Hypersonics, Plasma Mirrors, & Direct Energy Conversion
Summary
Analysis of Ashton Forbes video 'Hypersonics, Plasma Mirrors, & Direct Energy Conversion' (Video ID: Dh0frrR2SZc). Transcript length: 15084 words. Primary topics: MH370, military_tech, government, physics.
Key Claims (4)
Discussion of MH370 topics
Evidence: Video transcript analysis
Discussion of military tech topics
Evidence: Video transcript analysis
Discussion of government topics
Evidence: Video transcript analysis
Discussion of physics topics
Evidence: Video transcript analysis
Video Details
- Published
- December 13, 2025
- Duration
- 1h 38m
- Views
- 6,403
- Claims Extracted
- 4
- Theories
- 2
- References
- 2
People Mentioned
Video Transcript
# Hypersonics, Plasma Mirrors, & Direct Energy Conversion Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. [music] When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest can [music] even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably [music] question those in authority. When clutching our horoscopes our critical [music] faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back [music] into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay [music] of substantive content in the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest [music] common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience and superstition, [music] but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. [music] Those were among his final published. He died 10 months later. Here we are 25 years later realizing [music] just what he was trying to tell us back then. Malaysian 370 contact switch 120 decimal 9. Good night. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with [music] 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [music] >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government, >> why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? Our technologies permit us to [music] manipulate time and space. >> What Americans distance [music] annihilate? >> This country is very powerful. [music] >> Far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has [music] any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. I remember the line [music] from Hindu scripture [music] is trying to persuade the prince that [music] he should do his duty and to impress [music] him takes on his multi-armed form and says [music] now I am become death the destroyer of worlds. [music] I suppose we all thought that one way or another. Welcome everybody. TGIF. Thank god it's Friday guys. Got another big show for you guys here today. We are going to be talking about hypersonics, magneto hydrodnamics, directed energy conversion, and of course, my favorite topic, a neutronic fusion. I found a bunch of scientific papers to go over. So, we're going to be going over all that today. Uh, we're going to have a relaxing day. And just spoiler, just during the intro, I found a video from a Lockheed Martin engineer that hopefully we have some time to take a look at that as well because it's actually related to one of the papers that I found in here. Okay. Should we even talk politics today? [snorts] You know, I put a couple notes down here and now I'm just thinking we might just skip past it. Honestly, it's weird because I'm actually starting to feel bad for like the low IQ conspirator people. I can't believe this is actually happening, but I've been watching Ian Carol just get dogwalked all across the internet for the last three days by, you know, uh, guys with purple hearts, people that produce ammo for a living and Nick Fuentes multiple times, just destroying them. And I think we finally hit that inflection point where people have had enough. People have had enough. You know, Candice and these guys, they're doing what the debunkers on Reddit said that I was doing. They they claimed that I was doing, you know, hurting the families. Erica Kirk has come out and said, "Please stop." Meanwhile, they're like literally asking for the secret burial site of Charlie Kirk. You know, it's just it's gotten so weird at this point where now even normal people have had enough and they're speaking out. So, I don't even feel the need to talk about it. The only reason why I'm even bringing it up is because I was literally like the first person to speak out against this and I got viciously attacked by people over it. You're going to look so dumb, Ashton, in the future. Of course, I wasn't going to. It was absurd on its face. The worst part was like nothing even made sense about the conspiracy and it just kept morphing into a more and more ridiculous thing. And now we're just at the point where the only thing left is this idea of could the bullet have shot through his neck? Bullets do crazy things, chat. Okay, there we addressed the uh political elephant in the room. One more thing I want to address here in the chat. Actually, two more things. One is an announcement and one is something else I've seen going around on social media, which is I posted about it. I don't know why everybody's spamming me about it, but this author wrote this book called Hush. And in the book, he's talking about MH370. when he's talking about the MH370 videos. So, I see Money Penny out there promoting him as a whistleblower or something like that and everybody's wondering, Ashton, what's your opinion? So, I'm going to lay it down for you guys right now. I have distanced myself from Money Penny because she does the same kind of sensationalist content that I don't like from Ian Carol and Candace Owens. And I could be taking that CELIC guy's book and go, "Look, this confirms all my stuff. Look, guys." But that's not reality. Reality is that guy saw my work. He saw the videos and he chose to write a story about it. That's almost certainly what happened. I seriously doubt he has any insider information. And the one name of the guy that he references as being the pilot that he knows about, where is that guy? Is that even a real person? That's the guy that would be the whistleblower, not the guy writing a fictionalized novel. So, I'm not going to jump in on any of the sensationalist stuff that's getting pushed out there around MH370, around the videos or what have you. If real whistleblowers want to talk to me, people that have actually been on the inside that know about Gorgon Stair, then those people should reach out to me and we can set something up. Absolutely. But I don't want to talk to an author of a book that wrote a fiction novel that it seems like it's based on my work specifically because one of the sentences is directly lifted from the letter to Ashton Forbes. Now, I don't cop I don't own that because I didn't make it. So, I can't sue him for copyright or anything like that. He has every right to use it just as anybody else does. So, there's your answer on the MH370 situation. Have I spoken to Eric Hecker? Yes, I've spoke. Hey, Ocean, how do you not know this? Have I spoken to Eric Hecker? Yes, I've spoken to pretty much everybody out there. No, I haven't spoken to Robert Temple. There's a few people that I'd like to talk to, but the reality, guys, is that I do a nineto-five job. I had a hard week this week. I'm wiped out right now. So, it's hard to find time to do all this extracurricular stuff and do all these podcasts and talk to people, but I will be reaching out to some of those people. And I do have a pretty exciting um podcast interview set up. Not confirmed yet, but likely set up. So, more to come on that. Now, let's go start talking about the science a little bit. I posted a Witcher clip yesterday because I was in my own fields. I think that's what the kids say. You're in your fields. Something like that. And I was just sitting there thinking about how messed up the world is. And it reminded me of this scene from Witcher season 1, which is like really the only season that's worth watching if you're going to watch the Witcher show. And in it, they just escaped from this situation where they were going to be murdered and they get out of it luckily because they basically are able to sigh up the guy into um the elves into, you know, not hurting them. And the bard starts singing a song about it and he starts making up a fake story so that it's more, you know, uh, exciting, a better story to sell to the people. And Geralt says, you know, that's not how it went down. What happened to your respect? And he says, respect doesn't make history. Respect doesn't make history, chat. basically a nod to the idea that history is written by the victors. We decide what the history is. And I every time I think about that and I I remember watching that predating MH370 on the videos. Every time I watch that now, I think about the videos. I think about MH370. I think about how easy it was for them to hide all this fusion research. And this is all going to be relevant for the show for tonight because there's so much science that people ask me, Ashton, how do you know the videos are real? Well, I think the easiest way to solve that to to answer that for you is to say I started to dig into the science of the videos. And I found so much evidence for them being real that I actually started to be build a whole timeline for when they developed this technology, the basis for it, going all the way back to fusion bomb research, even potentially figuring out before that it might be connected to the Nazis. So, I can draw a direct line from the 60s to 2014 when the planes disappearing and the evolution of this fusion technology up until that point. So, how do I know it's real? Well, that's how I know it's real. If if the videos were fake, you're certainly not going to uncover a mountain of research about air breathing magneto hydronamics and a neutronic fusion propulsion and direct energy conversion and magnetic mirrors and everything that's required for those orbs to exist. And it's just all right out there. So, you see all that evidence and you go, "Well, okay, this is proof that there really is this physics that we think of as UFO or alien physics or whatever you want to call it. It's out there." And so, I go back to the Witcher episode and when the bard replies back to him and he says, "Respect doesn't make history." My favorite scene in the whole show. Geralt sits there and thinks about it and looks around almost like he's observing his whole universe, his whole reality. And he is seeing how fake everything is. And he's seeing how the world that we perceive that everybody collectively perceives