Felony Physics - Epstein Edition

Video Transcript

# Felony Physics - Epstein Edition Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few [music] and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably [music] question those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our [music] critical faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, [music] we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously [music] influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest [music] common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience [music] and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those [music] were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. [music] Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. Less than an hour before your meeting with President Xi, you posted on social media that you >> We're very powerful. This country is very powerful. >> Far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world that we have. More powerful than anybody even not even close. Malaysian 370 contact 12 decimal 9. Good night. Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. >> Even [music] as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government, >> why shoot [music] it down if it's not hostile? Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. >> What an distance [music] annihilated. This country is very powerful, [music] far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful [music] weapons in the world. Not even close. I remember the line from [music] Hindu scripture [music] is trying to persuade the prince that [music] he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form [music] and he says now I am become death and disturbed worlds. [music] I suppose we all thought that one way or another. Destroyer of worlds. Oi, you got a license for that physics chat. Welcome to Felony Physics Epstein edition. OMG chat. The Epstein files have dropped. They are available on the internet and people have been searching through them. Yes. [music] [music] Before we get to that, and we're going to get to that in a minute, I want to talk about the Jeremy Corbel MQ9 Fleer drone video. Briefly recapping that. And then at the end of the stream tonight, we are going to go through Ferris Williams 5D theory. Hopefully, we'll have enough time for that depending on how far fast we go through this. So, first [snorts] the video that was brought up, I have been watching people's reactions on social media to this video. Let me pull it up here for you guys. If you've been living under a rock, [snorts] this video here that I'm about to play, go remove this for a second, guys. Jeremy Corbel released this on Friday. We discussed it immediately on Friday and it seems pretty clear that it's three drones uh you know encased in plasma most likely based on the reflectiveness that we're seeing in this fleer footage here. The thing that we didn't know whether about was were we looking up, are we looking down, what what altitude are we at? And I haven't seen a lot of discussion of the actual facts of the video. So, there's a few things I want to bring up. Some people are claiming this video is birds. That seems to be the prevailing skept uh prevailing like cohesive theory that they have all decided that they're going to have a collective belief about on this. And one thing I want to point out, the reason why this is not birds, first of all, is because birds don't glow in the dark. They don't glow in infrared like that. I mean, really birds, by the way, I've decided, I don't know why I just discovered this. I am a skeptic. I am a true high IQ skeptic who looks for the answers and things. The difference between me or us and the debunkers, the Reddit debunkers, is they they take skepticism to full skept mode where everything is just fake to them and that's where their minds look at this and somehow think birds. [snorts] So beyond just those two reasons, beyond the fact that birds don't fly in triangle formations of three like that, beyond the fact they don't glow in the dark and glow in fleer, beyond the fact that you don't see any birds, any wings or anything like that in these videos, the other big detail is this. It actually tries to lock in on it and is not able to lock in. I'm pretty sure our most advanced fleer cameras are going to lock in on some birds. Let it play here. Pause. Monka Monka chat. What's going on here? Okay. Why is this thing so silly? I probably have too many windows. Okay. Well, right here at this point, it locks in on the birds and then it's not able to lock in. So, let me go back here. Here we go. You see it try to lock in right there and then it fails to lock in. So the question is if it's unable to lock in on this then it's probably not birds like right there tries to lock in misses it. So ultimately at the end of the day you want to believe that's birds that makes you feel good. You think that the US government [snorts] took this video of a MQ9 Reaper and categorized it under UFOs and they they couldn't tell that they were tracking birds for like a minute on you. One more detail I will point out that nobody has seen here. First of all, JK Philly fan was able to show that this is facing downward because you can tell from one of these numbers on the right is like negative. So it means it's angled downward. You do see an elevation over here on the right. I don't know why nobody's pointed this out. It says ELV on the bottom right. And it actually hovers between zero and three. Usually usually flips between zero and three. The problem with this is that it may and I again this is coming from somebody who doesn't never had firsthand experience on these. I have a feeling they might be able to like set this like if you get on a scale and you can set it to you can set it to zero or whatever. I have a feeling they kind of do that with elevation. So that might be the ground. If that's the ground that does add a lot of weight to the bird theory. If it is not the ground if that's the air if that is like high altitude or even low altitude clouds. Birds don't fly at super high altitude. So, if that is clouds that we're seeing in the background and not the ground, then I'd say there's no way that could be birds. So, just wanted to throw that out there. We got a lot more interesting stuff to go over tonight, but wanted to review that and get people uh up to speed on where that was at. Oh, one more thing I want to say on that. Why am I the guy defending Jeremy Corbel's videos? Where is this guy? How come he's not defending his own videos from arguments that people are saying they're birds or what have you? I haven't seen a more manufactured disclosure in my whole life. This guy's being given videos by the government, vetting them with the government, handing them to us, the people, saying nothing about it other than here's some details. I got it all vetted. It's good to go. Go for it. and then just doesn't bring it up ever again. What the hell, dude? I find some leaked videos on the internet and I make it my whole life's mission. Partially one, because I don't want to be killed and it's the safest way. Number two, because I find it super interesting. And number three, maybe it'll pay off in the long run. Probably not, though. Okay, this is relevant to a clip that I was just watching that I want you guys to listen to before we get into the, you know, all illegal felony physics and all that other stuff tonight. We're going to do a recap on that, too, in a second here. But what about this? Why is this not finding this? Okay, it's uh CIA puppet this one. Okay, remember that Jacques Valle video we were watching yesterday? Listen to just this part right now. Get ready. >> Eman called today to try to check up on some hearsay. He'd heard that a new group had been formed to study UFOs under Bigalow funding. That it included Kit Green, Hal Putoff, Dean Jud, Major McDuff, John Peterson, and me. And it had links to CIA director Woolsey and to E systems. that Bob Lazar was working with it through a project involving how Bob Wood and his son Ryan that John Alexander and Ron Pandalfi were once considered to run the group but had been excused that the goal was propulsion technology and that it was all a front financed by the government. What do do you guys know what he's saying right there? I that's Jacques Valle saying he got a call and they're saying that the group that Pudaf put together that had Bob Lazar as part of it which included Jeremy Corbel was the one that put Bob Lazar on the map. He's definitely connected to these people. This is the one that was funded by Bigalow. Well, Bigalow is funding the UFO stuff. It's either ATIP or what was it? Kona Blue or one of these programs, but they all include Hal Pudof. Now, what is the main subject of what he said? He said their goal is propulsion technology. Their goal isn't alien disclosure. Their goal is propulsion technology, guys. And propulsion technology is energy technology, fusion technology, and it's a front financed by the government. This basically says Bigalow is a CIA spook and he's probably only in the position he's in because of his CIA connections. And it says whatever they're pushing out to us, the public is whatever it is that's orchestrated disclosure, it's in their best interests. Part of it may be true or may all be true. I personally am not going to take people at face value that tell me the aliens are coming. We have to be careful about the aliens, but but don't worry about how the energy source works. I mean, it would change the whole world, but don't worry about it. It's too dangerous. Wait, I'm supposed to trust you? But you are curating information, leaking videos through your social media influencers like Jeremy Corbel to us with no additional comment or content. It does not feel it does not feel uh honest. It feels like they're leaving something out. And what the MH370 videos have shown us, it has shown us that they have figured this technology out. So it shows us they got caught in a big big lie. It shows that Pudof and the rest of them got caught in a big lie because they are the ones behind all of this. They're setting up front companies because they're the ones behind all of this. They're their their hands are in the cookie jar. [snorts] They're getting caught. They're setting up these front companies because they are trying to get this this propulsion technology. And the MH370 video showed that they were successful. They were successful. And they're out here saying, "We don't know what it is. We have no I don't know. Aliens. That could be anything. Big [ __ ] and grin on their face. Are you [ __ ] kidding me? Tell us what the [ __ ] it is. The MH370 video show. You know exactly what the hell is going on. If you can figure out how orbs work and teleportation works, you definitely [clears throat] figured out what the alien answer to the alien question is. Why aren't you telling us? That's what I want to know. I don't want to know about alien disclosure. I want to know why you're not telling us and what you're not telling us. Because what we have found out, what I am so passionate about right now is that we found out the biggest secret they've been hiding bigger than Epstein, bigger than COVID 19. And that whole that's not even a scop that was just mass psychosis. This is the biggest cover up ever. And you could hardly even call it a cover up. And you could hardly even blame them because we're so stupid. We should have figured out long ago. What is that? That fusion bombs, thermonuclear weapons can manipulate spaceime. And people might say, "Well, yeah, maybe, but the effect would be really small." No, no, no. Listen to what I just said. They figured out that thermonuclear weapons can manipulate spaceime. Do you not realize that that means they know what gravity is? It's not a mystery to them. It is no stretch from that to say that they have unified physics. You probably have to unify physics to understand that and understand how that works and why that works. The issue with it is they figured it out in the 1950s and the 1960s. Most people are dead from back then. That's how long ago it was. Now, if you don't believe me, this brings us to our first science paper of the night, and it's a doozy, chat. It's a doozy. Gravitational radiation production using nuclear explosions. Oh, what? Can I GET A WHOOP WHOOP IN THE HOUSE? UH, sweet John Knuckles Lel Wood of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1974. Now, which is my favorite part? I believe it's right over here somewhere. They talk about making a cylinder as in a fusion bomb. What they're talking about here is they're talking about using the energy of the atom itself to produce a gravitational wave. And you would say, "How how, Ashton? How do you make a gravitational wave from the energy of the atom?" Chat, if I taught you nothing, any guesses in the chat, what do you guys think? If I said, "Hey, if you take one atom, you got all this energy spinning around in it. The zero point energy is basically powering that atom and it's creating gravity. How would I get a lot? How would I scale that up? How would I scale that effect up? synchronicity. You synchronize all the atoms up. If you could synchronize everything up, get everything to move lock step perfect synchronization with itself. That's how you could scale up the effect of a single atom. to a massive massive effect. Now in here it says uh in fact one could in principle produce a directional beam of gravitational radiation by proper phasing of the explosion in different parts of the cylinder. Thus in principle the intensity