Friday Night Reactions - MH370 Debate, Jason Jorjani, & Disclosure

Video Transcript

# Friday Night Reactions - MH370 Debate, Jason Jorjani, & Disclosure Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. [music] When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest can [music] even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably [music] question those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our [music] critical faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, [music] we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. [music] The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay [music] of substantive content and the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down [music] to 10 seconds or less. lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience [music] and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. [music] Those were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. [music] Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. >> We're very powerful. This country is very powerful. It's far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world that we have. More powerful than anybody even not even close. And they also asked could you elaborate on what's oh the the uh Gorgon Gorgon stare that uh Ashton Forbes has spoken about both on social media and here on the show. I haven't had Ashton on here in a while, but the last time I did have him on, he spoke about that program. uh Gorgon stare and basically wanting to know can you tell us a little bit more about what that is and why it would be so secret. >> Yeah, I can't. [laughter] Um >> this is the part this is the part by the way where I said I'm not sure you're going to be able to answer it if it's really in your wheelhouse. I figured you would know about it but I figured you probably can't talk too much about Gorgon stare but I mean can you say anything? >> No. [laughter] >> Nope. >> Fair enough. But it is real. It does exist. >> Yeah, I would I would say that Ashton's very good at his research. >> Okay. All right. I guess we will uh leave it at that for the Gorgon stair question. >> Malaysian 370 contact 12 decimal 970. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [music] [music and singing] [music] >> [music] [music] >> I remembered the [music] line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu [music] is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form and says now I am become death [music] the destroyer of worlds. Welcome everybody and thank you for joining in on the live stream. TGIF. Everybody, thank God it's Friday, guys. If you have had a long week like me then, oh boy, I almost didn't live stream tonight, guys, because there's been so much content, but I just decided, you know what? I just can't get enough of you chat. I can't get enough. I just don't know how to quit you, chat. Okay, guys. It's been a great week, though. Just being perfectly honest. So, today we're going to do a little bit of a reaction to some of the content that's been going on. Um, if you did not check it out, the hard truths with Jason Georgiani dropped last night. I was in the chat for like most of it. I would say I was in the chat. Um, you can check it out anywhere where you can listen to audio podcast or you can check it out on the YouTube channel as well, wherever you want to watch it. But please do watch it because I think that it it represents probably my most accurate understanding of where this Tesla physics came from, how it got developed. And I've been wondering how can how far back can we draw a line from this uh zero point energy technology and I do think that it goes back to Tesla, but then there's this huge gap till like the 1960s. And that's where Jason Georgiani, I think, offered a lot of information that really fills in that gap. So, so check it out, guys. It was great. We're going to talk more about it later tonight. Um, in addition to that, the other big thing, the reason why I was late to the uh premiere yesterday is because I was doing a live debate after work yesterday, and I want to talk about that uh in just a minute here. So, we're going to talk about both of those things. And then on the at the same time, age of disclosure has dropped. Woo. And of course, perfectly in sync with the drop of the Age of Disclosure movie, you have the Joe Rogan interview with uh Dan Farah, the producer, who's got me blocked. So, I'm going to keep mentioning I've been blocked like a like a spoiled uh upset little child. Okay, guys. Now, before we get to that, I got a reply from David Kirkley of Helen Fusion. People should stop underestimating me. I know how to make people respond. I know how to needle them and make them respond. I got Lex Freriedman to respond to me and block me. It was a little bit He overreacted a little bit, right? It was the Stewie Brian thing where Stewie fl uh where Brian flips over the the the couch and then Stewie goes, "Well, that's a normal reaction." So David Kirkeley, how did I get him to respond? I basically said, "What is the significance of a nonequilibrium plasma when it comes to a neutronic fusion?" And this actually opened the door to understanding the plasma physics even better than I understand it now. I may have been wrong on one point. So, if you look at the thumbnail right now, you will see the the orbs in the MH370 videos and they we can see the plaid the shape of this orb. We can see this heat signature of this orb. And I said that the heat signature is the hot electrons. It turns out I might have been wrong about that. And there's actually a few different possibilities. It could be the electrons that are clustered together. It could be the ions that are clustered together, which is the opposite of the electrons is what's left over after we rip the electrons off. Or it could also just be a heat signature of some apparatus inside of the plasma orb is giving off heat. Those are the three options. David Kirkley responded and he said that in a non-equilibrium plasma, the ion temperatures are much hotter than the electrons. In fact, I looked up his scientific paper and read it and the ions are 10 times hotter than the electrons in a non-equilibrium plasma. And then I also cross reference further because every time I hear about these non-equilibrium plasmas, I always think about Salvador py. Salvatore pies. Here you go. Listen to this. way to see what the vi effect is all about is to say it's really the generation of extremely high energy densities that are obtained by the accelerated vibration andor accelerated spin >> of a none equilibrium plasma that means a plasma that's out of equilibrium you can think of of that um they have a term for it called cold plasma cold as in you know non-therrmal plasma and it has to do the um the electrons of this plasma uh that talks to the plasma density very high. The number of these electrons do not observe something called a Maxwell Boltzman distribution. That's what a core plasma is all about. >> Chad, I want to show you something. That was the very first interview I ever did with Salvador Pice. As you can probably tell from the production quality, [laughter] you could probably tell from the production quality and the giant headphones that it was basically like me rocking the 1980s style. You know, we had to upgrade. We had to modernize our presentation a little bit. It was quite embarrassing to be rocking that while you're talking to a US Navy engineer who, by the way, has very clearly been exposed to plasma weapons, right? Like, can we just be honest about this? Okay, S might say that he hasn't worked on nukes. Fine. I think he was being koi because like I think the definition of nukes now is super nebulous. Salvatore Pis has obviously been exposed to plasma weapons. Obviously, nobody goes like, "Hey man, I've got this dope idea called this the PI effect and it just requires a nonequilibrium cold plasma." Okay, hold on to that thought. [sighs] [snorts] This is David Kirkley's scientific paper. This is David Kirkley's scientific paper. [snorts] If you just search non, take a look at this paragraph right here. ion temperature as described above. The S parameter for a stable F FRC field reverse configuration is in the range of 1 to three almost ensuring a uniform ion temperature profile within the field reverse configuration. It is important to note that the ion temperature within an F FRC can be temporally different different by species and or follow non-Maxwellian distributions. Didn't didn't uh didn't Salvatore Py in that clip just say that these cold plasmas follow non-M Maxwell Boltzman distributions. The same thing that I think David Kirkley is saying right here. I think it said something else later on. Let me see what I wrote in my notes here. So the other here's the three factors of this what we're looking at. S knew what he was looking at in these MH370 videos. He knew. He knew right away. And now that I now that I know what we're looking for, now I know too. We're definitely looking at non-equilibrium plasma. And we can tell the density the density of the plasma. If you guys ask Grock right now, what would a non-equilibrium plasma look like? It'll tell you that it's going to be the same temperature as the atmosphere. And what we're looking at here is the surface temperature of the plasma. We're looking at the surface temperature of the the sphere of the plasma when we're looking at here. And it's the same temperature as the background. It's very cold. Relatively speaking, that's extremely cold. So, we're definitely looking at a nonequilibrium plasma where we've got separated positive and minus charge. My only question is why are we seeing this heat signature? Is that heat signature the ions? Is that heat signature the electrons or is that heat signature some apparatus that's absorbing energy from within within the plasma ball? Now low temperature. Do you know what they use to make these low temperature plasmas? Anyone want to guess? What do they use to make these low temperature plasmas? They use [snorts] helium 3. What? Helium 3? You mean the autronic fusion fuel? Helium 3 is what they use to make these cold plasmas. It seems obvious in retrospect. Now it's all making sense. We aren't just looking at some cold non-equilibrium plasmas. We're literally looking at a neutronic fusion reactors. Previously, I wasn't sure if those fusion balls are conventional fusion or if they're autonic fusion that's going on. Now, 100% that's a neutronic fusion propulsion. we are looking at in those videos. We know because of the cold temperature of the plasmas. The plasma is relatively cold and that must mean it's using a specific fusion fuel, not just any fusion fuel. And the density is super high. If you look if you look at the plasma videos that they showed of these tokamax, you see like a couple lines of color, but mostly you're just looking right through it. The transparency tells us how dense it is and we can kind of see through it but kind of not which tells us that's a pretty dense ball of plasma. So the point being Salvatore Py knows Salvatore Py knows and the question we should ask is how does Salvatore Pyest know? Obviously it's connected to his research in the US Navy. Obviously connected to his weapons research. My guess is we've got plasma weapons, whatever you would call that. And it's not really shouldn't be that much of a guess. John Ramirez, former CIA, has been talking about plasma weapons non-stop. Nobody just seems to take it seriously for some reason. And these plasma weapons aren't just like us confusing things on the radar with ghosts. Like these are physical objects that are can zap things out of the sky, make them disappear. Okay, I just wanted to talk about that because I've been looking into that and it's kind of bugging the hell out of me. Um, but this is the other thing about it is that David Kirkley's got to know as well. Anybody that's looking at the MH370 videos, anybody that's looking at the MH370 videos that works in plasma physics, they got to know what they're looking at in those orbs. The first thing you would look at that, you would go, "Huh, that's really dense plasma. That's interesting. It's got to be potentially theta pinch, uh, dense plasma focus or reverse field configuration." Like, right away you can narrow it down if you understand plasma physics and fusion. And that's what bugs me is that why aren't these people talking about it? Why aren't they looking at it going, "That's crazy. That looks just like our field reverse configuration. That looks just like a theta pinch. instead they're like weirdly not talking about it like they're afraid or something. I don't know. I just find that kind of odd. Guys, I want to talk about the um the debate. I want to talk about the debate. But before I do that, there's a couple things I want to mention here just from a personal perspective. Personal perspective. I think it's probably time that we start talking about the future, right? It's fun to research things. I love researching things. And people probably wonder why I don't do more research on some of these topics. First of all, I just kind of do whatever I want. But also, I think that we have to start to wonder at some point we've learned enough. I honestly feel like I've learned enough. I don't need to know exactly how every little minutiae of everything works. What I want now is I'll make a difference. And so that's pretty much what my goal is. That's what I'm trying to do is how do we bring light these technologies that they're hiding or suppressing, however you want to refer to it, that are coming to fruition right now in front of our eyes. And so I think highlighting those technologies, the political aspects of those technologies, ensuring that the government is supporting those technologies is huge. One of the things that we're going