Free Energy from Graphene

Video Transcript

# Free Energy from Graphene Malaysian 370 contact 12 decimal 9. Good night. [Music] >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. [Music] Oh, [Music] [Applause] [Music] I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita, Vishnu. is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him. Takes on his multi-armed form and says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." >> What up, MH70X? How are you guys doing tonight? Let's get it up. Hell yeah. Welcome everybody to the live stream. This is Ashton Forbes. I am your host. This is free energy Friday, guys. We're bringing it back. If you haven't been paying attention, we have found the motherload. We have found senior fellow at the Lheed Martin Skunkworks, Charles Chase, lifer, lifetime employee since 1986. And once we started digging into him, we found his YouTube channel and we found a bunch of scientific videos. And it is I am a kid in a candy store. Kid in a candy store. Can't wait to share this information with you. Before we get on to that, there is one thing. Now, I haven't said this person's name in a long time. I think it's Mach Mock West. I don't know. It's very forgettable, stupid sounding name. Oh, Mick West. Mick West. Um, I happen to run across this even though I have him blocked, so I literally never see his content, but I do see this Merrick guys stuff. And I have to point out something really weird here. What's going on right here is that apparently the ARO, the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, they have said that they brought skeptics in to give feedback on UFO cases or whatever, which that's super obviously true because they literally stole the skeptics's arguments about I think it was the gimbal one of the videos. They claim it's parallax. parallax is what's causing this hypersonic uh bird flying across the water. That's what the ARO came and said. And it's a literally word for word argument directly copied from the debunkers. So obviously the ARO is communicating with the skeptic community. We're going to call them the debunker community. And this is going to be relevant, guys. This is going to be relevant. And so Merrick here is just literally asking Mick West, "Were you invited?" which is a very reasonable question to ask because this guy is like literally the number one spook debunker on the planet. He has no reason whatsoever to be famous at all. He just literally was a developer on a video game, a Tony Hawk video game, but he's become the number one debunker that everyone goes to. Even though he has just completely ignorant, uneducated opinions about everything that everybody just looks to him as some sort of god that whatever he says is is the is that must be the truth. and he's a complete idiot. Like a complete and total [ __ ] That's the craziest part. Like people are just It's like idiocracy when they're looking to like the idiot to tell them what to do and what to think. That's what it's like. So it's a completely reasonable question because this guy is like constantly trying to be the main debunker and he has no reason to be. Almost looks like someone selected him to be the main debunker. This is his response. This is his real response to this question. He gets directly asked, "Were you one of these people that they reached out to? Makes sense that you would be." I talked to lots of people and I keep those confidential who wish to be kept confidential. I don't bite. Whatever that means. Because because he says because twice there like as if he's stuttering in his Twitter post. Because because even a no could reveal information by process of elimination. What? What the hell are you talking about, dude? This is the weirdest response I've ever seen to a basic basic yes or no question. What by what happens if you say no? What what are what kind of weird conspiracy are you making up in your sick head that somehow you just answering a question honestly is going to like somehow expose you? answering this question. Honestly, if this answering a question whether you met with ARRO exposes you, then you definitely need to be exposed. You definitely need to be exposed. Sadly, this logic is unclear to some people. Yes, this logic is extremely unclear to anyone who has a functioning brain. If somebody says, "Hey, Ashton, have you met with the ARO?" I'll say, "Yeah, I did when they called me up after I put in my my case. Other than that, no. Why would I? And if I did meet with them, I would just say, "Yeah, what I why would I hide that? Why would I care? Me saying that I met with ARRO doesn't change whether or not I met with other people. It has no impact on whether or not I met with different people. That's why this logic here doesn't make sense to anyone with a functioning brain. What it is is dodging a really, really basic question. So they think refusing to answer a question means yes. Yes, it does. It's exactly what it means. refusing to ask a question that you have answer a question that you have no reason not to answer other than it being true. That means a yes. That's exactly what it means. That's how logic works. Um because you have no reason to say no if you didn't if you didn't meet with them. In fact, saying no would clear up all the confusion. The problem is the answer is probably yes. And it's probably worse than that. It's probably a lot worse than that. But when I read this, this scares me because what this says right here is Mick West is meeting with influential people and helping the cover up persist. Like they're feeding him information. He's feeding them information and they are literally covering things up like MH370. Mick West is 100% implicated in the cover up of MH370. He should go to prison for the rest of his life or be put to death. That's the punishment. He should face capital punishment for covering up what happened to MH370. I mean that with all 100% sincerity. And when it's proven that I've been true about right about all this, I want people to go back to this clip that I'm saying about Mick West. And I want to say this is what Ashton Forbes wanted. If I'm not on this earth, I want people to know what I want is for MC West to go to prison for the rest of his life. He should be made an example of so that nobody ever does what he did ever again. That's what should happen. Someone needs to go down and it needs to be someone who will shock society to a degree where they will never do what he did ever again. One single man, this guy right here, set back humanity several decades just by himself. Just by himself. He's one of the worst human beings to ever exist on the face of the earth. And that's how history will remember him. There's nothing he can do to change that. That's his legacy. That's his life. It is what it is. So, I wanted to address that real quick because I just thought that's actually insane that that's his response that he's actually just denying. And I wanted to show you the difference between dishonest people like Mick West and honest people like myself. How many podcasts have I gone on where I've had no restrictions on the question that they're asked of me? People ask me personal [ __ ] about my family and I still answer. Mick West won't even answer a basic question on whether or not he's talking to DoD spooks on the reggg. And of course he is. Of course he is. Of course he's up to a bunch of sketchy [ __ ] And if we ever knew about it, it would be the end of him. It would just be the permanent end of him. Okay, now that we dealt with that unsavory business, let's get to the fun stuff, chat. So, the reason why I brought that up wasn't just random, actually. Uh, tonight's topic is Paul Fibido, who has a free energy device that harnesses, I guess you could say, the ambient thermal energy, but is really unclear exa exactly how it's just harnessing free energy, but we're going to learn about it right here and right now. The reason why I brought this up was that when I was googling Paul Thibido to find information about him, you can find the the video clip that we're about to watch right now, guys. I'm only The first article is University of Arkansas. That makes sense. That's where he goes. That's where he teaches, right? That makes sense. Second link here is another University of Arkansas. What do you guys think the third link in Google is? The third link in Google after two University of Arkansas links. What could be the third link in Google? Metabunk. Metabunk. Out of all the websites on the entire internet, Mick West's website, Debunker website, is the third highest rated Google link about Paul Fibido's graphine thing. That's the third highest link out of every It's even higher than Paul Fibido's Google Scholar link. Chat, explain to me how a failed video game developer who developed one game and never did anything ever again. He wasn't even a major role player in developing the game. Somehow is the major debunker whose random blog that nobody goes to that can't be making money is somehow promoted as the highest Google links just right behind the university the guy works at itself. It's higher rated than the guy's own scholar website. Who is rigging Google to rank Mick West's shitty blog this highly? Who's ri who's rigging it? That's what I want to know. There's no way in [ __ ] hell this is organic. 0% chance. 0% chance this is organic. And Mick West won't answer questions about who he's talking to in the DoD. I think he should be asking a lot of answering a lot of questions, especially about who's paying for his website that is definitely not making money. Who's paying for that website to even exist? so that it can be the third highest rank whenever I want to Google somebody who's literally building free energy devices. Literally building free energy devices. And the third hit I get is Metabunk. Metabunk. I just want you guys to see this. I just want you to see this because these are the reasons why people are asking Mick West questions about who he's talking to, where he's getting money from, because this is not organic. And anybody that understands search engine optimization knows this is no [ __ ] chance this is organic. No chance in hell. I hope MC West sees that clip because he has a lot of questions that he should be answering to people, especially because he also covered up the Philip Wood photo back in 2014 of Malaysian Airlines. No, I'm not even joking right now. Mick West is literally the guy that covered up the Philip Wood photo of Philip Wood being held prisoner at Diego Garcia. If it turns out that photo was real, Mick West should be put to death. He should be put to death. That should be the appropriate punishment for Can you imagine if your family members were kidnapped and being held prisoner somewhere and some piece of [ __ ] on the internet says, "No, that's fake. Your family's not really being held prisoner. That's all fake." And now your family members are dead because of that. I literally cannot think of a punishment hard enough. Death is death is actually a mercy. It's actually a mercy in a situation like that in my opinion. My opinion. So when I say he's the worst human being on the face of earth, I am not joking at all. Like I've got all the receipts to back it up. All the receipts. Now I believe in capital punishment. I believe in capital punishment 100%. 