of gravitational radiation that one could generate with a cylinder of dutyium and tridium would be limited only by the amount of tridium available. In practice of course one would be limited by the amount of energy released from 1 kilogram of uh I think it's hydrogen there or maybe uh lithium. I'm not sure what what they have there. What it says here is that we can shape our waves. And what they're talking about is that synchronicity. They're saying get everything to cancel out. Just like we learned from Tom Bearden, the Aaron Hoff Bomb effect. Get your waves to cancel out. And what are you left with? the scalar potential. You would say nothing. There's nothing there. But there is. There's the stress in the medium. Let's go back to my favorite example. We haven't used it in a while. One second. This will tie it together for you. So [clears throat] imagine this rubber band is two electromagnetic waves that are 180 degrees out of phase. And any two waves, if I as long as they're equal on both sides, as long as their amplitudes are equal, they cancel each other out perfectly. You would say there's nothing in the middle of this. So if I even put one unit or two units or three units of force on this rubber band, nothing. You would say that in all those situations, the forces cancel out. But you would say, Ashton, or I would ask you, do you think that there's no difference between the rubber band at this stage or this stage depending on how far I stretch it? You would say, yes, there is. If you pull it too hard, if I pull this rubber band too hard, this rubber band will snap. That's the stress in the medium of the rubber band. The stress in the medium of spaceime is the scalar potential. It is that potential which is invisible that we do not see but is all around us. That's what the Aronhoff bomb effect proves is real. And the reason why we don't see this effect, this is absolute facts right now. The reason why we don't see this effect is because you could imagine that our universe is like a extremely tight piece of fabric stretched over a table. And if it's extremely tight, it's very difficult to pull that fabric up. The more loose that is, the easier it is. Because it's so tight, it requires a huge amount of energy or mass energy density to break through that. Now, how does that come back to nuclear weapons? That's exactly what nuclear weapons are. Nuclear [snorts] weapons are harnessing the power of the atom, scaling it up through resonance, synchronization, scaling those effects up, making them all cancel out at one point exactly, and you've created a massive scalar potential. And we know that to be a gravitational wave, a gravitational ripple. That's how it's represented in our three-dimensional reality. So this is the secret. Now [snorts] back to these papers. So the other thing I want to point out about this, this paper is only two pages long. Two pages long. one of the shortest scientific papers I've ever seen in my life. Why Why would they release such a short scientific paper? Why is there no discussion about the implications of this? All there is is, hey, uh, so it turns out we might be able to make gravitational waves with thermonuclear weapons. Bye. That's basically what this scientific paper is. Do you see at the bottom here what it says at the thing? We would like to thank Edward Teller and George Zimmerman for their discussions. Wow. [snorts] So, I found another paper I thought was interesting. I want to pull up this. I just happened to find this one. I knew this one existed, but I was googling to try to find that last paper and I eventually did find the PDF of it and I found this one. What does this say? Generation of gravitational waves with nuclear reactions. Wait a minute. That sounds really similar to the other paper that was we just looked at. So similar that even Google was getting them mixed up. When I was searching for them, I accidentally found this one. But wait, who are the authors of this paper? Giorgio Fontana and Robert ML Baker. Holy [ __ ] Robert MLB Baker. I think we have talked about this guy more on this podcast on these live streams than anybody else in the entire world. He was essentially unknown to the world before we started talking about him. He was, as far as I can tell, the world's leading expert on high frequency gravitational waves before he died. He has like 20 papers about high frequency gravity waves. And now here he is connecting them to really the same thing that Loel Wood and and Knuckle and John Knuckles were saying the problem of efficient generation of high frequency gravitational waves impulses of gravitational radiation. I mean even calls it gravitational radiation might find a reasonably simple solution by employing nuclear matter especially isomers. A fishing isomer not only rotates at extremely high frequency but also highly deformed in the first stages of fishision. Thus it one achieves significant impulsive forces acting over extremely short time spans. Alternatively, a pulseed particle beam, which could include antimatter, could trigger nuclear reactions and build up a coherent gravitational wave as the particles move through a target mass. The usual difficulty with high frequency gravity waves generated by nuclear reactions is the small dimensions of their nuclear reaction volumes. That is the small moment of inertia. Such a difficulty is overcome by utilizing clusters of nuclear material whose nuclear reactions are in synchronization. [gasps] Oh. Oh yes, chat. Go ahead. Take a go ahead and bow down if you want. Your new lord and savior of physics has arrived. I am here to save physics chat. It's not all doom and gloom. We were We were cooked before. We were cooked and then I rolled up with some MH370 videos and now we know. There we go. So, he's saying you need a bunch of matter and you need to get it synchronized up all moving around at the same time. Okay. And are at a large distance apart. The effective RA g radius of gyration of the overall nuclear mass system is enormous and if the quadripole formulization holds even approximately then significant highfrequency gravitational waves is generated. Wow. Um yeah then it says something about how they go. So I wanted to show you those before we look at Epstein stuff. Why? Because the first Epstein video I'm going to show you will now probably blow your mind. There have been rumors that Epstein was involved in some of this UFO stuff, interested in this research, and it has essentially been proven true at a bare minimum he was very very interested. His emails are filled with these kinds of topics. He was researching his entire intent. We're not going to watch all these clips tonight, but I watched part of this segment. Actually, we will probably watch some of it here, so I shouldn't spoil all of it, but essentially high level, Epstein wanted to study quantum mechanics. There was a weirdness there that couldn't be explained. He knew there was something there and he wanted to put money into it. Very interesting because at the core of all of this, the fusion bomb, space-time manipulation is quantum mechanics. How does the atom really work? Because how the atom really works will tell us how we're going to engineer what Robert ML Baker and John Knuckles and Loel Wood just told us, which is that somehow whatever the atom is, we got to get those things coherent all aimed up, lined up the same way and boom, cancel out. Okay. So, oh, one more one more tidbit before I show go to our first clip. This is just one just for my MH370 lovers out there. I haven't forgotten about you, boo. Haven't forgotten about you. Never will. Never forget. MH370. This is from the Epstein files. I don't know if this is Epstein's sales list. Presumably, it is for his trades. This is from J uh June 2011. June 2011. Very first trade on the list. High sale cost freeale semiconductors through JP Morgan Securities. Uh, are these values with extra zeros here? 25,500 uh at 18. Oh, so $45,000 worth. Okay. So, he was quite literally invested in Freecale Semiconductors, the company that was on board MH370. I mean, three years before they disappeared, but he knew about them. he was interested in them. So if there is a direct connection, if that does end up being the motive, if MH3, if the the semiconductor people, they're going to China, they either had the technology in their heads or on them and that's why the CIA did that, then this is pretty weird. This is pretty weird. And probably somebody should go back and figure out who he was getting stock tips from around the 2011 time point because that was a good time to buy out as well to get out of there. That company ended up being seven billion dollars in debt and after the MH370 situation, they got bought out and all that debt luckily went away. Okay. So, I just wanted to share that [snorts] first video. Where is it? Here we go. Epstein. The man behind the curtain. Why did I buy a ranch in New Mex. >> Okay, so this clip, by the way, first time I've ever heard Epstein before. Never heard him before for before all this. I didn't really know who he was before all the drama and everything either. First clip is about why I I guess he was a founder of the Santa Fe Institute. This is the institute who's studying this. Let's not call it metaphysics, but let's just say quantum mechanics and and just any interesting edge of physics concepts. He's asked why he started this institute in New Mexico. First of all, why is that even a question? Do do people normally ask that? I mean, maybe I'm just a bad con conversationalist. You're like, "Hey, why do you start your company in New Mexico?" I don't know why I started anywhere because I was there. I don't know. But no, in this case, there's a very specific reason. Here we go. Let's go. Let's go. EP, tell us what's up, brother. >> So, why did I buy a ranch in 1993? So, that's gives you some sense. So, I would have funded it in 1990. Uh, Los Alamos, which was the high energy lab up in New Mexico, was losing all its scientists. >> And Los Alamos, it was where Oppenheimer where the where the a lot of the the nuclear weapons program, the bomb, >> that's when the Manhattan Project >> Manhattan Project was Los Alamos. And you brought >> uh whole Uh, I need to spit out my drink when I heard that the first time. I mean, I'll be honest with you guys. I didn't want there to be any connection between Epstein and all this stuff. I don't want to be mixing and mash matching matching my uh conspiracy theories here, right? you start to dilute it a little bit when you start to be like, "Yeah, you know, now it's connected to the time travelers and the X-Men and the Egyptian planes." Not naming names. You know what I'm saying? But wow, bro. He decided to set up the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico because that's where Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is and that's where all the nuclear scientists were at. This is the guy that is allegedly, and pretty much everybody agrees, he's convicted, trying to compromise significant figures and and basically broker information, broker intelligence. Now, if I'm right and fusion bombs are manipulating spaceime like relativity says should happen, then this is really suspicious because this implies that he knew these were the most important people on the planet. The scientists and engineers that were working on the atomic bomb knew more about the truth of physics and our and the universe than anybody else. And if they knew about the ether fivedimensional theory, if they knew there was an extra dimension because they did nuke tests and they saw the results and they're like, "Yeah, so there's more energy there." And why do you think they ban the testing? Because when you ban the testing, you can't do any more real tests. Now you can only do simulations and the simulations will only adhere to the code that you input. So if you design your simulation without the extra dimension, you'll always only get back wrong results from your simulation. If you put your simulation in that there is an extra dimension, it'll work out. How would you know the difference? especially if you're not allowed to test it in reality, in practice. If that were the case, only a few select people would actually know the truth. And imagine if those select people were sworn to secrecy that the simulations couldn't tell you the reality and only a few people are even alive today that have ever seen a nuclear weapon go off. That's a really really good way to hide hide weapons hide nuclear weapon secrets. Let me let him continue. Sorry, I didn't mean to rant too much there. I just think that's just so huge. >> Where the where the a lot of the the nuclear weapons program, the bomb >> that's when the Manhattan project >> Manhattan project was Los Alamos and you bought your property out in New Mexico to be near that. >> Yes. because the scientists were going to be they cut the funding for high energy physics but the people who worked in Los Alamos would still be in the Santa Fe area. >> They cut that because the end of the this was the cold war dividend, right? >> I don't remember exactly why. It was because again people thought there was that physics and high energy physics really wasn't that important >> because that was about nuclear weapons. >> No, it was because they were trying they decided which maybe not right. This was the same time that Murray Galman came up with the term quark. Q U A R K. He he picked it out of a old poem, the word quark. But it was something it was mysterious. So they were starting to understand in the '9s that the in the our world of the physical world there was