The Fusion Future - Quantum Warfare & Energy

Video Transcript

# The Fusion Future - Quantum Warfare & Energy Let's do this. >> Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us. >> Well, I can tell you we shared it with America, but I can't share it with you. Okay. the most advanced offensive weapons on the planet. Things that none of the superpowers have developed by Israel, shared with America. We seem to have lost focus and vision, to have lowered our sights and let systems and structures and bureaucracies muddle us along. But we are capable of so much more. Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. They leave distance annihilated, cause things to grow and improve productivity. >> We're very powerful. This country is very powerful. It's far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world that we have. More powerful than anybody even not even close. And they also asked, could you elaborate on what's oh the the uh Gorgon Gorgon stare that uh Ashton Forbes has spoken about both on social media and here on the show. I haven't had Ashton on here in a while, but the last time I did have him on, he spoke about that program uh Gorgon Stair and basically wanting to know, can you tell us a little bit more about what that is and why it would be so secret? >> Yeah, I can't. This is the part, this is the part, by the way, where I said, "I'm not sure you're going to be able to answer it if it's really in your wheelhouse." I figured you would know about it, but I figured you probably can't talk too much about Gorgon Stare. But I mean, can you say anything? >> No. No. >> Fair enough. But it is real. It does exist. >> Yeah. I would I would say that Ashton's very good at his research. >> Okay. All right. I guess we will uh leave it at that for the Gorgon stair question. >> Malaysian 370 contact 120 decimal 9. Good night. [Music] >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. Oh, [Music] [Music] [Applause] [Music] [Applause] [Music] I remembered the line from Hindu scripture the Bhagavad Gita Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says now I am become death the destroyer of worlds. [Music] Hello everybody. Guys, can you hear me in the chat? Hopefully so. We don't have the issue like we've been having the last few times, guys. TGI Monday or something like that. I don't know. Guys, today we've got a great episode for you guys. Uh we're going to be talking about China's Quantum Radar part two. gonna talk about war with Antifa as well as war with the Venezuelan narcos. We're gonna be talking about Nvidia microchips. Everybody's been asking me, Ashton, they've been saying, "What companies should I invest into? Where should I put my money?" So, tonight going to talk briefly about microchip processing and then going to talk about the fusion companies. We got a full list of every single fusion company. So, we're going to learn some of the names that we haven't known. And then lastly, there's actually a little surprise tonight that came up just the last minute, but I have a disciple already. I already have a disciple. Uh we're going to watch some of the interview uh between Douglas Miller, I believe it is. Let me just look up, make sure I got the right name. Yeah, Douglas Miller really just parodying almost exactly what we've been researching um to Tim Ventura and Ape just yesterday. Couldn't believe it when I watched it or two days ago, maybe it was on Saturday. And and then lastly, Ed Whitten, Ed Whitten, founder of String Theory, talks about wormholes, just dropped a few hours ago. See if we can take a look at that as well. So happy for you guys all be here. Hope you guys are having a good Monday. Let's get it started right off the bat. Okay, number one, going back to Friday's episode, I spoke about China having a quantum radar. Quantum radar, guys. Now, I dug into it to try to figure out what is this quantum radar. What actually does it mean? We know that quantum is just a fancy word for manipulating the ether. That's what we've learned over the the last couple years. So I looked into it and sure enough found a war zone article that mentions that China had been working on this quantum radar since 2018. So it goes back to 2018. So for the last seven years they've been developing this quantum radar and just now they are mass prodducing it and they are marketing it as that it can detect the F-22 and our other stealth fighters and supposedly there's nothing you can hide from this quantum radar. So, in this article by the War Zone that I read, it specifies that this quantum radar is an EPR device. Yes, Zapperoo in the chat. EPR radar. That really piqued my curiosity because I wouldn't go so far as to say I'm an expert, but I read I read a scientific paper by John Kramer and I stayed at a Holiday in Express. So, it turns out that I was on Tim P explaining how quantum radar, how quantum devices can actually transmit a signal faster than light. I said that in the scientific paper by John Kramer, it mentions that you can build in a switch. You can build in a switch. So, the idea is, and this is how the quantum radar works, guys. Here you guys go. Right at the beginning of the live stream, we're getting right into how quantum radar works. In an EPR experiment, an Einstein PDSki Rosen experiment where we're testing entanglement. We split our photon down two paths. Okay, it's actually quite simple. We split our photon down two paths, but they're still entangled together. And we send one path to our control. Our control tells us where the other what's going to happen to the other photon because they're entangled. What happens to one must have a correlation with what's going to happen to the other. Okay, still with me? So, one half goes to the control. Now, the other half of the laser or whatever it is is going to shoot out, and this is going to be the thing that they're going to use as the detection mechanism. They shoot the laser out in front of you or what have you. And what they look for is supposedly they can detect down to one photon. They can detect measurements down to one photon. This is going to be important in a second, but the idea is they're looking at the control and they're waiting for the entanglement to break. When the entanglement breaks, they can measure that instantaneously. Now, this is the dream. This is the absolute dream that you shoot one entangled particle over here and another entangled particle goes somewhere else. And when the entanglement breaks, we can tell practically instantly. How how can we tell? Because the interference pattern changes. It goes from coherent like the the two slits, it goes to being fuzzy. So depending on how the light interacts on one side, we can tell whether or not the co the interference pattern is broken. And this is how we work the switch. the switch mechanism which I described I think before basically anybody on the internet how do you communicate non-locally faster than the speed of light the way you communicate is whether or not the interference pattern is there or not there whether or not we have coherence where our double slit or in this case one slit or if we see an interference pattern depending on which one of those we get an answer to that tells us whether or not we get a one or a zero that tells whether or not we get a one or a zero. And now we have the capability of binary. It's actually that simple. So let me just reiterate this. Now the hold up, the reason why this is a challenge is because you need to be able to measure on your control. Like just imagine a screen where light is hitting it. You need to be able to tell if that photon of light that hits the screen, you need to be able to tell if that's coherent or decoherent. You need to be able to tell if it's coherent. How do you tell that? The answer, according to John Kramer, is that you need at least 10 photons. You need at least 10 photons and then you can measure with a good statistical degree of probability whether or not what kind of shape you're getting. So to give you an example, just to give you a full example, and for the people that are raging out in the chat and what have you, guys, I have accumulated a large number of haters. Um, mostly because they're mentally ill people that I have told that Charlie Kirk's death was not related to Israel. Yes. And if you think this is crazy, it gets crazier. They made up a fake conspiracy that Charlie Kirk's death was related to Israel. And all I did was tell them it's not and they completely lost their minds. And now they've decided that I'm sold out to Israel because I told them that Charlie I told them the truth which is that Charlie Kirk's death has nothing to do with Israel. Never did. And for some reason this makes you a massage chill. I mean I don't know what's wrong with people but we are going to systematically destroy this brain rot that is fundamentally equivalent to the woke left. It is the woke lefts. They're just roleplaying as right-wingers. They're just basically Redditors. So, if you're wondering why you see all these angry comments and weird stuff about that, it's just related to people having a hard time accepting reality. Now, back to the task at hand. The imagine that in our control panel, we are looking for either a star or we are looking for a circle. We're looking for one of two shapes. A star or a circle, right? Star will represent coherence. Circle represents decoherence. In order to use this radar, all they're doing is trying to determine whether or not in their control they're seeing a star or whether or not they're seeing a circle. And you can imagine there's overlap between the two pictures. So in order to figure out the answer, you have to let enough photons of light hit the control panel. Now this is huge because this is the first step towards non-local communication. In fact, if you can do this with radar, you can almost certainly communicate faster than the speed of light. Faster than the speed of light. And it's 100% possible. The issues of retrocausality are presumably solved by nature itself. Nature does not let retrocausality occur. It's pretty straightforward. So the reason why I bring this up is that China, we are broaching, we are stepping forward towards this geopolitical Mexican standoff with China. China is figuring this technology out and China has it and they're now deploying it on their planes. This is the same kind of technology that would make it so submarines are not can be detected anywhere in the ocean. Same technology. Same technology. Use these quantum radars. It can just go right through the water and it can detect anything because you point it at something and then you're looking for the decoherence to break down. It breaks down. We found something. Also, one of the benefits of this is that they've either found a way or that it just straight up bypasses the noise. So, you can imagine there's electromagnetic signals going everywhere all the time. This quantum interference device interferometer, which is really what it is, this can bypass all noise as well. So this to me represents a major provocation in the technology race and to me it was probably the biggest news story in the last week and normies will have no idea of why it's significant because they just quantum radar is just mumbo jumbo to them. They don't know what that any of that stuff means. They don't understand the significance of it. But when I read into it I went holy crap this is huge. This shows that China, no question, has this, you know, we've been calling it UFO technology, but it's nuclear technology, quantum technology. They have this technology. Absolutely. And this gives us kind of a benchmark. We can say, okay, if they've got quantum radars, they almost certainly have quantum communication devices. And the next step is directed energy weapons and plasma orbs. This would also tell me that if they just now are getting the quantum radars, they're probably a little ways off from having magical plasma orbs that can create a neutronic fusion bombs. Probably still a little ways off from that, but hard to say for sure. So, I just wanted to bring this up because I think a lot of people are looking at the next war, the next conflict. A lot of people right now, I see, are framing it as Islam is the next conflict, which certainly could be. Certainly could be. I think we've been at war with Islam for a long time already. But to me, the next war is China. The next war is China. Is that when China gets this quantum technology, we are going to something something's going to give one way or another. Either