The Futurist's Bible - Frontiers of Propulsion Science

Video Transcript

# The Futurist's Bible - Frontiers of Propulsion Science Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foroding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest [music] can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question [music] those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline. [music] Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing [music] back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow [music] decay of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. [music] lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience and [music] superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that [music] around for a while. Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we are 25 years later realizing just [music] what he was trying to tell us back then. Ashton Forbes, you know that super jacked guy. Malaysian 37 contact. >> Here we go. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with [music] 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [music] Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government, >> why [music] shoot a dand if it's the hostile? Our technologies permit us to manipulate time [music] and space >> by the magnitude. >> They need distance annihilate. >> This country [music] is very powerful, far more powerful than people understand. [music] We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world. [music] Not even close. I remember [music] from Hindu scripture is trying to persuade the prince that [music] he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multiarmed form and says now I am become death the destroyer of worlds. [music] >> I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> Tell us how it is. Oppenheimer, tell us how it is. Here we go, guys. Welcome to the live stream. Happy Monday, everybody. OMG, it is happening. Full science live stream. Oh, it's been the most requested thing. And it has arrived. We are ready. The Bible. The Bible for the high IQ futurist has arrived. There it is. Frontiers for Propulsion Science, edited by Mark Milis. He was the person that led the NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program. And Eric W. Davis. Wow, guys. There are going to be some significant readings from the Bible. Turns out, guys, this might be a religion. This might end up actually being a religion. Maybe I am your grandpa, actually, chat. Maybe I am your grandpa. Maybe I'm the one that messes all this up. Maybe it's me that goes into the future and develops the time machine and sends it to the past and that's why the whole timeline is all messed up. If so, I would like to apologize in advance if it's all my faults. I didn't know. I didn't know. Okay guys, before we get into that, a lot of good stuff for you tonight. First things I want to take a look at though are a couple things on social media. A lot of people wonder, you know, we have been revealing a neutronic fusion and it's been already beyond my wildest dreams. Trialpha Energy is selecting a new site for their fusion reactor. Um, Helion Fusion is building a fusion reactor as well. And I heard that Kepler Kepler aerospace is also building a fusion reactor. So, the commercialization of a neutronic fusion is coming online. And in the meantime, standard physicists, the uh, normie physicists have absolutely no idea whatsoever. So, I want to play this clip because I was actually on this podcast, the Demystify Science podcast with Anastasia, I think. Wait, I actually don't know how she pronounces her name. She might actually be the kind of person that gets upset about me mispronouncing her name. Anyway, Anastasia Anastasia, I forget how she pronounced her name. And Shiloh. See, I remember these people. I'm a good uh guest. They're interviewing Dr. Brian Keading. Now, Brian Keading is famous for almost winning a Nobel Prize. He loves to talk about how he was a finalist for the Nobel Prize. You're not supposed to even know that. So, you know, take it how you will. Here he is uh debating them or talking to them about cosmic microwave background. And chat, before you ask why this is significant and why we're watching this, how many live streams have you watched? Have I ever let you down? Have I ever let you down? No. Not once. Not ever. Get ready. Cosmic micro in the background. >> So, what we're saying is we're like, "Hey, Brian, there's a crazy thing that we've come across. We've read Plunk. We have been studying black body radiation. We have been thinking about it tremendously. Shiloh and I literally at 3:00 a.m. we will wake up and I'll be like, "Yo, dude, are you awake?" And he'll he'll groan and I'll be like, "Okay, so I've been thinking about lises." And then we talk for, you know, an hour until finally we can fall asleep. Like, this is something that we spend >> chat. I don't mean to go on a tangent. This is why I'm not married. I swear to God, if my significant other was waking me up at 3:00 a.m., she wants to talk about physics latises chat. That's not the time. That's not the time. There's time and place at 3:00 a.m. is not the time. all of our time thinking about and we're like, Brian, I think that there's something about material science in the laboratory that is relevant to cosmology that is that needs to be addressed. >> Okay, let me just maybe fast forward to some possibly more interesting things than this. I mean, for me, this is not very interesting, but I will address. >> Okay, it's the centerpiece of the theory. like if >> the deviations from perfect emissivity for 100% absorption and and emission the deviations of say that the the what we consider the CMBB frame to be to be about compared to any other dis any other uh model that purports to explain the CMB's existence there's there's a thousand sigma difference between the postulate that it's dust and it's caused by starlight scattering or iron filing >> okay that's enough damn bro can you imagine can you imagine if I went on a podcast and I was like this isn't interesting to me like they obviously want to they want to explore the idea of how sure are we about the cosmic microwave background. So we look at this thermal signature. We look out in outer space and we say let's look at this thermal signature from what we imagine to be the big bang. this leftover radiation that we see and we say okay this radiation here it has to have come from this big bang that we theorize occurred and this is why everything came from a single point and cos microwave background explains it now they're clearly trying to push back on the idea that this is you know either that the big bang exists or that happened or just really just exploring alternative theories isn't that what physics is all about now let me be clear I actually think the cosmic I don't I think the cosmic microwave background I mean I have no problem with it existing in fact it's going to be super relevant when we start reading some quotes from this book later during this live stream um but I wouldn't approach it that way I wouldn't be like this is not interesting to me sorry this is beneath me um and this is the problem this is the problem with physics because we haven't had any significant physics breakthroughs in over a decade minimum And really, you could say decades if you're talking about major significance breakthrough, physics breakthroughs in terms of understanding more about the aspects of physics we don't currently understand. Dark energy, dark matter, what's the nature of gravity? Um, you know, what where's mass and energy even coming from? Where where did it come from? How does that any of that work? Heck, we can't even really explain the big bang. What all the matter and energy came from? Nothing but just one particular time. We can't even logically explain that. So the problem with physicists, they're so condescending. These academic physicists, they act like everything's been figured out. They act like everything's been figured out. They're beyond reproach. This is boring to me. Like if it's such so simple, then just explain it simply, you know? And if you can't, then is your idea really beyond reproach? And it reminds me so much of the MH370 situation. You see that it's really a psychological issue that crosses all of these boundaries, not just physics, but even investigations in the missing airplanes where literally the whole case hinges on one piece of evidence in MH370. And we only know this because we know the truth. It hinges on the Inmarat satellite pings for this missing plane. If the Inmarat satellite pings after 1840 are wrong, then we're watching a plane get teleported out of the sky in the Nicar islands. If those pings are true, then that plane is in the South Indian Ocean. You ask people and you say, "How are you so sure this plane's in the South Indian Ocean or they're searching right now as we speak? As I speak, they're searching right now." And you ask these experts and they say, "Yeah, we know it's in the South Indian Ocean because of these satellite pings." And you say, "Well, what if those satellite pings are wrong?" Doesn't that just kind of destroy your whole underlying framework? Nope. Can't be wrong. Impossible for them to be wrong. You're like, "So, what results do you have from assuming that they're right?" None. None whatsoever. They've never found a single. The official search has never found anything before. Not even one piece of luggage. Nothing. Crazy. How can you be confident when you've completely failed to produce any actual advancement, conclusions, results, unbelievable to me. Okay, next clip. Next thing I want to take a look at. Um, did I download this one? I think I downloaded this one. Yeah, I download this one. Uh, this Jesse Michaels clip. So, UAP Gerb was on Jesse Michaels and real quick, I I have a new hard truth podcast that is going to drop uh probably in a few days, maybe next weekend with uh Dana Kipple talking about plasma, plasma consciousness, metaphysics, and it's a good conversation. Um we I talked about Nick Cook's uh work as I think he interviewed her. So, check that out coming out in a few days. Um, and then I've got another really exciting interview uh hopefully coming up after that. So, got some amazing things down the pipe here. So, UAP Gerb was on with Jesse Michaels and uh my name actually came up. So, let me go ahead and play this clip. I think this is it. >> Was a a slide deck, not really leaked, but kind of rediscovered about Eric Davis doing a teleportation study for the MIT Corporation. Go back to 2019. who and so when because you have people online like Ashton Forbes who like talk a lot about teleportation like he's really sure that like you could teleport like a macro scale human being or something. When I've spoken to Eric Davis he seems to be you know like talking about like quantum teleportation saying like that's already established science and you