things that were just unexplainable. They called it strange things. You gave it a name. You gave it some characteristics. You called it had charm was one of the term. It had a charm. It had a flavor. It had a color. But nobody really, no one, Mr. Bannon, understood what it was. >> Okay, he's talking about quantum mechanics. He's talking about quantum mechanics here. He's going, there's this weirdness. There are these weird things like entanglement. And if you, this probably seems weird for you guys that are younger because you've grown up in a world where we've always had quantum computers. We've always had AI for the last 10 years. Someone like me that was born in the 80s. Like the idea of quantum mechanics being taken seriously didn't even really begin to happen till the 90s from a cultural understanding. and perspective. The idea of quantum entanglement testing EPR, sure, it did happen beforehand, but it didn't really become a part of the collective conscious where people were really taking it seriously until relatively recently. So for him to set up this institute in the late 80s, early 90s where he was like, "Hey, we're going to study these effects, these quantum effects," he was way ahead of the curve. way ahead of the curve talking about quarks and saying yes, you know, we give them these colors. We say these quarks have these colors associated to them. I still I don't think that's literal, but I don't even know anymore. But the point here is what I bring up is honestly when it sure that people have maybe there's some tests that people have proven to show that quarks exist and this is what they're at. I don't know. For me, everything that's smaller than the atom, it's already so small that we are doing our best to visualize what we think it is. We'll know for sure when we can make a microscope that can look at something that small, but I think we'll end up being surprised. Okay, this last part really brings it all home. just like the financial system >> and you wanted to investigate that. >> I I wanted to see if we could build tools so others smarter than me could help investigate it. >> And that was the beginning of your concept of the Santa Fe Institute. >> Yes. >> The foundational thought, the organizing principle of Santa Fe in the high physics lab at um at Los Alamos, which had created the been the the headquarters of Manhattan and the Trinity Project, right? The bomb. >> Yes. So you're talking about the the elite, the high priest >> of physics. >> Of physics. >> Yes, sir. >> Which high priest of physics, some subset of that is also mathematics. >> Yes, they're both similar. >> Wow. The high priests of physics chat, we have started our new religion. Welcome to the cult, everyone. Please, [clears throat] if you're new to our cult, please go pick up your Bible. Um, it is Frontiers of Propulsion Science. It's available for free in PDF form on our Discord. Uh, I'll try to pin it for us. Edited by Mark Millis and Eric W. Davis. Um, it's free for all on our Discord. And hopefully Mark Millis and Eric Davis don't come after us. It's not that we want to steal from you. is that we believe that information like this, information so important for humanity like this should be available to the world for free. We're just we care about the world that much. That's the reason. So we have started our religion. We have our high priest Oak Shannon Loa Wood uh John Knuckles. Oh, we have the Arc Bishop Hal Pudof. Halof. He might even be the pope secretly. We don't even know maybe. But these are definitely the guys. And one more thing I want to repeat that I said last time is that we have dug and found so many people. I was trying to just list them off in my head. I don't even know if we can do another tier list. There's that many, like well over 50. And at this point, we have to have hit a few. Like if we're playing battleship here, we had to have sunk a few ships at this point. Some of these people have got to be directly involved in this. They're not just sitting on the sidelines cheerleading. They got to be they got to be in on it, too. I mean, how many more secret Black Project engineers can there be with this knowledge? In fact, you might even argue we've hit most of them. You might even argue we've hit most of them. Now, another video clip. This is more on the quantum mechanic side of this. I'm trying to go through Red Panda's thing here because he uh he tagged it, but he's been going on a Pinocchio kick. Apparently, guys, did you know that Pinocchio was about sex trafficking? I learned something new every day. Learn something new every day. Here we go. This one's kind of short. The other thing about Epstein that the reason why I was even interested in this was because we already knew that he organized a gravitational wave conference with Lawrence Krauss. He was buddy buddy. He was broke back mountain with Lawrence Krauss allegedly. I don't know that to be a fact. I'm just saying it. But the way they talk in emails seem pretty gay for each other. Just my outside perspective. No judgment. I mean, it's fine. Sleep with whoever you want. But Lawrence Krauss did make one funny joke. One funny joke. He said, "There's a woman, finally a woman that's good at math. That's pretty poor taste." And then Epstein replied, "Transgender?" No question mark though. [laughter] Oh yikes yikes chat. Anyway, so point being already interested in gravitational waves. So we knew anybody that's interested in gravitational waves probably has some idea of this idea of this extra dimension, this idea of the ether. Because what is the wave with what is the gravity wave? What is rippling? What's the medium that the wave is transmitting through? All waves require a medium. Sound waves, waves in the water. So what's the wave? What's the gravity wave? That's your answer. That's why we need this extra dimension, this fifth dimension. So if you understand that a gravitational wave exists that it's been proven now and this was only proven relatively recently 2017 2015 again the public's consciousness of this is a bit delayed let's say if that exists then an extra dimension should not even be surpris you here we go >> so why did I buy a ranch in Mexico that's not the right clip H. Here we go. This one. Um, why did the ball go down? I didn't push it. I just let it go. So, someone's pushing the ball because I know I am confident that the only thing that gets something to move is with a force that pushes. So, there's a force that's pushing the ball down. In fact, he never he called it gravity. He measured how fast it was pulled, but never was able to explain why it happened. How is it? What is gravity? It's this. Everybody says, "Well, why did the ball fall to the ground?" Because gravity took it. But what's gravity? That's, as Fineman would say, that's the name of the thing. We have no idea what it is. Why did the ball This is so for to me this is just so crazy. I'm Fineman number one superfan. You say you like fine men more than me, I'll fight you right now. Fight. Get your gloves out right now. We're boxing. That's it. You be like, Ashton, you're like a buck 50 soaking wet. I'll be like, that's how much I love Fineman. I'll take one for the team against Mike Tyson for Richard Fineman. And here he is saying and and not just not just glazing the goat, not just glazing him, but also using his analogy in context. He's going, "Hey, what even is gravity?" This Fineman has a famous five, seven minute speech out there where he gets asked, "What is magnetism?" And he goes, "Well, you know, you the answer to the why question has to do with how much you're willing to just accept at face value." And he gives a great analogy. He says, "Why is ice slippery?" You would think in your head you go, "Well, it's wet, but why is it wet?" And when you really start to dig down this, you keep getting to more and more why questions until eventually you just get to a point where you just accept it. And to give an example, we'd say, "If I were to say, my grandma fell over." You would you would really you wouldn't ask why. You'd be like, "Oh, is she okay?" which hospital is she at? You understand all of that context without me having to go into any additional detail just based on knowing what a grandma is and knowing the context. Your grandma might have fall conditions, right? Without me even saying any other information about it. But if you say what is gravity, people be like it's like a pulley force. Then that's what Epstein is saying. And he's saying all we know about gravity is that if I drop this napkin, it's going to go to the ground. We know it's going to go down. But why does it go down? We can measure this downward force. And here's the answer. Here's what we have been assuming versus the real answer. assuming a five-dimensional reality. We have been told that a gravity is a is a particle that we're going to find this particle of gravity, these gravitons, and that this will be our fourth fundamental force. We're we're going to have all these forces that we're going to make up, all these different forces. They're all a little different from one another, and gravity will be one of them. The problem was we built this huge collider particle accelerator. We're going to accelerate these particles near the speed of light and collide them. And then we're going to see all the little pieces. And we did that. And we looked at all those little pieces. You know what wasn't there? The graviton. There was no graviton there. And now since then, since like the 2000s, physics has been in a crisis because we don't know what the [ __ ] gravity is. Even though it's probably the most fundamental thing on this earth, drop an apple, goes to the ground. That's where Newton comes from. [laughter] Newton literally exists because an apple fell from the fell from a tree. No, but this is where the idea of gravitation came from as Sir Isaac Newton realizing that things relate to other objects. So what is the real answer to what gravity is? Gravity is a pressure force. Imagine a bubble in the ocean and you see this bubble and where is it going to go? It's going to go flying up. But you don't ask why is the bubble going flying up? Has to do with density. So a lot of people, a lot of kids when they were in science class, they would have to do these science experiments. One of my favorite experiments, one I still remember to this day was a very simple one. put water, oil, grease, different liquids that have different densities into a jar and they will stay separated. And if you put objects in them, the objects will fall down to the certain level where they reach their equilibrium between certain densities. And I love that in the context of gravity because you would say, "How do we manipulate gravity?" Well, don't think about trying to make a graviton. You're thinking about the problem all wrong. Think about manipulating the lattice, squeezing the lattice structure. Imagine the entire universe is just this screen that you're looking at right now. And now imagine it's like a matrix, right? It's like Minecraft. Everything's little blocks. When I'm talking about manipulating gravity, I'm saying take your matrix and squish it or expand it. Squish it. And if you squish your matrix in a localized point, say around an airplane flying through the sky, you squish your matrix in just this point. You squish it and you invert that matrix. This goes and then it shoots out this point. That's gravity manipulation. And you could use that same effect to simply ride on a wave. And you're just riding the wave just like a surfer does. Okay, let's take a look. Now that we understand gravity, now that we understand Epstein, I don't know if he understood gravity. My true impression I got from these video clips was that he knew there was something classified, something secret. Does he really know the actual answer? Not sure. I need to hear him talking about the idea of the ether or something that's analogous to that analogous and then then I would be more convinced. So, more to come on this, but what I heard is that there's like six, five more, I don't know, six or eight more hours worth of interviews. So, maybe he will talk about some of these topics. Now, let's take a look at some of these emails because this is also pretty interesting. Not all of them are super interesting. I'll give you I mean there's not a lot of contacts with a lot of these so take it at you know for what you will. Here's an email to Jeffrey Epstein vacation from David Gross. Here's some coverage of reports of teleportation of energy games of entanglement and attached is the author's report. Physicist proves that teleportation of energy is possible. Is it gone? Oh, yeah. Okay, that's gone. So, I think this is uh Hadada's HO TTA. I think this is Hada's quantum energy teleportation protocol. I'm pretty sure that's based on the timeline here. I mean, I kind of am becoming one of the world's leading experts on teleportation and wormholes. I'm pretty sure this is uh M uh I forget his first name. Hada is the last name though. And the idea was this. The reason why this is so big, the context here is that people started to realize people started to hone in on what kind of teleportation was going to be real. And they realized it's not going to be Star Trek teleportation. They realized we're not going to dematerialize every atom and rematerialize and resequence every atom. That's stupid. They realize the answer is you create a hole, a geometry between two points in space and time. Bring these two points together and then the person just walks across the bridge. There's no rematerializing or anything like