Breakthrough Energy - Aneutronic Fusion

Video Transcript

# Breakthrough Energy - Aneutronic Fusion Malaysian 370 contact 120 decimal 97. [Music] Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [Music] Oh, [Music] [Applause] [Music] I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu. is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him. Takes on his multi-armed form and says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds. Are we good now? Okay, I think we're good now. Uh, are we good? Hey guys, welcome to the live stream. Please tell me if we have some some sound this time. Uh, that was unusual. Okay, are we good? Put a thumbs up in the live stream. Thank you very much, guys. Okay, sorry about that. Thank you guys for being here. Right off the bat, I want to say give yourself a pat on the back if you are one of the uh internet warriors who's been on the front lines for this whole time pushing this information because we have actually formed a community. I don't know if you guys have noticed this, but we have formed a community. We have called ourselves MH370X, but what we care about is getting revolutionary technology to the people. We're basically like Robin Hood, but instead of stealing the gold from the rich elites, we're stealing their super advanced plasma orbs and teleportation technology. That's kind of how we roll. Now, I do also want to say right off the bat, guys, do not disrespect the Moon Train. I know a lot of you guys have been disrespecting the Moon Train, but it got a major major upgrade today, guys. Moon Train's got a major upgrade. If you're not familiar with what the moon train is, Northrup Grumman last year won a contract for a moon a train on the moon. And today, today, look at this. Transportation Secretary Shawn Duffy announces expedited plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon. So, for all my people out there who are not believers in outer space or believers we went to the moon, well, [ __ ] it's about to get really awkward because apparently we're about to have nuclearpowered moon trains. Nuclearpowered moon trains. This is definitely what we need right now, guys. Obviously, the number one priority is nuclearpowered moon trains. I mean, you know what? You think we need like what? Housing and food and shelter for people in America. No, we need moon trains. We need moon trains. But in all seriousness, guys, why are they building moon trains and nuclear reactors on the moon? I can actually only think of one reason. Assuming that that's in any way true sh uh I think the answer is helium 3. Helium 3. There's actually a reason why I brought this up and it's not just a joke. There are only a few fuels that can be used for something called a neutronic fusion. A neutronic fusion. You've probably never heard of that before. Most people had not. A neutronic fusion is the idea that we can make a fusion reaction that does not rely on producing energy through heat. You say, "Well, what what do you mean?" Well, there's more than one kind of energy. We can get electricity. And if we can create any kind of reactor that can produce electricity directly, it's going to be significantly more efficient than any other current form of energy production we have today. We are calling it cool fusion, cool fusion. Tonight I'm going to explain to you guys the difference between hot fusion, cold fusion, and cool fusion. But one of the few a neutronic fuel sources is helium 3. Another one is boron 11 which is the one that we've primarily been focused on. So if there is a helium 3 requirement and it's an extremely rare resource then you could see why they might have some reason to be on the moon for because otherwise why the hell would we why do we need a moon train? Why do we need a reactor on the moon? Doesn't make any sense. Now going back to Twitter, the reason why this community has been so significant is I think that we are representing the plight of the common man. And this is why there's a political angle to this is that we represent the plight of just like I'm a healthcare IT worker and I find out they've got free energy and plasma orbs that can teleport airplanes. That is relevant to me because why am I slaving my ass away 40 hours a week doing a job that's basically irrelevant. AI probably could have done my job. They probably have AI and they could have had it years ago. what's going on with all this? And so that's the reason why this this kind of research that we've been doing together and a lot of you guys have contributed to that research, this is why it's so impactful in terms of shaping the narrative is that we are representing what normal people want, people on the streets want. As re with respect to the rest of the UFO community, there's this glamorous idea, this fantasy that the aliens are going to come and like change our civilization or help us or be our saviors or be our reckoning or what have you. Nobody's coming to save us, man. Nobody's coming to save us. And I'm not saying aliens aren't real. I'm saying we've got to do it ourselves. We can't depend on them. And we have been shaping the narrative ourselves through this research. If you don't think that, I mean, check this out. I couldn't even believe some of the stuff I was checking out this weekend. This was one of the biggest ones right here. Gary Nolan, notorious Ashton hater, chat. Notorious Ash, like he doesn't say it, but he you can see it in his eyes. You can see it in his eyes. He blocked me a while back. I mean, he blocks everybody, but he did block me a while back. But here he is. He's He's quintessential woke disclosure. Quintessential woke disclosure. And here he is saying, "Oh, he he decided to do the math. He decided to ask the question that we've been asking, which is, what is the energy source of your little UFOs?" It's like, "Oh, you say there's these UFOs flying around that are coming from Andromeda or whatever, or we don't know where they're coming from. They could be coming from anywhere." Okay, what's the energy source? What's allowing them to do that? Well, do some napkin math and you find out that that energy source is that needs a huge amount of energy. Either they've figured out that they can produce energy for basically nothing that super efficiency or they essentially just have unlimited energy. The aliens basically must have a free energy device. So, here you go. Listen to Gary Nolan say in his own words >> actually just last night I was doing some calculations about how much energy it would take to create a one- ton tic tac out of energy and it's something like 10 the 18 billion uh you know Hiroshima bombs is the amount of energy it would it would require to do that. So if if they are creating it to them energy is a non-expenditure right energy isn't costly to them if that's what they're doing. Uh so I mean Kevin New has shown I think quite convincingly that the objects that if they're one ton and they're moving from point A to point B at the acceleration and deceleration that they accomplish then you're talking there about you know 1100 gawatt of uh of energy. um to do that. I mean again that's like the entire energy output of the planet for a year. Um so okay again to them energy seems a meaningless concept >> actually just last >> so let me just go ahead and ask you here what do you think is bigger the idea that we're not alone in the universe or free energy for the rest of all time? Free energy for the rest of eternity. Um, I'm going to go ahead and say that free energy is a little bit more important than whether or not the aliens are green or have three titties or have big butts. It's just it's slightly more important for me. But who am I? I'm just some guy that works in a healthcare IT job that just wants free energy for the world. What what what do I care? What do I matter? But the fact that we have Gary Nolan even saying that, that's a huge step forward, guys. They were not going to start talking about teleportation and free energy for years. For years. They still haven't talked about teleportation yet. But wait, they're going to start talking about teleportation soon as well. They're going to start talking about maybe the aliens figured out how to teleport. And I'm going to sit there and go, "Uh, yeah. How do you think they're getting here? They're not taking the Greyhound bus. They aren't flying those SpaceX rockets. They definitely aren't flying on asteroids or meteors either. Like get out of here with that. So, we have been shaping the narratives. And to see Gary Nolan now coming out going, "Oh, I wonder what the energy sources." That's a huge W for this community. Huge W for this community. So, a lot of people, one of the big questions that I get, especially around the MH370 videos, is when are we going to get this disclosure? When are we going to get this disclosure? The answer is, I don't know. I don't know when it's going to happen. But you can see that we've accelerated it along. They were not even close to revealing this information before we came along. And now you can see that the narratives have clearly shifted. Now there's another and just to clarify the energy source. So what we're saying is if you've got this flying saucer flying around um you know how is it floating there what Gary Nolan's saying the amount of energy required to keep it there or to make it move around like this or to teleport based on our understanding of physics is this huge amount of energy. The answer to that question is the ether is the zero point energy. But it's also just making a system that's so efficient that what looks like a huge amount of energy actually just is a really really efficient use of energy. Probably a combination of all of those things. All of those things. So that's that answer. Now the other thing is this Lockheed Martin situation. This Loheed Martin situation is pretty unusual, guys. So, let me find the link to this one. There you go. Oh, Lockheed Martin. There it is. There's been some version of this post for like all weekend. Loheed Martin has reportedly hinted at possessing advanced unreleased aerospace prototypes, potentially mindbending new technology according to Ross Kolhart. Um, you mean like the thing that I've been saying for a couple years? Like the exact thing that I've been saying? The thing that everybody else has been saying? No, they couldn't possibly have reverse engineered the alien physics and the alien science. There's no way humans could understand any alien technologies. Oh, now all of a sudden everybody's saying that now it's legit. Here we go. Let's listen. We got a clip. Here we go. We got a clip. >> I do believe that um the 2004 tic tac incident uh had Loheed Martin at the helm. Uh, and it's interesting to see a >> Wow. Wow, Chad, this is cra This is crazier than Tucker Carlson taking shots at Nick Fuentes, bro. What? How? Are you serious right now? Are you Are you serious? The gall the the absolute like these people have no shame whatsoever. How fake do you have to be? How fake do you have to be to go on major news like this after you you badmouth me? You lie about me. You make up fake death threats about me. This guy literally made up fake death threats about me. Really? 