Hypersonic Fusion Drones, The Trail Goes Cold

Video Transcript

Dr. Robert Terry Polywell fusion reactors. This is from 2016. Now, this is going to be pretty technical, guys, but it's only a couple minutes, so bear with us here, okay? How does it actually work? The notion of scientific break-even is embedded in this constraint. The density and the temperature in electron volts and the confinement time in seconds. Density in in inverse cubic meters. If you can get this trio of numbers to exceed that limit, then you have gone over sort of generalized Lawson criterion. So, he's saying there, similar what we were saying before, if we can achieve these criteria, density, pressure, energy, etc., now we're going to get fusion happening. He says, here's all our fuels, and sure enough, you look at that bottom fuel, you're going to see proton boron 11 right there. Aneutronic. And in in a steady state system Also, you can see proton lithium right there is right below proton boron 11. So, I'm going to read off the chart. Deuterium tritium's at the top. Deuterium deuterium's below that. Then you have deuterium helium, aneutronic. Then you have proton lithium, aneutronic. And then you have proton boron 11, also aneutronic. And it tells you the energy levels required for each of them. Huh. That steady state system is now producing more fusion energy or about equal fusion energy to the energy required to confine that volume of material. And so, that can operate steady state producing energy until the sun don't shine, as it were. Uh and and and and it and nothing changes. That's that's a steady state solution. Yeah, of course. You keep keep adding fuel, but as long as you're burning it, that's a steady state solution. Bring the fuel in, take the ash out, let the energy come out. Whatever you're going to do, that's a steady state. Most fusion reactors don't go there. Cuz most fusion reactors don't work yet. And even the ones that are proposed to work don't think they're going to go there. Most of them tend to think they're going to be pulsed in some way. But the the Lawson criterion you hear about is based on, you know, in all these fuels, these are the the peak temperatures of the cross-section. Now, see, people are in 11, it's really fierce. You have to drive this really hard cuz you have to strip all the electrons off your boron. And that's a lot of work. So, people are in 11, it's a very aggressive fuel. If you can get things that hot, you have to look at 120 kilovolts. Uh you have to you have So, essentially >> [clears throat] >> it's pretty easy to see from this chart why the dum-dums are going for the lowest option, right? From the energy level requirements deuterium tritium alone is three orders of magnitude lower than proton uh lithium and proton boron 11. And proton boron 11 is twice as high as proton lithium. Now, the other side of it is if the government built thermonuclear weapons with lithium as the main fuel then they've clearly figured cracked the code cuz lithium is the second hardest one to do. So, but on the other side of it, you would say only a loser only a loser would aim for second place. If you are a winner, winners aim for the best. They aim to be number one. That's why you should be aiming for proton boron 11. Aim to figure out the best one. Then you figured out all of them. The fuel energy off off these guys, and uh so, [clears throat] it's tough, but it's interesting. So, it's logarithmic in temperature, billions of Kelvin, millions. The cross-sections rise rather abruptly, but it's, you know, it's still uh you have to get the Lawson criterion, you're at the peak of these yield curves. And deuterium deuterium deuterium deuterium is a little further field over here. So, Okay, so lastly, the cross-section. Let me explain a little fusion for you, okay? I don't know if you can see these little graphs over here on the bottom right, but the bottom left graph says reactivity, and then it's got temperature, okay? So, you've got reactivity going up and down and you've got temperature going left to right. So, what does this mean? It says, you see this chart kind of this line going up over here? This line is saying, as your temperature goes up, you get more and more energy, you're going to have more and more fusion reactions happening. But you get to a peak where you add more temperature and you don't get more fusion reactions happening. So, what we're trying to do is we are trying to get to where that peak is. Wherever that peak is, that's going to be the most efficient temperature that we're trying to achieve. Cuz that gets us to the the highest amount of reactivity of reactions happening. According to standard distribution here or this standard physics equations. Okay. Honestly, that's about all I wanted to show on this part. I just wanted to give you guys a high level of the fusion idea because that presentation was all about using the Polywell's IEC fusion reaction concept to do propulsion. And how you could use that aneutronic fusion output at um that expellant the byproduct, you could use that as propulsion mechanism. Because what we learned from a lot of this is that you can't use standard fusion for propulsion, you need aneutronic. For the same reasons we need aneutronic for our reactor. The neutrons destroy the reactor. They're the radiation. They're the destructive element. So, if you have a fusion propulsion drone, but it's a standard fusion and not