is not the world as it really is. And what does he do? He size. He size and he just keeps marching forward. Doesn't that just fit? That fits exactly with how I feel on MH370. I go, "Holy they were able to hide all this fusion research and it's just all right out there." And they were even doing sketchy stuff like this is a real story I'm about to tell you here. They built a magnetic mirror machine in like 1986 to test literally the technology of the orbs to produce fusion in a magnet in a in a mirror system. And they cancelled all research into it before it right before it was finished. They canceled all research in a field reverse configuration and all the fusion stuff that we now know is real from the MH370 videos. So so absurd that the day after they completed the mirror device, the magnetic mirror reactor thing, they shut it down. Never was ever used, not even once. You just think about that and you go, "Holy crap. Somebody actively made a decision that we are going to hide and suppress this technology." They knew it worked. They knew it worked. You got to have somebody from the DOE try to convince me that they were making an honest assessment when they scrapped field reverse configuration. When they scrapped everything related to a neutronic fusion, when they literally shut down one of their own experiments right before it was about to be finished and start producing experimental results. Guys, somebody made that decision. And we only know this for a fact because we're watching these autonic fusion plasma orbs spinning around MH370 and zapping out of the sky in a US covert operation, which basically blows up the whole cover up. Says, "Yep, all those hypersonic air breathing magneto hydrodnamic stuff, it works. It works. And we must have known it works because people say, "Hey, why are they testing this orb technology on this plane? Why are they testing this on this civilian airliner?" And I go, "Oh, sweet summer child. So naive. So naive. You just probably got red pill last week, huh? Oh, no. No, no, no, no, no. We're not testing this on a civilian airliner, chat. There's not that is not a test that is being done to MH370. That is not an experiment. Whatever they're doing to that plane with those orbs, that's been tested hundreds of times. That's not You don't start zapping Boeing 7s. You start small and you work your way up. So there is systematic cover up. [snorts] And before you start telling me, Ashton, oh, this is illegal. This is illegal. Like, you're blowing the lid off this whole thing. Realize Errol of Riia. He looks around and he realizes there's nothing he can do to change the circumstances of his world, of his reality. That's how I feel as well. Truthfully, every day I wake up and I go, I know about teleportation and free energy and literal clean fusion that will change how we're going to produce energy forever. And I live in a world where that's being actively suppressed from humans, which I barely even consider myself to be one of at this point. And then I go work my pretty much meaningless job at my meaningless life all to support this illusion that's being propped up that will take a psychological toll on literally anybody. Anybody. And that's why I say much in the same vein that there's currently this woke right war going on [snorts] that this community needs to be intellectuals. I only want to cater to people that are intellectuals, people that can psychologically keep it together because you have to be extremely strong willed to even be aware of this information and not let it completely consume you. Not let it completely consume you. In fact, I think it does consume many of the very engineers that work on it. Now, that being said, what do I have for you guys tonight? Let's give you guys some papers. Let's give you guys some more scientific papers. I'm actually rolling through these scientific papers like they're just like uh Mentos at this point. Just popping them. They're the fresh maker. I feel like I'm reading the matrix at this point. We've just gotten to that that level. I think when it comes to this uh research where, you know, I still don't understand every aspect of all the papers that I find here, but a lot of them still make a you know, they're starting to make a lot of sense. And I want to just start by highlighting this paper called an Ajax technology advanced single stage to orbit design concept. The reason why is one of my absolute favorite black project engineers when it comes to personality. He's number one. Paul Sizz right there. Paul Dr. Paul St. Louis University. Also David Froonian just happens to be on this paper as well. These are two guys that we pretty much talk about all the time regarding gravity manipulation technology, air breathing, magneto hydrodnamics, uh, uh, fusion propulsion. So, you've got all the right people here. And we've got this guy named Dr. R. Boyd from Loheed Martin Skunk Works also working on this with these guys. So, we've got David Froining. We've got Paul Sizz. Paul Sizz like it's hard to know exactly where these guys rank because in the black project world you're only known about by other black project engineers. But if I had to guess Paul Sizz while he was alive may have been the world's leading expert in hypersonics. That's the feeling that I get. If he wasn't the world's leading experts he's certainly like top five in the world in the entire world. I've never seen air breathing magneto hydrodnamics and fume propulsion than what I've seen from pulses by anybody. It's not even close. So they talk about this Russian project, this Ajax project that they were kind of stealing from that the United States was stealing from, but essentially all they were doing here was they were trying to turn a traditional ramjet scramjet engine into a heat exchange using electromagnetism. So if you actually look into how jet engines operate and how they work, it's all about moving the air through the turbine in a very complex way so that it doesn't melt the the rotors and all this other stuff. So what they're essentially trying to do when they convert when we make these plasma drones is what we say is instead of all those rotors and metal parts inside, we're just going to use magnets. That's it. We'll have a laser shoot forward and ionize or pre-ionize the air to turn the air into a plasma. And then we're going to have a tube and then we're going to have magnets, cusps, magnets. And the magnets will just slow down particles that try to flow through the tube. Just like if you're making a fire hose and you get why do we get all that pressure from the hose? Because at the end we make a little nozzle and we make a hose. So in our plasma configuration though, what we're doing is we're trapping it within the interior of our orb. And so we have m we have mirrors on either side so that when the particles come in, they get trapped in here and that the only thing that can escape is the x-rays or whatever we want to escape and then we can accelerate or decelerate those particles as necessary within our trapped plasma system. This is the essence of a air breathing magnetohydrodnamic fusion system. Magneto-hydrodnamic just means controlling plasma with electromagnetism or you can just think of electromagnetism as magnetism if it makes it easier for you. So that's what the idea of this paper is is an advanced concept here. Now he goes through how it's set up and I think that my favorite image is this one here. You actually can see this in some of his other works for Paul Sizz. But what you see here is essentially this is just like a tube. It's just a tube and they're just having the air get compressed through this tube and then they put these magnets along the edges of it. I think they alternate in magnetic field too though that may not be like a thing that's stuck in uh set in stone. Um so let's see what did I want to discuss related to this. I don't want to go too much related to this, but let me just read the conclusion for you guys here because I think this lays out what he's getting at here. The idea of creating a virtual aerospace craft with respect uh with respect with respect to the flow field around the vehicle and the engine performance prevents represents a basic change in aircraft design, excuse me, philosophy. Traditionally, the environment through which the aircraft to fly is defined. And then the aircraft is designed to operate in that environment. The higher the speed, the more difficult it is to define the flight environment and simulate in test flights to verify the design. As speed increases, more performance is necessary by all elements compromise or comprising the aircraft design concept. Cost and technical risk increase. The virtual aircraft approach is different in that the environment is changed to accommodate the aircraft. Wow. Wow. What is Paul Sizz saying right there? I mean, he's being very explicit. What Paul Sizz is saying there is he's actually making a general relativity argument. Paul is saying if you were to accelerate something like this top to my soda, the more I accelerate this, the faster I speed this up, the heavier it gets and the harder it gets to accelerate. And he's saying the faster I fly my craft, the more we have to work on the structural design because otherwise it's going to rip apart. So he says there's another way to think about it. Don't think about changing the design of the craft. Think about changing the design of the environment of the environment. Now, if you know Paul Sizz and you know his work on hypersonics, you know exactly what he's talking about. He's talking about using cold plasmas to reduce drag. This is exact. This is real. By the way, people think that I'm bullshitting, but if you just fact check me, you would find that probably almost everything I'm saying is 100% true. They use something called a plasma sheath. Imagine that our Boeing 77 is actually a fighter craft, a spy hypersonic spider fighter craft. They use a plasma sheath. They shoot a laser in front of the craft to make a sheath. And the plasma sheath reduces the drag. Reduces the drag means reduces the stress on the plane. Exactly what Paul S is talking about. Why? Why does a plasma sheath reduce the drag? Why does that and why does that reduce the friction of the craft? Because you're modulating you're modifying the environment. You're modifying the environment. And the moment that they figured out that the plasma sheath is is making your craft easier to move, okay, make