Video Transcript
Wormholes as starships. John G. Kramer, Professor Emmeritus. Emmeritus, Department of Physics, University of Washington, Advanced Propulsion Workshop, 2018. So, for the historians that are out there who are watching this, let's say you're watching this in the year 2035 and you're like, "Oh, damn. This guy Ashton was on board." Okay, if I turn out to be right about this, then let me just tell you, my spider sense is going [ __ ] crazy. When it comes to Mark Millis, John Kramer, these dudes at the BPP, Eric Davis, Hal Pudof, I'm almost as sure those guys developed teleportation as I am that Edward C. Lynn leaked the videos. So, if it turns out Edward Lynn really did leak the Gorgon stair video of MH370, then you probably want to be talking to these guys, although they're probably dead at this point. in 2035. But those guys probably developed teleportation. There you go. It's just And the reason why I say that, you're going to find out in this presentation is that the way this guy is describing wormholes, there's like I found out there's like 50 different ways you can imagine a wormhole. Polyhedral spinning wormholes. Okay, cool. Then there's like the different ways that you can create the wormholes. And here's John Kramer pretty much explaining exactly the way we're seeing wormhole work in the MH370 videos. And and before I play that, here's a little quick reminder of what what a real wormhole looks like. This is what we're working with here on our screen. We can see these orbs spinning around the play. And these orbs, when we think about orbs, guys, everybody laughs at the idea of orbs. I'm going to keep calling them [ __ ] orbs. You show me some plasma balls and yes, I could get real specific and be like, well, that is a field reverse configuration plasma with a plasmoid inside and but I could do that. But no, I it's just easier to say it's some orbs. My whole thing in the back sign says orbs. So, there's three plasma orbs, but think of these as just balls of lightning. Imagine you take your lightning and you spin it up and you just zap something with it. That's what we're talking about here. And what we're talking about is these little balls of lightning, little zaps they do. They send you to the nega universe. They send you through a wormhole when you get hit that little zap. It's like a little special ability. Think of it like that. Okay, so here we go. So here's here's the video, right? So we got little balls of lightning and then they converge almost like magnetic reconnection and then our object's just not there anymore. Even the orbs aren't there anymore either. But also remember the dance. Look at how they're spinning like this. Okay, around the plane. Just remember that. I wanted to give us some frame of reference before we listen to our boy here, uh, Johnny C. [laughter] >> There was that laugh. There was that laugh. >> We can track wormholes back to to 1500 AD. Uh this is a picture from the uh palace of the doge in Venice uh by Heronomous Bos showing a wormhole connection between earth and heaven in which the blessed are taken from one place to the other. [laughter] Um more recently [clears throat] um wormholes were invented uh or were perceived to exist in the uh structures of general relativity by Einstein and and Rosen. Um, basically what Einstein and Rosen were trying to do is something very similar to what the speaker in the previous talk was trying to do, trying to explain what electrons and posetrons are. And there were [clears throat] their idea was that if if you had a wormhole that had electric flux threading through it, that one end of it would appear to be positive and the other end would appear to be negative. And therefore that maybe that's what fundamental particles are. Uh, it was laid. >> Okay. Okay. I mean, I'm one minute in here and I'm going, wait, what? So remember guys, what is my name? Ashton the demon. Four orbs takes no prisoners chat. And it's going to probably turn out that there's six orbs and that I'm going to have to legally change my name to Ashton six orbs. It's going to be rough. I'm gonna have to change this whole banner. My thing at the top is going to be all wrong in the future. The reason being, here's your answer to wormholes. monopoles, positive charge, minus charge. The connection between these two points, that's your wormhole. From a very basic physics perspective, what are we seeing in the MH370 video? When the plane disappears out of spaceime, you're seeing one half of a dipole. A dipole is a positive and a minus. You're seeing one half of it. That means the other side must be the other half. And the reason why this is the case is this is how you're determining how the plane's going to be attracted from one location to the next. You have a positive charge over here. You have a minus charge over here. They're linked together. When the barrier is removed between them, that's where they're going to go. And there may also be a vectoring, which is a targeting system that is required. So when John Kramer is mentioning this and he's saying he's also talking about scale and variance here he's alluding to this this idea that maybe this is also true at the very small scale. Maybe particles themselves are little wormholes. Maybe particles themselves are governed by the same physics that a wormhole is at the larger scale by the community at the time as an Einstein Rosen bridge. The basic idea as I said is that you have a uh a wormhole connecting two regions of space. You have electric flux going through them. Here you see the electric lines of flux going in and ending on the object here and that represents a negative charge. Here you see the lines of flux coming out of the object and that [clears throat] represents a positive charge. And so they said that's what maybe that's what electrons and posetrons are. The trouble is that if you calculate the mass of an object like this uh it doesn't have an electron mass. it has a much much larger mass [clears throat] some somewhat comparable to the plant mass. So uh this is a um uh