that. But then physicists realized a big problem. Anyone know? Oh, yeah. Mashirohata. I was close. There you go. Thank you very much. Mashiroat. Mashirohat. Okay, Masahiro Hata, I think his name is. The problem is if you can teleport something, let me bring this. If you can teleport an object, are you giving yourself free energy? Are you giving yourself free energy? And I always do this thought experiment but it's a very simple one to understand is if we imagine this airplane is now a huge amount of electricity based on how much mass it is which is a lot of mass E= MC^2 we say okay this is a huge amount of energy in here so we've got all this electricity if I can instantly move this from here to here and I'm chilling over here. I just I just move that energy to me where I can use it now. Whereas before I I would have had to traverse all that distance to get there. How much energy did it cost me to move that energy? If it cost me less energy to teleport the plane than the total energy of the plane, we got a problem. We got a problem. Because that would mean we can now just teleport energy from some other point in the universe to us and have unlimited energy. It's an unlimited energy hack now because we don't care where it comes from. We don't care where the current energy comes from. Just atoms and [ __ ] So Jeffrey Epstein getting this pretty interesting. Shows that he was at least interested in these topics. may be interested in trying to understand the idea of teleportation. Now, keep in mind, teleportation has been considered as far out there as like witches and [ __ ] for pretty good reason until I started and you guys help started bringing it back. Started making it more palatable to people. And we did that by what we're doing today is demystifying this for people, making people understand how it's real, exactly how it's real. Now, here's another email I'm going to read this. This is not I don't know if this is too Jeffrey Epstein. I don't really know who these people are. Presumably, they're a bunch of scientists. I do see Brian Josephson there. That's the Brian Josephson, the Nobel Prize winner, Josephson Junction. The Josephson Junction is basically how you turn a microchip into a gravity device. There he is. Thank you very much for your kindest correspondence regarding the concept of energy. Indeed, energy can mean several different concepts within physics, all relating to the physical accepted constructs of nature and its interactions. In relativistic physics, we encounter E= MC^2. In quantum field theory, E equals HAR new uh uh uh I forgetting my characters, whatever. In classical mechanics, we think of potential and kinetic energy. And in in uh chemical physics, we can allude to the idea of zero point energy. Okay. In condensed matter, zero point motion and forthcom coherent states or matter as representation basis. In cosmology, extensions can be made for the energy of the vacuum. the false vacuum depending on metastability. The idea of the cosmological constant as a representation of the energy density of the vacuum and its association of 0 point energy matter fields. What does this mean? [ __ ] chat honestly whose PhD who's who is going to be the first who's going to get their PhD grievous by me? [snorts] Who's going to get their [ __ ] Whose PhD am I going to take first? I'm not even going to go get one. I'm of the Ferris Williams mindset. PhDs are for people that don't know how to learn, but I'm going to take it a step further. I'm not against collecting other people's PhDs like pink slips. So, let me while I just threw my ego out there for everybody, let me back that up a little bit. The idea of the false vacuum is this idea that the matrix structure of our universe spacetime that I described earlier as this screen is not actually empty. It's filled with energy. If that's the case, then that is a false vacuum. The true vacuum, the true nothingness would be if you removed spacetime, the lattice structure. And what is that energy that makes up that lattice structure? Zero point energy. And flexing right now. Flexing. They say the idea of the cosmological constant we measure we say what's the energy density of the universe the energy density of the universe is if I take this matrix structure how much energy how much zero point energy is in there how much energy is in the matrix structure of the universe they say well here's the way we can solve that thermodynamics let's look into the the sky and let's see how much heat there is and we'll make a heat map and that'll tell us how much energy is in the universe. We call it the cosmic microwave background and it's wrong. That's not the amount of energy in spaceime. It's woefully wrong because we know zero point energy exists. Nobody's denying it. The problem is how do you quantify how much energy that is? If there's all these little invisible waves and they can scale down to quantum levels and all these tiny invisible waves like white noise everywhere. How do you add that up to energy? Well, you can actually just use those equations that were just on the screen there. And the only question is where do you take the cut off in your wavelength? So most people will take the cutoff to be the plank scale which is the smallest possible thing that exists the plank scale. So if that's going to be our cutoff and we do the calculations and we say okay how much does all these little waves add up to? It's like 10 to the 120. It's I don't even know what do they say 70 or 80 orders of magnitude. 80 zeros higher than the cosmic microwave background. We're not talking a significant difference here. We're talking straight up catastrophe. straight up catastrophe. And that's what's going on in physics. And I'm here to save it for you. Here to save the day. Not in a good way, like in the Joker kind of way, where everybody learns a valuable lesson at the end of the day and nobody really is happy. So what physics had to do to get rid of this problem is they had to do something called renormalization. They had to renormalize this 0.0. They be like, "Yeah, you saying there's all this energy here, but I'm not seeing it. So, we're going to just do some math and make it go away." If you think I'm joking, Google renormalization. Quite literally, we're like, "We're just going to do some math and make it go away." That's what they did. They made it go away. So that's why when you'll see this concept of renormalization get brought up that's what people are alluding to. Now one last part in this email the main point is that we have many different descriptions for the concept of energy and similarly speaking for zero point energy its regime of operability and discrepancies between observed and theoretical values. So they say if we try to tap into this we don't get this huge energy but you're saying from the theory standpoint it's this huge amount. So something what's missing? What are we missing here? Who's right and what are we missing? We seem to feel comfort by the various existing definitions because those have provided great success in our day-to-day living. um in addition to the technology we use at the same time believe that we have near a conclusive or even comprehensive understanding of energy would ultimately be a false premise and stand such stance could mean that in a large scale we have solved our problem quantum mechanics and general relativity that we can easily traverse from the EF back to the Schroinger equation by shrinking scales that force fields and our understanding of localizable points of matter are always simple mathematical extensions of one another. The point is that conclusively speaking, the concept of energy is far from being a wellestablished constant but varies from scale to scale from which universal frame only exists as an epistemic understanding and not ontological in nature. [ __ ] chat. She was just writing hot fire spitting fire there. That was a she, right? Wait, was that a woman? If so, kind of breaks. Yeah, Carla. Carla kind of breaks the paradigm right there. I felt that in my bones. She's saying we don't even know what energy is. We don't even know what energy is. This is why the number one qu anybody ever tries to come at you about this, tries to say you're a cook for whatever for believe in this. First thing you say is what is electricity? What is electricity? If you're going to come at me talk down to me, you tell me what electricity is first. You can't even tell me what that is, then go sit down. Then go sit down because [snorts] nobody really understands energy. We understand and we have been slaved to this idea of thermodynamics. But what if there are loopholes to thermodynamics because of general relativity because of quantum mechanics? H we'll come to that back back to that in a second. And the idea of quantum mechanics is something that specifically Ferris Williams highlights consistently when he talks about his fivedimensional theory. It's clear that quantum mechanics, the unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity is at the forefront of almost all of the unification theories that are out there, including the ones that we have reviewed. Now, take a look at this email. Another Epstein email here to Jeffrey Epstein from Boris Nichol. Some of the most interesting comments. Who is this from? Lowel Wood. Uh [music] so, um yeah. Uh that guy I was just talking about the paper I was just showing you guys about producing gravitational radiation with nuclear bombs. Yeah. So there he is. There he is right there. BTW. Uh, so there's Low Wood and here he is talking to this Boris guy because Boris apparently has left. Get this, Bill Gates's foundation chat. Our worlds are colliding right now. Worlds are colliding. Holy smokes. Worlds are colliding. Um, so I don't know if there's a direct connection, but here's Bill Gates saying Boris decided to leave the foundation. and some blah blah blah. And here's Level Wood saying, "Sorry, they've come to this. Sorry matters have come to this. Please do let me know if there's anything that can possibly done from my end of things to help out in any manner during your transitioning." Bro, I have left jobs where people weren't jerking me off this hard afterwards. This doesn't seem like a normal transition either. I'm just saying like this the way he's obsessing about then he sent a follow-up email like okay September 6th that wasn't enough. So the next day 3:00 a.m. I'm sure this is just because of time zones. If Lola Wood is sending out three emails at 3:00 a.m. then I'm really concerned. Dear Boris, I'm still stunned that matters have come to this. I'm most deeply puzzled as how it's happened. What What are we talking about here? I feel like this dude's talking about like he's got to like put his dog down or something. Like how has it come to this? Like bro, what what are you talking about right now? It's not that hard. It's not that serious, buddy. I'm just leaving a charitable foundation. What What are we talking about? Why are you acting like it's all my life's over here? I most earnestly hope that you'll continue to be available into the foreseeable future to help out in real crisises and emergencies from wherever you may be. Bro, what are they actually talking about here? What kind of organization is this? Do they think they're saving the world? This is how I imagine like Superman is like talking to Batman. They're like, "Yo, I'm How is it come to this? We have to break up. The team is breaking up, chat. The Flash is leaving. He got an He got an STD. The Flash got an STD and he emailed me and he said, "Hey, you got any antibiotics to give my wife? I was cheating on my wife." [laughter] No, man. You got to stay with the Flash. Don't leave Batman. Stay with it. By the way, that thing about the STD is totally real about Bill Gates. 