we're going to have to unify with China and they're going to have to become our ally, or we're going to have to destroy China. I don't really know how to put it another way, guys. But the truth is, no two waring factions can have this technology. Otherwise, this planet's not going to last. And we can never let China give this technology to people that are like committing public executions on the street, which is like what's happening in Palestine right now. Dissidents are being rounded up. People are screaming Alu Akbar and then they're beating them to death and then shooting them in the street. You think we're going to be able to give this we're going to give fusion bomb technology to these people, to these primitives? No. No. No. No. Not in a million years. So ultimately something's going to give with China and that's where I would be looking. I would be looking at China right now because them having quantum radar is a major escalation in the arms race between the United States and China. And if I'm the United States, the question that I'm asking myself is at what point are we forced to strike? At what point do we have to strike China to prevent them from hitting that echelon of technology? Or do we not? Or do we say that, oh, we're going to make peace with China. We're going to become friendly with them while we've been adversarial for the last 15, 20 years. So, that's what I would say. The other big thing that's going on right now is um in the United States is the war with Antifa and the war with the Venezuelan narcos. So, the war with Antifa actually just got an escalation. I can go ahead and admit that I was wrong when I said that the Antifas had been defeated a couple weeks back. Turns out that they're even more enraged than before. And a major victory was just won in court today. President Trump is going to be allowed to uh have the National Guard go to Portland. So, I would think that when the National Guard shows up, that should be the end of all these shenanigans that are going on. People are dressed up in uh inflatable costumes, dancing around in the street, uh screaming at the top of their lungs till, I don't know, 2:00 in the morning or whatever crap it is. I mean, at some point, the laring has to end. The laring has to end at some point. And in Chicago, it's especially dangerous where the judges have ruled that they need to pull down the barricades for these people who are screaming, rioting, um because now they've made it a dangerous situation for the actual federal officers involved. At the end of the day, like we just got to end the riots and just have there be civilized society. I mean, you had a chance during the election that just happened like a year ago to vote and you lost. You lost. You've got three more years of dealing with this. So, we need to end all the laring. Maybe next time go to the polls. Next time go to the the voting registar and and and you know, make your voice heard in the ballot box. Maybe next time don't put a crappy, you know, don't maybe next time you allow for people to actually vote on who they want to vote for as opposed to just putting up Camala Harris with no primary whatsoever. Just just a thought. Just a thought. Okay. Now, the Venezuelan narco situation. I don't know if you guys saw this, but it was just uh just a few days ago. a a submarine got entirely exploded. Submarine got entirely exploded. Um before I show that though, I want to point out this clip here as well. So, a lot of people are now saying that the the war between I mean everybody's blaming the other side, the Israel and Hamas situation in the Middle East. Um both sides are claiming that the other side broke the ceasefire, what have you. And now President Trump is saying that, you know, we're gonna put an end to this one way or another. And what is one thing that I've repeated to everybody, and this applies to the Venezuelan narco situation, is that the year is 2025, just in case you guys are you don't have a watch and you haven't been checking, the current year is 2025 right now. And we are not going to put boots on the ground in Venezuela, boots on the ground in Iran or boots on the ground in Palestine. Guys, I don't know what world you think you live in, but we live in a world of AI and drones now. So, the people that were trying to say that we're going to have boots on the ground, here is Donald Trump right here explaining that there's not going to be any boots on the ground. In fact, it's not even going to be Americans. It's not even going to be Americans that are fighting Hamas. Basically, what Donald Trump is about to say right here is that we're just going to let Israel take care of the problem. We've basically been holding them back, like holding the dog on the leash, right? And we're just going to let go of the leash and let Israel just take care of the Hamus problem, and they're going to be eradicated. They're going to be eradicated. So, for the people that going to start coming at me in the future weeks here when Hamus starts getting wiped out, they never had any chance at all. They never had any chance at all. They had no hope in this. I mean, you're dealing with people that are technologically just far superior than they are. And there is definitely going to be innocents that are taken out and along with this. I don't know what to tell you. War is hell. So, here you go. Here's Donald Trump explain the situation >> in the hands of others. You know, we have 59 countries that agreed to the deal. We have peace in the Middle East for the first time ever. Uh we made a deal with Hamas that you know they're going to be very good. They're going to behave. They're going to be nice. And if they're not, we're going to go and we're going to eradicate them if we have to. They'll be eradicated. And they know that. So they they went in they went in and uh I don't believe it was the leadership, but they had some uh rebellion in there among themselves and they killed some people, you know, pretty a lot of people. But this is a violent group. You know, you probably noticed over the last hundred years, this is a very violent group of people and uh they uh got very rambunctious and they did things that they shouldn't be doing and if they keep doing it then we're going to go in and straighten it out and it'll happen very quickly and pretty violently unfortunately. >> Yeah. Just following up on that question, when you say we are going to eradicate Hamas, who is we? Does that include American boots on the ground? Uh, no it won't be on the ground at all. We don't need to because we have many countries as you know signed on to this deal. The way I view it 59 countries and unanimous there's never been nobody ever believed it was right. Countries that >> So you just heard it right there. So you don't have to listen. What are the term called for them? The panakans I think is what people are calling them on social media. Also I want to point this out. I just asked a basic question because now all this weird skitso Israel stuff really has me questioning these other people's opinions that they've been saying. So I just asked this question like what are the policies? I think I was asking it to Nick Fuentes. What exactly are the policies that Israel has that are supposedly anti-American? As far as I can tell, there aren't any. I mean actual policies like which policy that Israel has that we think is anti-American? When I asked this question, mostly what I got back was a bunch of supposed historical events that have been blamed on Israel, including but not limited to JFK, 911, uh, and the Liberty bombing, which the Liberty I decided to just kind of look into a little bit because I didn't know that much about it. I knew that it was being blamed on Israel. The Liberty was an accident that happened in 1967. 1967. And both sides agreed it was an accident. It was a misfire. You know, they targeted the wrong thing. I mean, it's not unprecedented. We did it to TWWA flight 800. Definitely happens. But it was from 1967. like even if there was something nefarious going on, we've moved on a really long way since 1967. So, the one thing that I thought was interesting is when I was looking through the replies, I didn't see one person mention the current conflict in the Middle East. I didn't see maybe some I'm sure there's somebody in there, but I looked through the replies and and Destiny, this includes you. I see you in the chat. in your list. Maybe we should go look in real time. I don't remember seeing the current conflict in Palestine in Gaza right now as one of the reasons, which I thought was kind of funny because of all the policy things to be against Israel for, the only one I can think of is their current policy about Gaza, which is essentially to wipe out Hamas at any cost. I mean, that's essentially what their policy is. That would be a policy position that I think would be reasonable to be against. But I think the reason why people don't mention that is because they're not really against the conflict happening. They're just using it as an opportunity to bash Israel. The same reason why when the ceasefire was announced, they didn't celebrate. They didn't celebrate because they've lost an opportunity to bash Israel. The moment they believe that Israel broke the ceasefire, then everybody's out there screaming their head off, "Oh, Israel broke the ceasefire. They're monsters. They killed a bunch of innocents, what have you. On this one, guys, I'm gonna roll with the president. I'm gonna roll with the president on this one. President is probably one of the greatest presidents that we've ever had, and people like to say that he's a liar, but I find him to be quite truthful, personally, in my opinion. So, what I'll say is that I'm growing even more skeptical of this growing anti-Israel movement. It feels like it's a lot of feelings and conjecture based on conspiracy theories and tying events to conspiracy type thinking with not a lot of evidence to support it. Not a lot of evidence to support it. Ultimately, at the end of the day, you guys can believe whatever you want. I'm just giving you my opinion uh from a geopolitical perspective. I think that if you are following the path of Israel is the the cause of all things that are bad in the world, your geopolitical opinions are going to be pretty much the equivalent of dirt. pretty much the equivalent of dirt, useless for the most part. With respect to the Venezuela situation, it looks like there is a growing force, growing military force that's building up in Central America off the coast of Venezuela right now. I would not be surprised to find out that we are ready to do covert operations within Venezuela. So, we got to get technical. Technically, there might be boots on the ground, but it's not boots on the ground in terms of a peacekeeping, you know, army that we're sending in. We would just be sending in covert operations to take out some of the cartel leaders, generals, things like that. So, if this does happen, I would say I'm highly highly predicting, highly likely that we start seeing covert action within Venezuela itself. And I imagine that it's going to start to get twisted as whoa now we've got boots on the ground in Venezuela. Told you the forever wars blah blah blah when it's not really forever war in that sense. And one last thing I want to say on Iran and then we're going to move on from the political discussion is that the other narrative that I've been hearing about Iran is that this idea that like Israel is forcing us to get into all these wars in the Middle East. It was actually just one I was watching a clip on earlier today was uh the Coleman Dave Smith debate and Coleman correctly points out that like Israel wasn't lock step with us when we started invading the Middle East. Um I can't remember I think they wanted us to attack Iran and we want and we wanted to attack Iraq and they were didn't want us to fight Iraq but of course they get on board at the end of the day. I don't find there to be a lot of merit in this idea that Israel is is telling us which countries in the Middle East to take out for them. I think that our I think we're just our objectives were aligned and they've been aligned a lot. You know, our objective was to who even knows this point? Oil, take out Saddam Hussein and ISIS. There's a lot of different options that people throw out there. But to say that Israel was the one guiding us is patently absurd. And to believe that Israel is controlling the United States is just frankly ridiculous. We are not being controlled by a tiny