100% I believe in capital punishment. I believe certain people just don't don't don't belong on this earth. Simple as that. That's just that's my viewpoint, guys. That's a political viewpoint. It is my view. Okay, let's dig into it, guys. So, let's start with this video of Paul Fibido explaining his own free energy device in his own words. In his own words. Yeah. And I just want to point out, guys, cuz I see people upset. I am so far past forgiveness. There's not going to be any forgiveness. Man, you guys don't see how this is going to play out. I keep telling you, I'm going to have to repeat it one more time. This does not have a happy ending for anybody involved. Nobody involved is coming away with this unscathed. The debunkers are some of them are going to, you know, do that horrible thing where they don't exist on the earth anymore. Many of them are. You guys need to start coming to terms with that. There's no way around this. People are going to harm themselves. Other people are going to have psychological breaks. We're already seeing it happen. People going to have psychological breaks about this. People are going to have to come to terms with their whole lives being a lie. We are well past forgiveness. The only people getting a get out of jail free card are the engineers that built the technology. That's it. If you were a politician, if you were a CXO that was in one one of these companies, yeah, you're going to be on a list. you're going to be on a list and your consequences are coming. So that's how this plays out and doesn't probably end well for myself either. So guys, just let's keep it 100% real here. This is just where we're at. Okay, so here is Paul Thibido explaining his own device. This is straight up from University of Arkansas's YouTube channel. >> Graphine is a single um atomic plane of uh graphite. We've been studying a lot of different properties of graphine and at one point we decided to make it freestanding. We figured out what was happening is the um the membrane is kind of shaking around. The atoms are shaking around and vibrating but then every now and then this local let's say convex section of the of the membrane would flip its curvature over and become concave. If we place a charge on that uh ripple and it moves suddenly near a grounded conducting electrode, charge will flow in that conducting electrode to basically to screen the charge that's moving toward it. If we had another electrode above it, when it flipped back, then the charge would flow, say in a circuit up to this thing. >> You know what's interesting about this? Do you guys notice how the the charge polarity is flipping on there? I'm just going to go back like a few seconds. I'll I'll uh silence it. Notice how the charge polarity flips though. The charge polarity flips. And that's what of course causes it to rebound, right? Because if there if there's two positives, it's going to um uh repel. And if there is positive and negative, it's going to uh attract. So this is very similar to the concept of a magnetic motor. Remember when I was saying about magnetic motor free energy device, how would we make a magnetic motor work just from a conceptual standpoint? I got one magnet here and I got another magnet coming across. They're going to attract when they till they get to this point. Now the problem is they're going to keep attracting. So when they try to keep moving, they're going to be they're going to feel resistance. So how do we get around that? We just flip this we flip this off or on. We flip this off and now it'll just keep moving. But we have to flip it off at the exact right moment. This is where resonance comes into play. I would argue that's very sim similar to what he's doing right here. What Paul Thibido is doing. And this all comes back to the same idea of the trampoline. It all goes back to the same idea of the trampoline. How are we able to get free energy in any scenario? Why the ground state of the hydrogen atom by Hal Pudof. the hydrogen atom. Every atom must be exchanging energy with the environment. How is Paul Thibido's device possible? How are any of the devices possible? Because they're extracting energy and then the trampolines bouncing back while you're in the air. While you're in the air by 10 microns, which is pretty small cuz about 20,000 of those could fit on the head of a pin. But one of these 10 micron by 10 micron areas could produce um 10 microwatts of power continuously. So, wouldn't that be great if you had this, you know, powering your watch for example? You would never have to replace the batteries. You know, I like to think about the possibility of any househ. [Music] And if you could have a power source that you didn't have to replace the battery for, you know, it's basically a battery alternative. I guess that's the key thing. If you could have a battery alternative that you didn't have to go and replace it, you know, imagine, you know, all the things you could do. >> Wow. Imagine a battery alternative. Meanwhile, we got Elon Musk saying that we have to just do everything has to be solar. We have to have solar panels everywhere. Now, let's dig into the deep side of this. We are gonna listen to Paul Thibido explain it in detail scientifically. Guys, if you are not a math guy, I don't know. Go have a drink, guys. Loosen up a little bit because we're going to dig deep into this. I'm going to do my best job to try to give it to the common man as I understand it. And there are some pretty big yatsi moments in this. And we're also going to listen to the conversation because we're talking major players were at this at this conference, this little secret Illuminati conference that we found. Now, it's not really Illuminati, guys. I'm not really saying that uh Paul Thibido and and and these guys are Illuminati. It's just I just don't have a better comparison. Like it's like basically a secret club of all the black project engineers that I would invite all meeting together behind closed doors at MIT at academic institutions. I mean I don't know I don't got a better name for it. If you guys can come up with a better name for the Illuminati team of scientists that we got going on here let me know. Help me out. Okay so the presentation is called charging capacitors using graphine fluctuations. What you're looking at right here is the circuit. That's the circuit right there. You're looking at it. It uses two diodes. The configuration is actually super important. Now, my initial impression of this is that this must be similar to something called a Tesla circuit. Tesla circuit. Go ahead and Google it. If you guys go back to my free energy device discussions, I I've always said there was two things about the free energy device, like a magnetic motor. One is the resonance of getting the magnets to work. The other is the backend engineering, the circuit design. The circuit design. What I'm looking at here is the closest I've seen to anything that looks like a Tesla circuit where you're essentially able to siphon off current where normally current would be counteracting itself, canceling itself out. You're able to split it and then effectively use both ends of the current when normally they should be canceling each other out. That's my understanding of it. And I think that's kind of how he describes it here. But let's listen to Paul Thibido, uh, PhD physicist from University of Arkansas explain it for himself. >> That out of the way. And, um, I also want to thank, um, Daniel at Juan Garrett and Charles for, you know, talking to me and being interested in my research. Um, it's I've had great conversations with them. I'd also like to say that the talk that Daniel gave was excellent. I that's the first I've heard his talks. It was really well done. I do want to clarify a little bit that my research is not about searching for violations to the second law. My research is about harvesting energy from the environment. So I'm just going to kind of focus on that part of it. But I do talk about the laws of physics course. And so let me just get started with that. Start a little timer here too. My talk will probably only take 35 minutes. So there'll be plenty of time for questions if therefore it's extremely flexible a measure. >> Okay. So I'm just going to skip ahead here because I've already watched this like three times. I'm just I'm going to help us out and get through this a little quicker. But why graphine? Graphine is one atomic layer thick. So that means it's super flexible. Super flexible. So basically what we're doing here is we've created this graphing sheet. And because it's so flexible, it's like a thousand times more flexible. The next thing it can pop up and down really easily. And we can use this work and turn it into electricity. And we can do that without it getting hot. Wait, what did Ashton just say? Wait, we basically can create a little trampoline and it doesn't get hot and all the energy is being converted into electricity for us. Yes, that's pretty much what I think this boils down to. But here we go. Of that flexibility is called the flexural rigidity. It's given by D. Here's the formula for it. The important part is it has this parameter H to the third power where H is the thickness of the plate. >> Okay. And because it's so thin, because it's uh how much thinner is it? It's a lot thinner than the next best option. So that means it's a thousand times more flexible. And that means that you need a thousand times less force. You need a thousand times less force to bend the graphine than you need for like silicon. So it turns out this is why graphine is so important. Graphine is so big because it's so thin. Makes it super flexible, which means you need even less force to cause the trampoline effect to happen. A lot less force. So, this is why graphine is so big. There you go. You just got the big first big yatsi of the night. The >> graphine membrane is only about one nanometer thick, whereas you could probably make a silicon nitride cantaliever at best 10 nmters thick. That'd be the thinnest. So right here that would tell you that the graphine is going to be a thousand times more flexible than this scant lever. So this paper is out of the physics teacher. It basically talks about variable capacitors. If you look at the definition of the capacitance is how much charge it can store divided by the voltage you've applied to it. If we look at the change in capacitance at a fixed voltage, it'll result in a change in charge. Here's a nice illustration of a parallel plate capacitor connected to a battery and it has four units of