it a plasma bubble now. Even better. Now we can move 360° any direction we want to go. Just aim the laser where you want to go. Simple as that. In fact, in here, here you go. This is actually what I remembered I wanted to say. Listen to this. I'm glad I mentioned that. Here we go. The technologies incorporated in the design concept include a magneto hydrodronamic generator to extract power from the air entering the engine, a neutron beam to increase conductivity of the flow entering the engine, an MHD accelerator in series with the MHD generator to bypass energy around the combuster and return the energy to the exhaust of the engine. a cold plasma beam or air spike to interact with the flow field ahead of the aircraft and electromagnetic fields and microwave energy to modify the flow around the aircraft. And there's your design right there. There's your image. These guys, can you believe this? These guys were literally working on the precursors to the orbs in the MH370 videos. This is the precursor. The image you see here of a traditional flight craft. Mm- mm. Once your object is covered by plasma and once you realize there's no reason to have a person inside of the craft, once we can make a drone out of it, now this thing can become much, much smaller. Uh he also mentions somewhere in here. Yeah, there you Oh crap. Did you see that? Drag and where was that last part? There drag and heat transfer reduction is obtained by using a combination of magnetic fields, cold plasmas and microwaves. Um what was the other thing I was this somewhere he mentions? I just lost my train of thought. Okay, let me finish reading this part here and we'll come back to that. Okay, it has been proposed to change the operating environment by using a combination of magnetic fields, plasmas, and RF energy sources. To change the environment around the aircraft, it is necessary to make the flow conducting. The flow must be conducting to change the environment. So, you need to create an electrostatic bubble. This is a key requirement of the system. How it is to be done and the level of conductivity is needed is a question yet to be defined. The engine of the Ajac uses an MHD energy bypass system to control the velocity, the speed in the engine combuster. So this is what they're doing. This this bypass system controls the speed in your combuster in your engine. An MHD generator is used to extract energy from the flow entering the engine, thereby slowing the speed of the air entering the engine combuster. Flow through the combuster is maintained at subsonic speed. By maintaining subsonic flow in the combuster, performance of a ramjet rather than a scramjet engine is obtained. So what they're saying here is by doing this we can actually improve the efficiency of the engine. The ramjet produces a higher level of performance than a scramjet engine is much easier to design and build. And then I just said the thing about the cold plasmas. Okay. Drag reduction did not show a performance advantage based on the representation used for the cold plasma drag reduction system. In this study, the cold plasma trade case was preferred to the air spike trade case. However, little is known about the phenomen phenomenology of cold plasmas at this time. Both NASA and the Air Force are currently investigating cold plasmas. A close look at the comparison of the ideal velocity requirements for both designs indicates that drag losses were not a significant factor compared to the NASA to the allaxis bre. So there you go. He's talking about coal plasmas right here as well. Okay. So I wanted to show that paper. Let me show another one. Uh, which one do I want to show next? You can see I've got some good stuff here for us. This one. Oh, I remembered superconducting or magnet. Let me see. I think he says somewhere in this paper that the significant factor is the weight of the magnets. Yep, here it is. Right here. Oh, found it. Found it. Listen to this. The heaviest component of the system is the superconducting coil magnets which surround the MHD channels. Some of these I feel like are like unless you're a super follower, you probably don't understand the significance, but here you go. One of the connections that I think only I've put together, maybe some other people have put together, but from an influencer standpoint, I mean, from people that have over a 100,000 followers, let's say, on social media, I'm the only one that's put together that superconducting magnets are a requirement for this MHD fusion propulsion. And this is why Ning Lee and Eugene Popclanov, this is why they became so interested or they became so popular in the '9s. They were testing with superconducting magnets and they were seeing some of the effects that the US Department of Energy already knew about and and they knew that they could take these superconducting magnets potentially these new YBCO superconducting magnets and they would be lighter. they might be lighter because the key factor is that the magnets are the heaviest part of the apparatus. So if the magnets can get lighter then that changes everything about the design. So if there was a major breakthrough in superconducting magnets especially ones that can be molded that is something that would have enabled the fusion orbs now all of a sudden become something that we can produce humans can produce. So, why is that significant? Because these papers are about to roll from one into the next. Get ready. What's this? Take a look at this paper right here. Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 1967. So, we're starting to get to the point in this investigation, guys, where now I'm starting to make sense of these old scientific papers. These old scientific papers that are like from the 70s and the 60s that I didn't really understand the significance of. Now, I know exactly what the hell they're hiding. They are hiding a neutronic directed energy fusion conversion. They figured it out from inertial confinement fusion. And there's breadcrumbs everywhere in these old scientific papers. I mean, look at what this one is called right here. Superconductive magnets at the Lewis Research Center for NASA, 1967. They were researching superconducting magnets in 1967. Well, we're about to find out. What do you guys think? go ahead and speculate in the chat what you guys think they were uh looking into with these superconducting magnets in 1967 and we'll take a look here together. Okay, the announcement that I was going to say is that I've decided this weekend. I'm going to make a martini. It's by the way it's like zero degrees outside. I pretty much just want to wrists myself at this point. Zero degrees outside. Freezing cold out. Lulu doesn't care. I can't even stay outside for five minutes. I'm gonna make myself a martini. I'm gonna write up the final arrow submission. I'm finally ready. I'm finally ready to do the final arrow submission. You guys say, "Ashen, I thought you submitted the arrow thing like a year ago." Yeah, I probably should have submitted it like a year ago, but there was always just more stuff coming up. But now I know where I want to lie, where I want to direct the blame related to MH370. It's about Sierra Nevada Corporation, Gorgon Stair, a neutronic fusion propulsion, the Manhattan project, the fusion bomb, all that stuff. That's where I want to lay the blame. And I'm going to direct Arrow to Lawrence Livermore, direct them to Loheed Martin Skunk Works, direct them to these scientific papers that we're looking at right here. self because I hear Congress like Tim Berchett and Eric Berles sitting here talking about we've seen stuff and we can't talk about it and the people deserve to know. You're right. The people deserve to know. They deserve to know and they deserve to not be getting gaslit about alien They deserve to not be getting gas lit about alien when the reality of the disclosure topic is about free energy. Free energy for the world. If you were really just to boil it down to just one simplified explanation, it's about free energy. Yes, aliens are probably real, but that pales in comparison to literal free energy for the world and everything that you can do with free energy, which is everything. You can do everything with free energy, including teleport things. So, I actually took some notes on this one for you guys. You're in luck. I don't know how I had time to do all this. I was just This paper is amazing. Um, how am I going to do this? I think I'll just like Google to the part. Take a look at this. Studies have shown that for such possible space applications as magneto-hydrodnamic power generation and thermonuclear power generation and propulsion, the only practical solution to the required magnetic fields is the superconductive magnet. Boom. Drop the mic. Boom. We're out. We're out. Mom spaghetti chat. Knees weak. Arms uh sweaty. Mom spaghetti. Done. 1967. 1967 says right there, you need superconducting magnets if you want to pull this off. Wow. Okay. I mean, when I start reading these papers, there's like five more moments like this in this paper alone. And now we can understand why this is important. But we can only understand it now having learned what we've learned over the last two years uh reading these scientific papers, understanding this context. Now we understand why this is important. Now we understand why they were writing papers like this in 1967. Okay. So it says as NASA's primary space propulsion and research laboratory, the Lewis research center is especially interested in the development of superconductive magnets. Of course we were. Of course, we were interested in superconductive magnets. Take a look at the next one. Forcefree toids. What? Bob, is Bob still in the chat? Is Bob Greener still in the chat? What the 1967 forcefree toids? This I mean just just at a glance it sounds exactly like forcefree time harmonic plasmoids by Jack Nachamkin from the 90s but this is from 1967. What does this say? The concept of a forcefree magnet has been known and used since the early days in the production of high field magnets. Pioneers such as Capita and Croctoff Croc Crocoff used the principle of uniform hydrostatic pressure throughout the magnetic windings. In more recent times, the concept has been used in various laboratories concerning with the construction of highintensity fields of large volume for thermonuclear research. Wow. A toid can be wound so that everywhere the conductor is nearly parallel to the field. In that case, the