to talk about with the age of disclosure is the weapons race between China and the United States. I think that cannot be understated and I think that these spooks that are talking about that are dead on the money on that. They're absolutely right. So, we have to be thinking what are the ways where we advance the future. We bring fusion out. We explain zero point energy to people. I really only want to cater to high IQ futurists because I think that everybody I talked to and I got a response back from John Warner about this. I don't think he'll mind uh me saying this is that hopefully I can connect with him in the future. His big thing is how do we prevent World War II? That's exactly where we should be thinking. How do we prevent ourselves from destroying ourselves? Because that's where this is headed. This is headed to a situation where somebody blows up this whole planet or worse maybe just destroys our whole reality depending on how the time travel stuff plays out. It's not looking good for us. It's not looking good. And I want to address like I was in this debate. I was in hostile territory yesterday, guys. I went straight into the mouth of the lion's den with no protection whatsoever. None whatsoever. And they're right. The the the people that are the critics are somewhat right about me. I don't want to be pigeonholed into MH370. Does anybody want to be pigeonholed into anything that's out there? They're right. I don't. That's part of the reason why I'm talking about other topics. But I'm also talking about other topics because the technology in MH370 videos is inherently political. And I I personally believe that we they are talking about this technology in code words. Drones flying around nukes that we can't allow our adversaries to have. These are just code words for the public that has no idea what nukes look like or what drones do anymore. We look at everything from a simple conventional perspective, but the the higher level, they're not looking at that way anymore. So that's the reason why I want to expose the geopolitical aspect of it. But not only do I want to branch out, but they're also right. You are all also right that I'm extremely knowledgeable about MH370. Obviously, that would be my bread and butter if you're thinking about it from a perspective of my various skill sets. Let's just be honest. No, the MH370 videos would not have any play at all if it weren't for me. Nobody would ever be talking about them if it weren't for me. They would have gone the wayside as debunked videos that nobody would have been paying attention to. That's not me being egotistical. It just is what it is. And I think as I showed in the debate, no disrespect whatsoever to the sneezing monkey. I thought he was a nice guy and I think he's pretty intelligent. And I actually think we are a lot closer aligned than what he or his followers would expect because ultimately I'm a skeptic at heart too. People just don't realize it because I'm making some claims that are obviously extremely difficult to pallet to swallow. So no disrespect to him, but at the same time I think you can see that I'm no slouch when it comes to this topic. Not only do I have answers for every possible question you could come up with, but I've also researched the plane in such depth that I'm going to tell you stuff that you didn't even know about the missing plane. And I didn't even go through nearly all of it yesterday. It was just part of it. So, let me just say this. I prepared a little statement. I'm not going to read verbatim, though. It's true that I do make a little bit of money off of this. Can't deny that. It's not a lot of money though. It's not a lot of money where you're going to change your life and you're going to go, you know, make it all about this, what have you. And I don't want to either. I don't want to. Most of the money I make goes right back into the production of this, which includes the people that manage my social media, the people that make clips on this. And truthfully, I wish I could pay them more money, but I don't make enough money doing this to make pay them more money. I think that it's extreme and this is a direct statement to the sneezing monkey and to his followers in general because I think the most important part of them part of this at all is for them to understand where I'm coming from a personal level and here are my feelings on it. I think it's extremely important that this topic MH370 the videos the science and technology around them be an organic thing. I mean look at the age of disclosure and compare it to what I have been doing here. It is night and day and they I will basically want to do the exact opposite of what those people are doing and doing that does not make friends. Telling the truth is never po rarely popular. Rare telling the truth is rarely popular and that's probably part of the reason why they're doing this slow drip plan and that's not what I want to do. So I'm not saying this and I'm not trying to convince you in this debate to change your mind. That's actually not what I want to get out of it. Out of the debunkers and out of the skeptics or for sneezing monkey. I actually want you to be my harshest critic. I enjoy it. I enjoyed that. I want my ideas to be tested. Maybe there's something I missed. A great example of that is the Gorgon stare. Would I have ever figured out the Gorgon stare if people weren't pressing so hard on whether or not satellites could take that video? Maybe not. I want to play this game on hard mode. the hardest mode. In fact, I play all games on hard mode. That's a true fact. I love playing on the hardest difficulty. And the only way that I think disclosure will ever happen is that exact process. The way you're seeing it get played out right now. Not in a fun, happy way where you have your paragon of virtue, your hero come out and tell you what you want to hear. No, it's going to come from the person that you don't like. It's going to come from the person that you don't want to be correct. It's going to come from all of us ultimately accepting that the world's a little bit more complicated than what we thought. And it's not going to be something that's going to happen overnight. It's going to be a long process. And I've said this from the beginning. This is not a race. This is not a sprint. And I'm going to be here. I'm going to be talking about it. This is what they're afraid of. They're afraid of people talking about the videos. I'm not afraid of the of people talking about the videos. I'm not afraid of skeptics debunking the videos. Silence is what the people hiding the videos want. That's the only way they can win. The way they lose is if we talk about the videos. So that's what I'm gonna do. I'm going to keep talking about the videos even if nobody ever even if nobody else does. I'm going to talk about the MH370 videos until the day I die. And the reality is I would rather die a nobody than die as some famous person, some elite person. That's just the truth about the kind of person I am. I would be happy dying as somebody that nobody ever knew and then in 50 years from now they find out, oh wow, this guy was right about these videos out there. Because to me, that's the right way for disclosure to happen. Disclosure should happen from a random Joe figuring out their secret and just exposing it to a that exposing it to the world bluntly and barely in a way that is not easily to absorb. It's going to be catastrophic disclosure the whole way. Guys, [sighs] last thing I want to say on this. [snorts] Do you guys realize that I am implicating my own government in these videos and the MH370 videos? I love my country, guys. I love America. I came back here after living overseas because of how much I missed living in this country. Tons of expatriots never come back to the United States. I've thought about it, but not me. I [ __ ] love it here. We have it so good in America. Most people don't even realize how good we have it. And the reality is I want to push it even further. I want to be one of the people that can help push it so that we are just light years ahead of other countries. And it actually hurts me to think that discussing the MH370 videos harms national security in a way that allows other countries, other adversaries, specifically adversaries that are much further behind to catch up. That's the reality. >> [snorts] >> One last thing I want to address is that a lot of people I do often hear that I am exploiting a tragedy. But do you want to know what the truth is? The truth is that the spirits of the passengers, they are right behind me. They whisper to me. They say, "Don't ever stop. Even if the whole world is against you, we will win. Okay guys, so regarding the debate, I [snorts] think it was important because I wanted to show people that I'm not to be trifled with when it comes to debates, but at the same time, I'm not somebody that is going to just, you know, yell at you, scream over you. I don't need to win a debate that way. I can win a debate on the facts alone. I can win a debate on the facts alone. So please realize that while you see me bombastically emotionally charged on live streams or on social media content, realize that that is yes me of course, but people generally kind of turn up the character a little bit for social media so it's somewhat more enjoyable. Doesn't change the facts of the situation. But at the same time, people need to realize that that's just how people are, especially in 2025, guys. So, I can be somebody that crashes out. At the same time, we can have a easily respectful conversation between two adults without it devolving into yelling matches, even if we don't agree at the end of the day. And that's why I thought that conversation was so important. And I'm actually disappointed it hadn't happened earlier than that. So, it was quite impromptu, by the way. I just kind of got up, somebody pinged me. I was done with work and I'm like, "Oh, wait. Somebody's talking about me." And it just kind of happened. And I thought, the other reason is, as I said in that statement that I made, I want my ideas to be challenged. I want that because I am a skeptic myself and I am just trying to solve the mystery. I don't understand the full mystery myself. Why did we use this weapon on the plane? Just like I told the sneezing monkey. I said, why did we break out this weapon? This is the kind of weapon you only break out when World War II is about to happen. So why did we break out that weapon on the plane? I do truthfully believe that it's because we are in some kind of secret covert arms race with China. That does fit the motive. Why would we do that to a plane? Well, we're in a secret arms race with China for I don't know what you call it. Quantum weapons, alien weapons, UFO weapons, I don't know what you call it, whatever you want to call it. So, I thought that was great. And also, I feel like I reached a few people, even people that, you know, they still think I'm delusional, making stuff up, what have you. But I think that if you can win in a contest of ideas, that's how you change minds. That's how you really make people wonder. And now knowing that the footage is Gorgon's stare, it makes that a lot easier because it gets more progressively difficult to explain how the videos could be fake. If one of them is a perfect recreation of a real secret classified surveillance system that nobody has ever seen, nobody has ever seen out there. So, I don't want to go on too long on this, but the key point is this. Everybody wants to know what the standard of proof is when it comes to UFO videos, when it comes to the MH370 videos. When it comes to the MA370 videos, I want to put the goalpost down right now so that the goalpost cannot be moved later on, which I already know that they will be. Somebody is going to eventually come out and they are going to admit that that's Gorgon stair footage. I mean, I'm yelling it from the rooftops. That's Gorgon stair footage. Just imagine, assume that I'm correct. Even if you don't believe me, assume that I'm correct for a moment and that that really is military gorgon stair air force footage. Imagine all the people that know that that footage is real. Watching me talk about even though I don't know for a fact because I haven't seen the footage. I've never seen Gorgon Stare beyond this. Imagine all those people going, "Holy crap, this guy knows." They want to talk, right? They wanna They want to yell out, "Yes, yes, yes. You got it. You got it." Think about all those people. Eventually, one of those people is going to talk. Maybe many of those people will. Maybe there will be a floodgate that opens up after one of those people starts talking about it. And this is the burden of proof. When a Air Force military person comes out with their real name, real face, whatever it is, puts their credibility on the line and says, "Yep, I'm whistleblowing. Nobody's ever said this. Nobody's ever come out and admitted what Gorgon Stair looks like, what it can do, but I've seen it. I've worked with it. You're looking at it. That's it. That's the bar. that point. That's the point where you're now the burden of proof has flipped. The burden of proof has flipped at that point from me having to prove the videos are real to you now having to prove that they're not Gorgon Stare. And I know people aren't going to like that because they're afraid. Because deep down people are afraid that I'm right and they're afraid that that's going to really happen, which it might. I mean, it will eventually. It will eventually. So, that's where I want the bar to be because I don't want people to later on claim, "Oh, no. Uh, it was like, uh, the military faked this footage or like, uh, no, somebody just magically divined what Gorgon Stair looked like and was faking it before 10 years before anyone even knew that it existed