100% real. Crazy, huh? Um, okay. He says, "Your total vanishing would leave a memory and wisdom hole of likely catastrophic dimensions." Were these guys gay for each other? Is this just all all brokeback? That's another explanation here. It could just be very brokeback. Like this is like you're breaking up with your girlfriend. Your girlfriend's leaving. It's like this is like I haven't seen glazing like this. If I get an email of somebody glazing me this hard, I'm going to have to leave a tip. Please do let's let me know what's most likely to happen between now and your departure time and how I can possibly make this interval most productive useful uh preparatory for both you and Bill as in Bill Gates. Yours in deep puzzlement and considerable consternation. Lel and then he just sends this to Epstein. He just he forwards that chain with just Epstein just saying some of the most interesting comments chat. Yeah, no diddy chat. Um this is one of the weirdest you forget the time travel [ __ ] forget the you know teleportation. This is the one where I'm looking at I'm going, you got Bill Gates on this chain. You got Lel Wood who was a nuclear weapons engineer working on the fusion bomb that was written up by the Jasons. Written up by the Jasons. And he's sitting out here glazing some Russian dude who's part of this foundation being super cryptic about everything he says. And then the Russian dude is being super cryptic about it, too. All I'm saying, what is this foundation? All I'm saying is whatever this foundation is, FBI should be investigating this. [laughter] What is this foundation, dude? Leave the foundation and BGC3. I don't know. I don't have time to dig into all that tonight, but wow, what a what a series of evidence that we've put together here. You start with, hey, gravity waves are manipulating spaceime. And here's this dude, Lowel Wood, who wrote the paper about it. It's only two pages long. Doesn't tell you how you do any of it, but there you go. And now here's Lel Wood and email chains with Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein. Chat, drink to that. We live in a [ __ ] up world, chat. That'll be my only fbomb for the day. But live in a [ __ ] up world. [laughter] Okay, one more. [clears throat] CC Jeffrey Epstein. Uh, this is actually I actually found out who this is from. This is from and to two different MIT physicists or two MI one's MIT physicist, one's like a biology or something like that. But anyway, two MIT professors emailing one another with CC and Jeffrey Epstein. By the way, he financed them. He financed them. We should explore the biological consequences of time, excuse me, travel. It would be amusing to calculate the rate of evolution of a population or a mutant that can travel in time. Okay, question number one. or a mutant or who what is there an X-Men? If there's an X-Men, you got to tell me. Look, just let's be real with one another. If there is an X-Men, a secret training facility, people with mutant powers, you got to tell us if X-Men is based on a true events, we got to know. Secondly, time travel because time travel is gravity manipulation. One and the same, one comes with the other. Think of it like this. The more you manipulate gravity, you can control how much you manipulate it. the more you control your dial of time, the rate of that you experience time relative to other people. Now, for you, you'll always experience time normal. That always will be normal for you. You're not going to feel yourself stuck in slow motion, but you'll see other people in slow motion or in super speed, or it'll just appear like you teleported. That's what you can control. So this email implies that these people understood that concept. They were like, "Hey, if we can change the rate of dial, the rate of time, speed somebody's time up relative to our time, what would that do to evolution?" What they're implying is we could speed evolution up. If I send you forward, if I speed up your time relative to my time, so I'm moving slower, you in theory could evolve at a super high rate and then become more advanced than we are right now. In fact, this is the whole plot of the first season of the threebody problem. The super advanced aliens are coming here. so advanced that we have no chance whatsoever against them. But by the time they get here, we will already be more advanced than they are. Because that's how you should think about time travel. Think about it like if you were to speed up uh a civilization and how quickly they would develop and then how quickly they would evolve beyond you. And then if they were to then synchronize back up with your time, they would now be more involved than you are. There you go. Interesting, huh? Okay, what else we got here? Now, I want to go back to this for a second. We're going to move. Actually, little quick break. I'm going to switch gears. One more thing that I wanted to show you guys was from I've been saying that they have been trying to steal the narrative, so to speak. And I'm not trying to be one of those paranoid people that's trying to say that, yeah, they're trying to steal my narrative. I've never really been one to be too paranoid about people coming after me or listening or spying or anything like that. Just don't care, frankly. But there is clearly an intentional narrative theft that is being uh unleashed upon us right now. The people that thought teleportation was silly, the people that have been saying and I have talked to a lot of UFO people when I went to these conferences and I asked them, "Do you think the United States government has figured out any of this technology?" And I would resoundingly hear back, "No, no, they haven't figured any of it out." We would know if they had it figured out. Now we've got Jeremy Corbel dropping three orb videos, perfect triangle orb videos, while he just ignores the MH370 videos. And now we've got Ross Khart has got to be the most shameless. a guy that went so far as to call me out last year, got all his facts wrong while trying to call me out. Who talks about way more silly topics, you know, mind readading insectoid aliens and [ __ ] like this is now doing a 180. He's now coming over to the way of the four orbs. Okay, go ahead. Tell us, Ross. That's the perfect image right there for Ross, by the way. Right there. Oh, hold on. I got to change the sharing. You're not going to be able to hear it. Here we go. It defies explanation that the United States, which expends trillions of dollars every year on national defense, would not have made huge advances in aerospace technology, particularly if, as we believe, they've recovered nonhuman craft and had them since at least the 1950s. I do think that there is a strong probability that the United States has developed some type of electrogravitic propulsion if not some kind of energy system derived from 0 point energy. Why are they keeping that secret? I have no idea. But are they going to make an announcement? Not anytime soon, I suspect. It defy Okay, he he revealed himself there, Chad. He revealed himself there. Do you did you know exactly where he revealed himself? Now he's saying the government has figured out 0 energy technologies and possibly energy source. What? And I already know he's going to pretend like he never said anything otherwise. So like I never said anything otherwise. Try to find a quote of me saying it. And when we do find a quote he'll be like ah that was then and I've changed my opinions now. these [ __ ] people, bro. But this is this is where you catch him out from that clip. He says, "I have no idea why." What? You have no idea why the government wouldn't tell us the truth about UFO technology, let's just call it. Uh, how about free energy forever collapses our entire way of living from an economic perspective? How about the fact that this weaponry obsoletes all other technology? You have basically a trump card against everybody. Is that not a big enough reason to hide it? If those aren't big enough reasons, then how about a bunch of people that voted for Camala Hill Harris are going to blow their brains out because they're not going to be able to live in a world where they were lied to so easily for so long. Heck, maybe even some people that didn't vote for her, too. I'm just making a point. Some people are quite literally going to have a psychological break. The fact that he can't list one reason for why the government would hide it proves that he's just pushing a narrative. His narrative, oh [ __ ] we got to switch it up. We got to switch it up and start saying that 0 point energy is real now because otherwise when it becomes real, everybody's going to gravitate towards this Ashton guy who's been talking about it for two years when everybody else has said it doesn't it's it's insignificant. It's not real. Doesn't matter. Just the ground state doesn't do anything. Now they're jumping on board because when it is proven to be real, they know Vindication Train is coming and they're going to be sitting tied to the tracks. Choo choo [laughter] choo choo. MH370X train is coming. Rosart, we're coming for you. Rosart, I want you, Rosart. Okay. Yeah, we're catching those pink slips. If you if only he had something for us to take, chat. If only. But he doesn't. [sighs] You know what? Okay, one more clip. We're going to save I was going to save this for Wednesday, but before I start talking more physics, which I've done a lot tonight, here is AJ the Y files. So, they actually got into a little public spat with AJ's brother, Gino. I I like both of them, actually. But, you know, let's be honest, they're afraid to talk about the MH370 topic. And you say, "No, they're not Ashton." Come on, man. Just watch this clip. >> Sweet. He's my favorite because >> his inventions, he videotaped all of his stuff and you see him in his workshop. >> Hold on. That's not the right one. Although, that's interesting. Wait, where? Oh, this is the one. Here we go. This is the one I wanted. >> Are you convinced that the US government is totally transparent about energy? >> No. No. I think they're totally opaque about energy. >> Really? Totally. >> Oh yes. Um I think the US government >> honestly whatever the beef, shout out to AJ. This seems like actually something really simple to us. This seems this seems like trivial. We look at this, we go, is the government clear about energy? No. They're covering up energy. Do you guys not get it? They're covering up an energy source. So, bravo to AJ to just say that. That's the first step cuz then the questions that follow up, what energy source, how is that possible? >> Probably has unlocked 0 point or close to zero point energy, which would be pulling energy out of the vacuum. Um, we have inventors that have done that over and over and over. Uh, and >> making energy out of apparently nothing. Well, we can start with there was someone there's a man named Charles Pogue who in the 30s >> tinkered with his carburetor and was able to get 200 miles a gallon. It was proven. This it was engineers investigated scientists. It's totally proven. Um it worked. He was going to be a zillionaire or whatever. He's going to transform society. >> Well, okay. I mean, that's fine. That's that honestly that's the only part of the clip that I wanted to get. But here's the thing. It's not energy from nothing. It's not energy from nothing. From our perception, it's energy from nothing. But that's like saying we live in an empty vacuum. We don't live in an empty vacuum. It's not energy from nothing. We just don't quite understand what energy even is. [snorts] We don't understand what it is. So what we're saying here is that this space-time energy there is a way to tap into it. And so AJ gives an explan he gives an example. I think he talks about uh Stanley Meyer water power car. And he says this guy figured out how to use water power a car. Somehow there's a tie between 0 point energy and this mechanism because he's claiming over unity. So there must be some other energy source assuming the energy source is 0 point energy. So then if you're a scientist the question you should ask is what is the underlying source? How is that energy getting? If we are Richard Fineman we're asking the why question. You say, okay, why is the government hiding this? We explain it. How is this technology work? Okay, it's zero point energy. How are they tapping in? What is the what is the physics framework that allows us to tap into the zero point energy at this fundamental level? And the answer to that question is the ground state of the hydrogen atom. If we just take one atom of hydrogen, simplify your nuclear bomb down to just one hydrogen and we say that is the electron spinning around this atom. There's so much energy. Why is it not just radiating that energy away? And we realize each atom is pulling a tiny little bit of energy from that zero point energy. Each one is. So then [snorts] you would say, well, okay, now we've figured out the fundamental framework. What is the core concept that allows it? Now what do we have to do? Well, we were just looking at it in that scientific paper. Now we have to take that individual atom. We're going to extract this tiny insignificant amount of energy and we got to scale that up. We got to scale that up. And the best way to do that is plasma because plasma is like taking all those little atoms and having them all in a cluster together and treating them like a liquid. Treating it like a liquid of atoms of ions and electrons. a soup, if you will. What I'm saying is that if you boil it straight down to its grass roots, probably the most efficient way, the most direct way to extract 0 point energy probably fusion. probably fusion because you can indirectly manipulate the lattice structure to get past the kulon barrier in fusion. That's where you can use that free energy, the lattice structure to get actual real energy out that's usable for us. Don't think about it in terms of extracting 0 point energy to use the zero point energy. Think of it in terms of we have this energy source of the lattice structure. What can we do with that lattice structure that can give us real practical output? This is why I'm all in on a neutronic fusion because when you boil it down, any logical person just like I concluded will conclude that plasma is going to be your best way to interact with the zero point energy. And what is everybody doing to produce energy with plasma? They're doing fusion. They're all doing fusion. And this means there is a way to test this. The best physics theories are testable and this one is too. When we start producing fusion, we're going to see more energy output. In fact, fusion will likely act act like a tap where depending on how dense you get your plasma, how powerful you get this gravitational effect, you can pull more and more energy out of spaceime. And at some point, from a theoretical perspective, there would be a limit to how much energy you could pull out of a region of spacetime. because you pulling the energy out. Imagine like you're pulling water out of the ocean and then the water fills in the gap. But in theory, if you pull the water out fast enough, it would not be able to fill in the gap quick enough. This same theory, this hydrodnamic theory also applies to the ether, to the space-time energy. So this means that there probably is some limit to how much energy can get pulled out of a region of volume of spaceime. Okay, I've primed us for our final