country in the Middle East. Not even not even closely. But of course we have close ties to them. They are our ally. They have helped us develop super weapons. Admittedly, absolutely they have. But to think that they're driving all our policy decisions, um, that's where you start to broach into this area of like derangement syndrome where you think that they're this evil entity that that controls everybody, but they can't stop you. They can't stop you from from being a rebel on the internet. All right. Um, apparently their propaganda game isn't good enough. So anyway, the you will find uh I know this these opinions upset people because you've been living in a fake world. Um you've been living in a fake world where you've been listening to grifters and liars lie to you. And when somebody comes and tells you the truth, it hurts your feelings. It hurts your feelings. I understand it. I totally understand. It's okay to be frustrated. It's okay to be frustrated. What you will learn is that I'm right about everything. I have had I have the penthouse and always right about everything city and you will come to learn that. So that's fine. Be frustrated when you come around and you realize, oh, Ashton was right again. Ashton was right again. We're doing covert operations in in Venezuela against the narco uh lords and drug lords. Then you can come back and you can apologize or just not. Whatever you want to do. Whatever you want to do. Now, let's talk about how we can make some money, chat. That's what y'all want. You want to talk about how we can how I make some money? How to get some money off this chat? Well, first thing is we missed the boat. We missed the boat already. One time, chat, let me pull this up. And I should have seen this coming. This is on me, chat. This one is on me. You can blame Ashton Forbes for this one. Here it is. There it is. Right here. Mario Narfall chat says, "Oh, and by the way, if you were if guys, 7K is in the chat, by the way. 7K is in the chat." 7 Everybody's Everybody's so convinced I must be getting paid by Israel. I wish chat 7K is in the chat. Maybe Barry Weiss will hire me at CBS or for the free press soon and then you guys can really really go off on the on the 7Ks in the chat. Um, crap. What was I gonna say? You guys already made me lose my train of thought. There we go. There's the 7Ks in the chat. Uh, but okay, whatever. Let's just move on to the next thing. I totally forgot what my point was going to be. It'll come back. Okay, so we've already missed out on one cash in here, and I'm not going to miss out on another cash in chat. I'm not going to miss out. There's only so many options. There's only so many times you have in this world, in this life to cash in, right? If I had invested in Apple, for example, in the early 90s, then when they came out the iPhone, I'd have been a trillionaire, right? Same thing happened with microchips. Now, famously, not really famously, I invested in in um NXPI. NXPI was the microchip company that bought Frecale. So, I've I've actually closed my position out with them. It made a modest return. It actually kind of skyrocketed after I invested and then kind of went back down and kind of teetered out a little bit. I invested in NXPI. Now, true story I'm about to tell you here is that I spoke to a a stock advisor for a major bank um back when this was first happening and I told him I said, "Look at NX." I said, "Look at NXPI. Look at semiconductors. They're gonna take off. They're going to take off." That's what I told him. And NXPI didn't, you know, it was crazy part is he told me, "Oh, you mean like Nvidia? Nvidia is like the biggest chip manufacturer." And I was like, "No, no, NXPI." Turns out I was wrong and he was right. And I often think back to that conversation with that guy. I often think back to that conversation with the that guy because I think, man, if I if that guy if I had listened to that guy and put my money in 2023, in November of 2023, two years ago, if I had put my money in NXPI or in Nvidia compared to NXPI, how much better off would I be right now? How much better off? Well, let's let's go take a look, chat. Let's go take a look. Here is the stock performance of Nvidia Corp. over the last five years. So where was November of 2023? Stock was at about $50. Stock was at about 50 $40. $40 to $50. The stock price actually they split the stock split. I don't know if that's represented on here or not, but now the stock price is at 187. 187. So it's about a quadruple quadruple increase 400% gain. 400% gain if we had invested at the right time. I think there's actually still room for growth with Nvidia, but it's hard to, you know, hard to say that you should buy a stock that's like one of the most expensive, highest cap companies in the world now. So, so what's so what's the other update on Nvidia? Why did this happen? Why did Nvidia This is what we need to understand is that I can't tell you who to invest in. I can't tell you. I mean, I could, but I'm not going to. Instead, I'm just going to show you the trends and show you the data. You can make your decisions by yourself. Um, gold would have also been very intelligent to invest in. So, Bitcoin would have been intelligent to invest in as well. Pretty similar returns, honestly. But this is the reason why Nvidia's stock went up. Nvidia left Beijing. Left Beijing and went to America from 95% to 0%. That's how Jensen Huang sums up Nvidia's China problem. A geopolitical car crash disguised as tech policy. US export bans have nuked Nvidia's presence in the world's second largest computing market. Jensen said, "We went from 95% market share in China to 0%." Once the engine of China's AI boom, Nvidia is now a ghost there. So instead, you've got these two other companies that have been taking Nvidia's market share in China. This is huge to me. This right here signals that the United States knew how important Nvidia's microchips were and we basically forced them to come to the United States instead. We basically said you are now going to be an American company. You are no longer allowed to do any business with China. None. Zero. 95%. They had 95% of the market in China and now they have zero. Do you understand how unprecedented this is? This is clearly the intelligence agencies saying you now have to become an American company and you are no longer allowed to do business with China. I mean that's absolutely what had to have happened and and they kind of admit it. And what did they get in return? What did they get in return chat? They are now one of the most highest market cap companies in the entire world. Think about that. They are now the one of the highest market highest valuation companies in the entire world. What is their market cap? You would think their market cap is $4.4 trillion. That's the valuation of Nvidia based on their stock price. Have you ever heard of a company completely leaving a market where they have 95% market share and it being successful afterwards? No. The game is rigged. The game is rigged. And I'm pointing out to you one situation in which it was rigged. I thought the rigged game to get on was NXPI, the reason why we took action on MH370. That was not the right company to get in on. The one that the United States was backing was Nvidia the whole time. It was Nvidia the whole time. Boom. Now, you may say, "Okay, Ashton, well, we now know that Nvidia is clearly backed by United States military-industrial complex." So, I would say it's probably pretty smart to put your money in them, even though you're probably not going to be looking at four times gains anymore because at the end of the day, they're still going to be the ones that are going to power all of our AI. All their microchips are going to be powering pretty much every American company because we're not going to allow major companies to use microchips that are not developed in the United States. They could have Trojans that could have uh hacks involved in them. And Pelosi knows, right? Yeah, that was a good one. Nancy Pelosi made huge investments in Nvidia. So if you really want if viewers want general investment advice, I'd say do whatever you see Nancy Pelosi doing. Whatever you see her doing, she most likely has insider information. So we can't make that much money on them. But what is what is the next alternative? The next alternative is fusion. The next big thing is going to be fusion. Just as uh Bodhi Guya said here, capital fusion. Why? Because fusion is the energy source that we are going to use to power all these AI data centers where all these microchips are going to be produced on. In fact, we might need fusion to produce the microchips to produce the microchips. So the question then is which fusion companies should we be investing in? And that is not a simple question. So I can tell you for sure fusion is the answer. Fusion is going to obsolete all forms of energy production probably even including nuclear. Nuclear will be the only one that'll live because nuclear is fusion. I mean we're just talking about fishision versus fusion at that point. And specifically, I believe that a neutronic fusion is going to be the long-term winner. Now, when I say that short term, I could see other fusion companies being successful and they might switch over into a neutronic fusion in the longer term. So, we can't rule out any fusion company right off the bat. But the ones I'm most interested in right away are any of them that are looking at autronic fusion, which is direct energy conversion. Reason is the efficiency rate is significantly higher. It's like three times higher. Neutronic fusion is roughly around 30% efficient. A neutronic fusion is roughly 90 to 100% efficient in terms of production into electricity. So those are going to be by far and away your best bets in general. I also personally happen to think that maybe all forms of fusion, but we will hit ignition. We will hit ignition and we'll get to the point where we have unlimited energy production. And I think a neutronic fusion has the highest chance of getting to that quicker quicker and the highest over unity gains. At the end of the day, we're talking about how much energy do you get out versus how much energy do you put in and what a neutronic fusion is doing relative to neutronic fusion is they're looking at the back end as well. So, for example, helium fusion isn't just saying, "Okay, I'm going to put in this little bit of energy and then we're going to get out this much energy." They're saying, "We also want to recycle the energy that we put in, too. We also want to recycle the energy we put in and we also need to have a capacitor situation, battery situation that is efficient, that we're charging these batteries in an efficient way." So they're not just looking at the front end in terms of how do we produce fusion. They're looking at how do we actually move the energy around and how do we move it around efficiently which I think is going to be pivotal in the long run for uh net energy production by a fusion. So I've asked Grock here to list all the fusion companies. I think there may be a couple that aren't listed on here. There's actually one that I need to look up right now to see if it's on the list. Inertia Fusion. Are they on the list there? There could be a couple new ones that just got added as well. But there were more than I expected. So, let's read through them. If you guys hear of other ones or know of other ones, you can put them in the chat. Um, we can potentially have Grock edit the list here. Maybe we can get a running list that we can take a look at. Way more than I thought, guys. Way more than I thought. And also, I tried to have Grock break it up between DOE and and non-D DOE companies, but I don't I don't think it understood my my question here because it's got it's got Helion Fusion listed right here on companies without DOE funding, but they've gotten DOE funding. So, um yeah, I will point out that inertial confinement fusion, if it's not inertial confinement fusion, I'm basically not interested. I'm basically not interested if it's not inertial confinement fusion. that I think we can we can narrow it down. If you're not doing inertial confinement fusion, you're probably never going to get fusion to work. That's that's the version of fusion that was classified from nuclear weapons from thermonuclear weapons. That's pretty much where we figured out infinite energy. Okay, so let's just read through them. Avalanche energy designs electrostatic ion trap with magnetic field. This is pretty interesting, but there's it's pretty