Negative Mass Is the Key to Warp Drive

Video Transcript

What we've learned from wormhole technology is that it's really like an optical illusion. The magnetic wormhole is tunneling between these points. But really from the perspective of the the the people going through the wormhole, time is moving normally for them. This is the most common question I get. What would it feel like if you went through a wormhole? If you were moving faster than the speed of light. And the answer is like people say, you can't move faster than the speed of light from your frame of reference. You can't do that. So the best you can do, the best we can do is move the medium, which means that from the people that are in the wormhole, they don't even feel like they're moving. They feel like they're moving whatever they were moving before. If it's an airplane, they were moving in the airplane. They feel like they're moving on the airplane still. The thing is from the outside perspective, from the people watching them, our perspective looks like those people are moving faster than the speed of light. Now, how is this possible? How do we explain this? We use Alubi's warp drive metric who in 1994 came out and said warp drives we can manipulate the medium and create gravitational waves a negative potential in front of us and a positive one behind us and this will create a wave that we can just ride this wave. That was the idea of the warp drive. And to do that, we require negative energy or negative mass. So for this challenge, we need to learn what is negative mass, what is negative energy. This is the first topic for tonight. So let me pull up this. First of all, here is us understanding visually negative mass. This video is currently going viral. >> Let's see what happens in an inelast. >> Yes, here we go. And these are inelastic collisions. Uh uh I'll just show the whole video. Here we go. >> Let's see what happens in an inelastic collision where one of the blocks has a negative mass. We still aren't worrying about forces at this point. We're just assuming that the blocks can stick together without any trouble in this setup. When the big block hits a positive mass target, it slows down. But when it hits a negative mass target, it speeds up. Why? Because the combined mass is smaller than the big block alone. So for momentum to be conserved, it has to move faster. If the two masses are close to being equal and opposite, the combined mass is very small and they move very fast. And if they're exactly equal and opposite, boom boom. My favorite part about this video is the end because I didn't even edit that in there. That's from the the video that I edited took that clip from. They have a nuclear thing at the end. So people when watching that may say, "How do I understand that?" So you take a big mass big rock and you run it into a small rock and they're both going to move forward but slower than they were moving than the big rock was moving. Okay, easy. But when you take a negative when you have a positive mass bump into a negative mass, it doesn't slow down the resulting collision. It speeds it up because you simply do the math. F= ma and you say okay well now my mass is being reduced. So if it's F= ma then it's A= F / M. So if M gets smaller then A goes up. Acceleration goes up as mass goes down. All you're doing is taking our equations for force and you are reducing the mass from it. Now, what's interesting is when you get close to them being equal, when you get close to them being equal, because imagine now that they're not colliding, imagine our positive mass and our negative mass get very close together. What's going to happen? This is the part that really blows people's minds. A lot of people would say your positive mass and your negative mass should come together. But that's not what happens. The positive mass is attracted to the negative mass and the negative mass is repelled from the positive mass. Hopefully I'm not saying this backwards. It's either this or it's backwards, but either way, same idea. And what this means is as the positive mass gets closer to the negative mass, the negative mass is going to pull away from it. And so what you see is this type of effect. as they try to get closer, you see acceleration. You see free acceleration. Because if you could set up a system now where you have a positive mass and an equal negative mass, the positive mass is going to chase the negative mass and the negative mass is going to run away from the positive mass. So now you've just created an infinite acceleration system. You've created an infinite acceleration system from doing that. And what happens as we approach them both being equal? Positive five mass, negative five mass. As they collide or get close, we get near infinite acceleration. If we were just to do the math, and as they get closer, acceleration just starts to skyrocket. That's effectively teleportation because the moment the acceleration goes beyond the light barrier teleportation from anyone looking at it, it would look like you just instantly went from one location to the next cuz you went faster than light. H. So the idea of negative mass is a a lot of people just don't even