or what it looked like. That's the point where we're p we've we've gone past plausible deniability at that point." or not plausible deniability, but the burden of proof. Reasonable [snorts] doubt. That's what I was looking for. We've gone past reasonable doubt at that point. So, that's where I'm setting those goalposts right now. And that was the biggest thing I want people to take out of that debate because a lot of the arguments that are being made are subjective arguments. Oh, I think there's uh like the biggest one was the poly the polygon. I've seen that debunk. I've seen every debunk that's out there. I thought that was one of the weakest ones because I can literally just look at the videos and I can tell there's not polygon shapes. And I've seen the Reddit post where somebody like tries to draw a line and be like, "Look, it's like uh it looks like it's from Tron. It looks uh you know, square shaped." And that shouldn't be the thing. And then I just look at the original footage and I'm like, "I'm not seeing it, man. I'm just not seeing it there. I'm watching the real footage and there's clearly no like polygonal shapes that are, you know, can't be attributed to just basic artifacts or low compression or something like that or whatever you call it. Um, so I I didn't those are kind of arguments or the the reticle, right? The reticle debunk where it's like, look, man, have you actually looked at footage or the best argument for the reticle is have you actually used these cameras before? Because you all are telling me you don't even know what the cameras are. You're saying that it's all fake, but you're also saying exactly what it really should look like. Because it would be a very powerful debunk to have somebody that's worked on those footage before, worked on those cameras, come out and say, "No, that's not what this camera looks like. This is how it works." But that's not what's happening. Instead, it's people that have no idea how the cameras work subjective opinion based arguments about how they think it should look. So, those obviously don't have much weight, especially because I know the footage is real. So, I know that people are just kind of making up things. [snorts] That's not to discredit. I mean, I understand why people do that. I'm just trying to tell you why that doesn't really have any weight at the end of the day. And those arguments completely collapse. Completely collapse when somebody comes out and says, "That's real Gorgon stair footage. That's exactly how it looks." Because when that happens now, all your arguments about this is what it should look like. It doesn't look like this. It should look like this. Those are all now defeated. Completely defeated. And then, yes, as somebody just said in the chat, another great point, I didn't wait around. I could have easily said, "Hey, these videos, I think these videos are real. I'm just going to wait for like the news to pick up on it and them to do their own investigation." We didn't wait. I realized the videos are real. I was like, "Okay, what's the next step?" The next step is figuring out what are these balls of plasma. And now I think we can answer that question. We can answer that question. Those are fusion reactors. A neutronic fusion reactors flying around in the sky. We're looking at a neutronic fusion reactors flying around in the sky. Perfectly consistent with real physics papers by people that are doing that fusion right now. right now in the commercial space that at the time of writing those scientific papers did never expected some videos like this would be on the internet. Do we really think that a hoaxer knew military surveillance capabilities? The actual Boeing 7 configuration with the air conditioning manifolds you can see right through the skin of the plane. All six of them. Not only not only that, but they also happen to know about nuclear physics and fusion that like, let's be honest, took me two years to understand nonequilibrium plasmas. But the person who faked these videos is making perfect non-equilibrium plasmas that nobody had any idea what it should look like or what it would look like in a thermal video. I mean the amount of skills and then so not only that but they also have to be like a master VFX artist that is like taking making videos from two different angles perfectly in sync which the explanation I got was not adequate for my liking. This idea that oh you just make this big background this super high resolution image and then just like convert that into 3D. [laughter] Like what what do you mean just convert it into 3D? Yeah. you like press some button, press a button in Adobe uh Adobe FX and it'll just, you know, convert it to 3D for you. In 2014 with 2014 software, I doubt it. Press X to doubt. And that's one of my favorite things is that people try to explain how to make one video. And when they do that, they almost always explain it from a two-dimensional perspective. They're using two-dimensional stock effects. They're going, "Yeah, here's my two-dimensional thing." And then they go, "And then I go,"Well, isn't there two videos from like completely different angles?" And they're like, "Yeah, but then you would just like, you know, have the camera like follow it." And I go, "Yeah, that's called three-dimensional environment. That's called making a three-dimensional environment. That's what that is when you are talking about that." And three-dimensional VFX is a completely different beast when it comes to faking things. So, I think that's uh enough on the on the um the debate video. Now, the debate video is up. I posted a link to it and I will post a link I I'll put a link in the description later tonight. I'm going to upload it on my channel, too, just because I think it's a good conversation and I think it's a good example for people to watch of the of the main arguments on both sides about the case and then they can come to their own conclusion. I don't mind. And I think it was respectful. I don't think uh you know I'm not here here to like dunk on Sneezing Monkey. It's not my thing at all. I thought he was a nice guy. Um I I mean I have seen it did look like he's made some videos about me. I I'll say I haven't seen any of them and I don't care. I don't take it personally either way. Like I've got really thick skin. I got really thick skin anyway. So okay. So that's the debate guys. Now let me see what I got here. Oh, one more detail about the field reverse configuration since I was talking about it from this same paper. I want to go back to that for a second. Do I still have it up? I do. Here we go. Take a look at this. You guys are going to love this. Here's your yatsi moment for the night, guys. Guys, what who in the chat knows? Who in the chat knows why graphine why is graphine the secret sauce? This is a good one, right? I'm out here just spitting facts for you guys. This is going to make you impress your friends, especially your scientific friends later on because everybody knows graphine is some dope thing. Why is graphine so special? Why is graphine allow free energy or whatever else we're having? Yes, because it is one layer thick. That is a good point. But it's more than that. The electron drift velocity. The electron drift velocity of graphine is super high relative to something like copper where the electron drift velocity of copper is very low. Remember if you drop your magnet through your copper tube it goes super slow. Graphine has a very high electron drift velocity. Now imagine remember the Doppler effect. If two things are speeding away from one another, the waves will either compress depending on if they're coming together or if they're moving away, they stretch out. So this effect is what allows us to get non relativistic or relativistic, how do they refer to it? Relativistic motion. So we can now get speeds that are from a relativistic perspective, from the perspective of the electron itself very very high. And when we get to these super high relativistic speeds, this is where we start to break the laws of physics. So this is me just explaining at a very basic level that anybody can understand. Why is graphing so awesome? Electron drift velocity number one. Why is that important? Because the faster your electrons are moving relative to one another, now you get relativistic motion. Now you can get super high speeds. Now we can basically start breaking the laws of physics from a relativistic perspective because all of us are in our own little bubble all the time and time is always moving at a constant rate in our own little bubble. And that's also true of the electrons. The electrons themselves are also experiencing time dilation. And so this is why we want this relativistic motion between them. This is why graphing is so important. And now that I've said that, let's take a look at this scientific paper one more time. What does this say right here on page four of David Kirkley's Helen Fusion scientific paper about a neutronic fusion for commercial purposes? Beyond simple heating by uniformly distributed ions, field reverse configurations also have large parallel electron drift velocities along the magnetic field. Because the electrons are highly magnetized and can freely move along internal flux surfaces throughout the FRC, both axially and between the core and radial edges. This transport results in uniform electron temperature throughout the FRC. OH, BOO. YEAH, sweet sassy molassie. That's just Shaquille O'Neal breaking the backboard right there. Boom. What is going on? How are we making our free electron laser in our fusion reactor? That's how the electrons are moving freely along the axial path. And what do we see happening along the axial path in our orb videos? We see the X-rays coming out. We see the X-rays coming out because we're pre-ionizing the air in front of the orbs. And then imagine there's a tube inside the plasma orb. And the electrons are able to flow back and forth relativistically like this. That is your free electron relativistic X-ray laser. The fusion reactor is producing the X-ray laser on the inside because of the field reverse configuration. Now, if I'm wrong and it's not exactly a field reverse configuration, this is still the same mechanism. If it happens to be a theta pinch or a dense plasma focus, they're all very similar concepts. I happen to think that it is field of risk configuration. Exactly. But the only person that could tell us that I would trust would be David Kirkley. I want to hear directly from David Kirkley or maybe somebody at Tri Alpha Energy because I got a weird feeling that these guys have seen that like in their experiments. They've seen something that you know looking at those videos they're like uh oh [laughter] uh oh imagine you do some experiment in one of these fusion companies and you're making these like balls of plasma and then you see like you know a specific heat signature or something in there and then you see the MH370 videos and you're like oh [ __ ] you see those videos like, "Oh man, uh oh, something something's going on here, right?" Like, you' probably be spooked. I'd be spooked. So, there you guys go. That is your Yatsi moment of the night, guys. Check out the David Kirkley scientific paper. Uh I had to download it. I should be able to post a link in the in the chat for you guys later tonight as well on that front. Okay, let me take [snorts] a look here what we got next. Okay, let's I think we'll end with the Jason Georgiani. So, I want to talk about Age of Disclosure here for a minute. Um, I think I've got a clip ready to play for the Age of Disclosure for us. And also, by the way, guys, I do recommend if you are using AI, it's actually pretty solid. Now, if you have it, reference the scientific papers that I talk about on my Twitter in whatever question you're trying to ask it and it will be probably pretty accurate. I mean, you don't have to limit it just the stuff that I talk about, but if you a lot of people ask me like where can I find the science and stuff that you're talking about, right? Like realize we live in a world with AI. AI can do the heavy lifting for you now. So, just be like, hey, cross reference the scientific papers in Ashton's Twitter posts, blah blah blah. Boom. Trust me, you'll get good responses. Okay, this is a clip from Joe Rogan. So, I tell you guys that even if I don't like people, and let me just be honest, I don't really like Dan Far. I don't know him personally or anything like that, but I don't like him because he's got me blocked and I get just get weird vibes from people that pre-block me. There's a lot of elitism that happens, especially in the UFO community. So, more elitism than you could possibly imagine in the UFO community. And also I get truthfully my vibe is that they know what I'm exposing is literally the technology they're talking about and they've got a plan and I'm kind of spoiling that plan. That's the impression I get. I could be wrong, but since none of them will talk to me, literally none of them will talk to me, I'm going to go with my gut on this one, right? What are you afraid of is my question. What are you afraid of Dan Farah? What are you afraid of Hal Pudof? What are you afraid of, Chris Melon? Why are these people afraid of a one-on-one conversation? I went on into the lion's den, straight into debunker enemy territory with no preparation whatsoever. And off the cuff, I had a debate all about MH370. There was no problem for me because my only goal is the truth. And yet all of these UFO disclosure alien head people, they will only do softball interviews only go on an interview where they know the outcome's predetermined. CNN, CNN, Fox News, Joe Rogan, and they've got Joe Rogan wrapped around their finger, chat. They've got Joe Rogan wrapped around their finger, and I don't even know if he knows it at this point. That being said, they