light on information. So, Avalanche, we've got blue laser fusion. This is one I hadn't heard of. Laser direct drive inertial fusion. A neutronic uses boron 11. Okay, so right off the bat, we've already got a new one to add to our list. Blue laser fusion is one I haven't heard from anybody yet, and it claims they're doing laser-driven inertial confinement fusion using boron 11. That's pretty interesting. Electric fusion systems in Broomfield, Colorado. Electrically confined warm fusion using Ryberg phase plasma. No idea what that means. Um, Fusion Power Corporation Sacramento. Ion beam direct drive inertial fusion. So, a lot of these maybe I need more information on them. I hadn't even heard of a lot of these players. Makes me wonder if there's way more than I had thought. Helen Energy, this is the one we're very familiar with. Field reverse configuration FRC uses a neutronic fusion fuel with 5% neutrons and they're aiming for boron 11. Horn technologies and and by the way, Helen we know got DOE support. Helen got like 5 million in DOE support like 10 years ago. Yeah, there's more autronic fusion companies than I would have expected on here as well. Horn technologies hybrid inertial electrostatic heating with magnetically shielded grid. The other thing I'll notice is there's way more inertial confinement fusion companies than I thought. I was expecting this list to be like five or 10 and I think it's more like 20 25. Now there's no way all of these will be successful. Most of these will probably go away, but this is another one. They're using inertial electrostatic confined fusion. Long fu long view fusion laser indirect drive inertial fusion. Another inertial confinement fusion. LPP. Now LPP we know about LPP is using dense plasma focus and theirs is very very similar to reverse confield configuration is using a plasmoid to produce uh a neutronic fusion. So LPP by Eric learner dense plasma focus zpinch variant a neutronic boron 11 fusion. And then this one, this is I think a new uh no, this is the mag lift magneto inertial fusion technologies staged magnetize linear inertial fusion. This is one that I think I' I've spoken about a little bit, the mag lift, which was one that I was curious to look into. It seems like the DOE labs are starting to be allowed to to dig into this. So, because I have a feeling that this mag lift and some of these other very very recent designs are probably going to prove the concepts to be real. Meanwhile, the commercial companies are going to far surpass them. The commercial companies are going to go way beyond where the DOE labs are because the DOE labs are being forced. They're being held back intentionally. Near star fusion in Virginia. Projectile fusion with magnetized capsules. H weird. Pacific fusion approach not publicly disclosed. Princeton fusion systems. Now this is one that I've heard about recently as well. Princeton fusion systems. This one claims reverse field configuration with radio frequency heating. A neutronic helium 3. So, there's another one that we want to take a look at. Princeton Fusion Systems. Putting them on the list. Putting them on the list. Shine Technologies. Fusion neutron generators. So, this is just neutron generators. Shine Technologies. That one I'm not super interested in. Stellarax. I'm not interested in stellarators. I don't think the Stellarators I think the Stellarators are never going to be successful. So, here's a Stellarator. Stellarax. And then TAE, TAE is another one that we know was a Department of Energy funded uh fusion company. Trial Alpha Energy is what TAE stands for. Uh field reverse configuration a neutronic boron 11 fusion. And then there's a few more. These are supposedly don't have DOE funding. So the big one is Commonwealth. Commonwealth Fusion Systems is the one that Joe Lndale's invested in. He spoke about it on Shan Ryan. I think Bill Gates and other people are invested in in Commonwealth. From what I can tell on Commonwealth Fusion, they uh they are not doing a neutronic fusion. Now, if this changes, I'll be the first one to mention it, but from what I can tell, they're not doing a neutronic fusion. Um, somebody mentioned Andrea Rossi with the ECAT device. Most likely that's a scam. Most likely it's a scam. I don't think it's going to be economically feasible to sell a cold fusion reactor for like$25 or $50 or even $500. So my guess is that that guy's deal doesn't work. But I'm I don't know this officially. That's just my guess from the Andrea Rossi guy. I've heard that he has a long history of fraudulent claims and being sued in court for fraudulent claims. So just be very skeptical, guys, until you see an actual product. Be very skeptical for sure. Okay. Focused energy in in Austin. Laserdriven inertial confinement fusion with proton fast ignition. So some of these inertial confinement fusion mechanisms could turn out to be a neutronic. They just haven't listed their fusion fuels. Wouldn't surprise me to see a lot of these companies flip over to a neutronic as well. Realita fusion approached based on on reversed field pinch magnetic confinement. This is another one that's almost sounds like this is a mix between field reverse configuration and the dense plasma focus. I do wonder how many of these like had inside information like how many of these did somebody come to them and tell them hey field reverse configuration dense plasma focus that's the key and then they're just they're trying to figure it out based on partial information that's kind of how I feel most of these are and then thea energy says optimized high field stellerator with planer coils I don't like any of the stellarator designs personally. And then tokamac energy high field spherical tokamac maybe type one energy optimized high field stellerator with tubeshaped high temperature superconductors. I like superconductors but I don't like the word stellarator. Uh eximer energy in California laser inertial fusion with opposing beams maybe. And then lastly, zap energy sheer flow stabilized zpinch. The last one's interesting because zpinch is very similar to what Eric Learner and DPP Fusion is doing. Now, one new one as well that I got sent to me was um Inertia. Inertia Fusion, brand new Fusion company. Um let me see here. This is going to load up. Inertia Enterprise. This was August 27th, 2025. brand new, the one that I I'm just reading off my phone here, so let me switch this over. Inertia Enterprises launches to commercialize fusion energy, founded by proven leaders in business and science. Founding team includes Twillow co-founder and excee Jeff Lawson, Fusion Target designer Andrea Criter, and Fusion Power Plant designer Mike Dune. So there's another one as well. Apparently they have background they their inertial fusion confinement fusion was demonstrated at the DOE. Um I don't know if this was the one. One of them was trying to use lowcost lasers. I'm just looking to read. So, some of these seem like they're going for short-term gain where they might be able to produce over unity versus others seem like they're in it for the long haul in terms of how do we make super efficient, high coefficient of performance, clean energy reactions. So, there's the list of all the companies right now. I don't have any more information to tell you which ones are the best, but my opinion would be avoid stellarators and I would be focused on ones that are doing a neutronic fusion and any of the ones that are doing inertial or inertial magnetic. You can you can basically like they can take inertial static or inertial confinement or magneettoinertial. Any of those kind of fusion confinements I think are all legit. It's all about using electromagnetism to break down the coolum barrier so that we can cause our things to collide and then using resonance using resonance to enhance the tunneling effect as we've talked about in the past. Now, as more time goes on, I will edit that list, add more information to the list, and hopefully we will be able to figure out which of these companies we should be investing in before they become $4 trillion businesses. Now, this is sadly, I think, the best we're going to be able to do. The MH370 videos are real. It was a covert operation. They're never going to admit to it. That's just the reality. They're never going to admit to it. We can't even prove the technology is real because people don't believe what they see with their eyes. So, the next best bit, the next best thing that we can do is just invest our money. Invest our money in the technologies that we know are going to be successful. And then the other thing I would look forward is look for from the microchip standpoint is the moment you see the words Nvidia and Quantum in the same sentence in the news headlines, make sure you're already invested before that. Now it may be baked into the price of Nvidia right now, but the moment Nvidia or some other microchip company that is connected to the United States defense contractors, the moment they start producing Josephson Junction microchips, whatever that stock price is at, it's it's going up. It's going way up, chat. And the reason for this is that there's so many applications of these microchips. Free energy is just one application. Uh we just heard quantum radars. How about quantum communication devices where we're just communicating with the Mars rover from Earth. How about telescopes? There's practically unlimited application, commercial applications for these quantum microchips and they all use very similar designs to accomplish different things. So the moment Nvidia or some other microchip company has been blessed by the Holy Spirit of the United States intelligence apparatus, you're going to want to make sure that you're invested in that company. So that's the best advice I can give you guys right now. That's Ashton playing my uh what is that? Um the Kramer guy or whatever. That's me giving you my stock advice chat. We'll see how it does. We'll see how it does. I am in the penthouse of I always write about everything. So we'll see. Okay, two videos for you guys tonight. We got two videos. Look at me spoil you guys. First video is my boy Douglas Miller. Yeah, Jim Kramer, Jim Forbes, we're doing it. Uh, I couldn't believe when I saw this. Somebody said, "Hey, Ashton, you got to check out this APEC conversation that just happened." What was this Saturday? Quantum vacuum propulsion and kasmir engineering. Douglas Miller will will discuss quantum vacuum propulsion physics based on stochastic electronamics. Now his thing Douglas Miller will presenting new approaches to quantum vacuum propulsion including ZPE plasmoid engines for fuelfree space drives along with vacuum catalyzed autronic fusion reactors. Well, well, well, well, well, well, chat. Now, my impressions from watching this were, wow, this guy either follows me. He's either a super fan who follows my work or we are definitely over the target. Because if you have researchers that are all honing in on the same thing, then usually that means there's a there there's something there. Multiple independent researchers are are finding the same science, the same scientific papers and coming to the same conclusions. Usually means that you're finding something that is resonating with people out there. So, I watched a lot of this presentation. We're not going to have time to watch all of it. I just kind of want to watch the intro and I want to get a better impression because I I DM' this guy afterwards and he basically told me afterwards he said you're over the target and you just need to take it one step further and and look up this uh sitter sitter guy and I looked him up and it seems right. So let's just watch a little bit of this try to get an impression see what's going on with this interview. >> Thank you Tim. It is humbling and uh I feel completely honored to be invited onto your program to be able to present to you and your audience things that I am passionate about. Again, my name is Douglas Miller, founder of Zero Point Field Technologies LLC. And my purpose today is to talk about what is possible with stochastic electronamics, otherwise known as SED. So stochastic electronamics quite interesting. I learned a little bit from his presentation as well. I've seen stoastic electronamics thrown around in a lot of scientific papers by Hal Pudof and Eric Davis. And essentially what it is is it's a deviation or a branch of electronamics that moves away from quantum electronamics and moves towards this idea of stochastic electronamics which includes things like uh scalar potentials, scalar