segment of the night. Now Ferris Williams, we've spoken extensively about Ferris Williams. What I wanted to do tonight was to look at some of the scientific equations and papers related to Maxwell's equations and what are the impacts from Ferris Williams own words of this 5D theory if you add this extra dimension what does this do to general relativity what does this do to electronamics what are the impacts of all of this [snorts] So, this is where this kind of came back. Now, remember, we were just talking about, was it Los Alamos? Did I get Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos confused earlier? I don't know. Whatever. Either way, you get the point. Ferris Williams. This was that UFO uh what do we even call this thing? I don't even know if this even has a name. This was from the UFO hearing that got submitted. Ferris Williams has several indirect ties to UAP research. Los Alamos colleague Oak Shannon told a journalist in 2019, "If we were to build an anti-gravitational device, it would be built on the principles involved in Williams' theory. I mean, chat, that's a pretty big uh endorsement." uh nuclear physicist from Los Alamos is like, "Yeah, if we built any anti-gravitational devices, it's going to be based on this guy's fivedimensional theory because you're going to move the medium to travel instead of using conventional rocket propulsion or something like that." [sighs] Okay, so let's go back to this. Let's We don't need this one anymore. Which one do I want to go to first? One more thing I wanted to point out related to our Bible here on this. Which thing did I want to mention here? I called those folks because Nick Cook in the hunt for zero point energy mentions that at UW received a NASA contract to study theories of inertia as part of its BPP program. When we think about inertia, inertia can be explained as zero point energy as well. Inertia is the resistance you feel while moving through the zero point energy. That's a good place to start, I thought. But it took a backtracking to BPP project director Mark Milis, author of the Bible, BTW. Mark Milis at NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland to find Dr. John Kramer at the UW Physics Department. Kramer's mission was to confirm with partner James Woodward the latter's 1996 preliminary research into the loss of gravitational mass in a targeted piece of metal from oscillating capacitors. Wow. All of our goats chat. All of our goats are nuclear engineers and nuclear physicists and they all just love gravity research. Just a coincidence though. Probably just a coincidence that all the nuclear physicists all love gravity research. H But could there be a connection between fusion, nukes, atoms, and then gravity manipulation? H I'm just asking questions, guys. I'm just jacking off over here. Okay. Sorry. Let's close this now. Three different papers and I've got kind of some summaries to go through. So, how are we going to do this? Let's start with uh oh yeah, let's start with this. Okay, perfect. So, this what page we on? 32. This right here [clears throat] is electric propulsion study. Those of you mfers out there, those haters out there who've been doubting Get buckled up. You're about to get rocked right now. This right here, electric propulsion study by the Air Force. Boom. Electric propulsion say what year is this? 1990 or something like this. 1992. 1990. By Franklin me, project manager. [snorts] Wait, does it talk about Williams? [clears throat] The author wishes to thank Dr. Ferris Williams and the other tireless theoticians who have spent years slowly working in removing the rocks from the difficult path to the unified field theory as others idally stand by complaining that the road is too rough to travel and may never lead anywhere. You guys have no idea how much pleasure I am going to take when I rip that Pulitzer Prize up live on stream in front of at least a dozen people probably in the year 2045 or something like that because no doubt you guys think that the author of electric propulsion study that wrote this for the Air Force for one of their top special projects. Guys, he's thanking Ferris Williams, the guy that corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations. Corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations. He's thanking that guy because he's saying that nobody else is trying to unify physics, but this dude is doing it. Go to page 32. Williams. Williams has advanced 5D theory starting from thermodynamics. This is a unique approach that does not appear to have been stated elsewhere. He has combined thermodynamic laws with mechanical systems to give a unified 5D theory. I'm going to ignore a lot of the equations because I forget all the characters and what have you. But here you go. Here's all the different equations people say. Show us the math. This has all of the math. I don't want to hear people say the math. The math is like I might be one of the only people on the earth showing the math. Okay. So he shows what does that mean? Development of 5DM equations. One goal is to basically take Maxwell's equations and we want to understand what physical effects we should expect from by adding a fifth dimension. So when we do this here, this is where we're taking our variables and we're saying, okay, we're going to add an extra dimension. So now you have up, down, left, right, back, and forth. you have time and now we're going to add this extra lattice structure, this super structure dimension that we can't perceive but it's there. What does that do to the equations? That's what this is saying here. So down here he's saying if we take this we now can make a matrix. Now if you've learned from physics we've learned that in order to express dimensions and the vectors along those dimensions we need matrix. Matrices are really great for doing this because matrices can tell you where things are relative to other things. Great. Okay. So, we're going to use this matrix add a 5D analog. So, it says now these can be now utilized to derive 5D analoges to classical Maxwell expressions by using this identity bianke or whatever. Bianke we now achieve our four field equations. So by doing this we now find our new Maxwell equations. So, if you are not keeping up, we said, okay, we're going to take a 5D five-dimensional theory and we're going to say we're going to make a matrix out of it just like people did with fourdimensional theory and we're going to say what does this mean for electro what does this mean for uh Maxwell's electronamics Maxwell's uh electromagnetic equations and the first two equations are exactly the same first two are exly exactly the same. The last two indicate there is a new role played by the mass terms. Notice that a constant a is introduced specifically to indicate the degree of coupling between the electromagnetic fields and the inertial fields. Additional equations are obtained from the current density expression and three additional equations. Says equation 101, this one in the middle will become important in locating new effects. So now we're saying, okay, we've got a new 5D framework, new electromagnetic equations. Can we predict? Can we predict things? The electric field from the region now depends both on the charge density and the change in density. Uhoh. Wow. Now the field is determined by the density of your charge. Why does that matter? Remember dense plasma, all plasma is is a bunch of charge. So the denser you get it, that seems to be the secret. And here we're seeing the density is now going to impact the electromagnetic equations and the change in mass density. And the change in mass density represents gravitational waves. If I were to increase my density in a region and then decrease it rapidly, you would expect you would expect a gravitational ripple. Just like if I were to put a black hole here and then make the black hole disappear and then make the black hole come back, you would expect a gravitational ripple, right? I love this is my favorite part actually. I think when he explaining the Maxwell's equations okay notice that J I= 0 1 2 and 3 are the classical charge density or currents and then J4 is a new entity which is a mass d mass density like flow and dependent on the exact assignment of the fifth coordinate. Okay. Okay. Likewise, it says here that uh oh, this expression is important in looking for nonconservation of charge. So, we get this new equation. So, we're doing a bunch of transformations with the math here. The only assumption that has been made is that there is a fifth dimension. And it says this term is important because now we're looking for nonconservation of charge. We're looking can we break conservation rules? And you say, ' Ash, what's a conservation rule? Conservation says if I take something from over here, then it must reappear over here. Nothing can be created nor destroyed. The conservation rules, what we're looking for, is there a way to cheat and bring the airplane of energy to me? Is there a way to get around our perception of the laws of thermodynamics? And he says, okay, here's two more equations. The 5D forces become these equations for particles of velocity V. Notice the scalarike force that modifies the classic Lorent force. Now we have a scalar term that is modifying our classical Lorent forces. So what we've got here is we've added another variable to this equation that can change the others. This is important because what we've contested is that these effects only show up when you get to very high levels. Once you get these very high energy densities, when you get to these uh voltages that I think are in hundreds of thousands of volts where you'll now because of your charge density, you will now begin to see and be able to measure some of these effects. But only when you get near that threshold because the fabric is so tight of our special of our reality. Okay. To better understand the expected charge due to the added physical dimension, we must look at some special cases without any mass in free space. And now we say if the electromagnetic fields could be removed, the equations become these. Oh, so what you're saying here is that if we simplify our scenario, if we take our 5D example and simplify our scenario, we just take like a point charge, the equations reduce back down to Maxwell's equations. This is a huge point. What they're saying right here is the reason why the reason why we don't see this daytoday is because if you ignore this if you don't act if you're not near the threshold where these effects app these effects appear [snorts] then you Maxwell's equations are basically what you have today what you what we work with and what we see today this is essentially saying this fivedimensional effect only is visible under the certain conditions. That's huge. That to me is absolutely massive. And for it now to say, okay, we reduce this back down and it reduces back down to exactly Maxwell's simplified equations. That's in minimum a proof that this theory at least fits with observational reality. Okay, let's see what else did I want to see here. Equations 111, which is up here. This one. And and I think this is the scaling term here. I think that's what this weird character. Hold on. Let's let's see what it says. 111 and 102 can be used to help understand V4 and J4. So V4 and J4 I think these were the things these were the uh scalers that we were seeing the gravitational waves from it is from these it is apparent that they are that they are functions linear with respect to the added dimension. From equation 112 it is seen that the divergence in mass from a point is impossible in the absence of charge and magnetic effects. This rules out photon photon reactions via virtual particle virtual charge pairs. Such terms have plagued QED calculations. I actually didn't fully understand this, but I think he's saying here that this will help us understand why we see potential effects with the Aaronov bomb effect. Could be wrong, but that's kind of the gist I got from that. Not yet at the full S tier physics yet, guys. I'm working. Okay. Now, the first two equations remained unchanged, indicating no monopoles. This would mean no monopoles in free space, but this doesn't necessarily mean there can't be a monopole from a from a teleportation standpoint. Um, okay. Let's see. I'm going to read this part here. It's interesting to note that Mil pointed out the need to modify just these two Maxwell expressions. He arrived at a slightly different terms due to alternate assumptions concerning two timelike coordinates. His viewpoint was that strict relativistic AB initio theories must consider the possibility that in a moving reference frames it is impossible to use a moving test charge to measure a magnetic field without its own velocity relative to the other blast. What he's saying here is that it's very difficult to test relativity because in your own reference frame everything always looks normal to you. This is the trick to relativity is that somebody can teleport relative to me. But relative to them, it just looks like they're walking through a door. This is the big rub. So, how do you test something like that? Well, you teleport an airplane and then you record it on both sides. That's literally what you do. to teleport an airplane and record it on both sides. Okay. Um, this is another point that I should have mentioned here earlier in the above paragraph. So, equation 118 modifies Gaus's law to state that the flux through a closed sur closed surface is proportional to the charge inside only if there's no mass density charge within that region. In other words, the effect of