charge on it. If we applied a force to this plate and pulled it to the right, the capacitance would go down. So the charge has to go down. So what'll happen is let's say these two charges will flow counterclockwise. They'll go backwards through the battery and recharge it if it's a rechargeable battery and then come around here to cancel these charges. And the force that pulled that plate apart, that's what's doing the work here. So that's basically the fundamental operation of our uh circuit as well. So >> So how is this working? Well, it's basically just electric charges moving around. So it's basically just electric charges. Now he's going to talk about why the dodes are so important in that circuit in the top right as opposed to just a resistor. First thing he does is he proves that you can't extract energy from a system with doesn't have diodes and it actually has to have the diodes in that that type of configuration as well. That should do have to be in a very specific topological configuration for that to work. Now, before we do that, I think this is a good time to take a look at how do diodes work. Guys, we're learning science. Here you go. Here's a diode. How does a diode work? Okay, we have N type and ptype dodes. What a diode does, diode forces current to go in only one direction. It forces the current to go in only one direction. Wow. Oh, that's pretty cool. In fact, that's really useful for our little um magic Tesla circuit. So, here you go. Let's watch it. >> Let's imagine the material hasn't been doped yet. So, it's just pure silicon inside. Each silicon atom is surrounded by four of our silicon atoms. Each atom wants eight electrons in its veence shell. But the silicon atoms only have four electrons in their veence shell. So, they sneakily share an electron with their neighboring atom to get the eight they desire. This is known as coalent bonding. When we add in the end type material such as phosphorus, it will take the position of some of the silicon atoms. The phosphorus atom has five electrons in its veence shell. So as the silicon atoms are sharing electrons to get their desired eight, they don't need this extra one. So there's now extra electrons in the material and these are therefore free to move. Okay, I can see where this is going. Chat, can you see where this is going? If you've been studying electrical engineering along with us and you know what's about to happen here on the right side, they have excess electrons. Those electrons are be allowed to move. On the other side, they're going to have a a neglect of electrons. So, they dope one side of the silicon, which either adds excess electrons or removes needed electrons. And then what this does is means that you're always going to have unidirectional flow of current. And if you try to have the current go the other way, it's just going to stop. It won't it won't allow it. This is how we can force current to go in one direction. >> With ptype doping, we add in a material such as aluminium or aluminum. This atom has only three electrons in its veence shell. So, it can't provide its four neighbors with an electron to share. So, one of them will have to go without. There is therefore a hole created where an electron can sit and occupy. So, we now have two doped pieces of silicon, one with too many electrons and one with not enough electrons. The two materials join to form a PN junction. At this junction, we get what's known as a depletion region. In this region, some of the excess electrons from the ntype side will move over to occupy the holes in the ptype side. This migration will form a barrier with a buildup of electrons and holes on opposite sides. The electrons are negatively charged and the holes are considered therefore positively charged. So, the buildup causes a slightly negatively charged region and a slightly positively charged region. This creates an electric field and prevents more electrons from moving across. The potential difference across this region is about 0.7. >> This will create a forward bias and allow the current to flow. So once you get enough voltage then you're going to have this bias occur and now the voltage is going to flow but it won't flow back the other way right >> the voltage source has to be greater than the 0.7 volt barrier otherwise the electrons can't make the jump >> okay so yes if you flip it around now look what happens >> the ptype anode the holes are pulled towards the negative and the electrons are pulled towards the positive and this causes the barrier to expand therefore the diode acts as an insulator to prevent the flow of current >> okay so now we have some vital information about how this system is working. Now we understand that what a diode's doing. A diode basically forces electricity or forces current to flow in one specific direction. So if we go back to Paul Thibido's circuit design up here, now we have a better idea of what that's doing over there is that's basically saying we can only cause current to flow on a path that we want the current to flow. So, I can already tell from a conceptual viewpoint what his circuit is doing. His circuit is saying, "Okay, have a couple capacitors here, charge this one up, but once this one gets above a certain point, then have it go and start charging this one up." And then have both these capacitors feed back into the system, but you've now created this asymmetry where now instead of them being at zero, they're going to constantly stay charged because you force the current to flow in a specific direction. Now, why why does that work? That's the big mystery. Why is physics not working the way that we would expect it to work? >> The distance between the graphine and the electrode changes because the graphine's so flexible. It's moving all the time under the slightest influence. >> How come it's so >> the capacitance will increase and decrease and then the charge on the graphine will also increase and decrease. When current flows in this circuit clockwise, it'll go through diode one and charge capacitor C1 to complete the circuit. when it flows counterclockwise, it'll charge C2 going through D2 and go back to complete the circuit. That's basically how the energy harvesting work. Take an AC signal and charge these two. We had an illustration we made of this a while back. See if I can get >> So, it almost seems like it's it it's basically a circuit designed to set up to harvest both directions of the current. Right? It's saying if it goes one way, then C1 is going to catch it. If it goes the other way, C2 is going to catch it. Oh, for the record, I've already watched the George Hathaway interview. We're going to be talking about that on a later stream. Not really sure what to think about that guy. >> Um, so this is the idea. So, basically, there's the graphine fluctuating. Nice slow motion. As the capacitance increases, the charge increased there. And it took power from the battery, but now the um battery got recharged. And we also made it go through that storage capacitor. This is like that C2 over here. >> Yeah. I mean, look at it. >> As the keeps moving, it'll keep forcing charge onto the capac. >> So, it only took like three or four times for me to watch this to finally have it sink in. But basically, we've created a trap. We've created that the electricity can only the electrons can only flow or let's say the current can only flow in the direction we want it to flow. So, it's either going to flow through this first path and come back around or if it goes back the other way, it has to go the long path all the way back. So, that's what we're saying when we're creating those diodes. Why? because it's causing current to only flow in the direction that we want. It's actually a pretty simple design. So, when people say, "Hey, is there, you know, where are the where's the designs? Where are the open-source design?" This is as good as you need. This is all you need. This is open source right here. You're looking at it. You can recreate this. The reason why you're not recreating this is that nobody has microchip facilities on hand. That's why it's university professors that are doing this that have like relationships. In fact, he's built this and I think he got it built in Taiwan. They use Taiwan, Taiwanese manufacturing to build this microchip. So now you're starting to realize like the idea that we would just build these free, hey, just give me the schematics. I'll just go build this in my garage. You're not thinking about this on the right level yet. They're already so far beyond that capacitor and off the capacitor. We're using these diodes to redirect the current so it can charge charge up the storage caster. and we can use that later to do something useful. All right, what about the efficiency? So, we actually built this circuit. Uh here's a variable, you on a macroscopic scale. So, here is a uh variable capacitor. You can vary the capacitance by turning this rod here. Here, >> okay, so they built it and one of the big criticisms they got was that, oh, is this not going to be it's not going to be that efficient? It's not going to be efficient enough for it to actually be able to produce energy. It turns out, yes, it's actually way more efficient than what they had predicted. >> All these plates are for Zeiss charging it up here. And people thought, okay, well, it'll work, but the efficiency will be terrible. Turns out actually the efficiency is excellent. 50% efficiency is very good. Here's a little >> turns out the efficiency is actually excellent. 