waves. So it's another way of unifying classic electromagnetism with quantum field theory. Yeah. So basically what Yeah. Oh, there you go. As Jason says in the chat, SED is basically quantum electronamics with the ether mixed into it. With the ether mixed in. So this presentation is really good. I'm actually going to skip ahead a little bit. So he explains, take a look at this. What is 0 point energy right off the bat? What is zero point energy? The lowest temperature kind of explains everything about zero point energy. How much energy is in it? If this doesn't look familiar, you do not watch a lot of Ashton Forbes presentations because Richard Fineman, there it is right there. Richard Fineman calculated that the amount of energy is massive, massive amount of energy in the 0 point energy field. We're not aware of this because we're in this equilibrium of 0 point energy. This is pretty funny. Like this is and here's the virtual particle pairs. Now, how do we reach the virtual particle pairs? We achieve the Schwinger limit. We achieve the Schwinger limit. This allows us to interact and pull these virtual particle pairs straight out of the vacuum. Straight out of the vacuum. Been experimentally proven. Dynamic Casemir effect shows it as well. And then manipulating the permitivity and the permeability of the vacuum. The speed of light is not actually constant. Not actually constant. So looking through this, I just think it's funny because this is pretty much any one of my live streams reviewing 0 energy. But the interesting part about this is that even if this was somebody who was a super fan of mine, great. This means that I'm so influential now. If this was a super fan, this would mean I'm so influential that people are literally just reciting my research, using my research as basis for their own, and it's so good that it's on APAC presentations. It's on Apac presentations. To me, guys, Ape presentations are basically the height of cutting edge technology. I mean, we saw Charles Chase on the APEC conversations. Uh we've seen basically Sunonny White, Charles Buler, every scientist that I've discussed has done Apac presentations. Every single one has been on there doing them. So even if it was a copy, and I don't think that they are just copying my work, but even if it was, I would still consider it a huge victory, huge W. In fact, it makes me wonder why I haven't been invited to do a presentation on some of this stuff because I could I could definitely do a presentation like this. I wouldn't want to. It's not an invite to invite me, but I I don't like doing presentations, chat. I just like to do live streams. I do enough work at my real job doing presentations and all that stuff. Okay, so the exciting possibil I took some notes down. Hold on. Let me see what we got. Took some notes. Which time stamps do I want? Okay. Uh let's see what we have to say. The casemir force is when you have two. >> Okay. So what he uses this idea of vacuum catalyzed fusion. This idea of vacuum catalyzed fusion is essentially Douglas Miller's way of unifying the concepts that I've been speaking about that you know not they're not exclusive to me. I'm not I don't say I own these concepts. But the idea that fusion is a tap into the zero point energy. If we say that fusion taps into the zero point energy, then there must be a relationship between the 0 point energy and the fusion process. And right here, this is what he's essentially saying. He's saying that the vacuum catalyzed a neutronic fusion. He's saying that the vacuum itself is another input. We create our electrical engineering system. The vacuum itself is another input into our circuit, the vacuum itself. And this is how you unify the idea of classic atom theory, theory of fusion, theory of nuclear processes with this idea of the zero point energy. We say that oh when fusion is happening, it's tapping in to the 0 point energy. This would also explain why a neutronic fusion would be the strongest tap because the zero point energy is electromagnetic. So the more dense electromagnetism, the stronger your EMP pulses, the more interaction you're going to have. So autonic fusion in theory should be the most interactive. >> Very tiny, very small plates that are very close together facilities and the ZPF array. He offered me some wise counsel which I he details of the ZPF array uh for IP purposes. So the 30,000 foot view is this idea I had. Can't we push off the quantum vacuum with nano propellers? So as we discussed it's a Mims array with millions of Casemir cavities on it. Now obviously the casemir cavities cannot be parallel plates because they would just get forced together. So they have to be nonp parallel plates. You could call them wedges. And pretty funny, I've said this exact same thing. So he's talking about how we use the kasmir effect to produce propulsion. And he says, well, you can't have parallel plates. They just come together. So how do you produce asymmetric thrust? Just go like this. You go like this and you're going to get asymmetric thrust. So it is interesting that yeah, I mean he's paring pretty much all the same stuff that I'm that I posted about. And number two is this CPF array is not designed for energy extraction. It is my belief that it is a lot more efficient to use it for navigation, not extraction. That's foundational cornerstone number two. And so with that, the Casemir cavities cannot be static. And really, that's all I can say about that. They are non-static Casemir cavities, which also means number three that they have to be powered. And so the ZPF array is powered by a battery with up to 10 watts of power. And when turned on, simulations show a directional thrust of between 6 and resistance uh slow. The exciting part is what happened next. >> Oh, >> I said hydrogen. >> I also incorporated bow ring. So what I did was with their plasma fusion reactors is excite. >> Okay, hold on. Here we go. I think it's somewhere around here >> to what we're more familiar with, which is nuclear power plants. These things are dinosaurs. They're fossils. They're never coming back. They they heated up, they boiled water to turn turbines for electricity. And to do it, they had nuclear waste. What people have come up with right now, and my favorite uh example is Helon. What they are doing with their plasma fusion reactors is exciting. They plan on powering Microsoft's AI data center by 2028. They are working on this right now. It's never been done before. This is brand new. They're learning as they go. Brilliant minds love what they're doing. And it is a neutronic fusion. Well, what are they working on? They call it a field reversed configuration. What does that mean? That's just a fancy way of saying how they end up with their tooidal-shaped plasmas. Well, what's a tooidal shaped plasma for the lay man? It's a donut. It's a donut-shaped plasma that they fire at each other. Two of them. >> Yeah. People are like, how this is like literally my twin, right? Like this is me talking about that. Oh, nuclear reactors are just spinning a steam turbine. Isn't that stupid? Oh, a neutronic fusion, helium fusion is direct energy conversion. Isn't that just way better? Like this is word for word. Like this is what I'm talking about. This is why I'm pointing out that like this was so weird to listen to because it was almost like looking into a mirror of my own presentation. And this is where I realized either a I've done a great job influencing people. Either I've done a great job influencing people or we are directly over the mark. And either way, I don't even really care. I don't even really care. I'm I'm so proud of Douglas Miller. Either way, if he's a super fan, I'm proud of him. And if he came to this all on his own conclusion, then I'm super proud of him. Also, let me just go back real quick because we're at 51 4113 here. Somewhere in here, where does he talk about it? He actually references the same scientific papers. Where is it? He references the exact same scientific papers. Uh maybe it's like early on somewhere in here. He references Bernard Hian Ruda and even mentions their their scientific papers. I think it may be like right right after this. Hold on. Here it is right here. Look at this slide, chat. Look at this slide. This was the slide where I was like, is this me from another dimension? Look at what this says right here. Al Pudolf revitalized SED as a classic framework with the real electromagnetic ZP ZPF. His papers include the ground state of the hydrogen atom. ground state of the hydrogen atom. How many times I mentioned that scientific paper mentions gravity is a zero point fluctuation force. Gravity is a 0 point fluctuation force. And then the third one was the scientific paper with Ruda and H where they find out that inertia is a zero point force. [Music] Okay. I mean, either my man is a huge super fan or we we are definitely on the same we're definitely in the same ballpark when it comes to research one way or another. And once again, I don't mind at all. There's no such thing as stealing someone's research. I mean, you can do your own research and find the same stuff. That's the whole point. That's the whole point. >> Tooidal-shaped plasmas. Well, what's a tooidal-shaped plasma for the lay man? It's a donut. It's a donut-shaped plasma that they fire at each other. Two of them fire at each other. They meet in the middle very fast, very hot. Why? To create a fusion of their detium and helium. When it fuses, it creates what? Alpha particles. That's two protons, two neutrons, a helium 4 basically that can be harvested with MHD coils at a nearly 95% efficiency rate directly into electricity. That's how they're going to power Microsoft's AI data centers. Now, you have power in, you have power out. Right now in the process, they're probably right about break even. But you need more power out than power in for this thing to work. So that's called a Q factor. Q equals 1 is break even. Q=2 would be twice the power out than power in. Q= 3 would be three times the power out than power in. And so on. And so that is a okay. So a neutronic fusion they're going to get over unity without even hitting ignition. They're not even going to get ignition and they're going to hit over unity. I mean that's part of the reason why I'm so all in on helium fusion. You tell me we're not even going to need ignition. We don't even need these high temperatures and we're going to get over unity out of it and it's going to be clean energy and it's going to be direct energy conversion. You had me at hello. You had me at hello helion infusion. I predict that he a neutronic energy will get to coefficient of performance Q factors well over a hundred maybe even well over a thousand in the future. So we would be happy with like Q factor of five let alone Q factor of 100 just to give you some idea of how high I am on this technology. Now let's skip ahead a little bit. Uh he talks about his his 0 point energy array here. >> An increase in ZPE increases permitivity. epsilon increases with denser fluctuations effectively lowering the coolant barrier by 10 to 20%. >> So here he's basically saying that oh I wasn't even pulling it up here he's saying that he's explaining why why does the coolum barrier get reduced. This is the big thing when it comes to fusion. The big problem with fusion is that when you create your ions you you stripped your atoms of their electrons and you're left with these positively charged ions. The problem is they're positively charged and they're they're going to reflect. They're going to push each other aside. They're going to repel each other. So, we need to find a way to get these ions that would normally repel close enough together where they come together. Now, one way we can do this is we can make a giant soup of electrons, a giant plasma of electrons that clouds all the the ions. And if we do this then this is a theoretical way we can reduce the cool barrier. One of the things that we've talked about though is the vibration. Now he mispronounces ziterbuagong here. It's not an easy word to spell though or pronounce. Zitbagong is this natural resonance that's always happening in the background. Zitterbugong. You can imagine it's like the waves of the calm water. We've got this zitterbugong effect. And now if we amplify this resonance or if we apply a resonance effect then we can amplify this zitribug. We can cause tunneling to occur through resonance through frequency. Now if you don't believe me check out the paper that we took a la we took a look at last week