know that sounds insane because the word teleportation is in it but like is that necessarily involved in like UFO tech or is it so much of the science and physics is so far beyond me. Me too. >> I as boring as it sounds I like the money. I like the the program names. I like the offices cuz cuz while we're while we're speaking about um kind of these these administrators NRO CIA DS&T and kind of their string pullers and the DDNI ATNF and alstat are now O USDA and you talked about Kona Blue which was the failed prospective special access program that occurred in in 2010 and we can actually thank Arrow for releasing that slide deck. Weirdly enough this was to be a um DHS sponsored uh USAP uncknowledged special access program for Loy Martin to divulge some craft materials to the offset program and and big low advanced aerospace space studies bass. >> Uh and these materials were supposed to be bits and pieces of craft craft hall craft bulkhead. I myself have heard this involved the Kingman wreckage from the 1953 Kingman Arizona crash and that Loheed Martin vice President James Jim Jim Ryder James Ryder was the one who who wanted to get rid of these the materials for for who knows and conventionally u Glen Gaffne CIA DS&T deputy director was the one who put and kill this um >> huh so several thoughts [clears throat and cough] number one uh UAP Gerb I you know I don't know where he came from he got bit really big out of nowhere all of a sudden but and I could right now, just know I could spread a rumor and claim that he's, you know, some deep state something if I wanted and people would believe me, but I'm not that kind of guy and I have nothing against the guy anyway. Um, but and my true opinion from what I just heard right there is he's clearly an honest guy. For someone to say something like that, it's a very honest, genuine thing to say like I'm not interested. I the science physics goes above my head. But this also points out the problem just like with academia. The problem is nobody really wants to understand the physics. Just I mean UAP group is just simply not interested. It's like yeah can we teleport? Can we make wormholes? I mean the guy I'm talking about literally has a paper called teleportation physics study for Air Force Research Labs. Can we I mean I feel like I shouldn't have to put these dots together for other people. It's starting to like get a little silly for me. But this is the difference between UAP Gerb and I. His research is really good, but he's interested more in the companies and the money side of it. I think that stuff's interesting. I've talked about it many times. I even talked about Glen Gaffne, which he mentioned at the end there. But for me, I've got to know how the people in my comments that are saying, "Well, where did the plane go?" They always are. First of all, guys, yes, the aliens downloaded the information in my brain, but they didn't give me the ability to see to the future, unfortunately. So, I don't know where the plane went. I don't know where the plane went exactly. So, you know, I I can only guess. Um crap. Uh what was I going to say? Oh, so for me, I have to understand though how it's going to work. And tonight that's the main topic is here's and I'm going to sell it to you right now early on in this live stream which is I think they've figured out a deeper layer a deeper layer than the Miami mall. I keep thinking about the letter to Ash and Forbes. There's a deeper layer to this. The deeper layer that we already figured out is that it's connected to nuclear weapons and nuclear weapon research. And this shouldn't be surprising than the companies like Loheed Martin. Loheed Martin have figured this thing out. The deeper layer is that they've figured out the extra dimension. [snorts] There's not just four dimensions. Up, down, left, right, back, and forth. Time. Fifth dimension. mass energy as in all the energy in the universe including spacetime itself including the zero point energy five dimensions five dimensions and if we can understand there's an extra dimension then now we can understand how do I get from over here to over here while jumping the gap I mean like picked up on our piece of paper so now we've said, "If I'm stuck on the surface of this book and I can only move up and down like this, I can't go up uh vertically here." We've fig I'm saying that what they've figured out is that you can we figured out how to pick somebody up here, lift them up, and then drop them right here. That's teleportation. That's the teleportation like like my hand is on the screen right now to do this. And how did they do that? I postulate that what they figured out is something called the absolute or primordial rest frame. The absolute primordial rest frame. So everything is moving in relation to itself. You probably into other objects. You've probably seen the image on social media that shows how the planet's really moving through the solar system and you see us all spinning around the earth and the earth is spinning around the in the galaxy. That's true of everything. Everything is moving relative to everything else. But what if there's a position there's an absolute frame where if you're in that frame, you can see every the true nature of everything else moving around. If you could see that, that would be equivalent of doing what I was just describing, which is basically taking any two points and being able to make a bridge between them. That's what I think they figured out. And going to the point of Loheed Martin and Glenn Gaffne, Glenn Gaffne was whatever of inqel. This guy was over the CIA's acquisition and uh adventure capital. uh basically how the CIA lets technology disseminate into the public. James Ryder of Loheed Martin, it would not surprise me to find out that they did have some technology. And if you had that technology and you successfully reverse engineered it, like made your own plasma orbs, figured out teleportation, the very next thing I would do is destroy all the evidence. The very next thing I would do is I would take those UFOs and I would go destroy them, those alien bodies, go incinerate those. Leave no evidence whatsoever behind because what I would come out and say is that no, we invented this ourselves. Humans are really smart. We figured this out all by ourselves. And anybody says otherwise, show me the evidence. What do you mean we got this from aliens? We got this from the government. If I was Loheed Martin, I would have already done that like 20 years ago, maybe even longer, like 30 years ago. So, don't be surprised if there's nothing to find at this point because especially we're looking at, again, in the MH370 videos, we're not looking at like janky, we just figured it out, teleportation. We're looking at like quantum computers or AI controlling plasma or fusion orbs as they converge on a plane like perfectly from all three different angles. No. So if you remember so actually any last thoughts on that shout out to Jesse Michaels because he's actually not afraid to say my name. At least I feel like a lot of these guys are some just like afraid to even say my name. At least Jesse Michaels is like, "Hey, this guy Ashen Forbes says the teleportation's real and we teleported this airplane because here's the truth. It is real and we are going to find out that we teleported an airplane." That's what we're going to learn. So, you're here on the front lines learning it early. Now the next thing we spoke about Ferris Williams. Let me see what I've got here. You know, how do I want to start this? Let's start here. We spoke about Ferris Williams who corrected the nuclear weapons codes on Friday and I mentioned that he was good friends with Paul Morad. So, we are at a point now where I think we've found the deeper layer that they have been hiding that leads to all of these technologies, fusion, teleportation, probably a lot more other crazy stuff that we don't even know about. We found the deeper layer and we found the engineers who helped the US government do it. Are we ever going to be able to have proof of an one particular person who helped do it? Probably not. But how do you figure it out? you just read their scientific papers that they've written for the military. Literally just read the scientific papers they did for the military and instead of just saying I don't believe this is real, just assume that it is real. Do a thought experiment. So Ferris Williams found one of his papers. What What do you think it's about? Let's take a look. Oh, wait. That's not the right thing. Here we go. This is what I want. There we go. Here's one of Ferris's Williams papers. Fusion for Earth and Space. This is uh looks like it was published right after he died. The compact reactor concept has the potential to provide clean, safe, and unlimited supply of energy for Earth and space applications. Concept is a potential fusion reactor where dutrium are fused into helium nuclei. Um, so it says right here, no harmful radiation is a byproduct of this fusion process. Therefore, this reaction using uh does not require any shielding to contain the radiation. So, we know what we're looking at right here, an autronic fusion reactor. So, Ferris Williams in the early 2000 2000s had already postulated an autronic fusion reactor. Wow, that's pretty incredible to me. Now, let me go and show you some more stuff. Close that. Share this again. Here we go. Oh, we can share audio with this super lumininal spacecraft. Yet another one of his uh papers. Now, this one essentially it's pretty clear that Ferris Williams believed in the ether. He believed in an extra dimension. Um, guess what in his fusion reactor? So, I think this is one of the UFO people here. This guy um observing the anomaly. I don't know if I know him. He probably hates me. Most of them hate me. the dynamic theory as we spoke about on Friday that Ferris Williams believes there's a five dimensions and again this is the guy that corrected the nuclear weapons yields corrected them so there's a paper uh this is the paper right here memorial and thoughts of a man with great ideas Ferris Williams and it actually talks about this talks about his fusion reactor uh this document here talks about his connection to Paul Morad, Morad, however you say his name. The papers, his papers can be found here. He was published. He worked at Los Alamos. Oh, 2012 APEC interview. That's the one that I'm about to show you here. And then this space show interview, which I have downloaded, and we're going to watch listen to a moment of that as well. Okay. Now, where was the thing I was going to show here? This right here. [clears throat] Let me just read this. It gets even more interesting because at that same post I discussed Dr. Ronald Richter was claiming to have created fusion in 1948 and was reportedly using lithium hydide. Well, that's exactly what Williams is claiming to be likely the best way to make a compact fusion reactor using his theory. What? Uh