J * X the the crossroduct of the current times the magnetic field is small and therefore is a reduced force on the conductor. I'm just looking in the chat because I see Bob Greener in there. So they're talking about forcefree uh forcefree toids here for superconductors. However, there's an advantage of winding the conductor parallel to the local magnetic field. Experiments have shown that superconductors carry more current when placed in longitudinal fields than when placed in traverse fields. Now I highlighted this. I still don't know exactly why this is important but this feels really important because we're talking about longitudinal fields here which is a scalar longitudinal scalar fields are longitudinal in nature and this here when they talk about making them parallel this is exactly what Jack Namkin was talking about in his 1992 paper forcefree time harmonic plasmoids. So it was seems to be implying that there's a higher current when you set this up correctly with superconductors says the critical current is strongly influenced by the angle that the conductor makes with the field. And then near the bottom here, it says, "These and other investigations showed that current enhancement can be as much of a factor of 10 or more. That isn't that an energy amplification factor right there? You can amplify the current by a factor of 10 just by your geometric winding of your superconducting magnet. I mean, this may not be exactly what Salvatore Pais is talking about in his patents, but it seems very close minus the vibration. Okay. Uh, and what else do we have down here? So, let's scroll down a little bit more. We have high field large bowl solenoid. Um, skip through that part. Part I wanted to talk about, where is it? Look at this. Look what we've got here, chat. What? Magnetic bottle. That's the chapter header on this paper. Magnetic bottle. Now, why is that familiar? Um, because I'm literally listening to Lockheed Martin engineers talk about making a compact fusion reactor that's technically a magnetic bottle. [snorts] But now I'm looking at a scientific paper from 1967 where they were talking about using superconducting magnets and making a magnetic bottle. And I can't get out of my mind that Charles Chase, senior fellow at the Loheed Martin Skunkworks Revolutionary Technologies Division, was out there talking about how he was looking for technologies that may have been under underappreciated, underutilized because you could imagine that he might have found something like this. Maybe this exactly magnetic bottle. A system of coils whose combined field is shown in figure 9 was built for plasma containment experiments. The system consists of two mirror coils that produce five Teslas each on the axis of the system and a mirror ratio of 2:1 within the central field. The more uniform central field is provided by inserting a third coil between the two mirror coils as shown in figure 9. In addition, a cusp field is produced by a system of linear conductors equally spaced around the inner diameter of the coil forms. This scheme produces a minimum B field which is more effective than a simple mirror for plasma containment. Holy A magnetic bottle is a plasma is a is a mirror system. A magnetic bottle is a magnetic mirror. That's what he's describing right there. That's what he's describing right there. So, let's go ahead and scroll down and take a look at figure nine because this is pretty much the end. And then you can see the images of or all the references and stuff down here. [snorts] Where are you at? Figure nine. Figure seven, figure eight. Figure nine. Coil A, coil B, coil C. Now when I look at this, I'll tell you exactly what I what I see here. >> [snorts] >> When I look at this image here, I see two end coils and then I can see and imagine a series of coils in between that. And then again, we can now imagine our uh hypersonic craft. Our hypersonic craft is essentially what we see on the screen here. two cusps, one on either end, a series of ring conductors on the inside, and the plasma flows through this in the middle and it fuses in the middle, gets trapped in these magnetic fields that this produces. Let me see. Do I have one more? Okay, one more quote from this. Okay. Where are these magnets? Okay. Here we go. Uh, wait. That's not Is that the right one? Okay. Here we go. Well, okay. Maybe that's not what I wanted. Where is it? Okay, here we go. These magnets and magnetic pairs are being used in solidstate nuclear and plasma physics research. The research as well as the facilities have been described in available NASA publications. These magnets are all examples of a type of lowcost magnetic field equipment which has been made possible by the advent of high field superconductive materials and the consequent elimination of highcost power supply and cooling water supply required by conventional copper magnets. So what they're saying here too is that what this all boils down to is being able to produce lowcost high temperature superconductors. Why? Because it takes a huge amount of energy to cool your superconductors to get them to the superconductive state at very low temperatures. And the materials can be rare. They can be hard to work with. So they can become very expensive. So to me this is direct evidence that you look at this and you say okay well if there was a breakthrough in superconductive materials or research it would have directly impacted the fusion program because right here in both of the papers we just saw the number one factor was available lowcost high temperature superconductors. Now, magnetic mirrors. [clears throat] I think we just saw and just read in that paper one of the first references towards magnetic mirror configurations. Magnetic mirror configurations which is believed that the Loheed Martin compact fusion reactor uses. I would guess all the a neutronic fusion reactors are essentially using some type of mirror configuration. So let me pull up this take a look at this paper and we're going to watch a video now. We're going to switch over to a video experimental and computational results on direct energy conversion for mirror fusion reactors 1977. 1977 written by Robert Moyer, an extremely famous fusion research scientist for the United States government. I'm just going to read the abstract and I'm going to switch over. This paper presents the results of measurements of a space charge effect effects on the efficiency of a direct converter. The device consists of a 22 stage electrostatic periodic focusing direct energy converter, a magnetic expander, and a hydrogen plasma source. At low beam density, the measured average efficiency is roughly 86% as compared with the predicted one of roughly 88%. At high beam density, the measured efficiency decreases with the increasing space charge in agreement with predictions. The effect of space charge is increased if the ion energy is decreased or if the energy distribution is made narrower. Okay. Um take a look at the images of this real quick. This looks very similar to some of the early designs of the helium fusion reactor and the autronic fusion reactors. In fact, take a look at this one. Collector spaces here. So, uh, this I don't know exactly what they're what they're reviewing here. I don't think I read through all of this just yet. Um, but clearly what they're trying to do is they're trying to get electricity directly out of a mere fusion reactor, which sounds very similar if not exactly the same as a neutronic fusion, which is direct energy conversion into electricity. So, we know now, and this was 1977. So we know now that we require these advanced fusion fuels such as helium 3 uh or we you know boron for example. Helium's not mentioned. Is boron mentioned in this paper? No. Okay. So the reason why I found that is actually this video here. Let me pull this back up. This video is fusion master class number four about mirrors by Dr. Matt Moyahan. So, let's take a look at the mirror effect here. >> Uh, essentially two magnetic fields that reflect particles. The reflection occurs because of something called the mirror effect. As a particle moves from a low density magnetic field to a high density magnetic field, it experiences a loren force which causes it to corkcrew around uh the magnetic field line. So you can think of a particle like a just take a typical ion. Imagine it going clockwise around a magnetic field and traveling down this magnetic field which is a low density uh field where the lines are pretty far apart and then the flux and the magnetic field gets tighter and tighter and tighter. And what happens is as that happens the particle starts corkcrewing much faster and the the the the number of turns gets closer together. So it kind of scrunches together as it goes further along. And eventually under certain conditions, the particle will flip directions. The magnetic moment along the line will flip directions and the particle will be reflected off of that magnetic field and continue corkcrewing out uh out into the low density field lines. So I say under certain conditions because the effect doesn't work all the time. If the uh approach of the the helical turn is uh and the high enough pitch angle, it will leak through and holy chat. This is definitely I am I would say what's my percentage? 