100%. And then to just go and be like, "Oh yeah, I totally believe that Loheed Martin Loheed Martin's got the technology." What? Yeah. Anybody that's reading my Twitter post can can figure that one out. Ross, good journalism, bro. Here's some journalism. How about Did you ask Loheed Martin what happened to their compact fusion reactor? Did you ask them where that went? No, of course not. Did we ask any questions at all? Nope. No questions to be asked. We're just reporting things. >> A congressman of the status of representative Berles, who of course is a member of the uh transparency oversight committee, uh making these statements. I think we can all say watch that space. I'm certainly interested to hear more. It's perhaps opportune also to point out that in their own corporate advertising, Loheed Martin has indicated very recently that it has magical new technology in as yet unreleased aerospace prototypes. What is Loheed Martin talking about? I think I know, but let's just wait and see. One of the risks for America is catastrophic disclosure. Maybe this is a good time for the president and the national security council and indeed uh blue chip defense aerospace companies like Loheed Martin, Northrup Grman to seriously think about coming clean with the American public. It doesn't require the secrets of that technology to be >> Does it feel like he's sad, chat? Some people are saying, "Yeah, it feels like he's trying." He kind of seems sad. Yeah, this is like doesn't you get weird vibes from this too, right? The way he's saying this like kind of somber like this seems like like he's not really excited about saying this. I want to watch this last part again. blue chip defense aerospace companies. Look at those blinks. Northre Grman to seriously think about coming clean with the American watch. Ros doesn't require the secrets of that technology to be disclosed. But the mere fact that they exist is something that I think cannot justifiably be uh withheld from the knowledge of the public any longer. Bro, t say say marshmallow if they have you. Prisoner lock. Rosart. Roshart. If a deep state has you, brother. Marshmallow is the secret code phrase. Let me know. Pass it on to me. Pass it on. Okay. So, if you're not familiar, that was Deep State Ross. Um, I'm going to go ahead and play the best video that's ever existed. Uh, wait. Do I have it? Deep State Ross. Wait. Oh, yeah. Here we go. We got it. Here we go. >> Oh, wait. That's not it. >> That's not That's not it. Oh my goodness. Failure chat. Here it is. >> What the [ __ ] is that? UFOs. What the [ __ ] are you talking about? Ross, are you deep state? It's news a Ross egg shake. Now you're talking. Told her I didn't do blow. Now she walking. Ross, what the [ __ ] is that? UFOs, what the [ __ ] are you talking about? Are you nation? [Music] Okay, that's Tupac. Love it, guys. Uh, not to hate on Rods. Apparently, these people have very sensitive feelings. They get quite upset when you meme on them, chat. So, let's not hurt his feelings. Now, that story is not a lie. That story is 100% true about Loheed Martin having magical technology. So there was this story that Loheed Martin lost $1.6 billion dollars in some advanced technology classified program. I thought it was going to be kind of BS or something. I dug into it. Actually, it's real. They literally wrote down $1.6 $6 billion in profit due to a fixedpric contract for some sort of classified aerospace technology. And they wrote down another $500 million last year as well. So in the last two years, Loheed Martin has written down more than $2 billion in profits from this contract over this advanced technology now. And it's profits, I believe, not revenue. So, it's important to keep that in mind because losing profits doesn't mean you're I mean, technically your company's stock price is going to go down, but you're not like firing people, you know, maybe downsize a little bit, but it's not the end of the world. Now, there's a bunch of links to this where you can find this here, and they talk about magical technology. Let's just take this men's journal link here right now. Loheed Martin's magical classified project that will be gamechanging. The project still shrouded in mystery will be in high demand for a long time once it's been released. During the earnings call, Locky Martente's magical classified aeronautics program, there's going to be a very high demand once it's finished. In the same demand, they reported an 80% drop in second quarter profits, mostly due to this classified project. There it is. Read it and weep. The Loheed Martin CEO fielded questions about the pre-tax loss of $1.6 billion on July 22nd earnings call. The classified aeronautics program is to blame for much of the loss due to fixedpric contracts that were negotiated back in 2018. So the this is actually important. Why did they lose the money? It's not because it doesn't work. It's not because it doesn't work. This is actually because of a contract issue. Basically, what happens? They said, "We will deliver these products. We will deliver you 1,000 plasma orbs and the price will be $1 billion, whatever, $2 billion, $10 billion, who knows? And then what happened was they realized, oh no, their costs went over. They couldn't supply the thousand plasma orbs. It was too expensive. So now they're losing money on it. Something like that. That's the idea behind this is that they wrote a contract and they gave it to the government for too cheap and now they're losing. They have to write down a bunch of money, but the plasma orbs still work. The plasma orbs are still magical plasma orbs that can teleport a plane away. So that's why you hear the Loheed Martin guy say, "Yes, we lost a bunch of money on this, but it's going to be technology that's classified that's going to change the world." How crazy is that? Especially after like put in context now this video of Elon Musk chat >> unless it's completely in these weapons manufacturing corporations. >> I mean I know these weapons manufacturing companies like from Boeing Lucky to Northrup. I mean, yeah, they do some interesting things, but uh they do not have I there's no breakthrough that uh they have. >> So, >> I'm confident. >> Chat, who should I listen to? >> They do not have a breakthrough. >> When you hear people >> like why don't they just compete with SpaceX and make a better rocket in which case the you know >> they can make Why are they holding back on making um a lot of money from beating SpaceX with better rockets? Well, that clip is going to haunt Elon Musk for the rest of his natural life. On one hand, we've got Elon Musk saying, "I know Loheed Martin. I know all 50,000 100,000 employees. They don't have any magical technology. I know Northrup Grumman. They don't have any magical technology. If they did, why wouldn't they compete with SpaceX?" On the other hand, I've got Lheed Martins. Is he the CEO? Who was it? CEO of Loheed Martin saying, "We have magical technology. It's just classified, but don't worry, it's going to change the world forever." I mean, I'm paraphrasing, but there you go. I got to be honest. Elon is not lying, guys. He's not lying. He just literally doesn't know. Nobody would embar somebody like him would never say what he's saying on a platform like Joe Rogan because when the technology comes out, anybody who knows about this technology knows it's coming out. It's just a matter of when. You don't want to have all these clips about you looking like an idiot when the technology comes out. That's why you don't see Hal Pudof go on Joe Rogan and say, "No, Loheed Martin doesn't have anything." Because he knows they do. Hal Pudof knows they do. Elon Musk is out of the loop. Elon Musk is not in the club. Elon Musk doesn't know. He thinks he's on the forefront of engineering. And that's how they like it. They like him to think he's on the forefront with these little rockets shooting them in the sky. They're like, "Yeah, sure. You think you're the the premier game, Elon M? We're the Air Force, but sure, your little uh combustion rockets. We're going to get to the moon. We're going to get to Mars on those combustion rockets." Mhm. Okay. So, the next clip though, now people might say, you know what, I'm just going to go ahead and let let's just take credit for it. Why not, guys? We made Loheed Martin lose $2 billion, chat. We made Loheed Martin lose $2 billion. How? Because we exposed their plasma orbs. What else has happened over the last two years that could mess up a contract? Uh, I don't know. How about some guy and his like bang band of uh like science researchers finding out that you're hiding compact fusion reactors and plasma orbs that can fly around in the sky and teleport planes. That can cause somebody to lose billions of dollars. For sure. For sure. So, we're going to go ahead and just say it, guys. We caused Lockheed Martin to lose $2 billion. If they want to disagree, then they can just tell us what they how they lost the money. Just tell us how you lost the money. Then you can just clear up any of these misconceptions about whether or not MH370X made you lose $2 billion. And for And here's the thing, anybody that disagrees, anybody that says no, you there's no way there's no way that you're right about the Loheed Martin and the plasma orbs and whatever. Um, where is it? Uh, wait, where did I put it? Oh, yeah. Here it is. Okay, just watch this. Fusion is a much safer option. A next generation of airplanes that doesn't rely on fuel and can just stay aloft. Unlimited range, unlimited endurance. That's what nuclear fusion can do for an airplane. Okay, so 5 seconds in and we're listening to like the lead engineer of Loheed Martin's compact fusion reactor. And the very first thing he says is unlimited range, unlimited endurance, no fuel. No fuel on board your plane. That's what compact fusion reactor can do for propulsion. What? Guys, let me just put the timeline for you here. I'm just going to set the timeline for you. That's Tom Maguire. Let me just set the timeline. Loheed Martin's fusion reactor went dark in 2018. Their fusion reactor went dark in 2018. the literally the guy that sold it to the CXOs. His name is Charles Chase. In his resume, he says he's the one that convinced the CXOs and the project was successful and breathing on its own, quote unquote. The you know what year the project that lost $2 billion was started? 