what? Uh so what's going on with lithium? There are three a neutronic fusion fuels. Helium 3, boron 11, and lithium 6, lithium 7. But lithium never gets mentioned. never gets mentioned. MH370 is loaded up with lithium-ion batteries. Way too many batteries. And they didn't talk about them for some reason. And now here, let me read this. This is a direct quote from um uh Ferris Williams. One of the first hydrides that might come to mind when thinking of designing fuel for these reactors might be lithium hydrogen. This is known to gen uh to general come in powdered form with a few large chunks of approximately one/4 in in maximum dimension. The question of how to obtain sufficiently large solid of fuel to allow the use of magnetic control field should come up. The Los Alamos National Laboratory previously established a method of growing large crystals of lithium duteride for material characterization studies. What? And then listen to this. This is so crazy. This honestly connects so many of the people we've talked about and talked to. What Williams is describing is using magnetic fields to align the spin of dutyium, which he predicts will reduce the amount of energy it takes for fusion to begin and that it will lead to a normally rare type of fusion into helium with no nuclear radiation created. This of course sounds like cold fusion. It is also reminiscent of Dr. Ronald Richtor's claims of fusion which were refuted to be impossible at such low temperatures. Chat chat. Holy [ __ ] Does that that probably you guys, if you haven't been super hardcore watching me, that's exactly what Dr. U told me. Go watch the Hard Truths podcast with Dr. U from NASA. And Dr. Dr. U has his Yuon theory. Hey Billy, no downside. And in Dr. U's Yuon theory, he says that everything is magnetism. And the reason why things repel strongly is because the spin is oriented against one another. But if you were to flip the spin, like if I were to flip something that's upside down to the other direction, now all of a sudden they'll be able to come together. or things that are going to be gen if they're strongly repelled when their spins are oriented against one another then they won't be strongly repelled when their spins are are not oriented against one another. So you can think about spin like spin is a quantum spin but it's also has the same uh uh physics uh u uh properties as normal spin does. [sighs] So this is really interesting because what he's speaking about there is lowering the kulum barrier. If we have our two ions that are positively charged, they're going to repel each other. But he's saying if you change the spin, you can lower that cool barrier and now you don't need the same amount of energy. This is also very similar dynamic nuclear polar uh orientation. I mean, I think that's the whole point of dynamic nuclear orientation is aligning the spins of particular atoms. Hm. And this speaks to a lattice structure. Every every solid is a lattice structure of materials. That's what they are. So you could imagine all this lattice structure. Everything is lined up spinning the same way. You can imagine if you could change that spin around what the impact might be. Okay. So let's listen to this next part. Um, and he says he doesn't think the gravitational constant is constant. Okay, before I get too sidetracked here, I want to listen to this part. Let's listen to a little Ferris Williams. Guys, can you guys hear this? Let me see. >> Gage potential. >> I also have shown >> I'm gonna reshare because it's it's weird. Anyway, okay. So, this is one I have a couple Ferris interviews. We're going to listen to a couple minutes of this. >> Einstein's general theory is one fourdimensional hypersurface embedded into a fivedimensional space. When you talk about five dimensional gauge functions, the fifth dimensional potential is a gravitational potential. So, if you have a nons singular electrostatic potential, you also must have a non-s singular gravitational potential. >> Okay? You also have to have an inductive tie between electromagnetic and gravitational phenomenon. Well, that argues that you can electromagnetically create gravitational forces. That's where George came up with the >> So you guys >> So I can't make any louder. That's a max of that goes. It's just a quiet unfortunately quiet interview. But did you just listen to what he just said? He just said there must be an extra dimension. is that you take Einstein's equation, you throw it in a fifth dimension, spacetime, you throw it in this extra dimension, and then he says there must be a connection between gravity and electromagnetism. There must be a connection between gravity and electromagnetism. If that's the case, you can make a warp drive. You can make a warp drive. Why? Because you're going to manipulate the lattice. You're not going to manipulate the object. Stop trying to push the object. Use relativity. Use relativity and change the background. Change the environment. >> You guys actually built and tested the small version that >> I I built a uh small not not a warp drive in the sense of a lifter because I was didn't aim for that much gravitational modification but I was able to put two cones together. So I have to make one cone heavier and one cone lighter and measure the amount of torque. >> Okay. >> By uh the use of the noun for what? >> Okay. [clears throat] Honestly, I've heard enough. Like the thing people need to be realizing here. This guy was literally working for the DOE labs. He was literally working for the Navy. These guys like him and Busousard, all these guys are talking about have working on if you were to imagine where is the the the most advanced weapons research happening on the planet, nuclear weapons and that level. These guys are all there. They're there. There isn't anything higher than this. And they're coming out just saying this stuff publicly, talking about building fusion reactors and warp drives. And even if they don't all agree on the exact conceptual view of it, they all agree that spacetime must not be empty, that spacetime itself must be a lattice structure, that we must have some kind of ether going on that may have memory to it. Let me switch because I want to show I want to play this other interview here. We're going to connect this. This is all going to add up to something here. This should be a little louder. Uh hopefully this works. uh agreed that a good job for me after that was a military research associate at the uh national laboratory. I worked there for five years working. Now that put me in a very unique position. I was placed by the Navy and the senior admiral in the Navy was my sponsor. It turned out that that sponsor was also secretary for community. So he was in one over the director of Los. >> So >> let me go ahead and tell you what he's saying right there. That's the same guy. Rare interview with Ferris Williams saying that he was in the Navy but he went and worked at Los Alamos. And basically the person that was his advisor or whatever was the dep under director or whatever of DOE. So what's he saying? He's saying the only reason why I was allowed to do this research and he was doing fusion research. The only reason why I was allowed to do this research and this science was because the DOE had blessed it. This is something we've heard repeatedly. Bousard mentioned this as well. In fact, it's so similar that I'm getting them confused. Actually, so similar I'm getting them confused. Okay. So, here there's a quick in uh um commercial. Let me see what he says here. >> Establishment of a spaceiet on Earth. >> Okay, here we go. to us right now and I'm your host David Livingston that he hired me a collab with uh he only asked half the time I spend on laboratory with Oh, you guys couldn't hear anything there. Oh, sorry. It was muted. Okay, it's not working that well. I'll just tell you what he said. Okay, apologies. So, Ferris Williams is saying that the the academics were ignoring everything that he's saying. The academics are ignoring his science and his research. But the people that he was working with in these DOE projects, they knew something was missing. They knew something else is required to understand what's going on in physics. This is huge. This is exactly what we're looking for, guys. I have no doubt whatsoever that we have stumbled across something that was not meant to be figured. was not meant to be solved. Was never meant for the public to figure out. They knew. How would they know? Because they're doing high energy physics research. They're doing plasma research. So, they're seeing the results that are classified. They're seeing those results that they know the standard model is not holding up. For example, just imagine that you're working with plasma and you're seeing anomalous heat. You're seeing excess energy similar to ponds inflation. Imagine something like that. So there's Ferris Williams saying we the people I worked with in the DOE, those people took it seriously. So this also tells you is kind of a good old boys club. Some people see it and some people don't and they don't care. the people that don't see it, they just treat them like more primitive. They're like, "Yeah, people didn't really see it. They don't really get it." They don't try to convince them. They don't go to the media and try to tell people we got to know. They just say, you know, a lot of people just they don't believe it. They don't see it. That's how it is. Now, why am I showing you this? [clears throat] I told you this is going to all connect together. I'm not lying. This right here is Oak Shannon. Who's Oak Shannon? Well, remember that scientific that paper that I was just showing you that was called Memorial and Thoughts of a Man with Great Ideas, Ferris Williams. Well, the very first author on that is a guy named James O. Shannon. That's James Oki Shannon, as in Oak Shannon, as in this guy right here. So, this guy you're looking at on the screen right here was really good friends with Ferris Williams. And here he is. This is shout out to um what's this guy's name? Uh Project Unity. Project Unity. Uh do I have it on the right spot? I think I do. Uh hold on. Crap. What was the point? Okay. Yeah. Here we go. I took some markers down. I want you to listen to this. Um, here he is talking about turns out Oak Shannon worked with Ferris Williams and there was something called the Wilson Davis memos in the UFO lore where Eric Davis spoke to some Admiral, Admiral Wilson, and found out there really is a crash retrieval program, secret projects that even Admirals can't get access to. That's the short version. These notes only became public because Edgar Mitchell, the astronaut, died and somebody found them in his notes and we're like, "Hey, why is this here talking about this conversation?" So, this conversation definitely h anyone that didn't think this conversation happened with these notes is is honestly just kind of stupid. Oak Shannon