50% efficiency is very good. >> There you go. Of it running. >> There's a turned by a motor. So, it's nice and >> it's not just a hypothetical thing. and they've literally got it built, tested, etc. >> Smooth and continuous. This voltmeter back here is measuring, and it connects to these bonding pads around the outside. There's a bunch of bonding pads here. >> So, there you go. >> There's a big section here in the middle, which is um basically we left blank. And when the chips came back, we did post-processing. We built an array of these graphine electrode systems on this chip and then connected those uh things to the bonding pads or the circuitry. Below you can see the graphine here. This is graphine's covering the whole upper half of the chip touching the bonding pads naturally. There current flows and the diodes charge C1 C2. So hopefully I convinced you of that. >> Okay, hold on. Let's go back a few seconds. >> That's what I'm going to call the >> Okay, so he's built it out and now he's going to go through kind of the debunks of it, the arguments for it, why it's real, how it doesn't violate the laws of physics. So for all my you know PhDs out there all my academics all the disbelievers pay attention >> deterministic part let me ask this question. So when the graphine shakes it's not really a question let me point out something I'll get to the question below. So when graphine shakes current flows and the diodes charge C1 C2. So hopefully I convinced you of that. But here's the question. Will C1 and C2 will the capacitors charge if the only force acting is the thermal force and if everything's at the same temperature? Now, that's an interesting question. So, he said, "Okay, I've shown now that the the wobble of the graphine, we're harvesting that energy." No question. We just saw it happen. We looked at the circuit. It's able to harvest that energy. But he's saying, "Will this still work? If everything is is thermally the same temperature, is this system still going to work?" And what did we learn in the uh yorichiro uh presentation? All it took was a slight nudge and our system became asymmetrical out of equilibrium. So we could see the orbs spin from just in fact basically nothing. They just started to spin all on their own. So my guess the answer my guess the answer to this question is that this will still work even if everything is at one single temperature still going to work in my opinion >> well what's motivating this we had some early success we were able to show that the brownian motion that's that thermal motion of graphine could power a circuit we did this using our scanning tunneling microscope chamber this is a TEM grid with graphine overlay you can see the graphine film here this is pretty much the same circuit except we have ammeters here measuring the current in these two channels and uh so we could do that. We did power a circuit um and we determined that the power density was one powatt per micron squared. If you convert the units on that that's one watt per meter squared. There was a really nice study done in 2018 I want to draw your attention to that studied wind farms all around the world. There's thousands of them and they found out that wind farms produce.5 watts per meter squared. >> So I'm going to skip ahead a few minutes but I'll just give you the the brief the cliff notes here. says if we were to turn scale this up it would be twice as efficient or at least as efficient as wind power. It would be at least as efficient as wind power. I think he says it's about one watt per meter squared. So it's twice as efficient as wind is just from a scale perspective and five times less than solar. But keep in mind this is the first iteration of one of these prototypes. It can probably get a lot more efficient than this. So is this going to pass up solar? Yeah, eventually it's going to. >> It's actually worth. >> And then he also just kind of tootses his own horn about this scientific paper was one of the most read scientific papers of all of 2020. One of the most read scientific papers. Everybody was talking. He says he got a thousand emails about it. 1,000 emails. He got 1,000 emails about this. Some haters, some people that weren't haters, what have you. So he explains, "How is this possible?" the brownie in motion. How can the Brownian motion allow us to harvest energy? >> So let's move to part two, the stochastic part. So to do that, we're going to talk about Brownian motion and the EON equation. This is basically Newton's second law, but with a stochastic driving force. So I've written that here. This is ma. The forces that are acting there's a drag force that's involved in Brownian motion that basically is trying to bring the Brownian particle to a dead stop and it will bring it to a dead stop. But then there's a thermal force that is also present and this thing um transfers energy from the thermal environment to the brownian particle gives its energy to the particle and gets moving. And let me show this little video. So this is like our brownian particle. This is in three. >> So what he's saying here when you look at this he's going there's more going on than just what we would think. If you simplify the math it's not an accurate representation what's happening in reality. There's a thermal aspect to this motion of the particle of any atom that's happening and this thermal aspect can be exploited. We can exploit this and that's what he's doing right here. In fact, his whole presentation is showing that where is this energy coming from? It's coming from this thermal component that he's got added in here. But our our solutions will be in one dimension. The drag force is taking the kinetic energy of the particle and giving it to the environment. And the this force over here is taking the energy from the environment and giving it back to the particle. This thermal force looks a lot like this. It's basically kind of a noisy stochastic signal. What we want to do is steal energy from this force. So what we're doing is we're literally stealing energy from this force. This force, this thermal force that's out there is giving kinetic energy. We're going to steal energy from it. >> The thermal force is zero. If t equals z, the temperature is zero. That's how we know it's the thermal. So this is why we know it must be the thermal force because if t equals z it doesn't work. It doesn't work if t equals z. The math doesn't work. You can't harness energy if t equals z. That's why somebody just said why does the temperature matter. That's why it matters. He's about to show you. Also notice that ada this parameter is in both places. It's both here in the thermal force and in the drag force. This ensures that we reach thermodynamic equilibrium. This was a big breakthrough in the fluctuation dissipation theorem. Basically what it says is if the particle is giving energy to the environment and the energy is giving and sorry and the environment is giving energy to the particle if those two processes are equal to each other then we'll reach thermodynamic equilibrium that's huge what he just said and that's another call back to how Pudof's ground state of the hydrogen atom I think it was actually George Hathaway mentioned it in Tim Ventur's interview today and I've been saying it I don't even know how many times First zero point energy paper by Hal Pudof. What did he say? He said the ground state of the hydrogen atom. Why is it stable? It's stable because the hydrogen atom is both ex is exchanging energy with the zero point energy field. It's gaining some energy and it's dissipating some energy. And when that thing is not radiating any excess energy, then we know it's in a balance. It's in balance at that point. And that's what Thibido is saying right here. He's saying that there must be some exchange of energy that's happening and we can tap into that. And if you're wondering is this going to tie into zero point energy just wait till we get to the discussion. Basically saying that the kinetic energy 12 mv^2 is equal to the thermal energy 1 kbt. So we by doing this we ensure that graphine has a ripply structure. This is an important property we think. >> Okay. I'm going to skip ahead part this part because I just already explained it. So this is him just proving they literally prove scientifically that the graphing is wobbling like this just like a trampoline. It's wobbling just like this. The graph on the right shows you that it actually is inverting and they measured it. The reason why I love Paul Thibido, I mean there's several reasons. I mean because he's posting a free energy device. He comes with all the receipts. This is not a man that is like I'm just speculating. He's like nope. We've done all the tests. We've proven this is exactly how it's working. Here's the math. Here's the equations. Here's the physics. He's got it all lined up like this guy has gotten buttoned up >> the surface of >> So he's saying, "Okay, we've proven that it's it's it's flipping back and forth. >> We're gonna hook it." Well, it what it what we found it does is it lowers the frequency of the um energy, which is helpful for energy harvesting. We still have this. There's still thermodynamic program. All right, we're going to hook it up to a circuit. It turns out electrons in a circuit also have are basically have brownie in motion. So there's an edgeman equation for this as well. Let's start over here. Here's a circuit with a capacitor and a resistor. I'll tell you this can't harvest energy. I'll show that it can't. What we start off with is Kirkoff's loop law. It says that the voltage on this capacitor. >> So what he shows here is that a resistor, it must be a diode. We must use diodes in the circuit in order for this design to work. It you can't harvest energy if you have a resistor. And I believe he says here you can't harvest energy when T equals Z as well. >> But it's also I * R. Instead of using the resistance, we're going to use the conductance. It's just one over the resistance. So I equals the conductance times the voltage. We put that here. So I is dqdt. It's the conductance times the voltage. And then we add the thermal current this time. So here the resistance is trying to bring the electron to a dead stop and it will. Then the thermal uh current comes in, gives it a kick and starts it moving again. the thermal current is zero if the temperature is zero. >> So it's almost like this thermal current he's talking about it it really is an analog to zero point energy. He's saying it's it's the quantum thing that keeps everything oscillating like at the quantum level we know nothing is ever stopped. And so what he's saying here is if we look at the math, then there's this thermal component to this this heat transfer that we can take advantage of here that shows that even if we have this drag, even if we have these counteracting forces that should cause our system to stop, we still get this fluctuation and we can take we can take advantage of that fluctuation. >> Notice mu is in both places again. So this is going to ensure that we satisfy the fluctuation dissipation theorem and that we're in thermodynamic voltage or the average voltage is zero. the fluctuations or the standard deviation of the voltage increases dramatically as C becomes smaller and we're going to take advantage of this. >> Okay. >> All right. Let's replace the resistor with a diode that we can't do anything with the resistor. We need a diode. So here's a capacitor with a diode. I can tell you this circuit will not harvest energy either. To prove that I will. So even if you just have the diode right here, that's still not going to work. You actually have to have the diode in the proper topological configuration that he talks about. In fact, he says they went through several different designs and certain designs don't produce energy and certain ones do. So the actual configuration of the circuit and the the actual layout of it. So for my ancient archaeology type people, oh the pyramids are built in this specific way. This is the kind of stuff we're talking about. Like it's got to be built in a specific way for it to work. The diode is special in the sense it has a nonlinear conductance. So it has a mu prime. Basically the rate there's a rate of change in the diode conductance with voltage. >> And so because the rate of conductance in the diode changes that seems