aneutronic fusion, those I still have it up? Those cross-sections, that chart that showed all the different fusion possibilities, those low ones, the low energy level ones, great. Those are great for trying to show that you can do fusion. But from a practical standpoint of making an engine or a reactor, those are going to destroy your reactor very quickly. If you want to be able to use this reactor or have it actually work in its mission you need to be aneutronic, no neutrons being released. And for that you need to have those higher temperature levels or you need to understand physics in a different way, possibly with extra dimension that we've been talking about. Here is a little research. I have some sources and links, but I figured it might be better just to show you the research on here. Number one, Mayhem project. Unlike Blue Slide systems, this is an air-breathing scramjet drawing oxygen from the atmosphere for greater efficiency, probably hydrogen really is what they want. And it can perform multiple operations. It says some describe it as a hypersonic bomber or a conceptual successor to the SR-71, but it's more accurately an unmanned expendable platform larger than current hypersonic missiles like the hypersonic attack cruiser. And it has affordable mass. Which is an interesting way to phrase something, especially if we have plasma orbs that can fly around. Propulsion relies on advanced scramjet combined cycle engines potentially incorporating rotating detonate detonation engines. What the hell's a rotating detonation engine? For better efficiency at hypersonic speed. The system starts with a rocket booster to reach scramjet ignition speeds. Then sustains hypersonic cruise. Now, that part I thought was Because that's how you get away. That's how you do away with your booster. For your your They used to have this glide concept, tactical our hypersonic, and then it would take off and do its own thing. But this almost implies they can do it by itself. And when we watched the MH370 videos, one of the things that we see is that the lines before and after the orbs when the orb is intercepting the plane we only see these black lines behind the orb. But after these orbs get in alignment around the plane, then we start to see the black line in front of the orb. Almost like it was two different stages, two different modes, like a intercept mode and then a locked-in mode. Now, I'm not saying it's exactly this but that does sound eerily similar to what I just mentioned here in terms of starting with your rocket booster and then reaching scramjet speed and then switching over. So, maybe they incorporated a very similar idea when they pulled in the fusion concept. And they said, okay, we'll put the change the engine around with a fusion engine, and now we'll have a different mode for intercepting and have a different mode for when we've locked in and we're just going to, you know, match the speed or what have you. And this is apparently can reach Mach 10 and 60,000 ft. So, surely that can that fits our criteria. Um advanced thermal protection systems, ceramic composites. Now, this caught my attention because what are the huge factors of our fusion reactors? We have to keep our parts cold. We have to keep that plasma separated from our fusion reactor, from our engine. Otherwise, our whole thing's going to fall apart. Otherwise, our magnetism will will become undone. And so, when they say stuff like, "Oh, well, we need these this this particular secret project here was using advanced ceramic composites." The first thing I think of is YBCO superconductors. Hello? What other ceramic composites are we talking about here? The most famous ceramic composite that I know of is YBCO superconductors, the thing that Ning Li was working on, the thing that I said is what they would use to create the superconducting magnets that they need because they're lightweight, they're malleable, everything you would need. Weird. >> [sighs] >> So I'm just pointing out some of the different the things here. And you would need those thermal protection, a modular payload bay for switching between sensors and strike weapons. Huh. Unmanned and air-launched from bombers like the B-52. Now this gave me the creeps. Because I think that the way that I've described about how they have how you would deploy these orbs would be out of a cannon. You have a big plane and you shoot it out of a cannon under the wings on these giant B-52s. You use the B-52s. Now you might also be able to deploy them from a torpedo in a submarine. Because they're transmedium craft that can deploy through the water as well. So I thought that was interesting cuz it seems to fit that as well. Key hurdles include thermal management, flame stabilization, and affordability, all things that are also As of early 2026, Mayhem remains in the early design stages with Air Force Research Lab soliciting new ideas. Now it kind of pooh-poohs on the idea of fusion integration, but that doesn't surprise me cuz we're literally the only people on Earth saying this. Want people to understand the timeline. So 1957, we've got the X-20. 1958, we've got DARPA was established. 