can still be right. I actually think in a lot of situations, the truth is somewhere in the middle. The truth is usually somewhere in the middle. And I think that they know the truth. The difference between what I'm doing and what they're doing is this is the thing that bugs me about these guys. They know what the answer is. They're like admitting that they know what the answer is. But instead of just telling us, they're doing all this fanfare. It's like, guys, if you watch anime, who watches anime in the chat? You keep your anime away from my children, Mr. Oh, wait. Do I have it? I don't have that clip ready. >> I don't want to see any more anime stuff happening to my son, Buster. >> In these animes, they'll have a lot of filler episodes. They'll have episodes where it's like they just didn't decide. They didn't feel like doing an anime that week. So, they'll just have it be like a flashback episode where it's just a bunch of ep, you know, a bunch of stuff they already said repackaged together. That's what it feels like with this age of disclosure stuff. These are the people that literally say they know. They've already made this movie like 10 different times with the same people that all say they know what's going on. And then they never say anything. So why are you making the movie? If I was making a movie about MH370 and I just said, "I have all this information, but I'm not going to tell you any of it." [laughter] I Guys, the United States took the plane, but I can't explain why or tell you why, and it's a secret. You'd be like, "What the hell are you doing? Why are you even making a movie then? What's the point? What's the point of making the movie?" And that's the question we should be asking. Why are these people making the movie? Why are they making this documentary at all? Why are they making the same documentary they made seven times before? The conclusion that I reached is that this is all planned out. Their whole thing is planned out. They came with a plan that was like, "Okay, we're going to make a bunch of documentaries that will slowly wake people up to this because movies are how you disseminate information to the masses. I could totally see a CIA some in some boardroom in a CIA conference room them meeting up and being like, "Okay guys, how do we start to disclose this technology to the public? Who has a good idea?" Hal Pudof in the corner. Well, turns out that like the media is uh really popular these days. What if we what if we made some me some movies and we have some people go and talk in the movies about stuff that they've seen and everybody goes, "That's a great idea. That's a great idea. Let's do that. And we can even enlist Hollywood elite directors and we'll have them do the the documentary about us. It'll be all about us all the time. It's like that's feels like what they did here. That feels like what I'm experiencing because they could just tell us the truth. Just break your NDA and tell that's a movie I'll watch. [laughter] You want me to watch one of your stupid alien movies? Then just tell me exactly what you know. Break your NBA and I'll watch the hell out of that movie. I'm down. Start start spilling the beans, man. But you start trying to tell me that the aliens are invading and secretly controlling the government and we've we've been reverse engineering crafts. Show me evidence because those kinds of things can be misconstrued easily. And that's what the CIA does. That's literally what the CIA does is try to control narratives. And that's the only vibe I'm getting from these people is they're trying to control the narrative of how this plays out. That's that's the vibe I'm getting. And that's the reason why I think they got me blocked because I'm not playing that game. I'm not playing the control the narrative vibe game. I'm I'm doing the opposite of that. I'm going tell me what you know. And now we know what you know. We know what you know now. It's a neutronic fusion propulsion. You've been making little plasma orbs that are flying around in the sky. And if you want me to believe, yes, we are crashing out. If you want me to believe that little green men flew around in the little plasma orbs to come to Earth, then you best produce some alien bodies. is I don't know if you got to use crisper and some some chicken bones and you got to make up some alien bodies for me to believe in, then you better start getting working on it right now cuz my standard of evidence is extremely high. I'm going to ask for a third party DNA consultation on your alien bodies when you wheel them out. Just saying. Just saying. And hey, if they want to get mad at somebody because I'm not buying into their alien thing, I understand it. I'm actually open-minded to aliens. I'm very I wanted aliens to be real. I wanted aliens to be real. I still want aliens to be real. But now that I've seen them using plasma orbs to zap an airplane out of existence or teleport it somewhere else, you goddamn right I'm going to be demanding a DNA test on your alien bodies. I don't trust you at all. I don't trust you. You got plasma orbs teleporting Boeing 77s away and you want me to believe that the aliens are here? Uh-uh, man. That dog don't hunt. That dog don't hunt. First things first, start telling the truth about what you did to MH370. After you start telling the truth about your plasma orbs that are flying around that people are clearly misidentifying as aliens, then we can start talking about how many 50 species of reptilians and [ __ ] like that are visiting us. Then we can start talking about Mass Effect 5. You know the how many? We got the sloth aliens that only feel emotions and the thick whites are of course are going to be involved. Okay, I ranted enough. Here's the clip. That was all just to get us ready for this clip right here. >> Getting these crashed UFOs. What's the story behind that? >> So, here's an interesting thing. Um, one of the one of the unexpected things I learned in talking to sources like real credible people >> is that some of the cr some of the the crashes were actual crashes where just >> you know crashes happen just like they do for you can drive as safe as possible, fly as safe as possible, crashes are going to happen. But some of them were actually caused by elements of our military intelligence community and elements of foreign military intelligence community people. So like one of the realizations early on was that um atomic weapon test nuclear weapon testing atomic weapon testing create has a ripple effect that chat, you don't get to say that word, Dan Farah. That the N word is not your word to say. Only MH370 is allowed to say that word, Dan Farah. How dare you? I do. Do you see what they're doing here? I'm not trying to be that guy. Feels like they're encroaching on our narrative, chat. I'm feeling a little bit encroached over here. Feeling like that. Well, all of a sudden we're talking about ripple effects of nuclear weapons on UFO technology. Hold up. Okay, keep going Dan Farah. Keep going. >> Can down these things. >> Especially high altitude nuclear testing, which is one of the things that they did in the 1950s in particular. >> Yeah. And so they started doing it. >> Yeah. >> To like shoot fish in a barrel basically. >> They did it. >> 1950s. You're saying you mean the Ripple project? Castle Bravo. Literally talking about the nuclear weapons testing. A neutronic fusion bombs that we were building in the early 60s. Bro. Bro, what are you What are you doing right now? Are these guys It really feels like they're stealing a narrative. Yes, we got a We're throwing the flag. We're throwing the flag. Challenge flag. Ch. I'm challenging it here. We have a theft of a narrative. Theft of a narrative. This is a personal foul. Personal foul. It was going to be a 15 yard penalty. In fact, it's going to be a loss of down, too. Going to be a loss of down [laughter] >> on purpose. >> Yeah. And so did Russ. >> That's why they were doing it. >> Yeah. And then Russia Russia started doing it. >> No. >> Yeah. [laughter] And then one of the >> It's like throwing dynamite into the river. >> It's like fishing with dynamite. Yeah. >> Yeah. Fishing with dynamite. >> Okay. H Wow. What to say about this? Well, obviously there's a connection between UFOs and nukes. What is the power source of your UFO? Even if I'm wrong, even if you know, if UFOs are real, their power source is nuclear energy. Nuclear energy just means the atom, splitting the atom, fusing the atom, they're working on the smallest possible scales. And they understand the universe better than we understand it because we can't even see things that are super tiny. I mean, we can see things that are pretty damn small at this point. We're getting really, really good. Our material science has been advancing over time. One thing I want to address is this crash argument. I actually heard it yesterday as well saying that Sneezy Monkey saying, "Isn't it absurd that the aliens could be super advanced but then crash?" Not really. Everything crashes, things fail, things go poorly. There's actually a lot of explanations for why they might crash. And just like a surfer, it's kind of like saying that a surfer could never fall over. Of course, a surfer can fall over. They've learned how to surf on a wave. It doesn't make them invincible. That's the same idea as when we're manipulating gra we're making gravitational waves. You're using electromagnetism. So, if you get hit by some electromagnetism, it's going to knock you off. It's going to knock you imbalance you. So I I think that there is obviously some connection between nuclear weapons and UFOs. The energy source is the connection. But also you could then if Knuckles was correct, if if uh Lel was correct, Lel Wood, if those guys were correct, then nuclear weapons were manipulating spaceime. And if that's the case, then that's like throwing a speed bump on the highway. You're like, you're throwing a speed bump onto the highway. People are trying to fly around here, bro. People are trying to fly around with our warp drives and you're nuking things in the sky. It's going to mess things up. In fact, there's other scenarios as well. Just today, I was seeing this uh the twin universe theory, which is one that goes way back. Imagine that on one side of our reality, there's an alternate reality, the exact inverse of our reality. It's a weird idea, but it's possible. If we are nuking things and we are manipulating the bridge between these realities by adding removing this huge amount of energy, then that may show up on their side as well. So, there's a lot of different ways that nuclear weapons could be impacting UFOs. Totally agree. The part I'm less convinced on is that the aliens would even care. So what, bro? Okay, you figured out nuclear energy. Welcome to being a type zero civilization. Wow, you're basically the equivalent of a dog at this point. You're the equivalent of an ant. Bravo. Bravo. I mean, until you're using that technology to destroy a solar system or to make a Dyson sphere or to teleport across the galaxy, you're still not really a threat. Just because you figure out nuclear weapons doesn't make you a threat. The only scenario that makes sense to me for why the aliens would show up after a nuke. I get the idea. I would say a stretch is that okay, they're messing with the highway. Well, the problem is well, they don't have to fly past they don't have to fly past Earth when they're in their warp drive. The only situation that makes sense is if they're already here on this planet or they're monitoring us. And it's possible we could be on a prison planet. I kind of feel like I'm on a prison planet every day. Feels that way. So maybe they're monitoring us and we hit a certain level of technology and then they step in and they're like, "Okay, you don't know what you just unlocked. Chill out. Chill out. You're a little too primitive for that." I could see that scenario. I don't like the scenario where they try to argue that the aliens are protecting us from ourselves because it's just too much of an edge case. Like in order for them to protect themselves, protect us from ourselves, they would have to care about us. Why do the aliens care about us? We're insignificant. If they have fusion energy, they probably have replicators. They can teleport wherever they want to go. They can be invisible. Why would they care about a primitive species like us that the amount of energy we absorb, we can pull is like the the size of the light? We're basically nothing. We don't matter to them. So, this is the part where I don't understand like why they would protect us from ourselves or what have you. There's obviously explanations for that, but these are the kinds of questions that need answers where it's like, if you're going to propose these ideas, if you're going to try to sell me on a story of the aliens shutting down the nukes, give me a reason. Give me one that's palatable that I can actually understand. And, you know, maybe it is something like that we have a soul. But the thing about it, these people know. One thing I'm not going to accept is this idea that they don't know what it is. No, [ __ ] that, chat. We're swearing a lot tonight. [ __ ] that. This idea that they're like, "No, we got no idea what it is. There's there's 100% things flying around. And by the way, they're 100% non-human intelligence, but we just got no idea what it is. What do you mean, man? How do you know it's non-human intelligence if you have no idea what it is? And I know that's [ __ ] We know it's [ __ ] because we heard from John Ramirez is how the system works. The way that it works is they see something in some surveillance. They they're watching Gorgon stare and they see these three orbs spinning around an object that triggers an alert. Somebody flags that. Now they pull in a bunch of teams. They