to be what we're able to exploit and use the unidirectional flow of current. >> That's um an added assistically goes to zero if the current stops flowing. That's the steady state solution up here. this term, this voltage can't be zero. It needs to equal this term. So, we have a voltage that must be present in the diode at some temperature T. So, that voltage is non zero. That's giving us a hint that we're going to find something here special. All right, let me just chat about the diodes real quick. We do need diodes. They have to be real dodes. That that means they have to be leaky. Uh so what he's saying there is when he looked at the math he's saying that there is actually going to be a voltage in the diode. It's and so when we would expect there to be nothing we're still getting this term left over. He's saying this is going to be a clue that we're going to probably find some anomalous results here. And essentially what he's saying is that we can make the default of the batteries of the capacitors. We can make the default of the capacitors not zero. We can make the default of the capacitors is going to be some equation. is going to be some number based on the equations that we're looking at right here. It's going to be some power factor, however you I don't know how they call it or whatever, but there's going to be some value based on the design of our circuit where now our circuit will try to reach an equilibrium where the capacitors are charged to some degree, not zero that they're leaking in this circuit. There's a diode one C1 to the capacitor. There's the Kirkoff. There's the diode voltage right here. It's going to be this voltage plus this voltage. We're going to let V equal zero from that on. And then the other loop is going through the second diode, the second capacitor, and then the graphine. Okay, so those are the two loops. We also have a Kirkoff junction law. So any current that's coming from the graphine hits this junction and gets split. So there's an I1 goes this way and I2 goes this way and they have to add up to I. If we set all the initial charges on these three, >> so they did a bunch of math and they fed it into a supercomput. They fed it into a supercomput and they did like three what three billion iterations or whatever that says and they said okay we've done the math we fed it into the computer we're going to have the computer feed back to us what is this circuit going to do what is this actually going to do and because we gave it the math the computer is going to give us back pretty good accurate pretty good accurate representation so what happened >> a huge parameter space on top of that. So here's our surprise discovery. Charge is added to capacitors one and capacitor 2 and energy is harvested. Here's a plot showing charge is added to capacitor one and two. Energy is harvested. So we had the computer come back or and it says yes. And not only look at these graphs. Those are graphs. I believe green and red are C1 and C2. Q charge on one, charge two. And what are you seeing there? They're exactly equal and opposite. They're exactly equal and opposite. So what does this show? One is giving positive energy and one is giving negative energy. But wait, wait, what? How is that true? What? But you said, what is negative energy? They thought negative energy was swirly potter hairy mist. But now when we're looking at it from this perspective, negative energy isn't some magical Harry Potter substance. It's just the inversion of positive energy, but it's still just energy. It's all just useful energy that we can use. So all we did here was we broke our system out of equilibrium. We broke it out of equilibrium and we said, "Okay, I'm gonna pull on this rubber band and now it's still the same rubber band as it was before, but now it's all stretched out." And the charge on all three capacitors in time. Let's start with the blue one. The blue one is the graphine. The graphine doesn't build up any charge. Well, most of the voltage is set to zero. So, that's going to keep the charge here at zero. And so, it just fluctuates a little bit and stays zero the whole time. But look at this green one. The charge rises quite quickly and reaches a steady state close to 20. This is Q2. So this is the charge on C2. >> The red is the charge on a negative charge on it. So it gets to about negative 20 and reaches his steady state. That's C1. >> So C1 has a negative charge. That's the red one right here. And C2 has a green has a positive charge. But they're exactly equal and opposite. That's how we're able to reach conservation. When people wonder how can you get free energy when conservation conservation laws are what allow free energy to exist that's why anything exists I would argue why is there something and not nothing because conservation doesn't mean that you can't have anything conservation means you can have everything conservation is all you can eat baby break your system out of equilibrium and you got infinite energy as much as you need that's exactly what this paper is showing Notice that Q1 and Q2 are strongly anti-correlated. Anywhere Q1 goes, Q2 has to do the opposite. There's a strong anti-correlation here. This is coming about because of Kirkoff's laws. So, how can the circuit harvest energy from the thermal environment? There's three ingredients we believe are needed. The graphine, which is the C of X capacitor, we need it to be much much smaller than the storage capacitors. This boosts the voltage to really high levels for the diodes. >> So, that's pretty crazy. He says, how can you do this? How is it possible? He says you need to have the graphing capacitance be much lower than the capacitors that you've hooked it up to. The capacitors you hooked it up to, the bigger they are, the more voltage you're going to be able to pull out of this thing. Okay, that's cool. That sounds like something we can exploit. The diodes generate multiplicative noise. I pointed that out to you. There's multiplicative noise in diodes. That shifts the voltage, the diode voltage away from zero. So, we can have a persistent voltage. We also need this junction here the junction in fact the junction has to be followed by diodes wired in opposition. We've run to simulations with the diodes oriented in the same direction. You can't harvest energy then. So he just says right there you have to have this junction on the right in the top right. And if you wire the diodes in the same direction it doesn't work. It doesn't work at all. They actually have to be wired in this specific direction. Anyone want to guess in the chat? Who wants to take a wild guess? Who's a smarty smart pants in the chat? Why do you think the circuit has to be designed in that square like that where and they have to go in those specific directions? Anyone got a thought on that? He's going to say the answer in a couple minutes. I'll monitor the chat. >> We've also cut off this loop. If you force Q2 to go to zero, then Q1 goes to zero. You need these two loops. You need the junction. You can kind of see that here. We have that Q is equal to Q1 plus Q2. If we look at the time averages or ensemble averages, we know Q is zero. So that says that Q1 is negative of Q2. If we square this thing, it's kind of talking about the energy. Q1 2 + Q2 is going to be Q ^2 minus 2 Q1. This is a correlation function here really between these stoastic variables. We can see Q1 2 is just -20 * -20. It's 400. Q2 is also 400. >> So you do the math. I mean I can handle basic algebra chat. In the bottom right there it says 800 equals minus 800. So basically we're just having our positive and our negatives are just canceling out squared is zero. Then minus two this is Q1 times it's 20 * negative - 20. So we the anti-correlation of Q1 and Q2 is driving the energy harvesting. It's responsible for it. You can see that here. Let's look at the ensemble averages. If you plot the if you plot the capacitor charge as a function of capacitance the zero it's exact. If you look at the time constant towel, it starts high doing here's the graphing uh drag the resistance basically the the losses. There's the resistor dissipated power and there's the resistors heat. So what we do is we write down the energy of the system. That's straightforward. We use the first law of thermodynamics. Says that energy is the heat plus the work. >> Okay. So long story short, we're not violating the laws of thermodynamics. Now I want to go back to this and he says the source of the energy >> power of the diodes and that extra energy charges the capacitor. So that's the source of power. Can prove that. >> Here's a graph of that. So the red line here these all start at zero but the red line is the energy of the system. So this is the charging of the capacitors. Of course they're storing energy. So their energy is changing in time. The green one is the work plus the heat. But we also separately check the heat. It's actually zero. So this is really just the work. If you subtract these two, they're basically always zero. There's this is actually it's numerically challenging. There's some slight numerical drift here that's happening in time which we work very hard. >> So what he's showing here is that we are not violating I mean we are kind of violating the laws of thermodynamics but at the same time the math all checks out. The math checks out chat I challenge anybody out there anybody out there do your best to try to debunk this. But before you do, watch the rest the last 15 or 20 minutes of this because he's going to go through the most common questions >> hard to deal with. But notice how this hairiness goes away. This tells us the first law is rigorously obeyed at every time step. This is what this is telling us. So >> we are satisfying the law the first law of physics which is here. >> So thermodynamics is being satisfied. First law of thermodynamics is being satisfied through the math by what's happening here. Believe it or not, >> energy is increasing in time as the capacitors charge up. So, H is growing. Graphine does not provide any energy. Q is zero. The power comes from the thermal bath of the diode. So, the work done is what's giving us the energy. So, the work done is what's giving us the energy. So, the power is coming from the thermal bath of the dodes. What the hell does that mean? The thermal bath of the dodes is what's causing the energy. Now, when I think about that, I think, what's the thermal bath that we're all chilling in? I think that's the zero point energy. But maybe it's not. Maybe it's literally the sun. Maybe it's the power coming from the sun. Maybe Elon Musk will end up being right, chat. Maybe the sun is magically powering this device. Who knows? >> The graphine does provide the voltage though at these top rails. So, this is a very interesting thing why you need these two loops. So current actually flows between the diodes basically forming a vortex here. The C >> he just said the magic words