1967, X-15, Mach 6.7. So 1967, we were already going Mach 6, Mach 7. People are thinking we don't have hypersonics. What are you talking about? Year 2000, Falcon HTV, boost glide. So here's your glide tests, Mach 20 glide test. 2004, X-43 reaches Mach 9.6, NASA scramjet validation. So already in 2004, we had basically Mach 10, hypersonic speeds, and it was done on a scramjet engine. So this is why when I say, guys, when you look at the time frame for this, it's not me just saying that's an operation on MH370. But you actually look through the time frame on this and you realize the development of these orbs, development of these scramjet fusion hybrid systems, fits perfectly within the historical timeline of the development of these weapons. SR-72 rumors emerge. That same thing we were just looking at. That same thing we were just looking at. 2007, Lockheed Air Force Hypersonic Reconnaissance Concepts. Chat, those orbs have Lockheed Martin. They have Skunk Works logo all up in there, chat. It's like a magic eye test. You got to cross your eyes and then you can see the Lockheed Martin Skunk Works logo in the orbs. The Boost Glide program, TBG. DARPA Air Force glide test, 2010s. 2013, X-51 final flight sustained scramjet success. And remember, these are just what they're saying publicly. HAWC program starts 2014. Scramjet missile demonstrator. So this is the part This is the range where I'm I'm sus, right? Anything in this range could easily be what we're seeing in the MH370 videos. And even if they're hiding this, they're probably using some public program like this to cover it up. Like they're building these with conventional drones, but then they're building a fusion version up behind the scenes or something like that. Just my guess on how this is all being hidden. 2020, Mayhem program initiated. So this was a follow-on. So basically you can see here that what they're really doing when you look at it from this perspective, the programs are changing names and yes, the fund Now you're getting new funding, but it's really like a continuation of this research that's been going on since the '60s. Hypersonic research, just advancing it over and over and over. And then the old program now becomes this new program. And here you go. So the new one now is the Mayhem program. That's where we're at now today. And then they finished off the A HAWC flight tests. And then Leidos contract gets awarded in 2022. So and then you can see there's some additional programs that are basically coming into the next level. Now, what can we glean from this though? I think what we can glean from this is we can glean they're hiding something. They're hiding what they really have. What they're publicly showing us is at a minimum decades behind where they're really at. Which means either they're just straight up hiding programs that no we just don't see at all, which is possible I suppose. Those Those black project programs that are that are like, you know, classified every year, $50 billion a year. Or it is these programs and they're just describing them in declass unclassified ways to the public. But then behind the scenes when you read the classified versions, you realize, "Oh, that's not using conventional fuel, that's using nuclear fusion." Truthfully, I don't know what the answer is. And I'm not sure it even matters which one the answer is. I just think it's significant to think about and try to figure out. Doesn't it all make sense in the context of us having these hypersonic fusion drones? Technologies that we could never A president could never admit that. You can't go on TV and go, "Yep, we've got hypersonic fusion plasma drones." And people are seeing them and they're calling them UFOs. You can't say that. You have to say, "No, I'm not allowed to talk about it." You're to do exactly what Obama and Bush and Clinton and all these other people were saying. And I think that we've reached a tipping point now. You've got AI spitting out nuclear weapons answers. You got people educating themselves now where this can't really be hidden for that much longer. Maybe at best we got five more years of lying to people about this. But at some point this technology is going to just flow out to everybody. And people are going to have hard questions that they're going to have to answer. How did we figure this fusion? Oh, we They're going to be like, "Hey, we rediscovered we rediscovered this new fusion method from the '50s, guys." And we're going to be like, "Do you mean that you covered it up for 70 years?" They're like, "No, no, we rediscovered it. We We rediscovered it. It turns out all the fusion we were doing for the last 50 years, the tokamaks, that was all a waste. We're going to rediscover the old ways." So I asked Grok, I'm not going to go through the whole Grok conversation here, but I had it ask, you know, ask it for some additional sources. And, you know, one of the things that came up was the Hypersonic Air-Breathing Weapons Concept. That's that HAWC that you guys saw getting mentioned before. So they took this concept and the only thing missing is the plasma bubble. But then again, nobody's ever seen these things in action. So it's very possible these things just have a plasma bubble around them and we just don't know. Very possible. This was as close as I could get. The Mayhem project and the HAWC. This is where the trail just goes cold. You get to this part here and you're like, "Okay, we've got our hyper We got our scramjet engine. We've got people talking about incorporating fusion into it. We've got a plasma bubble around our thing. What does this look like? This is where it is. This is where the trail runs cold. This is where there's just no more after this.