even confirms the information in the notes and confirms that he had a phone call that is documented in the notes. So, I mean, what more do you what more confirmation do you need? Anyway, here you go. Pretty weird, though, right? Like, why would Oak Shannon be getting mentioned in the Wilson Davis notes, Wilson Davis memo? H because I mean, you guys get where I'm going with this, right? Nuclear weapons research, teleportation, these guys are all working together. They're all talking to admirals and [ __ ] about aliens, reverse engineering, and all kinds of advanced alien technologies. Well, what are those advanced alien technologies? Teleportation, animic fusion. Okay, so that's the summary of the Wilson Davis memos. It's It's actually I don't know why the UFO community makes it up to be like this huge thing for me. It's like, okay, great. Some admiral spoke to a physicist does black projects. Of course, they have crazy [ __ ] It's not even that wild to me. But anyway, I digress. This is the part I want you guys to hear, though. Let me see here. Okay. Made by human hands. Now, this transcript has been floating around online for a number of years with a a a pretty wide divide being created within the research community in regards to their overall legitimacy. And although behind closed doors, one of the individuals involved has confirmed their legitimacy. And those closest to the story have vouched for their accuracy. There has been a recent shift towards public acknowledgement. This was made clear when a man named Dr. Gary Nolan, one of the world's leading geneticists who works closely with Eric Davis, openly acknowledged his belief that the transcript of this meeting is indeed legitimate. And he said this to millions of people during an interview on Fox News. And he even acknowledged how he had briefed a sitting congressman, a man named Mike Gallagher, on this transcript. And uh and Mike Gallagher then brought these documents to an official congressional hearing on UFOs. these documents are actually now available to download off of the US Congress's own website. Now, I would not expect you to be able to confirm the legitimacy of the transcript itself or whether the meeting actually took place because the alleged meeting has nothing to do with you in a direct sense. However, your name is mentioned in these documents and so for the sake of clarification, I think it's important that we just get your side of this on the record. So, I would just like to be able to ask you first of all whether or not you personally know Dr. Eric W. Davis. >> Yeah. And do you personally >> I didn't I didn't work with him uh day in and day out, but I did work with him. I know him fairly well. >> May I ask how you >> Holy [ __ ] Holy [ __ ] Chat, [music] what in the hell is going on? you uh first got to know him >> uh in mutual projects uh mutual acquaintances u meetings >> what are you [ __ ] chat do you know how many people if you just put me in the room with you want to know why these engineers won't talk to me want to know why Mark Milis is rejecting interviews uh cuz I'm going to get the answers chat you put me in this interview like Jay Anderson. The reason why Jay Anderson hates me is cuz I'm just better than him in every possible way at the same exact thing. The only thing he's better than me than me at is being a pretentious guru. Fake pretentious guru. Because if you have this conversation with me, I you know what kind you're working on DOE projects with Eric W. Davis and you're a famous nuclear physicist engineer that works at like Los Alamos and where where was it? Lawrence Livermore. Uhhuh. I'm starting to see the connection here. Let You know what? Let I don't want to interfere. Let's let him keep going. >> Sure. >> And do you personally know Admiral Thomas R. Wilson? >> Yes, I do. >> I want to I want to play that again. I just I want to play that again. >> Fairly well. >> May I ask how you >> knows him fairly well? >> Who uh first got to know him? uh and mutual projects uh mutual acquaintances u meetings things of that sort. >> And do you personally know Admiral Thomas R. Wilson? >> Yes, I do. But again, I know him and of course I know of him. Um but um I I read somewhere that his response was, "Okay, I'm going to skip ahead a little bit here because he just says basically this story about how like this admiral is not going to remember him from super long ago." Okay, who cares? 2002 inquiring into the background and overall trustworthiness of Dr. Eric Davis >> uh earlier. >> Okay. So basically he's saying right here he gets asked that this note says that somebody was asking you about the trustworthiness of Eric W. Davis. So the chat chat what the [ __ ] is going on? This is basically Oak Shannon saying that the admiral reached out to him and was like, "Do you trust Eric W. Davis? Should I talk to him at all?" Not not should I disclose information. Should I even talk to him at all? Do you trust him? You worked with him in DOE projects. Do you This is like basically asking, "Do you think he's a spy or some shit?" So when when Oak Shannon says, "Yeah, I worked with him. I knew him a little bit. Bro, you are literally vouching for a guy saying he's not a spy. That goes a That's like a little beyond putting him down on a reference for your resume. You know, I could go to some co-workers and be like, "Hey, can I put you down for a reference for a job?" This is like, "Hey man, he's not a spy. I work on nuclear weapons and teleportation with him." >> Okay. >> That my apologies. >> Yeah. No, it's um Well, we were we moved to Florida in 2000 and Linda's listening in the background, so she can yell at me and tell me if I'm wrong. >> Hey, Linda. >> 2001. 2001. Um I had had a heart attack uh and had actually died on the ICU table. Um and and had my own out of body experience, by the way. >> Yes. I I want to talk to you about that a little bit later on. Absolutely. Um but um I was eventually forced to retire medically because I I could not get back in the saddle even remote uh work. Um and I was at home. I was several complications out of that experience out of that problem uh kept recurring over the months. This was in like May of 99. >> Yeah. May of 99. Um, and throughout the summer I was having these other problems being propped up for that. And and so I was at home, actually I was actually writing uh trying to write a novel about the destruction of the Twin Towers. >> Get ready. Something's about to happen here. >> Yeah. This was in 1999. I had to trash that when when it actually happened. >> Wow. Um but um I got this phone call uh and it was from uh Admiral Wilson and he asked me now this was not a short conversation that you know I was recuperating. >> Uh I was able to carry on >> chat [snorts] you're about to hear something here that blew me the [ __ ] away. Prepare yourself mentally >> on this conversation on the phone but I wasn't able to do much else at that point. Um, and we had a discussion and one of the things he wanted to know was could he trust um, Eric Davis? And I think he may have even mentioned how put off. Um, and pause uh, um, he maybe even mentioned how put off. Wait, wait. What? Say that again, buddy. Say that again. Let's go back. I need to rewind time like 10 seconds. So, Admiral Wilson calls you up. Imagine a [ __ ] Admiral calling you up. Admiral calls you up because people are inquiring about UFOs and secret projects that the government won't acknowledge exist. They're calling you up and they want to talk to you. and they're famous physicists themselves that work on black projects themselves call you up and you're like, "Hey, I'm going to call up Oak Shannon, my old bro at the DOE, and I'm going to get the inside scoop on these dudes. I don't know anything about them. Are they legit or not?" And Oak Shannon says, >> "I was recuperating." >> Uh, I was able to carry on this conversation on the phone, but I wasn't able to do much else at that point. Um, and we had a discussion and one of the things he wanted to know was could he trust um, Eric Davis and I think he may have even mentioned hell put off um, and one or two other people. And um, I >> I wish he said the other names. One or two other people. Is it John Kramer? Is it Mark Milis? It might literally be the people we're talking about tonight. >> Mentioned that. Yes, I believe that that Eric Davis was an honorable and and conscientious scientist uh and that he would honor any any restrictions the admiral might put on him. Uh and I I thought it would be safe for him to contact him. >> Did he uh >> Holy [ __ ] Holy [ __ ] >> Did he say at all why he was seeking that background information during during your conversation? >> No, he really didn't. No, but you did. >> Not my memory. Not my memory. I do not recall that. He's And I think I would have recalled that. Be [laughter] said, "I want to check on the little green men." I would Okay. >> Yeah. Certainly certainly would have recalled that. >> Eric Davis does other things than that, you know. >> Oh, yeah. He's a brilliant >> Eric He's and he goes, he's not talking about aliens. He wasn't calling to talk about aliens. Eric Davis does other thing than that. He's not talking about little green men. chat. What is Eric Davis known for? What is He's not known for his biological studies on aliens. He's known for his studies on teleportation physics. Teleportation is real, chat. You heard it here first. Okay. So, elsewhere in this interview, he talks about Ferris Williams and he talks about Ferris Williams five-dimensional theory. He talks about Ferris Williams and the popcorn project where Ferris Williams corrected the thermonuclear yield calculations. So we have a direct connection now between Ferris Williams, Eric W. Davis, Oak Shannon, Frank me, and Paul Morad in addition to the other engineers that are connected to all of those guys as well. In fact, at this point, we pretty much got like the Marvel superheroes group of guys that worked on thermonuclear weapons and also seem to work on gravity manipulation openly. And they also seem to all love autronic compact fusion reactors. What a coincidence, chat. They all believe in five dimensions. They all believe in unification of electromagnetism and gravity. They all believe in compact fusion reactors that can do autonic fusion. What a coincidence. They all believe in all the exact same things. What a miracle it must be for that to be the case. Okay, let me think. Was there anything else in that that I needed to show? It might be science time. Look here. I think it's science time. It [snorts] is science time. Okay, chat. Let's go to the hot sheets. Let's go to the Bible. I think it might be time for a passage. A passage from the book of Davis, [clears throat and cough] page 45, chat. If you are a um afficionado afficionado of the frontiers for propulsion science here, relativistic rocket equations. For the relativistic rocket equation, we follow essentially the