chat. Who was that? Who just won a gold star for the day in the in the chat. The circuit forms a vortex. The circuit is forming a vortex in the in the top right. That's what's allowing this energy conversion. It's the vortex topology that they've created in the circuit. That's the secret. It's always coming back to vortexes when it comes to free energy. Let me just repeat that again. Here we go. >> Graphine does not provide any energy. Q is zero. The power comes from the thermal bath of the diode. So the work done is what's giving us the energy. The graphine does provide the voltage though at these top rails. So this is a very interesting thing why you need these two loops. So current actually flows between the diodes basically forming a vortex here. The circulating current is here charging one positive the other negative and all the power and the current is here even though the voltage is set by this guy over here along these top rails again be at zero here. Very interesting. All right. What about the entry? The measure of disorder. We can track the ent. Okay. I think we've seen enough to be convinced. I know my followers have been. So we've got free energy. Now let's get to the hard stuff. Is entropy going up? Yes, entropy is actually going up. He shows there's actually a little bit of a dip there. There's a negative energy dip here. And he even says we should probably talk about that later on. So, look at that graph on the right. You see how it shoots up, but then it goes down a little bit right afterwards. H why is there a negative entropy aspect to the entropy line? Anyway, that's pretty interesting. And now, let's get to the common questions. Okay. So, for all my debunkers in the chat, you're about to be proven wrong. Your worldview is about to shatter. Here we go. All right. Let me just throw out some I got a lot of email, get lots of questions. Let me just guess some questions and throw out some answers here. Does our energy harvesting system violate the first law of thermodynamics? No. The energy is equal to the heat plus the work. That's the first law. Actually, we found the heat is zero. So all the work uh is is is done to create the energy. Where does the stored capacitor energy come from? Well, it comes from the thermal surroundings. It's coming from this KBT over RC. So it's the thermal it's the environment, the thermal environment stealing energy from that massive thermal environment that Daniel talked about. Is work done at thermodynamic equilibrium? No. Our system's not in thermodynamic. The charges are always moving. They're always adding and removing um from the system. >> So this is the big rub. This is what your normies are not going to understand. The reason why this isn't big for you guys because you understand that electricity comes from a dipole. Electricity comes from a dipole. A dipole means you have positive charge up here, you have negative charge down here. You're going to have electricity flow. So what he's saying here is we're in not in equilibrium. We do not have a canceled out battery. Instead, we're keeping our dipole open. We're staying out of equilibrium and we're keeping our dipole open. And this is why we have permanent electricity. This is why we seem to have an unlimited charge. What has Paul Thibido done? I got to dumb it down. I got to dumb it down, chat. I'm just a lowly healthcare IT consultant. Chat, I don't know about all these complicated physics terms. Quantum mechanics. Got to give me a break here. Basically, he figured out how to make an infinite battery because he said, "This positive charge is going to stay over here and this negative charge is going to stay over here. And we're going to make a maze. We're going to make a maze so that they can't come back together anymore. And if we do that, we've created, well, I'm going to go ahead and say it, a free energy device. We've created perpetual motion. We've created something that can power a load, do work, and still keep charging itself up. >> It's actually very far from equilibrium. Is it is useful work done at a single temperature? Yes. Everything's at the same temperature. We ensured that. >> Yes. Even if everything's at the same temperature, it still works. You don't have to have one part of it be this temperature and different part be a different temperature. It still works. Everything's the same temperature. through those um terms that I showed to you. Does our system violate second law of thermodynamics? No. Our system starts from equilibrium. Sorry, far from equilibrium and is driven to a steady state by unbalanced forces. I'll give a good example of this in a second. Those unbalanced forces, this is the diode voltage. It turns out that extra term is driving it. Is entropy produced? Yes, the capacitor entropy increases from zero to four. Are there any pedagogical examples of >> Okay, so then he says, okay, give me a real life example. And his real life example is, okay, imagine a balloon filled with gas and you have weights on top of it. If you lift a weight a lift a weight off the top of it, it's going to expand. And in this essential, you basically are now adding energy to your system >> kind of expand because the weight's been removed. >> And we're going to analyze the work done on this second mass as it is raised up a height. We're going to have a heater here. We'll see we need to have that. So this is to keep the energy increased from that. This is exactly what I was saying in our situation. So work was done by the thermal environment on the capacitors or on the circuit if you like and it raised its energy and the heat was there was no heat change. This is the same as ours. Now let's analyze the gas. This is a thermal gas. So >> okay, let's get to the so that so let's just go to the summary. >> Graphine this capacitor C of X we I mentioned shifts the power to low frequencies due to this double well. This has some technological value. The average capacitance of graphine determines the voltage. That's kind of like the gain or the bandwidth. You can think of you if you think of the um what is this? the impedance of a circuit. The imaginary part is the capacitance. So it can it can do something like change the gain or the band. >> Okay. So what he also says here and this is the biggest part is that energy harvested increases with time and then it stops. Energy harvested increases with time and then it stops. What he's saying is that you're going to get to a certain level. Just let's imagine that the energy level is 10 volts or whatever it is. Okay? He says, "When you get to 10 volts, you're not going to go any higher than that. The system is going to stop." And in fact, if you started the system higher than that, then it's going to actually go down. It's going to go down to match that because essentially what you said is your steady state, your equilibrium is now above zero. It's at now at this new threshold. That's what kind of system Paul Thibido has created here. >> But the about this is extreme hope to get >> questions. Uh I'll start off with a very quick one and that is that you uh have described your uh si uh system as being far from equilibrium and therefore not violating the second law. If you take your system uh of the graphine and you just start it in uh thermal equilibrium, what nudges it to be far from equilibrium if it isn't the system itself? >> So that's Garrett Modell right there. You were just listening to Garrett Modell ask a question. He has his own free energy device microchip as well. Everybody's got a free energy microchip except for me. Apparently, I'm the last schmuck on the planet without a free energy microchip. So, he's getting asked, he's saying, "Okay, well, what's nudging it? What is actually getting this thing started?" And what he's about to explain here, I'm actually going to skip over because I just explained it to you, is he essentially says nothing needs to nudge it. If you started at zero and the equilibrium is 10, the capacitors are going to increase till they get to 10 and then that's where they're going to stop because what you've done here is you've created a new equilibrium. You don't need anything to kick it off. The design of the circuit itself, its steady state is 10. And then he also says contra like uh conversely if you start it off at 100, it's going to go down until it gets to 10. So what we've done here is we haven't created a system that needs something to kick it off. We've created a far from equilibrium system that is constantly trying to stay at a certain charge that's not zero. That's not zero. Now for the people asking the smart questions, can you tug on that? Can you then pull energy from that? That's the follow-up question that I want to get into. So he explains this here. harvest thermal energy. Well, then you need you need a full wave rectifier. I shot a bit >> in um in audio file land there's a capacitor diode >> and then uh okay so here's the follow-up question. Where's the follow the guy the followup? I think it's here. >> Paul, thank you for just a marvelous talk. Really nicely explained and very careful. Um I I'm still at a loss. I mean I I think I understand what you're saying. your system comes to a steady state and as it's posed as far as you've gone I would agree that the second law is not is not violated. I agree with you on that. However, I I don't feel you've really addressed the question. If if you're if you can constantly siphon off energy from each of these capacitors to do external work, then thermodynamics is pretty clear that if you're if you are turning thermal energy into into the capacitive energy which you're claiming and then you're using that energy to carry out external work and if your capacitor continues to recharge, uh in my book, that's a second law violation. So, um I realize that you've circumcribed your system carefully, but could you expand it please to a situation where you're doing external work? Let's say on something like what Garrett said, a motor or um TV or whatever it happens to be. If it's doing external work, does it still not violate the second law? So, that's a good question. Not really actually. I mean, he already answered this question. The second law is not being violated by this circuit. So, if you are siphoning off energy from this, obviously you still are not violating the second law. So, this is where people's minds are broken. Literally, I don't know who that was. I'm not going to rag on him or whatever, but he obviously can't comprehend it because in his mind, free energy is not possible. It's not supposed to be possible. That's the reason why he's sitting there going, "But wait, you just did the math and all the math checks out, but you're also telling me that you could theoretically siphon off energy from this because this this system you've created is going to charge to a nonzero level. So, I should be able to just pull energy off of that and it's going to keep charging. It's going to stay