about resonance tunneling in for cold fusion and you can see that the tunneling percentage goes significantly up at certain resonant frequencies. Not not all of them are the same by the way. Different resonant frequencies have different tunneling improvement. >> HRP zitboom jiggles amplify screening boosting tunneling probabilities and planks constant increasing broadening uncertainties and the ZPF array. This catalyzes a neutronic proton boron alphas at lower energies. Hydrogen flow plus fringing fields ionize gas enabling nuclear pre-exitation. I wonder if nuclear pre-exitation is another word for uh pre-ionization. One of the terms I get seeing thrown around in uh mag air breathing magneto hydrodnamics is pre-ionization which I don't fully understand but it sounds like it's some kind of creating the plasma as the air is getting sucked in or something like that. I am curious about that. Um, the last bit I want to take a look at is 58 minutes here. Okay. So, he gets a standing ovation from the crew here. And something interesting gets mentioned here. >> That's awesome. You mentioned that you did not cover FTL. I would love it if you wanted to come back and talk about faster than light travel, wormholes, as well as drill down on a neutronic fusion. That is an area. >> Oh, I'm sorry. That >> that will be a future U. >> Wait for this. Wait for this response right here. I'm sorry, but Tim Ventura either knows or I don't know how Tim Ventura doesn't know. Get ready for what he's about to say right here, guys. Pay close attention what Tim Ventur is about to say. >> For sure. A lot of work to do on that, Bill. >> Yeah. Well, and if I could interject for just a moment. I used to go to the ISNPS conference and anronic fusion because it's not giving off certain types of radiation, right? It's not giving off those those fastoving neutrons. That was something that was really exciting. In fact, I have some stuff uh from Dr. Paul sizz on my computer that I'm working on creating a story about that idea goes back quite a ways and a lot of really leading scientists have been into it. So, so thank >> What the actual chat? Did I Did I just hear Tim Ventura say that a neutronic fusion, he's got a bunch of research related to Paul Sizz Paul Sizz, the black project engineer that I've been talking about for two years now. the one that I was able to figure out that we used a plasma sheath and turned it into a drone. The same Paul Sizz that made this video that I'm about to play warning people that UFOs are going to be parked over our nation's capital that are going to be unstoppable. You got I'm definitely gonna be paying attention for when Tim Ventur drops the Paul Sizz a neutronic fusion connection because if we're at this point like we're through the rabbit hole, we're through the looking glass and now you're telling me that a neutronic fusion which we've discovered is the secret they've been hiding is has a direct connection to Paul Sizz who's one of the authors of the durs friends with Hal Pudof who I've got this clip of pulses warning people that if we don't start taking these microwave technologies seriously, they're going to start showing up. >> If we're going to do this, we we have to keep the light bulb from going. >> This is Paul talking >> and if you notice it starts with I have an idea and you notice all the naysayers a word of caution a little too radical. We tried something like devils. Let me play the devil's advocate. As the guy says at the end, what was just might be there are there are hundred people out there turning off lights to one person that can keep the light lit. >> Chat, this is my goat. This is my number one spirit goat of all spirit goats. I have a lot of spirit mentors that come to me in my dreams. Came to me in my dream. Chat, when people ask me, Ashton, how do you know the videos are real? I say, it came to me in a dream. That's how we determine if things are real. Now, per Candace Owens came to me in a dream. Paul Sizz came to me in my dream and he told me, "Ashton, the MH370 videos are an autronic fusion bomb." He told me, never been wrong before. That's Paul Sizz right there. And first of all, he tells you the most inspirational thing ever. He says, "We got to keep the lights on. People, the haters are going to come out and tell you it's not possible. It's not real. You can see the haters in the chat right now saying this is all fake. Don't look at this. Don't look at this. There's no science here. All these black project engineers that were literally warning you about this, that's all fake. Don't pay attention to that. Don't look at what you see with your eyes. And what is he going to say next? This is the same guy, by the way, that just a second ago, Tim Ventura said that he's got data connecting pulses to a neutronic fusion. This video is from the 90s. He's working off an overhead projector. When I started out in business, my bosses always kept my life lit because they said, "I don't want to know the reasons it won't work. I want to know the reasons why we can make it work." Today, all I hear is, "Yeah, I know you think there's one or two reasons it can work." Here's a whole list of things why it won't work. I guarantee you I cannot find any set of circumstances where I can guarantee myself that I can cross the street out in front of the Hilton Hotel and not get hit by a car unless I block the traffic and do all these these >> I love the logical things that would make me not want to live a very useful life if we're not if we're not careful. if we keep shutting the lights off in the United States that one of these days and I have leaks leak sitting right here in the audience one of these days we're going to see that light orbit and that's a microwave powered spacecraft based on plasma propulsion and one of those right now is flying the former Soviet Union I can't I I don't know if I can go and touch it >> that is a spacecraft he said using plasma MA fusion propulsion. Did you just listen to the words that he just said? That looks like a UFO to me. I'm not an expert in UFOs. I'm going to go ahead and say that looks like a UFO. And he says these are going to be parked. This is parked over the Soviet Union right now. And if we don't take this seriously, these flying UFOs using plasma fusion propulsion are going to be flying over our country. Oh, and what just happened last December? Oh, we had drones last December. We had drones flying over our country that nobody could say where they were from. Basically, Paul Sizz was right. There you go. Now, let's listen and finish this up. I'm going to just go back a little bit >> based on plasma propulsion and one of those right now is flying the former Soviet Union. I can't I I don't know if I can go and touch it, but I I've seen the video of it and it won't be too long if we don't enter the 21st century in the United States with that railway train so people can look out and say this is what we've accomplished. This is what we can do. This is the we've made a tremendous economic breakthrough that's providing us the astein and and economic base that we've never envisioned before. We can't do that then someone else is going to do it. Thank you very much >> chat. That's the pulses that Tim Ventura has data connecting him to a neutronic fusion. I can't wait to get my hands on that data. I can't wait to get my hands on that data. A neutronic fusion is the answer. They have figured a neutronic fusion out for a long time. They've been using it as propulsion. It is the propulsion mechanism of UFOs. They're using autronic fusion to propel UFOs. The flying balls of energy you see flying around, that's a that's probably a neutron, but it could be neutronic fusion propulsion. just fusion propulsion in general. They've got it figured out. These guys have been talking about it for a long time. That's the secret to UFOs and it's classified because it's classified under nuclear weapons secrets. This is one of the things that Dr. Greer and I talked about. If you haven't checked out the interview, it dropped on Saturday. The interview between me and Dr. Greer, one of the big things we said is that I pointed out to him these are nuclear weapons. And he said they're classifying them. and they're classifying this UFO stuff underneath nuclear weapons. And he's saying that that he thinks that's illegal. He thinks they shouldn't be classifying them under nuclear weapons. And if we didn't classify them under nuclear weapons, then the whole shebang is an illegal operation. And we're classifying them under nuclear weapons because then it protects them legally. Legally, there's nothing we can do. Legally, we can't access them. Legally, we can't even know about them. And I personally happen to agree. I think that he's absolutely right about that. So, the last thing tonight, guys, is a special surprise. Special surprise. Ed Whitten, son of Lewis Whitten. Lewis Whitten, who Lewis Whitten unified electromagnetism and gravity back in 1958 for the Martin Corporation, as in Loheed Martin. Ed Whitten did a presentation that went live today on wormholes. By the way, shout out to Paul Sizz. If you're out there, bro, if you're out there in the spirit world, get me those files. Get me get me those animatronic fusion files. I don't know what you have to do. Hack into Tim Ventur's computer. Send them to me. Give me those animatronic fusion files, sir. Please give him Paul Si Siz and Friedwart Winterberg have in death done more for this investigation than basically anybody. These are two two goats who I've read their scientific papers. They were geniuses and they have pushed this thing forward. So like they deserve so much credit even in death for all their their efforts. Couldn't couldn't be more appreciative. Okay, here we go. Skipping ahead a little bit. I haven't even had opportunity to watch this whole thing. So, we may skip ahead a little bit. I want to just hear what I want to figure out from this. What What was my goal? I I've I've seen enough wormhole presentations. I want to know does Ed Whitten actually understand wormholes? We should be able to tell even if he's koi, even if he holds back information, we should be able to tell from this. So, let's see. I've skipped ahead a little bit. The smooth living relies upon the fact that as Einstein Rosen noticed R is not a good coordinate where R= 2G u^2= R minus 2GM has two roots with positive or negative U and let's say positive U corresponds to the region we started with and negative U is the second copy that they glued on Sakaras and others and it's most efficiently described in the Penrose diagram which um Penrose diagram we got here give me quite a while state >> um >> were you some overall energy states of the original >> okay this is interesting I kind of want to read this part so this is when they talk about these asymmetric as uh symptomatically flat regions of spacetime the meaning of the second asymptomatically flat region was a mystery mystery until 1970s when black hole thermodynamics was developed by uh Beckenstein hawking and gibbons and others a black hole has thermal interpretation at a hawking temperature. Okay, maybe I don't care about that actually. Oh, here's the states. So, these ion states are another thing that I don't really understand other than to some kind of interaction with the med with the ether or something like that. E is the energy states of the system with energies ei states of the second copy of the original system. So I think what they're talking about here is this idea of quantum quantum teleportation. They're saying that we can recreate this Ein state over here that exists over here. And they're talking about this idea of a monopole, the positive and negative half. You have a positive half and a negative half. The negative half is the one where the plane disappears. Positive half is the one where the plane reappears over here as well. I think that's I think I'm accurate on these >> system. If you add a corresponding state of the second copy and then you is thermal. You take the black hole at the hoging temperature then it's thermal field double state is actually a simple state of the quantum fields in the doubled spacetime. So more briefly when you see the penrose diagram >> the black hole exterior >> iggon >> let's say might be this diamond >> is it's pronounced iggon. Um the thermal field of the quantum fields in this region by adding anyway >> identical region behind the horizon. >> So the two copies correspond to the two copies in the thermal field double. >> So abstractly the thermofield double