2018. The contract in this article says the contract started in 2018. It says right here fixedpric contracts that were negotiated back in 2018. Is it just a coincidence that Loheed Martin's fusion reactor went dark in 2018 and these fixed price contracts that were related to aerospace advanced aerospace propulsion concepts were started in 2018 and we've got Tom Maguire in the first 5 seconds of his Loheed Martin video saying that fusion is the solution to aerospace propulsion. What could have happened chat? Could have been anything. Could be anything. Maybe it's just better SpaceX rockets. Maybe Loheed Martin just has better SpaceX rockets and they just decided we don't want to compete with Elon Musk because we like him. We like his takes on Twitter and how he's just banging thoughts and impregnating them. Yeah, that must be it. That must be the deal. Fusion is a much safer option. A next generation of airplanes that doesn't rely on fuel and can just stay aloft. Unlimited range, unlimited endurance. That's what nuclear fusion can do for an airplane. We put it in a magnetic bottle that can contain the high temperatures. You need hundreds of millions of degrees. We can release in a controlled fashion that energy. We think we have a very robust strategy going forward that has potential for success. What this concept does is it's a high beta concept, which means we use a high fraction of the magnetic field pressure. We use all of its potential. And that means we can make our devices 10 times small. So instead of a something the size of a building, we have something the size of a large truck. How are people not making a bigger deal of this? How are people not making a bigger deal of this? Oh, I know. Cuz no one understood Fusion. That's why we're doing the live stream tonight because apparently nobody understands Fusion because the words he's saying here should have been like shocking people. The the the helion fusion. This is like that video is from over 10 years ago. Helium Fusion is saying the same thing this guy was saying 10 years ago, but they're saying it now about their reactor they're about to roll out from Microsoft, right? They're about to roll out a reactor from Microsoft in 2028. This guy is saying the same high beta. High beta. We're not talking like, oh, it's a little bit higher than before. Beta is the magnetic field strength. It's magnitudes higher. Magnitudes higher. This isn't just a small breakthrough. these guys figured out. It's a huge one. The small is the reason we can do this quickly. If something's small, you can build up momentum. You can develop it fast. It doesn't take 5 years to design it. It takes 3 months. We can design it, build it, test it in under a year. We can do several of these cycles and we think we can get to a prototype in 5 years. Every time you do plasma physics, you learn something new. And that's why this is a high-risisk, high payoff endeavor. That's what we're doing here is testing that concept out to see if it really holds the promise that it appears to. And as a defense company, our increasing mission is to enhance global security. And this is how we do that in the energy realm. Gas turbines are a huge improvement over other technologies in terms of climate change, but they're only a 50% improvement. We take it all the way. So no emissions, safe operation, proliferation free. That means we can ship it to the whole world with a good conscience. So they don't explicitly say there that it's a neutronic, but he says it's clean. And I remember they were doing some kind of prototype demonstration and people were freaking out because people were saying, "Oh, there's like X-rays. There's radiation coming off the reactor. You shouldn't be anywhere near it." And they were just chilling, right? They were just chilling and they're going and then people are freaking out. I'm sitting here wondering, I wonder if they're trying to do a neutronic fusion reaction. And it would make sense for why they are doing a neutronic reaction because if they have super high beta field strength, they might be able to achieve temperatures that are required for an autonic reaction. The reason why you might say, "Hey, if there's this secret way to do fusion, why is everybody not doing it?" Well, as we're going to get to, the reason is because it's considered to require a much higher temperature. And from a conventional view of physics and conventional view of fusion, we can't even get this level of temperature. But if all of a sudden they figure out magnetic field strength that just go through the roof now, why are we aiming for the lowest bar? We should be aiming for the highest bar. Now, that's the difference. Now, the old promise of Adams for peace was a noble one, but ultimately flawed because the technology wasn't right for it. We can achieve that grand vision and bring clean power to the world. The true atomic age can start. 10 years we have great military vehicles. 20 years we have clean power for the world. This isn't online by 2100. This is online by the time I can't even retire after we finish this. You know, I still have to find another job after this is done. Okay, chat. You I dare anybody on this earth to tell me that that secret project is not related to their compact fusion reactor. I dare you to tell me it's not related to that compact fusion reactor. It's got to be plasma based propulsion. has to be at a minimum, right? And probably could be incorporating the concept of the the fusion reactor. Side note here as well I want to point out. I have been talking quite a bit about whether or not the plasma orbs in the MH370 videos have something inside of them or not. This is actually one of the most hotly contested aspects of the videos is whether or not the orbs are just like a self-contained ball of plasma where the plasma itself is what creates the asymmetry and that's why they can move around or if there's an actual like jet engine type situation without a turbine inside. And I'm open to the idea like basically everybody around me is trying to convince me that there's nothing really inside or if there is it's something really really tiny inside. And they're just using like creating an asymmetry that produces this this ball this coherent ball of plasma. Much like we saw with the with the vortexes in the pool where you create the vortex in the pool and now it's it's self- sustaining but all you did was you got it started and then it just goes. If they are self-contained plasmoids with no device inside of them, then the fusion reaction reactor concepts are basically taking that idea and they're saying, "Okay, how do we turn that into a fixed thing that's sitting here that's not moving around, something that's stationary?" That's basically what they're trying to figure out. Last clip I want to show you guys is Joseph P. Frell. Joseph P. Pharaoh. I've already played this clip before, but I'm realizing repetition is super important. So, this Joseph P. Pharaoh clip here. Um, which one is it? Uh, wait. It's funny because I just sent this to somebody. Oh. Um, oh, okay. I'll just I'll just search it in my Twitter. Okay. Joseph P. Pharaoh clip. Weirdly, I don't know what I called it. I have too many clips now. Okay, here we go. Where is it? Okay, share this. Where is it? Where's my Joseph P. Pharaoh clip? Oh, here it is. Okay. I don't know why it's so hard to find this clip. That device that they show in the commercial, it looks like a blown up version of Pho's patents on what he called a plasmater and a fusitor, >> which was a So right here, if you don't know the context of this, these guys asked me, it's Chris and Greg, I think, right? Chris and Greg. Yeah, they asked me if I had any questions for Joseph P. Ferrell. So my questions for Joseph P. Carol, we're on a neutronic fusion cuz I know he knows all about the Manhattan project and nukes and what have you and plasma. And I said, "Okay, well, let's test this guy. What does he know about a neutronic fusion?" And he kind of took it in a direction I was not expecting. He brought up Pho's fuser which was a electrostatic fusion concept little spherical device that he invented in 1965 for IT&T with these little electrodes sticking off of the ball. It's about the size of a softball. And he gave a press conference in 1965 where he claimed that he was trying to get fusion reactions in this little ball fusion. >> And he claimed to have sustained a reaction using these little devices with his vacuum tubes for about half a minute in 1965 >> with Here it comes vacuum tubes. So anyway, he goes dark and then let's listen to the last bit. >> And these little devices drop off the radar screen from that point on. You never hear about Pho again, much less about these little patents that are there in the record. You can go look at them. Uh IT&T owned the patents. There's a little clue for you. And you never hear from him again. And then all of a sudden, decades later, four decades later, out comes Lockheed Martian with a thing that looks like it's based on Pho. So, are they researching a neutronic fusion? You bet you they are. Of course they are. Why? Because if they can make it work, you can have a hydrogen bomb without the necessity for an Abomb. >> Huh. >> Wow. I just thought that was a really huge clip. It says because if you can make it work, you can have a hydrogen bomb, which is a fusion bomb without the need for an Abomb is a fish bomb. And the way thermonuclear bombs work, a thermonuclear device is a fish bomb that detonates a fusion bomb at the center. So what is he saying there? He's saying if you can get a neutronic fusion to work, you can cause you can create a clean hydrogen bomb. Hydrogen bomb that is not bombarding with radiation and heat. So what that is implying is a direct energy conversion mechanism because if if the energy is not coming off as heat, what's it coming off as? What's the energy coming off as? Oh, it's coming off as what we would think of as an electricity. Electricity, direct energy conversion. This is why the answer to the UFO phenomenon is nukes. Why are they connecting nukes to the UFO phenomenon? Because it's all connected to fusion. And fusion is connected to the ether. 0 point energy. Especially if those orbs of plasma we see don't have anything significant inside of them. Where's the energy coming from for those things to be flying around like that? I mean extracting it from the environment. That must be the way. So, let me go through some notes I have on fusion. Okay, what are we trying to do with fusion? And actually, this is a good point as well. Maybe I'll do some donations before we get to that. One of the big takeaways I realized is that basically all the Department of Energy labs, all of them are doing some component that adds up to nukes or plasma fusion etc. All of these things are offshoots of the nuclear program. Like why are we working on this? Oh, we're trying to figure out how to make a plasma ball work because apparently we're going to turn into a fusion bomb or something like that. Why are we working on super powerful lasers? Oh, so we can make gravity ripples and fly our plasma orbs around. Great. Why are we worrying about how to control plasma flow? Oh, so we can make a coherent ball of plasma. It'll just be stable. It's like the more I look into all this, it's not just hiding in plain sight. It's just in your face and we're just like, "Oh, nobody's put the pieces together to realize like what does this all add up to? What does this all create? Let's do some of these donos. Thank you for letting me know about the audio early on. Chaotic good and the rest. Here's a ticket to the moon train. Thank you. $5 ticket to the moon train. I don't know, man. With inflation, I seriously doubt we're going to be it's going to be that cheap, but I hope so. They found it in Antarctica. Chaotic goods says could be. Uh, thank you very much, Zack Dagger, for that donation. Appreciate you, Zack Dagger. Appreciate that. And uh hm this uh I don't know how to say your name. Uo whatever. Elon may not know but he shouldn't outright deny it. I don't I think that's the reason why Elon Musk has not actually commented on my posts. Isn't it weird that Elon Musk has not ever replied, retweeted anything that I put out there? even though everything I talk about is right up should be right up Elon Musk's alley. I mean, he retweets other people that are kind of in the same techno realm, right? He even replied one time to the Hodge Twins indirectly about me and it was a weird copy and paste, like literally a copy and paste response. So, I do think it's interesting that he he had he seems to be not in the no, but he's also not out there being like, "This isn't real. No way." You know, which you would think he would be if like it really was fake. If it really was fake, wouldn't you think the rocket guy, the rocket expert would come in and be like, "Nope, there's no way that can be real because it would violate this and blah blah blah." You know? Nope. Okay. Had a good merry band of men. Woohoo. And