No Physical Impossibilities, Only Conditional Possibilities

Video Transcript

Salvatore Pais. Um he starts by talking about this idea of a cyclical universe uh and that we should mimic what we see in nature. And he presents a very elegant idea that is what if nature has already created a super intelligence. He says if given enough time plasma may be able to be conscious. If that's true, something like the sun or something we don't really think of as possibly being conscious could become conscious and that might manifest itself in ways that seem foreign to us. So if this is the case, then there may be a super intelligence that's already out there. Not going to get too metaphysical here, but it could be that we are that super intelligence as well or we are a piece of that super intelligence. And he also speaks to this idea of a cyclical universe. Now the earliest physicists we previously thought there might be a big crunch. This idea that the universe expands and contracts in this cycle. Everything in duality, waves, cycles. The same way where when we first theorized black holes, we also theorized white holes. One in, one out. Which is why it should not be very surprising to connect the idea of a wormhole to a black hole. Perhaps it is either the very same thing or uh an analogy for this for uh or it can be manipulated. so that you do not have uh the event horizon crush our object. Let me play this first clip with Salvatore Pais. Now if you consider this the engineering of this idea truly gives rise to temporal weapons weapons of time which when designed developed and fielded would prove highly disruptive to the arsenal of nation. Imagine the ability to win all wars even before those wars are fought. >> So s let me jump in here real quick. I did research as well. I was going through everything that you sent me before the interview and I got completely turned around and so I had to do a bunch of research and I thought, you know what, if I'm lost, the audience will be lost. So, I tried to come up with some quick translations here. The Schwinger limit that you're talking about is basically the spark gap of the vacuum. And in everyday life, a strong enough electric field can rip electrons off atoms to create a spark. Now, the Schwinger limit is the vacuum version of that. If the field gets intense enough and it has to be incredibly intense, empty space becomes unstable and can convert field energy into real matter as electron positron pairs. So you get these high energy gamma rays, high energy like interactions like that and it literally creates matter. It creates these pairs of electrons and posetrons out of the vacuum. So the vacuum itself stops being a passive stage for other things to act on and starts behaving like an active medium. So that's that's the swinger limit part of it. And so he did a really good job right there. This is very important is that early on I didn't know if S believed in zero point energy or the ether. But now I know for sure it's just a matter of conceptual viewpoint. S saying that spacetime is this medium and if you get to these high energy levels energy density specifically then all of a sudden spacetime will get begin to break down particle antiparticle pairs will get produced in the form of light out of the ether out of the vacuum out of spaceime so that's the schwinger limit so there is a limit because we think of spaceime time as being this infinite. It can absorb infinite energy density, but you get to a certain energy density and it just you've hit the limit. You've hit the wall. You've hit the ceiling. Can't get over it, guys. Can't cannot get over that ceiling. Okay, that was important to state. Here we go. Oh, and then also right I mean there at the beginning he says if you have weapons of time this could potentially allow you to win all wars forever Edge of Eternity's chat or uh Edge of Tomorrow Edge of Tomorrow Tom Cruz great movie but that's the whole premise the premise of the movie in Edge of uh tomorrow is that the aliens have the ability to see the future. to have the ability to see the future and Tom Cruz's character is immune to it in the form and what that represents itself as is whenever he dies he comes back to life and the only reality that's the true reality is the one where he stays alive all the time quite interesting to think about because manipulating time is going to start to get pretty weird it's going to start to get pretty weird and what Sal's saying here then is there must be some way to do it. There must be some way to pull it off. We don't want to enlighten our enemies, but somehow we can we can manipulate time into some level of degree and there may be some way to send a message and who knows maybe in the future we will be able to you know actually travel through time. Now going forward is easy. Honestly, going forward is trivial. No one even argues that. We're really talking about retrocausality here. Future impacting the past. That's the the mind trip that everybody wants to know about. And the part that you were talking about, what you're speculating about is um in Einstein's picture, energy and pressure don't just sit there, they gravitate. So if you could concentrate and shape extreme energy densities in a very controlled region, you're not only doing quantum vacuum effects, you may also be affecting space-time