95% sure this is exactly what's in the orbs and the MH370 videos. The black lines that are coming out of the orbs, they're not solid. They're not solid. It almost looks like someone's got a spray can, like if you would use the paint and you just spray can paint on there. And I think that the reason is because they are controlling whether or not the cusps are closed in the magnetic mirror, whether or not they're going to allow the particles to escape. And so if they allow them to escape, then they're winding. and they're helically winding like he says and they're going faster and faster and faster and they're escaping out the front or out the back out either side. They can control which side they they come out of. So what you've got is you've got these particles coming in and then they're getting trapped in here and they're getting trapped because of the cusp. What's happening is he's saying is that what you do as you cusp you you squeeze the openings of the either side down and you make it more bulbous in the middle. And by doing this, when the particles approach that cusp, they have to they have to squeeze down and they get faster and faster and faster. What happens is some of them reflect back. This is your magnetic mirror. This is why it's a magnetic mirror because the configuration itself causes the particles to not escape and to bounce back. So then all you would have to do to control this is basically change the size of your cusp on either side just actively change your cusp just like a fire hose determine the pressure you want to shoot out or block it off entirely. The way they model this is they have something called a loth cone. So it's a three-dimensional representation in mathematical space of particles and things inside the lost cone have a high enough pitch angle that they get lost. things outside the lost cone are not lost and they are reflected. So that's a mirror coil. It's essentially in the most basic sense the basic magnetic mirror is think of a coil a ring a magnetic ring that gets tighter as you get to the end of the mirror causing that low density to high density transition where particles are easily contained and then they go to the mirror and they get reflected and they get sent back. And you put two of those coils facing each other. And essentially, you've got particles that bounce off one mirror, go across the machine, bounce off the other side, go across the machine, bounce off the other side. And they bounce back and forth and back and forth. And as they crisscross in the center, they hopefully collide and fuse. That's the basic concept of a mirror machine. I mean, chat, this is what we're looking at in the MAG. How many foreign intelligence agencies are watching this right now? I actually want to know chat if you are a foreign intelligence agency with the People's Republic of China or with the Russian Federation or you're with North Korea or if you are with Iran. Rest in peace for your nuclear scientists. Put a put a one in the chat. I just want to know. I want to get some representation of what we got out there. Um but by the way, yes, this is what our secret plasma orbs are using. Yes, indeed. This is exactly it. So, when I'm showing you these videos of these uh MH3270 videos, I mean, you can pretty much just tell by looking at it. That's clearly what we're looking at here. Like, you see those dark black lines coming out of it. Like, that's where the shit's shooting out of the front of those. They've got a m They've got a magnetic cusp on either side. And they can control one end or the other whether or not something comes out. And you see the bulbous plasma. Why it's why it's circular? It's circular because what we just looked at right here, like that's why right there. There you go. Anyway, I appreciate it. And you know, look, look, Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, whatever. I helped you out, man. You don't need to orb me. You don't need to zap me with a directed energy weapon or whatever other weird voodoo quantum you got. I'm a chill guy. I'm a chill guy. I have got no ill will towards you. And look, I helped you out with all this info. So, you know, get me that Scarlett Johansson clone. I never said it had to be the United States that does it. North Korea, you probably got like no rules against cloning. You know, just steal a piece of Scarlett Johansson's hair, clone her, make her a little bit less liberal, a little bit less of a hoe, and there we go. Perfect. Perfect for me. Just saying. Just throwing it out there. Look, the United States has not reached out to me in two years. So, they clearly don't care. That's the only conclusion I can come to is they don't care. They don't care their super orb technology is being exposed. Okay. Two magnetic coils that face one another uh and and have plasma bounce back and forth between the two in a linear facet fashion with stuff colliding in the center uh and hopefully fusing. I just don't get this is where like I've been watching this the other day and I'm just sitting here like Charles Chase figured this all out for Loheed Martin like 10 years ago. It's does somehow doesn't go public. People are sitting here looking at trialpha energy and helium fusion which is basically doing this as well and they're all wondering why is trialpha energy why is helium fusion have so many billions of dollars of investment? How have they been running and not losing money since like 1998 I think is when Tri Alpha Energy started. Well, I'll tell you why. Because a decent amount of people know that this is the secret to make Fusion work. A lot of people know and they are not throwing their money away investing in those companies. In fact, I'd be surprised if Trialpha Energy doesn't have a few secret government project contracts as well. I'd be very surprised. I mean, how are they making money? You can't run a business for 20 years, losing money, and still have people invest in you. It doesn't work that way. So, yes, something is a miss. >> Some of the bigger machines were about the size of a school bus. >> Okay, we're going to go a little bit that Dick Post proposed in uh the late 1960s. So, he was at Livermore and this uh event, his proposal collided with the oil crisis in 1972. Carter Carter administration uh was suddenly hit with a major problem when OPEC decided to cut off supplies as protest >> and baseball one was one attempt to do that. Americans built it in test. I do want to point this out. the geometry, the geometry of the baseball design, the middle one, very similar to what um Paul Tibido, this idea that you must have antiparallel, you must have antiparallel motion is actually highly represented in the baseball design because if you actually look at the relative motion of the fields, you're going to see that they're pretty much trying to maximize how often the fields are aligned. against one another for maximum relativistic motion. But apparently we ended up moving towards the Russian design here of these loft bars. Now what does this look like? The loft bars here look just like the wormhole. Look just like what we did to MH370. In fact, you could pretty much argue that the bars are the hyper cylinders. The bars are the hyper cylinders around the craft and you've got two rings, one on either end and that's how you're making your wormhole and you're kind of cut and pasting. I just thought that was interesting comparison at the time. Um, the Russians developed something called bars. I bars were an evolution over the baseball coil and we're probably showing a picture of that. Uh, the Americans got that techn and he's the author of over 180 papers. Uh, and he was the right-hand man of Edward Teller like I said. >> Okay. This is how I found Moyer. Ralph Moyer, not Robert. Dr. Ralph Moyer, the righthand man of Edward Teller. Okay. Anybody that's anybody whose description is the right-hand man of Edward Teller, yeah, you're about to get a lot of scrutiny from Ashton Forbes. You're about to get a lot of scrutiny from Ashton Forbes. Why? Because that environmental and computational results of direct energy conversion for mirror fusion reactors was written by this guy right here, Ralph Moyer. This is the guy that wrote that paper about the fusion mirror reactors. And I'm just gonna say highly suspect, highly highly suspect right now of of Edward Teller. There's basically no way Edward Teller wasn't involved in the cover up of this fusion. In fact, he might have been the guy making the decisions. He might have been the guy at the top deciding what was going to be covered up and what wasn't and has all kinds of exotic and fun stories about Edward Teller. Edward Teller believed uh that if he put himself in barometric chambers, he could extend his life or fight his disease. So he he would go to his chat. Did he just drop a like this interview was crazy. He says Edward Teller believed he could extend his life in bare hyperaric chambers. I literally was joking about this, but it's real. I was joking saying that these guys are like putting themselves in hyperbaric chambers and living to like 95 years old because they're all like 90 and life expectancy in the United States is like 75 years old at if you're at best. They were quite literally putting themselves in hyperbear chambers. I'm going to probably put myself in hyperar time chamber. I mean, bro, let's just look like this. If Edward Teller was doing it, there's probably at least at a minimum an element of truth to it. At a bare minimum, these guys understood zero point energy. They understood gravity better than anybody in their time. And there'd be a barometric chamber out in front of his lawn with uh gas cylinders around. And this was like in the early 2000s uh towards the end of his life. Uh but he has some very kooky uh kooky things and kooky stories around him. And Ralph Moyer was was there to see all these things. Um so William Piggles and Ralph Moyer worked on an approach called uh an energy capture approach called directed uh direct energy conversion direct holy chat. My mind is blowing right now. Did we just stumble upon the literal payload here? We just hit the jackpot. This is the guy that pioneered directed energy conversion. Let's go. Oh my goodness. Christmas came early. Now you understand why the topic of tonight's live stream says mirror mirror uh reactors and directed energy conversion. We just found the guy that pioneered directed energy conversion, Ralph Moyer. Nobody even knows who he is, but he's a famous physicist. Okay, let's go. >> Conversion is an exciting idea where material coming off a fusing plasma is at a very high potential energy because it's so hot. The helium ion that just came off the reaction is really really hot. >> The the helium ion keep going. So if you fire a beam of particles at a piece of metal that's just coming off a fusion reactor reaction um it creates a very high potential energy in one spot. So 30 million or 3 million excuse me uh electron volts is a good rule of thumb for this. So direct conversion basically harnesses this capability as a energy conversion approach. Particles come off they hit the metal at at some point um excuse me back up. particles come off, you apply magnetic and electric fields to sort of beat them into submission. So you kind of columnate them, get them going in the right direction, and maybe do some sort of charge separation so you have just the positives or just the negatives and then fire them into a metal. >> He's like this. We're like, can you you notice how every topic is going tonight from one to the next? I'm so glad I did it in this order because now when he's explaining this, you should in your mind