thank you very much for these donations. Elon Musk going to Mars on a Roman candle. RIP. Okay, so fusion guys, how does fusion work? It's actually very simple. Fusion is very simple. We have two neutrons and we are going to try to force these guys to collide. And if they collide, they will coalesque. And now we will have a new element gets formed. We call it fusion. call it uh transmutation from one element into the next. And this is again why it goes back why this this whole thing is connected now to nukes is when we're dealing with fusion, we're dealing with fish, we're dealing with nuclear power, we're dealing with creating new elements, we're dealing with alchemy, dealing with literal alchemy. And the problem is why can't we just do this whenever we want? Why can't we just force these guys to to collide? Well, there's something called the coolum barrier. Just like if you have two magnets, two similarly charged magnets, the closer you get them together, the more they repel, right? The more they repel. So, we have this kum barrier that says we can't get these guys together. We can't get them to come together. So we need to find a way to lower the koolum barrier or another way to force them together. And the conventional view of fusion says that the only way we can do this is we heat it up. We need to heat the plasma up. We heat our plasma up and we look at a Maxwell Boltzman distribution. We can estimate the number of fusion reactions that should occur based on the temperature. So this is the idea of fusion. So why is it called hot fusion or cold fusion? Because the whole idea of our based on our current understanding, our conventional understanding of physics is that the only way to get fusion to happen is we have to heat it up. The sun we believe is doing it by pressure, gravity, forcing everything together at high temperatures. That's the belief. And yet, for some reason, even though we think we understand how hot fusion works, after decades, after decades, we still have no hot fusion reactor that's producing over unity. No reactor. In fact, we're we only have reactors that can run for several minutes at best. And that's today, right now. They've known about fusion since the 50s or 60s. So we're talking 60 or 70 years where we've known that fusion can work. We've created hydrogen bombs which is a fusion bomb. We had a fusion bomb in the 60s and somehow we still have no fusion reactors on this earth. Isn't that weird? Something must be wrong. So what are the problems with fusion? Obviously the temperature requirement. We need to get to millions of degrees in order for fusion to happen. That's the big one. We need to get to millions of degrees. And that's using dut dutyium tridium. Dutyium tridium or dutyium dutyium reactions only require millions of degrees. So that's the ones that we've been going at first using these POMAXs that people are talking about in the chat. The boron fusion a neutronic fusion requires billions of degrees. So it's a whole level of magnitude higher than what we require for dutium or dutyium tridium. So the temperature requirement is one thing. How do we cause our neutrons to come together? And these all of these fusion reactors use superconducting magnets. Superconducting magnets, extremely powerful magnetic fields are what we're trying to achieve. So if we get very powerful magnetic fields, remember the beta field strength, that will allow us to keep our plasma confined and potentially compress our plasma as well. There's another concept as well that we need to understand that I don't think it's talked about that much. Plasma density. Plasma density. Well, what is one way that we could reduce the coolum barrier? What if we squeeze everything together? Right? If we squeeze our plasma together, then theoretically we're increasing the density, right? We're increasing the pressure. So, anything where I see dense plasma get discussed, I'm curious about it. Also, theoretically, if we have this plasma and we squeeze it together enough, shouldn't electricity begin to flow in it? You squeeze it enough eventually, you would think that electricity is going to flow, should become conductive. In fact, maybe it will become superc conductive if we press it down. Now, here's the real rub. Plasma itself produces a magnetic field. Plasma itself produces a magnetic field. So if you have a dense enough plasma, its magnetic field is going to get stronger the more dense it gets. So this actually leads to instabilities. Almost all of the instabilities related to fusion are due to the plasma creating its own magnetic field. This is true. There's various different instabilities, but they all basically form from the idea that the plasma is creating its own magnetic field and therefore becomes unstable. So if we combine these concepts we say okay maybe we can we can see there's a connection between magnetic field strength the density of our plasma and then therefore the confinement of our plasma but we also need to have a way to control the plasma. So the other big problem is this the plasma does not want to be confined. The plasma doesn't want to be confined. Look at the sun. I mean, don't actually look at it, but when we look at the sun, do we just see a solid circle ball? No. It's got magnetic fields ripping off of it all the time. Magnetic reconnection we see happening on the sun all the time. We've got people on Twitter saying that the sun is shooting coronal flares at us. They're going to wipe us out every day. Every day. This is the same problem you're going to have if you try to create a miniature sun. If you try to create a miniature sun, you're going to have things shooting out. And this is the big problem with hot fusion. So you say, Ashton, why have they not been able to figure out hot fusion? Well, the plasma is destroying the reactor. This is why their reactors can't stay online for more than a few seconds or minutes. Because when the plasma starts to get unstable and it comes in contact with the donut, the metal donut around it, it destroys the material, the reactor falls apart. So you can see that what would be a good design then? Well, have a reactor that doesn't have anything containing it. Just have the magnetic field be the only thing containing the plasma. Then we don't have to worry about that problem at all. Right? That's why the plasma orbs in the MH370 videos are so compelling. Now the other issue is neutrons. 23 of the fusion reactions the energy's coming off as neutrons. That means heat. So most all of the tokamax and all that stuff they're essentially trying to just produce heat from fusion. They're saying, "Oh, we've got some neutrons that's making heat. Heat is energy. We'll use this heat to boil this water, and then that water will make some steam, and that steam will shoot a race car, and that race car will hit a marble, and that marble will go down through a marble maze, and that'll shoot a trap, and then that'll go ahead and trap my mouse." And now we've got the mouse trap game. I only bring up that ridiculous analogy because it's absurd to think that the most efficient way to produce energy is to make heat and have it boil water and then have that water make steam and then have that steam spin a turbine. Like how primitive are we that we're still thinking like, oh, spinning a turbine must be the only way in the universe to generate electricity. When I grew up, I kept thinking I thought that nuclear power was literally direct energy conversion growing up. And then I find out, nope, they're just boiling some water. Heck, I I knew this is what how I thought it worked five years ago. This is how I thought it worked. So, the big issue I mean, how many issues are there? So, hopefully this has helped to give you some context because the reality is there isn't that many more issues. Like, that's pretty much it. You guys just heard it. Coolon barrier number one, instabilities that destroy the machine, trying to get our thing to super hot temperatures, and then we're producing heat instead of electricity. This is why I say fusion is going to be a scam. Fusion is going to be a scam because there's no way they're going to give us the best version. They're not going to jump immediately to the iPhone 20, right? They're going to jump to the iPhone one and we're gonna have to go through every single iPhone before they finally give us the iPhone 20 that they've already had the whole time. That's how this stupid game is played. And they're going to be like, "Oh, we had to do the neutronic fusion because we didn't think that a neutronic was possible." Blah blah blah blah blah. Um, yeah. So, I I mentioned superconductors and why superconductors are also super important. Now, the helion fusion is doing a neutronic fusion. I I believe I believe they are. Everybody's kind of sus about whether or not they're doing a neutronic fusion, but if you have a high enough beta concept, you have the pressure, you can achieve the temperatures that conventional physics would say are required to pull it off. I want to watch this video now that I've given oh I should I want to explain the difference between I want to explain cold fusion first and then we're going to jump in and we're going to look at cool fusion and hopefully I'll have given you guys enough background concepts that you'll be able to understand helion fusion when they describe how their power plant works and you're going to see holy crap these are the people we should be investing in and maybe we can change the market maybe we can break the market Who knows, guys? So, cold fusion. A lot of people wonder what was the deal with this cold fusion scenario? What is it? How does it work? 1989, guys. 1989, 36 years ago, Pawns and Fleshman skipped the peer review process. They didn't even wait for their paper to be published. They went straight to the media and they said, "We have achieved fusion at room temperatures and it's producing excess energy in the form of heat, but still excess energy at room temperature." And they did it using a garage setup, a garage setup. So this caused massive, massive waves in the media. People were freaking out. The DOE freaked out. The Department of Energy freaked out. Think about that. Has the Department of Energy ever freaked out before? No. The Department of Energy set up a tribunal because so many people were successfully reproducing the experiment. Dozens of successful replications at major universities across the country. Dozens. Some showing excess heat, some showing uh transmutation. All of them trying to figure out where it was coming from, how it was working. And the Department of Energy stepped in and they set up a tribunal primarily working with MIT, primarily working with MIT, but they took all their academic experts that they had under their belt and they basically came in and they did their whole disinformation thing. They said the way these guys did this was incorrect. They shouldn't have done all this. They shouldn't have gone straight to the media. They should have come to the pure to us to to peer review their stuff. That how dare they not kiss our ring. Blah blah blah. And for the record, Pawns and Fleshman were not quack physicists or anything like that. They were extremely reputable scientists from major universities. They weren't, you know, it wasn't anything fringe or anything like that. And what did they do? Basically, they took rods of palladium, metal, metal rods. They put them in dutyium, heavy water. They put it in water and then they passed a current through the water. That's