Video Transcript
There was an announcement in 2022 by Google making a duel of a traversible wormhole with a quantum computer. Now, if you are an ER equals EPR advocate, and we sure as hell are, then this is huge because we have been saying that quantum mechanics and general relativity, that classic and that quantum are connected through this idea that a wormhole is the same as quantum entanglement. And if this is true, this would mean that quantum tunneling might be a method for a traversible wormhole. Okay, so not going to show all this right now, but let me just read this sentence right here. Surprisingly, a quantum comp is an ideal platform to investigate this connection. The trick is to use a correspondence called ads, which is anti-deitter space. That's called the ether. I'm telling you this is what they do where they just rename words. Anti-deitter space. Isn't that just the ether? Fact check me chat. I'm pretty sure it is. Which establishes an equivalence between theory and describes gravity and spaceime in a fictional world with special geometry anti- ditter space and quantum theory does not contain it. Today we report on a collaboration with Caltech and Google Sycamore computer. So they use this quantum computer. They are able to probe the dynamics of a quantum system evident uh equivalent to a wormhole in the model of gravity. So anyway, I'm not going to read through all this, but I wanted to show you that what's crazy is that we're just like the pieces are all out there. We're just early to the party. Maybe way too early to the party. And people are saying it, but I guess people just aren't taking it seriously cuz I can't al understand why this wouldn't be the biggest news in the world here. I mean, it's literally everything we're talking about. Okay, before [snorts] I do this, let me take a look at my history here. Okay, I think that's fine. Yeah, this is where I wanted to start. [clears throat] Okay, going to Grock. So we have our questions and now we want to understand more about how these wormholes operate. And the first perspective I want to look at is John Kramer. You guys forgot who John Kramer was. Here's a 30 secondond video reminder of John Kramer and why he's relative to related to this. John Kramer even probably more important than he even people think he is and people really respect him as it is. I'm talking about uh reaching the stars by by accelerating a wormhole to a high very high velocities and shooting them at the stars and using relativistic time dilation to get there almost instantaneously. >> So you fly through the wormhole, >> you send the send the wormhole there, send momentum bearing particles through it to steer it uh around to where you want it. You land it and then you expand it and get out and and explore the planet. >> I see. [laughter] That's a guy who I'm going to trust to build me a wormhole. Anybody that laughs like that. Get all the money you want, bro. Build me some wormholes. Build me some doomsday devices. You know, you got that super villain energy down pat. You got it down pat, sir. Okay. So, John Kramer has this idea. He in my opinion for what I've looked at, he's the he's the world's leading expert on EPR experiments. So one half of our equation EPR Einstein Podski Rosen also known as quantum entanglement. He's probably the world's leading expert on uh quantum entanglement experiments [snorts] which are all basically just situation where you split a beam of light into two paths and then try to mess with one of the paths and see what happens. That's it. John Kramer says that the answer to all these weird things we see in these EPR experiments might be that we can cheat time travel. So with John Kramer is theoretically going to give us the answer to are we going to send the plane back in time? Are we going to send the plane to the present or are we going to send the plane to the future? And can we rule out any of those possibilities? So John Kramer's perspective, I'm going to give you the abridged version so we don't have to read through all this just right now and then we're going to get to the the next part. What John Kramer is going to tell us is whether or not this plan is going to go past, present or future. Now here I have read a lot of John Kramer's work and initially and in fact if you go watch my podcast appearances I have stated that he said we could create a signal a switch. So basically we have our two paths. Our one path is our control path. we're going to see either a star or we're going to see an orange. Okay, we see a star or an orange, we know the other side's going to be a star or an orange. That's how this entanglement thing works. So John Kramer was saying, "Hey, technically we can't send star or orange. We can't do that. If you try to send a message, the quantum entanglement breaks down. Can't do it. But what we can do is this one path, we've got our control path, our second path. Let's split the second path. In fact, we'll switch. We'll have a switch and then we'll send it down one way or we'll send it down another way. And if it goes down one way, we're going to measure it, which will cause the wave function to collapse. And if it goes down the other way, we're not going to measure it. The wave function won't collapse. So now we have a switch. If it goes one way, we have wave function collapse. Goes the other way, wave function won't collapse. So now if I flip the switch, now the control side should change every time I flip the switch. Genius. Cuz what did we just do there? Now we built an indirect way into the experiment to change the outcome without directly measuring it. Now we can send information. And I went on Tim Pool and I said, "We can make a switch and do faster than light communication. It's possible." But John Kramer did a test. And this is where it gets very confusing. Like I said, I read through a lot of John Kramer's stuff. And in 2014, John Kramer did an experiment where he tried to test retrocausality using this switch mechanism. And what happened? What happened was nature got in the way. At least we're going to assume that his results are all above the board that nothing was, you know, messed with or mess no funny business going on. I I trust John Kramer. So basically what he's saying is if you try to send message from the future to the past by using this switch somehow the control light beam just goes fuzzy doesn't send you don't see a picture you don't see the star you don't see the orange so what's happening is he's saying is that nature is basically getting in the way and he says we have a tr you have to look at quantum mechanics as a transactional exchange. Uh information coming from the future is meeting information from the past and then a handshake occurs and this handshake says is this real? Is this possible? Yes. If it's possible then it happens. If it's not possible, if it would violate causality aka go back in time, then it collapses and it doesn't happen. And this is what I've been saying is that the main physicists believed that nature would prevent us from going back in time. That something would happen that would prevent it from happening. And that's what John Kramer's results ultimately showed. So, first thing that we've learned about portals tonight. Well, is this even the first? We may have already learned a few things. Another thing we've learned about portals tonight, probably not going to be able to go back in time, but this does not rule out instantaneous transmission and it does not rule out moving forward in time either. Those are not ruled out by this information, by this experimentation. And we shouldn't rule out the idea entirely. just seems based on what we've seen here unless we can come up with some other workaround seems unlikely. There is one exception that may be a workaround that from what I looked and I can't find adequate answer by John Kramer which is a thought experiment two portals. Let's say I set up a portal here where the chat is over here on on this side and I set a portal way over here next to the edge of the screen and I can transmit instantly between these locations. But then when I'm over here near the edge of the screen, I set up another portal and that portal goes back over here somewhere between the two Now I've set up two different portal systems. When you set up these double portal systems and you're transmitting instantly between them, you could in theory set up a situation in which you go back in time because each of these locations is experiencing a different rate of time. So that the double hop or the multiple portal hop situation as far as I can tell is not adequately addressed for my liking. So, this could mean this could be a loophole to backwards in time travel. Not sure. Or maybe nature just gets in the way and says, "Nope, sorry. I can't do that.