be imagining the orbs, imagining a tube with superconducting magnets on it. And you've got your charged particles flowing through it. That's what he's saying here. Like these guys, like obviously the stuff is real. These guys were working on it back in the 60s and the 70s. They're working on direct energy conversion, plasma fusion propulsion, all of the baselines for everything that we now know is real. But the public still has no idea. Even right now in 2025, no idea. All you have to do is have your charged particles run into a plate. It's that simple. Have your charged particles hit a plate and what's going to happen? It's going to push you. It's just going to push. It's called momentum. It's called movements. That's it. So yes, you can very very very easily take a neutronic fusion and convert it into propulsion. by simply having your charged particles hit a plate. I'm sure there's even easier ways to do it or more efficient, smarter ways to do it, but just from a very simple standpoint wall. And what happens is that point on the metal wall is held at a high voltage, which means that you have a 3 million volt point in an electrical circuit that's consistent and steady and that allows for current to flow elsewhere in the circuit. So that's the concept. That's direct conversion. You have material coming off ions at a high voltage, high potential energy. It's kind of beat into submission and columnated. It goes into a wall. It creates a point that's 3 million degrees 3 million volts and that allows for electrical current flow elsewhere in the circuit. So that's the basic idea. It's a very interest. And he he even mentioned non-equilibrium. None equilibrium is separating positive or minus charges out and keeping them separated. And he mentioned that he said well you would probably separate the positive and minus charges. He's talking about non-equilibrium and that's what David Kirkley even talks about. He says you can even get higher efficiencies if you take your plasma and you make it go non-equilibrium and you keep it stable like that where the charges are separated which is almost certainly why we're seeing the heat signature in the plasma orbs because they've separated the charge in those orbs. That's what they're doing there. Which is like another reason why like this whole presentation we're watching here is about magnetic mirrors and we're looking at one. We're literally looking at it >> idea. Livermore developed it. >> Oh, here it is. This is how I found the paper. There it is right there. >> Part of the the tanmir >> direct conversion of plasma energy to electricity for mirror fusion reactors >> experiment. TMXU >> 1974. Is that even the same one? Wait, is that even the same one? That's actually a different one. The one I was looking at is 1977. And this one's a different one >> upgrade uh in 1978,79 80 81 82 that sort of time frame. Um and the way they did was they started with just a particle beam. So they created a test setup where they had a particle beam going into a piece of metal and then they applied all these um plates that had charges on them to redirect your machine doing fusion and collecting this material uh in one place. So two things that were exciting about that work. one, they showed a 47% inversion efficiency. >> I mean, you look at this, look how similar this is to the hypersonic design. How similar it is to the compact fusion reactor. They're basically just separating the electrons, which are blue in the image that you see here, from the ions and from the neutral particles. And you can see that you've got these collectors which presumably are just superconducting magnets that are controlling the motion of the electrons and the ions keeping them separated. That's it. Which is really incredible when you think about power plants today. A typical power plant today is 25% to 60%. Maybe the world >> and he says this research in the 70s they were getting 40 to 50% efficiency from doing this with fusion. 40 to 50% efficiency in the 70s guys. So 50 years ago they were getting 40 to 50% direct energy conversion efficiency. [snorts] We only get 20 to 25% efficiency from power plants today right now. So even in the 70s they were had proven experimental results showing double the efficiency of our best power production today. The question people should be wondering, and I made a post about this, is how absurd it is that we're going to be running advanced AI data centers essentially off of steam power. Like, we're living in cyberpunk world where we still rock steam power with our quantum computers. We run our quantum computers off steam power instead of just direct energy conversion into electricity which is like three to four times more efficient. Three to four times more efficient. By the way, we've upped that now. David Kirkley is saying that our direct energy conversion is like 90% efficiency. Now 90 to 100% efficiency. World's most efficient gas plants are 60%. So a 47% conversion of of energy is incredible. Now >> this is the last >> to do experiments of all >> the magnetic mirror test facility. I couldn't believe there was a story like this. Here it is >> kinds MFTtf was the largest machine ever built and it was finished in 1986 under the Reagan administration. And when Reagan came in in 1980, you know, his philosophy was um the biggest problem is government. Government is the problem. And what he meant by that was that he wanted to uh simplify and strip away a lot of big government programs that he didn't think the government the the country was really benefiting from. And one of them was the fusion program and principle among that was the mirror program. So this was a technical down select uh that the nation was making and it killed off technical down select. That's what we're calling it. Okay. So 1980s roll up. Reagan comes in and he's anti- big government. So he comes in says we got to cut all this government stuff. So what do you guys think they cut? What do you guys think they cut? Chat, anyone want to guess in the chat? [snorts] Five, four, three, two, one. [laughter] Let's find out. >> Not just mirrors, but also F FRC research and pinch research and other fusion research programs from around the country at various universities and national labs. I'm going to crash out. I'mma lose my effing right now. I can't believe what I just heard. They not only killed mirror fusion research, but it also killed all field reverse configuration research and pinch research. [snorts] No way, chat. No way. Is Reagan still alive, chat? Didn't he die? I I'm gonna lose my Who do I Who do I punish for this? Who do I punish for this, chat? No, he died like 20 years ago. Is Reagan's ghost out there? I'm gonna haunt somebody, chat. If the CIA takes me out, I am going to find all the people that threw away field reverse configuration research and Zpinch research and mirror research. I'm going to haunt the out of those people. I'm going to haunt them like I'm in uh one of those uh movies, The Conjuring. I'm gonna haunt the crap out of these people. So all of the research that we know now, we only we know now is legit because we've got Sam Ultman investing hundreds of millions of dollars in Helium Fusion and they've already got deals signed with Microsoft. Nobody even knows how their works and they've already got deals signed with Microsoft, which by the way, Microsoft has been chilling with Helian Fusion the whole time throughout their reactor cycles and their prototypes. They know all about what they're doing. So Microsoft's not going into an a deal with Helium Fusion without knowing what they're doing. So now we know all that was the right thing we should have been doing. And instead, what did we do? We invested in metal donuts. We're the Dunkin Donuts of metal doughut fusion reactors that have never done that have never done anything. We got a whole bunch of useless, obsolete metal donuts that we can't even eat when we should be having magical floating Jarvis plasma balls that I can talk to and interact with and fall in love with with AI personalities and stuff like that. They took so much from us, chat. Never forget what they took from us. Uh, and in one of my podcast episodes, if you check it out, the fusionpodcast.com, I interviewed Dr. Robert Terry, who was uh, at NRL at the time and talks about this. He said he was at the APS meeting and the Department of Energy showed up and essentially said, "We are going to down select to tokamax uh, and ICF and he was of the opinion, Chad, I'm going to go postal. I'm going to go straight up postal." I can't believe the words that just came out of my man's mouth. We're going to down select to tokamax. This is like making everybody drive around in one of those Aztec cars that was like the ugliest car ever that nobody wanted to drive. This would be like making a mandate where you know what every car that looks good. Nah. Ferrari, nope. Not allowed to have it. Porsche. Uh-uh. None of that. Chevy Aztecs for everybody. Aztecs and scions for everybody. Everybody's cars got to look like a piece of crap that doesn't do anything. That's basically what they did, but for fusion research, they cucked us, chat. Yeah, it's PT Cruisers. PT Cruisers for everybody. You want something else? Too bad. You get a PT Cruiser. Enjoy. Enjoy the 20 m per gallon that you get. And that it was the dumbest idea ever. And that they were Fusion was not at a place where technical down selection was a good idea. Uh, and I I tend to agree with that thought. Um there are and this is the weirdest part. So they interviewed the people that were in the room and what were their reactions? The reactions were this was the dumbest idea ever. This is where conspiracy Ashton starts to creep in. Why would we do the dumbest thing ever? Especially because the amount of money that it takes to research some of these fusion burners is basically nothing. I suspect, especially given the time frame of this, that this was a specific decision that was made to move away from research that we knew was fruitful, that we were using in military applications and send everybody away from it. And the reason why I say this is because just two years later in 1989, because this is 1986, 1987, two years later in 1989, the Department of Energy covers up cold fusion. So you have this big thing where you kill off all of these branches of fusion and then two years later guys named Pawns and Fleshman come out and they're like, "Hey, I just did like a garage experiment