particle creation and annihilation within a region must be considered when calculating the flux from a volume. Boom. Drop the mic. Holy [ __ ] Does How did nobody read this and know what they're I swear we're the only people that read these. What this is saying here, if you're making a bomb, if you're making a nuke, it's not just the lithium and the hydrogen. You have to consider if 5D theory is correct. You must also consider the effect of particle creation anti- and annihilation within the region. What is that? That's the zero point energy. Particle creation and annihilation is the virtual particle pairs that we talk about in physics. The virtual particle pairs that is the zero point energy that ver that particle pair creation that's the swinger limit. When you break the swinger limit and the virtual particle pairs become real photons. [snorts] Quite interesting. Conversely, calculation of a mass within a volume must consider the possible flow of electromagnetic energy within the volume. It can be argued that Gaus's law implies a 1 / r 2 potential and any new terms would alter that potential. The effects are very subtle or appear only in high mass density regions. The new potential does not have divergences as does the 1 / r^ 2. Likewise, the magnetic field can now arise from the changes in the electric flux, the movement of the charges, and the change from the voltage arising from the mass effects. I think that's what that V stands for. Wow. Wow. It lays it all out right there. Do you guys see why I needed to read this for you? It's not just me saying this. Papers from the 1990s by the Air Force Research Labs have been saying this. They're saying it right there. The reason why the calculations for the nuclear bomb were 50% lower, whatever the percentage is, were so low is because they forgot to calculate the 0 point energy within the volume. Boom. Felony physics, [ __ ] Lock me up. Send me to federal. pound you in the ass prison baby cuz we ain't done. Not only am I going to continue tonight, but my next step now that I know what this is all about, how long do you think it will take me to figure out the exact resonant frequency that they use to make this all go down? because we already figured out the geometry, right? I mean, that part is easy. Have everything cancel out. [snorts] But the next part is how did they make the plane link up with this location? How what resonant frequency did they use to have this get perfectly aligned with that? What frequency did they use to have the orb spin around the plane at that exact rate? Because that exact rate of spin is important. And these are the real these are the numbers that they don't want people to know about because these resonant frequencies are what really allows you to build something that you know can do like we saw happen to MH370. Okay, let me look back at this. Um, and here you go. He says, "This concept is very important. It seems to have been totally ignored in the current literature and only appeared in Milm's work. The idea is the uh theoretic insight directly into the heart of the understanding of charge. Here we have a case of fundamental physical theory relying on the existence of a physically impossible quantity. Charge is unique that it is quantized in the number of fundamental carriers is relativistic and probabilistic and variant within all physical reality. So we look at this and we look at charge and we say we can connect general relativity to uh to electromagnetism using this extra dimension. Here it is. And everybody seems to have just ignored it. Didn't give it the time of the day. And here's the Air Force saying this is the answer. I mean you guys listen or don't listen but here's the answer. So we need to modify the electromagnetic equations. Um, let me see. What were the were the main points on this? I didn't have a chance to read through read through this before the stream again. Um, there was something else in here. It's interesting to note that all plausible variations of Maxwell's equations investigated here had variations in just these two equations. This was true regardless of the theoretical starting point. Is highly recommended that any experimental project hoping to capitalize on modifying Maxwell's equations concentrate on these two equations. targeting these two relations is most likely to demonstrate any coupling between electromagnetism and other forces. So here they are. So this and again this is not just a document about Williams. This is the document about all of them. So it goes on to lay out how these forces are significant. how the waves are going to propagate in five-dimensional space. And you know ideally if this is real, if this is true, then this explains our entire reality. And down here it says the limits of the conversion rates. Now what did I just tell you? I told you that because we have to take into account the the space juice the how much space juice is in a volume of empty space. This means that there's a rate limit too. If we were to pull that energy out then the most we could ever pull out is how much space juice is in one volume. That's the most we could ever pull out before it refills back in. So whatever that is, there is some rate that we're going to be limited. Now, this might be good news because it's going to make it harder to make a black hole that destroys us all. Not impossible, just a little bit harder. That's all. Um, okay. Let's go to the second the other paper I wanted to show. This one's a lot shorter, so we're not going to go through all of this tonight. Oh, and one more thing I want to read here is just to show you that Ferris Williams was talking. This is Ferris Williams talking about the history on this paper. This paper by Ferris Williams is energy and entropy as the fundamentals of theoretical physics. And here he says the quantum theoretical treatment of this case is as follows. So he's talking about this idea of linking quantum mechanics to gravity. G is what he's talking about here. Only after an infinite time has passed away is the wave supply inside G exhausted while the outside wave is spread over an everinccreasing space. He's talking about treating gravity as these ripples through this extra dimension. So I just wanted to bring this up because it's clear if you try to understand how was someone able to figure this out what theories did they use to unify it. It's clear that quantum mechanics played an essential role in these people's theories especially when they realize that charge can be quantized. Charge being able to be quantized means that it's scale invariant. means that whatever we're seeing on the quantum scales is also true on the larger scales and that is absolutely huge because now it gives us a metric it gives us a ruler by which we can measure effects on any scale. Okay. Now this paper dynamic theory some shockwave and energy implications. Now look at the word shockwave. The shock waves and the bubbles, the the plasma sheets that the government was using for hypersonics were likely the beginnings of this research because they start to see these plasma waves forming in their sheath and they start to see these effects. So, not only do they see it from nukes, but they're seeing it in the plasma and the plasma sheets they're putting on our spy planes. Dynamic theory, a unifying five-dimensional theory of space-time matter is examined. The theory predicts an observed discrepancy between shockwave viscosity measurements at the low and high pressures in aluminum, a limiting mass to energy conversion rate constitu consistent with the available data and reduced pressures in electromagnetically contained controlled fusion plasmas. That last one, baby. So, you're writing a paper about your unification theory and you're like, there's three things I want you to know about three things. One, shock waves are going to act differently. You're going to see different plasma shock wave behavior. Number one. Number two, converting this energy, this 0 point energy, there is a conversion rate. There may be a limit to it. And then number three, you're going to want to know the impacts on fusion. Turns out this fivedimensional theory heavily impacts fusion. Okay, so the viscosity one, I'm going to kind of skip over this, but as you can see, the idea is that this shock wave is going to function slightly differently now in a five-dimensional manifold than it would function without. So, this is going to speak to things like stability, stability of our plasma. Um, the one I wanted to dig into though is rate of mass conversion. Now, I already spoke about this one, but I'm just going to read this first paragraph. In nuclear weapons and reactors, mass is converted into energy. However, Einstein's theory, which predicts the energy released in this conversion, says nothing about the rate at which this conversion can or does proceed. On the other hand, the dynamic theory not only provides an additional equation of motion that can be solved to find the mass conversion rate as a fluctuation as a function of time. But it predicts a limiting rate of mass conversion. The question addressed here is what is the limiting rate and how does it compare with experimentally achieved rates? If the experimental rate rates exceed the predicted limit then something is wrong. If on the other hand the predicted limiting rate is not seen experimentally then its existence is still possible. Wow. So right there that I love that as a physicist because he's saying think of this zero point energy like a tap and also think of just in general converting mass into energy. You can convert mass into energy but how fast how fast can you convert mass and energy? There is a limiting rate by which you can do that and how do you even determine these things? He's saying that Einstein's equations can't even determine these things because they're missing the required elements. But the fifth dimension add that in and now you can convert these now you can calculate these things. To me that's very powerful evidence. And just like it said, this should be testable. We are now on to the physics that things are they're testable things. People are probably testing them, at least some of them. Okay. Um, so then he does his calculations and he says, here's your example for uranium and and the maximum rate that you can get. Thus, the fastest gram of uranium may be converted into energy is 1.7 ps, picosconds, picosconds, I don't know. This time is very short considering that this time is several orders of magnitude larger than the minimum time possible for the fishing of one atom. Electromagnetically contained ionized plasmas. I'm just going to read this part. I think controlled fusion programs use variations of electromagnetic containment of ionized plasmas. Dynamic theory predicts forces on these plasms and pressures generated that are important to various fusion programs. This is where I start rubbing my hands together. Please sir, what what do you predict from your five-dimensional theory? The fivedimensionality of of the theory provides an additional equation of motion that becomes effective when mass is no longer conserved. Thus, the theory may offer a better description of the actual fusion process than current theories do. Any implications of the theory using this additional equation of motion during the actual mass conversion have not yet been explored. Hence, we're not digging into the limitations of doing fusion and pulling the energy out of the vacuum yet. On the other hand, conservation of mass embeds a fourdimensional hypersurface in the five-dimensional space and provides two implications for fusion systems before mass conversion. Both derive from the fact that within the dynamic theory, the energy momentum transfer for matter under the influence of electromagnetic forces has two parts. The first part is relativistic energy momentum transfer like running into something and the second part contains the geometric properties of the embedded hypersurface. So what he's saying here is there's two things that go on in fusion and you already know which one's been left out. The first one things flying around hitting each other. That's how we pretty much only figure out fusion right now. Energy momentum transfer. This one's moving really fast. This one's moving really fast. They hit each other. But there's something else. The other one is the geometric properties of the embedded hypers surface. If you were to shrink the geometry, now two objects that were further apart are now closer together than they were before. This is written by uh Ferris Williams. That's the person who correct this guy corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations. Corrected them if you're missing it. The first implication for fusion systems lies in the additional forces that must be considered as a result of this geometric term in the energy transfer. He's saying you now need to consider the space-time structure. You need to consider this five dimensions. Now this geometric shape these forces also depend on the energy density gradient as does the viscosity. So what he's saying here is that it's not just how much energy is packed into this region. Where is the energy localized? It also means is the all is the energy focus right here and then it disperses and gets less and less energy as you get further away or is it all uniform all the same energy density? That answer to that question changes the outcome. Changes the outcome. Because these forces have the multiplicative term, the density gradient components must be large. Therefore, they are evident. The geometric term in the energy uh momentum