it. Pass a current through the water. And if you're like, that's what they did. And according to them, some of these cells, they called them a cell. They create this cell. You got your metal rod in there, you've got your water in there, and you got a current passing through it. And so it's going to produce, it's producing helium, which is like saying basically producing air. producing air and it was also producing excess heat. They were actually reporting in some of the cases that some of these cells the water was boiling. The water was boiling in some of the cells. You're like, "Wait, you just put metal rods in water, pass a current through it, and now the water's boiling." Think about that. So, they're going, "If the water's boiling, there's clearly excess heat generation from something. Must be fusion. The reason why this was so groundbreaking is not that they figured out how to make a fusion reactor. That wasn't the big thing. They figured out something about the universe that was being kept hidden from us. They figured out something in our standard view of cosmology must be wrong. From a standard view, this should not have been possible. should not be possible that at low temperatures at room temperatures we can just stick metal rods and heavy water and pass a current through it and now see fusion happen. If that's the case it would mean there must be some connection between electricity and fusion that's causing us to to reduce that coolum barrier somehow. This was the advent of cold fusion. It got branded. This idea of using metal and putting it in water and passing a current through it and causing low temperature nuclear reactions, low energy nuclear reactions was called cold fusion. That's what they called it. Nowadays, it's been given a number of different names. Why? Because the Department of Energy was successful. This is a true story. I I still can't believe this is all just true and in the public, but it is kind of like how Epstein was just like, you know, doing gravity wave conferences as a science activist while like pedoing out kids to politicians and stuff like that. Nobody knew. After there was dozens of recreations, the DOE set up a tribunal, Department of Energy set up a tribunal and they went around and debunked everybody's fusion reactions. In fact, it didn't take that many. They only had to go debunk like three or four and then everybody just started tracking all their papers. Yep. It's literally what they did. Literally all it took. They went to one place and they said, this is a true story. They went to one place and said, "Oh, this isn't real. This was just because on the weekends the the the voltage in the power system in the in the power um uh um whatchamacallit network or whatever. I can't even think of the name here. Um, in the grid, in the power grid, the voltage in the power grid is a little bit higher on the weekends, and that's what caused your cell to just start boiling. Power grid. Slightly higher in the power grid. Are you kidding me? That was the excuse they gave? How about some evidence? How about you prove it? How about you prove it? No, they don't ever prove it. It's the same [ __ ] they always do every time. They always do the same [ __ ] every time. They come up with some fake reason and they just say it as if it's just absolute truth. The same thing they do about MH370. They go, "No, those are just CGI videos somebody recreated." Or they say, "It's a perfect match to some VFX." It's not. It's just not. You're just lying. It's the same thing that the DOE does. They just say, "Oh, that was just because of this. Did you do any science to show this because of that?" Nope. We just say that. And that's good enough. Why? because the Department of Energy has a lot of weight behind their name and nobody wants to cross them. So, they were able to make the whole thing go away. In fact, Eugene Malov of MIT blew the whistle on this. blew the whistle on the on MIT fudging their results to make it look like there was no anomalous reaction and he ended up dying of mysterious circumstances. Stomped to death in his own home. It happens all the time, chat. Happens all the time. Very common thing to happen. No conspiracy there. Stomped to death in his own home. Um so that's the story basically of Cold Fusion. So cold fusion then had to rebrand. It rebranded into low energy nuclear reactions. Len. So if you hear LNR, that's cold fusion. Now Lar Lauren or Larry Forsley, also known as Lar Lawrence Forsley. He is one of the people that has been still pushing cold fusion, but he has been pushing it under a new name called lattis confined fusion, LCF. LCF, which is actually just a play on words of inertial confined fusion, if you noticed, LCF, ICF basically. So Larry Forsley's idea is really the exact same as pawns inflation which is that how was fusion occurring somehow those hydrogens are squeezing into the lattice structure. So you got your metal rod imagine your metal rod is a crystal a crystal structure. Somehow those hydrogen atoms are squeezing into that crystal structure. And then when that happens, we're reducing that cool barrier and now we can see fusion occur. But wait, how the heck? How can that be possible? I thought this cool barrier was supposed to be so huge that they couldn't fuse. That must mean there's some other ingredient to the fusion recipe that we've missed out on. So lattice can find fusion. You can look up Larry Forsley's lattice confined fusion. He's shown positive net results of energy. Larry Foresley did. I found the paper. I've shown it on Twitter several times. Again, I don't know how many free energy concepts I have to show people. The amount of concepts of free energy. I think I've got half a dozen different concepts that all have peer-reviewed scientific papers showing anomalous excess energy of some sort. Now the last thing then is cool fusion. What is cool fusion? Why did we have to come up with a third different name for fusion? We had to come up with a third name because the mainstream academics are in complete denial about how fusion works. So cool fusion is saying that we can produce fusion without neutrons. Well, Ashton, didn't you just say a few minutes ago that 23 of the of the fusion reaction gets produced as neutrons, as heat, as radiation? We don't want radiation. Radiation hurts people. Radiation bad, chat. Chat, radiation bad. Everybody can understand that. So, cool fusion is no heat or at least very, very little heat. very very little neutron release. That would mean the energy is being converted in the fusion reaction into alpha particles. What's an alpha particle? You can just think of it as energy. Electricity, it's being converted directly into electricity. Wow. Look at it like this, chat. Even if we even if somehow the MH370 videos are fake, even if somehow teleportation's not real, it is. videos are real, too. Even if free energy is somehow not real, a neutronic fusion, directed energy conversion is honestly as big as any of those things. From a mainstream academic perspective, direct energy conversion changes everything. It's it's just as big. Direct energy conversion is instant unlimited green energy for the world forever. Forever. I don't even think anybody's done the math to figure out how much more efficient it is than our current systems, but magnitudes more is going to be my guess. Probably magnitudes more. Imagine. And to put it in context for you, I think the best way to to describe it's like this, guys. Free energy doesn't mean that the cost of energy goes directly to zero. It means it trends towards zero. Free energy means we trend towards zero. It means we're going to the energy costs are going to go down significantly. But imagine that a neutronic fusion is a hundred times more efficient than let's say solar panels. Let's imagine it's a 100 times more efficient. That means your power bill could be 1% of what it is right now. 1% of what it is just in a just theoretical view. So maybe free energy doesn't become immediately free. But what if your power bill goes down by a factor of 10 or a hundred? I mean, there's people out there that are paying $500 or $1,000 a month in the wintertime for heat. You get all that money back. That changes the world immediately. Immediately. And that's why we haven't got it. I just said that. Exactly. And that's why we haven't got it. So, there's another clip I'm not going to play. It's Hal Pudof clip, but Hal Pudof basically says, he explains to the energy companies, how do you do this? Do we give everybody a fusion reactor? And he goes, no, you don't give everybody a fusion reactor. He says, you give the energy companies the fusion reactors. Give the energy companies the fusion reactors, and they just they'll pass on the pro they'll pass the savings on to you, chat. The energy companies will pass the savings on to you. That's how the world works, right? Don't don't don't all major companies pass the savings on to the customers. Oh, no. That's not how the world works at all, is it? The energy companies don't give a crap about us. So, in reality, they're just building free energy devices, nuclear reactors, and they're still selling us the energy to the same price, and they're just making higher profits. They're just making bigger profits. That's it. That's how the world really works. So that's why I get skeptical of places like Helion Fusion that's got Peter Theel, Peter Teal, however he says his name, and Sam Olman as major investors because what have we talked about here so far? We've talked about, holy crap, all the fusion concepts are stupid except for Cool Fusion, a neutronic fusion. And it turns out a neutronic fusion isn't just better than the rest. It's like the the golden goose. It's laying golden eggs over here. That's the one we want. All the rest are obsolete. All the rest are just literally obsolete. So, whoever's figured out the autronic fusion, those are the people I want to know who are they talking to? Who are you talking to, bro? And now, now that we've got all the contacts, now I've explained to you cold fusion, hot fusion, cool fusion, let's try to figure out what helium fusion is up to. So this is their what is he CEO or something like this? Where is it? Let's figure out what who who is he again. This is um CEO CEO of Helium Fusion, David Kirkley, presenting the theory behind Helium's approach to building commercial fusion reactors. Originally presented at the fall 2022 meeting of the American Physical Society in Spokane, Washington. Presentation title, Fundamental Scaling of aatic compression of field reverse configuration thermonuclear fusion plasmas. That's like hitting every single possible buzzword that we've talked about today. Every single buzzword that we've talked about in fusion is hit up right there. Adiabatic compression of your plasma in a field reverse configuration for thermonuclear fusion plasmas. Okay. >> But very long topology. >> Oh wait, what are we doing here? >> Couple of fundamental relations we're going to be talking about today. The most important is beta. Um, and so this comes from this is plasma beta. And I'm specifically talking about the average plasma beta rather than a localized plasma beta. And that that's going to be important later. Um, oops. The plasma beta is a ratio of the external magnetic field to the internal particle pressure of the plasma. Really, as you push on this plasma, what is the inter how does the plasma push back on that magnetic field? And for an F FRC, this is really critical. Um, plasma beta is very