same setups as the classical rocket equation. The difference being the use of relativistic equations for mass and velocity. Dth said the con conservation of mass energy content of the system will still remain. So what does this brief passage teach us about our studies? It tells us that we have been using classic rocket equations for our boom boom bang bang rockets that shoot into the sky that shoot shoot material behind them. But we have missed something super important. General relativity can be cheated. We can make relativistic. We can use relativistic effects and that slightly changes the equations. Slightly changes those equations. But this is the starting point for understanding how we can potentially manipulate gravity, how we can manipulate spaceime itself. >> [clears throat] >> Another passage [sighs] we have wondered about something very significant chat. We have wondered about the ground state of the hydrogen atom. The ground state of the hydrogen atom. Haludaf. So says our lord Halpudaf. High priest Halpudof. Actually we shouldn't take we shouldn't blaspheme. We should not blaspheme. High priest Hal Pudof has said that the reason why in quantum mechanics the electron does not crash into the into the atom into the nucleus is because that electron is constantly absorbing energy from the zero point energy. And you would say whoa why does that matter? Why does that matter high priest? And the reason why that matters is if that is true, then in theory, if we had a plasma of hydrogen, we might be able to pull energy out of it, kind of like jumping on a trampoline, and then it would just go back to its normal state after we pull the energy out. We could potentially have a free energy setup. So, what does the Bible What does our Bible say about this? Does our Bible mention this? Of course it does. It wouldn't be the Bible if it did not mention quite literally everything that we've ever discussed. [clears throat] Please open your books and read along with me. If we look near the end, there's a chapter, the final chapter, I believe it is actually. No, chapter 20. Chapter 20 chat. Null tests of free energy claims. H quite interesting by Earth Tech International, Scott Little. This is somebody that works underneath Hal Pudof. It is about testing free energy claims. Quite interesting. Please turn your Bible to page 639. We will we will read uh several passages together or you can just listen along. The null test of free energy claims. Now the null test of free energy claims first initiates by essentially saying that is very difficult to test these theories but there are several different ones that show promise. Some of them are zero point energy devices as mentioned on page 641. zero point energy devices according to John Archerald Wheeler at all elementary particles represent a percentage-wise almost completely negligible change in the locally violent conditions that characterize the vacuum. And essentially this says that this 0 point energy we might be able to interact with this zero point energy therefore developing a system that pulls that zero point energy out. The casmir effect might be one such effect. That is that phenomenon manifest manifest physical as shown by the sage Robert Forward. So say his name, Robert Forward. Now if we skip ahead another couple pages, we will see there is mention to other high cardinals such as Schwinger, Julian Schwinger. [snorts] And then there it is on page 643. So saith our lord [snorts] he e pudof at the bottom of the page the last paragraph I shall read verbatim [cough] [clears throat] he pudof has calculated the ground state of the hydrogen atom there it is there there it is on the page chat the ground state of the hydrogen atom can be explained as a dynamic balance between energy lost by the electron due to the acceleration, radiation and energy absorbed from the 0 point field chat. I may have gone in the future. I may go back in time and give Eric Davis this book because how else can you explain that the literal exact explanation that I have been saying on podcast for two years is written into this book from 2008 that I had never read before two days ago. Quite interesting. Let us continue. [sighs] The fact that the space between the kasmir plates is a region where 0 point energy is reduced in energy density led to speculation that hydrogen might lose some of its ground state energy when placed in such a cavity. Boom. There's the answer. How do we do it? How do we pull the energy out of the hydrogen atom? It's quite simple actually. Put it in a box. Put it in a box where the walls are very narrow. So the zero point energy can't fit and then that will cause it to go to a lower ground state for the hydrogen atom. Wow. Interesting. That's the speculation. If that were to be the case, then that energy release would constitute 0 point energy conversion and a circulation of hydrogen into and out of a kasmir cavity might produce a continuous extraction of energy from the 0 point energy field. Uh that's literally the thing that I've been saying. And here's the weirdest part. I came to that deduction and conclusion myself. I've literally never read this on paper before. But interestingly enough, this is clearly what Bernard Hay, Hal Pudof, Garrett Modell, this is clearly what they were thinking. So it's not surprising that I came to that conclusion. But it goes to show we are definitely walking the same exact path that these engineers before us walked. So continued. So we're going to extract, we're going to use this plasma, this hydrogen to extract the sacred zero point energy, the sacred waters of the zero point energy, the space juice. The sacred space juice. [snorts] Okay. So we're going to extract it. We have designed this is verbatim. We have designed and constructed several experiments to explore this hypothesis but without success so far. Most of these experiments were attempts to detect heat energy being released by hydrogen flowing through some form of kasmir cavity. We first tried constructing cavities out of precision optical flats. Okay, so it gets kind of technical here. Blah blah blah. We didn't able to get it to work. Okay. In a different approach to testing this hypothesis, we put hydrogen molecules in a in a casmir cavity and used absorption spectrometry to look for a shift in their ground state. That's actually pretty smart. That's pretty smart. How did that go? Which follows from the assumption that a description of the ground state energy would produce corresponding increase in the dissociation energy. Early attempts at this experiment were constructed at the synretron radiation center of the University of Wisconsin Madison. Following in the footsteps of the molecular spectrometry pioneer Ghart Heightsburg Herzburg extreme ultraviolet radiation was used to probe the dissociation of energy of hydrogen in the cavity. Unfortunately we did not find any evidence of a ground state shift in this work. And then he has a link to it here. Further effort along this line by consortium of researchers is planned. The theory and operating principles behind this approach are discussed more in chapter 18. Wow. So let me sidetrack for one second here. I'm going to mark this. I don't want to lose this. I'm going to come back to that. [clears throat] I said, wait, I said, wait a minute. Um, that doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Shouldn't this be something that's like really easy to be tested? If that's the case that hydrogen is just quite literally absorbing energy from 0 point energy field, we should probably be seeing this in plasma experiments that involve hydrogen. We should probably be seeing like anomalous heat and energy and various other things. So, have there been follow-up experiments like that? This book is from 2008. This book's from 2008. So, have there been follow-up experiments? Grock, help us out, Grock. We need your assistance. Finally, a useful purpose for AI. Eric Davis and Hal Puto's work referenced in the 2009 book Frontiers Propulsion Science describes unsuccessful attempts at extracting zero point energy by manipulating the ground state of the hydrogen atom. So, where is it? Um, since then, no direct follow-up experiments by Davis or Pudof specifically on hydrogen atom ZP have been publicly documented. What? So for 17 years, 18 years, you haven't done any more public scientific papers about it? Nothing. And yet they're still doing interviews all the time talking about this physics. I mean, if you thought it wasn't real, if you thought you had falsified it, you certainly wouldn't be promoting the idea. You would move on and you would find a new model that worked better. And yet these guys talk about 0 point energy and all this stuff like as it's absolute but their scientific papers they don't have the proof publicly available and they just don't they had no experiments after that. Like we did some experiments and we didn't find anything. We just gave up. We're done. But it's it's literally our whole life's work but we've given up and we don't care. Yes. To your guys point I'm being koi it obviously the research went dark. Obviously, the point is it's classified, right? That's what I'm trying to get people to think outside the box on this. But that doesn't mean there's not nothing. So, here are some other examples. In 2015, researchers published simulations of the hydrogen atom solving the Abram Laurent equation numerically for the electrons motion under dipole approximation. Um, this supports ZPE balance hypothesis. So here's an So there are some that actually do support it because there's other studies because it's not just one person working on hydrogen. A lot of people are working on hydrogen and all this type of stuff. So here are some more studies that were done pretty recently that also seem to support it. Um let me see. I think these were the ones that were a little better. Yeah. So this goes to show Garrett Modell. This is why they started thinking about that. What else did I see? I think it was this one. A 2023 experiment at the University of Wateroo demonstrated quantum energy teleportation, extracting ZPE locally from a simulated vacuum using entangled cubits in nuclear magnetic resonance setups. What? What? That sounds exactly like the MH370 videos. Have you guys ever seen nuclear magnetic resonance? an NMR machine looks spinning the three magnets configured spinning around like that. Whoa, that's weird. This one's weirdly on point. In fact, I wanted to look at the this scientific paper. I'm going to read this later tonight. This showed entanglement enables borrowing energy from distant vacuum regions violating no conservation laws. So again, a lot of this is like, how is this possible? We must be not breaking the laws of physics but at least bending them. And this is why I say teleportation is connected to free energy because you're making energy appear in front of you that came from somewhere else. You're quite freely