state >> in the general quantum system there's entanglement between the two copies. But mysteriously in the case of a black hole the entanglement is manifested in a geometrical connection between the two copies. I mean so far everything's consistent with wormhole physics as we know it >> but in the case of the black hole system are correlated with measurements of system B but access to one system does not enable you to communicate with someone who has access to the other system that's why the Einstein podski roen phenomenon which they want to present as a paradox is regarded by modern physicists as a phenomenon rather than a paradox if you try a message you send ends up at the black hole singularity I've indicated that by this picture here an observer in the left half of the >> So, this is interesting is that we know this part's wrong. Actually, at the beginning of this live stream, I explained why this part was wrong. They say that you can't send a signal. You can't actually send a message faster and light. And the way we know this is wrong is because we don't need to actually send the message. All we need to do is create a one or a zero. And we can achieve that by either using one as coherence or or zero as decoherence or a system like that. And we can just watch as the system as the system goes from coherent to decoherent. And we can measure that the same way where we measure Morris code. Same concept. >> Spacetime is sending a signal which I imagical censorship. Spatial wormholes, connections between two different regions in space, between two different spaces or shortcuts between two different regions of space can exist in general relativity as we see from the black hole solution. But it's never possible to travel or to send a signal through the wormhole. >> So they called it topological censorship because although space can have a non-trivial topology, you can't observe it. The attempt to travel through the wormhole or to send a signal through the wormhole always comes to a bad end as it does in the case of the short shell geometry. >> The proof is not too hard and given a little more time I would explain it but I think I'll have to skip it today. I actually wrote some lecture notes on general relativity a few years ago were relatively well understood. At least in the case of Lebl the relation between geometry and intents rose in phenomenon which they regarded as a paradox. So here we go. A wide generalization is suspected though certainly not really understood. One vision Maldina and Suskind is that ER equals EPR meaning that quantum entanglement between two systems symbol symbolized by Einstein podski Rosen always corresponds to some sort of geometrical connection between the two systems >> always corresponds to some sort of geometrical connection between the two systems symbolized by the Einstein Rosen wormhole that we've been discussing also dating to 1935 now it's puzzling what this could possibly mean for a only quantum system like >> well the picture is the same but the meaning of the picture is completely different because now it's meant to be a picture of space time not just a picture of space and the wormhole is meant to be localized in spaceime not just inside the wormhole or more technically a time function would have critical points >> so these don't exist as completely that that's not the whole story but anyway gibbons and hawking had shown in the 70s originally again involving black hole thermodynamics reasonable matter system by the way you can in case B it's too much to hope for an exact solution because If far apart competitive is produced by a wormhole well before reviewing his argument let's think for a moment about instant times out of okay we have to integrate over the positions of the and variables and of >> sorry I'm skipping ahead here I I haven't seen this yet before so I'm trying to get to just the part that might be exciting uh wormhole exist as a classical solution let's Oh, string theory. Oh, here we go. String theory gives us quantum gravity theories. So, I guess the question is string theory going to be consistent with wormholes? It's hard to find wormholes in theories with zero cosmological constant. Let's see what else we got. Um, ads is anti-deitter space. So when you see ads, that's basically just the ether sitter space and then anti-deitter space. So when they're talking about this anti-deitter space stuff, they're basically just talking about pulling in the ether back. Okay. Um Okay, boy. This is pretty wild. What do we got here? Okay, let's see what this >> Do I still have five minutes? No. So I will briefly mention an interesting but ultimately unsuccessful attempt that was made to get rid of the problem. Y and I showed that if M1 and M2 have positive scalar curvature a wormhole does not exist. Here I drew M1 and M2 as spheres not round spheres but anyway spheres to suggest that they have positive scalar curvature. In that case a solution for X doesn't exist. That was interesting because it was also known that um in examples of ADS CFT duality where the CFT has a super symmetric brain that can wrap on the boundary the CFT is unstable unless the boundary has positive scalar curvature. So in examples of the duality with this property yell and I showed that when although it is a curious fact that those examples behave strangely when n does not have positive scalar curvature that's a fact whose significance hasn't really black hole. got so much math chat. I just want to know if the wormholes work. Look, look, Ed Whitten, I have nothing personally against you. I just want to know if the wormholes work and I want to know if they're consistent with string theory. When does this presentation get us to that part? That's the part I want to know. Okay, so blah blah blah uh comparison of wormhole physics to random matrix theory. Sure. Um what's the what's the conclusion? This is by no means the only application of wormholes. Well, we know that err is the answer. Okay, let's let's go back to this part here. >> But what we mean by wormhole is initial data for Einstein's equations that look like one of these two pictures. And then it would whatever in general in physics, we can specify initial data, but the theory decides how it will evolve in time. So the picture that you see on the right over here is the one they're going with because it's the idea that space is this flat surface. And that if we create a wormhole, we're basically just bending it around like this and creating a gap between the two of them, which is accurate. I mean, that's really what we're doing at the end of the day. The bigger question is whether or not we can have something go through the wormhole and come out the other side in one piece. That's the biggest biggest question we're getting at here is that there's no proof that with MH370 the plane disappears at one location and comes out one piece elsewhere. It could come out in a million pieces. It could come out on the other side and the people are now zombies right because they talk about this idea of well we're we're passing the quantum state but when you pass the quantum state do you still maintain your connection to consciousness? There's a lot of unknowns going on here. So those are the types of questions that we're trying to get resolved from our worm. We know wormholes exist. We watch a plane get wormholed. The question is what happens to the plane? What happens to the people? And are we going to be able to control this technology or is it this, you know, quantum uncertainty automatically rips things to shreds when you shoot them through a wormhole? These are the questions we want to know the answers to. >> And the initial date is a black hole. >> Well, here you can't tell from the initial data that it's a black hole. In the case of the Einstein Rosen bridge it's time evolution such that when you disc when you solve for the time evolution you can take beta zero but you have to be >> I wanted to ask about this err thing. So you know normally so nowadays >> somebody's asking about er equals epr here. I wonder if I can put the captions on >> a way to think about the epr paradox is we can measure you know these right and you show that in these quantum system there's you know distributions of measurement outcomes that are not possible in any classical system. I just want to understand with these wormholes like do you have you know kind of qualitatively different classical probability distributions of correlations about >> well the point of mentioning a topological censorship was to explain why er equals EPR is potentially viable the geometrical connections that we get have the same property as quantum entanglement they lead to >> chat potenti chat Ed Whitten Ed Whitten on the record just heard him erals EPR is quote unquote potentially viable. That's all I need to hear, chat. That's all I needed to hear. I'm going to let the man finish, but Ed Whitten just said ER equals EPR. Potentially viable. I don't know what that means when it comes to string theory, but I know it means good things when it comes to ER equals EPR. >> Correl correlated measurements, but not the possibility of communication. >> Yeah. And so this is the thing. They're being koi about the communication thing. Yes, we have quantum communication devices. Yes, we do. I'm 100% sure we have quantum communication devices. The reason why they're being koi is they're using words very carefully. You're not going to be able to transmit your communication through the EPR device itself. Because transmitting and measuring causes the wave function to break down, causes the the decoherence to become coherent. But you can still send a message indirectly. You can send a message indirectly. The same way I explained with the quantum radar earlier is that when you're looking at your source entanglement, remember we have our entanglement. We split it off. We look at our source, our control, and we're looking to see what shape forms in our control. Whenever the shape changes, we now have a Morris code signal. And if we can measure those shape changes really really fast, which China claims they can figure it out in one photon or they can measure it down to a single photon. Now we can create a quantum communication system that it' be nearly the speed of light. Not quite the speed of light, but nearly the speed of light. It'll be faster than any standard communication method that exists on planet Earth significantly. And it's not range dependent. the classical analog of what >> it's a yes it's perhaps surprising but by now it's been essentially known for a long time since black hole thermodynamics that geometry can mimic quantum entanglement geometry geometry can mimic quantum entanglement this is probably the clip that we needed right here er equals epr works and geometry can mimic quantum entanglement how did we know that we figured it out from black hole full thermodynamics. I love it, Chad. This is this is true disclosure. You're you're in the middle of true disclosure right now. You're literally listening to Ed Whitten, founder of string theory, explain that er equals EPR works and that we've known that geometry can mimic quantum entanglement since the thermodynamics of black holes. >> Yes. Any uh slightly broader version of maybe the same >> speak. >> Sorry, I just have a related question to this. Is there um a something special about specifically the thermal states uh this black hole thing that leads to >> matrix for any density matrix that's sufficiently close to being thermalization ultimately kind of should factoriize. >> Does he even have like a he conclusions on this >> and >> he just he went straight into questions in the middle of his interview or his presentation? Yes, in the large end limit it gives a non-factor contribution. But the Are there any more questions? >> Speak up, Junior. We can't hear you. >> Non-exponential longer range forces >> in the spaceime case. Okay, it's clear if we're in uklitian signature. I might tell you that when we get to complex metrics, even though there are some useful results that have been found, general rules are not known. So I can only give you a general answer if we assume a uklidian metric. >> Well, I don't know. Does he doesn't have any like end slide or anything like that. Let me take a look. What did he do right before he went to these questions? That was it. He just ends he chat. He just ends on a random slide. There's no like no question slide. Like this is where Okay, so we we got what we needed out of that presentation. But if I could just critique