close to one. Usually well over 90% sometimes 95 98% plasma beta. What that >> Okay, chat 98 to 100% plasma beta. That's as good as it gets. That's perfect confinement. Do you guys realize what the what tookax plasma betas are? He just said their plasma beta is between 90 and 100% for fuel reverse configuration. Tokamax is like 10% or something like that. like five or 10%. This isn't just a little bit better. This is a whole different a this is a whole different ballgame here. That's where he's just starting with that. >> Means is that this plasma temperature, energy, and um pressure is always in balance with an external field that allows us to compress and heat the plasma as well as translate it easily. Couple other key relationships that matter. Flux conservation. So if you have an FRC that you create, you have an amount of trapped magnetic flux. Unless you have a technique to add new flux to that FRC, you have a local amount of FRC of trapped colloidal magnetic flux. As you increase magnetic field, you can compress that plasma and it pushes back and creates a an equilibrium radius and scale. That's really critical. That also allows us to define a lot of the internal um parameters of the F FRC and distribution of the various particles and temperatures. >> Holy smack, he just explained the orbs chat. So he says you create an equilibrium poloidal magnetic field. A poloidal magnetic field is one that goes around like this like the earth. A poid magnetic field and it creates an equilibrium at a very certain scale. At a certain scale you reach an equilibrium and then boom now you've got your poloidal plasma ball. Okay? Your poloal plasma ball is going to have two axial jets on either end of it. Why? Just like the earth. Just like the poles of the earth, right? >> Last big one is the amount of the trapped flux defines how big that compressed FRC is. And that's going to be a really critical parameter as we start talking about the thermonucle. >> The amount of trapped flux, the amount of trapped magnetic flux will determine how big that plasma ball is. So the size of your plasma ball is going to be relative to the amount of trapped magnetic flux according to this >> nuclear fusion conditions and the plasma fusion the plasma physics results after compression. So before we dig into that part I want to take it one step back at at a higher level and look at how we model these systems. Um in most fusion systems the internal distribution of the density so the amount of particles the temperature how hot those particles are as well as the energy in the system is not very uniform and it's can be quite complex requiring detailed magneto hydrodnamic I'm going to call that MHD equations as well as simulation and a whole bunch of experimentation FRC's we have found historically to be much much simpler than most fusion plasma so we'll talk about why and provide some theoretical scaling computational scaling and empirical results to back that up and use those results to dig into the fundamental thermuclear equations for fusion and power output. >> Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and just say it right now. What everybody else is thinking. They found a way to make it easier than the rest. This screams plasmoid. This screams Ken Shoulders work, right? How did we create these simple, stable plasmmoids? Oh, they're exotic vacuum objects. And what did Ken Shoulders show? Pen shoulders showed that his plasmoids he were creating were showing electrons clustering clustering together violating the coolum barrier as we would think of it. How are these electrons clustering together when they should be repelling each other? Turns out these poloidal these magnetic field states that they can create these plasmoids in create these stable structures and these stable structures uh produce their own magnetic fields that keep them stable. >> So um there's a number of models that we can we can use for for F FRC plasmas. The simplest one is a uniform cylindrical model. It's a long cylinder. We just simply average the density and temperature over that volume and and use that as our fundamental scaling. And we're going to get to is to show that all the more complex scalings for R type the the compressed F FRC's that helon makes can be represented very accurately with cylindrical profile. But the more advanced theoretical models for F FRC plasmas come back to the very earliest days of F FRC literature and you'll see in the references quite a bit of literature around this. One of the most fundamental theoretical models for an F FRC profile is called a rigid rotor profile. Rigid rotor profile is a theoretical model. is well referenced and documented and references are attached that then shows the radial profiles going through the cylinder from the the core all the way to the edge of an F FRC at high pressure and at at high um beta. You can see actually shown on the slide here that for an F FRC there's some really interesting profiles that we'll touch just touch on um in that you have a core of an F FRC that's lower density and as you go towards the edge of the FRC density increases and peaks in what we call the null region and then very quickly what we call the separatrix region decreases very rapidly. temperature however is much more steady. A small slight decrease in the internal in the plasma temperature in this in the core goes through the null and then decreases in the separatics and we'll get into thermal conduction and talk about why. Um one of the other keys is in the null region there's no magnetic field. That's where the the externally applied magnetic field is fully reversed and you have literally a magnetic field of B equals 0 condition that has some very unique properties and allows us to simplify the models quite a bit. Okay. So, he just mentioned right there there's a certain region where you have a B equals 0 zero magnetic field. That's really interesting because when you look at these um plasma stabilization scientific papers, specifically the one by uh Joe Namkin, they're trying to figure out how to manipulate the magnetic field in certain areas. If you can create a zeroed out magnetic field or I think they try to make a parallel magnetic field like what is it E crossb equals zero or something like that is what they're trying to produce. There may be a connection here to gravity manipulation is what I'm trying to get at. So what if they can produce a well a gravitational well at the center? Could this stabilize the entire plasma ball and therefore cause it to become exactly what he's saying here a coherent shape? What scares me is that they might have figured out how to make a plasma ball that's just turn it on. There you go. Now you've got a plasma ball until you want it to turn off. That's extremely scary to me. I mean, and they not being these guys. I don't think these guys quite have that yet, but I think they might know it exists. Let me show you a quick demonstration of the field reverse configuration. I think this is TAE. Here you go. Wait, that's not him. Okay, this is another company. Try Alpha Energy. This is the only other company that I found that is in my on my radar for when it comes to field reverse configuration. And they had a huge amount of investment, which is probably coming from the military or defense contractors, but nobody knows who they are. Here's one of their presentations on the field reverse configuration. So, this is basically how it works. They shoot two plasma jets, two plasma smoke rings. Literally, they shoot toidal plasma rings at each other and then it produces the field reverse configuration in the middle. Yeah. Wait, is this a different video? Yeah, this is actually a different video than the one I was looking for, but this this works. So what they do is they shoot the plasma rings and then they shoot these jets at it. They shoot these jets at it and these jets are what stabilizes it. Keeps it stable. That's the idea at least. So those jets keep it stable. There you go. So this one is TAE. I think I have another video as well. Let me see. Huh. Oh, here we go. This is the one I was looking for. Here's another video. This is the field reverse configuration process. This actually comes from TAE as well. So you can see the plasma rings as they combined, they combine and then they produce this stable uh poloidal shape. So they create this like little earth magnetic field here in the middle. And actually look at this little ring. You can see this little uh like circle inside the ball here. here. This almost looks like the heat signature in the MH370 videos as well. So there you go. It's a two-dimensional representation. So obviously it's not perfect. It's just two dimensional representation. Okay, let's listen to my boy rigid rotor profile. However, typically compared to uh experimental systems that we actually build have very large separatrix. So that's the area after the null region that will have a very large separatrix. We think about it literally as a fluffy FR the internal plasma dynamics of an F FRC as well as its response to an external magnetic field and more importantly. >> So taking all those models together and that's what we did in this work is is you can see for some normalized representative cases um data on the right. >> Skip ahead a little bit >> and you ramp it to increasing field. >> Here we go. This is I think this is what I wanted. I want to want want to point out one um detail we haven't talked about historically is is really how are these compressed in a high beta system as you take a magnetic field and you ramp it to increasing field um if the beta is close to one what that means is that the F FRC is then compressed increasing in density and in temperature the equations that represent that adabatic compression are actually well understood provided here on the screen as well as in the references showing as you increase that magnetic field the plasma pressure increases increases in temperature roughly temperature to the in our systems to about 08 scale and density to the 1.2. Um, and you can you can see very quickly then that by if you can add a large magnetic compression, you can increase the temperature to very high temperatures. And what we've been able to demonstrate is in our systems is a wide range of operation all the way down to the compression at the 1k ion temperatures up to near 10KV and then electron temperature well over 2K and also a wide range of densities over three orders of magnitude for our compressed systems that we did in Trenton. Um, and so that allows us to operate over wide parameter space of final fusion conditions both temperature and density. So, I mean, he just gave away the secret sauce right there. He's saying this beta field, the beta represents how much pressure we can cause our plasma, how much we can compress our plasma down. And again, how does the hot fusion say that we're producing fusion? Oh, huge amounts of pressure, huge amounts of temperature. So if you figured out a way through magnetic fields to produce huge beta values which cause huge pressure now you potentially just shot right past tutium tridium fusion and now you're looking going why don't I just go do boron fusion for directed energy conversion because this kind of jump in technology doesn't just g get fusion for us it gets us the best kind of fusion that's why the beta value is so huge. The fact that they were able to figure out this high beta value, that's why when Loheed Martin says that they've figured out the exact same thing. Loheed Martin says, "We