moving energy from one location to the next which is a form of free energy. Absolutely. Okay. So I wanted to show that. But here was the other thing I thought because I thought isn't this easy to test? and it said, "Yeah, in principle they should be easy to test, but just like the Bible tells us, these concepts, a lot of them are so slim that they're very hard to test and accurately measure the impact." Now, the reason why it's hard and this and the Bible tells us this, this is not me speaking. The Bible tells us that, and again, not to be blasphemous, this is the futurist Bible, not the Catholic or any other Bible. It tells us the reason why gravity effects are so small is because spaceime is very tight, very tightly wound. So imagine something, imagine pulling a sheet that's super tightly wound, like super pull, it's super stretched, and you were to try to bounce on it. It's not going to go very it's not going to bend very much, right? That's the same as spacetime. Spacetime is the same way. So if you want to get spacetime to bend, if you want to manipulate, you have to have a huge huge amount of energy density or you need a resonance effect like breaking a wine glass. You need to pound on a little bit. Use your tuning fork. That's how you need to be thinking about it. And then I thought, hm, this is not the first time that I've heard of this idea that the the hydrogen atom there might be energy levels below the ground state. In fact, one specific one that sticks out to me is Randall Mills. Randall Mills. Because if this is the case, what should we see? If we can, what they're going to look for is this. They're going to put your hydrogen atom in a box, your chasm cavity, and they're going to measure the spectrometry of it. We're going to see where is the spectrometry of your atom. And if you see a shift, phase shift, left or right, you're seeing an energy difference. So in theory all you should have to do put your hydrogen atoms in a casmir cavity do spectrometry on it and you should be able to see a shift. So is anybody done this? In fact I kind of remember Randall Mills saying these exact words GPT help me out. Doesn't Randall Mills claim to have experimental spectrometry results that show lower stable states of hydrogen? Wouldn't that prove this theory correct? Well, well, well. What does it say? Yes. Randall Mills has long claimed experimental spectrometry and spectrometry results that he interprets as evidence for hydros, stable hydrogen states below the traditional ground state. Boom. And here you go. 2002 2022 paper sharp multi-line EPR spectrum form a molecular hydrino trapped in gallium hydroxide mix. So just saying this is the reason why I connect a zero point energy to what Randall Mills is saying and I've had several emails back and forth with him where I'm like dude how are you not seeing this? How are you not looking at what Halaputo's saying as an explanation for your for your results? And the answer, sadly, is that even the people that seem to know and be doing the research, they can even be blinded by their own vices. Sometimes it's ego, you know, usually it's ego and hubris because they want to be the ones who figured it out. Can't be somebody else's. It's got to be my theory is the one. got to be my theory. But my opinion, no question. Answer is zero point energy and you can use plasma. Now we're starting to realize how is it Sal told us directly just a week ago. He said plasma will allow us to extract 0. Fusion will allow us to tap into zero point energy. And I said, if I'm right, this should become obvious because we're going to start doing fusion reactions and they're going to be pulling way more energy out than we expected. Doesn't have to be way more. Just any amount more energy than we expected is got to have another explanation where that source is coming from. It's going to come from the zero point energy. And this theory right here is exactly the scientific basis and concept that would allow it for it to be possible. [clears throat] Let's read another passage. I'm looking for what I want to go to here. Okay. Um, which does he say here? I think it's this next one. This is the main one for tonight that I wanted to talk about. [snorts] [clears throat] This is from the book of Milis. Uh let's see. Oh, and they talk about optical analogy. Are you ready for this? Here we go. Little attention is typically focused on the an optical analogy because it does not predict any new effects that are not already covered in the more common geometric perspective and because it raises unanswered issues with coordinate systems. But it is these coordinate system issues that are provocative from the per from the spaceflight point of view and further to illustrate that is necessary to address Mach's principle. What is Mach's principle? What does the Bible teach us about Mock's principle? Mach's principle asserts [clears throat] that the inertial frame which is our bubble that we are in your bubble that you are in all the time my bubble that I'm in our inertial frame speci specifically the property of a space to be a reference frame for acceleration is actually created by and connected to the surrounding mass in the universe There it is, chat. All of what you are is coupled with spacetime. You're not in an empty vacuum. You're in a [ __ ] matrix. You're in a matrix and your inertial frame is connected to everything else. And everything you do touches everything else. your waves, you moving around vibrates and touches that object over there, that object over there just very subtly. But what this means is that you can manipulate the medium and that will cause me to appear to move from over here to over here. That's what they're saying here is they're laying the foundation. They're saying that spaceime is a your inertial frame is set within a medium. And now if we start to play with that medium now warp drives, wormholes, these things that we thought were science fiction now become physical reality. We just have to figure out how. But we just heard a clue. We just heard the clue. What was the clue? The clue said that this would imply a coordinate system. This would imply a coordinate system. Why is that so big? Because when we watch the sacred MH370 videos, we see orbs spinning around the plane in a perfect triangle formation vertically. They could be spinning along any axis of the plane, but they're spinning around it vertically. Almost like it's a coordinate system where they're cut and pasting that plane where it is in that moment into a different location somewhere else. H quite interesting. So these videos may be the missing link to the science and physics that they've hidden. Let me continue. [snorts] [cough and clears throat] So if your inertial frame is connected to the surrounding mass of the universe, then a relation assertion is that a literal interpretation of Mox principle implies an absolute reference frame coincident with the mean reference frame for all matter in the universe. Wow. They're saying that okay, yes, you're in your own little bubble. I'm in my own little bubble. But if you were to average out all the mess, all the mass in the universe, you could actually come up with the universe's rest frame. You could actually have something to compare against. And why is this big? Have you guys ever heard of adopt adaptive optics? Probably not. adaptive optics is that imagine we have a telescope and you're looking up in the sky. The problem is you're looking through the atmosphere and the atmosphere causes refraction, causes blurring. Do you know how they get around that? Adaptive optics. They shoot a laser beam into the sky and the laser beam becomes the reference point because they always know where the laser is. They're the source of the laser. So when they see the laser being blurred, they know how to correct the image that they're seeing. This is called adaptive optics. Adaptive optics is how you can tell how where something should be, where something actually is compared to where it looks like it is from the blur. Do you see where I'm going with this? Have you figured it out? The absolute reference frame is the same exact idea. If you've understood your absolute reference frame, now you have your adaptive optics. Now you have your laser beam that will tell you where everything really is in our universe. It will give you a coordinate system to tell you exactly where one point is relative to another point from a third party perspective. This is what they this is the big secret. This and the reason why this is the big secret is this is basically decoding the matrix itself. You've now figured out something beyond aerospace dominance and supremacy. This is supremacy over spa literal spaceime. Now let me continue. Goes on. Yes. And this also explains I think somebody just said the polyhedral configuration. Why are we seeing all these polyhedrals? because it's all about geometry and this coordinate system. And it's probably all about this coordinate system and geometry all the way down to the smallest scales and all the way up to the biggest scales as well. Unification. So this is because all the matter in the universe creates the inertial frame and hence the location and intensity of that inertial frame tracks with the position and distortion of that matter. Such considerations will evoke issues with coordinate transforms. Um so let's move down slightly here. >> [clears throat] >> So, how would we use this? I'm trying to see where it first mentions it. Okay. As mentioned previously, nature does possess one frame dependent phenomenon. Can anyone guess what the frame dependent phenomenon is? So we'd say, okay, how are we going to how are we going to figure out our adaptive object? What is the thing that we can compare against? What is the thing? How are we going to do this? How are we going to pull this off? Here's a secret. Here's a hint. We talked about it at the very beginning of this live stream. What's the thing that is the same? No matter where you are, if I'm on Mars, if I'm an Andromeda galaxy, if I'm on Earth, if I'm anywhere in the universe, what is the thing that's always exactly the same? The cosmic microwave background. Boom, baby. Boom. JK Philly fan. I knew you would get a JK Philly fan. The cosmic microwave background is the thermal bath left over in our universe. And no matter where you are, the thermal bath is always going to be the same. So because the thermal bath represents the entire space-time thermal representation. So it says right here, there is one frame dependent phenomenon, namely the cosmic microwave background. While curiositydriven science is focused on understanding the minute variations in this background for its implications to its origin, structures, and the fate of the whole universe, a propulsion engineer sees it as a four aft energy difference when moving through space. Such an effect also provokes conjectures about inducing motion by deliberately creating