an interesting idea but it didn't satisfy its original mission. What? So the [clears throat] earliest people Einstein Rosen er e er einstein roen the people that came up with the Einstein Rosen bridge the first idea of a wormhole before wormhole even had idea they said maybe a wormhole is just positive and minus charge being separated. This is a beautiful thought. Do you want to know why? chat. What is the first question that Dave Fina would get asked in a debate that he would never be able to answer? What is electricity? What is electricity? Got to be one of the most basic physics questions you could ever ask somebody. And yet 99% of physicists probably can't even answer it. What is electricity? Ashton can answer it. A separation of positive and minus charge. Separation of positive charge and minus charge produces a current between them that we call electricity. That's it. So when we talk about maybe a wormhole, maybe a wormhole is one end of positive charge and one end of minus charge. We're going all the way back to fundamental physics here. saying, "Whoa, are we unifying everything through electricity? Are we saying that spacetime itself is governed by the ideas of positive or minus charge, by electricity?" Whoa. Well, if that were the case, it would be some kind of electrical universe or something was to explain what fundamental particles are. Um, [clears throat] and John Wheeler subsequently uh renamed wormholes and demonstrated that they're very unstable and that's where things sat for a long time until 1988 [clears throat] when we Ray gave us a nice uh introduction to that to this business um yesterday and his student Mike Morris and his postto uh UV Viterver uh [clears throat] uh were caused to reexamine the idea of wormholes. because Carl Sean had had a book had a book a movie contract for writing a uh uh for writing the the a novel and a screenplay for things that ultimately became the movie Contact. Uh and uh he wanted to have his uh [clears throat] C SATI radio astronomer go from the Earth to some alien civilization in a big hurry without having to get on a spaceship and take years and years to do it. And so he said, "Hey, what about wormholes?" And Kip Thorne thought about it for a while and said, "Well, you know, the the real problem is that they're horribly unstable, but nobody's really looked very hard at seeing whether there's some way of stabilizing them. Maybe that's worth thinking about." Uh, and so he put his brightest student, Mike Morris, on the job, and Mike Morris found a way of stabilizing wormholes, which is sim summarized in this paper and involves the Casemir effect. >> Okay. Wow. Wow. I mean, from a historical perspective, what we just listened to right there, it should be mind-blowing for you guys >> to be produced was that you have some advanced civilization, which means a civilization much smarter than us, who could reach down into the quantum foam where at the most fundamental level, >> by the way, he calls it quantum foam. Oh, one more thing I had to mention. He calls it quantum foam right there. You know who else called it quantum foam? The ether. Tom Bearden. So, I was just talking about Oak Shannon's notes from 1985. This is probably the thing that freaked me out the most. And what do I see when I look through these Oak Shannon notes is I'm looking I'm sitting there thinking the whole time like where is Tom Bearden? Like why isn't Tom Bearden at this meeting in the 80s? Tom Bearden was talking about this Tesla science, teleportation, directed energy weapons. And I'm wondering while I'm reading these these notes because they even mentioned Tesla as in like the theory that was messed up was Tesla. And so I get down later on in the notes and what do I see right there? Tom Bearden. I hear see Bearden's name mentioned regarding this physics in 1985. Well, there's all kinds of stuff going on. There's electrons and positrons coming out and being violated. And there are much more complicated structures also emerging and disappearing all the time. And if wormholes are a valid solution of Einstein's uh equations, then they should be spontaneously popping out of the vacuum and disappearing again over and over again. And so if you have a uh a member of one of these advanced civilizations who agile enough to reach in and grab it while it while it's popping into the vacuum before it goes back in and pays [clears throat] off its debt to Heisenberg in the form of energy, you can keep it. And u that's the that's the basic idea that behind this paper. U [clears throat] >> so what did he just say right there? He also just connected to Charles Chase. I think about Charles Chase all the time. I think about Charles Chase all the time because in his conference that he held he kept asking people about how are you you're borrowing this energy. How are you paying it back? How are you paying it back? It's like you're dipping into this ocean, but you have to observe conservation. So, somehow that energy has to get back to that ocean. But this shouldn't be a problem. We have an analogy for this that we see all the time. In fact, you're seeing it right now as I'm drinking this water. When I drink this water in this cup, it's not free water. It's not gone. Doesn't disappear and go to the ether. It's part of a system. It's part of a cycle that recycles in and out forever. You tell me that there are virtual particle antiparticle pairs and you can dip into that ether and you can pull those out. How are you paying that back? You're paying that back because all energy is going back to that ether over time. That's my perspective. That's my view. I could be wrong, but that's how I look at the universe is I look at the universe as a big energy cycle. The same way you look at water as a big water cycle. Okay. So, uh the assumption is that in an advanced technology could by choice keep a uh stabilized wormhole but very small so that in the spirit of Einstein and Rosen, one mouth would behave like a charged particle of a certain mass and charge. Now they also showed another interesting