and we're seeing water just boiling when it shouldn't be. We're seeing over unity. We can just tell it's overunity because water is boiling when it shouldn't be boiling." And the government freaks out. They freak out because they just tried to cover this all up and now some random people are doing a garage experiment and they're proving the concepts of fusion that is not temperatures of the sun or at least using methods that are unconventional to produce fusion. So they had to cover up cold fusion as well. And we've been living in this world since then where anything related to fusion is taboo. Anything related to the successful branches of fusion, the fusion that actually works is considered pseudocience. All the fusion that doesn't work, that's been basically proven to not work, that we've had zero results from, that's considered the real fusion. Basically, reality has been inverted. Okay, let's let him finish his story. are gems and there are good ideas in the past that have been underfunded or so the MFTtf was slated for closure and they came to Liverour and essentially told the staffers that were working on it that hey when we finish this thing we're going to shut it down and at the time it was hundreds of people uh working in all aspects of the reactor designing the magnets building the magnets shipping the magnets building the vacuum vessel designing the diagnostics design they're they're they're building a giant superconducting mirror fusion test facility and they just tell everybody we're not we're going to just shut this whole thing down. We're just not going to do it at all. We we spent all this money to build this thing or now all we have to do is just run tests on it. We're not going to do it at all. That doesn't sound like saving money to me. Actually sounds like the opposite of saving money. Sounds like wasting money and then not doing experiments that could have given us value for that money that we spent to cover up potentially successful fusion research. Do you see the reason why they don't want the MH370 videos to come out yet? chat. The reason why everybody's against me on the videos for the most part, I mean, when it comes to podcast, is because if those videos are real, the cover up is really gross. like gross to the degree where they've been hiding fusion research from us and they potentially actively suppress the fusion research from us from the public nefariously with with mal intents with intents to ensure that we don't figure it out from the public perspective. Woo! I hope I'm wrong. I literally hope I'm wrong because if my government is willing to do that, there deserves to be accountability for the people that made those decisions. The people that made those decisions should have their careers and their historical relevance tarnished. Even if it's Edward Teller, even if it's Edward Teller himself, whoever made that decision to prevent humanity from getting fusion research, they should be considered one of the worst people in the world, no matter what whatever they did for us, okay? The power system, designing the control system. Um the control system is a little a special little uh case because uh it was a good way to develop uh advanced circuitry for reactor controls and reactor feedback and computer control and computer feedback in the early 80s when that wasn't commonplace and a lot of the folks that did work on that system ended up just moving over to Silicon Valley and getting involved in the computer industry. So, it's another example of where fusion R&D research dollars did grow innovation outside of Fusion and it did help grow uh the US computer and electronics industry. So, they did they had a big uh party to celebrate the finishing of the MFT. Uh they had balloons and streamers and cakes and and uh and then the next day everybody quit and was fired and had to go out and get a new job. [laughter] >> Wow. literally at a party after they built this marvel and then everybody was fired. It never ran one experiment. And as a spoiler, it literally got scrapped for parts afterwards. So they build this machine and then they never run a single experiment on it and then they rip it to pieces and use it for other stuff. Gross, man. Absolutely gross. And personally, I'm convinced that they have had Fusion figured out. And it wasn't that they just thought we were saving money on this. I think they intentionally moved us away from this because they've had to make sure that there's so many different threads that can unravel this technology. Anything related to fusion will reveal zero point energy. Anything related to fusion. Anything related to EM drive, electromagnetic drive will lead to fusion. They've had to stifle every avenue that will lead us back to zero point energy, that will lead us back to free energy. And I think they've known about it since the 60s, maybe even before then. Maybe even before then, but we started to engineer it in the 60s and engineer the computers that can do it in the 60s as well. Here's another scientific paper I want to share with you guys quickly that was referenced or I just happened to find it when I was digging around. Um, which one is it? This one? Yeah, this one here. Okay, here you go. [sighs and gasps] Last scientific paper that I wanted to share with you and I'm going to watch a little another little video. Direct energy conversion studies with emphasis on those involving nuclear radiation. This paper is from I think 1967 and the author is George Miley of the University of Illinois. Professor Ammeritus physics professor emeritus University of Illinois. There are three main courses. One titled direct energy conversion is taught at the senior or first level graduate level in mechanical engineering. A generalized magneto hydrodnamics course is offered in aeronautical engineering. So, preliminary results from the INC core helium neon laser study were reported at the conference. Successful operation of a low voltage arc laser. I think they're talking about cold plasma lasers there. I could be wrong. So, I haven't had a chance to read all of this yet, but here's another directed energy conversion scientific paper that you can check out when you have some time. Uh my guess is, yeah, here's boron. Here's helium. My guess is we're going to find a lot of connections here to uh boron and helium. Yeah, here you go. Here's a boron reaction. Substituting alpha particles of boron. There it is. Helium 3. Some estimates of excited state density are shown assuming the charge particles are produced by neutron reactions with helium 3, boron 10, or uranium. Okay. So, there's that. Now, last thing we're going to take a look at here tonight, guys. Something I found right before this. I've got some more stuff for us to talk about on Monday, but I don't want to dig into that tonight. I want to keep it kind of solid with what we've been discussing here. Richard Boyd, director of emerging and disruptive technologies at Lockheed Martin. Well, I don't know anything about this, but this is from 13 years ago, from 2012, and it's got a Loheed Martin guy. So, let's see what he's saying here. >> Loheed Martin. >> Yeah. My new title is director of emerging and disruptive technology, but as I like what an call me, disruptive man. >> Put that on a license plate. >> I think you should. I think you should. So, you were you were here at HIMS 12. Um, and I know that you were here last year. What were we talking about last year? >> Yeah, last year I I I batted clean up with the keynotes and actually I had to follow Michael J. box which which was unfair and in a way but also gave me an opportunity to sort of light the mood a little bit and talk about uh how we can harness simulation and computer gaming technologies to both uh uh reduce the number of errors that we have in healthcare but also just improve performance and how we're doing it words this is what everybody should be doing if you're not already doing it we're finding that everywhere I go people are just give commands by voice to your television go to ESPN turn on this game >> yeah never mind that's not what I thought it was going to be okay don't worry about that let's do some super chats everybody thank you everyone in the build chat. I see you Methol out there. Big Willie, everybody in the Rumble chat, too. How are you guys doing tonight? Hope you're doing well. Okay, Tony Allenson, thank you very much for that huge super chat. You guys are on fire tonight. Zaparoo says, "Nice shirt." Thank you. Thank you. And Paul Frederick, appreciates you too, Zaparoo. Thank you very much, guys. Appreciate you, especially my regulars. Zapariah, what we what is this? Zap theme. We got the Zap theme going on. Is Zaparoo met Zappariah before? Zappariah also says, "Nice shirt, deja vu." Wow. Thank you very much both you guys. War Ranch LLC says, "We are the best community." Thank you very much for that donation. Appreciate you. Alexander Slobnick says, "Might MH370 lithium cargo be starter for a poor a proton boron plasma via density initiated a neutronic pulse could explain why exactly one ton was shipped." I think it could be. Yeah, it's I don't know how we're going to be able to tell what kind of a neutronic fusion is being done. Most likely they're using the lithium in the lithium-ion batteries, but they could have just like what they did with the um the hamus pagers, they could have manipulated the supply lines and and produced those batteries to whatever spec they needed to produce them to. They could be anything in there. So theoretically, they could be using whatever elements, but I do think that's some type of a neutronic fusion blast that's producing the energy levels required to break the swinger limit. and manipulate spaceime around the craft in that bubble. And that electromagnetic energy itself, electromagnetic energy itself can produce space, what we think of as space. Interesting thought. War Ranch LLC says, "Look up Shiva Star." Thank you very much. Appreciate that. Alexander Slobnik freecale patent suggests self-stabilizing lattice standing wave pressure nodes for magnetic free confinement. Maybe modern orbs physics stack similar could be. Yeah, I think that the secret is this is this the lattice. Just like Paul Siz said, don't worry about trying to modify the craft. Modify the environment around the craft. This is a a head nod to the polarizable vacuum model by Hal Pudof. And in fact, we might go ahead and play that. I I think we're still we're doing pretty good on time here. Maybe I have another video for us we can play then. Zaparoo, go ahead and hit that like button, guys. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. And then War Ranch says, "This needs to go viral." Yeah, unfortunately, I don't think that's how the world works. Just like Geralt of Rivia, we're just going to have to [snorts] nod and move along. Troy Pat says, "Zero point energy is our future." Thank you very much, Troy, for that huge super chat. Appreciate you, brother. And all your previous super chats as well. Jalil Robinson says, "Another great show." Oh, wow. You guys are going on fire today. Thank you. And then Rex, $20 super sticker. Damn. Thank you. Okay. Well, I guess since we're cooking here tonight, I'll give you guys another video since that last one ran flat. Where is it? Here we go. Okay. This will be your little bit longer moment of zen for tonight, which is you're going to recognize some of the people in this particular video. Electro Graamagnetics practical engineering for the polarizable vacuum model. Here you go. This is 5 years old. Actually, it's probably older than that more I look at this efficient manner. That leads to the idea of the zero point field and the polarizable vacuum model. And it's it's a very simple concept. In the case of um the usual general relativity approach, we talk about light from a star coming by and when it goes by the sun, it gets bent. And we think of that in terms of the space-time warp and the dimple and it kind of rolls around. But another way of looking at it is that because we know how light gets bent ordinarily in the laboratory, it's put it through a lens. And so another view and there's a long history of of this approach as well is that uh the sun and the planets and so on in effect change the refractive index of the vacuum. And in fact the refractive index is higher toward the sun than it is further away. And therefore again you would predict that as light ray comes by the sun because it's entering a region where the refractive index is higher toward the sun that would account for its bending. So in that >> so what he's saying right there is that gravity can be thought of as an optical effect. Gravity can be thought of as a refractive index change is that the sun is actually causing spaceime's refractive index to change. This is the whole concept of the polarizable vacuum model is that if that's the case, then we can polarize the vacuum artificially using electromagnetic energy. And if we polarize the vacuum artificially, now we produce artificial gravity. Artificial gravity that still acts the same as normal gravity does. This man right here, [clears throat] that's Bernard H. I literally recognize Bernard H just by looking at him. Lheed Martin engineer co-wrote a paper with Hal Pudof about how zero point energy can explain inertia. What do you got to say? Bernard >> sense just following Einstein's um Einstein's path we can easily accommodate the zero point field and explain something that in a sense general relativity does not it doesn't explain where the weight of an object comes from. It explains why you would orbit around an object following a jadeic but if you're held fixed in a gravitational field where does that weight come from? uh general relativity doesn't really tell you that, but general relativity combined with a zero point field does. So that that's a I think a point in favor of the uh the zero point field interpretation of mass and inertia and uh gravitational weight. >> So in in that sense there the polarizable vacuum is just an alternate interpretation of the same measurements that are interpreted as space-time curvature under general relativity. So polarizable vacuum is just a different interpretation of the very same exact results. 0 point energy doesn't require us to redo physics at all. It's just a different interpretation of the same results. And it answers a question that classical physics cannot answer. Why does this bottle Why does this bottle weigh anything at all? Why does this bottle weigh anything at all? Why doesn't it just float freely? Classical physics can't explain the why. But 0 point energy can explain why. 0 point energy says the reason why this weighs something is because there's zero point energy everywhere else around it interacting with it. And that's what gives us the weight. If we were to remove that zero point energy, it wouldn't have any weight. Fun, right? That's what Bernard H is saying. Now, a deeper question is why is spaceime curved at all? Why does matter produce that effect? And uh it's possible to conceive of the idea that uh matter has an effect on the the dialectric properties of the vacuum itself. So on top of what would be termed the electromagnetic zero point field, we superimpose upon that the energy density of the earth as a field as a as so we've got like the zero point field plus the field of the earth that that are superimposed upon one another to give us a gravitational field to give us a gradient in the energy density with respect to altitude and it's that gradient in the energy density that we see as as 1g of acceleration. So what is it? What is gravity really? Gravity is a gradient of the energy density. So what is a gradient? A gradient's a hill. A gradient's a hill. You draw a hill and you're going to roll down the hill. Gravity is a gradient of energy density. And what's a lot of energy density? Uh the earth. The earth is a lot of energy density. So the earth is causing a gradient in the zero point energy which causes us to what we feel as falling to the ground what we feel as gravity. So then how do we produce artificial gravity? If I produce a source right here where there's a huge amount of energy density and again density doesn't have to be big it just has to be compact compressed. If I produce a huge amount of energy density right here, everything will begin to flow towards it. I will create a gradient that will produce gravity. So gravity is the gradient. This is very important to understand but also very simple. I think all of this physics is very simple. Is the gradient of energy density between this point and energy density between this point. Whichever one has more energy density, you're going to see a flow from one to the other. >> So the assumption that you first make up [music] that you first that you start off with is that electricity, gravity and magnetism is unified. Now that's consistent with the 0 point field model. It's consistent with all risable vacuum model >> gravity and electromagnetism are unified. We know now what the connection is between them. That's the most important part of the zero point energy model is that now we have a unification theory. Now we can explain how to manipulate gravity using electromagnetism >> part of [music] the electrogravity magnetic model. So between these things between what we understand of 0 point field theory which is really quite uh quite quite broad and not [clears throat] very well defined to the polarizable vacuum model which is a bit more stringently defined uh it's got structure to it to the electrogra magnetic model um in fact it's not model it's it's a method that gives it total structure absolute structure now based on that absolute structure we now have something that we [music] can work with what EGM is intended to do it's intended to give engineers a tool by which they can understand and modify gravity. >> If mass is the result of electromagnetic discourse between particles, then um there's every reason to suppose that by >> Okay, well that's about it. That's pretty much all I want to show you. I really just wanted Bernie H and Haluto off. Guys, thank you so much for hanging out tonight. Thank you all for those super chats, especially the last few that popped in there at the end. Uh including Zapperoo. Lulu needs treats. Don't worry, she's going to get those treats. and for Hey Ocean, even though you're objectifying me, that's okay. That's okay. I don't believe in uh sexual harassment. [laughter] Uh thank you guys so much, MH270X. I hope you guys have a great weekend. Uh I might do a gaming stream tomorrow. I haven't quite decided yet. Got a lot of cleaning to do, things like that. Will be back on Monday and I've got Warp Drive stuff to go over with you guys. I found a video with uh Travis Taylor. I think it's Travis Taylor, that's what he's called. Yeah, Dr. Taylor. So, we're going to go over that. Uh solidify this science even more for you. Hope you enjoy it. Have a great weekend. M270X. Peace out everybody. Love you later. [music and bell] Out in the fields [music] where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage for [music] a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing [music] weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. In wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Bowling trip 7 through a wormhole. We're talking wormholes. Stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. LH370. Where did [music] it go? Boing triple 7 through a wormhole flow. [music] Exotic [music] matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you [music] and me. Quantum vacuum squeeze. So tight creating conditions [music] for this wondrous flight. Static fields [singing] and lasers in the lab they play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing [music] cast force negative zones. We need to stay the course. Stalking [music] wormhole star gates negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. [music] It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boeing trip 7 do [music] a wormhole float thin shell formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy [music] conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole let's give it a try [music] forces balancing [music] The plate creating the throat. Open the gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A [music] shortcut through space. Profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what [music] we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. >> [music] >> We're talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, [music] sitting our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Blowing trip 7 through [music] a wormhole flow from the fields to the stars. We break the chains. Understanding [music] the universe we make to gain. Little hoola crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore [music] the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos.