor concepts are basically taking that idea and they're saying, "Okay, how do we turn that into a fixed thing that's sitting here that's not moving around, something that's stationary?" That's basically what they're trying to figure out. Last clip I want to show you guys is Joseph P. Frell. Joseph P. Pharaoh. I've already played this clip before, but I'm realizing repetition is super important. >> That device that they show in the commercial, it looks like a blown up version of Pho's patents on what he called a plasmater and a fusitor, >> which was a >> So, right here, if you don't know the context of this, these guys asked me, it's Chris and Greg, I think, right? Chris and Greg. Yeah. They asked me if I had any questions for Joseph P. Ferrell. So my questions for Joseph P. Ferrell were on a neutronic fusion cuz I know he knows all about the Manhattan project and nukes and what have you and plasma. And I said, "Okay, well, let's test this guy. What does he know about a neutronic fusion?" And he kind of took it in a direction I was not expecting. He brought up Pho's fuser which was a electrostatic fusion concept little spherical device that he invented in 1965 for IT&T with these little electrodes sticking off of the ball. It's about the size of a softball. And he gave a press conference in 1965 where he claimed that he was trying to get fusion reactions in this little ball fusion. >> And he claimed to have sustained a reaction using these little devices with his vacuum tubes for about half a minute in 1965 >> with Here it comes vacuum tubes. So anyway, he goes dark and then let's listen to the last bit. And these little devices drop off the radar screen from that point on. You never hear about Photh again, much less about these little patents that are there in the record. You can go look at them. Uh IT&T owned the patents. There's a little clue for you. And you never hear from him again. And then all of a sudden, decades later, four decades later, out comes Lockheed Martian with a thing that looks like it's based on Phosworth's patents. So, are they researching a neutronic fusion? You bet you they are. Of course they are. Why? Because if they can make it work, you can have a hydrogen bomb without the necessity for an Abomb. >> Huh. >> Wow. I just thought that was a really huge clip. He says, "Because if you can make it work, you can have a hydrogen bomb, which is a fusion bomb, without the need for an Abomb is a fish bomb." And the way thermonuclear bombs work, a thermonuclear device is a fish bomb that detonates a fusion bomb at the center. So what is he saying there? He's saying if you can get a neutronic fusion to work, you can cause you can create a clean hydrogen bomb. Hydrogen bomb that is not bombarding with radiation and heat. So what that is implying is a direct energy conversion mechanism because if if the energy is not coming off as heat, what's it coming off as? What's the energy coming off as? Oh, it's coming off as what we would think of as an electricity. Electricity, direct energy conversion. This is why the answer to the UFO phenomenon is nukes. Why are they connecting nukes to the UFO phenomenon? Because it's all connected to fusion. And fusion is connected to the ether. 0 point energy. Especially if those orbs of plasma we see don't have anything significant inside of them. Where's the energy coming from for those things to be flying around like that? I mean extracting it from the environment. That must be the way. Okay. So fusion guys, how does fusion work? It's actually very simple. Fusion is very simple. We have two neutrons and we are going to try to force these guys to collide and if they collide they will coalesque and now we will have a new element gets formed. We call it fusion. We call it uh transmutation from one element into the next. And this is again why it goes back why this this whole thing is connected now to nukes is when we're dealing with fusion we're dealing with fishision we're dealing with nuclear power we're dealing with creating new elements we're dealing with alchemy dealing with literal alchemy and the problem is why can't we just do this whenever we want we just force these guys to to collide well there's something called the koolum barrier just like if you have two magnets two similarly charged magnets. The closer you get them together, the more they repel, right? The more they repel. So, we have this coolum barrier that says we can't get these guys together. We can't get them to come together. So, we need to find a way to lower the kulom barrier or another way to force them together. And the conventional view of fusion says that the only way we can do this is we heat it up. We need to heat the plasma up. We heat our plasma up and we look at a Maxwell Boltzman distribution. We can estimate the number of fusion reactions that just should occur based on the temperature. So this is the idea of fusion. So why is it called hot fusion or cold fusion? Because the whole idea of our based on our current understanding, our conventional understanding of physics is that the only way to get fusion to happen is we have to heat it up. The sun we believe is doing it by pressure, gravity, forcing everything together at high temperatures. That's the belief. And yet, for some reason, even though we think we understand how hot fusion works, after decades, after decades, we still have no hot fusion reactor that's producing over unity. No reactor. In fact, we're we only have reactors that can run for several minutes at best. And that's today, right now. They've known about fusion since the 50s or 60s. So we're talking 60 or 70 years where we've known that fusion can work. We've created hydrogen bombs which is a fusion bomb. We had a fusion bomb in the 60s and somehow we still have no fusion reactors on this earth. Isn't that weird? Something must be wrong.