pull in the defense contractors. They pull in Halpud off. They review it. They write a report about it. Somebody writes that report. That report exists somewhere in the government. And those things can never be deleted. They're probably classified, but they're not being deleted. Those reports have information in them that would say like, "Oh, this must be a neutronic plasma because you can see the field reverse configuration." The same exact things that we have been doing, the exact same things that we've been doing looking at the MH370 videos, the government, the defense contracts, they would be doing with UFOs. So when they try to sell us on this idea that we just don't know what it is, [ __ ] If you didn't know what it was and there's magical plasma balls flying around in the sky, you would put all resources into figuring out what it is and how it works and how we can build it. And that's what's really going on. I don't have a clip for this, but somewhere else in here, maybe I do have a clip. Actually, wait, let me go back real quick. Uh, I don't see it here. There's another clip though where Dan Farah basically says that we've got these crash retrievals. We've got this technology and we are in this race. We are fighting with China and Russia to figure out who can get this technology out there faster. And when I look at that, I said that makes sense. That actually makes a lot of sense. That is what's happening. And in fact, you can argue that's what's happening in the MH370 videos. The the thing that makes the most sense in MH370 videos is like this is some kind of China, Russia, you know, jockeying for position in the global hierarchy of nuclear weapons, alien weapons, whatever you want to call it. and they're all trying to figure out who can advance this first. The thing that they're not saying that I don't think Dan Farah knows I think even like people like Dan Farah are being misled by his own witnesses is that we already won. We already won that war. We won that war 60 years ago. We won that war 60 years ago. And we've been winning that war 60 years ago. Since 60 years ago, that's the part that people don't understand. We already got there first. Now, we're just trying to hold on to the first position. And China is rapidly catching up because they've been spying on us. They've been stealing the technology. They've been doing whatever they can try to do to catch up to it. And we're in a fullon technological war against China right now. over semiconductors, over fusion research, over AI, all the things you see in the MH370 videos. We are currently battling China right now publicly. How crazy is that? Nvidia, semiconductors, AI, fusion. These are all the things we're trying to beat them on. The things that we're seeing in the MH370 videos. This is where Jason Georgiani wrote a really good article about our conversation about a neutronic fusion about the significance of this and these weapons and he said something at the end that really stuck with me when I read it. You guys should check it out and check out our conversation for sure. is he said we have weaponry we have a technological advantage right now because of this zero point energy weapons call them whatever you want nukes I don't even know what the appropriate terminology is for these weapons nuclear weapons plasma weapons zero point energy weapons UFO weapons alien weapons maybe they're all correct we have weapons s that the human mind cannot even comprehend. The human mind can't even comprehend it when you see it. We should be using that advantage to basically make a hedgeimony, I think is how he says it. Basically dominate the planet. Basically be like Bratannia in Code Guos. That's an anime if you haven't seen it. It's a really good anime if you haven't seen it. Code Guos chat. Code Guos Bratannia basically basically the the show starts with a plot point where the United States never broke away from from Britain, Great Britain. And because the United States never broke away from Great Britain, Great Britain ends up becoming the most powerful country in the entire world. And because they are a monarchy, they basically spread imperial rule all over the entire planet. And then the only competitors that they have are like a Southeast Asian coalition and like Africa, but you know, they can't really compete. So that should be what we do. Now, you might say right off the bat, Ashton, that is straight up fascism. That is totalitarianism. It's only those things if we act like that. It's only those things if we act fascist and we do those things. The reality of the world is it's not rainbows and unicorns. Somebody's always going to be in charge. If you believe in America and being America first, then if you have a huge technological advantage, you should take advantage of it for your people. trade deals, preventing war, stopping wars that are already happening, any way that you can. And we should be helping out other countries that are disadvantaged in my opinion. But that takes it the next step. So the most important part is that we should be spreading our power. We should be using our power. And I think that's exactly what Trump is doing right now. I think that's exactly what he's doing right now. I just saw a leaked peace plan for the Ukraine. Trump has basically ended every single war on Earth. It's even weird to say that if the Ukraine war gets ended, I think Trump will have ended essentially every single major war on Earth. It's pretty weird to think about that. And at the same time, we're lowering the deficit. And he's flexing on people. He's talking about we have weapons nobody understands. He's telling Putin. He's telling Russia, "You said the N-word. You don't ever say that word. We just sent a secret submarine that you can't even detect." Think about that. Our biggest adversary, Russia, said nuclear and we sent a nuclear submarine that they can't even detect because it's probably got some plasma around it that has got weapons on it that is going to render their nukes completely obsolete. That's what we should be doing that in my opinion. my opinion, we're doing the right thing. The only thing that I'm I'm not down with is that I'm not seeing the benefits on the ground level. I still see homeless people everywhere I go. People struggling everywhere. There was a lady today at the g at the gas station when I got this uh Mountain Dew and she was buying a guy a bag of chips. Homeless guy who was sitting outside just in the cold. Why? Why does that exist? Why isn't there a warm place for that guy to go hang out at? At a minimum. At a minimum. We've got teleportation and free energy plasma technology, but there's homeless dudes sitting on the corner of the gas station in the cold. That's just something my mind can never wrap its head around. Probably not till the day I die. Okay, so a few other points I want to talk about in this interview. just some of the big points I thought were um were relevant from Jason Georgiani. One was that the Nazis were testing. Well, first of all, I want to say several times I was emotionally emotionally moved in the conversation because the parallels that Jason Georgiani were bringing up, a I wasn't expecting wasn't expecting them and they were so perfectly aligned with my research, our research that I almost couldn't believe it. And then when Jason Georgian Johnny brings up John Ramirez watching me, which I thought was bizarre because I knew he had made that post about the satellites. I started to kind of realize there are, you know, sure I've fallen off. There's not thousands of people watching the stream, but there are significant people watching it. Significant people are still paying attention. And that to me, I don't know, a little emotional. So Jason Jordani says that there was a secret Nazi testing facility, a secret Nazi testing facility where they were working on plasma research where they and they were potentially using mercury spinning mercury possibly turning it into a plasma and using it for electrogravitic effects. And these electrogravidic effects are the same things direct connection to the physics for how we do fusion. And so then Jason brings up a really good point. He says, "How did we know? We didn't test the nuke that we dropped. Why did we not test it?" Isn't that interesting? Because I think that's actually true. We didn't end up testing it at all. We just knew it would work. How did we know that the nuke would work? There were people at the time that didn't think nukes were real. They thought nukes were fake. There's still people that think nukes are fake now. So, I just thought that was a great point, which is like, wait a minute, how did we know the nukes were going to work? Did we just, I don't know, hope and pray? We're like, hey, it seem to work on a small scale. It'll definitely work. We thought it might destroy the entire We might thought it might just uh you know destroy the atmosphere. But then it got darker. The story got even darker after that. The story is really dark. Is that what this idea that what if they really did have some different branch of physics that the Nazis were experimenting on that we would call gravity manipulation? What if they really did have that research? And people say, "Well, if they had that, why didn't they nuke us?" Well, because they understood they they found some principle of physics, but they didn't they weren't able to engineer it. They were working on it. They were trying to engineer it, but that's the thing. If this technology is real, why don't we have flying cars right now? Because the material science has to catch up. The material science has to catch up to the physics. This is talked about all the time by the black project engineers that they needed the material science. They needed the laser technology. They need the metamaterial technology. They needed all this stuff. They needed the microchips to catch up. So I think there's pretty good chance that what Jason said is true. And what he said is that they the Nazis figured this technology out. And what did they do with it? They used it as leverage to save their lives. Woo! Chat, now you're speaking my language because if I was a Nazi that you knew you were going to lose the war, there's no way we're beating America and all these countries. And the reason, by the way, the reason why America won World War II is because of our production. We simply outproduced everybody. You can't compete with somebody that can produce multiple warships every year when you're a tiny country like Japan. You just can't compete. We can just outscale everybody because our production was huge. So, you know, you're going to lose. You see the writing on the wall. If you're like, "We're gonna lose to America. It's just a matter of time, even if we take out a lot of people." So, what do you do? You say, "Hey, we want to flip sides. We're done with this. We We don't like this Hitler guy anymore. Let's uh Which gods do you want us to pray to? Sure. Just point me in the right direction. You want me to pray to the giant head in the sky? Sure. Whatever it is. By the way, you know what? If you give me safe passage and let me live in America as an American, even though I'm uh technically was working as a Nazi underneath Hitler, then I'll give you in response the ark of the covenant. You say, "What? The Ark of the Covenant? You don't have the Ark of the Covenant. Ark of the Covenant is not even real." Yes, it is. The Ark of the Covenant is gravity manipulation technology, electrogravitics, the same technology that Tesla was working on. And what does America say? America says, "Hell yeah." America says, "Why the hell not, chat? Why not?" Who says no? Who says no to that deal? I'll give you the secret, the keys to the universe, but you just got to let go of these transgressions where maybe we killed a few million Jews. Maybe we experimented on them, did horrific things, but we got some occult technology here. Got some occult technology here that you might be interested in. The I don't know why is it so compelling to me. Hm. I think the reason why it's so compelling is because of the videos. Because of the MH370 videos, because that's exactly what it feels like we're seeing in the MH370 videos when people are like, "Hey, why are they recording? Why are they using this weapon on the plane? Why? I don't know. Why did the Nazis kill a bunch of Jews? Why were the Nazis doing a cult [ __ ] Why were the Nazis making electrovidic technology? Because they can. Because they can. And nobody's going to stop them. Cuz then they can just go make a deal later on and for their lives. And then they can just go create NASA. They can be Warner von Braun and uh become the father of of rocket technology in the United States. [laughter] So that's what I thought was pretty wild is that potentially the Nazis might have made flying saucer technology which would have been rudimentary rudimentary anti-gravitational technology would have been flying saucers because of spin because of the spin of the Mercury. We would have thought we needed pilots in there because we didn't have drone technology way back then whereas now it's kind of stupid. Why would aliens ever be flying around in a spaceship? They would just send a drone. They're never going to send themselves if it's dangerous. So, it kind of makes sense that the Nazis may have developed this technology and we may have been early flying saucer sightings could have been this exact technology and then we took their scientists and their engineers and this is not debatable. This is what this is another great part of why it's so convincing is project paperclipip is real and the writer of the nuclear textbook that I read is a project paperclip scientist. Friedwart Winterberg is a project paperclip scientist. Inertial confinement fusion. Literally his mentor was her uh was Warner Heisenberg. The