property of wormholes which nobody had thought about before which is that if you have a pair of wormholes or a pair of wormhole ma mouths and you put one of these on a relativistic spaceship and send it off at a on a trip near the speed of light for maybe a year and then bring it back. There [clears throat] is a phenomenon in relativity called relativistic time dilation in which the clock on the spaceship slows down and the clock of the wormhole slows down. And so when it comes back, it's basically basically younger than the other end of the wormhole that had been that had been going off in the normal direction. And so there's an Now you want to know what's so crazy about what he's going to explain here in a second. Two years ago, we were talking about time travel before I dug into all the physics and I drew something on MS Paint that looked very similar to this with just two lines and pair of lines and they were different sizes. And I'm trying to do these lines and show you guys like, oh, we could do teleportation without violating causality. But what it's showing here is you're seeing time dilation. The reason why you see this bent curve and this straight line is that if you were to be walking along that line and you imagine the amount of time you experience, you can see that those two lines are different lengths. So, two different people might meet up, but they'll have walked a different amount of of of distance. They'll have experienced a different amount of time. This is what time dilation is. And this is why it's 100% real. I mean, if you don't think time dilation is real, you can't believe that grav we must completely misunderstand gravity and spacetime if that's the case. To be consistent, you must. So, we know that this this this idea of time dilation is real. And then when I see a similar equ similar graph like this, now I know I'm thinking about it the right way. And in fact, what he's about to say in a moment is that he says the same thing that you and I, if you were, some of you here have followed for this whole period of time, last two years. And somebody in the chat, I remember when I was drawing those graphs talking about going to Mars, teleporting to Mars, somebody was like, "Well, what if you build a second wormhole on Mars? Won't that cause problems?" because now you've got one wormhole that goes to Mars, but now you have another wormhole that can go in another direction and now you're going to have a situation where retrocausality becomes possible. And I said, "Yeah, that is kind of a problem. What's the answer to that?" Guess what? That gets mentioned in this presentation. So, I'm droning on. Let's go. A connection between two points in space becomes a connection between two points in time and the wormhole becomes a time machine. Um that bothered a lot of people. Um [laughter and clears throat] that the u uh this this is the statement from the uh from the paper describing what how exactly you do it. And this is their diagram here. The stay-at- home wormhole is going along like this. The traveling wormhole is going along like this. And the time connections are shown by this dotted line. This about dotted line. And the point is that they now when these things are together 11 on the stay-at-home guy corresps if we make any kind of wormhole or warp drive, it's a time machine. It's a literal time machine. There's no avoiding it. Time dilation means that you're making a time machine. Crazy. Jason Georgiani was saying this exact thing to Danny Jones. So people that want to hate on Jason Georgiani, I mean that guy at least he may not be a PhD physicist, but he understands the physics better than most PhDs do, which is a which [clears throat] is a passage through time. Okay. Um Stephen Hawking didn't like this idea and um uh he suggested that uh there there are equations in uh general in the interface between general relativity and quantum electronamics in which there are certain intervals involving the separation between two things and if you let these intervals go to the spaceime intervals go to zero it's you divide by zero and the equation blows up and [clears throat] so he suggested that the result of this would be that the fluctuations in the quantum vacuum would become larger and larger and larger as you approach this situation where you're making a time machine and they [clears throat] would uh essentially cause an a quantum explosion which would destroy the apparatus and you wouldn't be able to make your time machine. In other words, nature not only bores a vacuum but nature aborts a time machine even more so and would rise up and smite the wouldbe time traveler. >> So another huge point I at this point I'm going I'm going against s on this one. going against S. Nature is not going to let us go back in time. Not going to happen. In fact, when I dug into uh John Kramer's more recent experimental results, they found that there are like reverse signals that cancel out the forward signals, which basically means when you try to do retrocausality, nature just shuts it down. Basically, the noise just comes in and takes it over, which makes sense because we don't see it. We don't see it. So, I like the idea that nature doesn't let retrocausality happen. And so, some of you may say, "Wait a minute, Ashton. If you think retrocausality can't happen, so are you saying, how is teleportation possible then?" Because you're saying if you do teleportation, you make you're making a time machine. How can you keep both of those ideas consistent in your head? Well, what did I tell you guys on the last live stream? What was the what is the weird answer? The weird answer to the grandfather paradox or the bilking paradox, whatever, is that if you were to go back in time and you're given the choice between doing what keeps chronology correct or breaking the time stream, the answer must be that you don't break the time stream. So what's the answer for the retrocausality? The answer must be you don't do retrocausality. You can do teleportation, but you can't break the time stream. Huh?