figured out beta values near one." Of course, they're using a field reverse configuration. You're literally listening to the guy explain why field reverse configuration produces beta values near one. We if we want disclosure, we literally just have to knock down Loheed Martin's door and steal their compact fusion reactor and we have disclosure for everybody. That's literally how simple this is. >> Now that we've explored the radial profiles as well as how adabatic scaling works in a field reverse configuration, we can talk about fundamental scaling up to generator thermonuclear fusion conditions. So what we're going to do is we take the standard um simplified fusion relations but add in now cylindrical radial model for the distribution of density and temperature radially and a linear model for the density and temperature across the length of an elongated F FRC. You can quite easily now explore a full parameter space of temperature density fusion power output and radiation. So touching on those equations today um one of the most important that's unique for FRC plasmas is this beta equal one relationship. And in this once you once you assume a beta equal one or very close to one you can now simplify density temperature and directly equate it with the square of the magnetic field. Further if you assume a fixed ion to electron temperature ratio which we do typically see in FRC's you can go one step further now and equate fusion power output with the the standard cross-sections. And in this case we're using Maxwellian cross-sections. Um we're using standard Maxwellian cross-sections. You can now fold that in and have a very simplified equation for what is the power output watts per meter cubed for a thermonuclear fusion system as >> holy smokes chat. How this how many people even watch this video? Hold on. How many people watch this video? 40,000. Not even 40,000 views on this video. He just said right there, if you have a beta close to one, now you can just plug that into the equations and you can figure out your exact power output. You can just figure out what that power output's going to be. Spoiler alert, it's going to be good. It's going to be really, really, really good, chat. And of course, now we're talking about directed energy conversion as well. Now, our efficiencies are multiplying. Now, our efficiencies are multiplying. We already had a multiplicative efficiency from the beta value being going through the roof. But now you're saying we also don't need to boil water to heat up steam. Now you're saying I can just get electricity out of this as well directly. Yeah. This this energy efficiency is going to be light years beyond what we have presented here with ion temperature the external magnetic field the plasma beta and ion temperature to electron temperature ratio. Um a very unique feature here is noticing as typical that this is magnetic field to fourth power. that's expected but also it's beta to the squared power and a very strong relationship to that ion temperature ratio. Filling out the rest of the equations, brim brimstrong losses are shown here. Cyclron or synretron losses are shown here as long as well as the absorption of those systems. The last key thing to talk about is plasma transport. Um the energy and particle confinement of of an FRC is very well established empirically with some theoretical scaling as well as shown in the references. What we're using today is the empirical relationships that the Helon team has developed over the years over our now six. >> Sorry to pause, but one thing I'm realizing here too in the chat is that yeah, people are saying that you don't need external input for an EVO. Yes, the EVOs are inherently stable, but you still got to turn it on. The same way where when we do the pool experiment with the vortex, you still have to push the water to get the vortex to start up, right? So, do you have to have something inside of your ball lightning of your EVO? No, not necessarily. But also, if they do have stable ball lightning that they can produce that doesn't require external input whatsoever, then this is how they figured it out. This is how they figured it out right here. They realized that once we have our ball lightning, our plasma ball, once our plasma ball has a beta value of one, now we can just do all the math and figure out, oh, okay, we want to be this size. Okay, this is exactly how much energy we have to put into it to get it to be this size. Then it'll be stable just like this. That's 20 feet wide. Then that's 20 feet wide. All they have to do is just do the math. And that's why this is so big. Once you've solved the math, like last week we were talking about the Schrodinger equation. Once you've solved the math, you just plug the math in and now you figure out, okay, I want to teleport to Afghanistan. Okay, here's the math. Boom. There you go. Bada bing, bada boom. Now they're saying, okay, once you've got your beta value of one, now the math becomes simple for fusion. The math becomes actually simple for fusion. So figuring out that beta value of one is the secret. And it turns out field reverse configuration does it. So anybody talking to me about fusion that's not looking at field reverse configuration or dense plasma focus, which is a similar concept, GTFO chat, GTFO. You're wasting your life. You wasted your life on fusion concepts that ain't that aren't going to be productive. Go straight to the best one. Heck, just steal the stuff from them. There's no shame in this. It's free energy for the world. Steal the idea from Loheed Martin. Steal the idea from Helium Fusion. I don't give a [ __ ] I'm telling you right now, these guys know something that other people don't know. fusion prototypes that equates the particle transport and the energy transport of the plasma out of an F FRC through crossfield diffusion and other mechanisms and relates that to the scale of the F FRC the density of that F FRC and one of the most unique parameters is the geometric scaling the elongation that's that's here represented as epsilon of that F FRC so in a simplified way we're representing the total confinement time as as literally the ratio of one over the energy transport time and and shown here and we'll be using that you'll see that that drives a lot of the equations so By taking all of this together, we can fold this all into a simple model and now scale the fusion power output with the input energy as well as loss radiation input loss radiation power and particle transport power and put together a series of equations looking at the power density. This is in watts per meter cubed of an F FRC plasma over a wide variety of conditions. Chat, what do I see? Chat, what do you see in the middle of the screen? The exact middle of the screen. What do I see right here? I see helium 3 fusion. I see boron 11 fusion here. Look at the different uh materials here chat. Um temperature. Oh yeah. Okay. As the temperature goes up here. Yeah. So what they're saying is look boron fusion you need higher temperatures to get it going but once you've got it going you got directed energy conversion. So these are the ratios here or I never even looked at these charts before. So they definitely definitely have been considering look at that middle that middle one right there. They've definitely been considering boron for sure. >> One thing to note here is we are considering all radiation losses as losses and we're considering all particle transport as losses. For a whole system that's probably not a very good assumption because we get to use that power in an actual generator to generate electricity. But for now we're taking a conservative model and considering all that is lost. So let's start with a DT fuel by using the cross-sections from a dutium trium reaction with a 50-50 ratio. You can put together these power output and input. Uh, >> okay. We don't care about DT Fusion. That's for noobs. We want the good stuff. Where's the spice? Show me the good stuff. Chat. So, this is where Okay. High beta DT Floss from the FRC. >> Here's the conclusions. At high beta, unique trends occur as density decreases with temperature for a fixed field. Fusion outputs peak dramatically. Bremstrong radiation decreases. Cyclron radiation is absorbed. Transport conduction losses increase. H. So that's meant for low beta. It says high beta Q greater than 10 and ignition is possible. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure they're saying Q factor right there. Is that what they mean? Chat Q factor is the overunityity factor. So I guess what they're saying here is with DT fusion they can achieve over unity of 10 10 over unity >> and DT the maximum power output is on the 10 to 20 keV. Um but as losses increase you may have an optimum that's below that maximum power output and well below the maximum cross-section. So that's an important parameter for high beta plasmas I think is worth pointing out several times. Um DT again Q greater than 10 uh should be possible as well as full ignition in that system. >> Yeah. Yep. So Q greater than 10 that's way saying yes Q factor is the overunityity factor 10 times the output of energy. So even in DT fusion, even with DT fusion using a field reverse configuration, just doing the math, just solving the math with your beta factor of one, DT fusion can produce over unity of 10 coefficient of performance of 10 10 output for every input power. Does that sound good to you guys? Sounds pretty good to me. This the funny part is that's a scam. The funny part is that's a scam. Even though that's possible, even though the math shows that's possible, that's the that's the noob way of doing it. That's the scam fusion they were going to roll out for us. They're going to roll out Fusion, be like, "It's got a Q factor of two. This means it's great, everybody." And all the people, all the seals are going to clap. They're all going to go, "We saw Fusion with our Q factor of two. Yay. It's slightly more slightly cheaper than coal. Isn't this wonderful, everybody?" And everybody's going to clap. Meanwhile, they have something way better than that. >> But this allows us to go on to more advanced fuels. And this is where from my point of view at Helon, it gets much more interesting. Um, there's obviously >> now, now chat, now we know why they want the moon train. Now we're getting to the sauce. What does this say on the screen, chat? High beta dutyium helium 3 conclusions. High beta enables dutyium helium 3 fusion. What is dutyium helium 3 fusion? A neutronic fusion. A neutronic fusion. Now we're getting to the sauce, my man. Now we're getting to the sauce. >> Engineering advantages being operate in a low neutron or a neutronic fuel as well as gas input parameters, commercial benefits. >> Say it again for me. Say it again for me. CEO of Helen Fusion. >> My point of view at Helion, it gets much more interesting. Um there's obvious engineering advantages to being operate in a low neutron or a neutron fuel as well as gas input parameters, commercial benefits, and a whole host of things that we're not going to cover today. Um we're but we are going to look at the theoretical results for dutium and helium 3 fusion plasma. I've also included in this model the dutyium dutium fusion for dutium helium 3 that the actual fusion energy out of that may be significant. So that is in the model here. So what you're seeing on the slide is you're seeing two plots similar to before of a dutyium helium 3 plasma now using at low beta with a four ion to electron temperature ratio. Below