Heisenberg. So the project paperclipip stuff is real. clearly were trying to brain drain them. The only question is what were we trying to get out of them? What were we trying to get out of them? And it seems like a neutronic fusion or at least fusion in general is one of those things is one of those things. So, the next big plot point after the the Nazis use gravity manipulation technology as leverage. And what I'm presenting now is an alternative theory to the alien hypothesis. The alien hypothesis being that the aliens gave us this technology or we got crash retrievals. The other theory is that we've just been developing it. Now, this doesn't rule out aliens because maybe the maybe Nazis got the technology from aliens. Who knows? Or maybe there's more than one cra maybe multiple things are crashing and we're we're picking them up through the ages and we're just getting better and better. What I do know is we got some [ __ ] right now that definitely goes back to Tesla. Goes all the way back to Tesla. This technology does. And the key point where we seem to have stolen it, if I'm pointing now or we're focusing in on a neutronic fusion, which is what the topic was the year that we seem to have, this is even all is it really alt history? It's just real history, but we're just interpreting it. We're interpreting the effects of the history because nobody's denying that this history happened. Project Paperclip is real. It's just like what did they get out of it and why? Ronald RTOR. Ronald Richtor says he saw these plasma experiments in the Nazis in the 30s. Says he saw it. Says he knew it would work cuz he saw it with the Nazis. That's huge to me. Why would he lie about that? No reason to lie about that. Then he really went and built a fusion reactor 100%. People went and reviewed it and he clearly had the right equipment set up to do it. So he was at least trying to build a real fusion reactor. So that's just another huge plot point where you're like, wait, so in the 50s this guy goes to Argentina and now he's trying to build a clean fusion reactor, which we now know means a neutronic fusion reactor. And then what happened? He gets discredited. This might be the first case where they use disinformation and suppression to hide the physics. They said, "Oh, this doesn't work." I actually read the debunks of Ronald RTOR's work. They said that, get this. Are you ready for this? You're going to love this, guys. This might be another yatsi. They said the temperatures were too low for fusion to happen. H temperatures of the plasma were too low for fusion to happen. You say, "Hm, that's interesting. Right here in this scientific paper that we were just reading, it says that cold non-equilibrium plasmas can actually burn cold using a neutronic fusion fuels. H well, you look at that quite interesting. So I'm when I read the debunks, you realize, holy crap, they were trying to debunk it from a conventional perspective of physics, not from a Tesla perspective of physics at all. So if that really did work, then what happened to all his work? It all got classified. It all got taken. So presumably the United States rolls up and we just take that technology. Sorry, we're going to go ahead and take that lab. Uh nothing to see here. By the way, you're not building any more fusion reactors. That's never going to happen again. But we'll go ahead and take that research. We'll go ahead and we'll have some of that. So, that was in the 50s. That was in the 50s. And then in like 1959, in 1963, then what's happening? Then we're doing the Ripple project. We're doing the Ripple project and we are literally making clean fusion bombs. So now you've got a direct connection between Ronald Richtor and then just 10 years later the United States government who had been stealing all these scientists and technology. Now we're making clean fusion bombs and we are successful. We are successful at doing it. 1962 we build the clean fusion bomb. Nobody gets to see it. Sorry. No one gets to see it. And then what do we do right after that? We ban all nuclear weapons. Sorry. No one's allowed to do this anymore. No one's allowed to do this anymore. [laughter] Uh, okay. That's weird. It's like when you discover the secret sauce and you're like, "Nobody else is allowed to have this." You're like, "Okay. Uh, nothing to see here behind this door. There's no pots of gold at the end of this rainbow. Nobody look over here, guys. There's nothing down here that you need to see. We ban all nuclear weapons testing. No one's allowed to test weapons anymore. Sorry." It's like you couldn't be more guilty than that. In retrospect, if I'm right, in retrospect, it's going to be funny how obvious it was. It's going to be like, "Oh, of course we figured out some principle of physics right there about the nukes, about the the clean Hbombs, and then we couldn't let anybody else have it because it's just we figured out the next tech the next tech tree, guys, and nobody else allowed to have that tech tree." So, a neutronic fusion is is really the big thing. And I think that Jason Georgiani knows he obviously has connections, by the way. Jason obviously has connections in the in the government, probably the CIA people, probably John Ramirez is one of them. And so, I think he knew that I'm I'm over the mark with this. And I think he knew how it parallels in his own work. And that's probably why he was so excited because he was really excited to have this conversation with me about this. And a neutronic fusion is the secret. It's the secret because what we just learned today is that it also enables cold plasmas. The fusion fuel is what enables the cold plasmos. And so now we're even more skeptical of the helium fusions of the world who are doing this a neutronic fusion using helium 3. And we're going, wait a minute, bro. Where did you get that idea from? Where did you get that idea from, bro? because I'm writing I'm doing a history book doing a history lesson right now and I'm able to go to have that go all the way back to Ronald Richtor in 1953 goes all the way back to Ronald Richtor maybe even further back to the Nazis. Okay, few more things that I thought were really good. We talked a little bit about like biological life. um integrating with AI. Actually, I think I talked about this a little bit on the on the last stream, which is I think that people are going to eventually I think they are going to get brain chips. I think little kids are probably going to get brain ships, too. And I think it's going to happen and I think people will be shocked and horrified by how quickly that happens by how quickly this technology gets absorbed because if if I'm right if we are right about this technology then all the technology we have today most likely originates from this technology. All the public technology, all the massive advancement technology we've been experiencing comes from this origin. And that means we've been absorbing technology at a rate that wouldn't have seemed possible. And we've been pretty oblivious to it. We've been pretty oblivious that technology is going like this. And nobody's asking the question, man, isn't it weird how fast our technology is going? Nobody even knows how this iPhone works. Nobody even knows how it works. Nobody could even rebuild this. None of you could. Basically, nobody could even rebuild this thing. We Nobody even cares. No one even cares. Like, when's the next one? When's the next one coming out? Let me give me go line up for it. It's scary to think that we basically live in a matrix. People want to know what is zero point energy? How do you understand zero point energy? What's the easiest way to understand it? Think of the movie The Matrix. Except for the matrix is spacetime itself. The matrix is space. The universe itself is the matrix. That matrix is energy. The matrix that's making this projection that we live in has its own energy source that allows it to exist. And when we're tapping into zero point energy, we're tapping into that energy source. So you think of it as like, okay, this is a matrix. I can make a fire here. That's cool. But the fire is just the matrix making a fire. So if I were to tap into the underlying source of what's producing this coherence that we re that we understand to be our reality, then I've tapped into the space juice. tapped into the space juice, the underlying framework of reality. That's how you should think of the zero point energy. You think of the zero point energy as the universe, as the matrix itself. And this is where Jason Georgiani then says, "What if when we're setting off nukes, we're damaging the matrix?" He presents a lot of really good ideas that I hadn't even considered. Even his 9/11 theory was one that actually gave me pause because you guys know that I'm a debunker and I'm a skeptic. But he actually said, "Well, what if the towers were already what if they were already set up with explosives when they were built?" It's like, damn. Okay, you actually came with an excuse. You came with an explanation that you know, possible, at least possible. So, the nuking the matrix also possible. This is a better explanation for why the UFOs would care about us figuring out nukes because if we figured out nukes, we're actually damaging spaceime. We're we're manipulating spaceime. We're we're making rips in spaceime. That's essentially what we're doing with our nukes. We're manipulating the actual fabric of spaceime. And if that allows us to teleport, then you can see the significance of doing that from a physics perspective. But there's more implications. It may be more. It could be that when we pull 0 point energy out, we're actually damaging the matrix itself. That's possible. I don't think that's the case, but it's possible. There's another scarier implication that was just mentioned in the chat by Rick James. F your couch. What if we what if time travel is possible? What if when we are ripping through the matrix, we're not just ripping through distance, we're ripping through time as well. If we're able to figure out retrocausality, retrocausality can be thought of as you going back in time or sending a message back in time, then yes, we could see things like the Mandela effect. That would be the type of effect that we would expect is that the time stream even our current reality could be manipulated without us even understanding that it was because you get these closed timelike curves which is just like the movie dark where it's like okay in the future 20 years from now I make a time machine and I go back in time and then I give myself the MH370 videos maybe I'm reicided on like this is a perfect example what if I'm regided And I don't even realize it because 20 years from now I send a message back in time and I put the videos on the internet as regicide with the exact stuff that's in there received March 12th 2014. And you would say but wait if you did that 20 years from now then who made the videos? And the answer is nobody made the videos. The videos just always existed. The videos always existed. and me takes the same videos that I put back on the internet and I find them when I'm younger, right? That's a closed timelike curve. So, if we start doing that a bunch, what are the implications of doing that more than once? Heck, doing that even once is scary. But imagine you could just do that repeatedly. Now, you're just basically you're in the Marvel multiverse at this point. Now it's like you're either making alternative divergent paths and everybody's living in their own universe or maybe we're in some weird shared version of the multiverse all the time and we're getting Mandela effect type things happen or the butterfly effect as somebody pointed out. Those are scary thoughts man. So these are real things that we have to consider from a physics perspective that is I would call this hard sci-fi. It's hard sci-fi because it's based on real physics principles, not on science fiction, fantasy, imagination, world of physics. And in the real physics world, we can travel faster than the speed of light. I think it's funny because it's hard for even famous Harvard astrophysicists who shall not be named, but whose initials are Avi Lobe, [laughter] they don't believe we go faster than the speed of light. And if you don't believe we can go faster than the speed of light, you have boxed yourself in from a physics perspective. That's why a lot of the sci-fi sucks. That's why a lot of the sci-fi out there sucks ass because it doesn't go based on real physics. We know faster than light travel is possible because we see quantum entanglement. We see quantum entanglement and it's been proven and we can see two things that are connected and they're acting faster than the speed of light. So somehow it's possible. We just don't quite understand how to manipulate it yet, but we do. ER equals EPR. So, the next scary part. This is political as well. The technology transfer to China. [snorts] Jason Georgiani says, "If you ever get to talk to John Ramirez, ask him about the technology transfer to China." This gave me chills. Absolute chills. Still gives me chills to think about it right now. How much do you want to bet the [ __ ] Obama administration, maybe not even him, maybe even before him, I bet you we transferred some of this technology to China in some diplomatic exchange of [ __ ] said, "You know what? We want to be cool with you, CCP. So, here you go. We'll teach you that quantum mechanics is real and in exchange you give us a bunch of cheap goods. I could absolutely see that happening. When he said, I'm like, "Oh [ __ ] chat." I'm like, "Is the only reason why China's even close right now because we previously gave them a bunch of technology? because we had a bunch of weird CIA deals where we're trying to spy on Russia. Like we were trying to spy on Russia and who's right next to Russia? Oh, China is. So, in exchange for us being allowed to spy and set up surveillance stuff on Russia, well, we gave them some technology. We said, "We got some secret, you know, quantum radar technology that we want to implement in China that we can use to spy on Russia, and in exchange, we'll give you a little bit. You can have a You can have a little taste. You never do that, chat. Number one rule of secret technology. Never give them a taste. They're like drug addicts. First time's free. They got to come back for more. They need another bite of that forbidden fruit. And what do we see happen having happened? What looks like happened to MH370 is that China was trying to steal microchip technology. And we were like, "Uh-uh. No, that ain't gonna happen today. The bank is closed on Sundays. Sorry, we got some orb technology says no." So, the China transfer thing really bugs me, man. Really bugs me. Not because there's a lot of evidence for it, because it just it my spider sense goes off when I hear it. Because Salvatore Py has been yelling that he's afraid about China's catching this up. And I'm looking at Chinese scientific papers that are referencing Hal Pudof. I'm looking at Chinese scientific papers about warp drives referencing Hal Pudof and other plasma ones that are referencing Salvatore Pais. So I'm pretty worried about China catching up to us on this and they're going to eventually. It's just a matter of time. What that means is that we're looking at a future war with China. Just like just like John Warner was saying, how do we avoid World War II? That's what this is all about. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but at some point in the future, 10 years from now, 25 years from now, we are looking at a quantum war with China where AIs and drones are fighting each other, where humans are just sitting in their chairs, you know, playing video games, controlling drones that are zapping things to Narnia, basically. >> [clears throat] >> So, couple more things and then we're good for tonight. Can't let Iran have this technology. You just can't let and and what did um Jason actually brought up some really good points about this. And actually, I was listening to Charlie Kirk bring up really good points about this. And Jason said, "It's not that the Iranian people are anti-American. Actually, the Iranian people are more pro-American than most countries in the Middle East. I don't know if that's true, but that makes sense. At the end of the day, the individual people are not really at fault for their government. But the problem is that they have a theocratic government. Their government is literally theocratic. And Charlie Kirk, when he said Islam is not compatible with Western civilization, he gave specific reasons why. Because in those countries there is no freedom of speech. There's no freedom of religion. You are Muslim. You are Islamic or you're an outcast. That's it. And their religion says that you must push the religion through the state. So it's the exact opposite of what we have in the United States. We say that we have separation of church and state which means that you have freedom of religion and freedom from religion as well. That does not exist in the Middle East certainly not in Iran. So, and they also say that their religion should be the one and only religion. So if you add up these three factors, this leads to a situation where you simply cannot be allowed to have doomsday weapons. You can't have them. Sorry. You are not advanced enough to live on this world. If you think that you've got to wipe out everybody who's not like you, then that's just not compatible with being allowed to have doomsday weapons. You're clearly not responsible enough for that. This goes for anybody with that viewpoint except for us. And you say, "Ashen, that's the most hypocritical thing I've ever said." Yeah. Welcome to the real world, bro. Oh, no. Hypocrisy, chat. We're hypocrites. Yeah. Well, you know who gets to be a hypocrite? The ones with the plasma orbs. Those are the people that get to be the hypocrites. Everybody else gets to play by their rules. That's how the real world works, guys. That's how the real world works. It's not that I like it. It's not that I'm happy about it. It's just how the real world works. Um, and this is this is why they let me do this. Why are they letting me do this? Um, because we're cooked, man. Because a their whole plan that they're doing with this age of disclosure, it's not working. It's not working at all, man. If I had to rate how well this disclosure movement is going with these movies and what have you, I mean, I'd give it like a D minus. I give it like a D. Like, how many minds have been changed by these disclosure movies? Practically zero. Basically, nobody's mind is being changed by this. I look around on conservative media because I'm plugged into conservative social media. Nobody's talking about Age of Disclosure. Nobody cares about it. None of them do. Not even one of the MAGA people care about it. None. You have the same four congressmen who've been in the UFO thing talking about it and then a bunch of lefty libtard people that are basically encapsulate the UFO community. They're basically the only people. It's like some the one guy said it the best. like the mildly stoned libtards [laughter] are talking about how great the movie was and how this is going to change people's minds because I think that they thought in their mind that if everybody believed that the aliens are real and they still think this I think they're now floating this idea that Trump's going to say that the aliens are real like they really think in their minds that once the that people admit that aliens are real that somehow this is going to cause some profound change in people and humanity ity that we'll be ready for this technology or whatever, but that is not going to happen. So, on one hand, I'm doing the thing that they couldn't even do. I'm waking up more people just as a dude with a relatively small social media account than people that are backed by the CIA that have Hollywood investment and funding that are making major motion pictures. Like, they're doing nothing. It's not working. But at the same time, this technology has been so brainwashed. So, we've been so brainwashed to ignore this that they're not even afraid. As long as they say nothing at all, then it's extremely difficult for me to hit the burden of proof. As long as they try not to pay attention to the videos, try not to respond to them, try not to mention them, there's not much they can do. But at the end of the day, if it's doomsday either way, if we're looking at doomsday, then hey, you might as well let this guy do his best. Let this Ashton Forbes guy, you know, maybe he'll wake up a few people. Maybe he'll get lucky. But what are the odds that I'm actually going to be able to, you know, produce disclosure? Pretty much zero. Pretty much zero. Because again, that's not how the world works. You can pretty clearly see that things are coordinated when you're watching Dan Farah go on Joe Rogan the exact same day that his documentary drops. It's not a coincidence. How do you think you're like, "Oh, I'm on Joe Rogan. Now I'm on CNN. Now I'm on Fox News." I'll tell you what, guys. As a guy that's been moderately e famous, that [ __ ] doesn't happen organically. That doesn't happen organically. You have a PR person that that knows the producer at these places that tells you they're my best friend and I'll get you on there and blah blah blah and we're going to coordinate it for the day that the movie comes out. It's like that level of PR, that level of coordination requires like requires resources to pull that all off. Two more things. [clears throat] One, nukes are demons. I loved that Jason Georgiani took a shot at Tucker Carlson because in part Tucker Carlson is right. Nuclear weapons, if we are right about nuclear weapons, it's demonic. It's evil. In a sense, it is. I mean, we're talking about the alpha and the omega. We're talking about revelations. We're talking about the end of the world. So, there's absolutely a biblical aspect to it. And I think that you could also argue there's a good versus evil aspect to it. At the same time, claiming that UFOs are literally made by demons, which is what I'm afraid Tucker is saying. I'm afraid he literally means demons came from hell and made UFOs [laughter] and made made nuclear weapons. That's crazy. That's actually just crazy. the people that are the demons that made the the the UFOs, the people that are the demons that made the nuclear weapons, it's us, it's human beings that made this technology. We're the bad guys. The takeaway from this is we are the bad guys, not the aliens, not the demons. We're just pushing our own responsibility onto all of these things. And I love that Jason's able to see that even as a guy that believes aliens, believes that Atlantis and all these other things is that he can still I mean he still sees clearly as I can imagine anybody sees. I don't consider him to be a a crazy guy at all actually. And to me that Atlantis theory the theory that it didn't even come here from somewhere else that we've literally gone through cycles of civilization on this planet. That to me, I don't really necessarily have a ton of evidence for it, but it just rings more likely to me than aliens coming and flying down here and crashing their flying sauces on our planet because for no reason. So, that's just my personal opinion. And then, just as I said, I already kind of covered this, but we should be using our super weapons to dunk on the noobs. chat. Everybody knows when you're playing a video game, when you're playing World of Warcraft and you get that first Thunder Fury, what do you do with it? You get it on your Rogue and then you just go grief people. You go into Guys, if you guys didn't play World of Warcraft, let me I'm tell you how it goes. You're the one who gets you go to the raids and you get the super gear. The first thing you do is you go to the enemy's base in their base and you start griefing them. You start killing them in their base where they think they're safe. You use your advantage to dunk on the noobs. We have been dropping the ball, chat. America should be dunking on noobs the world over. And instead, we've been sitting here giving them favorable trade deals. Like it literally took Trump to come in here and actually get some good trade deals for us. We've just been giving we've been selling out America, selling out our weapons, maybe even giving weapons to China. This is the [ __ ] that pisses me off the most. This is what actually gets me politically activated is like, wait a minute, we had super weapons and we have we could have just ended these wars anytime we wanted. We could just get the best trade deals ever. We could just have no homeless people get everybody could be rich in America. But no, we didn't do that cuz a few people wanted to keep it all to themselves. Gross, man. Gross. Okay. Yes, we're still live, by the way, guys. Okay, let's do some donos. Thank you guys for hanging out with me tonight on a Friday night. We went about an hour longer. I was going to say at the beginning, we're going to only go for a short time, but every time I do that, we end up going for a long stream. Sam Fischer, Helian dropped a new promo video yesterday. Can you please explain parts of the process that look nerfed to you? Yeah. First thing is going to be what is their fuel source? Are they using lithium? I think we're going to find out they are using lithium and they're just not talking about it. Boron and lithium. If you're not using the right fusion fuel, that's probably the number one nerfing mechanism. But again, this is speculative. I haven't even watched the new video yet. I will watch it this weekend though for sure. And guys, tomorrow I will upload the debate video on my channel as well. I want to give the other guy uh Sneezing Monkey. I want to give him the bulk of the the views and the impressions, but I want to upload on my channel, too, because I think it's a great example of a good debate between both sides. War Ranch LLC, thank you very much, BROTHER. APPRECIATE YOU. WHOA, BUBBA. Booba 6553. Numbers in your names, guys. Secret. If you just want to be awesome on the internet, never put numbers in your username. The best people just are creative enough to never put numbers in their username. But thank you very much. Extended electronamics. E chat. There's something else called SED. EED. Extended electronamics is basically SED with the ether. Add that ether in. Uh so add I think that's right. Yeah, skastic electronamics. Yeah, thank you War Ranch. Thank you for those donos guys. And uh Dad Max Triac says, "Thank you for teaching us. You're really good at it. Appreciate you." Yeah, I'm pretty good at teaching people stuff. Um I think the secret is just try to understand it yourself. I try to understand it conceptually, like what does it mean as opposed to just throwing a bunch of big words out there like how do I understand this? How does this how do I make this make sense for people for normal people like me? Sam Fischer, another follow-up super chat. With the exception of going interplanetary, do you think this tech can be used to protect cities or outright? Of course it can. Of course it can. Here's a good example. Thank you for this super chat, by the way. They are currently, you see this narrative of us talking about nuking an asteroid or nuking a meteorite that might hit the moon. Chad, they're not using a conventional nuke. When they talk about nuking asteroids or whatever like that, we need to be paying close attention. They're not talking about classic nukes. They're probably talking about using a clean fusion bomb and just zap that thing out of the sky. Bye. Send it to the sun. Who cares? So, yes. Can