at that level, right? It's an infinite battery is what you're telling me." Yes. Paul Thibido and myself are literally telling you this is a free energy device that is pulling infinite energy from the environment, the ether, the the the heat, whatever the hell you want to call it, it's pulling free energy from it. Yes, that's what this device is doing. And yes, it's possible. It's mathematically proven to be be possible. It was just explained, but yes, it's been possible. Free energy has been possible for a long time. And a lot of people have tried to explain it. A lot of people. So when I see stuff like was it Mike Baker on Joe Rogan going well if Lockheed Martin had this technology it would have leaked out. Yeah. How do you think I figured out all this [ __ ] I don't have magic fair. I don't have psychic powers. I just researched it. It was all on the internet. It's exactly like Kurt Mezer says. Nobody is looking. These videos that we're watching right here have like 200 views on a channel that had 200 subscribers. A Lockheed Martin senior fellow interviewing having presentations by the top physicist producing free energy devices. Nobody's watching it. Nobody even knows it exists. It's basically just us. >> Okay. Well, this one took a year and a half. And I always hate to speculate on like maybe the next circuit we should study or the next situation. Uh but um let me just draw say something kind of related and I think it I think it'll support my point and give some clarity to your question. Um if and and you know we like to talk about Fineman's Brownie and ratchet. You know he says if you stick a windmill in your room and the air is not flowing at all then it's not going to sit and turn the windmill you know basically. So that's kind of a thermodynamic equilibrium position that you're sitting in. But but I I bet you don't disagree with this. If I take this mass off, this balloon will expand and raise it. So what we're really doing is we're creating a system that has uh an unbalanced set of forces that drives the system in one direction to balance out the force just maybe like water going off a waterfall. So there's unbalanced forces in the system and they drive the system in one direction. Nothing wrong with the laws of physics or thermodynamics there. >> But we created an unbalanced system. Would you argue that you can't harvest energy from a waterfall? Of course you can harness energy from a waterfall. But you would say, but well like the topology of the Earth allows the waterfall to exist. Exactly. The topology of the microchip allows for it to have a miniature microscopic quantum waterfall. We're creating a little waterfall in a microchip and we're exploiting that. And yes, it's a tiny little bit amount of energy, but we can amplify it. We can make an array of it on a microchip, on a wafer, and we can scale that up. And even if it's a tiny amount of energy, we don't need that much energy. What all these guys are saying is that they're doing this because they're going to power low energy devices. If my phone is being continuously charged all the time, it doesn't need to be continuously charged with that much energy. Just needs a tiny little bit constantly feeding into it. So even at these small scales that we're at right now in 2025, these are already practical devices. We just need to we just need to build it. We just need to build it at this point. >> That's exactly where this work comes from is from those forces doing work. and entropy, you know, and you I kind of went through this nice little >> gas versus in our in your system. It sounds like you're able to complete a cycle and have this energy extracted. So, I >> Okay. Yeah. No, no, thanks, Paul. So, so okay. So, let let's different than I think you said there. If I take this mass too and I >> and so then Paul jumps in and and he says this is what people are going to say as well. It's different. The balloon analogy is different because you can do all the math of the mass and you can find out that the energy gained or whatever was added to the atoms blah blah blah blah blah. But then basically you've got Paul coming back Paul Thibido coming back and saying well we are getting the energy we're getting it from the environment. We're getting from the environment. So whether or not you agree or disagree about your view of where the energy is being sucked to the energy is there and it's it is being uh taken from the environment. I think you're muted, >> Paul. We can't hear you. >> Oh, okay. Sorry. I'm back now. Somehow it muted muted me. Sorry about that. So, okay. So, um let's go back to this picture here. So, if I take the second mass, which I slid off, let's say I have >> I want to I want to point out this. Somebody says it sounds like the same idea as a heat pump for your home. It is almost identical to the idea of a heat pump for your home. Do you guys know that some of the heat pumps are over unity? Because you think about it, the heat is energy. So if you just calculate the heat that's being pushed into your home from a heat pump and how much energy it took to move that heat, you will find in some cases the coefficient of performance is greater than one. It's actually a very similar concept to this and this is why people should not be discounting thermodynamics and heat pumps as analogies for free energy devices because if you can convert heat energy to electric electrical energy now your overunityity heat pump just became a free energy device. And really now it's just a matter of efficiency. What are the efficiencies of it? Paul Fibidos is 50% efficient and that's considered very good. I imagine they're going to be able to get it much more efficient than that in the future as well. Raise it to H and set it back down on here and then it will compress this back down. So I have to do some work on the mass and then it'll compress the gas fat and I can now do work on the environment, put energy back into the environment from myself. So how do I do that with mine? I take the capacitors away from the circuit. I hook them up to resistors. They discharge through the resistor, dissipating energy back to the environment. >> Right? >> It's the same. It's the same thing. But I will give you something. There's something amazing going on here. I can put my finger on it. I can take that empty capacitor, hook it back up to the circuit. It will recharge itself. It's like I'm getting it for free. Here, I had to raise the mass to get it back to the initial condition. >> Right. Yeah. >> So, there's some element. He's saying there is this is where God these guys like avoid this so weird I can't tell which ones know and which ones don't know or I kind of tend but not all these guys know guys some of you may say well do all these people know about the secret technology they don't some of these guys literally building these free energy microchips they don't even know that Loheed Martin already has it like Garrett Modell he doesn't even know he literally doesn't even know he's presenting he's buddies with a Loheed Martin senior fellow and he's just completely completely oblivious to like, do you think this guy might already be building this at the skunk works where he's just working on advanced secret covert stuff for the military? Of course he is. Of course, that's how he knows about all you guys. Of course, that's why he's inviting you to his conference. He knows all your technology already works, guys. So, a lot of them have no idea. And Paul Thibido is so afraid to just say the obvious. I mean, he just says it right there. He's like, I can take an empty capacitor and I can plug it in here and now it's just going to start charging. That's free energy, bro. That's free energy. That's why everybody's freaking out about his scientific evidence, about his about his paper because there's no two ways about it. It's obviously free energy. Just a basic thought experiment shows this is definitely free energy. No question >> of freess here that's happening. There's an aspect of freess that's here. Yes, there's a really big aspect of freess, bro. You just created a circuit that powers two capacitors, charges two capacitors from zero. There's a very big aspect of freess that's happening here. I mean, where is the energy coming from? My guess is it's coming from the zero point energy field. I mean, we may say that it's coming from the thermal radiation around us, whatever, but I don't know. We'll find out one way or another. >> But it's really because >> okay energy off continuously as opposed >> trying it's it's a very interesting system and I hope other people will look at it too. >> There there's so many questions I just to push into what what Paul was just saying. So both Daniel and I are talking about bleeding the energy off continuously as opposed to switching back and forth. Uh can you comment on that situation please? >> Yes. So, um, so you're basically saying if I, um, somehow hook up a circuit here with the resistor right here. So, it draws current off this thing, but the rate of current is basically, it's crazy how hard he's trying to not understand the concept of free energy right here. He's like, "So, you're saying like I could hook this up to something else and then like pull the energy off of it and then charge that thing forever?" So, like, yes, we're trying to say that you created a free energy device and you could just charge things from it. Yes. Exactly. Like, how are you not understanding this >> such that it doesn't just pull it all off, you know? It kind of does it at some certain >> rate. So basically that's going to be taking the energy of the capacitor again putting it back into the thermal environment that that that originally came from you know you know to some extent you know people don't didn't I don't think really got this but um I like to think honestly this paper was almost more significant here we're powering the circuit directly from the thermal environment and it's doing work it can do work it can power a circuit that's really um to me was more significant But honestly, I got so much mail about, well, you're not really doing anything useful. What if you charged a capacitor and you stole energy from the earth, then you'd be doing something. Now you're doing something real. So, actually, we did do that. We did steal energy from the environment. Maybe it's >> like he's getting people responding to him and I can totally see it going, "Hey, man, you did this cool thing, but you're not producing real usable electricity. You're not really, if you charged a capacitor, you would be showing that you're doing real work." Dude, that's literally what it is. is that's literally what he's showing. He's literally showing you're charging two capacitors from zero up to some level that's not zero. It doesn't matter what level it is. It's free energy. Like this is how dumb people are. And this is what a lot of the arguments that I heard when I was talking about free energy and like magnetic motors is people would say, "Yes, you could do this, but it's not producing like usable energy, usable work." You're like, "What do you mean? What exactly do you mean by that?" Like I don't think these people even understand the concept of electricity to be honest with you guys. Um but yes, no, it's literally producing free energy. If you haven't if you still didn't figure it out, then watch my early live streams where we talk about the basics of electrical engineering. I mean, I don't know how anybody can even misinterpret this to be honest with you. It's just clearly a free energy device. >> We did something real. But now you're going to now you're kind of wanting to go back to the earlier one. You realize in your question, well, what if I just use it directly? >> Right? that actually is an easier problem. >> Okay. Fascinating. Thank you. >> Yeah. >> Quick questions. James Lee and then Tom Volone. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Paul, it's a wonderful work. Very solid. Um so pretty to see as Daniel and also um got to talk about it is actually your process actually been a very nice type of B energy process. We not discovered in my work actually in biologics exist in your body. >> Yeah. I'm just going to skip this part, but we're going to do one last question on this. We're going to call it. What he says here is he says basically this guy jumps in. I think James Lee I think it was his name says stop beating around the bush dude just say it's free energy. He's like stop like the second law of thermodynamics doesn't always have to apply and it doesn't apply in an asymmetric system and it only applies in a closed system. So instead of just like constantly trying to like bow down and kiss the ring of all these academics that don't understand free energy, you should just come out and say it. Bro, I've just broken the laws of thermodynamics. Like, be bold about your claims, man. I mean, you've got the evidence. You've got the scient. You've got the experimental data. This is the best presentation I've ever seen. In fact, I sent an email to Paul Thibido saying, "Dude, your presentation is one of the best I've ever watched. It has all the receipts. I don't know how anybody could even question it. You've got, you know, I don't know what people can even say about it other than just disbelieve." But you've literally built it, too. and he's literally built it. Just say you built a free energy device. Clearly, you did. It's harvesting the ambient temperatures of uh the air. Whatever the [ __ ] you want to say, bro. Just say it's harvesting space juice. Man, I'm going to be honest with you. Most people on this planet are too stupid to know. So, you could just literally say that it's harvesting space juice and you know what? You'll probably get CNN headlines. Paul Thibido, University of Arkansas creates device that harnesses space juice. The density of space juice has been calculated to be uh 10 to the 113. We got infinite space juice for everybody out there. And we're building an Ethernet as well. We're going to build an Ethernet using space juice. Now, the last point, the last question I wanted to dig into here. Uh what does he say? Trying to remember. >> And practical conversion 0 point energy. >> Here we go. Here we go. I haven't >> times you can apply, sometimes you don't apply. So that's my point. Thank you. Wonderful book. I like that. >> Tom, >> uh, you're muted. >> Okay, here we go. Last last question, guy. >> Hey, Tom. I can't hear you. >> Okay. Um, >> there you go. >> Yeah. How you doing? I'm the author of a book on practical conversion, zero point energy. Um, I haven't corresponded with you yet, but I've been a great fan. And I wanted to call your attention to Johnson Noise, uh, 1927 FSR Rev. um also Kalen and Welton in 1951 and also Estumian. Those are references that might actually start you in the direction of including zero point energy 1/2 h new and it could be another factor that's adding to the input energy especially if the temperature changes and starts to go down. That's a test for whether 0 energy is a contribution. Oh >> well well well well well well well zero point energy might be a contribution at the end of the presentation we have somebody jump in says I'm an author about zero point energy hey have you considered that there might be a zero point energy aspect to where this energy is coming from well well chat coke or coach Ko did experiments at liquid nitrogen temperatures liquid helium temperatures actually and still found oscillations and fluctuations that are available. So they're non-therrmal fluctuations that could be contributing to the effect you're having. >> Yeah, thanks for that. You know, I'm a big fan of Johnson noise and Nyquest's theory that I I pointed out the imaginary part and the real part here actually as kind of a nod to them because that's really what he originally proved was the real part is the important part kind of the power, but you can control the gaining with the imaginary part. So I kind of that's an interesting factor here. But yeah, I never thought about the um the zero point energy um here before. So that I I'll take a look at that too. That's a that's a good point. >> I'll send you the books I've got and references. >> So So guys, that was the Paul Fibido uh free energy device. So how many free energy devices like confirmed free at least three confirmed free energy microchips? One produced by Sunonny White from NASA, one produced by Garrett Mell, professor emeritus at University of Colorado, who also is co-working on it with Bernard Hay of Loheed Martin. And then the third one is Paul Thibidel of University of Arkansas, who has a a thermal bath conversion into electrical energy. Three energy devices, all by prestigious people that are in universities, NASA, what have you. people wondering how is this all working? They're already building this [ __ ] You got to be out of your mind if you think the defense contractors haven't already built this. If you think that the US military is not already using this technology, you are extremely naive. Defense contractors have already had this technology. They've already probably had it much better than this in fact as well. And they're probably already building fusion reactors. Like what the hell has Trial Alpha Energy been up to? Like what are they doing? What who are their contracts? How are they just bleeding hundreds of millions of dollars with no product? I mean, they're they're obviously building stuff for the military. That's what's going on behind the scenes. And you don't have to worry about energy prices going to zero because they're just replacing their generators without telling you. The energy companies just replace the generators. They don't tell you what kind of generators, how they're producing their energy. They're just the energy company. They'll just say 10% of our energy comes from renewables or some [ __ ] like that. They don't even tell you what their cost basis is for their energy. They just charge you something for it. Do you understand the scam that we're living in here? So, almost certainly all this is already happening behind the scenes. We're just now discovering it. We're now just finding out that it exists. We're the cattle that have been misled into thinking that we're not being just sent to slaughter. We are We are the change. Thank you very much for these donations. I appreciate you, man. Oh. Oh, yeah. He was attacking uh Matt Lommire as well. Chat, I'm about to break a big piece of information because I can't keep it in. I've spoken to Matt Lommire before. I've spoken I've had a private conversation with Matt Lomire, the current under secretary of the Air Force. There you go. Enjoy that. Jack Tenrose, thank you very much. Appreciate that donation. Appreciate the double donation. MH370, where did it go? Bowen 7 through a wormhole. This song is uh MH370 Cipher by Little Hudacrunk is the one that you want. Little Huda. I believe it's MH370 Cipher, but I saw him in the chat. Somebody else will help you out with the name of that. I'll play it at the end here for you guys. Zaparoo. Damn. Okay. For the new Dark Ash and Sunglass Fund, appreciate you. And then I want to shout out uh the PL chat, Matt 1776 and Filter Dog. Thank you guys very much for those donations. And then my Rumbled chat has been getting bigger and bigger, guys. Thank you guys very much, guys. Appreciate all of you. Um the last thing I want to say for tonight is I am hoping to talk to Joseph P. Frell. I think we're way over the target when it comes to this a neutronic fusion bomb situation. It goes back to the 60s just like the letter to Ash and Forbes said. Uh Joseph P. Pharaoh put together a couple pieces. Take a look at my ex my Twitter uh page for today. Monday we're going to Thermonuclear Secrets part two. Monday thermonuclear secrets part two exposing the a neutronic fusion bomb that we found in the MH370 videos. Can't wait to can't wait to check it out. It's going to be awesome. Peace out everybody. Love you MH370X. Oh, we have a moment of zen tonight. I almost forgot. Moment of Zen, then I'll play the video out. Chat, wait for it. Moment of Zen. It's from my boy. Shout out. Shout out to my boy Tupacabra. Chat, guys. There was a new new aliens, new uh alien spacecraft has shown up. >> There have been reports of a new alien species said to be similar to the tall whites in many ways except for a few key ones. >> And what is this new species called? Think she can make you clap all night. I can see her ass in that sunress. Pork chops, but the [ __ ] wet. >> We're bringing it to the chat. She can make it clap all night. Dick white [Music] so make me act right. [Music] She can make you clap all night [Music] chat. The thick whites are coming. The thick whites are coming for all my people out there. I know you love it. Have a great night, MH270X. Peace out, guys. See you on Monday. [Music] Out in the fields where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boner trip 7 through a wormhole. Flow with talking wormhole. Sargates negative energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole flow. [Music] [Applause] [Music] Exotic matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeezed so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing chase force negative zones we need to stay the course. Stalking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Bowling triple 7 through a wormhole float thin shell formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole let's give it a try [Music] for balancing The plate creating the throat. Open the gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. [Music] We're talking wormho, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Blowing triple 7 through a wormhole flow from the fields to the stars. We break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. Little Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is