understand how negative mass interacts with positive mass because that idea that I just explained to you the positive mass chasing the negative mass or vice versa that is the basis for a warp drive. That is what warp drive is. And now the question is well what is the positive mass and what is the negative mass to these questions we are going to go to the dursum we're going to the ders chat okay if you don't know what the derds are the defense intelligence reference documents the most important scientific papers in human history in human history not yet known but it will be in the future. Will be in the future. Here it is. Negative mass propulsion right here. Now, instead of reading through all of this and boring you all to death, I had Grock do a little summary of the main points and I think there's a couple slides that I can read through that will also bring the point home. But negative mass propulsion, first thing this paper does is explain what I already told you. So, let me go through what I set up at Grock real quick. Here you guys go. The talking points for our negative mass propulsion interpretation of the direct equation as evidence for negative masses. So, the first thing is how do we prove that there are negative masses that they can even exist from a conceptual physics perspective? Number one, Winterberg argues draws on Schrodinger's analysis of the Draq equation, arguing that and the equation's negative energy solutions imply that there must be negative masses. Now, where are they? They must be hidden behind the positive masses. So, here is Friedwart Winterberg. He's the one that wrote this dur. He's the one who wrote the nuclear weapons uh textbook thermonuclear weapon principles of thermonuclear detonations that I that I read that we've talked about several times. His principle is this. The electron itself is not just a negative charge. It's actually a positive mass and a negative mass that are locked into a geometry spinning around. And this positive mass and negative mass an angular momentum forms from them. And what this causes is what we call quantum spin. And that what this means is that what we think of as an electron is actually two parts mixed together in a like binary system. Maybe even more than two, but the idea is the simplest version two. So that's what Friedwart Winterberg says. And what he thinks then is if this is the case, maybe there's a way to disconnect the negative mass component of the electron from the positive mass component. And yes, JK Philly says this is what procession is when it comes to spin. So what we see Friedart Winterberg doing in this paper is he's doing something very similar to what Ferris Williams is doing. He's saying I'm going to look from the ground up the fundamentals of physics and I'm going to say how much do we really know and how much have we assumed and what other interpretations are there. Now, my opinion of Fryart Winterberg's uh analysis and concept, conceptual view is I think he's a little off, but I still think it's mostly there. And this is what I tell people in terms of like we're not, you know, perfect is the enemy of good. It's good enough. He's got the broad strokes down in my opinion. So he says this negative mass is hidden in the electron and the electron's zitribuagum which we've heard before the trembling motion the vibration is explained as an oscillation between the positive and negative masses. The DRA equation where we have our wave function H uh oh so this is the key equation sorry the significance is this pro this provides the quantum mechanical foundation for negative mass which is crucial for propulsion concepts like all could bei now he says that negative masses could be trapped in gravitational wells so this is where I was explaining to you negative masses which are repelled by positive mass gravitational fields would naturally migrate to the centers of celestial bodies. This is another claim that I thought was pretty wild that I'm not sure I agree with, but Friedart Winterberg thinks that there is a negative mass concentration at the center of planets and maybe even at the center of the moon. And so he even argued that if we were looking for a a concentration of negative mass because it's repelled by or repelled from positive mass, it's going to be in the center of the planet. It's going to be in the center. And actually what he wants to do is drill a hole through the moon to get to the middle where then we could basically mine the negative mass, which if he's right, that'd be pretty crazy. But I for some reason it doesn't seem realistic to me. But I mean, yeah, really any part of it, but you get the point. So this now says, and this is like almost a little too good to be true because like he says here, this would now say that negative mass goes from this exotic substance. Now something you can literally just mine mine it like you're mining helium 3 on the moon. Now, if this is true, hypothetically, if this is true, this means that what Elon is doing on the moon definitely has another purpose there. Why are we building a moon base? If you've been living on a rock, Elon gave up on Mars and now he's talking about building a elaborate moon base. Why? For