we use this to defend ourselves? Absolutely. We should not be afraid of space rocks. This idea that a meteor is going to hit us and take us out. No, bro. We got past that filter like almost a hundred years ago. That's not a threat to us anymore. I used to be super afraid of that when I was a little kid. Like a rock's going to hit us and wipe us out. Oh no, there'll be nothing we can do about it like the dinosaurs. Nah, bro. I guarantee you that's not how we go out. That's not the end of us. It's going to be much worse than that. And natural disasters. I don't think you can control the weather with this technology. I mean, in theory, in the future, of course, you can, but with our current level, probably not. Those plasma orbs are powerful, but they're not powerful enough to like make a hurricane form. But they might be possible. They might be strong enough to manipulate the weather, as in make something more extreme or less extreme or to slightly redirect a thunderstorm. I could see stuff like that being possible for sure. And a lot of people talk about that on social media. So yes, this technology definitely has that. And I avoid those topics because a I don't need that. I don't need additional conspiracies or events or things like that to explain the technology. And the other reason is that's how you get yourself discredited when you start going out there and you're seeing this right now. You're seeing this with Candace Owens and and a lot of the other people that they just they they took it too far. They flew too close to the sun. There are a lot of things out there that are are conspiracies. Absolutely. Conspiracies exist. But when you see everything as a conspiracy, you're going to miss. You're going to be wrong. And when you're wrong, people are going to hammer you. They hammer me when I'm wrong. And so, what you should be doing is trying to minimize how much you're wrong, which means being very selective about when you decide to go all in on hurricane formation or making earthquakes happen or various other stuff like that, which you can't really prove. There's not really solid evidence for. Thank you for that. Dono, Timothy Foster in the chat says, "Good evening, Ashton and four Orbee ambassadors in advance. Have a great safe Thanksgiving." Yes, we are going to have a good Thanksgiving. We probably won't be streaming on Thanksgiving next week, but I will be streaming next week for sure, guys. Should be a fun one. And then a couple Oh, there's more way more super chat. Okay. And then Annie McFersonson, thank you Ash for keeping it real. Thank you, Annie, for being in the chat. Appreciate you. Koba killers 88. Where did they teleport to or are they gone? First of all, I can't know for sure. I'm not psychic. I don't got psychic powers. I mean, I do have remote viewing powers. No, the reality is they probably were recording on the other side. If that's teleportation, so we know, they know, but we don't know. Like that plane could come out in one piece. It could come out in a million pieces. It could come out in the Andromeda galaxy. But no, I think it actually came out somewhere else on Earth. So where exactly did they go? Probably somewhere near the Maldives. Probably somewhere near where we found the debris. That's probably where the plane ended up coming out. Beyond that, I can't say. No idea. So actually not no idea, but watch my interviews if you want to know my in-depth analysis on Diego Garcia, where and why the plane teleported where it did. But again, at the end of the day, it's speculative. Parts of the story, even with all this evidence, we don't know. The only people that can answer that is the United States government. The people that were recording those videos, the people that conducted that operation, they obviously had some reason. They're not just teleporting things for no reason whatsoever. Hasn't happened since. So, those are the people that need to tell us those answers. And that's something else I wanted to say to the sneezing monkey is like when they say all these things about why they do this, why they do that. Look man, I'm not whistleblowing. I'm not telling you I was part of the operation. I'm just telling you those videos are real. And so whatever you're seeing there is real, too. And it has an explanation for why it's happened. Good question. Really good question. Resolute decide. I haven't seen you in a while, but Ashton, I think you may be overlooking the implications of the Drake equation in conjunction with the physics that we're learning about. What do you mean to respect that? The Drake equation is basically how many civilizations we should see in the galaxy. So it basically says, okay, what's the rate at which a solar system would form? How likely is there to be planets around the solar system? How likely is any individual planet likely to have uh life form on it? And I'm here to tell you, you can throw out the Drake equation. Just throw it. I never like the Drake equation. I didn't like the Drake equation when I first learned about it in freshman year of phys of of college in my physics class. The reason why I didn't like it is because the Drake equation is like models. The reason why models aren't science is because they're not based in reality. You're doing modeling and modeling is always going to be skewed based on your biases. Why are the models about the drift analysis fake? because they wanted they were trying to come up with a reason for how the debris could be in Africa and they reverse engineered it and came up with a lot with an answer for how that's not science. That's just working backwards. Same thing they did with the Drake equation. What was the answer to the Drake equation? The answer to Drake equation was one. There should be one civilization in the galaxy and it's us. So basically they just work backwards from assuming that there's only one and then that's how they came up with the Drake equation. My opinion, and I'm pretty confident in this opinion, life is everywhere. Life is everywhere in the universe. Life is everywhere in the galaxy. And life is everywhere in the universe. And we aren't just not alone, but there are there is life all over the place. And there is intelligent life and civilizations all throughout the galaxy as well. That's my opinion. And then the bigger question is why are we not seeing them? Why are we not seeing them? Because we're not looking the right way. We're basically Native Americans doing smoke signals, wondering why we're not seeing other alien civilizations sending us back smoke signals. Well, pretty obvious answer for that. The aliens aren't using smoke signals to communicate. They're using something more advanced. using quantum technology, which means that the moment we start turning on our quantum technologies, uhoh, we're going to see civilizations everywhere. We're going to hear them. We're going to see their signals. And so, when they say they don't know what the UFO topic is, I don't believe it for a second. I don't believe it for even one second because these technologies are going to allow us to detect civilizations that are out there like that. like no question we're seeing artificial signatures of warp drives of communications that are being sent through the quantum through quantum uh communications we would be detecting all of that and the moment you start detecting that you're like okay we're clearly clearly not alone in the universe right so that's my opinion on the Drake equation great question though Zaparoo fantastic and spot on your research has proven the case 100% never stop talking and the idiot critics and Redditards in the Where is the great Salvator Pis? F him. F him. Um, yeah. And that's the thing. The letter to Ashen Forbes. Never stop talking about it. Now, I'm never going to stop talking about it either just because I like it. I like the physics. It's fun. It's cool. Sarah Sunnisia, go Packers. How dare you? How dare you right now? That is such a lowb blow. Get out. Get out. I deny your existence. [laughter] I deny your existence, chat. No mercy for Packer fans. Also, just Bears fans, too. Yeah. Uh, Lions fans, you know, we feel bad for you. So, we hold no animosity because we also have not won a Super Bowl. But you Packer fans, how dare you? How dare you, chat. Just kidding. Have a good Have a good one. I hope we I hope we do well. But it's not a great year for us this year. Um, Alexander Slavnik, boouga sphere, seamless shell, piso humon contact, mass and ai suggest piso electric andron drone. Why hoax this tech stack? Uh, I think you're making a little too many assumptions. Well, a few too many assumptions on the boggasphere on this front and I'm extremely skeptical of the boggasphere. Could be something, but for me, you got to turn it on. If you can't turn it on, I'm not buying it. I'm not buying it unless you can turn it on. So, if you turn it on, and I'm not talking about I poured some water on it and steam came off. I'm talking make the thing hover in the sky, right? Apply a current to it, turn it into plasma, and have it float around the If you do that, if you do that, then I'm all in, baby. I'm all in. But until then, I'm I'm skeptical. Uh but yeah. Okay. And then I see a couple other follow-up donos here. Uh so yeah, I mean, you know, you're not wrong about the physics and the science. I'm just saying it's a it's a leap to say that the sphere is essentially doing that. But thank you very much for those donations, Alex. I appreciate you, man. And yes, if more information comes out of the bug sphere, someone can make it fly or do some more convincing. But again, these are the kinds of cases that like I just said, guys, why do we not go all in on these things? Because a we don't need them. We don't need the boggas sphere to prove a neutronic fusion. We don't need that. The only thing that could happen is that can get somebody comes out and says, "I'm the guy that hoaxed the bogusphere. You're an idiot for believing that it was real. It was fake the whole time." And then they'll use that to discredit all your theories. So why bother? Unless I know, unless I'm the person that found it. Why? I just don't care that much. Not it's not this huge revelation that's going to prove everything. And honestly, that's true of the tridactyl mummies, too. It's true of the tridactyl mummies. You say, "Well, Ashen, they they tested it. This can't be human DNA." Nobody cares, man. Nobody cares. And there might be a chance that it's fake, even if it's a small chance. And then they'll use that to say, "Yeah, see, you believe anything is aliens, blah, blah, blah." So, I'm just telling you the real situation here. And this is why I I really urge you guys to be cautious. And a lot of people were cautious about me in the MH370 videos. And they should be, too. Because turns out I've got the keys to the castle right here. We've got the this we've got the whole cake ready to go. Here you go. Here's the answer to the thing you were looking for. So, they should be cautious. But what they should have done is they should have done their own research. And yes, this is why I dropped the Miami aliens, too. Why did I drop the Miami aliens so fast? People were actually on me saying, "You got to keep digging into the Miami Aliens because a they were immediately using it to attack me and discredit me, which I didn't really care about at the time. But then the letter to Ashton Forbes came out and said, "You should stop talking about stupid Miami alien shit." The letter to Ashton Forbes says it twice. You could talk about Miami Aliens, but there's something a little bit more interesting. So, those are all our super chats tonight, guys. Thank you. so much for all the super chats, guys. And thank you everybody for hanging out tonight on this Friday. Hope you guys enjoyed it. Check out the Jason Georgiani podcast. Check out the debate with the sneezing monkey, which is a great debate, guys. You can, if you haven't watched it, make sure you check it out. We'll be back on Monday talking about more science, more physics. Hope you guys have a happy Thanksgiving. See you guys on Monday. Later, everybody. Peace out. Curl. >> [music] >> Out in the fields where the skies [music] are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, [music] they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing [music] weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy travel through the cosmos, it's [music] our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Bon trip 7 through a wormhole, but we're talking [music] wormhole. Stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. [music] MH370, where did it go? Holding triple 7 through a wormhole flow. [music] Exotic [music] matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeezed so tight, [music] creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers [music] in the lab they play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cases force negative [music] zones. We need to stay the course. Stalking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our [music] destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boowing trip 7 through a wormhole flow. Thin shell formalism [music] plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy conditions [music] that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a try. [music] [music] Cool. Forces balancing the plate creating the throat. Opening gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. [music] Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're talking wormho, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Blowing trip [music] 7 through a wormhole flow from the fields to the stars. We break the chains. Understanding [music] the universe, we make the gain. Little Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through [music] his music, we'll explore the night.