transfer also predicts reduced pressures in the plasma as a result of electromagnetic pressure. This right here, I think speaks to the high beta concept, lower pressure than is predicted. we might be able to get uh fusion to happen with lower magnetic field strengths given this theory. Note that the dynamic theory predicts a reduction in the pressure dependent on the mass density gradient. The value of the constant depends determined previously by the shock data indicates a density gradient could produce a 10% pressure reduction. So I think we looked at some of his other work, but to me this speaks to the idea that we might have a easier to produce fusion at lower temperatures and b um we might be able to get away with using less magnetic field strengths. And this is the idea of the high beta concept that we can create this well and that [snorts] we can create a ratio of plasma pressure to magnetic field pressure that approaches one unity. Now let me just read this last part. Acknowledgements. The author is grateful to many people especially Vice Admiral Kard R McKe US Navy for the encouragement and criticism they provided during the development of the dynamic theory. Special acknowledgement is given to JM Walsh who encouraged application of the theory to the viscosity of shocked solids to BG Craig who encouraged this analysis of theory for implications and Karen Peterson for assistance in preparing this manuscript. Karen, shout out to you Karen, the the lost person that was that was forgotten. Karen who wrote this up. You know what? You get some credit to Karen. Now, I bring this up. These are some pretty big names. I I don't think there's a lot of physicists on the planet that could say that vice admirals are helping them with their physics papers. Vice Admirals. And the point is, why would you have vice admirals and these other people that are like, you know, DOE, Department of Energy, nuclear weapons business? Why are these the people that are promoting you? Because they're the people in the no. They're the people that know about our weapons. They know what our weapons can do. So when people tell you we have the ability to manipulate space and we have technologies beyond public comprehension, they're just telling you the absolute truth, fam. They're telling you the absolute truth. So to close this out tonight before we go to our super chats, I want to play this clip from Tom Bearden again to bring it all together. How do we manipulate gravity? We create a scalar potential as we saw in the 5D theory. How do we create the scalar potential? You take two electromagnetic waves, cancel them out. 180° out of phase, meaning they're going in opposite directions, but there's not nothing left. We learned there's a stress in the medium that's left. We imagine this stress in the medium or we see the physical effects of this stress in the medium as gravity. So now we understand the basis for gravity manipulation. create some scalar potentials. It doesn't tell us how we can control it, but they tell us how we can go add to the noise. Let's listen to Tom Bearden again. >> That's no longer >> Tom Bearden was talking about this before everybody. And not just a little before everybody, like a lot before everybody. And now that we understand what he meant, this will make a whole lot more sense. We have a new kind of electromagnetics, a third kind and I have dubbed that scalar electromagnetics in quantum mechanics when the electric field. >> So already we hear scalar already we know he's linking it to quantum mechanics here and he's saying we have a new term the same new term that showed up in Ferris Williams modified Maxwell's equations >> and the magnetic field reduced to zero in an area you still may have the potentials. So even if you remove the electromagnetic field, even if you cancel out your waves, the potentials, the stress in the medium still exists. The stress in the rubber band still exists. And what we learned from the Aeronov bomb effect is you can argue the potentials are the only real thing. The fields aren't doing anything. It's the potentials that are doing it even though we can't even see them. >> And if these potentials, which are the real things going on, interfere with each other, you can have real effects still. >> Keep it mad real. >> Produced in in charged particle systems, real physical systems. In 1959, a classic paper by Aronoff and Bomb in Physical Review pointed this out very strongly and since then part of that has come to be called the Bomb Aronhoff effect or sometimes the Aronhoff bomb effect. >> Chad, he's such a goat that they used to call it bomb aaronhoff effect even though now it's only known as the Aronhoff bomb effect. If we can make this effect exist in the big world, they think it effect it exists only in the micro world. We can get action at a distance. That's no longer a dirty word. I'm going to show you how to change the mass and inertia of an object. >> By btw, I think we reviewed the other day that it wasn't until the 90s when Japan finally proved the Aronov Bulma effect beyond any doubt. So, this is from 1985. this video. This is Tom Bearden talking about the Areronov Boom effect before it was even proven when most mainstream physicists didn't want to believe that it was real because the Aronov bomb effect destroys the classical interpretation of physics. Keep that in mind when you want to doubt this guy. >> Affect its rate of flow through time, affect the gravitational field and so forth. You then you do this by making a zero system. You oppose the vectors so that they sum to zero but they are still there in the substructure. With this simple mechanism with few coils and transistors and so forth by making deliberate zeros we can deliberately engineer the stringinger equation and we can deliberately affect the probabilities of quantum mechanics. The hidden variable theory now becomes directly engineerable. What had been statistical before now becomes at least partly deterministic. >> And what's so beautiful about it is that we say we don't know where the photon where the electron is going to go in our EPR experiments. We just get a random probability wave. And what Tom Bearden is saying is that if you start making these scalar beams, these zeros, these intentional zeros, the stress in the medium, you can actually change the probability of that waveform. Before you had a normal distribution of the probability where that photon is going to show up and now by making these scalar potentials you can actually change that probability. That is the very beginning the very opening the door up to teleportation because now you figured out there's a way to engineer quantum entanglement. There's a way to link points together. We don't know exactly how, but I know I can start sending things through here and things are starting to happen over here in some random location. So, okay guys, that's going to be our stream for tonight. I want to go through and thank some of these super chats because you guys have been amazing tonight and the pill chat has been going on on fire. Pquest gifts the cookie. Nom nom. Delicious cookie. Pquest, thank you very much, my friend. Appreciate you. No question, but that's fine. John Glock, who's been in there for a while, I see methyl out there as well. He says, John Glock, Tom Bearden made a great analogy with the problem in physics regarding energy. I'm in my boat in a huge ocean with massive winds moving all around, but if that wind doesn't hit my sails, well, then the wind doesn't exist. Shout out to the Draxi. That's a great example is that I mean, if we just don't see it, it doesn't exist, right? really makes you wonder about some of this stuff. Um, and then he has a followup. I wonder if Ferris Williams and Tom Bearden ever worked together. Well, that's funny you mentioned that because somewhere on one of my back things here, I have the um the notes from Oak Shannon. Oak Shannon was confirmed very good friends with Ferris Williams. And in the notes from 1985, Oak Shannon's notes with Hal Pudof. I don't know where it is exactly right now, but he says they should look into Tom Bearden's stuff in the notes. Says Tom Bearden's I was wondering reading that like are they gonna talk about Tom Bearden? Boom. There he is at the bottom. So yeah, pretty sweet. And thank you guys very much in the Rumble chat. I appreciate all your guys support. Skeptards, the ankle biters, explorers, and dreamers. Yeah. And we shouldn't be too hard on the skeptic because some of them will make it through the filter. I'm not not gonna lie. Some of them NGMI not going to make it. Some of them are not going to make it. Some of them will make it through the filter and they will come out better. And we should accept them into our brotherhood, into our cult, our cult of zero point energy. Pray to our high priest. Get them a Bible. Get them a Bible. Let them uh renounce the old ways. Renounce the old ways and uh you know, whatever you do. Okay. Wow. Huge donation from Tony Allensson. Just just $50. That's all. Thank you very much. Appreciate you very much for that super sticker. Tony, you're the bomb. Broadway line. Professor Forbes chat. I mean, maybe I am going to be Professor Forbes at this rate. I thought there's no way I would ever be a teacher in this world. Here I am 400 live streams later. John says gravity is the force felt by the motion of the ether into electrons that maintain loss energy of the orbits. And so what John's saying here is that if you really break it down, like do the same thing with gravity that we did with the atom absorbing energy from the zero point. And he would say that you can actually measure the gravity that's being produced by the atom by the electrons in their orbitals. And that this is this gravity that we feel in the large scale also works exactly the same on these very tiny scales. unification, my dudes. [snorts] Tyler Boris is Epstein. No, I don't I don't think I'm think that's some Russian guy. But man, how weird was that email? That email about Loa Wood just glazing Boris, some Russian guy, with all this cryptic messages, you know, calling back the next day. Why are you still leaving? Why are you leaving me? weird dude. Timothy Foster, DJT stock is just the right thing to be in. Carry on. Dimensions rock. Yeah. So, if you want to be in these stocks, the companies I recommend either DJT, which just absorbed uh Trialpha Energy, the oldest fusion company that's definitely knows about this or Helian Fusion. Helium Fusion. Uh they're not public yet though is the problem. The other ones like Commonwealth. I mean, Bill Gates is in Commonwealth and I just don't like Bill Gates. I mean, we just saw that email earlier. So, plus they don't seem to be doing a neutronic fusion. So, unless they pull a switcheroo at the last moment, I don't know what's going on with Commonwealth. That's my full opinion for you all. Thank you. Um, Timothy Jol Robinson, we covered a lot in this stream. We really did. And then Barti Welding, I got warrants. Science warrants. Save Ferris. Recap. fusion mobs are manipulating uh spaceime because the more energy density into a smaller region, the more you're going to see gravitational ripple. If you want to ride a gravitational wave, you don't just want a whole bunch of mass energy density. You want a change in mass energy density, a rapid change in mass energy density according to Ferris Williams. And the last thing we need to figure out which we will be working on in the future is what is the resonance condition? What is the frequency that we need to hit to cause this all to occur? Okay, guys. Got some amazing more interviews. I'm going to try to talk to Salvatore Py in a couple weeks. I've also got uh Michael Herrera scheduled in the future and I'm going to try to do some others. Uh so check out the Hardru podcast, guys. More coming down the the pipe. And then on Wednesday, uh I don't know exactly what we're going to do on Wednesday, but oh, we're going to review the uh AJ and uh Tucker Carlson video on Wednesday. Guys, have a great night. MH370X. I love y'all. Peace out. Later. [music] Out in [music] the fields where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorne, [music] they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing [music] weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Bowling trip 7 through a wormhole. But we're talking wormholes. Stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing [music] trip 7 through a wormhole flow. [music] Exotic [music] matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeeze so tight, [music] creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab. They play generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing casame force negative [music] zones we need to stay the course. Talking wormhole, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our [music] destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing triple 7 through a wormhole float. Thin shell formalism plate [music] so fine. Spherical geometry we realign. Energy conditions [music] that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a try. >> [music] [music] >> forces balancing the plates creating the throat. Open the gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers [music] and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Throwing triple 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields [music] to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. Little Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through [music] his music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear. Exploring the