what? There's nothing up there we need, man. We don't even really need the helium 3 anymore. But if there is a whole bunch of negative mass in the center of the of the moon and it's a super rare resource like unoptanium level, it wouldn't make sense. So if I end up being wrong about Elon, he's not an NPC, then boy, then I'm even more impressed. Okay. Uh don't care about mining on the moon. We get the point. Um don't care about extracting it. Let's we'll we'll go past that. applications for self accelerating propulsion. Once extracted, equal positive and negative masses can be paired. Remember what I just told you guys. How crazy is this? By the way, I hadn't read these points before. I just told the AI to go do it. I was reading the paper instead. Right there is exactly what I told you when I showed you the video five minutes ago, 10 minutes ago. Right there. The point is when you have equal positive and negative masses, that's where you can get extremely high acceleration. Just like when we plopped our positive and negative masses together, instantly disappears. So this is what Fryart Winterberg is saying here is that the key to getting warp drive to work is getting your positive and negative masses to being close to equal. It's not that you want a huge amount of negative mass. You want an equal amount of positive and negative mass to reach the maximum amount of acceleration. Pretty neat. The negative mass repels the I was right. I didn't say it backwards, chat. The negative mass repels the positive. But due to inverted inertia, the system accelerates uniformly in one direction without expending energy, violating conservation laws apparently, but consistent with general relativity. So this is the rub. This is the rub that makes it look like it's breaking physics, but it's not because it's consistent with general relativity. And then uh oh it didn't even do the thing that I wanted to point. Okay, we're gonna go back and look at the paper in a second. There's the Zitriugong uh phenomenon as the manifestation for negative masses. Where's I want the Aaronhoff bomb effect one. There it is. Negative mass interpretation of the Aaronhoff bomb effect. What he's saying here is that you can actually figure out that negative mass must exist from the Aaronhoff bomb effect. So he takes the Aaronhoff bomb effect and he shows there must be this scalar potential. So he says in the hydrodnamic interpretation suggested by the plank ether hypothesis the phase shift caused by either the magnetic or gravitational vector potential result from a circular flow of the plank ether. The principle of equivalence can precisely relate this circular flow to the angular velocity of a rotating platform. Now one has the gra one has for the gravitational vector potential this equation now here. So what he's saying here interestingly is that oh I'm not sharing the right thing. My bad fam no one no one told me. What he's saying here is that we have we can explain this negative energy as the potentials that we are unable to measure when we look at the Aaronhoff bomb effect. When we looked at the Aaronhoff bomb effect, we said what we found was it it's not the fields that are causing the action because in the absence of fields, we still see the action. So what this would mean, it's the potentials that cause the action, not the fields that cause the action. And so Winterberg here is evoking an extra dimension to explain this phenomenon using the plank ether. And he's saying this is the source of the negative energy. How do we get negative energy? Well, we have these potentials. Let's tap into the potentials. and we can get our negative energy. So to me this interpretation is exactly what I have been telling you all which is this idea that we have this sea of energy around us and the negative energy is tapping into that how you visualize tapping into this sea of energy probably slightly different from physicist to physicist. One sees that inside the coil velocity profiles the same as in a rotating frame of reference having outside the coil form a potential vortex. And so what they're taking here is they're taking general relativity and they're saying take your frames of reference and imagine what this would look like on this small scale. He's saying it's going to look like a vortex motion. Everything is going to be a vortex motion through the ether through an extra dimension. So he says the plank ether model can give a simple explanation. The plank ether consists of two superfluid components. One composed of positive plank masses and the other composed of negative plank The two components can flow freely through each other making possible two configurations. One where both the components are correlate co-rotating and one where they are counterrotating. The co-rotating configuration realized on a rotating platform where it leads to the sagnetic effect and neutron interference effects says this suggests that the presence of the magnetic vector potential. The two superfluid components are counterrotating outside the coil where the curl is equal to zero. The magnetic energy density vanishes implying that the magnitude of both the velocities are exactly the same.