four aft energy differences around a spacecraft. Under no uncertain terms are they talking about warp drives. If you create an energy difference between the front and the back of your aircraft, that is quite literally an allubiary warp drive. And he's saying that if you were to do that, that will create the effect that we know of as gravity. You can actually move through space on a wave using an a difference a gradient between energy levels in your four and a half of your craft. If like the cosmic microwave background, there is a literal absolute inertial reference frame that is connected to the surrounding mass of the universe that it might serve as a propulsion medium, specifically an effective reaction mass to thrust against. By thrusting against this absolute reference frame, the reaction forces are imparted to the surrounding mass of the universe. At this point, this is sheer conjecture, but considering how little is known about the nature of inertial frames themselves, this notion at least warrants deeper consideration. Pursuing these conjectures leads to a different line of inquiry than the more common frame dependent geometric form of general relativity. The propulsion perspective leads to the uklitian treatments like the previously mentioned optical analogies. Okay. Now let me show something else. [clears throat] Now I want to go if you'll please move your book to page 521. We will now read from the chap the book of Kramer [snorts] the discip the uh disciple of Kramer to the ancient ways the ancient histories and the ancient teachings. Um [clears throat] where is it? Oh I have something else here. Uh yeah, we'll leave the conservation of momentum. There's a lot of questions that have to be resolved, including conservation of momentum, conservation of energy, but we also need to be able to answer retrocausality. Can we go back in time? Will that be actually possible? Well, the book of Kramer speaks to this. In fact, the book of Kramer is all about whether or not retrocausality will become possible. And keep in mind, this is from 2008. So I will actually end up giving an update on this. Now on page 521 of the book of Kramer, [clears throat] it mentions non-local communication. [clears throat] It actually mentions the switch mechan mechanism. So John Kramer's wording when it comes to retrocausality uh is a little bit confusing to understand because he says that the we are not going to violate uh the no communication theorem but then he kind of breaks down non-locality into its constituent components and he says but there might be a way where we can change the path of these and then now retrocausality might become possible. And he says how can we do this? He says, "Well, one thing that we can do is that on one of our paths, we're sending our entangle particles down two paths. One of them is our default path. We don't do anything to that one. We just look. And the other one, we send it down a random three different paths. We send it down random three different paths. And what this does is it rebuilds the wave function. Now, it could be in one of any of those three paths. And what we're going to do is we're going to have there be two options. It can either go down that way or we're going to make it another option. And the other option, it goes down. There's no randomizer. So, what this means is one of our particles goes straight to a detector that we just looked at. And the other one has a choice. It can either it can go between one switch or another, just like a rail, like a train. I'm going to send it down this path or this path. And we control that switch on which path it can go down. If it goes down one, it becomes a wave function. And if it goes down the other, it's a particle, a point representation. Now, we just use that as a switch. We switch that back and forth and that would send information. If now I'm looking at the other at the at the dummy one and I see that switch, if I see the wave function, if I see the particle representation, now I know which way it went. I'm now gleaning information from one location to the other. And those locations could be super far apart. This is the idea of how John Kramer speculated we might be able to communicate with like the Mars rover from Earth. I've talked about this several times. Now, [snorts] before I dig into the next part about this, because I have some maybe good news, maybe bad news on here. They talk about paradoxes. Now I've said several times and I don't think I'm going to quote here but I'm just paraphrasing that the belief was amongst these project these engineers that retrocausality will not be possible that we will not be able to go back in time we will not be able to change the past that something will step in and prevent that from happening we don't know exactly how but we also don't know how entanglement works either so All right. [clears throat] Um, I'm going to read parts of this. I'm trying to remember the part that he mentions it. [snorts] I think it's right here. Okay. Uh so he says there's also the possibility of a nonlinear form of quantum mechanics that that reduces to a linear form of quantum mechanics in the limiting case of weak gravity or no gravity. Using the wave picture, it is possible to form the leot uh Belrami wave equation for curved space. uh on the right hand side you find the term for the Klein Gordon wave equation in flat space with no gravity this curve space wave equation reduces the Klein Gordon wave equation there are many possibilities of this type of nonlinear space uh curve space quantum mechanics that can be explored um and he talks about traversible wormhole theories can now become explor explored uh however there could be some interesting intriguing possibilities analogist to tunneling through a potential barrier. Elementary particles might be able to tunnel through space-time geometries at super luminal speeds. What what does this say right here, chat? It says John book of John Kramer, page 525. Most likely they will not be able to uh they will not obey the position the principle of superp position. There could be possibilities analogist to tunneling through a potential barrier quantum tunneling. [snorts] Elementary particles might be able to tunnel through space-time geometries. Wow. Somewhere in here I'm looking for it. John Kramer also mentions the idea of the inertial frame. >> [snorts] >> Where is it? Okay. [snorts] So in the next part he says but in the everyday world of weak gravity and fairly flat space is quantum mechanics indeed nonlinear atomic physicists physics experiments have been used to a number of experimental groups to test Weineberg's nonlinear theory. So far, these tests have all been negative and indicating that any nonlinearity nonlinearities in quantum formulation must be extremely small if they exist at all. These negative results are not surprising, however, because the atomic translations used only involve a few electron volts of energy. If quantum mechanics does have nonlinear properties, they would expected to depend on on energy and to appear at only very high energy scale and particularly at the highest energy densities. Non-local communication tests should be made, if possible, with the highest energy particle accelerators. Why is that part important? That speaks directly to the idea that thermonuclear weapons are going to be needed to begin to see space-time distortions. We need huge energy levels if we want to begin to see these effects because, like I said, space is is very um tight. In his conclusions he says or [snorts] in his conclusions he says ultimately the question whether non-local communication is possible is an experimental one. The issue should be resolvable by testing for non-local communication and observing what experimental limits appear. Are there limits of coherence and entanglement complimentary? Uh, currently there's at least one experiment in progress that aims to produce a coincidence-free version of the ghost interference experiment. We eagerly await the results. So, I asked Rock. I said, "What's the deal with the John Kramer stuff? Did he find it or is, you know, did he not find it?" And I asked about the implications. So, here's what John Kramer had to say. Let's go ahead and pull this up. Here's what it had to say about John Kramer's thing. It says they did con they did do it. They did do the test and no retrocausal or non-local signaling was observed. The results consistently showed an anti- signal that cancelled out any potential signal, preserving the no signaling principles in quantum mechanics. Kramer has interpreted this as evidence that nature prevents exploitable non-local communication while still leaving room for retrocausality in an interpretive frameworks like his transactional uh like his transactional interpretation. So he says this would allow advanced and [ __ ] waves to explain quantum phenomenon without practical signaling. Now, why is this so confusing here? Because we're watching a plane get teleported. We're watching a plane the size of a bo a Boeing trip 7 size of a city block disappear from here and reappear over here. [snorts] So, we know teleportation is possible and that represents free energy. The only question is can you go back in time? And based on the results that John Kramer has showed, yes, [ __ ] like Tim Holtz, by the way. Yes. It's exactly the type of [ __ ] I'm talking about. No. When we're talking about advanced and [ __ ] waves, we're talking about waves that are going backwards and forwards and they meet at a point. And the point in which they meet is our reality. The point in which they meet is our reality. See, now you got me all sidetracked here. No. Um, so I think this is more evidence cuz I don't see any reason why you would lie about this experiment. So unless you think they're lying about this experiment, then what he's saying is that when we try to do retrocausality, when we set up the EPR experiment for retrocausality and you look in one half, the default half of your uh your entanglement, the signal comes out fuzzy. Instead of seeing the star or the shape that you want to see, it comes out blurry. So you can't actually tell what happened on the other side. And you would say, why is it doing that? How is it doing that? It shouldn't actually be physically possible. But entanglement shouldn't be physically possible either. So what he's saying here is that and and uh now I'm going to paraphrase a little bit. How do we resolve this? Because how do we say that we can teleport something but at the same time retrocausality is not possible? We can't actually go back in time because really when you look at the theories of this you would say that any kind of gravity manipulation is a time travel device by default. So how is it that we're not going to be able to go back in time? And to give you the answer to that, it's going to be kind of a weird one. Ready yourself. >> [snorts] >> I'll give you a thought