Ed Whitten for a second. As somebody that's been a consultant for 20 years that's done countless presentations, you got to always have a slide that's like questions with a big question mark at the end of it so people understand when the presentation is over. Or hey, maybe have a slide that talks about conclusions, discussion, and you have your bullet points put on there. This dude's just got a bunch of slides with a whole bunch of information on them and he's just reading off the slide directly. Like this is the worst kind of presentations you can do. You're supposed to just like have some bullet points and then you're supposed to do the rest from your memory. So, and it did it has no color anywhere on this. So, like the dude just put his thoughts on a on a piece of paper and was like, "Okay, turn this into a slideshow." And the worst part is if he just had the AI do it for him. The AI can do these kinds of tasks. All you got to do is be like, "Hey, I wrote this presentation. Put it into a slide format for me." Didn't even do that. Chat, these high functioning autists, high functioning autists, basically they can do all this complex stuff, but they just can't do basic things. Like basic things are beyond their capability. He can talk about wormholes and all the mathematical solutions and all this stuff, but like can't put together a basic PowerPoint presentation. just is what it is, chat. Okay, guys. I hope you guys enjoyed the live stream. I've got personal family stuff going on, families coming in town this week. I'm not sure about Wednesday and Friday live streams. I am going to try to make them happen. Uh but no guarantees on those guys. So, uh and we might do something fun as well. I will say tomorrow I am scheduled. We've had the uh Owen Shroyer interview has has been moved twice now. It is supposed to happen tomorrow. And I am looking forward to learning more about the Israel Palestine conflict. Um, but from what I've seen from people in general, it seems all very surface level stuff. But I want to learn more about the reasons why people seem to hate Israel, why there's so much backlash and animosity on the internet. Um, and hopefully learn, you know, get some new insights as to, you know, what the people's grievances are and what how they want things to move forward. So, we'll see. The number one thing I want to understand is what are people's policies? Like what what policies do people want against Israel? Like for me, I'm all about removing foreign influence in our country, but it's not going to be a unilateral thing that's only going to apply to one country. So, we'll see, guys. Okay, let's do some of these super chats. Thank you guys very much in the pill chat, and thank you very much also in the Rumble chat. Oh, for the time that that's going to be tomorrow, I think it's going to be 6:00 or 6:30 tomorrow. So, it'll be a little bit earlier than normal live streams tomorrow. Come check it out. Uh, for the super chats, did my things change back now? Like I think Streamyard keeps changing the thing. I think this is I think this is Levi from before. If I give you an envelope and I have a matching one, two different color cards. The second one I know mine, I know yours. That's a longitudinal scalar wave. The problem is if you try to measure that at any point, it breaks down the coherence and now what you try to measure on the other side is no longer consistent. So the way to get around that is you use the switch option that I told you before. And again the switch option is mentioned in the John Kramer non-locality derd. So again all you have to do guys is read the defense intelligence reference documents specifically the non-locality dur mentions exactly how they build the switch goes through all these EPR experiments explains them explains the drawbacks limitations etc. That dirt is also the one where I learned there's almost certainly no retrocausality. Can't go back in time. Levi followup says, "It was all about Bitcoin when it was $5. Sold it all for nothing. Hurts typing this." Exactly. So, we don't want to make that mistake again. So, this is why we're now looking ahead. We've already maybe missed the boat on the microchips. Maybe not. But the next one's going to be fusion. And we're not going to miss the boat on fusion. Now, the difficult part is find picking the winner. The winner's probably already been picked. We just got to find out which one which one of you have the intelligence communities decided you're going to be the fusion company. Probably going to be the ones that the billionaires are already investing in, but we'll see. Alex says, "I'd recommend pricing assets in gold as a true representation of value." Yeah, that might be a good that might be a better way to do it. Sam Fischer, thank you very much, Alex, for that donation. Sam Fischer, thank you for this donation. says, "Do you think the CIA has moles in all of these companies to keep them from going boom?" I think that they will exert control over these companies probably in indirect ways. Probably in indirect ways. This actually reminds me of the clip that I was playing earlier today. This is kind of I was wondering like how much do the intelligence communities really control perception, control companies? I think they have more control than what people expect, but it's done in more indirect ways than people expect. Like people say, "Oh, you think Danny Jones is a CIA shill?" Yeah, I do. But I don't think he's actually signed up with the CIA. I think he's just a that doesn't realize that his perceptions are being managed, that they use him to put out whatever messaging they want to put out, and they know he's somebody that will never push back on them, that will never ask a hard question. So they can send all their CIA shows on a Danny Jones because there's no fear whatsoever that classified information is going to be leaked. That to me is a CIA show. Indirect control. So here you go. This is what they did. >> Create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors. We're the producers. We're the main actors. The world is our stage. And we know for a fact that the CIA will plant information on the internet for a fact because we know they planted the Gorgon stair wide area motion photos at least one of which they appear to have manipulated and they planted those photos on the internet. The other photos may not even been manipulated at all. They only think there's only one photo that has a picture of Mount Fuji in it and it's not even used supposedly to make the videos. The other photos that are clearly clouds that are in the wide area motion imagery could only have been planted by the intelligence communities online only. So we know for a fact the intelligence communities are planting information on the internet to cover up covert operations. To me it's very likely that they're making we've we suspected we found a blog that seems to cover up a piece of MH370 that wash ashore in Thailand. We seem to have found a fake blog that could have easily been created by the CIA as well. So, it's hard to know the depths of what they're willing to go to do to cover up their crimes. Um, and I try to keep level-headed about it and not go way down into the rabbit hole, but it is what it is. Leslie says, "Took 65 years for Ed Whitten and string theorist to admit that the ether exists. Love the shirt, Ashton." Thank you very much, Leslie. I appreciate you. Yeah, it took them. It's they're basically going about they're doing it the hard way. Instead of just admitting like we screwed up now we got to look at stoastic electronamics. They're going backwards and they're going we got to keep everything we said intact and then we're going to go back and we're now we're going to call it the anti-deitter space as opposed to calling it the ether and admitting that we were wrong and then we're going to try to rebuild our theories and make everything fit into this box. Right? And at some point you just got to realize you made some foundational assumptions that have failed. And we don't have to throw everything out. Like the alternative would be uh the Jason Verbrelli guy or whatever his name is who's always in my replies going I have him muted. I only see him because you guys reply to him. All this physics is wrong and it turns out there's no space at all and everything that everybody's been teaching you is 100% wrong. Like that's going in the opposite direction too far. It's not that everything is wrong. We have a lot of really, really smart people that have got physics to this point. We just went on a little side quest that took us a little too far off the rails somewhere around the time after Heisenberg in quantum mechanics. Velocity says, "Love your work, Ashton. Watched a video from Green.Aviation." Yeah, I've seen it. Um, do I do a debunking thing? No, there's a lot of videos like that. If you watch my evidence review videos or anything where I've talked about MH370, you'll be able to tell where I deviate. Now, the main point of deviation is the satellite pings. Without the satellite pings, the whole case of the South Indian Ocean goes up in smoke. And the reason why those are so important is that if you discount the satellite pings, then the plane in the MH370 videos, which is MH370, is only 20 minutes away from the last radar plot. The last radar plot has MH370 in the Andaman Sea in the uh Straits of Mala at the Nicabar Islands flying straight ahead. 20 more minutes. It gets to the point in the MH370 videos. From that point on, it's these satellite pings that supposedly claim the plane went into the South Indian Ocean, which by the way, we looked down there and we never found anything. By the way, Boeing 7 has four redundant emergency transponders that cannot be turned off. Not possible to be turned off. None of them are emergency redundant transponders. went off during the crash. Explain that one to somebody. Good luck. Right. So, thank you very much, Velocity. I appreciate that donation. But there's not a lot of point debunking all these videos. They're really just grifting videos where like people just take the the available evidence and they don't really do any independent thought or research into it and then they just package it up because it's a mystery and it'll get a bunch a bunch of clicks. And the ultimate irony of the people that call me a grifter is that those are the grifters. Mentor, pilot, green do.Aviation, those are the people grifting off of a tragedy. Those are the people making lots and lots of money by not solving anything by pushing a narrative that you can you can just prove is wrong. Just compare the debris in Africa to the search zone. It's literally not possible to have physically drifted that far. Not physically possible. That's how little critical thinking these people are doing. None at all. Not even going, "Hey, this debris washed up in Africa literally couldn't have gone this far in this period of time." Not at all. So, I don't know. Would it be worth it to debunk those people? I don't know. Not really. Anyway, I am thinking about what's going to happen next in the MH370 situation. So, thank you for that donation. Uh, if I have news to announce, I'll announce it when it comes up. And then, Zaparoo, thank you. We appreciate you in the chat, Zaparoo. Appreciate all you guys tonight. Hope you guys enjoyed the live stream. Check us out on the audios are now live on Spotify, wherever you can get audio podcasts. Hope you guys enjoy it. Put your comments in the chat or in the in the replies. Let me know what you think about the show and we will be back on Wednesday, guys. Have a great night. Peace out. Infrared eyes scanning the black, tracking the heat, never turning back. Control 22, a covert gaze. Control 33. In the cosmic maze, and rolls in the mix, secrets untold. Silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interest far and wide as spears. Sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats of guiding our defenses like a guiding star. In the silence of space, they keep their post. Shields unseen yet feared the most. With precision and speed, they warn of danger, keeping us safe from the missiles anger. As Beer, Sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star and trolls in the mix. Secrets untold, silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows they silently glide, protecting our interest far and wide as fierce. The sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star. The spears, Sentinel of the Night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like Yeah.