geometry. Right. So this absolutely to the point of breaking ripping the space-time fabric itself at the quantum level, which would mean creating a void within the quantum vacuum. This is what Frroning was talking about when he talked about um as you know David Frroning, good friend of Paul Murad, a good friend of u god what was his name? Uh him and I had a conversation when I was working for the USPTO. Um Ferris Williams very interesting man. Wow. >> I'm working on story. Um, what what what did I what did I just hear right there? Sorry, hold on. I I feel like I must have misheard the words that just came out of Sal's mouth. Sorry, who? The US PTO. Sorry, what? >> Vacuum. This is what Froing was talking about when he talked about um as you know, David Froning, good friend of Paul Murad, a good friend of u God, what was his name? Uh him and I had a conversation when I was working for the USPTO. Um Ferris Williams, very interesting man. Wow. >> I'm actually working on a story about Ferris right now. Yeah. >> Yeah. A very interesting man indeed. One um wait hold up. So first thing Sal says in that the f first part of that clip is he's saying you can't just take energy. Einstein's equations require energy to be doing something. They require it to be moving around. They require this energy density. It's not just not just energy because that's nothing. It's got to be doing something relative to something else. And then he says this is what David Fonin was saying. David Froning, that's one of the engineers where I was talking about. And he says all of a sudden, I don't think S's ever ref brought this up. Brings up that he's had a chat with Ferris Williams. When didn't Ferris Williams die in like 2013? Didn't he die in like 2013? Was it his warp drive paper published in like 2016? His patent? Look, I'm just asking basic timeline questions here. Just asking basic timeline questions cuz holy crap. What is happening? Like so S was directly connected to these engineers that we've been talking about. It wasn't just how Pudof and Eric Davis and Jay Stratton or whatever like blocking him and his engineering thing like he was communicating and talking to these other people. Paul Morad, Paul Morad, David Fonian, Ferris Williams. Ferris Williams is the guy that corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations. Sometimes, chat, remember when I said like a year ago that humanity is kind of Like the answers are just kind of sitting there and nobody's really awake enough to just even look. Shouldn't Shouldn't it be kind of interesting that a guy corrected the thermonuclear weapons calculations and then he was like, "Oh, I don't think I don't think these people know anything about physics. I wish I was making this up." He's like, "I don't think these people know anything about physics. I'm going to come up with my own theory since these people don't know how to do math." Now, what is it that he added? He added an extra dimension. five dimensions instead of four because why? Because your energy can't just be the amount of energy is great, but you need the energy moving around the pressure. The energy causes the energy density. Because if you were to pressure, put pressure on your energy, you're increasing the energy density. If you expand, you're reducing it. Now, imagine a balloon and putting a weight on a balloon. Sorry, S. continue please with telling us your uh story about Ferris Williams that you never told us about before. It's pretty short but sweet >> conversation when I was working for the USPTO. Um Ferris Williams, very interesting man. Wow. >> I'm actually working on a story about Ferris right now. Yeah. >> Yeah. A very interesting man indeed. One um one of our best. I I believe he he had a great deal of nuclear weapon secrets that he took to his grave among other things. But yeah, >> I have an anecdote about Ferris. dynamic theory is quite interesting to say the least. He actually pointed me to Paul Murad when I sent him my first my so-called first paper that took me four and a half years to uh to publish called conditional possibility of spacecraft propulsion at super lumininal speeds. My goodness, what I went through. It It is again exactly what you've noticed them. Extremely hard to publish, especially if you're not one of them. You know, as as George Collins said, it's a big club and you're not part of it. Again, going back to weapons of time, it is our secretary of war, Pet Hexa, that has recently stated, "Victory belongs to those who embrace real innovation. Nothing is more innovative than the idea of designing, developing, and fielding weapons of time. I'll leave it there. >> That opens up the door to so many big ideas. >> Uh I won't leave it there. What I'll say is that we need to develop the time branch. I don't know. Call someone come up with a smart name. We need to develop a new weapons branch. Time cops. We needed to develop a new weapons branch that is working on advanced technologies related to space-time manipulation. And Salvatore Py should be the zar of it or whatever weird uh fascist name we're going with for our titles. I don't really care. But this get this guy in charge. He's got the clearances. He's in the Navy. We've already conscripted him and made him our endangered servant or whatever is going on with this weird relationship we've got going on with S. So just put him in a position and let him start making plasma disruption fusion weapons, space-time manipulation weapons, warp drives, enterprises, and little Jarvis balls plots also like I mean sliders the TV show although that was dimensions but but and you know what I shouldn't even broach this question. So could weapons of time be used to go to different dimensions do you think? >> Absolutely sir. And not only that, imagine the uh we recently had let's call a physical extraction. Now imagine let's say an individual sometimes unfortunate it is the unfortunate things of our times that it's individuals that lead to certain wars. Imagine the ability to actually go back in time and um try to change the mind of a certain individual >> or not. >> Well, >> imagine that. >> Yeah. I So, the the the obvious one that comes to mind, the old movie trope is go back in time and kill Hitler, right, before he comes to power. And then the the question and I've actually read philosoph like what how do how sure are we about how Hitler died? The reason why I say this, the reason why I say this is because anything that isn't publicly known, here's the crazy This is what I'm talking about when I'm talking about how weird this is going to get. Okay? Anything that we don't know for a fact that there's not some kind of verifiable information that can prove it. In theory, that could be changed by going back in time. In theory, think about this. In theory, I could go back in time and kill Hitler and as long as I hide his body or something like that, it's perfect crime. How would anybody in 2023, two years ago, know about that? They wouldn't. All they would know is what Wikipedia tells them. All they would know is what Reddit tells them. They would go, "Dude, no. This guy Ashton went back in time and he killed Hitler." Like, "That's what happened. He took a He took a selfie while he was back there. He took a selfie." They'll be like, "Nah, that's fake." They'll be like, "No, that's fake." They'll be like, "I went on Wikipedia, said he shot himself." Said he shot himself. You got to believe it. So, anyway, I'm joking, but here's the point. The real point is anything that we don't know for sure, like we don't have video evidence or some sort of information that can be passed on. In theory, that could have only happened potentially because of time travelers if it's possible that we can go back in time. Now, the other side of it is this. That's in a deterministic universe. I think Sal's getting a little ahead of himself there with Tim Ventur where he's saying you can go to different dimensions. That to me speaks to a many worlds hypothesis. Meaning that if we do end up figuring out time travel, you're not really going you're going to a different version of your reality, which now it doesn't matter if that different version's in the past because it's all just a matter of perspective. I kind of hope it's not the second one, but I don't really have any vested interest one way or another. It does open big possibilities. Now, what about the possibility of going forward in time? >> Of course, but this this mathematics speaks directly to a possibility of time travel to the past, which again was denied by Steven Hawings um chronology protection conjecture. I wanted to make sure that again I I bring forth the idea that there are no such thing as physical impossibilities. That the there are no such thing as physical impossibilities only conditional possibilities. In other words, under certain conditions everything and anything is possible. >> So again the solution to the most complex of problems may actually be extremely simple depending on perspective. That's key. Now, do you think that this could be tested using you were >> that's pretty much Salvador Pais's overall ethos? There are no impossibilities, only conditional possibilities. That is possible if this thing were to happen. >> Talking about fusion reactors a moment ago. >> Yes. Yes. >> This is something we could test like on a on a micro scale with power levels that are accessible to humanity right now. I believe for example that uh I first first of all I'm pretty sure that the plasma compression fusion device someone has tried it either theoretically or actually put it in practice I I cannot say more than that I've heard rumors of katas and so forth with Canada believe it or not anyway I'll I'll leave it there that's for another time and place most likely skiffs but um the whole idea >> if I hear people talk about skiff one more time chat. I'm gonna crash out. >> Look carefully at the PI effect, especially the engineering thereof rather than dismiss it out of hand as the illusory figment of imagination of a an engineer that should stick to what he knows or rather what his pedigree has brought him to be. Think further. We all have great abilities of intellect. Again, the idea of being enslaved by our minds and by our peers is no way to attack and win in physics. >> Yeah. Because if we if we unify our thoughts, if we bring again if we it's unification all the way, if we came together, can you imagine the kind of Manhattan Project ideas that we could actually solve if instead of killing each other off, we would actually come together and put our ideas together. Because I truly believe, sir, in this great cosmos of ours, not only are we not alone, but we have enemies out there.