that is the high beta version of this where we've increased plasma beta but we've still kept an equilibrium ion to electron temperature. And then you'll also see in the following slide now you take that and you go with what we see and what we've modeled and others have seen empirically in many devices now is that we actually have much hotter ions than electrons pushing those radiation losses even further lower. >> Okay. So what does this show here? The top one is a low beta fusion concept. In the low beta fusion concept, dutyium tridium is way above helium 3. But when you go to the high beta concept, all of a sudden helium 3 shoots up above dutyium tridium and dutyium dutyium. So all of a sudden in the high beta concept, a neutronic fusion begins to win becomes more efficient, higher power values. And here's what the results look like. In a low beta condition, dutarium helium 3 really doesn't make sense. Uh for F FRC's, probably other systems even with better confinement. They're dominated by both transport losses as well as radiation losses somewhat surprisingly are a driver. And that fusion power output for DH helium 3 does not close. Um however, by going up in beta, what you effectively do is turn up the fusion power output by being able to increase the density for any for a fixed magnetic field and for a fixed radiation loss. That allows you now to finally get to a condition where TM3 not only starts to make sense, but starts to make a lot of sense. In this case for an equilibrium plasma where ion and electron temperatures are still equal. So this is maybe in a steady operating case which is not what helon's doing. But in a steady operating case you now get to a condition where you can get to break even in dutarium and helium 3. You can produce more energy out than you put in or that you're losing from either radiation or particle transport. That optimal temperature is surprisingly low in um traditional literature for helium 3. We talk about 50 ke well over 100 ke optimal ion temperatures. But what we found for what we find for high beta is that in fact that the penalty of going up in temperature and lowering in density comes back to your fusion power output and your goal then is now optimized power output which optimizes in the 20 to 30 keV territory. >> Wow. Holy crap chat. He says if you look at the literature it says you need this really high temperature to enable a neutronic fusion with helium 3. He's saying actually we start doing the the math and we realize that you'd actually don't want to run it at that high a temperature because from an efficiency standpoint it's actually more efficient from a power perspective to run it at a lower temperature than that lower temperature values. So actually we don't even need as high of temperature values as what they've been saying. What the hell man and he's downplaying it like crazy here. He's saying yeah Q greater than one is possible. Yeah it's definitely possible. way bigger than one. In fact, there's no way this is less efficient than the one the model you just showed us which had Q factor of 10. So if we're getting Q factor of 10 from dutarium tridium with low beta values, then definitely high beta values are going to be way higher than 10 Q values, maybe as high as 50 in some cases, but never all the way up to those very high temperatures. So what we see is that an equilibrium now we can break even and further if you can get into a non-equilibrium plasma, which is what we see empirically. Now the situation changes even further. radiation losses are suppressed and and even assuming you lose all the output particle energy and output radiation, you still have a a situation where you can get to much higher than one Q, we actually see a scientific Q of greater than five possible and you can get right to the border where maybe even ignition is possible. Well, holy [ __ ] He says, "Oh, that was all just equilibrium plasmas. What about nonequilibrium plasmas?" He says if you can create a non-equilibrium plasma also known as a what chat? A cold plasma a cold plasma could get a Q factor greater than five and ignition now all of a sudden becomes possible if you can produce a cold non-equilibrium plasma. Now you can have ignition for a neutronic fusion using helium 3 or boron. Wow. Who said that? Oh yeah, it was s pais nonequilibrium plasmas. Let's see what does this clip say. >> Way to see effect is all about is to say it's really the generation of extremely high energy densities that are obtained by the accelerated vibration andor accelerated spin of a none equilibrium plasma. That means a plasma that's out of equilibrium. You can think of of that um they have a term for it called cold plasma. Cold as in you know non-therrmal plasma and it really has to do with the um the electrons of this plasma uh that talks to the plasma density very high. The number of these electrons do not observe something called a Maxwell Boltzman distribution. >> Holy crap Chad. If you don't realize that Sal Pais is legit after that, what world are you living in? The guy is explaining fusion on a podcast with a guy who didn't have any idea what he was talking about. Did you see that podcaster? That podcaster had no idea what that US Navy engineer was saying. Now, he probably knows a lot more two years later, but he had no idea at the time. Meanwhile, that's the exact same thing the CEO of Helen Fusion is saying. the CEO of Helium Fusion saying, "Hey, if we have a non-equilibrium cold plasma, we can produce a neutronic fusion with high Q factors that is direct energy conversion. No boiling your water for steam straight up electricity output. Straight up electricity. So, not only is the Q factor five, but we don't even have to convert it into steam. There's all there's no other equations. So, whatever that Q factor is, that's how much energy out we're getting. Simple as that. It's already usable. Plug it into the grid. >> I'm saying here at Helon right now is that that's not our focus to get to ignition. And in fact, the fact that we don't have to really helps in terms of commercial aspects, but we get right to the border now of where ignition even in Helium 3 is possible if you can get to high beta and you can suppress radiation losses. The last really key thing to see here is not only is the optimal temperature less than 100 KB, but in fact break even in helium 3 starts to be possible over 10 KB. And that's a really exciting result that we think opens 10K EV. He's saying that the literature says you need 100KV to break even for a neutronic fusion. And he's saying we've found out from our from our math, he's saying we can do it 10 times lower than that. 10 times lower, 10K EV compared to 100K EV. He's saying the break even points at 10K. 10 times lower than they thought. This is what I'm saying, guys. They're just literally just hiding this from us. It's it's hiding in plain sight. All you have to do is watch YouTube videos and be a healthcare IT consultant. You can solve free energy and cold fusion for the world apparently. This is just all out there in the open up the the parameter space for how you would operate a thermonuclear fusion generator in the future. Today we went over the fundamental relationships in a field reverse configuration uh describable equilibrium as well as adabatic compression. We're able to do a deep dive into radial profiles for the first time just describing and comparing both advanced theoretical models of full MHD magneto hydrodnamic simulations with some empirical results as well and show that in fact a cylindrical topology and a cylindric a simple cylindrical model is probably is a very good model and is a conservative model for the internal profile of an F FRC. So isn't it interesting how he didn't he kind of downplays the autumnic fusion aspect of this? I mean, here's the thing about it, guys, is that I'm trying to figure out who knows and who doesn't know. You would think that anybody that knows about unlimited green energy for the world should be really excited about it. Instead, he's saying our focus isn't even on getting a neutronic fusion breakthrough break even. It's not. Why? Why is it not? In fact, it seems like that's the only thing you should be focused on is direct energy converter. Why are you wasting time with the low beta value concepts? You just showed me the math. High beta solves everything. High beta enables a neutronic fusion. High beta enables using helium 3 for a neutronic fusion direct energy conversion. Okay, at this point just flip the cards over. Loheed Martin, flip the cards over. I know you're hiding the animronic fusion reactor. I know you're working with the US government. Probably turning into some propulsion orbs. Maybe they're self-contained orbs of plasma that you've also figured out using the same math. I don't know and I don't care. Just give it to us. Stop hiding free energy and fusion from the world. Give us the good stuff. Stop scamming us off of the dutyium tridium donut reactor. This is going to produce a a 2Q factor. No. Stop with the BS. Just tell us the truth. Just give us the free energy. Then you can tell us about how many different thick whites and other different alien species there are out there to appease everybody else. Okay. Thank you guys. MH370X. Appreciate you guys. It's been a good stream tonight. Mike er Michelle Barack Hussein Obama teleports a plane then goes home to his husband. Shame chat. Shame chat. And by the way, anybody that's upset about the Mike Obama jokes, President Obama teleported an airplane and covered it up. So he doesn't get to be pissed off or or upset that people are calling his wife a man. He teleported a plane, covered up 239 people presumably dead, and lied about it to the world. That's not a good person, bro. That's not a good person. Okay, guys. Thank you, M270X. On Wednesday, what did I think we were going to Oh, Wednesday, we may not do a live stream because I think I'm going to do a podcast. But if we do do a live stream Wednesday, the next thing we're going to talk about is coherent matter wave beams. Coherent matter wave beams. We found the number one gatekeeper, Charles Chase Loheed Martin. We're going to learn about coherent matter wave beams. We're going to learn what a Bose Einstein condensate is because I still don't even really know what it's all about. And uh we're going to spread the word. Spread the knowledge chat. Thank you guys. Appreciate you guys. Hope you have a great night. Peace out, everybody. [Music] Out in the fields where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Bing trip 7 through a wormhole. Flow. We're talking wormhole. Stargates. Negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole flow. [Music] [Applause] [Music] Exotic matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeeze so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cast force negative zones we need to stay the course talking wormhole star gates negative energy travel through the cosmos it's our destiny m370 where did it go 7 through a wormhole floating thin shell formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole let's give Give it a try. [Music] Cool. Forces balancing the plate, creating the throat, opening gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space. Profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. [Music] We're talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Going triple 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gains. Lulu Krunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos. Stop.