Video Transcript
First, Ferris Williams. So, let's just listen to the man himself. Now, you can look at this man and listen to him. And the other thing that's important, you need to understand this is not just an investigation into the various details and evidence that we find is that we are sociologically studying these engineers. And when I look at this man, this is not a charlatan. This is clearly respected man. Look how well he's dressed, how he talks. He's carefree. He's not concerned about the government coming after him. He's not concerned about money. He's obviously well off. The way he speaks, he doesn't he doesn't seem to care what the person is thinking about what he says about his ideas. Whatever he says, he clearly believes it. And what is he saying? Let's listen to the man. Let's start here. didn't aim for that much gravitational modification but I was able to put two cones together so as to make one cone heavier and one cone lighter and measure the amount of torque >> okay >> by uh the use of the now forbaden mercury >> I had the current pass through the cones by dipping brass rods in the mercury and so the depth of the brass rods would determine the torque So he was doing gravity modification experiments with mercury. Well then, huh? Hold up. Hold up, chat. I got it ready. Hold up. >> Okay, continue, sir. >> I think John Derek >> possible source of the effect rather than the predicted source. >> Oh yeah. >> So what they did was they put the energy source on the rotating element >> so as to eliminate that. arguments. >> Okay. >> And I understand they also saw positive results and put it in the uh triple E propulsion journal or something like that. >> No, he he told me about something that if I remember right, it kind of resembled a mushroom the way he described it. He said it was about diverging currents, I guess, and he was he was talking about stretching the ether, >> you know, and having it stretched more on the top than on the bottom. And that would >> Yeah. You see that smile there? Did you see the man's smile? Something I will recognize even more than a Redditor. There's one thing, chat, I recognize even more than recognizing a Redditor, which I can smell from through a wall. I can smell a Redditor through a wall across spaceime. It's a superpower. That man understood the ether. I know when a man understands the ether. Look at look at the smile on his face, chat. I'll go back. >> A mushroom the way you described it. It was about >> diverging currents, I guess. And he was he was talking about stretching the ether, >> you know. >> Oh, I mean, Chad, you got him. You got him. You don't you you you rarely get somebody this Well, did you see the the fa the facial expression go straight from nothing to just full on smile? Got him chat. Never never hide a secret from Ashton Forbes. Put it rule number one on your list. Never lie to Ashton Forbes. He will find out all your secrets. Okay, keep going, sir. Look at that. Holy crap. >> And having it stretched more on the top than on the bottom. And that would create kind of the anti-gravity factor. >> Well, of course, John was trying to create a mental picture of what was going on. And stretching the ether was probably his way of trying to visualize it. I haven't formed such a mental picture. And I don't really understand his visualization of it. What I do understand though is that the the gravitational uh potential arises from a divergence or convergence a force divergence of electric current >> where I use a cone to diverge the current and it's a hollow cone so you all the current has to diverge. Uh John used a uh a disc. Now you got the maximum convergence. >> Well, no. >> So he's saying, [clears throat] by the way, he's talking about convergence or divergence of your electric field. Reminds me a lot of uh what Tom Malk was talking about with the scalar potential. I think it that he's talking about different ways of engineering and producing the scalar potential which we see manifest as a gravitational effect. So producing gravitational waves and then he's saying well I look at it conceptually different than how I think that's his that was his uh coworker co-author that it was being discussed right there. They look at the same issue from a different perspective but they both are invoking an extra dimension. And if you don't believe me, just check out Ferris Williams uh dynamic theory, five dimensions, three space-time dimensions, time dimension. Fifth dimension is the total energy. Total energy being the whole system, the ether. Everything we see plus everything we don't see. Spacetime on a Saturday. So, why is this significant? I have a sneaking suspicion that Ferris Williams is right and that his personal dynamic theory may not be like the perfect solution to the answer at the end of the day. you know 100 years from now but it explains a dynamic of the thermonuclear weapons that conventional physics was missing and that would have been classical physics as we know it today. So if you look at physics in general, this has to be the thing. There's no other hidden physics that Ferris Williams was able to solve that somehow solved nuclear weapons secrets. Anyone who disagrees, I would challenge you right now. You tell me. If you don't think this is the thing, you tell me what it is. What is it that was able the Pharisees? It wasn't just the power of the calculator. The power of the calculator isn't what solved the math equations. There had to be something missing. It has to be the extra dimension. Okay.