experiment that John Kramer I think mentions. He says, "Well, if let's say you were given some information from the future, like let's say I'm told about the MH370 videos." So, my future self, I go back in time and I tell my younger self, I say, "Hey, Ashton, you're going to find these MH370 videos in 2014 and you're going to become famous because you're going to explore it. you're going to expose them. You're going to go on these podcasts. People aren't going to believe you, but eventually they will. But then my younger self says, "No, I'm not because you told me this. I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to do it anymore." That would break how this is the this is the problem. Now we have this bil I think it's called the bilking uh paradox. The paradox occurs now where if I if I don't follow what happens then now you've created an alternate timeline and we don't see these alternate timelines. So how is this this can't be true? So something's wrong here. So what's the what's the answer to that? Anyone know what the answer to that is? There's actually a really simple answer to that. No matter what, you must never choose not to do it. The answer is you always do the thing that leads to the future. Whatever it is that happens in the future must always happen. So if I go back in time and give myself the videos, it must have happened in a way where I didn't directly interact with myself. Maybe I'm registered on for example. So, however the time travel occurred, it must be logically consistent. So, if I didn't if I chose to do this, I always chose to do this. And whatever happens in the future must always lead to this decision that's happening right now today. That's the answer to the paradox. That's the answer is that even though you think you have free will to make an alternative decision, you don't. You never ever ever do. That's the answer to the paradox. That's how you can teleport without going back in time. That if any change is ever made, it never is going to it. Whatever happens, the answer to that question must always be the answer that leads to the current reality we're in right now. And the reason why that's mess messes with people's heads and people in the chat are already saying it is because then you have to wonder has everything already been foretold. Do we actually even have free will or has everything already been determined? [clears throat] chat. These are the big questions that the Bible teaches us. The futurist Bible teaches us these big questions. Do we have self-determination? Is everything deterministic or do we have free will? Can we make warp drives and wormholes? Yes, we can. So, what does that mean about the nature of our reality? Wow. What a book, chat. Can you imagine my feeling when I'm reading this the last few days over the weekend and I'm just seeing all the things that we've been talking about. And do you have any idea how many scientific papers are referenced in this book? Hundreds. [snorts] Hundreds of scientific papers. Maybe close to a thousand. In fact, just on one chapter alone, there are 52 references. 52 references on this. There's a lot more and we're going to go through it, but tonight that's all I've got for you guys. [clears throat] Let me just read the about the authors as our moment of zen and then we'll do some super chats. Mark Milis, headed the NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Project at NASA Glenn Research Center, continues to research gravity control and faster than light in his discretionary time. This research gained public attention, including a 2001 cover story in Popular Science. Eric W. Davis is a senior research physicist at Institute for Advanced Studies in Austin, CEO of Warp Drive Mechanics. His research specializes in breakthrough propulsion physics as well as general relativity and quantum field theories. He earned an AA liberal arts from Phoenix, BS and PhD from University of Arizona. And he's a fellow of the British Interplanetary Society and a uh AIA associate fellow chat. Okay guys, thank you so much in the pill chat. Everybody uh in the pill chat, John Glock, I see you in the chat, brother. Appreciate it. And people say it sounds like fineman diagrams. Why do you think it sounds like fineman diagrams? Fineman was trying to understand the nature of elementary particles. And that's what these guys are doing. Everybody is trying to understand what does an atom look like? What do particles look like? What are they? Are they little point particles or are they waves? They're trying to understand all of these concepts. Okay. Hey, Timothy Foster fell over. Do you see any relationship between plasma and crop circles geometry? Do I? Yeah, absolutely. In fact, I don't I do not think random people I mean they of course they could. Humans could make crop circles, but a lot of these crop circles like have no logical explanation for why random kids are doing or anyone would do it. And they're like crimes most of the time like trespassing, destruction of property. I mean, so I don't know what's up with them, but something's going on with Crop Circles. What I'll say is the Do you know what the first explanation for crop circles was in the 90s when they first got attention? Plasma vortex. I'm not even making that up. I remember hearing that when I was younger and thinking, "This person's [ __ ] insane. Plasma? What are you talking about? Plasma vortex is an explanation for crop circles? What?" Now I hear it. I go, who who said that and what were they researching? [laughter] Plasma vortex. Okay. Kind of on the right over the the target on that one. Okay. Night Slayer says, "First keeping the numbers. I saw the eggcraft fly by horizontally top front probably." That's awesome, man. Um I don't know. A lot of people ask tell me about their own sightings and but I don't know, guys. I'm not the expert. I'm not just because I research this stuff doesn't mean I know the answers to what you see that's out there. My uh what I would tell you guys is most likely it's us. Um what I want to say and obviously this reminded me like guys we're not seeing aliens. The world's going to [ __ ] There's no aliens anywhere to be seen. In fact, still to this day, the amount of videos that I would even begin to entertain the idea that it shows real aliens, I can count on one hand. I can count on one hand. Meanwhile, when it comes to the physics and technology, I've got the engineers down pat. We've been reading dozens and dozens of their scientific papers. So just from a prepoundonderance of evidence standpoint, we have to assume that most of the weird stuff we're flying seen flying around in the sky is not aliens. It's us. This does not preclude aliens from existing, not in any way, shape, or form. Does not do that. But most of the stuff we're seeing around there is going to be man-made. Even if it looks like Harry Potter [ __ ] Even if it looks like Harry Potter [ __ ] And until the aliens start coming out of the craft, we really should not be entertaining ideas of aliens. Until we see the Avatar alien body with its, you know, fake consciousness plugged in, what are we really talking about here? It's fun to to, you know, theorize, but we don't really have any hard evidence for any of that. And we're also at a point now, I think, from a civilization standpoint, where we realize the first contact is going to be with a drone. The first contact is going to be with a drone or a probe. It's not going to be with like a a flesh and blood being that breathes a different atmosphere with a helmet on its head. Come on, let's be realistic. Electronic bookworm says, "For the offering plate, good sermon. Thank you. Thank you. We appreciate it. The clergy appreciates it. We will get some new space juice. Lulu will have special treats. Absolutely. Thirdeye tribe says gives a super sticker. Thank you very much. And then ST99 says, "Do you think Roswell was US tech?" It's so long ago that I'm not sure. I think it could have been. Yes. I think that even in the 40s, if as long as it was after World War II, we could have had discs. And in fact, the fact that we don't see discs anymore, like I can't even remember the last discshaped UFO video tells you that this phenomenon is changing. But if it's coming from some advanced alien species, we shouldn't be seeing change from their craft over such a short period of time. You would expect that it'd be relatively static between 1940 and 2040. But even over the course of just several decades, we're seeing significant changes. They go from metallic saucershaped vehicles to now plasma energy shaped vehicles because it's advancing along with our advancement which shows at least speak to the idea that it's probably us. But going back to the Loheed Martin thing, if it's true that Loheed Martin was destroying stuff, then you could see how we might have actually gotten, you know, ancient technology, alien technology, future technology, whatever it is, and they might have figured it out. And then they said, "We don't need it anymore. We figured it all out. So, we don't need the craft anymore. Get rid of the evidence." So even if it is from aliens or Nazis or whatever, it's going to be really hard to prove because if you're Loheed Martin, you definitely destroyed that evidence long ago. You're not going to go live with your your uh autonic fusion propulsion reactors to the public while having this huge skeleton in your closet of like, you know, an alien ship with a body inside there. [laughter] No way, dude. Can't get caught with that. Okay, guys. I hope you enjoyed the live stream. I love you guys. Also, you in the in the Rumble chat. I see y'all in the Rumble chat, too. Guys, we'll be back on Wednesday. More science, more politics, more technology, more everything. Love you guys. Peace out. MH370X later, [music] infrared eyes scanning the [music] black, tracking the heat, never turning back. In roll 22, a covert gaze and roll [music] 33 in the cosmic maze. And rolls in the mix. Secrets untold. [music] Silent watchers brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interest far and wide as spears. [music] Sentinel of the night. Watching [music] over with infrared sight, alerting [music] us to threats of guiding [music] our defenses like a guiding star. In the silence [music] of space, they keep their post. Shields unseen yet feared the most. With precision and speed, they warn of danger, keeping us safe [music] from the missiles anger. As Beers, Sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a [music] guiding star and trolls in the mix. Secrets untold, silent watchers brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interest far and wide as fears. Sentinel of the night, [music] watching over with infrared sight, alerting [music] us to threats of guiding [music] our defenses like a guiding star. The spears sentinel of the night watching over with [music] infrared sight, alerting us to threats a far, guiding >> [music]